126:. There are probably mistakes here as well, but I think the results are a bit happier (though dirtier, because of the quality of the source material). Colour images are more fogiving in a way, but also you can't push the cleaning as far because (a) you're not trying to get to pure black and white, so you have to be more protective of the colour; and (b) I found that, at least with Gimp, if I did push it too far, I found I'd start getting very unrealistic pinks and blues starting to appear, particularly in the background and around the borders. (Though that may just because I don't know how to fly the software well enough, or perhaps strictly speaking because I ought to be working in a different colour space, eg something like CIELAB, cf
101:
using Gimp v2.8 for software, on images taken at the
Internet Archive, and found that a useful tool was the 'divide' filter -- a characteristic of the University of Toronto scans was that the middle of the page was lit more brightly than the edges. I found if I found a 'blank' page from the book, and applied a blur filter to it, that gave me a good baseline reference that I then could use to 'divide' the scan by, to get rid of most of the effect of the background (and deal with most of its non-uniformity). That may be less of a problem with BL images though -- they seem to have been illuminated more evenly.
153:
white space around the image. But on the other hand, it's undeniable that larger images make more impact, and you will get an appreciably image in a thumbnail on a
Knowledge article page if there is less surrounding white space. So a lot of people like to crop right on the boundary of the image -- and I would quite likely use one of their crops if I was selecting the image to use on the WP page. So I think this is a situation where there can be a case for having two images -- one cropped to leave in any caption, and then a second cropped variant that is more tightly cropped just to the actual picture.
459:
appearing white before that. And a lot of people are going to be using auto settings, which have a high chance of getting those slightly off colours. There's natural variations int the image, after all. And particularly with curves adjustments. It's not really something to worry too much about. In a worst case scenario, I'd just completely desaturate the image, then add a little yellow back in by manually adjusting the levels (there's a box where you can set the white point for blue at, say, 250, adding a bit of space on the right.
814:
policy generally, and I have a working knowledge of our NFCC policy as applied to the areas in which I edit. My own relationship with
Hammersoft started in an adversarial fashion, but has long since evolved into a constructive working relationship, and I have have used his knowledge of NFCC policy and enforcement procedures when I have encountered photos, team logos and other copyrighted images that I strongly suspected violated Knowledge's NFCC policy. As for the new user names suggested on Hammersoft's
1436:
882:
1288:
1429:
1222:. I have received a response from WMF on the matter, and they told me that this is a decision that has historically been left to the community. In order to get some clarification, I would like to run a widely-advertised RfC, but since I obviously have an opinion on the matter, I would prefer it if other editors could give me some feedback on the neutrality of my wording before I actually make the RfC. You can comment on the proposed statement
580:
834:
positive, open-handed, community-spirited sort of a way. I regret
Hammersoft seems to have taken offence. No offence was intended. I really wasn't intending to be critical, just offer what I thought was something that was relevant and positive. But I'm certainly not going to let it bother me any more -- there's a lot too much other stuff I want to be getting on with.
427:
was fixing the image to better resemble the original (hue/saturation, levels, curves, crop, maybe, perspective adjustments if the photograph was taken at an angle), and perhaps - at the most - combining a few copies with different lightings to remove excessive light reflections. The painting is a singular object; the engraving multiple.
675:
Are you sure that the EU negotiators have a red line on GMO? I thought the issue was that that the EU members only want GMO to be labeled as such (and the products could then be offered for sale - making it down to condumer choice to buy or not) but the US disagrees. I don't have a source for either
412:
I think the biggest obstacle is the quality of scans. A bad scan - one where the page isn't pushed flat onto the scanner, and where the resolution is too low, or the image saved at low-resolution - can screw you over. Chromatic fringing leads to the pink and blue spotting you mention - a GOOD scanner
211:
And now I seem to have written an awful lot, without really having given you very many very clear answers. Again I should caution that there may be people that are far more knowledgeable than me on
Commons, both as regards best methods/use of technology and best practice. But thank you for giving me
112:
I'm not at all sure I got it 100% correct though -- looking at the page of thumbnails, they don't look quite "right" to me. Perhaps they're all just a bit too dark, suggesting I overdid the contrast enhancement; or perhaps they're just a bit too even, too smooth, or too silvery grey. I can't quite
1153:
to stop edit-warring on this article. I think they probably deserve a tiny bit of slack about this because they seem to be a relatively new editor, and not yet aware of
Knowledge's rules on edit-warring, but I've given them links to the appropriate policies on their talk page, which should hopefully
440:
Huh. Though, mind, saying that, I don't obey that rule all the time, as there's a competing interest. With old photographs, there's a type of common damage - the albumen being scratched off the glass plate - that is particularly distracting, as in, it makes it difficult to focus on the image itself.
