Knowledge

Paradox of analysis

Source 📝

2022: 1303: 2012: 1313: 69:
is something like the definition of a word. However, unlike a standard dictionary definition (which may list examples or talk about related terms as well), a completely correct analysis of a concept in terms of others seems like it should have exactly the same meaning as the original concept. Thus,
98:
Yet (2) is not informative, so either (1) is not informative, or the two expressions used in (1) are not interchangeable (because they change an informative analysis into an uninformative one) so (1) is not actually correct. In other words, if the analysis is correct and informative, then (1) and
77:
However, if such an analysis is to be useful, it should be informative. That is, it should tell us something we don't already know (or at least, something one can imagine someone might not already know). But it seems that no conceptual analysis can both meet the requirement of correctness and of
107:
One way to resolve this paradox is to redefine what is an analysis. In explaining the paradox, a potential analysis is assumed to be a relation between concepts rather than the verbal expressions used to illustrate them. If the verbal expression is part of the analysis, then we shouldn't expect
89:
One can say that (1) is correct because the expression "brother" represents the same concept as the expression "male sibling," and (1) seems to be informative because the two expressions are not identical. And if (1) is truly correct, then "brother" and "male sibling" must be interchangeable:
70:
in order to be correct, the analysis should be able to be used in any context where the original concept is used, without changing the meaning of the discussion in context. Conceptual analyses of this sort are a major goal of
149:: Any new knowledge is either the same as what is already known, and therefore not informative, or else different from what is already known, and therefore not verifiable (or reachable by analytic logic). 240:"Analysis, Language, and Concepts: the Second Paradox of Analysis," by Filicia Ackerman, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 4, Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind (1990), pp. 535–543 112:
even in cases of correct analyses. However, this response seems to move the notion of analysis into mere linguistic definition, rather than doing interesting work with concepts.
99:(2) must be essentially equal, but this is not true because (2) is not informative. Therefore, it seems an analysis cannot be both correct and informative at the same time. 119:
and just say that correct analyses are uninformative — which then raises the question of what positive cognitive notion should be used instead of this one, if any.
227: 265: 1458: 1606: 233:"Analysis," by Michael Beaney, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = < 1316: 472: 1349: 228:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150622064448/http://www.compendioemlinha.com/uploads/6/7/1/6/6716383/greimann-definicao.pdf
126:'s position and reject the notion of conceptual analysis altogether. This is a natural response to the rejection of the 1667: 513: 432: 127: 1636: 1473: 1398: 258: 2056: 1892: 1243: 1885: 937: 417: 2061: 1709: 1306: 818: 740: 457: 251: 1539: 1661: 1601: 518: 412: 192: 1656: 1729: 1704: 1544: 1120: 897: 310: 85:(1) For all x (any given member of a class or set), x is a brother if and only if x is a male sibling 1824: 690: 219:"George Edward Moore (1873—1958)," by Aaron Preston, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, < 1952: 1912: 1789: 1586: 1504: 1408: 1403: 1342: 972: 123: 1829: 1719: 556: 528: 503: 305: 234: 46: 1987: 1972: 1947: 1942: 1870: 1814: 1794: 1699: 1534: 1428: 1199: 1155: 654: 467: 315: 1992: 1977: 1967: 1932: 1880: 1809: 1724: 1596: 1591: 1514: 1509: 1438: 377: 8: 2051: 1754: 1714: 1678: 1611: 1478: 1448: 1443: 1413: 1378: 1021: 952: 730: 561: 543: 427: 382: 372: 274: 158: 71: 66: 54: 2025: 1982: 1962: 1927: 1902: 1875: 1673: 1626: 1616: 1574: 1569: 1529: 1524: 1433: 1393: 1335: 1194: 912: 869: 838: 828: 788: 646: 626: 487: 447: 442: 367: 17: 1279: 2046: 2015: 1997: 1937: 1917: 1907: 1834: 1819: 1739: 1734: 1564: 1559: 1519: 1388: 1008: 998: 932: 813: 748: 482: 387: 139: 1031: 1957: 1922: 1897: 1849: 1774: 1749: 1744: 1646: 1621: 1084: 1061: 1051: 874: 823: 720: 576: 41: 1865: 1844: 1839: 1799: 1641: 1631: 1468: 1463: 1453: 1418: 1235: 1215: 1189: 1163: 1056: 1046: 1026: 758: 725: 616: 601: 452: 437: 357: 336: 116: 35:
can be both correct and informative. The problem was formulated by philosopher
1804: 1779: 1769: 1764: 1694: 1494: 1383: 1263: 1145: 1016: 947: 942: 907: 808: 705: 674: 659: 621: 611: 566: 341: 109: 226:"Definição", by Dirk Greimann, CompĂȘndio em Linha de Filosofia AnalĂ­tica, < 2040: 1784: 1651: 1499: 1284: 1253: 1140: 1135: 1105: 1071: 1041: 1036: 967: 962: 892: 884: 861: 768: 715: 606: 571: 533: 462: 362: 331: 1248: 1115: 1581: 1554: 1549: 1173: 1089: 957: 902: 851: 798: 793: 753: 700: 669: 664: 636: 596: 523: 407: 300: 1759: 1258: 1225: 1220: 1168: 1130: 1125: 1110: 1079: 993: 803: 773: 763: 710: 695: 631: 295: 36: 977: 846: 783: 778: 477: 243: 551: 422: 1327: 32: 49:
in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in
1359: 220: 78:
informativeness, on these understandings of the requirements.
179:
Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence
143: 235:
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/analysis/
1423: 146: 94:(2) For all x, x is a brother if and only if x is a brother 81:To see why, consider a potential simple analysis: 2038: 57:, Northwestern University, 1942, pp. 319–342). 1343: 259: 2011: 1350: 1336: 266: 252: 542: 273: 102: 2039: 122:One further response would be to take 1357: 1331: 247: 31:) is a paradox that concerns how an 13: 1668:What the Tortoise Said to Achilles 190: 181:, Walter de Gruyter, 1996, p. 265. 138:The paradox is a reformulation of 14: 2073: 2021: 2020: 2010: 1311: 1302: 1301: 514:Analytic–synthetic distinction 184: 171: 128:analytic–synthetic distinction 60: 1: 213: 51:The Philosophy of G. E. Moore 221:http://www.iep.utm.edu/moore 7: 152: 10: 2078: 413:Causal theory of reference 133: 15: 2006: 1858: 1687: 1487: 1366: 1297: 1272: 1234: 1208: 1182: 1154: 1098: 1070: 1007: 986: 925: 883: 860: 837: 739: 683: 645: 589: 496: 400: 350: 324: 288: 281: 147:dialogue of the same name 473:Scientific structuralism 164: 16:Not to be confused with 2057:Philosophical paradoxes 1587:Paradoxes of set theory 124:Willard Van Orman Quine 115:Another response is to 529:Reflective equilibrium 29:Langford–Moore paradox 1200:Nicholas Wolterstorff 655:David Malet Armstrong 45:, and first named by 1953:Kavka's toxin puzzle 1725:Income and fertility 103:Proposed resolutions 2062:Analytic philosophy 1612:Temperature paradox 1535:Free choice paradox 1399:Fitch's knowability 1022:Patricia Churchland 953:Christine Korsgaard 839:Logical positivists 731:Ludwig Wittgenstein 508:paradox of analysis 275:Analytic philosophy 159:Sense and reference 110:intersubstitutivity 72:analytic philosophy 67:conceptual analysis 55:Paul Arthur Schilpp 25:paradox of analysis 1988:Prisoner's dilemma 1674:Heat death paradox 1662:Unexpected hanging 1627:Chicken or the egg 1195:William Lane Craig 913:Friedrich Waismann 870:Carl Gustav Hempel 829:Timothy Williamson 789:Alasdair MacIntyre 647:Australian realism 627:Russ Shafer-Landau 488:Analytical Thomism 443:Logical positivism 197:plato.stanford.edu 2034: 2033: 1705:Arrow information 1325: 1324: 1293: 1292: 1009:Pittsburgh School 999:Peter van Inwagen 933:Roderick Chisholm 921: 920: 814:Richard Swinburne 749:G. E. M. Anscombe 585: 584: 483:Analytic theology 458:Ordinary language 396: 395: 191:Beaney, Michael. 2069: 2024: 2023: 2014: 2013: 1825:Service recovery 1679:Olbers's paradox 1379:Buridan's bridge 1352: 1345: 1338: 1329: 1328: 1315: 1314: 1305: 1304: 1244:Nancy Cartwright 1085:Nicholas Rescher 1062:Bas van Fraassen 1052:Nicholas Rescher 875:Hans Reichenbach 858: 857: 824:Bernard Williams 721:Bertrand Russell 643: 642: 577:Rigid designator 540: 539: 286: 285: 282:Related articles 268: 261: 254: 245: 244: 207: 206: 204: 203: 188: 182: 177:Dale Jacquette, 175: 42:Principia Ethica 2077: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2030: 2002: 1913:Decision-making 1859:Decision theory 1854: 1683: 1607:Hilbert's Hotel 1540:Grelling–Nelson 1483: 1362: 1356: 1326: 1321: 1312: 1289: 1280:Jan Ɓukasiewicz 1268: 1236:Stanford School 1230: 1216:Paul Feyerabend 1204: 1190:Alvin Plantinga 1178: 1164:James F. Conant 1150: 1094: 1066: 1057:Wilfrid Sellars 1047:Alexander Pruss 1027:Paul Churchland 1003: 982: 938:Donald Davidson 917: 879: 856: 833: 759:Michael Dummett 735: 726:Frank P. Ramsey 679: 641: 617:Jaakko Hintikka 602:Keith Donnellan 581: 538: 492: 453:Neurophilosophy 438:Logical atomism 392: 346: 320: 277: 272: 216: 211: 210: 201: 199: 189: 185: 176: 172: 167: 155: 136: 117:bite the bullet 105: 63: 21: 18:Moore's paradox 12: 11: 5: 2075: 2065: 2064: 2059: 2054: 2049: 2032: 2031: 2029: 2028: 2018: 2007: 2004: 2003: 2001: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1883: 1878: 1868: 1862: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1852: 1847: 1842: 1837: 1832: 1830:St. Petersburg 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1691: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1682: 1681: 1676: 1671: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1639: 1634: 1629: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1609: 1604: 1599: 1594: 1589: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1557: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1491: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1482: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1459:Rule-following 1456: 1451: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1384:Dream argument 1381: 1376: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1355: 1354: 1347: 1340: 1332: 1323: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1309: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1288: 1287: 1282: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1264:Patrick Suppes 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1240: 1238: 1232: 1231: 1229: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1212: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1186: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1177: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1160: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1146:Michael Walzer 1143: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1093: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1076: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1032:Adolf GrĂŒnbaum 1029: 1024: 1019: 1017:Robert Brandom 1013: 1011: 1005: 1004: 1002: 1001: 996: 990: 988: 984: 983: 981: 980: 975: 973:W. V. O. Quine 970: 965: 960: 955: 950: 948:Nelson Goodman 945: 943:Daniel Dennett 940: 935: 929: 927: 923: 922: 919: 918: 916: 915: 910: 908:Moritz Schlick 905: 900: 895: 889: 887: 881: 880: 878: 877: 872: 866: 864: 855: 854: 849: 843: 841: 835: 834: 832: 831: 826: 821: 819:Charles Taylor 816: 811: 809:P. F. Strawson 806: 801: 796: 791: 786: 781: 776: 771: 766: 761: 756: 751: 745: 743: 737: 736: 734: 733: 728: 723: 718: 713: 708: 706:Norman Malcolm 703: 698: 693: 687: 685: 681: 680: 678: 677: 675:J. J. C. Smart 672: 667: 662: 660:David Chalmers 657: 651: 649: 640: 639: 634: 629: 624: 622:Giuseppe Peano 619: 614: 612:Edmund Gettier 609: 604: 599: 593: 591: 587: 586: 583: 582: 580: 579: 574: 569: 567:Possible world 564: 559: 554: 548: 546: 537: 536: 531: 526: 521: 519:Counterfactual 516: 511: 500: 498: 494: 493: 491: 490: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 460: 455: 450: 445: 440: 435: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 404: 402: 398: 397: 394: 393: 391: 390: 385: 380: 378:Paraconsistent 375: 370: 365: 360: 354: 352: 348: 347: 345: 344: 339: 334: 328: 326: 322: 321: 319: 318: 313: 308: 303: 298: 292: 290: 289:Areas of focus 283: 279: 278: 271: 270: 263: 256: 248: 242: 241: 238: 231: 224: 215: 212: 209: 208: 183: 169: 168: 166: 163: 162: 161: 154: 151: 140:Meno's paradox 135: 132: 104: 101: 96: 95: 87: 86: 62: 59: 47:C. H. Langford 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2074: 2063: 2060: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2050: 2048: 2045: 2044: 2042: 2027: 2019: 2017: 2009: 2008: 2005: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1958:Morton's fork 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1898:Buridan's ass 1896: 1894: 1891: 1887: 1884: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871:Apportionment 1869: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1851: 1848: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1833: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1730:Downs–Thomson 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1647:Plato's beard 1645: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1620: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1610: 1608: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1595: 1593: 1590: 1588: 1585: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1545:Kleene–Rosser 1543: 1541: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1490: 1486: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1469:Theseus' ship 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1429:Mere addition 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1369: 1367:Philosophical 1365: 1361: 1353: 1348: 1346: 1341: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1318: 1310: 1308: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1286: 1285:Alfred Tarski 1283: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1254:Peter Galison 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1237: 1233: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1213: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1181: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1141:Nathan Salmon 1139: 1137: 1136:Richard Rorty 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1106:Alonzo Church 1104: 1103: 1101: 1097: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1073: 1069: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1042:Ruth Millikan 1040: 1038: 1037:John McDowell 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1014: 1012: 1010: 1006: 1000: 997: 995: 992: 991: 989: 985: 979: 976: 974: 971: 969: 968:Hilary Putnam 966: 964: 963:Robert Nozick 961: 959: 956: 954: 951: 949: 946: 944: 941: 939: 936: 934: 931: 930: 928: 924: 914: 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 893:Rudolf Carnap 891: 890: 888: 886: 885:Vienna Circle 882: 876: 873: 871: 868: 867: 865: 863: 862:Berlin Circle 859: 853: 850: 848: 845: 844: 842: 840: 836: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 815: 812: 810: 807: 805: 802: 800: 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 769:Philippa Foot 767: 765: 762: 760: 757: 755: 752: 750: 747: 746: 744: 742: 738: 732: 729: 727: 724: 722: 719: 717: 716:Graham Priest 714: 712: 709: 707: 704: 702: 699: 697: 696:Charlie Broad 694: 692: 689: 688: 686: 682: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 652: 650: 648: 644: 638: 635: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 607:Gottlob Frege 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 594: 592: 588: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 549: 547: 545: 541: 535: 534:Supervenience 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 509: 505: 502: 501: 499: 495: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 433:Functionalism 431: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 418:Descriptivism 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 405: 403: 399: 389: 386: 384: 383:Philosophical 381: 379: 376: 374: 373:Non-classical 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 355: 353: 349: 343: 340: 338: 335: 333: 330: 329: 327: 323: 317: 314: 312: 309: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 293: 291: 287: 284: 280: 276: 269: 264: 262: 257: 255: 250: 249: 246: 239: 236: 232: 229: 225: 222: 218: 217: 198: 194: 187: 180: 174: 170: 160: 157: 156: 150: 148: 145: 141: 131: 129: 125: 120: 118: 113: 111: 100: 93: 92: 91: 84: 83: 82: 79: 75: 73: 68: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 43: 38: 34: 30: 26: 19: 1978:Preparedness 1810:Productivity 1790:Mandeville's 1582:Opposite Day 1510:Burali-Forti 1505:Bhartrhari's 1373: 1174:Cora Diamond 1090:Morton White 958:Thomas Nagel 903:Otto Neurath 852:Ernest Nagel 799:Gilbert Ryle 794:Derek Parfit 754:J. L. Austin 701:Casimir Lewy 670:Peter Singer 665:J. L. Mackie 637:Barry Stroud 597:Noam Chomsky 590:Philosophers 524:Natural kind 507: 408:Anti-realism 368:Mathematical 342:Performative 301:Epistemology 200:. Retrieved 196: 186: 178: 173: 137: 121: 114: 106: 97: 88: 80: 76: 64: 53:, edited by 50: 40: 39:in his book 28: 24: 22: 1908:Condorcet's 1760:Giffen good 1720:Competition 1474:White horse 1449:Omnipotence 1273:Lwow-Warsaw 1259:Ian Hacking 1226:Karl Popper 1221:Thomas Kuhn 1169:Alice Crary 1131:Saul Kripke 1126:Jaegwon Kim 1121:David Lewis 1111:Jerry Fodor 1080:Susan Haack 994:Robert Audi 804:John Searle 774:Peter Geach 764:Antony Flew 711:G. E. Moore 632:Ernest Sosa 562:Possibility 311:Mathematics 296:Metaphysics 61:The paradox 37:G. E. Moore 2052:Definition 2041:Categories 1983:Prevention 1973:Parrondo's 1963:Navigation 1948:Inventor's 1943:Hedgehog's 1903:Chainstore 1886:Population 1881:New states 1815:Prosperity 1795:Mayfield's 1637:Entailment 1617:Barbershop 1530:Epimenides 1249:John DuprĂ© 1116:Kurt Gödel 1072:Pragmatism 987:Notre Dame 978:John Rawls 847:A. J. Ayer 784:R. M. Hare 779:Paul Grice 691:Arif Ahmed 478:Sense data 463:Pragmatism 337:Linguistic 214:References 202:2022-09-22 193:"Analysis" 1998:Willpower 1993:Tolerance 1968:Newcomb's 1933:Fredkin's 1820:Scitovsky 1740:Edgeworth 1735:Easterlin 1700:Antitrust 1597:Russell's 1592:Richard's 1565:Pinocchio 1520:Crocodile 1439:Newcomb's 1409:Goodman's 1404:Free will 1389:Epicurean 1360:paradoxes 1099:Princeton 898:Hans Hahn 684:Cambridge 557:Necessity 552:Actualism 423:Emotivism 388:Predicate 358:Classical 108:complete 2047:Analysis 2026:Category 1923:Ellsberg 1775:Leontief 1755:Gibson's 1750:European 1745:Ellsberg 1715:Braess's 1710:Bertrand 1688:Economic 1622:Catch-22 1602:Socratic 1444:Nihilism 1414:Hedonism 1374:Analysis 1358:Notable 1307:Category 1183:Reformed 1156:Quietism 544:Modality 504:Analysis 497:Concepts 468:Quietism 428:Feminism 401:Theories 306:Language 153:See also 33:analysis 1928:Fenno's 1893:Arrow's 1876:Alabama 1866:Abilene 1845:Tullock 1800:Metzler 1642:Lottery 1632:Drinker 1575:Yablo's 1570:Quine's 1525:Curry's 1488:Logical 1464:Sorites 1454:Preface 1434:Moore's 1419:Liberal 1394:Fiction 1209:Science 926:Harvard 572:Realism 448:Marxism 363:Deviant 332:Aretaic 316:Science 144:Plato's 134:Origins 1835:Thrift 1805:Plenty 1780:Lerner 1770:Jevons 1765:Icarus 1695:Allais 1657:Ross's 1495:Barber 1479:Zeno's 1424:Meno's 741:Oxford 1938:Green 1918:Downs 1850:Value 1785:Lucas 1652:Raven 1560:No-no 1515:Court 1500:Berry 1317:Index 351:Logic 325:Turns 237:>. 223:>. 165:Notes 142:from 2016:List 1840:Toil 1555:Card 1550:Liar 230:> 27:(or 23:The 2043:: 195:. 130:. 74:. 65:A 1670:" 1666:" 1351:e 1344:t 1337:v 510:) 506:( 267:e 260:t 253:v 205:. 20:.

Index

Moore's paradox
analysis
G. E. Moore
Principia Ethica
C. H. Langford
Paul Arthur Schilpp
conceptual analysis
analytic philosophy
intersubstitutivity
bite the bullet
Willard Van Orman Quine
analytic–synthetic distinction
Meno's paradox
Plato's
dialogue of the same name
Sense and reference
"Analysis"
http://www.iep.utm.edu/moore
https://web.archive.org/web/20150622064448/http://www.compendioemlinha.com/uploads/6/7/1/6/6716383/greimann-definicao.pdf
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/analysis/
v
t
e
Analytic philosophy
Metaphysics
Epistemology
Language
Mathematics
Science
Aretaic

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