22:
204:
133:
What "personal feud"? I'm not aware of any personal slight. As far as I know we've had only cordial relations unless you can find something to the contrary that I can't remember. Is your mindset such that the only possible explanation of criticism of you is that it is because of a "personal feud'? Do
255:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
214:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
118:
As in John's case, I don't know why you're pursuing a personal feud. It would be useful for you to provide diffs of whatever personal slight you perceived in the past that has put you on this course.
331:
And I noticed that the pages are regularly vandalized by people who were previously blocked by moderators for vandalism, and now they are vandalizing
Knowledge again and deleting some information
332:
297:
175:
148:
I would be grateful if in future you avoided as far as possible any contact, reply or mention of me anywhere on wikipedia. I will attempt to reciprocate.
293:
I would like you to pay attention to my edit and I can provide info about other current members of the
Romanov family, such as
248:
340:
320:
294:
215:
166:-ish request. I won't post on your user talk page though unless I ever need to post a noticeboard notification.
162:
No. I will reply to you or mention you anywhere on
Knowledge as I see fit and would never comply with such a
231:
71:
336:
301:
235:
157:
143:
101:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
283:
243:
305:
227:
211:
193:
180:
279:
8:
219:
127:
222:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about
226:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
198:
187:
261:
223:
260:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
153:
123:
252:
80:
21:
312:
135:
210:
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an
86:
84:
311:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Pay attention? To which edit?
149:
119:
288:
134:
you exclude all possibility that you might be at fault, objectively?
325:
203:
113:
82:
251:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
87:
242:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
15:
234:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
258:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule
218:to work toward making a version that represents
95:This page has archives. Sections older than
105:when more than 3 sections are present.
13:
202:
14:
354:
99:may be automatically archived by
20:
247:—especially if you violate the
321:06:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
306:22:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
284:11:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
176:sounds just a little familiar
7:
341:06:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
194:15:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
158:19:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
144:19:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
128:19:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
10:
359:
316:
139:
295:Princess Olga Romanova
207:
102:Lowercase sigmabot III
206:
244:blocked from editing
232:dispute resolution
208:
249:three-revert rule
109:
108:
350:
333:Just kidding me?
298:Just kidding me?
276:
224:how this is done
192:
190:
185:
104:
88:
24:
16:
358:
357:
353:
352:
351:
349:
348:
347:
291:
262:
236:page protection
201:
188:
181:
179:
116:
100:
89:
83:
29:
12:
11:
5:
356:
346:
345:
344:
343:
329:
290:
287:
200:
199:September 2024
197:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
115:
112:
107:
106:
94:
91:
90:
85:
81:
79:
76:
75:
31:
30:
25:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
355:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
296:
286:
285:
281:
277:
275:
274:
270:
266:
259:
254:
250:
246:
245:
239:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
205:
196:
195:
191:
186:
184:
177:
165:
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
130:
129:
125:
121:
111:
103:
98:
93:
92:
78:
77:
74:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
292:
272:
268:
264:
263:
257:
241:
240:
209:
189:MIESIANIACAL
182:
173:
163:
117:
110:
96:
34:
26:
228:noticeboard
164:prima donna
220:consensus
216:talk page
174:This all
326:Romanovs
256:warring—
230:or seek
212:edit war
27:Archives
328:👈 here
313:DeCausa
253:reverts
136:DeCausa
97:30 days
289:Hello!
150:DrKay
120:DrKay
114:WP:AN
337:talk
317:talk
302:talk
280:talk
178:. --
154:talk
140:talk
124:talk
238:.
339:)
319:)
304:)
282:)
271:oo
269:dF
156:)
142:)
126:)
72:10
70:,
66:,
62:,
58:,
54:,
50:,
46:,
42:,
38:,
335:(
315:(
300:(
278:(
273:t
267:a
265:P
183:₪
152:(
138:(
122:(
68:9
64:8
60:7
56:6
52:5
48:4
44:3
40:2
36:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
