Knowledge

Socially optimal firm size

Source 📝

229: 249: 33: 264:, meaning that firms can enter (and exit) the market at will with no logistical, legal, or other inhibiting factors, and if firms have U-shaped long-run average cost curves as in the graphs at the right, then in the long run all firms will end up producing at their point of minimum average cost. For suppose a particular firm with the illustrated long-run average cost curve is faced with the market price 138: 206:
The "diseconomies of scale" do not tend to vary widely by industry, but "economies of scale" do. An auto maker has very high fixed costs, which are lower per unit of output the more output is produced. On the other hand, a florist has very low fixed costs and hence very limited sources of economies
280:
in the graph's notation. With firms making economic profit and with free entry, other firms will enter the market for this product, and their additional supply will bring down the market price of the product; this process will continue until there is no longer any economic profit to entice further
296:
Thus with firms possessing U-shaped long-run average cost curves, perfect competition, with (1) firms small enough relative to the overall market that they cannot individually influence the product's market price, and with (2) free entry, leads in the long run to a situation in which no firm is
215:
An industrial society will tend to have large firms, as industry has substantial economies of scale. A service-based economy will favor smaller firms, as services have limited economies of scale. There will, of course, be exceptions, such as
197:
industry standards (like Microsoft Windows), etc. If only these "economies of scale" applied, then the ideal firm size would be infinitely large. However, since both apply, the firm must not be too small or too large, to minimize unit costs.
285:, with marginal cost equalling price at the minimum of the long-run average cost curve, and with the gap between average revenue (the height of the average revenue curve at this 272:
in the upper graph), and its per-unit economic profit is the difference between average revenue AR and average total cost ATC at that point, the difference being
297:
making economic profit, and in which firms are of their socially optimal size (producing at the minimum of their long-run average cost curve).
185:
existed, then the long-run average cost-minimizing firm size would be one worker, producing the minimal possible level of output. However,
105: 54: 77: 193:
discounts (components, insurance, real estate, advertising, etc.) and can also limit competition by buying out competitors, setting
84: 268:
indicated in the upper graph. The firm produces at the quantity of output where marginal cost equals marginal revenue (labeled
252:
After entry of enough other firms has occurred, their increase in market supply has driven down the price of the good, so that
91: 281:
entrants. The long-run outcome is shown in the second graph, with production by each firm occurring at the newly labelled
73: 124: 62: 17: 58: 348: 210: 207:
of scale. Thus there are disparate degrees of economies of scales for different types of organizations.
98: 343: 328: 173:
in a given industry at a given time which results in the lowest production costs per unit of output.
43: 316: 47: 306: 182: 142: 8: 189:
also apply, which state that large firms can have lower per-unit costs due to buying at
157:, reflecting diseconomies of scale. Consequently, the societally optimal firm size is OQ 311: 236:. This situation is shown in this diagram, as the price or average revenue, denoted by 228: 186: 329:
Bureaucratic limits of firm size: Empirical analysis using transaction cost economics
211:
Effects of agricultural, industrial, and service-based economies on optimal firm size
253: 233: 248: 337: 145:
diagram shows that as more is produced, so long as output does not exceed OQ
154: 261: 217: 190: 240:, is above the minimum average cost. The firm produces the quantity 32: 232:
In the short run, it is possible for an individual firm to make an
194: 170: 137: 289:) and average cost (the height of the average cost curve at this 201: 244:, at the intersection of marginal cost and marginal revenue. 161:, where long-run average cost is at its lowest level. 223: 335: 149:, economies of scale are obtained. Beyond OQ 61:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 202:Variation in optimal firm size by industry 125:Learn how and when to remove this message 247: 227: 136: 14: 336: 220:, which is a huge services company. 153:, additional production will increase 260:If the market for a product exhibits 59:adding citations to reliable sources 26: 24: 25: 360: 224:Effect of free entry on firm size 31: 13: 1: 322: 176: 74:"Socially optimal firm size" 7: 300: 10: 365: 167:socially optimal firm size 317:Minimum efficient scale 257: 256:of each firm are zero. 245: 162: 307:Diseconomies of scale 251: 231: 183:diseconomies of scale 143:long-run average cost 140: 349:Production economics 55:improve this article 312:Economies of scale 258: 246: 187:economies of scale 169:is the size for a 163: 135: 134: 127: 109: 16:(Redirected from 356: 344:Market structure 254:economic profits 130: 123: 119: 116: 110: 108: 67: 35: 27: 21: 364: 363: 359: 358: 357: 355: 354: 353: 334: 333: 325: 303: 234:economic profit 226: 213: 204: 179: 160: 152: 148: 131: 120: 114: 111: 68: 66: 52: 36: 23: 22: 18:Ideal firm size 15: 12: 11: 5: 362: 352: 351: 346: 332: 331: 324: 321: 320: 319: 314: 309: 302: 299: 293:) being zero. 225: 222: 212: 209: 203: 200: 178: 175: 158: 155:per-unit costs 150: 146: 133: 132: 39: 37: 30: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 361: 350: 347: 345: 342: 341: 339: 330: 327: 326: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 298: 294: 292: 288: 284: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 255: 250: 243: 239: 235: 230: 221: 219: 208: 199: 196: 192: 188: 184: 174: 172: 168: 156: 144: 139: 129: 126: 118: 107: 104: 100: 97: 93: 90: 86: 83: 79: 76: –  75: 71: 70:Find sources: 64: 60: 56: 50: 49: 45: 40:This article 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 295: 290: 286: 282: 277: 273: 269: 265: 259: 241: 237: 214: 205: 180: 166: 164: 121: 112: 102: 95: 88: 81: 69: 53:Please help 41: 195:proprietary 115:August 2013 338:Categories 323:References 262:free entry 177:Discussion 85:newspapers 218:Microsoft 42:does not 301:See also 181:If only 171:company 99:scholar 63:removed 48:sources 276:minus 101:  94:  87:  80:  72:  141:This 106:JSTOR 92:books 191:bulk 165:The 78:news 46:any 44:cite 57:by 340:: 291:Q 287:Q 283:Q 278:C 274:P 270:Q 266:P 242:Q 238:P 159:2 151:2 147:2 128:) 122:( 117:) 113:( 103:· 96:· 89:· 82:· 65:. 51:. 20:)

Index

Ideal firm size

cite
sources
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
"Socially optimal firm size"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

long-run average cost
per-unit costs
company
diseconomies of scale
economies of scale
bulk
proprietary
Microsoft

economic profit

economic profits
free entry
Diseconomies of scale
Economies of scale

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.