1466:
still continuously building the pages for individual interpreters. But since there is a great number of them, this task really takes time. (I am also interested in creating/expanding and improving other articles; not just this one). So please do not delete without consulting me. I might already have prepared a biographical data of the interpreter/s you might want to delete from the list but just not have found time to upload them yet. Thank you. If you or anyone else could assist me in this task, I would really appreciate it. Inclusion of the list within the article is important for maintaining the quality of this article. And these people are UN interpreters - their on "top" of their profession, as they themselves say. They represent the UN and the world. They are "diplomatic bridges" (voices of diplomacy too), representatives of international diplomacy, although they are performing from the backstage of conferences. (Note: I am considering making the fonts smaller than as they are now, to make room for future expansion of the article itself.)
1300:
However, I had nothing to do with the creation of the Render (band) article; I simply updated the link under the name "Bryan Russo" to redirect to the humorous bio page I had just created for that particular member. If you want to delete my articles because they're "nonsensical," that's fine. You can block me if you want to as well, if that's your agenda. But to delete the Render (band) page because you claim it's "An article about a band that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject," that's just nonsensical in itself to me. The importance or significance of its subject? It's letting the world know who Render is and gives a brief history of the band. How did it not assert any importance or significance? Because it was brief? Or because you didn't like the articles I created? I see no good reason for you to have deleted this article. I feel you deleted it simply because It was something that I linked to in one of my "nonsensical" articles. I request a good reason for deletion of the Render (band) page. Thanks. --
1748:, however it looks there that approximately half the definitions have been eliminated for some reason, leaving behind a sea of red links. I think the information was very useful for the encyclopedia, and hope that the information is still available. If so, there is very little left behind now to show me how to now find the red linked definitions; and the move has resulted in red links within the articles which now need fixing. Could you either point me to where the full glossary can be found now, or please point me to the discussions that led to the move so I can explore it further with those involved. Thanks
592:
in baseball-related articles. I don't even know how to find these articles now nor do I know how to link to them from
Knowledge (although I'm guessing it's not rocket science). When I go to Wiktionary and search for "baseball jargon" or "list of baseball jargon", it doesn't return any of the pages. I feel like I've lost a valuable resource that made the work I do here easier. Was it creating a problem having these pages where they were? Is there anywhere I can go to plead my case for having them restored (or is this the place)? Thanks again for your time. --
166:
article for those users looking for this drug as well. Knowledge has many articles on many antipsychotics and this should be no different, I can provide a number of papers if you would like, but I see no reason why this drug should be treated any different than others. LMK and with your clearance I will remake the article, thanks, Thioxane June 20, 2007 - 4pm
31:
1321:
Render band article, simply out of spite. I think the 75,000+ fans Render has on
Myspace.com alone would beg to differ about their notoriety. I again ask, what does a band have to do be "notable" or "remarkable" to you? Do you want them to change the world? As soon as your able to define what makes a band notable (which by the way, I'm sure has no true definition, only personal opinion), you can't justify deletion of Render (band) besides spite.
677:
creating it and it not being empty (as I'd never heard of the term before) but what the actual initial entry was I created this from escapes me. I'll hve to do some detective work to find out what has gone on and see if things were removed for a reason (it may be redundant and need delting) or not ;) Thanks for the heads up - you can make these things, you just can't guarantee what goes in or out of them ;) (
396:, section A5: transwikied articles "any article that consists of only a dictionary definition, where the transwikification has been properly performed and the author information recorded." I have seen the discussions you mentioned, but most seemed to center on glossaries where the individual entries pointed to larger articles (making them basically navigation lists, which is a good idea). But see e.g.
958::-) Yes, I noticed that you made them both. It is quite confusing indeed. In the future, when you have articles of your own that you want to delete, you can put db-author (between {{ }}) at the top if no one else has edited the article. But it's not a problem anyway, it's the kind of article that isn't important enough for Knowledge, but that can't hurt anyone.
1272:
every podcast that follows the very very simple rules is on the network. But perhaps it is best if you recreat the page, with all arguments (sources) for it you can find, and that we then take it to AfD (deletion discussion). I still think it will be deleted there, but then at least it will be a community decision, not just my own opinion.
1225:, the 3rd point under criteria includes distribution in a medium that is well known and independent. SUGN is distributed though both the YoungPodcasts (I believe I have the name correctly) Network and the Teen Podcasters Network, which received a mention on TWIT. If these points were made in the article would that satisfy your guidelines?
1245:. It is a bit like the difference between having published a book with a reputable publisher like HarperCollins or Random House or Penguin, and having a book with Lulu.com or iPublish.com (two "self-publishers: you pay, they produce). In both cases, the end result is a book, but the first is notable, the second isn't.
120:
in North
America for the glory of God." Such articles are unacceptable on Knowledge. Other church articles should be neutral if they are to be kept, but I'm quite certain that you can find exampes which are equally bad for other churches. Alas, then we have missed those thus far when checking Knowledge articles.
