986:
was active, but I have no reliable source stating his personal involvement in the project. One site states: "Benjamin
Franklin is generally credited with erecting milestones along the major post roads between Boston and Philadelphia in the 1760’s. However, according to Franklin scholars, this attribution is not true. There is no evidence he was ever involved in erecting any of many red sandstone milestones along the post roads in Massachusetts and Connecticut or any other place in the American colonies. Who erected these milestones is currently unknown. Careful examination of the stones indicates they were the work of different carvers and were probably erected in different years."
138:
1114:
a larger system and not of complete understanding. It would be wrong to make assumptions and tie things together that are unsupported by the evidence and documentation just because others exist. It may be a milestone, but there is no details on any administrative or business aspect surrounding it. The name of the carver and erector are unknown - but are not covered in any other comprehensive listing of other milestones. There is just a bunch of unknowns about this marker - barring some new study, I don't think there is much more known on it.
243:
216:
253:
346:
358:
21:
932:
907:
873:
821:
798:
777:
738:
706:
661:
640:
582:
541:
76:
128:
107:
1021:. I do not want to link directly in the article to that (as decided before) but I've linked it for you since it was not a direct part of the nomination form I linked within. I really dislike the MPS submissions which typically have precious little. In other news (related) I called the historical society for another property and they might have 1 image I do not have... nothing new on the milestone yet.
409:
1055:
I cannot find any other source about it. The problem is that this type of research is done in the reviewing process for NRHP listings. Many trivial things, like washing or repairs to NRHP properties are not listed and this stone is not going to have a "land deed" or other record next to it. I have no
1113:
I think the article is fine as is... considering related milestones and their usage and whether or not legendary accounts of
Benjamin Franklin are related to this one seems off... this milestone is not even listed in the book on postal milestones. It seems to be a standalone case that is not part of
985:
1a fixed. Not sure how to link directly to that page in Google Books - how do I do that? The NRHP is cited inline... I added it to the missing quote though, if that's what you meant. As for the
Franklin reference... I dunno, but I removed Waymarking as a ref. The position did not yet exist, but he
1070:
What I think this article needs is some discussion of
Colonial-era highways and milestones, not this specific milestone. I did some brief Googling and there seem to be plenty of sources on the subject. There are also sources knocking down Franklin's involvement, which seems useful since it keeps
989:
And this is clearly true according to other stones and their various styles, dates and carvings. Though this one is not of sandstone either. As for the electric road, I'll give a call and ask if anyone knows more, but this was a tough topic to get even cursory information on.
1098:, it has been over a month since the last post here (I don't see any edits to address it), and longer than that since the article was edited. I think it's getting to be about time to conclude the review, if no further work is contemplated. Thanks.
1056:
idea. The lead I have opens in 2 hours, but I'll check to see if they have anything more. I am not certain about the DAR chapter. Many times I wait weeks for responses from such places, but hopefully this is quicker.
1004:
Thank you. What I meant for the NRHP is the fact of the stone being added to the NRHP in 1982. That needs a citation. If
Franklin's involvement is rumored enough having a source knocking it down might be worthwhile.
1209:
198:
1143:
1204:
681:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
188:
1152:
My only criticism of this article is that it doesn't connect to the larger picture. It is apparently part of a greater system of milestones. Parenthetically, I would note that while the
755:
The article would benefit from a brief discussion of
Colonial-era highways to help place the milestone in context. "Colonial" is not wiki-linked and may be unfamiliar to foreign readers.
967:
I've noted some areas for improvement above but in general I think this article is in good shape. The article's a bit short but there's probably not much else to say on the subject.
1199:
164:
1175:
1224:
151:
112:
336:
768:
may have had a connection to the milestone as postmaster general (which would fit with the discussion above). Is there a reliable source which makes the claim?
283:
678:
447:
1128:
I think I must concur; and I'm going to pass the article as is. I appreciate all your hard work and I apologize if I drew this process out unnecessarily.
300:
32:
1194:
550:
607:
414:
1219:
1065:
999:
326:
1234:
376:
1123:
437:
1135:
1078:
1042:
1030:
1012:
974:
419:
1244:
290:
143:
1239:
890:
500:, thanks for your work on this article. I'll take this review on. Please excuse any missteps as this is my first crack at reviewing.
1214:
611:
603:
295:
1229:
595:
278:
953:
Just a note: I'll be away for a week so I will not get to fixes if needed until that time. Thanks for starting the review.
274:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
160:
266:
221:
46:
920:
371:
226:
1189:
1035:
Thanks, that works for me. I think if we can place this article in a slightly broader context we're all set. Best,
599:
962:
808:
486:
442:
38:
1017:
The "all data" database seems to be the best here. The current (and very large 7.5 mb excel spreadsheet) lists
715:
507:
882:
490:
758:
The "electrical line" in the article was described as an "electric road" in the source; that's probably an
87:
1107:
1156:
position had not come into being until 1775, his service as postmaster had gone on for decades before.
1168:
894:
670:
900:
The image is available under a free license, and is the only image which makes sense for the article.
674:
591:
1119:
1061:
1026:
995:
958:
163:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
886:
786:
625:
465:
53:
834:
747:
461:
648:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
1162:
1103:
93:
557:
This is mostly fine. The second paragraph in the
History section is awkward. A few examples:
59:
20:
258:
8:
1132:
1115:
1095:
1075:
1057:
1039:
1022:
1009:
991:
971:
954:
812:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
504:
497:
480:
363:
1153:
1086:
916:
987:
1145:
765:
393:
42:
1099:
859:
855:
1018:
863:
242:
215:
1129:
1091:
1072:
1036:
1006:
968:
649:
518:
501:
476:
1183:
271:
156:
785:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
468:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1157:
833:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
1210:
GA-Class
National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
759:
696:
I realize it's a nitpick, but nowhere is the NRHP addition cited inline
345:
567:"unknown stonecutter, the inscription" this is a comma splice
127:
106:
1205:
Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
173:
Knowledge:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
176:
Template:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
155:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
1200:
GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
353:
248:
133:
1225:GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
551:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
1181:
152:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
179:National Register of Historic Places articles
691:to link directly to the relevant information
572:"inscription is likened to" again, by whom?
144:National Register of Historic Places portal
1195:Engineering and technology good articles
33:Engineering and technology good articles
1182:
1220:Low-importance United States articles
1235:Low-importance Rhode Island articles
553:; spelling and grammar are correct.
264:This article is within the scope of
170:National Register of Historic Places
161:National Register of Historic Places
149:This article is within the scope of
113:National Register of Historic Places
75:
73:
69:
15:
549:. the prose is clear, concise, and
311:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
92:It is of interest to the following
13:
1245:WikiProject United States articles
1144:One of many milestones ordered by
344:
314:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1256:
1240:WikiProject Rhode Island articles
41:. If you can improve it further,
930:
905:
871:
819:
796:
775:
736:
704:
659:
638:
580:
539:
356:
251:
241:
214:
136:
126:
105:
74:
19:
1215:GA-Class United States articles
331:This article has been rated as
193:This article has been rated as
1230:GA-Class Rhode Island articles
679:could reasonably be challenged
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1079:14:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
1066:13:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
891:valid non-free use rationales
689:The American Monthly Magazine
369:This article is supported by
167:and see a list of open tasks.
1136:22:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
1124:16:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
1108:21:38, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
931:
906:
872:
820:
797:
776:
762:. Is it possible to clarify?
737:
705:
660:
639:
581:
540:
7:
1176:17:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
1043:02:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
1031:01:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
1013:12:30, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
1000:09:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
975:16:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
963:15:50, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
508:15:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
491:15:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
10:
1261:
1158:1761 Milestone by Franklin
842:
723:
650:the layout style guideline
619:
562:"is described..." by whom?
526:
513:
337:project's importance scale
199:project's importance scale
843:
724:
620:
527:
517:
352:
330:
267:WikiProject United States
236:
192:
121:
100:
514:
372:WikiProject Rhode Island
272:United States of America
1190:Knowledge good articles
919:to the topic, and have
687:Please fix the link to
590:. it complies with the
466:Talk:1761 Milestone/GA1
349:
317:United States articles
82:This article is rated
729:Broad in its coverage
348:
57:: October 31, 2014. (
39:good article criteria
837:or content dispute.
716:no original research
631:no original research
259:United States portal
746:. it addresses the
677:. All content that
364:Rhode Island portal
285:Articles Requested!
1154:Postmaster General
942:Overall assessment
887:copyright statuses
850:, if possible, by
697:
692:
612:list incorporation
573:
568:
563:
558:
350:
88:content assessment
1146:Benjamin Franklin
950:
949:
921:suitable captions
893:are provided for
766:Benjamin Franklin
695:
686:
571:
566:
561:
556:
456:
455:
391:
390:
387:
386:
383:
382:
209:
208:
205:
204:
68:
67:
64:
1252:
1174:
1164:7&6=thirteen
934:
933:
909:
908:
895:non-free content
875:
874:
823:
822:
800:
799:
779:
778:
740:
739:
708:
707:
671:reliable sources
663:
662:
642:
641:
584:
583:
543:
542:
512:
511:
410:Copyvio detector
398:
397:
366:
361:
360:
359:
319:
318:
315:
312:
309:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
229:
218:
211:
210:
181:
180:
177:
174:
171:
146:
141:
140:
139:
130:
123:
122:
117:
109:
102:
101:
85:
79:
78:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1180:
1179:
1161:
1150:
1089:
594:guidelines for
592:Manual of Style
523:Review Comment
460:This review is
452:
424:
396:
362:
357:
355:
316:
313:
310:
307:
306:
305:
291:Become a Member
257:
252:
250:
230:
224:
178:
175:
172:
169:
168:
142:
137:
135:
115:
86:on Knowledge's
83:
58:
12:
11:
5:
1258:
1248:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1149:
1148:placed in 1761
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1116:ChrisGualtieri
1096:ChrisGualtieri
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1058:ChrisGualtieri
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1023:ChrisGualtieri
992:ChrisGualtieri
980:
979:
978:
977:
955:ChrisGualtieri
948:
947:
945:
935:
927:
926:
924:
910:
902:
901:
898:
876:
868:
867:
841:
840:
838:
824:
816:
815:
813:
801:
793:
792:
790:
780:
772:
771:
770:
769:
763:
756:
751:
750:of the topic.
741:
733:
732:
722:
721:
719:
714:. it contains
709:
701:
700:
699:
698:
693:
682:
664:
656:
655:
653:
643:
635:
634:
618:
617:
615:
604:words to watch
585:
577:
576:
575:
574:
569:
564:
554:
544:
536:
535:
525:
524:
521:
516:
498:ChrisGualtieri
495:
471:
470:
454:
453:
451:
450:
445:
440:
434:
431:
430:
426:
425:
423:
422:
420:External links
417:
412:
406:
403:
402:
395:
392:
389:
388:
385:
384:
381:
380:
377:Low-importance
368:
367:
351:
341:
340:
333:Low-importance
329:
323:
322:
320:
304:
303:
298:
293:
288:
281:
279:Template Usage
275:
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
219:
207:
206:
203:
202:
195:Low-importance
191:
185:
184:
182:
165:the discussion
159:listed on the
157:historic sites
148:
147:
131:
119:
118:
116:Low‑importance
110:
98:
97:
91:
80:
66:
65:
50:
27:1761 Milestone
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1257:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1171:
1166:
1165:
1159:
1155:
1147:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1054:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
984:
983:
982:
981:
976:
973:
970:
966:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
946:
943:
939:
936:
929:
928:
925:
922:
918:
914:
911:
904:
903:
899:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
877:
870:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
846:
839:
836:
832:
828:
825:
818:
817:
814:
811:
810:
805:
802:
795:
794:
791:
788:
787:summary style
784:
781:
774:
773:
767:
764:
761:
757:
754:
753:
752:
749:
745:
742:
735:
734:
730:
727:
720:
717:
713:
710:
703:
702:
694:
690:
685:
684:
683:
680:
676:
672:
668:
665:
658:
657:
654:
651:
647:
644:
637:
636:
632:
628:
627:
623:
616:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
596:lead sections
593:
589:
586:
579:
578:
570:
565:
560:
559:
555:
552:
548:
545:
538:
537:
533:
530:
522:
520:
510:
509:
506:
503:
499:
493:
492:
488:
485:
482:
478:
475:
469:
467:
463:
458:
457:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
435:
433:
432:
428:
427:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
407:
405:
404:
400:
399:
378:
375:(assessed as
374:
373:
365:
354:
347:
343:
342:
338:
334:
328:
325:
324:
321:
308:United States
302:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
286:
282:
280:
277:
276:
273:
269:
268:
260:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
228:
223:
222:United States
220:
217:
213:
212:
200:
196:
190:
187:
186:
183:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:
145:
134:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
114:
111:
108:
104:
103:
99:
95:
89:
81:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1169:
1163:
1151:
1090:
941:
937:
915:. media are
912:
881:. media are
878:
851:
847:
844:
830:
826:
807:
803:
782:
748:main aspects
743:
728:
725:
711:
688:
675:cited inline
666:
645:
630:
624:
621:
587:
546:
532:Well-written
531:
528:
494:
483:
473:
472:
459:
448:Instructions
370:
332:
296:Project Talk
284:
265:
227:Rhode Island
194:
150:
94:WikiProjects
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1100:BlueMoonset
1071:coming up.
885:with their
848:Illustrated
462:transcluded
1184:Categories
1160:elsewhere
760:interurban
626:Verifiable
415:Authorship
401:GA toolbox
37:under the
1130:Mackensen
1092:Mackensen
1073:Mackensen
1037:Mackensen
1007:Mackensen
969:Mackensen
519:Attribute
502:Mackensen
477:Mackensen
474:Reviewer:
438:Templates
429:Reviewing
394:GA Review
917:relevant
854:such as
835:edit war
487:contribs
443:Criteria
84:GA-class
47:reassess
1019:it here
809:Neutral
608:fiction
335:on the
197:on the
1133:(talk)
1076:(talk)
1040:(talk)
1010:(talk)
972:(talk)
889:, and
883:tagged
856:images
831:Stable
610:, and
600:layout
505:(talk)
496:Hello
301:Alerts
90:scale.
54:Review
1087:Query
864:audio
862:, or
860:video
852:media
629:with
515:Rate
464:from
1120:talk
1104:talk
1062:talk
1027:talk
996:talk
959:talk
673:are
481:talk
789:).
327:Low
189:Low
49:it.
1186::
1122:)
1106:)
1094:,
1064:)
1029:)
998:)
961:)
944:.
940:.
923:.
913:6b
897:.
879:6a
866::
858:,
845:6.
829:.
806:.
783:3b
744:3a
731::
726:3.
718:.
712:2c
669:.
667:2b
652:.
646:2a
633::
622:2.
614:.
606:,
602:,
598:,
588:1b
547:1a
534::
529:1.
489:)
379:).
225::
63:).
1173:)
1170:☎
1167:(
1118:(
1102:(
1060:(
1025:(
994:(
957:(
938:7
827:5
804:4
484:·
479:(
339:.
201:.
96::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
