340:
Skinner 'there is a sense in which we need to understand why a certain proposition has been put forward if we wish to understand the proposition itself'. He values agency over structure and stresses the importance of authorial intentions. Skinner therefore proposes to study historical sources in order to retrieve the convictions the author held, reflect on their coherence and investigate possible motives for the illocutionary act. This practical method seeks to deal with the blurred distinction between text and context and offer a meaningful way of interpreting historical reality.
375:. Additionally, according to Sedgwick, performative utterances can be 'transformative' performatives, which create an instant change of personal or environmental status, or 'promisory' performatives, which describe the world as it might be in the future. These categories are not exclusive, so an utterance may well have both qualities. As Sedgwick observes, performative utterances can be revoked, either by the person who uttered them ("I take back my promise"), or by some other party not immediately involved, like the state (for example,
323:
Performativity has a political aspect that consists in what
Derrida has described as the breaking force, by which an utterance changes its context. Butler assigns an important role to what Austin has called infelicities and parasitic uses of language. Quotations, parodies and other deviations from official discourse can become instruments of power that affect society.
273:, it states that neither the meaning, nor the context of a text can be defined in its entirety. Instead of emphasizing linguistic rules, scholars within this strand stress that the performative utterance is intertwined with structures of power. Because a text inevitably changes a situation or discourse, the distinction between text and context is blurred.
176:
conditions have to be met (e.g. a person who pronounces a marriage must be authorized to do so). Besides the context, the performative utterance itself is unambiguous as well. The words of an illocutionary act have to be expressed in earnest; if not, Austin discards them as a parasitic use of language.
291:
holds with Austin and Searle that by illocutionary force, language itself can transform and effect. However, he criticizes the notion of 'felicity conditions' and the idea that the success of a performative utterance is determined by conventions. Derrida values the distinctiveness of every individual
231:
to its broader context, that is to say everything outside the text itself. The question whether a performative is separable from the situation it emerged in is relevant when one addresses for example the status of individual intentions or speech as a resource of power. There are two main theoretical
470:
In 1972 Jacques
Derrida published the article 'Signature Événement Contexte', in which he criticises several aspects of Austin's theory on the performative utterance. The first English translation appeared in 1977 in the first volume of Glyph. In the second volume (1977) Searle published an article
339:
Skinner agrees with
Derrida that contexts in their entirety are irretrievable but nevertheless states that there is a relevant context outside the text that can be described in a plausible way. Extensive research is required to relate historical texts to their contemporary discourses. According to
188:
tried to develop his own account of speech acts, suggesting that these acts are a form of rule-governed behaviour. On the one hand, Searle discerns rules that merely regulate language, such as referring and predicating. These rules account for the "propositional content" of sentences. On the other
175:
Every performative utterance has its own procedure and risks of failure that Austin calls 'infelicities'. He sees a sharp distinction between the individual text and the 'total speech act situation' surrounding it. According to Austin, in order to successfully perform an illocutionary act, certain
307:
Besides the consequential effects, the dissolution of the text-context divide is also caused by iterability. Due to the possibility of repetition, the intentions of an individual actor can never be fully present in a speech act. The core of a performative utterance is therefore not constituted by
260:
that sees performance as a repeatable ritual. The focus here is largely on individual sentences in the active first person voice, rather than on politics or discourse. The syntactical analyses are firmly anchored in analytical epistemology, as the distinction between the research object and its
322:
Notwithstanding such social restraints, Butler underscores the possibility of agency. The boundaries of a discourse need continuous re-demarcation and this is where speech can escape its constriction. The emphasis on the limits of what is allowed to be said also frames that what is silenced.
335:
developed classical and postmodern theories on performative texts into a concrete research method. Using Austin's vocabulary, he seeks to recover what historical authors were doing in writing their texts, which corresponds with the performance of illocutionary acts. According to
Skinner,
232:
strands in research today. One emphasizes the predetermined conventions surrounding a performative utterance and the clear distinction between text and context. Another emphasizes the active construction of reality through spoken and written texts and is related to theories of
192:
This focus on effect implies a conscious actor and Searle assumes that language stems from an intrinsic intentionality of the mind. These intentions set the prerequisites for the performance of speech acts and Searle sets out to map their necessary and sufficient conditions.
157:. When, for instance, one uses the word "Go!" in order to command someone to leave the room then this utterance is part of the performance of a command; and the sentence, according to Austin, is neither true nor false; hence the sentence is a performative; – still, it is
189:
hand, he discerns rules that are constitutive in character and define behaviour (e.g. when making a promise). These rules are the conventions underlying performative utterances and they enable not only representation and expression, but also communication.
303:
According to
Derrida, the effects caused by a performative text are in a sense also part of it. In this way, the distinction between a text and that what is outside it dissolves. For this reason it is pointless to try to define the context of a speech act.
255:
Early theories acknowledge that performance and text are both embedded in a system of rules and that the effects they can produce depend on convention and recurrence. In this sense, text is an instance of 'restored behaviour', a term introduced by
208:, if "the successful performance of the speech act is sufficient to bring about the fit between words and world, to make the propositional content true." Searle believes that this double direction of fit contrasts the simple word-to-world fit of
296:, because it has a specific effect in the particular situation in which it is performed. It is because of this effect or 'breaking force' that Derrida calls the possibility of repeating a text 'iterability', a word derived from Latin
59:
philosophical claim that the utterances always "describe" or "constate" something and are thus always true or false. After mentioning several examples of sentences which are not so used, and not truth-evaluable (among them
351:
and Robert
Harnish claimed that performatives are successful only if recipients infer the intention behind the literal meaning, and that therefore the success of the performative act is determined by the receiving side.
403:). Such a writing form is claimed to be, in itself, a form of performance. It is said to more accurately reflect the fleeting and ephemeral nature of a performance, and the various tricks of memory and
315:
offers a political interpretation of the concept of the performative utterance. Power in the form of active censorship defines and regulates the domain of a certain discourse. Indebted to the work of
336:
philosophical ideas are intertwined with claims of power. Every text is an act of communication that positions itself in relation to the status quo it seeks to change.
154:
471:
called: 'Reiterating the differences: a reply to
Derrida', in which he defended Austin's theories. Derrida responded with the essay 'Limited Inc a b c...', (1977).
147:
392:
603:
404:
153:; to utter an "explicit" performative sentence is to make explicit what act one is performing. However, there are also "implicit", "primitive", or
276:
Austin and Searle thought in terms of demarcated contexts and transparent intentions, two issues that in the 1970s led Searle into polemics with
1424:
209:
723:
269:
The second set of theories on performance and text diverged from the tradition represented by Austin and Searle. Bearing the stamp of
111:), the performance of which, again, would not normally be described as simply "saying" or "describing" something (cf. Austin 1962, 5).
1197:
107:
The uttering of a performative is, or is part of, the doing of a certain kind of action (Austin later deals with them under the name
168:
As Austin observes, the acts purported to be performed by performative utterances may be socially contested. For instance,
92:
true or false; and he calls such sentences "constatives". In contrast to them, Austin defines "performatives" as follows:
1065:
732:
214:
200:
that performatives are true or false just like constatives. Searle further claimed that performatives are what he calls
505:
319:, Butler expounds how subjects are produced by their context, because the possibilities of speech are predetermined.
84:
In order to define performatives, Austin refers to those sentences which conform to the old prejudice in that they
227:
Building on the notion of performative utterances, scholars have theorized on the relation of a spoken or written
1419:
1152:
104:; instead when something is wrong with them then they are "unhappy", while if nothing is wrong they are "happy".
1273:
1147:
806:
716:
925:
746:
811:
47:
1293:
955:
776:
146:
As Austin later notices himself, these examples belong (more or less strikingly) to what Austin calls,
1298:
1248:
1010:
899:
709:
1358:
1217:
796:
1353:
894:
204:; this is a technical notion of Searle's account: according to his conception, an utterance is a
165:
performative, for it does not make explicit that the act the speaker is performing is a command.
42:
which not only describe a given reality, but also change the social reality they are describing.
129:
take this woman to be my lawful wedded wife)" – as uttered in the course of a marriage ceremony.
1383:
1020:
995:
935:
834:
766:
368:
228:
39:
27:
1278:
1172:
1137:
1025:
1000:
844:
761:
308:
animating intentions, as Austin and Searle would have it, but by the structure of language.
1263:
1070:
849:
388:
252:, proving their methodological use for example in the interpretation of historical texts.
8:
1414:
1348:
1313:
1258:
1202:
1105:
1090:
1060:
1040:
1015:
884:
869:
646:
421:
1393:
1318:
1288:
1253:
1233:
1162:
1142:
1080:
1075:
985:
975:
960:
904:
655:
31:
701:
1373:
1328:
1308:
1268:
1207:
1177:
1157:
950:
879:
501:
441:
257:
241:
108:
73:
1378:
1303:
1192:
970:
691:
169:
644:
Bach, Kent; Harnish, Robert (August 1981). "Linguistic
Communication and Speech".
1182:
1085:
980:
945:
400:
332:
316:
288:
281:
245:
1368:
1363:
1283:
1167:
1045:
940:
781:
451:
20:
1408:
1055:
1030:
864:
696:
436:
312:
270:
101:
65:
19:
For the broader philosophical and critical applications of the concept, see
1323:
1243:
1110:
990:
874:
854:
426:
416:
376:
360:
233:
52:
391:; they are used as a justification for an attempt to create a new form of
1238:
1212:
1095:
859:
786:
431:
396:
185:
61:
407:
that happen in the mind of the viewer during and after the performance.
1388:
1035:
801:
756:
751:
659:
446:
293:
277:
249:
72:
and "ethical" propositions), he introduces "performative" sentences or
69:
56:
633:. Vol. 1 regarding method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
172:, may be accepted to constitute a divorce by some, but not by others.
1187:
1005:
930:
909:
839:
791:
771:
348:
237:
139:"I give and bequeath my watch to my brother" – as occurring in a will
1100:
889:
372:
355:
240:. The ideas about performance and text have contributed to the
965:
97:
364:
142:"I bet you sixpence it will rain tomorrow" (Austin 1962, 5)
363:
argued that there are performative aspects to nearly all
125:
731:
88:
used to describe or constate something, and which thus
170:"I divorce you", said three times by a man to his wife
579:
Derrida, Jacques (1988). "Signature Event
Context".
524:
Speech Acts, an essay in the philosophy of language
184:Building on Austin's thought, language philosopher
544:Intentionality, an essay in the philosophy of mind
1406:
1198:Segmented discourse representation theory (SDRT)
604:Excitable speech: A politics of the performative
16:Category of utterances in philosophy of language
624:
622:
620:
618:
616:
614:
574:
572:
570:
568:
717:
596:
594:
592:
590:
561:. New York: Taylor & Francis. p. 36.
537:
535:
533:
517:
515:
513:
492:
490:
488:
45:In a 1955 lecture series, later published as
356:Performativeness as non-dichotomous variable
643:
611:
565:
724:
710:
587:
530:
510:
485:
556:
326:
264:
261:context is not conceived as problematic.
672:
546:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
526:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
628:
578:
382:
1407:
600:
541:
521:
79:
1153:Discourse representation theory (DRT)
705:
343:
559:Performance Studies, an Introduction
222:
1425:Formal semantics (natural language)
1066:Quantificational variability effect
733:Formal semantics (natural language)
13:
196:Searle argued in his 1989 article
14:
1436:
685:
387:The above ideas have influenced
96:Performative utterances are not
666:
500:Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
1148:Combinatory categorial grammar
637:
550:
464:
179:
1:
926:Antecedent-contained deletion
692:'Performative' on Glottopedia
478:
7:
557:Schechner, Richard (2006).
498:How to Do Things with Words
410:
287:The postmodern philosopher
48:How to Do Things with Words
10:
1441:
807:Syntax–semantics interface
155:"inexplicit" performatives
18:
1341:
1299:Question under discussion
1249:Conversational scoreboard
1226:
1130:
1123:
1026:Intersective modification
1011:Homogeneity (linguistics)
918:
827:
820:
739:
629:Skinner, Quentin (2003).
1359:Distributional semantics
677:. Duke University Press.
542:Searle, John R. (1983).
522:Searle, John R. (1974).
457:
379:vows pre-legalisation).
119:Austin gives are these:
115:The initial examples of
1354:Computational semantics
1091:Subsective modification
895:Propositional attitudes
601:Butler, Judith (1997).
36:performative utterances
1420:Philosophy of language
1384:Philosophy of language
1021:Inalienable possession
1001:Free choice inferences
996:Faultless disagreement
767:Generalized quantifier
673:Sedgwick, Eve (2003).
607:. New York: Routledge.
327:Historical methodology
265:Postmodernist theories
198:How Performatives Work
132:"I name this ship the
117:performative sentences
28:philosophy of language
1279:Plural quantification
1173:Inquisitive semantics
1138:Alternative semantics
76:as another instance.
1264:Function application
1071:Responsive predicate
1061:Privative adjectives
389:performative writing
383:Performative writing
1349:Cognitive semantics
1314:Strawson entailment
1259:Existential closure
1203:Situation semantics
1106:Temperature paradox
1076:Rising declaratives
1041:Modal subordination
1016:Hurford disjunction
976:Discourse relations
647:Language in Society
631:Visions of Politics
422:Illocutionary force
80:Austin's definition
1394:Semantics of logic
1319:Strict conditional
1289:Quantifier raising
1254:Downward entailing
1234:Autonomy of syntax
1163:Generative grammar
1143:Categorial grammar
1081:Scalar implicature
986:Epistemic modality
961:De dicto and de re
344:The receiving side
109:illocutionary acts
32:speech acts theory
1402:
1401:
1374:Logic translation
1337:
1336:
1329:Universal grinder
1309:Squiggle operator
1269:Meaning postulate
1208:Supervaluationism
1178:Intensional logic
1158:Dynamic semantics
1119:
1118:
951:Crossover effects
900:Tense–aspect–mood
880:Lexical semantics
442:Performative turn
258:Richard Schechner
242:performative turn
223:Performative text
74:illocutionary act
55:argued against a
1432:
1379:Linguistics wars
1304:Semantic parsing
1193:Montague grammar
1128:
1127:
971:Deontic modality
825:
824:
812:Truth conditions
747:Compositionality
740:Central concepts
726:
719:
712:
703:
702:
679:
678:
675:Touching Feeling
670:
664:
663:
641:
635:
634:
626:
609:
608:
598:
585:
584:
576:
563:
562:
554:
548:
547:
539:
528:
527:
519:
508:
494:
472:
468:
393:critical writing
311:The philosopher
218:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1398:
1333:
1222:
1183:Lambda calculus
1115:
1086:Sloppy identity
1046:Opaque contexts
981:Donkey anaphora
946:Counterfactuals
914:
816:
735:
730:
697:Dinosaur Comics
688:
683:
682:
671:
667:
642:
638:
627:
612:
599:
588:
577:
566:
555:
551:
540:
531:
520:
511:
495:
486:
481:
476:
475:
469:
465:
460:
413:
401:performance art
385:
358:
346:
333:Quentin Skinner
329:
317:Michel Foucault
289:Jacques Derrida
282:Jacques Derrida
267:
246:social sciences
225:
212:
182:
134:Queen Elizabeth
102:truth-evaluable
100:, that is, not
82:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1438:
1428:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1369:Inferentialism
1366:
1364:Formal grammar
1361:
1356:
1351:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1332:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1284:Possible world
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1230:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1221:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1168:Glue semantics
1165:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1140:
1134:
1132:
1131:Formal systems
1125:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1056:Polarity items
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
941:Conservativity
938:
933:
928:
922:
920:
916:
915:
913:
912:
907:
905:Quantification
902:
897:
892:
887:
882:
877:
872:
867:
862:
857:
852:
847:
842:
837:
831:
829:
822:
818:
817:
815:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
782:Presupposition
779:
774:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
743:
741:
737:
736:
729:
728:
721:
714:
706:
700:
699:
694:
687:
686:External links
684:
681:
680:
665:
654:(2): 270–274.
636:
610:
586:
564:
549:
529:
509:
483:
482:
480:
477:
474:
473:
462:
461:
459:
456:
455:
454:
452:Performativity
449:
444:
439:
434:
429:
424:
419:
412:
409:
405:referentiality
384:
381:
357:
354:
345:
342:
331:The historian
328:
325:
266:
263:
224:
221:
181:
178:
144:
143:
140:
137:
130:
113:
112:
105:
81:
78:
66:interrogatives
21:Performativity
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1437:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1410:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1340:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1229:
1225:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1122:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1051:Performatives
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1031:Logophoricity
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
923:
921:
917:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
896:
893:
891:
888:
886:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
871:
868:
866:
865:Evidentiality
863:
861:
858:
856:
853:
851:
848:
846:
843:
841:
838:
836:
833:
832:
830:
826:
823:
819:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
744:
742:
738:
734:
727:
722:
720:
715:
713:
708:
707:
704:
698:
695:
693:
690:
689:
676:
669:
661:
657:
653:
649:
648:
640:
632:
625:
623:
621:
619:
617:
615:
606:
605:
597:
595:
593:
591:
582:
575:
573:
571:
569:
560:
553:
545:
538:
536:
534:
525:
518:
516:
514:
507:
506:0-19-824553-X
503:
499:
496:Austin, J.L.
493:
491:
489:
484:
467:
463:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
437:Judith Butler
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
423:
420:
418:
415:
414:
408:
406:
402:
399:(often about
398:
394:
390:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
353:
350:
341:
337:
334:
324:
320:
318:
314:
313:Judith Butler
309:
305:
301:
300:, to repeat.
299:
295:
290:
285:
283:
279:
274:
272:
271:postmodernism
262:
259:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
230:
220:
216:
211:
207:
203:
199:
194:
190:
187:
177:
173:
171:
166:
164:
160:
156:
152:
151:performatives
150:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:
122:
121:
120:
118:
110:
106:
103:
99:
98:true or false
95:
94:
93:
91:
87:
77:
75:
71:
67:
63:
58:
54:
50:
49:
43:
41:
37:
33:
29:
22:
1324:Type shifter
1294:Quantization
1244:Continuation
1111:Veridicality
1050:
991:Exhaustivity
956:Cumulativity
875:Indexicality
855:Definiteness
850:Conditionals
777:Logical form
674:
668:
651:
645:
639:
630:
602:
580:
558:
552:
543:
523:
497:
466:
427:J. L. Austin
417:Eve Sedgwick
386:
377:gay marriage
361:Eve Sedgwick
359:
347:
338:
330:
321:
310:
306:
302:
297:
286:
275:
268:
254:
234:human agency
226:
205:
202:declarations
201:
197:
195:
191:
183:
174:
167:
162:
158:
148:
145:
133:
124:
116:
114:
89:
85:
83:
53:J. L. Austin
46:
44:
35:
25:
1239:Context set
1213:Type theory
1096:Subtrigging
860:Disjunction
787:Proposition
581:Limited Inc
432:John Searle
397:performance
213: [
206:declaration
186:John Searle
180:John Searle
64:sentences,
62:nonsensical
1415:Pragmatics
1409:Categories
1389:Pragmatics
1036:Mirativity
802:Speech act
757:Entailment
752:Denotation
479:References
447:Pragmatics
294:speech act
278:postmodern
250:humanities
210:assertives
70:directives
57:positivist
1188:Mereology
1124:Formalism
1006:Givenness
931:Cataphora
919:Phenomena
910:Vagueness
840:Ambiguity
792:Reference
772:Intension
762:Extension
369:sentences
349:Kent Bach
238:discourse
40:sentences
1342:See also
1227:Concepts
1101:Telicity
936:Coercion
890:Negation
885:Modality
835:Anaphora
411:See also
280:thinker
163:explicit
149:explicit
845:Binding
660:4167219
583:: 1–23.
373:phrases
298:iterare
244:in the
123:"I do (
26:In the
1274:Monads
821:Topics
658:
504:
395:about
371:, and
966:De se
870:Focus
828:Areas
797:Scope
656:JSTOR
458:Notes
365:words
217:]
502:ISBN
248:and
236:and
229:text
38:are
30:and
1218:TTR
161:an
159:not
126:sc.
90:are
86:are
1411::
652:10
650:.
613:^
589:^
567:^
532:^
512:^
487:^
367:,
284:.
219:.
215:de
68:,
51:,
34:,
725:e
718:t
711:v
662:.
136:"
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.