Knowledge

Help talk:IPA/English/FAQ

Source 📝

61: 35: 88:-oriented dictionaries and pedagogical texts have adopted the IPA, and as a result, it is far less confusing for many people around the world than any alternative. It may be confusing in some aspects to some English speakers, but that is precisely because it is conceived with an international point of view. The sound of 184:
Listing multiple national pronunciations after every Knowledge entry word quickly becomes unwieldy, and listing only one leads to accusations of bias. Therefore, we use a system that aims at being pan-dialectal. Of course, if a particular dialect or local pronunciation is relevant to the topic, it
225:
in accents of English around the world, and the goal of our diaphonemic system is to cover as many of them as possible. Moreover, where there is no phonological contrast to possibly cause confusion, using a more typographically recognizable letter for a sound represented by another symbol in the
168:
is simply too inconsistent in regard to its correspondence to pronunciation, and therefore a completely intuitive respelling system is infeasible. This is why our respelling system must be used merely to augment the IPA, not to replace it.
171:
Knowledge deals with a vast number of topics from foreign languages, and many of these languages contain sounds that do not exist in English. In these cases, a respelling would be entirely inadequate. See
49:. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please update this material when needed. 84:
The IPA is the international standard for phonetic transcription, and therefore the Knowledge standard as well. Many non-American and/or
173: 181:
The IPA should be specific to a particular national standard, and the national pronunciations should be listed separately.
155: 145: 111: 234:
is arguably the more traditional IPA notation; not only is it used by most if not all dictionaries, but also in
85: 222: 245: 231: 215: 211: 95: 93: 261: 100:
in the IPA, and this was chosen from German and several other languages which spell this sound
21: 8: 165: 240: 199: 67: 189: 122: 46: 255: 17: 137: 140:
for a few examples. But even this is not without problems; for example,
77:
The IPA is gibberish and I can't read it. Why doesn't Knowledge use a
133: 226:
narrow IPA is totally within the confines of the IPA's principles (
66:
Questions not entirely specific to English must be accumulated at
129: 185:
may be listed in addition to the wider pronunciation, using
244:, which was written entirely in phonetic transcription, ⟨ 42: 214:
for the rhotic consonant is inaccurate. It should be
156: 146: 253: 110:use a "normal" pronunciation key. It is 174:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Pronunciation 128:template. See the opening sentences of 14: 254: 248:⟩ was the norm for the English rhotic. 154:, but this could easily be misread as 223:pronounced in a wide variety of ways 55: 29: 27: 28: 273: 112:Help:Pronunciation respelling key 59: 33: 13: 1: 106:For English words, Knowledge 45:about the corresponding page 70:, which is transcluded here. 7: 10: 278: 43:frequently asked questions 238:, the predecessor to the 118:the IPA, enclosed in the 230:, pp. 27–28). In fact, 176:for further discussion. 221:The English rhotic is 41:Below are answers to 236:Le Maître Phonétique 92:in "yes" is spelled 166:English orthography 144:would be respelled 241:Journal of the IPA 114:, and may be used 81:pronunciation key? 74: 73: 68:Help talk:IPA/FAQ 54: 53: 269: 247: 233: 217: 213: 204: 198: 194: 188: 160: 150: 127: 121: 99: 63: 62: 56: 47:Help:IPA/English 37: 36: 30: 277: 276: 272: 271: 270: 268: 267: 266: 252: 251: 250: 249: 219: 207: 206: 202: 196: 192: 186: 182: 178: 177: 158: 148: 125: 119: 82: 60: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 275: 265: 264: 262:Knowledge FAQs 220: 209: 208: 183: 180: 179: 116:in addition to 83: 76: 75: 72: 71: 64: 52: 51: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 274: 263: 260: 259: 257: 243: 242: 237: 229: 224: 201: 191: 175: 170: 167: 163: 162: 153: 152: 143: 139: 135: 131: 124: 117: 113: 109: 103: 97: 91: 87: 80: 69: 65: 58: 57: 50: 48: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 18:Help talk:IPA 239: 235: 228:IPA Handbook 227: 141: 115: 107: 105: 101: 89: 78: 40: 210:The use of 138:Lepidoptera 200:IPA-endia 142:cum laude 134:Cochineal 256:Category 218:instead. 20:‎ | 190:IPA-all 130:Beijing 123:respell 22:English 136:, and 79:normal 157:koom- 147:kuum- 16:< 161:-day 151:-day 108:does 232:/r/ 216:/ɹ/ 212:/r/ 195:or 159:LOH 149:LOW 86:EFL 258:: 203:}} 197:{{ 193:}} 187:{{ 164:. 132:, 126:}} 120:{{ 104:. 246:r 205:. 102:j 98:/ 96:j 94:/ 90:y

Index

Help talk:IPA
English
frequently asked questions
Help:IPA/English
Help talk:IPA/FAQ
EFL
j
Help:Pronunciation respelling key
respell
Beijing
Cochineal
Lepidoptera
kuum-LOW-day
koom-LOH-day
English orthography
Knowledge:Manual of Style/Pronunciation
IPA-all
IPA-endia
pronounced in a wide variety of ways
Journal of the IPA
Category
Knowledge FAQs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.