Knowledge

Quantitative structure–activity relationship

Source 📝

80:) when a chemical property is modeled as the response variable. "Different properties or behaviors of chemical molecules have been investigated in the field of QSPR. Some examples are quantitative structure–reactivity relationships (QSRRs), quantitative structure–chromatography relationships (QSCRs) and, quantitative structure–toxicity relationships (QSTRs), quantitative structure–electrochemistry relationships (QSERs), and quantitative structure– 232:
the basis of pre-defined chemical rules in case of non-congeneric sets. GQSAR also considers cross-terms fragment descriptors, which could be helpful in identification of key fragment interactions in determining variation of activity. Lead discovery using fragnomics is an emerging paradigm. In this context FB-QSAR proves to be a promising strategy for fragment library design and in fragment-to-lead identification endeavours.
414: 476:. Obtaining a good quality QSAR model depends on many factors, such as the quality of input data, the choice of descriptors and statistical methods for modeling and for validation. Any QSAR modeling should ultimately lead to statistically robust and predictive models capable of making accurate and reliable predictions of the modeled response of new compounds. 269:, rather than experimental constants and is concerned with the overall molecule rather than a single substituent. The first 3-D QSAR was named Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) by Cramer et al. It examined the steric fields (shape of the molecule) and the electrostatic fields which were correlated by means of 231:
Group or fragment-based QSAR is also known as GQSAR. GQSAR allows flexibility to study various molecular fragments of interest in relation to the variation in biological response. The molecular fragments could be substituents at various substitution sites in congeneric set of molecules or could be on
296:
by encoding molecules as sets of data instances, each of which represents a possible molecular conformation. A label or response is assigned to each set corresponding to the activity of the molecule, which is assumed to be determined by at least one instance in the set (i.e. some conformation of the
308:
In this approach, descriptors quantifying various electronic, geometric, or steric properties of a molecule are computed and used to develop a QSAR. This approach is different from the fragment (or group contribution) approach in that the descriptors are computed for the system as whole rather than
235:
An advanced approach on fragment or group-based QSAR based on the concept of pharmacophore-similarity is developed. This method, pharmacophore-similarity-based QSAR (PS-QSAR) uses topological pharmacophoric descriptors to develop QSAR models. This activity prediction may assist the contribution of
516:
Different aspects of validation of QSAR models that need attention include methods of selection of training set compounds, setting training set size and impact of variable selection for training set models for determining the quality of prediction. Development of novel validation parameters for
500:
The success of any QSAR model depends on accuracy of the input data, selection of appropriate descriptors and statistical tools, and most importantly validation of the developed model. Validation is the process by which the reliability and relevance of a procedure are established for a specific
87:
As an example, biological activity can be expressed quantitatively as the concentration of a substance required to give a certain biological response. Additionally, when physicochemical properties or structures are expressed by numbers, one can find a mathematical relationship, or quantitative
227:
of compound can be determined by the sum of its fragments; fragment-based methods are generally accepted as better predictors than atomic-based methods. Fragmentary values have been determined statistically, based on empirical data for known logP values. This method gives mixed results and is
2017:
Manz TA, Phomphrai K, Medvedev G, Krishnamurthy BB, Sharma S, Haq J, Novstrup KA, Thomson KT, Delgass WN, Caruthers JM, Abu-Omar MM (Apr 2007). "Structure-activity correlation in titanium single-site olefin polymerization catalysts containing mixed cyclopentadienyl/aryloxide ligation".
512:
cross-validation generally leads to an overestimation of predictive capacity. Even with external validation, it is difficult to determine whether the selection of training and test sets was manipulated to maximize the predictive capacity of the model being published.
3255:
Fabian Pedregosa; Gaël Varoquaux; Alexandre Gramfort; Vincent Michel; Bertrand Thirion; Olivier Grisel; Mathieu Blondel; Peter Prettenhofer; Ron Weiss; Vincent Dubourg; Jake Vanderplas; Alexandre Passos; David Cournapeau; Matthieu Perrot; Édouard Duchesnay (2011).
368:
problem (i.e., which structural features should be interpreted to determine the structure-activity relationship). Feature selection can be accomplished by visual inspection (qualitative selection by a human); by data mining; or by molecule mining.
256:
calculations requiring three-dimensional structures of a given set of small molecules with known activities (training set). The training set needs to be superimposed (aligned) by either experimental data (e.g. based on ligand-protein
309:
from the properties of individual fragments. This approach is different from the 3D-QSAR approach in that the descriptors are computed from scalar quantities (e.g., energies, geometric parameters) rather than from 3D fields.
2053:
Manz TA, Caruthers JM, Sharma S, Phomphrai K, Thomson KT, Delgass WN, Abu-Omar MM (2012). "Structure–Activity Correlation for Relative Chain Initiation to Propagation Rates in Single-Site Olefin Polymerization Catalysis".
2851:
Chirico N, Gramatica P (Sep 2011). "Real external predictivity of QSAR models: how to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient".
456:(including desirable therapeutic effect and undesirable side effects) or physico-chemical properties in QSPR models of chemicals (drugs/toxicants/environmental pollutants) with descriptors representative of 41:
or classification models used in the chemical and biological sciences and engineering. Like other regression models, QSAR regression models relate a set of "predictor" variables (X) to the potency of the
484: 1570:
Chirico N, Gramatica P (Aug 2012). "Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection".
1990:
Caruthers JM, Lauterbach JA, Thomson KT, Venkatasubramanian V, Snively CM, Bhan A, Katare S, Oskarsdottir G (2003). "Catalyst design: knowledge extraction from high-throughput experimentation".
3056:
Fioravanzo, E.; Bassan, A.; Pavan, M.; Mostrag-Szlichtyng, A.; Worth, A. P. (2012-04-01). "Role of in silico genotoxicity tools in the regulatory assessment of pharmaceutical impurities".
683: 690:
toxicological assessment of genotoxic impurities. Commonly used QSAR assessment software such as DEREK or CASE Ultra (MultiCASE) is used to genotoxicity of impurity according to ICH M7.
336:
Similarly to string-based methods, the molecular graph can directly be used as input for QSAR models, but usually yield inferior performance compared to descriptor-based QSAR models.
88:
structure-activity relationship, between the two. The mathematical expression, if carefully validated, can then be used to predict the modeled response of other chemical structures.
1812:
Manoharan P, Vijayan RS, Ghoshal N (Oct 2010). "Rationalizing fragment based drug discovery for BACE1: insights from FB-QSAR, FB-QSSR, multi objective (MO-QSPR) and MIF studies".
487:(actually, while extracting data, cross validation is a measure of model robustness, the more a model is robust (higher q2) the less data extraction perturb the original model); 1867: 402:
approaches, apply a similarity matrix based prediction or an automatic fragmentation scheme into molecular substructures. Furthermore, there exist also approaches using
705:, and so is less reliable (on average) than prediction within the applicability domain. The assessment of the reliability of QSAR predictions remains a research topic. 1447:, Gramatica P, Gombar VJ (2003). "The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models". 300:
On June 18, 2011 the Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) patent has dropped any restriction on the use of GRID and partial least-squares (PLS) technologies.