382:), with many editors believing glossaries play an integral part in a topic's coverage, and hence re/moving them without leaving a way to easily access them afterwards is slightly problematic. It's a loaded topic, and I'm sorry to dump so much info on you at once! Thanks for any insights/help you can give. --
1320:
I never said the article was nonsensical, just noted that the other two I did create were. What does a band have to do to be "remarkable" to you? I still think you had a biased opinion about the band simply because I referenced it, and the humorous articles I created swayed you do speedily delete the
1271:
The question is if this falls under "well-known" (borderline), and if it doesn't fall under the exception of rule 3: "except for trivial distribution such as hosting content on user-submitted sites (GeoCities, Newgrounds, personal blogs, etc.)". This is rather trivial indeed, as it is user-submitted:
1168:
Hello, I am the creator of the article. You deleted it for not showing importance. I have added the reason for the importance of the podcast under the intro to the article. If you would please review it and tell me if that is good. If not, please message me or leave a notice on the page so I can take
520:
pages for this purpose. Now that these pages have moved to
Wictionary, the links in the player articles are broken. Furthermore, the baseball jargon articles themselves are now full of broken links as well. Is there some automated process that can be run to fix these links or do we have to go through
515:
I'm a relative newbie here and have focused some of my editing efforts on improving baseball player articles. Some feedback I've received from other editors is that the articles tend to contain a good deal of baseball jargon and it's helpful for non-baseball fanatics if the jargon is wikilinked. I've
429:
As for soft redirects, it says that "only commonly wikified words should be soft redirects". As these were not words but lists of words, I don't think a soft redirect from e.g. Glossary of
Japanese tea ceremony terms is wanted. However, for some of the baseball jargon and the legal terms, it may be a
1512:. here you can complete it (with sources, additional info, ...) before copying it to an article again. That way, we can judge the complete article, not one line of it. It may still be speedy deleted if it isn't notable enough, but then at least you will have had the chance to give it yuor best shot.
1299:
You recently deleted my bands page, "Render," I feel for the sole reason that it had something to do with my personal postings on "Bryan Russo" and "The Todd Walker
Experience." It's true, these were nonsensical articles I created out of sheer boredom and for the purpose of humor and entertainment.
676:
Maqita is the term for
Indonesian comics and is part of my recent work sorting out the comics from various countries. As I've worked on an awful lot of categories it is diffuclt to recall exact details but I never create an empty category on the off chance someone will drop something in. I do recall
591:
Hmmm ... OK ... In addition to linking to the "baseball jargon" pages directly for some terms that don't have their own pages, I found them to be useful reference pages that pointed me to other terms that do have their own pages. They were an easy "one-stop shop" for finding articles commonly linked
546:
There is, as far as I know, no automated process for this. One possibility is to go through the now deleted baseball jargon articles, and click on the "what links here" option (first option on the left in the "toolbox", in case you didn't know). Then at least you get a list of all pages that link to
493:
Thanks for the understanding. I didn't know that the search on
Wiktionary worked that way, after checking I notice that you have to check the "transwiki" mainsopace box at the bottom of the search results page to get to the correct page (which isn't something most users will do of course). I'll look
119:
and another article that pointed to it. This was very far from an encyclopedic, neutral history of this church, based on idnependent reliable sources: it was a propaganda piece, containing sentences like "Depending on God, they prayed and decided to start Sharon
Fellowship Churches in various cities
1358:
Actually I did check the link that you posted, which is what prompted my response, asking your criteria for being "remarkable" (You should have posted the "music guideline" page in the first place). The link you just posted answered that question. To which I now respond: While the band may not meet
464:
Much thanks for the informative reply :) I was partially just making sure you were aware of some of the background, and partially hoping for an outside-but-informed (admin) perspective (which you gave perfectly), and partially seeking to clarify for myself what the legitimate options currently were
170:
No problem, you can recreate it. Try to make it more neutral, and above all provide good sources, and it shouldn't be any problem. If you need more help with anything, feel free to drop a note. By the way, you can sign your posts here with adding four '~' at the end of your post. This automatically
1465:
Reply from article originator: List of interpreters is a compilation of entries that have never ever been compiled anywhere else (especially on one page). It is a vital part of this article. It had also been featured (while in its "infancy" on DYK column of the main page. So consider that I am
1284:
Here's the thing. GeoCities, Newgrounds, personal blogs, etc. are all user-submitted in the fact that you just sign-up or in some cases just upload the content to them without even having to sign-up. Teen
Podcasters Network requires application to the network and then if you are approved (AKA The
1202:
to name one. If you look at that article you will see that I actually had more information to make SUGN notable. Also, Knowledge is an Encyclopedia to document things upon. If my article doesn't provide documentation to the SUGN podcast and its history. Then maybe some more articles need to go as
658:
Yep, it is one of the standard durations in the blocking page, and it is useful to block slightly over a day. It gives the editor a second chance, without just letting him come back the next day. So no typo but a deliberate first block. I don't like to block indefinitely for a first time offender
165:
Sorry if it seemed that way, but it was unintentional. I was reading a scientific paper about the antipsychotics that combine D2 and 5-HT receptor activities and Bifeprunox came up, so I made a quick search on wikipedia to see its structure, unfortunatly, nothing came up so I decided to create an
135:
Hi, I created the article about Bifeprunox because it will be the first of a new class of antipsychotics, totally different than the ones in current use, typical and nontypical. I think its important for people to know about, and a reference for it would be appropriate. I don't understand why you
1720:
Thanks for searching this. However, for such etymological studies, certainly for a big city, we need more than the unsigned page of an Antwerp tourist attraction which clims to have found the solution. As the text says, there are some 25 different proposals, and every athor probably believes his
1145:
It's a proposed deletion, so there is no discussion. If no one disagrees, it happens. If you (o rsomeone else) disagrees, you can either comment on the talk page of the article, and/or remove the proposed deletion tag (preferably with improvements to the article). If the ProD is contested, I (or
1657:
I created the text relating to Lambert Cronk myself, and would be grateful if you will let me know whether it can be reinstated - is it only allowable to have the same piece of text in one place on Knowledge? If so I would keep the "stand alone" page, and I will write a new piece to add to the
1028:
I haven't nominated it for deletion, I pointed out that the article gave no indication whatsoever as to why this was notable. The two blog posts you linked are at least an indication that it is so. And we don't create articles on subjects which may become notable in acouple of months, we create
565:
Knowledge page... Possible solutions? Avoid the jargon, explain it in the article, link to the Wiktionary article, or (if it is used in many articles and enough can be said about it) create a separate article (more than a dicdef, a true encyclopedic article) for it, like has been done with e.g.
110:
I created Sharon Fellowship to tell the history of the Sharon Fellowship Churches in the World. and I recently discovered that it was you that deleted it. I do not understand why you claim it was promoting a product when there is histories of other Churches on this wiki. Please let me know you
1645:
Hi, I admit I'm rather new to this, but a couple of months back I created a section which I put in the "related band" section of the page for The Strawbs (Dave Lambert and Chas Cronk are two members of the band who have recently released their own cd, but remain members of Strawbs).
688:
Found it. I have raised concerns about the term and was going to leave the category alone until that is sorted out. It may be we need to move everything to "Indonesian comics" but I'd want to do that on both the category and entry at the same time. So it is a bit of a wait and see.
1359:
all of the criteria listed on that page, we meet at least 3, and have various other achievements not listed on the "music guideline" page, but are could definitely be considered note worthy achievements. When the page is restored, it will be updated to meet these criteria. --
1373:
I take it you like deleting band pages. I guess thats just how it _seems_. Please, can you bring it back? I was on my way to make it notable with the guidelines for music pages. I need to re-create the article. V:M is notable! Just let me edit it after you bring it back!
1255:
The criteria says a medium that is well known and independent. Teen Podcasters Network and YoungPodcasts have no relations other then distribution to SUGN, check the site for further evidence. The Teen Podcasters Network is a very well known network. Check the wikipedia
943:. I am glad you help me out... So then I searched on the map, and I found there is really a Sideroad 20, so that I just put information there, not knowing how to delete it... Through months and months, I forgot about this article... It was one of my first articles..
1314:
page, under articles, item 7. I came across the page through your nonsense, but I did not delete it because it was nonsense, but because it is a non notable band, just like I delete many other pages for non notable bands, persons, companies, ... 07:02, 28 June 2007
833:
Yup, that's why I went for an immediate indef. It's the kind of behaviour (and username) that no amount of apologies, if they would ever come, could excuse. It's technically not a ban, but I doubt any admin would unblock such a case anyway :-)
1285:
content/quality is approved and you follow the rules set out) you are allowed to post as part of the network on the home page. The content on the Teen Podcasters Network is member syndicated content. It's combined together from all members.
1694:". We are not allowed to have pages that are partial or complete copies (or near-copies) of other publications, no matter if these are printed or on the web, except when those are in the public domain (i.e. old or from the government).
731:
Found the transwikied page after reading above, but it seems broken, with no master index. I can't help but feel that the caveat in CSD#A5, "where the transwikification has been properly performed" has not been satisfied in this case.
1653:
However, I happened to look yesterday as a couple of things need to be updated relating to the band, and found both the piece put in the "related bands" section of Strawbs page to have disappeared, and also Lambert Cronk's own page.
1017:
with links to both Wired and CNET. Maybe you shouldn't call every article's notability into question unless you have an understanding of its subject matter, or it hasn't garnered sufficient notability over, say, a couple months.
1038:
Got it. I'll remove the notability guideline now. You can expect this article to get quite healthy once Silverlight comes out this fall, but probably much sooner when the true test releases of Moonlight come out this summer.
400:, which I tagged for transwikying: not one of the lemma's is a link to an article. It is just a list of dicdefs without additional info, and so can be transwikied and deleted under the speedy deletion criteria and
116:
1649:
I then thought it would be a good idea for them to have their own page, as people who buy their cd in its own right would not be looking at Strawbs page, so created a new page entitled "Lambert Cronk".
1183:
guidelines. Has the podcast been the subject of any professional magazine or newpaper articles? Has it received any major web awards (a Webby or some such)? As long as you can't show any of these (with
1259:. YoungPodcasts is not as too well known in my opinion, but the criteria only require one medium. SUGN meets that criteria and the page says that only one of the three criteria points needs to be met.
1103:
as the main article. Hopefully this is acceptable to you, seeing as how the existence of the second page (which hasn't been nominated for deletion) combined with the fact that I am confident that
413:
269:
I've started for 24, and it seems doable. No idea how much flak I'll get, but the edpisode articles are mostly plot summaries anyway... Writing two-line plot summaries isn't always easy though :-)
344:
Thanks, good job. Perhaps the article can be expanded using these references, and they can be used as in-line references, but the subject now certainly can make a good claim to notability.
787:
I just noticed that I mislabeled that baseball slang oldafd as 'keep' when it was 'no consensus'. Thanks for fixing (and not chastising! I had a lot of tabs open). noreplyneeded. --
417:
238:
494:
into this some more before continuing to delete those dictionary lists that have been transwikied. The info doesn't need to exist at two places, but it has to be accessible...
392:
Well, most of them were transwikied a while ago without my involvement, and I just took those to a logical conclusion, i.e. removing them from Knowledge. This is covered by
1451:
Why are there lists of individual interpreters? I don't think these are sufficiently well known to be listed (some of them are for other reasons, but none are notable
468:
My major stumbling block is that Wiktionary doesnt search the Transwiki or Appendices namespaces automatically, which makes it much harder to find things (e.g. if one
1630:
so far), please include good independent sources indicating why this band is notable enough for Knowledge. Having released one record and toured a bit isn't enough.
1111:. If you would like to spend more time debating this, I request that you do so by directing future inquiries regarding this matter to the talk page of the article (
1712:
I'm new to this, so I hope it is ok for me to post here, if not, then please forgive me. For the origin of the name Antwerp, I found this to be quite resourceful:
983:
1029:
articles on subjects which have already shown to be notable. One of the two blog posts you linked to wasn't even posted yet when I put on the notability tag...
1421:
I know, and it's no problem. I just wanted to point out that you didn't change an indefinite block into a 24 hour block, but one 24 hour block into another...
820:
379:
976:
476:). I've got a full plate currently though, so I guess I'll let the old subconscious mull on that one for a few more weeks/months... :) Thanks again. --
878:
375:
1669:
1337:
It looks like you didn't check out the link I gave, which explained in brief why I deleted it. Anyway, here you go, our Music notability guideline
1687:
659:
except in very serious cases (threats, sockpuppets, ...), but I have no problem with other admins who indef block vandal only accounts on sight.
130:
1777:
1135:
Hi, thanks for adding the proposed deletion notice on my talk page. I could not find the deletion debate/voting page. Can you give me the link.
823:
for abuse of editing privileges. It's also pretty clear that they're impersonating me, so it would seem reasonable they stay blocked. Cheers. --
412:, 3 of the 21 had articles. Another indication is that many of these glossaries are orphans, they have very few or no articles linking to them.
1286:
1260:
1226:
1170:
939:. Sideraod 20 was an article that was created by an accident when I was a newbie. What I really wanted to create was "20th Sideraod", which is
1215:
521:
each article and fix them one at a time? This is the first I've encountered something like this here and will be grateful for any guidance. --
1555:
1239:
or so). There are no quality rules to be hosted at the Teen Podcasters Network, it just has to be made by teens and have at least 5 episodes.
936:
926:
397:
105:
796:
No problem, you seemed reasonable before, so I assumed it was a honest mistake. I make enough of those, so I try not to chastise others :-)
596:
363:) you've transwikied a few glossaries to Wiktionary. I was primarily wondering if you knew whether these would be suitable cases to setup a
1363:
1345:
648:- you blocked a vandal only account for 31h, I think it was a typo but I wanted to make sure you knew in case you had keyboard probs :) --
1198:
Ok, well if we go by the standards of things such as winning an award then we have more articles about podcasts that should go. Including
175:
156:
1289:
1263:
1229:
1173:
1163:
561:. Both articles linked to the same term (single), so the rest of the "S" page (96 terms in total) wasn't used (or at least linked to) in
1043:
1033:
857:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
628:
525:
124:
1002:
693:
1752:
962:
838:
1487:
1474:
800:
791:
498:
480:
455:
348:
1634:
1434:
1425:
1416:
1407:
1276:
1249:
1192:
273:
1412:
Almost 4 hours had gone by after I made your comment here to when I reblocked. So out of a 24 hour block, about 20 was remaining.
1400:
I know, and I have made that error in the past, but in this case, you changed the block from 24 hours (not indefinite) to 20 hours
919:
663:
317:
226:
1616:
1500:
Can you please re-create Velociti:Music so that I can make it notable! Please don't delete it again. Contact me on my talk page.
1099:
already existed. Since then, I've merged the two and subsequently removed the deletion notice (I used the original article from
451:. So you may be assured that I'm not on a blind crusade against all glossaries, only those that are better placed at wiktionary.
1527:
Thank you for responding quickly! The reason Velociti:Music is notable is that it meets the criteria of the "Others" section of
1079:
782:
769:
748:
140:
The article read like an advertisement for the new drug, not a neutral article based on independent sources. Articles should be
1154:
444:
1725:
page is normally even better: that way, you don't only get my opinion, but the one of other editors interested in it as well.
1022:
1329:
1304:
850:
1139:
1516:
1591:
709:. Transwikied to where? Was there a discussion about this? Seems like the edit summary could be a bit more enlightening.
371:
1459:
1130:
998:
No problem. It is a persistent silly IP vandal which I block on sight, but I noticed him a bit too late this time :-)
286:
Hello. Do you mind changing the disputed tag (which marks that whole section or page as bad) with the inline template
263:
1744:
following a transwiki move. The page was a lengthy glossary of alphabetized terms which I believe has been moved to
681:
448:
897:
872:
205:
1690:, which was created by user Burning4u, because (as the deletion log says) it was a "blatant copyright violation of
1483:
Thanks for copying yourreply here. I'll reply on the talk page of the article to keep the discussion in one place.
1394:
952:
1586:
992:
725:
1677:
1495:
1107:
is certainly a notable programming language. The bottom line here is that this is definitely an article which is
469:
386:
1698:
1401:
307:
1612:
1572:
1070:
827:
614:
338:
1729:
1125:
1065:
1566:
1446:
187:
152:: we try to avoid articles about things that will happen, products that will become available, and so on.
1008:
440:
409:
405:
652:
370:
There has been quite a bit of prior debate about whether glossaries belong within Knowledge or not (see
1735:
1208:
38:
212:
1749:
1509:
97:
1531:#4. Also, I will write the names of their songs/albums and possibly the names of the group members.
473:
232:
181:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
1759:
1294:
877:
854:
844:
706:
700:
669:
517:
364:
1430:
Huh? Now, I'm highly confused. I could have sworn that showed an indef block when I changed it.
472:, and clicks the blue link to the non-existent article, clicking the Wiktionary link from there
645:
559:
552:
439:
when doing this, and there were also a few that were clearly not candidates for deletion, like
1640:
1455:
they are interpreters). Without a good counterargument, I'll remove them in a few days time.
1381:
940:
1665:
1360:
1326:
1301:
1713:
617:. Pages that aren't included in here can be easily added. In Wiktionary, the pages are at
8:
1673:
1235:
Not for me, but then perhaps it would be better to have a larger discussion about it (at
1014:
925:
421:
290:
1716:
Now I am not sure that this is original material, but it is worth a look at. Thank you.
1577:
618:
436:
360:
354:
279:
1691:
1721:
proposal to be the best. As for posting here, this is good, although postding on the
1707:
1212:
1076:
1040:
1019:
593:
522:
280:
257:
1559:
1549:
968:
892:
867:
302:
1221:
Ok, fine. I drop that arugement. Although if you do go to the page for Notability
1623:
1597:
1528:
1387:
1338:
904:
670:
620:
and similar pages. As for restoring the pages, you can always plead your case at
222:
201:
191:
1243:
1146:
someone else) may still put the article up for deletion, but then it will go to
778:
about this page is currently being discussed, feel free to join the discussion!
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1763:
1583:
1180:
1122:
1056:
949:
824:
765:
744:
721:
323:
145:
47:
17:
1766:
1745:
1622:
No, it was deleted because the article did not assert any notability, as per
1471:
1467:
1311:
1236:
1222:
1147:
912:
908:
814:
788:
775:
621:
477:
401:
393:
383:
331:
149:
1762:
was the page you meant, and I deleted that one as well. It can be found at
1722:
1605:
1431:
1413:
1391:
1185:
1084:
1062:
690:
678:
567:
555:
246:
1240:
420:
had only one, which I replaced with a link to the wiktionary article (see
136:
deleted it, could you clear it up? Thanks, Thioxane. June 20, 2007 - 10am
1770:
1741:
1091:
Whilst investigating your nomination which calls for the deletion of the
1061:
Thank you for reverting a misplaced edit on my user page. Best regards,
1013:
I hope I've sufficiently appeased the deletion gods to spare the article
887:
858:
649:
640:
571:
548:
297:
141:
1601:
1242:
I can't find a lot about YoungPodCaasts, but it seems to be very similar
216:
195:
1470:
14:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC) (reply retrieved from article's talk page.)
1390:
IP's should not be blocked indefinitely unless they are open proxies.
1774:
1726:
1695:
1631:
1513:
1484:
1456:
1422:
1404:
1342:
1273:
1246:
1189:
1151:
1112:
1030:
999:
959:
916:
835:
797:
779:
755:
734:
711:
660:
625:
495:
452:
345:
314:
270:
172:
153:
121:
1534:
1136:
1100:
1096:
935:
I just wanted to notify you that I have always wanted to "delete"
171:
translates into your username and the date and time of yur post.
1257:
1199:
324:
211:
Thanks for the opinon. Could you give me an one with this too,
1773:
as a redirect to the glossary, since that has been recreated.
1522:
554:. That "S" page had only one other incoming link as well, the
1546:
Hello! Respond to me! Velociti:Music's future depends on it!
613:
The easy way to find all these pages here is to look through
1600:
was deleted because they are unsigned. They are signed to
1104:
1092:
1085:
547:
those pages. E.g. to the letter T, only one article links,
430:
good solution, if the individual terms exist on Wiktionary.
1501:
1375:
1582:
Hi Fram. Thanks for reverting vandalism of my userpage.
330:
I have added notable references and removed the tag. --
1714:
http://www.miniatuurstad.be/brabo/legende_van_brabo.htm
1386:
Is an IP address that you've blocked indefinitely. Per
144:(from reliable independent sources) and written from a
1150:, where a complete deletion discussion will happen.
470:
searches for Glossary of Japanese tea ceremony terms
1692:
http://www.strawbsweb.co.uk/related/dlcc/dlccre.asp
1403::-) I think you looked in the wrong place somehow.
408:, 2 of the 13 entries had their own articles; in
1535:
190:and say what you think about the idea of moving
1626:. If you want to recreate the article (deleted
435:I did check at random some glossaries from the
111:justification of deleting it? Thanks, Samauto.
1200:http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Writer%27s_Almanac
244:. It's horribly chaotic at the moment though.
215:? I think it was caused by a misunderstandng.
1095:article, I discovered that an article called
1075:...for the vandalism revert on my user page.
398:English language idioms derived from baseball
465:(having not revisited the issue for awhile).
194:there, instead of the present nameholder..?
1758:Well, Legal terms was only a redirect, but
1179:The page doe not assert notability per our
915:. I hope a 24 hour block will be enough...
705:Hi, just wondering about your transwiki of
117:Sharon Fellowship Churches of North America
1769:though. I hope this helps. I'll recreate
1540:
551:, which also had a link to the "S" page.
1658:related bands section of Strawbs page.
1188:), the page has no place on Knowledge.
414:Glossary of Japanese tea ceremony terms
131:Reason for deleting Bifeprunox article?
14:
445:List of terms for country subdivisions
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
106:Reason for deleting Sharon Fellowship
1661:Thank you for assisting me in this.
380:Knowledge talk:What Knowledge is not
25:
1164:Shut Up, Get Naked! Podcast Article
188:Talk:Magnus (comics)#Requested_move
23:
973:Thanks for reverting my talkpage.
416:had no incoming links at all, and
24:
1789:
449:Talking Glossary of Genetic Terms
1554:For devandalising my user page.
29:
1504:KNK! 14:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1378:KNK! 14:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
418:Glossary of atmospheric reentry
150:Knowledge is not a crystal ball
884:I think blocking is in order:
13:
1:
615:Category:Baseball terminology
1312:criteria for speedy deletion
903:Indeed, clear violations of
406:List of baseball jargon (U)
7:
1740:On Jun 12 2007 you deleted
1592:Deletion of Four Letter Lie
574:. 19:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
441:Terminology in graphonomics
410:List of baseball jargon (A)
186:Hey Fram. Could you pop by
10:
1794:
1778:19:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
1730:19:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
1131:List of geographical pairs
849:An editor has asked for a
404:. Some other examples: in
125:19:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
1753:21:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
1699:20:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
1587:10:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1573:10:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1517:07:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1510:User:Kinkijui KNK/Sandbox
1488:14:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1475:14:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1460:12:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1435:17:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
1426:14:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
1417:23:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1408:07:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1395:22:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
1364:18:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1346:12:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1330:12:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1290:08:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1277:08:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1264:08:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1250:07:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1230:08:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1216:02:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1193:09:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
1174:09:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
1155:12:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
1140:12:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
1126:16:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
1080:10:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
1066:10:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
1044:13:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1034:13:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1023:12:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1003:11:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
993:11:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
963:04:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
953:22:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
920:09:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
898:09:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
873:22:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
839:11:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
828:11:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
801:18:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
792:18:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
783:14:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
770:14:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
753:Any thoughts about this?
