Knowledge

Risk–benefit ratio

Source 📝

36: 171:
many people take daily, also since it is mitigated by the controlling factor of their perception of their individual ability to manage the risk-creating situation. When individuals are exposed to involuntary risk (a risk over which they have no control), they make
176:
their primary goal. Under these circumstances, individuals require the probability of risk to be as much as one thousand times smaller than for the same situation under their perceived control (a notable example being the common bias in the perception of
223:
For research that involves more than minimal risk of harm to the subjects, the investigator must assure that the amount of benefit clearly outweighs the amount of risk. Only if there is a favorable risk–benefit ratio may a study be considered
167:
Analyzing a risk can be heavily dependent on the human factor. A certain level of risk in our lives is accepted as necessary to achieve certain benefits. For example,
371: 296: 243:
cannot be done legitimately unless the importance of the objective is in proportion to the risk to the subject. The Helsinki Declaration and
100: 244: 72: 663: 659: 79: 709: 667: 655: 53: 364: 86: 830: 746: 611: 581: 68: 17: 357: 119: 868: 321:
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
178: 675: 895: 713: 435: 57: 861: 546: 840: 900: 804: 776: 705: 459: 276: 93: 854: 530: 173: 649: 261: 236: 587: 535: 415: 161: 300: 633: 503: 481: 450: 425: 408: 232: 46: 890: 621: 542: 625: 512: 420: 384: 320: 349: 202:, as determined by currently available data, as measured actuarially for insurance premiums. 591: 8: 498: 430: 240: 751: 701: 516: 445: 403: 825: 789: 756: 681: 603: 380: 256: 168: 599: 520: 474: 469: 794: 617: 572: 820: 741: 693: 486: 398: 266: 884: 799: 766: 761: 271: 208:, as analytically based on system models structured from historical studies. 641: 525: 196:, as disclosed by the fully matured future circumstances when they develop. 835: 689: 562: 552: 637: 629: 595: 557: 464: 697: 685: 332: 35: 731: 157: 736: 225: 379: 141: 145: 27:
Analysis of the risks and potential benefits of an action
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 882: 164:the risk and benefits and hence their ratio. 365: 372: 358: 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 664:Preventable fraction among the unexposed 660:Attributable fraction for the population 148:of an action to its potential benefits. 668:Preventable fraction for the population 656:Attributable fraction among the exposed 247:stress a favorable risk–benefit ratio. 14: 883: 353: 214:, as intuitively seen by individuals. 831:Correlation does not imply causation 747:Animal testing on non-human primates 58:adding citations to reliable sources 29: 218: 189:Evaluations of future risk can be: 24: 299:. Capita.wustl.edu. Archived from 25: 912: 34: 169:driving an automobile is a risk 45:needs additional citations for 714:Pre- and post-test probability 436:Patient and public involvement 325: 314: 289: 184: 13: 1: 282: 841:Sex as a biological variable 7: 805:Intention-to-treat analysis 777:Analysis of clinical trials 706:Specificity and sensitivity 460:Randomized controlled trial 277:Reference class forecasting 250: 10: 917: 849: 814:Interpretation of results 813: 775: 724: 674: 648: 610: 580: 571: 547:Nested case–control study 497: 444: 391: 237:World Medical Association 416:Academic clinical trials 634:Relative risk reduction 482:Adaptive clinical trial 426:Evidence-based medicine 409:Adaptive clinical trial 335:. Consort-statement.org 297:"Risk-Benefit Analysis" 233:Declaration of Helsinki 622:Number needed to treat 896:Ethics and statistics 626:Number needed to harm 513:Cross-sectional study 465:Scientific experiment 421:Clinical study design 262:Cost–benefit analysis 245:the CONSORT Statement 154:benefit-risk analysis 150:Risk–benefit analysis 592:Cumulative incidence 69:"Risk–benefit ratio" 54:improve this article 499:Observational study 431:Real world evidence 385:experimental design 241:biomedical research 901:Medical statistics 785:Risk–benefit ratio 752:First-in-man study 702:Case fatality rate 543:Case–control study 517:Longitudinal study 138:benefit-risk ratio 134:risk–benefit ratio 18:Risk/benefit ratio 878: 877: 826:Survivorship bias 790:Systematic review 757:Multicenter trial 720: 719: 710:Likelihood-ratios 682:Clinical endpoint 650:Population impact 604:Period prevalence 381:Clinical research 257:Benefit shortfall 235:, adopted by the 130: 129: 122: 104: 16:(Redirected from 908: 725:Trial/test types 600:Point prevalence 578: 577: 521:Ecological study 504:EBM II-2 to II-3 475:Open-label trial 470:Blind experiment 446:Controlled study 374: 367: 360: 351: 350: 344: 343: 341: 340: 