Talk:Chris Moyles - Knowledge

2673:

younger presenter etc (I have heard Grimshaw will be playing more records - does this offer a clue that they think listeners want more music than they tend to get with Moyles?) or if he left for his own reasons and Radio 1 would happily have kept him on. Could this information if it can be found (presumably there is media comment about this) be put in this article and the one on Moyles's show? Also, I would have thought the episode in I think 2010 where he told listeners on the air that he hadn't been paid for a substantial period would merit a mention. It is quite striking to have a high-profile DJ go public with a complaint about station management on air.

1503:

on them. The article simply states that they were made, and that PFC have reported on the subject of a response to them. Again - it's up to the reader to pass judgement if they so choose, but the facts as they are written in the article can be unquestioningly verified by the sources given, which are reputable and can be proven to be reputable given enough time and effort (as if it's not obvious by looking through their site, their recognition and their achievements), and the facts given offer all of the available and verifiable factual information that is currently available.

2366:

So far, so uncontroversial. However I would dispute that the term 'Anglo-Irish' refers exclusively to Church of Ireland 'Ascendancy' people. It has been used in that context, but that use is disputed both by those referred to (who invariably self-described as 'Irish', especially before the rise of the Gaelic League etc) and by others who see it as pejorative. Today, anglo-irish can mean someone born in the Republic of Ireland who goes to live in England, and many years later returns to the Republic. They are Anglo-Irish. Or Hiberno-English, perhaps.

1356:

demonstrated by the archive of PFC making them, and the fact that they are mentioned on Moyles' biography on his fansite, and that PFC have made further reports on the reaction to the accusation, the contents of which are unconfirmed. These aren't views - they're facts that not even Moyles would refute (after all, WP:Living is all about ensuring that libelous and baseless defamatory articles are not witten about living people likely to want to bite back if they knew of them. This is clearly not the case here anyway, even if there were bias).

393: 1804:

on twitpic are available for free use, hence the reason they have a link allowing you to embed the file into your website/blog. Further more, I personally uploaded this file to commons and I know the legal status of the image conflicts. I am new to editing articles I am unable to do better at this time, it took me ages to work it out and I am irritated, it's not nice to have your work removed without an ounce of consideration. I would ask anyone who takes issue with this discuss it with me.

692: 671: 573: 781: 1497:(a respectedand influential organisation, by definition, is neither a minority or a minority group. It's a respected and influential organisation). There's nothing to spill over to wikipedia. Moyles was accused and that fact is backed up by two significant sources that are of opposite bias (at least - to those who see such bias). There's no vendetta in the first place. It's not the person they are complaining about - it's the content of one of his shows. 639: 442: 421: 331: 307: 452: 2043:

of "rubbish". The panel felt on the one hand that it could offend some listeners, and counseled caution on its use, but then said that Moyles was keeping up with developments in English usage and was not being homophobic. Also, anthropomorphism aside, a song cannot be homosexual, so a song cannot accurately be described as gay, unless you're using the older definition and saying the song could be characterized by cheerfulness.

190: 563: 539: 276: 1317:, is even a fairly accomplished lawyer. PFC also has a great deal of respect for it's work in Parliament. Regardless of this, ALL news sources have bias - it's in the nature of news and journalism. Papers like "The Sun" and "The Daily Mail", to name but two of many are renowned for it, but they seem to be oki as sources. By comparison, PFC actually has an amount of credibility when you look at it in that light. 1619:

I've moved the latter. Also having this as a whole separate section seems to be in danger of becoming a catch-all list of everything he's ever done that someone didn't like, could some or all of it be part of a Biography section instead? He doesn't like Towers of London and they don't like him, is that a noteworthy "controversy" in the same way as being accused of being homophobic or racist? I don't think so.

3052: 2549:. Its removal is contested, and there is no consensus for its removal. Consequently the opinion of one editor is not a basis for its removal. It is up to those wishing it removed to present a case, based on policies and guidelines, that sways consensus. As I've said, I'm open to persuasion and accept there may be a case for either its removal or, preferably, a re-wording. -- 1456:

mind up about whether or not the BBC wrote it (and most would indeed conclude that the BBC did in fact write it - PFC doesn't and can't afford to make such things up and tell outright lies, and wouldn't want to anyway as they have far more important things to be doing). Again, the fact that the allegations were made is backed up by a prominent website with opposite bias.) --

341: 2396:

here to explain what he is trying to do by repeatedly removing long-standing content, without discussion, or any attempt to reach consensus. He has made a number of vague references to a consensus, but doesn't feel obliged to join in with "natterings" on the talk page to explain where this occurred,

2131:

Chris Moyles, brought up as a Catholic likes to think of himself in messianic terms. When he arrived at the Radio 1 breakfast show - a slot that has traditionally been accorded a quasi-mystical significance - he styled himself "The Saviour of Radio 1"; and his autobiography, published in autumn last

1502:

The references are acceptable for the purposes that they've been used. The article doesn't say anything that isn't a clearly verifiable fact. Whether there's any truth or grounding to PFC's accusations is entirely up to the reader - the article itself does not repeat them. The article doesn't comment

1324:

For that matter though, even Moyles' biography on the Chris Moyles Fansite mentions the accusations of transphobia - it just doesn't go into any detail. I could throw that in as a source for good measure if required (I've just added it)? I would suggest that if there is a concern that this article is

1157:

It's probably best to wait and see if the incident is reported in the news. The website you've referenced seems to be speculating to much about what the police could or should be doing about the incident rather than what they actually are doing about it and, as I'm sure you're aware, you can't submit

2672:

What is left unexplained is why the change of plan. There is a lot about the increased listenership that Moyles brought relative to his predecessor in the breakfast slot, but it is not clear if the figures went into decline in recent years and Radio 1 management wanted to shake things up, bring in a

2365:

To Johnny45irish Chris Moyles doesn't 'describe' his nationality as 'British', someone editing his Knowledge page has done that. As the son of an Irish mother he would be entitled to claim citizenship of the Republic of Ireland as well as British citizenship, there is no conflict in possessing both.

