758:{{italictitle}}{{Automatic taxobox | fossil_range = ], {{fossilrange|130}} | image = Eotyrannus model.JPG | image width = 200 pixels | image_caption = Model | name = ''Eotyrannus'' | taxon = Eotyrannus lengi | display_taxa = 3 | parent_authority = (Hutt ''et al.'', 2001) | binomial = ''Eotyrannus Lengi'' | binomial_authority = (Hutt ''et al.'', 2001) }}
961:
There are arguments for and against including blank parameters; you'd probably get the same or similar arguments on this issue. I prefer not including a parameter unless it's needed-- it saves space, makes the template code more compact, makes it easier to find the top of the article, and reduces the
65:
That's probably because of the dagger at the genus level. If I recall, the taxobox checks if the article title matches either the genus or binomial and then italicizes. Because the dagger is present, the parameters don't match and it won't automatically italicize. I suppose we could have it overlook
1191:
Actually, common practice is to not include a taxobox on an article about multiple taxa. It doesn't sound to me like the article topic is a named taxon under
Lobelioideae; it may be monophyletic daughter clade, but it doesn't appear to have a name. If it did, a taxobox would be fine. Otherwise, nix
946:
the name of the taxon? I get the alternative argument: why put it in if it's unnecessary? I suppose I'd argue it's more intuitive to the uninitiated for the automatic taxobox to state which taxon it's for. But more to the point, when an article is moved from a scientific name to a common name, the
1426:
Whichever is most likely to be the immediate parent of an arbitrary descendant taxon ought to not have the parameter. If it's a subgenus, chances are the genus is the best one to leave the parameter off of, and append it to the subgenus. If someone really wants the subgenus badly enough, they can
604:
I'm working on a conversion script that'll help users to convert existing taxoboxes to the new template. (I've written the script but haven't worked out how to let editors apply its results.) "Genus_authority" might mean "authority" or "parent_authority", so we can't just pass the parameter and
239:
You can go to "what links here" then go to the first article, figure out which taxa is the immediate child of the one you are interested in, point that to the new parent, then repeat. For pathological cases you have to traverse up a long list of non-primary taxa each time, but this goes fast. The
639:
Remove all taxon parameters. If the taxon the article is about is not the title of the page, change it to say "taxon = " instead of whatever taxon it is. If the taxon is monotypic, you will need to set taxon equal to the species (preferred by most zoology editors) or else use the subdivision
1863:
It is compelling to store the edges of the taxonomy graph separately from the articles about the taxa because it avoids data duplication. But with synonyms, you can't really do this, so I'm not sure how it would help. It's a lot of clutter, sure, but it has to go
379:
The pages were recreated specifically for hunting down daughter taxa. At this point, the only purpose they serve is to point to deprecated taxon templates, since the page notice can handle informing folks which updated template to use. Shall I delete them again?
346:
Erik, one of the beautiful things about the automatic taxobox is it's forcing people to agree on classification (though many would argue that's bad). The reason Sauria and
Lacertilia are bad choices is because these taxa are paraphyletic-- that is, they include
351:
of a daughter taxon-- they're like step-parent taxa, in a way. Squamata is preferred because it's monophyletic-- meaning it contains all members of all its daughter taxa-- making it highly ideal for a database such as the one this template relies upon.
1411:. Is it ok for us to reach a different conclusion for taxonomy templates vs. article titles? It maybe doesn't matter too much, because this decision only affects the title of the template, as far as I can tell; it isn't visible on any article.
1957:
don't think we should be making the synonym field that much harder to edit. If you think the synonym list is too large for the taxobox, you can move it to its own article section, but it shouldn't be hidden in a template.
1343:
You can specify any rank you like. I notice that you specified some ranked taxa (such as legions) as unranked, then placed "legion" in their display text. I've modified this so that legion is specified as a rank. (See
201:
Then they'd all display the correct taxon immediately, and (I think) they should eventually show up in a category that you can check manually (they'll only appear in the category when the host page is edited, though).
