Knowledge

User talk:Georgewilliamherbert/Archives/2011/May

Source 📝

31: 871: 519:
been there a while and had been seen by numerous admins who did not consider it block worthy. Your approach to civility blocks is on the very extreme end of approach - in fact I can't think of another admin who takes such a draconian stance - and it is very bad practice to block someone for something that hastacitly been accepted by other admins.
715:
regarding a questionable image. Please note I have a view on this image, and have made one edit on the article regarding the image inclusion (removal) so I am not neutral. The relation of Abortion to sex is clear, but not whether Abortion as an article falls under the topic of sex, broadly construed.
518:
I have undone the block. Firstly we don't indef an IP except in exceptional reasons. Secondly there is no clear consensus to ban jack so indeffing his IP in anticipation of this is premature and thirdly, civility blocks - which is the stated reason in the block log - don't work. The cited comment had
276:
and had no inkling at the time of my editing that it had anything to do with the I-P conflict. As far as I was concerned I was bringing categories into sink. Now I see how after SD and Debresser got invovled, it descended into a dispute associated with the I-P conflict. I am not contending my ban as
1111:, as it is obvious that I have failed, because ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ is only interested in attacking me, using years old material. He refuse to admit that I have changed for the better, I am no longer into content dispute, nor into name calling, I am only interested in implementing WP rules, such as 1360:
I do wonder, though, why Tarc would not receive a similar warning for his repeated sarcasm and personal attacks on the same page? It seems that there are the same group of editors from the MoMK article which make borderline uncivil remarks until the new guys blow up and get
299:
Hi. I was wondering if you could inform me on what would be the proper environment to report an editor who has possibly violated a recent topic ban. Could I provide that information here, considering you were the admin who imposed the block? Thanks
482:
Please see my comment and consider reversing your block. I believe Jack is still editing within his restrictions, as there is not restriction to anonymous editing with the exception of open proxies, which applies to everyone regardless.
936: 1188:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ doesn't want to stop attacking users. He's now having a go at me. I'm trying to make him understand that he's making things worse for himself, but he doesn't care. Perhaps you could deal with it? Cheers, 1227:
he was the one who posted conspiracy theories on the talk page of the article linking chinese high school text books, marxists, black panthers, and vietnam, to a peasant spiritual movement in China in 1900
716:
We can discuss on my page and place finding on article talk page; discuss on article talk page, or you can offer your opinion here; please do choose one location for discussion moving forward, thanks!
248:
or with a block, if you think it is a serious matter. Please consider logging this change yourself, as it would save a bunch of paperwork at AE. The appeal is not in the right form, it should use
1104:
on 22.32 18 May 2011, and on 23:57 21 May 2011 I opened an ANI on him. Because ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ raised the already discussed and uncalled for "racist remarks", I then added the term "racist" on the title.
148: 824:
banning him from editing evolution and related topics. Are you aware that he has removed this notice from his talk page, indeed has completely blanked it? Is it in order to remove such bans?
64:
Dear Sir, I don't know if you take comments on your user page here, but then, you really are a Jack of many trades! You seem to do amazing work off-wiki, and on-wiki too of course! Cheers,
1235: 1171: 1051: 1031: 1008: 988: 974: 890: 1164:
deliberately went into the edit history to select and post specific edits I made before I responded, to make sure users were unable to see that I did respond to their concerns later
914: 1231: 1167: 1047: 1027: 1004: 984: 970: 238:. Otherwise, it's an ingenious idea, though what these guys really should try is dispute resolution. In my opinion, Debresser's topic ban could be replaced with a warning using 898: 572: 1148: 906: 136: 366: 219:. Please understand that this is nothing personal, just that your prolonged silence left me no other option to seek what I consider to be justice and fairness in this case. 95: 848: 1080: 765: 612: 427: 502:
Please keep Jack blocked so he can stop feeding the idiots who prance around here, like for example certain marshmallow stuffed lard asses. He deserves better hobbies.
1310: 1294: 773: 757: 620: 604: 435: 419: 1318: 781: 628: 507: 443: 184:
You must be very busy, but in view of the fact that I have been topicbanned by you, and think that was a bad call, I'd respectfully ask you to make this a priority.
216: 1302: 511: 267: 1175: 983:
part of my comments after that were a response to this specific accusation, posting english langauge sources, I apologize if I went off board with other postings.
286: 193: 1147:
I counted at least 2 false accusations by Arilang1234 against me which you can easily take a look at (meaning its not muddled up or confused with random edits).
384: 207: 1151: 948: 1278: 741: 588: 403: 347: 324: 1162:
This is not just an ordinary mistake, or slip up by Arilang1234. My response to Smallchief and John Smith's was right there in plain english- and Arilang1234
725: 523: 109: 1347: 1262: 810: 696: 1286: 932: 749: 657: 596: 560: 532: 472: 411: 1003:
he was the first in violation of not making more personal attacks, I did not comment between your warning and his new personal attack, it was after his
707:
falls under his restriction of "topic banned from the topic of human sexuality, interpreted broadly, including talk pages and Knowledge space pages."
1046:
I apologize for bothering to respond to his new attack anyway, I should not have taken the bait, and should have not posted the other comments either.
121: 833: 1358: 1024: 963: 1370: 309: 336: 1139: 1035: 1012: 992: 1197: 496: 228: 178: 160: 1093:
Hi, I need your advice as you are at the moment the only uninvolved third person on this ANI. There are a few points I like to point out:
1055: 978: 870: 78: 234:
Hello George. It seems to me that Chesdovi's topic ban is OK, but Debresser's is not because he has never been notified or warned under
556: 1112: 1239: 854: 1107:(2)The only purpose of me opening an ANI is to try to engage ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ into a meaningful discussion of how to keep the neutrality of 686: 252: 277:
it will be over by the time this has been sorted out. I don't intend to waste anyone's time more than has already been done so.
1335: 878: 798: 645: 460: 1068:
I didn't realize he'd posted after I warned to stop, and have warned him about that comment (the "not telling the truth" bit).
1224: 503: 721: 1166:. If he had posted a direct link to the section as it is now, all the users would have been able to seen my responses. 357:
pages related to the topics. Never been topic banned before; direct me to the rules and I will gladly adhere. thanks.
1267: 1250: 1245: 1101: 730: 1219: 668: 1076: 844: 577: 392: 132: 91: 1215: 691: 343: 1217: 166: 1287:
Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
821: 550: 47: 17: 597:
Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
1116: 1326: 1206:
of editors with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way is considered
815: 789: 636: 451: 1352: 404:
Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
375:, where it seems obvious that talkpages are not part of a topicban unless specifically stated otherwise. 330: 294: 1225:
This post to be a personal attack, since Arilang1234 falsely claims this is not a content dispute, when
339: 103: 38: 1331: 1072: 840: 839:
That's fine and normally allowed. The restriction is logged at the central edit restrictions page.
794: 641: 546: 456: 128: 87: 568: 1193: 700: 629:
MediaWiki 1.16.5, 1.17b1; 1.18 branched; UploadWizard the default; Berlin Hackathon; brief news
149:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Both_primary_disputants_topic_banned_for_72_hrs
1115:. I am very sad to learn that ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ rejects WP rules in this way, and I am tired of all his 1183: 477: 242: 117: 1343: 1258: 1203: 806: 717: 712: 653: 468: 263: 215:
Since you have not had time or not seen fit to reply for about 36 hours, I have posted at
8: 954: 565: 380: 224: 189: 174: 156: 75: 1189: 1152:#2 Arilang1234 claims I did not respond to John smith's concern about neutrality- I did 944: 829: 538: 372: 362: 320: 282: 203: 142: 750:
Education minister's speech copied from Knowledge; Jimmy Wales interviewed; brief news
1366: 679: 305: 59: 1253:
where Anglo Pyramidologist is complaining about other editors and I've quoted you.
1128: 931:
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
490: 273: 235: 113: 1339: 1254: 1108: 802: 742:
Geographical distribution of Knowledge edits; Sue Gardner interviewed; brief news
649: 589:
More research on newbie editors; Baidu plagiarism; bin Laden coverage; brief news
464: 259: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1100:(1)I would not have titled the ANI with the term "racist" had ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ not post 711:
has been involved somewhat in a bit of an edit war, supporting the position of
376: 220: 185: 170: 152: 66: 165:
Also, please show me the "personal attacks" and "incivility" you mentioned on
940: 825: 358: 316: 278: 199: 1311:
Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
1362: 673: 520: 301: 198:
Debresser has no good reason for clemency. He has been a very naughty boy.
708: 662: 485: 86:
I take comments pretty much everywhere. Thanks for the good word!
704: 272:
I must add that I was unaware that these pages would be subject to
1357:
You beat me to a warning of Cody, though I did chime in with you.
968:
your warning at 06:51 , saying "ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ is not telling the truth"
112:
article, it's the team chatter says hit the bin Laden compound.
444:
Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
412:
Knowledge users name "superinjunction celebrities"; brief news
935:. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the 1149:#1 Arilang1234 claims I did not respond to Smallchief- I did 621:
AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
1071:
Thanks for understanding that it's time to disengage.
315:
Sure! Go straight ahead. How much longer need we wait?
782:
Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
110:
United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group
561:
Knowledge:Requests for comment/Philip Baird Shearer
559:). You are invited to comment on the discussion at 420:The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics 899:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content 436:Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case 605:Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games 1251:WP:ANI#Problems on British National Party Page 1113:WP:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight 1319:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 533:RFC discussion of User:Philip Baird Shearer 1202:User:John Smith's doesn't understand that 1279:GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news 915:Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view 907:Contest results, A-class medal recipients 964:Arilang1234 also made a personal attack 335:Isn't this against Chesdovis topic ban? 875: 14: 820:I noticed that you posted a notice on 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 879: 774:Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute 25: 758:Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects 353:Under the impression that I cannot 23: 24: 1381: 880:Your Military History Newsletter 869: 29: 1123:Could you give me some advices? 822:User talk:Anglo Pyramidologist 667:I have raised your actions on 541:has been filed concerning the 253:Arbitration enforcement appeal 18:User talk:Georgewilliamherbert 13: 1: 613:Featured articles bounce back 1135: 7: 10: 1386: 1327:Read this Signpost in full 1212:canvassing by arilang1234 864: 790:Read this Signpost in full 637:Read this Signpost in full 452:Read this Signpost in full 79:19:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 1246:You might want to look at 1025:6:20, 31 minutes earlier. 147:Please see my request on 1371:20:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 1348:01:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC) 1263:20:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1240:03:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1198:20:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1176:18:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1140:14:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1081:08:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1056:08:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1036:08:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 1013:08:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 993:08:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 979:08:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 949:22:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 858:: Issue LXII, April 2011 849:01:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC) 834:09:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 811:01:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC) 726:01:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 687:18:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 658:01:21, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 108:Please also protect the 1295:WikiProject Formula One 692:Your input is requested 573:11:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 524:03:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC) 512:20:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 497:19:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC) 473:22:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 385:10:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 367:21:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 348:20:38, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 325:12:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 310:15:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 287:00:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 268:23:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 229:22:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 208:12:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 194:10:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 179:15:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 161:13:19, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 137:05:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 122:04:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 96:04:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC) 764:Features and admins: 611:Features and admins: 426:Features and admins: 340:Supreme Deliciousness 42:of past discussions. 1309:Arbitration report: 1303:The best of the week 1293:WikiProject report: 1073:Georgewilliamherbert 841:Georgewilliamherbert 816:Anglo Pyramidologist 772:Arbitration report: 766:The best of the week 756:WikiProject report: 619:Arbitration report: 603:WikiProject report: 547:Philip Baird Shearer 539:request for comments 434:Arbitration report: 428:The best of the week 418:WikiProject report: 129:Georgewilliamherbert 88:Georgewilliamherbert 1353:Incivility question 1317:Technology report: 1208:disruptive behavior 780:Technology report: 627:Technology report: 442:Technology report: 331:Chesdovis topic ban 295:Appropriate channel 1301:Featured content: 703:regarding whether 676: 104:bin Laden protects 1134: 928: 927: 924: 923: 724: 674: 127:Done for 3 hrs. 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1377: 1277:News and notes: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1126: 1117:personal attacks 951: 891:From the editors 881: 873: 866: 865: 862: 861: 740:News and notes: 720: 685: 587:News and notes: 571: 495: 493: 488: 402:News and notes: 257: 251: 247: 241: 72: 69: 33: 32: 26: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1355: 1350: 1323: 1273: 1248: 1223:and I consider 1186: 1129: 1127: 1109:Boxer Rebellion 962:excuse me, But 957: 930: 920: 884: 860: 818: 813: 786: 736: 718:KillerChihuahua 713:Anythingyouwant 694: 682: 672: 665: 660: 633: 583: 564: 535: 491: 486: 484: 480: 475: 448: 398: 333: 297: 255: 249: 245: 239: 145: 106: 70: 67: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1383: 1354: 1351: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1305: 1298: 1297: 1290: 1289: 1282: 1281: 1274: 1272: 1266: 1247: 1244: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1121: 1120: 1105: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1069: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1023:you warned at 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 998: 997: 996: 995: 981: 956: 953: 926: 925: 922: 921: 919: 918: 910: 902: 894: 888:Project News: 885: 876: 874: 859: 853: 852: 851: 817: 814: 787: 785: 784: 777: 776: 769: 768: 761: 760: 753: 752: 745: 744: 737: 735: 729: 693: 690: 680: 664: 661: 634: 632: 631: 624: 623: 616: 615: 608: 607: 600: 599: 592: 591: 584: 582: 576: 534: 531: 529: 527: 526: 515: 514: 479: 476: 449: 447: 446: 439: 438: 431: 430: 423: 422: 415: 414: 407: 406: 399: 397: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 332: 329: 328: 327: 296: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 213: 212: 211: 210: 144: 141: 140: 139: 105: 102: 101: 100: 99: 98: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1382: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1285:In the news: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1271:: 23 May 2011 1270: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1221: 1220: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1204:WP:CANVASSING 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1132: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 994: 990: 986: 982: 980: 976: 972: 969: 967: 961: 960: 959: 958: 952: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 917: 916: 911: 909: 908: 903: 901: 900: 895: 893: 892: 887: 886: 883: 882: 872: 868: 867: 863: 857: 850: 846: 842: 838: 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 823: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 791: 783: 779: 778: 775: 771: 770: 767: 763: 762: 759: 755: 754: 751: 748:In the news: 747: 746: 743: 739: 738: 734:: 16 May 2011 733: 728: 727: 723: 719: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 689: 688: 684: 683: 677: 670: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 638: 630: 626: 625: 622: 618: 617: 614: 610: 609: 606: 602: 601: 598: 595:In the news: 594: 593: 590: 586: 585: 580: 575: 574: 570: 567: 562: 558: 555: 552: 548: 544: 540: 530: 525: 522: 517: 516: 513: 509: 505: 504:80.180.15.197 501: 500: 499: 498: 494: 489: 478:Jack Merridew 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 445: 441: 440: 437: 433: 432: 429: 425: 424: 421: 417: 416: 413: 410:In the news: 409: 408: 405: 401: 400: 395: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 369: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 350: 349: 345: 341: 337: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 288: 284: 280: 275: 271: 270: 269: 265: 261: 254: 244: 237: 233: 232: 231: 230: 226: 222: 218: 209: 205: 201: 197: 196: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 180: 176: 172: 168: 163: 162: 158: 154: 150: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125: 124: 123: 119: 115: 111: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 83: 82: 81: 80: 77: 76: 73: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1356: 1325: 1269:The Signpost 1268: 1249: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1190:John Smith's 1187: 1163: 1125: 1124: 1122: 965: 929: 913: 905: 897: 889: 877: 855: 819: 788: 732:The Signpost 731: 695: 678: 666: 635: 581:: 9 May 2011 579:The Signpost 578: 553: 542: 536: 528: 481: 450: 396:: 2 May 2011 394:The Signpost 393: 354: 334: 298: 243:uw-sanctions 214: 164: 146: 107: 65: 63: 55: 43: 37: 1336:Unsubscribe 1332:Single-page 955:Arilang1234 912:Editorial: 799:Unsubscribe 795:Single-page 646:Unsubscribe 642:Single-page 461:Unsubscribe 457:Single-page 373:WP:TOPICBAN 258:, etc etc. 167:my talkpage 114:TomPointTwo 36:This is an 1340:EdwardsBot 1255:Dougweller 896:Articles: 803:EdwardsBot 669:this tread 650:EdwardsBot 465:EdwardsBot 260:EdJohnston 143:Please see 1361:punished. 1130:Arilang 904:Members: 856:The Bugle 377:Debresser 274:WP:ARBPIA 236:WP:ARBPIA 221:Debresser 186:Debresser 171:Debresser 153:Debresser 60:User page 941:BrownBot 937:newsroom 826:Emeraude 705:Abortion 681:'fenian' 557:contribs 359:Chesdovi 317:Chesdovi 279:Chesdovi 200:Chesdovi 71:Michael? 1363:LedRush 1232:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 1184:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 1168:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 1048:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 1028:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 1005:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 985:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 971:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ 675:Domer48 569:of Doom 543:conduct 521:Spartaz 39:archive 722:Advice 709:DMSBel 566:Parrot 966:after 563:. -- 217:WP:AE 16:< 1367:talk 1344:talk 1259:talk 1236:talk 1194:talk 1172:talk 1102:here 1077:talk 1052:talk 1032:talk 1009:talk 989:talk 975:talk 945:talk 933:here 845:talk 830:talk 807:talk 701:here 697:here 671:. -- 654:talk 551:talk 508:talk 487:N419 469:talk 381:talk 371:See 363:talk 355:edit 344:talk 321:talk 306:talk 302:asad 283:talk 264:talk 225:talk 204:talk 190:talk 175:talk 157:talk 133:talk 118:talk 92:talk 68:Yes 699:or 663:ANI 545:of 1369:) 1346:) 1338:· 1334:· 1330:· 1261:) 1238:) 1196:) 1174:) 1079:) 1054:) 1034:) 1011:) 991:) 977:) 947:) 939:. 847:) 832:) 809:) 801:· 797:· 793:· 656:) 648:· 644:· 640:· 537:A 510:) 492:BH 471:) 463:· 459:· 455:· 383:) 365:) 346:) 338:-- 323:) 308:) 285:) 266:) 256:}} 250:{{ 246:}} 240:{{ 227:) 206:) 192:) 177:) 169:. 159:) 151:. 135:) 120:) 94:) 1365:( 1342:( 1257:( 1234:( 1192:( 1170:( 1119:. 1075:( 1050:( 1030:( 1007:( 987:( 973:( 943:( 843:( 828:( 805:( 652:( 554:· 549:( 506:( 467:( 379:( 361:( 342:( 319:( 304:( 300:- 281:( 262:( 223:( 202:( 188:( 173:( 155:( 131:( 116:( 90:( 74:• 50:.

Index

User talk:Georgewilliamherbert
archive
current talk page
Yes Michael?

19:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Georgewilliamherbert
talk
04:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group
TomPointTwo
talk
04:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Georgewilliamherbert
talk
05:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Both_primary_disputants_topic_banned_for_72_hrs
Debresser
talk
13:19, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
my talkpage
Debresser
talk
15:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Debresser
talk
10:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Chesdovi
talk
12:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.