User talk:Bardsandwarriors

220:

your islands category would have all of the islands (and island subsets like archipelago) for the entire ocean. You can break it out however you think is best. I saw the islands listed in two places, in the Arctic Islands cateogry, and in the specific sea category. A lot of them are the dividing line between seas, so they would be in both. If you create a category like DeLong Islands, it would be in the Arctic Ocean and the specific sea as well. Does this strategy make sense? I'm certainly open to discussing it. I think the inconsistencies you have found were from before, before I started creating the sea categories, I put everything into the Arctic Ocean category. Now, as I'm going through, I'm replacing the Arctic Ocean cat with a more specific sea cat. One other thing I've done that touches the islands, the island categories (like DeLong) I've started populating with other things like landforms, explorers, etc. that are beyond the scope of the ocean/sea categories. Let me know what you think, and again, sorry for the delayed response.

103:- you will see a flurry of 4 edits (after along break with no editing) - 2 with an anonymous IP, followed by 2 signed by Aaron. I haven't encountered Aaron before. But this is very likely the same person, as it follows a pattern: he makes some edits, then realises he isn't logged in, then logs in to finish his work. There is nothing wrong with that. But his reasons for removing the pictures make no rational sense to me, and his other edits don't either. On a debatable issue, he should have opened it for discussion on the talk page. Taking high-handed unilateral decisions, on things that are debatable, strongly suggest he is not doing it for rational reasons. We will have to see if he replies. 1361:, you wrote "The corrugations run across the short dimension, from side to side." To my mind - assuming (of course) that there are two dimensions under consideration, one short and one long, at right angles to each other - "across the short dimension" is equivalent to "along the long dimension". My linguistic intuition suggests to me that you wouldn't have put it like that if that's what you meant. "From side to side" doesn't help me! For clarity, may I suggest "across the slab, perpendicular to its long dimension" (or similar, or vice versa)? (I hope that 'or vice versa' shows that I'm not just being difficult - I really don't know what you meant.) 236:- so that eg. Svalbard appears in both the category Svalbard and the category Artic Islands. This applies because not all islands can be classified into subcats for groups of islands, therefore all island main articles must also form a complete list within "Artic islands". Live and learn! With your agreement, I will sort them out. And thanks for the other comments, I agree with everything except putting islands into the Arctic Ocean - surely readers can follow the "Arctic islands" category link? 1240:), went so far as to deliberately remove references to the modern principal areas in numerous articles and replace them with the former counties, worded in such a way as to suggest that these represent the actual administrative units of Wales today (I can provided you with over a dozen examples of diffs which prove this if you wish). The people and places categories created for the old counties were not even, for the most part, accesible via the actual county categories, e.g. for Powys. 1011: 1897: 3340: 3294: 3248: 3106: 3052: 2489: 2284: 3158: 2940: 2867: 2774: 2387: 1147: 1512: 2737:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like 79:(an admin) thinks he is god, and can change whatever he pleases, on subjects he knows nothing about, without any consultation. His ruthlessness makes me suspect a POVPush (ie. pushing his own point of view, antipathetic to the movement; wikipedia should be neutral). I have also restored the list of external links that he deleted, and left a message on his talk page to get the name of the article changed back. 1991: 2133:(COTM) is now in template form to enable it to be streamlined across the Project, without having to be manually updated on each page. Don't worry if we've lost you at this point - the point is, it works! You can now nominate an article for COTM on the COTM page. The more sharp-eyed amongst you may well have noticed that the COTM at the moment is still that old fella, 215:

article Franz Josef Land inside category Franz Josef Land. But many of your recent changes have placed the main article back outside aswell, eg. Franz Josef Land in both Franz Josef Land, and Arctic islands. Should I revert your edits in those cases, or edit them back, or do you have an interesting strategy that I should take note of? 01:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

2745:, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- 2710:

of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --

637:

Hi -- I see that you're in some manner reorganizing categories for theatre-related articles, some of which I created. I don't have any objections, but I'd like to know what the prevalent philosophy is concerning assigning categories, so I do it correctly if I make more articles (which I plan to do).

148:

area. I added my two cents, as I agree with your point of view - it's correct, and objective. There is another who errantly believe's he's right, with a couple of others who simply (evidently) aren't well-travelled enough to realize how much in error their comments appear to the rest of the world.

21:

Hello. You're right, it isn't awful for a first draft. But first drafts require cleanup, that's why they're not final drafts. When I said it desperately required cleanup, I didn't mean to insult your contribution, and I'm sorry if it looked that way. It's just got a long way to go before it meets our

2255:

I agree, if they are the same; or it might be necessary to have 2 articles? Certainly "The Elenydd" or "The Cambrians" (in its narrow meaning) is how the range is locally known, and your suggestion would fit the categories better. But I don't know the exact extents of them, or how they might overlap

1227:

Hi, thanks for your message. The edits I've been making are part of an on-going overhaul of the Welsh people and place categories. A significant number of these were unilaterally created without prior consultation by two editors. They chose to base their categories on the so-called historic counties

737:

I've only worked intimately with one dance company, so I'm hardly an expert on that area, but I guess the equvalent of "play" in dance would be a "piece" or a "work". A number of pieces presented together would be a "concert". In the ballet world, the equivalent of "play" would be a "ballet". I'm

360:

As per our traditions here, all countries should be under each continent category, i.e. "islands of Italy" under "islands of Europe" etc. I have done it all yet. As for the Russian Lakes category now at CFD, relocate these articles as you suggested and I will then delete empty Russian Lakes category

292:

If we make "Marginal Seas of..." into a subcat of "Seas of...", it wouldn't be necessary to duplicate the subcats; but we could still duplicate the articles to make a full list in each "Seas of..." category. Currently the other oceans are inconsistent: Atlantic has it that way; Pacific and Indian do

276:

Marginal seas are a subset of seas, and the marginal seas category traces back to the Seas category and covers every ocean. Instead, let's put the marginal seas in both the marginal seas and the Seas of the Arctic Ocean category. This makes sense to me as being within the category guidelines. Agree?

133:

No problemo. Knowledge is full of vandals. Most are harmless - schoolkids having a laugh, or people passing through and thinking they know better. But some are jerks with issues, eg. you might find some christians or moslems objecting to your style on religious grounds. Also small-minded people with

116:

Thank you for restoring my skirt pictures. I did some checking and found that it was a different IP address that removed them this time. I went ahead and left a note in the talk page for each of the two IP addresses to please do not remove my pictures unless you leave a note in the talk page for the

64:

Just to let you know, some anonymous user took out both of my pictures, saying in the summary line that they were not appropriate for men's skirts, or something like that. I re-inserted the pictures. I feel that as I have seen men wear skirts like the ones that I made; as well as having sold several

2709:

we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts

2067:

If you're stuck on what to do to help us then a list of the most important tasks is now available on the main page. At the moment, the list is looking a little short so if you have found something that you think ought to be added, then feel free to edit the list and let us know. Please refrain from

1247:

intact as it is in itself a valid list to which I take no great objection as such. But, and maybe I'm being too generous: the list was originally by modern principal areas and was changed to the former counties, again without consultation (at least there's nothing on the discussion pages). I intend

436:

I don't know how many yet, as many of the articles are still improperly classified. Maybe a few dozen? But there may be 100s or 1000s in the world which do not have articles yet. For consistency, I accept your implied argument: we should have "Islands in lakes" and "Islands in rivers". Or we should

2850:

is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for

704:

Having said that, I have probably made some mistakes; and sometimes I am making temporary decisions, to be refined later into more precise categories. So feel free to move things again where they seem wrong. There are some which I am unsure about, eg. what is the Dance equivalent of a "Play" - are

249:

It all sounds good. I've not been clear about putting islands into the Arctic Ocean. I did that first, before I added the seas cats, and before you created the Arctic islands category. I agree with you completely that no island should appear in the Arctic Ocean category, and as I'm working through

219:

Sorry it has taken me so long to respond, I just found your note. First, I really like the Arctic Islands category, and other oceans have something similar (more like Islands of the xx ocean). Here is the strategy I have had in mind (which I might not have executed correctly). I was thinking that

199:

I have no idea what you are talking about. I'm working on a project to populate the Arctic Ocean category, and I've been placing articles and categories in all of its subcategories, including the Arctic islands category. I've never spoken to you about this project, and didn't know until right now

231:

Thanks for the reply. In my fervour to sort everything out, I may have been a bit hasty and/or over-assertive in places. I've fully read the wiki help articles on categories now, and the 'exceptions' to the parent-child non duplication rule are applicable. I need to put back some of my changes -

89:

I do need to mention, Bard, that the edit to remove my pictures was from an anonymous user (an IP address). I don't know if it was Aaron, using a public terminal such as an Icafe, or someone else. No one left me anything in my talk page, nor the talk page for the article. From you experience, if

2583:

under development which you might be able to contribute to. Lonely Planet rated the coast of Wales "the best region on Earth" in 2012, yet there is a very low number of articles on the history and culture of places along the Coastal Path and the many and various activities and attractions. This

214:

But since we are introduced now - I have been working on cleaning up the 'islands' categories, and would appreciate a discussion on the best protocols for organising them. In Arctic Islands, for instance, I had got almost all articles categorised inside the subcats organised by archipelago, eg.

