User talk:Angusmclellan/Archive 21

598:'s claim that Guðroðr/Guðfrið had sons named Óláfr, Røgnvaldr and Sigtryggr. Two of those are the names of the grandsons of Ívarr who ruled in York in the following generation. Downham is undecided about whether these are the same people. Woolf doesn't even mention it, but Hudson accepts it and also makes the second Guðfrið (Gofraid ua Ímair) this Guðfrið's son. So, between this lot, I have quite a lot of material on Guðroðr/Guðfrið, and on Hálfdan, but just at the moment - I have a new job that I'm still learning - I don't seem to be able to get much time to write stuff. 984: 812:, can be used because even though they often contain stuff which now looks daft; these guys usually tell you the source from which their readings are derived, so you can evaluate for yourself (hence why a late medieval historian can cite Paul, but rarely guys like Burke). Unlike modern history, in high medieval history there is an expectation that, even in a medium like this, you discuss the sources in some way. Most importantly, it should be easier to prevent less experienced editors stating certain things 2134:

story of brave people who stood up at a time when it was more convenient to hide. I want their story told, in proper historical context and with all of the facts presented in a scholarly manner. I rewrote the entire copyrightvio-pegged article because I wanted the subject presented properly. That's my foundation at the base of the current article. I don't believe the article is "dreadful." What is dreadful is the attitude of too many people who prefer a good fight to a good article.

1201:...particularly the last paragraph. Though I casually monitor the article and its talk page, I've long since suspended any efforts to seriously work on the article and consider its elevation to GA/FA a lost cause until certain "editors X" (to borrow your phrasing) are permanently proscribed from editing it. I admire the enormous well of patience you've displayed during your mentorship of the article, but I'm relieved to know that the "nuclear option" is on the table. 361:, which PR brought up, is a poor effort on your part. PR may not be of spotless reputation, but that doesn't invalidate the comment. That's disruptive, civil POV pushing I believe they call it. As for the rest, it's really nothing to do with me. My sole input has been to point out that (a) "broadly construed" would be punitive in your case and (b) that you'd been sanctioned before whereas BigDunc and The Thunderer had not. You surely don't want diffs for those? 31: 1154:. Unfortunately it doesn't have much on Eastern Europe. The text is like you'd expect. When Polish rulers attempt to polonise their subjects, that's self-evidently forced polonisation from above, but when Władysław Warneńczyk doesn't attempt to polonise Ruthenian nobles, that's a subtle approach to polonisation. *yawn* So far as I can tell, there are no articles about the francisation of France, although there easily could be (cf. 1583:

reply to Ynhockey, and the comments by Vegaswikian, Good Ol'Factory and Flowerparty. Now some might say that's because my attention span is so short that I forgot all the earlier stuff, but I would disagree. I did think quite hard about listifying it, but maybe I didn't think hard enough because I can see how a list would have addressed some of the arguments for deletion. If a list would make you happier, let me know.

1164:

does mean either a trip to a major library or even buying the book, once you've figured which book it is. Although you probably don't want to hear this, I have to tell you that you'd be much better off asking the Deacon than asking me. I am a dabbler, but he's actually studied this sort of stuff. I have a few general books on EE history, but nothing particularly appropriate to this subject.

1799: 1972:. Its not your fault all the images should have been tagged properly. I had a nightmare trying to sort out the agremeents. These days I refrain from making any new agremeents which is a shame because it takes so long to sort out and the sort of people you mentioned start sniffing at them. If you could add the proper ticket using the code this would be great .Best 391:

be correct to support this with diff's based on the current discussion? What are you basing your support for sanctions on. The time frame is from the last AE till now. So could you possibly have another look at the questions above, and give me your consider opinion as to how I have conducted myself. Thanks again really nice of you to help. PS I fixed the link. --

1689: 2234: 104:

When you're checking the edit count with interiot's tool, I look at the articles and spaces edited rather than the edit count itself. If you're not sure about a candidate, you can always give me the username and I can do a check to see if they'd be good. Though for me it's more a gut feeling with some candidates.

1850:

I'm going to fix the truly unsupportable changes made recently and yes, then take a hike. Overall, the article is in far better shape now then when this version first was launched, not to mention the first version which had to be deleted entirely (it was a massive COPYVIO cut and pasted from a fringe

1163:

To fix it will need some plausible sources, which means avoiding impressive-looking but shallow cherry-picking from Google books excerpts. That may be good enough to make GA reviewers happy, but really it's not a sensible way to do things. The book, the whole book, and nothing but the book. Yes, this

124:

Hi, Thanks for all your work moving my pics to commons. They are all quite old & my more recent pics have all gone onto commons in the first place. I've been asked to consider adminship before, but don't really see any advantage from the tools for article creation & improvement. I try to keep

103:

Hm, well, what I do with users, besides the obvious (contrib checking, block log checking, etc.) is try to see what role they would fit. Like if they're specialists, I check their contributions and attitude on the appropriate pages. If they're more all-around, I look more closely at general demeanor.

