User talk:Johnny Spasm

4744:

the level of research I've put into all of my articles, but if someone is going to shadow my work, and make major issues over what I consider minor issues, it takes the enjoyment out, and I'm not going to bother. Seriously, take Jerry Mumphrey as an example. He had a 4190 bytes article with only one real source before I got to it. It now has 35 sources, and is over 5 times the size. I need to be told that there are "issues" with this article because I referred to him as a "speedster"? I said that at the point in his career where he came up from the minors with a reputation as a speedster, and had only ever been used as a pinch runner. "Speedster" seemed accurate, but whatever. If someone can look at that article, and that's what one takes from my work, I don't see a reason to continue to put this work in.

4629:' page in 5 years! And is it really all that much of a stretch to say that an 0-6 pitcher on a last place team's most memorable start came when he pitched against his brother in his major league debut? And Dick Tidrow WAS only ever traded for pitchers. I listed all his trades and sourced them. Look at his trade history if you don't believe me. As far as using Centerfield Maz as a source, anytime I've ever used a blog as a source, wikipedia never allowed it. If it's a blog, unbenounced to me, fine, take that out. I really don't care. Beyond that, you're being absolutely silly. 1939:'s page a while ago. When she reached a stage where I thought her notability increased, I made it a second time. When I heard that she was in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue, I contacted people who confirmed for me that this did indeed make her notable. She is or she isn't. I just did what I thought I was being told. I'm not sure what the reason is for the deletion. Someone thought I plagiarized the content of the article when I resored it. In actuality, someone else plagiarized what I had written. Regardless, I'm at the "whatever" stage of the game.-- 2041: 788: 4165: 5498: 5556: 5029: 4859: 3587: 3535: 3279: 109: 1512: 1356: 1163: 1118: 1050: 370: 282: 5529: 4912: 3451: 3207: 2515: 2332: 1569: 1413: 1257: 598: 3796:, OK, but this is not the first time, right? When the edit filter pings up an alert about blogs, please don't just carry on regardless. You're just one of a million editors and blogs and other crap sources are being added at the rate of hundreds per week, which creates a mountainous backlog of work to clean up. So I appreciate you removing it, and invite you to become part of the solution in future by nuking blog sources wherever you see them. 4922: 3968: 692: 1729: 1665: 5085: 21: 1853: 874: 181: 5171: 4648:

other points are over some more minor things (like whether he's only been traded for pitchers), but they're valid. Either a source says something, or it doesn't. I don't think anyone here is accusing you of being an incompetent editor ("I know what I'm doing")—but you are not applying the rules consistently. (On top of all of this, it would be pretty useful if you added edit summaries for substantive changes.) --

4955: 3036: 2991: 2946: 2901: 2287: 830: 5573:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5046:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4876:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3604:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3552:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4799:. For instance, "John Doe is the best baseball player" expresses an opinion and cannot be asserted in Knowledge as if it were a fact. It can be included as a factual statement about the opinion: "John Doe's baseball skills have been praised by baseball insiders such as Al Kaline and Joe Torre." Opinions must still be 4735:

3) The Toronto Blue Jays lost 109 games in 1979. Tom Underwood went 9-16. He wasn't on the mound for Carl Yastremski's 3000 hit or anything like that. He pitched against his brother making his major league debut, the only time it has ever happened in major league history. I don't think calling it his

5350:

discusses, the point isn't whether it happened, the point is whether anyone considered it significant that it happened. I don't really understand why you appear to have trouble comprehending this, but I'm running out of ways to try to explain it, and you're not providing any indication that you read

5224:

I added a youtube video of the Chicken Dance in the movie He Said, She Said. I kinda think that should count as a source. I couldn't find anything to substantiate that the last performance by Legs & Co. was the chicken dance, other than an interview with one of the dancers in which she says that

4661:

On Danny Napoleon, source #1, the link to Napoleon's Hall of Fame article, states that he's an assemblyman. Also, what did I add that is not sourced to Bobby Floyd's article? Again, the bit about him pitching in the minors was in the article before I ever touched it. Talk to the person who added it,

5387:

