Knowledge

Lee v Minor Developments Ltd

Source 📝

130: 24: 226:
regarding the real status of a worker as either a permanent employee or a casual employee. The case concerned whether or not the Employment Relations Authority had erred in law by determining that Sharon Lee was a casual employee of Oceana Gold (NZ) Ltd.
176: 235:
Judge C M Shaw delivered the Employment Court's decision allowing Lee's appeal and overturning the decision of the Employment Relations Authority.
41: 88: 60: 67: 302: 238:
Judge Shaw outlined the following characteristics as being those which the courts have used to assess whether employment is casual:
74: 56: 258:
The lack of an obligation on the employer to offer employment, or on the employee to accept any other engagement; and
107: 292: 272: 223: 140: 45: 81: 297: 34: 8: 261:
Employees are only engaged for the specific term of each period of employment.
129: 286: 151:
Sharon Lee v Minor Developments Ltd t/a Before Six Childcare Centre
246:
A lack of regular work pattern or expectation of ongoing employment;
23: 249:
Employment is dependent on the availability of work demands;
219:
Lee v Minor Developments Ltd t/a Before Six Childcare Centre
123:
Lee v Minor Developments Ltd t/a Before Six Childcare Centre
243:
Engagement for short periods of time for specific purposes;
48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 284: 252:No guarantee of work from one week to the next; 128: 108:Learn how and when to remove this message 285: 211:Employment relations, casual employee 46:adding citations to reliable sources 17: 13: 14: 314: 273:Jinkinson v Oceana Gold (NZ) Ltd 22: 303:Labour relations in New Zealand 224:Employment Court of New Zealand 141:Employment Court of New Zealand 33:needs additional citations for 255:Employment as and when needed; 57:"Lee v Minor Developments Ltd" 1: 278: 7: 266: 230: 177:Judgement of Judge C M Shaw 10: 319: 210: 205: 200: 195: 187: 182: 172: 164: 156: 146: 136: 127: 122: 293:2008 in New Zealand law 264: 222:was a decision of the 240: 42:improve this article 168:AC 52/08 ARC 16/08 215: 214: 118: 117: 110: 92: 310: 298:2008 in case law 183:Court membership 160:23 December 2008 132: 120: 119: 113: 106: 102: 99: 93: 91: 50: 26: 18: 318: 317: 313: 312: 311: 309: 308: 307: 283: 282: 281: 269: 233: 114: 103: 97: 94: 51: 49: 39: 27: 12: 11: 5: 316: 306: 305: 300: 295: 280: 277: 276: 275: 268: 265: 263: 262: 259: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 232: 229: 213: 212: 208: 207: 203: 202: 198: 197: 193: 192: 189: 188:Judges sitting 185: 184: 180: 179: 174: 170: 169: 166: 162: 161: 158: 154: 153: 148: 147:Full case name 144: 143: 138: 134: 133: 125: 124: 116: 115: 30: 28: 21: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 315: 304: 301: 299: 296: 294: 291: 290: 288: 274: 271: 270: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 241: 239: 236: 228: 225: 221: 220: 209: 204: 199: 196:Case opinions 194: 190: 186: 181: 178: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 145: 142: 139: 135: 131: 126: 121: 112: 109: 101: 90: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 62: 59: –  58: 54: 53:Find sources: 47: 43: 37: 36: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 237: 234: 218: 217: 216: 150: 104: 98:January 2017 95: 85: 78: 71: 64: 52: 40:Please help 35:verification 32: 15: 287:Categories 279:References 201:Couch, A A 173:Transcript 68:newspapers 191:Shaw, C M 267:See also 231:Judgment 206:Keywords 165:Citation 157:Decided 82:scholar 84:  77:  70:  63:  55:  137:Court 89:JSTOR 75:books 61:news 44:by 289:: 111:) 105:( 100:) 96:( 86:· 79:· 72:· 65:· 38:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Lee v Minor Developments Ltd"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

Employment Court of New Zealand
Judgement of Judge C M Shaw
Employment Court of New Zealand
Jinkinson v Oceana Gold (NZ) Ltd
Categories
2008 in New Zealand law
2008 in case law
Labour relations in New Zealand

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.