1248:

I see that my statement that Edward's reign saw grants of land to monasteries is an error based on the Ethelred article, and I have edited the Ethelred article citing the online Oxford DNB. I have made many minor edits and raised points on discussion pages, but this is the first time I have tried to

807:

I think cutting Burke off for "medieval" (whatever that means) can be sufficient. It's quite difficult to go way off this late in the game as the sources are so extensive. 19th century/early 20th century peerage or genealogy writers can still be cited by the historically competent ... you just gotta

610:

Well and good - I've ordered the book! I haven't had much wikitime myself until lately - and my tendencies towards wikiholism is something that comes and goes. It's been a while since I edited any norse-gael mediaval stuff, but I still have a rather ambitious but alas very unfinished "Ireland in the

572:

who was Guthfriths father, it would take some very solid references and a personal appearance from St. Cutberth to convince me of that ;) A question arose from my translation, do you know why it assumed that the Guthfrith/Gofraids etc are norse "Guðroðr", I would have assumed that "Guðfrið(r)" would

390:

an option suggested by AE. Now do you still consider it "disruptive, civil POV pushing" when I point out that the opinions I express are not my own, but are in fact referenced to a number of respected authors on the subject? Since you did share your thoughts on proposed sanctions on me, would it not

625:

Got it! Started reading and it seems promising, but I'm a bit surprised to see how much of what she's writing I've actually read (or even written translations of) before... I also ordered Ronald Williams "The Lords of the Isles", at first glance that seem to be more of a disappointment. BTW, Dowham

1582:

At bottom, the arguments in favour of deletion seemed stronger than those in favour of retention. But that, I suspect, is not the sort of vague non-answer you're wanting. Many of the comments left me unmoved. The ones that had stuck in my mind when I got to the end were your original comment, your

952:

Well, it is a template, or at least it functions as one, so I suppose that will be why it was categorised that way to start with. And having been categorised that way, it was changed when the category was renamed. Since most pages are in some category, it won't have struck me as being unreasonable

754:

I was wondering if anyone else was thinking that same user on this. My personal opinion is most genealogical works shouldn't be used in Knowledge, unless they are from one of the top tier publications (New England Genealogical and Historical Register, American Genealogist, and the one from England

588:

The Deacon just read Downham's book and liked it, as did I. It's principally based on Irish sources. It has a neat appendix of all Viking leaders mentioned in Irish annals down to 1014, which is very handy for Knowledge. Her stuff on England is very interesting. So yes, it's well worth looking at.

62:

For Commons, I think a tag {{Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure}} would be sufficient. The author of the photograph is not disclosed in the book and as it was no later than 1920, it would be impossible to verify the photographer and then find out whether he/she was still alive in 1938, the cutoff

2133:

I would call it a "work in progress" that has already been cited with a DYK and a spot on the Knowledge home page. And, quite frankly, I have a huge dog in the fight -- the article. I am sick of seeing both sides bickering and calling each other names. Getting lost in the shuffle is the actual

1220:

I sincerely hope I did not offend you with my comment on arbcom. You are a great editor, and while I do think you made a mistake there, we are all humans, and we err - it's not like I haven't made mistakes myself. I hope my comment there - in retrospect, perhaps not the most diplomatic - will not

2085:

I'm afraid I see this as a ludicrous remedy. Piotrus has been a Wikipedian since April 2004 and an administrator since January 2005. If his understanding is such that he still needs a "mentor to assist him in understanding policy" now, then he is never going to understand it. Better to give firm

1285:

As you can see in the above commments, I have permission from Peter Marshall to use his copyright material in my article on him which you have deleted. I have also sent an email with the message giving his permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org" . I understand from the Knowledge

1018:

I would appreciate it if you could reinstate the above article which you deleted at 20:58 on 25 Oct 2008 on grounds of copyright violation. I do in fact have copyright permission from the author to use material from his website in this article. If necessary, you can contact him for confirmation

1048:

I would like to confirm that I have given copyright permission to Jack Pippin to use material from my website (www. petermarshall.net) for his article 'Peter Marshall (author)' which was deleted by Angus McClellan at 20.58 on 25 October 2008 on grounds of copyright violation. I would therefore

473:

What say you to the anonymous editors repeated replacement of "Welsh" with "Brythonic" in the Wallace article? All of this speculation about Wallace's Welsh origins is probably inappropriate in the first place. Perhaps the whole section should go until sources are provided. Your thoughts?

247:

When you get to an article that big, there's no choice but either to take a chainsaw to it, which wasn't so popular, or to split it into chunks. Fair enough, there's room to quibble about what the summary section says, but it is a summary and so it should be short. It works for me anyway.

736:

There is a serious case for blacklisting this book in policy for all articles covering the medieval period. This is not the first Lauder-esque user to use the two-pronged Burke (/other random peerage source)/WP:VER attack on the quality of articles, and certainly won't be the last.

755:

whose name just escaped me). Some stuff from Genealogical Publishing Company is good, but some is bad. Even genealogists will tell you that you MUST go back to the original source, not just trust a published work, but it's obviously a distinction that folks on WP fail to get.

1120:

Actually IIRC Polonisation article is largely based on his writings including wholesale quotations in the article brought by Irpen. Do you believe it is correct and reliable source as well as way to create to create this article ? I wouldn't mind seeing your opinion there.

1895:

At the bottom of the photograph, I could find the message "Photo by Plate Ltd" in extremely small characters. The issue is February 1926 and the page number is 170. The name of the article is "Fishing for pearls in the Indian Ocean" and the author is Bella Sidney Woolf.

858:

Angus, I wish to withdraw my proposal for a change from the RoI because several editors who favour change are unhappy with pursuing this while a Task Force is 'active' (in the possum sense t'would appear). If this is do-able, could you please do the necessary barking?

335:

I think it only right and proper, and in the intrest fairness, that to defend myself I should first know what it is I’m supposed to have done, do you not agree? There is not much of a talk page to go through, and my edits were very limited. Thanks in advance,

717:

I did throw some stuff up this morning, hopefully it helps. I really don't know what to do about the huge chunk about his "afterlife", it's beyond my sources. Not sure what else I might be able to dig out from what I've got with me, we'll have to see.

2276:

I have been a bit ill and preoccupied. Haven't had much time to edit. I've just been monitoring my watchlist. Hopefully I can find some time to pick up where i left off. I'll probably just keep my edits simple at first. Thanks for your

593:

is not quite so good. I picked up a copy at a large discount, so there may be cheap copies around. Since we're here because of Guðroðr (as Downham calls him, Woolf says Guðfrið, Hudson Guðröðr), it's worth saying that Downham mentions

416:

I have reverted your edit- the wording and spelling was consistent with reference 5- the City of Rochester Society, who must be considered the definitive source. The ligature Ǣ is repeatedly reverted here on Wikipaedia. Mange

125:

out of some of the more "political" areas and discussions & although I know the mop & bucket work is important (& I'm aware of many of the relevant policies etc) it is not something I can get enthusiastic about.—

793:

The preferred choice would be the CP with corrections and the Keats-Rohan book on early medieval nobles, which I'm still trying to obtain a copy of. CP, while not perfect, at least is better than Burke's for medieval stuff.

1041:

Below is a copy of the email author Peter Marshall has sent to'permissions-en(at)wikipedia(dot)org' which confirms that he has given me permission to use material from his website in my article 'Peter Marshall (author)':

648:

Thanks, Angus! Can you tell me how to download the rollback into my username? And I'm sort of pressed for time right now, but show me the WP internal link for proper usage? I appreciate the help!!! Cheers from Maryland,

1147:, nationalist victimhood myths in paint and canvas. Now, instead of being like that, it should be more like the awesome medieval religious sculpture hidden away down in the basement, speaking a near-universal language. 956:

But Portal-space template type material is not generally categorised that way. They aren't categorised at all. That page, and all the other similar header boxes and so on, would be best categorised somewhere under

808:

be able to tell when to do it, when there is nothing else to use and at the same time make the relationship between source and interpretation clear to the normal reader. Some of these guys, like for instance

1249:

insert a source in an edit. Any advice on my contribution would be welcome. I accessed the source through my online local libary, but as it is a subscription source, I assume I should not show it as a link.

1289:

I would therefore appreciate it if you could undelete the article in question forthwith. If not, could you please tell me why not and how I can challenge your decision in keeping with Knowledge protocols.

1873:

was "related to medieval history", and that there was "clearly a section on medieval history within the article", whereas it only started by mentioning events from the second half of the 16th century?

519:

if I wanted to use the rollback feature. I declined at the time, but (typically) have since had several occasions when it might have been useful. Any chance I can take you up on the offer now? Thanks,

2035:

bottom of the section, and as you can see from the first diff, has been replaced with refs and no page numbers, and no attempt to join the discussion. I don't think the discussion is going to go well

1150:

Just looking at the refs, it is not good. Citing general encyclopedias is just lazy, and of Kostomarov the less said the better. There is an insanely great book on identities by Patrick Geary called

145:

perhaps? But it needs more info (that said, nobody is going ever to sue us over this forgotten image, so I wouldn't worry too much). Btw, which essay of mine do you disagree with? Have you seen

937:(as Amcl) modified the category of that page. Neither category seems appropriate. The page now gets listed in Category:Knowledge administration templates. Would you mind explaining? Thanks. -- 2039:, having directed them to were the information is they were looking for, they ignore it, and repeat the claim? I did provide the editor the oppertunity to illustrate their concerns to editors 844:

Hi Angus McLellan! Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers,

888:), but you would probably know: Are there examples of "Magnus" (after coming in popular norse use) being confused with the gaelic Aonghas/Óengus? The closest I've come (in 5 minutes) is 314:. Now since then I do not believe that I have breeched sanctions. I been extremely polite, civil, and have been in no way disruptive. With this is mind, could you possibly point to me: 611:

early middle ages" personal project over at norwegian wiki. If I manage to catch up with that you'll notice some more iw:no summaries on your articles ;o) All the best, happy editing,

2092:

My point was about the Committee's and community's appetite to engage with and attempt to reform long-standing users, and how Sam's comment would suggest a strengthening of our will.

682:

Consider me tempted! The army of socks seems to have quietened down recently, but shows no signs of disappearing permanently, so rollback certainly would be useful. Cheers,

136: 706: 573:

have been just as likely. Second question, noticing you added a reference to Clare Downhams book from last year: I'm considering bying that book, is it a good one? Regards,

884:

offered the interesting explanation that "Angus" is a gaelic derivative of the "norse name Magnus". I've taken that part out, and will inform the editor who put it there (

2195:

Spare a thought for other people. What about the poor arbitrators who might end up having to hear a case over this? Or the editors who might be blocked? They might cry.

1776:

on meta regarding Wikimedia UK and your offer of a donation. We are currently arranging approval for Gift Aid and will be in touch again when this is complete. Regards,

1944:

I don't have an account in Commons. So, I wish to ask my question here. How shall we be able to verify if National Geographic Society purchased the copyright or not? -

1624:

Well, I've never yet written an interesting hook. So long as they're coherent, they usually get accepted. So I went for a summary of the lead. Can't argue with that!

557: 1546: 1503: 1483: 1463: 497:

That Richard "le Waleis", the presumed ancestor of the Wallaces in Scotland, came from Shropshire seems uncontroversial. I don't see any need to say more than that.

1407: 441: 541: 504: 311: 1316: 1277: 1698:, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community. 1564: 1073: 827: 763: 1028: 993:. It was nice to see all the kind comments I got from my supporters and I hope that I will be more useful to the community now that I have the tools again.-- 1955: 1933: 1033: 946: 281: 255: 234: 216: 2120: 1058:

I appreciate your vigilance; I agree copyright is a very serious matter. Can you let me know when you will be able to undelete the article in question?

1010: 968: 2143: 1590: 459: 1669: 1649: 1631: 1576: 1304: 1107: 1065: 1020: 918: 635: 620: 605: 2216: 2202: 1450: 368: 1186: 768:

That name had occurred to me, although Burkem's the one I've gone hand-to-hand with for a while. I could get on board with this; where would we cut

924: 93: 72: 669: 2263: 1529: 163: 802: 788: 183: 2128: 310:

on all Troubles Articles, applyed to all Editors of those Articles. This was amended as you will have noticed by an additional amendment at AE

691: 491: 1558: 1078: 1542: 1479: 1446: 568:

I saw my iw edit inspired some more sources etc, and removal of some content that I didn't bother to translate - it could hardly have been

2043:

but that offer too was ignored. I'll walk away for a bit, as no progress can be made at the minute. Advice and suggestions are welcome, --

129: 2005: 933: 1914: 582: 528: 2104: 1996:

I've just started this article. I thought I should point it out to you, as I see the image from Commons I've used is one you uploaded.

1869:

is "borderline medieval" is kind of funny though. Are you aware that I was once blocked following the claim by someone that my article

77: 1272: 1258: 2058: 1969: 1840: 1133: 134: 55: 655: 1618: 990: 925: 905: 748: 2189: 1472:

Thanks. I'm always a little hesitant with registered accounts. And it had been relatively quiet recently... (sigh). Cheers,

1399: 1235: 2286: 1374: 1346: 299: 203: 82:

Seeing as how you had an eye on this account before, he showed up again. I might be wrong, but the coincidence seems strong...

2040: 2024: 1870: 1785: 119: 1874: 1695: 357:

Is the first link right? I've never knowingly edited PalestineRemembered's talk page. The "Provisional" Sinn Féin stuff on

42:

of former discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

38: 1984: 1855: 114: 2224: 426: 1002: 868: 2016: 1885: 1813: 726: 406: 351: 331:

On the Article, could you show me by way of diff's were I may have breech sanctions or been disruptive in your opinion.

146: 2070: 1312: 1210: 516: 848: 303: 56: 1762: 1989: 1817: 1773: 1406: 563: 209:

No bother. If you worry about writing the stuff, some obsessive will add all the chrome sooner or later. Cheers!

1521: 1112: 822: 743: 2166: 2036: 1425: 773: 2248:

Thank you for helping me by investigating the copyright status of the 1926 pearling image and in getting the

2010: 1429: 1809: 553: 524: 483: 1095: 2063: 1536: 1473: 1440: 698: 683: 643: 465: 2171: 1433: 1421: 1890: 1602: 873: 885: 816:

and giving undue weight. Some guideline or policy to "prevent" this should be easy to write. Regards,

1596: 1240: 817: 738: 318:

Were is the edit war which prompted the page to be blocked. Please bear in mind the article is under

2154: 1605:, article was the first I'd nominated for it. If you would like to find the pretext for nominating 1215: 1263:

Thanks. I have changed the reference as you advise and also added the article to the bibliography.

2258: 2199: 2117: 2074: 1990: 1950: 1928: 1909: 1791: 1666: 1628: 1587: 1500: 1460: 1323: 1183: 1140: 965: 915: 677: 602: 549: 538: 520: 501: 476: 456: 365: 325:

Show me, by way of diff’s what and were I have done something which warrants a Page/Troubles ban?

277: 252: 230: 213: 199: 17: 2282: 1903:. Well, it would be great if I could get some help with the fair-use rationale though. Thanks.- 1286:

deletion policy that this is all that is necessary for this deleted article to be reinstated.

1268: 1254: 1198: 328:

On the talk page, could you show me were I may have been uncivil or disruptive in your opinion?

911:

I'm afraid that this is far beyond my sketchy knowledge. The Deacon might have a better idea.

879: 2101: 1973: 1645: 1379: 1308: 1197:

Angus, just wanted to express my appreciation for your last contribution to the talk page of

1069: 1024: 942: 663:

Hello! I got it figured out...was pressed for time earlier! Thanks for the rollback rights!--

510: 433: 2139: 1767: 1728: 1572: 1395: 1389: 1329: 1300: 422: 1606: 775:

Although I suppose for medieval individuals there should really be no reason to resort to

83: 8: 2001: 1860: 1614: 1103: 68: 2271: 2253: 2196: 2114: 1945: 1923: 1904: 1852: 1821: 1781: 1710: 1663: 1625: 1584: 1497: 1457: 1206: 1180: 974: 962: 912: 901: 864: 809: 799: 760: 723: 697:...and thank you very much! I've read up on it and promise to use it wisely. Cheers, 667: 653: 631: 616: 599: 578: 535: 498: 453: 375: 362: 273: 249: 226: 210: 195: 142: 89: 626:

seem to use Gøðrøðr as well, at least that's a letter (Ø) I've got on my keyboard ;).

