Knowledge

Talk:British Library Philatelic Collections

Source 📝

218: 197: 297: 276: 307: 21: 1389: 1353: 1336: 1308: 1287: 1264: 1252: 1231: 1214: 1201: 1174: 1158: 166: 393: 107: 479: 1074: 1035: 1004: 965: 931: 901: 866: 831: 800: 769: 738: 708: 677: 647: 617: 586: 1082:
I tend to check with GBooks and WorldCat (and sometimes use a script to nab the text automatically), this example may have been taken from either the main GBooks or WorldCat entries where both match the case given, though I note that where cited in other works the mix-case form is used. I'm not sure
873:
Rephrased, this seemed misleading as my understanding is that Beech has been Keeper of the Collections for 30 years and there is no need to put in the current year just to say he is still there. I have removed "2011" and will try hunting around for information on when he was actually
572:
General: capitalisation – the use of u.l.c. for titles of people and organisations is inconsistent and looks odd in places. "Philatelic Collections" appears with and without capitals; "assistant keeper of Printed Books" looks decidedly odd. (I have checked Garnett's
577:
obit, 14 April 1906, p. 4, and "Assistant" and "Keeper" are both capitalised there.) Moreover, this does not square with the use of the capital letter in "The Head of the…" later in the article. Also, "Government departments" looks odd with one of the two words
567:
This article is well laid-out, nicely illustrated, thoroughly referenced and – as far as a layman can judge – comprehensive. There are, however, quite a few minor problems with the prose, which I think need to be dealt with before I can complete the review:
553:) 21:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC) I owe GA a review, having just had one of my own efforts promoted. As the privileged holder of a British Library reader's ticket I have picked this one. More to come in the next 24 hours. 1011:
I normally add book and article subtitles and by-lines using the semi-colon, however as the BL is the publisher (and this was also the format used in the citation), I'll go with their preference.
484: 489: 854:"The Head of the philatelic collections in 2011 is David Beech" – this construction is apt to get out of date, and is better phrased as "David Beech was appointed …. in 20XX". See 1083:
there is a convention on using title case, but I'll double check the other titles before either making consistent with the Google Books catalogue or using title case throughout.
1434: 639:
References 10 and 9 - I have been (rightly) pulled up at GA or FAC for having adjacent references out of numerical sequence as seen here; swopping them round would do the trick.
1444: 248: 1098:
I have changed over to consistent (hopefully) use of conventional Title Case throughout rather than relying on the haphazardness of whatever Google Books does.
823:"horse licenses and the pilot's license" – the modern English spelling of the noun is "licence" ("license" as a noun is either archaic English or else American) 517: 371: 1439: 258: 669:"in 1946 this was proposed to be moved" – tortuous use of the passive. Something like "…there was a proposal to move it…" would be easier on the eye. 1020: 785: 693: 535: 128: 90: 1107: 1092: 1051: 981: 946: 916: 886: 847: 816: 754: 723: 662: 632: 457: 877:
I found a decent source (a published lecture he gave which includes a profile) and so the dates of his appointment are verifiable and clear.
507: 32: 1410: 1459: 1429: 361: 1449: 1122: 562: 1464: 1330: 448:. Dropped for the time being unless someone takes this up again (in which case I might have to add a parameter to the template). 422: 413:
I do not know why the title is defaulting to italics, can anybody explain what is doing that as I'm not sure it is needed here?
139: 602: 1454: 337: 50: 1058:
Finally, back on capitalisation, are you sure you have correctly reproduced the titles of your reference books, such as
593:
Philatelic Collections, Assistant Keeper, Tapling Collection and Government Departments all standardized to title case.
1133: 1371:
I don't know how the image of the book cover would fare at FAC, but your fair use rationale seems fair enough to me.
83: 1424: 512: 320: 281: 38: 1225: 399: 224: 202: 1127: 227:. Please copy assessments of the article from the most relevant WikiProject template to this one as needed. 177: 442: 1027:"in tête beche pairs" – another technical term that should, I think, be explained (a footnote would do). 1168: 923:"…such as postal stationary" – stationary post is no use to anyone; I think you mean "stationery". 336:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1191: 531: 855: 609:"In 1900 the Crown Agents for the Colonies send three albums – past tense needed here, surely? 745:
A short explanation added but with a link to the related article which goes into the detail.
183: 121: 432: 408: 20: 8: 1406: 1118: 558: 550: 761:"valued at £7,600, Mackay had exchanged these" – stronger stop than a comma needed here. 106: 463: 42: 1322: 954: 332: 312: 1137: 1103: 1088: 1047: 1016: 977: 942: 912: 882: 843: 812: 781: 750: 719: 689: 658: 628: 598: 453: 418: 1402: 1277: 1114: 730:"progressive printings" – I think this needs to be explained for the lay reader 554: 546: 148: 700:"1961 Mr. James A. Mackay was" – why "Mr." here? Not usual Knowledge practice. 217: 196: 1418: 1347: 1113:
If you would like to consider the above points I can complete the GA review.
893:"which were the Crown Agents working records" – possessive apostrophe needed. 792:"ize" -v- "ise" – consistency needed; the article contains examples of both. 1042:
Wiki-link to related article added and an in-article explanatory footnote.
538:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 296: 275: 398:
This article has been flagged for improvement as part of the January 2011
838:
Working on Commons tends to make you blind to the American spelling. :)
1099: 1084: 1043: 1012: 973: 938: 908: 878: 839: 808: 777: 746: 715: 685: 654: 624: 594: 449: 414: 326: 115: 957:: the correct form for dates is 23 April 1890 – no "rd" or comma. 972:
A regex search only found the one instance of cardinal dates.
1346:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
1062:? A quick google suggests that it is generally rendered as 1329:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
807:
Only found one instance, harmonized to OED conventions.
1066:. The same may apply to other books in your references. 1435:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 302: 1211:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 1064:The Care and Preservation of Philatelic Materials 1060:The care and preservation of philatelic materials 114:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's 1416: 1445:Top-importance British Library-related articles 536:Talk:British Library Philatelic Collections/GA1 48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 996:(i.e. a dash where you have a semi colon). 1440:GA-Class British Library-related articles 147:items and was established in 1891 with 1417: 1401:A good job, and a pleasure to review. 992:" – the BL website gives the title as 140:British Library Philatelic Collections 27:British Library Philatelic Collections 387: 318:This article is within the scope of 236:Template:WikiProject British Library 165: 163: 159: 182:It is of interest to the following 13: 1460:High-importance Philately articles 1430:Art and architecture good articles 1284:Fair representation without bias: 33:Art and architecture good articles 14: 1476: 41:. If you can improve it further, 1450:British Library-related articles 1387: 1351: 1334: 1306: 1285: 1262: 1250: 1229: 1212: 1199: 1172: 1156: 1072: 1033: 1002: 963: 929: 899: 864: 829: 798: 767: 736: 706: 675: 645: 615: 584: 391: 305: 295: 274: 239:British Library-related articles 216: 195: 164: 105: 19: 1465:All WikiProject Philately pages 366:This article has been rated as 346:Knowledge:WikiProject Philately 253:This article has been rated as 988:"British Library pocket guide 856:Knowledge:MOS#Precise language 349:Template:WikiProject Philately 233:Knowledge:GLAM/British Library 225:related to the British Library 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 953:"23rd April, 1890" – see the 340:and see a list of open tasks. 1411:09:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC) 1388: 1352: 1335: 1307: 1286: 1263: 1251: 1230: 1213: 1200: 1173: 1157: 1123:11:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 1108:22:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 1093:12:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 1052:13:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 1021:12:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 982:12:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 947:12:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 917:12:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 887:22:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 848:12:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 817:12:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 786:22:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 755:22:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 724:12:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 694:22:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 663:22:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 633:12:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 603:16:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 563:21:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC) 458:23:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 423:19:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 7: 1455:GA-Class Philately articles 994:Treasures in Focus – Stamps 135:The text of the entry was: 10: 1481: 1198:A. References to sources: 990:Treasures in Focus; Stamps 372:project's importance scale 259:project's importance scale 137:Did you know ... that the 1326:to illustrate the topic? 400:British Library Editathon 365: 290: 252: 211: 190: 65: 61: 1425:Knowledge good articles 1150:reasonably well written 172:This article is rated 1244:broad in its coverage 321:WikiProject Philately 39:good article criteria 1226:No original research 91:Good article nominee 1331:fair use rationales 1305:No edit wars, etc: 1249:A. Major aspects: 1187:factually accurate 1155:A. Prose quality: 443:Infobox collection 438:being used within 352:Philately articles 178:content assessment 66:Article milestones 1348:suitable captions 776:Full stop added. 526: 525: 406: 405: 386: 385: 382: 381: 378: 377: 269: 268: 265: 264: 158: 157: 100: 99: 57: 1472: 1391: 1390: 1358:Well illustrated 1355: 1354: 1341:Well illustrated 1338: 1337: 1310: 1309: 1289: 1288: 1266: 1265: 1254: 1253: 1233: 1232: 1216: 1215: 1203: 1202: 1176: 1175: 1160: 1159: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1010: 1006: 1005: 971: 967: 966: 937: 933: 932: 907: 903: 902: 872: 868: 867: 837: 833: 832: 806: 802: 801: 775: 771: 770: 744: 740: 739: 714: 710: 709: 683: 679: 678: 653: 649: 648: 623: 619: 618: 592: 588: 587: 480:Copyvio detector 468: 467: 447: 441: 437: 431: 428:This was due to 395: 394: 388: 354: 353: 350: 347: 344: 333:stamp collecting 315: 313:Philately portal 310: 309: 308: 299: 292: 291: 286: 278: 271: 270: 241: 240: 237: 234: 231: 223:This article is 220: 213: 212: 207: 199: 192: 191: 175: 169: 168: 167: 160: 146: 129:January 25, 2011 109: 86: 84:January 28, 2011 63: 62: 46: 23: 16: 15: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1415: 1414: 1219:Well referenced 1206:Well referenced 1130: 1128:Overall summary 1073: 1071: 1034: 1032: 1003: 1001: 964: 962: 955:Manual of Style 930: 928: 900: 898: 865: 863: 830: 828: 799: 797: 768: 766: 737: 735: 707: 705: 676: 674: 646: 644: 616: 614: 585: 583: 530:This review is 522: 494: 466: 445: 439: 435: 429: 411: 392: 368:High-importance 351: 348: 345: 342: 341: 311: 306: 304: 285:High‑importance 284: 238: 235: 232: 230:British Library 229: 228: 205: 203:British Library 176:on Knowledge's 173: 154: 153: 144: 133: 82: 12: 11: 5: 1478: 1468: 1467: 1462: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1437: 1432: 1427: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1386:Pass or Fail: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1144: 1129: 1126: 1111: 1110: 1096: 1068: 1067: 1055: 1054: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1023: 998: 997: 985: 984: 959: 958: 950: 949: 925: 924: 920: 919: 895: 894: 890: 889: 875: 860: 859: 851: 850: 825: 824: 820: 819: 794: 793: 789: 788: 763: 762: 758: 757: 732: 731: 727: 726: 702: 701: 697: 696: 671: 670: 666: 665: 641: 640: 636: 635: 611: 610: 606: 605: 580: 579: 541: 540: 524: 523: 521: 520: 515: 510: 504: 501: 500: 496: 495: 493: 492: 490:External links 487: 482: 476: 473: 472: 465: 462: 461: 460: 410: 407: 404: 403: 396: 384: 383: 380: 379: 376: 375: 364: 358: 357: 355: 338:the discussion 317: 316: 300: 288: 287: 279: 267: 266: 263: 262: 255:Top-importance 251: 245: 244: 242: 221: 209: 208: 206:Top‑importance 200: 188: 187: 181: 170: 156: 155: 149:Thomas Tapling 134: 113: 112: 110: 102: 101: 98: 97: 94: 87: 79: 78: 75: 72: 68: 67: 59: 58: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1477: 1466: 1463: 1461: 1458: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1420: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1393: 1392: 1385: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1357: 1356: 1349: 1345: 1340: 1339: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1325: 1324: 1318: 1312: 1311: 1304: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1283: 1282: 1280: 1279: 1274: 1268: 1267: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1248: 1247: 1245: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1227: 1223: 1218: 1217: 1210: 1205: 1204: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1178: 1177: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1154: 1153: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1136:review – see 1135: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1040: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 983: 979: 975: 970: 961: 960: 956: 952: 951: 948: 944: 940: 936: 927: 926: 922: 921: 918: 914: 910: 906: 897: 896: 892: 891: 888: 884: 880: 876: 871: 862: 861: 857: 853: 852: 849: 845: 841: 836: 827: 826: 822: 821: 818: 814: 810: 805: 796: 795: 791: 790: 787: 783: 779: 774: 765: 764: 760: 759: 756: 752: 748: 743: 734: 733: 729: 728: 725: 721: 717: 713: 704: 703: 699: 698: 695: 691: 687: 682: 673: 672: 668: 667: 664: 660: 656: 652: 643: 642: 638: 637: 634: 630: 626: 622: 613: 612: 608: 607: 604: 600: 596: 591: 582: 581: 576: 571: 570: 569: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 545: 539: 537: 533: 528: 527: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 505: 503: 502: 498: 497: 491: 488: 486: 483: 481: 478: 477: 475: 474: 470: 469: 459: 455: 451: 444: 434: 427: 426: 425: 424: 420: 416: 401: 397: 390: 389: 373: 369: 363: 360: 359: 356: 339: 335: 334: 329: 328: 323: 322: 314: 303: 301: 298: 294: 293: 289: 283: 280: 277: 273: 272: 260: 256: 250: 247: 246: 243: 226: 222: 219: 215: 214: 210: 204: 201: 198: 194: 193: 189: 185: 179: 171: 162: 161: 152: 150: 142: 141: 131: 130: 125: 123: 122:Did you know? 117: 111: 108: 104: 103: 95: 93: 92: 88: 85: 81: 80: 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 60: 55: 53: 52: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1400: 1380: 1320: 1299: 1276: 1261:B. Focused: 1243: 1190: 1186: 1171:compliance: 1149: 1143: 1140:for criteria 1132: 1131: 1112: 1081: 1077: 1063: 1059: 1038: 1007: 993: 989: 968: 934: 904: 869: 834: 803: 772: 741: 711: 680: 650: 620: 589: 578:capitalised. 574: 566: 543: 542: 529: 518:Instructions 412: 409:Italic title 367: 331: 325: 319: 254: 184:WikiProjects 138: 136: 127: 119: 89: 49: 47: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 684:Rephrased. 532:transcluded 433:italictitle 151:'s bequest? 1419:Categories 1192:verifiable 874:appointed. 485:Authorship 471:GA toolbox 126:column on 37:under the 1403:Tim riley 1115:Tim riley 555:Tim riley 547:Tim riley 544:Reviewer: 508:Templates 499:Reviewing 464:GA Review 343:Philately 327:philately 282:Philately 145:8 million 143:has over 116:Main Page 1321:contain 1319:Does it 1138:WP:WIAGA 513:Criteria 174:GA-class 51:reassess 1381:Overall 1278:neutral 370:on the 257:on the 118:in the 74:Process 1323:images 1300:stable 1298:Is it 1275:Is it 1242:Is it 1185:Is it 1148:Is it 180:scale. 96:Listed 77:Result 575:Times 534:from 1407:talk 1189:and 1119:talk 1104:talk 1089:talk 1078:Done 1048:talk 1039:Done 1017:talk 1008:Done 978:talk 969:Done 943:talk 935:Done 913:talk 905:Done 883:talk 870:Done 844:talk 835:Done 813:talk 804:Done 782:talk 773:Done 751:talk 742:Done 720:talk 712:Done 690:talk 681:Done 659:talk 651:Done 629:talk 621:Done 599:talk 590:Done 559:talk 551:talk 454:talk 419:talk 362:High 330:and 71:Date 1224:C. 1169:MoS 1167:B. 249:Top 1421:: 1409:) 1383:: 1350:: 1333:: 1302:? 1281:? 1246:? 1228:: 1195:? 1152:? 1134:GA 1121:) 1106:) 1100:Fæ 1091:) 1085:Fæ 1050:) 1044:Fæ 1019:) 1013:Fæ 980:) 974:Fæ 945:) 939:Fæ 915:) 909:Fæ 885:) 879:Fæ 846:) 840:Fæ 815:) 809:Fæ 784:) 778:Fæ 753:) 747:Fæ 722:) 716:Fæ 692:) 686:Fæ 661:) 655:Fæ 631:) 625:Fæ 601:) 595:Fæ 561:) 456:) 450:Fæ 446:}} 440:{{ 436:}} 430:{{ 421:) 415:Fæ 54:it 45:. 1405:( 1117:( 1102:( 1087:( 1046:( 1015:( 976:( 941:( 911:( 881:( 858:. 842:( 811:( 780:( 749:( 718:( 688:( 657:( 627:( 597:( 557:( 549:( 452:( 417:( 402:. 374:. 261:. 186:: 132:. 124:" 120:" 56:.

Index

Good article
Art and architecture good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
January 28, 2011
Good article nominee
Did You Know
Main Page
Did you know?
January 25, 2011
British Library Philatelic Collections
Thomas Tapling
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
British Library
WikiProject icon
related to the British Library
Top
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Philately
WikiProject icon
Philately portal
WikiProject Philately
philately
stamp collecting
the discussion
High

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.