333:
63:
down-to-earth
Knowledge pragmatism may prevail. It is not likely to be an easy path though. People will try and shout you down with well-worn mantras, rather than think from a fresh perspective about the underlying rights and wrongs of this particular case. If you go this route you might therefore be well-advised to also sanity-check your views with ordinary editors at any relevant wikiprojects first, rather than go into the lions den with the hardened image-warriors at
449:
560:
169:
296:
406:
I do not accept this ruling but shall not contest it. I have seen that Lara has apologised to Warren Whyte, which at least is something. Lexigator does not own a computer, and as he is a contributor of some note I shall deal with the ways and the means of dealing with that when I am permitted to do
62:
here is to create a 💕" is a typical slogan. But if you can push past unreasoned sloganeering, to get people to ask themselves what actually empowers people and helps their freedom - showing people a non-replaceable image with restrictions, or no image at all - it is possible that more realistic
28:
Such material was once welcomed at
Knowledge, most notably publicity shots with permission to use but not to modify. However such publicity shots are no longer welcomed, because it is considered they inhibit people coming forward with their own completely free and unrestricted content. This
71:
You might also like to check, but my understanding is that (in most cases) Crown
Copyright only lasts for 50 years. So it may be that copyright has actually expired in the images you are interested in, and they are now public domain, free for anybody to use or modify as they wish.
572:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
475:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
43:
There is also a strong motivation only to use content on
Knowledge which would not limit a commercial republisher's ability to reuse Knowledge content -- hence WP's rejection of "noncommercial use only" licensed material.
479:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
515:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
584:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
438:
472:
600:
55:
purpose served by limiting material which is not replaceable by any more free image, nor restricted in its commercial re-usability, but only restricted in that it cannot be modified.
304:
157:
25:
is the freedom to make and distribute modified versions. Because the Crown
Copyright waiver does not grant this freedom, material covered by it is not considered "free".
489:
618:
58:
You are likely to find a cadre of die-hards who take the view that every and any "non-free" image on wikipedia is a stain on the project to be removed. "Our
264:
544:
308:
549:
430:
401:
126:
416:
303:, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Knowledge accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
283:
96:
87:
Many thanks. Busy right now, but I'll follow your suggestions and return. As you know, I do have a problem with barnstar Wiki-warriors!
461:
271:
217:
40:-- ie to a photo of an actress with limited restrictions which could be replaced with a photo of the actress with no restrictions.
494:
244:
81:
614:
540:
385:
456:
440:
373:
176:
162:
527:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
16:
610:
536:
248:
152:
321:
593:
139:
Thanks for the comment - by all means restore it if there's enough historical significance to merit a full
605:
532:
357:
236:
180:
158:
426:
381:
240:
465:
340:
143:
article, I was just saving the reader from having to click through an extra, unexplanatory page. --
140:
300:
353:
581:
422:
377:
326:
592:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
523:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
393:
313:
8:
528:
252:
228:
205:
408:
275:
148:
118:
106:
88:
64:
48:
568:
550:
504:
495:
391:
Timotheus, you've stated one week on the template, but the log is reading two weeks.
260:
213:
134:
194:
577:
524:
508:
485:
363:
114:
77:
36:
However, this argument as such really only logically applies to material which is
193:
While all contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
589:
520:
512:
349:
289:
30:
585:
516:
223:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
144:
110:
256:
22:
481:
73:
596:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
59:
168:
559:
421:
I obviously picked the wrong drop-down for the block length - fixed.
113:'s suggestion (see File:1931 Act ed.jpg), I have taken the matter to
473:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Society of
Construction Arbitrators
511:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
599:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
407:
so, be that in a week or a fortnight, or sometime later.
21:
One of the freedoms required for WP to consider an item
580:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
454:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
200:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
51:
whether, apart from impoverishing Knowledge, there is
460:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
352:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
503:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
309:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Ian Salisbury
188:Non notable organization - tagged since Apr 2008
247:can result in deletion without discussion, and
356:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
372:below this notice, but you should read the
272:Talk:Society of Construction Arbitrators
212:notice, but please explain why in your
29:thinking is the main motivation behind
569:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
566:Hello, Ian Salisbury. Voting in the
462:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
457:Society of Construction Arbitrators
441:Society of Construction Arbitrators
177:Society of Construction Arbitrators
163:Society of Construction Arbitrators
13:
331:
307:, then respond to the evidence at
195:deleted for any of several reasons
183:because of the following concern:
167:
109:and ran away - not for me! So at
14:
631:
529:review the candidates' statements
471:The article will be discussed at
558:
447:
294:
535:. For the Election committee,
505:Arbitration Committee election
496:ArbCom elections are now open!
284:17:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
265:19:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
619:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
582:Knowledge arbitration process
545:13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
431:17:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
417:15:31, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
402:12:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
386:02:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
344:from editing for a period of
47:But you might like to ask at
322:03:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
127:20:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
97:20:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
82:16:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
7:
603:and submit your choices on
531:and submit your choices on
490:21:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
251:allows discussion to reach
10:
636:
611:MediaWiki message delivery
601:the candidates' statements
537:MediaWiki message delivery
374:guide to appealing blocks
354:make useful contributions
237:proposed deletion process
153:18:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
464:or whether it should be
412:
279:
141:Sidney and Beatrice Webb
122:
92:
245:speedy deletion process
218:the article's talk page
336:
172:
578:Arbitration Committee
551:ArbCom Elections 2016
509:Arbitration Committee
368:Your reason here ~~~~
335:
305:notes for the suspect
299:You are suspected of
249:articles for deletion
181:proposed for deletion
171:
513:arbitration process
360:by adding the text
594:arbitration policy
553:: Voting now open!
525:arbitration policy
337:
241:deletion processes
173:
358:appeal this block
159:Proposed deletion
627:
562:
451:
450:
398:
371:
348:for engaging in
334:
318:
298:
297:
234:
233:
227:
211:
210:
204:
115:User:Jimbo Wales
635:
634:
630:
629:
628:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
606:the voting page
563:
555:
533:the voting page
499:
452:
448:
445:
400:
394:
388:
361:
332:
329:
320:
314:
295:
292:
231:
225:
224:
208:
202:
201:
166:
137:
105:Took a look at
19:
12:
11:
5:
633:
564:
557:
556:
554:
548:
502:
498:
493:
446:
444:
439:Nomination of
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
419:
392:
338:You have been
330:
328:
325:
312:
291:
288:
287:
286:
255:for deletion.
235:will stop the
191:
190:
165:
156:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
100:
99:
70:
18:
17:"Free content"
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
632:
621:
620:
616:
612:
608:
607:
602:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
571:
570:
561:
552:
547:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
497:
492:
491:
487:
483:
477:
474:
469:
467:
463:
459:
458:
442:
432:
428:
424:
420:
418:
414:
410:
405:
404:
403:
399:
397:
390:
389:
387:
383:
379:
375:
369:
365:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
327:December 2010
324:
323:
319:
317:
311:. Thank you.
310:
306:
302:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
230:
221:
219:
215:
207:
198:
196:
189:
186:
185:
184:
182:
178:
170:
164:
160:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:User:Carnildo
108:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
84:
83:
79:
75:
68:
67:by yourself.
66:
61:
56:
54:
50:
45:
41:
39:
34:
32:
26:
24:
604:
598:
575:
567:
565:
500:
478:
470:
455:
453:
443:for deletion
395:
367:
350:meatpuppetry
345:
339:
315:
301:sockpuppetry
293:
243:exist. The
239:, but other
222:
214:edit summary
199:
192:
187:
175:The article
174:
138:
69:
57:
52:
46:
42:
37:
35:
27:
23:free content
20:
38:replaceable
590:topic bans
521:topic bans
229:dated prod
206:dated prod
586:site bans
517:site bans
423:T. Canens
378:T. Canens
253:consensus
179:has been
135:The Webbs
60:m:mission
409:Salisian
366:|reason=
276:Salisian
145:McGeddon
119:Salisian
89:Salisian
466:deleted
376:first.
364:unblock
341:blocked
31:WP:NFCC
507:. The
482:Boleyn
346:1 week
290:Notice
257:Lionel
216:or on
107:WT:NFC
74:Jheald
65:WT:NFC
49:WT:NFC
615:talk
576:The
541:talk
486:talk
427:talk
413:talk
396:Lara
382:talk
316:Lara
280:talk
270:See
261:talk
149:talk
123:talk
93:talk
78:talk
33:#1.
501:Hi,
161:of
117:.
53:any
617:)
609:.
588:,
543:)
519:,
488:)
468:.
429:)
415:)
384:)
370:}}
362:{{
282:)
274:.
263:)
232:}}
226:{{
220:.
209:}}
203:{{
197:.
151:)
125:)
95:)
80:)
613:(
539:(
484:(
425:(
411:(
380:(
278:(
259:(
147:(
121:(
91:(
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
