585:. The data collected is not only filtered by the design of experiment, but also by the necessary precondition that there must be someone doing a study. An example is the impact of the Earth in the past. The impact event may cause the extinction of intelligent animals, or there were no intelligent animals at that time. Therefore, some impact events have not been observed, but they may have occurred in the past.
625:
that range, it is considered speeding. If someone receives a ticket with an average driving speed of 7 km/h, the decision maker has committed a Type I error. In other words, the average driving speed meets the null hypothesis but is rejected. On the contrary, Type II error happens when the null hypothesis is not correct but is accepted.
60:
can take various measures at each stage of the process to reduce the impact of statistical bias in their work. Understanding the source of statistical bias can help to assess whether the observed results are close to actuality. Issues of statistical bias has been argued to be closely linked to issues
68:
Statistical bias can have significant real world implications as data is used to inform decision making across a wide variety of processes in society. Data is used to inform lawmaking, industry regulation, corporate marketing and distribution tactics, and institutional policies in organizations and
661:
is the difference between an estimator's expected value and the true value of the parameter being estimated. Although an unbiased estimator is theoretically preferable to a biased estimator, in practice, biased estimators with small biases are frequently used. A biased estimator may be more useful
624:
leads to wrong results. Type I error happens when the null hypothesis is correct but is rejected. For instance, suppose that the null hypothesis is that if the average driving speed limit ranges from 75 to 85 km/h, it is not considered as speeding. On the other hand, if the average speed is not in
588:
Volunteer bias occurs when volunteers have intrinsically different characteristics from the target population of the study. Research has shown that volunteers tend to come from families with higher socioeconomic status. Furthermore, another study shows that women are more probable to volunteer for
73:
only includes men, any conclusions made from that data will be biased towards how the medication affects men rather than people in general. That means the information would be incomplete and not useful for deciding if the medication is ready for release in the general public. In this scenario, the
89:, in which participants give inaccurate responses to a question. Bias does not preclude the existence of any other mistakes. One may have a poorly designed sample, an inaccurate measurement device, and typos in recording data simultaneously. Ideally, all factors are controlled and accounted for.
757:
is essential to the process of accurate data collection. One way to check for bias in results after is rerunning analyses with different independent variables to observe whether a given phenomenon still occurs in dependent variables. Careful use of language in reporting can reduce misleading
707:, bias is defined as "Systematic errors in test content, test administration, and/or scoring procedures that can cause some test takers to get either lower or higher scores than their true ability would merit." The source of the bias is irrelevant to the trait the test is intended to measure.
311:
85:(instrument failure/inadequacy), lack of data, or mistakes in transcription (typos). Bias implies that the data selection may have been skewed by the collection criteria. Other forms of human-based bias emerge in data collection as well such as
737:
Depending on the type of bias present, researchers and analysts can take different steps to reduce bias on a data set. All types of bias mentioned above have corresponding measures which can be taken to reduce or eliminate their impacts.
69:
workplaces. Therefore, there can be significant implications if statistical bias is not accounted for and controlled. For example, if a pharmaceutical company wishes to explore the effect of a medication on the common cold but the data
662:
for several reasons. First, an unbiased estimator may not exist without further assumptions. Second, sometimes an unbiased estimator is hard to compute. Third, a biased estimator may have a lower value of mean squared error.
607:
arises due to differences in the accuracy or completeness of participant recollections of past events; for example, patients cannot recall how many cigarettes they smoked last week exactly, leading to over-estimation or
1321:
628:
Bias in hypothesis testing occurs when the power (the complement of the type II error rate) at some alternative is lower than the supremum of the Type I error rate (which is usually the significance level,
138:. The bias of an estimator of a parameter should not be confused with its degree of precision, as the degree of precision is a measure of the sampling error. The bias is defined as follows: let
741:
Bias should be accounted for at every step of the data collection process, beginning with clearly defined research parameters and consideration of the team who will be conducting the research.
