Knowledge

Hartford Convention

Source đź“ť

31: 620: 257:
or declaring neutrality. Otis thought the Madison administration was near collapse and that unless conservatives like himself and the other delegates took charge, the radical secessionists might take power. Indeed, Otis was unaware that Massachusetts Governor Strong had already sent a secret mission to discuss terms with the British for a separate peace.
340:
selected four delegates to discuss "the best means of cooperating for our mutual defense against the common enemy, and upon the measures which it may be in the power of said states, consistently with their obligations to adopt, to restore and secure to the people thereof, their rights and privileges
256:
Secession was again mentioned in 1814–1815; all but one leading Federalist newspaper in New England supported a plan to expel the western states from the Union. Otis, the key leader of the Convention, blocked radical proposals such as a seizure of the Federal customs house, impounding federal funds,
118:
assumed office, relations with both France and Great Britain deteriorated. Jefferson's goal was an expansion of free trade through Great Britain's lifting of trade restrictions placed against the United States. However, to pressure Britain into compliance, he adopted anti-foreign trade policies such
309:
to a special session on October 5, 1814. Strong's message to the legislature was referred to a joint committee headed by Harrison Gray Otis. Otis was considered a moderate. His report delivered three days later called for resistance of any British invasion, criticized the leadership that
154:
When Madison was re-elected in 1812 the discontent in New England intensified. In late 1813 Madison signed a more restrictive embargo act than any of those approved by Jefferson, this time prohibiting all trade between American ports (the coastal trade) and fishing outside harbors. By the summer of
1028:
The proceedings of a convention of delegates, from the states of Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode-Island, the counties of Cheshire and Grafton, in the state of New-Hampshire, and the county of Windham, in the state of Vermont  : convened at Hartford, in the state of Connecticut, December
646:
rejected the notion that the Hartford convention was an attempt to take New England out of the Union and give treasonous aid and comfort to Britain. Morison wrote: "Democratic politicians, seeking a foil to their own mismanagement of the war and to discredit the still formidable Federalist party,
549:
as secretary, the convention remained in closed session for three weeks. Cabot's journal of its proceedings, when it was eventually opened, was a meager sketch of formal proceedings; he made no record of yeas and nays, stated none of the amendments offered to the various reports, and neglected to
288:
Despite this, the Madison administration had reasons to be concerned about the consequences of the Hartford Convention. Federalists were already blocking administration efforts to finance the war and bring it to a successful conclusion with an invasion of Canada. There were fears that New England
670:
became synonymous with disunion, secession, and treason, especially in the South. The party was ruined and ceased to be a significant force in national politics, although in a few places (notably Massachusetts, where Federalists were elected governor annually until 1823) it retained some power.
239:
In September 1814, Madison asked Congress for a conscription bill. Even though this had not been one of the original grievances that led to the call for the convention, Federalists presented this as further proof that the Democratic-Republicans intended to bring military despotism into the
638:
Congress would never have recommended any of New England's proposals for ratification. Hartford delegates intended for them to embarrass the President and the Democratic-Republicans in Congress—and also to serve as a basis for negotiations between New England and the rest of the country.
