679:
have already said that the only place the
Canadian coat of arms may be used is in the Canadian Coat of Arms article, we are not allowed to display that image in the Monarchy of Canada article because the Coat of Arms is not vital to understanding the content of the article. So I removed the coat of arms holders within the infobox to stop displaying a fake image that no one had ever even added. Just because that capability exists within a template, does not mean they have to be present or filled. Displaying the wrong symbols of state in state articles is insulting to people from that state, and underminds the encyclopedia's credibility as a source. So I removed an image that was incorrectly appearing due to a Coat of Arms of Canada.svg redirect, and you added the incorrect image (Coat of Arms rendition) itself (or you undid me, and then Miesienical added the image itself, either way).
1061:
reliable. The reliability of a source is determined by the scientific community of the field. In the field of religious studies Amir
Arjomand books play no role, rather it represents the POV of the writer. The source that I used, instead, was an authentic and reliable one in religious studies. It was the first book written by a top scholar, Mohammad Tabatabi, specialized in Islamic studies and intended for western readership. It is a university textbook of its subject in the United States and the project resulting in writing the book backed by several American professors , such a Kenneth Morgan and Seyed Hossein Nasr, all in the field of religion studies.
1329:
292:
1417:
31:
515:
462:
Knowledge. It is forgivable for users putting disputed flag/coat of arms in the image section, but insisting to type words in that section while that polity doesn't have a flag at all…the name of that polity is rather short so it's possible to fit in those words for this case, but there are also plenty of articles that have long names, it's thus unfeasible to use words as representations, therefore the section should be left blank under universal practice.
664:"Monarchy of ..." articles always have the coat of arms in that position: it's part of the infobox template for monarchy articles. I don't see a difference between the version in the article and the version in the coat of arms article. If you do, I don't have a problem with you replacing it, but don't simply remove it. I didn't "add" it to the article, I undid your removal. Your explanation should be posted on the article talk page not here.
1286:
1170:
1216:
1119:
411:
good enough for the Stuart page! It seems quite nitpicky to me, but that's the original sin of
Knowledge, sigh. I can live with your compromise wording. Although it's worth noting that the parent House of Stuart itself passed through the female line numerous times prior to extinction! Michael David Plittman
850:, I've responded to both of you separately and I am awaiting a response. I don't believe any proper consensus was reached after reading the entire RFC and the cited sources multiple times. Furthermore, it doesn't solve the current issue of redundancy that I've brought up multiple times to different users.
997:
I knew that we all were in need of a referee, and I can't possibly thank you enough for being just that. I did as much discussing as I could towards what I thought was appropriate, constructive, and neutral/representative according to the sources. I then backed away from the article for a bit. I know
881:
did not include the word "Iranic". Multiple sources have been cited to support the proposal which was adopted. As far as undue weight? You make a reasonable argument. But your edits must pass the consensus test. At this time, it seems that the current lead was considered the most fair, as it included
744:
2) Cease and desist your miserable, greedy, hateful, raping, incestuous, lying, thieving, murderous, perjuring conduct and get your ugly, fat ass into high gear to discuss, like an adult, improving the article and talk page "Prophecy of the Popes" you are vandalizing. Undo your vandalism there. The
876:
I fully appreciate where you are coming from. In the discussions on this article, I have always said that both sides have completely valid points. As it stands, however, there was an in-depth discussion on this topic, with many people contributing, some who shared your view, but the proposed lead by
678:
The image in the infobox was 'Arms of Canada.svg'. That image was deleted and redirected to 'Arms of Canada rendtion.svg' from what I can tell. So, the actual arms used to be there, until the image was deleted as a copyright violation and redirected to this user-made interpretation. Since the admins
410:
None dispute the extinction of the house of Stuart. I DO find it odd that
Knowledge's own page for the House of FitzJames ( a house the Duke of Alba evidently considers himself the continuation of, as he uses the name in preference to Iraujo)list the Duke as current head, but that is apparently not
648:
arms (the same file as used in the Arms of Canada wiki page) should be added to the monarchy of Canada page, and not images of random user renditions. The use of random "renditions" to portray the actual arms are misleading best case, and insulting to
Canadians in the worst. Thanks so much for your
394:
who should take it to the talk page. The article should not change until there is consensus support for the change. Secondly, the article is about the House of Stuart. The article states that the Royal House of Stuart is extinct, which is correct. As an additional piece of information, it notes the
734:
You will be destroyed on March 25, 2016 A.D. Until then, this shall include sixteen hours per day of pure terror beginning at the next hour and minute I took my first breath resurrected; the remaining eight hours carrying with it the promise that if you should ever show your cowardly countenance
112:
337:
DeCausa: I am well and truly aware of the Duke of Alba's Iraujo ancestry. He uses the name Fitz-James Stuart, he is by blood a
Fitzjames Stuart, as undoubted descendant of his mother,and so it seems bizarre to me to arbitrarily declare the the loine of the FitzJames has "ended". If you want to
693:
Please stop posting here - keeping it to the article talk page is much more efficient. I've posted there to explain you have a misunderstanding about any particular rendering of a coat of arms. No version of CoA has an inherently better claim to being "correct" provided it is compliant with the
1060:
and think it is just a POV. The text that you reverted to is mostly based on two books by Said Amir
Arjomand. He is not an authentic source in our subject matter. He is a socialogist with no degree in religious studies. The mere fact that something is in a book does not mean at all that it is
610:
works. I suggest that before you dabble in such a controversial area with a long
Knowledge history you get to understand policy better. The decision is what you need to look at, viz.: "we found that there was the strongest consensus to put a calligraphic depiction of Muhammad in the infobox".
1036:
This is totally off the cuff, and not really related to content. I just wanted to say that I admire you standing your ground against some of those editors who are intent on pushing their POV. I just randomly stumbled across you when reading the article on Roman naming conventions (which is a
1037:
fantastic article, by the way), and I have to say, between those who misunderstand policy, and even those launching personal attacks, I've seen you take it all in stride, rebuffing and educating others in a cool and calm manner. I'm impressed. That is all. Have an excellent day, my friend!
461:
In every single
Knowledge pages (except this one), the image sections of predecessing and sucessing polities would be left empty if it doesn't have an unanimous representation, or doesn't have a representation at all (like in this case). It is a universal common practice since the birth of
395:
male line descendants of illegitimate sons of Stuart kings. Had they not been illegitimate they would have been members of the House of Stuart. The 19th Duke of Alba would not - if every descendant of a Stuart king in the female line was to be mentioned it would be a very long list.
820:) attempted to change the wording to "Iranic." While that wording was definitely suggested by more than one editor, as far as I can tell that was not the phrasing that the RFC discussion agreed on. I have reverted it with a clear explanation in the edit summary. —
975:
Thank you DeCausa. This wasn't a particularly difficult close, by the way. Yes, Sharisna, you may not edit as if the RfC never took place: the essence of an RfC is that it expresses editorial consensus, and editing against that consensus is disruptive.
484:
I see that someone else has reverted you. What you should do now, if you want to pursue this, is open a thread on the article talk page and persude others to your view rather than reverting. If you revert again you could be seen as
998:
that not everyone is happy (as they never are, that's the nature of discussion), but the result of the RFC consensus seemed like a good compromise. I'm relieved to have this issue settled, at least for now. —
639:
article, it instead shows the proper Arms. Those fake/user rendition arms were added to the article by way of a redirect, ie that image was never purposefully added until now. If an image of the Arms are
708:
In
Canadian law, there is only one Coat of Arms of the Queen of Canada, the one that the Queen personally signed as "approved". Anything else is an interpretation without any legal basis.
130:
article, as well as the clarity and eloquence with which you articulated your position and proposal. We could never have enough editors like yourself helping on the project. Keep it up! —
523:
563:
you showed me shows that most contributors are in favor of an unveiled photo of Muhammad. If assigning a "+1" to "support", and a -1 to "oppose", option A has the largest tally.
729:
126:
Although the discussion is still underway, I wanted to show you my appreciation for the research and diplomacy that you have already contributed to the discussion on the
550:
338:
argue by some obscure legalism, take it to the talk page, dont just revert poor and incomplete and misleading genealogical assertions back into the article. Thanks!
1263:
1147:
760:
375:
352:
1177:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
1092:
214:
1364:
1317:
1201:
1064:
I won't call Amir Arjomand's writings about Islam a NPOV rather seriously biased POV and we should not feed people with POVs of non reliable source those.
598:
578:. This is despite that fact that, as with Muhammad, no one would know what these people looked like (and are definitely not likely to have been Caucasian).
1142:
1381:
479:
463:
280:
1293:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
519:
890:, with what you believe is correct, and once you gain a consensus of other editors which overrides the result of the RFC and current consensus,
776:
560:
450:
404:
502:
781:
So you can continue to hide the truth about the Whore of Babylon in Rome? I see how this works, DeCause--the Templars are after you, buddy.
717:
703:
688:
673:
1403:
1346:
1067:
Please note that I had kept the contents from Henry Corbin books who is recognized an authentic source in Islamic studies by the experts.
936:
909:
859:
305:
970:
206:
174:
1070:
I don't revert the text now and wait for your response. Hopefully we can come to some agreement on what is authentic and what is a POV.
1013:
620:
985:
957:
explains what to do. Essentially you need to first discuss it with Drmies and then if you're still not satisfied you need to take it to
806:
I'm sorry I've been out of pocket for a while, I just noticed that the RFC was closed, and your proposal was accepted. I also saw where
790:
360:
It is also well worth noting, sir,that wikipedia'sown article on the House of FitzJames lists the 19th Duke of Alba as current head.
230:
191:
that my issue was with their lack of consensus. Your suggestions and comments were exactly what I had hoped for. Thank you again. —
145:
219:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
1122:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
471:
1365:
426:
379:
356:
1294:
1258:
1046:
226:
223:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
1244:
1086:
949:
The RFC was closed by an admin who determined what the consensus was. If you want to challenge the conclusion reached by
752:
1359:
1280:
1164:
745:
title must be changed to "St. Malachy Prophecy". Unless you work with me as a peaceful adult, this is not an option.
418:
371:
348:
1342:
1077:
This is something for the article Talk page - don't post it here. And by the way, your source is religious POV only.
102:
545:
835:
327:
921:
Please note my comment above, and feel free to correct me if I am off base as to the result of the discussion. —
658:
1290:
1178:
1009:
932:
905:
831:
817:
541:
323:
202:
141:
961:. What you can't do is just say "it was wrong" and edit against the consensus, as determined in the closing.
594:
1480:
253:
165:
with that user but saw your measured, polite and patient responses which reminded me how things should be.
94:
1475:
1470:
1458:
1453:
1445:
456:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
1424:
1051:
38:
1372:
1276:
1269:
1235:
1206:
1160:
1153:
1105:
1098:
332:
1042:
954:
220:
1265:
1225:
1149:
1094:
756:
433:
Actually, that's incorrect, it never passed through the female line except on one occassion: to
422:
1252:
This is a great article. Well done, it was good to review and really interesting to read. —
1031:
467:
767:
What an enjoyable hobby Knowledge is! Loony tunes of West Chester, Pennsylvania is blocked.
748:
713:
684:
654:
582:
414:
367:
344:
8:
1399:
1335:
1328:
1313:
1197:
1138:
1082:
1038:
966:
878:
772:
699:
669:
616:
607:
498:
446:
400:
170:
882:
both points of view being discussed. If you feel there is an issue in the lead with the
390:. The way it works is that if you wish to change an article, and you are reverted it is
1322:
1005:
928:
901:
865:
855:
827:
811:
636:
537:
508:
438:
319:
198:
137:
1433:
798:
590:
276:
267:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
47:
17:
566:
In addition, the vast majority of pages for prophets have their picture. I refer to
981:
786:
285:
298:
291:
1113:
883:
709:
680:
650:
1432:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1389:
1376:
1354:
1309:
1304:
1253:
1239:
1193:
1188:
1174:
1134:
1129:
635:
page you allude to in your edit does not depict the rendition you added to the
632:
434:
184:
180:
162:
999:
944:
922:
895:
871:
851:
843:
821:
807:
531:
490:
387:
313:
238:
192:
156:
131:
1395:
1375:
for you as it got 5,884 hits the day your DYK hook as on the main page. —
1300:
1184:
1125:
1109:
1078:
962:
958:
916:
847:
768:
695:
665:
626:
612:
586:
494:
486:
442:
396:
272:
268:
166:
1104:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1056:
Hi DeCausa, I see that you reverted my edit in the historical section of
992:
977:
950:
782:
522:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
183:, especially when someone doesn't seem to be responsive to input. I got
887:
527:
1285:
111:
552:
259:
244:
735:
before me, I will rip your arms, legs, and head from your trunk.
575:
1238:
to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! —
1215:
1169:
644:
to a proper understanding of the topic, then the image of the
1057:
800:
571:
567:
341:
Michael David Plittman,B.A., Knight of the Golden Horseshoe
127:
1349:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1118:
308:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
886:
policy, then by all means, make your own proposal on the
187:
myself with that user, when I felt like I was explaining
741:
1) Tie a millstone around your neck and drown yourself.
606:
That's irrelevant. You don't seem to know how RFC's and
730:
Regarding Your Vandalism / Grand Larceny at Knowledge
304:Message added 04:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC). You can
694:blazon - which the disputed one in this case is.
520:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
437:, and even then he was still a Stuart albeit a
215:Disambiguation link notification for January 3
161:Thanks... but undeserved! I started out quite
1366:Knowledge:DYKSTATS/Archive 2014#December 2014
1334:Hello, DeCausa. You have new messages at
297:Hello, DeCausa. You have new messages at
1213:
1181:for things which need to be addressed.
14:
1430:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1173:. The article is close to meeting the
555:Calligraphic Representation in Infobox
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1411:
25:
526:.The discussion is about the topic
518:There is currently a discussion at
23:
1327:
290:
24:
1494:
524:Accusations of paid contributions
1415:
1284:
1234:For your contributions to bring
1214:
1168:
1117:
513:
110:
29:
959:the administrators' noticeboard
1291:Talk:Death of Benito Mussolini
1179:Talk:Death of Benito Mussolini
738:There are two other options :
179:It can be difficult not to be
13:
1:
761:14:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
718:02:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
704:22:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
689:20:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
674:07:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
659:23:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
599:14:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
561:appended Community discussion
207:01:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
175:22:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
146:19:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
621:15:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
546:07:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
503:12:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
472:10:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
254:History of the Baloch people
7:
1297:to appear in Did you know.
451:20:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
427:17:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
405:07:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
380:05:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
357:04:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
328:04:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
281:11:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
10:
1499:
1404:20:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
1382:11:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
1360:13:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
1343:13:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
1318:11:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
1259:10:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
1245:10:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
1202:19:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1143:11:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1087:13:21, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
1373:Death of Benito Mussolini
1277:Death of Benito Mussolini
1270:Death of Benito Mussolini
1236:Death of Benito Mussolini
1220:
1161:Death of Benito Mussolini
1154:Death of Benito Mussolini
1112:-status according to the
1106:Death of Benito Mussolini
1099:Death of Benito Mussolini
1047:05:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
1014:06:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
986:15:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
971:12:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
937:06:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
910:06:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
860:03:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
836:00:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
791:15:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
777:09:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
258:added a link pointing to
243:added a link pointing to
116:
109:
103:Another barnstar for you!
1167:has been placed on hold
894:make that replacement. —
649:time and understanding!
489:which is blockable. See
1332:
295:
1428:of past discussions.
1336:Calvin999's talk page
1331:
1299:Message delivered by
1183:Message delivered by
1175:good article criteria
1124:Message delivered by
294:
120:The Socratic Barnstar
42:of past discussions.
877:that was adopted by
269:opt-out instructions
221:disambiguation pages
1279:you nominated as a
1163:you nominated as a
888:article's talk page
457:Lordship of Ireland
1347:remove this notice
1333:
1108:you nominated for
1073:Best, Smhhalataei
1052:Editing Mahdi page
866:User talk:Josh3580
637:Monarchy of Canada
439:Stewart of Darnley
306:remove this notice
296:
229:• Join us at the
1486:
1485:
1440:
1439:
1434:current talk page
1307:
1250:
1249:
1207:Barnstar for You!
1191:
1132:
955:WP:CLOSECHALLENGE
763:
751:comment added by
602:
585:comment added by
429:
417:comment added by
382:
370:comment added by
359:
347:comment added by
333:FitzJames Stuarts
234:
151:
150:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:DeCausa
1490:
1467:
1442:
1441:
1419:
1418:
1412:
1393:
1379:
1357:
1350:
1298:
1288:
1256:
1242:
1218:
1211:
1210:
1182:
1172:
1123:
1121:
996:
948:
920:
875:
746:
642:absolutely vital
601:
579:
530:. Thank you. —
517:
516:
483:
412:
365:
342:
309:
224:
160:
114:
107:
106:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1498:
1497:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1463:
1416:
1387:
1377:
1369:
1355:
1351:
1340:
1325:
1303:, on behalf of
1273:
1254:
1240:
1209:
1187:, on behalf of
1157:
1128:, on behalf of
1102:
1054:
1034:
1012:
990:
942:
935:
914:
908:
869:
834:
804:
732:
629:
580:
557:
544:
514:
511:
477:
459:
335:
326:
310:
303:
288:
231:DPL WikiProject
217:
205:
154:
144:
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1496:
1484:
1483:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1448:
1438:
1437:
1420:
1409:
1407:
1406:
1368:
1363:
1341:Message added
1339:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1272:
1268:nomination of
1262:
1248:
1247:
1231:
1230:
1221:
1219:
1208:
1205:
1156:
1152:nomination of
1146:
1101:
1097:nomination of
1091:
1090:
1089:
1053:
1050:
1039:Quinto Simmaco
1033:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1004:
927:
900:
826:
803:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
731:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
633:Arms of Canada
628:
625:
624:
623:
556:
549:
536:
510:
507:
506:
505:
458:
455:
454:
453:
435:James VI and I
408:
407:
386:Firstly, read
362:
334:
331:
318:
302:
289:
287:
284:
265:
264:
263:
262:
250:
249:
248:
247:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
197:
149:
148:
136:
123:
122:
117:
115:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1495:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1466:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1443:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1426:
1421:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1391:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1380:
1374:
1367:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1348:
1344:
1337:
1330:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1306:
1302:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1271:
1267:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1246:
1243:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1186:
1180:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1162:
1155:
1151:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1127:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1100:
1096:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1032:Kudos to you.
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1002:
994:
989:
988:
987:
983:
979:
974:
973:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
946:
941:Yes, agreed.
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
926:
925:
918:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
899:
898:
893:
889:
885:
880:
873:
867:
864:(Pasted from
863:
862:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
833:
829:
825:
824:
819:
816:
813:
809:
802:
792:
788:
784:
780:
779:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:
764:
762:
758:
754:
753:72.94.152.209
750:
742:
739:
736:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
692:
691:
690:
686:
682:
677:
676:
675:
671:
667:
663:
662:
661:
660:
656:
652:
647:
643:
638:
634:
622:
618:
614:
609:
605:
604:
603:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
577:
573:
569:
564:
562:
554:
548:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
529:
525:
521:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
481:
476:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
406:
402:
398:
393:
389:
385:
384:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
339:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
307:
300:
293:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
261:
257:
256:
255:
252:
251:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:Baloch people
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
222:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
158:
153:
152:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:
129:
125:
124:
121:
118:
113:
108:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1464:
1429:
1423:
1408:
1370:
1352:
1281:good article
1275:The article
1274:
1251:
1226:Good Article
1223:
1165:good article
1159:The article
1158:
1103:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1055:
1035:
1000:
923:
896:
891:
822:
814:
805:
747:— Preceding
743:
740:
737:
733:
645:
641:
630:
608:WP:CONSENSUS
581:— Preceding
565:
558:
532:
512:
487:edit-warring
460:
419:8.225.200.36
413:— Preceding
409:
391:
372:100.6.22.158
366:— Preceding
363:
349:100.6.22.158
343:— Preceding
340:
336:
314:
311:
266:
218:
193:
189:ad infinitum
188:
132:
119:
78:
43:
37:
1422:This is an
1295:nominate it
1283:has passed
480:Pktlaurence
464:Pktlaurence
36:This is an
1481:Archive 10
1345:. You can
710:trackratte
681:trackratte
651:trackratte
528:Talk:Kurds
509:ANI Notice
299:Talk:Kurds
271:. Thanks,
95:Archive 10
1476:Archive 9
1471:Archive 8
1465:Archive 7
1459:Archive 6
1454:Archive 5
1446:Archive 1
1390:Calvin999
1310:Calvin999
1305:Calvin999
1194:Calvin999
1189:Calvin999
1135:Calvin999
1130:Calvin999
879:consensus
225:Read the
90:Archive 9
85:Archive 8
79:Archive 7
73:Archive 6
68:Archive 5
60:Archive 1
1371:I added
1323:Talkback
1228:Barnstar
1114:criteria
1001:Josh3580
945:Sharisna
924:Josh3580
897:Josh3580
884:WP:UNDUE
872:Sharisna
852:Sharisna
844:Josh3580
823:Josh3580
818:contribs
808:Sharisna
749:unsigned
595:contribs
583:unsigned
553:Muhammad
533:Josh3580
415:unsigned
368:unsigned
345:unsigned
315:Josh3580
286:Talkback
260:Khorasan
245:Khorasan
194:Josh3580
157:Josh3580
133:Josh3580
1425:archive
1396:DeCausa
1394:Thanks!
1301:Legobot
1185:Legobot
1126:Legobot
1079:DeCausa
963:DeCausa
917:DeCausa
868:) - To
848:DeCausa
769:DeCausa
696:DeCausa
666:DeCausa
613:DeCausa
587:Rkbauer
576:Abraham
495:DeCausa
443:DeCausa
397:DeCausa
273:DPL bot
167:DeCausa
39:archive
1289:; see
993:Drmies
978:Drmies
951:Drmies
783:Drmies
646:actual
491:WP:BRD
388:WP:BRD
1378:₳aron
1356:₳aron
1264:Your
1255:₳aron
1241:₳aron
1148:Your
1093:Your
1058:Mahdi
953:then
801:Kurds
572:Moses
568:Jesus
364:MDP
185:bitey
181:bitey
163:bitey
128:Kurds
16:<
1400:talk
1314:talk
1224:The
1198:talk
1139:talk
1083:talk
1043:talk
1010:hist
1006:talk
982:talk
967:talk
933:hist
929:talk
906:hist
902:talk
892:then
856:talk
846:and
832:hist
828:talk
812:talk
799:Re:
787:talk
773:talk
757:talk
714:talk
700:talk
685:talk
670:talk
655:talk
631:The
627:Arms
617:talk
591:talk
574:and
559:The
551:Re:
542:hist
538:talk
499:talk
468:talk
447:talk
423:talk
401:talk
376:talk
353:talk
324:hist
320:talk
277:talk
203:hist
199:talk
171:talk
142:hist
138:talk
1308:--
1192:--
1133:--
392:you
227:FAQ
1450:←
1402:)
1353:—
1316:)
1266:GA
1200:)
1150:GA
1141:)
1116:.
1110:GA
1095:GA
1085:)
1045:)
984:)
969:)
858:)
789:)
775:)
759:)
716:)
702:)
687:)
672:)
657:)
619:)
597:)
593:•
570:,
501:)
493:.
470:)
449:)
441:.
425:)
403:)
378:)
355:)
279:)
173:)
64:←
1436:.
1398:(
1392::
1388:@
1338:.
1312:(
1196:(
1137:(
1081:(
1041:(
1008:/
995::
991:@
980:(
965:(
947::
943:@
931:/
919::
915:@
904:/
874::
870:@
854:(
830:/
815:·
810:(
785:(
771:(
755:(
712:(
698:(
683:(
668:(
653:(
615:(
589:(
540:/
497:(
482::
478:@
466:(
445:(
421:(
399:(
374:(
351:(
322:/
312:—
301:.
275:(
233:.
201:/
169:(
159::
155:@
140:/
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