398:
700:
may mean doctors are more likely to look for diabetes in obese patients than in thinner patients, leading to an inflation in diabetes among obese patients because of skewed detection efforts.
575:
of the test. For example, a high prevalence of disease in a study population increases positive predictive values, which will cause a bias between the prediction values and the real ones.
52:
depiction of reality. Statistical bias exists in numerous stages of the data collection and analysis process, including: the source of the data, the methods used to collect the data, the
208:
1325:
236:
670:. The value of a biased estimator is always positive and the mean squared error of it is smaller than the unbiased one, which makes the biased estimator be more accurate.
647:
529:
509:
466:
442:
354:
176:
678:
is the bias that appears in estimates of parameters in regression analysis when the assumed specification omits an independent variable that should be in the model.
649:). Equivalently, if no rejection rate at any alternative is lower than the rejection rate at any point in the null hypothesis set, the test is said to be unbiased.
489:
418:
334:
228:
156:
1997:
1244:
1972:
1317:
1188:
1187:; Green, Sally (March 2011). "8. Introduction to sources of bias in clinical trials". In Higgins, Julian P. T.; et al. (eds.).
2002:
688:
Detection bias occurs when a phenomenon is more likely to be observed for a particular set of study subjects. For instance, the
539:
Statistical bias comes from all stages of data analysis. The following sources of bias will be listed in each stage separately.
1254:
963:
945:
359:
1371:
729:
involves a skew in the availability of data, such that observations of a certain kind are more likely to be reported.
758:
phrases, such as discussion of a result "approaching" statistical significant as compared to actually achieving it.
1399:
875:
863:
17:
2100:
2074:
1992:
1802:
92:
Also it is useful to recognize that the term “error” specifically refers to the outcome rather than the process (
621:
595:
may lead to the selection of outcomes, test samples, or test procedures that favor a study's financial sponsor.
1921:
1807:
1461:
1456:
1117:
980:
181:
1579:
572:
108:
are recommended to differentiate procedural errors from these specifically defined outcome-based terms.
1915:
1441:
306:{\displaystyle \operatorname {bias} (T,\theta )=\operatorname {bias} (T)=\operatorname {E} (T)-\theta }
2045:
1769:
1569:
1547:
617:
571:
arises from evaluating diagnostic tests on biased patient samples, leading to an overestimate of the
93:
1139:"Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research?: An Inquiry into the "Funding Effect" Hypothesis"
2069:
1982:
1864:
1629:
1609:
1505:
793:
704:
131:
2055:
1739:
1719:
1500:
1478:
82:
1834:
1749:
1724:
1669:
1339:
675:
632:
582:
514:
494:
451:
427:
339:
161:
62:
31:
906:
1787:
1639:
1515:
1392:
667:
658:
560:
117:
581:
occurs when the evidence presented has been pre-filtered by observers, which is so-called
8:
1942:
1859:
1759:
1694:
1634:
1624:
1619:
1483:
70:
1839:
1824:
1584:
1574:
1557:
1299:
1166:
1073:
1016:
926:
474:
403:
319:
213:
141:
1952:
1889:
1874:
1797:
1714:
1510:
1426:
1291:
1250:
1158:
1065:
1057:
1008:
1000:
996:
959:
918:
910:
845:
813:
717:
where judgment may alter how an experiment is carried out / how results are recorded.
697:
135:
1170:
1077:
930:
891:"Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation"
2019:
1879:
1819:
1744:
1729:
1589:
1542:
1451:
1446:
1431:
1283:
1150:
1091:
1047:
1020:
992:
951:
902:
867:
805:
772:
1987:
1977:
1754:
1734:
1649:
1552:
1527:
1522:
1495:
1473:
1385:
1035:
809:
1212:
1034:
Tripepi, Giovanni; Jager, Kitty J.; Dekker, Friedo W.; Zoccali, Carmine (2010).
