92:
204:
183:
214:
76:
21:
152:
288:
Isn't this article completely back-to-front? The presumption of advancement was an exception to the presumption of resulting trust, not the other way round. In any event the presumption of advancement was abolished by section 199 Equality Act 2010 (not certain that this is yet in force)?
365:
341:
327:
313:
266:
68:
298:
360:
133:
332:
Well, if you know enough to have an opinion, any chance you have sources to hand? That way we could just correct it using those.
375:
256:
380:
56:
370:
137:
231:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
163:
129:
304:
Honestly, I don't know; I wrote it a while back and got rid of most of my legal texts in 2013 or so :(.
227:
188:
41:
283:
323:
294:
169:
36:
8:
337:
309:
151:
51:
20:
319:
290:
100:
61:
333:
305:
354:
91:
128:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
219:
203:
182:
31:
213:
232:
209:
352:
86:
366:Knowledge articles that use British English
104:, which has its own spelling conventions (
44:). The text of the entry was as follows:
149:
353:
136:, this should not be changed without
67:A record of the entry may be seen at
225:This article is within the scope of
145:
69:Knowledge:Recent additions/2010/June
15:
235:and the subjects encompassed by it.
168:It is of interest to the following
13:
74:
14:
392:
75:
212:
202:
181:
150:
90:
19:
361:Knowledge Did you know articles
261:This article has been rated as
28:Resulting trusts in English law
64:that "equity abhors a vacuum"?
1:
342:22:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
328:20:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
314:20:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
299:15:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
7:
376:Mid-importance law articles
10:
397:
267:project's importance scale
318:Added Disputed template.
260:
241:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
197:
176:
381:WikiProject Law articles
244:Template:WikiProject Law
40:column on 15 June 2010 (
30:appeared on Knowledge's
158:This article is rated
80:
78:
371:B-Class law articles
134:relevant style guide
130:varieties of English
132:. According to the
164:content assessment
81:
60:work based on the
281:
280:
277:
276:
273:
272:
144:
143:
85:
84:
388:
249:
248:
245:
242:
239:
222:
217:
216:
206:
199:
198:
193:
185:
178:
177:
161:
155:
154:
146:
97:This article is
94:
87:
77:
57:resulting trusts
23:
16:
396:
395:
391:
390:
389:
387:
386:
385:
351:
350:
286:
246:
243:
240:
237:
236:
228:WikiProject Law
218:
211:
191:
162:on Knowledge's
159:
138:broad consensus
101:British English
62:equitable maxim
12:
11:
5:
394:
384:
383:
378:
373:
368:
363:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
285:
284:Article wrong?
282:
279:
278:
275:
274:
271:
270:
263:Mid-importance
259:
253:
252:
250:
224:
223:
207:
195:
194:
192:Mid‑importance
186:
174:
173:
167:
156:
142:
141:
95:
83:
82:
72:
66:
65:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
393:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
358:
356:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
268:
264:
258:
255:
254:
251:
234:
230:
229:
221:
215:
210:
208:
205:
201:
200:
196:
190:
187:
184:
180:
179:
175:
171:
165:
157:
153:
148:
147:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
96:
93:
89:
88:
73:
70:
63:
59:
58:
53:
49:
46:
45:
43:
39:
38:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
287:
262:
247:law articles
226:
170:WikiProjects
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
98:
55:
50:... that in
48:Did you know
47:
37:Did you know
35:
27:
26:A fact from
320:Cyclopaedic
291:Cyclopaedic
233:legal field
99:written in
52:English law
42:check views
355:Categories
220:Law portal
334:Ironholds
306:Ironholds
110:travelled
79:Knowledge
32:Main Page
122:artefact
265:on the
160:B-class
126:analyse
118:defence
34:in the
166:scale.
114:centre
106:colour
338:talk
324:talk
310:talk
295:talk
257:Mid
238:Law
189:Law
357::
340:)
326:)
312:)
297:)
124:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
54:,
336:(
322:(
308:(
293:(
269:.
172::
140:.
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