155:
1814, the war had turned against the Americans. After ending their war with Napoleonic France, Great Britain was able to marshal more resources to North America and had effectively blockaded the entire eastern coastline. Territory in the
752:
myth of a New England secessionist plot,… although shown to be false by every serious historian of the United States for the past 150 years, is so pleasing to people who dislike New England that many to this day continue to believe
198:, most requisitions for state militia were denied. New Englanders were reluctant to have their militia, needed to defend their coasts from British attacks, assigned elsewhere or placed under the command of the regular army. General 80:
The convention was controversial at the time, and many historians consider it a contributing factor to the downfall of the Federalist Party. There are many reasons for this, not least of which was the suggestion that the states of
228:, Madison declined to pay their expenses. Consequently, critics said that Madison had abandoned New England to the common enemy. The Massachusetts Legislature appropriated $ 1 million to support a state army of 10,000 men. 289:
would negotiate a separate peace with Great Britain, an action in many ways just as harmful to the nation as actual secession. In preparing for a worst-case scenario, Madison moved troops from the New York–Canada border to
558:
The convention ended with a report and resolutions, signed by the delegates present, and adopted on the day before final adjournment. The report said that New England had a "duty" to assert its authority over
276:
who might have pushed for secession, and the final report of the convention did not propose secession. Nevertheless, Southern secessionists cited the convention as precedent in the crisis that preceded the
321:. The stated purpose of the convention was to propose constitutional amendments to protect their section's interests and to make arrangements with the Federal government for their own military defense. 885:
A short account of the Hartford Convention: taken from official documents, and addressed to the fair minded and the well disposed; To which is added an attested copy of the secret journal of that body
418: 650:
After the convention, Massachusetts sent three commissioners to Washington, D.C. to negotiate for the terms that had been agreed upon. By the time they arrived in February 1815, news of
61:
and requiring a two-thirds majority in Congress for the admission of new states, declarations of war, and creating laws restricting trade. The Federalists also discussed their grievances with the
349:
voted unanimously not to send delegates. Two New Hampshire counties and one Vermont county each sent a delegate, bringing the total to 26. On December 15, 1814 the delegates met in the
642:
Some delegates may have been in favor of New England's secession from the United States and forming an independent republic, though no solution was adopted at the convention. Historian
310:
had brought the nation close to disaster, and called for a convention of New England states to deal with both their common grievances and common defense. Otis' report was passed by the
202:, after the war, blamed Madison's policy of ignoring Federalists, who in New England constituted the best-educated class, when granting regular army commissions in New England. 428: 541:
In all, twenty-six delegates attended the secret meetings. No records of the proceedings were kept, and meetings continued through January 5, 1815. After choosing
524: 398: 85:, the Federalists' main base, secede from the United States union and create a new country. Historians generally doubt that the convention was seriously considering this. 260:
There are several reasons why historians doubt that the New England Federalists were seriously considering secession. All the states, especially Connecticut with its
209:, the Democratic-Republican candidate for governor, opposed the national party's commerce policies. Federalists still dominated the 1814  elections, returning 183:
was expected in the near future. Free trade with the rest of the world had virtually ceased, thousands were thrown out of work, and by August banks were suspending
324:
Twelve delegates were appointed by the Massachusetts legislature, of which George Cabot and Harrison G. Otis were chief (see list below). In Connecticut, the
1036: 293:
where they could quickly be sent to Massachusetts or Connecticut to preserve federal authority. Several New England regiments that had participated in the
423: 662:, preceded them and, consequently, their presence in the capital seemed both ludicrous and subversive. They quickly returned home. Thereafter, both 858:
The Constitution of the United States; A Synopsis of the Several State Constitutions; with various other Important Documents and Useful Information
978:
Mason, Matthew. "'Nothing is Better Calculated to Excite Divisions': Federalist Agitation against Slave Representation during the War of 1812,"
443: 328:
denounced Madison's "odious and disastrous war", voiced concern about plans to implement a national draft, and selected seven delegates led by
190:
New England governors followed a policy of giving minimal support to the Federal government in waging the war. With the exception of Governor
77:
swept over the Northeast, discrediting and disgracing the Federalists, resulting in their elimination as a major national political force.
1094: 1089: 236:. As early as 1804 some New England Federalists had discussed secession from the Union if the national government became too oppressive. 1099: 248:
saw this as the result of the administration leading the country "defenseless and naked, into that lake of blood she is yet swimming."
1074: 1114: 1079: 1104: 944: 264:, stood to lose more than they would gain. Efforts were made in the delegation selection process to exclude firebrands like 647:
caressed and fed this infant myth until it became so tough and lusty as to defy both solemn denials and documentary proof."
438: 217:. In September Governor Strong refused a request to provide and support 5,000 troops to retake territory in Maine. 1139: 1134: 550:
attach the names of authors to proposals. It is impossible to ascertain the speeches or votes of individual delegates.
606:
Requiring each president to be from a different state than his predecessor. (This provision was aimed directly at the
1014: 798: 568: 564: 297:
were returned home where it was hoped that they could serve as a focal point for New Englanders opposed to disunion.
213:
as governor and electing 360 Federalists against only 156 Democratic-Republicans to the lower house of the
1109: 1084: 225: 127:. These policies were very unpopular among Northeastern merchants and shippers. Jefferson's successor, President 1056: 950:
Hickey, Donald R. (December 1977). "New England's Defense Problem and the Genesis of the Hartford Convention".
337: 282: 20: 563:
infringements on its sovereignty—a doctrine that echoed the policy of Jefferson and Madison in 1798 (in the
1129: 1124: 627: 325: 1050: 920:
To the Hartford Convention: The Federalists and the Origins of Party Politics in Massachusetts, 1789-1815
879: 787:
America on the Brink: How the Political Struggle over the War of 1812 Almost Destroyed the Young Republic
635: 484: 378: 342: 317:
A letter was sent to the other New England governors, inviting them to send delegates to a convention in
306: 261: 229: 214: 132: 575: 354: 124: 1149: 1144: 1119: 265: 393: 346: 345:
was not in session and its Federalist governor, John Gilman, refused to call it back into session.
862: 597: 546: 413: 58: 690:
Banner, Jr., James M. (September 1988). "A Shadow of Secession? The Hartford Convention, 1814".
593:
for declaration of offensive war, admission of a new state, or interdiction of foreign commerce;
1031:(1815)  : convened at Hartford, in the state of Connecticut, December 15th, 1814 online] 655: 388: 318: 233: 172: 168: 74: 43: 30: 643: 489: 311: 8: 590: 403: 241: 232:, who inspired these measures, suggested that the eastern states meet at a convention in 120: 883: 856: 360:
The following lists the states that attended and the names of the twenty-six attendees.
967: 923: 790: 350: 278: 191: 62: 305:
In response to the war crisis, Massachusetts Governor Strong called the newly elected
1010: 1000: 940: 913: 830: 819: 794: 743: 701: 560: 459: 329: 273: 269: 156: 99: 619: 959: 826: 607: 578:. These attempted to combat the policies of the ruling Democratic-Republicans by: 504: 294: 290: 245: 139: 115: 54:
and the political problems arising from the federal government's increasing power.
47: 106:, vigorous trade with France was maintained while both administrations engaged in 659: 514: 479: 474: 469: 408: 333: 111: 66: 1049: 651: 464: 199: 176: 143: 138:
The opposing Federalist Party regained strength, especially in New England and
70: 1068: 834: 747: 705: 692: 509: 206: 195: 160: 128: 542: 499: 373: 314:
on October 12 by a 22 to 12 vote and the house on October 16 by 260 to 20.
210: 574:
The Hartford Convention's final report proposed several amendments to the
383: 221: 164: 82: 51: 990: 42:
was a series of meetings from December 15, 1814, to January 5, 1815, in
175:, and by September the British were advancing further in Maine and the 103: 971: 107: 24: 963: 69:. However, weeks after the convention's end, news of Major General 1037:
The Report and Resolutions of the Hartford Convention (Wikisource)
583: 205:
The anti-war sentiment in Massachusetts was so strong that even
180: 34:
The Secret Journal of the Hartford Convention, published 1823.
567:), and which would later reappear in a different context as " 905:
vol 1 (1891), provides the text for portions of this article
187:
payment. The federal government was approaching bankruptcy.
184: 995:
Morison, Samuel Eliot, Frederick Merk, and Frank Freidel,
224:
had refused to subject their militia to the orders of the
146:
of New York City and supported him for president in 1812.
867:
new hampshire delegates hartford convention mills olcott.
734:
Morison, Samuel Eliot (1968). "Our Most Unpopular War".
93: 50:
met to discuss their grievances concerning the ongoing
841:
The life and letters of Harrison Grey Otis, Federalist
46:, United States, in which New England leaders of the 1007:
The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln.
821:
Harrison Gray Otis, 1765-1848: The Urbane Federalist
16:
1814–1815 political meeting in Hartford, Connecticut
987:
Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society
736:
Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society
818: 985:Morison, Samuel Eliot. "Our Most Unpopular War." 1066: 614: 149: 958:(4). The New England Quarterly, Inc.: 587–604. 341:under the Constitution of the United States". 982:Vol. 75, No. 4 (Dec., 2002), pp. 531–561 812: 810: 729: 727: 725: 723: 721: 719: 717: 715: 689: 281:, which then became a standard part of the 142:; it collaborated with Lieutenant Governor 807: 712: 854: 685: 683: 618: 300: 29: 816: 733: 624:The Hartford Convention or LEAP NO LEAP 603:Limiting future presidents to one term; 57:This convention discussed removing the 1067: 949: 937:The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict. 910:New England in the Republic, 1776-1850 780: 778: 776: 774: 600:representation advantage of the South; 878: 680: 179:area of New York. A naval assault on 94:American relations with Great Britain 784: 553: 163:was occupied in July, in August the 771: 13: 1095:Political history of New Hampshire 1090:Political history of Massachusetts 1021: 895: 536: 14: 1161: 1100:Political history of Rhode Island 1042: 591:two-thirds Congressional majority 565:Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions 1075:History of Hartford, Connecticut 861:. New York: Peter Hill. p.  839:Originally published in 1913 as 1115:Separatism in the United States 1080:Political events in Connecticut 654:'s overwhelming victory at the 1057:New International Encyclopedia 997:Dissent in Three American Wars 932:. Yale University Press (1934) 872: 848: 817:Morison, Samuel Eliot (1969). 758: 610:in the presidency since 1800). 131:, and what was now called the 1: 855:Williams, Edwin, ed. (1833). 615:Negative reception and legacy 362: 283:Lost Cause of the Confederacy 150:Opposition to the War of 1812 110:. With the resumption of the 108:an undeclared war with France 98:Under the administrations of 88: 21:Connecticut Convention Center 1105:Political history of Vermont 903:History of the United States 766:History of the United States 674: 251: 7: 1051:"Hartford Convention"  343:New Hampshire's legislature 133:Democratic-Republican Party 125:Non-Intercourse Act of 1809 10: 1166: 989:(1968) 80: pp. 38-54, 166 980:The New England Quarterly, 785:Buel, Richard Jr. (2005). 338:Rhode Island's legislature 220:Because Massachusetts and 135:, continued his policies. 18: 1140:1815 in American politics 1135:1814 in American politics 952:The New England Quarterly 928:Buckley, William Edward. 658:, and the signing of the 453: 367: 215:Massachusetts Legislature 19:Not to be confused with 1110:War of 1812 legislation 930:The Hartford Convention 414:Stephen Longfellow, Jr. 262:claims to western lands 59:three-fifths compromise 1085:History of New England 908:Adams, James Truslow. 631: 582:Prohibiting any trade 576:U.S. Constitution 114:at the same time that 75:victory in New Orleans 35: 918:Banner, James M. Jr. 888:. Boston: O. Everett. 656:Battle of New Orleans 636:Democratic-Republican 622: 608:dominance of Virginia 586:lasting over 60 days; 389:William Prescott, Jr. 347:Vermont's legislature 319:Hartford, Connecticut 301:Call for a convention 266:John Lowell, Jr. 234:Hartford, Connecticut 44:Hartford, Connecticut 33: 644:Samuel Eliot Morison 490:Roger Minott Sherman 1130:1815 in Connecticut 1125:1814 in Connecticut 664:Hartford Convention 404:Samuel Sumner Wilde 121:Embargo Act of 1807 40:Hartford Convention 935:Hickey, Donald R. 791:Palgrave Macmillan 632: 379:Harrison Gray Otis 353:'s chamber at the 351:Connecticut Senate 279:American Civil War 230:Harrison Gray Otis 192:John Taylor Gilman 63:Louisiana Purchase 36: 945:978-0-252-06059-5 901:Schouler, James, 554:Convention report 545:as president and 534: 533: 525:William Hall, Jr. 460:Chauncey Goodrich 330:Chauncey Goodrich 270:Timothy Pickering 100:George Washington 1157: 1150:1815 conferences 1145:1814 conferences 1120:Federalist Party 1061: 1053: 975: 890: 889: 876: 870: 869: 852: 846: 845: 827:Houghton Mifflin 824: 814: 805: 804: 782: 769: 762: 756: 755: 731: 710: 709: 687: 668:Federalist Party 561:unconstitutional 505:Samuel Ward, Jr. 363: 295:Niagara campaign 242:Thomas Grosvenor 116:Thomas Jefferson 73:'s overwhelming 48:Federalist Party 1165: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1065: 1064: 1048: 1045: 1024: 1022:Primary sources 1005:Wilentz, Sean. 898: 896:Further reading 893: 880:Lyman, Theodore 877: 873: 853: 849: 815: 808: 801: 783: 772: 763: 759: 732: 713: 688: 681: 677: 660:Treaty of Ghent 628:William Charles 617: 556: 547:Theodore Dwight 539: 537:Secret meetings 515:Benjamin Hazard 480:Nathaniel Smith 475:Zephaniah Swift 470:James Hillhouse 424:Hodijah Baylies 409:Joseph S. Lyman 394:Timothy Bigelow 355:Old State House 334:James Hillhouse 303: 285:after the war. 254: 152: 112:Napoleonic Wars 96: 91: 67:Embargo of 1807 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1163: 1153: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1063: 1062: 1044: 1043:External links 1041: 1040: 1039: 1033: 1032: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1003: 999:(1970), ch. 1 993: 983: 976: 964:10.2307/364248 947: 933: 926: 916: 906: 897: 894: 892: 891: 871: 847: 806: 799: 770: 757: 711: 678: 676: 673: 652:Andrew Jackson 616: 613: 612: 611: 604: 601: 594: 587: 555: 552: 538: 535: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 519: 518: 517: 512: 507: 502: 494: 493: 492: 487: 485:Calvin Goddard 482: 477: 472: 467: 465:John Treadwell 462: 452: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 441: 435:New Hampshire 433: 432: 431: 426: 421: 416: 411: 406: 401: 396: 391: 386: 381: 376: 370:Massachusetts 366: 302: 299: 253: 250: 226:War Department 200:Winfield Scott 177:Lake Champlain 157:Maine district 151: 148: 144:DeWitt Clinton 95: 92: 90: 87: 71:Andrew Jackson 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1162: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1070: 1059: 1058: 1052: 1047: 1046: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1016: 1015:0-393-05820-4 1012: 1008: 1004: 1002: 998: 994: 992: 988: 984: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 948: 946: 942: 938: 934: 931: 927: 925: 921: 917: 915: 911: 907: 904: 900: 899: 887: 886: 881: 875: 868: 864: 860: 859: 