364:
Computer SAR models typically calculate a relatively large number of features. Because those lack structural interpretation ability, the preprocessing steps face a
219:"—a measurement of differential solubility and itself a component of QSAR predictions—can be predicted either by atomic methods (known as "XLogP" or "ALogP") or by 2123:
Mayr, Andreas; Klambauer, Günter; Unterthiner, Thomas; Steijaert, Marvin; Wegner, Jörg K.; Ceulemans, Hugo; Clevert, Djork-Arné; Hochreiter, Sepp (20 June 2018).
561:. There is a clear trend in the increase of boiling point with an increase in the number carbons, and this serves as a means for predicting the boiling points of 686:
regulation, where "REACH" abbreviates "Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals". Regulatory application of QSAR methods includes
3310:"Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship and docking studies in a series of anthocyanin derivatives as cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors" 1372:
Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V (Jul 2010). "Advances in computational methods to predict the biological activity of compounds".
3389: 3107: 2274:
Jiang, Dejun; Wu, Zhenxing; Hsieh, Chang-Yu; Chen, Guangyong; Liao, Ben; Wang, Zhe; Shen, Chao; Cao, Dongsheng; Wu, Jian; Hou, Tingjun (17 February 2021).
2765:
Put R, Vander Heyden Y (Oct 2007). "Review on modelling aspects in reversed-phase liquid chromatographic quantitative structure-retention relationships".
325: 1345:
Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Naenna T, Prachayasittikul V (2009). "A practical overview of quantitative structure-activity relationship".
2276:"Could graph neural networks learn better molecular representation for drug discovery? A comparison study of descriptor-based and graph-based models" 1174: 3106:
ICH M7 Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk - Scientific guideline
490:
external validation by splitting the available data set into training set for model development and prediction set for model predictivity check;
1302:
Ghasemi, Pérez-Sánchez; Mehri, Pérez-Garrido (2018). "Neural network and deep-learning algorithms used in QSAR studies: merits and drawbacks".
2172:
Merkwirth, Christian; Lengauer, Thomas (1 September 2005). "Automatic Generation of Complementary Descriptors with Molecular Graph Networks".
3486: 111: 403: 889: 654:
method to reduce the risk for a SAR paradox, especially taking into account that only a finite amount of data is available (see also
496:
data randomization or Y-scrambling for verifying the absence of chance correlation between the response and the modeling descriptors.
1183: 2738:
Roy PP, Leonard JT, Roy K (2008). "Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models".
1118: 3298: 3040: 3015: 2896: 2601: 2408: 2383: 1947: 1922: 1703: 1286: 1257: 1222: 631:
While many quantitative structure activity relationship analyses involve the interactions of a family of molecules with an
2102:
Bjerrum, Esben Jannik (17 May 2017). "SMILES Enumeration as Data Augmentation for Neural Network Modeling of Molecules".
1963:
Dietterich TG, Lathrop RH, Lozano-Pérez T (1997). "Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles".
655: 153: 236:
certain pharmacophore features encoded by respective fragments toward activity improvement and/or detrimental effects.
46:(Y), while classification QSAR models relate the predictor variables to a categorical value of the response variable. 3479: 2933: 2617:
Roy K (Dec 2007). "On some aspects of validation of predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship models".
3643: 3449: 3155:"AZOrange - High performance open source machine learning for QSAR modeling in a graphical programming environment" 2660:
Sahigara, Faizan; Mansouri, Kamel; Ballabio, Davide; Mauri, Andrea; Consonni, Viviana; Todeschini, Roberto (2012).
1029: 1013: 604:
often involves the use of QSAR to identify chemical structures that could have good inhibitory effects on specific
270: 2711:
Leonard JT, Roy K (2006). "On selection of training and test sets for the development of predictive QSAR models".
817: 152:
is that similar molecules have similar activities. This principle is also called Structure–Activity Relationship (
3407: 1164: 1128: 643:
of proteins. Protein-protein interactions can be quantitatively analyzed for structural variations resulted from
553:
between structure and observed properties. A simple example is the relationship between the number of carbons in
437: 436:
is seen as a "black box", which fails to guide medicinal chemists. Recently there is a relatively new concept of
427: 195:: the generation of hypotheses that fit training data very closely but perform poorly when applied to new data. 1516:"QSAR DataBank repository: open and linked qualitative and quantitative structure–activity relationship models" 1418:
Yousefinejad S, Hemmateenejad B (2015). "Chemometrics tools in QSAR/QSPR studies: A historical perspective".
1112: 1064: 1033: 1017: 2081:
Jastrzębski, Stanisław; Leśniak, Damian; Czarnecki, Wojciech Marian (8 March 2018). "Learning to SMILE(S)".
1239: 3628: 3472: 1025: 959: 708:
The QSAR equations can be used to predict biological activities of newer molecules before their synthesis.
3283: 3206:"Alvascience: A New Software Suite for the QSAR Workflow Applied to the Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability" 2461:"Prediction-driven matched molecular pairs to interpret QSARs and aid the molecular optimization process" 919: 3562: 3425: 625: 577: 293: 2592:
Wold S, Eriksson L (1995). "Statistical validation of QSAR results". In Waterbeemd, Han van de (ed.).
1138: 701:. Prediction of properties of novel chemicals that are located outside the applicability domain uses 644: 385: 220: 3638: 3118:
Lavecchia A (Mar 2015). "Machine-learning approaches in drug discovery: methods and applications".
1768:
Wildman SA, Crippen GM (1999). "Prediction of physicochemical parameters by atomic contributions".
659: 281: 118:) and observational variability, that is, the variability in observations even on a correct model. 1868:"Pharmacophore-similarity-based QSAR (PS-QSAR) for group-specific biological activity predictions" 3633: 1204: 1123: 636: 538: 440:
or prediction driven MMPA which is coupled with QSAR model in order to identify activity cliffs.
266: 253: 2424:
Dossetter AG, Griffen EJ, Leach AG (2013). "Matched molecular pair analysis in drug discovery".
202:
refers to the fact that it is not the case that all similar molecules have similar activities .
3547: 2207:
Kearnes, Steven; McCloskey, Kevin; Berndl, Marc; Pande, Vijay; Riley, Patrick (1 August 2016).
1037: 1021: 1009: 501:
purpose; for QSAR models validation must be mainly for robustness, prediction performances and
399: 377: 313: 289: 3254: 3567: 1143: 613: 345: 224: 216: 172:, target activity, and so on, might depend on another difference. Examples were given in the 1721:"On the hydrophobicity of peptides: Comparing empirical predictions of peptide log P values" 1274: 2962: 2550: 2230: 1821: 1133: 893: 698: 502: 115: 66: 50: 17: 8: 3582: 3572: 3496: 2125:"Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for drug target prediction on ChEMBL" 593: 453: 389: 353: 62: 54: 38: 2966: 2951:"Structural modeling extends QSAR analysis of antibody-lysozyme interactions to 3D-QSAR" 2554: 2234: 1825: 3648: 3336: 3309: 3232: 3205: 3181: 3154: 3089: 2983: 2950: 2925: 2828: 2801: 2688: 2661: 2642: 2574: 2487: 2460: 2376:
Algorithms on strings, trees, and sequences: computer science and computational biology
2351: 2326: 2302: 2275: 2251: 2220: 2208: 2149: 2124: 2103: 2082: 1895: 1845: 1745: 1720: 1641: 1542: 1515: 1397: 1344: 1327: 1238:
Mauri, Andrea; Consonni, Viviana; Todeschini, Roberto (2017). "Molecular Descriptors".