837:
2029:
2024:
2014:
1937:
1854:
1814:
1764:
1709:
1699:
1684:
1679:
1644:
1599:
1564:
1468:
1417:
1316:
1184:
726:
714:
598:
578:
547:
127:
75:
1233:
Casella, George; Berger, Roger L. (2002), Statistical
Inference, 2nd Ed., p387
2095:
2089:
1967:
1947:
1910:
1884:
1869:
1849:
1829:
1792:
1704:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1532:
1436:
1295:
1162:
1154:
1061:
1004:
914:
817:
742:
710:
601:
arises due to a loss of participants, e.g., loss of follow up during a study.
568:
555:
551:
550:
involves individuals being more likely to be selected for study than others,
97:
86:
57:
981:"Anthropic Shadow: Observation Selection Effects and Human Extinction Risks"
890:
531:
is often omitted when it is clear from the context what is being estimated.
1927:
1689:
1674:
1208:
1204:
1138:
1069:
1012:
922:
849:
750:
713:
arises when the researcher subconsciously influences the experiment due to
592:
955:
666:
A biased estimator is better than any unbiased estimator arising from the
1844:
1614:
1604:
1594:
1490:
746:
604:
1962:
1957:
1932:
1303:
1271:
1190:
Cochrane
Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1)
947:
Anthropic Bias: Observation
Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy
123:
41:
1052:
2050:
1537:
754:
53:
1287:
2009:
1894:
767:
689:
81:
Bias can be differentiated from other statistical mistakes such as
693:
94:
errors of rejection or acceptance of the hypothesis being tested
1213:"Contributions to the theory of testing statistical hypotheses"
44:, is a systematic tendency in which the methods used to gather
1367:
130:
of the results differs from the true underlying quantitative
979:Ćirković, Milan M.; Sandberg, Anders; Bostrom, Nick (2010).
1408:
49:
45:
1036:"Selection Bias and Information Bias in Clinical Research"
1377:
1340:"5 Types of Statistical Biases to Avoid in Your Analyses"
1033:
889:
Mulherin, Stephanie A.; Miller, William C. (2002-10-01).
836:
Popovic, Aleksandar; Huecker, Martin R. (June 23, 2023).
48:
and generate statistics present an inaccurate, skewed or
978:
78:
is only one of the ways in which data can be biased.
635:
517:
497:
477:
454:
430:
406:
362:
342:
322:
239:
216:
184:
164:
144:
74:
bias can be addressed by broadening the sample. This
862:
1318:
National
Council on Measurement in Education (NCME)
641:
523:
503:
483:
460:
436:
412:
393:{\displaystyle \operatorname {bias} (T,\theta )=0}
392:
348:
328:
305:
222:
202:
170:
150:
56:chosen, and the methods used to analyze the data.
2087:
1374:cataloguing biases that affect health evidence.
1243:Romano, Joseph P.; Siegel, A. F. (1986-06-01).
888:
835:
732:
1393:
1246:Counterexamples in Probability And Statistics
1203:
1242:
1183:
554:. This can also be termed selection effect,
158:be a statistic used to estimate a parameter
2056:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making
1400:
1386:
511:it is used to estimate, but the parameter
1051:
126:technique or of its results whereby the
1143:Science, Technology, & Human Values
1136:
1118:"Why Do Women Volunteer More Than Men?"
943:
907:10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00011
111:
14:
2088:
652:
1381:
1269:
612:
203:{\displaystyle \operatorname {E} (T)}
1115:
831:
829:
827:
791:
491:is always relative to the parameter
316:is called the bias of the statistic
682:
122:Statistical bias is a feature of a
24:
1372:Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
282:
185:
25:
2112:
1361:
1276:The American Mathematical Monthly
876:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
824:
745:may be reduced by implementing a
721:
542:
1272:"An Illuminating Counterexample"
997:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01460.x
444:; otherwise, it is said to be a
42:mathematical field of statistics
1332:
1310:
1263:
1249:. CRC Press. pp. 194–196.