2278: 2249: 2212: 2185: 2051: 1367: 1339: 1264: 1250: 1228: 1168: 882: 437: 399: 344: 189: 176: 156: 30: 379: 358: 2233: 2098: 1144: 1129: 983: 958: 938: 784: 772:

off? 1500? 1600? And should we make an exception for the 106th and later editions?

98: 1900: 2173: 2135: 1713: 1568: 1385: 1091: 1080: 998: 853: 467: 418: 293: 2032: 1139:

This is another one of those articles which reminds me of wandering through the

444:

article. The article on Scandinavians who invaded England in the C9th is called

2028: 1997: 1963: 1734: 1679: 1641: 1610: 1099: 712: 595: 411: 105: 64: 2031:

based on the same discussion. The Lead section I've been working on with Rock

1356: 194:

All help greatly appreciated. I'm not too hot on some of these tag thingies.

2162: 1881: 1777: 1758: 1738: 1701: 1414: 1202: 1176: 1172: 1118:

Ancient Brockhaus material, nineteenth century writings by Nikolay Kostomarov

897: 860: 845: 795: 756: 731: 719: 664: 650: 627: 612: 574: 319: 307: 85: 302:. I was recently part of an AE case and was subject to the remedies outline 272:

I'm glad you agree with it. I respect your opinion. Let's hope others do.

2208: 2181: 2045: 1845: 1361: 1335: 1224: 1192: 1087: 1019:

through his website contact address: peter@petermarshall.net. Many thanks.

961:. That would be a lot of work for little gain, so I wouldn't recommend it. 569: 393: 338: 172: 152: 1601:

Hi, Angus. Many thanks for mentioning DYK on my Talk page. Actually, that

1866: 1245:

Thanks for your comment. I agree of course that it is greatly improved.

1156: 1125: 839: 780: 383: 2020: 1496:

I've never seen anyone else do the heading stuff. It's a dead giveaway.

2148: 1520:

One give-away for me is the spelling. Talking of which, have you seen

994: 2207:

I hadn't thought of that. How's about mentioning this at Matt's page.

1865:

Hi Angus. Thank you for your comments. Your reassuring statement that

1352: 1049:

appreciate it if the article could be reinstated as soon as possible.

387: 126: 2158: 1877: 1754: 1744: 1355:, since they seem to be ignoring the strong advice being offered 1143:'s ghastly collection of heroic-pathetic C19th paintings of the 896:, allthough I'm not sure Knowledge is a very reliable source ;) 889: 445: 2153:

Hi Angus! Please note that I have filed a request for appeal

449: 1688: 1086:

You are receiving this message as you took part is a past

2113:

Thank you James, that makes perfect sense. All the best,

1221:

impact the respect I hope we both feel for each other. --

1816:

as I wish to challenge the speedy delete as I indicated

1694:

Angusmclellan, thank you very much for participating in

1160:

et cetera). More East European exceptionalism? Probably.

225:

I'm more worried about the objections I'll face now :(

1563:

Any chance of a longer summarisation of your thoughts

534:

You're added now. Any problems, let me know please.