749:04:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
726:04:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
694:16:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
682:16:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
664:19:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
653:19:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
629:04:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
597:23:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
526:16:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
499:07:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
481:20:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
456:19:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
387:17:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
349:20:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
339:16:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
237:I'm doing the same thing
176:20:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
157:14:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
1635:18:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
1617:14:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
1305:14:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
646:Special:Blockip/Snakeeee
372:Category talk:Glossaries
318:08:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
308:08:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
274:18:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
264:15:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
227:01:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
206:07:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
1760:Glossary of legal terms
1508:I have recreated it in
1496:Velociti:Music request.
1237:Articles for Discussion
855:List of baseball jargon
707:List of baseball jargon
518:List of baseball jargon
376:Talk:List of glossaries
365:Knowledge:Soft redirect
213:Talk:La_Rubrique-à-Brac
1596:Fram, it appears that
1169:care of that. Thanks,
819:Hi. I see you blocked
1071:And thanks from me...
941:Simcoe County Road 39
146:neutral point of view
42:of past discussions.
1750:Professor marginalia
1447:List of interpreters
1686:I deleted the page
1209:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
1015:Moonlight (runtime)
1009:Moonlight (runtime)
422:Atmospheric reentry
359:Hi. I noticed (via
1736:Transwiki deletion
437:List of glossaries
361:List of glossaries
313:No problem, done.
1682:
1668:comment added by
1570:
1563:
988:
896:
768:
747:
724:
306:
260:
253:
224:
220:
203:
199:
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1785:
1681:
1662:
1568:
1561:
1542:
1537:
1186:reliable sources
990:
986:
982:
979:
890:
865:
764:
761:
758:
743:
740:
737:
720:
717:
714:
474:gives no results
336:
300:
295:
289:
262:
258:
255:
251:
247:
233:Episode articles
223:
218:
202:
197:
182:A requested move
115:The article was
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1738:
1710:
1663:
1643:
1615:
1602:Victory Records
1598:Four Letter Lie
1594:
1580:
1552:
1544:
1525:
1498:
1449:
1384:
1361:Professorjive26
1327:Professorjive26
1310:Check out oour
1302:Professorjive26
1297:
1295:Unfair Deletion
1166:
1133:
1089:
1073:
1059:
1011:
989:
984:
977:
975:
971:
930:
882:
879:User:Movieindex
859:
851:deletion review
847:
845:Deletion review
817:
776:deletion review
759:
756:
738:
735:
715:
712:
703:
701:Baseball jargon
674:
671:Category:Maqita
643:
516:been using the
357:
332:
328:
293:
287:
284:
256:
249:
245:
235:
192:Roberto Raviola
184:
148:. Furthermore,
133:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1791:
1781:
1780:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1709:
1706:
1704:
1702:
1701:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1611:
1593:
1590:
1579:
1576:
1551:
1548:
1543:
1541:-]-<:": -->
1536:-]-<:": -->
1533:
1524:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1497:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1478:
1477:
1448:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1383:
1380:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1296:
1293:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1253:
1252:
1219:
1218:
1196:
1195:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1158:
1157:
1132:
1129:
1088:
1083:
1072:
1069:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1005:
981:
970:
967:
966:
965:
946:Thanks again,
929:
924:
923:
922:
881:
876:
846:
843:
842:
841:
821:User:Iımegreeŋ
816:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
702:
699:
698:
697:
673:
668:
667:
666:
642:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
486:
485:
484:
483:
466:
459:
458:
432:
431:
426:
425:
356:
353:
352:
351:
327:
322:
321:
320:
283:
278:
277:
276:
234:
231:
230:
229:
183:
180:
179:
178:
162:
160:
159:
132:
129:
128:
127:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
18:User talk:Fram
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1790:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1761:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1705:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1688:LAMBERT CRONK
1685:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1641:Lambert Cronk
1636:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1609:
1608:
1603:
1599:
1589:
1588:
1585:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1569:contributions
1564:
1557:
1547:
1532:
1530:
1518:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1503:
1489:
1486:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1469:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1458:
1454:
1436:
1433:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1382:71.220.133.86
1379:
1377:
1365:
1362:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1347:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1319:
1318:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1292:
1291:
1288:
1278:
1275:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1262:
1258:
1251:
1248:
1244:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1161:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1138:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1110:
1109:worth keeping
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1087:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1016:
1004:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
994:
991:
987:
980:
964:
961:
957:
956:
955:
954:
951:
947:
944:
942:
938:
933:
928:
921:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
899:
894:
889:
885:
880:
875:
874:
871:
870:
866:
864:
863:
856:
852:
840:
837:
832:
831:
830:
829:
826:
822:
802:
799:
795:
794:
793:
790:
786:
785:
784:
781:
777:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
762:
752:
751:
750:
746:
742:
741:
730:
729:
728:
727:
723:
719:
718:
708:
695:
692:
687:
686:
685:
683:
680:
672:
665:
662:
657:
656:
655:
654:
651:
647:
630:
627:
623:
619:
616:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
598:
595:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
573:
569:
564:
560:
557:
553:
550:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
527:
524:
519:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
500:
497:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
460:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
428:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
366:
362:
350:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
335:
326:
319:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
304:
299:
292:
282:
275:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
254:
252:
243:
242:
228:
225:
221:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
193:
189:
177:
174:
169:
168:
167:
163:
158:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
126:
123:
118:
114:
113:
112:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1739:
1723:Talk:Antwerp
1711:
1703:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1627:
1606:
1595:
1581:
1553:
1545:
1526:
1499:
1452:
1450:
1385:
1372:
1324:
1298:
1283:
1254:
1220:
1213:Freshacconci
1197:
1167:
1159:
1134:
1120:
1117:
1108:
1090:
1077:Freshacconci
1074:
1060:
1041:Thomasmallen
1020:Thomasmallen
1012:
974:
972:
948:
945:
934:
931:
883:
868:
861:
860:
848:
818:
754:
733:
710:
704:
675:
644:
594:Sanfranman59
568:Pinch hitter
562:
556:Adam Melhuse
523:Sanfranman59
369:
358:
333:
329:
285:
259:(Contact me)
248:
240:
236:
185:
164:
161:
134:
109:
78:
43:
37:
1771:Legal terms
1765:and not at
1742:Legal terms
1664:—Preceding
1628:seven times
978:Evilclown93
937:Sideroad 20
927:Sideroad 20
572:Knuckleball
549:Gene Larkin
36:This is an
1767:wiktionary
1746:wiktionary
1562:discussion
1523:Notability
1472:Dragonbite
1468:Dragonbite
355:Glossaries
296:? Thanks,
291:Disputable
281:WP:NONFREE
241:Smallville
142:verifiable
98:Archive 10
1708:Antwerpen
1670:Lasorrell
1584:Gimboid13
1123:Wikidrone
1113:Talk:Itcl
1048:Allright!
950:Smcafirst
932:Hi Fram,
825:Limegreen
90:Archive 8
85:Archive 7
79:Archive 6
73:Archive 5
68:Archive 4
60:Archive 1
1678:contribs
1666:unsigned
1624:WP:MUSIC
1578:Thanks 2
1539:-]-<:
1529:WP:Music
1502:Kinkijui
1388:WP:BLOCK
1376:Kinkijui
1339:WP:MUSIC
1211:a read.
1118:Thanks.
1101:Incr Tcl
1097:Incr Tcl
969:Talkpage
905:WP:POINT
789:Quiddity
558:article.
478:Quiddity
384:Quiddity
250:BIGNOLE
1607:Kedster
1453:because
1432:JoshuaZ
1414:JoshuaZ
1392:JoshuaZ
1287:mpippen
1261:mpippen
1256:article
1227:mpippen
1181:WP:NOTE
1171:mpippen
1063:Icemuon
691:Emperor
679:Emperor
39:archive
1556:☻ Fred
1550:Thanks
1538::: -->
1223:WP:WEB
1203:well.
1148:WP:AFD
1057:Thanks
985:(talk)
913:Wp:BLP
909:WP:NOT
862:bd2412
650:Tawker
622:WP:DRV
402:WP:NOT
394:WP:CSD
378:, and
367:for?
334:Naveen
325:Baraha
1315:(UTC)
1207:Give
888:nadav
815:Block
298:nadav
16:<
1775:Fram
1727:Fram
1696:Fram
1674:talk
1632:Fram
1514:Fram
1485:Fram
1457:Fram
1423:Fram
1405:Fram
1343:Fram
1274:Fram
1247:Fram
1190:Fram
1152:Fram
1105:Itcl
1093:Itcl
1086:Itcl
1031:Fram
1000:Fram
960:Fram
917:Fram
911:and
893:talk
836:Fram
798:Fram
780:Fram
766:talk
745:talk
722:talk
661:Fram
626:Fram
496:Fram
453:Fram
346:Fram
315:Fram
303:talk
271:Fram
239:for
219:urgh
198:urgh
173:Fram
154:Fram
122:Fram
1604:.
1567:✍
1137:Jay
1115:).
886:].
853:of
757:Dei
736:Dei
713:Dei
641:FYI
570:or
563:any
447:or
443:or
1680:)
1676:•
1560:☝
1341:.
1325:--
1121:--
907:,
774:A
684:)
624:.
424:).
374:,
294:}}
288:{{
94:→
64:←
1672:(
1613:C
1610:/
1565:|
1558:|
895:)
891:(
869:T
760:z
739:z
716:z
696:)
689:(
305:)
301:(
217:M
196:M
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.