1169: 461: 457: 349: 277: 92: 58: 49:
In QSAR modeling, the predictors consist of physico-chemical properties or theoretical
2974: 2662:"Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models" 2003: 1976: 1659:
Patani GA, LaVoie EJ (Dec 1996). "Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design".
3557: 3460:
Multiscale Conceptual Model Figures for QSARs in Biological and Environmental Science
3341: 3294: 3237: 3186: 3135: 3081: 3073: 3036: 3011: 2988: 2929: 2892: 2869: 2833: 2782: 2693: 2634: 2597: 2566: 2492: 2441: 2404: 2379: 2356: 2307: 2256: 2189: 2154: 2035: 1943: 1918: 1887: 1837: 1750: 1699: 1676: 1633: 1625: 1605: 1587: 1547: 1444: 1389: 1319: 1282: 1253: 1218: 640: 605: 597: 546: 542: 449: 365: 165: 161: 43: 2646: 2578: 1899: 1645: 1401: 1331: 697:
is generated by a particular training set of chemicals is called the training set's
3592: 3587: 3552: 3537: 3397: 3331: 3321: 3227: 3217: 3176: 3166: 3127: 3093: 3065: 2978: 2970: 2921: 2912:
Fraczkiewicz, R (2013). "In Silico Prediction of Ionization". In Reedijk, J (ed.).
2861: 2823: 2813: 2774: 2751: 2747: 2720: 2683: 2673: 2626: 2558: 2523: 2482: 2472: 2433: 2346: 2338: 2297: 2287: 2246: 2238: 2181: 2144: 2136: 2063: 2027: 1999: 1972: 1879: 1849: 1829: 1777: 1740: 1732: 1668: 1617: 1608:(2010). "Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation". 1579: 1537: 1527: 1494: 1486: 1477:
Gramatica P (2007). "Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external".
1456: 1427: 1423: 1381: 1354: 1311: 1245: 1210: 1148: 651: 569: 473: 433: 285: 180: 81: 3512: 3453: 3131: 3069: 2437: 1883: 1385: 1371: 1315: 1249: 1179: 1107: 675: 465: 395: 262: 258: 3464: 324:
It has been shown that activity prediction is even possible based purely on the
312:
An example of this approach is the QSARs developed for olefin polymerization by
3577: 3542: 3257: 2630: 2292: 679: 601: 562: 469: 2818: 2778: 2678: 2562: 2477: 2325:
van Tilborg, Derek; Alenicheva, Alisa; Grisoni, Francesca (12 December 2022).
2242: 1833: 1532: 1074: 57:
of the chemicals. QSAR models first summarize a supposed relationship between
3622: 3602: 3527: 3517: 3077: 2527: 2342: 2327:"Exposing the Limitations of Molecular Machine Learning with Activity Cliffs" 1629: 1153: 760: 702: 573: 558: 531: 381: 173: 1989: 344:
In the literature it can be often found that chemists have a preference for
3597: 3402: 3345: 3241: 3190: 3171: 3139: 3085: 2992: 2918:
Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering
2873: 2837: 2786: 2724: 2697: 2638: 2570: 2496: 2445: 2360: 2311: 2260: 2193: 2158: 2039: 1891: 1841: 1754: 1736: 1680: 1637: 1621: 1591: 1551: 1490: 1460: 1393: 1323: 1060: 621: 407: 3222: 2914:
Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering
1214: 639:
binding site, QSAR can also be used to study the interactions between the
493:
blind external validation by application of model on new external data and
3532: 2459:
Sushko Y, Novotarskyi S, Körner R, Vogt J, Abdelaziz A, Tetko IV (2014).
1499: 1044: 960:"MOA Massive Online Analysis | Real Time Analytics for Data Streams" 818:"Weka 3 - Data Mining with Open Source Machine Learning Software in Java" 694: 550: 373: 192: 3446: 3326: 1358: 866: 130:
Selection of data set and extraction of structural/empirical descriptors
3522: 3419:
A regression program that has dual databases of over 21,000 QSAR models
3055: 2140: 821: 479:
For validation of QSAR models, usually various strategies are adopted:
188: 184: 169: 149: 2865: 2185: 2067: 2031: 1781: 1672: 1583: 1209:. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. Vol. 41. Wiley. 3006:
Timmerman H, Todeschini R, Consonni V, Mannhold R, Kubinyi H (2002).
1413: 1411: 284:). The following learning method can be any of the already mentioned 2511: 223:(known as "CLogP" and other variations). It has been shown that the 3459: 3390:"Nature Protocols: Development of QSAR models using C-QSAR program" 3005: 2225: 2108: 2087: 1718: 1070:
Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, kNN, RF, SVM, GP, ANN, and others
663: 612:(non-specific activity). Of special interest is the prediction of 609: 160:
difference on a molecular level, since each kind of activity, e.g.
2802:"On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models" 2016: 1866:
Prasanth Kumar S, Jasrai YT, Pandya HA, Rawal RM (November 2013).
1408: 2122: 1158: 963: 890:"TANAGRA - A free DATA MINING software for teaching and research" 554: 3308:
Shityakov S, Puskás I, Roewer N, Förster C, Broscheit J (2014).
923: 799:"RapidMiner | #1 Open Source Predictive Analytics Platform" 413: 228:
generally not trusted to have accuracy of more than ±0.1 units.
106:(physiochemical properties and/or structural properties) + error 1865: 632: 508:
Some validation methodologies can be problematic. For example,
468:, toxicity prediction, and regulatory decisions in addition to 3293:. Vol. 1 (6th ed.). New York: Wiley. pp. 1–48. 2510:
Tong W, Hong H, Xie Q, Shi L, Fang H, Perkins R (April 2005).
1719:
Thompson SJ, Hattotuwagama CK, Holliday JD, Flower DR (2006).
941: 779: 711:
Examples of machine learning tools for QSAR modeling include:
276:
The created data space is then usually reduced by a following
2659: 1962: 589: 530:
One of the first historical QSAR applications was to predict
3307: 3152: 2541:
Dearden JC (2003). "In silico prediction of drug toxicity".
2324: 2052: 741: 588:
The biological activity of molecules is usually measured in
464:. QSARs are being applied in many disciplines, for example: 3507: 3429: 2948: 2458: 2206: 2080: 1102: 443: 3374: 3284:"History of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships" 2209:"Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints" 452:
derived from application of statistical tools correlating
3314:
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry
1565: 1563: 1561: 1417: 1244:. Springer International Publishing. pp. 2065–2093. 847: 678:. QSARS are suggested by regulatory authorities; in the 3360: 2512:"Assessing QSAR Limitations – A Regulatory Perspective" 1811: 1237: 1045:"alvaModel: a software tool to create QSAR/QSPR models" 982: 537:
It is well known for instance that within a particular
156:). The underlying problem is therefore how to define a 2799: 1558: 1443: 1275:"Chapter 1.2: What is QSAR? Definitions and Formulism" 798: 210: 3153:
Stålring JC, Carlsson LA, Almeida P, Boyer S (2011).
2920:. Vol. 5. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 2423: 978:
Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, RF, ANN, and others
658:). In general, all QSAR problems can be divided into 620:, which is an important measure used in identifying " 179:
In general, one is more interested in finding strong
2949:
Freyhult EK, Andersson K, Gustafsson MG (Apr 2003).