851: 844: 842: 836: 832: 828: 823: 822: 813: 811: 802: 800:1-4039-6238-3 796: 792: 788: 781: 779: 777: 775: 767: 761: 754: 749: 745: 741: 737: 730: 728: 726: 724: 722: 720: 718: 716: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 693:History Today 686: 684: 679: 672: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 648: 645: 640: 637: 629: 625: 621: 609: 605: 602: 599: 596:Removing the 595: 592: 588: 585: 581: 580: 579: 577: 572: 570: 569:nullification 566: 562: 551: 548: 544: 526: 523: 522: 520: 516: 513: 511: 510:Edward Manton 508: 506: 503: 501: 498: 497: 496:Rhode Island 495: 491: 488: 486: 483: 481: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 457: 455: 454: 451: 445: 442: 440: 439:Benjamin West 437: 436: 434: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 399:Joshua Thomas 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 371: 369: 368: 365: 364: 361: 358: 357:in Hartford. 356: 352: 348: 344: 339: 335: 331: 327: 322: 320: 315: 313: 308: 307:General Court 298: 296: 292: 286: 284: 280: 275: 274:Josiah Quincy 271: 267: 263: 258: 249: 247: 243: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 218: 216: 212: 208: 207:Samuel Dexter 203: 201: 197: 196:New Hampshire 193: 188: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 161:Massachusetts 158: 147: 145: 141: 136: 134: 130: 129:James Madison 126: 122: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 86: 84: 78: 76: 72: 68: 64: 60: 55: 53: 49: 45: 41: 32: 26: 22: 1055: 1027: 1006: 996: 986: 979: 955: 951: 936: 929: 919: 909: 902: 884: 874: 866: 857: 850: 840: 838: 820: 789:. New York: 786: 765: 760: 751: 739: 735: 697: 691: 667: 663: 649: 641: 633: 623: 598:three-fifths 589:Requiring a 573: 557: 543:George Cabot 540: 500:Daniel Lyman 456:Connecticut 444:Mills Olcott 429:George Bliss 419:Daniel Waldo 374:George Cabot 359: 323: 316: 312:state senate 304: 287: 259: 255: 238: 219: 211:Caleb Strong 204: 189: 153: 137: 97: 79: 56: 39: 37: 384:Nathan Dane 326:legislature 222:Connecticut 165:White House 83:New England 52:War of 1812 1069:Categories 1029:15th, 1814 764:Schouler, 104:John Adams 89:Background 835:505124356 748:0076-4981 742:: 38–54. 706:0018-2753 700:: 24–30. 675:Footnotes 252:Secession 25:XL Center 922:(1970). 882:(1823). 521:Vermont 246:New York 240:nation. 140:New York 123:and the 65:and the 1060:. 1905. 1009:(2005) 939:(1995) 912:(1926) 584:embargo 169:Capitol 119:as the 1013:  1001:online 991:online 972:364248 970:  943:  924:online 914:online 833:  797:  746:  704:  291:Albany 272:, and 185:specie 181:Boston 173:burned 968:JSTOR 768:vol 1 626:, by 171:were 1011:ISBN 941:ISBN 831:OCLC 795:ISBN 744:ISSN 702:ISSN 666:and 634:The 332:and 167:and 102:and 38:The 960:doi 753:it. 571:". 244:of 194:of 159:of 23:or 1071:: 1054:. 966:. 956:50 954:. 865:. 863:95 837:. 829:. 825:. 809:^ 793:. 773:^ 750:. 740:80 738:. 714:^ 698:38 696:. 682:^ 336:. 268:, 1017:. 974:. 962:: 843:. 803:. 708:. 630:. 27:.

Index

Connecticut Convention Center
XL Center

Hartford, Connecticut
Federalist Party
War of 1812
three-fifths compromise
Louisiana Purchase
Embargo of 1807
Andrew Jackson
victory in New Orleans
New England
George Washington
John Adams
an undeclared war with France
Napoleonic Wars
Thomas Jefferson
Embargo Act of 1807
Non-Intercourse Act of 1809
James Madison
Democratic-Republican Party
New York
DeWitt Clinton
Maine district
Massachusetts
White House
Capitol
burned
Lake Champlain
Boston

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