It isn't more relevant, and the source provided also didn't satisfy IPCV, and as such, I've removed it; thank you for bringing it to my attention. If the appearance in HS, SS is really the first appearance of the dance in a movie and you can find a source that says that, then by all means add it in

5261:

I know a youtube video doesn't count as a source, and that is part of why I find wikipedia so silly. We're talking about a scene in a movie. I post that scene in the movie, and the reference & link is removed. "Nope. Doesn't count. It's a youtube video. You need a source saying they did it. You

4743:

5) I've been going through Larry Hockett's list of veteran stubs, and I've been enjoying it. I worked on Kevin Elster's article. I've corrected quite a few incorrect statements in articles over the years, but his was the first article that I found 3 separate incorrect statements in. I take pride in

4739:

4) I know the difference between an opinion and a fact. Every time I've referred to a player's best season, it's been when that opinion has crossed over into fact, and I've included facts to validate that it is not really an opinion (I hope the way I phrased that makes sense). Every time I called a

4728:

1) Before I edited it, there were 2 references on Dick Tidrow's article. There are now 54, including articles to every trade he's been involved in. He'd been traded for a total of 7 players. The fact that every one of them is a pitcher, while not "HOLY CRAP!! EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM WAS A PITCHER"

2474:

Hey, sorry for the delay in responding (I'm at the "been here so long that I don't really come and do stuff anymore" phase of my wikicareer). While it is interesting that that's his only image online, since he's still alive having a fair use image is a non-starter. As for Gromek, since they did not

917:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

4647:

was not sourced and contained information about presumably living persons. You also made several unsourced or partially sourced edits to Bobby Floyd. Whether something can be found easily on Baseball Reference is irrelevant; it's your job to add a reference for new information you add. WilliamJE's

4567:

I have no idea why you insist on starting an edit war with me. I cited the sentence about him being a coach with the Mets, which by the way, was a fact in this article BEFORE I began working on it. Everything I've added to this article I've sourced. The one other fact in this article that I didn't

5331:

OK, and I didn't find that secondary source. You removed my work from the article because a video of what I said happened happening isn't considered reality on Knowledge. I think it's stupid, but I don't make the rules. Nice people like you follow the rules, and you removed a fact from an article

4835:

I wrote my last comment before going to work. I had the whole work day to think about this, and I'm done. Seriously, I'm done. I've put hours of research into the articles I've worked on. For all that work to merit a section in my talk page called "A whole boatload of issues" says a lot about how

3047:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at 3002:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at 2957:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at 2912:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at 1904:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

1822:

3042:

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files)

2997:

2952:

2907:

244:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

3814:

Why do I feel like I'm being scolded? Regardless, I added the blog as a source because there really isn't much about Powell on the net, and thought anyone reading this article might be interested in further readings on the guy. I compared the information used in the blog to other more credible

5402:

It's the first appearance to my knowledge. I'm not certain it is the actual first. As to whether or not I've ever reviewed WP:IPCV or any of wikipedia's other rules, the answer is no. I write what I write, and if a video of an event happening isn't enough evidence to prove that it happened in

2527:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3219:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3381:. If you are adding stats to baseball articles then you should ideally use the sport specific version, rather than the main article. There was a bot run to do the changes on articles at the time, I'm just going through and changing articles created / edited since then. Many thanks. 1694:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

1893:. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. 723:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 2475:

have any comments on the FFD and they did not note it happening on the image in the article (which they're supposed to and we both would've seen it there) I just restored it, which is allowed as a contested prod and fine-tuned the rationale to be safe.

234:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the 2344:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

396:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

308:

1538:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1382:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1189:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1144:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1076:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4024:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

906:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 213:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 924:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

5294:

Not sure I understand your point. I didn't add a link saying they did the Chicken dance in He Said, She Said. I added a link to the actual scene. For some reason, in Knowledge logic, that isn't a credible source. OK, you removed it.

4061:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

1686:

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

4568:

add, the bit about pitching in the minors for a game HAPPENED. I looked on Baseball-Reference.com, as could you. Instead, you remove factual information. Just leave the article alone. I know what I'm doing. Look at my edits of

563:

I don't know why you're so obsessed with her, but honestly I don't care whether or not she has an article. You can re-create it if you want, if you want a second opinion on sourcing beforehand you'll have to ask another admin.

1769:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 1217:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

3815:

sources before I added it, and saw that it checked out. If linking a blog is a big deal under those circumstances (which are the only circumstances that I've ever done that) is a big deal, I promise not to do it again.

1080:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

400:

312:

1193:

1148:

1909:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 1542:

1386:

2247:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3044: 2999: 2954: 2909: 3980:, which you've attributed to Ann Castle. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 930: 246: 5225:& a blog. I know blogs are a no-no, so I didn't source it. I don't edit nearly as much as I used to because wikipedia's admins piss me off. Nothing personal if you are one. Anyway, do what you must. 3051:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the 3006:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the 2961:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the 2916:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the 4791:. Which reads- 'Knowledge articles about art and other creative topics (e.g., musicians, actors, books, etc.) have a tendency to become effusive. This is out of place in an encyclopedia.' 'And their is 719:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3478:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3231:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2539:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2356:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3544: 5373:

is more relevant, as it happened there first. It's the first appearance of the dance in a movie to my knowledge. I consider that relevant, you don't. You removed it. What do you want from me?

227: 3529: 3494: 3247: 2555: 2402:

Hey, I see that you made the the Italy baseball national team uniform with the template. I was wondering if you could make one with the same template for the current USA WBC jerseys.

2372: 1141: 4662:

and tell him to source it. All I did was not remove it because when I looked it up, it turned out to be true. Add a link to his Baseball-Reference article if you find it necessary.

147:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 3464: 2307:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

1299: 1073: 1535: 3962: 143:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

4836:

little anyone cares about the effort I've put in. I get enough "Are you on Knowledge again?" from my in the next room. Now on, I'm gonna be in the next room with her. Peace.

4758:

For a editor who has a large number of edits around here, your lack of knowledge of WP policies or your intentionally ignoring them is significant. You say you know them but

845: 1345: 1186: 3976: 3596: 1363: 1347: 1264: 1250: 545: 507: 1197: 1791:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

5332:

with a youtube video as a source because that isn't considered a source. You did an admirable job in Knowledge world, and I suck. I don't know what else to tell you.

4868: 3581: 1379: 821: 5023: 3395: 82: 4853: 3834: 1841: 1717: 963: 862: 3576: 2302: 1240: 5417:

Well, I'd link you to the policies concerning why your viewpoint is problematic, but you wouldn't read them anyway, so it seems I'm just wasting my time here.

3308: 2181: 1245: 920: 709: 700: 540: 502: 236: 2390: 136:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

5632: 3633: 2721: 2679: 2637: 2420: 2136: 169: 132:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 5627: 5317:

source is required. A link to the scene is not a secondary source. If anything, a link saying they did it would be more likely to satisfy the requirement.

4989: 4443: 4359: 4287: 4245: 3679: 3157: 3115: 3073: 2580: 2065: 1989: 1396: 1039: 488: 4091: 496: 5565: 5125: 4773: 4401: 4203: 4116: 3520: 3265: 2851: 2809: 2573: 686: 1948: 539:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

501:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

5454: 4531: 3876: 3043:

normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to

2998:

normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to

2953:

normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to

2908:

normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to

2767: 2281: 1956:

I removed the copyright violation notice because I knew the other pages were copies, not yours, but not I see its been moved again to your userspace.--

1836: 1828: 1125: 1109: 271: 120: 857: 2407: 2276: 1936: 1930: 1901: 1878: 1846: 1819: 1754: 1722: 1676: 1658: 1611: 1501: 1340: 1057: 1041: 969: 958: 899: 867: 289: 273: 206: 174: 3436: 985: 534: 3871: 3628: 1015: 837: 101: 50: 5070: 3360: 2221: 1102: 744: 4900: 3674: 3283: 2762: 2716: 2674: 2464: 2321: 2316: 2176: 553: 515: 359: 305: 266: 5018: 4480: 4396: 4354: 4282: 3983:

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

3746: 3194: 3152: 3110: 2632: 2131: 2029: 981: 164: 4438: 4240: 4153: 2888: 2846: 764: 520: 482: 4638: 3927:

who had sizable careers yet are stubs, so that at least knocks out the one-season guys and should allow for sources being way easier to find.

3913: 2804: 1981: 1552: 724: 326: 152: 447: 424: 5550: 5159: 4845: 4713: 4699: 4614: 4597: 3956: 3295: 1576: 1562: 393: 93: 76: 5154: 4671: 4656: 1965: 5483: 5460: 3992: 1401: 794: 787: 4006:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 2501: 1496: 443: 4051: 3441: 3199: 2507: 713: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 4691:

says 'Napoleon retired from baseball and has worked as a car assem-bler for General Motorsin Wilmington, Del., for the past 25 years.'

353: 4688:

You're very funny. You edited into Napoleon's article 'where he became a state assemblyman'. The Hall of Fame article you keep citing

3824: 3809: 3788: 3340: 2612: 2444: 2201: 2156: 2081: 2009: 1800: 1524: 1368: 1175: 1130: 1062: 995: 457: 382: 294: 2415: 1652: 477: 5218: 4753: 4547:. What is a player's best year or not what their career highlight is an opinion and unless referenced don't belong in the article. 4071: 1796: 1700: 586: 429: 5585: 5058: 4888: 3616: 3564: 67:

I was about to upload pictures on Wikinedia, which as far as I knew, was not Knowledge, when I saw this message. Please explain.--

5597: 2070:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2058: 1557: 801: 681: 4824: 4561: 4263: 1107: 2226: 1842: 1718: 1632: 1476: 1320: 934: 863: 661: 250: 170: 3894: 3390: 988:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 450:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3336: 2608: 2440: 2437:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2397: 2197: 2194:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2152: 2149:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2077: 2074:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2005: 2002:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 991: 453: 224:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:

5117: 1712: 708:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 3924: 3516: 3261: 2933: 2569: 2386: 2272: 4981: 4939: 4195: 4079: 2978: 2485: 732: 3696: 3068: 3023: 2743: 4796: 4485: 2259:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

823: 816: 720: 61: 5569:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5280:? Because a source that simply said "they did it" would be equally unacceptable for "in popular culture"-style items. 5042:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4872:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4689: 4047: 3600:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3548:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1152: 124:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5426: 5412: 5397: 5382: 5360: 5341: 5326: 5304: 5289: 5271: 5256: 5234: 4510: 3852: 2869: 1804: 1222: 728: 581: 575: 347: 333: 4461: 3133: 2054: 5612: 4419: 4377: 4134: 4111: 3365: 2893: 2697: 5545: 4761:

1- No source says Tidrow says he was always traded for a pitcher. Even if you have six references for six trades,

4326: 3655: 3326: 2785: 4304: 4221: 3718: 3512: 3257: 3175: 3056: 3011: 2966: 2921: 2655: 2565: 2382: 2268: 1890: 1636: 1480: 1324: 1025:

Thanks for the notification. ahhh, what is her role in that Pain & Gain movie? She's not on IMDB listing?--

776: 665: 5522: 4259: 3303: 3091: 2047: 2040: 1276:

Non notable minor league baseball player, awards in the low minors is not enough for him to have his own article

5191: 4644: 3417: 2938: 2827: 2298: 416: 5574: 5047: 4877: 4736:"most significant start" was a stretch. Especially since it turned out to be a very impressive pitchers duel. 3890: 3605: 3553: 2598: 1699:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

137: 4740:

player's best season his best season, I've also included the facts that he had career highs in X, Y & Z.

4055: 3028: 2983: 2425:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2186:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2141:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1994:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

968:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

27: 1034: 5510: 5091: 4063: 3487: 3240: 2548: 2365: 1862: 1738: 883: 812: 530: 492: 190: 1228: 5403:

wikipediaverse, then someone else can take it out. I bet Derek Chauvin wishes he was tried on wikipedia.

3937: 3499: 3252: 2560: 2469: 2377: 2264: 1624: 1580: 1558: 1468: 1424: 1402: 1312: 1268: 1246: 653: 609: 587: 3692: 2739: 5570: 5183: 4075: 4040: 4033: 3374: 3287: 3048: 3003: 2958: 2913: 1906: 1886: 1824: 1628: 1472: 1316: 1236: 926: 657: 4530:

2 Putting a reference on a sentence on a sentence that doesn't corroborate the sentence. Like this one

5075: 4945: 4905: 3848: 3773: 3378: 3313:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2865: 2585:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1799:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 1784: 1657: 1528: 1372: 1179: 1134: 1066: 386: 298: 44: 4457: 3129: 5187: 5162: 5108: 5038: 4806: 4415: 4373: 4188: 4130: 3291: 2894: 2693: 2071: 1869: 1745: 1708: 890: 197: 4540:

like putting in Tidrow's article that he was only traded for pitchers. That's not referenced too.

4322: 3651: 3322: 2781: 4800: 4453: 4300: 4217: 4158: 3714: 3171: 2651: 1885:, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a 1691: 1232: 808: 558: 144: 3087: 1905:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1823:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

5541: 5518: 4977: 4792: 4251: 3923:

If you're looking for certain baseball stubs to expand on, there's a collection of veterans at

3413: 3272: 2939: 2823: 1211: 1198: 2594: 1593:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1437:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1281:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

4096: 4014: 3475: 3409: 3228: 3029: 2984: 2536: 2353: 1926: 1832: 1098: 954: 160: 1766: 1680: 5488: 4788: 3882: 3486:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3386: 3330: 3239:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2602: 2547:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2411: 2364:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2312: 2294: 2255:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1762: 1696: 1648: 1548: 1492: 1392: 1336: 911: 853: 772: 749: 740: 731:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

218: 8: 5314: 5244: 5101: 4821: 4816:

As the other editor said, all my points are valid. You need to change your editing style.

4696: 4611: 4558: 4292:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

4182: 3684:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

3083: 3052: 3007: 2962: 2917: 2260: 1808: 1704: 1672: 1640: 1484: 1455: 1328: 669: 322: 262: 90: 58: 4732:

2) Danny Napoleon is dead. The way his article currently reads, one wouldn't know that.

4068:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3333:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2605:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 4654: 4101:

Once you expand the stuff at that page, just cross off that line with the strike tags.

3988: 3688: 2727: 2034: 526: 410: 907: 214: 5604: 5603:

I'm the guy who uploaded the newer version of the logo. I have no problem with this.

5537: 5514: 5479: 5422: 5404: 5393: 5374: 5356: 5333: 5322: 5296: 5285: 5263: 5252: 5226: 5214: 5195: 5150: 5014: 4973: 4932: 4837: 4745: 4705: 4663: 4630: 4589: 4476: 4434: 4392: 4350: 4278: 4236: 4172: 4149: 4087: 4007: 3948: 3909: 3867: 3816: 3793: 3780: 3742: 3670: 3458: 3432: 3356: 3347:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3215: 3190: 3148: 3106: 2884: 2842: 2800: 2758: 2712: 2670: 2628: 2619:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2523: 2460: 2451:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2340: 2322: 2236: 2227: 2217: 2208:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2172: 2163:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2127: 2118:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2025: 2016:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1973: 1940: 1607: 1451: 1295: 1011: 1002:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

636: 473: 464:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

68: 1594: 1438: 1282: 623: 5186:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 4506:

at least. There are persistent problems in your edits. Not in any particular order

3844: 3506: 3471: 3224: 3064: 3019: 2974: 2929: 2532: 2426: 2403: 2349: 2256: 2240: 781: 640: 156: 129: 1881:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 5593: 5066: 4896: 4769:

applies. You can not use multiple sources to draw a conclusion none of them say.

4762: 3840: 3624: 3572: 3382: 3367: 3299: 2861: 2857: 2491:

Right; wouldn't be able to have the image, would have to somehow get a free one.

2308: 1758: 1388: 1332: 1020: 736: 622:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1882: 1757:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

903: 902:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

210: 209:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

5464: 5347: 5310: 5277: 5240: 5201: 5131: 4817: 4784: 4692: 4607: 4569: 4554: 4544: 4491: 4449: 4126: 4102: 4054:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

3928: 3647: 3483: 3236: 3125: 3121: 2731: 2544: 2492: 2476: 2361: 2252: 2244: 2110: 2104: 1914: 1910: 1781:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 1519: 1503: 1420: 1406: 1082: 938: 705: 677: 565: 337: 133: 108: 87: 55: 3045:

Category:Knowledge non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing

3000:

Category:Knowledge non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing

2955:

Category:Knowledge non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing

2910:

Category:Knowledge non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing

1972:

OK, but it's been deleted for some other reason. Any idea by whom & why?--

5621: 5205: 5179: 4962: 4649: 4626: 4577: 4513: 4503: 4499: 4407: 4365: 4255: 4176: 4122: 3886: 3804: 3768: 3757: 3751: 3479: 3318: 3232: 2819: 2685: 2590: 2540: 2434: 2357: 2248: 2191: 2089: 1995: 1958: 1644: 1617:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1544: 1488: 1461:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1305:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1221:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for

1027: 849: 768: 761: 646:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

403: 4550:

5 Totally unreferenced material like the bit about Danny Napoleon's family.

3779:

I removed it as a source. I also readded the useful information you removed.

5475: 5471: 5418: 5389: 5352: 5318: 5281: 5248: 5210: 5175: 5146: 5142: 5043: 5010: 5006: 4999: 4873: 4777: 4766: 4573: 4537: 4472: 4468: 4430: 4426: 4388: 4384: 4369: 4346: 4342: 4318: 4311: 4274: 4270: 4232: 4228: 4145: 4141: 4083: 3905: 3901: 3863: 3859: 3738: 3734: 3666: 3662: 3639: 3601: 3549: 3428: 3424: 3405: 3352: 3348: 3314: 3186: 3182: 3144: 3140: 3102: 3098: 2880: 2876: 2838: 2834: 2796: 2792: 2773: 2754: 2750: 2708: 2704: 2666: 2662: 2647: 2624: 2620: 2456: 2452: 2430: 2213: 2209: 2187: 2168: 2164: 2142: 2123: 2119: 2021: 2017: 1007: 1003: 757: 750: 469: 465: 377: 361: 314: 254: 125: 4002:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

5135: 4585: 4495: 4296: 4213: 4209: 3918: 3710: 3163: 3060: 3015: 2970: 2925: 2735: 2643: 2146: 1861:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1737:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1170: 1154: 882:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

605: 591: 435: 189:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

4643:

It's an exaggeration to say you've sourced everything you've added. The

3490:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3243:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2551:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2368:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1225:, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. 49:

You are well on your way to an indefblock or even an outright ban. See

5589: 5513:, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! 5262:

can't show the scene where they actually do it." Backwards silly logic.

5239:

A YouTube video simply showing the dance being performed won't satisfy

5062: 4995: 4892: 4795:

which reads- ' Biased statements of opinion can be presented only with

4581: 4411: 3944: 3725: 3643: 3620: 3568: 3468:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3294:

and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

3079: 2777: 2095: 767:. If you want to comment, or suggest an alternate hook, be my guest. – 4164: 1896:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1814:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

4911: 4333: 3703: 3450: 3401: 3278: 3206: 2815: 2689: 2514: 2331: 1765:

infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

704:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 673: 41:

For the record, I'm here. I just don't usually sign in much anymore.

5084: 4921: 4523: 3798: 3762: 2586: 1999: 5497: 1142:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Spencer Steedley (2nd nomination)

1074:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jessica Dykstra (2nd nomination)

20: 5528: 5369:

more relevant? If anything, I would think that the appearance in

5090:

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the

4533:

for Bobby Floyd coaching for the New York Mets in 2001 and 2004.

4509:

1 Your use of self published blogs as references such as this one

2243:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1536:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Daniel Lehmann (2nd nomination)

977: 5130: