1113:
this than pure fabrication - and certainly not a "pre-determined disdain" for the article subject. The purpose of the endless amount of these horse racing experts, owners, trainers, etc., cited with reliable sources (and the reliable, independent sources contextualizing why it is relevant) being in the article should not be to cast doubt on them just because they are controversial and critical, it is to summarize what these sources are saying. These cited reliable, independent sources (NY Times, LA Times, etc) certainly meet the
Knowledge standards of: editorial oversight, a history of fact-checking and retractions, and a positive reputation among colleagues as demonstrated by things like industry awards or citations. These are reliable sources, because they all have a strong history of all of these things. I'd say we must leave them all in the article (and/or add or clarify what the cited quoted sources say more elaborately to fully clarify or move them into more appropriate sections of the article); and have someone or others add in other significant viewpoints cited with reliable sources (and the reliable, independent sources contextualizing why it is relevant) cited describing other points of view - that way there is a description of both points of view. If there are reputable sources contradicting one another and are relatively equal in prominence, describe both points of view - describing the opposing views clearly, drawing on secondary or tertiary sources and all positions included in the article. As for the jockey's wins, where he is ranked in wins, where he is ranked in earnings, etc., they are ALL already in the article in the Riding, Records, religion and retirement sections, as well as the career wins, major racing wins, American Classics wins, Breeders Cup wins, Racing Awards and Honours sections. They are ALL in the article already.
1011:
this than pure fabrication - and certainly not a "pre-determined disdain" for the article subject. The purpose of the endless amount of these horse racing experts, owners, trainers, etc., cited with reliable sources (and the reliable, independent sources contextualizing why it is relevant) being in the article should not be to cast doubt on them just because they are controversial and critical, it is to summarize what these sources are saying. These cited reliable, independent sources (NY Times, LA Times, etc) certainly meet the
Knowledge standards of: editorial oversight, a history of fact-checking and retractions, and a positive reputation among colleagues as demonstrated by things like industry awards or citations. These are reliable sources, because they all have a strong history of all of these things. I'd say we must leave them all in the article (and/or add or clarify what the cited quoted sources say more elaborately to fully clarify or move them into more appropriate sections of the article); and have someone or others add in other significant viewpoints cited with reliable sources (and the reliable, independent sources contextualizing why it is relevant) cited describing other points of view - that way there is a description of both points of view. If there are reputable sources contradicting one another and are relatively equal in prominence, describe both points of view - describing the opposing views clearly, drawing on secondary or tertiary sources and all positions included in the article. As for the jockey's wins, where he is ranked in wins, where he is ranked in earnings, etc., they are ALL already in the article in the Riding, Records, religion and retirement sections, as well as the career wins, major racing wins, American Classics wins, Breeders Cup wins, Racing Awards and Honours sections. They are ALL in the article already.
4328:
10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111171). It is not an opinion - it is methodologically sound description of several fundamental breaches of
Cochrane protocol . The Australian Medicare Services Advisory Committee has recommended resumption of Medicare funding in Australia for thoraco-lumbar fractures less than or equal to 3-weeks duration despite the lead author of the Cochrane review being on the MSAC committee . Meta-analysis of vertebroplasty published by Lou et al in 2019 concluded that vertebroplasty was safe and effective for patients with fractures less than 6-weeks duration with severe, unremitting pain (Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2369-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05101-8.) Evidence review by Lamanna et al in 2019 in its conclusion writes "All RCTs evaluating vertebroplasty exclusively in patients with acute VCFs found it to be superior to conservative treatment or placebo, including a highâquality shamâcontrolled RCT. Despite recent Cochrane reviews, it may be that vertebroplasty has clinical value in treating acute VCFs, particularly in patients with severe pain.") (Lamanna A et al. Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An update. First published: 20 May 2019
2284:, namely by Bilorv, which has been the last post to the discussion before it was closed. I havenât even had the chance to provide sources. (And I certainly would provide sources which make it clear that this topic is heavily debated and far from settled.) On the contrary, I have noted several times that the lead sentence is not backed by sources and I asked several times others if they can provide any (since they have claimed multiple times, that the lead is backed by sources). I donât get your reference to âneutral point of view does not mean neutralâ. Itâs not about whether there should be a section about trans women being regarded as women or something. The policy specifically says âDo not state opinion as factsâ and this is exactly what I see. And again, I really find it odd that I have to provide sources for claiming that something, which is apparently so controversial that there had been multiple discussions and a request for comment, is
818:, I can't tell you how or why this started. I've never seen any indication in any of the discussions, debates, or complete breakdowns of all civilized standards for conversation I've read here that there is any solid basis in site policies or in the manual of style that specifies when or how to use them. Fights over infoboxes, however, have led to blocks, desysopings, and even global bans. To be sure, none of those have been because an editor was an advocate or opponent of infoboxes but because the actions they took to push their point were unacceptable. I honestly do not understand the intransigence that people bring to this issue. It is largely a cosmetic one, after all. Whether one thinks they are handy summaries (as I honestly do) or they are clutter, the only arguments ever offered are ones of personal preference. The only explanation I have is that it is related to the
1795:". "There" is a significant word in this sentence. It states a location. I am trying to give you advice on your talk page as it is a place that is less public. 2) Your second statement above is nearly incomprehensible in English, which only proves the point. No, I cannot give orders to you and anyone with passing competence in English would know I wasn't. It was advice freely given. I obviously think it is advice you should heed. You are, of course free to reject it. Doing so, however, will make for a more miserable experience. 3) Of course I don't know you and how you think I claimed I did is beyond me. Again, I hoped to give you advice that would make editing Knowledge projects a pleasant activity. Perhaps you enjoy half-formed arguments and garbled syntax. It that is the case, then, have at it.
4423:(non-radioactive) cesium from potassium, which is essential in the Na + / K + pump of animal cell membranes. This is clearly visible in the poor absorption and selectivity for cesium of the liver and fetuses, in the autoradiographs of Nelson et al. (1961) . The human organism in fact expels cesium through three emunctories: the kidney, and also through the salivary glands and, greatly, through the exocrine pancreas, that concentrate, filter it and eliminate it with secrete saliva and pancreatic juice in the intestine, as reported by Venturi . In fact, "Prussian Blue" (ferric ferrocyanide), ingested orally, is able in the intestine to chelate cesium, preventing its reabsorption, and to eliminate it in the faeces, and, in this way, purify the human organism by about half of cesium in 30-70 days.
3242:, I have closed now 96 discussions, many on difficult and controversial topics, only one of which has been overturned on grounds that were impossible to evaluate at the time of the close. I think that is a decent record. It is clear that you are at this point reading what you want to and not what I actually am writing. I said I did not evaluate the expert positions. I did not say I did not evaluate the arguments. I explicitly stated above that it was due to my evaluation of the arguments that I weighted them in the way I have already extensively discussed. It is also clear that you will dispute any close that did not agree with your position. I cannot agree with that. I am truly sorry you are feeling dissatisfied by my responses.
2261:
participating in this community then understanding those standards is a necessary prerequisite. This is part of the new user learning curve that every established user goes through. If you want to ignore those and just demand that your point of view be accepted (after all, "anyone can edit, right?) then one of two things will likely happen: You will go away ignored and dismissed and leave without contributing or you will be asked or forced to leave. Neither outcome is desired. I hope this helps explain why I did what I did and why I will not undo what I did. I hope this also helps provide you with the resources you need to understand how best to participate in talk pages you are interested in.
2531:, and thank you for asking. I think that it has become stagnant because the IP editor was the only editor advocating for their idiosyncratic and expansive definition and they have apparently abandoned the process. I would suggest that closing the DR as unsuccessful and returning the discussion about a fixed definition to the article talk page is the sensible action at this time, but I will abide by your moderation skills. Never having previously participated in the dispute, I don't consider myself involved and I don't think I want to be. If discussion does return, I might add some to a definitional discussion there but I don't consider myself an expert in the topic. Thanks again.
1638:, no problem. There are a million and one things that need to be done around here and I hope that I haven't given you reason to feel bad about not coming back to this one. For the record, I did "count" your !vote but closing discussions is explicitly not about just vote-counting. It's about weighing the discussion overall and trying to read what the composite result is. Sometimes that's an easy task but other times it's open to interpretation. Thank you again for asking your question here and best wishes in whatever you choose to volunteer your time here to do. I'm going to blatantly steal a sentiment from the long-time and respected administrator
1973:, thank you for your comment. I didn't mean to imply that the insertion was intentionally unflatttering but I'm glad you agree that the image itself is. The article subject is the target of a small but determined slandering campaign so we have to be aware of the BLP implications. I know that the article is protected because of these efforts but I suspect the wikidata item is not. I suspect this is a back door attempt to get good-faith experienced editors such as yourself to essentially do their character assassination for them. Thanks again for being so understanding and best wishes for you and your family's safety.
92:
3613:. 6. Motion to Dimiss for Failure to State a Claim. www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/motioniqbal_1.pdf. 7. Churney, Dan. âJudge Lets Suburban Doc Continue Lawsuit vs Doctor with Same Name Imprisoned over Opioid 'Pill Mill'.â Cook County Record, 5 Aug. 2019, cookcountyrecord.com/stories/512872512-judge-lets-suburban-doc-continue-lawsuit-vs-doctor-with-same-name-imprisoned-over-opioid-pill-mill. 8. Wood, Lauraann. âIll. Doctors With Same Name Agree To End Trademark Fight.â Law360, 2020, www.law360.com/illinois/articles/1303127/ill-doctors-with-same-name-agree-to-end-trademark-fight.
2406:â on the issue whether a trans woman should be described as a woman or as a person. So there is not long-standing consensus on this issue. Many thanks for your patience, I know it can be exhausting to engage in lengthy discussions about minor things. I know Iâm a nuisance right now, but I have decided to try and see how much effort is necessary to get one bit of Knowledge which I think is biased to be neutral again. Being an annual donator to this site, I feel strongly about it upholding neutrality and Iâve lately been noticing some clear violations of this. So sorry for all the fuss!
2293:
without any sources visible, in violation of
Knowledgeâs neutral point of view policy.â You argued âIf a position presented on a talk page isn't supported by reliable, verifiable sources then it is just an opinion.â Yeah, well, I merely applied this logic to the article itself, no? But, as I told you, Iâm happy to provide sources if the talk page is re-opened. Since you didnât even try to defend the other two accusations you made (that I questioned), I again kindly ask you to re-open the talk page, so I can actually provide sources as I have been now actually asked to do. Many thanks!
770:, whether I realized it or not, it doesn't change the comments people contributed. As a NAC, all I can do is reflect what is written by people who have said chosen to say something. I can't change what other people decide to say on any individual RfC. That said, I am aware of the fractious history of infoboxes, especially on classical music articles. The Arbcom decision I linked to is only the tip of a very large and nasty iceberg. Is there something else you would like me do say or do, though? (And yes, I agree the project is poorer for his absence.)
50:
3206:, accepting one editor's arguments that everyone else was wrong or not using the right sources or not understanding the issue would be taking a side and making a supervote. You seem to suggest that the "state-related" !votes did, in fact, "...show no understanding of the matter of issue." I cannot say I agree with that characterization because there were policy-based arguments for "state-related". I'm sorry that doesn't agree with your perception but that is exactly why I suggested that further DR is necessary, probably at DRN.
2335:, standard academic texts, and the Centers for Disease Control. These are the sources that you claim are not actually given. The long-standing consensus of editors is that these sources support the statement you want to change. You can find the discussions that lead to this consensus in the article's talk page and the talk page archives. The yellow boxes at the top of the talk page will be able to locate those discussions for you. New users often ignore those but they are repositories of useful links and information.
4332:) I have included four groups of authors (Clark et al, Lou et al, Lamanna et al and the 20 members of the Australian Medicare Services Advisory Committee) who find vertebroplasty effective for the management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures causing severe pain versus one group in the Cochrane review who don't. The Knowledge page is misleading in its current version and misinforms patients. Please arrange to have it rewritten or removed. Yours Sincerely Dr William Clark Lead author VAPOUR trial (Lancet. 2016;
36:
4028:, hello and thanks for your question. I'm sorry I haven' been able to reply sooner but I was out of town this weekend. I took another look and I still think a direct link to a Wordpress blog for the AhleSunnah Library is not a reliable source. That said, this PDF has a title and publisher's information page stating it was published by the Islamic Texts Society. If you can find the full publisher's information normally expected for citing published book,s it would probably be acceptable. I hope that helps.
489:
3964:
3099:? I agree that counting the different !votes likely results in a "no consensus" close. But I think you need to address the fact that the !votes for "public" provided numerous sources for how this precise situation is handled in reliable sources written by experts in this very topic who have had to make the exact same decision but the other !votes provided very few, if any, sources. (I can provide many, many more similar sources if that would be helpful, too.) Thanks!
64:
380:
3007:
3160:, there was an edit conflict so I did not see your offer of other sources. I appreciate that these sources may exist and be persuasive to other editors but my purpose as the discussion closer is not to be the one persuaded. I can only evaluate how well the discussion participants persuaded each other. I realize that is probably disappointing, but again I am not an admin and don't feel that it is appropriate to substitute my judgment for the discussion.
1066:, thank you for the kind words. I think these additions are very eligible for inclusion. Before adding this new material, though, the dispute over the text already there should be resolved first. We should see if there are any other responses in the article talk page before proceeding. Secondly, while the current text does deserve removal and such criticism can be distressing for an article subject or their friends and family, it is not defamatory. The
3330:
3546:
4741:
106:
3940:. The issue I have is with the statement that 22 anonymous women have come out with allegations. These allegations are nowhere to be found and the linked Washington Post and IranWire articles do not make any references to this either. Please review the edits one more time carefully with this in mind. Also, based on Knowledge rules the allegations should not be included in the opening paragraph. An edit request which you seem to have missed.
2766:
3521:" (my bold) answers my basic question. So, it *seems* that passing threats thru the system provides some Wiki identification of the sender. The links you have kindly provided, will help me with any further inquiries. (Of course, no matter what else is going on in respect to content matters, etc., editors should not receive threats, nor issue them.) You have been very helpful, as always! My best wishes to you, also,
3176:
understanding of the issue which was solely confined to how the institution is described in the lede and infobox and not how it should be described elsewhere in the article where context and nuance can be provided. We have incredibly clear evidence about how every reliable source has resolved this question and we're ignoring it because...we don't like it or we think we know better than the experts in this field?
1439:
never responds or present any scientific basis to their "CLAIMS". Infact, all of the people have been identified as highly prejudice against the ancient Indian antiquity on their own pages. Be my guest and check and confirm for yourself. How about being honest and present scientific refutal to many many researchers' works I have provided references to. Read the name of those researchers and provide your claim. --
1916:
going to recommend again that the
English-language Knowledge is probably not the project that you want to contribute towards. Whatever your native language is, there is definitely a Knowledge for it. Please use that one instead, both for your sake and for the sake of other editors and for the readers. The non-English Knowledge are always hungry for help and I'm certain they would welcome your participation.
78:
2567:
2187:
opinion, but explicitly that they are not and that I have been concerned about the neutrality of this article and (C) I have explicitly argued that my objection is based on the observation that âtranswomen are womenâ is a mere opinion, and not a fact, so it is not a matter of sources to give. (Nevertheless, I can still search for sources and show them when being asked â which Iâm inclined to do.)
1712:, I supposed I should be happy Mr. Norton didn't name me but aside from some sour grapes, I don't see anything there. It's not surprising a source judged not reliable is offended by that but it doesn't change anything. Just to check: Am I right in assuming that you're just letting me know about the reaction and don't want me to take any action or respond? Thanks for letting me know.
3486:, it is very unclear to me from MKW's posts whether he is claiming that he received the threats he claims through his regular (off-wiki) email or through the "Email user" (on-wiki) function, probably due to the obvious language competency issues. Neither is is clear if the legal threats he's making were on- or off-wiki. Most of the documentation on the internal email feature is at
3430:
of him as a hero, is simply not anywhere near that same level of significance. I will state that creating a new article or defending an article against deletion requires knowledge of many interlocking and overlapping policies and standards. It is better to understand as many as you can before trying to argue as you have been in the AfD. You can start with
2214:
talk page or a user talk page such as mine here, you should start a new section. This is easily done by clicking the "New section" tab at the top of the page helpfully placed next to the "Edit" tab. Also, when you make a post you need to sign it. This is also easy, just type a row of four tilde characters at the end of your post like this:
4260:
929:
that says "I buried a treasure in the
American Southwest" than to go through the trouble of putting one out there. Even if there is one, it's hidden in an area larger than Borneo with only minimal or even outright misleading clues. My suggestion is to treat the Fenn Treasure and the many books associated with it somewhat like Stevenson's
2581:
2869:
style. You can do research on it. The scripts has three lines. The first line is written á
ááá¸ááśáááášá that says Johnny
Patrick, the name of his father. The middle line is written á˘áśáá¸áá that says Alison, his mother's name. The last line is written áá¸á áááá that says Megan, his sister's name. I hope that you will look into this.
1591:, than you for asking. By "strength of arguments" I was referring to how the opinions expressed analyzed the source under consideration and also how relevant policies and procedures were related to the source. Your !vote, for example, only said "reasoning to follow" but there was no further expression of that reasoning.
3490:. When you send a message with this feature, the email address attached to your Wiki account is passed to the recipient and your WP name. I cannot find and do not remember if non-logged-in users can use the "Email user" feature of Mediawiki so I'm afraid I cant answer that question. You might try asking about that at
2847:, that was not actually an article of mine. As the edit summary noted, it was created as a favor to a new user who had tried to create it as a draft in the wrong place. That user never followed up so it is not of any interest to me to continue. It has already been deleted at this time but I thank you for the notice.
4512:, for the record, I wasn't just blowing off steam. I didn't think the IP editor's demand for a retraction should have gone unaddressed and I was making the absurdity of the demand clear. I was snarky, sure, but I wasn't uncivil or otherwise out-of-bounds. I hope that explains my reasoning. Thanks for your feedback.
3303:, I think it is inappropriate for me to close an RfC in one way or another and then make the edits I say should be made. Doing raises the possibility that I closed the discussion in that particular way just to make the edits I personally preferred. I hope that makes sense. Thanks anyway for asking here first.
3390:
afd, I am learning more about wikipedia and researching how things work. As you said unless i have no new point please dont comment. So i thought of sending it here if you could reply. Also in afd discussion i know we cannot compare pages as there is a policy which forbid that. But I wish to know why
2352:
As to "re-opening" the discussion, I think you are mistaking what I said earlier. I am not an administrator and closing the discussion has no adminstrative sanction attached. I am a regular editor and, to the extent that I have any rights any other random user, those are only because of length of my
2213:
Anonymous user, you say that you are new and fair enough. Every user started out new here. That said, there are some things that you need to know if you are going to continue to participate. First the easy stuff: When you start a new conversation on a talk page, whether a noticeboard or an article
1438:
Was wondering what it is like on your page. Now I understand where all that hunting of Surya
Sidhant wiki page was coming from. Completely understood. The interesting thing is, whoever tries to remove the BC era dating from Surya Sidhanta page, never showed up again. Everytime there is a new guy, who
581:
I just want to thank you for voluntarily walking into this hornet's nest and performing a closure. (And for messiness, welcome to the
Balkans!) I have for a long time tried to make some participants (read that as singular) understand that they have not "won" the RfC. I just hope your closing comments
4706:
Sure, I can see that there is a downside to not posting the close to the noticeboard. (Perhaps the right compromise would be to copy the closing statement to the noticeboard with a pointer to the closed discussion.) I'm not well versed in VP, but would be happy to help; it would be good to have some
2330:
In other words, every sentence in a lead does not require a cite to a reliable source if the general agreement of editors on the talk page is against it and the statement in the lead summarizes adequately-sourced statements in the body. The statement you want to change ("A trans woman is a woman who
2292:
and without any of them being visible before, neither on the article nor on the talk page nor on the request for comment about the issue. Again: I really donât see any sources. I really, really donât. So my complaint is: âThere is something which I can clearly identify as an opinion stated as a fact
2221:
Now the more substantive points: No, your "observation that 'transwomen are women' is a mere opinion" does not absolve you of needing to provide sources. As was pointed out to you several times, making arguments or stating your own conclusions without providing sources is not how discussions work on
2186:
on the grounds that I (A) complain about transwomen, (B) stated my objections are based on my personal opinion and (C) that I have not given any sources. These reasons do not hold: (A) I have not once complained about transwomen and (B) I have never stated that my objections are based on my personal
1112:
The fact that there are an endless amount of numerous horse racing experts, owners, trainers, etc., cited with reliable sources (and the reliable, independent sources contextualizing why it is relevant) that have these views/opinions/critiques of the jockey certainly means there is something more to
1010:
The fact that there are an endless amount of numerous horse racing experts, owners, trainers, etc., cited with reliable sources (and the reliable, independent sources contextualizing why it is relevant) that have these views/opinions/critiques of the jockey certainly means there is something more to
4824:
Hello, thanks for closing the RFC and emphasizing how the purpose of the RFC was not clear at all. Youâve logically stated that their is no consensus and thus the article should be brought back to the initial version prior to the adding of the sentence with
Afghanistan and Myanmar, however the user
4119:
such as birth certificates. If you want to edit your relative's article, I would suggest that you are more likely to get your changes accepted if you can find published secondary sources. That's probably not what you'd like to hear but I'm afraid it's the reality of the way these policies work. I
3978:
For making sure whatever criticism you give is always constructive. While it is not always what we want to hear, I can tell that it is done out of genuine concern for my behavior, rather than out of any stance in a dispute. I know I haven't made a good impression for you, but I really do appreciate
3588:
as the basis of the lawsuit, proclaiming himself to be a "world famous physician", the "only real Jay Joshi", and an apparent subject matter expert in a wide ranging array of medical topics . In a stunning departure from established legal precedent , Ellis allowed the case to survive initial motion
3429:
did, indeed, become only notable after his death but that death was so important that to not have an article would be ludicrous. The death of George Floyd has changed not only this entire nation but had real effects worldwide. Deeapk Sathe, despite his accomplishments and the official recognition
2366:
The basic rule, with exceptions outlined below, is to not edit or delete others' posts without their permission.... A discussion which has been closed with the {{subst:Archive}} or similar template is intended to be preserved as-is and should not be edited. Subsequent edits inside of an archive box
2322:
in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Leads are usually written at a greater level of generality than the body, and information in the lead section of non-controversial subjects is less likely to be challenged and less likely to require a source;
1618:
Thanks. I hadn't expected my own comment to count for anything. My intention had been to return and write a detailed reasoning, but I kept on being diverted to other Knowledge discussions, which was remarkably easy to do as I felt pretty heavy-hearted about getting involved in the RSN discussion.
1562:
of Grayzone with the effect that the site was deprecated, writing: " The arguments for two of the options presented were based more clearly on policy and procedures while the arguments for the other two options were based more on personal preference and appeals to anti-imperialism. There is a clear
670:
Hi, regarding the close of the Paste RFC on RSN you wrote there is no consensus on whether paste is a reliable source. I suggest it would be better to add ... for politically related topics. As the RFC did not question its status as an established reliable source for music and pop culture, regards
4825:
who initially added that and was edit warring with 6 different users about it and opened the very weird unclear RFC simply re-added the content by simply putting an â Albeitâ in front of the sentence and implied in his edit summary that this edit was done per your RFC closure(?). Here is the diff:
4429:
Nelson A, Ullberg S, Kristoffersson H, Ronnback C (1961). Distribution of Radiocesium in Mice. Acta Radiologica. 55, 5: 374-384. doi:10.3109/00016926109175132. Venturi, Sebastiano (2020). "Is there a correlation between radioactive cesium and the increase of pancreatic cancer ?". Reseachgate. Aug,
4202:
If you want to change these figures, you will need to propose the exact text you want changes, the proposed new text, and the sources you feel justify this change. This is more complex than the type of request handled by edit requests and should be a new section on the talk page. To create a new
4005:
because Wordpress is not a reliable source. The source I added is actually a PDF of a published book which happened to be hosted on Wordpress. I assume this is okay because Wordpress is simply being used as a host for the actual source, which is a book, and not as the source itself. Please clarify
826:
may also play a part in that some editors are hesitant to talk about, say, Mozart's perfection of the piano concerto form but they have a very definite opinion about the infobox on his article. I hope I have at least shed some light on the iceberg, even if I haven't really answered the question.
623:
of the RfC, Eggishorn. You have provided very good advice to the RfC participants about how to create an RfC that would have a better chance at achieving consensus. I really appreciate the thoughtful work you put into all of the RfC closes you have made the past few days (and in the past as well).
2373:
If you do want to continue the discussion, then you can use the "New Section" tab at the top of the article talk. I suggest that it will not change anything unless you do provide sources that dispute the ones that exist in the article. Just to re-iterate, you need to refer to the sources in the
1915:
statement you've made has been riddled with grammatical or usage errors. I can't explain to you the "where" because it's everything. In the first sentence above alone I count at least nine. That's a conservative estimate because I can only guess as to what you might have really meant to say. I'm
928:
article that we have here but only from the standpoint of ensuring it complies with site policies. I'm personally of the opinion that the Treasure doesn't exist and it was one man's dying hoax when he didn't think he would live for very long. It's a lot easier and cheaper to self-publish a book
4336:
Investigator Kallmes trial (N Engl J Med 2009; 361:569-579 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563) Author Diamond et al trial 2006 ( doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00148 ) Author Diamond et al 2020 (Diamond, T. et al. Early vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of fracture for acute painful vertebral osteoporotic
4224:
Dear Eggishorn, you have replied, "Establish consensus before editing". I have also read the info on consensus. I'm being new to the edit request on Knowledge, can't find a way for my next step. What should be my next step to establish a consensus? As I explained with the reference, that Female
3665:
These two points alone mean that the Joshi v. Joshi case is not going to be appropriate for the article about Ellis. None of the sources that are acceptable are going to support a claim that Ellis made a bad decision in allowing the case to move forward. Perhaps granting this type of motion is
3455:
Please excuse my lack of understanding, regarding the recent post at ANI. But, is Memon KutianaWala, claiming that they have received threatening emails, via WPâs âemail this userâ function? I always thought that if I used this function, my WP name would be attached to the msg. Or will it *only*
2868:
Hi. So I see that you just reverted my edit on Jack O'Connell's tattoo on his arm. I know that there are no source to back up, but I don't go around spreading nonsense on a Knowledge page. I'm a native Cambodian and I can recognize that the tattoo on his arm is indeed a Khmer script, not a Thai
2658:
2237:
Which brings me to the main point: I archived it as much as a courtesy to you (as a new user) as anything else. You were already asked several times to provide sources or to look at the previous discussions on the issue and provided no evidence that you were going to. The line of discussion you
2190:
Hence, I would like to have this section re-opened on the grounds that it has been closed for non-holding reasons. Iâm a bit new to editing wikipedia, so I donât know how exactly things like these are handled: Do I address this issue to you personally or do I leave a comment elsewhere? Anyway, I
1331:
I don't have a problem with that, besides it could actually be a good thing since multiple accounts seem to be constantly attacking the article for containing non-Hindu ideas on the subject. Though I would like to correct you that the cited material stated "According to legend, first narrated in
4148:
the holocaust was the systematic genocides carried out primarily during WW2 by the nazi's, not all "illegal" killings the they were responsible for i am arguing. the wartime deaths of civilians (whether partisans, perceived potential military threats, or other) are not all part of the holocaust
4111:, Thank you for your inquiry but I prefer to keep all discussions about Knowledge on Knowledge so I've removed the email address for your security and privacy. The information you've provided above from Family Search is not going to be considered generally acceptable because Family Search is a
4065:
Thanks for your help regarding my effort to correct my grandmother's Knowledge page. Can I cite and attach her (Minnie W Collins) Dartmouth MA birth record that shows her born on May 7, 1880, the illegitimate daughter of Eliza Collins? Her mother and George W Ashley, a married man, moved to the
2260:
If it sounds like I'm expecting you to read a lot of policy and procedure stuff in order to make the comments that you want, well, that's because I am. This is a community that operates differently than other Internet sites and has different mores and standards. If you want to be effective in
2229:
This resistance to providing the sources you were asked to provide is why I labeled it as your opinion. You state that it is not actually your opinion but that is neither here not there. If a position presented on a talk page isn't supported by reliable, verifiable sources then it is just an
272:
The edit is to correct the historical events that happened before Indian Independence. I am trying to edit some thing which is factually incorrect. In the Knowledge, it was mentioned that "Purna Swaraj" resolution was passed on January 26, 1929 which is factually incorrect. The fact is that it
3688:
The bottom line is: That content cannot be edited to fit policy and be added to the Judge Ellis article. I'm sorry to say that but not everything does fit. As a side note, you're encouraged to sign your posts on talk pages such as this. This can be done easily by typing a row of four tilde
3175:
I think that when one side of an RfC provides many reliable sources that are directly applicable to the exact question that is being asked and the other side doesn't then it's a pretty clear close no matter the numbers on each side. I don't think the "state-related" !voters showed a genuine
2401:
Okay, I will take my chances and reopen the discussion myself â itâs easier than opening a new section and I can directly reply to the person asking me for sources. Other than one source (implicitly) concluding âtranswomen are women such that âŚâ, nothing in the terminology section says that
4308:"Nagorno-Karabakh" is a region. Artsakh is a country; Stepanakert is capital of Artsakh, not of Nagorno-Karabakh. This would be like having an article on the Rocky Mountains and saying the capital is Denver. You seem to think I'm somehow questioning the existence of Artsakh; far from it. --
4149:
proper. i think that this is a rabbit hole that the holocaust museum's interpretation is leading you down. (if you want to count all illegal deaths caused by the nazis then we should have a number closer to 100 million as the regime and war were illegal by pretty much any interpretation.)
2728:, where I added the desktop distributions to the âplatformsâ table. The message you left was âfailed verificationâ. I wanted to ask what you mean by that, as Iâm fairly new to this, and I mightâve missed something important. If youâre saying that the downloads donât exist, you can see them
4327:
Dear Knowledge The vertebral augmentation page continues to cite the 2018 Cochrane review of vertebroplasty as core evidence that vertebroplasty is ineffective. We published a methodologically sound criticism of the Cochrane review, which has not been challenged by Cochrane authors (DOI:
464:. Given the frequency with which inappropriate requests have been made since the protection level was increased, my own opinion is that reducing protection is not indicated at this time. Although not the answer you were likely looking for, I hope that helps explain the situation better.
4422:
Cesium is absorbed by animal and plant cells in a competitive way with potassium, but cesium has no known function; however, at high concentrations, it can cause toxicity in plants, inhibiting their growth. Indeed, mammalian organisms, during evolution, began to distinguish the useless
3277:, which I initiated. Would you mind taking a few minutes to make the necessary edits to the article to reflect the consensus? I would do so myself if not for my declared COI. If you prefer to refrain from getting involved further in this area, I will make an edit request via the
232:
or one that is likely to be challenged. It is generally good practice to only make the smallest of changes supported by sources in such a case until other editors have a chance to express an opinion. I hope this helps explain why I did what I did and didn't do what I didn't do
332:
Thanks a lot for the help. I did the required changes but I am not able to add another editor as there was no such option.Kindly guide me on this. There is another Knowledge page called "Purna swaraj" whose information is accurate and conflicts with this page. Kindly check it.
2230:
opinion. No other editor cares what your opinion is or what my opinion is or what Jimmy Wales' opinion is without sources. Arguing ex nihilo based on one's own logic may be a viable discussion tactic in other parts of the Internet but here it almost always gets perceived as
3133:
Those policy grounds did not provide sufficient justification for completely ignoring the "state-related" !votes, whatever the possible shortcomings on sourcing discussion participants may have perceived. Making my own judgment on that sourcing issue would have been a clear
1599:, by contrast, posted detailed analyses of the source ans some of the source's writing and justified their analyses with policy-based arguments. The "strength of the arguments" they posted is more helpful in assessing consensus than those that did not. I hope this helps.
3868:. Ashtghik has just now acknowledged that the COI applies to them. There is no need to notify anyone about anything yet. I am not even certain that ru:wiki and hy:wiki even have the same COI policies that en:wiki does. We could try asking Ashtghik first, after all.
1242:
where there are multiple links to discussions that explain the reasoning in copious detail. Now, I have a question for you: Who is coordinating these questions? You didn't find my talk page by accident so who directed you here and where did you find those directions?
2592:
for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated!
4688:
So maybe we need a VP on whether closes requested at AN/RFC should be left in the archive with a note on the current page or unarchived. I think both are kind of problematic, either way you look at it. Would you help with such a discussion if I started it? Thanks.
3579:
I read your feedback and I acknowledge your point. I am willing to learn and to defer to more experienced editors. In your opinion, how should the following content be edited in order to fit the standards of Knowledge? I have asked Snickers2686 the same question.
4649:
It's allowed (indeed preferred) to leave the thread in the archive and close it there, then let one of the regulars know to put it on RSP. That way it doesn't clog up current discussions, and one doesn't have to update the RSP links once the thread is archived.
3074:, thank you for the note. I've made the change to the close statement for strict accuracy reasons. I'm not sure what I saw that made me use a May date to calculate the time it was open but 30 days is still long enough for a NAC. Thanks again for the heads up.
645:, thank you as well. It is very gratifying to have the work I do on those recognized. I try very hard to make my summaries neutral and reflect the discussion without injecting my own biases. As you know, this can be a challenge on some of them. thanks again.
3356:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1768:
3) "Using one of these may be more fun and less frustrating. No editor should be working on a Knowledge where they are not enjoying it": you don't know me at all, both in virtual and in reality, so you'll never ever know my true mood when I work in "general".
1259:
but now if you know that many people reporting it and it's a wrong information then you should change it to it's original name only Ram setu. it will be just a article for you but Indians attached emotionally with it and now you should respect thier emotions.
223:
in Knowledge terms means that a general agreement to make an edit exists among the editors who have an active interest in a page. In the case of your requested edit, I did not put all the details in that you requested for multiple reasons. This article is a
4144:
i am asking for a fairly large redefinition of "the holocaust" back to it's traditional definition. the 17m murders number need not be omitted, but the holocaust proper number of 11m dead should be included as well. (that is the X to Y that i am requesting)
2154:
project, which tries to address the encyclopedia's gender disparity in coverage. The name comes from the idea that links to articles that have not yet been written are usually presented to the reader in red text. Another editor had previously listed them at
2353:
user registration. I have been here for over thirteen years and that does give me some perspective but no actual authority. Closing the discussion was a regular editorial action, in other words, and you can't be sanctioned for continuing the discussion.
4984:
This is completely false information. Ahmadis are not even Muslims, according to The Holy Quran and Hadees. How they get the right to edit Knowledge in such way to hurt Muslims all over the world. A stick action must be taken on this... Thank you..
5021:
have nothing to do with this statement so I'm puzzled as anything as to why you chose to message me. What you are seeing is the result of Google's algorithms mistakenly taking something from an article and calling it the answer. Our article on the
3666:
unusual but stating that in the article would require one source to characterize what is "usual" for motions to dismiss in trademark suits and another to characterize this particular motion. Combining sources in such a way is what we refer to as
3201:
making any decisions or taking any position on the sources or the experts cited. That is not my place. I recognized already your use of sources but I cannot ignore the positions expressed based on my personal preferences or source evaluations.
4454:
I don't really know what is expected of me from posting this here. Knowledge is not a place to promote one's journal articles, but this isn't a specific request. Possibly it content that the anonymous editor should be part of the related to the
4225:
Infanticide is never a community-based thing or specific these community or cultural and ritual based thing to be represented in a Knowledge page that provides information on representing a community. It is purely independent of communities.
4679:, I have seen it done both ways recently so I'm honestly wondering if normal preference is changing. I did a close recently and left the thread in the archives and was contacted with a recommendation to do the opposite. That's why I linked
2257:. Finally, that talk page has archives that have extensive prior discussions about the very issue you raised. Failing to read through those archives and re-raising the same points without new sources will likewise be a negative experience.
1951:. May I please assure you that my intention was to insert an image, and it was in no way intentionally unflattering. The image inserted was the image given in wikidata for her. Happy with your edit, however. It is not a flattering image.
960:
Thank you for beginning to help on the Pat Day page. This page requires a lot of assistance because it has been formed by somebody who has a great deal of disdain for Pat Day and as you have noted, seems to favor rival jockey Mike Smith.
1841:
And then, the statement that you found on my user page: "...based on TRUTH, because of edit a page I inform you about EVERYTHING...", it's a type of statement to which I'm not tied and associated for a long time, because I wrote it as a
2402:
transwomen are considered women by any consensus, let alone that it is considered a fact. So the âcopious supportâ simply doesnât exist. If you actually read the request for comment on this issue, you will find that there is literally â
3462:
I have seen your name and comments, over the years, and have considered you to be "a good egg". I do not have an opinion, per se, regarding the issue at ANI, just wished to ask about the email function. Thanks for your time. Regards,
3583:
Ellis oversaw the frivolous Joshi v. Joshi case , in which a physician by the name of Jaydeep R Joshi filed a lawsuit against another physician by the name of Jay K Joshi ostensibly claiming the latter had imitated him, and used the
3047:
and for doing a good job of it. Secondly, in your closing statement you said "this RfC has been open 59 days," (it certainly felt like it), but it was actually opened June 19th and you closed it July 19th = 30 days. Happy editing!
734:, because fatigue reached a point where every repetition of the same "arguments" is a strain on editor relations? Call it a strike, - life is too short to participate. I said the same thing in other words years ago, same talk. --
2341:, doing so is often difficult. Expecting that other participants in a discussion will accept your proposal simply on the strength of your arguments is always very difficult. The odds for such discussions to violate either the
2313:
The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent
2150:, that is so gratifying to hear. It sounds like she was an amazing person from the research I did but to hear that her family members appreciate the research is amazing. I happened on her name as a requested article from the
1690:
On Knowledge, a small group of regime-change advocates and right-wing Venezuelan opposition supporters have blacklisted independent media outlets like The Grayzone on explicitly political grounds, violating the encyclopediaâs
880:
Greetings, my name is arya and i live in indonesia. I have a quick question for you, i see you an wiki ogre and journalist. Here the question, you know anything about Fenn Treasure? Anything, clue, codes, hint, coordinates.
4937:'s talk page lately. It is very sad to let you know that he is no more. I have worked with him about 13 years back in a featured article and it's very hard for me to tell this to you. But I thought about letting you know. --
4888:(regretfully with concessions), and can't see how I can do better without some enlightened instrtuction (details regarding that in the other part of this discussion, on my talk page). I am sure process will prevail. Cheers.
3003:] & you had responded my request by saying that its already changed to Dr.Brahma Deo Ram Tiwari but brother when I saw the page it was still Vijay Vishwas Pant written there I have attached a snip displaying the same.
2222:
this project. This project is not a social media platform where arguments and discussions are based on personal observations. This is an encyclopedia that uses policies and procedures that are based on the best possible
1074:
skirts the line of what needs to be removed on sight. Thirdly, given your user name the question posed on your user talk page should be answered directly. Are you related to Pat Day? If you are, you need to read the
2369:
You can easily create a new section on the talk page to continue the discussion without fear of sanction. So there is really no reason to re-open the discussion and good reasons (as I explained above) to not re-open
991:
I would like to further address some of the more vile attacks in the page as well as add some more of the positive accomplishments that Day achieved in order to balance this one-sided hit piece that currently reigns.
693:, thanks for asking. I've attached a note to the close reason to make this clarification. The RfC question was only about political coverage and so the close can only address political coverage. I hope that helps.
2238:
pursued was not going to result in any change and was likely to end poorly. Leaving it open did not serve the readers, the other participants in the discussion or even you. So, no, I will not revert my archiving.
3360:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
4161:
if you are willing to consider this position i can provide myriad sources for my 11 million number... pretty much all materials on the topic from between the end of the war through the beginning of this century.
2682:
1412:
Why in the name of Rama himself do none of you read anything before you make these demands? It's not my article. I didn't write it. The name of the article has been the same since 2016. It won't change. GO AWAY.
5085:
3761:
Someone is making assertions about you on ANI, at Articles for deletion/Chen Rui. Sorry, can't remember the way to link, etc. Listed as item #39. You are suspected of being a meatpuppet. Unfair not to let you
327:
4685:
If a thread has been archived prematurely, such as when it is still relevant to current work or was not concluded, unarchive it by copying it back to the talk page from the archive, and deleting it from the
1791:, you continue to misread. I intentionally used the simplest, most direct grammar to make it easy to read but apparently that was not successful. To clarify, then: 1) I said: "I don't want to criticize you
267:
964:
I am not experienced in how to cite sources on Knowledge but the most important things that need to be added and protected is to mention near the top that Pat Day retired as the record-holder in earnings
451:
4115:. All the information that Family Search provides was given to Family Search by other users. There is no way of verifying this information. The birth certificate is interesting but Knowledge policy
4597:
You can just create a little index page in your User: space and then include it as a template in your talk page and in archive pages. Then you add a link to every new archive page in one place only.
4768:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2915:
Ok, I understand that. But do you have a source to back up that his tattoo is a Thai-style? I saw it as a false information and I'm trying to fix it. Also, he did come to Cambodia a few years back.
295:. Great. The edit request was very unclear and so I did not see that there was a factual inaccuracy you are trying to fix. I apologize for the oversight. To make such a change you need to provide
4066:
Boston area. Minnie's last name was changed to Minnie Ashley although Eliza and George never married and there is no legal document showing when her surname was changed by Ashley and Eliza Collins.
3601:
statements by the plaintiff, Jaydeep R Joshi . The case has since been dismissed with prejudice and it is unclear whether Ellis recommended sanctions against the plaintiff, Jaydeep R Joshi, or the
1332:
Gnostic sources and later given in Islamic texts, when Adam was expelled from paradise, he crossed this bridge". Meaning that this legend was referenced to by the presented groups. Cheers anyways:)
582:
will be understood properly. I do not really have a stake in this discussion at all, beside trying to keep it inside Wiki rules, but I can say that your closure has made my day brighter. Cheerio! --
5028:
Since the Ahmadiyya is widely viewed as a heterodox movement by the mainstream of Sunni and Shi'ite Islam, most Muslims outside the movement do not recognise Ahmadi claims to a caliphate as valid.
5077:
5069:
2331:
was assigned male at birth") is a summary of several sourced statements in the body text. The "Terminology" section provides copious support for the lead summary, including references to the
2307:
Anonymous user, thank you for your interest but you are continuing to depend on argumentation and your own personal interpretations. You say the lead sentence is not backed up by sources but
1353:, thanks for your understanding and help. I recognize the difference in meaning but the nubbin of the issue is the "according to legend" bit. If we find a citable RS that says "according to
1176:
What is most important to me is that the vile, personal character assassinations are ended and replaced with a factual accounting of his career.{[unsigned|NatroneDay|23:58, March 14, 2020â}}
4043:
No worries, I hope you had a good trip. Sorry for my late response too, I was really busy yesterday. Okay thanks for clarifying, Iâll check it out and try and re-add it with a new source. â
456:
Anonymous editor, I thank you for the kind words. I am not an administrator, however, and I cannot remove or place protection levels myself. The administrator who placed the protection,
4158:
and at the risk of being repetitive, i consider it ill advised to move the goal posts and arbitrarily redefine what the holocaust was - and thus change the numbers by around 50% upwards.
228:
and there are strict rules about that class of articles. Furthermore, the article subject is a political leader and the accusations are very negative in nature. This makes the "award" a
2508:
Hi, the discussion seems a bit stagnant at the Lynching list case DRN. I just sent a few reminders, but would you like to be involved? You seem to know this particular field. Thank you!
2128:
I just wanted to say thank you for creating the Marjorie Bell Chambers page. She is my grandmother and our family misses her dearly. If I may ask what inspired you to create this page?
3013:
Therefore I request you to please change it and as far as the spelling is concerned I think the spelling on the website that I inserted would be all right as its an official website.
1761:": the nationality of a Knowledge public user for every languages sections, not only in the main English, is personal and not necessarily notable. And then, as the same name says (for
4784:
1486:
342:
2781:
2759:
282:
5007:, I strongly suspect you are not ever going to see this and have no interest in anything but stating your doctrine and therefore giving yourself a lovely righteous glow but I will
3353:
5122:
4754:
392:
For your good work in handling edit requests . I was specially impressed by your responses on Bhindranwale request while I was away where you patiently explained the new editor.
3131:...flatly contradict established policy, those based on personal opinion only, those that are logically fallacious, and those that show no understanding of the matter of issue.
5065:
1553:
474:
3554:
4346:
3221:
If you believe that you should not be reading and evaluating the arguments and evidence presented by those participating in an RfC then you have no business closing them.
1835:
called me "troll" and "incompetent" on his summary description. In fact, if you look at all my answers in this discussion, I'm replying exclusively for these their words,
4350:
4322:
2757:
1567:
and those who did not distinguish between those options, there is a rough consensus for Option 4: "Publishes false or fabricated information, and should be deprecated."
1390:
hello sir I read your article on Ram setu. I found many mistakes in it. first it's Not Adam's bridge, it's just Ram setu. so please make a correction in it. thank you.
443:
428:
1524:
521:; Knowledge needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
5052:
2089:
352:
Hi there, Eggishorn, and thanks for adding the new WIR box to your user page. May I suggest you become an "official" member of Women in Red by registering on the main
299:
that demonstrates the change you are requesting is supported and verifiable. You can either create a new request or reopen the old one. To do the second, go back to
2577:. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.
4441:
4120:
hope that helps at least explain the situation. Feel free to contact me with further questions. This is an interesting case to me since I grew up on Buzzard's Bay.
4069:
2417:
2298:
2226:. The current text is supported by sources and your argument to change it requires equally-good sources. You aren't excused by labeling the current text as opinion.
1892:
Then explain to me where these incomprehensibility errors are that I'll correct them. And then it's actionable because I'm telling the truth, nothing but the truth.
1699:
1578:
1227:
258:
202:
4810:
2818:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
4994:
4851:, I am not an administrator and I do not know how definitive my "intervention" can be. I can do not more than you as a fellow editor can. I will post a message on
3735:
3718:
3641:
3620:
2202:
1290:
I said I updated the link but that didn't happen until afterward. Just giving you a simple heads up and please continue on with the good work you are doing here.
4358:
4342:
4244:
2834:
2249:. If you can provide source and policy-based reasons, then a new discussion might be fruitful. I will also strongly caution you to thoroughly read the actual
5002:
4986:
4977:
4219:
4203:
section on any talkpage (such as I have gone back and added here), use the "New section" tab at the top of the page next to the "Edit" tab. I hope this helps.
3677:
Furthermore, the terms such as "frivolous case", "stunning departure", "specious claim" "likely perjured statements" are all clearly not acceptable under the
3395:
page is live. He became notable only through that unfortunate incident and all news about him came only after that terrible incident. Please clarify . Thanks
3376:
3138:
and therefore not allowed as a NAC. I hope this clarifies the close. Please let me know if you think this needs further expansion. Thanks again for asking.
2058:
2019:
2001:
338:
278:
1683:
558:
4130:
3024:
2920:
2874:
1407:
1391:
1261:
534:
401:
254:
214:
198:
4906:, it is poor practice to split discussions between multiple talk pages and I had already started this discussion on yours. I will reply as needed there.
3750:
3703:
4377:
4232:
3513:
Thank you for this reply! Between the language competency issues, and my lack of understanding of the email function, I was rather confused. Your stmt: "
3108:
3090:
3032:
2990:
2791:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
2156:
966:
5046:
1983:
3795:
3531:
3508:
2996:
2114:
907:
4473:
3337:
3321:
2498:
2448:
2421:
2384:
2302:
1423:
1253:
969:) and still ranks fourth on the earnings list (thttps://www.equibase.com/stats/ViewAllTime.cfm?tf=all-time&tb=horse&vb=E) and fourth in wins (
247:
4918:
4894:
3917:
3878:
3852:
3838:
3121:, wow, that was quick. As a closer I did take that into account, which is why the plurality of !votes for "state-related" was not accepted as even a
2691:
2670:
2271:
2133:
863:
837:
806:
780:
273:
happened on December 19,1929. I am trying correct it. Kindly guide me how to get consensus on this as I am new to editing in Knowledge. Thank you. --
4184:
4097:
2752:
1269:
1231:
1167:
I am a racing fan, historian and admirer of Pat Day's career. He frankly should not require me to stand up for him as his career speaks for itself.
717:
703:
304:
4971:
3550:
3319:
2710:
1857:
1089:
436:
334:
290:
274:
4867:
4524:
3893:
Hello, I hope I haven't been too sarcastic in my comments...as my User page states, I try to defend worthy music articles (maybe that should read
3313:
3170:
2541:
1926:
1899:
1880:
1805:
1375:
1341:
1326:
321:
4613:
3020:
2947:
2932:
2916:
2909:
2886:
2870:
2490:
2483:
2456:
2440:
2434:
1738:
1722:
1669:
1652:
1626:
1609:
1478:
1433:
447:
432:
395:
4213:
4052:
4038:
3252:
3230:
3216:
3185:
3148:
2857:
2547:
Thank you for your answer, I asked the involved editors to write their decisions over there in order to conclude this dispute. Thank you again.
2159:
and I noticed the listing and thought she would be interesting to learn about both for me and for other readers. Thanks again and best wishes.
1547:
4723:
4701:
4638:
4579:
4275:
4193:
4172:
4136:
4044:
4023:
4007:
3096:
2650:
2629:
949:
655:
633:
614:
3740:, but it's not so much "my decision" as it is just the way this project has decided to run itself. I realize it's not what you want to hear.
3084:
2169:
1357:, Adam..." or some such then that would be includable. As you've noted, though, the current attacks mean making absolutely certain we follow
4666:
640:
625:
591:
525:
4829:. This is definitely not going according to the rules, the outcome of the RFC is just simply ignored by him, please intervene. Best regards
2924:
2878:
902:
Goodday, hello my name is arya from indonesia, i see you an wikiogre and journalist, quick question, you know anything about fenn treasure?
4585:
4499:
3290:
2719:
2145:
2129:
1658:
4152:
this - what you have done on these pages regarding the holocaust - may be a current trend, but i think that it is completely wrongheaded.
3843:
Should we mention this to the other Knowledge communities? As I mentioned before, this user also edited the Armenian and Russian version.
3656:
The two news articles (references 7 and 8) do not directly support the claim that Judge Ellis's actions were unusual or unacceptable. The
4731:
3431:
1811:
4406:
Lamanna A et al. Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An update. First published: 20 May 2019
3988:
3815:
1642:
and say that volunteer time is the project's most precious resource. You should choose to spend yours however you like without guilt.
1211:
935:
and enjoy the yarn but not take it seriously. People have died looking for it. If what I've said still doesn't dissuade you, then the
194:
Hi I understand your point, can you briefly explain what you mean "please establish a consensus for this alteration" as I'm fairly new.
5081:
3726:
3435:
2863:
2735:
Once again, sorry if Iâm not doing something correctly - Iâm new at editing stuff on wikipedia, so I probably just missed something :P
1299:
4155:
the nazis themselves kept pretty meticulous records of the holocaust. hence the solid 11 million number for more than half a century.
1399:
1205:
3342:
1500:
514:
is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
1960:
4838:
4644:
4554:
4093:
3632:
3473:
2206:
896:
573:
4070:
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-DTK3-G65?i=162&cc=1536925&personaUrl=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3AFX85-RQ3
3925:
2787:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
2606:
410:
3949:
3628:
3001:
Hello Eggishorn, I am 7vik0808 & I had posted a request to Change the name of the District Magistrate of Kanpur on this page
1846:
the first day I registered here on Knowledge 8 years ago. Therefore, you must not relate it to my alleged opposion to the site's
1778:
1448:
970:
730:
You mentioned fatigue, - did you realize that people who think an infobox is the normal thing to have voluntarily decided not to
482:
3646:, thank you for the message. I am always ready to help new users. To start with the sourcing, there are two important points:
3459:
It hadnât occurred to me that a non-WP (unnamed) editor might be able to use this function, without signing in....ie, as an IP.
2967:
2104:
is the name of a mountain in Switzerland. Why is that "pretty cringe" and why did you attempt to remove you insulting comment?
3404:
2556:
2517:
2439:
As per the wiki sources itself the video of Kunal kamra is 2.26M dislike taking it up to spot number 27 of most disliked video
1994:
im sorry I noticed that theres a difference between the interstates (highways) and the routes are regular roads at least in CT
2700:. Please be sure to provide some reference for why you think the number should be different. Thanks, and I hope this helps.
2367:
should not be removed for this sole reason, but may be moved below the box to preserve the integrity of the closed discussion.
423:...you need to consider the edit protection, at OneCoin, so other likeminded and hardworking editors can help you make this a
4015:
3566:
888:
262:
206:
3693:
at the end of your post. Thank you again for your question and I hope this helps explain the policies a little. Stay safe.
1170:
He has the fourth most wins, fourth most victories and has accomplished more than only a handful of jockeys can compare to.
604:, why, thank you. That's possibly the nicest thing another editor has said to me concerning a NAC I've done. Thanks again.
5118:
4806:
4626:, thank you again. I do it manually intentionally to make sure I have control over everything and know what is happening.
4445:
4317:
2085:
2066:
2009:
1312:, thank you, but I have reverted again. The actual text says "According to legend" it is in gnostic texts. This is not a
3772:
2093:
911:
365:
4946:
4481:
4437:
4060:
3717:
Okay, I stand corrected. I will accept your decision and refrain from adding any additional content to the Wiki section.
3268:
2413:
2294:
2137:
1223:
850:
on today's Main page, - enjoy, we sang it last Sunday. - I decided to not waste time in these discussions this year, but
757:
743:
1563:
consensus below for the options that consider Grayzone less reliable (i.e., Option 3 and Option 4). Taking into account
1496:
1052:
4240:
2198:
2151:
1154:
680:
3515:
When you send a message with this feature, the email address attached to your Wiki account is passed to the recipient
3061:
1122:
967:
https://www.newsday.com/sports/horseracing/pat-day-s-career-was-complete-when-he-finally-won-kentucky-derby-1.13562122
1465:
3906:
1020:
2725:
2678:
1048:
789:, and still don't understand how many words, thoughts and energy a few people spend to prevent Mozart looking like
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
139:
134:
2899:. If there's no source to back a statement up, we can't make it in an article about a person. I hope this helps.
1503:
or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.
847:
822:
and participants in these debates forget that there's another human being on the other side of the keyboard. The
5114:
5043:
4968:
4915:
4864:
4802:
4698:
4635:
4576:
4521:
4470:
4374:
4337:
fractures: subgroup analysis of the VAPOUR trial and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 29, 1606â1613 (2020).
4210:
4127:
4035:
3875:
3835:
3792:
3747:
3700:
3505:
3310:
3249:
3213:
3167:
3145:
3081:
2987:
2944:
2906:
2854:
2707:
2626:
2538:
2480:
2381:
2268:
2166:
2111:
2043:
1980:
1923:
1877:
1802:
1719:
1649:
1606:
1544:
1475:
1420:
1372:
1323:
1274:
1250:
1202:
1151:
1086:
946:
834:
777:
700:
652:
620:
611:
471:
318:
244:
105:
45:
4295:
4200:
The puts the total number of murdered during the Holocaust at 17 million: 6 million Jews and 11 million others.
4872:
I am sure anyone can edit to "retain the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit" (
4530:
4089:
3028:
1870:, this message is not comprehensible and, even if a comprehensible meaning is extrapolated, is not actionable.
1159:
1144:, please don't argue article content here. The discussion has been opened on the article talk page. Thank you.
3685:
These sound like excerpts from a motion to recover attorney's fees and penalties, not an encyclopedia article.
4539:
4180:
3954:
3801:
3624:
3562:
3456:
reveal the email address I am using? Or both? (Note: I have a WP-only email address attached to my account.)
2561:
4341:) Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2369-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05101-8DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111171
2663:
Diamond Princess says "fourteen" deaths and should be "thirteen" unless there's a reference I'm not seeing
1911:, I'm not your copyeditor and I'm not going to markup your statements for correction. That said, literally
4777:
4712:
4655:
2697:
2280:
Thanks for your reply and thanks for the advice for new users. In fact, I have only been asked for sources
2025:
4395:
3425:
and repeated discussions for months on this project on exactly that question. The ultimate result is that
2659:
Diamond Princess says "fourteen" deaths and should be "thirteen" unless there's a reference I'm not seeing
2325:
The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus.
1559:
4819:
4789:
4490:
is for the good of Knowledge (and neither is it likely to have the slightest effect on the IP editor). --
4364:
3722:
2793:
1164:
I am not related to Pat Day, I have no association with Pat Day, and no business interests with Pat Day.
892:
819:
542:
370:
2288:, whereas the people claiming it to be a fact may rely on proclaiming âit is based on reliable sourcesâ
981:
49:
5110:
4680:
3418:
2963:
2241:
If you truly want to continue your discussion, then you first need to read, understand, and follow the
2062:
2005:
1385:
529:
3660:
policy requires all claims made about a living person to be directly supported by a verifiable source.
63:
5030:
If you had taken even 5 seconds to verify this for yourself instead of simply following a YouTuber's
4990:
4601:
3911:
3649:
References 5 and 6 are not really acceptable because they are primary source documents. This is the
3346:
2374:"Terminology" section to see the support for the sentence as it currently exists. I hope this helps.
1956:
1746:
300:
59:
4236:
3931:
3769:
3558:
3528:
3487:
3470:
3369:
3122:
2588:
of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the
2175:
1731:
Your assumption is correct. I didn't expect you to take action or respond in any particular way.
2822:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
5068:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
4106:
4085:
3996:
3709:
3058:
2584:, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users,
2503:
1828:
1395:
1265:
91:
5074:
Please add your evidence by December 30, which is when the evidence phase is scheduled to close.
3928:
I clicked the TALK button at top of article but I can't find where I can ask my question. Gerry
3897:). If the community consensus is delete, great. If it's keep, great as well. Have a good day.
2937:
I've removed the statement about the Thai style tattoo because it is also not reliably sourced.
4934:
4487:
4303:
4138:
3984:
3848:
3811:
3450:
3400:
3044:
2674:
2253:. Many new users just skim it and so think it means some form of balanced or neutered content
1936:
1044:
859:
802:
753:
739:
353:
101:
87:
3610:
971:
https://www.equibase.com/stats/ViewAllTime.cfm?tf=all-time&tb=horse&vb=Edespites)since
4873:
4765:
3682:
3498:. Sorry I couldn't answer fully your questions but thank you for the nice words. Stay safe.
2975:
2959:
2254:
2120:
2039:
875:
851:
713:
676:
253:
That's clear thanks and much appreciated for sharing your insight. Happy New Year you too!!
229:
4942:
4776:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4604:
for a primitive example of such index, and the lead section of my talk page for its use. --
4433:
4228:
4168:
4081:
3945:
3921:
3650:
3616:
3381:
3274:
3016:
2819:
2666:
2409:
2194:
2081:
2054:
2031:
1997:
1968:
1952:
1219:
1188:
1036:
884:
347:
3281:
process, but as the queue there is very long, I thought to inquire here first. Thank you!
2191:
would like to ask you for some forbearance if I donât follow all the protocols properly.
1819:
I understood their message about using English langauge only that they'd to clarifying me
8:
5040:
5023:
4965:
4912:
4861:
4834:
4695:
4632:
4573:
4518:
4495:
4467:
4371:
4207:
4176:
4124:
4032:
3872:
3832:
3789:
3780:
3764:
3744:
3697:
3571:
3523:
3502:
3481:
3465:
3363:
3307:
3286:
3246:
3210:
3203:
3164:
3142:
3135:
3078:
2984:
2941:
2903:
2851:
2788:
2748:
2704:
2623:
2552:
2535:
2513:
2477:
2378:
2265:
2163:
2108:
1977:
1920:
1896:
1874:
1854:
1799:
1774:
1751:
Hi Eggishorn. With the message you sent me, you contradicted yourself. For three points:
1716:
1646:
1603:
1541:
1472:
1417:
1369:
1337:
1320:
1295:
1247:
1239:
1199:
1148:
1083:
943:
831:
774:
697:
649:
608:
468:
315:
241:
220:
73:
17:
4884:. I hope you wont mind if I state that I have edited into the article what I saw as the
1491:
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct
4486:
Hi, Eggishorn. I sympathise strongly with your feelings, but I really don't think that
4363:, Knowledge is a project that anyone, including you, can edit. Please discuss this at
3902:
3491:
3038:
2494:
2444:
1734:
1695:
1666:
1622:
1574:
1444:
1754:
1) "I don't want to criticize you there": you've already criticized me for no reason;
4901:
4889:
4852:
4748:
4048:
4011:
3980:
3859:
3844:
3823:
3807:
3412:
3396:
3226:
3181:
3104:
2953:
2830:
2589:
1685:
Knowledge formally censors The Grayzone as regime-change advocates monopolize editing
1519:
1070:
policy tells us we should try to get such articles right but the objectionable text
855:
823:
813:
798:
765:
749:
735:
361:
189:
4333:
3553:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The section is
1757:
2) "If this is true, then you may want to use the Knowledge in your first language.
793:(community consensus), and painters, and scientists, and saints. I gave up in 2015,
5104:
5034:
you would have already discovered this information. Please never contact me again.
5026:
already makes it clear that the belief of who is the 5th Caliph is a minority one:
4928:
4796:
4761:
4708:
4651:
4609:
4550:
4313:
4259:
3937:
3278:
2777:
2643:
2599:
2183:
2176:
1592:
1507:
1173:
It is quite obvious to me that he is being slandered here with a one-sided attack.
1118:
1016:
709:
688:
672:
629:
587:
575:
3806:
So, User:Astghik Manukyan just admitted that they are related to Vazgen Manukyan.
3421:
yet you are asking an "other stuff" question. To clarify, though, there have been
2724:
Hi there! Sorry for bothering you, but I noticed that you reverted an edit I made
4954:
4938:
4417:
3941:
3667:
3052:
2342:
1847:
1192:
1187:, thank you for that. Where you need to make sure you state this, though, is on
1182:
1061:
1040:
955:
931:
842:
I like your reflection ;) - I was welcomed to the group of infobox warriors with
418:
77:
5086:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Notification list
2323:
there is not, however, an exception to citation requirements specific to leads.
5035:
4960:
4907:
4856:
4846:
4830:
4773:
4690:
4627:
4568:
4513:
4507:
4491:
4464:
4368:
4290:
4250:
4204:
4121:
4029:
3869:
3829:
3786:
3741:
3694:
3678:
3499:
3495:
3304:
3298:
3282:
3243:
3207:
3161:
3139:
3075:
2981:
2938:
2900:
2848:
2744:
2701:
2634:
2620:
2548:
2532:
2526:
2509:
2474:
2375:
2349:
approach 1:1 as the discussion continues so you should take those into account.
2262:
2250:
2160:
2105:
2035:
1974:
1946:
1937:
1917:
1906:
1893:
1887:
1871:
1865:
1851:
1813:
1796:
1786:
1770:
1713:
1643:
1600:
1538:
1469:
1414:
1366:
1348:
1333:
1317:
1307:
1291:
1287:
1281:
1244:
1196:
1145:
1080:
940:
828:
771:
725:
694:
646:
605:
465:
312:
307:, and edit it so that it reads: "|answered=no". Then add your revised request
238:
31:
785:
Perhaps you can tell me something about the iceberg. I met the topic in 2012,
488:
5080:, which closes January 13, 2020. For a guide to the arbitration process, see
5008:
4769:
4338:
4286:
4116:
4112:
3898:
3888:
3865:
3756:
3657:
3439:
3126:
2896:
2773:
2357:
2338:
2246:
2242:
2073:
1707:
1662:
1639:
1633:
1596:
1586:
1506:
Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the
1459:
1440:
1076:
1067:
936:
925:
794:
786:
748:
ps: seeing DBigXray's colourful signature above makes me sad with missing. --
665:
549:
511:
460:, would be the first person to contact concerning reducing the protection on
311:
and another editor or I will consider the request again. I hope this helps.
225:
976:
Day is also one of only two jockeys with five wins in the Preakness Stakes (
4826:
4542:
makes an impression you answer to User:Khajidha instead of the OP IP-user.
3979:
criticism when it's constructive like yours is. Here's to a bright future!
3671:
3426:
3392:
3387:
3237:
3222:
3192:
3177:
3155:
3116:
3100:
2892:
2842:
2826:
2470:
2346:
2231:
2223:
1832:
1532:
1514:
1492:
1362:
1313:
843:
357:
296:
35:
4407:
4329:
3963:
4717:
4674:
4660:
4621:
4605:
4562:
4546:
4460:
4309:
3539:
3443:
3006:
2638:
2614:
2594:
2574:
1365:
is really, really important right now. I hope that helps. Thanks again.
1358:
1139:
1114:
1012:
919:
903:
599:
583:
379:
234:
4780:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
3555:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Interaction ban proposal
2772:
Hello, Eggishorn. It has been over six months since you last edited the
5078:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Workshop
5070:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Evidence
4758:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
4396:
http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/Content/1466-Public
3585:
3069:
3049:
2218:. Both these things help other users follow conversations more easily.
457:
5098:
5090:
4740:
4538:
I've noticed the second level of indentation you used in this reply:
3590:
2101:
982:
https://www.cbc.ca/sports/jockey-pat-day-retires-from-racing-1.535657
790:
519:
it requires a good understanding of Knowledge policies and guidelines
2364:
frown on you removing the closing tags and continuing that section:
2316:
Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body
1765:), Knowledge is a đ so there are no orders you can give to others;
1216:
In your article, you have named Ram setu as adam's bridge. Why so?
4280:
3602:
3598:
3594:
3043:
Hi Eggishorn! First, I want to thank you for taking the initiative
2308:
524:
If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the
4978:
1510:
is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.
977:
4002:
2729:
1758:
461:
4793:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
4594:
and I think you may be interested in a simple way to reduce it.
985:
4783:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
4545:
I fixed it. Feel free to revert my change if I did it wrong. --
4456:
3354:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/GĂźnter Bechly (2nd nomination)â
5066:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda
4752:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
2566:
1823:
using words equivalent to real insults for me, because I hate
1537:, thank you for the notice and for also adding the sourcing.
1238:
It's not my article, I didn't name it. The full answer is at
4459:
article and if so, this should be an actual edit request at
2792:
1989:
1657:
Hehe. Thank you very much, Eggishorn. You've inspired me to
3611:
https://Www.abajournal.com/Images/main_images/JoshiSuit.pdf
1569:
Could you detail which arguments carried strength and why?
328:
Regarding "Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2020 "
268:
Regarding "Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2020 "
4959:, thank you for letting me know. I'm sorry to hear that.
2157:
Knowledge:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Academics#United_States
1487:
Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages
3446:
policies. I hope that helps. 06:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
3386:
Hi, this is for a clarification. I saw your entry in the
3129:
says that arguments that can be discarded are those that
2255:
but neutral point of view does not mean "neutral" content
1195:
would also help forestall questions. I hope this helps.
939:
article has links to more resources. I hope this helps.
4827:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/989963621
4764:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
3335:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
517:
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but
424:
5076:
You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,
5060:
The Arbitration Committee has accepted and opened the
1554:
RSN: Deprecation of Grayzone -- more detail requested.
1831:
called me "paranoid" and "mess" on his answers, then
1286:
oops, in one of your edits which I undid recently on
4426:
sign User:A-Venturi Sebastiano (assumed) 28-10-2020
3828:, noted and responded to. Thanks for the heads up.
3341:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
115:
4876:), only it would probably take a bit to find which
4323:
Vertebral augmentation article needs major revision
2637:, awesome - keep in touch on how it works for you.
988:). The only other jockey to do so is Eddie Arcaro.
619:I agree with TU-nor's comments. Thank you for your
2461:, make your request in the form of "Please change
442:And thanks for your WIR work, formal or informal.
3936:Hello, thanks for reviewing the edit request for
2489:Done .. mentioned it on the talk page of article
2333:International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
978:https://en.wikipedia.org/Preakness_Stakes#Winners
5014:Knowledge has nothing to do with your complaint.
4334:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1)
3683:Knowledge is not a forum for arguing a position.
3273:Thank you for your recent closure of the RfC at
2469:" on the talk page of the article and provide a
1466:User_talk:Gurnidar#Discretionary_sanctions_alert
924:, Arya, I'm afraid I don't. I've worked on the
25:
4165:thanks again for your time and consideration.
4001:Hi Eggishorn. You recently reverted my edit on
3551:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
986:https://en.wikipedia.org/Belmont_Stakes#Winners
4979:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Ahmadiyya_Caliphate
2732:, otherwise I know not what you mean by that.
2696:, you need to suggest this on the page titled
5009:assume at least a minimal level of good faith
2825:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge!
2619:, thanks for the invite. I'll check it out.
4430:16: 1â13. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.27682.86728.
3095:Can you please clarify something about your
2565:
1501:the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide
505:New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
5084:. To opt out of future mailings please see
4855:'s talk page and see what the response is.
3432:Help:My article got nominated for deletion!
3091:Request for clarification about RfC closure
5082:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration
4339:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06362-2
3436:Knowledge:Introduction to deletion process
2997:Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2020
2958:Thank you for your help at the tea house!
1682:The reaction: The Grayzone - Ben Norton -
4367:or make the changes yourself. good luck.
3593:claim despite the absence of any notable
3589:for dismissal on the basis of a specious
3005:
980:) and three wins in the Belmont Stakes (
4408:https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12900
4330:https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12900
2897:Policy on Biographies of Living Persons
2435:Kunal kamra video is now 2.26 M dislike
2318:, editors should balance the desire to
427:-quality piece. Cheers, a former prof.
309:including a reliable, verifiable source
14:
444:2601:246:C700:19D:7C8D:56CB:34EB:ED61
429:2601:246:C700:19D:7C8D:56CB:34EB:ED61
237:). Happy New Year to you and yours.
4749:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
4586:Indexing archive pages in themselves
4540:Special:Diff/988356286#Joe Biden bio
4268:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
4220:Regarding the edit on "Mukkulathors"
4117:frowns on the use of primary sources
2720:Tetris Clones - failed verification?
2078:wow your username is pretty cringe
4732:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
4707:kind of common practice at least. (
4590:I have noticed your recent work on
3549:There is currently a discussion at
3343:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
2028:to keep everything in one location.
532:. You can apply for the user-right
23:
2764:
1558:Hello. On 08 March, you closed an
487:
24:
5133:
5088:. For the Arbitration Committee,
4933:I have seen that you have edited
4683:in the edit summary, which says:
3352:The article will be discussed at
3204:According to the consensus policy
1316:. I hope this explanation helps.
4739:
4645:Closing archived RSN discussions
4258:
3962:
3609:References 5. âJoshi v. Joshi.â
3544:
3328:
1495:for additions. For details see
1212:Naming ram setu as Adam's bridge
378:
104:
90:
76:
62:
48:
34:
4787:and submit your choices on the
3417:, you seem to be familiar with
2760:Draft:Swami Yogeswarananda Giri
2580:RedWarn is currently in use by
483:Sorry for bothering you, but...
4886:version prior to the bold edit
4400:
4389:
4198:, Please re-read the article:
4131:18:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
4098:18:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
4053:18:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
4039:18:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
4016:00:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
3989:05:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
3950:10:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
3926:02:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
3907:23:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
3879:19:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
3853:19:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
3839:18:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
3816:18:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
1079:right now. I hope this helps.
13:
1:
5123:09:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
5047:03:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
4995:02:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
4972:14:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
4947:09:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
4919:21:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
4895:18:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
4868:03:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
4839:02:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
4811:01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
4766:Knowledge arbitration process
4724:17:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
4702:17:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
4667:17:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
4639:19:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
4614:18:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
4580:18:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
4555:18:31, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
4525:18:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
4500:18:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
3670:and it is not allowed by the
3605:representing the plaintiff .
2864:About Jack O'Connell's tattoo
2182:You closed a talk section on
2069:) 18:13, April 19, 2020 (UTC)
2046:) 16:32, April 19, 2020 (UTC)
2012:) 15:54, April 19, 2020 (UTC)
1565:the strength of the arguments
1191:. Placing a similar note on
1068:Biographies of Living Persons
708:thanks that's great, regards
475:22:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
452:17:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
437:17:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
411:20:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
263:22:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
248:22:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
207:22:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
4474:19:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
4446:08:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
4378:02:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
4351:01:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
4318:01:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
4296:21:22, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
4245:14:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
3785:Thanks for letting me know.
2698:Talk:Diamond Princess (ship)
2347:disruptive editing guideline
2251:Neutral Point of View Policy
1033:I appreciate your efforts.
366:08:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
343:19:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
322:18:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
283:18:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
226:Biography of a Living Person
7:
4482:Your reply at the Help desk
4365:talk:Vertebral augmentation
4214:18:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
4185:18:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
4061:Beatrice Chanler Birth Data
3796:23:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
3773:20:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
3751:07:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
3727:01:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
3704:17:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
3633:15:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
3567:15:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
3532:00:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
3509:23:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
3474:22:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
3405:03:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
3269:Project Veritas RfC closure
2893:Policy on Original Research
2290:without actually giving any
1077:Conflict of Interest Policy
820:Online disinhibition effect
10:
5138:
5115:MediaWiki message delivery
5062:Flyer22 and WanderingWanda
5054:Flyer22 and WanderingWanda
4803:MediaWiki message delivery
4006:when you have the time. â
2339:While consensus can change
2115:18:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
2094:18:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
1984:17:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
1961:19:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
1927:18:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1900:19:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1881:18:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1858:19:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1806:19:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1779:19:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1670:20:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1653:15:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1627:15:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1610:15:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1579:14:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1548:18:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
1525:23:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
1424:15:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
1400:11:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
1376:13:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1342:07:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1327:04:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1300:04:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1270:11:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
1254:02:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1232:02:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1206:05:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
1155:02:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
1123:01:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
1090:23:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
1053:20:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
1021:01:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
950:17:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
912:11:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
897:10:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
864:17:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
838:17:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
807:05:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
781:01:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
758:22:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
744:22:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
718:22:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
704:20:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
681:19:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
4602:User talk:CiaPan/archives
4264:
4257:
3968:
3961:
3377:20:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
3314:17:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
3291:13:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
3253:20:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
3231:20:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
3217:22:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
3186:21:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
3171:21:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
3149:21:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
3125:despite said plurality.
3109:21:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
3085:16:36, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
3062:13:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
3033:05:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
2991:18:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
2968:17:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
2948:18:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
2925:18:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
2910:18:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
2879:13:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
2782:Swami Yogeswarananda Giri
2711:22:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
2683:21:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
2651:17:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
2630:16:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
2607:22:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
2582:over 80 other Wikipedians
2557:19:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2542:17:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2518:17:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2499:00:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
2484:00:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
2449:00:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
2320:avoid redundant citations
2024:, I'm going to copy this
1739:18:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
1723:16:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
1700:12:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
1479:22:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
1449:22:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
1100:Duplicate content dispute
656:14:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
634:09:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
615:16:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
592:16:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
559:19:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
377:
4801:to your user talk page.
3488:Knowledge:Emailing users
3345:or whether it should be
2858:16:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
2835:08:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
2753:14:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
2422:22:44, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
2385:20:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
2356:That said, however, the
2343:Civility code of conduct
2303:07:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
2272:20:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
2207:08:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
2026:to the article talk page
5056:arbitration case opened
2286:not an established fact
2170:19:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
2138:18:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
1850:because it's not true.
1827:type of insults: first
1355:The Apocryphon of James
1275:Link updated after undo
4592:restructuring archives
4531:Indentation in a reply
4139:Talk:Holocaust victims
3010:
2769:
2573:Hello, Eggishorn! I'm
2570:
2051:yes thank you so much
1508:burden to provide them
1160:Not related to Pat Day
543:Insertcleverphrasehere
492:
4939:Tarif from Bangladesh
4762:Arbitration Committee
4746:Hello! Voting in the
4567:, that's OK. Thanks.
4113:self-published source
3972:The Civility Barnstar
3802:User:Astghik Manukyan
3679:Neutral Point of View
3009:
2774:Articles for Creation
2768:
2730:on the downloads page
2569:
2562:Invitation to RedWarn
2243:Core Content Policies
1848:Core Content Policies
1812:Possible issues with
1497:the content guideline
491:
386:The Editor's Barnstar
305:edit request template
301:the article talk page
3438:and, of course, the
3275:Talk:Project Veritas
2758:Your draft article,
2358:Talk Page Guidelines
2247:Talk Page Guidelines
854:is still valid ;) --
844:a Mozart composition
5024:Ahmadiyya Caliphate
5011:and reply anyway.
4820:Indian Subcontinent
4681:WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE
4078:William A Chanler
3955:A Barnstar for You!
3559:Boing! said Zebedee
3419:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
2794:edit the submission
2780:page you started, "
2309:our Manual of Style
848:another composition
526:granting conditions
371:A barnstar for you!
18:User talk:Eggishorn
4778:arbitration policy
4107:WilliamAChanler3rd
4086:WilliamAChanler3rd
3197:, I am explicitly
3097:recent RfC closure
3011:
2980:, you're welcome.
2891:, please read the
2770:
2647:
2603:
2571:
2473:for your request.
2232:disruptive editing
1829:The Grand Delusion
1386:Regarding Ram setu
1240:Talk:Adam's Bridge
973:retiring in 2005.
493:
5097:
4817:
4816:
4448:
4436:comment added by
4301:
4300:
4294:
4247:
4231:comment added by
4187:
4171:comment added by
4100:
4084:comment added by
3994:
3993:
3912:asking a question
3736:Engaged audience1
3719:Engaged audience1
3672:Original Research
3642:Engaged audience1
3635:
3621:Engaged audience1
3619:comment added by
3123:WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS
3055:
3035:
3019:comment added by
2685:
2669:comment added by
2645:
2601:
2590:RedWarn tool page
2424:
2412:comment added by
2314:controversies....
2209:
2197:comment added by
2096:
2084:comment added by
2070:
2057:comment added by
2047:
2034:comment added by
2013:
2000:comment added by
1747:Re:Personal notes
1523:
1234:
1222:comment added by
1189:you own talk page
1134:
1133:
1055:
1039:comment added by
1030:
1029:
899:
887:comment added by
824:Law of triviality
555:
554:
553:
530:instructions page
416:
415:
297:a reliable source
235:to steal a phrase
230:contentious claim
187:
186:
114:
113:
5129:
5095:
5038:
5006:
4963:
4958:
4910:
4905:
4892:
4859:
4850:
4800:
4743:
4736:
4735:
4720:
4693:
4678:
4663:
4630:
4625:
4571:
4566:
4516:
4511:
4431:
4410:
4404:
4398:
4393:
4362:
4359:Williamxrayclark
4343:Williamxrayclark
4284:
4262:
4255:
4254:
4226:
4197:
4166:
4137:Edit Request on
4110:
4079:
4027:
3966:
3959:
3958:
3938:Aydin Aghdashloo
3932:Aydin Aghdashloo
3863:
3827:
3784:
3767:
3739:
3692:
3645:
3614:
3548:
3547:
3526:
3517:and your WP name
3485:
3468:
3416:
3375:
3372:
3366:
3332:
3331:
3302:
3241:
3196:
3159:
3120:
3073:
3053:
3014:
2979:
2976:Lima Bean Farmer
2960:Lima Bean Farmer
2936:
2890:
2846:
2814:
2813:
2808:
2807:
2802:
2801:
2796:
2767:
2695:
2664:
2648:
2641:
2618:
2604:
2597:
2530:
2460:
2407:
2224:reliable sources
2217:
2192:
2177:Talk:Trans woman
2149:
2100:Anonymous user,
2079:
2052:
2029:
2023:
1995:
1972:
1950:
1910:
1891:
1869:
1839:for the message.
1790:
1737:
1711:
1698:
1688:, 10 June 2020:
1637:
1625:
1590:
1577:
1536:
1517:
1493:reliable sources
1463:
1437:
1411:
1352:
1311:
1285:
1217:
1186:
1143:
1096:
1095:
1065:
1034:
996:
995:
923:
882:
817:
769:
692:
644:
621:impressive close
603:
576:Talk:Donji Kraji
574:Your closure at
546:
545:
541:
408:
405:
399:
382:
375:
374:
294:
218:
116:
108:
94:
80:
66:
52:
38:
26:
5137:
5136:
5132:
5131:
5130:
5128:
5127:
5126:
5058:
5036:
5017:Furthermore, I
5003:Waqas Ahmad Jan
5000:
4987:Waqas Ahmad Jan
4982:
4961:
4952:
4931:
4908:
4899:
4890:
4857:
4844:
4822:
4794:
4734:
4718:
4691:
4672:
4661:
4647:
4628:
4619:
4588:
4569:
4560:
4533:
4514:
4505:
4484:
4449:
4420:
4415:
4414:
4413:
4405:
4401:
4394:
4390:
4356:
4325:
4306:
4253:
4222:
4191:
4142:
4104:
4063:
4021:
3999:
3997:Recent revision
3957:
3934:
3914:
3891:
3857:
3821:
3804:
3778:
3765:
3759:
3733:
3712:
3710:Stand corrected
3690:
3639:
3574:
3545:
3542:
3524:
3479:
3466:
3453:
3410:
3384:
3370:
3364:
3362:
3333:
3329:
3326:
3296:
3271:
3235:
3190:
3153:
3114:
3093:
3067:
3057:
3041:
2999:
2973:
2956:
2930:
2884:
2866:
2840:
2811:
2810:
2805:
2804:
2799:
2798:
2797:and remove the
2765:
2763:
2722:
2689:
2661:
2644:
2639:
2612:
2600:
2595:
2564:
2524:
2506:
2504:Case at the DRN
2471:reliable source
2454:
2437:
2215:
2180:
2143:
2123:
2076:
2017:
1992:
1969:MargaretRDonald
1966:
1953:MargaretRDonald
1944:
1941:
1904:
1885:
1863:
1817:
1784:
1749:
1732:
1705:
1693:
1631:
1620:
1584:
1572:
1556:
1530:
1489:
1457:
1431:
1405:
1388:
1346:
1305:
1279:
1277:
1214:
1180:
1162:
1137:
1135:
1101:
1059:
1031:
1001:
1000:Content dispute
958:
932:Treasure Island
917:
889:114.124.133.223
878:
811:
797:, 2015, DYK? --
763:
728:
686:
668:
638:
597:
579:
571:
552:
528:and review our
512:New Page Patrol
485:
421:
403:
397:
394:
373:
350:
330:
288:
270:
212:
192:
123:
110:
96:
82:
74:Talk to me here
68:
54:
40:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5135:
5057:
5051:
5050:
5049:
4981:
4976:
4975:
4974:
4930:
4927:
4926:
4925:
4924:
4923:
4922:
4921:
4874:WP:NOCONSENSUS
4821:
4818:
4815:
4814:
4785:the candidates
4755:eligible users
4744:
4733:
4730:
4729:
4728:
4727:
4726:
4646:
4643:
4642:
4641:
4587:
4584:
4583:
4582:
4532:
4529:
4528:
4527:
4483:
4480:
4479:
4478:
4477:
4476:
4428:
4419:
4416:
4412:
4411:
4399:
4387:
4386:
4382:
4381:
4380:
4324:
4321:
4305:
4304:re your revert
4302:
4299:
4298:
4271:
4270:
4265:
4263:
4252:
4249:
4221:
4218:
4217:
4216:
4141:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4074:
4062:
4059:
4058:
4057:
4056:
4055:
3998:
3995:
3992:
3991:
3975:
3974:
3969:
3967:
3956:
3953:
3933:
3930:
3913:
3910:
3890:
3887:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3882:
3881:
3803:
3800:
3799:
3798:
3781:Tribe of Tiger
3766:Tribe of Tiger
3758:
3755:
3754:
3753:
3711:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3686:
3675:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3654:
3608:
3573:
3570:
3541:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3525:Tribe of Tiger
3482:Tribe of Tiger
3467:Tribe of Tiger
3452:
3451:Email function
3449:
3448:
3447:
3383:
3380:
3365:Chris Troutman
3338:GĂźnter Bechlyâ
3327:
3325:
3322:GĂźnter Bechlyâ
3320:Nomination of
3318:
3317:
3316:
3270:
3267:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3092:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3051:
3040:
3037:
2998:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2955:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2913:
2912:
2865:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2776:submission or
2762:
2756:
2721:
2718:
2716:
2714:
2713:
2660:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2563:
2560:
2545:
2544:
2505:
2502:
2487:
2486:
2436:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2405:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2371:
2354:
2350:
2336:
2328:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2275:
2274:
2258:
2239:
2235:
2227:
2219:
2179:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2122:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2086:124.171.146.63
2075:
2072:
2059:Sportsstatsguy
2049:
2048:
2020:Sportsstatsguy
2002:Sportsstatsguy
1991:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1940:
1938:Meredith Russo
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1840:
1816:
1814:User:Luigi1090
1810:
1809:
1808:
1759:Here is a list
1748:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1726:
1725:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1613:
1612:
1570:
1568:
1560:RSN discussion
1555:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1427:
1426:
1387:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1276:
1273:
1257:
1256:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1161:
1158:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1003:
1002:
999:
994:
957:
954:
953:
952:
877:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
846:, DYK? I have
727:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
667:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
578:
572:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
547:
522:
515:
508:
507:
486:
484:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
420:
417:
414:
413:
389:
388:
383:
372:
369:
349:
346:
329:
326:
325:
324:
269:
266:
251:
250:
191:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
177:
172:
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
129:
128:
125:
124:
119:
112:
111:
99:
97:
85:
83:
71:
69:
57:
55:
43:
41:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5134:
5125:
5124:
5120:
5116:
5112:
5109:
5106:
5103:
5100:
5093:
5092:
5087:
5083:
5079:
5075:
5071:
5067:
5063:
5055:
5048:
5045:
5042:
5039:
5033:
5029:
5025:
5020:
5016:
5015:
5010:
5004:
4999:
4998:
4997:
4996:
4992:
4988:
4980:
4973:
4970:
4967:
4964:
4956:
4951:
4950:
4949:
4948:
4944:
4940:
4936:
4920:
4917:
4914:
4911:
4903:
4898:
4897:
4896:
4893:
4887:
4883:
4879:
4878:prior version
4875:
4871:
4870:
4869:
4866:
4863:
4860:
4854:
4848:
4843:
4842:
4841:
4840:
4836:
4832:
4828:
4813:
4812:
4808:
4804:
4798:
4792:
4791:
4786:
4781:
4779:
4775:
4771:
4767:
4763:
4757:
4756:
4751:
4750:
4745:
4742:
4738:
4737:
4725:
4722:
4721:
4714:
4710:
4705:
4704:
4703:
4700:
4697:
4694:
4687:
4682:
4676:
4671:
4670:
4669:
4668:
4665:
4664:
4657:
4653:
4640:
4637:
4634:
4631:
4623:
4618:
4617:
4616:
4615:
4611:
4607:
4603:
4598:
4595:
4593:
4581:
4578:
4575:
4572:
4564:
4559:
4558:
4557:
4556:
4552:
4548:
4543:
4541:
4536:
4526:
4523:
4520:
4517:
4509:
4504:
4503:
4502:
4501:
4497:
4493:
4489:
4475:
4472:
4469:
4466:
4462:
4458:
4453:
4452:
4451:
4450:
4447:
4443:
4439:
4438:95.249.207.36
4435:
4427:
4424:
4409:
4403:
4397:
4392:
4388:
4385:
4379:
4376:
4373:
4370:
4366:
4360:
4355:
4354:
4353:
4352:
4348:
4344:
4340:
4335:
4331:
4320:
4319:
4315:
4311:
4297:
4292:
4288:
4283:
4282:
4277:
4273:
4272:
4269:
4266:
4261:
4256:
4248:
4246:
4242:
4238:
4234:
4230:
4215:
4212:
4209:
4206:
4201:
4195:
4190:
4189:
4188:
4186:
4182:
4178:
4174:
4170:
4163:
4159:
4156:
4153:
4150:
4146:
4140:
4132:
4129:
4126:
4123:
4118:
4114:
4108:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4099:
4095:
4091:
4087:
4083:
4076:
4072:
4071:
4067:
4054:
4050:
4046:
4042:
4041:
4040:
4037:
4034:
4031:
4025:
4020:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4004:
3990:
3986:
3982:
3977:
3976:
3973:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3952:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3929:
3927:
3923:
3919:
3909:
3908:
3904:
3900:
3896:
3880:
3877:
3874:
3871:
3867:
3861:
3856:
3855:
3854:
3850:
3846:
3842:
3841:
3840:
3837:
3834:
3831:
3825:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3817:
3813:
3809:
3797:
3794:
3791:
3788:
3782:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3771:
3770:
3768:
3752:
3749:
3746:
3743:
3737:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3724:
3720:
3715:
3705:
3702:
3699:
3696:
3687:
3684:
3680:
3676:
3673:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3655:
3652:
3651:WP:BLPPRIMARY
3648:
3647:
3643:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3634:
3630:
3626:
3622:
3618:
3612:
3606:
3604:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3587:
3581:
3577:
3569:
3568:
3564:
3560:
3556:
3552:
3533:
3530:
3529:
3527:
3520:
3518:
3512:
3511:
3510:
3507:
3504:
3501:
3497:
3493:
3489:
3483:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3472:
3471:
3469:
3460:
3457:
3445:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3414:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3389:
3379:
3378:
3373:
3367:
3358:
3355:
3350:
3348:
3344:
3340:
3339:
3323:
3315:
3312:
3309:
3306:
3300:
3295:
3294:
3293:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3254:
3251:
3248:
3245:
3239:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3228:
3224:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3215:
3212:
3209:
3205:
3200:
3194:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3169:
3166:
3163:
3157:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3147:
3144:
3141:
3137:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3118:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3106:
3102:
3098:
3086:
3083:
3080:
3077:
3071:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3060:
3056:
3050:
3046:
3036:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3008:
3004:
3002:
2992:
2989:
2986:
2983:
2977:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2949:
2946:
2943:
2940:
2934:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2922:
2918:
2911:
2908:
2905:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2888:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2880:
2876:
2872:
2859:
2856:
2853:
2850:
2844:
2839:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2823:
2821:
2816:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2761:
2755:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2742:
2739:
2738:Best Wishes,
2736:
2733:
2731:
2727:
2717:
2712:
2709:
2706:
2703:
2699:
2693:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2672:
2668:
2652:
2649:
2642:
2636:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2628:
2625:
2622:
2616:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2605:
2598:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2578:
2576:
2568:
2559:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2543:
2540:
2537:
2534:
2528:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2501:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2485:
2482:
2479:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2458:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2414:78.49.135.228
2411:
2403:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2386:
2383:
2380:
2377:
2372:
2368:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2337:
2334:
2329:
2327:
2326:
2321:
2317:
2310:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2295:78.49.135.228
2289:
2285:
2281:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2273:
2270:
2267:
2264:
2259:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2233:
2228:
2225:
2220:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2188:
2185:
2178:
2171:
2168:
2165:
2162:
2158:
2153:
2147:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2126:
2121:Marjorie page
2116:
2113:
2110:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2071:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2027:
2021:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1985:
1982:
1979:
1976:
1970:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1948:
1939:
1928:
1925:
1922:
1919:
1914:
1908:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1898:
1895:
1889:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1879:
1876:
1873:
1867:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1815:
1807:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1788:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1766:
1764:
1763:all languages
1760:
1755:
1752:
1740:
1736:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1724:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1709:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1686:
1671:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1635:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1611:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1566:
1561:
1549:
1546:
1543:
1540:
1534:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1513:Thank you.
1511:
1509:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1464:, please see
1461:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1435:
1425:
1422:
1419:
1416:
1409:
1408:Sajankumar408
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:Sajankumar408
1377:
1374:
1371:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1350:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1325:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1288:Adam's Bridge
1283:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:Sajankumar408
1255:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:106.210.99.84
1221:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1193:your userpage
1190:
1184:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1141:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1098:
1097:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1069:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
998:
997:
993:
989:
987:
983:
979:
974:
972:
968:
962:
951:
948:
945:
942:
938:
937:Fenn treasure
934:
933:
927:
926:Fenn treasure
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
900:
898:
894:
890:
886:
876:Fenn Treasure
865:
861:
857:
853:
852:my battle cry
849:
845:
841:
840:
839:
836:
833:
830:
825:
821:
815:
810:
809:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:Pierre Boulez
792:
788:
787:Samuel Barber
784:
783:
782:
779:
776:
773:
767:
762:
761:
760:
759:
755:
751:
746:
745:
741:
737:
733:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
705:
702:
699:
696:
690:
685:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
657:
654:
651:
648:
642:
637:
636:
635:
631:
627:
622:
618:
617:
616:
613:
610:
607:
601:
596:
595:
594:
593:
589:
585:
577:
560:
557:
556:
551:
544:
537:
536:
531:
527:
523:
520:
516:
513:
510:
509:
506:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
490:
476:
473:
470:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
426:
412:
409:
407:
400:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
376:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
345:
344:
340:
336:
323:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
265:
264:
260:
256:
255:FreethinkerMT
249:
246:
243:
240:
236:
231:
227:
222:
216:
215:FreethinkerMT
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
199:FreethinkerMT
195:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
126:
122:
118:
117:
109:
107:
103:
98:
95:
93:
89:
84:
81:
79:
75:
70:
67:
65:
61:
56:
53:
51:
47:
46:Contributions
42:
39:
37:
33:
28:
27:
19:
5107:
5101:
5089:
5073:
5061:
5059:
5053:
5031:
5027:
5018:
5013:
5012:
4983:
4935:Aditya Kabir
4932:
4902:Aditya Kabir
4885:
4881:
4877:
4853:Aditya Kabir
4823:
4788:
4782:
4759:
4753:
4747:
4716:
4684:
4659:
4648:
4599:
4596:
4591:
4589:
4544:
4537:
4534:
4485:
4432:â Preceding
4425:
4421:
4402:
4391:
4383:
4326:
4307:
4279:
4276:this comment
4267:
4233:Shunmugamsri
4227:â Preceding
4223:
4199:
4167:â Preceding
4164:
4160:
4157:
4154:
4151:
4147:
4143:
4080:â Preceding
4077:
4073:
4068:
4064:
4000:
3981:Unnamed anon
3971:
3935:
3915:
3894:
3892:
3860:Saturdayopen
3845:Saturdayopen
3824:Saturdayopen
3808:Saturdayopen
3805:
3763:
3760:
3716:
3713:
3615:â Preceding
3607:
3582:
3578:
3575:
3543:
3522:
3516:
3514:
3464:
3461:
3458:
3454:
3427:George Floyd
3422:
3413:Jehowahyereh
3397:Jehowahyereh
3393:George Floyd
3388:Deepak Sathe
3385:
3382:Deeapk Sathe
3359:
3351:
3336:
3334:
3324:for deletion
3272:
3198:
3136:WP:SUPERVOTE
3130:
3094:
3042:
3015:â Preceding
3012:
3000:
2957:
2914:
2867:
2824:
2817:
2806:{{db-draft}}
2786:
2771:
2743:
2740:
2737:
2734:
2723:
2715:
2665:â Preceding
2662:
2585:
2579:
2572:
2546:
2507:
2488:
2466:
2462:
2438:
2408:â Preceding
2404:no consensus
2365:
2361:
2332:
2324:
2319:
2315:
2312:
2199:93.132.68.27
2193:â Preceding
2189:
2184:Trans woman
2181:
2152:Women in Red
2127:
2124:
2080:â Preceding
2077:
2053:â Preceding
2050:
2030:â Preceding
1996:â Preceding
1993:
1942:
1912:
1843:
1836:
1824:
1820:
1818:
1792:
1767:
1762:
1756:
1753:
1750:
1689:
1684:
1681:
1659:say it again
1564:
1557:
1512:
1505:
1490:
1429:
1428:
1389:
1354:
1278:
1258:
1218:â Preceding
1215:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1163:
1136:
1071:
1035:â Preceding
1032:
990:
975:
963:
959:
930:
901:
883:â Preceding
879:
856:Gerda Arendt
814:Gerda Arendt
799:Gerda Arendt
766:Gerda Arendt
750:Gerda Arendt
747:
736:Gerda Arendt
731:
729:
669:
580:
540:
539:
533:
518:
504:
422:
393:
385:
354:Women in Red
351:
348:Women in Red
331:
308:
271:
252:
221:WP:CONSENSUS
196:
193:
120:
102:Log of RfC's
100:
86:
72:
58:
44:
30:
4790:voting page
4461:Talk:cesium
3732:Thank you,
3714:@Eggishorn
3689:characters
3597:and likely
3572:Point taken
3492:WP:HELPDESK
1691:guidelines.
1593:DreamLinker
710:Atlantic306
689:Atlantic306
673:Atlantic306
624:Thank you!
303:, find the
4955:Tarif Ezaz
4880:and which
4774:topic bans
4488:your reply
4384:References
3942:CameliaMTF
3918:WOOLFHOUSE
3586:Lanham Act
3039:Quick note
2812:{{db-g13}}
2800:{{db-afc}}
2692:GFTAnalyst
2671:GFTAnalyst
1183:NatroneDay
1062:NatroneDay
1041:NatroneDay
550:click me!)
5044:(contrib)
5037:Eggishorn
5019:certainly
4969:(contrib)
4962:Eggishorn
4916:(contrib)
4909:Eggishorn
4882:bold edit
4865:(contrib)
4858:Eggishorn
4847:Xerxes931
4831:Xerxes931
4770:site bans
4699:(contrib)
4692:Eggishorn
4636:(contrib)
4629:Eggishorn
4577:(contrib)
4570:Eggishorn
4522:(contrib)
4515:Eggishorn
4508:ColinFine
4492:ColinFine
4471:(contrib)
4465:Eggishorn
4375:(contrib)
4369:Eggishorn
4211:(contrib)
4205:Eggishorn
4128:(contrib)
4122:Eggishorn
4075:Thanks,
4036:(contrib)
4030:Eggishorn
3876:(contrib)
3870:Eggishorn
3864:, please
3836:(contrib)
3830:Eggishorn
3793:(contrib)
3787:Eggishorn
3748:(contrib)
3742:Eggishorn
3701:(contrib)
3695:Eggishorn
3681:policy.
3591:trademark
3506:(contrib)
3500:Eggishorn
3423:extensive
3311:(contrib)
3305:Eggishorn
3299:Sal at PV
3283:Sal at PV
3279:WP:COIREQ
3250:(contrib)
3244:Eggishorn
3214:(contrib)
3208:Eggishorn
3168:(contrib)
3162:Eggishorn
3146:(contrib)
3140:Eggishorn
3082:(contrib)
3076:Eggishorn
2988:(contrib)
2982:Eggishorn
2954:Tea house
2945:(contrib)
2939:Eggishorn
2907:(contrib)
2901:Eggishorn
2855:(contrib)
2849:Eggishorn
2820:this link
2789:mainspace
2745:Jabster28
2708:(contrib)
2702:Eggishorn
2635:Eggishorn
2627:(contrib)
2621:Eggishorn
2549:Feynstein
2539:(contrib)
2533:Eggishorn
2527:Feynstein
2510:Feynstein
2481:(contrib)
2475:Eggishorn
2382:(contrib)
2376:Eggishorn
2269:(contrib)
2263:Eggishorn
2167:(contrib)
2161:Eggishorn
2112:(contrib)
2106:Eggishorn
2102:Eggishorn
2036:Eggishorn
1990:us routes
1981:(contrib)
1975:Eggishorn
1947:Eggishorn
1924:(contrib)
1918:Eggishorn
1907:Luigi1090
1894:Luigi1090
1888:Eggishorn
1878:(contrib)
1872:Eggishorn
1866:Luigi1090
1852:Luigi1090
1803:(contrib)
1797:Eggishorn
1787:Luigi1090
1771:Luigi1090
1720:(contrib)
1714:Eggishorn
1650:(contrib)
1644:Eggishorn
1607:(contrib)
1601:Eggishorn
1571:Thanks.
1545:(contrib)
1539:Eggishorn
1476:(contrib)
1470:Eggishorn
1421:(contrib)
1415:Eggishorn
1373:(contrib)
1367:Eggishorn
1349:Prana1111
1334:Prana1111
1324:(contrib)
1318:Eggishorn
1308:Prana1111
1292:Prana1111
1282:Eggishorn
1251:(contrib)
1245:Eggishorn
1203:(contrib)
1197:Eggishorn
1152:(contrib)
1146:Eggishorn
1087:(contrib)
1081:Eggishorn
947:(contrib)
941:Eggishorn
835:(contrib)
829:Eggishorn
791:Beethoven
778:(contrib)
772:Eggishorn
701:(contrib)
695:Eggishorn
653:(contrib)
647:Eggishorn
612:(contrib)
606:Eggishorn
472:(contrib)
466:Eggishorn
335:Balaji049
319:(contrib)
313:Eggishorn
291:Balaji049
275:Balaji049
245:(contrib)
239:Eggishorn
197:Thanks --
190:Consensus
32:User page
5064:case at
4929:Sad news
4686:archive.
4434:unsigned
4241:contribs
4229:unsigned
4181:contribs
4169:unsigned
4094:contribs
4082:unsigned
3899:Caro7200
3895:subjects
3762:know....
3668:WP:SYNTH
3629:contribs
3617:unsigned
3603:attorney
3599:perjured
3595:evidence
3045:to close
3029:contribs
3021:7vik0808
3017:unsigned
2933:Yuforiya
2917:Yuforiya
2895:and the
2887:Yuforiya
2871:Yuforiya
2679:contribs
2667:unsigned
2491:Ask4akki
2457:Ask4akki
2441:Ask4akki
2410:unsigned
2311:states:
2245:and the
2195:unsigned
2082:unsigned
2067:contribs
2055:unsigned
2044:contribs
2032:unsigned
2010:contribs
1998:unsigned
1735:ZScarpia
1708:ZScarpia
1696:ZScarpia
1663:Bishonen
1640:Bishonen
1634:ZScarpia
1623:ZScarpia
1597:ZiaLater
1587:ZScarpia
1575:ZScarpia
1460:Gurnidar
1441:Gurnidar
1434:Eggihorn
1220:unsigned
1049:contribs
1037:unsigned
885:unsigned
827:Thanks.
121:Archives
60:Linkages
4797:NoACEMM
4418:Biology
4194:KuzeOri
4173:KuzeOri
4045:LissanX
4024:LissanX
4008:LissanX
4003:Ramadan
3674:policy.
3576:Hello,
3496:WP:VP/T
3347:deleted
3238:ElKevbo
3223:ElKevbo
3193:ElKevbo
3178:ElKevbo
3156:ElKevbo
3117:ElKevbo
3101:ElKevbo
2843:Lapablo
2827:Lapablo
2815:code.
2523:Hello,
2362:greatly
2345:or the
2125:Hello,
1833:Llywrch
1821:WITHOUT
1533:Toddst1
1515:Toddst1
956:Pat Day
462:OneCoin
419:Perhaps
358:Ipigott
356:page.--
88:Sandbox
5113:) via
5091:KevinL
5041:(talk)
5032:dictat
4966:(talk)
4913:(talk)
4891:Aditya
4862:(talk)
4719:buidhe
4696:(talk)
4675:Buidhe
4662:buidhe
4633:(talk)
4622:CiaPan
4606:CiaPan
4574:(talk)
4563:CiaPan
4547:CiaPan
4519:(talk)
4468:(talk)
4457:cesium
4372:(talk)
4310:Golbez
4251:Classy
4208:(talk)
4125:(talk)
4033:(talk)
3873:(talk)
3866:WP:AGF
3833:(talk)
3790:(talk)
3745:(talk)
3698:(talk)
3658:WP:BLP
3653:policy
3503:(talk)
3440:WP:BLP
3308:(talk)
3247:(talk)
3211:(talk)
3165:(talk)
3143:(talk)
3127:WP:NHC
3079:(talk)
2985:(talk)
2942:(talk)
2904:(talk)
2852:(talk)
2741:- Jab
2705:(talk)
2640:Ed6767
2624:(talk)
2615:Ed6767
2596:Ed6767
2575:Ed6767
2536:(talk)
2478:(talk)
2379:(talk)
2360:would
2266:(talk)
2164:(talk)
2109:(talk)
1978:(talk)
1921:(talk)
1897:(talk)
1875:(talk)
1855:(talk)
1844:novice
1800:(talk)
1717:(talk)
1647:(talk)
1604:(talk)
1542:(talk)
1473:(talk)
1418:(talk)
1370:(talk)
1321:(talk)
1248:(talk)
1200:(talk)
1149:(talk)
1140:JIJJRG
1115:JIJJRG
1084:(talk)
1013:JIJJRG
944:(talk)
920:Essexx
904:Essexx
832:(talk)
775:(talk)
726:Mozart
698:(talk)
650:(talk)
641:Cunard
626:Cunard
609:(talk)
600:TU-nor
469:(talk)
316:(talk)
242:(talk)
4291:typo?
4287:help!
3889:Hello
3070:Atsme
2809:, or
2778:Draft
2646:talk!
2602:talk!
2146:Amt18
2130:Amt18
2074:?????
1913:every
1793:there
1363:WP:RS
1314:WP:RS
666:Paste
458:MER-C
16:<
5119:talk
5099:L235
4991:talk
4943:talk
4835:talk
4807:talk
4760:The
4610:talk
4600:See
4551:talk
4535:Hi,
4496:talk
4442:talk
4347:talk
4314:talk
4274:For
4237:talk
4177:talk
4090:talk
4049:talk
4012:talk
3985:talk
3946:talk
3922:talk
3903:talk
3849:talk
3812:talk
3723:talk
3691:~~~~
3625:talk
3563:talk
3444:WP:N
3442:and
3434:and
3401:talk
3371:talk
3287:talk
3227:talk
3182:talk
3105:talk
3054:Talk
3025:talk
2964:talk
2921:talk
2875:talk
2831:talk
2784:".
2749:talk
2726:here
2675:talk
2553:talk
2514:talk
2495:talk
2445:talk
2418:talk
2299:talk
2282:once
2216:~~~~
2203:talk
2134:talk
2090:talk
2063:talk
2040:talk
2006:talk
1957:talk
1775:talk
1667:tĂĽlk
1595:and
1520:talk
1445:talk
1396:talk
1361:and
1359:WP:V
1338:talk
1296:talk
1266:talk
1228:talk
1119:talk
1072:just
1045:talk
1017:talk
908:talk
893:talk
860:talk
803:talk
754:talk
740:talk
732:vote
714:talk
677:talk
630:talk
588:talk
538:. â
535:HERE
448:talk
433:talk
362:talk
339:talk
279:talk
259:talk
203:talk
180:2020
175:2019
170:2018
165:2017
160:2016
155:2015
150:2014
145:2013
140:2008
135:2007
5096:aka
4281:Guy
3757:ANI
3557:--
3540:ANI
3494:or
3199:not
2586:90%
2465:to
2370:it.
1943:Hi
1837:NOT
1825:ALL
1733:â
1694:â
1621:â
1573:â
984:) (
584:T*U
404:ray
398:Big
5121:)
5072:.
4993:)
4945:)
4837:)
4809:)
4799:}}
4795:{{
4772:,
4715:)
4711:¡
4658:)
4654:¡
4612:)
4553:)
4498:)
4463:.
4444:)
4349:)
4316:)
4289:-
4278:.
4243:)
4239:â˘
4183:)
4179:â˘
4096:)
4092:â˘
4051:)
4014:)
3987:)
3948:)
3924:)
3916:--
3905:)
3851:)
3814:)
3725:)
3631:)
3627:â˘
3565:)
3403:)
3349:.
3289:)
3229:)
3184:)
3107:)
3059:đ§
3031:)
3027:â˘
2966:)
2923:)
2877:)
2833:)
2803:,
2751:)
2681:)
2677:â˘
2555:)
2516:)
2497:)
2447:)
2420:)
2301:)
2205:)
2136:)
2092:)
2065:â˘
2042:â˘
2008:â˘
1959:)
1777:)
1665:|
1661:.
1499:,
1468:.
1447:)
1430::
1398:)
1340:)
1298:)
1268:)
1230:)
1121:)
1051:)
1047:â˘
1019:)
910:)
895:)
862:)
805:)
756:)
742:)
716:)
679:)
632:)
590:)
450:)
435:)
425:GA
364:)
341:)
281:)
261:)
219::
205:)
5117:(
5111:c
5108:¡
5105:t
5102:¡
5094:(
5005::
5001:@
4989:(
4957::
4953:@
4941:(
4904::
4900:@
4849::
4845:@
4833:(
4805:(
4713:c
4709:t
4677::
4673:@
4656:c
4652:t
4650:(
4624::
4620:@
4608:(
4565::
4561:@
4549:(
4510::
4506:@
4494:(
4440:(
4361::
4357:@
4345:(
4312:(
4293:)
4285:(
4235:(
4196::
4192:@
4175:(
4109::
4105:@
4088:(
4047:(
4026::
4022:@
4010:(
3983:(
3944:(
3920:(
3901:(
3862::
3858:@
3847:(
3826::
3822:@
3810:(
3783::
3779:@
3738::
3734:@
3721:(
3644::
3640:@
3623:(
3561:(
3519:.
3484::
3480:@
3415::
3411:@
3399:(
3374:)
3368:(
3301::
3297:@
3285:(
3240::
3236:@
3225:(
3195::
3191:@
3180:(
3158::
3154:@
3119::
3115:@
3103:(
3072::
3068:@
3023:(
2978::
2974:@
2962:(
2935::
2931:@
2919:(
2889::
2885:@
2873:(
2845::
2841:@
2829:(
2747:(
2694::
2690:@
2673:(
2617::
2613:@
2551:(
2529::
2525:@
2512:(
2493:(
2467:Y
2463:X
2459::
2455:@
2443:(
2416:(
2297:(
2234:.
2201:(
2148::
2144:@
2132:(
2088:(
2061:(
2038:(
2022::
2018:@
2004:(
1971::
1967:@
1955:(
1949::
1945:@
1909::
1905:@
1890::
1886:@
1868::
1864:@
1789::
1785:@
1773:(
1710::
1706:@
1672:.
1636::
1632:@
1589::
1585:@
1535::
1531:@
1522:)
1518:(
1462::
1458:@
1443:(
1436::
1432:@
1410::
1406:@
1394:(
1351::
1347:@
1336:(
1310::
1306:@
1294:(
1284::
1280:@
1264:(
1226:(
1185::
1181:@
1142::
1138:@
1117:(
1064::
1060:@
1043:(
1015:(
965:(
922::
918:@
906:(
891:(
858:(
816::
812:@
801:(
768::
764:@
752:(
738:(
712:(
691::
687:@
675:(
643::
639:@
628:(
602::
598:@
586:(
548:(
446:(
431:(
406:á
402:X
396:D
360:(
337:(
293::
289:@
277:(
257:(
233:(
217::
213:@
201:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