2855:

from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your

2879:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

250:

the seas (still not done), I'm replacing the Arctic ocean cat on the island article with the appropriate sea cat. You can do that replacement as well. I don't know if we have all of the sea cats created yet, so you may have to create a sea category to move an island from Arctic Ocean.

2952:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

134:

similar issues, who think it is 'perverted' or some old rubbish. Pushing points of view like that are strictly not allowed in wikipedia, but it happens. Best thing is to just revert the changes (look at history page; hit 'diff' to compare pages; hit 'undo') and think no more of it!

533:

I notice you making bulk changes to the organization of the islands. I would strongly suggest discussing the organization first, rather than making changes with having a consensus on what the changes should be. We have not heard anything about your proposed changes here

1433: 499:

As we are posing questions which we cannot resolve, I am happy to join those projects and discuss it there. I will refer them to this discussion, if you agree. However, that may not solve consistency issues, as each project may give different answers. Please advise!

2786:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1658:

as "Musical instruments by key". I don't have any opinion either way about that (partly because I know little about the topic!), but if you think it would be more a more appropriate name, then please feel free to nominate it for renaming by tagging

2310:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

2515:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2741:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like 2042:

As mentioned above, the WikiProject has recently undergone a spring-clean and we're excited about it! If you don't mind - we'd like to take this opportunity to explain some of the features and generally show off about it a little.

986:

My blanking edit was titled as followed: "(removed crosspost by Bishonen. Please do not crosspost. A simple note is sufficient.)". This is the trouble with crosspoasting - debates can get out of synch. I decided to reply to you on

515:

Sure, refer them here. Discuss lakes in Lakes project and rivers in Rivers project. Consensus should be reached to make whole issue consistent. Our mutual goal is the same, to make better encyclopedia. I gotta go now. Bye bye. -

727:

Thanks for the explanation, it sounds good to me. The only change I've made so far was to put Prince Music Theatre back into the Music Theatre category, since they're a specialized company that only does various kinds of music

2029:

Finally, a warning - the new-look WikiProject is still having the finishing touches put on it. If you find something that doesn't work, you don't agree with or is just plain missing, please don't hesitate to let us know on the

372:

Agreed, Darwinek. You may notice I have made a vast number of changes to the categories for Islands, and I freely admit to making a few poor decisions amongst them, aiming to clear them up later. See also my reply to you in

322:

Hey guy, I haven't been online for a couple days. I'm indexing a book this week, and it is so tedious that I don't have any brain power left for the Arctic Ocean (LOL). I'll check in with you when I'm back, probably Monday.

738:

not sure how useful that information will be to you. Although "ballet" is a fairly stable category, similar to "play", I don't know if "piece" or "work" carries that same importance, at least in terms of categorization.

938: 2519:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

2314:

2664:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 267:, and moving all seas into "Seas of the Arctic Ocean". Reason: currently the reader needs to look in 2 places instead of one, and may not think of looking 2 places; and I see no special reason to split them up. 1810: 1542: 1531: 1523: 1505: 1113:. "Weaving", like others such as "Knitting" and "Spinning", is now reserved for general articles about weaving processes, issues, equipment, etc. You may notice that it doesn't contain any fabrics, except for 1710: 3308: 3284: 1587: 3262: 2060:

Every page on the WikiProject now has the official WikiProject navigation menu so you can easily flick between pages and get back to the main project page. Say goodbye to clicking the back button several

1866: 3253: 3239: 3238: 1766: 3354: 350:, which contains lists of countries. I have been populating "Islands by continent" in a different way, although only tentatively, while wondering if it should be there at all. What are your thoughts? 3187:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2964:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2891:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2798:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1801: 1793: 1579: 2137:. That's because no-one has nominated a COTM for this month (being a new feature an' all...) so we've decided to leave it as it is for this month until a new one has been democratically voted for. 1701: 1693: 3345: 3331: 3330: 1255:

Hope that answers your query, which I can quite understand. You'll find more on this question of 'people and places' and the apparent political agenda behind it at the bottom of my Talk page.