643:
Change the authority to read simply "authority =" instead of "species_authority =". If an authority is needed for the parent taxon, use "parent_authority =", and "grandparent_authority =" for the grandparent taxon's
1676:. I can't think of any instances where both a subgenus and a subspecies are used, but I'd expect the same rule to be used there as well. However, if it should happen there are two taxa with the same name that
2020:
Breaking the article up and transcluding just for the sake of making the raw wikitext shorter doesn't seem terribly useful, is there something else going on here? Are you going to do something with the
269:
This puts all the deprecated taxon templates into a category together, where maintenance will be slightly easier if we can keep track of them all. I was hoping I could implement something more like
465:
The site defaults to creating the taxon as X. species name. I have to change it to full name, Velutina insculpta when creating the
Taxonomy template. Please default species taxon to the full name.
1449:
1396:
66:
the dagger, just like it does when there are disambiguators in the title like (genus). I'm not sure how to do that, though, so we'd have to see if one of the template gurus can do it.
1803:
Thanks! I may have made some somewhat bold prescriptions; hopefully things are in a new enough state that this was ok to do. But if people can check the content that would be great.
1917:
1524:: "If there is a natural mode of disambiguation in standard English, as with Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger, use that instead (of adding a disambiguating tag in parentheses)."
1684:
recently, but I see someone's resolved the taxonomy paradox since then), then the one less likely to serve as a parent to a new taxon would take the parameter. So yes, please use
1626:
This is essentially what we do for species, anyway – the titles of the taxonomy templates are generally the full binomial. Should we do this for subgenera also? I'll update the
1327:
1276:
Interesting-- I could have sworn I fixed that problem a few weeks ago. The problem had been that the color code for one part of the taxobox was not the same as the other parts.
1258:– or any animal with a "binomial name" section or a "synonyms" section. The part where is says "Binomial name" has a white background instead of beige like it would if we used
189:
1172:
At the risk of sounding like my dad, I'm really tempted to say it wouldn't matter since it is probably never applicable. If you really do need it to do that, I think the old
1231:
For animals at least, it seems the section headers – ie, binomial/synonyms – have a white background instead of that beige color. I think this just started happening today.
774:
126:
1561:
149:
59:
1408:
1240:
490:
The taxobox had "V. <species". In these cases (if the species name does not match the page title), it would be best for the taxobot site to default the page name.
1883:
1744:
1698:
1461:
1431:
1420:
1280:
1271:
1250:
1186:
1167:
840:
831:
398:
384:
374:
356:
338:
289:
249:
1378:
1365:
1306:
1141:
813:
804:
740:
715:
324:
232:
219:
683:
666:
1196:
966:
98:
994:
26:
440:
1903:
1812:
1798:
1533:
1495:
1226:
1020:
2034:
1877:
909:
895:
548:
1639:
1589:
1386:
1210:
531:
70:
1936:
622:
502:
599:
179:
1995:
1962:
365:
altogether? Was the idea to leave it there until all its daughters were re-parented? Or is it just there to make sure nobody unwittingly re-adds it?
1582:
425:
1959:
1586:
1193:
972:
952:
67:
1337:
1262:. Plant taxoboxen appear ok – the headings have green backgrounds. I presume this has to do with /core refactoring but I'm just guessing.
647:
Check to see that the taxobox title and page title are correct and show the correct italicization. Due to a glitch, you may need to use
416:
Speaking of toolserver, there's nothing there beyond what you could get with the API that would be useful other than hosting, is there?
1345:
329:
Is the point of this just to prevent people from using template:Taxonomy/Sauria? If someone does use it, then this breaks them, right?
955:
587:
the genus authority issue. Many articles still link to the genus_authority parameter. Can the parameter be added to this template?
343:
Martin, I attempted exactly that before giving up-- it wasn't working for me (although it's quite possible I had a typo somewhere).
1371:
1150:
to avoid "Hawaiian lobelioids" showing up in those taxoboxes. Just out of curiosity, though, if I didn't want to make a separate
485:
389:
Well, it does seem useful to have them flagged like that so people know not to use them and use the other ones instead. Thanks,
1857:
1732:
1627:
1475:
577:
1614:
Rkitko, this is an interesting alternative that I hadn't mentioned – it's essentially what is done on wikispecies – that is,
1097:
468:
It defaults to whatever is in the existing taxobox, but creates the page at the full taxon name (where it can work it out).
171:, it's quite difficult to clean up daughter taxon templates. Perhaps there is a way to search for, say, all pages containing
584:
50:
in order to get the italics right. It kind of has that "I'm doing it wrong" feel. Is there a better way to do this? Thanks!
1323:
Shall we add support for the microrder? If so, I've got one that will be needing set to that rank once the change is made:
137:
1286:
260:{{tdeprecated|{{PAGENAME}}|Taxonomy/Squamata|date={{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}}</noinclude: -->
1146:
Thanks Bob, that does make sense and might be the way to go. I guess the genera templates below it would have to have
640:
parameter (preferred by the plant editors and several paleozoology editors). When setting taxon equal to the subtaxon.
822:. The name doesn't show up in the taxobox. Neither does the image, but I suspect that is a separate problem. Thanks!
1619:
962:
page's size, improving download time. However, including the parameter prepares the page in case of a page move.
779:
It looks to me like you are referring to a taxobox not italicizing the page title when a name is specified using
17:
1845:. I noticed that the taxobox stills looks crowded. Can the synonyms to be moved into the Taxonomy template too?
1572:
1554:
In botany there are clear rules on how to style these things. So instead of having an article on the section
154:
118:| name = {{#if:{{{name|}}}|{{{name}}}|{{taxobox name|{{taxobox/italics|{{{taxon|{{{1|{{PAGENAME}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
511:
The submit button stays grey even after the verified checkbox is checked. It allows me to click it though.
1688:
1517:
1445:
1392:
809:
That is correct. I noticed your edit and I've begun incorporating that in monotypic genera's taxoboxes.
1882:
I agree. If you want to avoid the clutter in the article text, you could create a special template at
108:
1395:, because it shows up that way on wikispecies and it is written that way normally. But then I noticed
1735:; please take a look, and we should probably move this discussion there if there is more to discuss.
951:
wasn't specified, correct? A common action like that shouldn't break the taxobox. What do you think?
745:
Oops...looks like that page has been updated. Anyway, pop this code into your
Sandbox and you'll see:
362:
1695:
1428:
1375:
1334:
1277:
1247:
1183:
1138:
963:
933:
837:
810:
771:
737:
663:
381:
353:
286:
240:
toolserver thing would be nice for other reasons anyway, though, and will make this even faster.
229:
176:
123:
95:
565:
Overall it is a useful tool. I do prefer using the tool over creating the templates manually.
43:
2030:
1873:
1808:
1740:
1635:
1529:
1457:
1416:
1267:
1236:
1206:
1163:
990:
905:
827:
651:
436:
421:
394:
370:
334:
245:
145:
55:
880:
8:
1513:
1029:
Sounds like a monophyletic daughter clade of
Lobelioideae. I'd use the following taxobox:
978:
254:
I'm now copying/pasting the following code, replacing the two pointers to the new taxon:
32:
1953:
I'm not sure I like this... While most synonyms are static, some opinions do change. I
1897:
1792:
1489:
1359:
1300:
1246:
Could you provide an example? The one I'm looking at currently has a beige background.
1014:
798:
709:
616:
525:
479:
318:
213:
1990:
1931:
1852:
1318:
890:
678:
594:
572:
543:
497:
1680:
genera/subgenera or the like, such as a phylum and kingdom (I had this problem with
122:
but I don't have time tonight to look at it. Martin, feel free to work on this one.
1836:
1259:
1176:
446:
159:
As I learn of new controversial taxa, the most recent of which I learned about was
84:
452:
2026:
1869:
1804:
1736:
1631:
1525:
1453:
1412:
1263:
1232:
1202:
1159:
986:
901:
823:
432:
417:
390:
366:
330:
241:
141:
51:
1158:
then is there a way to get
Lobelioideae to be linkified in the taxobox? Thanks!
1400:
1921:
1893:
1887:
1842:
1788:
1782:
1485:
1479:
1399:. I realize a lot of times the Knowledge article titles are disambiguated as
1355:
1349:
1296:
1290:
1010:
1004:
794:
788:
705:
699:
612:
606:
521:
515:
475:
469:
314:
308:
209:
203:
431:
I'm applying for toolserver permissions to create something to this effect.
273:, where it would transclude the code I mentioned above, but I can't seem to
1986:
1927:
1848:
1255:
982:
886:
819:
674:
590:
568:
539:
493:
1983:
Did you notice the edit button on the synonym box? Will that not suffice?
1409:
Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(fauna)#Disambiguating_subgenus_articles
361:
I'm with you wrt. monophyly; I'm just wondering why you don't just delete
1556:
1391:
Can we standardize on how subgenus articles are disambiguated? I created
1920:. I added a text {{Synonyms/Lobatus gigas}} to the synonym parameter on
1154:
template, then is it possible to get the link to show up? ie, if I have
733:
671:
Bob, thanks for the guide. I will follow these instructions next time.
164:
1521:
836:
Weird.... I do see the image, but the name is definitely not there.
1681:
787:
should do the job in such cases. Have I understood you correctly?
636:
Add "automatic" before "taxobox", and make sure the T is lowercase.
558:
457:
168:
1781:
Thanks for doing that Erik; you've done a really good job there!
657:
as well as a formatted taxobox title for certain monotypic genera.
1440:
I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing. Considering the
1623:
185:
Eventually I'll have to code a toolserver page for this purpose.
938:
So, I was thinking... Shouldn't we always encourage the use of
160:
536:
I am using IE 8.0. I am not sure if it fully supports HTML5.
514:
Are you using an up-to-date browser (that supports HTML5)?
1668:
In zoology, subgenera and subspecies should be written as
698:
Do you have examples of the glitch? It might be fixable.
633:
When automating the taxobox, use the following procedure:
1585:. Seemed easier and clearer to me than parenthesis.
981:– what's the best way to get the taxobox to link to
301:Text to be included</inclu<includeonly: -->
879:The title shows up when the italic parameter is
228:thinking outside the box. :) Will do right now!
1583:Template:Taxonomy/Levenhookia sect. Coleostylis
900:I think this is working now; thanks mr. smith.
27:Italics and using |taxon= for monotypic genera
1478:when you have resolved this matter. Thanks,
557:The genus authority is not displaying on the
1227:section header background colors for animals
297:Blah blah blah <inclu<includeonly: -->
94:parameter gets filled in. I'll take a look.
1624:http://species.wikimedia.org/Mus_(Coelomys)
1387:Disambiguating subgenus taxonomy/ templates
1618:, you would write the "long" version, eg:
294:To include an includeonly, use the format
1056:|subdivision = ''Brighamia''<br /: -->
104:I think the problem lies in this line of
138:Template_talk:Automatic_taxobox#Feedback
1046:|image_caption = ''Clermontia pallida''
14:
1733:Template:Automatic_taxobox/Conventions
1628:Template:Automatic_taxobox/Conventions
1476:Template:Automatic_taxobox/Conventions
1450:Template:Taxonomy/Xenophora (subgenus)
1397:Template:Taxonomy/Xenophora (subgenus)
973:Links when taxobox is on another page
605:assume that it means a single thing.
1285:Can you check this now please (with
942:, even if the title of the article
23:
1287:Template:Automatic taxobox/sandbox
24:
2056:
1630:page if we're agreeable. Thanks,
262:#REDIRECT] ]</includeonly: -->
136:Note: this is discussed below at
1841:I just added the autotaxobox to
1620:Template:Taxonomy/Mus (Coelomys)
196:#REDIRECT] <includeonly: -->
1918:Template:Synonyms/Lobatus gigas
1616:even when there is no ambiguity
1041:|image = Clermontia_pallida.jpg
18:Template talk:Automatic taxobox
13:
1:
2035:18:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
1813:18:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
1799:12:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
1745:10:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
1379:19:08, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
1366:17:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
1307:06:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
188:Meanwhile, you could replace
90:is getting parsed before the
1996:12:50, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
1963:15:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
1937:13:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
1904:23:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
1878:22:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
1858:15:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
1699:03:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
1640:00:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
1590:23:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
1534:17:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
1496:21:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
1462:08:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
1432:07:44, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
1421:20:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1338:05:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1281:05:04, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1272:04:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1251:03:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1241:00:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1211:19:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1197:12:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1187:04:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1168:04:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1142:02:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1098:Taxonomy/Hawaiian lobelioids
1021:01:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
995:00:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
967:00:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
956:22:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
910:07:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
896:04:07, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
841:03:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
832:22:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
814:01:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
805:13:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
775:00:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
741:23:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
716:22:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
684:11:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
667:21:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
623:19:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
600:01:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
578:00:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
549:11:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
532:19:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
503:11:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
486:19:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
441:21:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
426:21:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
399:21:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
385:05:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
375:05:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
357:02:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
339:21:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
325:19:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
290:18:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
250:16:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
233:16:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
220:13:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
190:Template:Taxonomy/Lacertilia
180:05:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
150:22:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
127:00:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
99:00:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
71:23:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
60:22:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
7:
1518:Template:Taxonomy/Mus (Mus)
1446:Template:Taxonomy/Mus (Mus)
1393:Template:Taxonomy/Mus (Mus)
1370:Hey, neat! I tested it out
1061:''Clermontia''<br /: -->
10:
2061:
307:. Hope that makes sense?
1182:may be your only option.
1120:|link=Hawaiian lobelioids
1071:''Delissea''<br /: -->
985:? Or is this just wrong?
662:Hope this guide helps...
461:. Here is some feedback:
1886:with the synonym list.
1674:Genus species subspecies
1403:. I'm trying to discuss
1110:{{taxonomic unit|{{{1}}}
1076:''Lobelia''<br /: -->
451:I have tried to use the
363:Template:Taxonomy/Sauria
163:, which was replaced by
1884:Template:Synonyms/taxon
1407:particular issue here:
1137:Hope that makes sense.
1066:''Cyanea''<br /: -->
947:taxobox would break if
818:What am I doing wrong:
36:| name = ''Eotyrannus''
1448:correctly? What about
1051:|subdivision_ranks = ]
455:for the species under
197:]</includeonly: -->
1916:Okay, I have created
1694:. Thanks for asking!
1201:Fair enough. Thanks!
1093:and for the template
783:. The new parameter
304:</includeonly: -->
302:</includeonly: -->
300:</includeonly: -->
298:</includeonly: -->
155:Referential integrity
76:Looks to me like the
1444:example, did I name
1328:Taxonomy/Mystroptera
1125:|parent=Lobelioideae
296:<includeonly: -->
279:<includeonly: -->
275:<includeonly: -->
264:]</noinclude: -->
261:<includeonly: -->
1156:|taxon=Lobelioideae
1036:{{Automatic taxobox
1001:|taxon=Lobelioideae
979:Hawaiian_lobelioids
271:{{dtaxon|Squamata}}
31:Here is an example
1696:Bob the Wikipedian
1689:Taxonomy/Mus (Mus)
1429:Bob the Wikipedian
1376:Bob the Wikipedian
1335:Bob the Wikipedian
1278:Bob the Wikipedian
1248:Bob the Wikipedian
1184:Bob the Wikipedian
1139:Bob the Wikipedian
1081:''Trematolobelia''
964:Bob the Wikipedian
838:Bob the Wikipedian
811:Bob the Wikipedian
772:Bob the Wikipedian
738:Bob the Wikipedian
664:Bob the Wikipedian
382:Bob the Wikipedian
354:Bob the Wikipedian
287:Bob the Wikipedian
283:<noinclude: -->
263:<noinclude: -->
259:<noinclude: -->
230:Bob the Wikipedian
177:Bob the Wikipedian
124:Bob the Wikipedian
96:Bob the Wikipedian
1901:
1796:
1731:I've reorganized
1493:
1363:
1304:
1018:
802:
713:
620:
529:
483:
322:
217:
173:parent=Lacertilia
109:automatic taxobox
80:parameter of the
2052:
1994:
1935:
1891:
1856:
1786:
1693:
1687:
1670:Genus (Subgenus)
1483:
1427:find it or ask.
1353:
1332:
1326:
1294:
1260:Template:Taxobox
1181:
1175:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1103:, add this code:
1102:
1096:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1008:
1002:
950:
941:
894:
792:
786:
782:
759:
703:
682:
656:
650:
610:
598:
576:
547:
519:
501:
473:
312:
306:
284:
280:
276:
272:
266:
265:
207:
174:
119:
113:
107:
93:
89:
83:
79:
48:
42:
34:. I have to add
2060:
2059:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2051:
2050:
2049:
1984:
1925:
1846:
1839:
1691:
1685:
1389:
1374:and it worked.
1330:
1324:
1321:
1229:
1179:
1173:
1155:
1151:
1148:|display_taxa=0
1147:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1100:
1094:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1000:
975:
948:
939:
936:
934:taxon parameter
884:
784:
781:|name='italics'
780:
757:
672:
654:
648:
588:
566:
537:
491:
449:
295:
282:
278:
274:
270:
258:
257:
198:
172:
157:
117:
111:
105:
91:
87:
81:
77:
46:
40:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2058:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1838:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1474:Please update
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1435:
1434:
1401:Mus (subgenus)
1388:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1024:
1023:
974:
971:
970:
969:
935:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
660:
659:
658:
645:
641:
637:
628:
627:
626:
625:
563:
562:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
448:
445:
444:
443:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
344:
327:
267:
255:
237:
236:
235:
195:
194:
193:
186:
156:
153:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
120:
115:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2057:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
1997:
1992:
1988:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1964:
1961:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1938:
1933:
1929:
1923:
1922:Lobatus gigas
1919:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1902:
1899:
1895:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1854:
1850:
1844:
1843:Lobatus gigas
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1784:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1700:
1697:
1690:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1591:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1570:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1558:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1516:it should be
1515:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1487:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1433:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1361:
1357:
1351:
1347:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1336:
1329:
1308:
1305:
1302:
1298:
1292:
1289:)? Thanks!
1288:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1192:the taxobox.
1190:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1178:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1099:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1006:
999:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
977:For example,
968:
965:
960:
959:
958:
957:
954:
945:
911:
907:
903:
899:
898:
897:
892:
888:
882:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
842:
839:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
821:
817:
816:
815:
812:
808:
807:
806:
803:
800:
796:
790:
785:|italic_name=
778:
777:
776:
773:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
744:
743:
742:
739:
735:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
717:
714:
711:
707:
701:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
685:
680:
676:
670:
669:
668:
665:
661:
653:
646:
642:
638:
635:
634:
632:
631:
630:
629:
624:
621:
618:
614:
608:
603:
602:
601:
596:
592:
586:
582:
581:
580:
579:
574:
570:
560:
556:
550:
545:
541:
535:
534:
533:
530:
527:
523:
517:
513:
512:
510:
504:
499:
495:
489:
488:
487:
484:
481:
477:
471:
467:
466:
464:
463:
462:
460:
459:
454:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
383:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
358:
355:
350:
345:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
326:
323:
320:
316:
310:
293:
292:
291:
288:
268:
256:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
218:
215:
211:
205:
200:
199:
191:
187:
184:
183:
182:
181:
178:
170:
166:
162:
152:
151:
147:
143:
139:
128:
125:
121:
116:
110:
103:
102:
101:
100:
97:
86:
74:
73:
72:
69:
64:
63:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
37:
33:
19:
2022:
1954:
1890:
1865:
1840:
1785:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1615:
1577:
1573:
1566:
1562:
1555:
1514:WP:PRECISION
1512:I think per
1482:
1441:
1404:
1390:
1352:
1322:
1293:
1256:Acrophyseter
1230:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1084:
1079:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1007:
983:Lobelioideae
976:
943:
937:
820:Acrophyseter
791:
756:
702:
609:
564:
518:
472:
456:
450:
415:
348:
311:
225:
206:
167:and then by
158:
135:
75:
44:Italic title
39:
35:
30:
2025:templates?
1578:Coleostylis
1574:Levenhookia
1567:Levenhookia
1563:Coleostylis
1557:Coleostylis
1115:|rank=clade
652:italictitle
583:Rkitko has
303:deonly: -->
299:deonly: -->
2027:ErikHaugen
1870:ErikHaugen
1805:ErikHaugen
1737:ErikHaugen
1632:ErikHaugen
1571:, we have
1526:ErikHaugen
1454:ErikHaugen
1452:? Thanks,
1413:ErikHaugen
1264:ErikHaugen
1233:ErikHaugen
1203:ErikHaugen
1160:ErikHaugen
987:ErikHaugen
902:ErikHaugen
824:ErikHaugen
734:Eotyrannus
644:authority.
453:trial site
433:ErikHaugen
418:ErikHaugen
391:ErikHaugen
367:ErikHaugen
331:ErikHaugen
242:ErikHaugen
165:Lacertilia
142:ErikHaugen
52:ErikHaugen
2023:Synonyms/
1866:somewhere
1581:and thus
1522:Mus (Mus)
1442:Mus (Mus)
1319:Microrder
1152:taxonomy/
305:Blah blah
1894:Smith609
1837:Synonyms
1789:Smith609
1682:Bacteria
1622:. a-la:
1560:or even
1486:Smith609
1356:Smith609
1297:Smith609
1011:Smith609
795:Smith609
706:Smith609
613:Smith609
559:Velutina
522:Smith609
476:Smith609
458:Velutina
447:Feedback
315:Smith609
210:Smith609
169:Squamata
1987:Ganeshk
1928:Ganeshk
1849:Ganeshk
1177:taxobox
887:Ganeshk
881:removed
675:Ganeshk
591:Ganeshk
569:Ganeshk
540:Ganeshk
494:Ganeshk
85:taxobox
1960:Rkitko
1955:really
1888:Martin
1783:Martin
1678:aren't
1587:Rkitko
1576:sect.
1480:Martin
1350:Martin
1291:Martin
1194:Rkitko
1005:Martin
953:Rkitko
949:taxon=
940:taxon=
789:Martin
700:Martin
607:Martin
516:Martin
470:Martin
309:Martin
226:that's
204:Martin
161:Sauria
68:Rkitko
585:fixed
561:page.
281:or a
92:genus
16:<
2031:talk
1991:talk
1932:talk
1898:Talk
1874:talk
1853:talk
1809:talk
1793:Talk
1741:talk
1672:and
1636:talk
1530:talk
1520:and
1490:Talk
1458:talk
1417:talk
1405:that
1372:here
1360:Talk
1346:here
1301:Talk
1268:talk
1237:talk
1207:talk
1164:talk
1015:Talk
991:talk
906:talk
891:talk
828:talk
799:Talk
732:See
710:Talk
679:talk
617:Talk
595:talk
573:talk
544:talk
526:Talk
498:talk
480:Talk
437:talk
422:talk
395:talk
371:talk
349:part
335:talk
319:Talk
246:talk
224:Now
214:Talk
192:with
146:talk
78:name
56:talk
38:and
1348:)
1086:|}}
277:an
2033:)
1985:—
1926:—
1924:.
1896:–
1876:)
1868:.
1847:—
1811:)
1791:–
1743:)
1692:}}
1686:{{
1638:)
1532:)
1488:–
1460:)
1419:)
1358:–
1333:.
1331:}}
1325:{{
1299:–
1270:)
1239:)
1209:)
1180:}}
1174:{{
1166:)
1130:}}
1101:}}
1095:{{
1013:–
1003:?
993:)
944:is
908:)
885:—
883:.
830:)
797:–
736:.
708:–
673:—
655:}}
649:{{
615:–
589:—
567:—
538:—
524:–
492:—
478:–
439:)
424:)
397:)
373:)
337:)
317:–
285:.
248:)
212:–
175:?
148:)
140:.
112:}}
106:{{
88:}}
82:{{
58:)
47:}}
41:{{
2029:(
1993:)
1989:(
1934:)
1930:(
1900:)
1892:(
1872:(
1855:)
1851:(
1807:(
1795:)
1787:(
1739:(
1634:(
1569:)
1565:(
1528:(
1492:)
1484:(
1456:(
1415:(
1362:)
1354:(
1303:)
1295:(
1266:(
1235:(
1205:(
1162:(
1017:)
1009:(
989:(
904:(
893:)
889:(
826:(
801:)
793:(
712:)
704:(
681:)
677:(
619:)
611:(
597:)
593:(
575:)
571:(
546:)
542:(
528:)
520:(
500:)
496:(
482:)
474:(
435:(
420:(
393:(
369:(
333:(
321:)
313:(
244:(
216:)
208:(
144:(
114::
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.