3951:. Your sock accounts are all blocked, and you should avoid them completely under all circumstances. Make no attempt to do anything with them. If I can help with the topic you wish to edit I am happy to do so (assuming that it satisfies Knowledge criteria), but unless you say what the topic is I am unable to confirm my ability to help. On your talkpage there is, down the margin on the left, a menu list. One of the options is "tools". If a list does not appear below this, click on it and a list will appear; you will see that the sixth item on the list is "e-mail this user". To e-mail an admin go to the admin's talk page and, on his page, click on "e-mail this user". A page appears on which you can type as you wish; there is a "send" button on the page for when you are ready to do so. --
1558:
4015:. In 2013, Pramukh was suspected for sexually abusing two other gurus. According to the conversation on the talk page in the past, these accusations should not be placed on in a Controversy section in Knowledge page because he is “relatively unknown outside of India” but in this website of the group, it states that “Spread across the world, the BAPS Global Network is composed of more than 1100 mandirs and 3,850 centers.” In the drop down list there is over 100 locations in the USA and UK and they are building the world’s largest temple in New Jersey. So it is safe to say that this he is well known to millions of people around the world as a deity and guru. The sect has also responded to the allegations and multiple third party sites verify the accusations.
1513:, in which the editor acknowledges that his/her use of multiple accounts was unacceptable, and undertakes not to do the same again. My own feeling is that, as far as the sockpuppetry issue is concerned, there is no reason not to take the editor's statement as made in good faith, and since the block no longer serves any preventive purpose, if sockpuppetry were the only issue, I would be happy to unblock. However, I am less than 100% comfortable about unblocking an editor with a clear conflict of interest, who is here only to promote a point of view, and who has vigorously done so through nearly 2000 edits in a few months. Maybe you would like to look at the unblock request and my comments about it, and indicate whether you have any opinion on the matter.
5218:
this one in form to acceptance I would like to do more writing. I also actually am using this as a way to work on my writing skills. I am serious about this and have taken Evil
Beavers page on as I noticed it had been denied several times and I like a challenge. So I have poured hours of research time into locating sources and information to try my hand at creation of a legit article on the band. I know the article is not perfect and am working on it as I get time to focus on it. Will you please release it and link this article to it as the submitted draft?
496:
57:
5736:
1803:
2668:. Your draft article has been restored. It was deleted because it hadn't been worked on for six months. Please be sure to add sources that are independent of organizations related to Mr. Julian - news reports, magazine or journal articles, books, etc., which discuss him and his contributions. Then please submit it for inclusion in the main encyclopedia, because the "Articles for creation" area of Knowledge is only a temporary area for articles that are being prepared for the encyclopedia. —
5693:
3834:
373:
3254:, I appreciate the efforts to maintain copyright rights but the content that was deleted is part of a disciplinary framework and the editor who added the content to Bitrum was Prof. Søren Brier who developed the framework. He was the one who gave me the content as he wants to ensure that the description of Cybersemiotics stays the same independent of the venue. Nonetheless, I worked many hours making the entry specially for Knowledge. I am not sure how to proceed right now.
4667:
705:
2576:
place where information of that sort gets logged so that it can be reviewed later. Is that the same here? And if so, is it publicly accessible in a place that I could be pointed towards? If not, that's perfectly fine and I understand, but given that my interaction with
Knowledge has been rather limited to date, I've found that my unintended involvement in this administrative action has led to my curiosity piquing with regards to how such things are processed.
4265:(p. 174). I had noted unusual activity on the article, several days ago, when an IP user was adding new honors like "All-American," etc. -- and I work a lot with college football All-American articles. Clay was not picked in the 2008 NFL Draft. Before I could explore the article's claims further, someone else nominated the article for AfD. Anyway, Clay does exist, and did play for Clemson; beyond that, I cannot yet say. I thought you should know.
1115:
respond to my formatting question; another user eventually fixed my error, but I'm still not totally sure what caused it in the first place (spacing issues, I'm sure, but I know nothing more specific than that). I won't take it personally, as I'm sure you're busy IRL, and I am too. Would you be able to point me in the direction of another potential adopter? Either way, thanks, and I'm sure I'll see you from time to time on the site.
966:
whether this has been the subject of much debate amongst you and your colleagues, and whether any of this discussion is available for me to read? In the meantime, I would be grateful if you could return the deleted material so that querents can read what shall soon be a much improved article. Actually I feel a little bit embrassed by the fact that the page is currently no. 2 on a google search but only end up with
336:
193:
2364:" which was created by me? You have cited that it is a "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" article. But in reality this article is about an organization of social workers. Does writing about an organization of social workers seem like an advertisement to you? This organization is 100% genuine and it is situated at Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. If you still don't believe me, here is the map link:
1988:
3093:? I have been working with editors for a very long time now making all necessary changes to get this page up and abide by Knowledge guidelines. Please restore this page so I can continue modifying it until it meets the guidelines. I have been working with almost two months worth of progress and was making significant progress and have put in significant time on this article. Thank you.
39:. You deleted the article two minutes later, so I would never have had an opportunity to address any copyvio issue. Yes, there is plenty on here that needs to be deleted, and I'm not questioning the reasonableness of your decision, but people need more two minutes to address issues! Would it be possible to restore the article and I will deal with any issues within 48 hours.
4708:. It was not a well written stub, true, and it did have an encyclopedically-superfluous personal comment (a very friendly and good-faith comment actually), but it is a valid topic and did attempt to define the meaning. I was personally looking at redirecting the article to something pre-existing but wasn't sure what that should be. Any suggestions?
2935:, which states "Athletes from any sport are presumed notable if they have competed at the Summer or Winter Olympic games". Since this is at least an assertion of notability, it does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7. Also, for good measure, I've at added at least a basic reference to the page so that said status is at least not in question.
2631:"The sources are by Colleen M. McCorkell of NCAR, reporting the archiving of the extensive papers created by this meteorologist at NCAR. These are not the best sources, but they are valid. See also other improvements to content and referencing of the article, on a clearly noteworthy scientist. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)"
4128:? Literally minutes after placing the cited allegations information in the article after having it up on the talk page for a week, a user who has already tried to question your unblocking decision, reverted the edit because it "sounds like gossip." This is the patrolling of the articles that I had to deal with initially. Please help. Thank you
5136:
policy. One of my students completed this entry and, although it is true that he cut and pasted it from his word document onto wikipedia, it is well-researched, accurate, is not plagiarized and doesn't violate any copyrights. Could you please restore it as it is an important topic that warrants an entry. Thanks, Anna Pegler-Gordon.
4990:
again or if you feel her is vandalizing, then by all means make a report to the relevant place. But second-guessing a previous discussion is, in my opinion, not helpful to the project or anyone here. As far as I am concerned the matter is closed unless there is any fresh concern raised about this editor's activity since his unblock. --
3907:-- she has had solo exhibitions, her work is in major collections, she is in the Union List of Artists, etc. So I created it for her. If it's OK, I'm planning to go ahead and copy my draft to a new page under her name (without the editing history of my draft). I've never met her. She's in London, and I'm in Tokyo. Thanks. --
2601:, where I have been working over this lunch to improve the references and address other issues? You literally deleted this while I was in the cycle of reviewing my changes, before putting them up on the Talk page. Please. Any replies other than action, please reply here, I am watching in real time. Thank you. Le Prof
535:"promotional." He is pulling from my bio/CV which may be throwing too much into the mix... I am writing to say that I am a real person and am not trying to promote anything - just trying to support my Nephew in creating a successful page. I'd like to help David out - any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
527:
trade association, and have designed over a dozen digital domes worldwide including the
Library of Alexandria planetarium in Egypt and Papalote Museo in Mexico City. I looked at some of my colleagues' Knowledge bios and realized that my background was comparable. David therefore offered to create the page for me.
3291:
copyright violation. I do not know what you mean by calling the article part of a disciplinary framework, and a verbal consent for publication given by the original author is wholly inadequate here. I gather that you are not the owner of the copyright? If so the procedure is complicated. I suggest you go to
2741:, which makes your previous posting redundant; in fact, I wonder why you made it. Anne has answered your initial question correctly; articles awaiting submission for review, or failing review, which have not thereafter been edited for at least six months may be deleted, and usually are. Yours was one such.--
2568:, and I'm saying that in all sincerity. Despite being collateral damage, I won't try to contest it further, since I already have a previously-registered account and I can appreciate why a rangeblock may be necessary. I sincerely appreciate that you took the time to read through my request and respond.
5452:
The article needs to be moved to a more appropriate title. "Bannwald" is ok, except that very few people would think to search for it, were they so minded, under its German title. Neither "protected" nor "preserved" are entirely accurate; how about "German forests with restricted entry"? Cumbersome I
4973:
Anthony, you were aware of his socking? I cannot believe this user at all, I think he is harmful for this website. Yes everyone deserves 1 million chances but this user has socked too much and he has not contributed into any other wikipedia's sister project that could make any of us believe on him. 6
3592:
My page (Jeff Opdyke) has been fully deleted while in the process of working on it. I have for several weeks been working on revisions to make it meet
Knowledge requirements and it was near completion. The progress I have made has taken me many many weeks, and I have now also lost the place to review
3566:
My page (Jeff Opdyke) has been fully deleted while in the process of working on it. I have for several weeks been working on revisions to make it meet
Knowledge requirements and it was near completion. The progress I have made has taken me many many weeks, and I have now also lost the place to review
2170:
They were playing the same stupid game as IvanOS was. Neither of them are anywhere close to newbies and they really should know better than to edit war over a single word whose existence or lack thereof has no meaning to the vast majority of
English readers. It's just plain ridiculous that we have to
1654:
Didn't you have a thought that not
Knowledge page, but that content you found infringes copyrights? Did you check which content was created first? Following your logic, anyone can create webpage on some subject copying content of Knowledge, put (c) onto that newly created page, and apply to Knowledge
1326:
Far worse as this book is part of his life we are effectively barred from an entry in
Wikepdia of a citizen as worthy of inclusion as any other. i would also like to know why the first review only asked for references and how much this deletion is a matter of personal bias and how much actually rests
570:
Ok, I have found the page. I have got to say that it still appears promotional (promoting yourself) and although it was not a given reason for deletion, asserted notability is questionable. You may have noticed that the article was deleted in rapid succession by three admins, of which I was the last.
3430:
and I can provide written permission for the entry
Cybersemiotics that was questioned as violating copyrights. Nonetheless I understand now that I should try to explain with my own words instead of copying from reliable references. My only concern is that because the text describes a theory it would
3257:
Can the deletion be reverted? I will gladly fix any citation problems and provide any proof of copyrights and/or work the parts that could be different from the Bitrum entry. Unfortunately I do not have the latest edit of the
Cybersemiotics entry and without the entry I can't ask for the scholars in
2769:
No such good fortune. Rankersbo, instead of receiving and reviewing the revised submission (16 citations, sections, and an info box, etc.), instead re-received the originally rejected and deleted draft (3 citations, one a dead URL, and otherwise a mess)—and therefore rejected it… without a look at
2090:
I have restored the article; it still fails as written to aver notability. I have put a hold tag on the talk page, but it will still be deleted (by another admin) if left in its present state. A valid reference, which is present, does not of itself confer notability, although it certainly helps, and
1694:
Submission had already been declined, as you say,more than twelve months previously, as being non-notable. The article of which this appeared to be a copyright violation was modified by you, it appears, in January of this year. I have no way of telling how extensive the modification was, nor whether
965:
This means that increasingly community members see the simple of establishing links to other language Wikipedias, which contain substantial pages on the subject in question, is an assertion of notability. However, you claim that this should be treated as "not relevant". I would be interested to know
526:
Greetings. My nephew David Lantz asked why I did not have a Knowledge page since I have spoken at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences on the future of cinema, have scores of articles published including a peer-reviewed journal, am invited to keynote at conferences, co-founded a thriving
5217:
I am trying to create a article for a Band Evil Beaver and noticed the the name space Evil Beaver is locked from creating a page. I am asking if you will unlock it so I can use it for my article I am working on. I am trying to create my first article and really trying to learn the ropes. Once I get
3929:
I wanted to know what I need to do to correctly start editing and moving on from a approved unblock requested. I am not sure how to handle clearing or archiving my user page and talk page and what to do with my sock accounts. I searched for a guide and wasn't able to located any information on this
3660:
Thank you. I had not picked up on the name of the second (or first) account, but the degree of intransigence shown here is a degree which I can recall encountering previously only once or twice in the last seven years. Why he wants two accounts is not clear to me, given that his stated reason makes
2754:
Thank you for your attention, and apologies if the assessment of non-responsiveness was unfair. I have had a week full of Admins like RHaworth that treat people poorly and deletions with a cavalier attitude. Your deletion as I worked came in the midst of this, and I likely over-interpreted silence,
2722:
You complain about my lack of response, and I feel that your complain is wholly unreasonable. Your first request is timed at 19.14 yesterday: as it happens I was otherwise engaged at that time. There is no requirement that admins, even the more active ones which I am, should be on call at all hours
1815:
We haven't properly met yet, but I have seen the tireless work you've done around the site warning users and reviewing unblock requests. While those tasks can be tedious and sometimes irritating, I really appreciate that you have taken the time to commit to them. Please keep up the fantastic work.
1760:
Thanks. I know that there are many edits (proper ones too), required to get into admin, but one cannot deny that even a person with high number of edits can be stated as one without any reasonable knowledge. I know, I have not done many edits, but I am trying to get into a proper course of editing.