329: 323: 318: 312: 311: 309: 308: 293: 219:Medical research 200:Statistical risk 194:Real future risk 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 103: 62: 38: 30: 21: 916: 915: 911: 910: 909: 907: 906: 905: 881: 880: 879: 874: 845: 809: 771: 716: 670: 644: 618:Risk difference 606: 567: 501: 493: 448: 440: 404:Trial protocols 387: 378: 348: 347: 338: 336: 331: 330: 326: 319: 315: 306: 304: 295: 294: 290: 285: 253: 221: 187: 126: 115: 109: 106: 63: 61: 51: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 914: 904: 903: 898: 893: 876: 875: 873: 872: 869:List of topics 865: 858: 850: 847: 846: 844: 843: 838: 833: 828: 823: 821:Selection bias 817: 815: 811: 810: 808: 807: 802: 797: 792: 787: 781: 779: 773: 772: 770: 769: 764: 759: 754: 749: 744: 742:Animal testing 739: 734: 728: 726: 722: 721: 718: 717: 694:Mortality rate 680: 678: 672: 671: 654: 652: 646: 645: 616: 614: 608: 607: 586: 584: 575: 569: 568: 566: 565: 560: 555: 550: 540: 539: 538: 533: 523: 509: 507: 495: 494: 492: 491: 490: 489: 487:Platform trial 479: 478: 477: 472: 467: 456: 454: 442: 441: 439: 438: 433: 428: 423: 418: 413: 412: 411: 406: 399:Clinical trial 395: 393: 389: 388: 377: 376: 369: 362: 354: 346: 345: 324: 313: 287: 286: 284: 281: 280: 279: 274: 269: 267:Odds algorithm 264: 259: 252: 249: 239:, states that 220: 217: 216: 215: 212:Perceived risk 209: 206:Projected risk 203: 197: 186: 183: 181:vs. driving). 179:risk in flying 160:that seeks to 128: 127: 42: 40: 33: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 913: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 891:Risk analysis 889: 888: 886: 871: 870: 866: 864: 863: 859: 857: 856: 852: 851: 848: 842: 839: 837: 834: 832: 829: 827: 824: 822: 819: 818: 816: 812: 806: 803: 801: 800:Meta-analysis 798: 796: 793: 791: 788: 786: 783: 782: 780: 778: 774: 768: 767:Vaccine trial 765: 763: 762:Seeding trial 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 738: 735: 733: 730: 729: 727: 723: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 583: 579: 576: 574: 570: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 548: 544: 541: 537: 534: 532: 531:Retrospective 529: 528: 527: 524: 522: 518: 514: 511: 510: 508: 505: 500: 496: 488: 485: 484: 483: 480: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 462: 461: 458: 457: 455: 452: 451:EBM I to II-1 447: 443: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 410: 407: 405: 402: 401: 400: 397: 396: 394: 390: 386: 382: 375: 370: 368: 363: 361: 356: 355: 352: 334: 328: 322: 317: 303:on 2013-10-29 302: 298: 292: 288: 278: 275: 273: 272:Optimism bias 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 258: 255: 254: 248: 246: 242: 238: 234: 229: 227: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 191: 190: 182: 180: 175: 174:risk aversion 170: 165: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 124: 121: 113: 102: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: –  70: 66: 65:Find sources: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 37: 32: 31: 19: 867: 860: 853: 784: 642:Hazard ratio 526:Cohort study 337:. Retrieved 327: 316: 305:. Retrieved 301:the original 291: 230: 222: 211: 205: 199: 193: 188: 166: 153: 149: 137: 133: 131: 116: 107: 97: 90: 83: 76: 64: 52:Please help 47:verification 44: 836:Null result 795:Replication 690:Infectivity 612:Association 563:Case report 553:Case series 536:Prospective 185:Evaluations 885:Categories 638:Odds ratio 630:Risk ratio 596:Prevalence 582:Occurrence 558:Case study 339:2013-10-25 307:2013-10-25 283:References 80:newspapers 698:Morbidity 686:Virulence 588:Incidence 333:"Consort" 140:) is the 862:Glossary 855:Category 732:In vitro 573:Measures 392:Overview 251:See also 162:quantify 158:analysis 110:May 2012 737:In vivo 226:ethical 144:of the 94:scholar 96:  89:  82:  75:  67:  676:Other 156:) is 142:ratio 101:JSTOR 87:books 515:vs. 383:and 231:The 152:(or 146:risk 136:(or 73:news 228:. 56:by 887:: 712:, 708:, 704:, 700:, 696:, 692:, 688:, 684:, 666:, 662:, 658:, 640:, 636:, 632:, 628:, 624:, 620:, 602:, 598:, 594:, 590:, 519:, 132:A 549:) 545:( 506:) 502:( 453:) 449:( 373:e 366:t 359:v 342:. 310:. 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 98:· 91:· 84:· 77:· 50:. 20:)

Index

Risk/benefit ratio

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Risk–benefit ratio"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
ratio
risk
analysis
quantify
driving an automobile is a risk
risk aversion
risk in flying
ethical
Declaration of Helsinki
World Medical Association
biomedical research
the CONSORT Statement
Benefit shortfall
Cost–benefit analysis
Odds algorithm
Optimism bias
Reference class forecasting
"Risk-Benefit Analysis"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.