1236:
1227:
1197:
1177:
1137:Krimsky, Sheldon (2013-07-01).
1130:
792:Cole, Nancy S. (October 1981).
1109:
1084:
1027:
972:
937:
882:
856:
785:
622:statistical hypothesis testing
381:
369:
294:
288:
276:
270:
258:
246:
197:
191:
13:
1:
1193:. The Cochrane Collaboration.
778:
210:denote the expected value of
96:), or from the phenomenon of
1217:Statistical Research Memoirs
944:Bostrom, Nick (2013-05-31).
810:10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1067
7:
1922:DĂ©formation professionnelle
895:Annals of Internal Medicine
870:; Lash, Timothy L. (2008).
761:
733:Addressing statistical bias
573:sensitivity and specificity
10:
2117:
1916:Basking in reflected glory
1407:
1322:"NCME Assessment Glossary"
115:
29:
2064:
2046:Cognitive bias mitigation
2038:
1903:
1778:
1415:
1040:Nephron Clinical Practice
618:Type I and type II errors
1630:Illusion of transparency
1155:10.1177/0162243912456271
753:technique. Avoidance of
534:
471:The bias of a statistic
1270:Hardy, Michael (2003).
950:. New York: Routledge.
705:educational measurement
642:{\displaystyle \alpha }
579:Observer selection bias
524:{\displaystyle \theta }
504:{\displaystyle \theta }
461:{\displaystyle \theta }
437:{\displaystyle \theta }
349:{\displaystyle \theta }
171:{\displaystyle \theta }
2101:Accuracy and precision
1344:Business Insights Blog
643:
525:
505:
485:
462:
438:
414:
394:
350:
330:
307:
224:
204:
172:
152:
1998:Arab–Israeli conflict
1725:Social influence bias
1670:Out-group homogeneity
1368:The Catalogue of Bias
1185:Higgins, Julian P. T.
956:10.4324/9780203953464
798:American Psychologist
676:Omitted-variable bias
644:
526:
506:
486:
463:
439:
415:
395:
351:
331:
308:
225:
205:
173:
153:
32:Bias (disambiguation)
1640:Mere-exposure effect
1570:Extrinsic incentives
1516:Selective perception
1370:is a project at the
1116:Alex, Evans (2020).
668:Poisson distribution
659:bias of an estimator
633:
515:
495:
475:
452:
428:
404:
360:
340:
320:
237:
214:
182:
162:
142:
118:Bias of an estimator
112:Bias of an estimator
63:statistical validity
30:For other uses, see
1865:Social desirability
1760:von Restorff effect
1635:Mean world syndrome
1610:Hostile attribution
878:. pp. 134–137.
872:Modern Epidemiology
864:Rothman, Kenneth J.
653:Estimator selection
583:anthropic principle
27:Systemic inaccuracy
1780:Statistical biases
1558:Curse of knowledge
639:
613:Hypothesis testing
552:biasing the sample
521:
501:
481:
458:
434:
422:unbiased estimator
410:
390:
346:
326:
303:
220:
200:
168:
148:
2083:
2082:
1720:Social comparison
1501:Choice-supportive
1256:978-0-412-98901-8
1053:10.1159/000312871
991:(10): 1495–1506.
965:978-0-203-95346-4
868:Greenland, Sander
804:(10): 1067–1077.
794:"Bias in testing"
608:under-estimation.
589:studies than men.
484:{\displaystyle T}
420:is said to be an
413:{\displaystyle T}
336:(with respect to
329:{\displaystyle T}
223:{\displaystyle T}
151:{\displaystyle T}
16:(Redirected from
2108:
1880:Systematic error
1835:Omitted-variable
1750:Trait ascription
1590:Frog pond effect
1418:Cognitive biases
1402:
1395:
1388:
1379:
1378:
1355:
1354:
1352:
1351:
1336:
1330:
1329:
1324:. Archived from
1314:
1308:
1307:
1267:
1261:
1260:
1240:
1234:
1231:
1225:
1224:
1209:Pearson, Egon S.
1201:
1195:
1194:
1181:
1175:
1174:
1134:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1124:
1113:
1107:
1106:
1104:
1103:
1092:"Volunteer bias"
1088:
1082:
1081:
1055:
1031:
1025:
1024:
976:
970:
969:
941:
935:
934:
886:
880:
879:
860:
854:
853:
833:
822:
821:
789:
773:Systematic error
683:Analysis methods
648:
646:
645:
640:
530:
528:
527:
522:
510:
508:
507:
502:
490:
488:
487:
482:
467:
465:
464:
459:
446:biased estimator
443:
441:
440:
435:
419:
417:
416:
411:
399:
397:
396:
391:
355:
353:
352:
347:
335:
333:
332:
327:
312:
310:
309:
304:
229:
227:
226:
221:
209:
207:
206:
201:
177:
175:
174:
169:
157:
155:
154:
149:
38:Statistical bias
21:
18:Statistical bias
2116:
2115:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2079:
2060:
2034:
1899:
1774:
1755:Turkey illusion
1523:Compassion fade
1420:
1411:
1406:
1364:
1359:
1358:
1349:
1347:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1315:
1311:
1288:10.2307/3647938
1268:
1264:
1257:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1202:
1198:
1182:
1178:
1135:
1131:
1122:
1120:
1114:
1110:
1101:
1099:
1096:Catalog of Bias
1090:
1089:
1085:
1032:
1028:
977:
973:
966:
942:
938:
887:
883:
861:
857:
834:
825:
790:
786:
781:
764:
735:
724:
685:
655:
634:
631:
630:
615:
561:Berksonian bias
545:
537:
516:
513:
512:
496:
493:
492:
476:
473:
472:
453:
450:
449:
429:
426:
425:
405:
402:
401:
361:
358:
357:
341:
338:
337:
321:
318:
317:
238:
235:
234:
215:
212:
211:
183:
180:
179:
163:
160:
159:
143:
140:
139:
120:
114:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2114:
2104:
2103:
2098:
2081:
2080:
2078:
2077:
2072:
2065:
2062:
2061:
2059:
2058:
2053:
2048:
2042:
2040:
2039:Bias reduction
2036:
2035:
2033:
2032:
2027:
2022:
2017:
2015:Political bias
2012:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1985:
1980:
1975:
1970:
1960:
1955:
1950:
1945:
1943:Infrastructure
1940:
1935:
1930:
1925:
1918:
1913:
1907:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1898:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1860:Self-selection
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1784:
1782:
1776:
1775:
1773:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1757:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1695:Pro-innovation
1692:
1687:
1682:
1680:Overton window
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1572:
1567:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1550:
1548:Dunning–Kruger
1545:
1540:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1462:Correspondence
1459:
1457:Actor–observer
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1423:
1421:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1405:
1404:
1397:
1390:
1382:
1376:
1375:
1363:
1362:External links
1360:
1357:
1356:
1331:
1328:on 2017-07-22.
1309:
1282:(3): 234–238.
1262:
1255:
1235:
1226:
1196:
1176:
1149:(4): 566–587.
1129:
1108:
1083:
1046:(2): c94–c99.
1026:
971:
964:
936:
901:(7): 598–602.
881:
855:
823:
783:
782:
780:
777:
776:
775:
770:
763:
760:
734:
731:
727:Reporting bias
723:
722:Interpretation
720:
719:
718:
715:cognitive bias
708:
701:
684:
681:
680:
679:
672:
671:
654:
651:
638:
614:
611:
610:
609:
602:
599:Attrition bias
596:
590:
586:
576:
548:Selection bias
544:
543:Data selection
541:
536:
533:
520:
500:
480:
457:
433:
409:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
368:
365:
345:
325:
314:
313:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
219:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
167:
147:
128:expected value
116:Main article:
113:
110:
76:sampling error
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2113:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2093:
2091:
2076:
2073:
2071:
2067:
2066:
2063:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2044:
2043:
2041:
2037:
2031:
2028:
2026:
2023:
2021:
2018:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2008:
2004:
2001:
1999:
1996:
1994:
1993:United States
1991:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1981:
1979:
1976:
1974:
1971:
1969:
1968:False balance
1966:
1965:
1964:
1961:
1959:
1956:
1954:
1951:
1949:
1946:
1944:
1941:
1939:
1936:
1934:
1931:
1929:
1926:
1924:
1923:
1919:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1906:
1902:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1840:Participation
1838:
1836:
1833:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1808:Psychological
1806:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1781:
1777:
1771:
1768:
1766:
1763:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1575:Fading affect
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1546:
1544:
1541:
1539:
1536:
1534:
1531:
1529:
1526:
1524:
1521:
1517:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1414:
1410:
1403:
1398:
1396:
1391:
1389:
1384:
1383:
1380:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1365:
1345:
1341:
1335:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1313:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1266:
1258:
1252:
1248:
1247:
1239:
1230:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:Neyman, Jerzy
1200:
1192:
1191:
1186:
1180:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1133:
1119:
1112:
1097:
1093:
1087:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1030:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
985:Risk Analysis
982:
975:
967:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
940:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
885:
877:
873:
869:
865:
859:
851:
847:
843:
839:
832:
830:
828:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
788:
784:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
759:
756:
752:
748:
744:
743:Observer bias
739:
730:
728:
716:
712:
711:Observer bias
709:
706:
702:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:
677:
674:
673:
669:
665:
664:
663:
660:
650:
636:
626:
623:
619:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
587:
584:
580:
577:
574:
570:
569:Spectrum bias
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
557:
556:sampling bias
553:
549:
540:
532:
518:
498:
478:
469:
455:
447:
431:
423:
407:
387:
384:
378:
375:
372:
366:
363:
343:
323:
300:
297:
291:
285:
279:
273:
267:
264:
261:
255:
252:
249:
243:
240:
233:
232:
231:
217:
194:
188:
165:
145:
137:
133:
129:
125:
119:
109:
107:
103:
99:
98:random errors
95:
90:
88:
87:response bias
84:
79:
77:
72:
66:
64:
59:
58:Data analysts
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
33:
19:
1953:In education
1920:
1904:Other biases