1322:
I was asked the reference all material in this article which i have done but you have deleted it due to a portion of the entry being about the non-fiction book Eden - The Long walk to Justice. As Jonathan Ball's life is important and all references to the three cases fought were referenced i do not
5590:
No, with respect I should not. Admins make their own decisions, although these are susceptible to change in the event of dispute. In my opinion your article, which mentions neither Gujarat nor India, does not adequately infer notability. you have two options. If you wish I will post your text here
4989:
Yes, I am aware of his past history of socking. As was the admin who blocked him, with whom I had a discussion before, after the usual 6-month edit-free period, I unblocked him. All of the socks remain permanently blocked. I really do not understand your problem here. If you suspect him of socking
4862:
This is the specific style harassment I get from members of this group. I have not made one edit to an article, just opened up a discussion and this guy jumps down my throat to change my user name. I have asked him on my talk page to explain why. I hope he can provide a better example then a false
4747:
Sorry, but I do not feel that the content is significantly meaningful. As an aside, and not of course a deletion qualification, the title is spelled incorrectly. And, as you say, the personal comment is wholly superfluous. The article summarises as being a statement that when one looks in a mirror
4018:
So the point is that I believe that a controversy section with these allegations it is warranted with the sect’s response to the allegations. This should be included on the Knowledge page unless there are greater reasons that I am missing not to. Please let me know. I can write the section for you
3705:
I would not ever consider an unblock without discussion with the blocking admin, as I hope you would know (I have been here some long time). And as you will appreciate I was not aware of the identity of the other account until now. Blanking talk pages may be seen as acceptable, if one assumes that
3611:
I understand things cannot be plagiarized. The writing you are referring to was originally created by someone who was authorized my permission to use it. I would be happy to change it further to make sure it is not the same. I however, did not save any of my work (or my sources) outside of here on
3348:
Thanks for your response! The content posted is the official description of the framework according to Prof. Brier. It should not be an interpretation. I can have the written authorization but I need the text as I did not make a copy. Can you please revert the deletion so I could at least have the
2484:
Paco Ahlgren was speedily deleted with the reason cited 'No indication of importance'. However, the article referred to two awards the author had won. Therefore, the outcome couldn't be 'no indication of importance', at most it would have to be 'insufficient indication of importance' if you felt
1727:
I think a better path is to create a smaller stub with robust sourcing that establishes notability for this computer through 3rd party reliable sources. You should also talk to someone about the copyright on your wiki- it may be incompatible with that of Knowledge so if wiki content is ever copied
1712:
Anthony, I do not see your point. It was declined a year ago (BTW, is "notability" measurable - or it is up to personal judgement of reviewer?), then elaborated and sent for another review. Academic or not, the result is that article was killed without considering it again. Would you please return
946:
I am justified, in principle, because I am an admin here (for nearly seven years), and that is one thing that admins are entrusted with the ability to do. As to this specific page, I deleted it because it was a very short article containing no assertion of notability. Linkage to other wikis is not
5135:
Hi ... I'm interested in the deletion of the page on the 1991 Armed Forces Immigration Adjustment Act. I am a professor at Michigan State University. In my undergraduate senior seminar on US immigration policy, I have students complete or revise a wikipedia entry about a topic in US immigration
4734:
A3 is a more correct tag than G1, that is correct. But I still argue that there was indeed meaningful content, and that the article subject is indeed notable. It should not have been speedied but at the very least redirected. Can you suggest an article that this title could be redirected towards?
2889:
Hello Anthony Bradbury, I am very concerned of the aggressive language you used to block Grfr12345's request to be unblocked, posing as aggressive and intimidating by saying 'These are good questions, why did you?'. You also used this question to accuse Grfr12345 of something he may be wrongfully
2575:
as a matter of curiosity, I was trying to find out what that range had done that warranted the block in the first place, since I was only able to track down one IP address related to what I would presume was a vandalism spree. Most of the (much smaller) wikis I've used or administrated have had a
1887:
I personally wrote that page (with another administrator), and it certainly was not a soap box or a personal vendetta on my part. It even appeared on the main page in the DYK section. I also wasn't notified about the speedy deletion by the nominator, therefore didn't know about the nomination to
984:
I am aware that you have been here for many years, and have a significant editing experience.. to answer your specific question, I am not aware of any debate on the topic in question; as you probably know debate on established policies is normally only initiated if a significant policy change has
4642:
This was not a vacuous legal threat. It was a very clear and unambiguous threat, which requires an equally clear and unambigious retraction and disavowal. If you feel that asking for a commitment not to repeat the threat is inappropriate then so be it, but in my personal view this requirement is
3361:
Publications within BITrum frame, as well as the content of its websites are protected under a Creative Commons Atribución-Sin Derivadas 3.0 España License. Public reproduction, distribution and communications is allowed whenever the work and its authors are properly quoted, using as responsible
3290:
I am sorry that you were unable to respond to the deletion notification. One hour is the usual time allowed for a response, but obviously on occasion circumstances can prevent such a response from occurring. The article was deleted, not because of any problem with citations, but because it was a
1778:
My friend, I am not trying to put you down; I just do not think you are ready yet, and I am certain that this is going to be the general feeling shown. It is a fact of life that a meaningful number of edits will be needed; as I say, about 3000 is the minimum which most people will accept. And at
1130:
I don't take it personally, and you are partially correct; Although I have in my time created a significant number of articles, mainly relating to pre-dreadnought battleships, Roman emperors and medical conditions, I have of late edited almost entirely in the admin sphere. I am sorry not to have
1114:
Hi, Tony. With all due respect, I think I will decline your offer of adoption. If I'm going to be adopted, I'd like it to be by someone who does more editing within the article namespace, as I think that will always be my primary focus on this site. It also bothered me a bit that you declined to
5467:
Hi, and thanks for pondering about a more appropriate name. That is difficult, because the meaning differs. However, a Bannwald is not a forest with restricted entry, but where certain restrictions are in force. One definition given in the English wiktionary for "ban" in the paragraph about its
3067:
It is not exactly clear what you mean. If you are asking me to restore the article on this, my talkpage, the answer is no. If you are asking for it to be restored in article-space, then I must say that in my opinion it is not an article which deserves a place in Knowledge, although you have the
2696:
Tony, with deep respect for your person (as judged by your User page), and for your efforts performed at Knowledge: If you are not responsive to editors (as it appears you do not currently have time to be, see last several unanswered entries above), should you be deleting articles? Should you
2616:
The appearance of the new info box, and new references, and haphazard appearance of the article, alongside the following comment, had to make clear than an edit was in process at time of your deletion. Please, revert, so I can finish; reject the finished product, and not what I was in midst of
1658:
I hope you have looked at the submitted page's history, and saw that this page was declined more than year ago, and created even much earlier. I was told that Knowledge (represented by you) immediately deleted the article without even rejecting it on the unverified basis (please describe which
3644:
I've commented there about the other account. Its identity has not been a secret for at least a few years, yet they refuse to coherently explain why an alt is needed for certain topics. They once asked at ANI if they could select which account was blocked, and switch back and forth as needed.
1695:
it was radical or trivial. As the article had in any case been rejected the copyright issue appears to be academic. Incidentally, when you post a comment onto a talk page, it is helpful if you sign your post; either by adding ~~~~ or by clicking on the pencil icon at the top of the text box.--
534:
I can provide David with verifiable evidence of any content as requested, but without knowing what is triggering the rejections, I am at a loss to help him. And he believes that he has been blacklisted and blocked from posting anything. One reason given for deletions is that the content is
5671:
I have left the talk page, with a warning comment, on the basis that nobody is going to find it under its current labeling. I will watch to ensure that he does not transclude it into article pace. Note that the userpage dates from September last year and the talk page from four months ago.
926:
page, bearing in mind I had spent considerable energy ensuring that the page on your English Knowledge to make sure it was linked to both the German and the Serbia pages. Yet you, with all the wisdom you could muster have deleted the page. Why7 Please tell me why? I really want to know why
556:
Could you please tell me either the name of the page in question (the page under "Ed Lantz" is very short, and I suspect not the page you are talking about) or else the name of the account under which he edits. I need one or the other to find and review the article, which I am happy to do.
5243:
As you may be aware the original article was deleted by another admin some two years after my involvement, and the salting admin has commented on the current draft page. The draft is also awaiting review. I suggest you contact either the salting admin or the last admin to delete; I am
4099:
If he has been publicly accused of an offence, or has appeared in Court on a charge, and if there are reputable third-party and uninvolved references to back up the statements made, then the accusations can be mentioned. If they remain unproven unsubstantiated or unreferenced then by
5441:, because there is no English term that encompasses the German word's multiple historical meanings, though today it mostly boils down to "protected forest" or "forest preserve". So I'm wondering if I should just move it to "Bannwald". Any thoughts? Thanks in advance for your input.
2784:
Good news: Editor Rankersbo, realizing that he had rejected the Julian draft on the basis of viewing an earlier (and not the best, actual review draft) reversed his decision, and the article is back in queue. Cheers, again apologies, and thank you for your understanding. Le Prof
4863:
comparison to priestsucks. Please keep an eye out for these kinds of forms of undermining critical research about the topics. I read the username policy and I do not find my user name in violation of any policies and neither does a administrator but this person specifically does?
3431:
be best to use the description defined by the theorist who created it. I am working on a new article on Cybersemiotics and I am wondering if you could make the deleted article available for two days so I can have a better picture of what I have done wrong and where I can improve.
2405:
An organization does not have to be profit-making in order for an article about it to be promotional. I could also have cited lack of assertion of notability as a valid deletion reason, so I do not feel that restoring the article is appropriate. Feel free to take your request to
2295:
it is mentioned as per point 4 that the person is notable by winning and ATP Challenger event, and although not mentioned there that they need to have a world highest ranking of 255, he definitely fulfilled that right now. Is it not good enough for the article to be recreated?
134:
I am sure that the lady is genuine; there are, however, large numbers of actresses in India and notability here is not asserted. References alone are an insufficient assertion. If I restore the article are you happy to add whatever information makes her notable above other
5027:
Im on my mobile so checking things goes slow. You are correct that the account exists, my bad for the confusion. Those userpages were not made by this user. And any links to these pages were made by yet another user. I probably should have mentioned thatt. All the best,
4624:
Merely deleting your legal threat is not sufficient. You are required to specifically state that you disavow any legal threat made by you against Knowledge and any of its editors in relation to any edit made here, and that you agree not to make any such threats in the
2208:
I don't think you really need my permission. I'm certainly not going to block-war with you over that :) I don't block people very often, so if you have more experience doing that and you are certain an adjustment would be an improvement, please feel free to intervene.
4030:
The criteria for Biographies of living persons accused of a crime states that only if the person is considered unknown, then editors should give serious consideration to not include material in any article suggesting that the person has accused of committing a crime.
5468:
etymology is "to command", i.e. to give orders or directives which in itself is a privilege and comprises the right to grant privileges. However, a lengthy explanation is not a good title, and I'm still deliberating. Perhaps something like "privileged forests". --
1131:
answered your query; possibly the fact that I recently spent some three weeks in hospital after a heart attack and three operations, followed by a period of convalescence, may have had something to do with it. To find an adopter you can do no better than going to
3965:
Minor correction; the e-mail link only appears as I describe it if e-mail is enabled. It does not show on your page because you have not enabled e-mail (it is not compulsory), but all admins are required to enable the e-mail link, so my instructions are correct.
1148:
Wow, I had no clue about that. I lost my grandfather to heart disease when I was ten (his eighth heart attack), so I certainly understand how serious those issues can be. I hope you make a full return to the pink of health, and sorry if I seemed insensitive.
2755:
and the few Talk entries to which you had not responded. Cheers, and here's hoping for a speedy end to this "public service effort" (my retrieving a bio of a meteorologist from the deletion pile). I normally write on chemistry and pharma. Cheers. Le Prof
5426:
Hello Anthony, and thanks for your speedy deletion of the above-named article this morning. The author has re-created it, this time as a translated version of the de.wiki article. But the name is still nonsense--a completely non-existent term in English.
960:
Hi, Tony, thanks for that. Wow, an admin for nearly 7 years! That's great. I am starting to understand your feelings. However, I sometimes wonder whether admins of such long standing might take a while to understand the impact of new devlopments such as
5434:, made no reply to the message I placed on his/her talkpage, and is not a communicative editor from what I can tell, but seemingly one of those non-native speakers who likes to practice English on here on en.wiki without interacting with editors here.
1892:
are only to Canadian Conservative politicians, I suspect he is the one who has the issue. I would appreciate your restoring the page, I would do it myself, but think it would be improper as the creator without mentioning it to you first. Much thanks,
3379:
Like i said before I do not have access to the content, but whatever part was taken from Bitrum I did reference it. Maybe the quotation was not properly placed and I will definitely work with the editors of Bitrum and Prof. Søren Brier who wrote the
3930:
particular topic. I appreciate the unblock and also wanted help on a topic that I wanted to edit but I know it's a controversial topic so I just needed some help. Please let me know. Also how do we e-mail admins? Is there a link that I am missing?
3475:
It remains that, as of the deletion date, there was no article in Knowledge about the artist. The article therefore qualifies for deletion; in the event of an article about the performer being accepted in Knowledge the deletion could be reviewed.
1002:
The article is now on your talk page. I may be misinterpreting, but one or two of your edits give me the impression of being sarcastic. I would be most grateful if, in any future communication with me, you could seriously try to avoid giving that
4026:
The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field
5646:, which I agree with (having been the one to tag it). I thought you should know the same content is on their talk page. Not sure what can be done about that though; deleting the entire page may not be a good idea, and revdel seems excessive.
2075:
I beleive that this person is notable (I may not have done a good job of expressing that in the article). Could I please get you to undelete this? I'm happy for you to move it to draft:; immeidately nom for AfD; or anything else you see fit.
2951:
530:
After many hours of editing, re-editing, and a constant string of page deletions over several days, plus numerous failed attempts to acquire the reason for deletions, David has given up in frustration. And I'm feeling kinda hurt, too.
985:
been proposed. I am happy to post the article on your talk page; that will allow you either significantly to improve it, so as to comply with current Knowledge policy, or alternatively to apply for restoration of the deleted text at
1313:
1163:
Not at all; I had not widely publicized it. You may recall that I said I had a long holiday booked? It happened just a few days before we were due to travel. Nicely recovered now. but a number of e-mails failed to get answered.
1217:
for any public domain sources that he may have copied from, (as per the AFC decline statement). I have also asked Moonriddengirl to have a look for me to make sure that I haven't majorly goofed (which is entirely possible).
2175:
hot-button issue. If anything, I could have made IvanOS' block a longer one, because I've previously applied blocks to them with no apparent result. YMMV; I see you're an admin, so you can adjust block lengths yourself.
1880:
2259:
There are also plenty of articles for tennis players that have world highest rannkings outside 255, aren't those also supposed to be deleted? Just for information right now he is actually ranked 226. You can check it
3090:
4367:
The article is being considered for deletion if the expressed opinion of the community so decides. It is not appropriate to apply speedy delete, and removal of the deletion tag before a decision is reached is not
3511:
Hi there! I was just wondering how I go about getting my deleted page back in order to edit it. I believe I submitted a request to get it back, however I have not received any notice yet. Thanks for your time!
600:
629:
The page was not correctly transcluded, and hence received neither vote, nor comment, nor answers to any questions. The editor in question had only a few days experience here and only a handful of edits to his
1903:
Restored at your request. I must say that it still looks a little promotional, but I would not dream of arguing the point. Perhaps you could review it and see if you are still happy with your text as posted.
2863:
1637:
5554:
you deleted this page citing that person is not of much importance. she is mayor of largest city of gujarat and 6th largest city of india. you should have discussed matter on talk page before deleting it.
4816:
The word "swami" is variously defined, but ir commonly taken to mean "religious guru". It does not refer to any specific person ans, as such, I do not find the name objectionable. Feel free to take it to
4305:, and I strongly suspect the subject was not going to pass WP:GNG, either. That having been said, if the article gets recreated, the speedy deletion for blatant hoax is probably not available. Cheers.
4321:
All versions created by two users with very similar names (Antoniclay43 and Antonic43), probably just one person - may even be an autobiography. If they look to create again then the links will point to
3246:) On June 27, 2014 I received a message that the entry on Cybersemiotics had been tagged for deletion. One hour later the article was deleted. I was on vacation then and tried frantic to contact you and
4801:
While the sockpuppetting issues may have been addressed, I am unclear as to why you did not require this editor to change his user name, especially as he's editing articles with "Swami" in the title. --
1079:
I put DB talk on the top of a talk page as it was still there yet it said you deleted it-so sorry I brought the page back as I noticed it had no page linked to it so I was doing that at the same time!
308:
Thanks Anthony, it seems there have been some recent developments. As most of those articles are restored now we can move on from here and remerge them properly if needed in future, with the history in
3903:. I saw the person's question at the Teahouse, asking why her draft had been deleted. It was because it was about her, and she created it herself. But I think she clearly meets all of the criteria in
2435:. Now there is another article on the same subject with a slightly different title. Not realizing this, at first I cleaned up the prose in the article, including the fact that the word Kelomang means
2976:
4748:
objects seen are laterally inverted; this is technically original research, as well as being a statement of the obvious. I am not going to redirect this article, but thank you for your interest. --
3612:
Knowledge, so with this page deleted I have lost everything I was working on and don't even have any way to see where I last left off. Please restore and I can make any and all necessary changes.
3135:
5745:
Thank you for being "an Administrator on Knowledge long enough to know what I can do, and what I cannot. I am always prepared to do the first, and to consult on the second", and for seeing when
5012:. The user does not exist. There are no logs showing he exists, the page was made by another user, and any links to it are made by yet another user. Why should this not be deleted? --Sincerely,
1204:
4627:" I don't see where that's required by the legal threats policy or where it's common practice to require anything more than retraction for obviously vacuous legal threats (or most other one).
3686:
innocent). There was a whole lot of disruptive/promotional editing by the two accounts. And if the person were really interested in abiding by Knowledge's policies, perhaps they wouldn't have
2964:
2953:
2864:
2105:
2879:
1647:
I very appreciate that you take time looking for information being requested to be published on Knowledge, however I ask you to elaborate on your judgement. Please consider the following:
3138:(02:28, 22 June 2014) then fourteen minutes I mentioned to User:Sandstein that he might be a sock (02:36, 22 June 2014) and then six minutes later he voted oppose on the request move for
893:
1663:
I am the right person to talk about copyright matters on the subject (GR8BIT), and I confirm that I granted permission for the content to be published on Knowledge encyclopedia pages.
5782:
5752:
4599:
879:
OK. As you have no strong feelings about this, I've restored the previous versions (for the record) and then amended it to be a redirect. I hope this is OK. 14:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
3072:. If you want the text of the article posted to your own talk page then I can do that; let me know if this is your wish. I do not understand your comment about a large document. --
2723:
and in all circumstances, and being logged-out for a total as of now of just under fifteen hours is not unreasonable. I have not yet dealt with your request, but will now do so. --
4704:
Thanks for deleting some of the articles I tagged for speedy when I was doing NPP earlier today. However, I disagree with your deletion under the criteria of "patent nonsense" of
5344:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
2967:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
5310:
The article is grossly promotional, and adding links will not make it less so. I am not prepared to restore it, although you have the option if you wish of lodging a request at
4522:
4280:
OK. Whether it counts as a hoax or merely misinformation becomes a discussion point; but the obvious fallback position is that he is in any case lacking wikipedic notability. --
3904:
2991:
1312:
3947:
OK. Now that your block has been released you are free, if you wish, to delete some or all of the material on your talk page. Or if you wish to archive it, instructions are at
2377:
I think these evidences are sufficient for proving that this organization is genuine. So, I request you to kindly restore the article. Sorry for my poor English....Thank You.
740:
501:
I am fresh out of wiki kittens; please accept this cake as a thank you for your support and thoughtful comments during my (now withdrawn) RfA. What doesn't kill me... Cheers,
5068:) to be deleted. Please let me know what exactly is the copyright issue and I would be grateful if you could recover the deleted page so that I could resolve the conflicts.
1761:
Oh, and I am not one who gets piled on. I know, there will be many opposes, or might be all of then as opposes. I am not afraid mate. Still, Thanks a lot for the heads up. :)
2870:
A title such as this is an assertion of notability if correct. Several of these were nominated at AFD and were kept, with some editors regarding these as inherently notable.
4492:
3682:
It never hurts to get more information, but, just so you know, I would be opposed to an unblock, at least at this point in time. There's not just socking that went on here (
2960:
2905:
It would also seem that your talk page also produces these rude, shutdown comments. And yet you block it for 'vandalism' ? These people are very civilised from what I see.
245:
Hello, recently you mass deleted a set of "Minister of..." articles. Unfortunately this included a few that should not have been deleted, but due to a misunderstanding in
4848:
Sorry, I had a look at your user page after I asked the above question. I pulled that example out of thin air and it was not constructed with you specifically in mind. --
1345:
5269:
Below are the details: 09:52, 22 October 2014 Anthony Bradbury (talk | contribs) deleted page Africell (Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G11, G12. Source URL:
3169:
2432:
5543:
3003:
2987:
2697:
perhaps recuse yourself until you have time to be responsive? Thankfully, Anne stepped in, but yours was the initial action, so the onus was on you to reply. Le Prof
3959:
2500:
Whether an author is made notable by awards depends on the significance of the awards. This author has received insignificant recognition for a self-published book.--
1186:
1172:
1158:
1143:
4585:
3900:
1923:
Hi Tony, thanks for your input on Wackslas' unblock request and for being willing to give them another chance. By the way, while you accepted their unblock request,
289:
4608:
3974:
3324:
2749:
1066:
1011:
583:
5636:
5076:
3484:
3119:
3080:
1787:
399:
5203:
4236:
1722:
1703:
143:
2425:
5322:
4261:
Antonio Clay was a three-year letterman for the Clemson Tigers (2005-07); I have verified this by reviewing the online PDF version of the 2013 Clemson football
3997:
3942:
3786:
3764:
3012:
2318:
2305:
2286:
2273:
2254:
2099:
2019:
1864:
1542:
5156:
4998:
4349:
4314:
4288:
4250:
3620:
3597:
3571:
3493:
3459:
3427:
3097:
3053:
2764:
2551:
2530:
2508:
1599:
1432:
1207:, the nominator hadn't provided a source of the copyright, and most of the text used as sources was public domain (1912/13). I have advised the author to add
5461:
5252:
4504:
4376:
3669:
3552:
2819:
just so he could get his puerile edits about a certain Rugrats character on. Any chance of locking his talk page and getting it over and done with? Thanks. --
1912:
1745:
1625:
1330:
It does not seem to me you can limit the merit of an entry because a non fiction book based on a story of public interest and fully referenced is mentioned.
443:
5706:
5603:
5386:
4756:
4742:
4729:
4579:
4335:
4137:
3888:
3847:
3223:
3037:
3028:
1945:
1462:
Why did u delete the page Mahika Sharma.. we have links for it and have the reason of making her wiki.. than why are you deleting it... please create a page
1304:
1290:
663:
638:
386:
2418:
2123:
2006:
1363:
1030:
Hey, Anthony, I'm puzzled by your deletions/restoration, the net effect of which is the talk page of the category is gone. Could you enlighten me? Thanks.--
5483:
5237:
5130:
4651:
4204:
3404:
3303:
3180:
2584:
1254:
1240:
1229:
565:
342:
177:
100:
5680:
5477:
5437:
As I suggested on the article's talkpage before it was deleted, I think if the article is worth having, the only workable title would be the German term,
4112:
2914:
2794:
2779:
2706:
2691:
2677:
2647:
2626:
997:
979:
955:
358:
5345:
5290:
4843:
4829:
4705:
4595:
3921:
3728:
3714:
3501:
3467:
2731:
2397:
2085:
1103:
1053:
874:
826:
461:
5505:
3376:
My understanding is that even if I did not have access to a written copyright I could still use the content if I quote Bitrum. Am I completely mistaken?
3151:
2858:
1095:
Just a time-lag effect, I expect. I deleted the article, then the talk page; talk page now deleted again. why it was brought back is not clear to me. --
86:
4776:
4293:
AB, the only reason I had not nominated the article for AfD myself was I was still trying to figure out what was real and what was blatantly false per
2218:
2199:
1686:
1039:
430:
318:
303:
3661:
no sense. Certainly if he is ever unblocked, which currently is of low probability, it will need to be on the basis of a single account restriction.--
3593:
everything I have written and the sources I have obtained. Please restore the article so I can continue working to make it acceptable for Knowledge.
3567:
everything I have written and the sources I have obtained. Please restore the article so I can continue working to make it acceptable for Knowledge.
3532:
3210:
4983:
4361:
4199:
3818:
3800:
3751:
3520:
3105:
3061:
3020:, he was username-blocked, and I unblocked for username change, so I am certain that a username change is being requested. I will leave it to you. --
2494:
1651:
It is fine that several encyclopedias have same description of the subject. Knowledge is general encyclopedia, the page you found is specialized one;
1528:
1485:
4679:
You are great wikipedia editor i aprreciate your interest in history and science. i would like to contact you email me srikrishnachaitan@gmail.com
4094:
4069:
2610:
1447:
1378:
into a redirect. It seems to me that the user who CSDed was only trying to get it merged with the other article, even the merge template was added (
1295:
I didn't tag the sockpuppetry. I see spamming socks all the time and trying to figure out whose is whose is too much work, so I don't tag them. --
5364:
5353:
4953:
4932:
4914:
4897:
4872:
4518:
4486:
2278:
Possibly they make a better claim to notability. I am not going to trawl through all the tennis articles here, but will look at any you nominate.--
5447:
3443:
5615:
5582:
5416:
2385:
1337:
1023:
48:
5529:
5051:
5037:
3791:
If necessary, I think I'll go back to school as your comments flew right over my head. No need to clarify, though. I'll survive unenlightened.--
2995:
282:
273:. Could you please restore all these articles to their finished state, before they were deleted to make way for their current redirect. Thanks--
5209:
4810:
4390:-- Why not let the checkusers who monitor the unblock queue -- I'm not the only one, I'm pretty sure -- handle these rather than denying them?
4348:
If The Pakistani Urdu-language reliable newspapers References are not acceptable for English Knowledge Please Speedy delete My Created Article
4212:
2355:
2338:
1389:
But rather than me doing it, shouldn't it be undeleted and then redirected? the page has a LOT of history besides being a former FL and having
541:
469:
163:
70:
5492:
4857:
4690:
5401:
5042:
Since the account exist, ofcourse the situation is different. I agree it may all be one person. I widraw my request for now. - All the best,
4902:
Thank you for reporting me. The administrator agreed and declined your report. They stated "Not a blatant violation of the username policy."
4050:
3192:
2565:
1585:
1375:
940:
5747:
2599:
1931:
1846:
1825:
128:
5276:
The data were being changed with missing links so can you please restore the old data info. Meanwhile, we are working on fixing the links.
5104:
page. J Mark Martin is a notable person, in terms of being a pastor of one of the largest protestant churches (12,000 members) in USA see
4205:
2350:
2071:
recently. This was on my watch list and probably written by me (but I'm not sure, without access to the history). Based on the coverage in
1834:
549:
481:
56:
5065:
3654:
2842:
2588:
1497:
5421:
3916:
3632:
3605:
3284:
3139:
2770:
the real submission! What a mess this is. With the deletion while I was editing, I have to say, no good deed goes unpunished. Le Prof
2474:
2460:
1611:
1323:
see the mention of the book being a fault. in traditional encyclopedia there were always mentions of the publications and their content.
753:
3737:(edit conflict) Blanked their own talk page? I would. Maybe it's common among humans who feel they've lost an argument. In all settings.
209:
5665:
3579:
2946:
1509:
You quite rightly declined an unblock request for Redmoon660, who is blocked for sockpuppetry. There is now another unblock request at
1412:
689:
513:
231:
when you deleted it, so I saved my edit anyway and recreated it. The topic is definitely notable; the article was just poorly written.—
2240:
2185:
2061:
1222:
5794:
4715:
4636:
3506:
1978:
1779:
least four, prefereably six, months of editing through your registered account. but I quite seriously wish you well for the future.--
1276:
1124:
270:
5302:
5021:
4721:
My reason for deletion was A3, not G1. G1 (patent nonsense) was the suggestion of the NP patroller. A3 is "no meaningful content".--
3699:
2231:
Hi Tony, I would like to ask why the article was deleted? I mentioned that it is notable since he just won an ATP Challenger title.
5088:
4425:
4394:
4343:
3983:
Thank you for your help. I added my subject to your talk page. I will began archiving my talk/user pages and will build my page up.
2160:
1459:
1402:
726:
415:
258:
235:
5804:
For deleting that "Africa" WP-Book. Don't know if you saw that the creator indicated on their user talk page that they wanted it
4834:
I've asked the user to voluntarily change his name. For reference, would you find a user name like "PriestsSuck" objectionable? --
4274:
3874:
1897:
906:
5189:
5084:
4793:
4545:
4481:
4044:
4002:
3449:
2479:
1024:
26:
4788:
4565:
4591:
2899:
2593:
2145:
1631:
1504:
198:
Thanks for going through my ugly CSD marathon. I was looking forward to see which courageous mop man would pick those up haha.
5722:
5549:
4262:
3628:
2332:
1771:
1557:
1427:
246:
149:
5629:
4905:
After this, I will report you for harassment because two administrators have told you that my user name is not a violation.
4884:
You were in fact blocked indefinitely for your user name before you started sockpuppetting. So fine, I will add a report to
4598:
election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the
2825:
623:
5817:
5392:
5372:
5328:
4189:
4056:
4038:
3880:
No, that's fine. The conversation thread after my unblock refusal clearly indicates that this is the appropriate action. --
3860:
3806:
2890:
accused of. On top of that, your question did not answer the one posed by Grfr12345 as his block was definitely premature.
2854:
2816:
1682:
911:
54:
As far as I can recall, 100% of the article was copyvio or close paraphrasing. Might be better to just start from scratch.
571:
I do not feel it appropriate to restore the article, but if you would like the opinion of the community you can appeal at
119:
page. It seems genuine and notable article and have added proper references to it. Please review this and restore. Thanks
3047:
2072:
2037:
1889:
1444:
1351:
In my view the projected article is clearly promotional; but if you wish you have the option of applying for a review at
1264:
1250:
4227:
have previously deleted this article. I'm not sure how it keeps appearing. This article should play offense! Thanks.
2341:
keeps recreating the article. He also removed all deletion tags reviewers have put into it. Please advise. Thank you. --
1957:
1390:
810:
I have no strong feelings about it, but it was not a true dab page, in that the two articles quoted were, specifically,
804:
5298:
5066:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Sheikhul_Mashaeikh_Dewan_Syed_Zainul_Abedin_Ali_Khan_Sahib&action=edit
2815:
after the use made three unsuccessful unblock requests over posting a fake news source, amongst other maladies such as
2443:. So anyway, is this a blatant hoax do you think? Or do you suppose it could actually be a genuine attempt? I see that
1089:
4558:
4184:
4419:
3687:
3175:
2261:
2149:. I came here because I noticed there are a lot of broken redirects to this page, might want to take care of those.
858:) 22:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC) ...and it doesn't appear (IMO) that the asserted A1 criterion was very appropriate.
521:
326:
3199:
3052:
Hello. Excuse me, I have a large document. Were large contributors to this article., Please restore it here. Thanks.
1236:
680:, and it's causing a lot of formatting issues. Could you show me what I need to do to avoid these problems, please?
5314:. Also, as Knowledge accounts are for use by one person only, why are you using the pronoun "we" in your request?--
5010:
4571:
Certainly; it was just a holiday. I know that the wikibreak message is over-complex, but it looks ok on the page.--
3528:
3147:
3125:
2165:
1918:
1493:
354:
262:
240:
3777:
Just so; my intent was mainly to educate Bbb23, for which purpose your talk page provided a setting. Thank you. --
3130:
I have strong reasons to believe that this user is a sockpuppet of Jaqeli. I suspected since June 8 and talked to
5805:
5578:
4541:
4388:
4186:
3231:
2850:
2559:
266:
254:
183:
1379:
5635:
5152:
3645:
Seriously, that was their reply to a one-account restriction. This is the mentality you are dealing with here.
2465:
Should I fix this article up some more or do you still believe that it (like the other one) should be deleted?
2393:
2119:
250:
5337:
5170:
5064:
Hi Anthony, I had provided enough citations and the person of interest is notable and still I found the page (
4183:
That is clear violation of biography of living person. To add more, Swamiblue now claims that I am vandalizing
2365:
2040:, with only a handful of exceptions, are considered notable. Maher was the founder of the congregation of the
1963:, but I thought it might help to let you know, so you can watch out and avoid similar mistakes in the future.
5525:
4657:
3639:
2424:
1885:
This page has no real value to Knowledge, is being used for someone's soap box, political gain and vandetta.
1793:
1636:
Hello Anthony, I was informed that you recently completely removed article waiting for review, located here "
1465:
486:
5108:. Some of other pastors are as notable, or less notable, but yet they do have their own wikipedia page like
4974:
month STANDARDOFFER is for those who have rarely socked, there is bigger length for people like swamifraud.
5659:
4455:
3894:
3675:
2448:
1593:
1182:
1154:
1120:
685:
451:
4051:
http://www.ndtv.com/article/diaspora/one-of-world-s-largest-temples-to-be-inaugurated-in-new-jersey-570146
4032:
5080:
5004:
4613:
4443:
3143:
2830:
1961:
870:
855:
800:
695:
350:
110:
4104:
they are not admissible. Note that on-line publications usually do not qualify as appropriate sources.--
5678:
5601:
5541:
5515:
5503:
5459:
5384:
5320:
5250:
5201:
4996:
4827:
4754:
4727:
4649:
4577:
4374:
4286:
4248:
4110:
3972:
3957:
3886:
3762:
3712:
3667:
3550:
3482:
3420:
3384:
3342:
3322:
3301:
3251:
3247:
3243:
3221:
3215:
I am, perhaps, more tolerant than some. But I have warned him, and will block on next transgression. --
3167:
3117:
3078:
3026:
2981:
2747:
2729:
2506:
2416:
2316:
2284:
2252:
2197:
2097:
2027:
2017:
1943:
1910:
1862:
1785:
1701:
1623:
1578:
1548:
1540:
1361:
1288:
1170:
1141:
1101:
1064:
1051:
1009:
995:
953:
824:
636:
581:
563:
441:
175:
141:
84:
17:
5105:
5101:
5497:
That's fine. May I say how nice it is, for a change, to have a non-confrontational discussion here!--
5405:
4699:
4449:
3624:
3601:
3575:
3497:
3463:
3101:
3057:
2447:, who wrote the article, claims to be part of a ""Free Your Knowlegde 2014" Writing Competition from
1423:
1227:
1198:
346:
2292:
1924:
5521:
5195:
You are quite right; that was careless of me. To be fair I think it was a one-off, unique error. --
5182:
4766:
4686:
4431:
4382:
2638:
Please, I am awaiting your reply, to be able to post the revision I have given hours to. Le Prof
2133:
2002:
1974:
1718:
1678:
1524:
1438:
762:
757:
402:
does not represent Harrisburg medical centre (besides naming after organisations is against policy
124:
5520:
Revoke talk page access for that guy you just blocked. Thanks for nailing it so fast, by the way.
4126:
4041:
3690:, including the Welcome message. Although that happened post-block, it still speaks to attitude.--
771:
4437:
3840:
3833:
3584:
2941:
2920:
2226:
1258:
1244:
1178:
1150:
1116:
766:
681:
393:
379:
372:
314:
278:
91:
I have just created a new version of the article, which I hope you will find to be satisfactory.
5790:
5763:
5727:
5349:
5294:
4173:
and if there are reputable third-party and uninvolved references to back up the statements made
3854:
3814:
3782:
3747:
2598:
Can you please undo your deletion, in the last few minutes, of the Julian (meteorologist) page
2301:
2269:
2236:
2081:
1951:
1842:
1821:
1741:
1398:
887:
477:
4045:
http://dnasyndication.com/showarticlerss.aspx?nid=mImJz11JigGXnzzT4wzdp0d4AqdA/N9ShvzCIEbe/KU=
2191:
Wouldn't dream of doing it without discussion. Or after, for that matter, unless you agreed.--
5673:
5643:
5596:
5536:
5498:
5454:
5379:
5315:
5258:
5245:
5196:
4991:
4979:
4822:
4749:
4722:
4644:
4572:
4509:
4500:
4413:
4399:
4369:
4310:
4281:
4270:
4243:
4232:
4195:
4105:
4008:
3967:
3952:
3881:
3757:
3707:
3662:
3558:
3545:
3477:
3414:
3336:
3317:
3296:
3237:
3216:
3162:
3112:
3073:
3021:
2972:
2910:
2895:
2875:
2790:
2775:
2760:
2742:
2724:
2702:
2687:
2673:
2643:
2622:
2606:
2547:
2537:
2526:
2501:
2490:
2411:
2311:
2279:
2247:
2192:
2092:
2012:
1938:
1905:
1870:
1857:
1780:
1696:
1618:
1572:
1535:
1356:
1283:
1165:
1136:
1096:
1059:
1046:
1004:
990:
948:
819:
783:
749:
631:
576:
558:
436:
170:
136:
79:
2140:
I noticed you deleted this page. Why do you believe that article needed immediate deletion?
5813:
5778:
5625:
5566:
5412:
5286:
5233:
5140:
5072:
4949:
4910:
4868:
4552:
4529:
4357:
4256:
4216:
4148:
Anthony.. After reading your actual words, I think Swamiblue find it hardest to understand.
4090:
4065:
3993:
3938:
3912:
3676:
3650:
3616:
3541:
3524:
3516:
3309:
2381:
1960:
that you intended to unblock this editor, but you didn't. I have unblocked, as you can see
1767:
1762:
1670:
1607:
1510:
1489:
1481:
1416:
1369:
1211:
426:
3492:
Indeed, thank you. Please delete the leftover cover. I cannot as it is an admin function.
3033:
Based on their edits, it seems they wanted the name "Bumblebee9999"; I have renamed them.
2835:
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by
8:
5686:
5574:
5559:
5407:. Recommend changing the block of this sock puppet to revoke talk page access as well. --
5394:
5368:
5176:
4903:
4739:
4712:
4682:
4537:
4474:
4302:
4133:
3868:
3206:
3188:
3142:(02:42, 22 June 2014). Now he is using his oppose vote as prove that he is not Jaqeli. --
2932:
2470:
2456:
2055:
1714:
1674:
1300:
1272:
897:
832:
656:
616:
411:
220:
120:
5591:
for you to improve, or alternatively you can appeal on the basis of the preaent text at
4057:
http://www.baps.org/About-BAPS/TheCurrentSpiritualGuru-PramukhSwamiMaharaj/His-Work.aspx
4039:
http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/baps-refutes-allegations-by-former-sadhus/1186609/
4033:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Persons_accused_of_crime
366:
5619:
5148:
4298:
2936:
2812:
2389:
2113:
2068:
2033:
1455:
1341:
671:
310:
274:
232:
154:
Hello Anthony, with your last edit on your user page you have left this | }} on it. --
5786:
5759:
5718:
5699:
5692:
5609:
5106:
https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_the_largest_Protestant_churches_in_the_United_States
4632:
4619:
3948:
3810:
3778:
3743:
3439:
3400:
3292:
3280:
3272:
3131:
2884:
2518:
2373:
2369:
2297:
2265:
2232:
2077:
1998:
1970:
1838:
1817:
1737:
1520:
1394:
866:
851:
796:
545:
507:
495:
473:
159:
96:
44:
3426:
I went through the Knowledge training and read all the information on Copyright and
831:
I see what you mean about not being a true dab page. And as there's already one at
5655:
5473:
5400:
The user has placed a malicious unblock request (see his talk page). Note that the
5163:
5102:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=J._Mark_Martin&action=edit&redlink=1
5047:
5033:
5017:
4975:
4772:
4496:
4306:
4294:
4266:
4228:
4191:
3454:
2968:
2907:
2892:
2871:
2806:
2786:
2771:
2756:
2738:
2698:
2683:
2669:
2665:
2639:
2618:
2602:
2543:
2522:
2486:
2172:
2134:
2041:
1881:
I'd Rather Be Baking Cookies: A Collection of Recipes from Lisa MacLeod and Friends
1731:
1109:
975:
936:
779:
734:
594:
298:
204:
4047:
3905:
Knowledge:WikiProject_History_of_photography#Notability_criteria_for_photographers
3368:
5809:
5773:
5408:
5358:
5229:
5059:
4945:
4906:
4879:
4864:
4795:
4784:
4353:
4220:
4086:
4061:
3989:
3934:
3908:
3796:
3724:
3695:
3646:
2928:
2921:
2846:
1894:
1603:
1383:
1219:
1132:
1085:
1074:
1035:
722:
457:
422:
5735:
4681:
do not forget to send your some of your photos i would like to know your face!!
1927:. I removed the block, as that appeared to be your intent. Was that okay? Best.
603:(a page you've deleted) got any votes (were their any RfA !votes) on that page?
465:
5799:
5570:
5555:
5490:
5445:
4736:
4709:
4562:
4533:
4462:
4326:
4224:
4129:
3864:
3202:
3184:
3034:
3017:
3009:
2821:
2466:
2452:
2444:
2050:
1928:
1802:
1471:
1296:
1268:
1267:) was warned for spamming the same links. I blocked the Katie account, too. --
892:
Hi Anthony. This spam page you deleted a couple days ago has been put back up:
775:
644:
604:
407:
5614:
please restore my article in my sandbox. I am still working on improving it.--
5266:
Can you please restore Africell wikipedia page that was deleted by your side.
2360:
Hello Anthony Bradbury, I just want to know why you have deleted the article "
5592:
5311:
5144:
4885:
4818:
4605:
4391:
4323:
4101:
3313:
3158:
3069:
2580:
2407:
2346:
2214:
2181:
2155:
2109:
1937:
I got distracted in mid-flow and failed to remove the block. My apologies. --
1853:
1451:
1352:
986:
572:
403:
116:
4242:
Speedy-deleted and salted. It can be resurrected should he become notable.--
2036:. Would you mind restoring the article, please? People with an entry in the
1239:: I would be inclined to say no until they can explain why they created the
5714:
5453:
know, but reasonably accurate and searchable in an encyclopedia context. --
4628:
3435:
3396:
3276:
3268:
2366:
http://wikimapia.org/30594031/Balarampur-Sampriti-Sangha-and-Shitala-Mandir
503:
155:
92:
40:
5124:
just to name a few. How can I help getting a page up for J Mark Martin?
4666:
4594:! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual
4053:
3899:
I've created a draft article that is similar to one you deleted. It is at
704:
5647:
5469:
5438:
5431:
5430:
Sorry to bug you with this, but I'm not sure how to proceed. The author,
5043:
5029:
5013:
2436:
1984:
Errm, after I posted that message, I saw the section above! Care needed!
1755:
971:
932:
677:
293:
228:
221:
199:
36:
4923:
blocked you before for... a blatant violation of our username policy. --
4023:
3756:
Thank you for your input, which does not in reality affect the issue. --
3136:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of the mothers of Georgian monarchs
2091:
indeed as I expect you know is obligatory for a biographical article. --
1883:, a page I created. The speedy deletion rationale by the nominator was
1382:). Probably due to being unaware about the usual way to proceed through
4924:
4889:
4849:
4835:
4802:
4780:
3792:
3720:
3691:
1205:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Lewis Earle Sandt, Pioneer Aviator
1081:
1031:
861:
846:
791:
718:
4643:
implicit in the requirement to desist from the threat already made. --
4188:
wikipedia and his edits should be reverted only if they are vandalism.
3134:
about it. After Jaqeli got blocked, the IP addres voted in support of
2965:
Jane Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 28th Baroness Willoughby de Eresby
2954:
Jane Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 28th Baroness Willoughby de Eresby
2865:
Jane Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 28th Baroness Willoughby de Eresby
470:
User_talk:Ottawahitech#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Sucharita_Mulpuru
5487:
5442:
2246:
World highest ranking of 255 does not appear to confer notability. --
2152:
Just for reference, that article received just over 100 daily views.
916:
Please I would really really appreciate an explanation as to why you
398:
Considering the non-existence of Jude Jaxon, it seems plausible that
75:
64:
32:
5482:
Anthony, I took the liberty of copying some of this exchange to the
3385:
https://sites.google.com/site/glosariobitrum/glossary/cybersemiotics
2361:
1203:
Hello Tony, Just to let you know I reversed your speedy deletion of
5341:
5330:
2342:
2210:
2177:
2045:
967:
962:
923:
741:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive830#User:Iraag
3455:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Melvin_Jackson_Funky_Skull_cover.jpg
1386:, the user thought the source page should be deleted through A10.
4125:
Sorry to bug you about this again. Would you take a look at this
3352:
I checked the Bitrum Copyright disclaimer and it is is as follow:
2374:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Balarampur_Sampriti_Sangha.jpg
1374:
Hi Anthony, I just wanted to tell you that I'm going to recreate
249:
and error in procedure the following were included on that list:
5270:
4019:
and you can let me know if it’s written correctly and cited.
3389:
Thank you for helping rescue the content and your understanding,
2927:
Hi. Just as a friendly notice, I have reversed your deletion of
435:
Account is now username blocked (I was away from PC until now)--
5595:. If you would like the text posted here please let me know. --
5363:
please restore my article in my sandbox. i will improve there--
5222:
5113:
4775:
was recreated, also seems to have some sock puppetry going on.
4042:
http://www.baps.org/Announcement/2013/Message-for-All-5347.aspx
1640:" for the purpose "(G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of
335:
192:
4175:- No one says that these charges are true, except the 2 other
1472:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:List_of_hoaxes_on_Wikipedia
5535:
As you say. I have revoked his talk page access. Thank you.--
5404:
had its talk page access revoked for abusing their talk page
4493:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Antonio Clay (2nd nomination)
2837:
2440:
1641:
5709:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
4561:. Welcome back; I hope that everything is well with you. :)
3850:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
389:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
4176:
4157:
4012:
3008:
Are you asking for a rename? If so, I can do that for you.
1413:
User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Is_this_worth_filing_at_WP:DRV.3F
840:
836:
811:
745:
4407:
2368:
and here is the link of the website of this organization:
421:
If Anthony wasn't already involved I'd block the account.
2542:
due to none response I have asked for a deletion review.
743:, I wondered if you'd consider restoring the dab page at
5109:
5095:
4352:
Or Remove the Objection Tag from the article. Thanks. --
1602:
look the same now as it did when you deleted it as A7?
1314:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Ball MBE.
815:
4024:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:CRIME#Basic_criteria
4007:
The topic that I would like your assistance on is for
3742:
I have no thoughts on any other aspect of the case. --
3706:
the messages have been read, but I take your point. --
2337:
Hello. I just wanted to notify you that the author of
2108:. Do not move it back until it is a proper article. —
5219:
1856:. I have attended already to the IP you highlight. --
1177:
Ouch. Hope you get to make up the travel time later!
5642:
You deleted this user's user page as a violation of
5117:
1570:Have a great day, and a Dogtastic Wikibirthday!!!!
5698:Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at
5121:
3839:Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at
2310:
OK, point conceded. I have restored the article. --
1728:there it may be in violation of content licensing.
1534:
I have left my opinion on the editor's talk page.--
1475:
378:Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at
5771:Two years ago, you were the 308th recipient of my
4777:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Chticalifornia
4297:. As best I can tell the subject did not satisfy
2370:https://sites.google.com/site/wwwsampritisanghacom
4586:WikiProject Military history coordinator election
3183:, vandalism account, identical user page as you.
2431:Hello Anthony. I see that you previously deleted
1875:Hello Tony, I had just noticed that you deleted (
4937:Anthony and Daniel have stated to you that they
4919:Might want to read what he wrote again. And the
3091:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Jeff Opdyke
4943:Not a blatant violation of the username policy.
4048:http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-3107856951.html
3805:Rest easy; I don't go to quite the extremes of
3369:http://en.bitrum.unileon.es/reproduction-rights
2737:I see that your request has been dealt with by
1282:Fair enough. Failed to spot the sockpuppetry.--
5223:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Evil_Beaver_(2)
5114:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bill_Johnson_(pastor)
601:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Omar Choudhry
468:, you may be interested in the discussion at:
4160:who are opposing him cannot be considered as
4154:If he has been publicly accused of an offence
3719:I appreciate the courtesy, thanks, Anthony.--
3111:Copyright violations are not allowed here. --
2171:look at that kind of nonsense over a glaring
1376:List of recognised political parties in India
1333:I would like another opinion on this matter.
5279:Your prompt feedback is highly appreciated.
5131:1991 Armed Forces Immigration Adjustment Act
4206:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Antonio Clay
3295:and determine your best course of action. --
227:I was removing the speedy deletion tag from
35:advised me of a proposed speedy deletion of
3922:Moving on after an approved unblock request
3140:Talk:Princess Leonida Bagration of Mukhrani
2451:in Jakarta Indonesia". Best wishes to you,
1736:may have some thoughts, I'm not a lawyer.--
1638:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/GR8BIT
4404:Greetings Tony! A userpage you've deleted
2372:and here is the image link of this club:
1833:Also, what should be done with edits like
271:Minister of Highways, Ports & Shipping
4011:. He is an Indian guru of a group called
3258:the field to contribute to the article.
2048:, and that's why she's got a DNZB entry.
1411:Please will you respond to my comment at
4487:Someone did not receive the memo . . . .
3863:, same applies, revert me if it's bad.
2845:is very much appreciated. Many thanks.
259:Minister of External Affairs (Sri Lanka)
5110:https://en.wikipedia.org/Charles_Nieman
4054:http://www.baps.org/Global-Network.aspx
1025:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
78:is correct, and his advice is sound. --
14:
5486:so we can keep things together there.
3068:option of challenging this opinion at
2356:Deletion of Balarampur Sampriti Sangha
931:feel you are justified in this action.
4215:for deletion. When I looked through
3383:Here is where he is shown as author:
3250:who tagged the entry. Like I said to
3198:I suggest blocked as vandalism only,
2293:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines
504:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
5220:https://en.wikipedia.org/Evil_Beaver
5100:Hi Anthony. 5 years ago you deleted
4939:I do not find the name objectionable
4167:or has appeared in Court on a charge
3544:and follow the instructions there.--
2579:Thanks again, and have a great day.
2143:Also, you might want to look at the
2106:User:Stuartyeates/Mary Cecilia Maher
1985:
1443:Go Won-hee is real person and here6
31:Hello. On 9 January 2014 at 15:53,
5171:put comments on someone's user page
5118:https://en.wikipedia.org/Mike_Glenn
2073:Dictionary of New Zealand Biography
2038:Dictionary of New Zealand Biography
1713:back and reconsider it? Thank you.
818:- i.e. not the same article name.--
23:
5691:
5122:https://en.wikipedia.org/Jim_Tolle
3832:
2485:the references were not adequate.
1888:contest it. Given the nominators
1470:Aditnálta should be directed to -
894:User:Maxim trader malaysia/sandbox
739:Hi. Considering the discussion at
692:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing
591:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing
552:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing
371:
217:__what5 0on earth arre you doiing
24:
5828:
3507:Articles for creation/Eric Fisher
1994:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1966:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1956:Hello, Anthony. It is clear from
1516:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1476:http://en.wikipedia.org/Aditnálta
115:Hi There, I have recently edited
5734:
5562:) 16:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
5009:Hi Anthony Bradbury, concerning
4665:
4604:by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!
4344:Speedy Delete My Created Article
2817:falsely accusing me of vandalism
2564:I just wanted to say thanks for
1986:
1801:
1655:for removal of original content;
1556:
1391:important articles linking to it
703:
494:
334:
263:Minister of Finance and Planning
191:
55:
5766:) 7:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
4622:'s block, you left this note: "
4102:living persons biography policy
4003:Pramukh Swami abuse allegations
3807:some of the education committee
3450:Funky Skull deletion completion
2811:Hi, I already made my point at
2480:Speedy Deletion of Paco Ahlgren
1045:Answered on your talk page. `--
267:Minister of Justice (Sri Lanka)
255:Minister of Defence (Sri Lanka)
27:Deletion of Sheila Bird article
5378:Restored in your talk page. --
4652:14:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
4637:12:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
4609:22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
4580:12:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
4566:22:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
2986:How do I transfer my account?
2682:Thank you, will do. Le Prof
2594:Please reverse Julian deletion
2032:Hi there, you've just deleted
1632:Deletion of the GR8BIT article
1505:Unblock request for Redmoon660
676:I inserted a book source into
460:who deleted the article about
251:Minister of Sports (Sri Lanka)
13:
1:
5818:16:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
5795:07:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
5723:11:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
5681:22:31, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
5666:22:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
5550:article on meenakshiben patel
5271:http://www.lintel.com/Holding
4546:21:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
4523:Achraf Baznani (photographer)
4505:03:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
4211:Hi there. Today I nominated
4022:The criteria for notability:
3355:"Creative Commons 3.0 License
2333:Recreation of deleted article
907:20:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
875:22:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
827:11:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
805:23:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
727:09:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
690:01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
664:16:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
639:10:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
624:03:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
584:18:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
566:18:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
550:02:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
514:11:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
482:15:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
150:User page little format issue
5630:17:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
5604:17:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
5583:16:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
5544:20:54, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
5530:20:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
5506:20:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
5493:19:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
5478:18:18, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
5462:12:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
5448:21:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
5417:16:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
5402:sock puppet master MRivera25
5387:12:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
5373:06:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
5354:10:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
5323:16:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
5303:12:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
5253:11:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
5238:01:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
5210:The salting of "Evil Beaver"
5204:19:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
5190:16:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
5157:19:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
5089:17:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
4779:might want to look into it.
4592:WikiProject Military history
4200:04:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
4138:03:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
2449:Jakarta Theological Seminary
1877:almost a year and a half ago
912:What on earth are you doing?
599:Hello Tony! Can I ask , did
444:17:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
431:17:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
416:16:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
359:23:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
319:16:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
304:15:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
283:14:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
236:16:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
210:12:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
178:22:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
164:22:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
144:17:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
129:22:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
101:11:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
87:22:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
71:19:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
49:18:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
7:
5052:16:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
5038:16:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
5022:16:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
4999:16:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
4984:10:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
4954:03:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
4933:03:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
4915:02:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
4898:23:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
4873:23:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
4858:17:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
4844:17:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
4830:10:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
4811:08:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
4789:17:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
4757:16:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
4743:15:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
4730:15:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
4716:13:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
4691:06:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
4482:18:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
4395:18:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
4377:21:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
4362:16:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
4113:20:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
4095:03:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
3859:Just to let you know about
3048:sayed mohamad bagher posaei
2521:isn't a significant award?
341:Thank you for dealing with
10:
5833:
5751:, - repeating: you are an
5336:An editor has asked for a
5174:? Please be more careful.
4336:18:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
4315:18:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
4289:18:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
4275:16:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
4251:10:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
4237:01:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
4070:04:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
3998:04:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
3975:13:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
3960:13:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
3943:02:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
3275:) 13:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
3252:User:Justlettersandnumbers
3248:User:Justlettersandnumbers
2959:An editor has asked for a
2851:MediaWiki message delivery
2362:Balarampur Sampriti Sangha
2124:19:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
2100:17:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
2086:07:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
2062:00:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
2020:20:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
2011:Slapped wrist accepted. --
2007:11:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1979:11:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1946:09:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
1932:20:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
1913:15:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
1898:20:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
1865:18:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1847:18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1826:17:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
1788:19:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
1772:17:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
1746:01:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
1723:22:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
1704:19:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
1659:copyrights were violated).
1564:Happy WikiBirthday award!!
1543:17:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
1529:11:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
1498:22:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
1460:14:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
1433:11:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
1403:17:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
1364:12:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
1346:12:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
1305:15:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
1291:11:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
1277:06:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
18:User talk:Anthony Bradbury
5422:"Banned" forest, redux...
4664:
3917:20:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
3889:11:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
3875:07:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
3819:22:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
3801:00:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
3787:00:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
3765:22:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
3752:22:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
3729:23:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
3715:22:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
3700:21:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
3670:21:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
3655:20:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
3633:17:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
3606:13:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
3580:13:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
3444:13:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
3224:20:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3211:20:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3193:20:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3176:You may be interested in,
3170:20:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3152:19:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3120:20:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3106:14:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
3081:09:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
3062:06:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
3038:12:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
3029:11:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
3013:21:44, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
2996:21:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
2977:22:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
2947:16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
2915:08:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
2900:08:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
2433:The deer and the kelomang
1800:
1687:22:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
1642:http://www.msx.org/GR8Bit
1626:19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
1612:18:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
1586:17:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
1555:
1223:01:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
1187:00:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
1173:20:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1159:19:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1144:17:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1125:17:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1104:21:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
1090:21:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
1067:18:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
1054:18:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
1040:17:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
1012:18:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
998:18:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
980:17:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
956:11:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
941:01:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
702:
522:deletion of Ed Lantz page
380:50.121.48.234's talk page
3553:20:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
3533:13:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
3502:16:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
3485:10:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
3468:22:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
3405:12:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
3358:Creative Commons License
3325:20:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
3304:20:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
3285:13:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
3126:User talk:68.109.175.166
3070:the deletion review page
2880:21:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
2859:06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
2826:06:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
2795:15:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
2780:22:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2765:22:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2750:09:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2732:09:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2707:01:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
2692:22:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
2678:22:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
2648:21:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
2627:19:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
2611:19:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
2589:15:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
2566:reviewing the rangeblock
2552:16:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
2531:18:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2509:19:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2495:14:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
2475:13:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2461:00:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
2419:10:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2398:09:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2351:06:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
2166:Re: Edit war in progress
1919:Wackslas unblock request
1353:the deletion review page
241:Ministers of...deletions
5748:others can do the same
5282:Thank you in advance.
5225:I appreciate your time
3901:User:Margin1522/draft01
3688:blanked their talk page
3232:Cybersemiotics deletion
2560:Thanks for reviewing it
2319:11:02, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
2306:10:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
2287:10:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
2274:09:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
2255:09:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
2241:21:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
2219:10:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
2200:20:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
2186:19:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
2161:04:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
2067:I notice that you A7'd
1925:they were still blocked
643:Alrighty then! Thanks!
367:Talkback: 50.121.48.234
347:civil and polite manner
327:A cheeseburger for you!
184:A cheeseburger for you!
5696:
5637:User:Ameka Wisdom Bone
4461:, is a spambot. Best,
3837:
3089:Why was this deleted:
2517:So you are saying the
400:User:HarrisburgMedical
376:
351:Illegitimate Barrister
5695:
4673:The Original Barnstar
4009:Pramukh Swami Maharaj
3836:
3640:Apteva unblock appeal
3362:institution: BITrum."
3144:The Emperor's New Spy
2617:improving. Le Prof
2426:Deer and the kelomang
1466:Deletion of Aditnálta
1327:on Knowledge policy?
1319:The speedy deletion.
1058:Restored talk page.--
788:. What do you think?
711:The Original Barnstar
487:Some baklava for you!
375:
290:Just letting you know
5329:Deletion review for
4350:Najmi Healing Energy
3895:Draft of new article
3677:User talk:Debraross1
3434:Thank you so much,--
3428:Copyright Violations
2952:Deletion review for
1809:The Admin's Barnstar
1763:User:Harrybrowne1986
1600:Carolina Silverhawks
1594:Carolina Silverhawks
1511:User talk:Redmoon660
1253:) account after the
452:Just to let you know
169:Thank you; sorted.--
5700:Gilliam's talk page
5522:NorthBySouthBaranof
5395:User:OpaqueVodville
5005:User does not exist
4771:Well it seems that
4658:A barnstar for you!
4614:odd unblock decline
4596:project coordinator
3004:Bigpolesmokerfromoh
2831:Request for comment
2146:links and redirects
1794:A barnstar for you!
839:should redirect to
833:4H (disambiguation)
696:A barnstar for you!
111:Request for restore
5755:! (6 June 2007)!
5753:awesome Wikipedian
5707:remove this notice
5697:
5516:Should probably...
5484:article's talkpage
4921:same administrator
4219:, I see that you,
3848:remove this notice
3841:Slon02's talk page
3838:
3181:User:Blackbetty412
2982:How do I transfer?
2813:User talk:Garr1984
2069:Mary Cecilia Maher
2034:Mary Cecilia Maher
2028:Mary Cecilia Maher
1549:Happy Birthday!!!!
1179:Dozzzzzzzzzing off
1151:Dozzzzzzzzzing off
1135:. Happy wikying.--
1117:Dozzzzzzzzzing off
717:Thanks for help.
682:Dozzzzzzzzzing off
456:Since you are the
387:remove this notice
377:
5742:long enough admin
5664:
5586:
5569:comment added by
5306:
5289:comment added by
5168:Since when do we
5160:
5143:comment added by
5092:
5077:Muthalathottathil
5075:comment added by
4706:Lateral invertion
4700:Lateral invertion
4697:
4696:
4549:
4532:comment added by
4080:Any help Anthony?
3873:
3636:
3619:comment added by
3536:
3519:comment added by
3316:may be helpful.--
3132:User:FactStraight
2519:Eric Hoffer Award
2401:
2384:comment added by
1996:
1968:
1852:Make a report at
1831:
1830:
1690:
1673:comment added by
1591:
1590:
1518:
1501:
1484:comment added by
1431:
1199:Reversed deletion
1133:the adoption link
732:
731:
519:
518:
462:Sucharita Mulpuru
364:
363:
215:
214:
5824:
5776:
5750:
5738:
5710:
5675:Anthony Bradbury
5663:
5652:
5650:
5632:
5598:Anthony Bradbury
5585:
5563:
5538:Anthony Bradbury
5500:Anthony Bradbury
5456:Anthony Bradbury
5381:Anthony Bradbury
5317:Anthony Bradbury
5305:
5283:
5247:Anthony Bradbury
5198:Anthony Bradbury
5188:
5185:
5179:
5173:
5159:
5137:
5091:
5069:
4993:Anthony Bradbury
4929:
4894:
4883:
4854:
4840:
4824:Anthony Bradbury
4807:
4794:Your unblock of
4773:Olivier Leclercq
4767:Olivier Leclercq
4751:Anthony Bradbury
4724:Anthony Bradbury
4669:
4662:
4661:
4646:Anthony Bradbury
4574:Anthony Bradbury
4548:
4526:
4517:Please redirect
4479:
4472:
4467:
4460:
4459:
4426:deleted contribs
4410:
4383:Checkuser blocks
4371:Anthony Bradbury
4331:
4283:Anthony Bradbury
4245:Anthony Bradbury
4107:Anthony Bradbury
3969:Anthony Bradbury
3954:Anthony Bradbury
3883:Anthony Bradbury
3871:
3867:
3851:
3759:Anthony Bradbury
3709:Anthony Bradbury
3664:Anthony Bradbury
3635:
3613:
3547:Anthony Bradbury
3535:
3513:
3479:Anthony Bradbury
3416:Anthony Bradbury
3338:Anthony Bradbury
3319:Anthony Bradbury
3298:Anthony Bradbury
3261:Please advise!
3239:Anthony Bradbury
3218:Anthony Bradbury
3164:Anthony Bradbury
3114:Anthony Bradbury
3075:Anthony Bradbury
3023:Anthony Bradbury
3007:
2944:
2939:
2913:
2898:
2841:. Your comments
2840:
2744:Anthony Bradbury
2726:Anthony Bradbury
2541:
2538:Anthony Bradbury
2503:Anthony Bradbury
2413:Anthony Bradbury
2400:
2378:
2313:Anthony Bradbury
2291:Okay, so in the
2281:Anthony Bradbury
2249:Anthony Bradbury
2194:Anthony Bradbury
2158:
2135:Akhtar Raza Khan
2094:Anthony Bradbury
2058:
2053:
2042:Sisters of Mercy
2014:Anthony Bradbury
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1964:
1940:Anthony Bradbury
1907:Anthony Bradbury
1859:Anthony Bradbury
1805:
1798:
1797:
1782:Anthony Bradbury
1774:
1735:
1698:Anthony Bradbury
1689:
1667:
1620:Anthony Bradbury
1584:
1581:
1575:
1574:Happy Attack Dog
1560:
1553:
1552:
1537:Anthony Bradbury
1514:
1500:
1478:
1439:you made mistake
1422:
1419:
1358:Anthony Bradbury
1285:Anthony Bradbury
1216:
1210:
1167:Anthony Bradbury
1138:Anthony Bradbury
1098:Anthony Bradbury
1061:Anthony Bradbury
1048:Anthony Bradbury
1006:Anthony Bradbury
992:Anthony Bradbury
950:Anthony Bradbury
904:
903:
864:
849:
821:Anthony Bradbury
794:
787:
769:
707:
700:
699:
661:
654:
649:
633:Anthony Bradbury
621:
614:
609:
578:Anthony Bradbury
560:Anthony Bradbury
510:
498:
491:
490:
466:Knowledge:CSD#A7
438:Anthony Bradbury
390:
349:. Best regards,
338:
331:
330:
301:
296:
207:
202:
195:
188:
187:
172:Anthony Bradbury
138:Anthony Bradbury
81:Anthony Bradbury
69:
67:
63:
59:
5832:
5831:
5827:
5826:
5825:
5823:
5822:
5821:
5802:
5774:
5769:
5768:
5746:
5739:
5730:
5711:
5704:
5689:
5653:
5648:
5640:
5623:
5612:
5593:deletion review
5564:
5552:
5518:
5424:
5398:
5361:
5338:deletion review
5334:
5312:deletion review
5284:
5261:
5212:
5183:
5177:
5175:
5169:
5166:
5138:
5133:
5098:
5070:
5062:
5007:
4927:
4892:
4877:
4852:
4838:
4821:if you wish. --
4805:
4799:
4796:User:Swamifraud
4769:
4702:
4660:
4618:When declining
4616:
4590:Greetings from
4588:
4555:
4527:
4512:
4491:AB, it's back:
4489:
4475:
4468:
4463:
4411:
4406:
4405:
4402:
4385:
4346:
4329:
4259:
4221:User:Courcelles
4209:
4005:
3924:
3897:
3869:
3857:
3852:
3845:
3680:
3642:
3621:Matt.tennenbaum
3614:
3598:Matt.tennenbaum
3596:Thank you, Matt
3587:
3572:Matt.tennenbaum
3570:Thank you, Matt
3561:
3514:
3509:
3494:Professionalign
3460:Professionalign
3452:
3392:Claudia Jacques
3234:
3178:
3157:Please post at
3128:
3098:Matt.tennenbaum
3054:Mokhtar-saghafi
3050:
3001:
2984:
2961:deletion review
2957:
2942:
2937:
2929:Gustaf Brunkman
2925:
2922:Gustaf Brunkman
2906:
2891:
2887:
2868:
2836:
2833:
2809:
2596:
2562:
2535:
2482:
2429:
2408:deletion review
2379:
2358:
2335:
2229:
2227:Sebastian Bader
2168:
2156:
2138:
2056:
2051:
2030:
1987:
1954:
1921:
1873:
1796:
1765:
1758:
1729:
1668:
1634:
1617:Yes it does. --
1596:
1579:
1573:
1571:
1551:
1507:
1479:
1468:
1441:
1417:
1372:
1317:
1233:
1214:
1208:
1201:
1112:
1077:
1028:
987:deletion review
922:my work on the
914:
899:
898:
890:
859:
844:
789:
760:
744:
737:
698:
674:
657:
650:
645:
617:
610:
605:
597:
573:deletion review
524:
512:
508:
489:
454:
396:
394:Jude Jaxon hoax
391:
384:
369:
329:
299:
294:
243:
225:
205:
200:
186:
152:
113:
65:
61:
60:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5830:
5801:
5798:
5744:
5733:
5732:
5731:
5729:
5728:Precious again
5726:
5703:
5690:
5688:
5685:
5684:
5683:
5644:WP:NOTAWEBHOST
5639:
5634:
5628:comment added
5611:
5608:
5607:
5606:
5551:
5548:
5547:
5546:
5517:
5514:
5513:
5512:
5511:
5510:
5509:
5508:
5423:
5420:
5397:
5391:
5390:
5389:
5360:
5357:
5333:
5327:
5326:
5325:
5263:Dear Anthony,
5260:
5257:
5256:
5255:
5211:
5208:
5207:
5206:
5178:Chris Troutman
5165:
5162:
5132:
5129:
5097:
5094:
5061:
5058:
5057:
5056:
5055:
5054:
5006:
5003:
5002:
5001:
4971:
4970:
4969:
4968:
4967:
4966:
4965:
4964:
4963:
4962:
4961:
4960:
4959:
4958:
4957:
4956:
4798:
4792:
4768:
4765:
4764:
4763:
4762:
4761:
4760:
4759:
4701:
4698:
4695:
4694:
4683:Krishnachaitan
4676:
4675:
4670:
4659:
4656:
4655:
4654:
4615:
4612:
4587:
4584:
4583:
4582:
4554:
4551:
4525:. Thank you.
4519:Achraf Baznani
4511:
4508:
4488:
4485:
4401:
4398:
4384:
4381:
4380:
4379:
4345:
4342:
4341:
4340:
4339:
4338:
4318:
4317:
4258:
4255:
4254:
4253:
4225:User:Ronhjones
4208:
4203:
4181:
4180:
4170:
4164:
4150:
4149:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4142:
4141:
4140:
4117:
4084:
4083:
4082:
4081:
4074:
4004:
4001:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3984:
3978:
3977:
3923:
3920:
3896:
3893:
3892:
3891:
3856:
3855:Toes and stuff
3853:
3844:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3826:
3825:
3824:
3823:
3822:
3821:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3739:
3738:
3734:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3679:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3641:
3638:
3610:
3586:
3583:
3560:
3557:
3556:
3555:
3508:
3505:
3490:
3489:
3488:
3487:
3451:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3432:
3424:
3410:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3393:
3390:
3387:
3381:
3377:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3359:
3356:
3353:
3350:
3346:
3330:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3233:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3177:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3161:, not here. --
3127:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3084:
3083:
3049:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3042:
3041:
3040:
2983:
2980:
2956:
2950:
2924:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2886:
2883:
2867:
2862:
2838:Anna Frodesiak
2832:
2829:
2808:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2633:
2632:
2595:
2592:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2533:
2512:
2511:
2481:
2478:
2445:user:BP20Benny
2428:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2410:if you wish.--
2376:
2357:
2354:
2334:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2228:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2203:
2202:
2167:
2164:
2137:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2029:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
1953:
1952:Missed unblock
1950:
1949:
1948:
1920:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1872:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1829:
1828:
1812:
1811:
1806:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1770:comment added
1757:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1738:Obi-Wan Kenobi
1715:EugenyBrychkov
1707:
1706:
1675:EugenyBrychkov
1661:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1588:
1567:
1566:
1561:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1506:
1503:
1467:
1464:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1409:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1316:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1232:
1226:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
913:
910:
889:
888:recreated spam
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
736:
733:
730:
729:
714:
713:
708:
697:
694:
673:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
596:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
523:
520:
517:
516:
502:
499:
488:
485:
453:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
395:
392:
383:
370:
368:
365:
362:
361:
339:
328:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
242:
239:
224:
219:
213:
212:
196:
185:
182:
181:
180:
151:
148:
147:
146:
121:Ashishlohorung
112:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
104:
103:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5829:
5820:
5819:
5815:
5811:
5807:
5797:
5796:
5792:
5788:
5784:
5781:
5780:
5777:
5767:
5765:
5761:
5756:
5754:
5749:
5743:
5737:
5725:
5724:
5720:
5716:
5708:
5701:
5694:
5682:
5679:
5677:
5676:
5670:
5669:
5668:
5667:
5661:
5657:
5651:
5645:
5638:
5633:
5631:
5627:
5621:
5617:
5605:
5602:
5600:
5599:
5594:
5589:
5588:
5587:
5584:
5580:
5576:
5572:
5568:
5561:
5557:
5545:
5542:
5540:
5539:
5534:
5533:
5532:
5531:
5527:
5523:
5507:
5504:
5502:
5501:
5496:
5495:
5494:
5491:
5489:
5485:
5481:
5480:
5479:
5475:
5471:
5466:
5465:
5464:
5463:
5460:
5458:
5457:
5450:
5449:
5446:
5444:
5440:
5435:
5433:
5428:
5419:
5418:
5414:
5410:
5406:
5403:
5396:
5388:
5385:
5383:
5382:
5377:
5376:
5375:
5374:
5370:
5366:
5356:
5355:
5351:
5347:
5343:
5339:
5332:
5324:
5321:
5319:
5318:
5313:
5309:
5308:
5307:
5304:
5300:
5296:
5292:
5288:
5280:
5277:
5274:
5272:
5267:
5264:
5259:Africell page
5254:
5251:
5249:
5248:
5242:
5241:
5240:
5239:
5235:
5231:
5226:
5224:
5221:
5215:
5205:
5202:
5200:
5199:
5194:
5193:
5192:
5191:
5186:
5180:
5172:
5161:
5158:
5154:
5150:
5146:
5142:
5128:
5125:
5123:
5119:
5115:
5111:
5107:
5103:
5093:
5090:
5086:
5082:
5078:
5074:
5067:
5053:
5049:
5045:
5041:
5040:
5039:
5035:
5031:
5026:
5025:
5024:
5023:
5019:
5015:
5011:
5000:
4997:
4995:
4994:
4988:
4987:
4986:
4985:
4981:
4977:
4955:
4951:
4947:
4944:
4940:
4936:
4935:
4934:
4931:
4930:
4922:
4918:
4917:
4916:
4912:
4908:
4904:
4901:
4900:
4899:
4896:
4895:
4887:
4881:
4876:
4875:
4874:
4870:
4866:
4861:
4860:
4859:
4856:
4855:
4847:
4846:
4845:
4842:
4841:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4828:
4826:
4825:
4820:
4815:
4814:
4813:
4812:
4809:
4808:
4797:
4791:
4790:
4786:
4782:
4778:
4774:
4758:
4755:
4753:
4752:
4746:
4745:
4744:
4741:
4738:
4733:
4732:
4731:
4728:
4726:
4725:
4720:
4719:
4718:
4717:
4714:
4711:
4707:
4693:
4692:
4688:
4684:
4678:
4677:
4674:
4671:
4668:
4663:
4653:
4650:
4648:
4647:
4641:
4640:
4639:
4638:
4634:
4630:
4626:
4621:
4611:
4610:
4607:
4603:
4602:
4601:election page
4597:
4593:
4581:
4578:
4576:
4575:
4570:
4569:
4568:
4567:
4564:
4560:
4550:
4547:
4543:
4539:
4535:
4531:
4524:
4520:
4515:
4510:Redirect page
4507:
4506:
4502:
4498:
4494:
4484:
4483:
4480:
4478:
4473:
4471:
4466:
4457:
4454:
4451:
4448:
4445:
4442:
4439:
4436:
4433:
4432:nuke contribs
4430:
4427:
4424:
4421:
4418:
4415:
4409:
4400:G11 - spambot
4397:
4396:
4393:
4389:
4378:
4375:
4373:
4372:
4366:
4365:
4364:
4363:
4359:
4355:
4351:
4337:
4334:
4333:
4325:
4320:
4319:
4316:
4312:
4308:
4304:
4300:
4296:
4292:
4291:
4290:
4287:
4285:
4284:
4279:
4278:
4277:
4276:
4272:
4268:
4264:
4252:
4249:
4247:
4246:
4241:
4240:
4239:
4238:
4234:
4230:
4226:
4222:
4218:
4214:
4207:
4202:
4201:
4197:
4193:
4190:
4187:
4185:
4178:
4174:
4171:
4168:
4165:
4163:
4159:
4155:
4152:
4151:
4147:
4146:
4139:
4135:
4131:
4127:
4124:
4123:
4122:
4121:
4120:
4119:
4118:
4115:
4114:
4111:
4109:
4108:
4103:
4097:
4096:
4092:
4088:
4079:
4078:
4077:
4076:
4075:
4072:
4071:
4067:
4063:
4059:
4058:
4055:
4052:
4049:
4046:
4043:
4040:
4035:
4034:
4028:
4025:
4020:
4016:
4014:
4010:
4000:
3999:
3995:
3991:
3982:
3981:
3980:
3979:
3976:
3973:
3971:
3970:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3961:
3958:
3956:
3955:
3950:
3945:
3944:
3940:
3936:
3931:
3927:
3919:
3918:
3914:
3910:
3906:
3902:
3890:
3887:
3885:
3884:
3879:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3872:
3866:
3862:
3849:
3842:
3835:
3820:
3816:
3812:
3808:
3804:
3803:
3802:
3798:
3794:
3790:
3789:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3771:
3766:
3763:
3761:
3760:
3755:
3754:
3753:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3740:
3736:
3735:
3730:
3726:
3722:
3718:
3717:
3716:
3713:
3711:
3710:
3704:
3703:
3702:
3701:
3697:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3678:
3671:
3668:
3666:
3665:
3659:
3658:
3657:
3656:
3652:
3648:
3637:
3634:
3630:
3626:
3622:
3618:
3608:
3607:
3603:
3599:
3594:
3590:
3585:Page deleted?
3582:
3581:
3577:
3573:
3568:
3564:
3559:Page deleted?
3554:
3551:
3549:
3548:
3543:
3542:WP:REFUND/G13
3539:
3538:
3537:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3518:
3504:
3503:
3499:
3495:
3486:
3483:
3481:
3480:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3465:
3461:
3457:
3456:
3445:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3425:
3422:
3418:
3417:
3412:
3411:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3391:
3388:
3386:
3382:
3378:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3360:
3357:
3354:
3351:
3347:
3344:
3340:
3339:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3326:
3323:
3321:
3320:
3315:
3311:
3310:WP:COPYOTHERS
3307:
3306:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3299:
3294:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3265:
3262:
3259:
3255:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3240:
3225:
3222:
3220:
3219:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3194:
3190:
3186:
3182:
3171:
3168:
3166:
3165:
3160:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3133:
3121:
3118:
3116:
3115:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3094:
3092:
3087:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3076:
3071:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3059:
3055:
3039:
3036:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3027:
3025:
3024:
3019:
3016:
3015:
3014:
3011:
3005:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2997:
2993:
2989:
2988:Bumblebee9999
2979:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2955:
2949:
2948:
2945:
2940:
2934:
2930:
2923:
2916:
2912:
2909:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2901:
2897:
2894:
2882:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2866:
2861:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2839:
2828:
2827:
2824:
2823:
2818:
2814:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2748:
2746:
2745:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2727:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2591:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2577:
2574:
2569:
2567:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2539:
2534:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2504:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2477:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2463:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2427:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2414:
2409:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2353:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2320:
2317:
2315:
2314:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2294:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2282:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2250:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2195:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2174:
2163:
2162:
2159:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2147:
2141:
2136:
2125:
2121:
2118:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2098:
2096:
2095:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2060:
2059:
2054:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2021:
2018:
2016:
2015:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1995:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1959:
1947:
1944:
1942:
1941:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1930:
1926:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1908:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1891:
1890:contributions
1886:
1882:
1878:
1871:Page deletion
1866:
1863:
1861:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1807:
1804:
1799:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1783:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1773:
1769:
1764:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1733:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1699:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1664:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1639:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1621:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1587:
1582:
1576:
1569:
1568:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1554:
1544:
1541:
1539:
1538:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1477:
1473:
1463:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1434:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1414:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1315:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1255:Katiealbright
1252:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1241:Brandiperkins
1238:
1231:
1230:Brandiperkins
1225:
1224:
1221:
1213:
1206:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1099:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1026:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1007:
1003:impression.--
1001:
1000:
999:
996:
994:
993:
988:
983:
982:
981:
977:
973:
969:
964:
959:
958:
957:
954:
952:
951:
945:
944:
943:
942:
938:
934:
930:
925:
921:
920:
909:
908:
905:
902:
895:
878:
877:
876:
872:
868:
863:
857:
853:
848:
842:
838:
834:
830:
829:
828:
825:
823:
822:
817:
813:
809:
808:
807:
806:
802:
798:
793:
785:
781:
777:
773:
768:
764:
759:
755:
751:
747:
742:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
712:
709:
706:
701:
693:
691:
687:
683:
679:
665:
662:
660:
655:
653:
648:
642:
641:
640:
637:
635:
634:
628:
627:
626:
625:
622:
620:
615:
613:
608:
602:
592:
585:
582:
580:
579:
574:
569:
568:
567:
564:
562:
561:
555:
554:
553:
551:
547:
543:
539:
536:
532:
528:
515:
511:
505:
500:
497:
493:
492:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
445:
442:
440:
439:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
388:
381:
374:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:50.121.48.234
340:
337:
333:
332:
320:
316:
312:
311:Blackknight12
307:
306:
305:
302:
297:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
275:Blackknight12
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
238:
237:
234:
230:
223:
218:
211:
208:
203:
197:
194:
190:
189:
179:
176:
174:
173:
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
157:
145:
142:
140:
139:
133:
132:
131:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:Nikki Galrani
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
88:
85:
83:
82:
77:
74:
73:
72:
68:
58:
53:
52:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
19:
5803:
5787:Gerda Arendt
5772:
5770:
5760:Gerda Arendt
5757:
5741:
5740:
5712:
5674:
5641:
5624:— Preceding
5613:
5597:
5565:— Preceding
5553:
5537:
5519:
5499:
5455:
5451:
5436:
5429:
5425:
5399:
5380:
5362:
5346:Lulucylulucy
5335:
5316:
5291:Lulucylulucy
5285:— Preceding
5281:
5278:
5275:
5268:
5265:
5262:
5246:
5227:
5216:
5213:
5197:
5167:
5139:— Preceding
5134:
5126:
5099:
5071:— Preceding
5063:
5008:
4992:
4972:
4942:
4938:
4925:
4920:
4890:
4850:
4836:
4823:
4803:
4800:
4770:
4750:
4723:
4703:
4680:
4672:
4645:
4623:
4620:Raymond88824
4617:
4600:
4589:
4573:
4557:Glad to see
4556:
4553:Welcome back
4528:— Preceding
4516:
4513:
4495:. Cheers.
4490:
4476:
4469:
4464:
4452:
4446:
4440:
4434:
4428:
4422:
4416:
4403:
4386:
4370:
4347:
4327:
4303:WP:NGRIDIRON
4282:
4260:
4257:Antonio Clay
4244:
4213:Antonio Clay
4210:
4182:
4172:
4166:
4161:
4153:
4116:
4106:
4098:
4085:
4073:
4060:
4036:
4029:
4021:
4017:
4006:
3988:
3968:
3953:
3946:
3932:
3928:
3925:
3898:
3882:
3858:
3811:Demiurge1000
3779:Demiurge1000
3758:
3744:Demiurge1000
3708:
3683:
3681:
3663:
3643:
3615:— Preceding
3609:
3595:
3591:
3588:
3569:
3565:
3562:
3546:
3515:— Preceding
3510:
3491:
3478:
3458:
3453:
3415:
3367:
3337:
3318:
3297:
3266:
3264:Thank you,
3263:
3260:
3256:
3238:
3235:
3217:
3179:
3163:
3129:
3113:
3095:
3088:
3085:
3074:
3051:
3022:
2985:
2958:
2933:WP:NOLYMPICS
2926:
2888:
2869:
2834:
2820:
2810:
2743:
2725:
2721:
2597:
2578:
2572:
2570:
2563:
2502:
2483:
2464:
2430:
2412:
2380:— Preceding
2359:
2339:Real MD Asif
2336:
2312:
2298:MbahGondrong
2280:
2266:MbahGondrong
2248:
2233:MbahGondrong
2230:
2193:
2169:
2154:
2151:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2116:
2093:
2078:Stuartyeates
2049:
2031:
2013:
1999:JamesBWatson
1993:
1971:JamesBWatson
1965:
1955:
1939:
1922:
1906:
1884:
1879:in January)
1876:
1874:
1858:
1839:EmilyREditor
1832:
1818:EmilyREditor
1808:
1781:
1766:— Preceding
1759:
1697:
1669:— Preceding
1666:Thank you.
1665:
1662:
1646:
1635:
1619:
1597:
1563:
1536:
1521:JamesBWatson
1515:
1508:
1480:— Preceding
1469:
1442:
1415:? Thanks! --
1395:Ugog Nizdast
1388:
1373:
1370:A10 criteria
1357:
1335:
1332:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1284:
1261:
1247:
1237:your message
1234:
1202:
1166:
1137:
1113:
1097:
1078:
1060:
1047:
1029:
1005:
991:
949:
947:relevant. --
928:
918:
917:
915:
900:
891:
820:
738:
710:
675:
658:
651:
646:
632:
618:
611:
606:
598:
590:
577:
559:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
474:Ottawahitech
455:
437:
397:
288:Hi Anthony.
244:
226:
216:
171:
153:
137:
135:actresses?--
114:
80:
30:
5687:Re: Gilliam
5439:de:Bannwald
5432:User:Zaxevi
5228:scottsdesk
4976:Bladesmulti
4497:Dirtlawyer1
4408:LucieAllman
4307:Dirtlawyer1
4299:WP:NCOLLATH
4267:Dirtlawyer1
4263:media guide
4229:Magnolia677
4192:Bladesmulti
2969:Peter James
2911:(talk tome)
2896:(talk tome)
2872:Peter James
2787:Leprof 7272
2772:Leprof 7272
2757:Leprof 7272
2739:Anne Delong
2699:Leprof 7272
2684:Leprof 7272
2670:Anne Delong
2666:Leprof 7272
2640:Leprof 7272
2619:Leprof 7272
2603:Leprof 7272
2544:Jonpatterns
2523:Jonpatterns
2487:Jonpatterns
2437:hermit crab
1732:Newyorkbrad
1212:PD-old-text
678:Ben Chapman
472:. Thanks, X
247:discussions
229:Geledi clan
222:Geledi clan
37:Sheila Bird
5810:Shearonink
5409:Hammersoft
5244:neither.--
5230:Scottsdesk
4946:Swamifraud
4907:Swamifraud
4880:Swamifraud
4865:Swamifraud
4450:block user
4444:filter log
4392:--jpgordon
4387:Regarding
4368:allowed.--
4354:Farha Zeba
4156:- 2 other
4087:Swamifraud
4062:Swamifraud
3990:Swamifraud
3935:Swamifraud
3909:Margin1522
3684:supposedly
3647:Beeblebrox
3521:Fisherarch
3293:WP:COPYVIO
2847:Jim Carter
1895:kelapstick
1604:Jackmcbarn
1486:Kitwalkerr
1420:HairedGirl
1408:Hi Anthony
1393:. Thanks,
1220:kelapstick
672:Formatting
509:reply here
423:Dougweller
5571:CAKrutesh
5556:CAKrutesh
5393:Block of
5365:Vipdus123
4563:Acalamari
4534:Maromania
4456:block log
4295:WP:BEFORE
4130:Swamiblue
4037:Sources:
3949:archiving
3865:Dreadstar
3308:Possibly
3203:Sepsis II
3185:Sepsis II
3035:Acalamari
3018:Acalamari
3010:Acalamari
2885:Grfr12345
2822:Marianian
2571:Even so,
2467:Invertzoo
2453:Invertzoo
2173:WP:ARBMAC
2104:Moved to
1958:this edit
1929:Acalamari
1580:you rang?
1297:Gogo Dodo
1269:Gogo Dodo
901:INeverCry
630:credit.--
538:Best, Ed
408:IRWolfie-
33:User:Czar
5705:You can
5616:dputgr11
5579:contribs
5567:unsigned
5342:Africell
5331:Africell
5299:contribs
5287:unsigned
5164:Gordonap
5153:contribs
5145:Gordonap
5141:unsigned
5085:contribs
5073:unsigned
4542:contribs
4530:unsigned
4420:contribs
4217:this log
3933:Regards
3846:You can
3629:contribs
3617:unsigned
3589:Hello,
3563:Hello,
3529:contribs
3517:unsigned
3349:content?
2938:Canadian
2908:Aneditor
2893:Aneditor
2849:through
2807:Garr1984
2581:Aichonic
2573:strictly
2394:contribs
2386:Suman888
2382:unsigned
2157:Elassint
2120:contribs
2110:RHaworth
2046:Auckland
1835:this one
1683:contribs
1671:unsigned
1494:contribs
1482:unsigned
1452:Sunuraju
1428:contribs
1380:see here
1338:Nanavati
1265:contribs
1251:contribs
1110:Adoption
963:Wikidata
924:Geca Kon
871:contribs
856:contribs
835:, maybe
801:contribs
735:RE: HHHH
595:Question
458:wp:admin
385:You can
5806:deleted
5775:Pumpkin
5715:Gilliam
5626:undated
5610:request
5359:request
5127:Thanks
5096:Jazyfko
5060:Eldhose
4629:Protonk
4625:future.
4514:Hello,
4465:///Euro
4169:- Never
3926:Hello,
3809:. :) --
3436:Crau999
3397:Crau999
3277:Crau999
3269:Crau999
2664:Hello,
2052:Schwede
1768:undated
1384:merging
1075:Oh oops
919:trashed
763:protect
758:history
647:///Euro
607:///Euro
542:Edlantz
464:citing
309:tact.--
156:Ben Ben
93:Edwardx
41:Edwardx
5800:Thanks
5649:demize
5470:Zaxevi
5112:, and
5044:Taketa
5030:Taketa
5014:Taketa
4886:WP:UAA
4819:WP:UAA
4332:jones
4324:WP:AfC
4223:, and
4162:public
3540:Go to
3380:entry.
3314:WP:DCM
3159:WP:SPI
2439:, not
1854:WP:AIV
1424:(talk)
1336:Daniel
972:Leutha
933:Leutha
767:delete
404:WP:ISU
5783:Prize
4781:Wgolf
4737:Witty
4710:Witty
4177:gurus
4158:gurus
3793:Bbb23
3721:Bbb23
3692:Bbb23
3413:Dear
3335:Dear
3236:Dear
2441:snail
1644:)".
1598:Does
1450:by --
1418:Brown
1082:Wgolf
1032:Bbb23
862:Trevj
847:Trevj
792:Trevj
784:views
776:watch
772:links
719:Iraag
345:in a
269:and
16:<
5814:talk
5791:talk
5785:, --
5764:talk
5719:talk
5620:talk
5575:talk
5560:talk
5526:talk
5488:Eric
5474:talk
5443:Eric
5413:talk
5369:talk
5350:talk
5295:talk
5234:talk
5214:hi!
5184:talk
5149:talk
5081:talk
5048:talk
5034:talk
5018:talk
4980:talk
4950:talk
4941:and
4926:Neil
4911:talk
4891:Neil
4888:. --
4869:talk
4851:Neil
4837:Neil
4804:Neil
4785:talk
4740:lama
4713:lama
4687:talk
4633:talk
4559:this
4538:talk
4501:talk
4438:logs
4414:talk
4358:talk
4311:talk
4271:talk
4233:talk
4196:talk
4134:talk
4091:talk
4066:talk
4013:BAPS
3994:talk
3939:talk
3913:talk
3861:this
3815:talk
3797:talk
3783:talk
3748:talk
3725:talk
3696:talk
3651:talk
3625:talk
3602:talk
3576:talk
3525:talk
3498:talk
3464:talk
3440:talk
3421:talk
3401:talk
3343:talk
3281:talk
3273:talk
3244:talk
3207:talk
3189:talk
3148:talk
3102:talk
3096:Matt
3086:Hi,
3058:talk
2992:talk
2973:talk
2943:Paul
2931:per
2876:talk
2855:talk
2843:here
2791:talk
2776:talk
2761:talk
2703:talk
2688:talk
2674:talk
2644:talk
2623:talk
2607:talk
2585:talk
2548:talk
2527:talk
2491:talk
2471:talk
2457:talk
2390:talk
2347:talk
2302:talk
2270:talk
2262:here
2237:talk
2215:talk
2211:Joy
2182:talk
2178:Joy
2114:talk
2082:talk
2003:talk
1975:talk
1843:talk
1822:talk
1742:talk
1719:talk
1679:talk
1608:talk
1525:talk
1490:talk
1456:talk
1448:here
1445:here
1399:talk
1355:. --
1342:talk
1301:talk
1273:talk
1259:talk
1245:talk
1228:Re:
1183:talk
1155:talk
1121:talk
1086:talk
1036:talk
976:talk
968:this
937:talk
867:talk
852:talk
841:HHhH
837:HHHH
814:and
812:HHHH
797:talk
780:logs
754:talk
750:edit
746:HHHH
723:talk
686:talk
546:talk
478:talk
427:talk
412:talk
355:talk
315:talk
279:talk
233:Neil
160:talk
125:talk
97:talk
76:Czar
62:czar
45:talk
5808:.
5779:Sky
5622:)
5340:of
4521:to
4470:Car
4328:Ron
4301:or
3312:or
2963:of
2343:BiH
2044:in
2001:" (
1973:" (
1756:RFA
1523:" (
1426:• (
1235:Re
989:.--
929:YOU
860:--
845:--
790:--
652:Car
612:Car
575:.--
406:).
300:man
295:Reh
206:man
201:Reh
5816:)
5793:)
5758:--
5721:)
5713:–
5672:--
5658:·
5581:)
5577:•
5528:)
5476:)
5415:)
5371:)
5352:)
5301:)
5297:•
5273:)
5236:)
5155:)
5151:•
5120:,
5116:,
5087:)
5083:•
5050:)
5036:)
5020:)
4982:)
4952:)
4913:)
4871:)
4787:)
4689:)
4635:)
4606:Ed
4544:)
4540:•
4503:)
4477:GT
4360:)
4313:)
4273:)
4235:)
4198:)
4136:)
4093:)
4068:)
3996:)
3966:--
3941:)
3915:)
3817:)
3799:)
3785:)
3750:)
3727:)
3698:)
3653:)
3631:)
3627:•
3604:)
3578:)
3531:)
3527:•
3500:)
3476:--
3466:)
3442:)
3403:)
3395:--
3345:),
3283:)
3267:--
3209:)
3201:,
3191:)
3150:)
3104:)
3060:)
2994:)
2975:)
2878:)
2857:)
2793:)
2778:)
2763:)
2705:)
2690:)
2676:)
2646:)
2625:)
2609:)
2587:)
2550:)
2529:)
2493:)
2473:)
2459:)
2396:)
2392:•
2349:)
2304:)
2272:)
2264:.
2239:)
2217:)
2209:--
2184:)
2176:--
2122:)
2084:)
2057:66
2005:)
1977:)
1904:--
1893:--
1845:)
1837:?
1824:)
1744:)
1721:)
1685:)
1681:•
1610:)
1527:)
1496:)
1492:•
1474:.
1458:)
1401:)
1344:)
1303:)
1275:)
1218:--
1215:}}
1209:{{
1185:)
1164:--
1157:)
1123:)
1088:)
1038:)
978:)
939:)
896:.
873:)
869:·
854:·
843:.
816:4H
803:)
799:·
782:|
778:|
774:|
770:|
765:|
761:|
756:|
752:|
725:)
688:)
659:GT
619:GT
557:--
548:)
480:)
429:)
414:)
357:)
317:)
292:.
281:)
265:,
261:,
257:,
253:,
162:)
127:)
99:)
47:)
5812:(
5789:(
5762:(
5717:(
5702:.
5662:)
5660:c
5656:t
5654:(
5618:(
5573:(
5558:(
5524:(
5472:(
5411:(
5367:(
5348:(
5293:(
5232:(
5187:)
5181:(
5147:(
5079:(
5046:(
5032:(
5016:(
4978:(
4948:(
4928:N
4909:(
4893:N
4882::
4878:@
4867:(
4853:N
4839:N
4806:N
4783:(
4685:(
4631:(
4536:(
4499:(
4458:)
4453:·
4447:·
4441:·
4435:·
4429:·
4423:·
4417:·
4412:(
4356:(
4330:h
4309:(
4269:(
4231:(
4194:(
4179:.
4132:(
4089:(
4064:(
3992:(
3937:(
3911:(
3870:☥
3843:.
3813:(
3795:(
3781:(
3746:(
3723:(
3694:(
3649:(
3623:(
3600:(
3574:(
3523:(
3496:(
3462:(
3438:(
3423:)
3419:(
3399:(
3341:(
3279:(
3271:(
3242:(
3205:(
3187:(
3146:(
3100:(
3056:(
3006::
3002:@
2990:(
2971:(
2874:(
2853:(
2789:(
2774:(
2759:(
2701:(
2686:(
2672:(
2642:(
2621:(
2605:(
2583:(
2546:(
2540::
2536:@
2525:(
2489:(
2469:(
2455:(
2388:(
2345:(
2300:(
2268:(
2235:(
2213:(
2180:(
2117:·
2112:(
2080:(
1997:"
1969:"
1841:(
1820:(
1740:(
1734::
1730:@
1717:(
1677:(
1606:(
1583:)
1577:(
1519:"
1488:(
1454:(
1430:)
1397:(
1340:(
1299:(
1271:(
1262:·
1257:(
1248:·
1243:(
1181:(
1153:(
1119:(
1084:(
1034:(
974:(
970:!
935:(
865:(
850:(
795:(
786:)
748:(
721:(
684:(
544:(
506:|
476:(
425:(
410:(
382:.
353:(
313:(
277:(
158:(
123:(
95:(
66:♔
43:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.