2352:

Thanks for pointing it out. I have removed this from the info box as it appears to be based purely on someone's estimation of what he may be based on what is known about his family. Ethnicity is a minefield that shouldn't involve guesswork, so it shouldn't be listed unless we have a good cite, and

2220:

The number of listeners grew from 6.9m to 7.8m over her first fifteen months in the job. The tide turned however, and by August 2002 numbers had dipped back under 7m. In August 2003, the BBC again denied rumours, reported in the Daily Mail, that she had been given 10 weeks to increase ratings, or to

1618:

Surely I'm not the only one who thinks that "controversies" dominate this article, too much so even for someone who is well known as being controversial. The actual section takes up about half the article and there were mentions within "Radio 1" and again where his autobiography is mentioned, though

2690:

The bit about his contract is still valid, he hasn't left, there's no change of plan as far as his contract is concerned as he'll still be with the BBC at least until 2014, he's just stopped doing the Chris Moyles Show. The reasons he gave on air didn't seem to suggest he was pushed although, if he

2467:

Vandalised again, this is getting out of hand. We have established a 2:1 consensus that the (cited, relevant) info should stay in but Wolfowitz continues to 3RR and vandalise the page. The first editor that removed it did not supply an edit summary and has not returned. The second editor complained

2432:

There fact that it's an "award" may be questionable, but I think therefore that it's a question of how it is presented on the article. Clearly, the thoughts of Stonewall, if properly cited, on this are notable. So it could be that it would be presented more as commentary by a notable body, rather

2042:

No, it isn't relevant, since that wasn't Moyles defense. As explained in the article, Moyles used the word "gay" to describe something as "rubbish", and was not commenting on the ringtone in the manner as you describe. The issue was if it was homophobic to use the word "gay" in the derogatory sense

1803:

I am a follower of Chris Moyles on twitter and have uploaded a picture that he has personally taken and posted on twitpic. Unfortunately someone keeps removing it and saying that it does not have appropriate permission. However if they bothered to do their research they would know that all pictures

1492:

This organisation have neve mentioned Chris Moyles before except for this incident. If you look at the sections of their website mentioned in the sources, you will see that they have cited many such incidents where they feel there has been discrimination. There is no kind of vendetta against Moyles

1472:

Does any group hold the same opinion as PFC? It seems to me that this minority group dislike chris moyles and have been pushing their agenda, and it has now spilled over onto Knowledge. Also, I don't find the references acceptable, they all point to the PFC website, apart from one which points to a

1361:

Also, please define "tiny uninfluential minority". Last I checked, PFC were in no small part responsible for a major Act of Parliament, trans people have gone from being the subject of constant ridicule to having protections in statute law, and police are starting to record incidents of transphobic

1320:

Because of the fact that only PFC so far seem to have reported on this in any detail (pending either a response from the Met or from OfCom), I have taken the NPOV measure of choosing my words very carefully to reflect the facts exactly, rather (eg, PFC reported/accused) as opposed to portraying any

2483:

Hi IP. Please note that this is NOT vandalism. This is called a content dispute, and is very common on the project. You and a few other editors believe the "award" belongs in the bio. Other editors believe it should not be included. I believe that there should be a clear consensus for ANY material

2369:

From what I've seen and heard of Chris Moyles he would not be bothered at all by being described as Anglo-Irish, acknowledging, as it does, that he has strong links to both Ireland and England. It has nothing to do with his alleged religious affiliation which is, as far as I can see, unknown. Many

2324:

despite it being used informally, as to refer to joinly made flims or banks or whatever, it is not an ethnicity, well not in the broad sense, and if it did it would only refer to those of the aforesaid and their ancestors. he also constantly refers to his irish ancestory, which shows that he has a

2314:

what struck me even worse than the nationality is that the ethnicity written underneath describes him as being 'Anglo-Irish', which despite its relevance, its both historically and politcally incorrect. the anglo-irish were 'a privileged social class in Ireland, whose members were the descendants

2061:

Some songs, such as Relax, have a homosexual theme, hence such a song can be described as gay. Why isn't the name of the song stated in the article, so that the reader can make up their own mind whether it can be described as gay as in having a homosexual theme and / or as in (widely considered to

1455:

the allegations are backed up again by the fansite. The BBC response contained in the PFC sources contains quite enough information to be checked - as irrelevant as it is because it's about the fact that PFC reported it in response to the allegations. The reader of the article can make his/her own

1355:

It doesn't represent a view. It represents the fact that accusations were made. Nowhere does it say what PFC's view on the issue was, and thus there can be no bias. It mentions only the facts that can be unarguably be ascertained from the sources, being that PFC did indeed make the allegations, as

1032:

I think this should be removed for the time being. All the other controversies link to a reputable source (aka. BBC, Ofcom, Digital Spy, The Times etc.), but this controversy just links to a source where this bloke is trying to generate support for people to complain to Ofcom. I think it should be

2667:

On 1 July 2011, it was announced that Moyles will remain within the BBC until at least 2014, ending speculation that he would move to a commercial rival. The deal was estimated to be worth £1 million. This would have allowed the presenter to reach his 10-year anniversary on The Chris Moyles Show.

2208:

After five years on afternoons, on 5 January 2004, Moyles started presenting Radio 1's flagship programme The Breakfast Show, switching places with Sara Cox. He had been appointed to increase the ratings for the show and did so, putting on an extra 1,000,000 listeners to the audience in the first

1582:

I've just added an unsourced paragraph to the section on accusations of transphobia with regards to OFComs response. Unfortunately, the message has not yet been added to the archive, and so cannot be linked. When it can be (which will hopefully be soon, but it is the chrismas period after all), I

1448:

Only the verifiable facts have been written and sourced. No bias or commentary has been written into the section. everything written can be confirmed in the sources, and the source itself is recognised and credible (as per it's nature, achievements, and recognition in government and state for the

1178:

Their source of information seems to be one of their subscribers, not the police themselves. Second hand information from a non-reputable source is not reliable information. I really think it's in your best interest to wait and see if there's an official press release about it from the police. ~~

2610:

If Obama was involved in some controversy that Fox News could authoritatively comment on? Possibly. It depends if there were other, better, sources and the general notability of it all. Treat each case on its merits. But do you think this is a relevant comparison? Moyles is not a prominent

1188:

That's good enough reasoning, as long as it is accepted that PFC believe it to be reliable information else they wouldn't have posted it, being as they are a reputable organisation. I will stand by for further developments, although I do feel that this section now has sufficient grounding to be

1270:

I think there is one important point differentiating between newspapers and this group PFC as reliable sources. Newspapers (despite their biases) have the threats of libel action and the PCC to force them to stray not too far from the truth. PFC, on the other hand, is both the prime agent and

804: 1401:

Again - please point out where the "view" lies. There's no view in the article section for anybody to hold. (Therefore incidentally,) please also define "uninfluential minority" and state exactly who you feel this minority is, because I'm not entirely certain that this is the case

1249:

Couldn't you have said The Sun or the Daily Record? We don't all live in that London... ;) ;) On topic, though, then if we have news source stating that its been investigated, then it could go in. Using the PFC would be suitable, but a non-involved organisation would be better.

2452:

The vandal keeps removing the information. Most recently calling the content 'contentious' having previously tried other adjectives and ignored your request that they define them. Would appreciate your input as to how we get this info to stick and put an end to the vandlalism?

1639:

Agree, I think it's getting a bit too much. I notice Towers of London Controversy now has its' own section. What next? Perhaps we should devote a whole section to the Dr. Fox controversy, the John Peel controversy, the time when Moyles said Fuck at 09:49 controversy....

2310:

While going over his statistics, i was a bit suprised that he describes his nationality as british, despite his strong links to ireland, from his mother being from dublin and his father's ancestors coming from the west of ireland, but that isn't why i am writing this.

1362:

hate crime seperately. That's not exactly uninfluential - further backed up by the fact that somebody (or a group) quite clearly managed to "influence" the state into awarding people of PFC honours for their work and the PCC into changing the Editorial Code of Conduct.

2138:

Despite this Chris Moyles spoke honestly about his views on church in the UK on his breakfast radio show about the BBC televised Pentecost service: 'That's The Spirit!' from Kingsgate Community Church (Peterborough) shown on BBC1 for Pentecost Sunday (31st May 2009).

1286:

The thing is that no reputable source is reporting it - PFC are the only people on the matter. And of course I think it is fair to say, PFC is quite biased when it come to matters like these. It would surprise me if this inclusion wasn't written by a PFC memeber.

2529:

I'm open to persuasion, actually. What I'm not open to is an editor repeatedly removing established cited content, while claiming a consensus that he won't direct anyone to, nor enter any discuss with anyone. The one editor who has removed this

2258:

That's not what it says. It says they were 6.6m two months after August 2003, i.e. October 2003. Moyles did not start until January 2004. Presumably they were significantly down since October by then. However, it should be noted that both the

1793:

I agree with you, it is not a very good quality photo, although it does the job, you can see who he is. There are a lot of pictures of him all over the place and I would have thought that at least one photo would comply with Knowledge standards.

2512:

cited, relevant material from a wiki without consensus? I'm not sure you're right. In answer to your question, though, what you write doesn't make sense, but only because you've hold a series of misconceptions about this situation (see below).

1441:

accusations are also listed on a major (pro-moyles) fansite, which has been referenced. PFC has indeed made the allegation which is what's written in the article and appropriately sourced (to PFC actually making the allegation - it doesn't get

1312:

Never the less, the accusations were made by PFC. PFC are a group that contain within a number of people who have been given honours by the queen for this exact work - That says at least something for their individual integrity. One of them

2412:

I second that. It's bullying, nothing less, and cannot be tolerated. If the 'Stonewall Awards' are flimsy (which, as it happens, I believe them to be) then that wiki needs to go if they are not to be referenced here. So we need an AFD for

2026:

What was the tune that he described as 'gay'? It is relevant to the article, and the accusation of him being homophobic - if, for example, it was Relax by Frankie Goes to Hollywood, then it would have been accurately described as gay.

1707:

Could the racism section be merged into the intro into contoversis as its about a single incident! nobody (or atleast no source i can find) has accused him of being racist! halle belied that the joke was in bad taste and made this

1628:

with a link to a Guardian article. I think that's pretty POV for something which isn't a direct quote from the article or anyone else, far as as I can see. That article is worth being linked but it's not much of a source in this

1711:

the pay controversies section also has no place in a NPOV article as at most it should read "some people are unhappy over claims that he earns £630k but as the sun has a biased POV against him it should be dropped completely

1886:

Wouldn't it make more sense if this section be removed from here and added to The Chris Moyles Show article as it's an activity the team (especially Comedy Dave and Dominic) are involved in rather than just Chris himself?

2318:'The term 'Anglo-Irish' is often applied to the members of the Church of Ireland who made up the professional and landed class in Ireland from the 17th century up to the time of Irish independence in the 20th century.' 2098:

I think it's relevant to mention it as it is useful as a source, when it comes to pictures and personal opinions, for updating this article... however a running commentary is inappropriate. Go to his fanpage for that.

1325:

looking a bit negative overall, a better way of adressing it would be to add a section on any notable work for charity that he has done (as I imagine he's done some) or something, rather than ommitting facts from it.

800: 153: 1483:

PFC isn't a minority group. In spite of everything that's been written, I have no idea how it woulb be possible to come to that conclusion. Here's a google search as further evidence of the nature of PFC...

2572:

Please explain where BLP is being violated. It is not a violation to include the opinion of a notable authority when discussing a notable event in Moyles life. Even if it is a negative opinion. --

1836:

I've deleted the setion on transphobia. He may have ben accused by the PFC but Ofcom found no breach of "section 2 of their code relating to harm and offence". It seems a bit a of a nothing section

3163: 1109:

now appears that the incident is being investigated by the metropolitan police. I now see no reason that this event should be ommited from the article, as it is quite clearly significant. --

2634:

They are not, any more than they are an authority on Radio 1 DJs. They are however, an authority on the more specific homophobia, accusation of which is what the section is discussing. --

1309:

It is often the case that issues like these go under-reported. It must be said thought, that Stonewall arn't exactly unbiased when it comes yo accusations of homophobia on the same logic.

2917: 2777: 1738:

The accustations of racism section should probably be wholly deleted. Halle Berry understood it was a joke, if in bad taste, and no investigation or repremand was issued by OFCOM. -Anon

1666:

I agree, shall we delete the towers of london section? in six months time no one will know who they are and it trivalises the other serious issues that have been raised with OFCOM etc.

1099:

If it's not yet deemed a suitable addition to the article, then that fair enough, but we do now have the issue talked about by both sides of the dispute, including sources for each.

1419:

for all to see. Once more, in the sense that the sources have been used and in the way the section has been written, it confirms quite reasonably with the required policies as per

1167:

While that is undoubtedly true for the purposes of wikipedia, never the less the Metropolitan police are looking into the matter. Surely this is the statement that really matters?

1984:

On two occasions in the past few weeks Chris has claimed on his show, to be only 24. Is this some ongoing gag that I've missed or is he seriously trying to make out he's only 24

702: 2935: 2931: 2795: 2791: 2873: 1508:

The site that acknowledges the accusation also cites PFC as the organisation that made it, and quotes PFC in giving an explanation of what exactly the accusation was about. --

1557:

finished mid december, and then Scott Mills filled in until the show launched properly. Or does it go by the date the last presenter finished?? Appologies if I am incorrect.

1148:

Note also though that it's not just the fact that it's been reported to the police who are investigating - there is also the fact that the BBC have responded to a complaint.

2691:

was, he's very unlikely to say so while still under that contract. We can speculate of course, as you have done, but there's unlikely to be any verifiable source for it. ~~

1597:

The quote he would take the virginity of Charlotte Church" does not appear in the reference 43 the actual quote is quite different, unless anyone can find a reference.?

1384:

You misunderstand. It is the view of a tiny minority. Yes, it is a fact that the minority hold this view, but that is where you have misunderstood the point of the policy.

3158: 2221:

face replacement. However just two months later the BBC announced that Cox, whose listening figures had slipped to 6.6m, would be replaced by Chris Moyles in January 2004.

989:

hmm - I'm hoping that it'll die down afte the weekend. At the moment the vandalism is regualr but not unmanagable; there seems to be a fair few editors coping with it.

1995: 1927:

There was a Golden Hour that ran before Xmas 2007. It was circulated around the '40 years of radio 1' celebration. They played old songs, and also some of the covers.

1592: 147: 2336: 2743: 3109: 2154: 1917: 648: 549: 1328:

Incidententally, I'm in no way a "member" of PFC, but I do subscribe to the newslist. there are very few who are actually "members" of PFC - it's a tight ship. --

1976:

As it is mentioned on the Mark and Lard page, should something not be mentioned about his show on 9/11, and his exceleent control of the situation? Duffman1208

1782: 1608: 2468:

that the cite didn't fit (correctly) and after the cite was corrected, has also not returned. Consensus thus established 2:1. How can we stop this vandalism? --

2733: 1851: 1692:

As for the Guardian comment - its not necassairly disparaging. His wit and put downs are one of the reasons people listen to the show (I know it is for me!) --

1485: 402: 317: 2209:

quarter of 2004. By 2005, Moyles and his team had succeeded in hugely increasing the morning audience, with his programme's audience swelling to 6.5 million.

1735:

I think the Contraversies section needs scaling down to facts, not POV comments and irrelevant time-lines. It is rather large for a living persons biography.

2226:

Doesn't seem to me that these numbers match up? If the audience was 6.6m when sara cox left, how did chris moyles add 1 million listeners and get to 6.5M?

1837: 1739: 1725: 1321:

Bias from them (Moyles did/was guilty of). As such, the way it is written really offers very little POV or Bias. The section merely aknowledges the event.

243:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 210:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 629: 3168: 2150: 255: 1047:, we should avoid including negative material just for the sake of it. There is already enough for people to realise that Moyles can offend at times. -- 521: 1761: 1033:

removed, and if the matter does eventually end up in Ofcoms hands, or gets an article given to it by a very reputable source, it should be reinstated.

1715:

The section on the transgenderism should be cut right down the section should only describe the incident not give a step by step follow up by the PFC

1198:

personally i would reinstate the section and include the fact that the police are investigating. im not sure why PFC arent seen as a reputable source.

1612: 1633: 3198: 2044: 1931: 1795: 623: 2534:

in the last week without once attempting to establish a consensus, is still notable for his absence in this talk page. He vaguely references a

2187:

There is little point in citing The Sun in the article, as the supplied cite is not The Sun. So it's little better than third hand hearsay. --

758: 1716: 2874:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110321171652/http://www.fundraising.co.uk/news/2011/03/19/comic-relief-raises-record-%C2%A374360207-red-nose-day

1367:

Not that it matters though for the reasons in my first paragraph above. This isn't a view - it's a fact, and as such, there's no violation of

3208: 2107: 1812: 1558: 890: 653: 3148: 1019: 260: 2015: 2640: 2446: 2555: 2522: 2493: 1687: 1670: 1265: 1096:

PFC of course, while working on trans issues, are in fact a reputable group with many noteable people that carry honours for said work.

3183: 2484:

that goes into an article, and not the other way around, ie, no consensus means material stays. Does that make any sense? Thank you. --

2269: 1202: 821: 511: 79: 2877: 1742: 3213: 1728: 834: 3047:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2913:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2071: 2052: 1275: 3218: 3094: 2983: 2658: 2437: 1696: 1291: 1075: 1051: 1006: 358:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1659: 1625:"He is renowned for his sharp manner, quick temper and put-downs, which are directed at seemingly everyone in a constant barrage" 1512: 1460: 1388: 1375: 3188: 3173: 3143: 2843: 2744:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120520133814/http://www.jesuschristsuperstar.com:80/2012/05/16/jesus-christ-superstar-arena-tour-2/

2700: 2682: 2629: 2617: 2590: 2578: 2567: 1930:

Chris Moyles doesn't like playing old songs for an entire hour, so sometimes he has the 'Golden 5 minutes' or something similar.

1774: 1643: 1548: 1254: 1113: 909: 359: 235: 2893: 1719: 1571: 1193: 1183: 1171: 1162: 1152: 1126: 3228: 3203: 1748:

I've put in the line regarding the drinking criticism - but I don't know how to source it. The information is taken from here (

1213: 748: 197: 1209:

I was referring to PFC's subscriber, not PFC. Even so, I would hardly describe PFC as unbiased, as a news report would be. ~~

993: 2162: 2133: 1561: 1539:

Could somebody please either find these sources via archive.org or find a different source for the relevant statements. :) --

1056:

this is a major site for the trans community isnt that a reputable source? i think this issue will before ofcom very shortly.

595: 85: 2903: 2734:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080717061636/http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/big-brother/2008/07/mirrorcouks-big-brother-blog-o.html

2605: 2084:

Is it really necessary to mention his Twitter account? And is it really necessary to count his number of followers each day?

3193: 3027: 2883: 1991: 1553:

Did he not start on the 5th January(or there abouts) 2004, not in 2003 as it says in that little box at the bottom? I know

1477: 1349: 1037: 599: 486: 363: 168: 44: 2300: 1332: 1103: 3233: 3178: 3153: 1872: 1587: 902: 135: 3105: 2514: 2469: 2454: 2418: 2374: 2288:, and just have a single line mention here, as the finer details of guests etc are not about Chris Moyles the person. – 2158: 1913: 1906:

They no longer run the golden hour but I don't know the date that it was discontinued. Does anyone else have details?

1139:

It was a recent email from the PFC news list. It will be placed in the public archives soon (if it hasn't been already)

1027: 817: 367: 30: 2747: 2988: 2848: 2485: 2126: 1778: 1604: 1577: 841: 3037: 3005: 2865: 2737: 2725: 2477: 2462: 2436:

However, if we are regard it as purely a negative award, I don't see any real difference between this and, say, the

2426: 2407: 2250: 724: 586: 544: 3223: 2708: 1840: 1655: 480: 470: 426: 354: 312: 213: 201: 99: 2934:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2794:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1771:

Does nobody in Britain have a REAL camera anymore? That cell phone picture is no better than having NO picture.

2668:

However, on 11 July 2012, Moyles announced that he would be leaving his show at the end of September that year.

2340: 1921: 1854: 1850:

The section on Chris' team needs an edit I feel, as the use of grammar is poor and the sources are uncredited.

104: 20: 3128: 2382: 2359: 1024:

As you can see there, Wiki does not censor the word "fuck" and am therefore changing the "f*****" to "fucker"

129: 2373:'Irishness' is specifically excluded from BAME, if it is not an ethnicity, than neither is 'Anglo-Irishness'. 2294: 1960: 1880: 928: 74: 2595:

I can't see how Obama and Fox are relevant. Could you answer EscapeOrbit's question? How is this a BLP vio?

2538:

consensus, but won't say where, and has otherwise ignored his fellow editors, or treated them with contempt.

2193: 2093: 3089: 2978: 2838: 2115: 2036: 1939: 1820: 1786: 811: 793: 287: 1999: 1964: 1896: 3113: 2181:

The cite supplied says £630,000 a year, it does not say £810,000 or an extra £75,000 for extra listeners.

1530:(1 and 2) no longer seem to work. link #1 is dead, and link #2 has been redirected to a set of forums... 715: 676: 125: 65: 3064:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2953:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2813:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1798: 1543: 3004:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2864:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2724:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2393: 2119: 1824: 1085:

While the issue is clearly ongoing, given that the BBC have now responded to the complaint (complaint

983: 2399:

reverted the first time he could have avoided a lot of hassle for everyone if he had discussed things

2275: 2199: 484:, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's 254:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1531: 1271:

reporter of this allegation and this conflict of interest undermines their credibility as a source.

175: 2878:

http://www.fundraising.co.uk/news/2011/03/19/comic-relief-raises-record-%C2%A374360207-red-nose-day

2387: 945: 723:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3080: 3021: 2969: 2829: 1876: 1757: 1527: 940: 884: 258:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 244: 219: 109: 2938:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2798:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3065: 3001: 2954: 2861: 2814: 2518: 2473: 2458: 2422: 2378: 2289: 2089: 2184:

The comparison to Jo Whiley in the cite is not in line with the quoted £810,000 in the article

1090: 1086: 2941: 2894:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110708123857/http://castroller.com/podcasts/BestOfChris/1146124

2801: 2489: 2281: 2067: 2032: 2011: 1416: 922: 857: 293: 2174:

I have removed a sentence under "Pay controversies". I did this for the following reasons;

1222:

be' giving the fact Metro, London lite and thelondonpaper are all apparently newspapers. ; )

3072: 2961: 2821: 2768: 2263:

and this article are conspicuously uncited on this matter. So neither can be verified. --

2246: 2238: 2230: 2146: 2103: 1987: 1948: 1909: 1892: 1868: 1831: 1808: 1600: 877: 2134:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/chris-moyles-snap-cackle-pop-448486.html

1523:

I've just been through the article and replaced the inline links with proper referencing.

1343:

If a view represents that of a tiny uninfluential minority, it has no place in the article

1143: 141: 8: 2904:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090326060837/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb130/

2678: 2062:

be) lame? For a controversy to omit a piece of info that is central to it is censorship.

1901: 1667: 1651: 1262: 1199: 275: 55: 3028:

https://web.archive.org/web/20060715202429/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/pcb33/

2884:

https://web.archive.org/web/20060927122821/http://www.chrismoyles.net/mw/teamchris.shtml

3099: 3015: 2920:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2780:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2332: 2305: 2048: 1935: 1753: 974: 70: 3071:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2960:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2820:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2541:

This content is not "going into the article", it has been there for some while. It is

2370:

people brought up as Roman Catholics have long since stopped self-describing as such.

2897: 2696: 2635: 2612: 2600: 2573: 2560:

This isn't about "cited content", it's about inflammatory content that violates BLP.

2550: 2441: 2402: 2354: 2264: 2188: 2085: 1956: 828: 578: 207: 51: 2748:

http://www.jesuschristsuperstar.com/2012/05/16/jesus-christ-superstar-arena-tour-2/

2414: 2169: 2111: 2079: 2063: 2028: 2021: 2007: 1860: 1845: 1816: 1766: 1518: 1420: 1368: 1338: 1044: 847: 457: 346: 805:

National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)

161: 3124: 3038:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090207011413/http://showbiz.sky.com/mels-boob-grope

2907: 2738:

http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/big-brother/2008/07/mirrorcouks-big-brother-blog-o.html

2721: 2328:

could an admin or advanced user please look over this and correct it. thank you.

2242: 2234: 1888: 1314: 934: 591: 251: 3031: 2887: 1749: 594:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 2674: 2626: 2587: 2564: 2535: 1693: 1684: 1647: 1568: 1474: 1445: 1385: 1346: 1288: 1251: 1072: 1048: 1034: 1003: 990: 870: 392: 2926:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2786:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2140: 3137: 2546: 2398: 1630: 1584: 1540: 1509: 1457: 1452: 1372: 1329: 1190: 1168: 1149: 1110: 1100: 1068: 2997: 2857: 2717: 2692: 2596: 2285: 1979: 1952: 1534: 1210: 1180: 1159: 1123: 863: 707: 464: 222:

when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

24: 2583:

If Fox News gave Obama an "award" would you mention that on Obama's page?

3041: 2927: 2787: 2346: 1438: 916: 780: 691: 670: 590:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about 2397:

or why it applies to this particular content. I think that after being

3120: 1272: 1122:

What's your source of information regarding a police investigation? ~~

638: 572: 3059:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

1415:

I have not misunderstood the point of the policy, as it is set out in

2623: 2584: 2561: 980: 850: 475: 2260: 1865:

Can somebody add Chris to the category : Parody musicians? Thanks

1554: 366:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 330: 306: 1067:

It makes no difference what you "think" will happen, wikipedia is

478:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the

1093:), are the "accusations of transphobia" now worthy of inclusion? 451: 441: 420: 3164:

Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles

3022:

http://web.researcha.com/iccquery/detail/?did=3799451&c=uk

1014: 250:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

2622:

How do you prove that Stonewall is an authority on bullying?

720: 2753:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

562: 538: 474:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 1622:

Also under "Show Format", "Features" there is the comment:

3008:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2868:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2728:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2132:

year, has the title The Gospel According to Chris Moyles.

1583:

shall put it in (unless somebody else gets there first).

1020:

Knowledge:What Knowledge is not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored

2178:

The cite supplied makes no mention of any "controversy".

2417:

and a removal before this xref can be removed also. --

1261:

They print that Metro rubbish everywhere nowdays *tsk*

160: 1752:). It seems Moyles came in for particular criticism. 719:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 697: 568: 447: 336: 15: 3159:

