2224:. That idea, which he had even advanced by editing it into the MOSDAB's ordering section, was what was fully enough discussed, I guess. In a couple of places there it was just me and him and you speaking, it may look like it was running 2:1 against me, but that was only in narrow sections, where the "right"-in-my-view outcome was achieved anyhow (e.g., that a Roosevelt School dab page move by JHunterJ was reversed), so the final consensus apparent is that the 1 argument prevailed. And there was explicit polling of many editors in other discussion sections above and below, and the overall consensus of these many other editors was that reasonable ordering schemes such as by-state-then-city should certainly be allowed, and the extra work and confusion caused by JHunterJ's reorderings should not be supported, so the MOSDAB's ordering section was returned to something more reasonable. I hope you don't want to revisit the ordering issue (which your recent edit did not re-raise, and which i don't think was your original concern; it was JHunterJ who inserted that issue). I also see that I did acknowledge in one or two of those discussion sections that you had other points to make that weren't talked out. If you want to open a new discussion on whatever those are, now, I would be happy to participate. Currently, I don't see any serious deficiency for readers and editors in the current formatting of Broad Street Historic District and similar dabs, but you could perhaps convince me and others of something. I am skeptical that there would be any wide consensus supporting removal of the red-link entries, though, which was the main alarming-to-me effect of your recent edit. Do you want to discuss other ideas here or at Talk page of one of the dabs? --
2063:
thereby supporting the validity of having the item in the disambiguation page to start with. Is that correct? I "fixed" those first two, by the in-my-view pretty useless step of making the bluelink more precise, to the county-level article. Note the "issue" would have gone away naturally, as the articles would be created within some time-frame of a year or two. During the last couple years, articles have been created for about 20,000 or so out of 85,000 NRHP-listed places indexed in the NRHP list articles, and article-creation has been accelerating. I see that the 5th or 6th or 7th entry in the list is now a bluelink with a supporting bluelink, indicating that an article for what was a redlink has recently been created, so then the proper update now is to delink the supporting bluelink. I don't see the value of refining the other supporting bluelinks, because they will be delinked soon enough in the same way, anyhow. And, readers are primarily served by finding out whether or not there exists an article, and that the place is NRHP-listed. If they click on the supporting blue-link they may be brought to a state-level NRHP page and have to try one or few more clicks to get to a county- or city-level NRHP list article which shows the red-link in context. But they are served well enough IMO. Also, crucially, editors are served, advancing the development of wikipedia in this area. Having the complete disambiguation pages set up now avoids serious confusion, multiple unnecessary edits in having a system that supports creating articles at appropriate names. So, you have a narrow technical point to make, that the
1897:. Pages "involving NRHP disambiguation" should not be treated differently. Specifically: (1) Redlinks should not appear on a dab page unless the entry also has a bluelink to an article containing information about the redlink topic. I left the 2 redlinks that met this criterion and removed the others. (2) Bluelinks should not be pipes as a main entry. I corrected the one case of that. (3) Section headers should not be used unless there are sections. (4) Links to sections of articles should come after links to actual articles. I made an exception to that for Marion, North Carolina because that was a borderline case and seemed to make sense where it was. (5) Things in Texas should not link to articles about Wisconsin. (6) It is not necessary to say "listed on the NRHP in " next to every bluelinked entry, because that doesn't help in any way disambiguate one entry from another. On the other hand, where it points out that one entry in Connecticut was in a different town from the town in the article's title, I left that because that is useful for someone trying to figure out which of the several Connecticut articles is the one sought.
2573:
identifying in each of the NRHP list-articles that temporarily link there, that a specific article about the NRHP HD of the exact name in 3 places, should not get the shared name, but rather should get (City, State) added. It is OBVIOUSLY a help to readers who might see mention of a
College Avenue HD in a newspaper article, and seek to look it up in Google, where the first hit will soon be the Knowledge dab page, where they will find out that there exists an article about one and that other places exist but don't have articles. It is OBVIOUSLY designed to help readers find relevant content, and further to provide the extremely helpful service of showing that there is not substantial content developed yet about some of them. They will not be "sorely disappointed"; that is an overstatement. If you wish, you can further refine the supporting bluelinks so the readers will more easily find the NRHP list-articles showing the red-links in some context, in county tables of NRHPs. But already O has said she chooses not to do that refinement, and Station1 has previously stated disinterest in doing same. If you don't like it,
3899:
sometimes it was), it is so hard to tell. And, given you have made an unexplained abrupt move, what should
Mcorazao think you would do if M moved it back? If it happened to me, I would expect that you would yourself move it back again, or try, or otherwise cause a ruckus. I hope you are not meaning to deny the point that an abrupt move of a page that an editor is actively developing, is likely to cause misunderstanding/contention/drama? I think it is very similar to your redirecting a page that i was in the midst of developing (Fairfield Railway Stations or something?), not too long ago. It is almost a 100% rule, that if you interrupt an editor working productively, with an unexplained move or redirect, that you will cause drama. If your goal is to cause drama, go ahead. By doing that, you can almost surely cause distress, disturb an editor who was working productively, cause overhead / involvement of numerous others, and contribute perhaps to driving people out of the Knowledge project. You have a different choice available, every time, though. --
2592:
disambiguation pages, besides helping users, can be to help EDITORS, whether NRHP Wikiproject participants or not, to know the proper name to create an article under. This facilitates the process for new editors, and judging from how often we all run across the same people time after time these days (as if we were following each other around), I'd say that encouraging new editors should be of paramount importance. I doubt that "a user who clicks on the blue links on the
College Avenue Historic District page is going to be sorely disappointed", as noboby but us Wiki-nreds cares THAT much what they find on a page. I agree that "to find the relevant content they have to know what county the site is in", and that this is inconvenient. But, if we could all constructively campaign for a bot to fix this stuff, so that ALL of our concerns can be met, instead of tearing out or constantly criticizing each others hard work, maybe we'd be further ahead.
5459:
pages unnecessarily. That, however, causes several NRHP-focussed editors to go beserk, more or less: some of them really hate the creation of short stub articles. For creating NRHP articles, it makes sense for local editors to create them when they have visited the sites and gotten pictures, or for the articles to be created systematically according to where sources are available to allow more than minimal stub articles from the get-go. For example, because New York State makes available NRHP nomination documents on-line, the New York State ones can all be created in an orderly way right now, with efficient generation of similar references. It is inefficient and unnecessary to force stub articles to be created, at more minimal quality, at the scattered sites covered in dab pages. But some of the New York pages will be created at incorrect names, causing more work later, if the dabbing is not completed out first, now.
2357:(3) Here I don't think your position is supported by consensus. Dab pages almost never have anything like that. First, the order is obvious to most readers, imo. If you're concerned about editors, it should at least be commented out so that only editors see it. But the more important point is that you're trying to get other editors to follow your ordering preference when other orders may be just as valid. In fact, since links to sections of articles should come after links to articles (see next point), a different ordering is preferred imo; there are also cases where the most searched for topic(s) is placed ahead of others, although that may not apply to this case. I'm glad at least that you mention some other formatting might be better; say on one line unbolded.
2280:"(6) It is not necessary to say 'listed on the NRHP in ' next to every bluelinked entry, because that doesn't help in any way disambiguate one entry from another." Well, in the current list that consists of only U.S. NRHP-listed places constructed out of the National Register's NRIS database, I agree it may appear excessive. You could be suggesting to identify them all as being listed on the National Register, at the top. However, there are state-designated and locally-designated historic districts in many U.S. states, and I am pretty sure a few of them have name "Main Street Historic District". One problem is that when other items get inserted, there is no way to identify which are which, and to update the introduction to "all but
6902:
meaningless - there is
Wilmington, Newark, and New Castle and everyplace else. Many listings with Wilmington, just aren't close (but how to decide what stays in the Wilmington list?). There are no townships in the County and the "Hundreds" have only historical meaning are are hard for me to find the borders of. I might suggest breaking this down into 4 or 5 new lists, but that would take a bit of work - perhaps 1) Wilmington proper 2) Newark area (NWestern part of County) 3) New Castle area 4) Everything else south of I-94 and 5) Everything else = NE part of county = Wilmington area. It would take a lot of work, and some judgement calls. Drop me a note in a couple of weeks if you'd like to help doing this!.
3939:, where i have objected to another editor who did not pursue BRD properly IMO, after the first instance. There, the first removal of material was arguably okay under BRD, as the issue had been discussed out pretty far in other places that the editor and I both knew about, and knew that each other knew about. Here, the issue was not discussed out beforehand AFAIK, though perhaps there was more discussion that i don't known about. And, if there was an impasse, the Requested Move would be the preferred option; a bold move is not needed as Requested Move machinery is available (unlike to address the CT NHLs issue, where there is no obvious other process to go to, instead). --
2293:
red-link items for reason of supporting notability, as you understand. It seemed also to work best to keep the NRHP mention on NRHP items that turned blue, as part of communicating to readers that only notable churches named "First
Congregational Church" or whatever should be included. It's part of battling against non-notable items being added. Here, I expect that any locally-designated "Main Street Historic District" is probably wikipedia-notable, so it is less of a factor. But still, having the NRHP mention in does help communicate to readers/editors what they should do for adding another item. Paring off the NRHP mention doesn't seem particularly helpful, to me. --
585:
1955:
wikipedia-notable places named exactly "Main Street
Historic District", whether the primary links are redlinks or bluelinks, is helpful for readers and editors, as has been talked out in previous discussions. If you want I could create a stub article using National Register database information for any one primary redlink, but there are a number of NRHP editors who strongly prefer that NRHP articles not be created unless more development than a stub is provided. I would only do one right now in order to demonstrate to you that any one is wikipedia-notable, in case you question that. But otherwise, I hope this is resolved as okay, now. Thanks. --
2957:), to allow us to extract out info for delisted or other-status-than-currently-listed properties that ever got an NRIS entry. It's a bit wonky: for a delisted place the date of delisting appears in the place of the original listing in E's output (similar i think to how NRHP.COM's info can appear, too), and you need to look up at E's page or somewhere what the listing status codes are, but you can mostly figure it out. Running that search with delisted box checked on "Lisha" and then on "Reformed Church" within state of NY, and searching through that output yields no more likely candidates as far as i can tell, though. --
6617:, you made a statement (referring to me) that said in part: "the deletion-nominator herself (her choice to give gender)". I am interested in your emphasis on gender in that context. Did you do that simply to avert a needless typical-of-Knowledge harangue about whether you had correctly identified my gender, or do you consider that calling someone a female is inherently defamatory, so you needed to caveat your comment by asserting that I myself admitted to being female? I want to believe that the former reason applies, but I have wondered on occasion whether your antagonism toward me is a symptom of misogynist views. --
2267:. That seems better than not identifying the country and not explaining the ordering, which is not immediately obvious otherwise for readers and editors. In the previous discussions, i think Englanders and other non-Americans prefered for the country to be identified while some Americans think it is obvious and not needed, for cases like the current version of this article which has just U.S. items currently. Using the leading phrase mentioning the United States that way makes it clear how a section for a different country should be added. And IMHO it does not detract for any readers. Mentioning the
2285:
dabs of churches, some NRHP-listed and some not, to have the NRHP listing mentioned within each item where it applied. There are other maintenance-related problems engendered, too, i think, in other NRHP lists if the identifying information is not put in. I can't remember all the other small problems engendered, offhand, but I am sure some would apply in other dabs having NRHP items if not applying exactly here. And then, there is efficiency for editors and some benefit of consistency for readers, in using the same formatting in all of these. I wouldn't want to change from this format lightly.
7403:
3817:. If the editor there agrees up front, then the editor or I will make the move. Or if it turns out there are sources and reasons i don't know about, my opinion about need for move may change. Or maybe there will be disagreement and it is appropriate to open a Requested Move. Requested Moves are usually very polite, helpful processes. What happened here did cost a lot of overhead in ANI discussion and so on already. And the editor has probably lost the DYK. It was just a big unnecessary disruption, which could have been avoided by some polite discussion at Talk page first. --
6227:
would really serve readers okay. There are some very long dab pages where non-geographic order would seem very unhelpful, in my view. Note, by existing and/or previous dab page guidelines, inserting subsection headers for state names or letters A, B, etc. would justify sorting the places geographically, and override using some rule of putting the exact article name matches. It seems that inserting subsection headers or removing them should not necessitate changing the overall order. So for this and other reasons i prefer just using geographic order for dab lists of places. --
1974:
suggest, but never on dab pages. I agree with those editors who say create articles that contain significant information, but whether you do that or create stubs, create them first, then put them on a dab page. If you don't want to do that, however, at the very least, please make sure each line has a bluelink to an article with information about the topic (though it seems a waste of time to me); otherwise we send readers to dead ends. As I said, if you want a few days, no problem. I noticed the following articles with similar problems:
3545:...you asked why I am interested in Nagao Sakurai (landscape architect). I was born near Spokane, Washington and I am interested in local history. He designed a Japanese garden in Spokane's Manito Park. I should put that on my to-do list. Next I will see if there are any public domain images of any of the gardens he has designed that I can link to and he lived in Japan for 20 years? Must be some history there. I should see if I can figure out how to link to his entry on Japanese Knowledge, if there is one. Thanks for asking : )--
4404:
reviewer who raised the concern may well give you further feedback on how you did. Also i noticed you have somehow put it up for GAR, but it seems not properly done as it is currently showing you yourself as the GA reviewer, and it also seems not correct to do while the peer review is still open, though i am not well informed about GA. I participate in the PR review process sometimes but frankly unfamiliar with how the GA process works. Anyhow, you could comment further in the PR or simply ask there that it be closed. --
2828:
ZIP Code and thought it might have gotten listed there. But so far no luck. I was wondering if you have any ideas, if I cant find any listing of it I'll have to remove that sentence from the Lisha Kill article and it throws me into doubt about anything else I used from that newspaper article. And I havent forgotten your old requests for articles about Alcove, New York and other hamlets that have NRHP listings, I'm slowly making a counter-clockwise sweep through all hamlets that I can find enough sources about.
3809:
face, if you move it without consulting the editor who has just invested a good amount of time and energy in developing something. You may be right about what is the better permanent name for the article when all factors are considered at higher levels, but you didn't present your reasoning to secure agreement before a move. And you have to be polite or it will certainly lead to misunderstandings/contention/ ANI cases. For another example, right now I am addressing what appears to be a misnamed article at
2687:
699:
first/main thing needed is to obtain the specific NRHP nomination form about the district. This is different than the MRA document that is on-line, that i linked already. It would be a many-page document about the district only, probably providing detail on each of the contributing buildings individually and providing overall context. Having it would inform a pic-taking visit and allow good devt of the article text. Can you request that from the
National Register? Email to nr_reference (at) nps.gov. --
2679:
2009:
wikipedia should be developed would conflicts with other useful preferences, such as my and other editors' preference that wikipedia readers who wish to find a given historic site should be shown the alternatives (including showing that there are places of a given name that do not have and article yet), and they should not misdirected to an article about a different place instead. This has been talked out before (see the links that I posted at your Talk page, for two discussions) and it is embodied in the
2655:
4695:
never heard of any other instance where the
National Register staff didn't get back to someone promptly (if only to say that it will perhaps take 2 weeks for them to get a photocopy out in the mail, though usually they do it quicker). Could you please try again? You need to email to: "nr_reference (at) nps.gov" (replace the (at) by @ sign and remove spaces). I hope i didn't give u an incorrect email address before. I hear you about libraries not being open when you feel like wikipediaizing. :( --
2484:, and several similarly named places that might also be confused. And, in a subsequent step after creating the good dab and after creating one of the articles it covers, i returned to update one of the entries so that it fully complied with the letter of the MOSDAB rules. Yes, you are welcome to "improve" the dab if you wish by refining entries to find the NRHP list-articles that show the same redlinks. However the existing supporting bluelinks do support the current redlinks, in that they point
7374:
7319:. You should consider yourself on a 24 hour functional reversion ban from the article - if you are to revert it yet again in the next 24 hours, I will report your edit warring. I don't know or care about the DAB, but it appears that two editors disagree with your proposed changes. Engage in discussion with them. If you cannot reach a consensus, seek outside input. If that still does not work, seek mediation. If that also fails, seek arbitration. Continued edit warring will no longer work.
7219:
6091:
649:
31:
2274:"(4) Links to sections of articles should come after links to actual articles. I made an exception to that for Marion, North Carolina because that was a borderline case and seemed to make sense where it was." I don't agree for dab pages whose items are explicitly organized by state then city. It is unreasonable to expect readers and editors to understand a more complicated ordering which would put a section-type entry at the very end, or at the end of a state subsection, or whatever.
2101:
fine, do the others, no problem. To be clear, I have no issue with MOS:DAB or MOS:DABRL. I have no desire to change any guideline or policy. I have no desire to engage in the kind of protracted dialogue to which you referred me. I generally agree with all the other editors at that discussion, who were patiently trying to explain to you where your unique viewpoint differed from the general consensus. I was not making a narrow technical point. These links were
2198:(same page) in this discussion. Surely you don't believe that you talking and two other editors disagreeing with you means "this was all talked out well enough". Perhaps you missed my final comment later on that page "Both Roosevelt School and Broad Street Historic District need fixing. The only reason I'm not touching them is because they're still under discussion here and because I'm not interested in getting into an edit war over pages almost no one looks at."
5428:
pages over the basic articles? I realize there's some off-chance that someone will create those pages because there is a disambiguation page link, but that's statistically rare. I don't want my DAB opinions to be throwing up roadblocks to another project, but I don't see the pre-emptive creation as all that valuable, which I suppose colors my opinion about DAB policy (although maybe it shouldn't). I'd welcome hearing the NRHP project's motivations for the push.
7047:
5281:
4195:
2121:
of the view that tinkering with them further does not add value for readers, and feel that if you believe otherwise you should create the articles or revise the supporting bluelinks yourself. It's nice, yes, that Orlady has helped out by revising those supporting bluelinks. And I'll offer now that I will encourage other NRHP editors to do some of that type of bluelink refining from time to time, as well. With that, I hope we are done. Thanks. --
397:
5890:
3487:
1675:
different places, and I would like to focus on that. The contending with Orlady over NRHP articles in CT is really almost over, I believe....well, knock on wood. I will state my case as seems necessary in appropriate forums, and I generally trust it will work out. Anyhow I would hope that you'd work as you have recently to take and add pics, and to do research and develop mainspace articles in your area. Thanks. --
6923:
5453:. One editor is marching through all the New York State ones right now, for example, heading towards creating good starter articles for all 5,000 of them. No one is creating NRHP articles simply because they appear in a disambiguation page. I am not creating the dab pages in order to promote NRHP article creation. They are to head off a lot of conflict, contention, bad links, etc. now and in the future.
186:
this. We have to be careful not to try to enforce some standard that is not better, and where differences are a matter of taste we cannot insist on one way vs. another. I will, however, take a look at these sometime later and make some comment at wt:NRHP or elsewhere, but not for a few days at least. Will leave this item open here on my Talk page until i do respond to you more substantially. Thanks!
