Knowledge

Talk:Snowball sampling

Source 📝

932:
some details about the use of SSM in qualitative and quantitative research where finding potential interviewees from a population with specific characteristics that is only identifiable by the population individuals like formal and informal means of reaching a target group and SSM use when preferred methodologies are not possible to implement (using quota sampling). 3- In the advantages/disadvantages section, I would explain more about the advantages like locating, accessing, involving and disadvantages like limitation. The representatively is the main limitation of SSM and it mostly caused by the “Gatekeepers”, the facilitator between researcher and potential respondent and willingness to participate. This can be overcome in SSM by initiating parallel snowball and quota samplings. 4- I would also suggest to add some examples about the use of SSM in conflict environment and marginalized population in the SSM application section like “The value of SSM use in the context of the Israel and Arab Conflict”. --
977:
research in conflict environment and marginalized population”. The reason why we are able to see so many examples of use of snowball sampling in conflict and marginalized population is because there has been an extensive research done in this field. I’m not exactly sure how you want to structure the article but make sure that the reader will not get the impression that it is not successful in other fields unless you are able to provide the reference. Also, I have noticed that you use the SSN acronym for Snowball Sampling Method – the article never uses it, it refers to the method simply as “Snowball Sampling”. So you either need to follow what the article already has or (in order to be consistent) introduce it at the beginning of the definition.
179: 158: 74: 53: 928:
conducting research in conflict environment and marginalized puplolation as per many research studies. Based on “Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling” article by Nissim Cohen and Tamar Arieli in 2011, I would suggest following changes in the article that will improve the quality of this article by providing more insight on the methodology advantages/disadvantages, ethical issues, statistical approach and SSM applications.
687:
example, the research about heroin-using populations (Kaplan C D, Korf D, Sterk C. Temporal and social contexts of heroin-using populations an illustration of the snowball sampling technique. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 1987, 175(9): 566-574.) can be cited and illustrated as a good example. The method, research steps, results and analysis should be included so that the readers can understand how snowball sampling is applied in practice.
1073:
persons to identify those who had been in hospitals in the last six months, and obtained a response rate of 87 percent. Hunt(1978) sent a screening questionnaires seeking basic demographic details about the members of 11500 households to identify a sample of elderly, and achieved a response rate of 8O percent. Although these response rates are high there is high risk that non-respondents include a larger proportion of members of the rare population.
253: 84: 22: 305:
essentially independent of the starting point. He doesn't mention that, in this setting, the theorem says nothing about how big "large enough" is. Indeed, it is well-known in Markov chain theory that, without making very strong assumptions on the form of the chain, there is essentially no way of checking that a chain has run long enough until you've actually seen every state.
971: 691:
stay unchanged, the references concerned should at least be included. Like the research about heroin-using populations (Kaplan C D, Korf D, Sterk C. Temporal and social contexts of heroin-using populations an illustration of the snowball sampling technique. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 1987, 175(9): 566-574.)
947:
These changes all sound great, Waqas Amin. Just pay attention that the article currently has lots of headings with little information in each section or subsection. It will be beneficial to make sure your changes will help to improve the structure of the paper as well. 14:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
927:
I am suggesting to contribute the use of Snowball Sampling Method (SSM) in the conflict environment and marginalized puplolation where it is challenging to reach potential interviewees. The current article needs to emphasize more on this topic, because use of SSM has shown great degree of success in
817:
2. In the new section I will compare traditional and online snowball sampling by providing additional advantages and disadvantages unique for online sampling i.e. problems with access to the Internet, sample selection bias based on characteristics of online population, expansion of geographical scope
395:
The content of the article is not well-organized, and most of them are redundant. To make the article more neat and well-organized, we would like to rearrange some of the parts. Divided the usage of snowball sampling part into small pieces which seems easier to read. In addition, delete the redundant
690:
2. Wrong citation. As the only reference in this section, Browne, Kath's research on non‐heterosexual women is however not mentioned in the passages at all. It is referred in the "Improvements for snowball sampling" section, but the citation of reference 15 is wrong, too. To improve, if the contents
686:
1. The examples given in this section are redundant and confusing. They are just some general ideas seemingly made up by the author for the lack of reliable references and in-detial explanations. This section is supposed to give an concrete experiment that has been done to illustrate the method. For
561:
2. A term called Peer Esteem Snowballing should be added to the Improvements for snowball sampling section. In this article Dr Dimitrios C Christopoulos mentioned that snowball sampling is not a robust measure of reliability when applied to the public, but if we want to investigate small populations
810:
Virtual snowball sampling (sampling which uses virtual networks) deserves more attention than the article currently devotes to this topic, due to additional examples, advantages and disadvantages that it brings in addition to the traditional snowball sampling. Based on the article Baltar, F., &
821:
3. I will also provide the example of use of snowball sampling in online research of Argentinean immigrant entrepreneurs in Spain which uses data obtained from Facebook and I will add it to the section “Social computing” (application field). I think that by providing this example I will be able to
755:
The content need to be reconstructed. Compared with the "Examples" part, the "Applications" part should focus on the fields that snowball sampling can be applied in. For instance, snowball sampling can be used as an evaluation method in social network field, or a tool for gathering information in
694:
3. With regard to the contents, it may be inappropriate to divide this section into "positive" and "negative" subsections. Examples should be illustrated in a neutral tone, with the research background, candidates information, processes, figures, models and statistics etc. to make it more academic
483:
The computer science references seem out of place to me. This isn't a computer science article and the analogies to BFS will probably confuse readers that aren't already familiar with the concept. I suggest creating a "relationship to BFS" subsection for this material rather than putting it in the
296:
Somebody has added a number of references to articles by Heckathornon on "RDS". I'm a mathematician, not a sociologist, and don't know to what extent they represent state of the art in the area. However, I thought it was worth adding my two cents to the comment below, titled "Representativeness of
1072:
In U.K. where the telephone coverage is not as high as in USA, Harris(1971) conducted survey of handicapped and impaired. He screened 250,000 households, by mail questionnaires at the initial phase; a response rate of 85.6 percent was obtained. CartWright(1964) sent a mail questionnaires to 29400
931:
1- I will describe the critical challenges of conducting research in conflict environment and how the use of SSM has overcome these challenges. The major issue is distrust of conflict environment population to participate in research studies. 2- In the methodology section, I would suggest to add
862:
I support the suggested edits. The advantage / disadvantage section needs to be elaborated more and good idea to show them in tabular format. In addition, by providing distinction between virtual and traditional snowball sampling, it will allow reader to understand the broader implication of this
300:
Despite somewhat vague claims in the prologue (and in the wikipedia article), RDS doesn't give complete protection against the bias issues inherent in snowball sampling. Instead, it makes some fairly strong model assumptions about what the underlying network/sampling process looks like, and gives
732:
In addition, I have some similar viewpoints with CAP129. This article partly mixes up the "applications" and "examples" parts. The "Application" part makes a great effort to explain an example of 3M. The "Example" part can only be perceived as a further literal explanations to the advantages and
304:
Full disclosure, I commented only because the articles (and the author's website!) set off some warning lights in my head. For example, one of the mentioned article cites a well-known theorem which, translated into the language of graph sampling, says that for large enough samples, the sample is
365:
On the other hand, Guttman showed that random samples with low response rates can be extremely unrepresentative. In many surveys the respondents are not matched back to the population and there is no way of asserting that the final responses are representative of the population being studied.
976:
To Waqas Amin: I think that your suggestions will improve the quality of the article. It certainly needs more examples and insight into methodology part (and good references for his part). I only have a few comments. You mention that “use of SSM has shown great degree of success in conducting
383:
van Meter K, "Methodological and Design Issues: Techniques for Assessing the Representativenees of Snowball Samples" in Lambert E (ed), The collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations, NIDA Research Monograph 98, National Institute on Drug Abuse Rockville, 31-43, 1990.
780:
To Bdarren: I saw you edited this section and made good improvement, but there is one mistake that you didn't notice. The reference 15 in the first paragraph is wrong. It should refer to reference 13 or 14 (obviously they are the same, so maybe you should delete one of them).
527:
Pratibha VS - Improvements to Definition section and overall faults, if any, Cleaning up reference link, Bdarren - "Improvements for snowball sampling" CAP129 - Improvements to "Example" section WenZhang61 - Improvements to "Application of snowball sampling".
519: 922: 396:
content and complete the article to make it more integrated. We specify the advantage and disadvantage of snowball sampling. And since the article mentioned disadvantage, we think it is better to indicate the method to improve the snowball sampling.
606:
1. The main definition can include some more details like. For eg: under Nonprobability sampling, "Snowball sampling" can be best example of Purposive Sampling or Judgmental sampling. The definition can be improved with respect to some other aspects.
630:
5. Statistical inferences are missing from the article. An important source for this would be "Kalton and Anderson (1986)" It also discusses compares different sampling procedures and their limitations, which is good comparison to other techniques.
818:
of the sample, sample size increase in comparison with traditional snowball sampling. I think it will also be a good idea to combine all advantages and disadvantages in one table and check which appear in online and which in traditional sampling.
759:
Neutral. In the "advantages and disadvantages" part, this article should state it neutrally. Now, it pays more attention to the disadvantages. Moreover, some defenses against those disadvantages or solutions to inevitable problems should be
257: 463:
Hi there, as a random page patroller I came across this page and found it hard to read because there are no pictures or diagrams. Just thought somebody might have a nice picture in mind. Thanks - I hope this suggestion is useful.
361:
As long ago as 1990 Van Meter summarised research that showed snowball sampling can be representative if selection for the sample is treated as a stochastic process and the probability of selection for the sample is calculated.
301:
some evidence that the assumptions are useful. This is great work, of course, but it is probably worth pointing out that there is no protection against the fact that a bad choice of the initial sample really can lead to bias.
729:
First of all, I agree with Bdarren's views--"this article obviously lacks references and nearly no internal links". Especially in "Applications of snowball sampling" part, only one same reference and no internal link are
586:
This section originally read like it was copied and pasted from a paper, so I updated the style. However it doesn't actually describe what Peer Esteem Snowballing is or how it differs from traditional snowball sampling.
1062:
I have temporarily deleted the following section, as it appears to contain no relevance to Snowball sampling. All of the studies listed are large, mailout surveys. These don't have any relation to snowball sampling.
822:
show that snowball sampling could have applications in research concerning not only people with some sort of health problems or criminals (which is the impression that one can get from reading the current article).
805: 1077:
The reference for this paragraph is as follows. If desired, someone could re-read the reference, identify how this information is related to SNowball sampling, and then revise the above paragraph and re-insert it.
614:
through this study can give better visualization to this article by referring to article "Faugier, J., & Sargeant M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 790-797."
557:
1. The article is obviously lack references and some of the external links is link to an empty page. Furthermore there are nearly no internal links for us to refer to. Update those links would be necessary.
764: 308:
The articles mentioned below sound more reasonable, putting some emphasis on the fact that strong model assumptions play a very large role in trying to do any inference using snowball-based sampling.
895:
anywhere that discusses the technique (at least under this name). A variation described in one source does not need to have its own section; the length and detail of coverage in this article is
229: 562:
of expert opinion, a sampling method like this is perfect for the study. This is a pretty refreshing idea because the reliability of snowball sampling is depend on the study it being used.
740:
This part should include some internal or external links to make it more readable and convincing. For example, some words should have internal or external links in this article.(e.g.
543: 941: 399:
Secondly, the article is lack of references and examples which make it less reliable. As a result, we searched some paperes relative to the article and added them as the references.
986: 811:
Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57-74., I will change current “Snowball sampling” article by:
784: 833: 246: 1032:
The last 3 sections read as if they've been copied and pasted from a paper on this topic. I'm adding a style template, suggesting they be rewritten in encyclopedic tone.
618:
3. Same references are mentioned multiple times eg: David L., Morgan (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. pp. 816–817.
777: 681: 601: 495: 319: 1057: 1094: 1043: 592: 756:
expert field such as surgery, etc. Additionally, the advantages and disadvantages should disengage from the "Application" part to set up an independent part.
505:
Snowball sampling is not like a breadth first search. I don't know where this idea came from but it's wrong and I removed the analogy from the introduction.
711: 411: 676: 661: 285: 140: 1098: 337: 581: 439: 724: 390: 356: 706: 375: 419: 549: 426: 1127: 219: 573: 1117: 130: 872: 499: 273: 1019: 1001: 848: 1132: 514: 1051: 916: 473: 596: 323: 256:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
195: 1122: 491: 349: 106: 1112: 478: 315: 972:
Comments about Suggestions to add Snowball Sampling Method (SSM) use in Conflict Environment and Marginalized Population
800: 695:
and helpful. And the positive and negative outcomes should be mentioned in the "advantages" and "disadvantages" parts.
387:
Guttman L "What is not what in Statistics. Statistical inference revisted - 1984" Bull Methodologie Sociol 4:3-35, 1984
367: 992:
PaulinKa, to respond to others on talkpages, you can create a thread by indenting your response like I have done here
451: 657: 622: 345: 1047: 1027: 627:
4. As one of my teammates Bdarren said some of the external links are broken. I have fixed all the external links.
447: 186: 163: 97: 58: 641:
7. Added important missing advantages and disadvantages eg: Low cost, Lack of control over the sampling method
415: 458: 963: 33: 923:
Suggestions to add Snowball Sampling Method (SSM) use in Conflict Environment and Marginalized Population:
885: 291: 814:
1. Adding the distinction between traditional and virtual sampling in snowball sampling definition.
900: 194:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
469: 371: 910: 672: 653: 533: 431:
The suggestion is very constructive and promising. It can improve the organize the article.
341: 39: 1035: 951: 937: 868: 745: 720: 645: 539: 487: 443: 435: 403: 333: 311: 8: 510: 21: 1015: 982: 959: 829: 465: 281: 789:
To CAP129: Yes, you are right. I've already mapped it to the right reference. Thanks!
796: 619: 569: 178: 157: 997: 906: 844: 773: 702: 668: 649: 529: 520:=======Discussion Board for group Pratibha VS, Bdarren, CAP129 and WenZhang61===== 1090: 1039: 933: 896: 864: 716: 588: 261: 749: 506: 89: 903:, and shortened to better conform with the other examples under that section. 858:
Good suggestion: distinction between virtual and traditional snowball sampling
73: 52: 1106: 1011: 978: 825: 407: 277: 265: 892: 792: 565: 806:
Plans to add distinction between virtual and traditional snowball sampling
610:
2. An important concept/advantage of Snowball sampling as how do we reach
993: 955: 840: 769: 698: 191: 1082:
Kalton, G., & Anderson, D. W. (1986). Sampling rare populations.
102: 252: 83: 891:. A single source is cited, and that source seems to be the only 736:
To sum up, "Application" part can be improved in following ways:
765:
Wrong citation in the "Improvements for snowball sampling"
741: 733:
disadvantages without some detail statistics or cases.
247:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
524:
We divided the work on improving article as follows
190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 79: 602:Suggestion on definition/main topic and References 1104: 1058:Statistics on snowball statistics - not relevant 899:. It should be moved into a subsection under 881:I've tagged "Virtual snowball sampling" with 682:Suggestions on changes to the 'Examples' part 274:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1084:Journal of the royal statistical society 634:6. There is no reference from where the 391:Suggestion on how to improve the article 357:Representativeness of Snowball sampling 272:Above undated message substituted from 19: 1105: 554:Two main aspects need to be improved. 1086:. Series A (general), 65-82. sampling 1010:That's much better, thank you Rstaf! 550:Suggestions on Improving the article 184:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 15: 507:Paul Ralph (University of Auckland) 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 1128:Low-importance Statistics articles 712:Suggestions on "Applications" part 14: 1144: 1118:Mid-importance sociology articles 251: 204:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 177: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 1133:WikiProject Statistics articles 1068:Statistics on Snowball sampling 224:This article has been rated as 207:Template:WikiProject Statistics 135:This article has been rated as 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology 901:Snowball sampling#Improvements 839:All sounds very good PaulinKa 118:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 1020:17:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 1002:14:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 987:17:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 942:17:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC) 917:17:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC) 873:03:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC) 849:14:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC) 834:18:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC) 725:07:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 707:23:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC) 376:06:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 198:and see a list of open tasks. 109:and see a list of open tasks. 801:23:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 778:22:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 677:06:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC) 662:23:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 574:18:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC) 544:00:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 474:20:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 452:00:01, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 420:00:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 350:23:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 286:09:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 7: 1123:C-Class Statistics articles 515:21:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC) 479:Computer Science references 10: 1149: 1113:C-Class sociology articles 1099:22:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 1052:21:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 597:21:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 141:project's importance scale 500:07:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC) 223: 172: 134: 67: 46: 1028:Copy and paste material? 612:hard to reach population 324:02:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 582:Peer Esteem Snowballing 187:WikiProject Statistics 28:This article is rated 459:Pictures or diagrams? 260:. Student editor(s): 98:WikiProject Sociology 785:About Wrong Citation 297:Snowball sampling". 292:Heckathorn Articles 210:Statistics articles 886:One source section 258:on the course page 121:sociology articles 34:content assessment 1054: 1038:comment added by 967: 954:comment added by 915: 665: 648:comment added by 490:comment added by 455: 438:comment added by 423: 406:comment added by 353: 336:comment added by 329:Like this one! 314:comment added by 244: 243: 240: 239: 236: 235: 151: 150: 147: 146: 1140: 1033: 949: 914: 904: 890: 884: 664: 642: 546: 502: 454: 432: 422: 400: 352: 330: 326: 288: 255: 230:importance scale 212: 211: 208: 205: 202: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 152: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1103: 1102: 1060: 1030: 974: 925: 905: 888: 882: 808: 787: 767: 714: 684: 643: 604: 584: 552: 537: 522: 485: 484:introduction. 481: 461: 433: 429: 427:Good suggestion 401: 393: 359: 331: 309: 294: 271: 249: 209: 206: 203: 200: 199: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1146: 1136: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1088: 1087: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1059: 1056: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1005: 1004: 973: 970: 969: 968: 924: 921: 920: 919: 878: 877: 876: 875: 860: 852: 851: 807: 804: 786: 783: 766: 763: 762: 761: 757: 753: 750:social network 731: 713: 710: 683: 680: 603: 600: 583: 580: 578: 551: 548: 542:comment added 521: 518: 492:36.231.136.221 480: 477: 460: 457: 428: 425: 392: 389: 358: 355: 293: 290: 248: 245: 242: 241: 238: 237: 234: 233: 226:Low-importance 222: 216: 215: 213: 196:the discussion 182: 170: 169: 167:Low‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Mid-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 90:Society portal 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1145: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1055: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 984: 980: 965: 961: 957: 953: 946: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 929: 918: 912: 908: 902: 898: 894: 887: 880: 879: 874: 870: 866: 861: 859: 856: 855: 854: 853: 850: 846: 842: 838: 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 812: 803: 802: 798: 794: 790: 782: 779: 775: 771: 758: 754: 751: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 734: 727: 726: 722: 718: 709: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 679: 678: 674: 670: 666: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 639: 637: 632: 628: 625: 624: 623:9781412941631 621: 616: 613: 608: 599: 598: 594: 590: 579: 576: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 547: 545: 541: 535: 531: 525: 517: 516: 512: 508: 503: 501: 497: 493: 489: 476: 475: 471: 467: 466:Creeper jack1 456: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 424: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 397: 388: 385: 382: 378: 377: 373: 369: 363: 354: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 327: 325: 321: 317: 316:99.246.77.229 313: 306: 302: 298: 289: 287: 283: 279: 275: 269: 267: 263: 259: 254: 231: 227: 221: 218: 217: 214: 197: 193: 189: 188: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 154: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1089: 1083: 1076: 1067: 1061: 1034:— Preceding 1031: 975: 950:— Preceding 930: 926: 857: 824: 820: 816: 813: 809: 791: 788: 768: 746:veterinarian 735: 728: 715: 697: 693: 689: 685: 667: 644:— Preceding 640: 635: 633: 629: 626: 617: 611: 609: 605: 585: 577: 564: 560: 556: 553: 538:— Preceding 526: 523: 504: 486:— Preceding 482: 462: 434:— Preceding 430: 402:— Preceding 398: 394: 386: 380: 379: 368:203.13.1.142 364: 360: 332:— Preceding 328: 310:— Preceding 307: 303: 299: 295: 270: 250: 225: 185: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 907:Lwarrenwiki 669:Pratibha VS 650:Pratibha VS 530:Pratibha VS 338:Williamlion 1107:Categories 1091:Jenlouised 1040:Jenlouised 934:Waqas Amin 865:Waqas Amin 760:mentioned. 717:WenZhang61 589:Jenlouised 440:KatePolice 381:References 262:Waqas Amin 201:Statistics 192:statistics 164:Statistics 730:included. 638:is taken 112:Sociology 103:sociology 59:Sociology 1048:contribs 1036:unsigned 1012:PaulinKa 979:PaulinKa 964:contribs 952:unsigned 897:WP:UNDUE 863:method. 826:PaulinKa 658:contribs 646:unsigned 488:unsigned 448:contribs 436:unsigned 416:contribs 408:LeiLei63 404:unsigned 346:contribs 334:unsigned 312:unsigned 278:PrimeBOT 266:PaulinKa 793:Bdarren 566:Bdarren 540:undated 228:on the 139:on the 30:C-class 994:Rostaf 956:Rostaf 841:Rostaf 770:CAP129 699:CAP129 636:Method 36:scale. 893:WP:RS 1095:talk 1044:talk 1016:talk 998:talk 983:talk 960:talk 938:talk 911:talk 869:talk 845:talk 830:talk 797:talk 774:talk 721:talk 703:talk 673:talk 654:talk 620:ISBN 593:talk 570:talk 534:talk 511:talk 496:talk 470:talk 444:talk 412:talk 372:talk 342:talk 320:talk 282:talk 536:) 276:by 220:Low 131:Mid 1109:: 1097:) 1050:) 1046:• 1018:) 1000:) 985:) 966:) 962:• 940:) 889:}} 883:{{ 871:) 847:) 832:) 799:) 776:) 748:, 744:, 742:3M 723:) 705:) 675:) 660:) 656:• 595:) 572:) 513:) 498:) 472:) 450:) 446:• 418:) 414:• 374:) 348:) 344:• 322:) 284:) 268:. 264:, 1093:( 1042:( 1014:( 996:( 981:( 958:( 936:( 913:) 909:( 867:( 843:( 828:( 795:( 772:( 752:) 719:( 701:( 671:( 652:( 591:( 568:( 532:( 509:( 494:( 468:( 442:( 410:( 370:( 340:( 318:( 280:( 232:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Sociology
WikiProject icon
icon
Society portal
WikiProject Sociology
sociology
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
Low
importance scale

on the course page
Waqas Amin
PaulinKa
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
PrimeBOT
talk
09:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
unsigned

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