B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles

2930:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2790:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1526:Unfortunately, the first two external links in the 2898:http://castroller.com/podcasts/BestOfChris/1146124 1971: 628:This article has not yet received a rating on the 2611:politician and Stonewall is not a TV channel. -- 3135: 1567:I changed it to 2004 as that is when he started 1002:Though I'm beginning to think that you're right 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2280:I think this section should be moved to either 1944:Golden Hour is every Friday from 9am to 10am. 1473:site which simply acknowledges the accusation. 598:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2916:This message was posted before February 2018. 2908:http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb130/ 2776:This message was posted before February 2018. 2315:and successors of the Protestant Ascendancy.' 3032:http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/pcb33/ 2888:http://www.chrismoyles.net/mw/teamchris.shtml 1750:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7598288.stm 174: 1218:perhaps that should read ' as a news report 2353:preferable one where he self-describes. -- 3169:Arts and entertainment work group articles 788:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 2996:I have just modified 2 external links on 2856:I have just modified 4 external links on 2716:I have just modified 2 external links on 2438:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress 1593:"Controversies" section and POV comments 2141:Chris Moyles Talks Up Church on Youtube 273: 3199:Unknown-importance television articles 3136: 3042:http://showbiz.sky.com/mels-boob-grope 2006:Bit of both really! He isnt 24 though! 2765:to let others know (documentation at 1142:Oops. Further to my above comment... 1043:I think that this is reasonable - re 403:the arts and entertainment work group 3209:Low-importance The X Factor articles 979:Time to request semi-protection? -- 713:This article is within the scope of 584:This article is within the scope of 352:This article is within the scope of 269: 227: 184: 3149:Biography articles of living people 1486:google "press for change" in the UK 801:Missing years and articles in radio 292:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 637: 391: 14: 3245: 3184:Mid-importance Yorkshire articles 3000:. Please take a moment to review 2860:. Please take a moment to review 2720:. Please take a moment to review 822:Unknown-importance Radio articles 3214:The X Factor task force articles 3050: 2659:Reasons for leaving R1 breakfast 835:Radio articles needing attention 779: 700: 690: 669: 608:Knowledge:WikiProject Television 571: 561: 537: 450: 440: 419: 339: 329: 305: 274: 233:This article must adhere to the 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3219:WikiProject Television articles 1549:Breakfast show presenter error? 753:This article has been rated as 611:Template:WikiProject Television 516:This article has been rated as 496:Knowledge:WikiProject Yorkshire 376:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 212:Content must be written from a 196:The subject of this article is 3189:WikiProject Yorkshire articles 3174:WikiProject Biography articles 3144:Knowledge controversial topics 3119:Please clarify what you mean. 2701:18:47, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 2683:18:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 2270:22:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC) 2251:22:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC) 1855:08:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1562:11:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1544:08:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1513:19:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1478:19:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1461:19:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1389:19:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1376:18:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1350:18:29, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1337:The section is a violation of 1333:18:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1292:16:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1266:21:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 1255:20:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1214:09:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1203:02:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1194:02:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1184:01:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1172:01:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1163:01:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1153:01:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 1127:01:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 929:The History of Rock & Roll 910:Requests for Radio peer review 499:Template:WikiProject Yorkshire 379:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 3229:Mid-importance Radio articles 3204:B-Class The X Factor articles 3095:06:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC) 2984:01:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 2844:10:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC) 2556:17:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 2523:17:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 2494:21:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2478:17:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2463:16:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2447:12:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2427:21:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 2408:18:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 2000:11:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 1881:16:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 1762:11:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 1588:14:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 1528:Work outside of radio section 1276:14:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 1158:speculation to Knowledge. ~~ 1114:22:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 1104:20:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 727:and see a list of open tasks. 646:This article is supported by 400:This article is supported by 236:biographies of living persons 42:Put new text under old text. 3129:21:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 3114:21:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 2641:15:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2630:13:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2618:11:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2606:09:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2591:04:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 2579:15:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 2568:14:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 2321:chris moyles is a catholic. 2194:14:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 2053:03:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 2037:23:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 2016:08:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1922:10:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 1897:22:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 1697:08:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 1688:08:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 1671:08:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 1660:09:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 1634:13:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1572:09:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1449:work they do and have done). 1007:14:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 994:16:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 984:16:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 364:contribute to the discussion 7: 3194:B-Class television articles 2360:15:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 2341:03:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 1076:11:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1052:19:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1038:18:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 733:Knowledge:WikiProject Radio 248:must be removed immediately 206:When updating the article, 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 3250: 3234:WikiProject Radio articles 3179:B-Class Yorkshire articles 3154:B-Class biography articles 2993:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2947:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2853:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2807:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2713:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2394:User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz 2301:10:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 2094:16:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 2072:01:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1940:14:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 1787:07:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 1028:Accusations of transphobia 759:project's importance scale 736:Template:WikiProject Radio 630:project's importance scale 522:project's importance scale 2383:05:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 2163:20:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 2127:Chris Moyles and religion 1965:03:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC) 1720:09:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1613:22:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 1578:Added unsourced paragraph 903:Collaboration of the Week 818:Unassessed Radio articles 765: 752: 685: 645: 627: 556: 515: 435: 399: 324: 300: 208:be bold, but not reckless 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2120:00:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 1841:20:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1825:00:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 1799:21:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 1743:16:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 1729:16:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 946:Scott Mills (radio show) 2989:External links modified 2849:External links modified 2709:External links modified 2433:than a "award" as such. 2401:. It's good to talk. -- 1341:, on negative content: 941:The Museum of Curiosity 649:the X Factor task force 468:is within the scope of 3224:B-Class Radio articles 3104:Entered November 2022 2204:Chris moyles article: 721:Radio-related subjects 642: 587:WikiProject Television 396: 318:Arts and Entertainment 282:This article is rated 200:and content may be in 75:avoid personal attacks 2282:The Chris Moyles Show 1777:comment was added by 1646:comment was added by 923:The Howard Stern Show 641: 602:for the type of work. 471:WikiProject Yorkshire 395: 355:WikiProject Biography 214:neutral point of view 100:Neutral point of view 2928:regular verification 2788:regular verification 2663:The article states: 2508:vandalism to remove 105:No original research 2918:After February 2018 2778:After February 2018 2757:parameter below to 2325:strong connection. 1417:WP:LIVING#Rationale 614:television articles 596:join the discussion 592:television programs 3083:InternetArchiveBot 2972:InternetArchiveBot 2923:InternetArchiveBot 2832:InternetArchiveBot 2783:InternetArchiveBot 2215:Sara cox article: 643: 502:Yorkshire articles 397: 382:biography articles 288:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2948: 2808: 2603: 2504:Hi IP also. It's 2276:Longest ever show 2254: 2233:comment added by 2200:Listening numbers 2166: 2149:comment added by 2123: 2106:comment added by 1990:comment added by 1968: 1951:comment added by 1924: 1912:comment added by 1883: 1871:comment added by 1828: 1811:comment added by 1790: 1663: 1603:comment added by 972: 971: 968: 967: 964: 963: 960: 959: 956: 955: 891:Unreferenced BLPs 716:WikiProject Radio 664: 663: 660: 659: 579:Television portal 532: 531: 528: 527: 414: 413: 410: 409: 268: 267: 226: 225: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3241: 3093: 3084: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3019: 2982: 2973: 2946: 2945: 2924: 2842: 2833: 2806: 2805: 2784: 2772: 2638: 2615: 2601: 2576: 2553: 2444: 2415:Stonewall Awards 2405: 2388:Award Discussion 2357: 2297: 2292: 2267: 2253: 2227: 2191: 2165: 2143: 2122: 2100: 2002: 1967: 1945: 1907: 1866: 1827: 1805: 1772: 1641: 1615: 1071:a crystal ball. 848:Midweek Politics 794:Article requests 783: 776: 775: 767: 766: 741: 740: 737: 734: 731: 710: 705: 704: 703: 694: 687: 686: 681: 673: 666: 665: 616: 615: 612: 609: 606: 600:style guidelines 581: 576: 575: 565: 558: 557: 552: 541: 534: 533: 504: 503: 500: 497: 494: 460: 458:Yorkshire portal 455: 454: 444: 437: 436: 431: 423: 416: 415: 384: 383: 380: 377: 374: 360:join the project 349: 347:Biography portal 344: 343: 342: 333: 326: 325: 320: 309: 302: 301: 285: 279: 278: 270: 256:this noticeboard 228: 192: 191: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3249: 3248: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3134: 3133: 3102: 3100:I’m a celebrity 3087: 3082: 3055: 3051: 3013: 3006:this simple FaQ 2991: 2976: 2971: 2939: 2932:have permission 2922: 2866:this simple FaQ 2851: 2836: 2831: 2799: 2792:have permission 2782: 2766: 2726:this simple FaQ 2711: 2661: 2636: 2613: 2574: 2551: 2545:a violation of 2536:BLP Noticeboard 2442: 2403: 2390: 2355: 2308: 2295: 2290: 2278: 2265: 2228: 2202: 2189: 2172: 2144: 2129: 2101: 2082: 2024: 1985: 1982: 1974: 1946: 1904: 1863: 1852:212.158.111.130 1848: 1834: 1806: 1773:—The preceding 1769: 1642:—The preceding 1598: 1595: 1580: 1551: 1521: 1315:Stephen Whittle 1189:re-instated. -- 1030: 1017: 977: 952: 935:American Top 40 738: 735: 732: 729: 728: 706: 701: 699: 679: 613: 610: 607: 604: 603: 577: 570: 547: 501: 498: 495: 492: 491: 456: 449: 429: 381: 378: 375: 372: 371: 345: 340: 338: 315: 286:on Knowledge's 283: 189: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3247: 3237: 3236: 3231: 3226: 3221: 3216: 3211: 3206: 3201: 3196: 3191: 3186: 3181: 3176: 3171: 3166: 3161: 3156: 3151: 3146: 3132: 3131: 3101: 3098: 3077: 3076: 3069: 3045: 3044: 3036:Added archive 3034: 3026:Added archive 3024: 2990: 2987: 2966: 2965: 2958: 2911: 2910: 2902:Added archive 2900: 2892:Added archive 2890: 2882:Added archive 2880: 2872:Added archive 2850: 2847: 2826: 2825: 2818: 2751: 2750: 2742:Added archive 2740: 2732:Added archive 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2670: 2669: 2660: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2632: 2608: 2539: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2497: 2496: 2450: 2449: 2434: 2389: 2386: 2363: 2362: 2307: 2304: 2277: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2201: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2171: 2168: 2128: 2125: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2056: 2055: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2018: 1992:58.165.239.250 1981: 1978: 1973: 1970: 1903: 1900: 1862: 1859: 1847: 1844: 1833: 1830: 1768: 1765: 1746: 1745: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1668:Jocasta shadow 1594: 1591: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1550: 1547: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1505: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1489: 1488: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1450: 1443: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1379: 1378: 1364: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1263:Jocasta shadow 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1200:Jocasta shadow 1176: 1175: 1174: 1146: 1140: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1117: 1116: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1029: 1026: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 997: 996: 976: 973: 970: 969: 966: 965: 962: 961: 958: 957: 954: 953: 951: 950: 949: 948: 931: 926: 919: 907: 893: 880: 866: 853: 837: 824: 807: 787: 785: 784: 772: 771: 763: 762: 755:Mid-importance 751: 745: 744: 742: 739:Radio articles 725:the discussion 712: 711: 695: 683: 682: 680:Mid‑importance 674: 662: 661: 658: 657: 654:Low-importance 644: 634: 633: 626: 620: 619: 617: 583: 582: 566: 554: 553: 542: 530: 529: 526: 525: 518:Mid-importance 514: 508: 507: 505: 462: 461: 445: 433: 432: 430:Mid‑importance 424: 412: 411: 408: 407: 398: 388: 387: 385: 351: 350: 334: 322: 321: 310: 298: 297: 291: 280: 266: 265: 261:this help page 245:poorly sourced 231: 224: 223: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3246: 3235: 3232: 3230: 3227: 3225: 3222: 3220: 3217: 3215: 3212: 3210: 3207: 3205: 3202: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3192: 3190: 3187: 3185: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3142: 3141: 3139: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3097: 3096: 3091: 3086: 3085: 3074: 3070: 3067: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3048: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3023: 3017: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2994: 2986: 2985: 2980: 2975: 2974: 2963: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2943: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2919: 2914: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2854: 2846: 2845: 2840: 2835: 2834: 2823: 2819: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2803: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2779: 2774: 2770: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2642: 2639: 2633: 2631: 2628: 2625: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2616: 2609: 2607: 2604: 2602:(squirt ink?) 2598: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2586: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2554: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2448: 2445: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2410: 2409: 2406: 2400: 2395: 2392:I'm inviting 2385: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2371: 2367: 2361: 2358: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347:Anglo-Irish / 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2333:Johnny45irish 2329: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2293: 2287: 2283: 2271: 2268: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2210: 2205: 2195: 2192: 2186: 2183: 2180: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2167: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2142: 2136: 2135: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1977: 1969: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1942: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1925: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1884: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873:81.145.240.76 1870: 1858: 1856: 1853: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1838:84.69.159.234 1829: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1754:Blaise Joshua 1751: 1744: 1741: 1740:84.69.246.164 1737: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1726:84.69.246.164 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1632: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1590: 1589: 1586: 1573: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1524: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1476: 1462: 1459: 1454: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1390: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1316: 1310: 1293: 1290: 1285: 1277: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1161: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1089:and response 1088: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1008: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 992: 988: 987: 986: 985: 982: 947: 943: 942: 937: 936: 932: 930: 927: 925: 924: 920: 918: 915: 914: 912: 911: 905: 904: 900: 898: 894: 892: 889: 887: 886: 881: 879: 875: 873: 872: 867: 865: 862: 860: 859: 854: 852: 849: 846: 844: 843: 838: 836: 833: 831: 830: 825: 823: 819: 816: 814: 813: 808: 806: 802: 798: 796: 795: 790: 789: 786: 782: 778: 777: 774: 773: 769: 768: 764: 760: 756: 750: 747: 746: 743: 726: 722: 718: 717: 709: 698: 696: 693: 689: 688: 684: 678: 675: 672: 668: 667: 655: 652:(assessed as 651: 650: 640: 636: 635: 631: 625: 622: 621: 618: 601: 597: 593: 589: 588: 580: 574: 569: 567: 564: 560: 559: 555: 551: 546: 543: 540: 536: 535: 523: 519: 513: 510: 509: 506: 489: 488: 483: 482: 477: 473: 472: 467: 466: 459: 453: 448: 446: 443: 439: 438: 434: 428: 425: 422: 418: 417: 405: 404: 394: 390: 389: 386: 369: 368:documentation 365: 361: 357: 356: 348: 337: 335: 332: 328: 327: 323: 319: 314: 311: 308: 304: 303: 299: 295: 289: 281: 277: 272: 271: 263: 262: 257: 253: 249: 246: 242: 238: 237: 232: 230: 229: 221: 217: 215: 209: 205: 203: 199: 198:controversial 194: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3106:80.47.28.164 3103: 3081: 3078: 3058: 3049: 3046: 2998:Chris Moyles 2995: 2992: 2970: 2967: 2942:source check 2921: 2915: 2912: 2858:Chris Moyles 2855: 2852: 2830: 2827: 2802:source check 2781: 2775: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2752: 2718:Chris Moyles 2715: 2712: 2671: 2662: 2637:Escape Orbit 2614:Escape Orbit 2575:Escape Orbit 2552:Escape Orbit 2542: 2531: 2515:82.41.22.244 2509: 2505: 2470:82.41.22.244 2466: 2455:82.41.22.244 2451: 2443:Escape Orbit 2419:82.41.22.244 2411: 2404:Escape Orbit 2391: 2375:78.16.174.46 2372: 2368: 2364: 2356:Escape Orbit 2344: 2330: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2286:Comic Relief 2279: 2266:Escape Orbit 2225: 2222: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2190:Escape Orbit 2173: 2151:Stevejay2005 2137: 2130: 2097: 2086:Startstop123 2083: 2025: 1983: 1975: 1943: 1929: 1926: 1914:86.27.95.134 1905: 1885: 1864: 1849: 1835: 1832:Transphobia? 1802: 1792: 1770: 1747: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1599:— Preceding 1596: 1581: 1552: 1538: 1525: 1522: 1495:organisation 1494: 1471: 1342: 1336: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1311: 1308: 1219: 1098: 1095: 1084: 1031: 1023: 1018: 978: 939: 933: 921: 908: 901: 896: 895: 883: 882: 869: 868: 864:Portal:Radio 856: 855: 840: 839: 827: 826: 810: 809: 792: 791: 754: 714: 708:Radio portal 647: 585: 550:The X Factor 517: 485: 481:project page 479: 469: 465:Chris Moyles 463: 401: 353: 294:WikiProjects 259: 247: 240: 234: 211: 195: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 25:Chris Moyles 19:This is the 2769:Sourcecheck 2486:68.9.119.69 2229:—Preceding 2145:—Preceding 2102:—Preceding 2064:Nietzsche 2 2029:Nietzsche 2 2008:Squirrel684 1986:—Preceding 1947:—Preceding 1908:—Preceding 1902:Golden Hour 1867:—Preceding 1807:—Preceding 1779:24.87.70.91 1605:82.0.112.19 1144:source here 917:Rod Serling 878:Radio stubs 770:To-do List: 148:free images 31:not a forum 3138:Categories 3090:Report bug 2979:Report bug 2839:Report bug 2532:nine times 2306:Ethnicity? 2296:projectors 2243:Dwyatt 101 2235:Dwyatt 101 1889:Violetbeau 1015:Censorship 975:Protection 605:Television 545:Television 3073:this tool 3066:this tool 3016:dead link 2962:this tool 2955:this tool 2822:this tool 2815:this tool 2675:Credulity 1694:Robdurbar 1685:Robdurbar 1648:Anon Dude 1569:Anon Dude 1493:from the 1421:WP:LIVING 1369:WP:LIVING 1339:WP:LIVING 1289:Anon Dude 1252:Robdurbar 1049:Robdurbar 1045:WP:LIVING 1035:Anon Dude 1004:Robdurbar 991:Robdurbar 851:Bob Crane 493:Yorkshire 487:talk page 476:Yorkshire 427:Yorkshire 373:Biography 313:Biography 252:libellous 220:citations 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3079:Cheers.— 2968:Cheers.— 2828:Cheers.— 2261:Sara Cox 2231:unsigned 2170:Contract 2159:contribs 2147:unsigned 2116:contribs 2104:unsigned 2080:Twitter? 2045:cswpride 2022:Ringtone 1988:unsigned 1961:contribs 1949:unsigned 1932:AlexFili 1910:unsigned 1869:unsigned 1861:Parodies 1857:Siobhan 1846:The Team 1821:contribs 1809:unsigned 1796:Andrewjd 1775:unsigned 1767:Picture? 1683:Done. -- 1656:contribs 1644:unsigned 1631:Jimbow25 1601:unsigned 1585:Crimsone 1555:Sara Cox 1541:Crimsone 1519:Sourcing 1510:Crimsone 1458:Crimsone 1442:closer). 1373:Crimsone 1330:Crimsone 1191:Crimsone 1169:Crimsone 1150:Crimsone 1111:Crimsone 1101:Crimsone 876:Expand: 858:Maintain 799:Create: 218:Include 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3020:tag to 3002:my edit 2862:my edit 2755:checked 2722:my edit 2693:Peteb16 2597:Squiddy 2291:anemone 1953:Narok04 1717:Xbehave 1446:WP:NPOV 1402:either. 1211:Peteb16 1181:Peteb16 1160:Peteb16 1124:Peteb16 829:Cleanup 757:on the 520:on the 284:B-class 202:dispute 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3012:Added 2763:failed 2627:(tock) 2588:(tock) 2565:(tock) 2547:policy 2108:Dom991 1813:Dom991 1559:SFadam 1475:Martin 1453:WP:NOR 1386:Martin 1347:Martin 1220:should 1073:Martin 885:Verify 842:Expand 812:Assess 290:scale. 126:Google 3121:S0091 1724:Done 1708:clear 1629:case. 1273:Kijog 897:Other 871:Stubs 730:Radio 677:Radio 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3125:talk 3110:talk 2759:true 2697:talk 2679:talk 2624:Shii 2585:Shii 2562:Shii 2519:talk 2490:talk 2474:talk 2459:talk 2440:. -- 2423:talk 2379:talk 2345:ND: 2337:talk 2247:talk 2239:talk 2155:talk 2112:talk 2090:talk 2068:talk 2049:talk 2033:talk 2012:talk 1996:talk 1980:Age? 1972:9/11 1957:talk 1936:talk 1918:talk 1893:talk 1877:talk 1817:talk 1783:talk 1758:talk 1652:talk 1609:talk 1439:WP:V 1091:here 1087:here 981:9cds 362:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3040:to 3030:to 2936:RfC 2906:to 2896:to 2886:to 2876:to 2796:RfC 2773:). 2761:or 2746:to 2736:to 2543:not 2506:not 2284:or 1712:IMO 1423:... 1069:not 913:: 749:Mid 624:??? 512:Mid 241:BLP 176:TWL 3140:: 3127:) 3112:) 3018:}} 3014:{{ 2949:. 2944:}} 2940:{{ 2809:. 2804:}} 2800:{{ 2771:}} 2767:{{ 2699:) 2681:) 2599:| 2521:) 2513:-- 2510:x9 2492:) 2476:) 2461:) 2453:-- 2425:) 2381:) 2339:) 2331:-- 2299:– 2249:) 2241:-- 2161:) 2157:• 2118:) 2114:• 2092:) 2070:) 2051:) 2035:) 2014:) 1998:) 1963:) 1959:• 1938:) 1920:) 1895:) 1879:) 1823:) 1819:• 1785:) 1760:) 1658:) 1654:• 1611:) 1371:-- 1345:. 1250:-- 944:; 938:; 820:; 803:, 656:). 548:: 316:: 156:) 54:; 3123:( 3108:( 3092:) 3088:( 3075:. 3068:. 3056:Y 2981:) 2977:( 2964:. 2957:. 2841:) 2837:( 2824:. 2817:. 2695:( 2677:( 2517:( 2488:( 2472:( 2457:( 2421:( 2377:( 2335:( 2245:( 2237:( 2153:( 2110:( 2088:( 2066:( 2047:( 2031:( 2010:( 1994:( 1955:( 1934:( 1916:( 1891:( 1875:( 1815:( 1789:. 1781:( 1756:( 1662:. 1650:( 1607:( 1535:2 1532:1 906:: 899:: 888:: 874:: 861:: 845:: 832:: 815:: 797:: 761:. 632:. 524:. 490:. 406:. 370:. 296:: 264:. 239:( 216:. 204:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index