User talk:Donner60

1313:

covid twice but fortunately seem to have gotten over it without much, if anything, in the way of after effects - maybe some periodic fatigue could be related, I suppose. I resumed editing but not working on anti-vandalism except for a few brief instances that I came across. I started working more on military history project reviews, GA reassessments and some editing about a year ago. In the absence of enough volunteers, I agreed to be a military history project coordinator starting last September. I have spent almost all my time reviewing and assessing articles, monitoring the article writing contest and occasionally answering some questions. It has taken almost all of my online time so my to-do list has remained about as it was when I got more involved in the project. I have missed working and communicating with you and a few others whom I have lost contact with for a few years now. Since I am still active, I hope to keep up with online friends here more than I have been doing.

2922:" – this parameter may use one of two standard terms: "X victory" or "Inconclusive". The term used is for the "immediate" outcome of the "subject" conflict and should reflect what the sources say. In cases where the standard terms do not accurately describe the outcome, a link or note should be made to the section of the article where the result is discussed in detail (such as "See the Aftermath section"). Such a note can also be used in conjunction with the standard terms but should not be used to conceal an ambiguity in the "immediate" result. Do not introduce non-standard terms like "decisive", "marginal" or "tactical", or contradictory statements like "decisive tactical victory but strategic defeat". 26: 1482:, was written by Vami_IV and Epicgenius, introduced: "This article is about another of the great houses that once lined Fifth Avenue in New York. Specifically, this is the mansion of Felix M. Warburg, a Jewish financier who ignored fears of anti-Semitic reprisal to his decided to build himself a big Gothic manor in the middle of New York City. Although the Warburgs no longer remain, their legacy does: the museum is now the home of the Jewish Museum (Manhattan) and the building largely survives as they left it. It's a beautiful building and I hope you will all enjoy it."! - in memory -- 17: 969: 1455: 98:) 08:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC) To clarify, the new item should not be below this message and not below the repeated message after my introductory paragraphs but at the very bottom of the page after every other item on the page. It will help me to understand what you are talking about to add a section heading, identify the article you are concerned with (if your question or comment refers to a specific article), using a link, probably putting the article title in the heading, and sign your edit with four 3021:

this. At this point, I see deletion of the result parameter as the best option here to prevent that. You can still point out the obvious result overall by citing the Riedel book. If you wish to carry it forward and keep the result, I think you will need to take it to dispute resolution. You may also want to ask for further comments or opinions on the military history project talk page. It might bring some positive ideas but I would not be surprised if it also did not produce a conclusive resolution.

124: 2515:. The last couple books I've read have involved Turchin, who is invariably known as John B. Turchin in those works, with his Russian name only brought up as biographical background. Google books does show "Ivan Turchin" has some use, but I'm still inclined to think that John B. Turchin would be the better title, especially since the references in the article don't call him Ivan in the title. I wanted to see what you thought about this before opening a requested move, though. 896: 2218:. If a close strike symbol had been included, it would have made the strike through up to the point of that symbol. The complete absence of a close symbol resulted in the entire remainder of the page being struck, not just on the assessment request page but on the paragraphs that follow on the main assessment page. I have nowiki symbols before and after the strike symbol here which is the reason you don't see a strike through from that point to the end of the message. 540:, i.e. after every other item on the page. If you put them here (immediately before or after this paragraph or section), I may either not see them or at least not see them very promptly. That will delay any reply from me to you. Please add a section heading, identify the article you are concerned with, and use a link, (if your question or comment refers to a specific article or edit), probably putting the article name in the heading, and sign your edit with four 2289: 2254: 1038: 507:: If a thread has developed new subjects, it may be desirable to split it into separate discussions with their own headings or subheadings. When a topic is split into two topics, rather than sub-sectioned, it is often useful for there to be a link from the new topic to the original and vice versa. A common way of doing this is noting the change at the end of the original thread, and adding an unobtrusive note under the new heading, e.g., 3202: 1674: 766: 2711: 2375: 2097: 1722: 1345: 1100: 2025: 1230: 831: 601: 2323:

have reviewed many of the articles that are put up for GA for B class and the military history standards are similar for B. Of course, the GA assessment is independent. So it should be done by a different assessor. If your article was not as complete as it is, it still might have been B but would need to be expanded for GA. I would have noted that much if you had asked about such an aritcle.

2637: 551:

seems simple and does not seem to be time sensitive. If you have a user name, I will try to remember to ping you if I just leave a return message here. As far as I know, IP addresses cannot be pinged. When I notice a question or comment that was not placed at the bottom of the page, I will move it to the bottom of the page and provide a heading if there is not already a heading.

304:, which includes not a dictionary, a publisher of original thought, a soapbox or means of promotion, a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files, a blog, Web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site, a directory, a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal, a crystal ball, a newspaper, or an indiscriminate collection of information. • 3025:

question. Maybe some other coordinator or experienced uninvolved military history editor can be of more help if you wish to continue to add the result parameter. You could also take it through dispute resolution, as I noted, but I am not sure you could get a definite resoultion without at least one more definitive source.

2871:"between Pakistan and the Soviet-backed regime in Kabul were about to occur, or whenever an important VIP would arrive in Pakistan, the air raids escalated. But limited to the Northwest Frontier, they didn't have much effect on the population at large and failed to undermine the strong popular support for the mujaheddin." 501:: This could include moving a new comment from the top of a page to the bottom, adding a header to a comment not having one, repairing accidental damage by one party to another's comments, correcting unclosed markup tags that mess up the entire page's formatting, accurately replacing HTML table code with a wikitable, etc. 2943:– the outcome of the operation from the perspective of the planners with a very brief summary of defence if appropriate." Here, this may not be adequate either. Questions could still arise about whether the planners thought it was a success (or claimed that it was) when in fact it was inconclusive or even a failure. 2852:, However the source itself does not contain any notes within and is a self published Book and makes exceptional claims. Whereas i cited the source for the claim of Khad-Kgb failure (Although i think now it would be better worded to this (KhAD–KGB failure to halt Pakistani support to the mujahideen) with the Book 434:: While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Knowledge is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. 1619: 3060:

Thanks. I want to emphasize that I agree with your conclusion. My concern is that this situation is somewhat unusual. I am looking at it in part as a problem that should be handled carefully withough provoking an edit war. If you can find some additional sources, that would certainly help. I do think

2902:

The article seems to me to be unusual in some respects. It is not the more usual type of operation which is limited and time and has a narrower objective. It is a continuing operation in a conflict where the side conducting the operation failed to achieve their ultimate objective and lost overall. On

2322:

Hi Rahim: Here is my opinion and comments for what they are worth. When I see a good and complete B-class article for military history, I think it is probably ready for GA. Be aware that even though I think your article falls into this class, I don't do GA assessments. This is in large part because I

565:

If I do not reply to your message, but do not delete it or have archived it, it is likely because I took it to be a statement rather than a question or message that called for a reply. If some time has passed since I have logged on, the message may have become stale, or appear to me to be stale or no

3020:

This leaves me with the opinion that you will probably need some additional sourcing to prevent an edit war, which you rightly have been trying to do. Otherwise, you may be left with just the sort of ambiguous result which the guidelines reject. You certainly don't want to get into an edit war over

2997:

Actually you can access the book pages on History archive, First just insert the page number in the search bar on the top left in this case (Page-36) you want to access hit the search bar then on the results you will see the page number in results. Click on the page number like three to four times

2874:

So what would be the result of the article retained in the info box ? since the sources presented by me were pretty reliable especially when this book was published by Brookings Institution Press compared to a self published book for citing an claim. Im not sure what do whether to change the result

2222:

The next coordinator or experienced assessor who looked at the page likely would have been alert to the problem but I am glad you brought it up because it would not necessarily be obvious to everyone. The strike and end strike sympbols are placed on the page after an assessment is made and only the

561:

If your edit was disruptive, vandalism, uncivil, nonsensical or abusive, and you do not find the edit on this page, it is because I have deleted it. In most such cases, I will also put another warning on your talk page, but will not otherwise reply to it. (I will reply, however, if you then leave a

550:

Often I will reply on your talk page and may note or summarize that reply on this page. If you do not get a reply on your talk page, check back here. I may put brief replies here, especially if they do not seem urgent. Keep an eye on this page because I may just reply here, especially if the answer

244: 2326:

It is hard for me to predict what a GA assessor might want but I would be surprised if much was asked of you for it to be promoted to GA. (I have worked on a few GA reassessments if I have sources and usually if only some citations are needed or minimal expansion is needed. In a reassessment since

1205:

Thank you for the comment and for taking a look at this article (and also for the Galicia Division article that you assessed a while ago). For the organization table, I think it will be best for me to go through and add citations for every individual unit, because there is not a single source that

3016:

While the book comes to the obvious conclusion as to the outcome of the war, I have to say that the pages cited do not deal with the entire campaign, only with parts of it. I don't see how this can possibly be used to support a KHAD/KGB victory of any sort (except for an operation or two). On the

2985:

According to the sources the Campaign and its main objective was to intimidate Pakistani High command to stop the support for Afghan mujahideen by means of Terrorist bombings through out cities, cross border raids, Aerial confrontations, Funding separatist's etc. The campaign was ramped up in the

2894:

I will start with a comment about the infobox statement of the result as it stands with respect to its form. All the additional information in the infobox as to the result is not in line with infobox guidelines for military conflicts. It may be appropriate to include these items in a footnote, if

2840:

which was first a small scale terror campaign later became large scale and was mainly conducted by the Khad-Kgb to undermine the continuous Pakistani support to the Mujahideen during the soviet-Afghan war. Now the result of the article on the Info box has been changed many times from "Operational

2580:

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal

1312:

Good to hear from you. I have spent my time recently as a coordinator for the military history project. Before that Huggle had gone haywire on me and my activity fell off when I could not get it to work. I then moved on to less activity in covid times which started about the same time. I have had

707: 3012:

I accessed the book. Thanks. I think your conclusion is correct based on the obvious outcome. The sources may not persuade others, however. For me, the most important point about the CIA report is that it is an interim report from 1986. There is potential argument to be made about the language.

2614:

Thanks for taking the trouble on a Sunday. I'm not too fond of Holland's writing, which reminds me of books I read in the 60s. To me his books seem to be commercial publisher pot-boilers that lack academic depth; I'd like to find out that I was wrong. I had a long look at some Italian books in

33:

I hope I will not be entirely offline in the coming days but I may not be online as much as usual or as long as I often am due to a condition that with any luck will be temporary. I expect October and early November will be busy for me in real life as well. Unrelated to these things, I will be

102:(~~~~) so I know to whom to reply. Keep an eye on this page because I may just reply here if the answer is simple and does not seem to be time sensitive. When I notice an out of order question or comment, I will move it to the bottom of the page and provide a heading if there is none already. 3024:

I appreciate that you are in a difficult position with this. You have an obvious conclusion but don't seem to have the definitive statements from the sources about the specific operations to convince the doubters or POV pushers. Unfortunately, I think this is the best I can do with this hard

2472:

I believe the annual coordinator election is coming up. I don't have near as much time as I use to, but I'd be able to be at least a part-time figure for that in the coming year I think. Do you think it would be useful for me to stand for election, even if I'm only going to be available for

646: 2532:

Eicher, p. 537, lists him as Turchin, John Basil (Ivan Vasilovitch Turchinov) and Warner, p. 511, lists him as John Basil Turchin (Ivan Vasilovitch Turchinoff). Based on these sources, I think John B. Turchin or John Basil Turchin would be a better choice for the article title.

2890:

Your question is an appropriate one to ask a coordinator. A careful analysis seems necessary for me to reach an answer, or possibly more than one adequate answer. I'll give it a try here but if this turns out to be unsatisfactory, I suggest other options below to carry this

562:

civil and reasonable followup with a legitimate question or comment and some reference or reasonable explanation related to the question or comment. Note that I cannot reply to a message which is incomplete or otherwise cannot be understood or reviewed on another page.)

3013:

Although it does have a section which says the Soviet operation was not troubling the Pakistanis, it also uses the words "modest success" at the beginning. So it seems to contradict itself. But the fact that the campaign continued after this is the real sticking point.

239:

If you have come here for information, or to complain about something, read the information at the pertinent links in the next two sections first. It may save both of us time as well as providing an immediate definitive answer. Current talk page items follow these

2202:. I see its crossed out or something straight after I placed it there so im not quite sure what that means as I cant find a key for what to do. If you have any advice on the crossing-out thing or have any tips on the article I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks! 518:. Some reformatting may be necessary to maintain the sense of the discussion to date and to preserve attribution. It is essential that splitting does not inadvertently alter the meaning of any comments. very long discussions may also be divided into sub-sections. 48:

I have added a prioritized to do list to my user page. That may move along more slowly because of coordinator tasks or unanticipated editing that need more immediate attention. Posted 1 October 2023, now updated to note no progress at all on the list since then.

2306:

article for reassessment now that its a B-class article and can you suggest whether its ready for Good article nomination since it's expansion has been completed with no further possible expansion and what it appears to me that it fulfills the criteria for GAN.

2898:

This article is not about a war, campaign or battle. It could be best described as a military operation, or an operation in support of one side in a military conflict, or even as a terrorist campaign. The methods used by the KHAD/KGB were not simply terrorism,

2223:

article name is within the symbols. Then a reply is posted and the user who posted the request is notified of the result. I will be removing the strike out on the assessment pages when I complete this message. Soon I or another assessor will review the article.

1206:

lists out everything on there on one page (from what I could find), but there are sources for the individual units. I will start on that soon, and I will reply to your note on the assessment page when I finish with this task. I don't think this will take long.

1819:

Thank you for looking at the articles. As for me: not the war, but work kept me from continuing the work in wikipedia. I have more time now and will be back to continue to create articles for all Italian Army units. I fixed the missing references for the

2558:. One more: Sifakis, Stewart. Who Was Who in the Civil War. New York: Facts On File, 1988. ISBN 978-0-8160-1055-4, p. 663, lists him as Turchin, John Basil (1822-1901). Later on the page he adds: Tuchinoff, Ivan Vasilovitch, see Turchin, John Basil. 2490:

Yes. You would probably do at least as much as others have done, even if it is sporadic. Please don't stretch yourself too thin or become stressed over it. I may be a bit preachy, but I know you have much to do in real life and that must come first.

2895:

they are reliably sourced and are needed for explanation and if the result parameter is kept at all. I will continue next with an analysis but include the template article guideline below because it could determine whether to keep the result item.

1876:(In case of all three aviation regiments the source for the naming was at the beginning of the paragraph and not repeated at the end of the paragraph. An oversight on my part. I fixed this now also in the remaining Italian Army Aviation articles.) 3221:

On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your election to the position of Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best of luck for the coming year!

785:

67:, use a new section heading, refer to the exact title of an article and sign your message with four tildes. If you send me an e-mail please leave a talk page notice. I am not always prompt at looking for new e-mails at the listed address. 3039:

I understood what you meant by there needs to be additional sourcing, since Riedel book doesn't talk about the campaign only but also includes of the result of whole war and the Cia Document is a report before the war ended but credible

482:

that render material difficult to read. In this case, restrict the edits to formatting changes only and preserve the content as much as possible. Examples include fixing indentation levels, removing bullets from discussions that are not

1297:

fault; work and life has gotten very busy for me). I was going through some old pages, saw your responses to me in many discussions, and I wanted to thank you for your support and to let you know that I was thinking about you... :-)

81: 2906:

Although your source seems to be a good one and the source for the other opinion does not appear to be a good one, I can't say that it shows a conclusive result of any kind because I cannot access the full three pages that you

20:

Friendly talk page watchers are appreciated. They may respond to questions on or edits to this page, especially when I am unable to respond quickly or when an additional response to an edit, question or comment would be

445:

is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and unregistered users.

2961:

or one of the other noticeboards mentioned a few items above that. I am reasonably sure it would not be something to bring up to the administrators notice board unless some out of line conduct becomes apparent.

1511:

yes, I remember the feeling of shock when I just saw the watch list entry -- today's story has a pic of a woman holding her cat, a DYK of 5 years ago - the recent pics of places show 2 orange tip butterflies

2946:

If there is no conclusive source or if the other editors won't concede, and if eliminating the item from the infobox altogether doesn't work for you or them, this could go to a request for comment on the

2954:

You could ask one or more other coordinators for an opinion but I think it would be better to put a request for comment on the article talk page and ping coordinators if you wish to be sure they see it.

2327:

the article had been assessed GA, in at least some cases, it can be kept GA. If one or a few editors who have some time and enough sources are confident they can improve the article, it stay as GA.)

558:

despite the above request, and you can not find it if you check back, I have moved it to the bottom of the page in a new section with an appropriate heading if there was none given to the message.

417: 1832:

article, which suffered two officers killed in the same battle and did not properly edit it. I will finish with the cavalry intros next and then move to the aviation units. Cheers, and thank you,

1028: 2742: 2726: 34:

offline from about October 10 through 13 due to routine minor surgery. If I know that I will be offline for more than a day or two otherwise, I will post that on my user and user talk pages.

2582: 2581:

structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

2964:

I should note that the existing article has other problems as noted in the template at the top of it. I might even wonder whether non-duplicate reliable information should be merged with

2803: 2406: 2390: 1062:

backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – –

2734: 1131: 1115: 1013:

Thanks. Most of the articles put up for manual assessments are easy enough to review due to the many outstanding contributors that we have to the project. Most are interesting as well.

3212: 2865: 2810: 2587: 2128: 2112: 1920: 1916: 1753: 1737: 776: 1824:

and I wrote a longer introduction for the article. I will write longer introduction for the other four cavalry regiments as well. I already fixed the issue with the personnel of the

1633:

G'day Donner60. Just popped by to say what a brilliant effort you have been making on checking the B-Class auto assessments. Thanks for all your work for the project! Warm regards,

1376: 1360: 1574: 2863: 2398: 1985: 1123: 574:

I occasionally get one of these notices. I fix the link or bracket, then delete the message, as the messages state is permissible, instead of further cluttering up these pages.

111: 2120: 1989: 1745: 849:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between October and December 2023.

2935:

There is another template in the same template article about the the item to use for a military operation. That is to use "outcome" instead of "result." The explanation is "

2199: 1862: 1497:

Thanks, Gerda. I was shocked and saddened by Vami_IV's death, especially when I saw that he was so young. He was an outstanding contributor to Knowledge and will be missed.

1368: 467:: On your own user talk page, you may archive threads at your discretion. Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving. 1248:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between January and March 2024.

566:

longer in need of a reply for some reason. In those cases, I also may not reply and will likely simply archive the message at the next archiving on aging messages/replies.

1139: 2823: 2043:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between April and June 2024.

1893:

Again, glad to see you back. I know you want to finish the other Italian Army unit articles. I have rated these B class, and pinged you on the assessment request page.

1828:, which as you correctly noted should be "those personnel". And: Captain Vannetti Donnini was the only Genova officer killed at Porta San Paolo. I reused text from the 2808:

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote

1384: 1293:... It has been too long, my friend. I hope you're doing well, and that life is treating you with happiness and joy. We haven't spoken in quite some time (it's really 988: 911: 569: 3148: 3156: 3128: 3104: 2015: 1220: 1075: 2673: 2034: 1239: 932:

Thanks! At least 40 more to come soon. The editor has done a good job of bringing these up to B class. He will be posting the remainder in the near future.

840: 309: 3096: 1865:- fixed missing citation, deleted the last two sections, as these were not by me and I do not think they add to the article, which is now ready for review. 821: 484: 3112: 2592: 991:; of the past 500 edits made there, you contributed 348 of them. That to me is an absolutely incredible figure, and I think you definitely deserve this. 449:

There are certain types of notices that users may not remove from their own talk pages, such as declined unblock requests and speedy deletion tags. See

2998:

and the page can be previewed if it doesn't load after that zoom in and out the book and im pretty sure it will load, it applies for most of the book.

2951:

in an effort to reach a consensus. This request for comment should also be put on the article talk page even though the question is already open there.

3043:

For the success thing everyone knows if the Campaign actually succeeded in its main aim we today might've had a Communist Afghan government instead.

2866:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1988/03/13/moscows-invisible-war-of-terror-inside-pakistan/6e96dd11-56a5-4d1e-bc64-c333f41af17e/%7C1

3061:

that other results or outcomes can not be well supported so any conclusion other than the one you support should not be inserted into the article.

321: 583: 317: 3136: 3120: 3170: 2767: 2431: 2153: 1829: 1778: 1409: 1164: 682:

Thanks! I was glad to help. The Battle of Gettysburg is such an important milestone in U.S. history that it should be kept to a good standard.

2604: 2060: 1265: 741:

Thanks. It's something I can do for the project which relieves the frequent contributors from the task and can be spread out over a month.

313: 2958: 866: 2948: 2710: 2374: 2096: 1856: 1721: 1344: 1099: 1055: 337: 3186: 1470: 1868: 450: 2688: 1850: 1825: 1821: 341: 329: 305: 2694: 2591:

by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

2575: 1215: 383: 356: 3174: 2763: 2427: 2149: 1774: 1405: 1160: 431: 387: 953: 2771: 2435: 2157: 1782: 1413: 1200: 1168: 3182: 2819: 2600: 2358: 266: 2875:

or leave it like this with both statments in the info box. See talk page of the article for what i explained to the user.

2615:

translation but they were too expensive for my purse. There's an article in Italian too but Jstor didn't have it. Regards

941: 457: 2797: 1083: 250: 3046:

I will try my best look further into this matter and consult other coordinators as well. Thanks for your Kind feedback!

2684: 949: 923: 691: 3084: 2911: 2506: 2080: 1705: 287: 2845: 2526: 2461: 1328: 1194: 325: 2856: 2183: 1808: 1022: 2068: 1439: 1273: 874: 1560: 1539: 1521: 1506: 1004: 3178: 2982:

The topic itself is quite notable in order to remain as a stand-alone article it just needs some work to be done.

2815: 2629: 2596: 2270: 423: 375: 301: 1588: 673: 2965: 919: 488: 472: 379: 3070: 3055: 3034: 3007: 2977: 2903:

the other hand, the defending side seems not to have stopped the operation itself until they won the conflict.

2567: 2542: 2500: 2350: 2336: 2282: 2003: 1979: 1965: 1949: 1902: 1888: 1603: 815: 750: 2837: 1841: 984: 277: 214: 211: 208: 204: 201: 198: 194: 191: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 1544: 1527: 1322: 732: 407: 3165: 2484: 2266: 1568: 669: 399: 281: 262: 168: 164: 161: 158: 154: 151: 147: 144: 141: 2992: 2990: 628: 495:

and other technical markup to fix code samples, and providing wikilinks if it helps in better navigation.

2211: 25: 3233: 3149:

Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Knowledge editors

1697: 1211: 442: 403: 3097:

Courts order Knowledge to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

1934: 1642: 1132:

Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes

797: 456:

User talk pages are subject to the general user page guidelines on handling inappropriate content—see

2207: 1814: 1466: 915: 333: 297: 2316: 1688:

This award is for your heroic efforts over many months to review B-class military history articles.

617:

For all your excellent help with Gettysburg, Hobart Ward, Stonewall's arm, and many other articles.

2244: 1001: 959: 886: 697: 391: 352: 1659: 245:

Knowledge policies, guidelines; twitter, facebook; what Knowledge is not; avoiding common mistakes

3105:

Indian courts order Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

2467: 2239: 1306: 665: 371: 2833:

Hi, i hope I'm not annoying you by asking some questions related to Military history articles.

2777: 2441: 2163: 1970:

Can we count these as June promotions? The bot time was 9 minutes after midnight UTC. Thanks.

1788: 1638: 1556: 1535: 1517: 1487: 1479: 1419: 1174: 591: 363: 258: 2884: 2624: 1530:

mentions a concert I loved to hear and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --

1491: 1462: 1207: 1070: 427: 1054:

This award is given in recognition to Donner60 for collecting more than 5 points during the

2278: 2203: 2195: 2056: 1261: 862: 661: 367: 254: 16: 8: 3192: 3017:

other hand, unfortunately, it does not clearly say that the campaign was a total failure.

2620: 1693: 992: 291: 2932:

That is the easiest answer to the question: just eliminate the result (or outcome) item.

983:

I was curious, seeing as I remembered you reviewing another article I did some work on,

3228: 3051: 3003: 2880: 2785: 2521: 2479: 2449: 2346: 2312: 2171: 2048: 1998: 1960: 1929: 1910: 1884: 1837: 1796: 1664: 1583: 1427: 1253: 1182: 854: 792: 756: 727: 636: 623: 273: 82:

New messages, questions, comments: Put at very bottom of page, see text of this section

76: 58: 43: 2776:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2440:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2162:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1787:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1634: 1552: 1531: 1513: 1483: 1418:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1173:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

348: 2793: 2457: 2303: 2297: 2179: 1804: 1435: 1190: 1063: 721:

For all the work you put in checking the military history writing contest entries.

968: 2274: 2052: 1285: 1257: 1059: 858: 2616: 1689: 1609: 1454: 395: 2989:

Another source by the CIA on this Topic which explains the Campaign in detail.

2841:

inconclusivity" to victory or Pakistani Failure, by respective Afghan users.

223: 3223: 3062: 3047: 3026: 2999: 2969: 2925: 2876: 2781: 2559: 2553: 2534: 2516: 2492: 2474: 2445: 2342: 2328: 2308: 2231: 2189: 2167: 2044: 1993: 1971: 1955: 1941: 1924: 1894: 1880: 1833: 1792: 1651: 1595: 1578: 1548: 1498: 1423: 1314: 1290: 1249: 1178: 1014: 933: 850: 807: 787: 742: 722: 683: 618: 609: 575: 411: 123: 103: 91: 68: 50: 35: 2512: 2957:

Finally, a request for dispute resolution by uninvolved users as shown at

2341:

Thanks for your comment, I will be nominating this article for GA review.

2217:

Unfortunately, you prefaced your request with a strike sympbol </s: -->

895: 2789: 2453: 2200:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment#Requests for assessment

2175: 1800: 1575:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#ACRs for closure

1431: 1299: 1186: 227: 2407:

Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

548:

Where I may reply; and reasons why I might ignore or delete your message

229: 2993:

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP06T00412R000606330001-2.pdf

2828: 1618: 294:. References to Knowledge policies, guidelines, instructions, include: 2609: 2269:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made 1029:

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

1673: 706: 2850:"Pakistani ISI also failed to quell soviet terror campaign in 1987" 1037: 225: 3201: 2910:

One possible solution is to eliminate the result item altogether.

1921:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Tinian

1917:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Saipan

765: 2804:

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

2288: 2253: 2194:

Hi man. I see your an experienced editor and reviewer. I created

645: 310:

Knowledge:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Relative time references

1986:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/News/August 2024/Articles

1551:, one of five items on the Main page - more musing on my talk -- 910:

For your work reviewing the backlog of Italian Army articles at

2024: 1445: 1229: 830: 600: 451:

Knowledge:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings

1990:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/News/July 2024/Articles

230: 541: 99: 63:

Please put comments or questions on new subjects at the very

2968:

and a redirect substituted under the title of this article.

2636: 2959:

Knowledge:Dispute resolution#Dispute resolution noticeboard

2667:

New user script for easily searching The Knowledge Library

2198:

and was wanting to get it assessed so I have placed it at

1140:

Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

912:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests

2844:

Upon asking them for the source they present this source

554:

If you put a question or comment on this page but not at

2966:

KHAD#Psychological Warfare and State-Sponsored Terrorism

471:

From the section Editing comments, Other's comments in

318:

Knowledge:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Editorializing

1923:? Both have three supports + source and image reviews 1863:

3rd Special Operations Helicopter Regiment "Aldebaran"

2924:

Omit this parameter altogether rather than engage in

2727: