User talk:Ivanvector/Archive 16

1137:. It is not enough to have a few, even academically (Rummel, Valentino), sources generally discussing the topic if they are a minority and are ignored by most scholars of Communism apart from, say, Ghodsee. If we cannot write a NPOV article, that article should not exist until our policies and guidelines are actually respected and followed. Because that article is not only unhelpful but, in my humble opinion, is actively harmful in propagating such unscholarly topic and a likely source of citogenesis. Now, I do not know whether you think that an article on the topic can actually be written by respecting NPOV and WEIGHT, while avoiding OR and SYNTH, or if it should be deleted — but "victims of communism" would be a better and more accurate name. I mean, the title itself is SYNTH because if there is one thing genocide scholars can at least partially agree is that the most-commonly used definition of mass killing is 50,000 killings within five years, but this would limit the scope only to Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, so we synthethise it by using a generic definition where 4 deaths is a mass killing. 1195:? When just like scholars, we cannot even agree on the topic (we can only agree that many, many people have died under Communist regimes, and anything after is up for grabs, but the same is true of many other regime-types ... I just really dislike such double-standard, which has been called out in academic debates, so it is not just my view, as someone who tries to be consistently oppose to all forms of authoritarianism and exploitation — and this has been going on for a decade, so the argument to keep it so that we can improve it is way beyond its expiration date), what is the point of having such article other than misinforming our readers by treating a popular concept, narrative, or theory propagated in the popular press but either ignored, rejected, or much more controversial within the much more relevant and weight academic press; even Conquest did not write about it and focused only on the Stalin era, and 1154:

Communism and Nazism for Courtois; Karlsson & Schoenhals 2008, pp. 53–54) or fringe (Rummel is mainstream about the democratic peace theory but either revisionist or fringe when it comes to scholarly Communism, mainly because of its political bias like colonialism and fascism being forms of socialism rather than capitalism, which clearly affected his reliability; "they are hardly an example of a serious and empirically-based writing of history", Karlsson & Schoenhals 2008, p. 79) or controversial per above. As a politicised field, it is no wonder than anti-communist historians (in a descriptive term) focus on such anti-communist discourse, while many other scholars either ignored it or have criticized or rejected it, as in the case of

1223:), of which that article acts as a POV content fork and coatrack, but this allows the defenders of such article to expand the topic to all Communism, even though that approach reflected a righist, anti-communist POV (David-Fox 2004), and ignores things like Romania, Soviet, Chinese, Yugoslav, and Albanese splits, the relevance of Hungary and Afghanistan (Dallin 2000), and widely different regimes like the Soviet Union and Cambodia just because they were governed by self-described Communist parties (David-Fox 2004). It simply remains a convenient label for the Eastern Bloc vis-à-vis the Western Bloc but it is not really analytical or accurate, and is mainly a useful generalization. 860:) editing patterns. They frequently will add/remove/change cast lists, sometimes without explanation, sometime citing official credits or billing blocks (when this info is not yet available). Sometimes this is followed up with proper citation, sometimes it is not. In my opinion, I feel that this editor is pushing POV to elevate certain cast members over others arbitrarily. Beyond that, I have left notes and messages on their talk page asking for explanation and trying to start a conversation, but these are not followed up with response. I am not sure how to proceed. I know you have looked at this editor's past and I'm hoping you could give some guidance. 908:, nice to see you again. I explained in the close why I thought topic bans require broader and more enthusiastic support than your proposal achieved, and how I thought it inappropriate to revive the stale, archived discussion a month later apparently just because it wasn't "closed formally". You must have noticed that only two participants in that discussion were not editors you notified? I can't see how any neutral admin would see a cause to act based on that. However, you can interpret my view on the close as "no quorum" rather than "no consensus" if you think that makes it clearer. 3636:, I do not understand why this was closed procedurally. While "disambiguate" is a common RfD outcome, there must be consensus for it, and a single user drafting a disambiguation page below a redirect does not immediately procedurally render a current RfD discussion moot or lead to the redirect becoming a disambiguation page automatically, or require a new discussion at another venue. No user was given the opportunity to comment on Jay's proposal, let alone reach consensus to disambiguate. I request this discussion be reopened, as there was no justification for closing it. Cheers, 1210:

be actually following NPOV, are dismissed as SYNTH ... when the article itself, as was intented to be structured, is SYNTH), or can be moved, so nothing is going to be actually lost. I am actually very curious about a scholarry review and comparative analysis article, using only the best scholarly sources, of Communism not limited to killings. As long as we limit ourseful to killings alone, treating this as a scholarly discourse rather than a popular press propaganda topic, we are violating our policies and gudielines, and in all honestly are not writing a good article.

4247: 3240: 2872:, thanks for your message. This file was hosted on Commons and was deleted there. Commons doesn't accept fair-use images so I'd guess it was probably removed for that reason. I would think that a composite which included a non-free image would also not be acceptable here (because there's a free alternative available in the other half of the image) but I can't say for sure. Anyway, you'd have to ask the deleting admin at Commons to restore the image or send you a copy (if that's something they can do, I don't really know). See the deletion log 891:

attempts at escalation fizzled out due to a perception that there was insufficient attempts at local resolution; and when local resolution was attempted in further detail before escalation, it gets interpreted as local resolution being effective (despite the fact that it definitely wasn't). I respect your admin work greatly but in this case it is unfortunate that your closure is enabling him to continue gaming the system, and indirectly enabling certain censorious regimes to push their point of views onto our global knowledge resource.

1250:

have such article. The only literature is Karlsson & Schoenhals 2008 on the basis that Stalin influenced Mao, who influenced Pol Pot; in such cases, killings were carried out as part of a policy of an unbalanced modernization process of rapid industrialisation (Karlsson & Schoenhals 2008, p. 8), not communism itself, so the alleged link for having such an article is gone. In addition, Cambodia is also often compared to non-Communist regimes, and the link in the comparative analysis is not communism but I am digressing.

4695: 1367: 4258: 4179: 3206: 4321: 4299: 4268: 4205: 3280: 3251: 3216: 912:

mess of reverts and long back-and-forth discussions, which is pretty much what every article with any kind of dispute looks like. Instead, bring specific examples with diffs showing how Cold Season's interference is disruptive to the articles. You were involved in the disputes and know exactly what behaviour you need to point out to make your case, and you can better show how the behaviour has been disruptive over time and is ongoing. You'll attract more attention if your case is clear.

31: 4168: 3185: 3196: 289: 4637: 112: 659:, and if we just revert they'll probably see the open near-unanimous discussion and inappropriately close it a third time. I think it would be better to leave this close be (since it is a pretty clear keep: the nominator didn't give a very good rationale for deletion and everyone else who commented has said it's an obvious keep) and leave a note for the closer that they shouldn't have done that. I don't have time right now, I have a meeting in 3 minutes :S 4396: 3382: 4057: 4911: 4073: 4023: 1921:! Nothing special here, you caught me in an oversight. When I'm blocking in an SPI I usually open the block interface for each user in a new tab, click all the buttons, and then go back and tag from the result interface. I wasn't going to tag this case so I just closed the tabs, and I've been having a lot of what seem to be DNS failures lately and some of the blocks seem to have not gone through. I've fixed it now. Thanks for the heads up! 5006:, and not evidence of anything. The edit summaries are too generic to demonstrate commonality, as is the material being edited. When I checked RoboCric before I did not see any evidence of other accounts using the same connections, and even if there was enough evidence to warrant another check, Cambria Math's most recent accounts are too old to match, or would have shown up already in the earlier check. There's nothing more I can do here. 3544: 3534: 4369: 3349: 4461: 3429: 1432:! Sorry I haven't time to look into this myself, I am having A Winter this year. I suggest filing an SPI as normal, it's helpful for us to have a record of ongoing abuse in one place, and this case hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years. There have recently been a new batch of eager clerks trained at SPI who have helped to nearly eliminate the perpetual backlog, for the first time in the seven years I've been participating. Cheers, 1625:, "Where disagreement persists after such a reversion, the editor proposing the change should first take the matter to the talk page, without personal comments or accusations of ownership. In this way, the specifics of any change can be discussed with the editors who are familiar with the article, who are likewise expected to discuss the content civilly." - but this person decided to go for accusing me of ownership anyway. 4310: 4288: 3269: 4334: 3298: 1103:, thanks for your note, I haven't been following the case since the spring. I'm disappointed they kept up their harassment campaign and continued socking. I'm going to leave that note at WP:ER, I guess technically they're still under the one-account restriction which will still be in effect in the event they manage to convince someone to unblock them. I'll make a modification to note their main account. Cheers. 2629:

daughters (Beatrice and Solace) and Mike Layton has two daughters (Phoebe and Chloe), this is confirmed on his Social media along with Brett Tryon's social media. Can we agree that calling it "untrue" was erroneous without adding them to the relative section until and unless they gain enough notability to have their own article at some future date? Those girls are indeed Jack Layton's grandkids:

4280: 3261: 218: 178: 1298:. As a reservist you have no official duties, but your assistance and expertise are welcome as a de facto coordinator. In the event of a vacancy in the commission, you may be activated - should this be required it is generally declared by the majority of the remaining active commissioners. Again, thank you for volunteering for this important position. Best regards, — 2954:. This page had also been edited multiple times previously. The information I'm looking for is a Table with 52 things in it. It was on the same page. I didn't know how to access this info or how to request for the same. All I could managed to do is this 'talk thing'. if this is possible somehow, I request you please arrange me the same. Thank you in advance. 3047:'52 Gotra'. Now I am helpless because I couldn't find any article with such name on Knowledge, and I don't know how to search or find a deleted article. All I had was the bookmark. Alas! all in vain. Now I desperately need guidance whether you could help me with that. Anyway, you showed such a kind gesture. Thank you for that. Edit: May be this is the page 4786:

supports what you changed, the way to resolve the dispute is to start a section on the article's talk page, and explain why you think the source supports your change. The other editor might accept your explanation, or they might challenge you and then you discuss with them what to do next. Let me know which article and I can have a look.

3710:

disambiguation page replaced the redirect is because you closed the discussion and made it so without there being consensus to do so. I been active at Rfd for a while now and I have never seen a drafted disambiguation page lead to a procedural close. But I guess all this really is moot now that it is at Afd.

1717:, even if you just save an empty page. That way the link in your signature will be blue instead of red. Some editors here have an unconscious bias against new/inexperienced users, and having a red-link signature is a good indicator of that. It's a silly thing but it will probably save you some frustration. 4785:

I'll need more info to investigate myself. Which article, and which other editor? In general, if someone reverts your edit and says "not in the source cited" that means they compared the information you changed with the citation provided, and could not verify your edit. If you're sure that the source

2628:

I think a consensus on who is considered notable should be on Layton's article's talk page. The initial reason for the granddaughters being deleted was due to him not having granddaughters at all as the reason that was originally given was that it was "untrue". I can confirm that Sarah Layton has two

2338:

but I also don't disagree with him that it's difficult to evaluate a pattern based on only 4 edits. In my opinion, brand new accounts restoring edits that were made by a proven sock is very good evidence of sockpuppetry, and I think you should feel free to report them. That's what SPI is for, to draw

2200:

I'm also pretty familiar with editors weaponizing SPI as a substitute for discussion; I was pretty active in the India-Pakistan disputes years back when I was starting out at SPI, and I've adminned my way around the Balkans too. One possible incident is probably nothing to get your guard up over (AGF

1692:

I think you're doing fine. CaffeinAddict is taking a more perfectionist approach to the article than some of the rest of us and there's some butting of heads going on, but that happens on Knowledge, and mostly anyone who's been editing for any length of time runs into this sort of dispute eventually.

3046:

Thank you for your kind help. You are right, the information I'm looking for is not in the article. But I'm sure that the information with a tabular form was available in an article with the heading 'Bagra or Bagda Cast, or Bagra or Bagaur Brahmin' and the heading of the tabular format was something

2702:

I don't understand this insistence that Jack Layton's granddaughters are fictional, that including them is adding fictional relatives. That the users adding them have some "fanfic' of Jack Layton having granddaughters? I can confirm that he does have granddaughters. I doubt that Mike Layton would be

2481:

but I didn't think those were any more suitable, and then I found the custom parameter fields and so I did that instead. I don't work with infoboxes much, custom parameters are a new thing to me. I thought about restoring the 34 deaths field, but then I thought that, by the same logic, the 34 bodies

1697:

if you're really being attacked. Have a look at that policy, there is a wide range of interpretation as to what is a personal attack and what is just fair comment. Taking the dispute to the talk page is the best approach, you have a number of experienced editors there already and that's normally the

1249:

Again, this would reduce the scope to Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. I think some users who want to keep the article in spite of everything do not accept this because it would mean drastically reducing the topic to them, and we already have relevant articles about each one, so it is unclear why we should

1209:

Most of the content is either already in other articles (the problem is this article does not properly summarize the events but only presents the views within the "victims of communism" narrative from some non-expert authors or genocide scholars who are a minority, and country-specialists, who would

1177:

I think my latest edits at least improved it and made me more neutral by describing the lack of consensus, its controversial nature, etc. Another improvement would be to move it directly at Victims of communism, while removing the SYNTH "By state" section, rewriting the NPOV/OR/SYNTH/WEIGHT "Causes"

1167:

It is my understanding that they are writing within the context of genocide studies, which is a minority school of thought, and are essentially a minority within a minority because not all scholars of genocide even agree among themselves, much less with scholars of Communism, who have mostly ignored

911:

At any rate, you're of course free to challenge or revert my close, but I think your more productive path here is to make a new report. This time, don't rely on the past discussion which also fizzled, and don't rely on anyone else to review the background themselves. They'll likely see what I see: a

578:

to have been of some service. People don't have to be open-minded to edit here of course, but on a project with so many people from so many different backgrounds, it helps, and it's too bad that more people don't see it that way. People are entitled to their opinions, but when an editor's expression

4751:

you certainly can ask. Knowledge is not a live chat: when you write on someone's talk page, you're leaving them a message, like an email, and they may not see it or be able to respond for some time. I appreciate the courtesy, but if you need something you should just say what it is in your original

3742:

I'm not new to RfD nor to closing discussions, though I've been on hiatus for a while, but believe me that I appreciate your feedback. But I think we can all agree it wouldn't make things any less complicated if I reopened the RfD at this point. I say we let this play out - it appears to be heading

3142:

I restored the edit but I'm reviewing and I'm not so sure. The source you provided indicates an "admission date" of March 8, 1955, but various sources I've found have said that Hillery was imprisoned for rape in 1955, but was out on parole before he was convicted of murder and returned to prison in

2852:

But then later a driveby anon removed it from the article (with their only edit), possibly for homophobic reasons, and so it was orphaned and automatically deleted (it's fair-use). I didn't notice this in time, nobody did I guess. I don't have the original anymore and I'm not up for making it again

2265:

Am I supposed to keep moving the page back to its original version until this person get bored and stops? Several other editors were also undoing the new Korean nationalist accounts and anonymous users for the past year. I don't mean to sound frustrated, but there must be some other way than having

2196:

does weigh in my decision-making. As for presently, I think Theonewithreason's concern was reasonable, given Miki Filligranski's block log and the IP activity during Miki's lengthy block. Per RoySmith's comments it doesn't seem to have amounted to anything, but as we say, just because we don't find

1572:

Ivanvector - thanks for the response, I suppose I was following this page in particular along with my regular COVID-19 article watch lists to prevent misinformation where I can. SystemEff - a) You're not the only red name/new editor in the edit history b) if you are not a sock, a sock investigation

675:

Yeah, I wrote the above before I saw that you'd formally re-closed as an admin action. Which I can live with. My concern was more with a questionable NAC being left to stand. (I think I'm much more tolerant of NACs than most people (seeing as I make one or two a week myself usually), and even think

3651:

There was no consensus to disambiguate and I did not want to give the impression that there was. But as I explained in my close, creating the disambiguation addressed the deletion concern, and the discussion was veering off-topic into which topics should be included on it. Or you could think of it

2351:

and you don't want to end up blocked for that. RoySmith has protected the page from being edited by new accounts for a while, that should help. If more new accounts show up making the same edits after that protection expires, I would suggest that's a good time to file another report under the same

1153:

Like Courtois, they actually represent a minority, as was admitted by the biggest contributor and defender of the article, but it is justified because they are attributed; I do not think this is enough to have such an article. In addition, Courtois and Rummel are either revisionist (equivalency of

3709:

Any user is free to create a disambiguation page over a redirect, but not while it is under discussion at RfD. And in this case, a disambiguation page was not created over the redirect, it was drafted under it, which is the usual procedure (as instructed by the RfD template). So the only reason a

3676:

FWIW I also think that you jumped the gun there and forced us to go through another set of procedural hoops that are excessive. If there was no Twinkle, I'd care a lot more, but still, please don't do it in the future. We should not need like half a month of discussion about something this small,

3605:

Hey Ivanvector I just found out that Sundayclose seems to have a history of not looking at the sources in certain edits, or maybe is just indiscriminately reverting a new user and flooding their talk page with inappropriate warnings? I think he just did that to me the second time on the updates I

2686:

I agree, I think they only should be added unless and until they become notable at some future date. I agree with you that Instagram isn't a reliable source; the reason I linked their Instagram pages was to show that they're not fictional children, as was the reason someone gave to the removal of

1457:

Somehow that also led to me being blocked when editting from my phone while in Saskatchewan, which is where I spend most of my time. I do a lot of travelling and right now I'm in Manitoba now so my phone is using a different IP and I can once again edit. I'm not a techy so I have no idea how this

3802:

Hello, the reason I added "acting" under Leader of the Official Opposition is because due to the NDP holding Official Opposition status at the time the interim NDP leader was by extension the Official Opposition Leader. However, after Layton's death she "officially" assumed the role since he was

2807:

has undergone several edits mostly from IP addresses, and everyone is putting their guesses and numbers. I request to lock edit for this page for one week so that situation becomes clear and then this page could be edited as per the new situation. Also, there is a dedicated page for this purpose

3143:

1962. It needs to be clear in the table that he has not been imprisoned continuously since 1955. The source you provided also doesn't verify any of the details of his conviction, sentence, and re-trial; you need to provide sources for those things as well. I found these sources that will help:

890:

discussion I have had with Cold Season since autumn 2019 as "productive". Cold Season has done a good job filibustering out any discussion in which his viewpoint is disagreed with, and then engage in months-long vigilante edit wars to push his point of view when others aren't looking. Previous

3868:

also lists her as Leader of the Opposition starting August 23, 2011 and ending March 24, 2012. If you have a reliable source which contradicts these dates, you will need to provide it, and then we can try to reconcile why they're giving different information and what it means for our article.

1199:

is not about mass killings; Courtois' introduction is about the double genocide theory and equivalency between Communism and Nazism (Jaffrelot & Sémelin 2009, p. 37), while the book itself ", in effect, narrowly focused monographs, which do not pretend to offer overarching explanations."

676:

the occasional out-of-process NAC can be justified (seeing as I've done that a few times too), but I dislike NACs that include no rationale, outside the most obvious of cases.) If this had been your close to begin with, I'd've probably scratched my head at it and moved on with my day. So...

2892:

Ah, of course. Thanks. So: I uploaded the file here, and I guess I didn't tag it "do not move to Commons" as I often do, exactly to prevent this sort of thing. (I know it wasn't uploaded to Commons, because I virtually never do that.) So then it gets gets moved to Commons, and then deleted

1458:

could've happened. All I know is I'm not the one who made the edits that got the IP banned (and no one had access to my phone). I'm not sure how to get this resolved but I would very much like to be able to edit from my phone in Saskatchewan again. I hope this is an easy quick fix. Thanks!

1056:

OK, I was just looking into this because, at the time, the RFD was closed but the hatnotes were not updated and there was a Missing Redirect flagged. I glanced at the discussion and stopped reading after you said "wrong argument". Anyway, hatnotes have since been fixed, so no issues now.

2579:

That's what I thought, they were just trying to correct info that was provably wrong. I'm pretty sure my unblock undid your par-block, but I thought that block log was already polluted enough if they don't re-offend. I'm in a meeting for the next few hours but I'll check back later.

2339:

attention from editors experienced in investigating sockpuppetry. This case is difficult because it seems (from the technical side) to be several different people making the same edit, rather than one person, but that also doesn't necessarily mean that it's not sockpuppetry (or

3885:

The NDP was the Official Opposition at the time which made her legally Opposition leader. It’s how the parliamentary system works. Yes, she formally assumed after Layton’s death hence my edit for acting. Regardless if it was summer break she was legally the opposition leader.

2143:

Either way, fast forward to the present day... this user seems to have been engaging in content disputes (some of which I attested to or was part of myself), and today I noticed a disturbing pattern of behavior - they continued what seems to be a long-term revert war at

1129:, and I think that your description of "victims of communism" as "more of a propaganda topic than a scholarly debate" is exactly the point that many users who defend that article do not get; it is no wonder that the only other 'encyclopedias' to have such an article are 519:

I know you have more patience than I do (how could you not?), but it seemed like it might have started to work on you. Maybe not, I did kind of ignore the possibility you were having fun. Talking to people like that is the opposite of fun for me, maybe I was assuming.

203: 2312:

I guess Esiymbro just changed it back, so Buyeo is back to normal. But regard my question above as one on general procedure on how to handle the new accounts. Should I keep changing the page back to normal until there is enough evidence to restart the investigation?

4382:. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the 2552:(SIGH) I had partially blocked from the COI article and let them know about the COI user name. I did not read them as being intent on promotion, just lacking understanding of our ways. Which they confirmed on my talk. Some people are just a little too hard ass. -- 2836:

Hi I picked you at random because I can't figure out who the deleting admin was, actually I think the deletion was just done by robots (the history was deleted along with the file I guess). Is it even possible to undelete an image and, if so, could you undelete

1480:

apologies, I set the block too aggressively. You should not be affected by it now. Just so you know, you should always be able to edit your own talk page if you're affected by a block like this, and can ping an admin or use an unblock template there for help.

4996:

There's not enough to go on here. First off, new users know how to use templates and references because of our many guides explaining how to use templates and references, and/or they can copy and paste an example from one of our billions of articles, and

3775:

Thanks for the ping. I agree with Mdewman6. I'm as surprised by the close as he is! I would suggest re-opening the RfD and closing the AfD procedurally. Also, in this case it's better to have all the discussion at one place than splitting it across

993:

I've dealt with Mewulwe's arrogant approach to the topic, for years. If you want to open up an RFC on the matter, anywhere on the 'pedia? that's fine with me. Perhaps, a criteria for adding/deleting ordinals in such infoboxes, could be established.

2224:

I think restrictions have been useful, and would apply some myself, but since I actually edit in this topic area, it's harder to do because I actually often come in contact with so many of these folks and then I'm too often automatically involved.

1767:

Thanks for the advice, Ivanvector. I didn't know about WP:DR and WP:30. That might come in handy in the future. I did take the criticism personally, so I'll take some break from editing this page, and focus on other articles, or do something else.

2152:, in what seems to me to be an attempt to disqualify their opposition in that dispute without actually having to argue the merits, i.e. gaming the system. Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but it's not my first rodeo with Balkan topic area abuse... 3454: 4354: 1245:) should actually be the name of the MKuCR article. It is a common name, and unlike MKuCR it does not engage in SYNTH, or not reflecting RS(s), by using it in a generic sense rather than the most-common accepted threshold of genocide scholars. 268: 3416: 3652:

this way: the redirect that was the subject of the discussion no longer exists as it's been replaced with a disambiguation page. If you think that disambiguation page should be deleted, you should nominate it at AFD. Or never mind,

3587:

These revisions I made were deleted because User:Sundayclose said it was not in the sources cited but I am not sure about that being true could you check that for me and if it IS in the sources cited could you bring it back please?

558:

Honestly, I have to thank you; the edit conflict with one of your replies gave me time to reconsider posting my own, allowing me to just stop re-engaging with someone who--ahem--isn't open to changing their mind about this subject.

2191:

The Theonewithreason case was really borderline as I recall, and was also obfuscated because of interfering technical data from a long-term abuse case; I really couldn't tell you now why I didn't modify Generalrelative's block but

972:

is for reporting edit warring. You'll probably get a better response there rather than complaining about it on a WikiProject discussion page. As for the ordinals I really don't have a strong opinion either way, only that we should

1541:

I don't see it, yet. Events like this tend to attract new editors, that's probably all it is. In my experience the trolls come out after the event and try to skew the narrative, keep an eye out for that and stick to the sources.

4419: 2034:

for tagteaming with "Brownfingerslayerz", both posting on the same page right after each other, with the exact same timestamp, yet the IP isn't blocked, which ought to mean that "Brownfingerslayerz" used a different IP range.

3900:

Your insistence that that is the case does not make it so. We have several sources in agreement that Layton was Leader of the Official Opposition up to his death, and none saying Turmel was Leader of the Official Opposition,

2655:. Non-notable in this context generally means individuals who do not have separate articles about themselves. The usual approach to this, if you have a reliable source (Instagram is not), is to list the notable individual's 1525:

Based on the amount of red names/new editors I'm seeing on the edit history at the Freedom Convoy article - I'm concerned there's a current influx of socks to get around the semi-protection. Should I open an investigation?

2251:, what is an editor supposed to do if new accounts and anonymous users keep making the same edits? I know that RoySmith said to wait before continuing the investigation, but the page keeps being attacked in the meantime. 1084:

closed today, they've continued to edit with another account. I don't know if you need to do anything at WP:ER/UC, but I thought I'd drop you a note just incase. Thanks for your help with this matter earlier in the year.

579:

of their opinion negates the personhood of a broad group of fellow editors, my opinion is that they deserve to be challenged. We won't change that editor and it's pointless to try, but they're not the only ones watching.

2848:

there was a dispute about which image of Ramirez to use, a feminine-looking one or one that wasn't (she's bisexual and nonbinary), and to settle it I combined the two photos into one, and that was satisfactory to all.

4431: 2385:

Can I restore the page? Zessede/Aqww/Q1A1Z have not addressed any of the concerns on the talk page (Zessede and Q1A1Z did just comment on it, but without addressing anything substantial while still making their edits).

1240:

Have a discussion on whether Victims of communism (it should be capitalized because they happened under Communism, i.e. a Communist party-led state, rather than communism, a distinction even made, of all sources, in

3993: 3958: 3808: 2838: 650:

Thanks for the double-ping. I don't get notifications on the alt for posts here but I do get emails. I'm not sure what would be accomplished by reverting the close again, which is why I self-reverted. It seems like

5001:

is policy so I do not investigate sockpuppetry allegations when that is the only evidence. Furthermore, editors in RoboCric's location with an interest in cricket is like fish with an interest in the ocean - it's

3891: 1276: 4350: 3465: 2981:. I looked through the history of the article and did not see any revision with a table, but you're free to have a look yourself. Please note that the article was deleted because it was believed to be a non- 1039:

I think you should read the discussion more closely. There were only two commenters: I initially disagreed with the other editor but they convinced me of their position, and we both agreed with retargeting.

421: 3930:

Nycole Turmel herself said she started as Opposition leader during Layton's leave. "In July 2011 she was appointed Leaderof the Official Opposition and act as such for nine months until the election of Mr.

3458: 4940:

hello, Ivanvector. RoboCric can also be a sock of User:A.A Prinon (Cambria Math). Ive found some evidences. Firstly, A.A Prinon (AP) and RoboCric (RC) both are interested in cricket. RC's first edit

4102:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1287: 1200:(Paczkowski 2001, pp. 28–34). So when even anti-communist sources (again, in a purely descriptive sense) are misinterpreted and made to appear much extreme than they are... I think this says it all 3329: 3071:

you will have to ask an administrator on the Hindi Knowledge to review that page for you. I only have administrator privileges on the English Knowledge. The administrator who deleted the page is

3818:

You will need to provide a reliable source which states that Turmel was interim or acting leader during the time that Layton was ill but before his death. Without a reliable source your edit is

3409: 3420: 2663:. You should discuss this on the article's talk page, I only reverted because the IP was edit-warring, I don't have any particular feelings about the content other than the policy concerns. 435: 308: 3323: 1283: 3633: 1337:. My comment in the discussion was really with respect to sockpuppetry, and not on the topic of the page which I'm really not at all familiar with. I don't think I can be of help here. 4413: 4118: 3997: 1902:) still have clean block logs. Was this an oversight? Or have I failed to understand something about the process? If it's the latter, please disregard this message. Much appreciated, 2803:, there is no motion confidence poll against the prime minister expected to be done by end of this month. During this period several political alignments are being changed. The page 1606:

As the above discussion states, what is the best way to deal with uncharitable editors? You can see the history of my talk page to see this editor's pattern of communications to me.

3856:, gives dates of her holding the title of Leader of the Official Opposition as "2011.08.23 - 2012.03.23", i.e. from Layton's death to Mulcair's election. The article also states, " 4405: 4087: 1733:

SystemEff - I have also engaged with you on your own talk page, but you continue to delete my comments. I guess we can continue to communicate via other talk pages, if necessary.

4702: 2184:

generally: we don't typically block users indefinitely for a first sockpuppetry offence in isolation; my standard for a long time has been two weeks and I've been criticized for

1374: 4360: 3391: 3076: 1125:

First of all, sorry for the length (summarizing is not exactly my strength yet but I try, and use notes to improve rediability). Second of all, thanks so much for your response

164: 4623: 2140:

was not modified. (I could have also posted this to their talk page, I guess...) I don't recall seeing this kind of an apparent act of lenience before, does it happen often?

3340: 2743:, we interpret this as unless the grandchildren are notable in their own right, we can say how many there are (with a reliable source) but not their names. Also, there is a 2503: 3989: 3954: 3804: 2133: 1291: 198: 3853: 2149: 3887: 3657: 4226: 4216: 3472: 248: 150: 4978: 4902: 4836: 3359: 2524: 2254:

After Zessede and Aqww did it (as we discussed at the investigation page), the new users Accplc1213 and 220.95.101.209 just removed the references and material from

1895: 474:

You're being baited. Don't fall for it. Just disengage (as I did further up the page) before you say something in anger/annoyance that will complicate your life. --

401:, so any redlinked user making a series of one-letter changes will be an obvious sock. I can format a list of those if you want to also add them to your watchlist. 3310:, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the 3125: 1081: 4343: 2469:

I still don't know what point you're trying to make. I reverted with BLUE in mind, but then I went to see if there was a more fitting parameter to use instead of

4211: 1295: 1272: 880: 4521: 3254: 3521: 3199: 3103: 3055: 2959: 2425: 2221:

Oh, then I guess I hardly ever deal with first offenders. In retrospect, I guess a lot of my experience with SPI has been with hardcore repeat business, sigh.

1178:

section, and a general copyediting, and see how it would look and read like. I think that this is the only way to have a NPOV-written article about the topic.

2923:

Thank you for correcting my attempted corrections, it seems a revert was all that was needed and there was nothing worth saving in that edit. The changes by

2405: 158: 4895: 3833: 3405: 1871: 596: 3916: 3895: 3209: 1850:

Looks like I owe you a Coke. I knew to expect the police to be ineffective, but I'm amazed at how much effort they've put into not doing anything at all.

4145: 3137: 3007:

courtesy ping as you were the deleting admin. I assumed you would be okay with this action as the deletion was five years ago and we would consider it a

3219: 2739:

dictates that we have to strike a balance between enriching knowledge about the article subject and publishing harmful information about other persons.

2439:

applies (why dig a grave if not to put a dead body in it?) but making the text of the parameter match the actual data does seem like a better approach.

1946: 1932: 4324: 4302: 319: 2591: 1742: 1553: 3099: 3066: 3051: 2970: 2955: 2873: 1777: 1582: 608: 590: 569: 549: 529: 500: 2703:

pleased to think that people don't think that his daughters are real. Why does it mention them on his Toronto City Council bio if they don't exist?

2493: 2464: 2450: 1510: 1492: 923: 2778: 2758: 2541: 2395: 2363: 2322: 2011:

Evlekis seems to often have access to multiple IP ranges at the same time, just switching to a new one when the one he's just used is blocked... -

154: 4752:

message. Then, when I'm writing this reply, I can answer your question, instead of now needing to ask you what the question is in the first place.

4271: 4231: 4221: 4153: 1728: 1567: 1219:

See Ott 2011: "... that number can range from as few as four to more than 50,000 people." Note that Ott is writing about mass killing in general (

715: 413: 379: 362: 4498: 3498: 2482:

that turned up after one of the sites flooded aren't necessarily causally linked to the residential school system either, so I just left it out.

2088: 2065: 2025: 2006: 1687: 1661: 1348: 1114: 847: 798: 778: 758: 742: 3283: 3167: 2413: 1003: 988: 695: 670: 4943:

is very suspicious, which they made a few minutes after joining. How did they know the use of templates and references? Similar edit summaries

4236: 3962: 3812: 3307: 2159:

in early 2021), but is now back under a restriction, one that also caused the aforementioned Talk page discussion to exist in the first place.

2111: 2049: 1637: 4190: 4185: 2431:

I don't know what you mean, I thought using the custom parameter functionality was a fair way to reflect the referenced data, keeping in mind

1650: 1443: 1237:

As the name itself seem to come from such "Victims of Communism" memorials, I thought it relevant or useful to have a disambiguation about it.

644: 4503: 4448: 3589: 3503: 3399: 2406: 2306: 1877: 1861: 1315: 823: 4676: 3645: 2826: 2674: 2234: 2212: 628:. IMO 5-1 after a few days still has a chance of turning around to some other consensus (even if that's unlikely, and if I'd probably !vote 322:

for the most recent version. Any advice/ideas on longer-term measures or is this just gonna be a whack-a-mole situation? Thanks in advance.

4564: 3803:

obviously not coming back. I will not revert your edit unless and until we work this issue out. Just wanted to explain myself. Thank You.

2371:

After the protection, Aqww undid 3 other editors 6 times (isn't that edit warring?), while even using the same exact words as Zessede did:

1558:

I wouldn't be surprised if this editor was thinking of me. Please see the section below to see the underlying pattern of their edits/talk.

1063: 1051: 334: 3227: 2432: 130: 4440: 3624: 2248: 1601: 1467: 4771:

This guy reverted my edits as he said the are not in the source cited but I don’t think that is true so can you check it for me please?

4578: 1911: 1234:"Victims of communism" is a common name, even if POVish. Unlike MKuCR, there is a literature about it that I mentioned on the talk page. 4493: 3493: 3223: 3148: 1017: 619: 538:

example". But then also following up with "Knowledge is not the real world", so I guess we were going to go in circles no matter what.

534:

I was expecting something more akin to green cheese: "Show me a real world example. ... That example is about New Brunswick. Show me a

426:

Thanks for fixing the L St Laurent page, and also introducing me to a formatting template I didn't know existed. Will come in handy!

1535: 1391: 1020:- only two differing opinions is a No Consensus. Since you are one of the two, I'll leave it to you to contact the closer about this. 4803: 2094: 1899: 1413:

quacks at all the usual ponds. What is the most expeditious way to block the sock? Another SPI, direct to ANI, or alternate? Cheers,

1259: 632:

myself). I'm a big fan of NOTBURO, but in this case I just don't think it's SNOWing yet. Okay if I revert your revert of your revert?

4876:

is very suspicious, which they made a few minutes after joining. How did they know the use of templates and references? Same edits

3905:, prior to Layton's death. If you want to challenge these sources you need to provide sources of your own, and you still have not. 2573: 1972: 1891: 1592: 5017: 4982: 4861: 3880: 3858:

At the time, because Parliament was in summer recess and Layton was hoping to return when Parliament resumed in September, Turmel

3847: 3619: 3600: 2171: 231:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

4533: 3921:"Your insistence that that is the case does not make it so." The NDP didn't form the Official Opposition after the 2011 election? 3161: 2862: 2809: 1819: 1093: 4615: 2931:

against modifying quoted text. I will try to be more careful with my own edits, thanks again for catching my overcorrection. --

2910: 2887: 2623: 727:

my edit summary was "Revert inappropriate (inadvertent?) early close: closer did not specify a rationale for closing early (see

4928: 4065: 4050: 3576: 3090: 3059: 3022: 448: 4719: 4261: 3759:

I agree let's let the Afd run its course at this point regarding how best to disambiguate all of these related terms. Thanks,

3039: 4630: 4383: 4158: 3986: 3925: 3768: 3754: 3737: 3719: 3671: 3172: 3107: 2963: 2242: 1844: 1304: 3439: 1422: 1327: 1126: 955: 898: 4814: 4797: 4780: 4766: 4553: 4517: 4141: 3517: 1967:

have their TPA revoked, or they will invariably start posting crap on their talk page, so could you please remove TPA for

1187:

Again, the topic is still not clear; should it be about the events alone, the narrative, both, or what? Should it be about

483: 313: 4755:

Let me know what kind of help you're looking for, and I'll help if I can or I'll direct you to a better resource. Thanks.

4195: 3590:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_youngest_killers&type=revision&diff=1114876159&oldid=1114854589

3144: 117:

Thanks for making good calls in moderating discussions to keep peace and keep conversation focused on improving the wiki.

4974: 4898: 4832: 3839: 2932: 2435:

that the sourcing does not support that the identified grave sites are equivalent to confirmed deaths. I also think that

2031: 1710:, but that last page can get very unhinged and you really should only post there if you've already tried everything else. 869: 3702: 3686: 1872:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-ontario-plans-seizure-of-trucks-fines-to-reopen-windsor-bridge-sources/

3121: 3787: 1647: 1626: 464: 2901:

too. This seems dysfunctional. But that's a different conversation. Thank for the explaino and the timely response!

2127: 1989: 1968: 1109: 665: 605: 585: 566: 544: 495: 1402: 1318:, but I'm afraid the dispute has flared up again. Could I trouble you to revisit the page and spell out your view? 367:

Thanks. They must have a really simple, worry-free life if they have the time and energy for this. <rolleyes: -->

5012: 4923: 4892: 4873:

I think Lugnuts is the sockmaster. Lugnuts and RoboCric both are interested in cricket. RoboCric's (RC) first edit

4856: 4840: 4792: 4761: 4600: 4573: 4039: 3911: 3875: 3828: 3749: 3697: 3666: 3156: 3085: 3017: 2882: 2773: 2753: 2669: 2586: 2536: 2488: 2445: 2358: 2207: 2060: 2001: 1927: 1856: 1723: 1548: 1487: 1449: 1438: 1343: 1046: 983: 918: 773: 737: 357: 102: 4804:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Parabon_NanoLabs&type=revision&diff=1125614756&oldid=1125596233

4379: 2940: 2136:

was resolved with a confirmation and blocking of sockpuppets, but the one-week block of the sockpuppeteer made by

1837: 4584: 4513: 4137: 3743:

for a SNOW close, but the redirect was there for 4 years, it won't hurt anything if this takes another few days.

3513: 2928: 410: 376: 331: 280: 259: 205: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3372: 1693:

Try not to take any criticism personally, it's a slippery slope to burnout, but of course we also have a policy

1026: 977:. That way if it comes up again we can refer to a consensus instead of dealing with each incident in isolation. 3447: 2155:

The other user in that dispute is certainly no sunshine and has previously been severely sanctioned (thanks to

857: 4889: 3936: 3129: 4544: 2978: 2831: 2804: 2788: 2258:. The new ones from this week (Accplc1213, Aqww, 220.95.101.209) are ignoring the attempt to discuss this on 2071: 244: 3412:

case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.

2950:

Hi, Namaste. I'm Shriram from India. I needed to access history of an article. The link I had bookmarked is

275:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

4908:

While I agree that there are some similarities in their edits, Lugnuts and RoboCric are quite definitively

4532:

Could you take a look at this edit? Is it connected to the last user to change the snow color on the page?

4111: 4035: 2347:

recommend that you keep reverting new accounts that make the same edit: some admins will interpret that as

1354: 1120: 1071: 942:& restore the ordinals in the eight related-bios? I won't object. But, you'll be facing an edit-war at 431: 276: 255: 2352:

SPI case, and if it does get renamed/merged there will be a pointer from the old name. I hope this helps.

4409: 4123: 3939:. News releases coming out from the Opposition office would be under Turmel's name during Layton's leave. 3626: 3582: 2973:, thank you for your message. The normal process for getting access to or restoring a deleted article is 2822: 1885: 1824: 1698:

best way to settle things. If you're in a dispute and you get to an impasse with another editor, we have

1518: 3362:

now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at

3146: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2372: 811:

tag on the first revert, and if I recall correctly those are the only kinds that trigger a notification.

4738: 4013: 3438:

An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their

2945: 2267: 1799: 939: 138: 38: 929: 4682: 4412:

for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen

3864:" (emphasis added). As for her Parliament bio, you haven't indicated where you actually found it but 1942: 1907: 1793: 1396: 2853:

even if had the source images. Surely there a remedy for this, the image is kept somewhere? Thanks.

4669: 4560: 4535: 3615: 3596: 3567: 3527: 3048: 2547: 1646:

They seemed to have gotten off a bad start with me, and see no sign of cooperating. Case in point:

303: 193: 3865: 3843: 2936: 2609: 2565: 2271: 2266:

to go back to check the newest account ignoring everyone else to remove the academic mainstream (

1894:. I saw that you said you'd blocked all three CU-confirmed accounts but then I noticed that two ( 1738: 1578: 1531: 1264: 866: 784: 625: 427: 243:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 4715: 2818: 2747:

that any information about minors added without a reliable source must be removed immediately.

2137: 1995:

I think my block settings on their IP ranges would've taken care of that, but happy to oblige.

1387: 1309: 1265: 125: 3852:

You keep saying that but you haven't actually provided the source. The source in the article,

4478: 4099: 2906: 2858: 2721: 2688: 2646: 2637: 2460: 2421: 1506: 1463: 1255: 895: 602: 563: 525: 479: 4650: 4257: 4178: 3332:, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of 3205: 2145: 2097:(blocked, but with TPA still enabled). Created today so it might yield an interesting IP. - 4594: 4320: 4298: 4267: 4204: 4110:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3953:

Not to mention news articles referred to her as Opposition leader prior to Layton's death.

3607: 3279: 3250: 3215: 3008: 2715: 2708: 2519: 2391: 2318: 2302: 1938: 1918: 1903: 1867: 1812: 146: 47: 17: 3987:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/turmel-vows-to-stay-on-until-ndp-chooses-leader-1.1023554

3926:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp-s-layton-becomes-official-opposition-leader-1.1086887

351:

of course, but this case is worth running checkuser. People have the weirdest obsessions.

8: 4847: 4663: 4387: 3691:

Well frankly if it looks like a duck and makes a sound like a duck .... but point taken.

3611: 3592: 3560: 3368: 3315: 2924: 2512:

in our article(s)? This isn't a public park, you know, it's just another tourist trap. --

2509: 2287: 2283: 1773: 1683: 1657: 1633: 1628:. Note that this editor never initiates talk page discussion (when reverting), but I do. 1614: 1563: 1519: 874: 457: 407: 373: 328: 298: 188: 184: 169: 4611: 4473:: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add 3764: 3733: 3715: 3641: 2740: 2598: 2554: 2105: 2082: 2043: 2019: 1983: 1734: 1574: 1527: 1323: 862: 851: 793: 753: 710: 469: 398: 240: 3195: 2530:

Back off. It was one edit and she was working on compliance when you hardblocked her.

4711: 4081: 4043: 3554: 2736: 2201:

is policy, remember) but if you do notice a pattern, feel free to bring it up again.

1383: 999: 951: 183:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

118: 4246: 3932: 3239: 3098:@Ivanvector Thank you so very much for your time. I will contact the administrator. 1455: 1080:

you logged for user A.A Prinon about being restricted to one account. For info, per

505:

They're resorting to something like the Chewbacca defense. I particularly like the:

4810: 4776: 4734: 4452: 4423: 4130: 4095: 3797: 3482: 3443: 2974: 2902: 2869: 2854: 2764: 2744: 2652: 2456: 2417: 2054:

I have to invoke the checkuser cloak of secrecy here, but trust me that I'm on it.

1502: 1475: 1459: 1271:

Hello Ivanvector. Thank you for volunteering for the Electoral Commission for the

1251: 1104: 1011: 905: 892: 660: 599: 580: 560: 539: 521: 490: 475: 2985:

topic, and you may not recreate the article unless you can show that the topic is

5007: 4989: 4935: 4918: 4868: 4851: 4787: 4756: 4645: 4590: 4568: 4527: 3906: 3870: 3823: 3744: 3692: 3661: 3634:

Knowledge:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_6#Bela_River_(disambiguation)

3319: 3151: 3080: 3012: 2877: 2798: 2768: 2748: 2697: 2681: 2664: 2581: 2531: 2513: 2483: 2440: 2387: 2353: 2329: 2314: 2298: 2202: 2055: 1996: 1954: 1922: 1851: 1805: 1718: 1543: 1482: 1433: 1418: 1338: 1077: 1041: 978: 943: 913: 768: 732: 440: 394: 352: 288: 4694: 2994: 2630: 1366: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4624:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Change to the Checkuser team

4107: 3363: 3049:

https://hi.wikipedia.org/%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%BC%E0%A4%BE

3030: 3002: 2436: 2340: 1838:

https://globalnews.ca/news/8602177/freedom-convoy-protest-us-far-right-support/

1769: 1714: 1679: 1653: 1629: 1610: 1559: 1406: 841: 452: 441: 402: 368: 342: 323: 3862:. She only assumed that office upon Jack Layton's death on August 22, 2011 ... 3677:

it's really making us look so bureaucratic that any newbie would be scared. --

2633: 2297:

Thanks again. I would appreciate your help (I also just asked RoySmith this).

489:

Oh, you're no fun. But thank you for the advice, I will go do something else.

4998: 4826: 4657: 4607: 4482: 4103: 3783: 3760: 3729: 3711: 3682: 3637: 3311: 2982: 2335: 2291: 2230: 2193: 2167: 2156: 2102: 2079: 2040: 2016: 1980: 1826: 1707: 1694: 1622: 1334: 1319: 1299: 1130: 969: 788: 748: 722: 705: 652: 385: 348: 224: 209: 165: 4971: 4968: 4965: 4962: 4959: 4956: 4953: 4950: 4947: 4944: 4941: 4886: 4883: 4880: 4877: 4874: 3118: 704:

criteria, and you didn't leave any indication of it in your edit summary. ―

254:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3937:

https://www.ndp.ca/news/statement-new-democrat-interim-leader-nycole-turmel

3819: 2990: 2918: 2845: 2728:

of Layton's granddaughters. The issue is about publishing the names of non-

2348: 1703: 1699: 1410: 1282:. Congratulations! Some important pages to watch about the election are: 1220: 1100: 1087: 995: 963: 947: 728: 701: 4363:

on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.

4167: 3366:

to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to

3184: 2376:. Then Zessede returned to undo an editor and make the same edit as Aqww: 1275:. Following the closure of the ELECTCOM RfC, you have been selected as a 4806: 4772: 4746: 4730: 4378:

A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the

3333: 2986: 2732: 2729: 1288:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Coordination

815: 687: 636: 4114:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3838:

It says she was on her Parliament of Canada bio. Not original research.

1866:

I'll take it! Though we've possibly hit critical mass, at least for the

1314:

Quite some time back you were kind enough to provide a third opinion on

258:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

4091:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3075:. They're not very active in English but you could try asking on their 2275: 2259: 2148:, and then -- instead of responding on Talk about that matter -- filed 1573:

would not affect you so you would not have anything to worry about :).

1429: 1414: 514:

Editor G: Yeah? Well, you know, that's just like uh, your opinion, man.

4444:

has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.

2508:

So, what are you going to do to make sure she doesn't keep committing

2162:

Maybe it's time to reassess the earlier lenience, in light of this? --

1706:

on an issue, and if things get really out of hand you can post at the

511:

Editor P: Counters that with opposite opinion, with concrete argument.

347:

I've been collecting some data on this troll, I'll see what I can do.

111: 4636: 4395: 4072: 4038:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made 3860:

did not formally assume the role of Leader of the Official Opposition

3381: 3112: 2659:

of grandchildren (if that's important to the article), but not their

2368:

Thank you for your opinion. Can you take a look at the article again?

2334:

personally I wouldn't have been as quick to dismiss your concerns as

2279: 1874: 1841: 1134: 2704: 2455:

If you thought blue applied you wouldn't have changed the template.

2150:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Crovata/Archive#13 February 2022

1284:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Coordination

4910: 4850:

and it is not allowed. What makes you think they are a sockpuppet?

4724: 4589:

Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permissions of

3778: 3725: 3678: 3653: 3543: 3533: 3475:

to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.

3072: 2226: 2179: 2163: 287:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3117:

Can you revert this or at least bring it back with modifications?

4460: 4368: 4309: 4287: 4056: 4022: 3428: 3348: 3268: 1058: 1034: 1021: 227:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 4127:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2977:, but I'll bypass that for you. I have undeleted the article at 4117:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

4085:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3336:

is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.

1702:

where experienced editors can provide input; you can request a

4333: 3728:, who closes RfDs often, would agree this close was improper. 3297: 2767:. There have been no new discussions on that page in 2 years. 1602:

Talk:Freedom_Convoy_2022#Selective_removal_of_timeline_updates

655:

doesn't even realize they've now close that discussion poorly

2255: 1401:

Hi Ivanvector. You were the closing admin on the most recent

4279: 3341:

the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines

3260: 2596:

No problem. I have high hopes that they will rename soon. --

2197:

anything doesn't necessarily mean that it was wrong to look.

2134:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Theonewithreason/Archive

1292:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021

422:

Thanks for introducing me to the "Clear" formatting template

4451:

has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing

3658:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Bela River (disambiguation)

217: 177: 143:

We have no beef between us. Let's not create one. Thanks!

4831:

Hi, I think User:RoboCric is a sockpuppet. Can you check?

3481:: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at 2262:

while continuing to push their Korean nationalist stance.

2763:

I also agree that this discussion should be happening at

265:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

3119:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1111766619

2132:

Hey there, I noticed that in late 2020, a discussion in

1678:

possible I'm over-reacting here. Any advice is welcome.

4897:. That's it. Can you help me by finding more evidences? 4098:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3978:

Quote: "Layton's recommendation that Turmel step in as

2951: 1296:

Category:Knowledge Arbitration Committee Elections 2021

1230:

I have created the disambiguation for several reasons:

447:

I have drafted an alternative version of this essay at

3982:

was accepted by the NDP caucus and party's executive."

1652:, but that had no effect on this user as you can see. 393:" articles. Almost all the legit edits are by either 3376:

and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

2504:

Tamara Nasser Deputy Marketing Manager Drusillas Park

4424:

2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system

3446:

in cases of poor account security. You can also use

783:

Strange... I didn't get notified for that, only for

4346:

to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.

1597:I would appreciate a couple of responses from you. 4485:rather than an IP that may change within a minute. 388:, I've watchlisted all the "Italian Destroyer < 320:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/LittleMemories 3933:https://ca.linkedin.com/in/nycole-turmel-97a2b230 2416:, do you have something you'd like to say to me? 3464:You are invited to comment on candidates in the 3326:) instead of the administrator making the block. 2839:File:Composite_of_two_photos_of_Sara_Ramirez.png 1409:in 2018. I just came across the latest IP sock. 4432:Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block 2379:. Then another new account Q1A1Z did the same: 1798:Hi, can you revoke TPA for 172.58.224.0/21 per 3398:case will be rescinded 1 November following a 2473:. As far as I could tell there's not: there's 247:over time. You may like to take a look at the 4729:Hello can I ask you to do me a favor please? 2631:https://www.instagram.com/mikelaytonto/?hl=en 2407:Canadian Indian residential school gravesites 4565:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikequfv 3450:(2FA) to provide an extra level of security. 2927:seem to be deeply flawed, and I even had to 2651:information on non-notable minors generally 846:Hi! I have been increasingly concerned with 3444:reserves the right to not restore adminship 2634:https://www.instagram.com/bretttryon/?hl=en 2249:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Zessede 1834:Ah, breaker, Pig Pen, this here's the Duck! 1016:F.Y.I, there was a bad non-admin closed on 4693: 4154:Administrators' newsletter – December 2022 3550:Have a very happy first edit anniversary! 2993:, otherwise it will be deleted again (see 1649:. Sensing this I had tried to be welcoming 1365: 3168:Administrators' newsletter – October 2022 1708:administrators' noticeboard for incidents 2095:User talk:I sniff Maria Zakharova's feet 1973:Special:Contributions/Brownfingerslayerz 1892:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/RJII 1890:Hi Ivanvector, thanks for your close at 1454:I see you blocked User:207.228.78.0/24. 384:Because they have all the subtlety of a 251:to see how you can improve the article. 2810:No-confidence motion against Imran Khan 14: 3990:2604:3D09:982:A200:7D18:5D6E:2E2A:8451 3955:2604:3D09:982:A200:7D18:5D6E:2E2A:8451 3805:2604:3D09:982:A200:A57A:6360:7DD0:6ABD 3421:2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review 3175:from the past month (September 2022). 624:You reverted before I could, but then 449:User:Cullen328/sandbox/One last chance 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4846:No, I can't just check, we call that 4563:got 'em. There's a bit of history at 4161:from the past month (November 2022). 3888:2604:3D09:982:A200:19B8:B374:4BA2:E2C 2952:http://en.wikipedia.org/Bagra_(caste) 1937:Aha, that makes sense! Thanks again, 4481:to see all of a subnet's edits, and 4082:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 4017: 3980:temporary Official Opposition leader 3459:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 3178: 151:2601:5C2:300:62E:2D79:1C9F:332B:6B05 25: 4159:News and updates for administrators 4066:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 3461:open 2 October and close 8 October. 3410:Conduct in deletion-related editing 3360:Articles for creation helper script 3173:News and updates for administrators 2032:Special:Contributions/46.233.91.119 1896:Precious delicate sweet little baby 318:We apparently have a wiki-stalker: 23: 4894:etc. Lugnuts was blocked for this 4635: 4631:Happy Sixth Adminship Anniversary! 4483:consider blocking the whole subnet 4344:Consensus has been found in an RfC 4278: 3656:has already done that; please see 3542: 3532: 3408:to the deletion RfC remedy in the 3259: 938:you want to reverse my changes at 620:The weather report: Is it SNOWing? 216: 176: 24: 5039: 2705:https://mikelayton.to/about-mike/ 1969:Special:Contributions/Zack_N_Jack 508:Editor G: States opinion as fact. 296:Thanks again, and happy editing! 235:The article has been assessed as 4909: 4459: 4394: 4367: 4332: 4319: 4308: 4297: 4286: 4266: 4256: 4245: 4203: 4177: 4166: 4071: 4055: 4034:Hi Ivanvector! On behalf of the 4021: 3427: 3380: 3347: 3324:ArbCom's recent updated guidance 3296: 3278: 3267: 3249: 3238: 3214: 3204: 3194: 3183: 2989:through the use of citations to 1593:Advice on an uncharitable editor 1076:Hi Ivan - hope you are well. At 747:I meant for the first revert. ― 110: 29: 4606:For the Arbitration Committee, 4251:Interface administrator changes 4121:and submit your choices on the 3322:for action (as applicable, per 3244:Interface administrator changes 2724:: there is no debate about the 3822:and cannot be published here. 3466:2022 CUOS appointments process 3162:18:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 3130:17:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 3108:01:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC) 3091:13:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 3060:06:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 3040:16:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 3023:14:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 2964:18:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2941:18:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC) 2911:17:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC) 2888:14:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC) 2863:04:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC) 1213: 1203: 1181: 1171: 1161: 1147: 1115:14:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 1094:07:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 1064:15:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1052:10:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1027:01:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1004:14:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC) 989:13:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC) 956:21:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC) 924:13:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC) 899:10:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC) 700:Sorry, I wasn't aware of the 13: 1: 4983:10:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC) 4929:21:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4862:18:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4841:15:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4815:22:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4798:14:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4781:23:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 4767:21:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 4739:04:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 4720:07:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC) 4677:19:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC) 4616:17:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC) 4579:01:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC) 4554:19:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 4146:00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 4100:Knowledge arbitration process 3343:is requested until 8 October. 2979:User:Shriramsrz/Bagra (caste) 2805:National Assembly of Pakistan 2592:19:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 2574:18:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 2542:18:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 2525:18:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 2494:01:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC) 2465:23:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 2451:23:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 2426:22:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 2396:18:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2364:23:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 2323:02:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 2307:02:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 2243:Sockpuppets on Buyeo and more 2235:22:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 2213:21:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 2172:21:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 2112:16:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC) 2089:18:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 2072:Special:Contributions/KkKk121 2066:17:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 2050:17:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 2026:17:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 2007:17:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 1990:17:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 1947:00:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC) 1933:00:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC) 1912:00:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC) 1878:07:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC) 1392:08:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC) 1328:09:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC) 870:00:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC) 824:18:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 799:17:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 779:14:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 759:14:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 743:13:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 716:19:48, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 696:14:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 671:13:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 645:13:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC) 279:without posting a request to 4658:Knowledge Birthday Committee 4585:Change to the Checkuser team 4522:12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC) 3998:22:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC) 3963:22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC) 3917:18:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC) 3896:18:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 3881:16:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 3848:17:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC) 3834:14:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC) 3813:18:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC) 3788:02:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 3769:00:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 3755:23:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 3738:20:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 3720:20:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 3703:20:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 3687:20:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 3672:19:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 3646:19:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 2624:Jack Layton's granddaughters 2617:21:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC 1862:13:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC) 1845:20:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC) 1820:06:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC) 1778:18:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1743:18:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1729:17:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1688:17:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1662:16:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1638:16:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1583:18:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1568:16:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1554:13:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1536:04:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 1511:15:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC) 1493:11:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC) 1468:03:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC) 1444:00:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1423:05:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 1349:03:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC) 1305:23:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 314:So LittleMemories/Tognella99 7: 5018:14:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC) 4652:happy adminship anniversary 4051:20:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC) 3627:Bela_River_(disambiguation) 3620:19:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC) 3601:19:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC) 3577:13:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC) 3522:11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC) 3442:, and reminded that ArbCom 1695:forbidding personal attacks 1260:04:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 1243:The Black Book of Communism 1197:The Black Book of Communism 1156:The Black Book of Communism 609:17:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC) 591:19:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 570:19:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 550:19:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 530:19:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 501:19:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 484:18:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 465:22:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC) 436:23:33, 11 August 2021 (UTC) 239:, which is recorded on its 10: 5044: 4514:MediaWiki message delivery 4138:MediaWiki message delivery 4042:and became a Wikipedian! 3514:MediaWiki message delivery 2832:Can you undelete an image? 2827:20:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC) 2779:13:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC) 2759:13:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC) 2675:19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC) 2268:Cambridge University Press 940:Deputy Premier of Manitoba 680:. Not a hill I'll die on. 414:22:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 380:21:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 363:21:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 335:20:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 4917:based on checkuser data. 4701: 4692: 4351:article creation at scale 4338:Guideline and policy news 3453:Self-nominations for the 3448:two-factor authentication 3302:Guideline and policy news 2844:So what happened was, at 2128:Question about a 2020 SPI 1715:create your own user page 1373: 1364: 309:17:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC) 199:17:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC) 131:23:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 4135:to your user talk page. 3632:Regarding your close of 3583:Not in the sources cited 2897:, and so it's gone from 1450:Caught in the cross-fire 968:I'm sure you know where 290:leaving us some feedback 277:create articles yourself 256:create articles yourself 159:18:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC) 103:A cup of coffee for you! 4885:. Both used 'Cricinfo' 4494:Discuss this newsletter 4477:to the end of an IP in 3494:Discuss this newsletter 2946:Copy of a deleted page. 2640:, 18:46, 11 March 2022 2272:Oxford University Press 1018:Mystical Body of Christ 946:, with editor Mewulwe. 451:and invite your input. 4640: 4603:) have been restored. 4283: 3547: 3537: 3264: 2691:, 19:26, 11 March 2022 2653:should not be included 221: 181: 4802:This is the revision 4639: 4479:Special:Contributions 4438:The arbitration case 4429:The arbitration case 4420:The proposed decision 4282: 4172:Administrator changes 4096:Arbitration Committee 4079:Hello! Voting in the 4030:Happy First Edit Day! 4014:Happy First Edit Day! 3546: 3540:Happy First Edit Day! 3536: 3528:Happy First Edit Day! 3339:Community comment on 3312:Arbitration Committee 3263: 3200:ScottishFinnishRadish 3189:Administrator changes 2789:Request for Edit lock 2689:User:CountingStars500 2638:User:CountingStars500 1963:Evlekis socks should 1333:Thanks for your note 1105:Ivanvector's squirrel 886:I would not describe 661:Ivanvector's squirrel 581:Ivanvector's squirrel 540:Ivanvector's squirrel 491:Ivanvector's squirrel 281:Articles for creation 260:Articles for creation 220: 206:Articles for creation 180: 42:of past discussions. 4683:Precious anniversary 3608:Murder of David Dorn 3455:electoral commission 3440:passwords are secure 3027:No problem, thanks. 2737:policy on the matter 2709:User:EmilyPhillipson 2687:their inclusion. - 2284:Taylor & Francis 2093:And even more work: 1713:I would suggest you 1411:Contribution history 1355:Precious anniversary 1273:2021 ArbCom Election 1121:Victims of communism 1072:Editing restrictions 18:User talk:Ivanvector 4689: 4539:TheManInTheBlackHat 3562:Comr Melody Idoghor 2925:User:WikiMaster2K15 2288:Antiquity (journal) 1900:Editor Without Bias 1886:Sockpuppet blocking 1520:Freedom Convoy 2022 1361: 1316:Talk:Phoebus cartel 204:Your submission at 185:Draft:Rebecca Petty 170:Draft:Rebecca Petty 4687: 4641: 4559:It definitely is, 4410:vote on candidates 4284: 4112:arbitration policy 4036:Birthday Committee 3555:Birthday Committee 3548: 3538: 3265: 2741:Generally speaking 2146:Višeslav of Serbia 1700:dispute resolution 1359: 881:Link to discussion 787:. My apologies. ― 767:the first revert. 428:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz 222: 182: 139:Cevallos and Ganim 4967:. Similar edits: 4708: 4707: 4655:on behalf of the 4621:Discuss this at: 4550: 4524: 4314:Oversight changes 4292:CheckUser changes 4148: 4063: 4062: 3820:original research 3524: 3423:closes 3 October. 3293: 3292: 3273:CheckUser changes 3038: 2819:Dr Shahzad Bhatti 2477:and a series for 2475:|reported deaths= 2138:GeneralNotability 1794:IP editor threats 1397:UrbanNerd IP sock 1380: 1379: 865: 611: 212:has been accepted 172:has a new comment 161: 149:comment added by 136: 135: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5035: 4993: 4939: 4913: 4872: 4750: 4697: 4690: 4686: 4675: 4672: 4666: 4551: 4546: 4542: 4511: 4476: 4463: 4435:has been closed. 4398: 4384:wide-vector-2022 4380:Vector 2022 skin 4371: 4336: 4323: 4312: 4301: 4290: 4270: 4260: 4249: 4207: 4181: 4170: 4136: 4134: 4075: 4059: 4048: 4025: 4018: 3863: 3786: 3781: 3574: 3563: 3541: 3511: 3483:Special:Undelete 3431: 3384: 3375: 3351: 3330:Following an RfC 3308:Following an RfC 3300: 3282: 3271: 3253: 3242: 3218: 3208: 3198: 3187: 3179: 3141: 3070: 3037: 3035: 3028: 3006: 2991:reliable sources 2802: 2765:Talk:Jack Layton 2745:bright-line rule 2722:CountingStars500 2719: 2701: 2685: 2650: 2647:CountingStars500 2613: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2569: 2563: 2560: 2557: 2548:DrusillasZooPark 2522: 2516: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2333: 2188:being too harsh. 2183: 1817: 1815: 1810: 1808: 1479: 1369: 1362: 1358: 1302: 1294:, and others in 1224: 1217: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1189:excess mortality 1185: 1179: 1175: 1169: 1165: 1159: 1151: 1090: 1038: 967: 861: 822: 819: 818: 810: 806: 796: 791: 756: 751: 726: 713: 708: 694: 691: 690: 683: 643: 640: 639: 595: 462: 460:Let's discuss it 405: 371: 346: 326: 306: 301: 292: 284: 271: 196: 191: 144: 128: 123: 114: 107: 106: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5043: 5042: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5015: 4987: 4933: 4926: 4866: 4859: 4829: 4795: 4764: 4744: 4727: 4685: 4680: 4679: 4670: 4664: 4662: 4633: 4587: 4576: 4545: 4536: 4530: 4525: 4509: 4508: 4474: 4453:Level 2 desysop 4408:are invited to 4330: 4329: 4276: 4241: 4200: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4128: 4076: 4068: 4044: 4040:your first edit 4032: 4016: 3914: 3903:in any capacity 3878: 3857: 3831: 3800: 3782: 3777: 3752: 3700: 3669: 3630: 3585: 3580: 3568: 3561: 3539: 3530: 3525: 3509: 3508: 3396:Muhammad images 3367: 3294: 3170: 3159: 3135: 3115: 3088: 3077:Hindi talk page 3064: 3031: 3029: 3020: 3000: 2948: 2921: 2885: 2834: 2796: 2791: 2776: 2756: 2716:EmilyPhillipson 2713: 2695: 2679: 2672: 2644: 2626: 2611: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2589: 2567: 2561: 2558: 2555: 2550: 2539: 2520: 2514: 2506: 2491: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2448: 2410: 2361: 2327: 2245: 2210: 2177: 2130: 2063: 2004: 1957: 1939:Generalrelative 1930: 1919:Generalrelative 1904:Generalrelative 1888: 1859: 1831: 1813: 1811: 1806: 1804: 1796: 1726: 1595: 1551: 1523: 1490: 1473: 1452: 1441: 1399: 1357: 1346: 1312: 1300: 1269: 1266:WP:ELECTCOM2021 1228: 1227: 1218: 1214: 1208: 1204: 1186: 1182: 1176: 1172: 1166: 1162: 1152: 1148: 1123: 1112: 1088: 1074: 1049: 1032: 1014: 986: 961: 944:Kelvin Goertzen 932: 930:'Tis up to you. 921: 877: 844: 820: 813: 812: 808: 804: 794: 789: 776: 754: 749: 740: 720: 711: 706: 692: 685: 684: 681: 668: 641: 634: 633: 622: 588: 547: 498: 472: 458: 445: 424: 403: 369: 360: 340: 324: 316: 311: 304: 299: 274: 267: 263: 214: 201: 194: 189: 174: 141: 126: 119: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5041: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5011: 4922: 4855: 4828: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4791: 4760: 4753: 4726: 4723: 4706: 4705: 4699: 4698: 4684: 4681: 4665:Chris Troutman 4642: 4634: 4632: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4586: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4572: 4529: 4526: 4510: 4507: 4506: 4501: 4496: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4457: 4456: 4445: 4436: 4427: 4417: 4406:Eligible users 4392: 4391: 4373:Technical news 4365: 4364: 4358: 4347: 4328: 4327: 4306: 4305: 4277: 4275: 4274: 4264: 4243: 4242: 4240: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4224: 4219: 4214: 4208: 4201: 4199: 4198: 4193: 4188: 4182: 4164: 4163: 4155: 4152: 4119:the candidates 4088:eligible users 4077: 4070: 4069: 4067: 4064: 4061: 4060: 4053: 4033: 4028: 4026: 4015: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3983: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3928: 3924:Explain this: 3922: 3910: 3874: 3827: 3799: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3748: 3724:I'm sure even 3722: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3696: 3665: 3629: 3623: 3612:Railtrailssuck 3593:Railtrailssuck 3584: 3581: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3510: 3507: 3506: 3501: 3496: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3476: 3469: 3462: 3451: 3425: 3424: 3413: 3406:A modification 3403: 3378: 3377: 3353:Technical news 3345: 3344: 3337: 3327: 3291: 3290: 3287: 3286: 3284:GorillaWarfare 3258: 3257: 3235: 3233: 3231: 3230: 3212: 3202: 3177: 3169: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3155: 3114: 3111: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3084: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3016: 2998: 2947: 2944: 2920: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2881: 2833: 2830: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2790: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2772: 2761: 2752: 2692: 2668: 2625: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2585: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2535: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2487: 2444: 2409: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2383: 2369: 2357: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2206: 2198: 2189: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2059: 2000: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1926: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1855: 1830: 1823: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1722: 1711: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1641: 1640: 1608: 1607: 1604: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1547: 1522: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1496: 1495: 1486: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1437: 1398: 1395: 1378: 1377: 1371: 1370: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1342: 1311: 1310:Phoebus cartel 1308: 1268: 1263: 1247: 1246: 1238: 1235: 1226: 1225: 1212: 1202: 1180: 1170: 1160: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1108: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1045: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 982: 931: 928: 927: 926: 917: 909: 884: 883: 876: 873: 843: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 772: 736: 698: 664: 621: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 584: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 543: 517: 516: 515: 512: 509: 494: 471: 468: 444: 439: 423: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 382: 356: 349:Block on sight 315: 312: 300:Eternal Shadow 262:if you prefer. 253: 249:grading scheme 232: 229: 215: 213: 202: 190:Eternal Shadow 175: 173: 168:notification: 163: 140: 137: 134: 133: 121:Blue Rasberry 115: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5040: 5019: 5014: 5009: 5005: 5000: 4995: 4994: 4991: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4975:103.120.39.35 4973:. Thank you. 4972: 4969: 4966: 4963: 4960: 4957: 4954: 4951: 4948: 4945: 4942: 4937: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4925: 4920: 4916: 4912: 4907: 4906: 4904: 4900: 4899:103.120.39.35 4896: 4893: 4890: 4887: 4884: 4881: 4878: 4875: 4870: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4858: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4833:103.120.39.35 4816: 4812: 4808: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4794: 4789: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4763: 4758: 4754: 4748: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4722: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4704: 4700: 4696: 4691: 4678: 4673: 4667: 4660: 4659: 4654: 4653: 4648: 4647: 4638: 4626: 4625: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4604: 4602: 4599: 4596: 4592: 4580: 4575: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4552: 4549: 4543: 4541: 4540: 4534: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4505: 4502: 4500: 4497: 4495: 4492: 4491: 4484: 4480: 4472: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465:Miscellaneous 4462: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4443: 4442: 4437: 4434: 4433: 4428: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4397: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4370: 4362: 4359: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4345: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4335: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4311: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4289: 4281: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4248: 4238: 4235: 4233: 4230: 4228: 4225: 4223: 4220: 4218: 4215: 4213: 4210: 4209: 4206: 4202: 4197: 4194: 4192: 4189: 4187: 4184: 4183: 4180: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4169: 4162: 4160: 4149: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4132: 4126: 4125: 4120: 4115: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4092: 4090: 4089: 4084: 4083: 4074: 4058: 4054: 4052: 4049: 4047: 4041: 4037: 4031: 4027: 4024: 4020: 4019: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3988: 3984: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3938: 3934: 3929: 3927: 3923: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3913: 3908: 3904: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3877: 3872: 3867: 3866:ourcommons.ca 3861: 3855: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3840:184.71.49.238 3837: 3836: 3835: 3830: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3798:Nycole Turmel 3789: 3785: 3780: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3751: 3746: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3708: 3704: 3699: 3694: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3668: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3628: 3625:Rfd close of 3622: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3591: 3579: 3578: 3575: 3573: 3572: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3556: 3551: 3545: 3535: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3505: 3502: 3500: 3497: 3495: 3492: 3491: 3484: 3480: 3477: 3474: 3470: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433:Miscellaneous 3430: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3411: 3407: 3404: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3383: 3374: 3370: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3342: 3338: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3262: 3256: 3255:Cyberpower678 3252: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3241: 3236: 3234: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3220:Ahoerstemeier 3217: 3213: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3174: 3163: 3158: 3153: 3149: 3147: 3145: 3139: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3120: 3110: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3068: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3050: 3045: 3041: 3036: 3034: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3019: 3014: 3010: 3004: 2999: 2997:). Thank you. 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2933:109.76.196.74 2930: 2926: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2884: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2850: 2847: 2842: 2840: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2811: 2806: 2800: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2780: 2775: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2760: 2755: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2717: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2699: 2693: 2690: 2683: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2671: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2639: 2635: 2632: 2616: 2615: 2608: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2588: 2583: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2571: 2564: 2543: 2538: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2523: 2517: 2511: 2495: 2490: 2485: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2447: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2408: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2360: 2355: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2337: 2331: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2293: 2292:Asian Affairs 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2252: 2250: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2223: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2209: 2204: 2199: 2195: 2190: 2187: 2181: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2160: 2158: 2153: 2151: 2147: 2141: 2139: 2135: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2062: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2003: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1929: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1858: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1828: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1809: 1801: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1735:CaffeinAddict 1732: 1731: 1730: 1725: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1709: 1705: 1704:third opinion 1701: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1621:Notably, per 1620: 1619: 1618: 1616: 1612: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575:CaffeinAddict 1571: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528:CaffeinAddict 1521: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1363: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1279: 1274: 1267: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1244: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1222: 1216: 1206: 1198: 1194: 1193:mass killings 1190: 1184: 1174: 1164: 1157: 1150: 1146: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1131:Conservapedia 1128: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1083: 1082:this SPI case 1079: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1048: 1043: 1036: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1005: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 990: 985: 980: 976: 971: 965: 960: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 925: 920: 915: 910: 907: 903: 902: 901: 900: 897: 894: 889: 882: 879: 878: 872: 871: 868: 864: 859: 856: 853: 849: 825: 817: 802: 801: 800: 797: 792: 786: 782: 781: 780: 775: 770: 766: 762: 761: 760: 757: 752: 746: 745: 744: 739: 734: 730: 724: 719: 718: 717: 714: 709: 703: 699: 697: 689: 679: 674: 673: 672: 667: 662: 658: 654: 649: 648: 647: 646: 638: 631: 627: 626:self-reverted 610: 607: 604: 601: 598: 594: 593: 592: 587: 582: 577: 573: 572: 571: 568: 565: 562: 557: 551: 546: 541: 537: 533: 532: 531: 527: 523: 518: 513: 510: 507: 506: 504: 503: 502: 497: 492: 488: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 467: 466: 463: 461: 456: 455: 450: 443: 438: 437: 433: 429: 415: 412: 409: 406: 400: 399:Sturmvogel 66 396: 391: 387: 383: 381: 378: 375: 372: 366: 365: 364: 359: 354: 350: 344: 339: 338: 337: 336: 333: 330: 327: 321: 310: 307: 302: 297: 294: 291: 285: 282: 278: 272: 270: 261: 257: 252: 250: 246: 242: 238: 233: 228: 226: 225:Rebecca Petty 219: 211: 210:Rebecca Petty 207: 200: 197: 192: 186: 179: 171: 167: 162: 160: 156: 152: 148: 132: 129: 124: 122: 116: 113: 109: 108: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5003: 4914: 4830: 4728: 4712:Gerda Arendt 4709: 4656: 4651: 4644: 4622: 4605: 4597: 4588: 4547: 4538: 4537: 4531: 4528:Block Evader 4470: 4464: 4458: 4439: 4430: 4399: 4393: 4372: 4366: 4337: 4331: 4325:TheresNoTime 4313: 4307: 4303:TheresNoTime 4291: 4285: 4272:TheresNoTime 4262:TheresNoTime 4250: 4244: 4232:TheresNoTime 4222:RedWordSmith 4196:TheresNoTime 4171: 4165: 4157: 4122: 4116: 4093: 4086: 4080: 4078: 4046:CAPTAIN RAJU 4045: 4029: 3979: 3952: 3902: 3859: 3801: 3631: 3604: 3586: 3570: 3569: 3559: 3558: 3552: 3549: 3478: 3432: 3426: 3417:second phase 3395: 3385: 3379: 3352: 3346: 3301: 3295: 3288: 3272: 3266: 3243: 3237: 3232: 3188: 3182: 3171: 3138:95.51.12.186 3122:98.51.12.186 3116: 3097: 3032: 3011:these days. 2949: 2922: 2898: 2894: 2851: 2846:Sara Ramirez 2843: 2835: 2817: 2725: 2660: 2656: 2627: 2597: 2553: 2551: 2507: 2479:|casualties= 2433:your concern 2411: 2349:edit warring 2344: 2341:meatpuppetry 2296: 2264: 2253: 2246: 2185: 2161: 2154: 2142: 2131: 2107: 2106: 2098: 2084: 2083: 2075: 2045: 2044: 2036: 2021: 2020: 2012: 1985: 1984: 1976: 1975:? Cheers, - 1964: 1960: 1958: 1889: 1833: 1832: 1825:We got us a 1803: 1797: 1675: 1609: 1596: 1524: 1453: 1400: 1384:Gerda Arendt 1381: 1313: 1280:commissioner 1277: 1270: 1248: 1242: 1229: 1221:Mass killing 1215: 1205: 1196: 1192: 1191:rather than 1188: 1183: 1173: 1163: 1155: 1149: 1124: 1086: 1075: 1059: 1022: 1015: 974: 935: 933: 887: 885: 854: 845: 764: 677: 656: 629: 623: 575: 535: 473: 459: 453: 446: 425: 389: 386:Jägermonster 317: 295: 286: 266: 264: 236: 234: 230: 223: 145:— Preceding 142: 120: 78: 43: 37: 4561:Yamaguchi先生 4400:Arbitration 4355:been closed 4227:Ron Ritzman 4212:Alex.muller 4124:voting page 3473:RfC is open 3386:Arbitration 3369:Preferences 3334:FoxNews.com 3320:oversighter 3210:Staxringold 3009:soft delete 2903:Herostratus 2870:Herostratus 2855:Herostratus 2515:Orange Mike 2457:Magnolia677 2418:Magnolia677 2070:More work: 1868:Borderlands 1503:Masterhatch 1476:Masterhatch 1460:Masterhatch 1375:Five years! 1252:Davide King 906:Deryck Chan 875:Cold Season 803:There's no 600:Writ Keeper 597:Jesus wept. 561:Writ Keeper 522:Floquenbeam 476:Floquenbeam 237:Start-Class 36:This is an 5008:Ivanvector 4990:Ivanvector 4936:Ivanvector 4919:Ivanvector 4869:Ivanvector 4852:Ivanvector 4827:Sockpuppet 4788:Ivanvector 4757:Ivanvector 4703:Six years! 4646:Ivanvector 4591:Ivanvector 4569:Ivanvector 4108:topic bans 3931:Mulcair.": 3907:Ivanvector 3871:Ivanvector 3824:Ivanvector 3745:Ivanvector 3693:Ivanvector 3662:Ivanvector 3392:Remedy 8.1 3152:Ivanvector 3100:Shriramsrz 3081:Ivanvector 3067:Shriramsrz 3052:Shriramsrz 3033:Sandstein 3013:Ivanvector 2971:Shriramsrz 2956:Shriramsrz 2878:Ivanvector 2799:Ivanvector 2769:Ivanvector 2749:Ivanvector 2698:Ivanvector 2682:Ivanvector 2665:Ivanvector 2582:Ivanvector 2532:Ivanvector 2484:Ivanvector 2441:Ivanvector 2412:Regarding 2388:MGetudiant 2354:Ivanvector 2330:MGetudiant 2315:MGetudiant 2299:MGetudiant 2276:De Gruyter 2260:Talk:Buyeo 2203:Ivanvector 2056:Ivanvector 1997:Ivanvector 1923:Ivanvector 1852:Ivanvector 1802:? Thanks. 1719:Ivanvector 1544:Ivanvector 1501:Thank you! 1483:Ivanvector 1434:Ivanvector 1339:Ivanvector 1168:the topic. 1042:Ivanvector 979:Ivanvector 914:Ivanvector 821:(she/they) 769:Ivanvector 733:Ivanvector 693:(she/they) 642:(she/they) 536:real world 470:Suggestion 395:Chesipiero 353:Ivanvector 187:. Thanks! 95:Archive 19 90:Archive 18 85:Archive 17 79:Archive 16 73:Archive 15 68:Archive 14 60:Archive 10 4915:Unrelated 4499:Subscribe 4386:gadget. ( 4104:site bans 3553:From the 3499:Subscribe 3316:checkuser 3003:Sandstein 2995:WP:CSD#G4 2975:WP:REFUND 2919:Thank you 2726:existence 2510:marketing 2414:this edit 2294:, ...). 2280:Routledge 1770:SystemEff 1680:SystemEff 1654:SystemEff 1630:SystemEff 1611:SystemEff 1560:SystemEff 1407:UrbanNerd 1135:Metapedia 863:BOVINEBOY 411:(contrib) 404:Eggishorn 377:(contrib) 370:Eggishorn 343:Eggishorn 332:(contrib) 325:Eggishorn 269:help desk 241:talk page 5004:expected 4688:Precious 4643:Wishing 4608:Primefac 4601:contribs 4512:Sent by 4471:Tech tip 4426:is open. 4422:for the 4353:RfC has 4217:Excirial 4191:Euryalus 4186:Eddie891 3985:Source: 3854:this one 3761:Mdewman6 3730:Mdewman6 3712:Mdewman6 3638:Mdewman6 3606:made on 3512:Sent by 3479:Tech tip 3457:for the 3224:deceased 2929:warn him 2841:please? 2471:|deaths= 2336:RoySmith 2157:RoySmith 2103:Thomas.W 2080:Thomas.W 2041:Thomas.W 2030:He used 2017:Thomas.W 1981:Thomas.W 1360:Precious 1335:Jpatokal 1320:Jpatokal 1301:xaosflux 1078:WP:ER/UC 1012:redirect 858:contribs 848:KigToons 805:rollback 790:Qwerfjkl 750:Qwerfjkl 723:Qwerfjkl 707:Qwerfjkl 653:Qwerfjkl 147:unsigned 4848:fishing 4649:a very 4504:Archive 4441:Stephen 4388:T319449 4237:Stephen 4131:NoACEMM 3776:forums. 3504:Archive 3419:of the 3394:of the 3373:Gadgets 3364:WP:AFCP 2987:notable 2983:notable 2730:notable 2437:WP:BLUE 1959:Hello. 1955:Evlekis 1278:reserve 1101:Lugnuts 1089:Lugnuts 996:GoodDay 964:GoodDay 948:GoodDay 442:WP:ROPE 245:develop 39:archive 4999:WP:AGF 4807:Ejdnfo 4773:Ejdnfo 4747:Ejdnfo 4731:Ejdnfo 4548:(Talk) 4449:motion 4361:An RfC 3571:(talk) 3400:motion 3318:or an 3113:Revert 2735:. Our 2733:minors 2657:number 2247:About 2194:WP:AGF 1965:always 1827:Convoy 1674:It is 1623:WP:OAS 975:decide 970:WP:AN3 934:FWIW, 893:Deryck 842:Advice 816:Tamzin 688:Tamzin 678:shrugs 637:Tamzin 454:Cullen 408:(talk) 374:(talk) 329:(talk) 127:(talk) 5013:Edits 4924:Edits 4857:Edits 4793:Edits 4762:Edits 4725:Favor 4574:Edits 3912:Edits 3876:Edits 3829:Edits 3750:Edits 3698:Edits 3667:Edits 3157:Edits 3086:Edits 3018:Edits 2895:there 2883:Edits 2774:Edits 2754:Edits 2670:Edits 2661:names 2603:fried 2587:Edits 2559:fried 2537:Edits 2489:Edits 2446:Edits 2359:Edits 2345:don't 2343:). I 2256:Buyeo 2208:Edits 2061:Edits 2002:Edits 1928:Edits 1857:Edits 1814:84664 1807:Cards 1724:Edits 1549:Edits 1488:Edits 1439:Edits 1430:Hwy43 1415:Hwy43 1344:Edits 1141:Notes 1047:Edits 984:Edits 919:Edits 774:Edits 763:That 738:Edits 729:WP:SK 702:WP:SK 657:twice 576:proud 392:: --> 358:Edits 16:< 4979:talk 4970:and 4964:and 4958:and 4952:and 4946:and 4903:talk 4888:and 4879:and 4837:talk 4811:talk 4777:talk 4735:talk 4716:talk 4671:talk 4612:talk 4595:talk 4518:talk 4414:here 4349:The 4142:talk 4094:The 3994:talk 3959:talk 3935:and 3892:talk 3844:talk 3809:talk 3765:talk 3734:talk 3716:talk 3683:talk 3679:Joy 3642:talk 3616:talk 3597:talk 3518:talk 3415:The 3358:The 3314:, a 3228:Ched 3226:) • 3126:talk 3104:talk 3056:talk 2960:talk 2937:talk 2907:talk 2899:here 2874:here 2859:talk 2823:talk 2720:and 2612:talk 2606:okra 2600:Deep 2568:talk 2562:okra 2556:Deep 2521:Talk 2461:talk 2422:talk 2392:talk 2319:talk 2303:talk 2231:talk 2227:Joy 2186:that 2168:talk 2164:Joy 2074:. - 1971:and 1943:talk 1908:talk 1898:and 1875:El_C 1842:El_C 1840:🚛 1800:this 1774:talk 1739:talk 1684:talk 1676:also 1658:talk 1634:talk 1615:talk 1579:talk 1564:talk 1532:talk 1507:talk 1464:talk 1419:talk 1405:for 1388:talk 1324:talk 1256:talk 1133:and 1127:here 1110:nuts 1000:talk 952:talk 867:2008 852:talk 809:undo 795:talk 785:this 755:talk 731:)". 712:talk 666:nuts 630:keep 586:nuts 574:I'm 545:nuts 526:talk 496:nuts 480:talk 432:talk 305:Talk 195:Talk 155:talk 4475:/64 3779:Jay 3726:Jay 3654:Joy 3610:.-- 3471:An 3073:SM7 2969:Hi 2868:Hi 2180:Joy 2099:Tom 2076:Tom 2037:Tom 2013:Tom 1977:Tom 1961:All 1917:Hi 1836:🚛 1428:Hi 1403:SPI 1099:Hi 904:Hi 888:any 814:-- 807:or 765:was 686:-- 635:-- 397:or 390:xxx 166:AfC 5016:) 5010:(/ 4981:) 4961:, 4955:, 4949:, 4927:) 4921:(/ 4905:) 4891:, 4882:, 4860:) 4854:(/ 4839:) 4813:) 4796:) 4790:(/ 4779:) 4765:) 4759:(/ 4737:) 4718:) 4710:-- 4661:! 4614:) 4577:) 4571:(/ 4567:. 4520:) 4447:A 4144:) 4133:}} 4129:{{ 4106:, 3996:) 3961:) 3915:) 3909:(/ 3894:) 3879:) 3873:(/ 3846:) 3832:) 3826:(/ 3811:) 3784:💬 3767:) 3753:) 3747:(/ 3736:) 3718:) 3701:) 3695:(/ 3685:) 3670:) 3664:(/ 3660:. 3644:) 3618:) 3599:) 3557:, 3520:) 3371:→ 3160:) 3154:(/ 3150:. 3128:) 3106:) 3089:) 3083:(/ 3079:. 3058:) 3021:) 3015:(/ 2962:) 2939:) 2909:) 2886:) 2880:(/ 2876:. 2861:) 2825:) 2777:) 2771:(/ 2757:) 2751:(/ 2707:- 2694::: 2673:) 2667:(/ 2636:- 2590:) 2584:(/ 2540:) 2534:(/ 2518:| 2492:) 2486:(/ 2463:) 2449:) 2443:(/ 2424:) 2394:) 2362:) 2356:(/ 2321:) 2305:) 2290:, 2286:, 2282:, 2278:, 2274:, 2270:, 2233:) 2225:-- 2211:) 2205:(/ 2170:) 2101:| 2078:| 2064:) 2058:(/ 2039:| 2035:- 2015:| 2005:) 1999:(/ 1979:| 1945:) 1931:) 1925:(/ 1910:) 1870:: 1860:) 1854:(/ 1776:) 1741:) 1727:) 1721:(/ 1686:) 1660:) 1636:) 1617:) 1581:) 1566:) 1552:) 1546:(/ 1534:) 1509:) 1491:) 1485:(/ 1466:) 1442:) 1436:(/ 1421:) 1390:) 1382:-- 1347:) 1341:(/ 1326:) 1290:, 1286:, 1258:) 1158:). 1113:) 1107:(/ 1060:MB 1050:) 1044:(/ 1035:MB 1023:MB 1002:) 987:) 981:(/ 954:) 936:if 922:) 916:(/ 896:C. 777:) 771:(/ 741:) 735:(/ 682::) 669:) 663:(/ 589:) 583:(/ 548:) 542:(/ 528:) 520:-- 499:) 493:(/ 482:) 434:) 361:) 355:(/ 293:. 208:: 157:) 64:← 4992:: 4988:@ 4977:( 4938:: 4934:@ 4901:( 4871:: 4867:@ 4835:( 4809:( 4775:( 4749:: 4745:@ 4733:( 4714:( 4674:) 4668:( 4610:( 4598:· 4593:( 4516:( 4455:. 4416:. 4390:) 4357:. 4140:( 3992:( 3957:( 3890:( 3842:( 3807:( 3763:( 3732:( 3714:( 3681:( 3640:( 3614:( 3595:( 3516:( 3485:. 3468:. 3402:. 3222:( 3140:: 3136:@ 3124:( 3102:( 3069:: 3065:@ 3054:( 3005:: 3001:@ 2958:( 2935:( 2905:( 2857:( 2821:( 2812:. 2801:: 2797:@ 2718:: 2714:@ 2700:: 2696:@ 2684:: 2680:@ 2649:: 2645:@ 2614:) 2610:( 2570:) 2566:( 2459:( 2420:( 2390:( 2382:. 2332:: 2328:@ 2317:( 2301:( 2229:( 2182:: 2178:@ 2166:( 1941:( 1906:( 1829:! 1772:( 1737:( 1682:( 1656:( 1632:( 1613:( 1577:( 1562:( 1530:( 1505:( 1478:: 1474:@ 1462:( 1417:( 1386:( 1322:( 1254:( 1037:: 1033:@ 998:( 966:: 962:@ 950:( 855:· 850:( 725:: 721:@ 606:♔ 603:⚇ 567:♔ 564:⚇ 524:( 478:( 430:( 345:: 341:@ 283:. 273:. 153:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index