2027:. Another article was just created to day by Rock 1094:. This message is to inform you that their a new 1922:Oh good! :-) Expecting it to get resolved soon.- 298:Thanks for your contribution to the discussion 382:you will notice that is my contrabution to a 1640:Many thanks. We do not need to scintillate. 1179:and whatever else we have in the same vein. 1743:for the kindness from the start. Regards, 1278:Reinstate article 'Peter Marshall (author) 1034:Reinstate article 'Peter Marshall (author) 2231: 1970:User:Blofeld of SPECTRE/Flickr agreements 1662:Right, only till four at my age. Cheers, 1011:Reintate article 'Peter Marshall (author) 2252:article back on track for the next stage 1700:I would also like to thank my nominator 1328:Amusing, but the name is not that rare. 926:Portal:Catholicism/Patron Archive/Header 2081:It was a comment in response to Sam's: 989:Hi Angus, and thanks for supporting my 14: 2129:Regarding your posting on my talk page 1456:Indeed, it's that man again. Blocked. 35: 2015:Could you have a look at this for us 1968:Hi here are my Flickr agreements: at 1871:France-Japan relations (19th century) 1559:Nuclear fiction CSD closure rationale 1336:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1225:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 173:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 153:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2242:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 1384:Cheers bru, I didn't realise, sorry 2180:Hiya Angus. I don't cry so easily. 1814:Image:4-cube horribly scrambled.png 23: 2023:which came out of this discussion 78:You might be interested ... or not 24: 2297: 2157:. Comments welcome! Best regards 2086:instruction as to future conduct. 1788:(Company Secretary, Wiki UK Ltd) 374:Thanks very much for your reply. 57:Image:AlfredRobertWilkinsonVC.jpg 2232: 1797: 1687: 991:successful request for adminship 982: 432:The Knowledge article is called 29: 1330:This is my sock, for the record 953:that this one should have been. 515:Hello Angus. A while back you 13: 1: 2287:06:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2264:04:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2217:02:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2203:02:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2190:02:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2167:16:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 2144:14:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 2121:12:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2105:12:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2059:21:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 2006:19:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1985:16:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1956:04:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 1934:06:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1915:16:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1886:10:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1856:00:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1841:20:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1810:Image:5-cube solved close.png 1786:18:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1763:07:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1670:00:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1650:00:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1632:00:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1619:00:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1591:15:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1577:01:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1547:21:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1504:19:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1484:19:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1464:19:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1451:19:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1430:speling adn gramar; infoboxes 1400:21:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1375:21:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1347:07:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1317:12:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 636:09:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 137:Image:Aleksander Kaminski.jpg 120:my non RfA & Bristol pics 1693: 1420:The usual boxes are ticked: 1273:18:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 1259:17:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 1236:02:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 1211:22:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 1187:17:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 1152:The Medieval Myth of Nations 1134:03:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 1108:23:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 1074:17:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 1029:14:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 1003:15:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 988: 969:12:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 947:02:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 919:13:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 906:12:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 878:The Norwegian article about 869:03:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 849:19:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 828:18:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 803:23:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 789:20:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 764:01:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 749:16:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 727:15:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 707:08:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 692:18:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 670:23:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 656:17:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 621:01:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 606:00:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 583:00:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 558:12:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 542:09:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 529:09:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 505:01:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 492:01:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 460:09:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 436:and there's a redirect from 427:09:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 407:22:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 369:21:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 352:20:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 282:23:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 256:23:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 235:22:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 217:22:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 204:22:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 184:22:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 164:21:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 130:06:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 28: 7: 2225:The image has been restored 1351:Would you possibly step in 115:23:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 94:17:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 73:04:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 50:October & November 2008 10: 2302: 2095:Sorry this wasn't clearer. 1686: 981: 452:is a disambiguation page. 2238: 1733:, and special mention to 1603:St Mary's Cathedral, Tuam 1434:persistence/brinksmanship 1167:I'll leave my opinion at 1045:'To whom it may concern, 2019:. We created an article 1991:Martyrology of Tallaght 1408:User:Bread & Butter 1157:Peasants into Frenchmen 564:Guthfrith, King of York 18:User talk:Angusmclellan 1538:This flag once was red 1524:? I think our mutual 1475:This flag once was red 1442:This flag once was red 1282:Dear Angus McClellan, 1199:Great Famine (Ireland) 1113:Regarding your comment 1079:New requested move at 1038:Dear Angus McClellan, 442:King Ethelbert of Kent 2011:Could you take a look 1532:makes it invisible... 1398:comment was added at 1899:The issue is listed 1609:, I'd be flattered. 1530:registering accounts 818:Deacon of Pndapetzim 739:Deacon of Pndapetzim 2064:Can you clarify ... 1098:has been requested 700:This flag once was 685:This flag once was 644:RE: Rollback rights 2048: 1891:Re:Image copyright 1364: 874:Angus & Magnus 810:James Balfour Paul 550:Jonathan Oldenbuck 521:Jonathan Oldenbuck 478:RepublicanJacobite 434:Æthelberht of Kent 396: 341: 143:Template:PD-Poland 2269: 2268: 2250:Madras Presidency 2046: 1851:website!) thanks 1751: 1750: 1607:Áed Ua Crimthainn 1597:Áed Ua Crimthainn 1362: 1320: 1303:comment added by 1241:Edward the Martyr 1169:Talk:Polonization 1008: 1007: 825: 746: 440:, but there's no 438:Ethelbert of Kent 394: 339: 46: 45: 2293: 2256: 2236: 2229: 2228: 2069:cross-posted to 2057: 1982: 1981: 1948: 1926: 1907: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1808:Please undelete 1805: 1801: 1800: 1772:Many thanks for 1741: 1731: 1726: 1719: 1708: 1691: 1684: 1683: 1539: 1476: 1443: 1403: 1373: 1344: 1342: 1319: 1297: 1233: 1231: 1216:No hard feelings 1171:after I've read 1145:January Uprising 1055:Peter Marshall' 986: 979: 978: 959:Category:Portals 936: 821: 742: 704: 703: 689: 688: 490: 486: 479: 405: 350: 181: 179: 161: 159: 112: 63:date for EU PD. 33: 26: 25: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2274: 2261: 2254: 2227: 2178: 2151: 2131: 2075:Angusmclellan's 2071:James F.'s page 2066: 2054: 2044: 2013: 1994: 1975: 1974: 1966: 1953: 1946: 1931: 1924: 1912: 1905: 1893: 1863: 1848: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1825: 1823: 1798: 1796: 1794: 1792:Please undelete 1770: 1739: 1729: 1720: 1714: 1702: 1682: 1599: 1565:in closing this 1561: 1545: 1537: 1482: 1474: 1449: 1441: 1426:Scottish issues 1411: 1393: 1382: 1370: 1360: 1345: 1340: 1334: 1326: 1324:Re: Small world 1298: 1280: 1243: 1234: 1229: 1223: 1218: 1195: 1141:National Museum 1115: 1092:Flag of Ireland 1084: 1081:Flag of Ireland 1036: 1013: 977: 932: 929: 876: 856: 842: 734: 715: 701: 699: 686: 684: 680: 646: 566: 513: 489: 484: 477: 475: 471: 468:William Wallace 414: 402: 392: 378:if you look at 347: 337: 296: 192: 182: 177: 171: 162: 157: 151: 140: 122: 106: 101: 80: 60: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2299: 2273: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2260:My coffee shop 2259: 2245: 2244: 2239: 2237: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2197:Angus McLellan 2177: 2170: 2150: 2147: 2130: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2115:Angus McLellan 2108: 2107: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2065: 2062: 2052: 2012: 2009: 1993: 1988: 1965: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1952:My coffee shop 1951: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1930:My coffee shop 1929: 1911:My coffee shop 1910: 1892: 1889: 1862: 1859: 1847: 1844: 1793: 1790: 1769: 1766: 1749: 1748: 1712:and my co-nom 1692: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1664:Angus McLellan 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1635: 1634: 1626:Angus McLellan 1598: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1585:Angus McLellan 1560: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1541: 1533: 1528:believes that 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1498:Angus McLellan 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1478: 1467: 1466: 1458:Angus McLellan 1445: 1410: 1405: 1381: 1378: 1368: 1333: 1325: 1322: 1296:Jack Pippin. 1293:Many thanks, 1279: 1276: 1242: 1239: 1222: 1217: 1214: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1181:Angus McLellan 1165: 1161: 1148: 1114: 1111: 1083: 1077: 1035: 1032: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1005: 987: 976: 973: 972: 971: 963:Angus McLellan 954: 928: 923: 922: 921: 913:Angus McLellan 886:Finn the first 875: 872: 855: 852: 841: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 733: 730: 714: 711: 710: 709: 679: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 645: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 623: 600:Angus McLellan 596:Adam of Bremen 591:Viking Pirates 565: 562: 561: 560: 548:Thanks Angus, 545: 544: 536:Angus McLellan 512: 509: 508: 507: 499:Angus McLellan 485:The'FortyFive' 481: 470: 464: 463: 462: 454:Angus McLellan 413: 410: 400: 380:Talk:Sinn Féin 376:Angus McLellan 372: 371: 363:Angus McLellan 359:Talk:Sinn Féin 345: 333: 332: 329: 326: 323: 295: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 250:Angus McLellan 240: 239: 238: 237: 220: 219: 211:Angus McLellan 191: 188: 187: 186: 170: 150: 139: 133: 121: 118: 100: 97: 79: 76: 59: 54: 44: 43: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2298: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2265: 2262: 2257: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2243: 2240: 2235: 2230: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2175: 2169: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2122: 2119: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2049: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1992: 1987: 1986: 1983: 1980: 1979: 