Knowledge

EarFold

Source 📝

138:
before the operation by having a Prefold positioner, of the same size, shape and tension as the implant, placed temporarily on the antihelix fold. The extent of the ear pinning is determined by the curvature of the Earfolds and their position along the antihelix. The resulting new head-to-ear distance doesn’t always meet the individual expectations of the patient because it is determined by the constant, preset curvature of the implant. The incisions in the skin are sewn up and covered with a strip of plaster. The method is not suitable for all patients. If their ears have a large, deep Cavum conchae, which in combination with a poorly formed antihelix is often the cause of a protruding ear, ear pinning in the lower half of the ear is not possible or the ear-pinning result is unsatisfactory. Protruding earlobes can’t be pinned. In comparison to the conventional ear-pinning operations (see traditional
22: 150:, there are no publications available on long-term results. The authors of the Earfold method point out that late complications, such as relapse, secondary deformations, defects, shifts in position or rejection of the implants, could only be assessed to a limited degree due to the short follow-up time of the patients in the study carried out (1, 2). 133:, an alloy of titanium and nickel, and have a 24-carat gold plating. On the side facing the cartilage, the implants have short, triangular, thorn-like tips that penetrate the cartilage and thus fix the implant in place after several weeks. Because of their U-shape, the implants reshape a poorly developed 171:
They are comparable to the methods of the traditional otoplasty: irregularities; undesired results; top of ear is pointed (the so-called Spock ear); post-operative bleeding with haematoma in the pockets of the skin; pain; infection; erosion of the skin; allergic reaction to the implants; rejection of
137:
or create a new one if it is non-existent, thereby moving the ear towards the head. The ear cartilage lying beneath the implants is either left intact or is scored or perforated with a needle - the latter is done to weaken it. The patient is allowed to check the new position of his ears in a mirror
125:
One or several incisions of approximately 1 cm in length are made in the skin on the front of the ear, depending on the number of metal implants to be inserted in the ear. Starting here, the skin on the front of the ear is raised from the cartilage to create pockets in which the metal implants
184:
in the position of the ears; shifting of the implants in the first weeks when lying on the ears; visibility of the implants under the skin; removal of the implants more complex and difficult than removing sutures with other surgical methods.
197:
Norbert V. Kang, Nilesh Sojitra, Sinisa Glumicic, Jacobus A. Vlok, Greg O’Toole: Earfold Implantable Clip System for Correction of Prominent Ears. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. Volume 6, Nr.1, January
158:
The patients should not sleep on their ears for the first 4 weeks, so that the metal implants are not shifted out of place. One may not smoke for 3 months, so that there are no circulatory disturbances leading to skin
216:
J. C. Mustardé: Effective formation of antihelix fold without incising the cartilage. In: Transactions of the International Society of Plastic Surgeons, Second Congress, AB Wallace. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkens;
117:
The Earfold technique was first described by Norbert V. Kang and Ryan L. Kerstein in 2016 (1). Kang and his colleagues reported on the results and possible complications of the method in 2018 (2).
220:
J. M. Converse, A. Nigro, F. A. Wilson, N. Johnson: A technique for surgical correction of lop ears. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1946), Volume 15, Number 5, May 1955, p. 411–418,
101:. As far as the invasiveness of the surgery is concerned, the Earfold method ranks between the open, invasive conventional ear-pinning procedures (6, 7, 8, 9), and the closed, minimally invasive 213:
S. J. Stenström: Cosmetic deformities of the ear. In: Graff WC, Smith JW, eds. Plastic surgery: a concise guide to clinical practice. 2nd Ed. Boston: Little Brown & Co; p. 603–604, 1973
194:
Norbert V. Kang, Ryan L. Kerstein: Treatment of Prominent Ears with an Implantable Clip System: A Pilot Study. In: Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Volume 36, Issue 3, 1 March 2016, NP100–NP116
207:
W. H. Merck: Ohrmuschelkorrektur ohne Hautschnitt – die Fadenmethode von Merck. In: K. Bumm (editor): Korrektur und Rekonstruktion der Ohrmuschel. Springer, p. 153–169, 2017
109:
as in conventional ear-pinning operations, but to a lesser extent. Occasionally, the cartilage under the detached skin is also scored or perforated with a needle to weaken it.
105:(4, 5) or other variations of minimally invasive procedures (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). The ears are cut open and the skin is detached from the 264:
Vecchione, T.R. 1979 Needle scoring of the anterior surface of the cartilage in otoplasty. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 64, Number 4, 568,
51: 210:
S. J. Stenström: A natural technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 32, p. 509–518, 1963
253:
Tramier, H. Personal approach to treatment of prominent ears. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 99, Number 2,, 562–565,
163:
of the very thin skin over the implant. Earrings should not be worn for 2 weeks. One should not swim during the first 4 weeks.
247:
Fritsch, M.H. (2009) "Incisionless Otoplasty". Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America |volume=42 |issue=6 |pages=1199–208,
204:
W. H. Merck: Dr Merck's stitch method (Die Fadenmethode nach Dr. Merck) J. Aesth. Chirurgie., 6, p. 209–220, 2013
73: 44: 250:
Fritsch, M.H. (2013), "Ohranlegung ohne Hautschnitt (Incisionless otoplasty. A review). "J Aesthet Chir, 6, 203-208
180:
on the skin incisions; cosmetically disfiguring edge formations on the front of the ear when the implants turn;
129:
The metal implants are called Earfolds. They are 5x15 mm large and 0.15 mm thick. They are made of
93:
is a surgical method for pinning protruding ears. In contrast to all the other ear-pinning procedures (
288: 34: 38: 30: 235:
Mouly, R. (1971) Correction sans cicatrice des oreilles décollées. Ann. Chir. Plast., 16, 55–59
55: 238:
Peled, I.J. (1995) Knifeless otoplasty: how simple can it be? Aesth. Plast. Surg., 19, 253–255
8: 173: 265: 254: 221: 244:
Fritsch, M.H. (2004). "Incisionless Otoplasty". Facial Plastic Surgery 20, 267–70
98: 282: 147: 102: 225: 258: 269: 139: 275:
Fritsch, M.H. (1995). "Incisionless Otoplasty". Laryngoscope. 105, 1–11
241:
Fritsch, M.H. (1995). "Incisionless Otoplasty". Laryngoscope. 105, 1–11
181: 143: 134: 106: 94: 160: 130: 177: 201:
Video bei wolterskluwer.http.internapcdn.net (MP4-Datei)
126:
are inserted with the aid of an Earfold introducer 3).
280: 43:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 153: 166: 74:Learn how and when to remove this message 281: 97:), metal implants are used instead of 120: 15: 13: 14: 300: 20: 1: 188: 7: 10: 305: 112: 154:Post-operative treatment 29:This article includes a 167:Risks and complications 58:more precise citations. 174:hypertrophic scars 121:Surgical procedure 31:list of references 84: 83: 76: 296: 289:Cosmetic surgery 79: 72: 68: 65: 59: 54:this article by 45:inline citations 24: 23: 16: 304: 303: 299: 298: 297: 295: 294: 293: 279: 278: 231:Reference List 191: 169: 156: 123: 115: 80: 69: 63: 60: 49: 35:related reading 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 302: 292: 291: 277: 276: 273: 262: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 229: 228: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 195: 190: 187: 172:the implants; 168: 165: 155: 152: 122: 119: 114: 111: 91:EarFold method 82: 81: 39:external links 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 301: 290: 287: 286: 284: 274: 271: 267: 263: 260: 256: 252: 249: 246: 243: 240: 237: 234: 233: 232: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 196: 193: 192: 186: 183: 179: 175: 164: 162: 151: 149: 148:Stitch method 145: 141: 136: 132: 127: 118: 110: 108: 104: 103:stitch method 100: 96: 92: 88: 78: 75: 67: 57: 53: 47: 46: 40: 36: 32: 27: 18: 17: 230: 170: 157: 128: 124: 116: 90: 86: 85: 70: 61: 50:Please help 42: 140:ear surgery 56:introducing 189:References 146:) and the 182:asymmetry 144:otoplasty 135:antihelix 107:cartilage 95:otoplasty 64:June 2018 283:Category 226:14384519 259:9030170 161:erosion 131:Nitinol 113:History 99:sutures 87:EarFold 52:improve 270:482446 268:  257:  224:  178:keloid 198:2018. 37:, or 266:PMID 255:PMID 222:PMID 217:1960 142:and 89:or 285:: 176:; 41:, 33:, 272:. 261:. 77:) 71:( 66:) 62:( 48:.

Index

list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
otoplasty
sutures
stitch method
cartilage
Nitinol
antihelix
ear surgery
otoplasty
Stitch method
erosion
hypertrophic scars
keloid
asymmetry
PMID
14384519
PMID
9030170
PMID
482446
Category
Cosmetic surgery

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.