1890:Verification
1875:Survivorship
1825:Non-response
1798:Healthy user
1779:
1740:Substitution
1715:Self-serving
1511:Confirmation
1479:Availability
1427:Acquiescence
1348:. Retrieved
1346:. 2017-06-13
1343:
1334:
1326:the original
1312:
1279:
1275:
1265:
1245:
1238:
1229:
1220:
1216:
1199:
1189:
1179:
1146:
1142:
1132:
1121:. Retrieved
1111:
1100:. Retrieved
1098:. 2017-11-17
1095:
1086:
1043:
1039:
1029:
988:
984:
974:
946:
939:
898:
894:
884:
871:
858:
841:
838:"Study Bias"
801:
797:
787:
751:double-blind
740:
736:
725:
656:
627:
616:
593:Funding bias
559:
546:
538:
470:
445:
421:
315:
121:
105:
101:
100:. The terms
91:
80:
67:
37:
36:
2020:Publication
1973:Vietnam War
1820:Length time
1803:Information
1745:Time-saving
1605:Horn effect
1595:Halo effect
1543:Distinction
1452:Attribution
1447:Attentional
842:Stat Pearls
605:Recall bias
124:statistical
2090:Categories
1983:South Asia
1958:Liking gap
1770:In animals
1735:Status quo
1650:Negativity
1553:Egocentric
1528:Congruence
1506:Commitment
1496:Blind spot
1484:Mean world
1474:Automation
1350:2023-08-16
1123:2021-12-22
1102:2021-12-18
779:References
692:involving
178:, and let
2051:Debiasing
2030:White hat
2025:Reporting
1938:Inductive
1855:Selection
1815:Lead time
1788:Estimator
1765:Zero-risk
1730:Spotlight
1710:Restraint
1700:Proximity
1685:Precision
1645:Narrative
1600:Hindsight
1585:Frequency
1565:Emotional
1538:Declinism
1469:Authority
1442:Anchoring
1432:Ambiguity
1296:0002-9890
1163:0162-2439
1062:1660-2110
1005:1539-6924
915:1539-3704
818:1935-990X
755:p-hacking
637:α
519:θ
499:θ
456:θ
432:θ
379:θ
367:
344:θ
301:θ
298:−
286:
268:
256:θ
244:
189:
166:θ
136:estimated
132:parameter
54:estimator
40:, in the
1948:Inherent
1911:Academic
1885:Systemic
1870:Spectrum
1850:Sampling
1830:Observer
1793:Forecast
1705:Response
1665:Optimism
1660:Omission
1655:Normalcy
1625:In-group
1620:Implicit
1533:Cultural
1437:Affinity
1211:(1936).
1171:42598982
1078:18856450
1070:20407272
1013:20626690
931:35752032
923:12353947
850:34662027
768:Trueness
762:See also
698:diabetes
690:syndemic
230:. Then,
83:accuracy
2070:General
2068:Lists:
2003:Ukraine
1928:Funding
1690:Present
1675:Outcome
1580:Framing
1304:3647938
1223:: 1–37.
1021:6485564
694:obesity
400:, then
106:mistake
2075:Memory
1988:Sweden
1978:Norway
1845:Recall
1615:Impact
1491:Belief
1409:Biases
1302:
1294:
1253:
1169:
1161:
1076:
1068:
1060:
1019:
1011:
1003:
962:
929:
921:
913:
848:
816:
356:). If
134:being
71:sample
50:biased
1963:Media
1933:FUTON
1300:JSTOR
1167:S2CID
1074:S2CID
1017:S2CID
927:S2CID
747:blind
535:Types
2096:Bias
1292:ISSN
1251:ISBN
1159:ISSN
1066:PMID
1058:ISSN
1009:PMID
1001:ISSN
960:ISBN
919:PMID
911:ISSN
846:PMID
814:ISSN
696:and
657:The
558:and
364:bias
265:bias
241:bias
102:flaw
46:data
2010:Net
1895:Wet
1284:doi
1280:110
1151:doi
1048:doi
1044:115
993:doi
952:doi
903:doi
899:137
806:doi
749:or
703:In
620:in
448:of
424:of
104:or
61:of
2092::
1342:.
1320:.
1298:.
1290:.
1278:.
1274:.
1219:.
1215:.
1207:;
1165:.
1157:.
1147:38
1145:.
1141:.
1094:.
1072:.
1064:.
1056:.
1042:.
1038:.
1015:.
1007:.
999:.
989:30
987:.
983:.
958:.
925:.
917:.
909:.
897:.
893:.
874:.
866:;
844:.
840:.
826:^
812:.
802:36
800:.
796:.
564:.
468:.
65:.
1401:e
1394:t
1387:v
1353:.
1306:.
1286::
1259:.
1221:1
1173:.
1153::
1126:.
1105:.
1080:.
1050::
1023:.
995::
968:.
954::
933:.
905::
852:.
820:.
808::
479:T
408:T
388:0
385:=
382:)
376:,
373:T
370:(
324:T
295:)
292:T
289:(
283:E
280:=
277:)
274:T
271:(
262:=
259:)
253:,
250:T
247:(
218:T
198:)
195:T
192:(
186:E
146:T
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.