59:, by far the most important source for both poems. They both have an intimate knowledge of law and the courts, which has led some to believe that the author or authors were law clerks. Both poems manifest a delight in word play, though this is typical of alliterative poems generally. But the differences are striking as well. Richard the Redeless focuses wholly and exclusively on Richard II and the latter part of his reign, whereas Mum ignores Richard's rule to concentrate exclusively on problems during Henry IV's administration... Richard the Redeless contains specific allusions to events and personalities of Richard II's reign, but this is not the case with Mum... to be a truth teller and name names may have proved too much for him. He prefers more general, satirical attacks to explicit personalities or incidents... It seems best to hold open the possibility that there may be a connection between them, but there may not be."
55:". This link between the two poems continued to the early 20th century, with Day and Steele declaring in their EETS edition that "the two fragments form part of one larger composition." This assertive opinion has also generally fallen out of favour within the academic community for a more nuanced and cautious belief. As James Dean argues: "The two alliterative fragments do have much in common. They both presume to advise a king, include satirical critiques, and imitate
23:'s kingship and his court, seeking to offer Richard retrospective (or even posthumous) advice, following his deposition by Henry IV in 1399. The poet claims that "Richard has been poorly advised, his kingdom mismanaged, his loyal subjects ill-served." The author believes that the advice he imparts will be of great aid to any guiding the kingdom in future years. The poem also contains elements of
167:
177:
162:
172:
19:("Richard without counsel") is an anonymous fifteenth-century English alliterative poem that critiques
102:
Mum and the
Sothsegger Edited from the Manuscripts Camb. Univ. Ll. iv. 14 and Brit. Mus. Add 41666.
68:
40:
20:
8:
142:
156:
47:(1495–1563), an important early antiquarian, identified what Skeat named
44:
39:
has become heavily intertwined with another fifteenth-century poem,
24:
27:, especially towards court manners and clothing fashions.
149:
Ed. by James M. Dean. TEAMS Middle
English Text Series.
129:, ed. James M. Dean, (Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 2000), pp.77-8.
154:
127:Richard the Redeless and Mum and the Sothsegger
89:Richard the Redeless and Mum and the Sothsegger
104:EETS o.s. 199. (Oxford: OUP, 1936), p.xn3
155:
100:Day, Mabel, and Robert Steele, eds.
30:
13:
14:
189:
136:
91:, (Kalamazoo: TEAMS, 2000), p. 7.
147:in medieval and modern English
120:
107:
94:
81:
1:
74:
7:
62:
10:
194:
168:15th century in England
117:EETS (OUP, 1936), p. x.
69:Piers Plowman tradition
115:Mum and the Sothsegger
41:Mum and the Sothsegger
178:Richard II of England
163:Middle English poems
145:Richard the Redeless
49:Richard the Redeless
37:Richard the Redeless
17:Richard the Redeless
173:15th-century poems
185:
130:
124:
118:
113:Day and Steele,
111:
105:
98:
92:
85:
53:Mum, Soth-segger
31:Critical history
193:
192:
188:
187:
186:
184:
183:
182:
153:
152:
139:
134:
133:
125:
121:
112:
108:
99:
95:
87:James M. Dean,
86:
82:
77:
65:
35:The history of
33:
12:
11:
5:
191:
181:
180:
175:
170:
165:
151:
150:
138:
137:External links
135:
132:
131:
119:
106:
93:
79:
78:
76:
73:
72:
71:
64:
61:
32:
29:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
190:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
160:
158:
148:
146:
141:
140:
128:
123:
116:
110:
103:
97:
90:
84:
80:
70:
67:
66:
60:
58:
57:Piers Plowman
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
28:
26:
22:
18:
144:
126:
122:
114:
109:
101:
96:
88:
83:
56:
52:
48:
36:
34:
16:
15:
157:Categories
143:E-text of
75:References
43:. Indeed,
21:Richard II
45:John Bale
63:See also
25:satire
51:as "
159::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.