426:
Oh, one more thing: I think the amount of cleanup justifiable depends on the medium. When you're cleaning up an engraving, you're basically trying to create - of the hundreds, thousands, or even hundreds of thousands copies out there - an ideal example. With a painting, all I could really see fixing
407:
Those are applied in that order; most of those are linking to saved, pre-done adjuments. ("Levels: Puck of Pook's Hill" means "Go to levels, appy pre-made setting 'Puck of Pook's Hill'"). You'll probably note that a lot of the images don't actually fit the dimensions given. And I did need to adjust
334:
In all honesty, it's rather good work with a mediocre source. This is why I prefer to self-scan engravings as much as possible; they're much harder to get good sources for. Lithographs are far easier. Though, I'll be honest: I still struggle with getting colour right, pretty much every restoration.
158:
But in all of this, it's entirely up to you as to how much work you want to do, and how far you yourself feel you want to go -- with an eye to how you want to use the image, or how others may want to use the image if they find it for example through Google Search. For example, looking at some of my
135:
One thing I did do, having again used the divide trick to reduce the effect of non-white backgrounds (this time just by sampling a point in the background, and then turning into a layer), was then to multiply by a uniform layer of off-white colour -- looking at an old workfile I think I used #fbf7ea
1258:
forbids extensive quotation. I'm knocking at your door because I see you've done cleanup at that article. I would really prefer to ask somebody to help turn that into a proper paraphrase than to blank the section - I think it's quite unlikely that I could paraphrase it myself, since the material is
152:
As regards cropping, there are different points of view. Myself, I quite like to know what the original caption text was, and especially if there is any information there about the artist and the engraver. So I tend to leave any caption, plus a little white space below it, and a similar amount of
146:
In terms of filenames, I think it is okay to use the same filename from original upload to what you consider is your "best version" of the original image. One good thing about the
Wikimedia upload system is that it makes it very easy to see previous versions, and I think it is good to deliberately
205:
include some different variants of the same view, and that's also fine I think. If there's something identifiably different about the other view, eg a different caption, or a different 'state' of the engraving, or a different colour scheme, or perhaps if it is from a different source, then it may
1182:
I will do my talking on the t-distribution page from now on. Thanks for that direction. I will pursue this further when I have the time (I have real work to do at present, so it may take me a little while). However, for the record, I am not the one edit-warring; Jheald is. I continue to offer new
1079:
However I don't think you can properly say that "a distribution consists of distributions"; whereas it is quite a standard thing to talk about a parametrised distribution as a family of distributions -- for a specific value of the parameters you get a specific distribution; or if you consider the
813:
Jheald, I have no interest whatsoever in injecting myself into whatever disharmonious relationship you may have had with User:Hammersoft. That having been said, I have been a registered
Knowledge editor for over five years, with over 60,000 edits, I have acquired some sophistication in Knowledge
462:
As for rotation - honestly, I've never been able to notice a difference. But I wouldn't worry too much about making very slight adjustments if it looks alright already. Your bigger nemesis is saving as JPEG before the very last moment - repeatedly saving as JPEG will degrade the image rapidly. I
1063:
is not (yet) universal for written
English. I would find it entirely natural to say "the whole family are ill" -- stressing each and every last one of them is not well, or "the family are going on holiday together this year" -- identifying that this was something that all the individuals in the
920:
article, I am having trouble with people vandalizing it - reverting edits which were jointly written by a collection of Rabbis to accurately reflect a
Rabbinic Jewish position on the topic. I need some help arresting the reverts. Any suggestion you can offer is appreciated. Jaim Harlow 00:36, 1
100:
If you look at the image description page for one of the images in that series, you can see that I did some quite aggressive compensation for the background of the image, followed by further bleaching out of the background, straightening, and finally cropping to a standard size of border. I was
964:
If you would like to change the subject of the sentence so that the sentence is a little clearer or reads differently, that's certainly fine. My point is that the sentence has to be grammatically correct. The math content should be accurate, but it needs to be written properly, too. We can work
34:
When uploading scans of prints from old books I'm unsure as to how much I should manipulated the image in Photoshop. Should I make the background white and convert to a grayscale image? How tightly should I crop the image? Should I try to correct imperfections and brown stains? As an example, I
944:
In probability and statistics, Student's t-distribution (or simply the t-distribution) is a family of continuous probability distributions that arises when estimating the mean of a normally distributed population in situations where the sample size is small and population standard deviation is
458:
If I had to guess about the pink and blue - particularly if the image started off a little yellow or the like and got adjusted to white, it's not hard to get something slightly off - a white that's, say, 253, 249, 247, or the like. If you upped saturation on that enough, it'd look pink, while
338:
As for your advice, I'm honestly a little surprised you use layers. I've never seen much need to go beyond the Levels, curves, clonestamp, healing brush, hue-saturation, and select tools. But then, I'm often rather unhappy with my background borders, so I suppose I can't say that's sufficient.
833:
No problem. I just was trying to be helpful. From the conversations I've had, I think there are nuances that the pages Hammersoft linked to don't quite get right, that it's useful to be aware of; and I thought the Techdirt page was quite empowering as to how one can take on such a task in a
106:
I also did then usually use the 'curves' tool to further adjust the contrast, and I think I usually did convert the images to greyscale. (I can't remember if I usually did so on the basis of 'luminosity' or 'lightness' -- Gimp gives both options, and I'm not sure that I was necessarily
346:
what you do to the first image of a set, saving any settings you used, and you often have a big start on making a consistent set. Don't force everything to match those instructions - you'll screw yourself over that way - but it's a start, and helps. I did that with, for example, the
206:
well be worth having two different versions. Equally, if somebody else has done a lot of image enhancement on the other image, or simply if it doesn't fit into your preferred naming scheme, then it's probably uploading your own new version. But otherwise it's up to you I would say.
818:, that was intended to be funny. If you're going to inject yourself into the private conversation of two other editors perhaps you should be aware of their history and not so quick to comment on the good-natured humor in such private conversations. Thanks for your understanding.
1254:- from the third paragraph under "A geometrical construction from his schooldays" to the end is a quotation. Investigation confirms that this material is likely under copyright, which means that the IP is right that the quotation doesn't comply with copyright policies.
1040:
I do not know why you are insisting on making the sentence awkward and bizarre. It is not appropriate the way you are using it. I have offered to work with you, and instead you are just reverting the sentence. This is not helpful and does not improve the article.
1075:
of the relative clause, so really the collective noun issue doesn't arise. (In the same way that it doesn't arise when you wrote "consists of distributions that...") So even in U.S. English, the subject-verb agreement as originally written is actually
1102:@Jheald: You are still not offering any new solutions. I am offering a new solution, once again. If you don’t like my edits, you should be productive and useful--reverting back to the same problematic word over and over again is childish.
196:
is an example of a file where somebody has done just that, entirely reasonably I think, and also with the advantage that they don't have to edit Knowledge pages in 5 different languages to point to a new filename. On the other hand, both
81:
I don't know if I know all the answers. There are probably forums on Commons that would be good places to ask these questions also, and other users who may be able to give better more authoriatative advice. But here are some thoughts
46:
With the uploading of images to Flickr by the British Library, some of the images that I've uploaded in the past are now available at higher quality than I could obtain from Google/Gallica/Internet Archive. The above image is here:
1186:
Also, I am not a new editor; I have been editing for four years. I have not made tens of thousands of edits, like some people, simply because I have a full-time job. Please check your facts before making erroneous comments.
271:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
136:-- which makes the image a bit warmer, and seems to correct the overkill of the colour-correction itself. I think this probably is a good idea, though I don't know the best off-white colour to give black-and-white images.
198:
323:
The effective resolution of the originals isn't enough to show the microscopic lines that make up steel and copper engravings, giving them a photogravure-like appearance that doesn't really match engravings as we know
147:
leave an audit trail of the major changes you have made, so people can see what the original version of the image looked like, and what treatments you have applied to it (in case they may to try different choices).
1105:
I have changed the subject again, so that the subject and verb agree WITHOUT ANY QUESTION. If you don’t like this edit either, please find another way to make the subject and verb agree, no matter who reads it.
387:
Text often looks better if darkened more than the image. A good way to do this is to use curves to keep the values that relate to the paper exactly the same, while darkening the levels related to the printing a
479:
By the way, I've actually updated Durova's instructions a bit. Some of what she did came back to bite her at times, like cropping and then having someone object to the crop, after she spent hours restoring.
1158:
now, and sort it out there before making any more edits to the article. I've made a couple of my own suggestions there to start things off: this really is a very difficult thing to phrase! Thanks, --
1044:
I have made a different edit this time. This one is just as accurate as all of the other sentences I have written but makes "distributions" the subject. Hopefully that will be more to your liking.
517:
924:
162:
113:
put my finger on it (and I'd welcome anybody's input or thoughts), but to me there's some attractiveness of the original that I've lost, and I'm not quite sure why. So this may be an example of
31:
Hi, I see that you are involved with handling scans of old prints on Commons and thought you may be able to give me some guidance on how I should process images that I wish to use on en:Wiki.
234:. If you zoom-in you'll see that there is a brown/orange stain to the left of the tower - it would be trivial to remove (photoshop healing) but on this occasion I resisted the temptation.
441:
In that case, a restored image that removes the damage and thus puts the focus back onto the subject of the image can be very helpful to the encyclopedia. Paintings are generally notable
1380:
187:
So I guess my answer is, do as much as you feel you need to do to make the image seem as useful and usable as it can be; but it doesn't have to be perfect (and probably never can be).
1020:
More to the point, in the phrase "a family of distributions that arise", ask yourself what the word 'that' principally refers to. It is not the family, it is the distributions.
1207:
251:
1003:. Family is a collective noun. "The family is happy" (presenting the family as a unit) and "the family are happy" (presenting the family as individuals) are both correct.
182:
the first two are exactly as I found them -- one from the BL digital collection, the other off the internet -- as really is the third one, apart from my having cropped it.
1154:
sort them out on that point, and requested that they discuss this on the article's own talk page. I think the right thing to do would be for everyone to take this to the
1196:
988:
290:
43:
to Commons (replacing an earlier upload). Would it have been better to keep the yellow background? Was it a good idea to crop the image and remove the original caption?
1201:
1141:
1096:
700:
168:
1237:
342:
Oh, one bit of advice I'll add: You'll often need to deviate from it by the end of the series - especially if the paper in the book varies a lot - but note down
123:
1273:
230:
Wow - many thanks for your detailed reply. How much to "improve" an image is always going to be a tricky decision. Here is an old photograph that I uploaded:
899:
706:
141:
But "your milage may vary" as they say. I think it probably really depends on how you want the image to look on any eventual Knowledge page or gallery page.
625:
1345:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
1037:
People do not use family in the way you are describing; have you ever said, "my family are taking a vacation this summer" or "the whole family are sick"?
1213:
330:
They are completely desaturated. Most paper and ink has a slightly warm tone to it, whereas desaturated grey tends to appear somewhat on the cool side.
231:
754:
1322:
1232:
665:
541:
965:
together on this, if you like. I'm not a big fan of using "family" to begin with; I just corrected the sentence the quickest way possible, for now.
895:
548:
305:
566:
493:
1402:
1188:
1150:
1111:
1050:
998:
976:
791:
631:
1414:
235:
58:
843:
1247:
1167:
827:
685:
174:
1332:
1015:
1396:
1029:
815:
243:
221:
691:
OK, tyvm. I knew that growth hormone beef was a red line. I'll look at the text again to see if it was the phrasing that misled me. --
734:
645:
202:
1183:
solutions, whereas he keeps simply reverting to a problematic sentence. He is warring, whereas I am offering new ideas and choices.
212:
the chance to try to put my own thoughts in order, and I hope you can find at least some counsel of use in the above! All best,
1391:
1369:
92:
40:
803:
66:
1223:
903:
335:
It helps a lot to work from originals so you can compare, though this is, of course, impractical in a large number of cases.
808:
730:
727:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
641:
638:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
894:
Thank you for trying out / using quarry.wmflabs.org! Let me know if there are any improvements you would like made to it :)
488:
474:
453:
435:
421:
192:
Finally, you asked about over-writing existing versions of files. I think the answer, again, is to follow your instincts.
1374:
968:
I can come back to this talk page and we can come up with something you like better. But do you understand the issue now?
530:
1056:
617:
1294:
1269:
template to the section in hopes that somebody else will. But with a case like this one, I really hate to do that. :) --
867:
1342:
773:
26:
1278:
929:
Here's how subject-verb agreement works: in a sentence, the verb must correspond with the subject. For instance:
696:
681:
526:
513:
285:
193:
408:
the curves and levels for some images (extremely for some more faintly-printed ones in the middle of the book.)
1365:
1155:
327:
The white point is set to remove all paper texture, which can look a little unnatural with this kind of image.
1503:
984:
711:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
630:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
778:
1218:
Greetings, I am leaving you this notice because you participated in the discussion about non-free SVGs at
275:
1448:
872:
397:
Alt: Sat -50, Puck 2 levels, Sat -30, Puck 3 curves Puck Part 2, Puck Text, -35 sat, adjust white point.
1418:
To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
57:
and then make a separate derivative that is rotated, cropped and perhaps colour corrected? Many thanks
1346:
1328:
1259:
so far from my realm. Would you be able to help out with this? If not, I can of course apply the usual
1006:
Here we are presenting how the individual distributions arise, so the plural is entirely appropriate.
692:
677:
670:
601:, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
265:
252:
413:
will avoid that. I find that I need to replace scanners every few years, when that problem develops.
36:
1125:
1064:
family were going to be doing. I would find using the singular in either of those cases unnatural.
849:
91:, the material that I think I worked hardest to clear up (at least from a uniform source) was the
764:
Hi Jheald, It was really nice meeting you at Wikimania. Keep up the good work on Knowledge. :) —
613:
597:
with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
281:
1381:
Knowledge:Reference_desk/Mathematics#Problem_with_single_rotation_in_SO.284.29_using_quaternions
952:" is the subject--NOT "t-distribution." "Arises" is the verb. Therefore, the sentence must say:
512:
or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a
1443:
554:
311:
1287:
351:
set. In fact, I have those instructions still. They're applied after the cleanup is finished.
1299:
1128:
that arise..." -- because that plainly doesn't have subject-verb agreement. I have asked at
823:
506:
972:
799:
790:
regarding the discussion you had with staffers of the Foundation. The thread is located at
769:
605:
348:
571:
8:
1409:
1270:
1163:
1129:
1084:
88:
48:
1458:
1359:
1219:
1137:
1092:
1083:
So I'm afraid I'm going to revert you again. Perhaps we should ask for other views at
1025:
1011:
839:
787:
780:
609:
301:
217:
127:
1325:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
53:
When using the BL Flickr images how should I proceed? Should I upload them to Commons
1192:
980:
759:
750:
741:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
712:
661:
652:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
593:
562:
536:
483:
469:
448:
430:
416:
199:
Commons:Category:Bury's Coloured Views on the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, 1831
1263:
855:
819:
598:
239:
62:
17:
463:
tend to use PNG. Lossless, but smaller file size and better supported than TIFF.
1499:
1336:
1315:
1306:
917:
795:
765:
1405:
as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks!
1406:
1177:
1159:
863:
520:. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
1435:
1387:
1355:
1255:
1251:
1227:
724:
557:
for the issue of gwtoolset converting apostrophes and parenthesis to dashes.
1060:
881:
746:
742:
657:
653:
635:
558:
130:. But Photoshop perhaps works in that more advanced colour-space anyway?).
1243:
1133:
1088:
1021:
1007:
835:
297:
213:
911:
858:
article, your help in improving it would go a long way. Thanks so much,
1490:
720:
716:
163:
File:Heinrich Barth's route through Africa, 1850 to 1855 (Deutsch).jpeg
1428:
1466:
859:
1486:
1478:
1474:
1462:
1383:
1080:
parameters taking different values, you get a set of distributions.
1072:
37:
http://archive.org/stream/voyagedanslesoud00mage#page/211/mode/1up
925:
A lesson on subject-verb agreement (for the t-distribution page)
1482:
1470:
1202:
Hi, can you make a comment about my new project Encyclopine.org
579:
1057:
variation in English as spoken in different parts of the world
916:
Hi Jheald: Having just revamped the Judiasm section of entire
316:
Honestly, I'd say most of the issues with these come down to:
792:
Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content#If_it.27s_legal.2C_it.27s_ok.
1379:
Hi - I was wondering if you can help me with the problem at
1422:
1493:, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
587:
573:
169:
File:Routes of European explorers in Africa, to 1853.jpg
715:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
634:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1319:
was once called "the most feared woman in Washington"?
124:
Commons:Category:Ackermann's Repository - London views
35:
recently took this picture from the Internet archive:
553:
Just a heads up and to keep you in the loop, I filed
49:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12403504@N02/11085655303
1321:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1206:
hi, Hi, can you make a comment about my new project
586:An article that you have been involved in editing,
518:implementation of previously deprecated parameters
232:File:Edouard Baldus Tour Philippe le Bel c1862.jpg
1323:Template:Did you know nominations/Phyllis Richman
362:320 px border all sides but bottom. Bottom ~476.
1238:Can you help with an excessive quotation issue?
466:Oh, and save the JPEG at at 99 or 100 quality.
1403:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/JhealdBot
632:Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
1311:, which you recently nominated. The fact was
707:Disambiguation link notification for August 1
320:The originals have a lot of JPEG artefacting.
626:Disambiguation link notification for July 12
578:
1214:Feedback on RfC wording about non-free SVGs
854:Hi Jheald: Having just revamped the entire
175:File:View of Constantine, Algeria, 1899.jpg
1461:! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
1303:was updated with a fact from the article
1067:But even so, as written above it was the
549:gwtoolset handling of special characters
203:Commons:Category:Pyne's Royal Residences
502:As one of the previous contributors to
93:Commons:Le Keux, Memorials of Cambridge
14:
274:If you have any questions, please see
1498:Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{
1282:
353:
23:
1434:
1427:
1397:BAGBot: Your bot request JhealdBot
1156:Student's t-distribution talk page
445:; photographs for their subjects.
376:Colour Levels: Puck of Pook's Hill
24:
1518:
1250:about the extensive quotation at
1132:for some wider community input.
41:File:Palais d'Ahmadou Ă SĂ©gou.jpg
1286:
1124:-distribution is the continuous
880:
262:The media file you uploaded as:
516:started on the talk page as to
194:File:Harlaxton Manor Morris.jpg
1506:}} to your friends' talk pages
904:14:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
868:07:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
13:
1:
1504:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec14c
1415:23:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
1370:13:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
1274:11:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
1233:17:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
1197:22:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
1168:23:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
1142:23:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
1097:08:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
809:Hammersoft talk page comments
122:Some more recent work was on
1392:19:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
1375:Problem with single rotation
1030:22:49, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
1016:22:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
989:22:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
489:23:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
475:23:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
454:19:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
436:19:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
422:18:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
306:15:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
291:04:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
244:13:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
222:19:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
67:14:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
7:
844:15:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
828:14:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
804:14:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
774:20:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
392:Final adjustments as needed
255:missing description details
10:
1523:
786:I started a discussion at
755:09:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
567:05:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
527:MediaWiki message delivery
266:File:Hornby early logo.png
253:File:Hornby early logo.png
1341:, and it may be added to
1126:probability distributions
932:John walks to the store.
879:
701:16:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
686:16:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
666:09:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
542:18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
525:This message was sent by
128:HSL_and_HSV#Disadvantages
72:Hi! Many thanks for your
1055:This is possibly just a
938:John walk to the store.
385:Text: Curves: Puck text
27:Photoshopping old prints
1279:DYK for Phyllis Richman
955:a family...that arises
1439:
1432:
1347:Did you know talk page
961:a family...that arise
941:So, for our sentence:
888:The Technical Barnstar
583:
1438:
1431:
1313:... that food critic
1059:, similar to the way
693:John Maynard Friedman
678:John Maynard Friedman
582:
572:Merge discussion for
280:Message delivered by
159:most recent uploads,
743:opt-out instructions
654:opt-out instructions
117:-cleaning of images.
1401:Someone has marked
1343:the statistics page
1248:brought up concerns
921:October 2014 (UTC)
873:A barnstar for you!
498:be interested in...
349:Puck of Pook's Hill
1440:
1433:
733:• Join us at the
671:TTIP and GMO crops
644:• Join us at the
584:
1507:
1459:Seasons Greetings
1419:
1353:
1352:
1340:
992:
975:comment added by
909:
908:
738:
713:Nicholas Woodeson
649:
622:
608:comment added by
544:
405:
404:
282:Theo's Little Bot
89:Commons user page
1514:
1497:
1455:
1451:
1446:
1417:
1412:
1326:
1295:25 November 2014
1290:
1283:
1268:
1262:
1230:
1181:
1115:
1054:
1002:
991:
969:
884:
877:
876:
856:Jews in Carthage
850:Jews in Carthage
728:
639:
621:
602:
540:
524:
511:
505:
494:An RfC that you
487:
473:
452:
434:
420:
373:Saturation: -30
354:
18:User talk:Jheald
1522:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1457:is wishing you
1453:
1449:
1444:
1425:
1410:
1399:
1377:
1316:Phyllis Richman
1307:Phyllis Richman
1281:
1266:
1260:
1240:
1228:
1216:
1208:Encyclopine.org
1204:
1175:
1109:
1048:
996:
970:
927:
918:The Golden Rule
914:
912:The Golden Rule
875:
852:
811:
784:
762:
735:DPL WikiProject
709:
673:
646:DPL WikiProject
628:
603:
592:proposed for a
577:
551:
534:
533:) on behalf of
509:
503:
500:
481:
467:
446:
428:
414:
314:
293:
276:Help:Image page
257:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1520:
1494:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1398:
1395:
1376:
1373:
1351:
1350:
1291:
1280:
1277:
1271:Moonriddengirl
1239:
1236:
1215:
1212:
1203:
1200:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1116:One thing you
1100:
1099:
1081:
1077:
1065:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1004:
926:
923:
913:
910:
907:
906:
891:
890:
885:
874:
871:
851:
848:
847:
846:
810:
807:
794:. Good day, --
783:
779:Discussion at
777:
761:
758:
708:
705:
704:
703:
672:
669:
627:
624:
576:
570:
555:bugzilla:62909
550:
547:
546:
545:
499:
492:
411:
403:
402:
399:
396:
394:
393:
390:
383:
382:Curves: Puck 2
380:
377:
374:
367:
366:
363:
358:
332:
331:
328:
325:
321:
313:
312:Le Keux images
310:
309:
308:
269:
268:
260:Dear uploader:
258:
256:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
225:
224:
208:
207:
189:
188:
184:
183:
180:
179:
178:
172:
166:
155:
154:
149:
148:
143:
142:
138:
137:
132:
131:
119:
118:
109:
108:
103:
102:
97:
96:
87:Looking at my
84:
83:
78:
77:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1519:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1495:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1447:
1437:
1430:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1408:
1404:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1364:
1361:
1357:
1348:
1344:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1324:
1320:
1318:
1317:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1302:
1301:
1296:
1292:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1265:
1257:
1253:
1252:Josip Plemelj
1249:
1245:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1225:
1221:
1211:
1209:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1179:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1113:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1071:that was the
1070:
1069:distributions
1066:
1062:
1058:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1000:
995:
994:
993:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
966:
962:
959:
956:
953:
951:
946:
942:
939:
936:
933:
930:
922:
919:
905:
901:
897:
893:
892:
889:
886:
883:
878:
870:
869:
865:
861:
857:
845:
841:
837:
832:
831:
830:
829:
825:
821:
817:
806:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
782:
776:
775:
771:
767:
757:
756:
752:
748:
744:
739:
736:
732:
726:
725:Michael Birch
722:
718:
714:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
676:position . --
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
650:
647:
643:
637:
633:
623:
619:
615:
611:
610:Khairul Islam
607:
600:
596:
595:
589:
581:
575:
569:
568:
564:
560:
556:
543:
538:
532:
528:
523:
522:
521:
519:
515:
508:
497:
491:
490:
486:
485:
477:
476:
472:
471:
464:
460:
456:
455:
451:
450:
444:
438:
437:
433:
432:
424:
423:
419:
418:
409:
400:
398:
391:
389:
384:
381:
378:
375:
372:
371:
370:
364:
361:
360:
359:
356:
355:
352:
350:
345:
340:
336:
329:
326:
322:
319:
318:
317:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
292:
289:
287:
283:
278:. Thank you.
277:
273:
267:
264:
263:
261:
254:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
219:
215:
210:
209:
204:
200:
195:
191:
190:
186:
185:
181:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
160:
157:
156:
151:
150:
145:
144:
140:
139:
134:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
116:
111:
110:
105:
104:
99:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
80:
79:
75:
71:
70:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
50:
44:
42:
39:and uploaded
38:
32:
19:
1496:
1489:or even the
1442:
1441:
1400:
1378:
1362:
1354:
1337:daily totals
1314:
1312:
1305:
1304:
1300:Did you know
1298:
1241:
1217:
1205:
1185:
1174:
1151:User:Weyesr1
1121:
1120:say is "the
1117:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1068:
1043:
1039:
1036:
971:— Preceding
967:
963:
960:
957:
954:
949:
947:
943:
940:
937:
934:
931:
928:
915:
887:
853:
812:
785:
763:
740:
710:
674:
651:
636:Anti-dumping
629:
604:— Preceding
591:
585:
552:
537:Technical 13
507:Infobox film
501:
495:
484:Adam Cuerden
482:
478:
470:Adam Cuerden
468:
465:
461:
457:
449:Adam Cuerden
447:
443:as paintings
442:
439:
431:Adam Cuerden
429:
425:
417:Adam Cuerden
415:
410:
406:
395:
386:
368:
343:
341:
337:
333:
315:
279:
270:
259:
114:
73:
54:
52:
45:
33:
30:
1246:. :) An IP
1244:User:Jheald
1149:I've asked
820:Dirtlawyer1
590:, has been
369:Settings :
107:consistent.
1491:Saturnalia
1333:live views
1329:here's how
1226:. Thanks!
796:Hammersoft
766:Stevey7788
745:. Thanks,
721:Peter Hall
717:Jim Carter
656:. Thanks,
76:questions.
1467:Christmas
1407:AnomieBOT
1356:Cas Liber
1178:The Anome
1160:The Anome
945:unknown.
896:YuviPanda
816:talk page
760:Wikimania
729:Read the
640:Read the
365:3332x5140
74:very good
1487:Festivus
1479:Hanukkah
1475:Hogmanay
1463:Solstice
1454:Chequers
1423:Yo Ho Ho
1366:contribs
1229:0x0077BE
1076:correct.
1073:referent
985:contribs
973:unsigned
618:contribs
606:unsigned
1264:copyvio
1242:Hello,
1189:Weyesr1
1130:WT:MATH
1112:Weyesr1
1085:WT:MATH
1051:Weyesr1
999:Weyesr1
977:Weyesr1
747:DPL bot
658:DPL bot
559:Bawolff
379:Sat -30
344:exactly
296:Fixed.
286:opt-out
95:series.
82:anyway.
1483:Lenaia
1471:Diwali
1256:WP:NFC
1220:WT:NFC
1134:Jheald
1089:Jheald
1022:Jheald
1008:Jheald
950:family
836:Jheald
788:WT:NFC
781:WT:NFC
298:Jheald
236:Aa77zz
214:Jheald
59:Aa77zz
1500:subst
1450:Spiel
1118:can't
1061:WP:LQ
594:merge
171:, and
55:as is
16:<
1445:Ϣere
1388:talk
1360:talk
1224:here
1193:talk
1164:talk
1138:talk
1093:talk
1026:talk
1012:talk
981:talk
958:NOT
935:NOT
900:talk
864:talk
860:IZAK
840:talk
824:talk
800:talk
770:talk
751:talk
723:and
697:talk
682:talk
662:talk
614:talk
599:here
563:talk
535:{{U|
531:talk
388:bit.
324:them
302:talk
240:talk
218:talk
201:and
115:over
63:talk
1465:or
1384:PAR
1293:On
1087:.
731:FAQ
642:FAQ
588:LBC
574:LBC
514:RfC
496:may
1508:.
1485:,
1481:,
1477:,
1473:,
1469:,
1390:)
1368:)
1335:,
1331:,
1297:,
1267:}}
1261:{{
1210:?
1195:)
1166:)
1140:)
1095:)
1028:)
1014:)
987:)
983:•
902:)
866:)
842:)
826:)
802:)
772:)
753:)
719:,
699:)
684:)
664:)
620:)
616:•
565:)
539:}}
510:}}
504:{{
401:”
357:“
304:)
242:)
220:)
65:)
1502::
1411:⚡
1386:(
1363:·
1358:(
1349:.
1339:)
1327:(
1191:(
1180::
1176:@
1162:(
1136:(
1122:t
1114::
1110:@
1091:(
1053::
1049:@
1024:(
1010:(
1001::
997:@
979:(
948:"
898:(
862:(
838:(
822:(
798:(
768:(
749:(
737:.
695:(
680:(
660:(
648:.
612:(
561:(
529:(
300:(
288:)
284:(
238:(
216:(
177:,
165:,
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.jpeg){kind=link}