1978:Count Blofeld 1971: 1957: 1954: 1949: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1935: 1932: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1913: 1908: 1902: 1897: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1853:Boodlesthecat 1843: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1806: 1804: 1789: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1736: 1732: 1727: 1725: 1724: 1717: 1711: 1709: 1707: 1706: 1697: 1690: 1685: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1416: 1415:User:Nimbley6 1409: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1391: 1387: 1380:Ulster Banner 1377: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1365: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1337: 1331: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1246: 1238: 1237: 1232: 1226: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1177:Russification 1174: 1173:Germanization 1170: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1153: 1149: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1119: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1082: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061:Best wishes, 1059: 1056: 1053: 1052:Many thanks, 1050: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1016: 1015:Hello Angus, 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 985: 980: 970: 967: 964: 960: 955: 951: 950: 949: 948: 944: 940: 935: 931:Hello, Your 927: 920: 917: 914: 910: 909: 908: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 881: 871: 870: 866: 862: 851: 850: 847: 829: 824: 819: 815: 811: 806: 805: 804: 801: 797: 792: 791: 790: 786: 782: 779:as a source. 778: 774: 771: 767: 766: 765: 762: 758: 753: 752: 751: 750: 745: 740: 729: 728: 725: 721: 708: 705: 696: 695: 694: 693: 690: 678:Re: Rollback? 671: 668: 666: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 652: 637: 633: 629: 624: 622: 618: 614: 609: 608: 607: 604: 601: 597: 592: 587: 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 571: 559: 555: 551: 547: 546: 543: 540: 537: 533: 532: 531: 530: 526: 522: 518: 511:Re: Rollback? 506: 503: 500: 496: 495: 494: 493: 488: 487: 480: 469: 461: 458: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 430: 429: 428: 424: 420: 409: 408: 404: 403: 397: 389: 385: 381: 377: 370: 367: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 353: 349: 348: 342: 330: 327: 324: 321: 317: 316: 315: 313: 309: 305: 301: 283: 279: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 257: 254: 251: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 222: 221: 218: 215: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 185: 180: 174: 168: 167: 166: 165: 160: 154: 148: 147:my essay page 144: 138: 132: 131: 128: 117: 116: 113: 111: 110: 96: 95: 91: 87: 84: 75: 74: 70: 66: 58: 53: 52: 51: 41: 40: 32: 27: 19: 2279:Timelinefrog 2275: 2241: 2179: 2152: 2132: 2084: 2068: 2067: 2050: 2014: 1995: 1977: 1976: 1967: 1898: 1894: 1864: 1849: 1822: 1807: 1802: 1795: 1774:your message 1771: 1768:Wikimedia UK 1752: 1722: 1721: 1715: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1600: 1562: 1525: 1438: 1422:sub-headings 1419: 1412: 1383: 1366: 1350: 1327: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1265:Dudley Miles 1262: 1251:Dudley Miles 1247: 1244: 1219: 1196: 1155: 1151: 1123: 1117: 1116: 1088:move request 1085: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1037: 1017: 1014: 930: 898:Finn Rindahl 893: 877: 857: 843: 813: 776: 769: 735: 716: 681: 647: 628:Finn Rindahl 613:Finn Rindahl 590: 575:Finn Rindahl 567: 514: 482: 472: 415: 398: 373: 343: 334: 297: 193: 141: 123: 108: 107: 102: 81: 61: 49: 48: 47: 37: 2255:Ravichandar 1947:Ravichandar 1925:Ravichandar 1906:Ravichandar 1867:Jean Bureau 1394:—Preceding 1305:Jack Pippin 1299:—Preceding 1066:Jack Pippin 1064:Jack Pippin 1021:Jack Pippin 36:This is an 2272:My absence 2136:Ecoleetage 1569:MickMacNee 1386:Zolstijers 975:RfA thanks 419:ClemRutter 1998:Strawless 1876:? Cheers 1861:Thank you 1735:Acalamari 1642:Strawless 1611:Strawless 1100:GnevinAWB 589:Hudson's 386:which is 274:Thunderer 227:Thunderer 196:Thunderer 190:Thank you 109:Wizardman 65:Rcbutcher 2277:support. 2099:James F. 2053:'fenian' 1778:AndrewRT 1740:Lenticel 1535:Cheers, 1439:Cheers, 1369:'fenian' 1313:contribs 1301:unsigned 1203:Dppowell 880:Angus Og 861:Sarah777 846:Ynhockey 814:as facts 796:Ealdgyth 757:Ealdgyth 720:Ealdgyth 665:Sallicio 651:Sallicio 570:this guy 517:asked me 401:'fenian' 346:'fenian' 99:Re: clue 86:HighKing 2209:GoodDay 2182:GoodDay 2047:Domer48 1705:Realist 1396:undated 1363:Domer48 854:Ireland 777:Burke's 770:Burke's 446:Vikings 395:Domer48 340:Domer48 294:Request 169:Done.-- 39:archive 2200:(Talk) 2174:Matt's 2118:(Talk) 2102:(talk) 1964:Flickr 1730:(talk) 1696:my Rfa 1680:My Rfa 1667:(Talk) 1629:(Talk) 1588:(Talk) 1501:(Talk) 1461:(Talk) 1413:... = 1184:(Talk) 1126:Molobo 966:(Talk) 939:davidz 916:(Talk) 894:Maccan 890:Aengus 781:Choess 713:Edward 649:USA!-- 603:(Talk) 539:(Talk) 502:(Talk) 457:(Talk) 412:Danes. 366:(Talk) 320:WP:1RR 308:WP:1RR 253:(Talk) 214:(Talk) 2172:From 1836:Spark 1543:deeds 1526:fiend 1480:deeds 1447:deeds 1341:talk 1230:talk 995:Berig 732:Burke 450:Danes 178:talk 158:talk 16:< 2283:talk 2213:talk 2186:talk 2176:page 2163:talk 2155:here 2140:talk 2041:here 2037:here 2033:here 2029:here 2025:here 2021:here 2017:here 2002:talk 1901:here 1882:talk 1846:Idea 1818:here 1812:and 1803:Done 1782:Talk 1759:talk 1737:and 1646:talk 1615:talk 1573:talk 1522:this 1390:talk 1359:. -- 1357:here 1353:here 1309:talk 1269:talk 1255:talk 1207:talk 1193:Whew 1130:talk 1104:talk 1096:move 1070:talk 1025:talk 999:talk 943:talk 934:edit 902:talk 892:aka 865:talk 823:Talk 800:Talk 785:talk 761:Talk 744:Talk 724:Talk 632:talk 617:talk 579:talk 554:talk 525:talk 466:Re: 423:talk 417:Tak. 388:here 384:WP:3 312:here 304:here 300:here 278:talk 231:talk 200:talk 149:? -- 135:Re: 90:talk 69:talk 2159:PHG 1878:PHG 1755:Efe 1745:Efe 1718:ran 1392:) 1332:.-- 1090:at 840:RfA 702:red 687:red 474:--- 127:Rod 2285:) 2215:) 2188:) 2165:) 2149:Hi 2142:) 2073:, 2004:) 1884:) 1832:ng 1828:ni 1826:in 1824:Sp 1820:. 1784:) 1761:) 1753:-- 1648:) 1617:) 1575:) 1567:? 1436:. 1432:, 1428:, 1424:, 1417:? 1315:) 1311:• 1271:) 1257:) 1209:) 1175:, 1132:) 1124:-- 1106:) 1072:) 1027:) 1001:) 945:) 904:) 867:) 826:) 798:- 787:) 759:- 747:) 722:- 634:) 619:) 581:) 556:) 527:) 448:. 425:) 336:-- 306:a 280:) 233:) 202:) 92:) 71:) 2281:( 2211:( 2184:( 2161:( 2138:( 2000:( 1880:( 1780:( 1757:( 1723:e 1716:O 1644:( 1613:( 1571:( 1402:. 1388:( 1338:| 1307:( 1267:( 1253:( 1227:| 1205:( 1128:( 1102:( 1068:( 1023:( 997:( 941:( 900:( 863:( 820:( 783:( 741:( 630:( 615:( 577:( 552:( 523:( 421:( 322:. 276:( 229:( 198:( 175:| 155:| 88:( 67:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index