2889:
Chemical graph theory: introduction and fundamentals
1279:
A primer on QSAR/QSPR modeling: Fundamental Concepts
191:
number of chemicals, so care must be taken to avoid
53:
of chemicals; the QSAR response-variable could be a
2046: 867:"AZCompTox/AZOrange: AstraZeneca add-ons to Orange" 592:to establish the level of inhibition of particular 1937: 1202: 517:judging quality of QSAR models is also important. 421: 121: 3494: 3024: 2999: 2880: 2585: 2392: 2367: 2171: 1931: 1906: 1513: 761:"LIBSVM -- A Library for Support Vector Machines" 65:in a data-set of chemicals. Second, QSAR models 3620: 3456:, Drug Theoretics and Cheminformatics Laboratory 2891:. Tunbridge Wells, Kent, England: Abacus Press. 2850: 2764: 2273: 1915:Molecular modelling: principles and applications 1872:Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 1797: 1569: 1472: 1470: 1365: 1338: 265:software. It uses computed potentials, e.g. the 3291:Burger's medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 2740:Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1420:Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1281:. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc. pp. 2–6. 1203:Todeschini, Roberto; Consonni, Viviana (2009). 3441:A comprehensive web resource for QSAR modelers 2886: 2509: 2417: 1793: 1791: 1767: 1439: 1437: 432:Typically QSAR models derived from non linear 3480: 3197: 3030: 2800:Pratim Roy P, Paul S, Mitra I, Roy K (2009). 2737: 2653: 2378:. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1861: 1859: 1467: 74:quantitative structure–property relationships 3608:Quantitative structure–activity relationship 3388:Verma, Rajeshwar P.; Hansch, Corwin (2007). 3203: 3146: 3111: 2942: 2911: 2854:Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2844: 2758: 2591: 2534: 2331:Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2174:Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2010: 1712: 1658: 1652: 1572:Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 1301: 1184:List of predicted structure based properties 742:"R: The R Project for Statistical Computing" 568:A still very interesting application is the 303: 148:The basic assumption for all molecule-based 31:Quantitative structure–activity relationship 3387: 3210:International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2452: 1788: 1598: 1434: 3487: 3473: 3258:"scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python" 2710: 2543:Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2213:Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 1856: 1814:Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 1514:Ruusmann, V.; Sild, S.; Maran, U. (2015). 1206:Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics 143: 126:The principal steps of QSAR/QSPR include: 3401: 3335: 3325: 3231: 3221: 3180: 3170: 3117: 2982: 2827: 2817: 2687: 2677: 2503: 2486: 2476: 2350: 2301: 2291: 2250: 2224: 2148: 2107: 2086: 1744: 1541: 1531: 1498: 1476: 1272: 1175:Software for molecular mechanics modeling 3281: 2905: 2793: 2403:. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis. 2373: 2020:Journal of the American Chemical Society 1917:. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall. 444:Evaluation of the quality of QSAR models 412: 3248: 3204:Mauri, Andrea; Bertola, Matteo (2022). 2610: 2594:Chemometric methods in molecular design 2540: 2101: 1940:Kernel methods in computational biology 1604: 794:SVM, RF, Naïve Bayes, DT, ANN, and k-NN 359: 14: 3621: 3361:"The Cheminformatics and QSAR Society" 3058:SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 1938:Vert JP, Schölkopf B, Tsuda K (2004). 3468: 3035:. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 2398: 1912: 1693: 176:reviews by Patanie/LaVoie and Brown. 3262:Journal of Machine Learning Research 693:The chemical descriptor space whose 348:(PLS) methods, since it applies the 3031:Duda RO, Hart PW, Stork DG (2001). 2616: 2596:. Weinheim: VCH. pp. 309–318. 1696:Bioisosteres in Medicinal Chemistry 1241:Handbook of Computational Chemistry 1024:and Consensus) and Classification ( 211:Fragment based (group contribution) 24: 3275: 2926:10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.02610-X 2516:Current Computer-Aided Drug Design 1119:Conformation–activity relationship 848:"KNIME | Open for Innovation" 448:QSAR modeling produces predictive 25: 3660: 3353: 3008:Handbook of Molecular Descriptors 1798:Ajmani S, Jadhav K, Kulkarni SA, 674:(Q)SAR models have been used for 69:the activities of new chemicals. 2713:QSAR & Combinatorial Science 2619:Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 1374:Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 1165:QSAR & Combinatorial Science 737:RF, SVM, Naïve Bayesian, and ANN 271:partial least squares regression 3100: 3049: 2731: 2704: 2318: 2267: 2200: 2165: 2116: 2095: 2074: 1983: 1956: 1805: 1761: 1687: 1507: 1129:Matched molecular pair analysis 669: 438:matched molecular pair analysis 428:Matched molecular pair analysis 422:Matched molecular pair analysis 319: 292:. An alternative approach uses 122:Essential steps in QSAR studies 2887:Rouvray DH, Bonchev D (1991). 2752:10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.07.004 1942:. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1428:10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.06.016 1295: 1266: 1231: 1196: 520: 398:approaches, a special case of 331: 13: 1: 2975:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75032-2 2004:10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00036-2 1977:10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00034-3 1273:Roy K, Kar S, Das RN (2015). 1190: 1113:Computer-assisted drug design 682:, QSARs are suggested by the 583: 392:a predictive learning model. 