2852: 1843: 388:

OK, then move 'em. I assume your good faith, you have just made some wrong moves but this can happen when you do such a huge task. Next I wanna talk with you about "Islands by river" cat. -

1743: 1651: 1615: 1573: 1458: 400: 1503: 1270:

Thanks for your reply and sorry for taking so long to answer. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Let me know if there are any problems (not everything's recategorised yet). Cheers,

2552: 3203: 3122: 2980: 2907: 2814: 1791: 3096: 3068: 3042: 1834: 1691: 1440: 210:

You are right. I had the idea that you were someone else, and I don't know why I thought that. I will delete my question from your talk page if you like.01:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

792:

Appreciate you organizing the theatre categories but when you shift an entry to a category which has no content or other entries, you might want to reconsider what you are doing.

3172: 1734: 2156:

on the WikiProject page. If (like most of the old WikiProject) this information is out of date and you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the

2550:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 979: 3279: 2329:

Your tone and attacking comments on the AfD are uncalled-for. I don't think you do yourself any good with that kind of attitude, and suggest that you refactor your comments.

1629:

However, just for future reference, whwn you want to delete a page you have created it's most helpful all round if you make your intentions clear by tagging such a page with

3325: 2478: 1555:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

1090: 2496: 2480: 2432: 1601: 3371: 233: 2546: 1568: 2512: 1427: 309: 182: 178: 154: 2145:

Thanks very much for reading down this far - hopefully future newsletters won't be this long! Please, if you can, invite new members and drop us a line over at the

337:

Hello. Please, make sure your contributions are consistent. You created "Islands of Asia" cat but didn't include subcategories to it. I have now made it for you. -

3145: 3091: 891:

Ezeu - Right near the end of the page, I've backed up JJay in his little debate with JzG, by adding a parallel reply. -?? :) It isn't meant to be a reply to JJay.

2832: 2237:- and it would be a great deal more geographically precise. What do you think? Obviously the article text would need to be changed around a bit, and expanded. 2234: 1926:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 1132:

Thanks for your note. I'm in obsessive mode myself, which probably means that temporary burnout (at least on this project) can't be far behind. See you soon. -

677:

There seems to be an accepted hierarchy for geographical categories. For instance, if I am moving a theatre company "X Theatre" in "A town" - the categories are -

2598: 1545:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 1252:. All this work on the categories, still incomplete, has taken a considerable amount of time and I just have not got round to doing it yet. Please bear with me. 991:

instead. Please make your point over there. If you would like to copy your reply over there, edited as you choose, I will blank this section to avoid confusion.

1886: 399:"Islands by river" already existed when I tackled the Islands. However it seems reasonable to me. What are you concerns? Also: I disagree with speedy-rename of 2535: 2394: 2380: 1786: 293:

not; Southern does neither, and has no Marginals cat. Note that "Marginal Seas" is a subcat of "Seas". However, I am straying onto your territory here (pun).

3005: 2998: 2925: 40:

Bards: Thanks for the note! I did add a couple of images of male skirts that I have designed and constructed. I will be adding more as I make more skirts. --

2584:

promises to be an exciting project as it gathers momentum with many Users joining in. Let's make this WikiProject, like the path itself, the best on earth!

452: 2847: 2840: 748: 639: 51: 1475: 663:, and move them into relevant subcategories, or sometimes (if appropriate) out of the theatre hierarchy. I want to end up with a good list of articles in 504: 465: 441: 407: 381: 297: 3037: 2742: 2719: 2693: 2370: 2273: 1644: 849: 3022:. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at 2638: 2343: 2291: 2275: 1187:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 779: 762: 718: 2338: 2324: 856: 2758: 2730: 2473: 2375: 1592:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

3230: 2208: 414:

I would like better something like "Islands on the rivers" and without subcategories. Honestly, how much islands on the rivers do we have here... -

281: 271: 254: 240: 2307: 1686: 827: 805: 796: 2265: 1385: 995: 520: 488: 418: 392: 365: 2763: 1640: 1203:

to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add

1121: 583: 553: 461:

However, there may be proper geographical terms for "Islands in rivers/lakes" which I am not aware of. Is there an expert on this at wikipedia?

2130: 2069: 2024: 1376:

I had some trouble phrasing that sentence. Perhaps "The corrugations usually run parallel to the shortest side" would be easier to understand?

1079:

and put it back. If you have a good reason for removing it, please do so but just say why in the edit summary. Kind regards and happy editing.

138: 107: 83: 58: 2349: 2172: 2161: 925: 908: 895: 224: 2178: 1413: 1322: 1296: 621: 612: 1279: 2752: 427: 3299: 3285: 2593: 1606: 1244: 1639:. Use of that tag rather than blanking the page has a number of useful consequences, one of which is that the page shows up promptly in 1045: 476:

I am afraid it ain't here. However, we have various WikiProjects concentrating on several issues here. You can ask for help etc. there,

2932: 2859: 2082: 2020: 264: 2856:

participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

2054:

amongst us may wish to know that the precise names of the colours we use are: "lightblue" for headings and "#c0e0e0" for backgrounds).

3062:, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the 2618: 2501: 2296: 1966: 1453: 1217: 54:

aswell. Once we get 1 or 2 more in other styles aswell, we'll choose your best one and just have that there - if that's ok with you.

2246: 2574: 573: 867:

Oops, I didn't intend to remove the picture, sorry I got a bit carried away when snipping that section. Feel free to add it back.

2569: 2068:

linking to a specific article that generally needs an overall update. Single articles like this should be nominated for a future

1961: 1583: 2157: 2153: 1556: 1422: 1347: 653: 189: 3150: 2724: 2698: 2643: 2453: 1192: 1141: 1061: 2839: 1826: 1311: 1264: 172: 35: 2738: 2614: 2611:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2184: 2146: 2031: 1726: 1681: 1486: 1233: 26: 2013:

Hello and welcome to this, the first ever edition of the WikiProject Stagecraft Newsletter! If you haven't been over to the

817: 354: 3226: 2994: 2921: 2828: 2715: 2689: 1643:. Just blanking it is a less explicit and less prominent form of request, which AFAIK doesn't show up anywhere except in 1033: 944: 158: 1083: 542: 3359: 3313: 3267: 3127: 3073: 3019: 2557: 2215: 1463: 1184: 842: 757: 648: 559: 327: 204: 150: 1498: 2676:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2225:

I've not been happy with the title of that article for some time. Do you think it would make more sense to move it to

1445: 1370: 1291: 1026: 955:

happened? And you take no responsibility because it was all somebody elses's fault...? I'll bring your practices up on

595: 3018:

may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the

1814: 1647:... and that page is not regularly watched (until I started patrolling it in December, it was massively backlogged). 1391: 1316: 403:. I have posted my reasons in the speedy-rename list, but I am not sure if that is the right place to talk about it. 315: 1714: 341: 2540: 2204: 2109: 2085:. Whilst we were going through we also noticed one was missing. We have now added the new template in the form of: 2050:

All pages on the WikiProject now use two consistent shades of blue as part of the new streamlined interface (Those

1999: 1976: 1859: 1822: 1660: 1655: 1168: 594:

Hello, Bards - I see you have been categorizing various stitches - would you be interested in formally joining the

579:

ok ;) I thought you had created an article cwith that title, and had it deleted. I thought it sounded quite funny!

127: 94: 69: 44: 1806: 1759: 1722: 3222: 2990: 2917: 2824: 2711: 2685: 2457: 1706: 1449: 1285: 1196: 1172: 1001: 871: 535: 3116:

has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

602: 2734: 2706: 2699: 1891: 1160: 2125:

Ok, so this isn't exactly a new feature. It's always been there but has never really been updated on a, ahem,

1025:

I am proud to present you with this cross-stitched barnstar for Taxonomy Above and Beyond the Call of Duty in

2603:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2017:

lately then you're missing out - the whole thing has undergone a complete makeover - see below for more info!

1847: 1136: 823:

Thank you for the compliment :) Just a few dozen more to go now, and it will all be smart and shipshape...!

3196: 2973: 2900: 2807: 2093: 1865:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1765:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1747: 1222: 885: 481: 90:

Aaron makes a change, does he usually leave a comment in your talk page or the talk page of the article? --

2579:

I see you're a member of WikiProject Wales and have contributed to Welsh articles. There's a new project,

1855: 951:

error" and "imagined" things had happened, which 30 seconds study of the history would have shown you had

3208: 2985: 2912: 2819: 2746: 2681: 2445: 2398: 2376: 1942: 1878: 1839: 1818: 1778: 1755: 1164: 477: 347: 3352: