32:
Parliament; c) To urge another person to attempt, otherwise than by lawful means, to procure a change to any matter established by law in the
Commonwealth; d) To promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different groups so as to threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
27:
At that time 2004 I was
National President of One Nation and with the support of several retired well known legal persons, I viewed several hundred documents proving this fact as an absolute. This was confirmed by both political and legal persons in the UK. So it became a rather large 'oups' moment
23:
I admire your energy and voluminous contribution to
Knowledge, BUT what day do you celebrate Australia's independence? I wrote to John Howard, and the GG, both refused to reply, so a good mate forwarded the intent of my letter to Her majesty, she requested I forward it to her. I received a reply in
19:
My great uncle was personal private secretary to Curtin and
Chifley and later commissioner of industrial relations. I inherited some documents (placed in secure care in the UK) which outlined the reluctance of Curtin in taking on the Westminster Adoption Act point blank. Other documents form part
31:
I note that
Schedule 7, Part 4 “Seditious intention”; means an intention to effect any of the following purposes: a) To bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt; b) To urge disaffection against the following: i. The Constitution; ii. The Government of the Commonwealth; iii. Either House of the
35:
So I look forward to my future endeavours that will shed light on the oversight of where
Australia really stands on the Independence issue and just how many Federal and State statute laws will fall once its officially recognised.
48:
40:
20:
of my matter I have raised in the SA Supreme Court that caused a 'lock down' by chief justice kourakis and a full bench sitting on appeal to my matter.
93:
63:
24:
8 days that ordered the GG to respond to my request. I visited London 3 months later for a cup of tea and a quite chit chat.
16:
Been looking over some of your
Knowledge contributions and although admirable miss a few basic foundation blocks in law.
67:
56:
89:
8:
85:
28:
for Howard but with a bit of effort he was able to shut people up. Thus:
84:
Knowledge content is based on extant knowledge only. --
76:
the legal theory your position rests on is sound, and
64:Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942
79:you really did have tea with Her Maj,
39:Kindest Regards Neil Russell-Taylor
13:
14:
105:
73:the documents you refer to exist,
62:I presume this is in relation to
47:) 04:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)--
68:Knowledge:No original research
1:
94:05:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
7:
57:04:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
10:
110:
66:? I suggest you read
101:
109:
108:
104:
103:
102:
100:
99:
98:
12:
11:
5:
107:
97:
96:
82:
81:
80:
77:
74:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
106:
95:
91:
87:
83:
78:
75:
72:
71:
69:
65:
61:
60:
59:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
37:
33:
29:
25:
21:
17:
52:
49:Aldgatetroll
44:
41:Aldgatetroll
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
18:
15:
70:. Even if
86:bainer
90:talk
53:talk
45:talk
92:)
55:)
88:(
51:(
43:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.