252:refers to the application of 3132:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.012 3070:10.1080/1062936X.2012.657236 2438:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.03.003 1884:10.1080/07391102.2013.849618 1386:10.1517/17460441.2010.492827 1316:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.06.016 1250:10.1007/978-3-319-27282-5_51 920:"ELKI Data Mining Framework" 885:SVM, RF, Naïve Bayes, and DT 7: 1095: 775:RF, SVM, and Naïve Bayesian 525: 376:based prediction uses e.g. 339: 10: 3665: 3159:Journal of Cheminformatics 2631:10.1517/17460441.2.12.1567 2465:Journal of Cheminformatics 2293:10.1186/s13321-020-00479-8 2280:Journal of Cheminformatics 1520:Journal of Cheminformatics 425: 386:artificial neural networks 294:multiple-instance learning 239: 3503: 2819:10.3390/molecules14051660 2779:10.1016/j.aca.2007.09.014 2679:10.3390/molecules17054791 2478:10.1186/s13321-014-0048-0 2243:10.1007/s10822-016-9938-8 1834:10.1007/s10822-010-9378-9 1800:Group-Based QSAR (G-QSAR) 1770:J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 1533:10.1186/s13321-015-0082-6 1139:Molecular design software 645:site-directed mutagenesis 304:Chemical descriptor based 221:chemical fragment methods 91:A QSAR has the form of a 27:Predictive chemical model 2528:10.2174/1573409053585663 2343:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01073 1422:. 149, Part B: 177–204. 843:DT, Naïve Bayes, and SVM 813:RF, SVM, and Naïve Bayes 549:, that there are strong 282:dimensionality reduction 205: 84:relationships (QSBRs)." 3644:Computational chemistry 3563:Lipinski's rule of five 3289:. In Abraham DJ (ed.). 3010:. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. 2563:10.1023/A:1025361621494 1965:Artificial Intelligence 1698:. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. 1124:Differential solubility 626:Lipinski's Rule of Five 483:internal validation or 404:maximum common subgraph 378:support vector machines 314:half sandwich compounds 290:support vector machines 267:Lennard-Jones potential 144:SAR and the SAR paradox 3447:Chemoinformatics Tools 3403:10.1038/nprot.2007.125 3172:10.1186/1758-2946-3-28 3033:Pattern classification 2767:Analytica Chimica Acta 2725:10.1002/qsar.200510161 1737:10.6026/97320630001237 1622:10.1002/minf.201000061 1491:10.1002/qsar.200610151 1461:10.1002/qsar.200390007 418: 400:structured data mining 72:Related terms include 3568:Lipophilic efficiency 3223:10.3390/ijms232112882 2401:Predictive toxicology 1610:Molecular Informatics 1215:10.1002/9783527628766 1144:Partition coefficient 614:partition coefficient 416: 346:partial least squares 217:partition coefficient 139:Validation evaluation 51:molecular descriptors 3375:"The 3D QSAR Server" 3282:Selassie CD (2003). 3120:Drug Discovery Today 2426:Drug Discovery Today 1304:Drug Discovery Today 1134:Molecular descriptor 862:RT, SVM, ANN, and RF 780:"Orange Data Mining" 699:applicability domain 505:(AD) of the models. 503:applicability domain 360:Data mining approach 3629:Medicinal chemistry 3583:New chemical entity 3573:Mechanism of action 3497:medicinal chemistry 3327:10.2147/AABC.S56478 2967:2003BpJ....84.2264F 2955:Biophysical Journal 2555:2003JCAMD..17..119D 2374:Gusfield D (1997). 2235:2016JCAMD..30..595K 1826:2010JCAMD..24..843M 1359:10.17877/DE290R-690 594:signal transduction 458:molecular structure 454:biological activity 110:The error includes 63:biological activity 59:chemical structures 55:biological activity 3452:2017-07-04 at the 2141:10.1039/c8sc00148k 1998:(1–2): 3776–3777. 1606:Tropsha, Alexander 1170:Scientific journal 650:It is part of the 641:structural domains 598:metabolic pathways 543:chemical compounds 419: 350:feature extraction 278:feature extraction 215:Analogously, the " 187:usually rely on a 136:Model construction 133:Variable selection 93:mathematical model 3616: 3615: 3558:Ligand efficiency 3394:Protocol Exchange 3300:978-0-471-27401-8 3042:978-0-471-05669-0 3017:978-3-527-29913-3 2898:978-0-85626-454-2 2866:10.1021/ci200211n 2603:978-3-527-30044-0 2432:(15–16): 724–31. 2410:978-0-8247-2397-2 2385:978-0-521-58519-4 2337:(23): 5938–5951. 2186:10.1021/ci049613b 2135:(24): 5441–5451. 2068:10.1021/om200884x 2032:10.1021/ja0640849 1949:978-0-262-19509-6 1924:978-0-582-38210-7 1913:Leach AR (2001). 1782:10.1021/ci990307l 1705:978-3-527-33015-7 1673:10.1021/cr950066q 1584:10.1021/ci300084j 1310:(10): 1784–1790. 1288:978-3-319-17281-1 1259:978-3-319-27282-5 1224:978-3-527-31852-0 1093: 1092: 942:"MALLET homepage" 547:organic chemistry 474:lead optimization 366:feature selection 166:biotransformation 44:response variable 16:(Redirected from 3656: 3593:Pharmacokinetics 3588:Pharmacodynamics 3553:Enzyme inhibitor 3538:Drug development 3489: 3482: 3475: 3466: 3465: 3443: 3438: 3437: 3428:. Archived from 3421: 3416: 3415: 3406:. Archived from 3405: 3384: 3382: 3381: 3370: 3368: 3367: 3349: 3339: 3329: 3304: 3288: 3270: 3269: 3252: 3246: 3245: 3235: 3225: 3216:(12882): 12882. 3201: 3195: 3194: 3184: 3174: 3150: 3144: 3143: 3115: 3109: 3104: 3098: 3097: 3064:(3–4): 257–277. 3053: 3047: 3046: 3028: 3022: 3021: 3003: 2997: 2996: 2986: 2946: 2940: 2939: 2909: 2903: 2902: 2884: 2878: 2877: 2848: 2842: 2841: 2831: 2821: 2797: 2791: 2790: 2762: 2756: 2755: 2735: 2729: 2728: 2708: 2702: 2701: 2691: 2681: 2672:(5): 4791–4810. 2657: 2651: 2650: 2614: 2608: 2607: 2589: 2583: 2582: 2538: 2532: 2531: 2507: 2501: 2500: 2490: 2480: 2456: 2450: 2449: 2421: 2415: 2414: 2399:Helma C (2005). 2396: 2390: 2389: 2371: 2365: 2364: 2354: 2322: 2316: 2315: 2305: 2295: 2271: 2265: 2264: 2254: 2228: 2204: 2198: 2197: 2180:(5): 1159–1168. 2169: 2163: 2162: 2152: 2129:Chemical Science 2120: 2114: 2113: 2111: 2099: 2093: 2092: 2090: 2078: 2072: 2071: 2050: 2044: 2043: 2014: 2008: 2007: 1987: 1981: 1980: 1960: 1954: 1953: 1935: 1929: 1928: 1910: 1904: 1903: 1863: 1854: 1853: 1809: 1803: 1802: 1795: 1786: 1785: 1765: 1759: 1758: 1748: 1716: 1710: 1709: 1694:Brown N (2012). 1691: 1685: 1684: 1667:(8): 3147–3176. 1661:Chemical Reviews 1656: 1650: 1649: 1616:(6–7): 476–488. 1602: 1596: 1595: 1567: 1556: 1555: 1545: 1535: 1511: 1505: 1504: 1502: 1474: 1465: 1464: 1441: 1432: 1431: 1415: 1406: 1405: 1369: 1363: 1362: 1342: 1336: 1335: 1299: 1293: 1292: 1270: 1264: 1263: 1235: 1229: 1228: 1200: 1149:Pharmacokinetics 1089: 1087: 1085: 1079:scikit-learn.org 1052: 997: 995: 993: 967: 962:. Archived from 945: 927: 922:. Archived from 904: 902: 901: 892:. Archived from 874: 851: 832: 830: 829: 820:. Archived from 802: 783: 764: 745: 714: 713: 652:machine learning 570:Hammett equation 545:, especially of 485:cross-validation 434:machine learning 286:machine learning 105: 82:biodegradability 21: 3664: 3663: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3639:Cheminformatics 3619: 3618: 3617: 3612: 3513:Bioavailability 3499: 3493: 3454:Wayback Machine 3435: 3433: 3424: 3413: 3411: 3379: 3377: 3373: 3365: 3363: 3359: 3356: 3301: 3286: 3278: 3276:Further reading 3273: 3253: 3249: 3202: 3198: 3151: 3147: 3116: 3112: 3105: 3101: 3054: 3050: 3043: 3029: 3025: 3018: 3004: 3000: 2947: 2943: 2936: 2910: 2906: 2899: 2885: 2881: 2849: 2845: 2812:(5): 1660–701. 2798: 2794: 2763: 2759: 2736: 2732: 2709: 2705: 2658: 2654: 2625:(12): 1567–77. 2615: 2611: 2604: 2590: 2586: 2549:(2–4): 119–27. 2539: 2535: 2508: 2504: 2457: 2453: 2422: 2418: 2411: 2397: 2393: 2386: 2372: 2368: 2323: 2319: 2272: 2268: 2205: 2201: 2170: 2166: 2121: 2117: 2100: 2096: 2079: 2075: 2056:Organometallics 2051: 2047: 2015: 2011: 1988: 1984: 1961: 1957: 1950: 1936: 1932: 1925: 1911: 1907: 1864: 1857: 1810: 1806: 1796: 1789: 1766: 1762: 1717: 1713: 1706: 1692: 1688: 1657: 1653: 1603: 1599: 1568: 1559: 1512: 1508: 1475: 1468: 1442: 1435: 1416: 1409: 1370: 1366: 1343: 1339: 1300: 1296: 1289: 1271: 1267: 1260: 1236: 1232: 1225: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1180:Chemicalize.org 1108:Cheminformatics 1098: 1083: 1081: 1073: 1049:alvascience.com 1043: 991: 989: 981: 958: 940: 918: 899: 897: 888: 865: 846: 827: 825: 816: 797: 778: 759: 740: 676:risk management 672: 624:" according to 586: 528: 523: 466:risk assessment 446: 430: 424: 396:Molecule mining 362: 342: 334: 322: 306: 263:superimposition 259:crystallography 242: 213: 208: 146: 124: 103: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3662: 3652: 3651: 3646: 3641: 3636: 3634:Drug discovery 3631: 3614: 3613: 3611: 3610: 3605: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3578:Mode of action 3575: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3555: 3550: 3548:Drug targeting 3545: 3543:Drug discovery 3540: 3535: 3530: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3510: 3504: 3501: 3500: 3492: 3491: 3484: 3477: 3469: 3463: 3462: 3457: 3444: 3422: 3385: 3371: 3355: 3354:External links 3352: 3351: 3350: 3305: 3299: 3277: 3274: 3272: 3271: 3247: 3196: 3145: 3110: 3099: 3048: 3041: 3023: 3016: 2998: 2961:(4): 2264–72. 2941: 2934: 2904: 2897: 2879: 2860:(9): 2320–35. 2843: 2792: 2757: 2730: 2719:(3): 235–251. 2703: 2652: 2609: 2602: 2584: 2533: 2522:(2): 195–205. 2502: 2451: 2416: 2409: 2391: 2384: 2366: 2317: 2266: 2219:(8): 595–608. 2199: 2164: 2115: 2094: 2073: 2062:(2): 602–618. 2045: 2026:(13): 3776–7. 2009: 1982: 1971:(1–2): 31–71. 1955: 1948: 1930: 1923: 1905: 1855: 1820:(10): 843–64. 1804: 1787: 1776:(5): 868–873. 1760: 1725:Bioinformation 1711: 1704: 1686: 1651: 1597: 1578:(8): 2044–58. 1557: 1506: 1485:(5): 694–701. 1479:QSAR Comb. Sci 1466: 1449:QSAR Comb. Sci 1433: 1407: 1364: 1337: 1294: 1287: 1265: 1258: 1230: 1223: 1194: 1192: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1177: 1172: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1110: 1105: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1075:"SciKit-Learn" 1071: 1068: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1041: 1040:and Consensus) 1006: 1003: 999: 998: 979: 976: 973: 969: 968: 966:on 2017-06-19. 956: 954: 951: 947: 946: 938: 936: 933: 929: 928: 926:on 2016-11-19. 916: 913: 910: 906: 905: 886: 883: 880: 876: 875: 863: 860: 857: 853: 852: 844: 841: 838: 834: 833: 814: 811: 808: 804: 803: 795: 792: 789: 785: 784: 776: 773: 770: 766: 765: 757: 754: 751: 747: 746: 738: 735: 732: 728: 727: 726:External link 724: 721: 718: 680:European Union 671: 668: 602:Drug discovery 585: 582: 578:pKa prediction 563:higher alkanes 559:boiling points 532:boiling points 527: 524: 522: 519: 498: 497: 494: 491: 488: 470:drug discovery 445: 442: 426:Main article: 423: 420: 382:decision trees 361: 358: 341: 338: 333: 330: 321: 318: 305: 302: 288:methods, e.g. 261:) or molecule 241: 238: 212: 209: 207: 204: 145: 142: 141: 140: 137: 134: 131: 123: 120: 108: 107: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3661: 3650: 3647: 3645: 3642: 3640: 3637: 3635: 3632: 3630: 3627: 3626: 3624: 3609: 3606: 3604: 3603:Pharmacophore 3601: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3576: 3574: 3571: 3569: 3566: 3564: 3561: 3559: 3556: 3554: 3551: 3549: 3546: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3536: 3534: 3531: 3529: 3528:Drug delivery 3526: 3524: 3521: 3519: 3518:Chemogenomics 3516: 3514: 3511: 3509: 3506: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3490: 3485: 3483: 3478: 3476: 3471: 3470: 3467: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3451: 3448: 3445: 3442: 3432:on 2009-04-25 3431: 3427: 3423: 3420: 3410:on 2007-05-01 3409: 3404: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3376: 3372: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3347: 3343: 3338: 3333: 3328: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3306: 3302: 3296: 3292: 3285: 3280: 3279: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3251: 3243: 3239: 3234: 3229: 3224: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3200: 3192: 3188: 3183: 3178: 3173: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3149: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3126:(3): 318–31. 3125: 3121: 3114: 3108: 3103: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3052: 3044: 3038: 3034: 3027: 3019: 3013: 3009: 3002: 2994: 2990: 2985: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2945: 2937: 2935:9780124095472 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2908: 2900: 2894: 2890: 2883: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2847: 2839: 2835: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2796: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2773:(2): 164–72. 2772: 2768: 2761: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2734: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2707: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2685: 2680: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2656: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2613: 2605: 2599: 2595: 2588: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2537: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2506: 2498: 2494: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2455: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2420: 2412: 2406: 2402: 2395: 2387: 2381: 2377: 2370: 2362: 2358: 2353: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2321: 2313: 2309: 2304: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2270: 2262: 2258: 2253: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2203: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2168: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2119: 2110: 2105: 2098: 2089: 2084: 2077: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2049: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2013: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1959: 1951: 1945: 1941: 1934: 1926: 1920: 1916: 1909: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1862: 1860: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1808: 1801: 1794: 1792: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1764: 1756: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1731:(7): 237–41. 1730: 1726: 1722: 1715: 1707: 1701: 1697: 1690: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1655: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1601: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1566: 1564: 1562: 1553: 1549: 1544: 1539: 1534: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1510: 1501: 1500:11383/1668881 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1473: 1471: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1440: 1438: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1414: 1412: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1380:(7): 633–54. 1379: 1375: 1368: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347:Excli Journal 1341: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1298: 1290: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1269: 1261: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1234: 1226: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1199: 1195: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1154:Pharmacophore 1152: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1001: 1000: 988: 984: 980: 977: 974: 971: 970: 965: 961: 957: 955: 952: 949: 948: 943: 939: 937: 934: 931: 930: 925: 921: 917: 914: 911: 908: 907: 896:on 2017-12-19 895: 891: 887: 884: 881: 878: 877: 873:. 2018-09-19. 872: 868: 864: 861: 858: 855: 854: 849: 845: 842: 839: 836: 835: 824:on 2011-10-28 823: 819: 815: 812: 809: 806: 805: 800: 796: 793: 790: 787: 786: 781: 777: 774: 771: 768: 767: 762: 758: 755: 752: 749: 748: 743: 739: 736: 733: 730: 729: 725: 722: 719: 716: 715: 712: 709: 706: 704: 703:extrapolation 700: 696: 691: 689: 685: 681: 677: 667: 665: 661: 657: 653: 648: 646: 642: 638: 634: 629: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 608:and have low 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 581: 579: 575: 574:Taft equation 571: 566: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 535: 533: 518: 514: 511: 510:leave one-out 506: 504: 495: 492: 489: 486: 482: 481: 480: 477: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 441: 439: 435: 429: 417:QSAR protocol 415: 411: 409: 408:graph kernels 405: 401: 397: 393: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 370: 367: 357: 356:in one step. 355: 351: 347: 337: 329: 327: 317: 315: 310: 301: 298: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 274: 272: 268: 264: 260: 255: 251: 247: 237: 233: 229: 226: 222: 218: 203: 201: 196: 194: 190: 186: 182: 177: 175: 174:bioisosterism 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 138: 135: 132: 129: 128: 127: 119: 117: 113: 102: 98: 97: 96: 94: 89: 85: 83: 79: 75: 70: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 47: 45: 40: 37:models) are 36: 32: 19: 3607: 3598:Pharmacology 3440: 3434:. Retrieved 3430:the original 3426:"QSAR World" 3418: 3412:. Retrieved 3408:the original 3393: 3378:. Retrieved 3364:. Retrieved 3317: 3313: 3290: 3268:: 2825–2830. 3265: 3261: 3250: 3213: 3209: 3199: 3162: 3158: 3148: 3123: 3119: 3113: 3102: 3061: 3057: 3051: 3032: 3026: 3007: 3001: 2958: 2954: 2944: 2917: 2913: 2907: 2888: 2882: 2857: 2853: 2846: 2809: 2805: 2795: 2770: 2766: 2760: 2746:(1): 31–42. 2743: 2739: 2733: 2716: 2712: 2706: 2669: 2665: 2655: 2622: 2618: 2612: 2593: 2587: 2546: 2542: 2536: 2519: 2515: 2505: 2468: 2464: 2454: 2429: 2425: 2419: 2400: 2394: 2375: 2369: 2334: 2330: 2320: 2283: 2279: 2269: 2216: 2212: 2202: 2177: 2173: 2167: 2132: 2128: 2118: 2097: 2076: 2059: 2055: 2048: 2023: 2019: 2012: 1995: 1991: 1985: 1968: 1964: 1958: 1939: 1933: 1914: 1908: 1878:(1): 56–69. 1875: 1871: 1817: 1813: 1807: 1799: 1773: 1769: 1763: 1728: 1724: 1714: 1695: 1689: 1664: 1660: 1654: 1613: 1609: 1600: 1575: 1571: 1523: 1519: 1509: 1482: 1478: 1452: 1448: 1419: 1377: 1373: 1367: 1350: 1346: 1340: 1307: 1303: 1297: 1278: 1268: 1240: 1233: 1205: 1198: 1163: 1082:. Retrieved 1078: 1061:scikit-learn 1048: 1008:Regression ( 990:. Retrieved 986: 964:the original 924:the original 898:. Retrieved 894:the original 870: 826:. Retrieved 822:the original 710: 707: 692: 687: 673: 670:Applications 649: 630: 622:druglikeness 617: 587: 567: 551:correlations 536: 529: 515: 509: 507: 499: 478: 447: 431: 406:searches or 394: 371: 363: 343: 335: 323: 320:String based 311: 307: 299: 275: 249: 245: 244:The acronym 243: 234: 230: 214: 199: 197: 178: 157: 147: 125: 109: 100: 90: 86: 77: 73: 71: 48: 34: 30: 29: 3533:Drug design 987:deepchem.io 695:convex hull 521:Application 374:data mining 332:Graph based 297:molecule). 254:force field 200:SAR paradox 193:overfitting 112:model error 99:Activity = 3623:Categories 3523:Drug class 3495:Topics in 3436:2009-05-11 3414:2009-05-11 3380:2011-06-18 3366:2009-05-11 2226:1603.00856 2109:1703.07076 2088:1602.06289 1191:References 992:20 October 983:"DeepChem" 900:2016-03-24 828:2016-03-24 791:RapidMiner 723:Algorithms 584:Biological 557:and their 462:properties 372:A typical 280:(see also 185:hypotheses 183:. Created 170:solubility 150:hypotheses 39:regression 3649:Paradoxes 3320:: 11–21. 3078:1062-936X 2806:Molecules 2666:Molecules 2471:(1): 48. 2286:(1): 12. 1630:1868-1743 1455:: 69–77. 1445:Tropsha A 1353:: 74–88. 1084:13 August 1005:alvaModel 975:Deep Chem 688:in silico 580:methods. 354:induction 168:ability, 164:ability, 3450:Archived 3346:24741320 3242:36361669 3191:21798025 3140:25448759 3086:22369620 2993:12668435 2874:21800825 2838:19471190 2787:17933600 2698:22534664 2647:21305783 2639:23488901 2579:21518449 2571:13677480 2497:25544551 2446:23557664 2361:36456532 2312:33597034 2261:27558503 2194:16180893 2159:30155234 2040:17348648 1992:J. Catal 1900:45364247 1892:24266725 1842:20740315 1755:17597897 1681:11848856 1646:23564249 1638:27463326 1592:22721530 1552:26110025 1402:17622541 1394:22823204 1332:49418479 1324:29936244 1096:See also 859:AZOrange 664:learning 637:receptor 610:toxicity 526:Chemical 390:inducing 340:Modeling 328:string. 250:3-D QSAR 162:reaction 33:models ( 3337:3970920 3233:9655980 3182:3158423 3094:2714861 2984:1302793 2963:Bibcode 2829:6254296 2689:6268288 2551:Bibcode 2488:4272757 2352:9749029 2303:7888189 2252:5028207 2231:Bibcode 2150:6011237 1850:1171860 1822:Bibcode 1746:1891704 1543:4479250 1159:Q-RASAR 1026:LDA/QDA 882:Tanagra 606:targets 555:alkanes 273:(PLS). 246:3D-QSAR 240:3D-QSAR 104:  67:predict 3344:  3334:  3297:  3240:  3230:  3189:  3179:  3165:: 28. 3138:  3092:  3084:  3076:  3039:  3014:  2991:  2981:  2932:  2895:  2872:  2836:  2826:  2785:  2696:  2686:  2645:  2637:  2600:  2577:  2569:  2495:  2485:  2444:  2407:  2382:  2359:  2349:  2310:  2300:  2259:  2249:  2192:  2157:  2147:  2038:  1946:  1921:  1898:  1890:  1848:  1840:  1753:  1743:  1702:  1679:  1644:  1636:  1628:  1590:  1550:  1540:  1526:: 32. 1400:  1392:  1330:  1322:  1285:  1256:  1221:  1115:(CADD) 1065:Python 1030:PLS-DA 935:MALLET 871:GitHub 772:Orange 753:libSVM 660:coding 633:enzyme 590:assays 539:family 450:models 326:SMILES 189:finite 181:trends 3287:(PDF) 3090:S2CID 2643:S2CID 2575:S2CID 2221:arXiv 2104:arXiv 2083:arXiv 1896:S2CID 1846:S2CID 1642:S2CID 1398:S2CID 1328:S2CID 840:Knime 717:S.No. 684:REACH 206:Types 158:small 3508:ADME 3342:PMID 3295:ISBN 3238:PMID 3187:PMID 3136:PMID 3082:PMID 3074:ISSN 3037:ISBN 3012:ISBN 2989:PMID 2930:ISBN 2893:ISBN 2870:PMID 2834:PMID 2783:PMID 2694:PMID 2635:PMID 2598:ISBN 2567:PMID 2493:PMID 2442:PMID 2405:ISBN 2380:ISBN 2357:PMID 2308:PMID 2257:PMID 2190:PMID 2155:PMID 2036:PMID 1944:ISBN 1919:ISBN 1888:PMID 1838:PMID 1751:PMID 1700:ISBN 1677:PMID 1634:PMID 1626:ISSN 1588:PMID 1548:PMID 1390:PMID 1320:PMID 1283:ISBN 1254:ISBN 1219:ISBN 1103:ADME 1086:2023 1034:k-NN 1018:k-NN 994:2017 915:k-NN 912:Elki 810:Weka 720:Name 662:and 656:MVUE 616:log 576:and 472:and 388:for 352:and 225:logP 198:The 116:bias 78:QSPR 61:and 35:QSAR 18:QSAR 3398:doi 3332:PMC 3322:doi 3228:PMC 3218:doi 3177:PMC 3167:doi 3128:doi 3066:doi 2979:PMC 2971:doi 2922:doi 2862:doi 2824:PMC 2814:doi 2775:doi 2771:602 2748:doi 2721:doi 2684:PMC 2674:doi 2627:doi 2559:doi 2524:doi 2483:PMC 2473:doi 2434:doi 2347:PMC 2339:doi 2298:PMC 2288:doi 2247:PMC 2239:doi 2182:doi 2145:PMC 2137:doi 2064:doi 2028:doi 2024:129 2000:doi 1996:216 1973:doi 1880:doi 1830:doi 1778:doi 1741:PMC 1733:doi 1669:doi 1618:doi 1580:doi 1538:PMC 1528:doi 1495:hdl 1487:doi 1457:doi 1424:doi 1382:doi 1355:doi 1312:doi 1246:doi 1211:doi 1057:14. 1038:SVM 1022:SVM 1014:PLS 1010:OLS 1002:13. 972:12. 953:MOA 950:11. 932:10. 756:SVM 635:or 596:or 541:of 460:or 248:or 154:SAR 3625:: 3439:. 3417:. 3396:. 3392:. 3340:. 3330:. 3316:. 3312:. 3266:12 3264:. 3260:. 3236:. 3226:. 3214:23 3212:. 3208:. 3185:. 3175:. 3161:. 3157:. 3134:. 3124:20 3122:. 3088:. 3080:. 3072:. 3062:23 3060:. 2987:. 2977:. 2969:. 2959:84 2957:. 2953:. 2928:. 2916:. 2868:. 2858:51 2856:. 2832:. 2822:. 2810:14 2808:. 2804:. 2781:. 2769:. 2744:90 2742:. 2717:25 2715:. 2692:. 2682:. 2670:17 2668:. 2664:. 2641:. 2633:. 2621:. 2573:. 2565:. 2557:. 2547:17 2545:. 2518:. 2514:. 2491:. 2481:. 2467:. 2463:. 2440:. 2430:18 2428:. 2355:. 2345:. 2335:62 2333:. 2329:. 2306:. 2296:. 2284:13 2282:. 2278:. 2255:. 2245:. 2237:. 2229:. 2217:30 2215:. 2211:. 2188:. 2178:45 2176:. 2153:. 2143:. 2131:. 2127:. 2060:31 2058:. 2034:. 2022:. 1994:. 1969:89 1967:. 1894:. 1886:. 1876:33 1874:. 1870:. 1858:^ 1844:. 1836:. 1828:. 1818:24 1816:. 1790:^ 1774:39 1772:. 1749:. 1739:. 1727:. 1723:. 1675:. 1665:96 1663:. 1640:. 1632:. 1624:. 1614:29 1612:. 1586:. 1576:52 1574:. 1560:^ 1546:. 1536:. 1522:. 1518:. 1493:. 1483:26 1481:. 1469:^ 1453:22 1451:. 1436:^ 1410:^ 1396:. 1388:. 1376:. 1349:. 1326:. 1318:. 1308:23 1306:. 1277:. 1252:. 1217:. 1168:– 1077:. 1067:) 1047:. 1036:, 1032:, 1028:, 1020:, 1016:, 1012:, 985:. 909:9. 879:8. 869:. 856:7. 837:6. 807:5. 788:4. 769:3. 750:2. 731:1. 666:. 647:. 628:. 600:. 572:, 565:. 534:. 410:. 384:, 380:, 316:. 95:: 3488:e 3481:t 3474:v 3400:: 3383:. 3369:. 3348:. 3324:: 3318:7 3303:. 3244:. 3220:: 3193:. 3169:: 3163:3 3142:. 3130:: 3096:. 3068:: 3045:. 3020:. 2995:. 2973:: 2965:: 2938:. 2924:: 2901:. 2876:. 2864:: 2840:. 2816:: 2789:. 2777:: 2754:. 2750:: 2727:. 2723:: 2700:. 2676:: 2649:. 2629:: 2623:2 2606:. 2581:. 2561:: 2553:: 2530:. 2526:: 2520:1 2499:. 2475:: 2469:6 2448:. 2436:: 2413:. 2388:. 2363:. 2341:: 2314:. 2290:: 2263:. 2241:: 2233:: 2223:: 2196:. 2184:: 2161:. 2139:: 2133:9 2112:. 2106:: 2091:. 2085:: 2070:. 2066:: 2042:. 2030:: 2006:. 2002:: 1979:. 1975:: 1952:. 1927:. 1902:. 1882:: 1852:. 1832:: 1824:: 1784:. 1780:: 1757:. 1735:: 1729:1 1708:. 1683:. 1671:: 1648:. 1620:: 1594:. 1582:: 1554:. 1530:: 1524:7 1503:. 1497:: 1489:: 1463:. 1459:: 1430:. 1426:: 1404:. 1384:: 1378:5 1361:. 1357:: 1351:8 1334:. 1314:: 1291:. 1262:. 1248:: 1227:. 1213:: 1182:: 1088:. 1063:( 1051:. 996:. 944:. 903:. 850:. 831:. 801:. 782:. 763:. 744:. 734:R 618:P 114:( 101:f 76:( 20:)

Index

QSAR
regression
response variable
molecular descriptors
biological activity
chemical structures
biological activity
predict
biodegradability
mathematical model
model error
bias
hypotheses
SAR
reaction
biotransformation
solubility
bioisosterism
trends
hypotheses
finite
overfitting
partition coefficient
chemical fragment methods
logP
force field
crystallography
superimposition
Lennard-Jones potential
partial least squares regression

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.