776:.) Let me know when the National Register replies to your request. If they have scanned, e-versions to email, let's trade email addresses (I see we both have email enabled) and then I would appreciate if you could email me copies of them. If they can only send photocopies by postal mail, then I will request the same as you have requested and they can make 2 sets and mail out at the same time. --
7195:
long as each has a proper supporting bluelink, are acceptable. In the past those would often be nominated for deletion, and i had previously agreed in negotiation with some of them to create at least one stub article when creating a dab page. Since the stubs were so disliked by some NRHP editors, i pressed to renegotiate that, and i think it is now consensus and will hold. Knock on wood. :) --
6128:. Also thanks for fixing the bluelink for the Mary Alice Hammond House there. These are improvements. There are still many redlinks on the page, however, that do not have corresponding bluelinks that mention the redlinks. Do you plan to fix these? If so, I will wait a few days before doing anything. I still disagree with the ordering, though, especially since the only article actually titled
517:
365:
7118:. My wife gave me a copy of the Alinder biography for my birthday, which I've just finished reading. I am now prepared to make a lot of edits to the article, but will start out with various factual "nuggets" rather than a major rewrite. I hope to hear your detailed thoughts on how the article can be improved, so that the process can be a collaboration among all interested editors.
6861:
5104:. In addition, they've posted the documentation for the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties, which follows the NRHP format for every vaguely historical building in the state, many of them contributing properties in HDs. The server seems to be steam-powered, even worse than NPS Focus, so patience is indicated. The MIHP was mostly done in the 1990s, so it is somewhat dated.
5537:, which permits searches of the latest version of the NRIS database that the National Register has put into the public domain, and which Elkman downloaded. You could search on a given name and find out if there are multiple occurences in the National Register. More recently, i downloaded my own copy of NRIS, and ran database programs to generate draft dab articles indexed
2105:. They were misleading readers to the wrong articles. They needed to be changed. I see now another editor, who perhaps has read this exchange, has just gone and quietly corrected these links, in a relatively short time and without drama (thank you very much, Orlady!). That's all that's required if you want redlinks. I will continue to fix WP to the best of my ability.
111:
Chicago landmark district, all sounding similar. (Also confusing is that one of the Nat Reg districts is desginated a
National Historic Landmark and its name is slightly different from the Nat Reg name.) Also, the streets involved are similar, but the address ranges are very specific to each district. Bottom line - I think there is an opportunity to correct all this.
2363:(5) Not much to say, except if I may offer what I hope you take as a constructive suggestion: If you make your own additional edits to a page, rather than a mass revert, it may sometimes make other editors realize you've given some thought to what you do change back. In this case, at least points 2 and 5 would have been corrected, and perhaps point 1 as well.
2068:
I believe it would detract. I expect you are trying to do what is the right thing here. Please try to consider what I am saying, and what has been talked out in the earlier discussions. But, if you wish, you may open a broader discussion to revisit this area, and you and I will contact various previous participants and get them all to testify again. --
1825:, with edit summary asserting "per MOSDAB", was not that. I reverted. Could we please discuss? I went through several very long discussions about how pages involving NRHP disambiguation should be constructed, and believe this basically complies. If you wish to revisit the previous consensus of numerous disambiguation editors, please explain. --
2974:
outside (as I drove by at 45 mph it wasnt a detailed inspection!). Certainly if it was ever listed the words Lisha and
Reformed would have been in the title some where. I will continue to look on and off but figure it's better to move on to the next community. Perhaps someone will come across our discussion and nominate the building!
2260:"(2) Bluelinks should not be pipes as a main entry. I corrected the one case of that." That sounds like your change would have been an improvement, but I can't spot the problem in the current article, perhaps it was fixed by Orlady. Is it still there? I agree that articles' names should be shown, rather than hidden by pipelinks
2851:, with search string "Reformed Church". If you can find it there then I could help you more. Certainly there have been many newspaper stories over the years where a journalist got it wrong, about what kind of historic site designation a place got. The poor journalists didn't use to have wikipedia to look up things in. :) --
1105:(which varies). In some previous situations with NRHPs, I have wanted for the NRHP list-articles to adhere to the NRIS database-given official name. Not sure that applies for this. I will try to tally up how many instances of each kind, anyhow. But the immediate question is where to discuss out a bit more. Thanks! --
166:, Mr. Case made such revisions as to remove the NRHP name fron the infobox, and remove the county reference and building type from the first sentence (a "standard" I tend to use for my articles). He indicated he did this to conform to other post office articles. I happen to think having a link to the building type (
2366:(6) Information not necessary to disambiguate one entry from another should not appear on a dab page. In cases where "there are state-designated and locally-designated historic districts" as well as federal districts all with the same name in the same town and for some reason each had an individual article, then yes,
7453:
the coordinates given in the infobox display as a dot on the map. Or you could leave the parameter blank to suppress map display. If you have a suitable map ready for use for Davenport, Iowa places, I think you could ask to have that enabled for use for display of point locations. You could ask at
7452:
Currently, only a few maps at less than state level, including for county of Los Angeles and for New York City, are supported in the NRHP infobox map display area, as far as I know. For a NYC place, you could choose locmapin=USA, locmapin=New York, locmapin=New York City, to have a point location of
5620:
by adding another article, taking it out of the criteria for deletion i think. Was not familiar with that criteria. By the way i've noticed your edits to many disambiguation pages on my watchlist, and think you're doing generally fine work. I did notice you adding a cu tag to one or a few articles
5448:
The disambiguation pages should all be created now, i feel, because NRHP article creation is going on and generating new articles at incorrect, non-disambiguated page names, all the time. They are being created from the NRHP list-articles, which is a big system whose state-level lists are indexed at
5386:
And btw, have fun with your dab troubles haha.. I hate to say I told you so.. but I told you so. I still think that if you'd just slow down and put a little more effort into each article you create, you'd have a lot less trouble. It only took a few hours (and that's only because I took breaks) to put
5235:
Hi Cje, thanks for your note. I was aware of the musician performing as the lead in a small ensemble and knew vaguely of her recording regularly in Peanuts music and otherwise. I am not able to dig up, easily, sufficient evidence to meet wp:MUSICBIO standards, as i don't immediately find individual
5166:
to a new discussion page so that policy can be established while technical development of the template can continue in its own space. When the template functions are finalised, the policy bits can be merged into them. If you intend to continue to contribute your ideas to the development
4483:
will serve up those documents, but it's confusing: it seems to be promising results even when they don't have the document scanned and available, so in fact you might not get anything there. Some individual states make their documents available separately. If you're more specific about the NRHP of
3934:
article case and elsewhere. But, actually, I don't think BRD is appropriate to start with. If you read BRD, it is about an option to pursue when there has been plenty of discussion already, and there is deadlock / impasse, when "Editing a particular page has become tricky, too many people are stuck
3808:
in the first place, which is easy to do. In pretty much any case where an editor has just developed a new article, either the editor should be the one to move it (and you could suggest it), or it should be addressed by a Requested Move. It is just too likely to be taken as an affront, a slap in the
3653:
I hadn't realized how detailed and to the point the nomination form is (head and shoulders above most noms). The building, society history, and maybe current programs, should all be easy to do tomorrow. Seems like I made the gravy before roasting the meat. Any chance you can do the switch between
3341:
in bold in the lede of the Kentucky article, explaining it as an alternative name. I see it does appear as the title in the NRHP infobox there, but it still should be mentioned in the article text in bold, IMHO, else it is a mildly surprising redirect for readers coming from the KY NRHP list-article
2292:
Actually I think my experience in dabs of churches, some NRHP-listed and notable, some otherwise notable, and some not at all notable, has most influenced me to want to leave the NRHP mention in for even the ones that have articles. In church dabs, it made sense to put the NRHP mention in on all the
1973:
I meant the entire redlink line entry. Dab pages are strictly for navigation, so redlinks on dab pages are rarely useful, and never useful without a corresponding bluelink that goes somewhere useful. Dab pages are not lists and not indexes. Lists and redlinks can sometimes be useful in the manner you
1939:
Thanks for your reply. I'm glad that you're working to fix the bluelinks and I'll leave the page alone for a few days to give you a chance to update. Frankly, I don't think the redlinks are very useful, and wouldn't bother refining them even if I had the time, but I would not delete one that pointed
7160:
Don't think that I'm trying to get on you about the dab project standards, by the way; I really don't pay attention to their standards (all I know is that your contributions page shows that you're discussing something at their project page currently), so I'm actually curious, not asking a rhetorical
5207:
Hi Doncram/Archive 13! This is a one line musician bio that you created back in September. Your last comment was "more research needed". I've spent a little time googling ... clearly Carole is an active session musician, but I can't find references to membership of well known ensembles or recordings
4621:
Like, i see the corresponding Iowa Site Inventory form for the Blackhawk includes mention of a brochure from the Blackhawk, which is the kind of local item that a good special collections will keep in a file on the Blackhawk. Also, trying the Quad City's PrairieCat library search screen linked from
3781:
I assume you must realize that this doesn't always work (seems to be a bug in the software). I tried to do the move on this article but WP refused to allow it. Since at the time I was trying to go for DYK and I was obviously going to need admin help to fix it I did the copy as a stopgap measure. And
3711:
It took me awhile but I did nominate it Hook "... that America’s oldest private medical society, the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, displays the conjoined liver of Siamese twins Chang and Eng Bunker in its museum ? " If you can think of a better hook please substitute it - I'm not very good
3314:
Your goal is to get something out there to help readers, and that is easy for other editors to work with (like to add other entries, maybe not relevant here), and to do it in a way that doesn't attract deletion of your items. You can also add a "See also" section if there is something possibly also
3089:
has seemed down, meaning i wasnt then able to search for any forms (or, you can search but it will show all non-available, even the ones that are in fact available). I sometimes forget that is different than the permanent URLs to documents being down. If u know the url to an MPS or other document,
2827:
article a newspaper reference I used refers to the Reformed Church of Lisha's Kill as being on the NRHP listings, yet I cant find it on the Albany County article list under any name that I recognize. I checked the Schenectady County listings just in case because the church does fall in a Schenectady
2553:
Orlady, it's a hopeful idea about using set-index articles, but that was previously considered by me and others in the long previous discussions, and basically does not work. The point is to create disambiguation, not to create a list-article for unrelated places only coincidentally having the same
2534:
If your purpose in creating these pages is to help NRHP Wikiproject participants, then it might be a good idea to create these pages in Project space, where they won't be detrimental to the experience of encyclopedia users. If you want to keep them in article space (as I believe you do), I think the
2507:
for a bot to do all those refinements, tho i could not bring myself to beg, and i felt it was only fair to state that i did myself feel the refinements would be very helpful in building the wikipedia. If you feel more strongly that those refinements are so important, you could comment in support of
2120:
No, not at all wanting to pick a fight. I was rather trying to be efficient and get it all laid out quickly, both to ascertain more quickly what was your concern, and to let you know that considerable thought and discussion has already gone into the design and building of those dab pages. I remain
2067:
is not exactly complied with. I would object to your proceeding by attempting to delete the offending entries rather than leaving them be or making the small effort to bring them into technical compliance with said guideline. I don't think that would advance development of wikipedia in this area;
1350:
Thanks for the compliment on the photos of St. Henry's! I would also have uploaded a straight-on front shot, but I was there shortly after noon, and the church faces straight north: hence the sun made the church into a silhouette, and it doesn't look at all nice. I hope to get more at some point —
7179:
which you refered to was not yet acceptable to anyone. It was one that i had created quickly and left in draft form, tagged with "NRHP dab needing cleanup" for me to fix up later. There are about 100 left in the NRHP dab cleanup category that i am fixing up steadily. I plan/expect to finish in a
5458:
One alternative, which has been favored up until recently, was for me to generate at least one quick stub article per new dab page, so that there would be at least one primary blue-link. I personally don't mind that, though it slows me down and prolongs the process of setting up all the needed dab
5427:
Our DAB discussion notwithstanding, I realize that you're active in the NRHP project and hope you'll entertain a question of mine. I know that you'd like the NRHP entries to all have pages, and that you'd also like them to have appropriate disambiguation entries. But why focus on the disambiguation
3617:
OK, I think that I've got all the numbers correct in NHL lists (Pennsylvania and Philadelphia) and NRHP lists (Philadelphia, Center City, and I'll Check PA). My major concern has been whether I've added them correctly to the Center City NRHP and Philadelphia NHL lists, and now it's the best I know
3458:
What do you think about citing documents from NPS Focus as if they were print sources, without giving a URL? Pennsylvania is in the process of converting its NRHP documents from one website to another; while the forms are still online from the old URLs, I don't know how long they'll stay there, so
2526:
is not a long-existing page needing to be cleaned up, but a newly created page that is a problem from its very creation. (I'm not going to help you fix this one.) Disambiguation pages are supposed to be designed and maintained to help users find relevant content. A user who clicks on the blue links
2284:
two of the following are NRHP-listed" or whatever. Someone inserting one will tend not to update the top at all, or to provide an identifying phrase explaining how that item is different than the NRHP ones, if each NRHP one is not identified. It just worked out better given insertions coming into
2008:
portion of the MOS Style policy, and how, in numerous long discussions, that has been interpreted to apply to NRHP cases. It is your personal preference, not unreasonable from your point of view, to say that there should not be red-link entries, but that is not policy. Your preference for how the
1674:
Thank you for your supportive gesture here, and in comments elsewhere. But the process you refer to here appears to be a proposal, not policy. I have not looked into it as I expect it would go nowhere. And, I am really interested in working on NRHP articles, especially with newer NRHP editors in
967:
It's hard to say, given just a view from as far away as this pic is taken, and no other info. Perhaps an old Greek Revival house, with modern additions? A modern Georgian Revival? Is it a smaller, old house, with modern additions, or is it all relatively modern? I see it has an entry porch with
185:
Hmm. Well, Daniel Case makes a few editorial decisions differently, but does great articles, at a steady pace. And he is more experienced than either of us; he helped me get started in Knowledge, by the way. I do think the NRHP name should show in the infobox, am not sure about other aspects of
6157:
about the inclusion or not of several items. There are actually four places whose articles would now be "Hammond House (__)" with disambiguation in parentheses: one in Canada, two in New York State, one in Texas. I personally think the dab page is now in reasonably good condition, but I have to
6147:
Thanks for commenting here. I am sorry for being impolite in another exchange or two recently. I want to acknowledge that I do think your concerns are generally valid. I however get frustrated when i see content such as legitimate dab items deleted from a page, which might have happened in some
5486:
Thank you for that explanation. I think the goal of uniform and orderly dab page creation is a good one. I personally would be ok with a solution that allowed for the quiet creation of those pages (I'm not going to start mass prodding), but leaving the DAB page rules alone. Another idea, and maybe
4694:
Oh no, that's not good. I have never had problems. There was just one time when an email request of mine got mislaid, but it was inbetween multiple requests by me and some other correspondence with them about information corrections, so it was very understandable that one email got lost. I have
4606:
which sounds like a useful source, and it also mentions the Richardson-Sloane Special Collections of the Davenport Public Library. If you can go there, the special collections could well turn out to have a file folder of newspaper clippings and locally-published materials about the building. And
3971:
Yes, your suggestion regarding renaming sounds reasonable; I'm embarrassed that I couldn't copy the name down in the correct order. I can't imagine that anyone would object. This is beyond my technical expertise, and it sounds like you are already knowledgeable about making this type of change. Go
3593:
I can't see any reason not to expand the article greatly - I've got the nomination pdf. For right now I'm trying to make sure that I'm adding it to the NHL Philadelphia list and NRHP Center City Phiily list correctly. And I better get the NHL reference for them. Is there an easy way to renumber
2062:
because their supporting bluelinks pointed to state-level NRHP list-articles rather than the county- or city-level NRHP list-articles that have been split out from the state-level ones, and which now are the Knowledge articles carrying the red-link to the particular item name, in a useful context,
7194:
The recent advance with them is that the dab page in the current version, which now shows one primary bluelink for the Botkins, Ohio one, would now be deemed acceptable even without that link being blue. From the recent discussions, it is now consensus that pages of all primary redlink items, as
6416:
Okay thanks. Obviously i am not very familiar with how you see these things attached to an account, and how many different things like this are possible. Like are there different exemptions from NPPers for new articles, vs. exemptions from review for edits to existing articles, etc. I can just
6226:
3 places whose wikipedia articles have name "Hammond House" first, and then the rest by geographic order say, on this dab page, would have some merit. I don't personally think it is worthwhile to mix up the types of ordering though. There are some very short dab pages of places where either way
4878:
I would be happy to. But, the point we were stalled at a while back, was needing to get the NRHP noms to work from. Will you be able to scan what you receive and share by email? I have a scanner that works pretty good and have done that a couple of times with others. Or, maybe i should send a
1244:
Thanks for your note re. Daniel School in Hayes County. I've been in touch with Jessie Nunn at the Nebraska State Historical Society, and she's encouraged me to contact her if there are specific nomination forms that I want. NSHS is in the process of putting them on their website, and they have
698:
as a stub, would be willing to help on one or 2 others if you suggest particular districts. I am not familiar with the area, so would prefer you pick. Can you possibly visit and take pictures in the district area? I know that there is one panorama type pic available (perhaps yours?). But, the
110:
It seems you have helped edit the entries entitled "South Loop Printing House District" and "Printing House Row District" in Chicago. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I think I have sorted out some discrepancies here, caused by the fact that there are two Nat Reg districts AND one local
7457:
about how to get that done, and i for one would like to know, but the answer will probably be to ask at some higher level place. The infobox nrhp uses programming from some higher level place. Also, to include a customized map like this Davenport one where you have somehow highlighted the HD's
6443:
That's strange because I thought I was seeing your articles unpatrolled, which is why I assumed you didn't have it. In retrospect I bet my mistake was that I was seeing your pages through AWB and not through new page patrolling, which I got mixed up because I tend to do the two at the same time.
5790:
The home is actually located in Baltimore county, BUT it is only half a mile outside the Baltimore city line. While I'm pretty sure it would be more correct to say Bare Hills, MD, even people who live there wouldn't know where you were talking about. On mail, the house's address is written in
3763:
Perhaps next time you disagree with a move and want to revetrt, you should just move it back using the move tab instead of creating a whole new article by editing the redirect resulting from the first move. This is what prevented you from simply moving it back properly and what gave you all your
3267:
That seems okay. I tend to explain the NRHP-ness on each entry in a dab, so that non-NRHP entries can be inserted by others, but maybe this is the complete set forever, already. And, I think you need to make it clearer on each line why the items are being listed in the dab, say by appending an
2973:
Thank you both for your time and enormous amount of effort. It is looking very much like the journalist was mistaken, especially since he didnt place a year when it was listed on the NRHP that could help us. Last time I saw the church it was maybe 2 years ago and it looked in good shape from the
2662:
Thanks for noticing! I have a couple cameras that i use. That's a cheap digital camera that, oddly, has a General Electric brandname, which I bought at a discount store for about $ 80 i think, a few months ago. I see from a label on it that it is made in China and there is the General Imaging
2375:
might disambiguate, otherwise not. Notability is never an issue for dab pages; if a topic has an article on WP it's presumed notable (if it's later AfD'd, the dab page link turns red and is removed). That's one reason bare redlinks don't appear on dab pages: without an article, there's no way to
2100:
my changes within minutes as if the page had been vandalized, came to my talk page to say, in effect, I didn't know what I was doing, and asked me to discuss. I believe I patiently and clearly explained my actions in the first paragraph. You seemed to understand and corrected two entries. I said
544:
Hi don ... Do you recall if you added sites from these press releases to any NRHP county/city other than Orange and Onondaga (Syracuse)? I've removed the sites that have been nominated but not yet listed from those two tables and I'm trying to avoid checking every NY table for these nominations.
6901:
Thanks for your attention to New Castle County, Delaware NRHP listings. You may not want to make minor adjustments there, because I think this is the most screwed up county listing anywhere (anytime!). A brief explanation won't cover everything - but - municipal names in the county are almost
6568:
to undo the move i did, when i got your note. I went back and completed that request. It was a mistake; i was temporarily misunderstanding NRIS records which i thot showed they were in fact two different houses. As i pulled up the 2 sets of full PDF documents, i saw that it was a mistake as
4403:
to be helpful. Actually, it is not necessarily over. The peer review has not been closed. You could, like many editors do, respond to the comments there, for example inserting your responses and/or asking questions. If you respond that you have edited to address a specific concern, then the
3898:
You may be right about that, that Mcorazao could have moved it back right then. But, as Mcorazao points out and knows from experience, it is often not possible to move a page back, and it is hard to tell when that will be the case. I have myself thought the move system was broken (and i think
1104:
Ah, BD2412, yes that is actually a good point about US vs. U.S. I really have not brought this back into mind properly, but I do recall that was part of the issue for post office articles, about whether to go with one of those or to follow whichever the National Register's database, NRIS, used
3863:
As I said before, I did do the Undo before trying to change anything else. This is a software bug (I've seen it before). WP says that the edit can be undone but when you click "Save page" it simply reverts back to what was there already. I've only ever seen that happen when undoing page moves.
6549:
There is only one such house in Guilford. I'm not sure why you think there are two separate houses. There are two refnums because the house was listed on the NRHP in 1972 before it became a NHL in 1997. The NHL added some outbuildings but I don't think this warrants separate articles for each
6336:
Thanks, I guess that would be helpful. I believed my account already had some status like autoreviewer which removed my edits from the general stream, already, but i guess whatever i already have is different. Indeed it does not seem right to involve NPPers into the well-considered-already,
2488:
existing NRHP list-articles that show the redlinks. And, all the supporting bluelinks will be deleted eventually. And I don't think that focussing further attention here is particularly helpful; it is good as is and serves readers and editors pretty well. It just doesn't fully comply with
1920:
require either creating stub articles for each NRHP item, or by refinement of bluelink to point to a county or city NRHP list that has recently been split out from the state-wide NRHP list. Would you please agree to work to remedy the situation, either by creating articles on the NRHP-listed
1375:
I'm somewhat puzzled: I wouldn't say that Polaron is violating his editing restriction ("converting articles into redirects or vice versa"), but I also don't understand why redirects are needed or desirable when the redirect title isn't discussed in the target article (as you've pointed out).
2572:
And, i don't know how to put this mildly enough, but it is ridiculous or being uninformed at this point to say the disambiguation page system is detrimental to readers and to editors. The new College Avenue HD one had somehow been overlooked, but it is immediately serving an editor need of
1921:
historic districts, or by refining links at the disambiguation page? I started by further refining the first 2 bluelinks justifying items that are primarily red-links. Honestly, I think the better approach is to allow the articles to be created, which has been proceeding at a good pace. --
1083:
about having a discussion and where it should take place. Do you have a suggestion where to hash out anything about naming conventions for these? I need to browse the policy/guideline pages about naming conventions and I think this should be addressed at one of their Talk pages, probably.
1054:
I would say to have them at the fully spelled out title because (1) this is an encyclopedia, and abbreviations in titles are unencyclopedic, generally, and (2) it prevents arguments over whether to use "US" or "U.S." - no kidding, I've been in some very heated discussions over the point of
2564:
tag on what is really a disambiguation page is not the way to go, was pointed out strongly by JHunterJ i think i recall. There is no readership constituency for a list-article of places around the U.S. or the world which just randomly have the same name. On the other hand, there is some
1954:
I think you mean the secondary bluelinks where you said redlinks, right? I don't think the bluelinks are that helpful and I don't particularly want to refine them, like you. Those secondary bluelinks will all be dropped eventually, as articles are created. But having a complete list of
2591:
I agree that the DAB page is useful and important. It is hardly a "newly created page that is a problem from its very creation." I will help you fix this one, since the people who have problems with it don't want to, nor do they want to wait for a bot to be able to do it. Another use of
1689:
Well I know there is a dysop policy somewhere, cause admins have lost their adminships. I don't know if she has done enough to lose it or not. If you are going to write more articles about NRHP in my area, I'll gladly take pics. I just dunno if I wanna write a bunch of NRHP articles.
4807:. I take and add photos and develop NRHP articles in areas i have visited (and i have quite a backlog to process). I happily work with others interested in developing on NRHPs anywhere in the U.S. Of non-NRHP stuff, i work some on World Heritage Sites world-wide and otherwise in
6569:
photos show same house. Oddly there are many sorta similar cases where two houses of same name in same town exist, and I have recently been identifying and separating many of those which previously had been conflated, erroneously. Glad this is not one of those cases! Thanks --
6351:
I added an explanation on top of yours, which I'm sure you've seen. Sorry for adding myself immediately above. I knew about the flag, and when I started looking at it for you I thought that it might be helpful for myself too. Sorry if that makes the whole ordeal a little awkward.
872:
is another that does have a pic for each contributing building. Of course it may be the case that fewer pics, panoramic or otherwise, could provide good illustration for an article. I'll ask elsewhere for others' suggestions of good historic district articles to use for models.
5506:
Of course, thank you for engaging me in a very thoughtful discussion. As an aside, what method did you use to figure out which pages would need disambiguation and which wouldn't? Doing that by hand would seem pretty tedious, but doing it with a script would be equally difficult.
3107:
Okay, I understand about the rating; no complaints. I was viewing the MPS form online, so it wasn't down. AFAIK, the NPS has no reason to digitise Pennsylvania's forms, since (except for a few sites listed in the last couple of years) the state website has all of them online.
6321:. It would simplify a lot of what you're dealing with in terms of talk page responses, as it would for new page patrollers. I would second your request insofar as it applies to these NRHP dab pages, notwithstanding my reservations about extending that concept beyond that point.
5402:
Meh! I just want to get the NRHP disambiguation done. A hiccup or two is to be expected, when covering so much. I've run up the total of dabs from 1800 to 2500 in very short amount of time. It will all be done soon enough, even if have to pause and discuss further at the
2370:
would help to diambiguate one from the other, but otherwise it's clutter on a dab page (even though unquestionably a major point in the article itself) that only makes it harder to navigate quickly and easily. Same with churches; if two have similar names in the same city,
1940:
to an article containing info about the topic. I fully agree the best approach is for articles to be created; I just think it's better to create the article first and then add it to the dab page, because until it's created there's nowhere for the reader to go. Best wishes.
767:
Okay, tx for adding to the Riverview Terrace HD article. I'll start up NRHP stubs for the other ones over the next couple days if no one else beats me to it. (By the way, in doing so I am using a neat tool, what's called the "Elkman NRHP infobox generator, available at
2663:
Company name on it. It has a 5X zoom and various features that i haven't all figured out. I did try to buy a more recognized brand, fancier digital camera on-line, but the order didn't go through somehow, so i ended up buying this cheap one quickly one day. Cheers, --
266:
Also, I haven't forgotten about resolution of the town/HD issues. While time has opened up a little, it's about to close again as house guests descend on us for the holidays: the cleaning/decorating/putting-stuff-away has already begun. I'll plug away as time permits.
4372:
Hi. I userfied the Neighborhoods article, as "not ready for prime time" (namely article space), based on the discussion on the talk page. Neighborhoods articles in general are reasonable to create, but articles should not be created on as little basis as this one has.
3935:
discussing endlessly, and no progress can be made." I am not checking the Talk page there, but I don't have the impression that was the type of situation there. If you apply "bold"-type moves, you are likely to cause drama. Perhaps you are referring to the issue at
170:) and to the county where the PO is located to be helpful. I also understood from our previous exchange above on the Maryland churches that we should retain the NRHP name in the infobox. How do I petition to revise the standard for PO articles? Thanks in advance.--
133:
Hey you're doing great. I am glad, very hopeful you will be able to help sort out this confusion. Indeed it is confusing, and you sound like you are on the right track. Unfortunately i won't be able to correspond much in next few days, will get back to this later.
4802:
About what i work on, I have some big projects that i return to. These include supporting the U.S.-wide system of NRHP lists by developing lists themselves, developing supporting disambiguation, developing NRHP infobox, and developing the help info available from
2539:, with red links for the property names and blue links for the city articles, state NRHP articles, and anything else that contributors choose to include. (The set-index articles could be set up as wikitables, using the same format as the county NRHP list pages.) --
3831:
I moved the article as I said on the Talk page before seeing the message from Mcorazao. As I've said, he could have simply moved it back at that time instead of editing the redirect. I didn't think it was going to be an issue at all until after the move was done.
4662:
No, I never received an e-mail. Do you have better luck when you request them? Thanks for the info, I guess I could always go to the library, which I'm sure will have lots of sources....problem is they close too early, so I can't work on them at 11pm and later.
226:. I'm not sure who would be up for discussion about this and/or a decision by consensus. There's a similar type discussion at the U.S. Courthouses wikiproject that has not garnered much comment, which makes me less eager to do anything much about this topic. --
4879:
request to the National Register to get photocopies of the same items sent to me, too. Hmm, they might easily be able to run two photocopies at once...I would send a request right away if you can list here what are the places for which you've requested docs. --
4115:
in New Haven was torn down about 40 years ago, as directed in the will of the owner, who bequeathed the property to the city. The buildings that remain on the property (as an NRHP-listed property) were support buildings (such as carriage houses or gatehouses).
864:, i think it would be good if you could visit and take new pics of all 23 contributing buildings in the district. You really need the NRHP nom first, to know what they are, probably. For one example of a historic district article that i've contributed to, see
7184:
which I think is acceptable to the disambiguation wikiproject editors. Except there is continuing discussion with one or a few of those, about order of entries. Some want to keep shuffling the entries, out of geographical order, which i think is simplest and
4587:
Oh, of course. Well you've made a good start with those. I see you found an Iowa state level nomination form, the Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs / State Historical Society of Iowa's "Iowa Site Inventory Form", for the Kahl Building. Its bibliography
2095:
I'm not sure if you are trying to pick a fight here or what. This is really pretty simple: I found a dab page with many broken links and cleaned it up in accordance with MOS:DAB. I spent 15 or 20 minutes doing that, carefully checking each link. You undid
1868:. Perhaps you could review those. There have been other followups, too. You may make the point that a given entry includes a link to a state-wide NRHP list, when in fact it should better point to a county-specific NRHP list, in order to best comply with
114:
For example, part of the confusion begins with the fact that the title "Printing House Row District" refers to the local Chicago landmark district name, not the Nat Reg name, I believe. So then entries in each of the current listings are somewhat confused.
2708:
in Los Angeles, CA county and--i think--many other pics i've contributed. I have travelled around the U.S.A., and I have some contributed coverage of overseas places too, i think, tho i don't keep close track and am not sure what i have uploaded so far.
2896:. The NYS site includes all NRHP sites, and also sites that were nominated and failed to get NRHP designation (perhaps because owners objected, derailing a listing). Usually any place officially deemed "NRHP-eligible" would show up in the NYS site. --
2347:
Yes, this is helpful in understanding each other. I appreciate the tone as well as the content. I guess the best thing now might be for me to go over the 6 points, explain my view, and say where I think we agree or disagree, and maybe leave it at that.
1079:(ec) To Pubdog: Okay, good, glad you contacted me again. I have been meaning to get back to the Post office naming conformance issue which you raised a while back, and i promised to address, so it is still showing far above here. I asked just now at
5002:
just now. Whatever is the most common usage should apply for the article name, IMO, though the NRHP infobox should keep showing the official NRHP name identifying what was NRHP-listed. I don't have any sources to add info to this article, currently.
2238:
Not really, because, frankly, you seem to believe your view represents consensus while I believe all the other editors who repeatedly disagree with you more closely represent consensus, but if you want to give it a try... I made 6 types of changes to
6041:
to a redirect. There is one "Natchez Trace", aka "Old Natchez Trace," not a bunch of different roads by the same name. Creating the page was a good thing, though, as there was a need for an Old Natchez Trace page to help people find the article.
2360:(4) I think it is usually easier for most readers to get to where they want to go if an uncluttered format lists articles first, and this is preferred by the MOS, but I agree there can be common sense exceptions, such as I made for Marion, NC.
1039:. Now after creating what seems like a thousand articles for NY POs, should they have been United States Post Office instead of U.S. Post Office? I appeal to you because I know how much you like POs. Confused again ... time to return to NY--
5742:
Thanks, yes, just been fixing that up. Thanks for calling it to my attention. I hadn't gone all the way into fixing it properly before. Still messy, as coordinates for the two places are incorrect in the National Register database system.
4814:
About getting the nom docs, I have received a good number that way, by postal mail. Only for some states do they have scanned copies ready to email. Like many govt offices, they find it easier to photocopy than to scan and email, i guess.
4607:
you certainly should still request the NRHP nomination documents for the two sites, from the U.S. National Register office. Did you ever receive the noms for the several Davenport historic districts that we were working on, a while back? --
6960:
2489:
technical rules made up by disambiguation-focused editors. Perhaps an explicit exception to dab rules for pages like this should be added to the technical rules; i.e., it is the technical rules that are deficient, not this dab page. --
4273:
1440:
Thanks for pointing that out. Map display was quite akilter there, not sure why. It seemed to fix itself, when i did an edit just removing some extra stuff in infobox, and moving other infobox stuff around. I guess it is okay now.
6288:
Sure! Added refnum and that seemed to do the trick to show the NRHP header, and showed NRHP listing name in infobox. Feel free to edit down redundancy in footnote i added, or otherwise change. Not sure what style this is, is it
6214:, which seems fine. To anyone else watching this thread, over the last year there's been discussion about order of entries and, i think, more-or-less consensus that geographic ordering is okay and specifically can be included in
4031:
By the way, what kind of computer do you use? You'll have to download some sort of Windows-based program to run CRGIS (I downloaded it in July, so I don't remember what it is), which has worked fine on my Windows-based computer;
3978:
I used to access NRHP nomination forms via the Pennsylvania government's ARCH system, which is now defunct. Their newer website (ARGIS) is a nightmare and I have not been successful in accessing it. Thank you for the compliment!
2013:
policy. I'll revisit that now to confirm that it has not been changed. If you want, you could open a new central discussion about the policy and/or its application to one or more of these similar example dab pages, perhaps at
1181:
1566:
2351:(1) I think we agree this is the most important point. I think we now also agree that redlinks are permissible on a dab page if they also have a bluelink that has some meaningful information about the topic, but not otherwise.
4063:
I left a note on Canadian2006's talk page with links to the documents, as well an offer to try and explain how use the CRGIS system. I clarified, somewhat, how to find things with the database in the editor resource subpage.
2869:
Interesting question. Some of my ancestors were members of that church. I've never had a very clear idea of the specific family geography, since it's all submerged in metropolitan development. (Nice article by Camelbinky.)
4634:/ Authors Connie Heckert, Scott Community College Foundation / Material type Book / Subject Kahl Building (Davenport, Iowa), Kahl, Henry C., History Language English / Publisher Scott Community College Foundation / Year .
5496:
I haven't yet reconciled two contradictory opinions I have about this: (*) dab pages ought to have two direct links; but (*) insisting on that for these NRHP creations seems dogmatic and unnecessary. It's an interesting
2189:
That's what I was referring to when I replied to you on my talk page "I think we have discussed this before..." Please see 5 sections up on my talk page or the archive of your own talk page. That's also why I mentioned
1292:
is currently an article about a (non-NRHP) church in New Jersey, but I'm just about to start writing an article about an NRHP-listed church in Ohio, "St. Henry Catholic Church". Could you create a disambiguation page?
3741:
Please do feel free to offer me any constructive critisms if you are so inclined. Frankly I don't understand why I had to go to so much effort for something so simple (i.e. what could I do differently in the future?).
2427:
Thanks for noticing, and thanks for your helping. Now, I think the Main Street Historic District dab and also the other four mentioned have now all been cleaned up that way, to fully meet the technical requirement of
1322:
No, it is not completely simple. The edits are clearly in violation, however, of P's agreement to abide by mutually-selected mediator Acroterion's judgments including specific ruling on this exact matter. I asked at
6936:
6753:
3994:
Okay, good. I moved the article per that. Sorry i guess i used to use ARCH some, have not done PA stuff recently, don't get how to get NRHP docs out of PA's newer ARGIS interface either. Also commented more at
6219:
254:
for admins on enwiki at long last. We are now able to import content with full contribution histories from de, es, fr, it and pl, just like dewiki's been importing articles from enwiki. I've given it a try at
2168:
2952:
I don't know specifically about NYS's practices for removing info from their system. For NRHP-listed places, the info should always be in the NRIS database. Elkman added capability to the NRHP infobox tool
2217:
6736:
2802:
You're welcome. I had just come across the DYK nom, noticed it was for an american architect. When i went to evaluate it, then i got a bit involved adding info, yes. Good luck with the dyk and afd on it.
339:, which seems to be a prominent and notable but not-at-all historical Catholic church near Albany, New York. Could you convert it into a disambiguation page? I've discovered another St. Francis Chapel in
6688:, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT WE HAVE BECOME AWARE OF SOME QUESTIONS AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THIS DATABASE. What do you think? I fear that she's lost all objectivity on the subject I am interested in, which is
3684:
I think you moved it. It looks fine to me now. It's DYK-eligible now based on expansion and it is already a nice starter article worth giving some attention to; i think you should put it up for DYK. :)
1258:
Sorry I didn't know that you were going to write the article on St. John's—I think I know where it is, and if I'd known there'd be an article, I would have tried to photograph it while I was in the county.
7005:
I disagree with your opinion, but I've proposed an alternate hook; please check it out. Also, sorry for the confusion; perhaps you already discovered that I meant to say the fourth page, not the third.
1865:
1861:
1203:
Just curious, how did you get the nomination form — request from the NPS or otherwise? I don't remember seeing any Nebraska forms online, so I'd be interested in hearing if you got it some other way.
5167:
of the template or its policy of use, and we hope you will, please consider either adding your name to the list of workshop members, or joining in with the policy discussions on the new page. --
6873:
6879:
2220:
was one of the other discussions, from which you quote. The other editor, JHunterJ, was specifically focusing on his idea that red-link entries should be sorted down to the bottom of pages like
5991:
Hi, thanks for commenting. I removed the PROD though. See other short discussions above, and, again, my response is: The red-link places are legit entries, wikipedia notable, and comply with
2243:, which I numbered 1 thru 6 in my reply to you, all of which you reverted. You've already addressed point 1, and just now you've addressed point 4. Would you care to address points 2, 3, and 6?
4641:/ Annotation 1st ed." That sounds like a useful source! So you've made a good start already, but it seems like there's more available locally and in the NRHP nom docs, yet to be obtained. --
3568:
and others. You are absolutely correct. I have changed the infobox on Yeywa Dam and addressed your concerns but I'm not happy with the result. The box is too wide as you can see compared with
3093:
I just cut and pasted the wikiproject info from another page or an open Elkman infobox window, didn't think about whether it should be left at Stub or changed. Sorry for causing confusion. --
4493:
7020:
Do you think that I'm angry? If so, I'm sorry; I didn't mean to create that impression. Please don't "bow out" because of what I've said; there's no way that you're being unhelpful here.
560:
I think that's it. I forgot about Orange, but i recall thinking i would try to catch Daniel Case's attention by that, and only one edit in a Hudson valley county should be needed for that.
6588:
5236:
recordings by her. I wonder if there is some main article in which she could be mentioned, and convert this article into a redirect to that, but marked as a redirect with possibilities. --
5101:
While, thanks to Pubdog, Maryland has at least stubs for every NRHP property, the Maryland Historical Trust has recently posted the noms for every property but those in Baltimore City here
3996:
1152:
1198:
4475:. Hey, the best sources vary according to what U.S. state your NRHP of interest is located in. A very good source is always the NRHP nomination document, which usually is a well-written
4306:
5791:"Baltimore, MD" - so your change is valid. I thought I'd clarify for your benefit though. How do i know this? I lived in the house from ages 12-22ish, and I still keep a room there.
4471:
Hi. Your talk page says to reply here, so i will. You can start any NRHP article by clicking on a redlink in the system of lists of NRHP places wikipedians have built up, indexed from
2171:
where Station1 had nicely enough opened some discussion, but then where this was all talked out well enough IMHO. The NRHP disambiguation was also discussed in several other threads at
968:
columns and can see other details, but knowing approx. when the house was built and other info would be most helpful. Is it described in the NRHP nom doc, have you received that yet? --
5625:
3005:
is the website for the church congregation, the photo is of the church we are discussing. And this is the address- Lisha's Kill Reformed Church 2131 Central Avenue Schenectady, NY 12304
1916:
and further followed up briefly, to point out previous discussions and to acknowledge that items with bluelinks only linking to state-wide NRHP lists might, for technical compliance to
2565:
constituency for ships given the same name, because there is coherence and relationship in the naming: when one British warship was retired, another would be given the same name. So
1226:. I was interested to notice Kansas has some or all of its NRHP nom docs online, but Nebraska seems to just have very short summaries and small pics, like linked from this article. --
4287:
1222:'s nom form by email from the National Register upon request. It was the one of 3 Hayes County ones they had scanned, about which i mentioned at the Address Restricted discussion at
7316:
2892:
Oh? It also does not appear to be New York State-listed, at least i don't find anything with "Lisha" in its title and no hits on "Reformed Church" jump out at me, when I search at
1024:
6869:
1552:
6770:
4060:
I'm thinking that merging the Manchester Historic District into the Manchester neighborhood article would work, as the historic district is an integral part of the neighborhood.
3064:
What did you mean about the NPS website being down? I'm able to download the MPS form without trouble, and the nomination form comes from the state website, not the NPS website.
2577:
by doing the work you are calling for. Again it is highly likely that that work will turn out to be wasted in a few months or a year, after all the NRHP articles are created. --
2640:
I don't pay attention to New York listings, so this is the first time I've seen one of your pictures. Just curious — what kind of a camera is a General Imaging Company A1050?
4709:
Ya, I sent it January 31, to the correct address. It is very possible I over looked it when I glanced at my spam folder, I resent it, and will hopefully receive a reply soon.
7416:
You may have missed this up higher.....Do the map locations have to be of the location within the state? Can it be switched to the location within the city such as the map of
4283:
1774:, to be moved to some more appropriate place once it's developed. I'll be working on it in between bouts of snow shoveling, and you're encouraged to contribute as you desire.
4439:
Where is a good place to find info about the NRHP. Their website really only has basic info, I'm looking for where I can find enough info to create a stub/start article.
3975:
In case you were wondering, Greensburg, Pa., is my hometown. I also created the Academy Hill Historic District article, although it needs more work regarding references.
3966:
1156:
5996:
5837:
5670:
5465:
4291:
6759:
6510:
6417:
imagine how dreadful it would be for anyone creating NRHP dab pages without Autoreviewer status, by the way, since i am getting enough heat as it is. Anyhow, thanks! --
5878:
5538:
1219:
6294:
1771:
1876:
will apply. I do believe you mean well but I also believe that revisiting all this, reasonably well settled already, is not likely to be hugely helpful. Regards, --
1213:
223:
6153:
Okay, i just revisited the dab article to build out supporting bluelinks for the other NRHP ones listed. And, in the process, i removed a couple and commented at
6019:
You recently created a disambiguation page that seems inappropriate. These really shouldn't be separate articles and is probably better treated under the existing
4400:
3988:
860:
Nice pics there! I like how u have that laid out and captioned, and i like ur panoramic pics especially. I oughta get a camera that can do that. About pics for
539:
7350:
4252:
3618:
how. Is there a central adder/number checker who should be consulted/informed? I checked on the sandbox to see if other entries had been added: it looked like
263:. Let me know if there's anything you'd like imported, although I prefer to keep it to clean titles: complex history merges aren't easy or quickly accomplished.
5135:
554:
102:
5985:
6337:
somewhat arcane issue area of the NRHP dab pages, and that has been coming up repeatedly. I'll put my name forward in the linked place for that. Thanks! --
4185:
2847:'s "WhoHas" NRHP search tool, when search on "Reformed Church"? I don't see Lisha Kill mentioned, but perhaps under a different location name? You try, at
2172:
1351:
there are many more NRHP-listed churches in the area that I expect to visit — so I should be able to pass through some time in late winter or early spring.
200:
Thanks very much for your consideration. I too highly respect the work of Mr. Case and will defer to his style on these stubs, if that is what is decided.--
6614:
4484:
interest i could help more. But, for all NRHPs, there's a handy system to generate an NRHP infobox and appropriate categories and more info, supported by
1726:
3038:
is listed, and in the nom it notes that the 1854-built Lisha's Kill Church closely resembles it. That's probably where the article author got confused.
6097:
6090:
5651:
5422:
5349:
4279:
2480:
Yes, it is a good idea. It is a good contribution to building the wikipedia, to provide disambiguation between 3 wikipedia-notable places named exactly
6692:
libeling an enterprise with questionable and outdated claims of illegal operation that never saw light of day anywhere in the state of Pennsylvania. --
5437:
3090:
it is in fact available. And Elkman's system "knows" the MPS URLs because we built up a list of them, and then E incorporated our list into his system.
2160:
5826:
5396:
4897:, and my parent's have a scanner I can go use, so e-mailing them is no problem. They won't get tired of sending me copies of the nominations, I hope.
1822:
1764:
127:
713:
E-mailed, and my panorama pic is of this district, if more are needed let me know, and I can take care of that. If I'm picking a few to do, we can do
7362:
7333:
5201:
5096:
4894:
4811:. And i browse around and do other stuff hard to classify, like helping some recently on the big problem of unsourced Biographies of Living Persons.
4132:
2607:
2044:(and the other pages mentioned) currently do not conform. In the first paragraph above I explained precisely how it does not and why I changed them.
1751:
861:
724:
6158:
acknowledge there is room for other opinions about some matters. If very specific to this dab, perhaps best continued at its Talk page. Thanks. --
5254:
Another editor has tagged for expansion/cleanup. So I've just added a note to the talk page to see if anyone else can help. Will see what happens!
7260:
5271:
5151:
7104:
5737:
5416:
5186:
Article has been moved; thanks for the notification. I deleted the Oregon redirect, since I seriously doubt that it would be a useful redirect.
4267:
4013:
I can help you with the CRGIS (not ARGIS) if you want. The system is overall self-explanatory with multiple help pages if you can find them; try
3631:
The "The" in the article name doesn't look right to me - on the infobox, sure; but on the article name? I found the infobox. I'll check out the
3611:
2812:
2569:
does use SIAs successfully. But again here, we want just one Fred House article to cover all the houses and actors and other uses of that phrase.
1530:
1504:
454:
6148:
previous cases. Perhaps if there are individual items that are not adequately supported, those could be removed to the Talk page for discussion.
5977:
5805:
5338:
5259:
5225:
3351:
3332:
6453:
6399:
5870:
5849:
5800:
3671:
3644:
3399:
2718:
2672:
2649:
2527:
on the College Avenue Historic District page is going to be sorely disappointed (and probably will mutter some evil things about Knowledge), as
1410:
6949:
6708:
6306:
5131:
4171:
As you can see at the talk page, I think that my own error is the major reason for the misunderstanding between us. Sorry for confusing you.
4008:
2635:
2139:
I did ask other NRHP editors to refine supporting bluelinks from time to time, e.g. as when they happen to be editing a disambiguation page. --
569:
7328:
5752:
7387:
7232:
6724:
6712:
6500:
6426:
6361:
6346:
6104:
5554:
5516:
5477:
5370:
5364:
3721:
3694:
3586:
3029:
3014:
2983:
2860:
2837:
1276:
1036:
222:
That was about edits on 30 October or 31 October. On November 3, Nyttend edited the two articles to restore the NRHP name to infobox, as in
119:
7287:
6911:
6375:
5682:
4428:
4282:
selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
4131:
Ah, thanks. Have interested me in adding a bit to the Edgerton Park article. And then yes the demolition was in 1964 apparently. More at
3533:
2184:
1806:
1793:
1080:
179:
7127:
6536:
6236:
6197:
6167:
6008:
5487:
the project already does this, is to make dab page creation standard whenever making the NRHP page (if it's one that needs one, of course).
4413:
4345:
3873:
3826:
3791:
3772:
3623:
3468:
2498:
2394:
2342:
2302:
2252:
2233:
2207:
2130:
2077:
2053:
2031:
1999:
1964:
1949:
1930:
1885:
1855:
1580:
1114:
7204:
7170:
7029:
7015:
6844:
6830:
6816:
6600:
6578:
5640:
5580:
4359:
4100:
4045:
4026:
3948:
3921:
3908:
3840:
3117:
3102:
3047:
2601:
2517:
2455:
2148:
1468:
1450:
1360:
1345:
1317:
1235:
381:
322:
7502:
7471:
6681:
6659:
6641:
6522:
6073:
6051:
5785:
5046:
5012:
4923:
4888:
4824:
4735:
4704:
4689:
4616:
4582:
4548:
4505:
4158:
4144:
3501:
3369:
2966:
2931:
2905:
2879:
2619:
2586:
2548:
2441:
1716:
1684:
1592:
1134:
1093:
977:
915:
882:
855:
820:
785:
762:
708:
688:
235:
209:
195:
149:
143:
5062:
Do the map locations have to be of the location within the state? Can it be switched to the location within the city such as the map of
4993:
4962:
4797:
4771:
They asked me for my home address, which is fine, but I just figured they'd e-mail me a copy...is this how they usually do it for you?
4766:
3258:
2474:
2114:
1906:
1669:
1168:
1070:
962:
7293:
6211:
5700:
5343:
5255:
5221:
3814:
3782:
as I mentioned before, since I wasn't the one who did the move, it wasn't really my job to chase down the admins to fix the problem. --
1834:
5610:
5263:
5245:
3067:
Why rate it a stub? Bear in mind that I never rate articles, so this is a confused question, not a challenging or unhappy question.
2796:
2421:
1802:
I've closed this RfC because there has been no outside interest. It looks like the skirmishes and edit wars have stopped, anyway. --
6916:
5722:
5404:
4390:
3655:
2015:
1565:
on it and have an admin delete it? Should I submit it for a regular AFD? I could probably re-edit it so the names are in sync with
7462:
about gaining ability to display 2 images, like one for a photo and one for a custom map. That I would also like to learn about. --
6677:
4846:
Did you want to work on some of the Scott County places with me and develop articles, or are you tied up on other stuff right now?
7310:
7307:
7304:
7301:
6781:
6701:
2818:
657:
7446:
5352:
elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
4932:
says Kahl Building and Capitol Theatre, should the article remain named Kahl Building as that is the NRHP name, and then just put
3076:
7109:
6896:
6485:
3738:
I very much appreciate your helping to mediate the discussion on El Paso-Juarez. My faith in the system is restored, as it were.
1573:
1302:
642:
5195:
4180:
1434:
7070:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page
7037:
6558:
6282:
5965:
5304:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page
4218:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page
3151:
2732:
1757:
1744:
1569:, but since I violated Knowledge standards so badly, and since I'm completely clueless, I'll let you make the call on this. --
1193:
420:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page
387:
336:
159:
6999:
6685:
5663:
5407:
page now. Sure, i'll take a look at that. Saw your posting at wt:NRHP but didn't have any bright ideas for you easily. :) --
4085:
2058:
Okay, then this is back to your saying the first 2 items in the Main Street Historic District page did not comply with MOSDAB
1308:
I'm not going to block because of a request on a talk page, unless it's simple vandalism, and I take it that this is not so.
1048:
7086:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
6976:
5320:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
4234:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
4213:
3810:
3659:
3587:
3474:
1814:
436:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
6748:
6626:
1913:
352:
6031:
5592:
3452:
3395:
3254:
3210:
1032:
733:
163:
6934:
has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
4419:
Whoops! In that case I'd say close it. You guys gave me more than enough feedback to keep me busy for a while! Thanks!
3434:
3168:(actually, the one in Kentucky reads "Olmstead", but that's an NRIS error and beside the point). They both have articles:
7417:
7406:
6330:
5938:
5176:
5063:
1608:
1495:
template freak out.. so that's what was wrong. Don't include that parameter unless you're going to set a number to it. --
729:
695:
7256:
6141:
4330:
3931:
1542:
7335:
7294:
7244:
7115:
6891:
6290:
6265:
6185:
5376:
3527:
1182:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject United States courts and judges#Request for comment on federal courthouse naming conventions
714:
610:
471:
403:
7268:
7154:
6672:
We may need to file an Administrators Notice on Orlady, and her tag-team partner TallMagic (aka Bill Huffman). She's
5631:
tag already, though. For the NRHP cleanup ones, they are already well marked enough by that tag, i think. Thanks! --
2213:
533:
7397:
7053:
6210:
I just went to the dab page to address the New York, New York one, and find that Orlady has just revised the item by
5780:
5287:
5229:
3581:
2772:
865:
488:
5713:, which does not exist. I'm contacting you in case this is not the way to go as far as your project is concerned.
4201:
4017:
for some help. I've also emailed you a how-to-use-CRGIS document that someone from the Pennsylvania SHPO sent me.
3757:
1395:
307:
6789:
6269:
5299:
4650:
4511:
3595:
3554:
3290:
3223:
3178:
3055:
2523:
2481:
1637:
614:
286:
6961:
Talk:National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Wilmington,_Delaware#Cleaning_up_the_New_Castle_County_lists
5091:
4872:
4465:
4385:
256:
7380:
7373:
5969:
5688:
4125:
3156:
2019:
1284:
719:
7313:
2036:
No; with respect, you misunderstand me or MOS:DAB or both. I am saying MOS:DAB (a guideline, not a policy, btw)
1249:. I'm not sure what their timetable is for getting the rest online, or the order in which they're posting them.
6491:
That was obnoxious to delete within a minute or two of first edit. I restored and am continuing to develop. --
6468:
I speedied this - being a nominee for a "best of city local band" award isn't really a claim of notability per
6114:
5897:
5883:
5181:
4638:
4597:
Svendsen, Marlys. “Davenport, Where the River Runs West: A Survey of Davenport History & Architecture”. ND.
4166:
3357:
2221:
2191:
2164:
1975:
1860:
Okay, or here (I'll watch). But perhaps to cut unnecessary discussion short, i am referring tin part to [[See
1416:
6801:
6255:
to show the NRHP header. I also need ref no info, style info and other general assistance with the infobox.--
4488:
mostly using the National Register's public domain NRIS database. To use it, search for your NRHP by name at
2462:
1013:
999:
868:(which does not happen to include a pic of every structure, though I think i do possess a pic for each one).
498:
Ammodramus discovered two of these places: one in North Platte, Nebraska and one in Grand Island, Nebraska.
6667:
6544:
3913:
I posted on the talk page before I moved it. I didn't do anything against the BRD process you always cite. --
3423:
3127:
2240:
2041:
1815:
1018:
575:
6632:
Ridiculous. I was explaining, to non-involved others, why i did not write "s/he", "himself/herself" etc. --
4556:
I'd still like ideas from you on where to find more...especially cause my site is downtown buildings only.
7142:
6981:
6463:
6220:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Order of entries allowing geographic order explicitly
5617:
5380:
4055:
2778:
2461:
Considering the long exchange above and the work Orlady and you did in response, it's disheartening to see
2263:"(3) Section headers should not be used unless there are sections." Here I think you refer to the leading
889:
Those two articles are nice with all the pics. I'll see what I need to take pics of after I get the email.
584:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
6591:
list — it has two reference numbers because it was listed, removed, and relisted at a different address.
3569:
7100:
6608:
5957:
5901:
5879:
5832:
Hi, thanks for asking. Yes, actually! The places are legit entries, wikipedia notable, and comply with
5770:
4248:
2740:
2686:
2536:
450:
3198:
on the first one, but have had second thoughts. Since they are arguably of equal importance, shouldn't
7459:
7458:
area, you could simply display that as the infobox's image, in lieu of a photograph. You could ask at
7454:
7141:, or is the current format now accepted by the disambiguation wikiproject? I've created an article on
7087:
7073:
5961:
5854:
OK, thanks for the link to the NRHP discussion - I see there has been much said on this issue already.
5646:
5321:
5307:
4235:
4225:
4221:
3635:
article - to try to avoid too much overlap - then start of the College article. Any help appreciated.
933:
869:
437:
423:
328:
38:
4091:
Okay, thanks! (tho i tried, again, a bit feebly perhaps, and couldnt get it to work), and sure. :) --
3572:. I don't know how to fix it as the coding for these things is above my pay grade, so I am moving on.-
1425:
to fill the page. You don't need more to do - but I tried, and am not able to fix it myself. Thanks
6987:
6730:
6014:
5392:
4396:
4318:
3497:
3136:
3035:
2922:
If it was torn down and delisted within the last few years, would the delisting info be available? --
2792:
1500:
7114:
Hello! I've done an annotated critique of the Ansel Adams article, which I invite you to review at
6954:
6673:
6246:
5162:
Hi Doncram/Archive 13 ! The template workshop has now split off most of the long threads purely on
3804:
Polaron, if there is any chance that a page move will be contested, it is far better IMO to open a
3500:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
3428:
3391:
3250:
2678:
118:
I'd like to try to correct this, but want to make sure I do it right. What do you think? Thanks.
5311:
1579:
Those are over-statements in my view, but I am sorry that you took offense to my comments within
6821:
Added a couple more to lists; Weldon House in Greene County and Dubois House in Columbia County.
5864:
5820:
5705:
5695:
5200:
5157:
4376:
Note that I reviewed your latest DYK nomination (Whitney Avenue HD) and found multiple issues. --
3936:
1821:
You left the following message on my talk page, headed "your edit in contradiction to MOSDAB": "
6986:
Thanks for the note; I've offered a revised hook. Did you want a link to the nomination form?
6317:
I ran across a few more of your dab pages on NPP, and I wondered if you'd considered asking for
5597:
Hello, just to let you know that this disambiguation page has been nominated for deletion using
4480:
3662:? Last time I tried a double switch like this, I really messed it up. Thanks for everything.
3086:
1739:
has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge. The RFC entry can be found by your name in
1246:
7096:
7065:
6785:
6318:
6261:
6061:
4244:
3984:
3521:
2169:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)/Archive 39#Broad Street Historic District
1422:
826:
606:
550:
446:
415:
7046:
6882:
on the table to conclude the process. I encourage your input, whatever it might be. Thanks. --
5810:
Does it make much sense to create a disambiguation page whose contents are entirely redlinks?
5280:
5142:
both currently show as red-links. Or is Maryland under-scrutinized so far by wikipedians?) --
4194:
1756:
That link looks like it's broken because of a template for deletion, so here's a direct link:
396:
7058:
6945:
6697:
6188:
is a redirect, and I think we may have agreed earlier that these were generally undesirable.
6124:
Thank you for keeping the written-out state names when otherwise reverting my recent edit to
6119:
5999:. If you have further questions/comments, probably they are best made in that discussion. --
5733:
5718:
5710:
5292:
5139:
4312:
4206:
4068:
3538:
2218:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)/Archive 39#restore NRHP dab page please
1489:
592:
408:
662:
Actually, would you be interested in helping me expand some of the districts you mentioned?
7317:
Talk:Old_Natchez_Trace_(disambiguation)#to_name.2C_or_not.2C_the_7_NRHP_places_of_this_name
7225:
7218:
7132:
6972:
6907:
6854:
6481:
6449:
6390:
6357:
6326:
6312:
5796:
5598:
5512:
5433:
5388:
5114:
3930:, and generally talking here. I do believe you are trying to improve the wikipedia in the
3717:
3667:
3640:
3607:
3010:
2979:
2833:
2824:
2788:
2744:
2726:
2705:
2504:
1851:
1784:
1496:
1406:
1386:
1272:
791:
493:
340:
277:
7181:
7176:
5134:. (Funny about those Baltimore County towns, are they not legal towns or what, why would
2354:(2) I'm glad we agree! The piped link is Marion, North Carolina, and yes it's still there.
8:
7467:
7402:
7358:
7324:
7283:
7275:
7264:
7200:
7123:
6637:
6574:
6496:
6422:
6342:
6302:
6232:
6163:
6069:
6060:
Hmm. I restored and extended the disambiguation page. Am copying the above comments to
6004:
5973:
5949:
5926:
5845:
5748:
5678:
5659:
5636:
5550:
5541:. I still rely heavily upon the Elkman who has tool in creating and improving dabs, and
5473:
5412:
5241:
5147:
5008:
4884:
4820:
4700:
4646:
4612:
4501:
4424:
4140:
4096:
4004:
3944:
3904:
3822:
3690:
3619:
3577:
3387:
3347:
3328:
3323:
although that is probably not needed here, given Olmsted spelling. You're doing fine. --
3246:
3199:
3185:
3098:
3025:
2962:
2901:
2856:
2808:
2714:
2668:
2582:
2513:
2494:
2437:
2338:
2298:
2229:
2180:
2144:
2126:
2073:
2027:
1960:
1926:
1680:
1588:
1446:
1341:
1289:
1231:
1223:
1189:
1110:
1089:
1055:
punctuation (which was inconsistent among the court names before I moved them, as well).
973:
878:
781:
704:
632:
565:
529:
467:
459:
377:
231:
191:
139:
7367:
7278:, since archived by EuroPride. Resolution was that orphan tag was kept off the page. --
7077:
4286:
by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
1567:
National Register of Historic Places listings in Center Township, Marion County, Indiana
427:
7250:
7212:
7083:
6887:
6744:
6532:
6193:
6154:
6137:
5981:
5856:
5812:
5776:
5760:
5360:
5317:
5209:
4999:
4326:
4302:
4274:
Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
4231:
3869:
3787:
3753:
3448:
2736:
2470:
2451:
2390:
2248:
2203:
2110:
2049:
1995:
1945:
1902:
1740:
1598:
1119:
Don't sweat the numbers too much, a bot can rename ten thousand articles in its sleep.
433:
358:
329:
291:
6180:
item 3-1 (as opposed to item 3-3), because someone typing in or linking to the phrase
5654:
is fine, but all it consists of are two redlinks. Are you planning to make them soon?
4554:
2893:
7166:
7150:
7025:
7011:
6995:
6940:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
6931:
6840:
6826:
6812:
6797:
6760:
WT:STICKY#Category:Users with new unsourced Biographies of Living People under review
6596:
6555:
6273:
6256:
6038:
6028:
5934:
5606:
5576:
5191:
5172:
4635:
4434:
4409:
4367:
4355:
4341:
4176:
4041:
4022:
3980:
3918:
3837:
3769:
3733:
3559:
3510:
3464:
3419:
3304:
3232:
3147:
3113:
3072:
3043:
2731:
Hi, this message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion on
2645:
2597:
2574:
1987:
1893:
Reply: The "previous consensus of numerous disambiguation editors" is represented at
1881:
1873:
1830:
1526:
1464:
1430:
1356:
1313:
1298:
1209:
618:
601:
546:
503:
484:
348:
318:
303:
47:
17:
5915:
7498:
7442:
6941:
6720:
6693:
6655:
6622:
6518:
6371:
6252:
6215:
6081:
6047:
5729:
5714:
5334:
5087:
5042:
4989:
4958:
4919:
4868:
4808:
4793:
4762:
4731:
4685:
4578:
4544:
4492:. It generates output ready for you to cut-and-paste into your article. Also see
4461:
4381:
4154:
4121:
4106:
4014:
3365:
2927:
2875:
2752:
2615:
2544:
2417:
2195:
1983:
1979:
1846:
I think we have discussed this before, but I will reply on your talk page shortly.
1712:
1665:
1633:
1559:
1164:
1129:
1065:
1044:
1009:
995:
958:
911:
851:
816:
758:
684:
475:
260:
205:
175:
155:
123:
6177:
5102:
7410:
7241:
6968:
6927:
6903:
6477:
6445:
6383:
6353:
6322:
5914:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
5792:
5766:
5508:
5429:
5107:
4515:
4263:
4033:
3713:
3663:
3636:
3603:
3006:
2975:
2829:
2784:
2765:
2566:
2531:-- and to find the relevant content they have to know what county the site is in.
2412:
Kudos to you, Doncram, for finishing the update of all the links on that page. --
1777:
1770:
I've begun to put together an outline for an RfC on the NRHP content disputes at
1402:
1379:
1370:
1268:
270:
2654:
107:(This is my first attempt at using a talk page - I hope I am doing this right.)
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
7354:
7320:
7315:.) During this time period you appear to have engaged in limited discussion at
7255:
Please do not remove maintence tags without addressing the problems as you did
7119:
6766:
6473:
6469:
6297:? For whichever, add "architecture= ___" to infobox. Hope this much helps. --
6277:
5655:
4804:
4420:
3573:
3287:(and listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under that name)
3192:
2277:"(5) Things in Texas should not link to articles about Wisconsin." I agree! :)
1548:
628:
622:
251:
245:
5997:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#feedback requested on NRHP dab pages
5838:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#feedback requested on NRHP dab pages
5671:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#feedback requested on NRHP dab pages
5466:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#feedback requested on NRHP dab pages
2743:
issues with which you may have been involved. (See Here for more information:
2271:
order is essential in my view. Some other formatting perhaps would be better.
6883:
6740:
6528:
6189:
6133:
6125:
6020:
5944:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
5772:
5356:
4929:
4519:
4322:
4298:
4112:
4067:
By the way, I'm not sure when, but I'm probably going to tap you for a PR of
3927:
3865:
3783:
3749:
3632:
3599:
3550:
3539:
3475:
3440:
2698:
2466:
2447:
2386:
2257:
Oh, ok, I hadn't focused on other than the first one, i guess. About those:
2244:
2199:
2106:
2045:
1991:
1941:
1898:
1847:
1736:
1324:
985:
648:
5703:
as that is the only page on Knowledge I could find with the correct title.
2522:
I share Station1's concern here, Doncram. Unlike some of those other pages,
7463:
7279:
7196:
7162:
7146:
7138:
7021:
7007:
6991:
6836:
6822:
6808:
6793:
6775:
6754:
Category:Users with new unsourced Biographies of Living People under review
6633:
6592:
6570:
6565:
6551:
6492:
6418:
6338:
6298:
6228:
6159:
6065:
6024:
6000:
5841:
5744:
5674:
5632:
5602:
5572:
5546:
5469:
5450:
5408:
5237:
5187:
5168:
5143:
5127:
5004:
4880:
4816:
4740:
Do you have specifics you work on, or do you just go where you're needed?
4696:
4642:
4608:
4497:
4476:
4472:
4405:
4351:
4337:
4172:
4136:
4092:
4074:
4037:
4018:
4000:
3940:
3914:
3900:
3833:
3818:
3805:
3765:
3686:
3460:
3415:
3343:
3324:
3280:
3217:
3172:
3143:
3109:
3094:
3068:
3039:
3021:
2958:
2897:
2852:
2804:
2761:
2710:
2664:
2641:
2593:
2578:
2558:
2509:
2490:
2433:
2334:
2294:
2225:
2176:
2140:
2122:
2069:
2023:
1956:
1922:
1877:
1826:
1732:
1676:
1584:
1522:
1460:
1442:
1426:
1352:
1337:
1309:
1294:
1227:
1205:
1185:
1106:
1085:
969:
874:
777:
700:
596:
561:
525:
510:
499:
480:
373:
344:
314:
299:
227:
187:
135:
5529:
During the last year i have primarily used tools created and supported by
5130:(where i drafted a reference for one of its documents) and for mention at
4489:
2954:
7478:
7422:
6716:
6651:
6618:
6514:
6367:
6043:
5601:. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Best wishes,
5534:
5530:
5330:
5067:
5022:
4969:
4938:
4899:
4848:
4773:
4742:
4711:
4665:
4558:
4524:
4485:
4441:
4377:
4150:
4117:
3493:
3479:
3409:
3361:
2923:
2871:
2848:
2844:
2769:
2747:
2611:
2540:
2413:
2377:
1803:
1761:
1748:
1692:
1645:
1613:
1604:
1570:
1160:
1120:
1081:
User talk:BD2412#naming conventions for U.S. post offices and courthouses
1056:
1040:
1028:
1005:
991:
938:
891:
831:
796:
773:
738:
664:
201:
171:
167:
6098:
User_talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects#BLP_and_wikiprojects_expanding_their_role
3598:- I can always go get another photo of the place under snow! Note that
2768:. And the discussion is attracting no real outside interest anyway. --
1990:. I'll leave those for a few days too, in case you want to update them.
5889:
4259:
4494:
Knowledge:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Editor help
3507:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --
3202:
be a dab pointing at both of them? I had in mind something like this:
3132:
Re your recent edit, there is an infobox specifically for windmills -
6762:
6584:
6172:
Thanks for fixing the bluelinks. I think the entries actually titled
6111:
5992:
5833:
4479:, written by a historian. For some states, the Federal website with
3997:
Talk:Greensburg Downtown Historic District (Greensburg, Pennsylvania)
3565:
3315:
confusing, but not named the same, such as Olmstead Place State Park:
2702:
2429:
2010:
2005:
1917:
1869:
1153:
United States Post Office and Courthouse (Charleston, South Carolina)
6472:. Feel free to repost if you find more information that shows that
6023:
article. This is a single old road from Mississippi to Tennessee. --
5616:
Hi, thanks for the notification. As you've noticed, i responded at
5443:
I appreciate your asking and your general thoughtfulness about this.
4553:
Actually the Davenport Library has some pretty good info for a stub
4036:
has reported an inability to use it on his/her Macintosh computer.
5212:. What do you think? Where would you like to go with this article?
3546:
3486:
3459:
I'm often citing them as print sources when I write new articles.
3360:
which is locally known as the Olmsted Park System in Buffalo, NY.--
6922:
6527:
And mine. You're mixing up two bands, and possibly three or four.
2004:
Okay, no, well, then what you are saying is you disagree with the
1521:
Good to know there is a rational explanation. Thanks to you both.
313:
Do you have other pics? I'd like one of the terra cotta details.
3764:
trouble. Anyway, we'll see how the current requestd move goes. --
1894:
1025:
Knowledge:WikiProject United States courts and judges/courthouses
5215:
I've got this page on my watchlist if you prefer to reply here.
5208:
in her own name. Therefore I'm not convinced that she satisfies
4496:, which gives state-specific tips and more. Hope this helps. --
2529:
they will not find any relevant content on the blue-linked pages
1555:
now that I screwed up so bad with the names? Should I just put
1553:
Apartments and Flats of Downtown Indianapolis Thematic Resources
7342:
5542:
2385:
So I hope we now understand each other even where we disagree.
1421:
I like those new LA County maps. But it caused the infobox at
1031:
is now moving all articles with U.S. to United States, such as
769:
154:
Hello: Another question concerning recent edits, this time by
6860:
1327:. Thanks for considering, but you don't have to get involved.
990:
Hi. I replied on my talkpage to the comment you made there. --
790:
I sure will. Thanks for all your help. I'll add pictures from
7341:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
6872:. The sticky prods are now in use, but there are still a few
1180:
Please see RFC opened by BD2412 on this point and others, at
7390:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
7235:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
6107:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
5545:
which have long been provided to perform other functions. --
3002:
1157:
U.S. Post Office and Courthouse (Charleston, South Carolina)
5383:
into mainspace, but I'm not sure what to name the article.
4928:
As noted on the picture I just uploaded...the sign for the
1862:
this extended past discussion at WikiProject Disambiguation
1841:(Also added there, copying to here for completeness later):
2843:
Could it be any of the churches which appear in output of
2175:
at that time in which Station1 and I also participated. --
1220:
St. John's Evangelical Lutheran German Church and Cemetery
1199:
St. John's Evangelical Lutheran German Church and Cemetery
2760:
Uh, I think he's already aware of that. And it's not on
2167:
a few months ago, and then I further find my way back to
4401:
Knowledge:Peer review/Nawa-I-Barakzayi District/archive1
6684:
source" a snapshot of an outdated website that said in
6184:
is more likely to be searching for these topics. Also,
3439:
seems to have gone dead. Can you remedy this? Thanks, —
3209:
may refer to either of two sites with that name on the
1914:
User talk:Station1#your edit in contradiction to MOSDAB
1547:
Since I'm so clueless about the way things are done at
932:
Are you good with housing styles? If so, what style is
591:
Thanks again for your helpful comments at peer review.
5921:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
4149:
Hmm... 1964 is much longer ago than I remembered... --
3268:
explanation for each one, as in perhaps the following:
1027:. After doing a bunch of articles, the project owner
6444:
Thanks for that anyway, sorry for any inconvenience.
5387:
together this library page, and it's over 10K now. --
3564:
Doncram, Thank you for your comments on infoboxes in
3414:
Didja see that someone's offering to help with this?
3283:, Boston and Brookline, Massachusetts, also known as
2173:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)
6990:you go; the relevant passage is on the third page.
3967:
Greensburg Downtown Historic District (Pennsylvania)
5464:Please also see my commenting a bit further at the
3492:An article that you have been involved in editing,
2446:I also want to thank both of you for your updates.
1336:
Sure, will do the disambiguation page requested. --
6564:Yes, you're right. I was just requesting help at
2783:Thanks very much for all your improvements at the
7180:couple weeks. I did just now fix this one up to
4895:Prospect Park Historic District (Davenport, Iowa)
4632:The Kahl legacy: the history, the man, the vision
4522:so I feel it necessary to start those articles.
4395:Hi Palm dogg. Glad you found the peer review of
4133:Talk:Edgerton (Hamden and New Haven, Connecticut)
2608:Main Street Historic District (Roxbury, New York)
2214:User talk:Station1#Broad Street Historic District
2022:. If you do, please invite me to participate. --
862:Prospect Park Historic District (Davenport, Iowa)
725:Prospect Park Historic District (Davenport, Iowa)
7300:It is obvious you are over 3rr on this article (
6650:Thanks. I'm glad (and relieved) to know that. --
6086:Sorry, I have been very busy with new house....
4258:Congratulations, Doncram. You deserve this. ----
3020:Hey you're welcome, and it's no biggy at all. --
540:NYS OPRHP press releases about new NRHP listings
5968:can result in deletion without discussion, and
5020:got the Riverview Terace stuff from the NRHP!
6550:nomination when there is only one property. --
5132:Talk:Hooper House (Baltimore County, Maryland)
2159:For the record, I just came across Station1's
1023:Hi ... taking a break from NY NRHP to work on
103:correcting Printing House Districts in Chicago
7409:location shown as an area within the city of
6380:You've been an autoreviewer since last June.
5379:when you get a chance? I really want to move
4186:DYK for Montauk Association Historic District
1037:United States Post Office (Missoula, Montana)
6737:Knowledge talk:Sticky Prod workshop/testpage
1743:, and the actual discussion can be found at
1727:RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Doncram)
1581:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Cathcart
1151:Issue still unresolved. See todays move of
7349:redirect, you might want to participate in
6711:reminds me that there are cons everywhere:
5423:Question about the NRHP drive for dab pages
3502:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nida Sameer
3241:Or am I missing something? Thanks, . . . .
2333:Hope this helps. Thanks for persisting. --
7379:Hello, Doncram. You have new messages at
7345:. Since you had some involvement with the
7312:are all functionally reverts to basically
7224:Hello, Doncram. You have new messages at
6366:I believe you are already on that list...
6096:Hello, Doncram. You have new messages at
5701:Francois Cousin House (Slidell, Louisiana)
5673:and join in the festivity of it all. :( --
3815:Talk:Downtown Greensburg Historic District
7062:was updated with a fact from the article
6176:on WP should come first, as described at
5405:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation
5296:was updated with a fact from the article
5097:Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties
4210:was updated with a fact from the article
3656:The College of Physicians of Philadelphia
3626:had - I'll leave that question for later.
2465:. Is there some reason it's a good idea?
2265:in the United States (by state then city)
2016:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation
412:was updated with a fact from the article
7401:
6782:Dr. Christopher S. Best House and Office
5350:Military history WikiProject coordinator
5272:DYK for Whitney Avenue Historic District
4280:Military history WikiProject coordinator
3337:Further, I personally would want to add
3319:==See also== *], Ellensburg, Washington
3297:(and listed on the NRHP under that name)
1401:I agree with Acroterion on both points.
5933:notice, but please explain why in your
5806:Disambiguation pages that are red links
5355:This has been an automated delivery by
4490:http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php
4297:This has been an automated delivery by
3602:is a pretty big article. Back in 10.
3060:I'm confused about a couple of things:
2955:http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php
1245:them up for a number of counties, e.g.
160:U.S. Post Office (Dansville, New York)
14:
6037:I agree with Polaron, and I converted
5909:Disambiguation page with only redlinks
3433:Hi, the main source for your dyk hook
3382:All done, thanks to you both. . . . .
2849:http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/whohas.php
2636:File:ReynoldsBridge ThomastonCT sm.JPG
1758:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Doncram
1745:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Doncram
337:St. Francis Chapel (Colonie, New York)
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
6780:Added some new pics. Take a look at
6132:is buried in the middle of the page.
5728:I see you've been busy. Thank you.
5377:WT:NRHP#Salt Lake City Public Library
5371:NRHP in Salt Lake City naming trouble
4214:Montauk Association Historic District
3811:Downtown Greensburg Historic District
3660:College of Physicians of Philadelphia
3588:College of Physicians of Philadelphia
3220:, Boston and Brookline, Massachusetts
3175:- Boston and Brookline, Massachusetts
3161:You're the dab pro -- advice please.
2733:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
1747:, where you may want to participate.
7353:(if you have not already done so).
7182:this current version of Shelby House
5995:. Please see ongoing discussion at
3211:National Register of Historic Places
2787:related articles. Much appreciated.
2535:best option is to structure them as
1033:U.S. Post Office (Missoula, Montana)
734:Crescent Warehouse Historic District
164:U.S. Post Office (Hornell, New York)
25:
7418:McClellan Heights Historic District
7407:McClellan Heights Historic District
6222:. To be honest, about listing the
5786:Hooper House (Baltimore) Correction
5064:McClellan Heights Historic District
4967:Did you see my above question? :)
3188:to the first one. I've just put an
1609:Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship
730:McClellan Heights Historic District
696:Riverview Terrace Historic District
464:I found these interesting reading.
150:Conformance of Post Office articles
23:
7477:
7421:
7372:
7295:Old Natchez Trace (disambiguation)
7217:
7116:User:Cullen328/Sandbox Ansel Adams
6868:! You participated earlier in the
6291:International style (architecture)
6186:Hammond House (New York, New York)
6089:
5916:deleted for any of several reasons
5904:because of the following concern:
5888:
5344:Coordinator elections have opened!
5066:
5021:
4968:
4937:
4898:
4847:
4772:
4741:
4710:
4664:
4557:
4523:
4440:
4071:, a ghost town on the NRHP.
3342:that should show the NRHP name. --
2685:
2677:
2653:
1912:Yes i posted at your Talk page at
1691:
1644:
1612:
1551:these days, what should I do with
937:
890:
830:
829:is ok or should I take a new one?
795:
737:
715:Vander Veer Park Historic District
663:
472:Knowledge:Give an article a chance
24:
7516:
6917:DYK nomination of Cecil Alexander
4934:Kahl Building and Capitol Theatre
4391:Nawa-I-Barakzayi District reviews
3596:File:College of Physicians 2.JPG
3570:User:Marcus334/Sandbox#Weigyi_Dam
2163:removing almost all entries from
1583:. I've replied further there. --
1485:" but leaving it blank makes the
866:Manlius Village Historic District
7259:. This page is still an orphan.
7045:
6921:
6859:
6790:Livingstonville Community Church
5468:discussion just now. Thanks! --
5300:Whitney Avenue Historic District
5279:
4514:to GA, and it mentions both the
4512:Neighborhoods of Davenport, Iowa
4317:I've replied to your comment on
4193:
3932:El Paso-Juárez Metropolitan Area
3485:
3291:Parkways of Louisville, Kentucky
3224:Parkways of Louisville, Kentucky
3184:Currently there's a redirect at
3179:Parkways of Louisville, Kentucky
2819:Your expertise requested please-
2524:College Avenue Historic District
2482:College Avenue Historic District
658:NRHP and Davenport neighborhoods
647:
583:
515:
395:
363:
335:This is currently a redirect to
29:
7494:
7491:
7488:
7485:
7482:
7479:
7438:
7435:
7432:
7429:
7426:
7423:
7110:Critique of Ansel Adams article
6897:New Castle County NRHP listings
5083:
5080:
5077:
5074:
5071:
5068:
5038:
5035:
5032:
5029:
5026:
5023:
4985:
4982:
4979:
4976:
4973:
4970:
4954:
4951:
4948:
4945:
4942:
4939:
4915:
4912:
4909:
4906:
4903:
4900:
4864:
4861:
4858:
4855:
4852:
4849:
4789:
4786:
4783:
4780:
4777:
4774:
4758:
4755:
4752:
4749:
4746:
4743:
4727:
4724:
4721:
4718:
4715:
4712:
4681:
4678:
4675:
4672:
4669:
4666:
4574:
4571:
4568:
4565:
4562:
4559:
4540:
4537:
4534:
4531:
4528:
4525:
4457:
4454:
4451:
4448:
4445:
4442:
4075:
3813:; i just opened discussion at
3528:
3522:
3514:
3511:
3001:Addendum- if this helps at all
2697:But, hey, what about semi-lame
2380:that the topic actually exists.
2020:Knowledge talk:WikiProject NRHP
1708:
1705:
1702:
1699:
1696:
1693:
1661:
1658:
1655:
1652:
1649:
1646:
1629:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1617:
1614:
954:
951:
948:
945:
942:
939:
907:
904:
901:
898:
895:
892:
847:
844:
841:
838:
835:
832:
812:
809:
806:
803:
800:
797:
754:
751:
748:
745:
742:
739:
720:Prospect Park Historic District
680:
677:
674:
671:
668:
665:
589:
579:
7038:DYK for Wilkinson-Martin House
6835:Sent yet an different e-mail.
6807:Check your e-mail once again.
5898:Otis Elevator Company Building
5884:Otis Elevator Company Building
3926:I appreciate your pointing to
3358:Buffalo, New York parks system
3164:We have two NRIS listings for
2222:Broad Street Historic District
2192:Broad Street Historic District
2165:Broad Street Historic District
1976:Broad Street Historic District
388:DYK for Saugatuck River Bridge
259:; this will be a big help for
13:
1:
7476:Ok, thanks, I'll ask there.
6932:Did You Know nominations page
4181:04:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
4159:05:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
4145:04:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
4126:22:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
4101:15:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
4086:00:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
4046:04:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
4027:04:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
4009:23:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3989:22:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3949:17:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3922:16:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3909:16:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3874:17:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3841:16:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3827:15:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3792:02:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3773:02:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3758:02:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3722:15:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
3695:15:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3672:05:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
3645:18:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
3612:17:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
3582:07:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
3555:18:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
3534:16:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
3469:02:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
3453:17:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3424:17:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3400:13:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3370:00:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3352:22:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
3333:22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
3259:21:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
3152:06:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
3118:01:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
3103:14:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
3077:03:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
3048:20:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
3030:23:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
3015:23:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2984:23:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2967:23:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2932:22:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2906:22:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2880:22:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2861:21:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2838:21:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2813:06:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2797:05:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2773:16:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
2620:00:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
2602:21:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
2587:19:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
2549:19:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
2518:16:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
2499:16:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
2475:06:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
2456:23:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2442:22:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2422:21:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2395:23:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
2376:establish notability or even
2343:22:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
2303:22:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
2253:22:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
2241:Main Street Historic District
2234:14:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
2208:07:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
2042:Main Street Historic District
1816:Main Street Historic District
1807:18:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
978:15:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
296:funny recent mention in news
287:15:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
257:Église Saint-Ambroise (Paris)
7177:This version of Shelby House
5693:I have just edited the page
5618:Walter Cook (disambiguation)
5593:Walter Cook (disambiguation)
4510:Well I'm working on getting
3441:
2719:07:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2673:03:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2650:02:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2185:22:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2149:22:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2131:20:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2115:19:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2078:04:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2054:04:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2032:03:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
2000:00:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
1965:00:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
1950:20:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1931:20:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1907:19:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1886:19:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1856:19:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1835:19:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1794:17:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
1765:23:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1752:23:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1717:01:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1685:01:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1670:00:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1638:19:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
1593:15:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
1574:04:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
1531:23:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1505:21:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1469:21:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1451:19:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1435:19:15, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1411:05:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
1396:18:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1361:03:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
1346:17:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1318:17:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1303:17:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1277:23:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1236:23:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1214:22:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1169:02:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1135:03:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1115:02:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1094:02:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1071:02:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1049:01:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
1014:20:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
1000:22:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
963:09:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
916:03:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
883:21:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
856:20:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
821:20:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
786:19:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
770:http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/
763:18:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
709:15:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
689:19:45, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
646:
643:17:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
582:
570:14:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
555:18:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
534:20:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
489:14:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
455:12:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
382:20:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
353:05:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
323:14:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
308:01:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
210:13:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
196:13:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
180:12:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
144:13:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
128:03:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
7:
7137:Are you planning to rework
6758:Your input is requested at
5972:allows discussion to reach
794:after I cook some lunch :)
10:
7521:
7503:17:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
7472:07:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
7460:Template talk:infobox nrhp
7455:Template talk:infobox nrhp
7447:04:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
7363:22:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
7329:15:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
7288:15:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
7269:19:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
7245:19:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
7205:03:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
7175:Sure, thanks for asking.
7171:00:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
7155:23:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
7128:21:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
7105:09:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
7030:00:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
7016:00:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
6926:Hello! Your submission of
6845:16:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
6725:14:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
6707:Apparently unrelated, but
6676:to "wikistalking" me, and
6454:22:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6427:15:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6400:12:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6376:11:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6362:08:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6347:07:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6331:07:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
6307:23:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
6283:22:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
6237:21:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
6198:20:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
6168:20:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
6142:19:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
6115:01:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
6074:01:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
6064:and will respond there. --
6052:19:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
6032:18:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
6009:18:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
5986:17:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
5871:04:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
5850:04:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
5827:04:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
5801:06:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
5781:02:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
5753:19:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5738:19:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5723:19:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5683:19:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5664:19:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5641:18:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5611:17:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5581:04:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
5555:03:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
5517:22:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5478:14:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5438:03:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5417:03:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5397:03:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5365:21:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5339:12:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5264:09:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
5246:20:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5230:11:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5196:02:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
5177:06:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5152:14:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
5092:06:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
5047:21:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
5013:17:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
4994:19:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
4963:03:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
4924:18:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
4889:18:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
4873:18:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
4825:11:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
4798:05:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
4288:coordinator academy course
3594:the lists? Minor interest
1194:16:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
870:Detroit Financial District
236:20:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
7398:NRHP infobox map question
7143:one property by this name
7000:21:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
6977:20:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
6950:18:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
6912:18:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
6892:06:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
6831:03:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
6817:18:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
6802:01:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
6771:20:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
6749:14:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
6702:06:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
6660:17:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
6642:17:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
6627:16:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
6601:18:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
6579:00:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
6559:00:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
6537:23:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
6523:21:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
6511:Talk:Natchez Trace (band)
6509:Please see my comment at
6501:19:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
6486:19:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
5958:proposed deletion process
5375:Could you take a look at
4767:22:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4736:21:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4705:21:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4690:21:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4651:12:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4617:11:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4583:04:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4549:04:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4506:03:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4466:03:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
4429:01:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
4414:01:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
4397:Nawa-I-Barakzayi District
4386:21:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
4360:00:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
4346:16:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
4331:23:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
4307:21:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
4268:00:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
4253:00:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
4111:FYI: The estate house in
3036:Niskayuna Reformed Church
2503:By the way, i did ask at
1735:. Please be aware that a
7336:Redirects for discussion
7161:question with a point.
6295:Modernist (architecture)
6178:MOS:DAB#Order of entries
5626:NRHP dab needing cleanup
4294:on the coordinator page.
4292:responsibilities section
3056:Francis M. Drexel School
2212:Okay, yes, I do now see
1772:User:Acroterion/RfC NRHP
1543:Since I'm so clueless...
1004:Discussion continues. --
736:. Thanks for your help.
250:The devs have activated
7368:Carpenter House Changes
7351:the redirect discussion
7088:Did you know? talk page
6937:your nomination's entry
6739:or can it be deleted ?
6583:This reminds me of the
6251:I am unable to get the
5966:speedy deletion process
5939:the article's talk page
5706:Cousin, Francois, House
5696:Cousin, Francois, House
5689:Cousin, Francois, House
5322:Did you know? talk page
5126:Thanks! I used it for
4236:Did you know? talk page
3937:Talk:List of NHLs in CT
3157:Olmsted Park System dab
1607:harassing you? Perhaps
1285:Disambiguation, please?
438:Did you know? talk page
7413:
7377:
7226:SunCreator's talk page
7222:
7066:Wilkinson-Martin House
6786:Bellinger-Dutton House
6094:
6062:Talk:Old Natchez Trace
5893:
5621:which already had the
5182:Charles Woodruff House
4336:I commented, briefly.
4167:New Haven County NRHPs
3496:, has been listed for
2691:
2683:
2658:
2610:. Hope it looks OK.--
2040:be followed and that
1843:
1611:could be looked into?
1423:Dominguez Rancho Adobe
1417:Dominguez Rancho Adobe
936:for more description.
416:Saugatuck River Bridge
7405:
7381:Jrcrin001's talk page
7376:
7221:
6668:Orlady on the attack?
6545:Henry Whitfield House
6093:
5970:articles for deletion
5902:proposed for deletion
5892:
5836:. Some discussion at
5711:Francois Cousin House
5140:Upper Falls, Maryland
4936:bolded as the lead?
4069:Pithole, Pennsylvania
3128:Little Chute Windmill
2689:
2681:
2657:
2606:Hi ... created today
1842:
1019:U.S. vs United States
593:Jay Pritzker Pavilion
576:Jay Pritzker Pavilion
42:of past discussions.
6982:McClelland Farmstead
6878:There are now a few
6874:points of contention
6870:sticky prod workshop
6589:Portage County, Ohio
6464:Natchez Trace (band)
6319:auto-reviewer status
5599:Template:db-disambig
5533:, specifically this
5136:Bare Hills, Maryland
4056:New PA NRHP articles
2825:Lisha Kill, New York
2779:Article improvements
2706:Upton Sinclair House
2701:or so-what-he-was-a-
2690:Upton Sinclair House
1737:request for comments
792:User:Ctjf83/Pictures
341:New Roads, Louisiana
7276:User talk:EuroPride
6866:Doncram/Archive 13'
6609:Why mention gender?
5769:is not appreciated.
5571:Check your E-mail.
3620:Aaron Copland House
3339:Olmsted Park System
3295:Olmsted Park System
3285:Olmsted Park System
3274:Olmsted Park System
3207:Olmsted Park System
3200:Olmsted Park System
3186:Olmsted Park System
3166:Olmsted Park System
2894:New York State site
2508:the bot request. --
468:Knowledge:INSPECTOR
7414:
7388:remove this notice
7378:
7233:remove this notice
7223:
6735:Do you still need
6155:Talk:Hammond House
6105:remove this notice
6095:
5962:deletion processes
5894:
5709:had redirected to
5669:Sheesh. No. See
5647:New red linked dab
5543:other Elkman tools
5000:Talk:Kahl Building
4481:this search screen
3385:
3244:
2692:
2684:
2659:
2554:name. Slapping a
2537:set-index articles
2373:listed on the NHRP
2368:listed on the NRHP
2269:by state then city
1290:St. Henry's Church
359:St. Francis Chapel
330:St. Francis Chapel
298:], 10th paragraph
158:. In the articles
7334:T:tdyk listed at
7097:Materialscientist
7094:
7093:
7081:
6731:BLP Prod testpage
6395:
6281:
6039:Old Natchez Trace
6015:Old Natchez Trace
5880:Proposed deletion
5367:
5328:
5327:
5315:
5119:
4309:
4245:Materialscientist
4242:
4241:
4229:
3383:
3242:
2756:
2741:Article ownership
1988:Washington School
1789:
1391:
655:
654:
639:
626:
447:Materialscientist
444:
443:
431:
282:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Doncram
7512:
7501:
7496:
7493:
7490:
7487:
7484:
7481:
7445:
7440:
7437:
7434:
7431:
7428:
7425:
7391:
7236:
7071:
7049:
7042:
7041:
6955:Feedback request
6925:
6863:
6397:
6393:
6389:
6386:
6293:, or some other
6259:
6253:330 North Wabash
6247:330 North Wabash
6108:
5955:
5954:
5948:
5932:
5931:
5925:
5869:
5867:
5863:
5859:
5825:
5823:
5819:
5815:
5708:
5698:
5630:
5624:
5354:
5305:
5283:
5276:
5275:
5158:BLP sticky prod
5121:
5117:
5113:
5110:
5090:
5085:
5082:
5079:
5076:
5073:
5070:
5045:
5040:
5037:
5034:
5031:
5028:
5025:
4992:
4987:
4984:
4981:
4978:
4975:
4972:
4961:
4956:
4953:
4950:
4947:
4944:
4941:
4922:
4917:
4914:
4911:
4908:
4905:
4902:
4893:I requested for
4871:
4866:
4863:
4860:
4857:
4854:
4851:
4796:
4791:
4788:
4785:
4782:
4779:
4776:
4765:
4760:
4757:
4754:
4751:
4748:
4745:
4734:
4729:
4726:
4723:
4720:
4717:
4714:
4688:
4683:
4680:
4677:
4674:
4671:
4668:
4622:there, i find: "
4581:
4576:
4573:
4570:
4567:
4564:
4561:
4547:
4542:
4539:
4536:
4533:
4530:
4527:
4464:
4459:
4456:
4453:
4450:
4447:
4444:
4350:Check ur email.
4296:
4219:
4197:
4190:
4189:
4084:
4081:
4079:
3530:
3524:
3516:
3513:
3489:
3445:
3429:dyk hook problem
3356:Consider adding
3309:
3303:
3293:, also known as
3237:
3231:
3197:
3191:
3141:
3137:infobox windmill
3135:
2823:In creating the
2750:
2563:
2557:
2196:Roosevelt School
1984:Jefferson School
1980:Roosevelt School
1791:
1787:
1783:
1780:
1715:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1668:
1663:
1660:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1636:
1631:
1628:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1616:
1564:
1558:
1494:
1488:
1484:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1127:
1063:
961:
956:
953:
950:
947:
944:
941:
914:
909:
906:
903:
900:
897:
894:
854:
849:
846:
843:
840:
837:
834:
819:
814:
811:
808:
805:
802:
799:
761:
756:
753:
750:
747:
744:
741:
694:Okay, i started
687:
682:
679:
676:
673:
670:
667:
651:
637:
604:
597:featured article
587:
580:
523:
519:
518:
476:meta:Eventualism
421:
404:January 19, 2010
399:
392:
391:
371:
367:
366:
284:
280:
276:
273:
156:User:Daniel Case
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
7520:
7519:
7515:
7514:
7513:
7511:
7510:
7509:
7411:Davenport, Iowa
7400:
7392:
7385:
7370:
7339:
7298:
7253:
7240:again Regards,
7237:
7230:
7215:
7145:, by the way.
7135:
7112:
7040:
6984:
6957:
6928:Cecil Alexander
6919:
6899:
6857:
6778:
6756:
6733:
6686:big red letters
6670:
6611:
6547:
6466:
6396:
6391:
6384:
6382:
6315:
6249:
6122:
6109:
6102:
6084:
6017:
5952:
5946:
5945:
5929:
5923:
5922:
5887:
5865:
5861:
5857:
5855:
5821:
5817:
5813:
5811:
5808:
5788:
5763:
5704:
5699:to redirect to
5694:
5691:
5649:
5628:
5622:
5595:
5425:
5389:Dudemanfellabra
5373:
5348:Voting for the
5346:
5274:
5205:
5202:Carole Mukogawa
5184:
5160:
5120:
5115:
5108:
5106:
5099:
4998:Hi, replied at
4516:Blackhawk Hotel
4437:
4393:
4370:
4315:
4276:
4188:
4169:
4109:
4082:
4072:
4058:
3969:
3736:
3591:
3562:
3543:
3490:
3483:
3431:
3412:
3320:
3307:
3301:
3235:
3229:
3195:
3189:
3159:
3139:
3133:
3130:
3087:NPS search site
3058:
3034:The 1852-built
2821:
2789:ChildofMidnight
2785:H. Neill Wilson
2781:
2729:
2638:
2561:
2555:
2216:and I see that
1819:
1790:
1785:
1778:
1776:
1729:
1601:
1562:
1556:
1545:
1497:Dudemanfellabra
1492:
1486:
1482:
1419:
1392:
1387:
1380:
1378:
1373:
1287:
1201:
1121:
1057:
1021:
988:
660:
636:
590:<font=3: -->
578:
542:
516:
514:
496:
462:
390:
364:
362:
333:
294:
283:
278:
271:
269:
248:
152:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
7518:
7508:
7507:
7506:
7505:
7399:
7396:
7384:
7371:
7369:
7366:
7338:
7332:
7297:
7292:
7291:
7290:
7252:
7249:
7248:
7247:
7229:
7216:
7214:
7211:
7210:
7209:
7208:
7207:
7189:
7188:
7187:
7186:
7134:
7131:
7111:
7108:
7092:
7091:
7082:and add it to
7054:April 11, 2010
7050:
7039:
7036:
7035:
7034:
7033:
7032:
6983:
6980:
6956:
6953:
6918:
6915:
6898:
6895:
6877:
6856:
6853:
6852:
6851:
6850:
6849:
6848:
6847:
6777:
6774:
6755:
6752:
6732:
6729:
6728:
6727:
6669:
6666:
6665:
6664:
6663:
6662:
6645:
6644:
6610:
6607:
6606:
6605:
6604:
6603:
6546:
6543:
6542:
6541:
6540:
6539:
6525:
6504:
6503:
6465:
6462:
6461:
6460:
6459:
6458:
6457:
6456:
6436:
6435:
6434:
6433:
6432:
6431:
6430:
6429:
6407:
6406:
6405:
6404:
6403:
6402:
6388:
6378:
6314:
6311:
6310:
6309:
6248:
6245:
6244:
6243:
6242:
6241:
6240:
6239:
6203:
6202:
6201:
6200:
6150:
6149:
6121:
6118:
6101:
6088:
6083:
6080:
6079:
6078:
6077:
6076:
6055:
6054:
6016:
6013:
6012:
6011:
5976:for deletion.
5956:will stop the
5912:
5911:
5886:
5877:
5876:
5875:
5874:
5873:
5807:
5804:
5787:
5784:
5762:
5759:
5758:
5757:
5756:
5755:
5690:
5687:
5686:
5685:
5648:
5645:
5644:
5643:
5594:
5591:
5590:
5589:
5588:
5587:
5586:
5585:
5584:
5583:
5562:
5561:
5560:
5559:
5558:
5557:
5535:"who has" tool
5522:
5521:
5520:
5519:
5501:
5500:
5499:
5498:
5491:
5490:
5489:
5488:
5481:
5480:
5461:
5460:
5455:
5454:
5445:
5444:
5424:
5421:
5420:
5419:
5372:
5369:
5353:
5345:
5342:
5326:
5325:
5316:and add it to
5288:March 18, 2010
5284:
5273:
5270:
5269:
5268:
5267:
5266:
5249:
5248:
5204:
5199:
5183:
5180:
5159:
5156:
5155:
5154:
5112:
5098:
5095:
5060:
5059:
5058:
5057:
5056:
5055:
5054:
5053:
5052:
5051:
5050:
5049:
4844:
4843:
4842:
4841:
4840:
4839:
4838:
4837:
4836:
4835:
4834:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4830:
4829:
4828:
4827:
4812:
4628:
4627:
4626:
4625:
4624:
4623:
4619:
4599:
4598:
4594:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4590:
4589:
4551:
4436:
4433:
4432:
4431:
4392:
4389:
4369:
4366:
4365:
4364:
4363:
4362:
4314:
4311:
4295:
4275:
4272:
4271:
4270:
4240:
4239:
4230:and add it to
4198:
4187:
4184:
4168:
4165:
4164:
4163:
4162:
4161:
4108:
4105:
4104:
4103:
4057:
4054:
4053:
4052:
4051:
4050:
4049:
4048:
3968:
3965:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3961:
3960:
3959:
3958:
3957:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3951:
3887:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3882:
3881:
3880:
3879:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3846:
3845:
3844:
3843:
3806:Requested Move
3797:
3796:
3795:
3794:
3776:
3775:
3745:Thanks again.
3735:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3702:
3701:
3700:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3674:
3648:
3647:
3628:
3627:
3590:
3585:
3561:
3558:
3542:
3537:
3484:
3482:
3478:nomination of
3473:
3472:
3471:
3430:
3427:
3411:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3404:
3403:
3402:
3388:Jameslwoodward
3375:
3374:
3373:
3372:
3335:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3311:
3299:
3298:
3288:
3276:may refer to:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3263:
3247:Jameslwoodward
3239:
3227:
3226:
3221:
3204:
3182:
3181:
3176:
3158:
3155:
3129:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3091:
3080:
3079:
3065:
3057:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3050:
2999:
2998:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2941:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2864:
2863:
2820:
2817:
2816:
2815:
2780:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2728:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2676:
2675:
2637:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2570:
2532:
2459:
2458:
2444:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2364:
2361:
2358:
2355:
2352:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2287:
2286:
2278:
2275:
2272:
2261:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2134:
2133:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
1934:
1933:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1844:
1818:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1797:
1796:
1782:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1600:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1483:| map_width =
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1459:You fixed it.
1454:
1453:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1384:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1239:
1238:
1200:
1197:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1074:
1073:
1020:
1017:
987:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
823:
659:
656:
653:
652:
645:
633:
600:
588:
577:
574:
573:
572:
541:
538:
537:
536:
495:
492:
461:
458:
442:
441:
432:and add it to
400:
389:
386:
385:
384:
332:
327:
326:
325:
293:
290:
275:
252:Special:Import
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
215:
214:
213:
212:
151:
148:
147:
146:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
7517:
7504:
7500:
7497:
7475:
7474:
7473:
7469:
7465:
7461:
7456:
7451:
7450:
7449:
7448:
7444:
7441:
7419:
7412:
7408:
7404:
7395:
7389:
7382:
7375:
7365:
7364:
7360:
7356:
7352:
7348:
7344:
7337:
7331:
7330:
7326:
7322:
7318:
7314:
7311:
7308:
7305:
7302:
7296:
7289:
7285:
7281:
7277:
7273:
7272:
7271:
7270:
7266:
7262:
7258:
7246:
7243:
7239:
7238:
7234:
7227:
7220:
7206:
7202:
7198:
7193:
7192:
7191:
7190:
7183:
7178:
7174:
7173:
7172:
7168:
7164:
7159:
7158:
7157:
7156:
7152:
7148:
7144:
7140:
7130:
7129:
7125:
7121:
7117:
7107:
7106:
7102:
7098:
7089:
7085:
7079:
7075:
7069:
7068:
7067:
7061:
7060:
7059:Did you know?
7055:
7051:
7048:
7044:
7043:
7031:
7027:
7023:
7019:
7018:
7017:
7013:
7009:
7004:
7003:
7002:
7001:
6997:
6993:
6989:
6979:
6978:
6974:
6970:
6966:
6963:
6962:
6952:
6951:
6947:
6943:
6939:
6938:
6933:
6929:
6924:
6914:
6913:
6909:
6905:
6894:
6893:
6889:
6885:
6881:
6875:
6871:
6867:
6862:
6846:
6842:
6838:
6834:
6833:
6832:
6828:
6824:
6820:
6819:
6818:
6814:
6810:
6806:
6805:
6804:
6803:
6799:
6795:
6791:
6787:
6783:
6773:
6772:
6768:
6764:
6761:
6751:
6750:
6746:
6742:
6738:
6726:
6722:
6718:
6714:
6710:
6706:
6705:
6704:
6703:
6699:
6695:
6691:
6687:
6683:
6679:
6675:
6661:
6657:
6653:
6649:
6648:
6647:
6646:
6643:
6639:
6635:
6631:
6630:
6629:
6628:
6624:
6620:
6616:
6602:
6598:
6594:
6590:
6586:
6582:
6581:
6580:
6576:
6572:
6567:
6563:
6562:
6561:
6560:
6557:
6553:
6538:
6534:
6530:
6526:
6524:
6520:
6516:
6512:
6508:
6507:
6506:
6505:
6502:
6498:
6494:
6490:
6489:
6488:
6487:
6483:
6479:
6475:
6471:
6455:
6451:
6447:
6442:
6441:
6440:
6439:
6438:
6437:
6428:
6424:
6420:
6415:
6414:
6413:
6412:
6411:
6410:
6409:
6408:
6401:
6398:
6394:
6387:
6379:
6377:
6373:
6369:
6365:
6364:
6363:
6359:
6355:
6350:
6349:
6348:
6344:
6340:
6335:
6334:
6333:
6332:
6328:
6324:
6320:
6308:
6304:
6300:
6296:
6292:
6287:
6286:
6285:
6284:
6279:
6275:
6271:
6267:
6263:
6258:
6254:
6238:
6234:
6230:
6225:
6221:
6217:
6213:
6209:
6208:
6207:
6206:
6205:
6204:
6199:
6195:
6191:
6187:
6183:
6182:Hammond House
6179:
6175:
6174:Hammond House
6171:
6170:
6169:
6165:
6161:
6156:
6152:
6151:
6146:
6145:
6144:
6143:
6139:
6135:
6131:
6130:Hammond House
6127:
6126:Hammond House
6120:Hammond House
6117:
6116:
6113:
6106:
6099:
6092:
6087:
6075:
6071:
6067:
6063:
6059:
6058:
6057:
6056:
6053:
6049:
6045:
6040:
6036:
6035:
6034:
6033:
6030:
6026:
6022:
6021:Natchez Trace
6010:
6006:
6002:
5998:
5994:
5990:
5989:
5988:
5987:
5983:
5979:
5975:
5971:
5967:
5963:
5959:
5951:
5942:
5940:
5936:
5928:
5919:
5917:
5910:
5907:
5906:
5905:
5903:
5899:
5891:
5885:
5881:
5872:
5868:
5860:
5853:
5852:
5851:
5847:
5843:
5839:
5835:
5831:
5830:
5829:
5828:
5824:
5816:
5803:
5802:
5798:
5794:
5783:
5782:
5778:
5774:
5771:
5768:
5754:
5750:
5746:
5741:
5740:
5739:
5735:
5731:
5727:
5726:
5725:
5724:
5720:
5716:
5712:
5707:
5702:
5697:
5684:
5680:
5676:
5672:
5668:
5667:
5666:
5665:
5661:
5657:
5653:
5642:
5638:
5634:
5627:
5619:
5615:
5614:
5613:
5612:
5608:
5604:
5600:
5582:
5578:
5574:
5570:
5569:
5568:
5567:
5566:
5565:
5564:
5563:
5556:
5552:
5548:
5544:
5540:
5536:
5532:
5528:
5527:
5526:
5525:
5524:
5523:
5518:
5514:
5510:
5505:
5504:
5503:
5502:
5495:
5494:
5493:
5492:
5485:
5484:
5483:
5482:
5479:
5475:
5471:
5467:
5463:
5462:
5457:
5456:
5452:
5447:
5446:
5442:
5441:
5440:
5439:
5435:
5431:
5418:
5414:
5410:
5406:
5401:
5400:
5399:
5398:
5394:
5390:
5384:
5382:
5378:
5368:
5366:
5362:
5358:
5351:
5341:
5340:
5336:
5332:
5323:
5319:
5313:
5309:
5303:
5302:
5301:
5295:
5294:
5293:Did you know?
5289:
5285:
5282:
5278:
5277:
5265:
5261:
5257:
5253:
5252:
5251:
5250:
5247:
5243:
5239:
5234:
5233:
5232:
5231:
5227:
5223:
5219:
5216:
5213:
5211:
5203:
5198:
5197:
5193:
5189:
5179:
5178:
5174:
5170:
5165:
5153:
5149:
5145:
5141:
5137:
5133:
5129:
5125:
5124:
5123:
5122:
5118:
5111:
5103:
5094:
5093:
5089:
5086:
5065:
5048:
5044:
5041:
5019:
5016:
5015:
5014:
5010:
5006:
5001:
4997:
4996:
4995:
4991:
4988:
4966:
4965:
4964:
4960:
4957:
4935:
4931:
4930:Kahl Building
4927:
4926:
4925:
4921:
4918:
4896:
4892:
4891:
4890:
4886:
4882:
4877:
4876:
4875:
4874:
4870:
4867:
4826:
4822:
4818:
4813:
4810:
4806:
4801:
4800:
4799:
4795:
4792:
4770:
4769:
4768:
4764:
4761:
4739:
4738:
4737:
4733:
4730:
4708:
4707:
4706:
4702:
4698:
4693:
4692:
4691:
4687:
4684:
4661:
4660:
4659:
4658:
4657:
4656:
4655:
4654:
4653:
4652:
4648:
4644:
4640:
4637:
4633:
4620:
4618:
4614:
4610:
4605:
4604:
4603:
4602:
4601:
4600:
4596:
4595:
4586:
4585:
4584:
4580:
4577:
4555:
4552:
4550:
4546:
4543:
4521:
4520:Kahl Building
4517:
4513:
4509:
4508:
4507:
4503:
4499:
4495:
4491:
4487:
4482:
4478:
4474:
4470:
4469:
4468:
4467:
4463:
4460:
4430:
4426:
4422:
4418:
4417:
4416:
4415:
4411:
4407:
4402:
4398:
4388:
4387:
4383:
4379:
4374:
4361:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4348:
4347:
4343:
4339:
4335:
4334:
4333:
4332:
4328:
4324:
4320:
4313:disambig note
4310:
4308:
4304:
4300:
4293:
4289:
4285:
4281:
4269:
4265:
4261:
4257:
4256:
4255:
4254:
4250:
4246:
4237:
4233:
4227:
4223:
4217:
4216:
4215:
4209:
4208:
4207:Did you know?
4203:
4202:March 1, 2010
4199:
4196:
4192:
4191:
4183:
4182:
4178:
4174:
4160:
4156:
4152:
4148:
4147:
4146:
4142:
4138:
4134:
4130:
4129:
4128:
4127:
4123:
4119:
4114:
4113:Edgerton Park
4102:
4098:
4094:
4090:
4089:
4088:
4087:
4080:
4078:
4070:
4065:
4061:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4035:
4030:
4029:
4028:
4024:
4020:
4016:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3993:
3992:
3991:
3990:
3986:
3982:
3976:
3973:
3950:
3946:
3942:
3938:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3924:
3923:
3920:
3916:
3912:
3911:
3910:
3906:
3902:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3875:
3871:
3867:
3862:
3861:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3854:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3842:
3839:
3835:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3824:
3820:
3816:
3812:
3807:
3803:
3802:
3801:
3800:
3799:
3798:
3793:
3789:
3785:
3780:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3774:
3771:
3767:
3762:
3761:
3760:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3746:
3743:
3739:
3723:
3719:
3715:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3704:
3703:
3696:
3692:
3688:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3673:
3669:
3665:
3661:
3657:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3649:
3646:
3642:
3638:
3634:
3633:Mutter Museum
3630:
3629:
3625:
3621:
3616:
3615:
3614:
3613:
3609:
3605:
3601:
3600:Mutter Museum
3597:
3589:
3584:
3583:
3579:
3575:
3571:
3567:
3557:
3556:
3552:
3548:
3541:
3540:Nagao Sakurai
3536:
3535:
3531:
3525:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3505:
3504:. Thank you.
3503:
3499:
3495:
3488:
3481:
3477:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3457:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3444:
3438:
3437:
3426:
3425:
3421:
3417:
3401:
3397:
3393:
3389:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3371:
3367:
3363:
3359:
3355:
3354:
3353:
3349:
3345:
3340:
3336:
3334:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3321:
3313:
3312:
3310:
3306:
3296:
3292:
3289:
3286:
3282:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3275:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3261:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3238:
3234:
3225:
3222:
3219:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3212:
3208:
3203:
3201:
3194:
3187:
3180:
3177:
3174:
3171:
3170:
3169:
3167:
3162:
3154:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3138:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3088:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3066:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3049:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3004:
2985:
2981:
2977:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2956:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2933:
2929:
2925:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2868:
2867:
2866:
2865:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2826:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2774:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2754:
2749:
2745:
2742:
2738:
2735:regarding in
2734:
2720:
2716:
2712:
2707:
2704:
2700:
2699:Rowland House
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2688:
2682:Rowland House
2680:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2661:
2660:
2656:
2652:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2571:
2568:
2560:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2533:
2530:
2525:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2506:
2505:wp:botrequest
2502:
2501:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2379:
2374:
2369:
2365:
2362:
2359:
2356:
2353:
2350:
2349:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2283:
2279:
2276:
2273:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2259:
2258:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2161:previous edit
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2099:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2066:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2012:
2007:
2003:
2002:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1972:
1969:Where I said
1968:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1866:this followup
1863:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1817:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1788:
1781:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1718:
1714:
1711:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1664:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1610:
1606:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1568:
1561:
1554:
1550:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1491:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1383:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1326:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1291:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1248:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1126:
1125:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
979:
975:
971:
966:
965:
964:
960:
957:
935:
931:
917:
913:
910:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
880:
876:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:
857:
853:
850:
828:
825:Do you think
824:
822:
818:
815:
793:
789:
788:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
766:
765:
764:
760:
757:
735:
731:
727:
726:
722:
721:
716:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
697:
693:
692:
691:
690:
686:
683:
650:
644:
641:
640:
630:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
603:
598:
594:
586:
581:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
535:
531:
527:
522:
512:
509:
508:
507:
505:
501:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
457:
456:
452:
448:
439:
435:
429:
425:
419:
418:
417:
411:
410:
409:Did you know?
405:
401:
398:
394:
393:
383:
379:
375:
370:
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
331:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
289:
288:
285:
281:
274:
264:
262:
258:
253:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
184:
183:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
130:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
7415:
7393:
7346:
7340:
7299:
7254:
7139:Shelby House
7136:
7133:Shelby House
7113:
7095:
7064:
7063:
7057:
6985:
6967:
6964:
6958:
6935:
6920:
6900:
6865:
6858:
6855:Sticky prods
6779:
6757:
6734:
6689:
6671:
6612:
6548:
6467:
6381:
6316:
6313:Autoreviewer
6257:TonyTheTiger
6250:
6223:
6181:
6173:
6129:
6123:
6110:
6085:
6018:
5964:exist. The
5960:, but other
5943:
5935:edit summary
5920:
5913:
5908:
5896:The article
5895:
5809:
5789:
5764:
5692:
5652:Your article
5650:
5596:
5451:List of RHPs
5426:
5385:
5374:
5347:
5329:
5298:
5297:
5291:
5220:
5217:
5214:
5206:
5185:
5163:
5161:
5128:Bevard House
5105:
5100:
5061:
5017:
4933:
4845:
4631:
4629:
4438:
4394:
4375:
4371:
4319:my talk page
4316:
4277:
4243:
4212:
4211:
4205:
4170:
4110:
4076:
4066:
4062:
4059:
3981:Canadian2006
3977:
3974:
3970:
3747:
3744:
3740:
3737:
3592:
3563:
3544:
3509:
3508:
3506:
3491:
3442:
3435:
3432:
3413:
3338:
3300:
3294:
3284:
3281:Olmsted Park
3273:
3272:
3262:
3240:
3228:
3218:Olmsted Park
3206:
3205:
3183:
3173:Olmsted Park
3165:
3163:
3160:
3131:
3059:
3000:
2822:
2782:
2753:Be my friend
2737:Edit warring
2730:
2727:AN/I Warning
2639:
2528:
2485:
2460:
2411:
2372:
2367:
2281:
2268:
2264:
2102:
2097:
2094:
2064:
2059:
2037:
1970:
1892:
1820:
1775:
1755:
1730:
1603:How much is
1602:
1546:
1490:Location map
1420:
1377:
1374:
1288:
1202:
1179:
1130:
1123:
1122:
1066:
1059:
1058:
1022:
1003:
989:
772:courtesy of
723:
718:
661:
631:
602:TonyTheTiger
547:sanfranman59
543:
520:
511:Hotel Yancey
497:
494:Hotel Yancey
479:
466:
463:
445:
414:
413:
407:
368:
334:
295:
268:
265:
249:
153:
117:
113:
109:
106:
75:
43:
37:
7274:Replied at
7078:quick check
6942:Storye book
6694:CRedit 1234
5730:Rejectwater
5715:Rejectwater
5531:User:Elkman
5312:quick check
5210:WP:MUSICBIO
4486:User:Elkman
4399:article at
4290:and in the
4226:quick check
3712:on hooks.
3622:hadn't but
3494:Nida Sameer
3480:Nida Sameer
2845:User:Elkman
2746:) Regards!
1872:, but then
1605:User:Orlady
1481:Including "
1029:User:BD2412
774:User:Elkman
460:Interesting
428:quick check
168:post office
36:This is an
7251:Orphan tag
7242:SunCreator
7074:here's how
6969:Smallbones
6904:Smallbones
6478:NawlinWiki
6446:Shadowjams
6385:Acroterion
6354:Shadowjams
6323:Shadowjams
6274:WP:CHICAGO
5950:dated prod
5927:dated prod
5793:Spiral5800
5767:incivility
5761:Incivility
5509:Shadowjams
5430:Shadowjams
5308:here's how
5109:Acroterion
4639:0970515901
4222:here's how
4034:Smallbones
3714:Smallbones
3664:Smallbones
3637:Smallbones
3624:Camp Incas
3604:Smallbones
3007:Camelbinky
2976:Camelbinky
2830:Camelbinky
2764:, it's on
2575:wp:SOFIXIT
1874:wp:SOFIXIT
1779:Acroterion
1643:Thoughts?
1599:Harassment
1403:EdJohnston
1381:Acroterion
1269:Ammodramus
619:WP:CHICAGO
424:here's how
292:Louis Will
272:Acroterion
95:Archive 20
87:Archive 15
82:Archive 14
76:Archive 13
70:Archive 12
65:Archive 11
60:Archive 10
7321:Hipocrite
7261:EuroPride
7120:Cullen328
6880:proposals
6674:resorting
6585:Kent Jail
6476:is met.
6216:wp:MOSDAB
6212:this edit
5993:MOS:DABRL
5974:consensus
5900:has been
5834:MOS:DABRL
5656:Buggie111
5497:question.
4809:wp:HSITES
4588:includes:
4435:NRHP Info
4421:Palm_Dogg
4368:New Haven
3734:Thank you
3574:Marcus334
3566:Yeywa Dam
3560:Infoboxes
2703:muckraker
2430:MOS:DABRL
2065:guideline
2060:guideline
2011:MOS:DABRL
2006:MOS:DABRL
1918:MOS:DABRL
1870:MOS:DABRL
1823:Your edit
1741:this list
1247:Jefferson
635:<: -->
629:Ruhrfisch
595:is now a
261:WP:HSITES
224:this edit
7386:You can
7231:You can
7213:Talkback
7084:DYKSTATS
6884:Maurreen
6741:Cenarium
6682:reliable
6678:claiming
6529:Station1
6190:Station1
6134:Station1
6103:You can
6082:Talkback
5978:Codf1977
5773:Station1
5357:BrownBot
5318:DYKSTATS
4323:Ipoellet
4299:BrownBot
4232:DYKSTATS
4107:Edgerton
3866:Mcorazao
3784:Mcorazao
3750:Mcorazao
3529:contribs
3498:deletion
3443:mattisse
3396:contribs
3386:. . . .
3305:disambig
3255:contribs
3245:. . . .
3233:disambig
2766:WP:RFC/U
2567:wp:SHIPS
2467:Station1
2448:Station1
2387:Station1
2245:Station1
2200:Station1
2107:Station1
2046:Station1
1992:Station1
1971:redlinks
1942:Station1
1899:Station1
1848:Station1
827:this pic
434:DYKSTATS
7464:doncram
7280:doncram
7197:doncram
7163:Nyttend
7147:Nyttend
7022:Nyttend
7008:Nyttend
6992:Nyttend
6965:Thanks
6930:at the
6837:Lvklock
6823:Lvklock
6809:Lvklock
6794:Lvklock
6634:doncram
6593:Nyttend
6587:on the
6571:doncram
6552:Polaron
6493:doncram
6474:WP:BAND
6470:WP:BAND
6419:doncram
6339:doncram
6299:doncram
6278:WP:FOUR
6229:doncram
6160:doncram
6066:doncram
6025:Polaron
6001:doncram
5866:Shalott
5842:doncram
5822:Shalott
5745:doncram
5675:doncram
5633:doncram
5603:Boleyn3
5573:Lvklock
5547:doncram
5470:doncram
5409:doncram
5238:doncram
5218:Thanks
5188:Nyttend
5169:Kudpung
5144:doncram
5018:Finally
5005:doncram
4881:doncram
4817:doncram
4805:wp:NRHP
4697:doncram
4643:doncram
4630:Book:
4609:doncram
4498:doncram
4406:doncram
4352:Lvklock
4338:Lvklock
4173:Nyttend
4137:doncram
4093:doncram
4077:Niagara
4038:Nyttend
4019:Nyttend
4001:doncram
3972:ahead!
3941:doncram
3915:Polaron
3901:doncram
3834:Polaron
3819:doncram
3766:Polaron
3687:doncram
3512:Phantom
3461:Nyttend
3416:Lvklock
3344:doncram
3325:doncram
3144:Mjroots
3110:Nyttend
3095:doncram
3069:Nyttend
3040:Lvklock
3022:doncram
2959:doncram
2898:doncram
2853:doncram
2805:doncram
2711:doncram
2665:doncram
2642:Nyttend
2594:Lvklock
2579:doncram
2510:doncram
2491:doncram
2486:towards
2434:doncram
2335:doncram
2295:doncram
2226:doncram
2177:doncram
2141:doncram
2123:doncram
2070:doncram
2024:doncram
1957:doncram
1923:doncram
1895:MOS:DAB
1878:doncram
1827:doncram
1733:Doncram
1731:Hello,
1677:doncram
1585:doncram
1560:db-user
1549:WP:NRHP
1523:Emargie
1461:Emargie
1443:doncram
1427:Emargie
1371:Polaron
1353:Nyttend
1338:doncram
1310:Nyttend
1295:Nyttend
1228:doncram
1224:wt:NRHP
1206:Nyttend
1186:doncram
1107:doncram
1086:doncram
970:doncram
875:doncram
778:doncram
701:doncram
623:WP:FOUR
562:doncram
526:doncram
500:Nyttend
481:Lvklock
374:doncram
345:Nyttend
315:Lvklock
300:Lvklock
228:doncram
188:doncram
136:doncram
39:archive
7347:T:tdyk
7343:T:tdyk
7309:, and
6717:Orlady
6680:as a "
6652:Orlady
6619:Orlady
6515:Orlady
6392:(talk)
6044:Orlady
5937:or on
5331:Mifter
5164:policy
5116:(talk)
4378:Orlady
4151:Orlady
4118:Orlady
3928:wp:BRD
3362:Pubdog
2924:Orlady
2872:Orlady
2770:Elkman
2612:Pubdog
2541:Orlady
2414:Orlady
2378:verify
2103:broken
2038:should
2018:or at
1804:Elkman
1786:(talk)
1762:Elkman
1749:Elkman
1571:Elkman
1388:(talk)
1325:wp:ANI
1161:Pubdog
1124:bd2412
1060:bd2412
1041:Pubdog
1006:Orlady
992:Orlady
732:, and
279:(talk)
246:Import
202:Pubdog
172:Pubdog
120:Adgorn
7185:best.
6566:wp:RM
6218:(see
6112:Okip
5765:Your
4477:wp:RS
4260:DanTD
3658:and
3515:Steve
3193:about
2762:WP:AN
986:Reply
634:: -->
16:<
7499:chat
7468:talk
7443:chat
7359:talk
7325:talk
7284:talk
7265:talk
7257:here
7201:talk
7167:talk
7151:talk
7124:talk
7101:talk
7026:talk
7012:talk
6996:talk
6988:Here
6973:talk
6946:talk
6908:talk
6888:talk
6841:talk
6827:talk
6813:talk
6798:talk
6788:and
6776:Pics
6767:talk
6763:Gigs
6745:talk
6721:talk
6715:. --
6709:this
6698:talk
6656:talk
6638:talk
6623:talk
6597:talk
6575:talk
6556:Talk
6533:talk
6519:talk
6513:. --
6497:talk
6482:talk
6450:talk
6423:talk
6372:talk
6358:talk
6343:talk
6327:talk
6303:talk
6233:talk
6194:talk
6164:talk
6138:talk
6070:talk
6048:talk
6029:Talk
6005:talk
5982:talk
5858:Lady
5846:talk
5840:. --
5814:Lady
5797:talk
5777:talk
5749:talk
5734:talk
5719:talk
5679:talk
5660:talk
5637:talk
5607:talk
5577:talk
5551:talk
5539:here
5513:talk
5474:talk
5434:talk
5413:talk
5393:talk
5381:this
5361:talk
5335:talk
5260:talk
5242:talk
5226:talk
5192:talk
5173:talk
5148:talk
5138:and
5088:chat
5043:chat
5009:talk
4990:chat
4959:chat
4920:chat
4885:talk
4869:chat
4821:talk
4794:chat
4763:chat
4732:chat
4701:talk
4686:chat
4647:talk
4636:ISBN
4613:talk
4579:chat
4545:chat
4518:and
4502:talk
4473:here
4462:chat
4425:talk
4410:talk
4382:talk
4356:talk
4342:talk
4327:talk
4303:talk
4284:here
4278:The
4264:talk
4249:talk
4177:talk
4155:talk
4141:talk
4135:. --
4122:talk
4097:talk
4042:talk
4023:talk
4015:here
4005:talk
3999:. --
3985:talk
3945:talk
3919:Talk
3905:talk
3870:talk
3838:Talk
3823:talk
3788:talk
3770:Talk
3754:talk
3718:talk
3691:talk
3668:talk
3641:talk
3608:talk
3578:talk
3551:talk
3523:talk
3465:talk
3449:Talk
3436:here
3420:talk
3392:talk
3366:talk
3348:talk
3329:talk
3251:talk
3148:talk
3114:talk
3099:talk
3085:The
3073:talk
3044:talk
3026:talk
3011:talk
3003:here
2980:talk
2963:talk
2928:talk
2902:talk
2876:talk
2857:talk
2834:talk
2809:talk
2793:talk
2739:and
2715:talk
2669:talk
2646:talk
2616:talk
2598:talk
2583:talk
2545:talk
2514:talk
2495:talk
2471:talk
2463:this
2452:talk
2438:talk
2432:. --
2418:talk
2391:talk
2339:talk
2299:talk
2249:talk
2230:talk
2204:talk
2194:and
2181:talk
2145:talk
2127:talk
2111:talk
2074:talk
2050:talk
2028:talk
1996:talk
1961:talk
1946:talk
1927:talk
1903:talk
1882:talk
1864:and
1852:talk
1831:talk
1713:chat
1681:talk
1666:chat
1634:chat
1589:talk
1527:talk
1501:talk
1465:talk
1447:talk
1431:talk
1407:talk
1357:talk
1342:talk
1314:talk
1299:talk
1273:talk
1232:talk
1210:talk
1190:talk
1184:. --
1165:talk
1111:talk
1090:talk
1045:talk
1010:talk
996:talk
974:talk
959:chat
934:this
912:chat
879:talk
852:chat
817:chat
782:talk
759:chat
705:talk
685:chat
627:and
566:talk
551:talk
530:talk
521:Done
513:dab
504:talk
485:talk
474:and
451:talk
378:talk
369:Done
361:dab
349:talk
319:talk
304:talk
232:talk
206:talk
192:talk
176:talk
162:and
140:talk
124:talk
7420:.
7394:--
7052:On
6959:at
6864:Hi
6713:FYI
6690:not
6615:AfD
6613:At
6270:BIO
5882:of
5286:On
5256:Cje
5222:Cje
4321:. —
4200:On
3547:cda
3476:AfD
3410:BOT
3398:)
3384:Jim
3257:)
3243:Jim
2559:sia
2282:one
2098:all
1155:to
1035:to
615:bio
402:On
343:.
7470:)
7361:)
7355:TB
7327:)
7306:,
7303:,
7286:)
7267:)
7203:)
7169:)
7153:)
7126:)
7103:)
7090:.
7076:,
7056:,
7028:)
7014:)
6998:)
6975:)
6948:)
6910:)
6890:)
6843:)
6829:)
6815:)
6800:)
6792:.
6784:,
6769:)
6747:)
6723:)
6700:)
6658:)
6640:)
6625:)
6599:)
6577:)
6554:|
6535:)
6521:)
6499:)
6484:)
6452:)
6425:)
6374:)
6368:dm
6360:)
6345:)
6329:)
6305:)
6280:)
6235:)
6196:)
6166:)
6140:)
6072:)
6050:)
6042:--
6027:|
6007:)
5984:)
5953:}}
5947:{{
5941:.
5930:}}
5924:{{
5918:.
5862:of
5848:)
5818:of
5799:)
5779:)
5751:)
5743:--
5736:)
5721:)
5681:)
5662:)
5639:)
5629:}}
5623:{{
5609:)
5579:)
5553:)
5515:)
5476:)
5436:)
5415:)
5395:)
5363:)
5337:)
5324:.
5310:,
5290:,
5262:)
5244:)
5228:)
5194:)
5175:)
5150:)
5011:)
5003:--
4887:)
4823:)
4815:--
4703:)
4649:)
4615:)
4504:)
4427:)
4412:)
4384:)
4358:)
4344:)
4329:)
4305:)
4266:)
4251:)
4238:.
4224:,
4204:,
4179:)
4157:)
4143:)
4124:)
4116:--
4099:)
4083:
4073:
4044:)
4025:)
4007:)
3987:)
3947:)
3917:|
3907:)
3872:)
3864:--
3836:|
3832:--
3825:)
3790:)
3768:|
3756:)
3748:--
3720:)
3693:)
3685:--
3670:)
3643:)
3610:)
3580:)
3553:)
3532:\
3467:)
3451:)
3422:)
3394:•
3368:)
3350:)
3331:)
3308:}}
3302:{{
3253:•
3236:}}
3230:{{
3213::
3196:}}
3190:{{
3150:)
3142:.
3140:}}
3134:{{
3116:)
3101:)
3075:)
3046:)
3028:)
3013:)
2982:)
2965:)
2930:)
2904:)
2878:)
2870:--
2859:)
2836:)
2811:)
2803:--
2795:)
2748:RM
2717:)
2709:--
2671:)
2648:)
2618:)
2600:)
2585:)
2562:}}
2556:{{
2547:)
2516:)
2497:)
2473:)
2454:)
2440:)
2420:)
2393:)
2341:)
2301:)
2251:)
2232:)
2206:)
2183:)
2147:)
2129:)
2113:)
2076:)
2052:)
2030:)
1998:)
1986:,
1982:,
1978:,
1963:)
1948:)
1929:)
1905:)
1884:)
1854:)
1837:"
1833:)
1760:--
1683:)
1591:)
1563:}}
1557:{{
1529:)
1503:)
1493:}}
1487:{{
1467:)
1449:)
1441:--
1433:)
1409:)
1359:)
1344:)
1316:)
1301:)
1275:)
1267:--
1234:)
1212:)
1192:)
1167:)
1159:--
1113:)
1092:)
1084:--
1047:)
1012:)
998:)
976:)
881:)
873:--
784:)
728:,
717:,
707:)
625:)
568:)
553:)
545:--
532:)
524:--
506:)
487:)
470:,
453:)
440:.
426:,
406:,
380:)
372:--
351:)
321:)
306:)
234:)
208:)
194:)
178:)
142:)
126:)
91:→
7495:3
7492:8
7489:F
7486:J
7483:T
7480:C
7466:(
7439:3
7436:8
7433:F
7430:J
7427:T
7424:C
7383:.
7357:(
7323:(
7282:(
7263:(
7228:.
7199:(
7165:(
7149:(
7122:(
7099:(
7080:)
7072:(
7024:(
7010:(
6994:(
6971:(
6944:(
6906:(
6886:(
6876:.
6839:(
6825:(
6811:(
6796:(
6765:(
6743:(
6719:(
6696:(
6654:(
6636:(
6621:(
6595:(
6573:(
6531:(
6517:(
6495:(
6480:(
6448:(
6421:(
6370:(
6356:(
6341:(
6325:(
6301:(
6276:/
6272:/
6268:/
6266:C
6264:/
6262:T
6260:(
6231:(
6224:4
6192:(
6162:(
6136:(
6100:.
6068:(
6046:(
6003:(
5980:(
5844:(
5795:(
5775:(
5747:(
5732:(
5717:(
5677:(
5658:(
5635:(
5605:(
5575:(
5549:(
5511:(
5472:(
5432:(
5411:(
5391:(
5359:(
5333:(
5314:)
5306:(
5258:(
5240:(
5224:(
5190:(
5171:(
5146:(
5084:3
5081:8
5078:F
5075:J
5072:T
5069:C
5039:3
5036:8
5033:F
5030:J
5027:T
5024:C
5007:(
4986:3
4983:8
4980:F
4977:J
4974:T
4971:C
4955:3
4952:8
4949:F
4946:J
4943:T
4940:C
4916:3
4913:8
4910:F
4907:J
4904:T
4901:C
4883:(
4865:3
4862:8
4859:F
4856:J
4853:T
4850:C
4819:(
4790:3
4787:8
4784:F
4781:J
4778:T
4775:C
4759:3
4756:8
4753:F
4750:J
4747:T
4744:C
4728:3
4725:8
4722:F
4719:J
4716:T
4713:C
4699:(
4682:3
4679:8
4676:F
4673:J
4670:T
4667:C
4645:(
4611:(
4575:3
4572:8
4569:F
4566:J
4563:T
4560:C
4541:3
4538:8
4535:F
4532:J
4529:T
4526:C
4500:(
4458:3
4455:8
4452:F
4449:J
4446:T
4443:C
4423:(
4408:(
4380:(
4354:(
4340:(
4325:(
4301:(
4262:(
4247:(
4228:)
4220:(
4175:(
4153:(
4139:(
4120:(
4095:(
4040:(
4021:(
4003:(
3983:(
3943:(
3903:(
3868:(
3821:(
3786:(
3752:(
3716:(
3689:(
3666:(
3639:(
3606:(
3576:(
3549:(
3526:|
3520:/
3463:(
3447:(
3418:(
3390:(
3364:(
3346:(
3327:(
3249:(
3146:(
3112:(
3097:(
3071:(
3042:(
3024:(
3009:(
2978:(
2961:(
2953:(
2926:(
2900:(
2874:(
2855:(
2832:(
2807:(
2791:(
2755:)
2751:(
2713:(
2667:(
2644:(
2614:(
2596:(
2581:(
2543:(
2512:(
2493:(
2469:(
2450:(
2436:(
2416:(
2389:(
2337:(
2297:(
2247:(
2228:(
2202:(
2179:(
2143:(
2125:(
2109:(
2072:(
2048:(
2026:(
1994:(
1959:(
1944:(
1925:(
1901:(
1880:(
1850:(
1829:(
1709:3
1706:8
1703:F
1700:J
1697:T
1694:C
1679:(
1662:3
1659:8
1656:F
1653:J
1650:T
1647:C
1630:3
1627:8
1624:F
1621:J
1618:T
1615:C
1587:(
1525:(
1499:(
1463:(
1445:(
1429:(
1405:(
1355:(
1340:(
1312:(
1297:(
1271:(
1230:(
1208:(
1188:(
1163:(
1131:T
1109:(
1088:(
1067:T
1043:(
1008:(
994:(
972:(
955:3
952:8
949:F
946:J
943:T
940:C
908:3
905:8
902:F
899:J
896:T
893:C
877:(
848:3
845:8
842:F
839:J
836:T
833:C
813:3
810:8
807:F
804:J
801:T
798:C
780:(
755:3
752:8
749:F
746:J
743:T
740:C
703:(
681:3
678:8
675:F
672:J
669:T
666:C
638:°
621:/
617:/
613:/
611:c
609:/
607:t
605:(
599:!
564:(
549:(
528:(
502:(
483:(
449:(
430:)
422:(
376:(
347:(
317:(
302:(
230:(
204:(
190:(
174:(
138:(
122:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.