User talk:Kbthompson/Archive 1

4022:

referencing the council's website re lists of primary and secondary schools on the LBTH page - and then identifying all relevant schools on the locality page - plus their websites - plus their OFSTED reports. This is locally relevant information - which should be made as accessible as possible to Joe Public!!! It also reduces the current tendency for articles about locales to look a bit like history essays. (Very good history essays I have no doubt - but history essays for all that!) The locale articles need to produce a rounded perspective on the present. If you produce a list of schools on the LBTH page then it's not very helpful as it's difficult to see which ones are located where - pretty much in the same way as has been my experince while trying to get the **&&^%% map to focus correctly at the right level so I can sort out where they are all located. Why on earth should we expect users of wikipedia to go through that if we can make it simpler for them? You will note a recurring theme in pretty much everything I do - which is that I'm very, very focused on the reader and making it simpler for them to access reliable information.

4449:

article. However, if a theatre is a major venue, in which hundreds or thousands of notable actors have appeared, such as the Haymarket, then it only unbalances and clutters up the article to mention particular appearances by actors, except for the ones that are particularly notable, because there are lots of really notable things to say about that theatre, and we should be focusing on those and not just throwing in information because we happen to come accross it. I am sure that there is more to say about the Haymarket that is far more notable than that Hiller or Daniell played in yet another play there, unless that play is of enough importance that we can write more than a stub about it. If they played in an important play, then yes, definitely say so. But let's be a little selective in putting the most notable information in the article. Best regards, --

3460:; looks like there was a theatre stub, but it got merged (as one sentence) into the later cinema - enjoy the thrills, the spills, the cries of rage from cinemaophiles as two-thirds of the article turns to theatre ... No, as you say, its been a pleasure. A tremendous amount achieved in a short time and a lot of justice done to London's Victorian theatre history. There's more, somewhere like Mile End Road had over 300 theatres and music halls between Aldgate and Mile End - there's the area's Yiddish theatre (verging on original research ... tempted?). No this month I've clocked as many edits as in the previous three months, so you're right to give it a rest. It's good to hit these things in a rush, with all the references to hand, but ultimately better to get back to real life! Good luck with everything. 3866:

doing their bit around places in the East End - and think that anybody coming along and contributing is getting in the way / doesn't know what they're doing / thinks they know it all. Not very nice. Some of the comments made to me have been plain downright rude - despite the wiki injunctions about behaviour. But nobody owns Wiki. There are no personal territories and people do come and go - and write/contribute - within the constraints of time and expertise. I entirely agree that the way to move forward is to co-operate - but surely that that has to include welcoming new people and asking them what they have to offer and how they think articles can be improved. Especially if they've been working in areas which are a lot further along than London.

4428:

or have some other indicia of notability. It may be significant to an actor's career that he stepped into a role in a dull play for a few performances -- he might have been noticed by a casting director and soon hired for a really significant role. It should then be mentioned in the actor's bio article; but I don't think it means that that work ought to be listed in the *theatre's* article. I disagree that people want to see too much detail about less notable productions in an article about a theatre. I'm content to leave it in for now, but the Haymarket is an important theatre, and if we want to upgrade it to Good Article, we will need to do some editing. For one thing, I don't think the "list" approach will wash. Best regards, --

5483: 5478: 5697: 5687: 5488: 5537: 5709: 5879: 5692: 5386: 5789: 5714: 5731: 5600: 5571: 5466: 5884: 5874: 5554: 5857: 5726: 5595: 5852: 5806: 5896: 5767: 5663: 5653: 5454: 5449: 5425: 5366: 5930: 5641: 5612: 5559: 5515: 5510: 5500: 5847: 5527: 5403: 5818: 5583: 5743: 5658: 5835: 5381: 5935: 5624: 5549: 5908: 5801: 5755: 5532: 1444:'Music Halls' in the actual signage on the top of the establishment and in the programmes. Hence you had the 'Middlesex Music Hall' , the 'Oxford Music Hall' etc. Your reference above is not contemporary, but rather a modern confusion. All the 19th century programmes and descriptions call the Britannia theatre a theatre cos that's what it was...Also performing a music-hall act at a venue does not tranform that venue ipso-facto into a 'Music-Hall': in later times Cinemas interpersed the films with music-hall acts - this did not tranform said cinemas into 'Music Halls'. 5420: 5415: 5371: 5925: 5505: 5913: 5779: 5398: 5830: 5376: 5784: 1971:. Frankly, I think Knowledge's coverage of the entire subject is a little inconsistent and confused currently. If you can add any clarity, please do so by all means, but I think that many British Victorian authors referred to their low comedy works as burlesque. By the way, there is also some confusion with Victorian melodrama, pantomime and other forms, as well as "variety", "vaudeville", "music hall", etc., and indeed, I believe that in the Victorian era, many stage works mixed elements of the various comic forms. Whew!! I'll stop talking now. -- 3957:

agenda, and any mention of politics tends to drag them out of the woodwork - you know the kind of thing, if you've got Respect there, why don't you list UK independents, or the Scots Nats! Put political parties represented in the boro' on the boro' page, make it their local party site and don't duplicate them throughout the area articles. Put the main parties and any who have councillors - so Respect, but I think no Greens in TH. Put their full official title, in alphabetical order. Anticipate severe anon vandalism, from all the other parties ...

7219:

theatre - tidied up a bit of too obvious plagiarism and then found that the entire cat:English dramatists and playwrights was in a bit of a mess, so started going through them with the AWB tool - looking for obvious blunders, omissions (not yours of course) and things that can tidied up - like the defaultsort (the tool does most of that for you, so is worth using. The annoying thing is when someone made a mistake with the name in one entry, then it makes you do the whole list manually). Trouble is, I think I'm still only half way through.

7580:), their solution to the problem was to shoot a few and re-educate the rest - so, perhaps best not go there! I think of article development as moving it in the direction of 'some ideal notion of quality'; the reality of wiki is you push in one direction and five push in the opposite. If you don't develop a healthy sense of live and let live, it will quickly drive you mad. Sometimes you get a chance to do something which gives a few people satisfaction, other times you just have to watch it all fall apart. Move on. 1999:), you could do anything you wanted, so long as it had musical accompaniment of some kind. So, all the theatres had a piano, and a guy played the piano while the play was going on. Melodrama was a sort of play where there was musical underscoring all the time anyway, and I think most "Burlesques" had actual musical numbers, which were, at least in some cases, silly lyrics set to well-known melodies, like "Greensleeves" or something from Mozart. Maybe some of the "external links" will help you. Good luck! -- 3716: 4970: 3907:, don't fiddle! I wrote most of it, but it is the result of consultation and co-operation by many people. That is something I think could go through the process - notice that it tells a tale, but not detailed. The details are in the supporting articles - where they should be. Draw the reader in, let them make up their mind what is relevant and what is not. Everything doesn't have to be in the article - it's a wiki - the links are what are important. OK, be bold - I nominated it, let's see what happens. 1369:(including the proprietor of the Britannia) breaking the law and putting on such plays. The first proper Music Halls, such as the Middlesex etc belong to a later period: the 1850's. The unusual thing about the Britannia was that it served drinks in the auditorium as per a music hall, but, to re-iterate, it opened as a theatre before the world had ever heard the term 'music hall'. It was a lot later (in the 1880s) that music-hall and theatre got confused under the name of 'variety theatre'. 3929:- as I have already started to do on one or two articles. Then I shall be pulling in information about councillors and their websites and schools and their websites. Any problem with that? Do we need some sort of category page to discuss treatment of TH articles as a group - as opposed to each one individually. I looked for one of these when I started and simply couldn't find one. And it's a bit difficult to communicate with people across the piece when there isn't anywhere to do it. 3514:

Curtain plaque is in Hewitt St, a cul-de-sac leading off Curtain Road, by the way...And there is a Shakespeare memorial window in St Helen's, Bishopgate: the ONLY window not destroyed by the two adjacent IRA bomb blasts of the early 90's. Also there used to be an original Shoreditch borough arms metal plaque tacked on to the outside of the massage parlour in Gt Eastern St, but that has since been removed by some unknown person. I do have a photo of it in my Shoreditch scrapbook though...

31: 5437: 5869: 1464:

social trend by which theatre going in the twentieth century eventually became confined to the middle class. According to Weightman ('Bright Lights, Big City') in the 19th century up to about 1900 theatre going was a cheap popular entertainment for the working classes. Then came the cumulative decline in taste in which, in turn, music-halls, cinemas and bingo became the preffered option of a night out, as TV meantime transformed them all into a generation of couch-potatos...

5675: 5636: 1183:

my knowledge ... I can now bore for Britain on Tudor Hackney ... beginning to have trouble finding my way around the modern streets! And as for going to Stepney, now spend all my time looking over my shoulder for Burkers! Keep at it, some agreement is always possible when people stop shaking their dongs at each other. I think your latest friend remains anon because he's already pulled the trick and been pulled before, I think it's probably a he, could be a sock-puppet!

6016: 2413:

did you know that during Britain's 'finest hour' (1940) the War Minister Hore-Belisha was replaced, for no apparent reason, except that he was a Jew?). If you do enough digging into the historical records you can find some pretty unsavory stuff which often belies the English self-image of tolerence: I have a photo from 1938 showing a huge urban crowd doing a Fascist salute in the direction of some agitator. Belin? Vienna? No actually its Bermondsey...

4180: 2866: 6995: 2311:

up a lot of detail about performance in the article, and that can be somewhat difficult to read. Perhaps we should extend the introduction - make that an executive summary of important events in the life of the theatre; and retain the detail below it? I started out doing a historical section for an inner city suburb recently, and began doing it historically and ended up doing it by topic. 's funny how these things work out ...

3496:

Hoxton Hall, detoured into Bunhill fields, but Finn got there first. Shoreditch church, Bell, memorial and vicar snapped. Left Columbia Road for another day. Photos up, if you want to check. Had to climb over furniture to get the memorial, so it's a bit of an odd shot. It's upstairs - so you need permission, but the vicars a gem, said there was a memorial window in St James, Curtain Rd, but it took a blighty one for Winnie.

275:

read like an interesting story. You've done a good bit towards tidying that up.I think there's a bit of a jump (now) into the late period, but that probably reflects the relative importance of the buildings. From the Georgian period, Whitechapel/Mile End Road had over 100 (200?) music halls along it's length - most music rooms in pubs; some large purpose built. There should be some of this in the Charlie Booth archive.

2301:(historic). This will leave the modern theatre very stubby, but I can't get any responses as to whether this is a good idea, or not. Just massive disinterest, or the usual wiki crowd thing of waiting until you've actually done it, and then whingeing for the sake of whingeing. There's about fifty links to them both - most of which will have to be changed to the old theatre - so, I'm trying to come to terms with AWB. 704:

other historical anomalies into the system. Our old friend Norton Folgate, being a case in point, where some responsibilities were taken away from them for failing to organise anything properly - like being amongst the first to have gaslight, but not having proper paved streets, or sewerage ... It's a difficult job, so good luck to you! I'll try to help with formatting and editing once life returns to normal.

307:- sadly now a supermarket - it had a glass roofed music room at the back, and you could see the previous layout in the ceiling (always look at the ceiling ...) Most refurbs of pubs these days are complete strip out jobs, and all 'authenticity' is added later! Laterly, the saloon was an area with a carpet and comfy chairs, with a couple of pence on the price, but entertainment was much the same idea. 3561:

a penny). Not too sure about lists in local articles, I think text descriptions of notables with a breakout to individual articles, where significant. It's kinda wot got me started on theatres - now I'm writing on music halls, trying to help out on the gap in Victorian theatre history, and still managing to put my oar in where it's not wanted ... actually the Open House list would be a good start!

2710:

article is not my progeny. Like yourself, I have tweaked, and am aware that more tweaking is required. One is chasing down the refs, and putting more in-line from multiple sources. The e-theatre group (link on Fortune Playhouse talk page) specialise in the area; although I did some work on The Theatre, The Curtain and The Red Lion (playhouse); I can't claim to be an expert. (I would bet that

1834: 4060:, you'll find who starred in the original production. I'm trying to streamline Wiki articles by removing redundant facts that are included in the blue-linked articles. If there was no way to reference additional info (due to lack of a blue-linked source), then it would be appropriate to include the details. I hope that explanation clarifies my intent. Thanks for your input! 1982:

the patent theatres. This meant that nearly everything had to be accompanied by music, and more generally to include variety in order to distance itself form 'serious theatre'. I still imagine them tap-dancing through Banquo's ghost scene ... I've had this row with Colin4c, as one theatre (of that time) we were talking about clearly included variety in its 'serious' drama.

6392:(so could end up being hijacked to disappearing too far up it's own posterior antonym); secondly, the focus, how would it differ from an extension to an article on (say) Holmes? The Limehouse of Holmes is only a short cab ride from Baker Street, but we know that there was so much traffic that it would take hours and participants would all be knee deep in horse shit ... 7353:, Hornsey rates a mention, but no form of Harringay. Generally, the Victoria County History is regarded as the definitive account of the history of London, because the project is the most heavily peer reviewed historical publication. In respect of the manor of Harringay, I would think (but don't know!) that this is probably a sub-manor of Hornsey. Since the 1665:... and well done for making the start. I didn't want to interfere too much when you were still in full flow, but all articles benefit from collaborators and the editing process. It's interesting that we all start from such different perspectives and end up bumping into each other ... There is another user who has expressed an interest in London theatre at 4092:. It seems very odd. Given he seems to think he controls the musical theatre project when, in fact, I'm the only one who has contributed new articles to it on a daily basis for the past few months, I think I was quite civil in the way I addressed him. But that's beside the point. What interests me is why you would be so interested. Thank you. 4125: 7369:

your work in the same style as them, c). not quote websites verbatim, and d). write prose, rather than disconnected sections - it looks like notes at the moment. If you need to experiment, or work something out, then please use your Sandbox - with Wiki you're publishing immediately and that should be at least partially complete. Use the

1198:

abusive alter ego, who does the dirty work for a 'respectable' editor with a real name. The sort of Jeckyll and Hyde approach to editing. Anyway, I have left a version of my edit on 'The Whitechapel Murders' in the talk page of the Jack the Ripper article, so that some people at least will have a chance of making an informed judgement.

3263:. If you got on a bus, to take you to Bow, it would still drop you at the same place, i.e. Bow High Street, by Bow Church - which stubbornly remains by Bow Bridge. You're also attempting to apply an inappropriate schemata to a London area, which has had no formal boundaries since 1865 - except for a short lived informal existence as a 4384:

think you'd want to know of Judi Dench's first west end performance, but wouldn't want an account of a wet Wednesday afternoon in rep at the Portsmouth Empire. The same goes for a notable actor, in a lack lustre play that closes after the previews - although, that in itself might be notable. Perhaps the sections should be relabelled

3674:. With my pic, tho I didn't write the piece. I think the whole thing - as a system - deserves better treatment. And the little-known but very visible Limehouse Tower was the earliest generating component of it as far as I know. GLIAS (Greater London Industrial Archaeology Society) have much more, will put something together soon. 3973:

boro's are often named after a central district, and all sorts of crap gets put there that is actually about the boro'. Your good friend Colin has done a lot of good work, you may not like the way he does, but he is within wiki guidelines and finds useful material in books, so not easily appropriate to in-line refs to websites.

655:(about 1800). It all gets very complicated (Norton Folgate x 200!) ... Some of them will be the same as modern districts, some very different. At what 'time' would they be, there were major reorganisations of the parishes in at least 1835, and 1865, possibly more. In some cases, articles on ecclesiastic organisation exist like 3582:

easy enough too. Grade II* pics, fair enough, but articles not always quite so easy. Grade II - varies, exactly as you say, ten a penny sometimes, but while few of those housing terraces are worth an article of their own, even the early Georgian ones, I feel that Grade II in general is still where some of the gems are hidden.

4002:

political change then it's much more appropriate to do so in relation to a larger area (like Tower Hamlets) than individual locales. In relation to the wards, I think you'll find it surprising to see how many of the wards do in fact fit exactly (or pretty close) to the localities. See Bow for example. Bromely by Bow ditto.

3163:

the Lloyd site would be dodgy! Might look to see if I can find something that is non-CR. It's a grey area, the ephemera the images were produced from are normally out of copyright. It's why there was such a kerfuphal over the Watson, Keppel & Betty image (from the BBC), in the end it was adjudicated fair use. Sorry.

3900:

good faith - and be prepared to look up your own references where you feel they are necessary! Lansbury took a while of searching to find something worth referencing (and I found a couple of things I didn't know about Lansbury on the way), but Whistler and the other artists, seconds to find some of the works online.

292:

as-we-know-it with the saloon bar is essentially linked to the provision of entertainment in said saloon bar. Beforehand I guess your pub or tavern had a whole different ambience. This equation between saloon bar and music hall must account for the vast numbers of them you mention along Whitechapel/Mile End Road.

3441:, I would be happy to help out with proofreading, but I think I am finished with theatre research. Tim did a big expansion to the Haymarket Theatre. You may wish to fool around with the format, but that theatre has a lot of history, and even more could be written, particularly about the 19th century. The 970:. I'll try and explain things a little. Firstly, I am actually a member of the UK geo project - the guidelines you mention are guidelines only and not part of wikipedia's policy. They are also somewhat outdated amd I'll try to update that asap. Given I'm a member of the project (I predominantly work on the 7218:

Cheers SS. Whenever I go in for one of these AWB sessions, I always dread receiving a message - it usually indicates I messed up! So, it's pleasant to hear from you. I apologise for lighting up your watchlist. I wrote a brief article the other day, began looking at some of the people linked with that

7156:

My apologies for that. I've (a) updated my bot so that it doesn't make that miscorrection any more, and (b) added it to my list of national spelling variants so my bot will warn me if I accidentally try to add it to its corrections rules again and (c) am going to have a look over the last few days of

4733:

Well it's (City) complex, but not impossible. Attractions shortcut, fine while we think about it; the main template's been added, doesn't mean we can't change it later. There's actually lots of room. If we made it too big, I'm sure someone would come along and knock it back. Editing is about choosing

4481:

I note that you've changed the text of the Manor House article from indicating that it straddles the border of Haringey and Hackney to being solely in Hackney. The article states that the area is centred on the tube station - which (I believe has one exit in the LBH, but no part of the tube station).

4448:

Well, we might just have to agree to disagree, but let me try to explain more clearly what I am saying: If a theatre is a crappy little theatre, and the best boast that it can make is that a well-known actor of the early 1900s once passed through there, then yes, I agree that is very notable in that

4102:

Why not? Everything in wiki is open to everyone. Everybody has something to contribute, sometimes we disagree. You seemed to come on more than a little strong there. I noticed you made some edits recently to articles that I had an interest in, that might appear to a casual observer to be destructive.

3972:

to avoid needless duplication, one of the aims of wiki is to achieve coverage and brevity. Someone, somewhere has to store all these bytes. I think Finn tidied up Hackney, as well as creating stubs for all districts in E.London; he also takes masses of photos. It's not such a problem in TH, but other

3924:

I want to get on and develop the TH articles beyond the history sections. That will involve pushing the history sections down as the convention is for the geography and administration to come first - and I'm proposing that convention should be followed - mainly because people first need to know what

3920:

The unrefenced notice on the Spitalfields article has already been taken down by the objector so nothing I can do about that. Are any others causing problems so far as you are aware? I wonder whether unpleasant personal attacks on my character now seen in a number of places will also be taken down?

3857:

I apologise if recent actions came across as noisy - but the reality is that people have different windows to operate in - mine tend to come in chunks so I try to get quite a bit done when I can. Others do their bit day after day. I think the give and take which you refer to involves being tolerant

2922:

Very sorry about that. I had to go back over them all again and add a reference. I can't think why I didn't add the references when I made the entries. Maybe I'm having a bad day! Could you answer a question for me? Is the Court Theatre the same as the Royal Court in Sloane Square? If so, when did it

2412:

From what I've read there was a lot of indigenous resentment against the Jews in the East End (which fear Mosley played upon) - which even led to anti-Semitic riots during WW2. This sort of stuff however usually gets air-brushed from history and nobody can quite remember it afterwards...(For instance

2032:

to do was do better justice to some of the theatre articles! Now we have to rewrite the history of the British theatre ... I don't think the external links are that good on the subject. They have a tendency to fudge the issue. You're both right, it's not a coherent narrative, and in fact the articles

1646:

Thanks for your good work on the Gaiety Theatre and other articles. You are right in surmising that my understanding of London geography, then and now, is tenuous, so feel free to spruce these up. I have been trying to write about London theatres that were famous for hosting G&S works (Royalty,

578:

Wooooowh! Never, never use parishes in the sense of Finsbury - it's the Vestry that has the civil authority, ecclesiastical authority only is vested in the parish! It's the vestry what does the business, because it's what they call an elected body (in London since 1835) - as opposed to the appointees

7368:

Also, you've been editing Haringay and the boro' page - no argument with that, some of it is a definite improvement and I'm glad to see someone having a go at it. I would urge you to look at other writings on settlements in London to a). try to keep to much the same style, b}. endeavour to reference

7290:

Cheers for noticing the omission, it's an important article - and many more minor places have quite extensive history sections. I generally ravage BritHistory for important tidbits, rephrase - the copyright is by no means clear, as the digital version was published between 2002-present - they've now

6781:

As for the history of left theatre in the US, they're worse than Stalin when it comes to airbrushing communists and such like out of history. Brecht is fine, as long as it remains a financial transaction, as soon as it involves rational thought, or heaven forbid dissent then hold the horses ... (not

6525:

Probably; but needs a wiki-article first, seats 190 ... Some of these things come and go faster than we can change them, but then some turn into the next Almeida theatre. Not obvious from their website who's behind them, if it's publicly funded I think it could quickly go to the wall - remembering a

4427:

I don't think we need to cut it down too much. But I agree that the mere fact that a notable actor appeared in a ho-hum play does not make that play notable - it is only one factor. The play must either catch on with the public and have a good run, with the critics and be nominated for "Best Play"

4355:

OK, Thanks. Do you think that this list of productions is too long? Unless there is some reason why a production was particularly notable, I don't see why we are listing it. The fact that Hiller or Daniell appeared in it, I think, does not make it notable unless it either had a rather substantial

3928:

I'd appreciate any suggestion you may have as to how I go about doing this. I was minded to state what I was doing on the talk page (as I've already done in a number of pages by posting the standard for writing about settlements) and then start to pull existing material into the standard categories

3560:

Oh, I can live with that, adds to the local colour - just getting uppity about Hackney Central's claim 8^). Personally, I would like to see all Grade I listed buildings with - at least a picture - if not an article. Equal coverage on Grade II*, and significant groups of Grade II (individuals are ten

2763:

article...and, actually, I was wondering if I could ask for a bit of geography help from a native Londoner. I am trying to find the neighborhood where the people who stole Elizabeth Barrett Browning's dog lived; I know that they lived near Wimpole Street at the bottom of Tottenham Court Road, but am

2495:

Thanks for the message. The box is a nice way to navigate around from theatre to theatre, and there is a similar one for Broadway theatres. I'm not sure you need the "fringe" theatres in the box - maybe you could just show a "hide" button that expands to reveal the fringe theatres if one wishes to

1981:

Thanks for that clarification, it goes some way to explaining my confusion. The burlesque page is too caught up in the modern form, so doesn't really go into historic detail. The main problem in the UK was the patent theatre act, this denied 'spoken performance' (except in very limited forms) beyond

1632:

I think it was actually located on the Aldwych, and they built the new Indian High commission on it (I only ever looked at it because of the Lupinos!) ... I thought the article was a bit US-PoV (Burlesque has never been a UK speciality). Anyway, give the gentleman his head, and have a look when he's

1463:

Just to add that in the 19th to early 20th century there were many large bona fide theatres (as opposed to Music Halls) in the East End of London, which are now almost all defunct. The present concentration of theatres in the West End in just an historical accident of survival and an indication of a

1443:

As I said before, in the 1880's or so theatre and music-hall got confused under the designation 'variety theatre', this mostly involved 'theatres' putting on music-hall acts, never music-halls putting on plays. Music Halls were not licensed to stage plays. The true Music Halls were explicitly called

1382:

Mrs . Lane, who was so well beloved of the surrounding districts that she could go alone unmolested where policemen had to go in couples, served up such shockers as " Sweeney Todd, tile Barber Fiend of Fleet Street," "Maria Martin," or "The Murder in the Red Barn," &c. In 1851 James Anderson was

1124:

article. He seems to have adopted a policy of serially reverting all my edits and then personally abusing me in the Talk page. I think he (denoted merely by a number) has been unthinkingly reverting new edits there for years. For instance he has just blanked out an entire section on the 'Whitechapel

654:

It's a kinda good idea, Sam; but again one of those rods to beat yourself with. There are what, 32 London boroughs, 80-odd metropolitan, 200-odd vestries and odd things. I got caught out in Finsbury - most of it's constituents weren't even vestries; and there's the Holborn Board of Works to consider

274:

Hi Colin. I only contributed the section about surviving music halls; buildings being a particular interest of mine; and the article being particularly short in letting people know what was being talked about. The rest of the article was more than a little lengthy, and well to put it frankly, didn't

168:

Hi! Just been browsing through some pretty dreadful wikipedia articles on the East End. There's a particularly bad one on the Ratcliffe Highway Murders which somehow manages to omit the names of both the victims and the murderer and the fact that the latter was buried at the cross-roads with a stake

7027:

Thank you for the shared interest, and thanks for the additions and corrections - I think the Robeson snippet came from the theatre museum site, or the unity theatre site that's referenced. There's nothing to say they're right - particularly if you have the programmes for the performances. It would

6377:

article, but it is just an (inaccurate) list, and anyway 'fiction' is not synonymous with 'literature'. A better article would mention the activities and locales of the London literati and such people as Shakespeare, Pepys, Johnson, Keats and Betjeman whose contribution to London literature was not

4388:; and a text section added covering the periods that summarises important events in the theatre - like the ceiling coming down, or the management changing. Certainly, in more recent years, the theatre has been a receiving house, so productions change regularly, so it becomes a very long list indeed! 3872:

Re the history bit - it struck me that one option might be to create an 'overview history article' for Tower Hamlets. It could take the best bits of what exists in different areas and turn it into something that stands as an article in its own right. That way, if it met all the criteria, you have

3865:

I remember reading when I first joined editing that you should never ever participate in Knowledge if you don't want to see another member making bold changes to your area of expertise. I've been feeling like I've been in the midst of a group of people who had forgotten about that bit, who've been

3861:

My experience from elsewhere has been that if you show people what can be done and get the basic structure in place then ordinary people (ie not the 'usual suspects') can actually start contributing - sort of the reverse of what you were suggesting before. What is really really difficult for a lot

3794:

I don't see any particular need for speed so much as being clear about what sort of quality standard we're aiming for - and what it takes to get it. We can leave them at 'stub' or 'start' quality level - but I think that ought to be a conscious decision rather than an unconscious one. Personally -

3495:

A sunny and reasonably productive day, but the Theatre and Curtain heritage plaques seem to have disappeared - and I looked in Curtain Road and Holywell Place. Drove past Gainsborough, didn't seem to have a plaque any more. Hit Britannia plaque (finally, it's on a modern block of flats - suddenly),

3485:

I lived on the MER and walked to work on the WCR; at 8:30am, you used to have to step over the drunks ... The area now has 'patisseries' and 'gastropubs' ... hard to believe. Cycling I once did a triple twisting somersault, over a car, by Barclays bank. Spotted the landing on the bonnet, wrapped it

3408:

I stole wholesale (what pay retail!) from the theatre website, which is a good article - it's referenced. It's largely prÃ©cis, so there may be nuggets that I didn't discover. It needs your own estimable arts of identifying performance and probably a pass, or two, to clean up my desperate prose. We

3333:

just now. I'm not sure who owned the theatre after Rupert died. It may be that the Savoy group owned it. Bridget was a major shareholder, but not the sole owner of that group. By the 1960's, Bridget had given the opera company to a trust that she ran for a time (the company closed in 1982), but

3162:

Images on PeoplePlay are from the theatre museum, put on the internet at public expense to be shared for educational purposes. So, I don't have a problem with sticking them up. Arthur Lloyd site is actually a private collection, and they retain the copyright in respect of their images. Loading from

2970:

at Sloan Square was opened in 1871 and closed in 1887. A new theatre with that name was built on a different site in Sloan Square in 1888 and survives today. I'm pretty sure there were no other significant theatres with that name since then. The Theatre Museum in London has a major collection of

2310:

That is nice, and so much easier when there's no confusion. I am wondering about how to generally improve the structure of theatre articles. There's a historical progression for the building; there's a history of management; there's performance and then there's the actors. At the moment, there ends

1368:

I'm pretty certain that the Britannia opened as a theatre, with the intention of putting on plays hence the name: 'The Britannia Theatre'. Although to begin with (before the law was changed in 1843) plays were strictly illegal outside the two licenced ones in Convent Garden, that didn't stop people

1182:

There does seem a sense in which wiki editing is a hiding to nothing, what with all the vandalism and people who make changes without actually reading what they're changing ... if I had a penny for everybody who mistakes Hackney Central for LBH, I'd be a rich man ... Never mind, I do it to increase

1143:

Having made an edit at that page, in dim history, it's on my watchlist, so I do the occasional 'rvt vandalism'. I made some suggestions in that talk area, that I hope will allow it to move forward. I'm not sufficiently up on Ripparian matters to make significant contributions to the debate. I would

769:

Sorry Col, I wasn't thinking of divorce, just suggesting Sam bear in mind that the two authorities don't necessarily share the same territory; I would agree that there should not be a proliferation of unnecessary articles. I thought Sam was proposing extending the parish articles from their (usual)

666:

I had a quick look at some of the other metro boros today, and horrified myself at the copy editing that needs to be done to bring them all into some semblance of similarity. I don't think it's a priority for the Wiki London project, as they're still caught up in trying to handle modern day London!

291:

Your section is very good. I just had time to put in the bare minimum of info about the development of the music hall, mentioning e.g. how 'variety theatre' of the late 19th century subsumed the older music hall tradition. One interesting thing I've realised is how the development of the modern pub

242:

The Boundary was the world's (?) first council estate, built by a prepubescent LCC, complete with a bandstand in the middle to entertain the masses. All the areas are amorphous - they all were part of larger units - even Hackney was a part of 'Stepney' at one time! They sub-divided like amoeba with

6192:

I rem'd the Commonwealth Institute, it's being allowed to fall down. The idea of having LB in front of all the template names was to keep them together in the NavBoxesofEngland category - we could declare UDI and create a NavBoxesofLondon category - but thats going over the top, perhaps. Otherwise

3916:

I'm not in a competition and I have no personal need to win anything at all. I'm picky about procedure - generally working on the principle that if it exists it does so for a reason and that's generally good enough for me - unless it's causing problems. I guess we can agree that sometimes people

3842:

that tends to characterise a lot of the articles. I would like to see editing - i.e. an active choice about what makes an area special, rather than check listing. Most of these (modern) places are just dormitories, they have no industry, its pretty sad when the local landmark is a small stone ...

3824:

to! Mostly I've concentrated on writing well referenced history sections to locations that I thought deserved it, that tends to be more selective than blatting an entire area - although with three others, we recently did a number on London theatre - and earned two DYK and that barnthing - whatever

3760:

Thumb right from Open House. I think (see discussions elsewhere), I'm going to concentrate on Listed Buildings (referenced, uncontroversial), and hopefully add an LB section to each district (assuming that our beloved London districts don't end up as AfDs under some new and totally bizarre schema

3535:

Well done, kudos, though I will not dwell on the specific reason. And also, thanks for reinforcing my conviction that every district needs a Listed Buildings section - appropriately referenced, of course, which is part of the fun*. And these can, of course, migrate selectively upwards to borough**

2940:

is a good resource on theatre history, but a quick look doesn't show any listing for the Royal Court/Court Theatre. If you can't immediately see the way something works, it's probably best to leave it and come back to it later when you are sure. Searches tend to be of no help, as they bring up too

2014:

is another pretty bad wikipedia entry. There is a lot about the highly specialised usage of the term in opera and just a tiny bit about the more usual usage concerning the blood and thunder Victorian melodramas. And just to add that the term 'melodrama' was imported from Germany to England without

1740:

should be listed in reverse chronological order, I don't expect you (or me) to change it, but it's worth thinking about for the future - the logic is that most recent awards/performance are more highly relevant. I don't know about you, but I find that distinctly counter-intuitive. Again, well done

1569:

Thanks for your message Kb. As for me I'm keeping a low profile at the moment, though I did do a bit of 'original research' last week in darkest Hackney, East London at the site of the Sebright Music Hall: gone, but there is a pub opposite called 'The Sebright Arms', which has a notice advertising

1212:

All the more reason to show your maturity by allowing things to die down for a few days, then restart the discussion in the talk pages. Gather your reasons for why the material should be included and avoid being drawn into arguing with anon. Its a distraction and, I suspect, the game anon wants to

827:

article, which I have added stuff to (though didn't create). To my mind there is a conceptual distinction to be made between the fictional character 'Count Dracula' and the novel 'Dracula'. What do you think? By the way, all the other major characters in the novel have their own seperate articles:

703:

Sorry for delay in replying, and brevity - up to ears in sharp snappy things. Should be great, as long as it's not too confusing having an ecclesiastic body and a civil authority with the same name on the same page. At that time, there was much confusion, as they were still absorbing liberties and

481:

Hello again Kb. Just to say that there is a new series starting Tuesday on Channel 5 on Jack the Ripper which you might be interested in. I doubt that they will turn up any new evidence but its always fun to see 'the usual suspects' (the Masons, the Duke of Clarence, Sickert, Patricia Cornwall) do

7323:

Your comment on the Miidlesex page suggests that you deleted harringay because it was not a historic parish. You are right in that it was never a parish. But you are wrong because hundreds were never based on parishes. They predated them. See the Wiki page on "hundred" for easy reference on this.

7016:

a proper entry of its own - it deserves it (especially on a wiki projects - after all it was "Theatre by the people for the people". I've just made a few edits to it. I've got an amount of info on this subject. Besides Colin Chambers' invalueable book I've got various theatre programmes and other

4558:

Looking at a ward map of Hackney (Haringey's website appears to be down); I thought the boundary was Green Lanes, it's actually 7SR (I forgot Brownswood). The boundary is the bottom of the steep hill following Eade Road. The park and all but one exit of the tube lie in Haringey though ... I might

4383:

IMO, as a non-notable actor, I'd say the list is too long. PremiÃ¨res are notable, for important plays, directors and actors. A good/featured article will achieve coverage of the subject, but it would also be edited for brevity - providing the reader with where to get that complete information. I

4325:

Someone added about half a dozen mentions of Wendy Hiller to the Haymarket Theatre article. Please take a look and see if you think they are all notable appearances. I'll rely on your excellent judgment and will support your decision to either leave them in or cut one or more repetitions. Best

3899:

Perhaps you could start by taking down notices where you have met opposition, and think about meeting people half-way. Ultimately, it's not about winning, it's about improving articles - they improve through genuine consultation, not by wasting time on long procedural arguments. Above all, assume

3862:

of ordinary people with something to offer is that there is no 'template' set up where they can see where their bit of knowledge fits in. They then stick it in the wrong place - get treated as an intruder by people who have been around for a bit, have their stuff deleted and never ever come back.

3581:

Yeah, I know, stuck on work stuff for now. Agree with all the significant aims above, though. Agreed, every Grade I at least should have a pic (actually I have some for St Matthias N16, I guess I don't like the building much, sigh, I'll add one). And them being Grade Is, I suppose articles may be

1935:

Just been to the library today and forgot to pick up anything on music halls. Doh! Just to reiterate that I'm no great expert on the subject, just that in the Kingdom of the Blind Wikipedians the One-Eyed Man is often King, especially when it comes to general, synthetic or theoretical articles or

1724:

Thanks! I went back in to the Adelphi Theatre article and added a link backing up some of your info and couple headings and put the info in more chronological order. The article is looking much better, but it could use a few more references/links if you have any. Thanks, and best regards! --

1550:

Since the original premises sold food and drink in the auditorium, had tables, had standing room round the side and galleries above. I'd say it was a music hall of the saloon style! Now, after the introduction of the theatre act, it rebuilt itself pretty quickly - but still appears to have served

567:

sorry, I capitalised Vestry (cap), and used the word authority (non-cap) in the normal sense, of well authority, if it were related to the poor law responsibilities, I would probably have used the word 'board', but Vestry (eh) authority was more the lay responsibilities of the vestry - if you can

7319:

KB, if you check original sources, you will find that Harringay and Hornsey were used interchangeably. In referring to the manor, the normal appelation was Harringay or Harringhay. The Hornsey version came later, Can you not live with this being represented on the Hundreds page? It is verifiable

7222:

I'm off shortly to the West End, but will have lunch with an old friend, who has genuine talent, but scrapes a living as a professional musician (with no pension plan! - so I'm glad I didn't go that way). I probably won't get around to looking at those articles today (or indeed finishing the AWB

4459:

I'd say you're both right - but it's a question of balance. It may be that what the theatre ends up with will be too thin for David, and too rich for Ssilvers. I saw what that other fella did to the Victoria Palace - and it doesn't need to go like that (list of plays/musicals, with no details of

3956:

The political information can often cause people to be much more prickly than you've seen so far! (BTW: I wouldn't expect comments to be withdrawn, if you listen to people and respect their boundaries, you might eventually get an apology). With the political stuff people often have a particular

3895:

things over on the talk pages, and I mean discuss, listen too ... people would accept what benefits you bring, and also make improvements to the way in which you present your information. As always, I will help where I can, I will challenge where I feel it necessary and concede defeat gracefully

2987:

Hello. I just wanted to clarify that Gielgud was not the only theatre called "Globe", so I thought that pointing to the disambig page would give people some useful info. BTW, I plan to put up an article for the slightly earlier "Globe Theatre" that was, along with the Opera Comique, one of the

2053:

I did look to the site, and they list the awards as the 2007 Orange British Academy Film Awards. I also assumed because both the Golden Globes and Oscars, although dealing with films that opened in 2006, were listed under 2007, the BAFTA should also be listed under 2007 since that is when Helen

443:

The New Standard was a strange place, it was a music hall, but aimed to provide a 'higher class' of entertainment. It would provide normal music hall entertainments, until people like the Royal Ballet had finished their normal performances, and then came down to do an extra late 'gig' at the New

6416:

Well, I WAS thinking that the reality of London is actually to a certain extent constructed out of fantasy and myth. For instance the East End is a place where certain transgressive fantasies concerning opium dens, sailors and loose women etc (as seen in Dorian Grey and Jeckyll and Hyde and the

6127:

Well done. I was trying to avoid using the nav template, and just leave these boxes floating in template space, reasonably easy to get to, but safe from vandals. It adds the v/d/e marker, but I guess it can't be avoided. (I'm having a bad day with vandals ...). Maybe I'll go back and change the

4533:

to the Manor House Junction. It then proceeds along the west side of Green Lanes to a point just past the Hermitage Road junction where Green Lanes "submerges" totally into Haringey. This would mean that the situation is actully the reverse of what you state (3/4 lies in Hackney, and 1/4 within

4404:

Noted, but I still think important actors who trod their boards enhances the theatre. It is important for us to keep in mind that encyclopaedias contain articles that the general reader can comprehend in several respects. They're not written for specialists or affectionados. In the case of many

4021:

I don't know anything about an informal policy - if it's something people need to adhere to then it really does need to be a bit more obvious and also up for comment by people with alternative experiences (like me). I'm all for avoiding needless duplication but tell me what the problem is with

4001:

Rigid adherence to NPOV and objectivity goes a long way with the political sections. Straight facts, links to relevant websites and no superfluous commentary seems to me to be pretty unobjectionable. Start including comments and people start answering back. If people want to make comments on

1735:

I'll revisit it when I have more time. One of the problems with active theatres is that there are too many contemporary references on a search to tease out the more interesting stuff. Usually you can dig by looking at peripheral terms, like the architects and managers. I did read somewhere that

1513:

All these were in existence before the rise of the Music Hall proper (in the 1850's) and all of them (illegally at first!) staged plays. The classic book about such East-End Theatres is 'East End Entertainment' by A.E. Wilson, which lists a whole lot more theatres in the East End which I cannot

744:

there is already an article devoted to the civil and ecclesiastical parish of said district as run by aforesaid Vestry + the local vicar respectively. Therefore I think it would be inadvisable to divorce the civil parish authority (the Vestry) from the civil parish itself and give it a seperate

6145:

Hi there; you just inserted a comment into an anon-user's page telling him that he was blocked. You are, I believe, not an admin; if I am wrong here tell me, and I will go and hide. Only an admin can impose a block, and to tell an editor that he is blocked when he is not is regarded as serious

4372:

would view it, because TV and film have made many who started out on the stage famous. I also think it gives the theatre a certain amount of distinction having had such people tread their boards. Lets face it, there must be thousands (hundreds of thousands?) of actors and actresses who are not

3962:

For schools, I really think just a title on locale pages, with a link to the boro' article. It is needless duplication, and in London schools are run by the boroughs and allocated by an arcane system that no-one has ever got to grips with - some aspects are still dictated by ILEA, and that was

3811:

There has been a continuing drive to improve the quality of articles in London, much of it has been appalling in the past. Most areas were stubs, and if you look at west London, or the 'burbs, you will find that situation hardly improved. We've also been trying to adapt a schemata, to give the

3513:

Nice photo. I blagged my way into see the memorial at St Leonards courtesy of the vicar about a year ago. Other times however the staff get a bit shirty, unless you are a bone fide down-and-out trying to get into the hostel there... Did you notice the stocks and whipping post in the porch? The

2709:

Sorry, I only split the article; previously the modern and historic playhouses were confounded on the one page. I was trying to create a nav-box for London theatres, and most were in an appalling state, and I tried to correct some glaring anomalies as I went along. This was one of them, so the

2387:

Mosley really didn't have a lot to do with the East End. He and his supporters were parachuted into an area where they thought the right social conditions existed to commence the disorder that his particular revolution required. A bit like the BNP marching through Deptford and Lewisham, in the

2376:

Just to inform you that Stephen Dorril's damning new bio of Oswold Mosley: 'Blackshirt' has just been published in paperback (Â£9.99 from Penguin). Of interest to the study of East-End Fascism of the 'Knees up Eva Braun' variety: as well as the Cable Street fracas, apparantly Mosley stood as a

1197:

My new section on the Whitechapel Murders has now been reverted and re-reverted about 4 times in 4 days accompanied by a chorus of vitriolic personal abuse against me in the Talk Page. I am seriously wondering whether it is worth fighting with these bullies. I also wonder whether 'Anon' is the

716:

in some of the historical entries I've done against districts in Hackney to link into the parishes. I'll think about that one, I don't think it's a good idea to bury too much history at that level, rather keep the parish/vestry entries for organisational, population and contemporary politics.

688:

District Board from 1855. The District Board pages would refer to each constituent Vestry. The sort of information to be included: population and area (I have got that), description of the area (say from the Charles Booth or Henry Mayhew), its representatives on the Metropolitan Board, and its

6763:

I added some info. Feel free to trim out anything you think is unnecessary. I think the article could be even clearer that the Unity theatre was presenting works that were quite different from the mainstream works of the day, that only the Unity theatre did this, and how the movement spread

1178:

Not a problem, sorry it carries on. I'm not sure how you bring these things to a moderator's attention, or even if that's worthwhile. I've found the ripper page interesting, and also your changes. As I say, collaboration invariably improves things, dogmatism isn't particularly useful. I don't

3053:, at the bottom, it doesn't help an online reader to find the original text. By citing inline, using the ref tag you can immediately direct the reader to the correct source (esp. if online); since the same system is used for notes, and the correct citation style would probably be "Fred Blogs 1023:, as well as outlining that the settlement had a different administrative history as it does today (a feature common on other encyclopedias). Also some contents of the current administration section you re-instated, relate to a current frame of geo-administration, rather than a historic one. 6858:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually

6160:

and I had just repaired another page he/she had also been vandalising (following the contributions tag). I had no where else to go with the warnings, and was escalating beyond my meagre powers. Having seen MerC's page, I now think I understand the proper process to follow. Apologies, again.

3828:

The key to wiki is dragging people in, to share the work, and inform your own product. You've been a bit noisy, and certainly some regular contributors have moved on - they might be busy in WP:reallife, but equally, they could be tired of being hectored and seeing their precious bytes being

1165:

Thanks for your support Kb. As you suggest these things are not good for ones blood pressure. However I think the problem with 'Anon' is that his bullying tactics are a tried and tested way he has been using for ages to scare off other editors from the Ripper page. He is most definately not

4087:

I'm curious, why would you choose to get involved in a discussion I'm having with another editor? Since I would never consider responding to a note left on someone else's discussion page that had nothing to do with me, I don't understand what possessed you to reply to a message I left for

3212:

on the Bromly page? It includes references to Bow as well as Bromly by Bow and is therefore relevant (notwithstanding there's a whole debate which probably needs to continue about how one comments on an area which used to be larger than the two modern day wards)? I didn't understand the

3946:

I would put specific ward information on a separate page, as it's been done at Stokie, which I ref'd before. That decouples the political map from the real map, and for reasons I've stated before, the political map is regularly redrawn. Categorise them, I think the form is something like

7049:

often gets ignored, mainly because it gathers together a few talented people for a while, who then drift off to earn money. Before Edward Bond, Steven Berkoff and the like were premiÃ¨ring at the National they premiÃ¨red all their work at the Half Moon Theatre in Stepney - now a major

2328:, stressing the historical importance of this area to things theatrical, and listed current and defunct theatres on the road. It is a very small section so far - but it's a start...Some of the rest of the article looks dubious and clumsily phrased...and probably needs attention also... 1588:

The track below is now going to be used to carry the Crossrail spoil out of central London, a conveyor belt, rattling away 24 hours a day for three years, past the backs of those now expensive, Spitalfields/Brick Lane houses. I guess once it's been used for that, you'll see extensive

229:

No need to burden yourself on my account Kb.....but....Just a bit bothered about 'The Jago' (aka 'The Boundary Estate'). I guess, if it is not indeed an entity in itself, it must be in Bethnal Green, certainly over the Shoreditch boundary. 'Bethnal Green' seems such an amorphous area

7162:

However, I feel a comment is in order here: you might like to consider being less sarcastic in matters like this in future. I don't see how it can achieve anything other than to get people's backs up, and make them less inclined to listen to your (entirely legitimate in this case)

2398:

Most recent East End fascism has been of the envy variety, where the white community felt that everything was being done for BME, and nothing for them. There's now the rise in the BME community of resentment towards new immigrants from Eastern Europe. Basically, you can never win.

3925:

and where is being discussed. I wonder whether if places have a very substantial history section then maybe that history should enjoy a page and article all to itself and be linked to the main article which covers all the rest of the standard contents of an article about a place?

2086:

I know, not least because the awards ceremonies are held in the succeeding year. I think the main principle should be consistency between the various wiki pages. I think everyone's been doing it in good faith, but I really can't bear to see it yo-yo'ing back and forth. Page 25 of

3006:

Globe goes up, it can just point to that! If you want to mention it for the moment, use one of those ref things to put in a footnote. The whole of London theatre, old and new needed a good shake up. By starting to make the changes, it's drawing more people in - so, that's a good

2941:

much about the modern productions (they pay people to do that for them); the significance of the modern theatre obscures its origins. The Royal epithet is normally associated with patent theatres, but after about 1880, it occurs when one of the royals adopts a favourite theatre.

444:

Standard. I think it's fair to use it here, as many of the stars listed performed there, and I found an image of the Canterbury to put in the article further up! It also hosted touring performances of straight theatre ... Point taken, if I found something better, I'd replace it.

1684:

Anyway, welcome to London, now if you exit the (demolished) theatre through the main door, and head down the Strand for about 500m, you will find the Savoy on your right ... there you can still (sometimes) hear G&S (although it's next production is Porgy & Bess) ... --

3890:

People are naturally prickly, particularly me ... Some changes you've made I do regard as 'damage'; but one of the strengths of wikis is that they do repair themselves over time - long after you, I and everyone else around here have passed on to other interests. I think if you

4053:

Hello! Blue links exist so that the reader can click on them to get additional info about a subject if he/she desires. To describe what each of the past productions at this or any venue was is to provide unnecessary data that clutters the article. If you click on the link for

3474:

Hard to believe that I have walked up and down Whitechapel High Street several hundred times without realizing where I was...But then again ask the average London resident about any directions and they won't have a clue: 'Dunno guv I'm from Tajikistan' being the usual reply.

6745:

I'd like to give him a chance to reply first - hopefully agree, it's not a hanging. Editing is a balancing process, but I do think he errs on the side of brevity and some of his edits have been disruptive. He is so prolific that his changes affect a wide swathe of articles.

1891:

Thanks for the reference Kb. I'm intrigued that there was a music hall in Leman Street (which still hosts dancing girls at a certain venue...Inspector Abberline's (of Ripper fame) police station is there also (very handy for the opium dens of Limehouse - but I digress...)).

4482:

Of the area surrounding the crossroads, I believe 3/4 lies in Haringey, and 1/4 within LBH. I note the tube station has also mysteriously moved to Hackney - despite Hackney being able to proudly boast that it is the one borough north of the river not to have a tube station.

3791:. Now this place is similar to one of the areas within Tower Hamlets so this maybe conveys to you a bit better why I'm banging on about needing to bring articles up to standard. Or to put it another way, somebody had a go at dinning it into me and I'm now evangelising! 7262:

takes a look and makes comments. While I've been through GA on East End, I'm not sure I feel totally competent to review. I don't see a reason why they shouldn't pass - at the moment. I'd like to submit some more articles to the process before doing a review on my own.

3825:

that is. While we were doing that, Drury Lane got FA, but I only tinkered with that, so again a collaboration. The theatre drive worked very well, collaborators came forward and worked on their interests within a subject. Many theatres have been rescued from stubbiness.

1036:

I'm glad you chose to think about the ammendments - though be mindful not to hold the page to randsom, so to speak; it is considered good practice, as well as good manners to allow others to contribute to, and revamp sections and articles. I would urge a few additional

3991:

I'll have a think about your suggestions - but it would make London completely out of step with the rest of the country and the Knowledge guideline. Personally I look at it from the point of view of what would Joe Public want to see there if they were to look up their

3445:

article would be one place to look, since it has a lot of info and footnotes. It has been a pleasure working with you on these articles, and I think we and the others have collectively made a tremendous amount of progress in a relatively short time. Best regards, --

640:

There are already some pages in existence in wikipedia on the civil parishes of London: run by the Vestry authorities. There is certainly one for Shoreditch. Bearing in mind that technically it (and other authorities) weren't in London at all: but rather in Middlesex.

1621:

leaves a lot to be desired. You'd never guess from this page that the Strand was the centre of Victorian nightlife in all meanings of that term: from theatre to 'ladies of the night' (vide the dubious Walter's infamous 'Secret Life' available from any Soho bookshop).

6417:

novels of Sax Rohmer for instance) are realized. Or when the London smog descended as of yore one could imagine all kinds of mysterious things (Idea for a film: 'THE SMOG'). I'm sort of thinking aloud here...Let's just test a link and see if it turns red or black:

1703:

article. Would you mind taking a look? Thanks for all the great work! As to theatres in general, that's not my focus, so I think I'm pretty much done with what I can do on these articles. I'm more interested in the musicals that played there. Best regards, --

1750:

I just tinkered with it a little, in a copyedit. It's beginning to look more like a respectable article, than a stub! Be good to get a few more images (say interior), but looking through my normal sources, I've not seen anything that can be legitimately nicked.

605:

cheers col, doesn't matter unless I look at it again ... just something to bear in mind when editing, not everyone has same screen resolution/settings. God knows what a 'screen talker' would make of it; don't think wiki has ever heard of disability guidelines.

230:

though....however I'm not a born and bred East-Ender, so what do I know...I was also looking unsuccesfully for a reference to the 'London Burkers' (Bishop and Head) who conducted their body-snatching activities in this area (see 'The Italian Boy' by Sarah Wise)

7243:

Thanks for reviewing. My sense is that they're GA. Of course, I would value any specific improvements you can suggest. I think, if I understand the process, that you can promote them to GA now, since you did not edit them. Oh, BTW, got some new info in

3819:

of the guideline is applicable to these places. Some of it certainly is, others less so. It's a guideline, not a policy. I would regard improvement as a continuing aspiration. I remember when I started editing on wiki, Whitechapel was a standard to which

3843:

I'd like to see each article being written in clear unambiguous English that gets the reader interested and makes them want to find out more by clicking those wiki and external links. That's what I want, your mileage may differ, but I can live with that.

6318:

I've been adding Cat:Neighbourhoods; unfortunately I did not realise you were also working on those pages, so some LB Hounslows have been added twice ... the districts also need a bit of a cleanup (so I'm not wasting my time) 8^). The title is known as

6456:

No I have every agreement, merely urge you to identify where you're going with it. There are multiple directions - some could even be undertaken at the same time. I think it's a useful article because it's under-represented, hell, it's even important!

2350:

OK, had a quick shufty. Not sure to limit this to Victorian era. The patent theatres were just off it, and also a lot of historic theatres. Fiddled with the page, rather than making any substantive changes before I've slept on it. Somewhere, there's a

3786:

It's always easier to aim if you know what you're aiming at. I don't know whether you've ever looked at any other articles about places from elsewhere in the UK but this is the one that was quoted to me when I first started as being a "good article"

2695:

Nice article! I've been tweaking the refs and was wondering if you could specify which volume was used from Bentley? I strongly suspect it's vol. 6 (Theaters), but I'd like confirmation. Page numbers would rock my socks, but I won't be pushing it ;-)

2508:

Yes, that's quite a nice template KB. I prefer the blocky templates to those which trail endlessly down half the right side of the page - often ruining and ripping holes in the original carefully composed format of said page...(that's the aesthete in

4405:

actors and actresses who were in films, people have forgotten that they were firstly (and some would argue foremost) stage performers. Absolute brevity (built, opened, had a few musicals, closed) in the articles on theatres makes them fairly boring.

3416:

I have to get invoices out, identify at least two competing software products that meet some specialist requirements (public authority procurement), and write a legal document about a cello (don't ask) ... so, don't expect to hear too much til late.

1326:, which is how SatyrBot found them and tagged them (with my oversight). But while I'm working in SatyrBot mode, I don't make changes to the categories, just to assess the class of the article. If something catches my attention, I'll bring it up at 1570:

music-hall acts every Friday....which it seems is an old notice giving out-of-date information...As a student of industrial archaeology and urban dereliction I also found fascinating the railway journey from Liverpool St to Cambridge Heath Road...

3951:. That page can then link to individual councillors profiles (external websites). The locales can then reference which wards cover them, without trying to bend the locales to fit the political map. Which seems to change more often than my socks. 2484:

Cheers, I checked most of them, and am currently going through checking the contents. Naturally, West End first ... I'll get to it, and correct. As I go through, I'm finding a lot of errors that require correction, so it's quite time consuming.

1647:

Gaiety, Opera Comique, Savoy, Sadlers Wells), but it is difficult without having your background, so I appreciate all the help. I've pretty much done what I can, so if you can improve them further, by all means do. I am a big G&S fan (see

6332:

I just try to be thorough when doing the templates and so that means looking at a multimap er... map as well as the Whatlinkshere and include all the places in thr borough that i can. Why would you say some articles get mid and others get low?

6193:

really good work, another list its difficult to cut. Have you rolled it out? I use AWB it makes it a tad easier. It's also a good time to do a quick review of each page and ensure they roughly follow a format, and there are no glaring errors.

6941:

Hi, good to have more information about the author and that, of course confirms the copyright status. However, the image still needs a source - i.e. where the digital image came from - a scan from a book, a website etc. Sorry to be a pain.

7279:

Thanks for having a go at the history section- those histories are public domain due to their age, I don't suggest we should copy the whole thing though as they're vast! Also we need to find other sources for 1800-present day, Regards

4011:

As for referencing see Tyrenius's comment on Spitalfields. Plus why doesn't friend Colin just reference the books like everybody else does? It doesn't have to be a website. I really am genuinely mystified about what all the fuss is

3591:

But on the whole it's a project to get one's teeth around, a noble aim (while EH may have partly achieved it, their database really sucks). As you say, indeed, Islington is supposed to be my ongoing thing too - but I have been rudely

2219:- which I think it would, as it's reasonably substantial. So, left all refs to former theatre intact for moment. I shall endeavour to look into the history of both theatres, but now have to go and do some work (not too much, I hope). 2189:

and it is not clear which of the many articles that link to the latter really played at the former. I am afraid that I have confused the issue for several months. Can you do anything to comb out this mess? Thanks for any help! --

842:; they had lots about opera and ballet and completely ignored the first 150 years of its existence (ie theatre!). I'll be putting in the clown stuff next, which will probably excite the same degree of 'boffo' that you're encountering. 4416:

I don't think I'm arguing for complete brevity. As you say, that can be telegraphic. It's a part of the editing process to decide on notability. Let it stew for a while and see how you feel about it, coming to it fresh - as it were.

1333:

In this case, I think I agree with you that those two are mis-categorized. If you feel so inclined, delete the category and the tag. If you don't, I'm going to check with the WikiProject, but I suspect we'll agree to do the same.

4460:

prominent cast). There are aspects of that list that make me go - I didn't know that. That's worthwhile, but equally editing is about cutting back to what's important - and as with any performance, leave the audience wanting more!

7291:

begun putting copyright notices on their maps (which is a bugger, 'cos they're generally good!). I think the more recent history can actually be dealt with through the 'objects' that remain - as you say, there's a lot of of them.

3734:

tower, at Limehouse Basin. It was used to power the locks, it might pre-date the other - it's still there, but used as a sales office for the project - I think. You can go up the top if you say you're buying a riverside appt.

1536:

circuit (owners of the Palace chain); but this conflicts with the current information about its fate between 1900 and 1913 (dark). It all needs much more investigation. I will give you that many of the playbills I've seen say

6400:. It kinda got poo-poo'd and lost down the cracks. So, what would a literary London article do? Would it be an examination of the contemporary reality, or revisit the fiction? There is a big gap between those aspirations. 6212:

There's no defined format (so far), just general consistency, try to sort out redlinks, rem advertising, that sort of thing. Maybe K & C won't be so bad. The 'burbs all need serious TLC. Anyway, time for my cocoa ...

3287:

Yes, I agree that all London articles could do with improvement, I don't think it particularly useful to conflate location with postcode, or to blur the boundaries of these informal districts more than they are already.

845:

Always dangerous to ask me what I think ... I'll take a little mosey along. Off hand, I think you're right in that there is now a distinct 'legend of Dracula' in fiction which is quite independent of the original novel.

3628:- there's a tunnel under the Thames, near Tower Bridge (to carry the Hydraulic power) that everyone forgets about, too. I was there (LHAT) only a couple of weeks ago ... took a pic. I think we could loosen the rules to 6706:

if you care to. IMO, we don't need everyone to say "play nice", we need someone to really look at the problem and see the extent and seriousness of it. It is a systematic destruction of information on Knowledge. --

6202:

What format would that be? I suppose when you say rolled it out, you mean placed it on the appropriate pages. No i haven't yet. Shame about the Commonwealth. I've been there a while ago and thought it was interesting.

6378:

necessarily in the form of pulp fiction...Or maybe the emphasis should be on how London itself has been constructed through literature: Dickensian London, Holmsian London, Sax Rohmer's East End, 'Metroland', etc etc.

1827: 1584:

track bed underneath. Used to run into Bishopsgate goods yard, and you could walk into there from holes in the fence around Brick Lane. The other way, you could get to Poplar goods yard on the Isle of Dogs. All gone

568:

think of a better term, then please do ... The problem is that in this field, authority is also a term relating to 'legal bodies'. My only excuse, my brain was overheated from converting between acres and km^2 ....

3610:

Oh - the Open House Day list is very selective. But it could be argued that if a structure is on Open House it must be notable, so maybe it is worth nominating buildings for their own articles simply on that basis

6976:

If you scanned it, just put that! Yes, I know I'm being a pedant - but I've come to think an image without a source is like a fact without a reference - no way of checking it out. Thanks for being understanding.

4508:

I know the border goes through there, and the junctions are quite complex (in fact, it's probably more true to say that Manor House is covered by tarmac!), but I think between us, we can work out what's going on

662:

I think what would probably be better would be to write a brief piece on the constituent parts of each metro boro, under the metro boro - and then if it warrants it, they can be split out into separate articles

7448:

ROFL-bomp ... I seriously doubt it, then it again, it's no worse than the historic county debate ... I'm interested in history, but even I don't go for them. Which silly uniform turned up at the council's AGM.

1213:

play. There's a link to a collection of user space templates on my user page that can be used in extremis, but as I say let it lie. People play political games on wiki, and that somehow makes me depressed ...

7563:. I thought this way forward offerred real compromise and a chance for improvement. I see now that some editors have no desire to do any work to the articles, but at the same time are not prepared to let go. 6395:

Somewhere, can't remember, I made the suggestion (ah, it was about British history), that we should write something brief on what contemporary life was like for ordinary people, rather than restricting it to

3693:

Forgot to say, pulling together those two threads, that the Limehouse Tower was one of the places I in fact went on the last open day, so I have a couple of interior pix (not great but illustrative) too. See

6778:

leapt from, Joan Littlewood is my personal heroine, in that she first got me involved in the theatre by inviting a young lad to climb amongst the lights (literally, I was 40 before I stood in front of them).

6063:

City is divided into wards, which equates to districts. There are templates for wards and gates of the city - not sure how useful, or whether they could be more usefully combined. It doesn't hurt to mull it

595:

Hi Kb. I'm sorry if the picture is obscuring the stats on your computer monitor. You can move it again if you like: I didn't realize that wikipedia pages look different when viewed on different machines....

3486:

round the engine block and cracked it. Unfortunately, screwed up the dismount and ended up with my glasses in my eye. An ambulance reversed 200 m from the London, with its siren on to scrap up my bits ...

1936:

stuff the Yanks know nothing about (i.e. English culture and the English sensibility). People here are great on detail but often fall down badly when trying to make sense of things in a wider perspective.

7421:

I think I'm going to move history - since its essentially administrative and try to find something historical to say about Ilford - although with only 60 dwellings there in 1650, that might be difficult.

3352:

shows it changed hands with the hotel. No date - not even in the source code - that must be the sale prior to 2004, no same story in Irish Examiner 13/10/2005. The hotel was sold again in 2007, to Prince

993:(in combination), standalone years, months and days of the week generally should not be linked (unless the article is about time/dates itself or the date is spelt out in full (DD/MM/YY)). Should you want 6307:

Oddly now, i decided to add a few and stopped at Hanoworth. I however did not add the neighbourhoods cat. The template is appearing twice on the pages and finally the title of this discussion is a typo.

5491: 5487: 5482: 5477: 4031:

Hope you get a good night's sleep after the journey (I remember it well - Quarry House by any chance?) I've got a meeting tomorrow and probably won't be around much over the weekend. Thanks for talking

2111: 3829:

threatened, if not recycled. Collaboration always improves articles, and that's achieved largely by softpedal. Following your interests is good too and there's a time to fact and a time to live with it.

7550:

It is difficult to see why someone would want a collection of one-line stubs. If I could understand it, it might be possible to talk them out of it - but it's not just the stubbornness of one person.

6050:

I was just giving examples. There are so many world famous attractions and landmarks to name. Btw, City of London doesn't seem to count as a borough and i'm not sure it includes any other districts.

6403:

Modes of communication are all a bit flakey here, I seem to have exceeded my ISP's arbitrary bit limit, and they seem to be turning the screw on what can be achieved. So, if I drop out, it's them!

409: 6809:

No arguments with its historical importance, merely does it deserve an entire category separate from Westminster? I think this verges on an obsession, when will you be demanding independence? 8^)

3601:

And hey, I'm like an industrial architecture dude - dunno bout music halls, great as they were, but I haven't written my vital piece about the Limehouse Hydraulic Accumulator Tower yet - with pix.

3010:

Adding an image is no problem, it's finding one that some over enthusiastic guardian of copyright won't take down again 8^). Thanks for the star - its kinda cute, but I'm sure totally undeserved.

213:

I think the fact that there's someone else actively working on the material is a big help. Everybody need editing, and everyone needs reining back sometimes from my more extravagent excursions ...

6040:

I thought they'd closed the LT museum, maybe that was the theatre one. Tate Britain? National Portrait Gallery ...? Yeah, where is the cut? I'll do a provisional. No Covent Garden, too touristy!

1317: 401:, and googled for other references (can you tell that I'm a librarian? ex-Leeds University, actually), intending to put up a stub from online sources. Then I found myself doing major surgery on 6818:

Hi, its not obsessive at all and I don't see why smaller parts of London can't have their own categories. Note the Marylebone category is not even in the London borough category anyway. Regards

3349:... Bridget died in 1985, but left Â£1M to restart the opera company, but by 2003 it was again in dire financial straits - no talk of the theatre. I think it was on a lease from the hotel - ah! 6764:

throughout Britain (anywhere else)? I know there was something like it in the U.S.) The movement was a key artistic and political outlet for working people during WW II.... Best regards, --

344:

A physical structure that no longer exists in an architectural form; was put together by 'rule of thumb builders' ... Certainly no architects were harmed in the construction of this object ...

1148:

has been previously banned for pulling such tricks. I would suggest patience, you get too caught up in these things, and ultimately, it's not worth it. People do feel a very personal sense of

899:

A conversation I had last week: Me: 'I heard you had strippers on here?' Club landlord: 'Sir you are mistaken! However we do have a burlesque evening' Me 'ohhhh...so that's just.....etc etc.'

264:

article so that it at least approximates the known basic facts of the matter and removed stuff which was irrelevent/stupid/false. That is one seriously bad article and needs a lot of work.....

3761:

thought up by three woodsmen and a dog in the wilds of Cheshire). Yeah, I know I'm chicken-shit and I should be edit-arguing, but it takes up so much time - and I'm into content provision...

6146:

vandalism; whether he deserves to be blocked is, as far as this is concerned, irrelevant. Reported vandalism is, of course, correct. But please do not attempt to abrogate sysop functions.--

6444:

As for 'ordinary people', maybe an examination of the lyrics of certain music-hall songs by Marie-Lloyd etc could tell us a lot about working class life in the Big City. Just a thought...

6080:. Never heard it referred to as that before ... seems to derive from the New York equivalent. For Southwark and Lambeth, I think I included bridges. Less notable in this context, perhaps. 1918:

is nicely stubbi ... The location and ownership may indicate a link to Yiddish theatre, but maybe not. That's an even more untold tale, than that of music halls (it verges on the dreaded

6067:

One of the main points of this exercise is to look at the appalling state of the outer boroughs. There's too much to say about Westminster, not enough landmarks shared out for the rest!

2597: 2015:

anybody having any clear understanding of its true etymology, therefore to use the etymology retroactively to explain the characteristics of this genre of plays is to make an error....

3152:

Would you kindly put images of the Royalty theatre and St. James theatre up from one of the images in the Lloyd external links? Thanks for helping the incompetent! Best regards, --

3068:

and use normal font for notes, footnotes and breakouts. That makes your refs section automatically, and the biblio for further reading. It may be wrong, but it's the way I do it! HTH

3798:

Hope you don't me putting this on your talk page. It just suddenly struck me that there was a way of showing you why I've been going on and on and on about standards and quality.

1166:

interested in compromise as in his lights his tactics always work, leaving him the incumbent dog-in-the-manger. Would be nice if people could be nice to one another in this world...

3963:

abolished 20 years ago. There is an aspiration to have an article on every school, and if you really wanted to go to town, that would be a useful area where nobody would bite back.

1853: 1085:

Just to say that if you are ever on a pub crawl south of the river, in search of Chapliana and music-hall memories that (mostly) I have produced this handy cut-out-and-keep guide:

6799:

Hi, Marylebone is not a borough but is very much a specific area of London famous in history which many famous people, places and organizations have been associated with. Regards

5991: 5717: 5708: 913:

film club in Soho, by day it was a strip club. Every now and then, a customer would come to an evening performance, and depart when they found it wasn't up to their expectations.

408:

Anyway, I've never visited Wilton's (must do it soon), so I'm sure you're in a better position to start an article. Do you know the Theatre Trust database? The Wilton's entry is

4267:

Yes. I think these are good. We should have one for every borough. I think Newham and Richmond are the only other two. I started them ages ago and forogt about them (as you do).

3239:- but then you're confused about your coverage, in any case. The original text was careful to make the distinction between Bow and surrounding districts. You've decided that the 5968: 5963: 4373:

notable for any reason. The alternative suggestion could be a list of productions at a theatre over the years adding "with Lawrence Olivier as Henry V" (or whatever) after it.

7200:

Someday I'll get the hang of this Default sorting thing. Thanks for taking care of it on so many of the articles I catted. What's new in KB world? In mine, someone put the

6735:

Thanks. I agree about the RfC. Can you start the process? I can add my examples/experience to it, and so would SandyGeorgia. The more editors review this, the better. --

6253:

They seem a little more confident than they were in January; can see their way to March 2008, and hope to have a trust in place to pay for the building by then. We'll see. --

4616:

I've just started a template on the City of Westminster. However, i know nothing on the constituencies and i feel the list attractions may be rather large. Can you finish it?

4308:

I just took the style from the Camden area, where they'd already started on this. If there's any kind of decision made on the WPLondon pages, I'd be glad to change it. Cheers

4368:

has a section on notable plays and revivals. I am inclined to think if a famous actor has appeared in a production that makes it notable in itself. At least, that is how the

2988:

Rickety Twins, unless someone beats me to it. That Globe presented a number of important productions in its relatively short career. Also BTW, check out the new article on

2742:

OK, take care. I passed on your query to the user. (Apart from anything else, he probably wants to know about the DYK entry, so thanks for making me go back and look it up).

6344:

If a place appears on the list of principal places in London, then it should be mid, or higher. If a London Boro, it should be high. Principal places in boro's are mid-: -->

5713: 5700: 5696: 5691: 5686: 5247: 2160: 1004:), the 4.6 miles should be spelt out in words rather than numbers, with the metric conversion being scripted with numbers (I can't think of the policy but it is out there!) 7396:

and replied there. This account seems to have been set up for a single purpose and I notice almost every edit by that account has been reverted by a wide range of editors.

3437:

OK, I am about all theatred out. Unless a theatre has a connection to Gilbert or Sullivan, I think I shall leave it to others. If you have a project to make an article a

1358: 6899:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3366:

Funny enough: The theatre's own website supplied the missing info, except for the purchase by the prince in 2007. Would you kindly add a cite for that? Best regards! --

6862:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

3398:

This needs expansion desperately. Unfortunately, it's 2:30 in the morning, and I have to get up in 4-1/2 hours. Plus, I have to work tomorrow so I don't get fired! --

6426: 3848:

I also devote about 10mins in the hour to vandal patrol. No-one thanks you for it, they come and vandalise your page, but again, it's part of the give and take of wiki.

6529:

I have no 'ownership' of templates, merely that they help people get around things they might not otherwise find - that turns out to be a bit of a curate's egg. Cheers

3012:

I want to thank my mother and father, my agent, of course .... my wife for the long hours we spend on separate computers, and not complaining when her dinner's late ...

1673:, because it ends up knocking with G&S, Elizabethan theatre, Music hall addicts and history projects. I'm still trying to get my head around the difference between 1133:

I thought that people there should have the benifit of knowing what they were: there were eleven Whitechapel murders, of which the 'canonical five' are a subset. Help!

1089:. I would have probably benifited from the appropriate Pevsner guide, but I could tell that those terraces were Regency...even after the effects of the London Pride. 255: 3409:

may want to add the details of the Covent Garden threat to the other theatres, since it involved the destruction of FIVE theatres. I'm glad we're not writing about

2166:

Fair use tags added, with copyright details. Hopefully, that will scrape it through the process. It's for this reason I try to avoid anything published after 1923!

7304: 7295: 6831: 6822: 6813: 2391:

I was told, by a family member, that their headquarters were on Cambridge Heath Rd, but they couldn't use it, because people in the surrounding flats saved their

169:

through his heart....which I thought might JUST be worthy of mention...Nothing much on 'The Jago' either (just an article on Morrison) and a pretty bad entry for

1378:

I cannot find ANY reference where the Britannia is described as a Music Hall. Every ref I have seen describes it as a theatre, mentioning the plays put on etc:

4978: 4391:

I wouldn't know where to start trimming that list - I keep finding little gems; I'd suggest we worry about it if and when the article goes forward for review.

4070:

Not a problem, in many ways I find that an admirable project. This page has recently turned into an argument for much the same thing, on a geographical level.

4438:

Ah! But we are not talking about a ho-hum play. We are talking about articles on theatres and notables who passed through them giving the establishment cred.

6592:

Where it makes sense, it makes sense. I'm glad you enjoyed the process. Maybe we should start a new category:Champion clogdancers of England .... take care.

3536:

level. I may just take this mission on board and run with it, it'll keep me out of trouble and I can go on a mission to get pix where they're missing too...

268: 3315:

Nyet ne probleme, if they're not copyright they can be used. There's also a postcard of Iolanthe on wikicommons, but I ran out of room. We need more text!

2677:

In the end, I just nicked the idea and based it on something pinched from WWII! But it was a good idea, and in the nature of good ideas, it has been used!

6725:

but came up zilch, so twiddled with some omissions I found on the way. On the other matter, I'll take a look-see, but as always will make my own mind up.

2667:

Please feel free to work on the template that I created. I have had very little time for WP lately, but would be lovely if you could pick up the baton. --

6782:

that communists are the be all and end all, merely that people should exercise some kinda choice). Anyway, it's nearly the witching hour, so toodle-pip!

5955: 1850: 6165: 4036: 3982: 3933: 3911: 3877: 3852: 3292: 3802: 7524:

Thanks for doing that, particularly after the entrenched attitudes you faced on the last occasion. It seems a good way forward and a good compromise.

7233:

Lunch got can'd, which is just as well. Had a look at both articles and seems difficult to see they'd fail GA. I think they're both on the way to FA.

6859:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

6226: 4720: 4652: 4207:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3765: 3702: 3678: 3636: 3615: 3572: 2893:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2103: 1819: 693: 6502: 6349: 6337: 6327: 6240: 6217: 6207: 6197: 6132: 6118: 6084: 6071: 6044: 4695: 4633: 4421: 4409: 4395: 4312: 2958: 2949: 1863: 1015:- this section is increasingly commonplace for UK geo settlements, as it groups together the "civic/administrative" history within one section, and 740:

on the inadvisability of multiplying essences and/or wikipedia articles beyond human endurance, I'd just like to say that in the particular case of

6666: 6565: 6550: 6533: 5201: 4093: 4061: 3231:

for an internal link, which is already there. The second was a website that is not accessible unless you are registered with a subscribing library

2681: 2615: 1959:, for instance, called many of his plays (both musical and non-musical) "burlesques". I think that, nowadays, British people would call this form 6475: 6358: 6101: 4442: 3657: 3500: 2489: 2363: 2231:

Great job! I added some info to both articles, but particularly the Scala article needs more content. BTW, not G&S, just Gilbert. His play

2223: 1755: 1298: 791: 645: 370: 359: 348: 6978: 6943: 6935: 6932: 4564: 4107: 4074: 3137: 3128: 787:, out of Hoxton; Col might wish to keep a watching eye. At the moment, it's very stubby and contains little more than was in the Hoxton article. 572: 7252: 7227: 7185: 7172: 7057: 6981: 6963: 6786: 6750: 6729: 6596: 4593: 4464: 4349: 4340: 4254: 4162: 3421: 3383: 3360: 3319: 3193: 3167: 3093: 3072: 3019: 2844: 2658: 2526: 2315: 2305: 2267: 2204: 2040: 1989: 1745: 1718: 7462: 7357:

aren't to hand, I'd probably go with the Victoria History. There are two criteria on writing history on wikipedia: the first is verifiability (

7109: 6627: 6448: 6433: 6407: 6294: 5252: 5239: 3518: 3490: 2731: 2722: 2470:

I noticed that you added the box, and it looks good. However, the link to Almeida does not take one to the theatre. However, there is a Wiki

2446: 2417: 2403: 2332: 1940: 1926: 1876: 1640: 1518: 1468: 1448: 1405: 1231: 1202: 1170: 1156: 1107: 927: 850: 804: 757: 671: 610: 496: 467: 454: 311: 296: 282: 234: 220: 6946: 6908: 6561:

wasn't a first, it was a revival - was it a London premiÃ¨re? I'll get around to it when I can, but in the meantime, feel free. All the best.

3450: 1065: 903: 433:

article I can't help questioning whether the New Standard Theatre was in fact a music hall...According to my info it was a regular theatre...

7469:... see a doctor! I used to live in 10025, but I'm much better now. Which reminds me. I once had to go to pick up my post in NYC. They had a 5975: 3815:

You have shown me that article before and I'm sorry if my attitude about it has come across as confrontational, but I still don't think that

3551: 2768: 2513: 2019: 990: 7597: 7584: 7571: 7554: 7545: 7528: 7489: 7453: 7443: 7426: 7300:

Hi I don't think there's any doubt the text is public domain (I believe the same applies to 1911 Britannica, the Jewish encyclopedia etc.).

4285: 2573: 2170: 6843: 5325: 4799: 4302: 3217: 2833: 2809: 1514:

remember at this moment off the top of my head...I will retrieve said book from our local library and give you more comprehensive info....

329: 4144:

and elsewhere in Knowledge, many of which are of a repetitive or tedious nature. Contributors like you increase Knowledge's quality. =)

3223:

I removed two links; one was a mislabelled self reference to the page (i.e. if had been in wiki format, it would have been enboldened -

516:, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as 7477:; some little old ladies confirmed this to be the case. I went off, did stuff and came back after lunch in good time to be called for my 7053:

There's a lot of theatre history missing here, because ultimately, it is a populist project. That can be both a strength and a weakness.

6803: 6519: 5996: 3739: 3568:

a look-see, and add anything I overlooked. There were some more huge music halls there, but ultimately, I think we have to be selective.

534: 7284: 6623:

Ta for that, I shall set the box up to watch it for me ... eventually I'll run out of disk space and actually have to watch television.

6060:

Don't have to name them all, that's editing, enough to give a flavour of the area - they can punch the 'other' button for the long list.

4345:

She seems to have been the Peggy Ashcroft, or Judy Dench of her day. It's believable and notable - would be nice to see refs though ...

2344: 463:

on some sheet music, and added that to Shoreditch, as she was born there. Liked the joke so much, I added it to the boro' page as well!

6001: 4603: 4583: 4336:

Was away for a few daze, meant to check in when I got back. Will take a look. She was a DBE and a friend of GBS, so not insignificant.

3781: 711: 100:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

7267: 7237: 6955:

Not a problem, I can probably match it to several websites, but this scan came from an academic source. I've faced complications with

6683:

but it does not seem to have been updated with respect to GM since 2004. Can you provide a reliable source for your information about

2283: 2242: 2194: 1815:

East London (accept no substitutes); but if I was wrong about that, then I apologise, not least for the many edits you've had to DAB.

1049:

Yes time is a continum (!), but categorising everything as history is not helpful to users (and certainly not an approach used in the

328:

is an architectural creation. I realize that the connection isn't quite the strongest ever drawn. My bot is tagging articles found in

6654:

Hi, read it, it's put up by his music management company (Jack L Higgins). I admit it contains sales information, but since it's the

5469: 5465: 4064: 3540:

OK, I will properly check those Stokie figures we had a mild disagreement about. Might be best if I just drop the damn claim, though.

416: 7351:'Ossulstone Hundred', A History of the County of Middlesex: Volume 6: Friern Barnet, Finchley, Hornsey with Highgate (1980), pp. 1-5 7212: 6054: 6034: 4624: 4281:

Ta, I'll get on with it, when I get a mo. There seem to be an awful lot of geo-cords to fill in - with the usual spurious accuracy.

634: 437: 338: 4782: 4148: 2754: 1312: 1272: 7150: 4969: 4738: 4674: 2478: 1659: 1241: 1217: 1187: 838:

Hi there, I don't quite share your Gothic fascinations, although recently I've tried being 'the phantom of the opera' over at the

486: 6912: 6280:

Congratulations Kb. I applaud your devotion to Truth - a good looking woman, and bold with it, as I can see from your user page.

6236:

Category:Neighbourhood of Kensington & Chelsea (if it's appropriate); and add Category:Kensington & Chelsea to that cat.

6150: 3464: 2817: 2671: 1626: 832: 777: 724: 140: 7380: 7130: 2590: 2500: 2088: 1259: 599: 583: 6690: 6648: 6093:

I've now got it collapsible, it's supposed to autocollapse when there's a number of templates on the page, but not doing so on

5290: 5285: 5280: 3431: 3402: 2117: 1808:

of London. East London is not an amorphous region, but one with definite boundaries imposed by the GLA and national government.

1137: 561: 124: 7458:

I remember getting seriously big-headed about residing in SW1. Is that good enough? Or should I send my cranial measurements?

7071: 6461: 3869:

Re. Whitechapel - get it quality assessed / subject it to peers working outside London - see what other people think about it.

3079:

tag puts the text that comes after it in *italics*? Is that right? If so, that is all I was trying to understand! :-) --

2642: 545: 7095: 6468: 4377: 3025:

Thanks for putting in the images. BTW, I asked before, but I did not understand: What is the function of the < cite: -->

2746: 2080: 1798: 953: 917: 7021: 6739: 6711: 6263:

Thanks for the update, I've had more good times - and bad times (exams of all things!) - in there than I can count. Cheers.

4572: 3177: 3156: 2460: 2436: 2200:

This will probably have to wait til Monday, the sun's out, temperatures a nice spring like 61F, and we're off to the coast!

1804:

Thanks for clarifying that, my disagreement would be on the basis of (a) habitual usage, and (b) consistency with the other

1729: 1708: 1559: 1545: 1433: 871: 557:

Never heard that term before: I suggest civil parish would be correct: the vestry was the governing authority of the parish.

528: 143:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

6382: 5878: 5873: 2927: 1125:

Murders' which I just added and has threatened to serially revert it till doomsday, just out of a fit of pique I think. As

1093: 1043: 923:

Yes, but I've heard all about those 'Art' films....especially that one with Catherine Deneuve getting mud thrown at her....

626:

Do you think there's mileage in starting a series of pages on the Vestries and District Boards which ran London before the

247: 6768: 6186: 4519: 4275: 3479: 3370: 3338: 3309: 3083: 3039: 2996: 2700: 2381: 2178: 155: 6928: 6312: 4542: 4453: 4432: 4360: 4330: 4244: 3118: 2146: 2072: 1417: 1391: 1373: 1019:

improves the flow of the history section itself, without having to splice the two together. This also aids in conforming

824: 6889: 4589:

Not too sure it was a theatre, but I'll take a look if I have time tomorrow - oh damn, here, it's already tomorrow ....

4487:

The stuff I added relied on the information that was already there, and I didn't change any of it - apart from changing

4096: 3213:

self-reverential comment. Did you think I'm the author? In which case you're mistaken - I just know how to Google! ;)

1528:

I'm going to look into it some more, there is a 1903 reference (in British Library) about the Britannia moving from the

177: 6617: 6492: 6373:

I'm thinking of creating an article on literary London, or London in literature. What do you think? There is already a

6179: 5540: 5536: 5531: 5526: 5275: 5006: 4293: 3530: 2975: 2631: 1896: 188:

a) to cover, however briefly the important topics in the East End (there are some areas in Hackney that just about say

6284: 2395:

and deposited it on the head of any passing fascists. As far as I understand, his real power base was in the Midlands.

2213:; haven't removed any redirects for the moment. All refs to it were changed to Scala Theatre|Prince of Wale's Theatre. 2003: 1975: 1056:

Again, per the dates policy, standalone years/months/etc should not be linked, unless it is about years and dates etc.

6866: 6510: 5001: 3838:

across the board; with others of much higher quality with good referenced history sections; rather than the informal

2551: 2474:

article, so maybe you can adjust the box to get to the correct article. I'm not sure how it is done. All the best,

1603: 1053:

of work. As articles mature it is often appropriate to create new sections, to improve copyediting and content prose.

6156:

Sorry, I just came to apologise at your page, then spotted the new message tag. The user was repeatedly vandalising

4115: 353:

haha. anyway, I'm just explaining why it was tagged. Feel free to remove it if you want. It is a wiki after all :).

216:

I'd go ahead and change anything you feel particularly interested in, especially where they're factually deficient.

6900: 6586: 424: 7518: 6267: 1574: 1075: 7301: 7281: 7195: 6819: 6800: 5297: 4046: 3671: 2954:

I have numerous references for actors and actresses appearing at the Court Theatre, London, up until about 1930.

770:

state of stubbiness. I already noted that it's a rather big job, with possibly a small readership (mainly us!).

7435:

I wonder if anyone has written anything good about the effect of postal geography on perceptions of location...

2971:

information about this theatre. I just beefed up the article, but it still needs more work. Best regards, --

1030: 909:

Well, yer pays yer money and takes yer choice ... had something of a communication breakdown? I used to go to a

243:

the growth in population. Nothing on London bodysnatchers turned up, except a 'paid for article' in the Surgeon

7404: 6893: 5883: 5734: 5730: 5725: 5076: 4224: 3232: 3203: 2829: 2453: 2359:

theatres, perhaps. It might be someone's pet project, but probably worth trying to persuade them to put it up.

2134: 1322:

Hi, Kb! Actually, I noticed the same issue and marked those two to be reviewed manually. Both of them are in

476: 398: 76: 71: 66: 7146:. I would hope this could be stopped before it goes to far. The Irish spelling is the same, CmdrO'bot. Thanks 7039:(a 'professional' company), but one who grew out the Unity Theatre movement and whose ethos still informs the 4749:

Westminster Abbey, Buckingham Palace, Covent Garden Market, Trafalgar Square, Horse Guards, National Gallery,

3234:

Neither were the link you quote here, this would be appropriate for Bromley-by-Bow, the neighbouring district.

378: 332:, which, presumably, if categorized correctly, have relevance to Wikiproject architecture. I hope that helps. 6883: 6850: 6672:

I have read the site and can find nothing on it to indicate that it is George Melly's official site. Indeed

5809: 5805: 5800: 5603: 5599: 5594: 5574: 5570: 5440: 5436: 5126: 5056: 4237: 2910: 1741:

for fleshing out some of the neglected areas of London - it's a big city, but someone has to write about it.

1608: 1348: 814: 319: 7040: 6429:

article would be a good idea...though I can see myself going off the post-modern deep end with this one...

6019: 5916: 5912: 5907: 5860: 5856: 5851: 5846: 5821: 5817: 4775: 4617: 4141: 4140:

I hereby award you this Working Man's Barnstar to recognize your tireless contributions large and small to

3347: 1783: 1246: 590: 183:

As someone who produces much tortured prose, myself; I sympaphise with the perpretrators. The main thing is

173:

which omits to tell us where it is....Some very strained attempts to master the English language as well...

109: 97: 3350: 2522:

ta, and now it seems to be locked by an admin ...? Theatre Royal, Drury Lane made FA BTW. Well done them.

1837:

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Knowledge. Your edits could be considered

997:

to conform to the strictest and highest of standards, this is a necessety for taking the article further.

7534: 7507: 7137: 5899: 5895: 5770: 5766: 5586: 5582: 5081: 4991: 4608: 4573: 3873:

the potential for something which could become a featured article. Now that is something to aspire too.

2465: 2186: 1115: 6345:

high. I think that's how it works ... MSRC knows the scoop, and I'm sure will correct me if I go wrong.

3356:

I think the evidence does point to the lease being with the hotel, but confirming it would be a bugger!

3344: 2992:. Can you add an image into it? I'm afraid I'm a little technologically challenged. Best regards, -- 2596:

I don't remember exactly how the interface looks, but I believe the protection notice might lead you to

7340: 6854:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 5666: 5662: 5657: 5652: 5457: 5453: 5448: 5262: 4661:

With the city and westminster, essentially being the most complex, I was going to leave them til last!

4208: 3391: 2894: 2540: 2179: 2058:

the award. I won't push the issue, however; just don't assume there isn't two ways of looking at it.

1915: 627: 621: 445: 397:. I couldn't understand why there isn't an article for Wilton's, so redlinked it to add to the one in 38: 1541:. Which would place it more under the auspices of the theatre legislation, for that part of its life. 7314: 7078: 5678: 5389: 5385: 5380: 5375: 5370: 5365: 5307: 5071: 4262: 2601: 2581: 1791: 1775: 1020: 552: 129: 7473:

system. I knew it was going to take a while, so I turned up soon after 9am. The ticket said that my

7142:

Thank you (CmdrObot) for introducing spelling mistakes into British-English articles, as you did to

3189:, at the weekend. There's more from the same article, but if you have anything in your sources .... 6539: 5938: 5934: 5929: 5924: 5627: 5623: 5355: 5270: 5066: 5046: 4905: 4535: 2727:

It's not that big a deal. I can probably look them up myself here. I just hoped I wouldn't have to.

1283: 1255:. At the moment this article by some weird oversight names neither the victims or the murderer..... 1252: 533:

Terribly sorry, I used it in the sense to which it is usually and commonly used, i.e to denote the

3795:

I'm for doing the best we can do without undue effort for starters and getting into good habits.

7007: 6697: 6635: 6368: 6354:

Most places are start class, since few of them have achieved quality necessary to go any higher!

5887: 5868: 5640: 5615: 5611: 5562: 5558: 5553: 5548: 5518: 5514: 5509: 5504: 5499: 5091: 5061: 4996: 4768: 4047: 3147: 2276: 2066: 1694: 1080: 538: 504: 205:

d) Maintain a list of areas that need attention, and then clock them when either of us have time.

2543:

there are quite a few streets suffixed ", London" so I guess that is the right dab form to use.

151:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --

6543: 5792: 5788: 5783: 5778: 5758: 5754: 5406: 5402: 5397: 5136: 3469: 2689: 2371: 2279:. I think you'll find it somewhat improved! Any comments/changes welcome. Best regards, -- 1614: 858: 104: 7418:

location. Maybe I show too much patience, but (above) I've been accused of not showing enough.

4179: 3695: 2865: 1179:

understand why the other editor is 'all-or-nothing', but you do seem to attract these people.

1061:

I actually have the article's best interests at heart here and would like to see it improved.

630:? (And if so, how would be best?) I have quite a bit of information which could be put there. 7013: 6758: 6722: 6703: 6557:

The article needs work, and heavy editing to highlight that the spoof was, a well, spoof ...

6257: 6147: 5146: 5121: 5111: 4921: 4195: 4033: 3930: 3874: 3799: 3300: 3214: 3173:

Thanks. If there are any images of these theatres that we can use, that would be great! --

3124:

Thanks for that, I always ask because someone somewhere might be emotionally attached to it!

3046: 2982: 2881: 2604:. The protection should expire at 00:00 (UTC), a little over three hours from this point. -- 2496:

see those - whatever you think. You've done yeoman work here. Well done! Best regards, --

2432:

I believe MRSC's edits are right; it's a reorganisation of the London Postcode pages. Cheers

2427: 2340:

Hi there, I've got to go Nat Trusting in a minute, I'll try to give it some attention later.

1399: 1363: 946: 136: 773:

Again, apologies, but I will be doing some work in 'real life' for at least the next 24 ...

7350: 7328: 7201: 6140: 5746: 5742: 5016: 4579:

This theatre could use some beefing up if you have any time. I'll try to do some too. --

4320: 4231: 3279: 2779: 2534: 2121: 1669:

talk page. It is a big topic, with lots of sub-topics within it, I'd hesitate to suggest a

1422: 1323: 512:

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to

394: 379: 354: 333: 163: 47: 17: 7414:. Everybody wants to live somewhere else, and if they can't move houses, they'll move its 6388:

I think it's a good idea. There are two immediate concerns. Firstly, it would attract the

3278:, actually Mile End Park (must be a clue there ...) and is in the E2 postal district. The 1099:

Ta, I used to hang out in Kennington a lot, but these days, like taxi drivers, I don't go

8: 6608: 6094: 6077: 5838: 5834: 5829: 5428: 5424: 5419: 5414: 5021: 4791: 4472: 3762: 3699: 3675: 3612: 3548: 3101: 3078:

I am still confused, but I think the answer to my question may be that the < cite: -->

3028: 2967: 2945:

is the website of the Theatre museum, but I'm having trouble accessing it at the moment.

2048: 1886: 1838: 1765: 1305: 1126: 741: 152: 144: 7373:

to sign your comments. And if there's anyway I can help, pls feel free to ask. Good luck

2236: 2217: 2120:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes 749:

on how many angels you can dance on the head of a pin whilst lost in the backstreets of

7245: 7119: 6916: 6877: 6794: 6275: 6097:. If you know a quick fix, pls do. Otherwise, I will spend some time in contemplation. 5674: 5644: 5635: 5345: 5219: 5171: 5086: 4530: 4082: 3392: 3186: 3111: 2937: 2917: 2825: 2711: 2622:

Hello, Kb. Have you seen these articles? They may be helpful in a number of entries:

2060: 1795: 1599:

ps this page now auto-archives, and I've begun playing with popups, both useful tools.

1042:

The word "The" should not be used in section titles, (please familiarise yourself with

982:

status by UK geo and Knowledge itself, and thus an example of which to aspire towards.

971: 690: 631: 459:

OK, I clarified that in the caption (still awaiting a better image). Found an image of

413: 119: 3209: 2626: 1580:

Nice to hear you're still around. That ride has always been strange, particularly the

492:

ta, with Five, it can either be good, or just plain piss poor ... you just never know

7501: 7274: 7102: 7084: 7064: 6677: 6613:

Kb, there is a play on BBC4 about Marie Lloyd, on Wednesday, if you are interested...

6489: 6374: 6334: 6309: 6223: 6204: 6183: 6182:. Have a loook. Do you think i should change the name to RB Kensington and Chealsea? 6173: 6115: 6051: 6031: 5214: 5186: 5051: 5031: 5011: 4942: 4848: 4717: 4692: 4649: 4621: 4439: 4406: 4374: 4299: 4202: 3788: 3260: 2955: 2924: 2888: 1968: 1950: 1846: 1344: 986: 975: 938: 839: 784: 7589:

My faith is restored. Runcorn and his army of sockpuppets have been blocked. Horah.

6680:

page that he does not believe it is officially endorsed. Jack L Higgins has a site

2632:

http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/lma_learning/theatrelands/text.asp?ID=335

7560: 7036: 6775: 6687: 6645: 6547: 6516: 6302: 6254: 5320: 5229: 5181: 5166: 5156: 5116: 5106: 4954: 4949: 4667: 4356:

run or had some other historical importance, which we should mention. Thanks. --

3438: 3248: 2668: 2606: 1666: 1648: 942: 934: 656: 7223:

edits). Generally been neglecting wiki this month - got too much on in real life.

4124: 2209:

OK, I've made a start. I removed the ambiguity by renaming the former theatre the

7581: 7551: 7525: 7486: 7450: 7423: 7377: 7292: 7264: 7234: 7224: 7205: 7182: 7147: 7143: 7127: 7115: 7106: 7068: 7054: 7017:

odds and ends, so can try and look bits up if there's more we want to add on it.

6960: 6905:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

6828: 6810: 6783: 6747: 6726: 6663: 6624: 6593: 6562: 6530: 6499: 6472: 6458: 6404: 6355: 6346: 6324: 6291: 6264: 6237: 6214: 6194: 6162: 6129: 6098: 6081: 6068: 6041: 5340: 5335: 5176: 5161: 5096: 4931: 4856: 4807: 4735: 4671: 4630: 4590: 4561: 4516: 4461: 4418: 4392: 4346: 4337: 4309: 4282: 4251: 4221: 4159: 4104: 4071: 3979: 3908: 3849: 3736: 3654: 3633: 3569: 3497: 3487: 3461: 3457: 3418: 3380: 3357: 3316: 3289: 3271: 3244: 3190: 3164: 3125: 3090: 3069: 3032: 3016: 2989: 2946: 2907: 2841: 2806: 2760: 2743: 2719: 2715: 2678: 2655: 2651:

Thanks for that. Interesting, when I get a chance. So much to do, so little time.

2587: 2570: 2523: 2486: 2475: 2471: 2457: 2433: 2400: 2360: 2341: 2312: 2302: 2290: 2264: 2220: 2201: 2167: 2139: 2100: 2037: 1986: 1923: 1860: 1816: 1774:

pointed to the South African city. At the end of January, this page was moved to

1752: 1742: 1715: 1700: 1686: 1637: 1600: 1556: 1542: 1430: 1402: 1355: 1309: 1295: 1269: 1238: 1214: 1184: 1153: 1130: 1121: 1104: 1086: 1072: 950: 914: 847: 788: 774: 721: 668: 607: 580: 569: 542: 493: 464: 451: 367: 345: 308: 279: 244: 217: 86: 7181:... and I replied with apologies for any misunderstanding at your bot page .... 6922: 6542:- and important in the current scenario since they were the ones to first stage 4734:

the right stuff. Five, six ... what's your most important stuff in Westminster?

3715: 3547:

Assuming it's not a cross-borough district, but that can be handled in its way.

2764:

otherwise baffled. If you have a chance could you help me specify? Thanks again.

429:

Hello again Kb. Although I like your picture of the New Standard Theatre in the

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7594: 7568: 7559:

I really don't understand how the one-liners are preferred to articles such as

7542: 7515: 7440: 7401: 7387: 7336: 6659: 6573: 6483: 5330: 5315: 5224: 5141: 5101: 5041: 5026: 4816: 4539: 4272: 3228: 3134: 3115: 2787: 2548: 2325: 2155: 1996: 1842: 1618: 1564: 1327: 1279: 1120:

Hello again Kb. I am encountering the ultimate 'dog-in-a-manger' editor at the

1001: 868: 750: 737: 558: 517: 402: 7361:) (of which there are many arguments) and the second is no original research ( 6488:

Thanks for the quick review around 11 days ago!. I will see how i can improve

1786:. The proposal I have made is to redo the move of the South African city from 1651:), but I realize (realise!) that I need some help from the natives! Note the 1354:

14:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC) (retirement when ready) q/a on other user's page

7362: 7358: 7249: 7209: 7169: 7018: 6765: 6736: 6708: 6673: 6583: 6579: 4877: 4861: 4838: 4600: 4599:

Great work! It's a pretty respectable little article now. Best regards, --

4580: 4450: 4429: 4357: 4327: 4241: 4170: 4145: 4089: 4056: 3447: 3428: 3399: 3367: 3335: 3330: 3306: 3174: 3153: 3080: 3036: 2993: 2972: 2821: 2765: 2639: 2497: 2280: 2239: 2191: 2000: 1972: 1956: 1726: 1705: 1656: 1652: 1224: 1062: 1027: 720:

Once free, I'll return to wiki-tabling the pop stats; if that's OK with you.

525: 521: 324:

Hmm. In that it's a physical structure, presumably designed by an architect,

170: 114: 2185:

It appears that this theatre was built long before the theatre now known as

1413:

But that's a programme from the Britannia THEATRE - which proves my point...

482:

their jolly music-hall turn as the audience gasp in horror (and despair...)

7482: 7459: 7123: 7092: 6998: 6614: 6445: 6430: 6379: 6281: 5151: 5036: 4986: 4866: 4833: 3515: 3476: 3442: 2728: 2697: 2510: 2443: 2414: 2378: 2329: 2016: 1937: 1893: 1873: 1623: 1571: 1515: 1465: 1445: 1414: 1388: 1370: 1339: 1265: 1256: 1237:

The Vandals and the Goths were always close ... Don't let it get you down.

1228: 1199: 1167: 1134: 1090: 1050: 979: 924: 900: 829: 801: 754: 642: 596: 483: 434: 293: 265: 231: 174: 1592:

I've been in the Sebright, don't think I was impressed enough to go again!

883:

Club landlord:'Sir you are mistaken! However we do feature 'go-go' dancers

7393: 6959:

images, but I never thought I'd face problems with 400 year old artwork.

6718: 6418: 6248: 4959: 4926: 4549:

Can we agree for my immediate purposes that Manor House should be both a

3334:

I'm not sure what happened to the theatre's ownership. Best regards, --

3256: 3107: 2856: 1955:

Good question. I'm not an expert here, but I don't think you're right.

1787: 1779: 1771: 994: 967: 958: 746: 390: 7410:

Doncha just luv it. Much the same thing happened with the late lamented

7091:, I believe, and was possibly a transvestite. That's about all I know... 6774:

Ta for that. I was interested in it, in that it was a movement that the

4529:

Hackney border follows the Finsbury Park Border along the north side of

3921:

I'm not sure how they reinforce 'assume good faith' and 'be welcoming'.

3456:

But I just found a picture of the Empire Theatre Leicester Square - now

1714:

Supper time! (Actually, got a meeting), will have a look later. Cheers!

1555:. It certainly had pretensions, but also knew what its audience wanted. 7208:

article up for GA review. Feel like commenting on those? Be well, --

6422: 5209: 5191: 5131: 4899: 4884: 4871: 4218: 3377: 3064:(may 1902)", it's easier to use the cite tag to put the whole thing in 2904: 2803: 2799: 2783: 2654:

There is however, a constant improvement, thanks, in part to yourself!

1859:

What got your goat, Mr/Ms Anonymous User, some reversion of vandalism?

460: 430: 386: 261: 4760: 3015:. I'd better remember not to reply to it, so it doesn't get archived! 7590: 7564: 7538: 7511: 7436: 7397: 7332: 6855: 6157: 4843: 4828: 4823: 4268: 3565: 2791: 2544: 2355:

to go across the bottom of a page. It should go on the bottom of all

2150: 2099:. Perhaps it would stop this if that were made clear in the article. 2011: 864: 6222:

OK. I will add more tomorrow. (btw, see my reply for Regent's Park)

4629:

I might have to leave it for tomorrow, but will look at it. Cheers.

2124:

very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the

2112:

Image copyright problem with Image:1939 Wilson, Keppel and Betty.jpg

1633:

finished. His understanding of London theatre may change by the end.

6994: 4909: 4894: 3904: 3427:

Excellent. I, too, will not get to this until late (NY time). --

3326: 3275: 3252: 2872: 2775: 1964: 1960: 1828:

You don't know you've arrived until you get vandalised - that's two

1387:

Music Halls did not do melodramas and they did not do Shakespeare!

1383:

engaged at a salary of Â£ 180 per week to play Shakespearean parts.

195:

b) attempt to expand them with local history and other detail (eh,

7320:

through ancient documents rather than 19th century history books.

3808:

No, I don't mind, I can give you a sense of where I'm coming from.

3346:

shows what happened to it about 2004 ... ATG management from 2005

3049:

for bibliographic references. If you cite works that collect as a

3035:. See if you have any comments/corrections. -- Best regards, -- 2942: 4916: 4889: 4811: 4186: 2036:

anyone any ideas on getting Keppel & Betty through fair use?

820: 513: 506: 325: 6602:

Apologies also for insertion under Stock Photography. SarahEMBH

6235:

Oh, the other change is Category:Kensington & Chelsea -: -->

4298:

Wouldn't it make more sense to call it "Districts of Haringey"?

2600:, which contains all the templates on today's featured article, 1902:

No problem. I'm struggling with the idea of creating a category

1318:

SatyrBot and Gender issues in the British theatre and music hall

278:

Busy week for me, might not get too much time to look at stuff!

3133:

I am emotionally attached to Three Mills - but not that page!!

3089:

sorry, perhaps I'm too academic, and not enough encyclopaedic!

2759:

Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the nod on the DYK for the

2586:

Hi, may I ask why this template is locked from editing? Thanks

2145:

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

2132:

of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a

1811:

I had thought, that at least at some stage it did point to the

667:

To summarise, I think there's probably too much mileage in it!

7506:

In this vein, I have a plan for dealing with these stubs. See

7083:

Am shocked to discover that there is absolutely nothing about

6681: 6526:Â£2m (public money) Half Moon theatre that is now a large pub! 1833: 707:

What might ultimately be a good idea is to go back and insert

6702:

Thanks for your La Strada edits. Weigh in on the discussion

6684: 1655:

article that we upgraded to FA status. -- Best regards! --

1223:

Yes, that's sound advice Kb. People are so much nicer at our

541:, that existed in the historical period referred to. cheers, 6640:

Where did you get the information that this is the artist's

202:

c) correct the worst horrors, even revisiting our own stuff!

7576:

It beats me! The wiki ideal is a sort of practical Maoism (

6873: 6662:, but in this case, I would argue for its appropriateness. 4936: 4190: 3696:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/albedo/sets/72157594290071908/

2876: 2795: 208:

e) Aim to increase quality, both in our own and others work

7157:

edits to see if I made any other miscorrections like that.

1872:

Probably another disgruntled bilious banned sock-puppet...

1026:

I hope that helps a little. Do get back to me if need be.

7088: 3978:

I had a meeting in Leeds, just got back - time to sleep.

3282:

joins the River Lee at Old Ford lock (that's a hint too).

2250:

I had thought there was a confusing overlap, but in fact

1906:; but it's very twisted in that some fall across the cat 1551:

food and drink in the auditorium, quite unlike any other

945:

from stubbiness, and a merge for no apparent reason with

684:

What I was thinking of was just one page for each Vestry

4691:

I've taken a shortcut on the attractions. Is this okay?

4559:

have a go at the text - please correct me if I go wrong.

2456:. It would be best for you to make your comments there. 1423:

Contemporary description of contents of BFI film archive

823:

talk page, about countenancing the existence of the new

6658:, I'd let that slide. I'm as anxious as you to prevent 3224: 6896:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

6290:

I'd just got out of the bath when that was taken ....

393:

now has an article, so I hastened to put in a link at

7028:

be great to add more, but we have to avoid the dread

2377:

candidate for Shoreditch after the war...(but lost).

1636:

There's a lot of work to be done on London theatres.

260:

Hello again Kb. I've just been rewriting part of the

6498:

Not a problem. Let me know if I can help in anyway.

2561:- even that might cause problems; but less dab than 974:

area articles), as an example of my work please see

6927:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 4716:I'm not really sure City of London can be tackled. 2627:

http://www.victorianweb.org/mt/theaters/pva234.html

1985:I need to read more, and preferably not from wiki! 941:a bit before your time? I've been trying to rescue 828:Van Helsing, Harker, Mina, Lucy, Renfield etc etc. 783:unrelated, I know, but a stub has been created for 7087:(who rose at 10.30) in the wikipedia. He was from 3379:. Sorry I left this question hanging for so long. 3267:during the 1990s - that was based on the postcode. 1845:. If you would like to experiment, please use the 1486:Incomplete list of 19th century East-End THEATRES: 7012:KB, I was really pleased to see someone had made 6876:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 4648:Or maybe i will finish it when i have free time. 3247:postal district - which includes Bromley-by-Bow, 2442:Show me where the debate is so I can join in. -- 2324:Hello again, Kb. I've added a theatre section to 1294:- added a link to their history on Ratcliffe ... 256:A bit of an article Cromwell knocked about a bit? 3027:tags? I can't figure it out. Also, I expanded 2933:No problem, it's a habit we all need to acquire. 2216:The modern theatre has no mention of G&S at 1152:of these things; no more so, than Ripper-perts! 412:and looks well worth plundering. Best, Andrew ( 385:Hi, K (or b, as the case may be). I saw in the 6582:and came here to thank you for your support. -- 4236:Would you please weigh in with your opinion at 2033:are sometimes (internally, even) contradictory. 819:Hello again Kb. I'm getting some flak from the 7485:, in order to avoid the queues in Manhattan). 1539:Sarah Lane is licensed by the Lord Chamberlain 1071:(force retirement) replies on other user page 6717:I got caught up trying to find references to 6114:Had to change a few things but i've done it. 4776: 4528:As far as I can make out, the Haringey -: --> 1427:Busy scenes outside an East London music hall 1000:Per the lead section (which is too short per 991:Knowledge:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) 877:A conversation I had at a bar many years ago: 800:I saw it and even added an extra paragraph... 7475:estimated wait to service time was 3.5 hours 5326:Hungerford Bridge and Golden Jubilee Bridges 4103:You had your reasons, I assumed good faith. 3698:(A mixed bag, but you blag what you can...) 3564:You were going to give my tortured prose at 867:site in reference to the edit, go for it. -- 863:By all means, if you would like to edit the 330:Category:Buildings and structures by country 6128:others, some areas are in multiple boro's. 4240:? Thanks for your opinion either way. -- 3325:How about adding the postcard image to the 3026:tag, which you add when after < ref: --> 1617:looks OK to me, Kb. However, its location, 1337:Thanks for bringing it to my attention! -- 535:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 7248:. Please take a look. Best regards, -- 7105:? A strange way to cut heroin, I know ... 4783: 4769: 4158:move to front page, this will archive now 2452:They were part of changes made to support 1778:and a new disambiguation page was made at 1498:City of London Theatre, Bishopsgate (1834) 135:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 7481:. (I used to renew my driving licence in 6578:Hey, I performed my first-ever merger at 6515:for your Theatres in London Template? -- 4199:was updated with a fact from the article 3227:) (sic). In any case, the style would be 2885:was updated with a fact from the article 1227:page. Even the vandals are nicer there... 6993: 6872:tag can be used to release it under the 3714: 3208:What's the problem with the link to the 2149:. Thanks again for your cooperation. â 1495:The Pavilion Theatre, Whitechapel (1828) 880:Me: 'I heard you had strippers on here?' 6890:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use 4790: 2118:Image:1939 Wilson, Keppel and Betty.jpg 1501:The Standard Theatre, Shoreditch (1835) 14: 6911:. If the image is copyrighted under a 4534:LBHgy, with only one entrance of the 4503:; and adding the two borough nav bars. 4122: 3903:Have a look at the history section on 3834:What I would like to see are articles 3645:there's a lot of places that need the 3632:... no point in beating ourselves up! 2778:is slightly to the east of the end of 949:; I'd welcome anything you could add. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6827:I shall most definitely sleep on it. 6469:London Psychogeographical Association 4764: 4551:Neighbourhood of Haringey and Hackney 4538:falling into Haringey "territory". -- 3626:Limehouse Hydraulic Accumulator Tower 3329:article? BTW, I did some editing at 2714:would be a good place to start (from 888:Me: 'ohhhh - so that's just topless?' 448:variety acts and concert performances 6844:Image:Image:1755 Stow Shoreditch.jpg 3670:Well there is a stub already on the 1504:The Britannia Theatre, Hoxton (1840) 1044:Knowledge:Manual of Style (headings) 891:Club landord: 'No sir: full nudity!' 25: 7510:. Your input would be appreciated. 6888:or one of the other tags listed at 4553:; and I'll add both boro' nav-bars? 1264:Done, needs more work ... See also 825:Count Dracula (fictional character) 147:, ask me on my talk page, or place 23: 7035:You may also be interested in the 6180:Template:LB Kensington and Chelsea 5007:British Optical Association Museum 3782:Standards of articles about places 3376:They were all trade websites, one 3059:International Journal of Blah-Blah 2936:I'd have to see it in context ... 2275:Hello, Kb. Please take a look at 894:Me: 'ah.....right......I see.....' 24: 7621: 5002:British Dental Association Museum 2598:User:Tariqabjotu/TOFA templates A 2565:. Surely, it should (or also) be 2091:makes it clear that the award is 96:Hello, Kbthompson/Archive 1, and 7392:I've copied the conversation to 6015: 6014: 5933: 5928: 5923: 5911: 5906: 5894: 5882: 5877: 5872: 5867: 5855: 5850: 5845: 5833: 5828: 5816: 5804: 5799: 5787: 5782: 5777: 5765: 5753: 5741: 5729: 5724: 5712: 5707: 5695: 5690: 5685: 5673: 5661: 5656: 5651: 5639: 5634: 5622: 5610: 5598: 5593: 5581: 5569: 5557: 5552: 5547: 5535: 5530: 5525: 5513: 5508: 5503: 5498: 5486: 5481: 5476: 5464: 5452: 5447: 5435: 5423: 5418: 5413: 5401: 5396: 5384: 5379: 5374: 5369: 5364: 5248:Cities of London and Westminster 4968: 4178: 4123: 2864: 2755:Fortune Theatre and random query 2263:So, there should be no problem. 1832: 1770:The original situation was that 1330:and get some input from others. 524:by writing out ] or ]. Regards, 29: 7258:Let's see if anyone completely 6538:Does have an article I think - 3858:of different ways of operating. 3812:historic places their full due. 3672:Wapping Hydraulic Power Station 3259:(in Newham) and perversely the 7126:. - or was it Harry B Norris? 6929:Media copyright questions page 6925:after 21:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 6894:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 6851:Image:1755 Stow Shoreditch.jpg 6676:who is GM's son states on the 5298:Queen's Park Community Council 5077:Institute of Contemporary Arts 2454:Template talk:Infobox UK place 2147:media copyright questions page 1286:, also need an article on the 966:Thanks for your message about 399:List of Restoration candidates 248:11:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 235:10:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 221:09:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 178:02:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 5127:Royal Academy of Music Museum 4670:page, better than that list. 4370:general public/average reader 4238:Buddy - The Buddy Holly Story 3968:I think there was a WPLondon 3651:WPLondon borough of the month 3624:funny you should mention the 3225:The history of Bromley by Bow 1641:19:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1627:19:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1604:16:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1575:16:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1560:14:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1546:14:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1519:11:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1469:11:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1449:11:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1434:00:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1418:11:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1406:00:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1251:Nice work Kb. Our next task: 1007:I don't remember including a 851:23:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 833:14:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 805:18:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 792:13:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 778:13:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 758:13:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 725:12:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 694:15:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 672:15:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 659:, in others, they just don't. 646:15:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 635:14:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 611:23:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 600:20:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 584:23:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 573:18:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 562:17:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 546:20:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 529:20:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 497:11:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 487:11:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 105:The five pillars of Knowledge 7578:Let a thousand flowers bloom 7041:Theatre Royal Stratford East 6909:criteria for speedy deletion 4618:Template:City of Westminster 1904:former music halls of London 1784:East London (disambiguation) 1392:19:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1374:19:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1359:08:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1313:17:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 1299:15:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1273:00:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1260:16:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 1242:17:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1232:17:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1218:11:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1203:11:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1188:19:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 1171:18:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 1157:11:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 1138:11:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 1108:12:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 1094:12:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 468:16:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 455:11:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 438:11:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 417:17:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 371:14:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 360:13:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 349:08:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 339:01:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 312:11:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 297:10:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 283:09:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 269:16:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 125:How to write a great article 7: 7535:Talk:London postal district 7508:Talk:London postal district 6467:Maybe you need to join the 5960:Grade II* listed buildings 5082:Kennel Club Dog Art Gallery 3896:where I am downright wrong. 3305:Great images! Thanks! -- 2187:The Prince of Wales Theatre 1129:automatically redirects to 1076:17:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 1066:21:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 1031:18:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 954:01:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 928:20:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 918:19:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 904:18:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 872:17:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 10: 7626: 7302:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 7282:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 7063:OK, I couldn't resist ... 6921:the image will be deleted 6820:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 6801:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 6551:16:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 6534:13:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 6520:13:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 6503:10:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 6493:10:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 6476:12:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 6462:22:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 6449:18:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 6434:17:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 6408:12:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 6383:12:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 6359:17:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 6350:17:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 6338:17:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 6328:16:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 6313:16:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 6295:12:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 6285:09:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 6268:15:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 6241:23:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6227:23:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6218:23:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6208:23:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6198:22:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6187:20:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6166:11:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6151:11:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6133:11:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6119:11:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6102:11:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6085:10:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6072:10:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6055:10:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6045:10:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 6035:09:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 4739:23:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4721:19:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4696:18:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4675:17:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4653:17:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4634:17:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4625:17:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4604:13:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 4594:23:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4584:19:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4574:St. George's Hall (London) 4565:09:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 4543:08:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 4525:Thanks for your message. 4520:23:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4465:23:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4454:22:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4443:20:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4433:20:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4422:18:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4410:18:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4396:17:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4378:17:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4361:13:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4350:08:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4341:08:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4331:04:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 4313:18:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 4303:18:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 4294:Neighbourhoods of Haringey 4163:18:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 4149:20:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 4133:The Working Man's Barnstar 4075:17:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 4065:17:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 4037:00:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 3983:23:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3934:17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3912:23:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3878:21:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3853:18:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3840:read it in a pub somewhere 3803:17:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3766:02:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 3740:16:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3703:12:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3679:11:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3658:11:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3637:10:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3616:10:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3573:10:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3552:09:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3531:Listed buildings in London 3491:23:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 3480:22:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 3465:08:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3451:03:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3432:12:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 3422:10:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 3403:06:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 3384:23:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 3371:03:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 3361:00:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 3339:21:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3320:20:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3310:20:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3293:09:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 3218:01:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 3194:09:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 3178:04:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 3168:23:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 3157:22:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 3138:10:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 3129:10:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 3119:10:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 3094:12:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 3084:12:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 3073:10:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 3040:02:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 3020:23:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 2997:20:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 2976:05:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 2959:17:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2950:13:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2928:13:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2911:00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2845:23:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2834:20:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2810:17:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2769:17:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2747:01:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2732:01:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2723:01:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2701:01:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 2682:10:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 2672:10:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 2659:15:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 2643:13:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 2616:20:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2591:17:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2574:18:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2552:10:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2541:Category:Streets in London 2527:18:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2514:10:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2501:04:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2490:16:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 2479:16:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 2461:00:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2447:00:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2437:00:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 2418:12:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 2404:11:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 2382:11:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 2364:00:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 2345:12:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2333:12:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2316:10:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2306:09:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2284:00:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2268:15:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2259:1884 Princes Theatre-: --> 2243:15:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2224:11:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2205:23:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2195:22:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2171:11:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1916:Garrick Theatre (Leman St) 1288:River Police Establishment 1278:Now a seperate article at 709: 628:London Government Act 1899 7371:Sign your username button 6511:Menier Chocolate Factory? 6427:London in popular culture 6425:....Hmmmmmmm.....maybe a 6010: 5984: 5948: 5354: 5306: 5261: 5238: 5200: 4977: 4966: 4798: 4501:Neighbourhood of Haringey 4286:17:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 4276:17:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 4255:18:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 4245:18:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 4225:13:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 4209:"Did you know?" talk page 4129: 4108:08:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 4097:23:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3917:interpret it differently. 3519:20:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3501:17:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3210:History of Bromley by Bow 2895:"Did you know?" talk page 2774:Well, the old rookery at 2602:Theatre Royal, Drury Lane 2180:Prince of Wales's Theatre 2161:07:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2104:14:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2081:14:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2041:11:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2020:11:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2004:04:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 1990:18:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1976:18:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1941:19:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1927:17:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1897:16:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1877:16:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1864:10:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1854:06:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1820:17:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1799:17:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1792:East London, South Africa 1776:East London, South Africa 1756:17:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1746:17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1730:17:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1719:19:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1709:19:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1660:16:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 753:to name but one place... 156:19:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 7598:07:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 7585:10:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7572:09:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7555:08:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7546:07:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7529:11:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 7519:06:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 7490:19:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7463:19:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7454:14:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 7444:14:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 7427:13:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 7405:13:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 7381:21:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 7305:17:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 7296:16:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 7285:16:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 7268:13:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 7253:05:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 7238:17:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 7228:08:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 7213:02:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 7204:article, as well as the 7186:10:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 7173:20:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 7151:20:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 7131:00:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 7110:00:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 7096:20:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 7072:10:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 7058:20:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 7022:10:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 6982:22:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 6964:22:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 6947:22:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 6936:21:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 6867:GFDL-self-no-disclaimers 6832:23:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6823:23:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6814:23:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6804:23:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6787:22:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6769:20:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6751:17:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6740:17:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6730:15:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6712:13:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6691:19:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 6540:Menier Chocolate Factory 6076:There's a weird article 5956:Grade I listed buildings 5271:Westminster City Council 5067:Household Cavalry Museum 4753:, London Zoo etc etc etc 4493:Neighbourhood of Hackney 4366:Who's Who in the Theatre 3649:too ... I still think a 2116:Thank you for uploading 1963:. See the articles for 1400:Apparently, they did ... 1284:Ratcliff Highway murders 1268:for the tale of Muller. 1253:Ratcliff Highway murders 425:The New Standard Theatre 303:One of the best was the 7196:Thanks for the clean up 6667:17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 6649:17:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 6628:10:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 6618:10:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 6597:12:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 6587:11:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 6566:12:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 6390:English Major essayists 5092:London Transport Museum 4997:Benjamin Franklin House 4048:Victoria Palace Theatre 3630:Grade I if we like them 3185:I added a stub for the 2353:London Theatre template 2277:Prince of Wales Theatre 2256:1886 Sally Army Hostel. 1013:"civic history section" 978:which is bestowed with 7002: 6544:Little Shop of Horrors 5356:Rail and tube stations 5137:Sherlock Holmes Museum 4751:Londn Transport Museum 4116:Working Man's Barnstar 3949:wards in Tower Hamlets 3836:as good as Whitechapel 3720: 3653:would be a good idea. 3411:former theatres in ... 3204:Bow and bromley by Bow 3114:by a simple REDIRECT. 2798:, on the east side of 2140:image description page 1615:Gaiety Theatre, London 1011:section; I included a 1009:"civic administration" 477:Hands of the Ripper... 7014:Unity Theatre, London 6997: 6848:Thanks for uploading 6723:Unity Theatre, London 5541:Great Portland Street 5202:Parks and open spaces 5122:Royal Academy of Arts 5112:Palace of Westminster 3718: 3051:selected bibliography 2923:acquire the 'Royal'? 2840:Nyet ne probleme ... 2820:comment was added by 2790:is to the west, past 1609:Going Down the Strand 947:East 15 Acting School 815:The Horror of Dracula 405:and ran out of time. 320:Bot Architecture Tags 42:of past discussions. 7202:Gilbert and Sullivan 6884:non-free fair use in 6880:, use a tag such as 6178:Well i've just done 5949:Art and architecture 5861:Tottenham Court Road 5057:Handel & Hendrix 5017:Canada House Gallery 3280:Hertford Union Canal 2780:Tottenham Court Road 2563:Green Street, London 2559:Green Street, Newham 1699:I just expanded the 1324:Category:Drag queens 1247:Columbia Road Market 689:politics generally. 591:Shoreditch Town Hall 395:Leeds City Varieties 18:User talk:Kbthompson 7138:jewelleryâjewelry 6095:City of Westminster 6078:Museum Mile, London 5022:Churchill War Rooms 4852:(in commercial use) 4792:City of Westminster 4609:City of Westminster 4536:Underground Station 3106:Hi - I have merged 3002:No problem, when a 2968:Royal Court Theatre 2567:Green Street (film) 2466:London theatres box 2289:I'm about to split 2235:is referenced here. 2233:The Palace of Truth 1306:Marine Police Force 1127:Whitechapel murders 1116:Hands of the Ripper 742:Shoreditch (parish) 380:Wilton's Music Hall 145:Knowledge:Questions 7120:William Hargreaves 7043:'s community work. 7003: 6917:Knowledge:Fair use 6907:, as described on 6878:Knowledge:Fair use 6721:'s involvement in 5346:Westminster Bridge 5220:Kensington Gardens 5172:Wallace Collection 5087:London Film Museum 4531:Seven Sisters Road 4142:WikiProject London 3730:There was another 3721: 3393:Vaudeville Theatre 3187:Sans Souci Theatre 3112:Three Mills Island 3029:St James's Theatre 2712:User talk:Jlittlet 1292:River Police force 1101:sarth od the river 972:Greater Manchester 745:article. See also 622:Vestries in London 305:Lord Rodneys' Head 110:How to edit a page 7355:ancient documents 7345: 7331:comment added by 7315:Ossultone Hundred 7246:St. George's Hall 7116:Burlington Bertie 7103:Champagne Charlie 7085:Burlington Bertie 7079:Burlington Bertie 7065:Half Moon Theatre 7030:original research 6686:georgemelly.com? 6678:Talk:George Melly 6375:London in fiction 6028: 6027: 5735:Piccadilly Circus 5253:Westminster North 5187:Westminster Abbey 5032:Courtauld Gallery 5012:Buckingham Palace 4853: 4820: 4752: 4263:Borough templates 4215: 4214: 4203:Playhouse Theatre 4155: 4154: 3789:Shaw and Crompton 3261:London Gas Museum 2901: 2900: 2889:Fortune Playhouse 2837: 2816:âThe preceding 2638:Best regards, -- 2582:West End Theatres 2299:Fortune Playhouse 2078: 1969:Burlesque (genre) 1920:original research 1782:(which is now at 1051:highest standards 987:Knowledge:Context 976:Shaw and Crompton 840:Royal Opera House 785:Britannia Theatre 553:Vestry authority? 366:Nyet ne probleme 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 7617: 7561:SE postcode area 7344: 7325: 7037:Theatre Workshop 6913:non-free license 6887: 6871: 6865: 6776:Theatre Workshop 6148:Anthony.bradbury 6018: 6017: 5941: 5937: 5932: 5927: 5919: 5915: 5910: 5902: 5898: 5890: 5886: 5881: 5876: 5871: 5863: 5859: 5854: 5849: 5841: 5837: 5832: 5824: 5820: 5812: 5808: 5803: 5795: 5791: 5786: 5781: 5773: 5769: 5761: 5757: 5749: 5745: 5737: 5733: 5728: 5720: 5716: 5711: 5703: 5699: 5694: 5689: 5681: 5677: 5669: 5665: 5660: 5655: 5647: 5643: 5638: 5630: 5626: 5618: 5614: 5606: 5604:Leicester Square 5602: 5597: 5589: 5585: 5577: 5575:Hyde Park Corner 5573: 5565: 5561: 5556: 5551: 5543: 5539: 5534: 5529: 5521: 5517: 5512: 5507: 5502: 5494: 5490: 5485: 5480: 5472: 5468: 5460: 5456: 5451: 5443: 5439: 5431: 5427: 5422: 5417: 5409: 5405: 5400: 5392: 5388: 5383: 5378: 5373: 5368: 5321:Grosvenor Bridge 5263:Local government 5182:West End theatre 5167:Two Temple Place 5157:Trafalgar Square 5107:National Gallery 5072:Hunterian Museum 4992:Banqueting House 4972: 4955:Westbourne Green 4906:Paddington Green 4851: 4814: 4785: 4778: 4771: 4762: 4761: 4750: 4668:West End theatre 4182: 4175: 4174: 4127: 4120: 4119: 4034:Cosmopolitancats 3931:Cosmopolitancats 3875:Cosmopolitancats 3800:Cosmopolitancats 3439:Featured Article 3215:Cosmopolitancats 2868: 2861: 2860: 2815: 2786:further north. 2612: 2609: 2079: 2075: 2069: 2064: 2054:Mirren actually 1995:Apparently (see 1841:, and have been 1836: 1353: 1352: 943:Theatre Workshop 935:Isabelle Huppert 736:Bearing in mind 657:Hackney (parish) 150: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 7625: 7624: 7620: 7619: 7618: 7616: 7615: 7614: 7504: 7390: 7326: 7317: 7277: 7206:Malcolm Sargent 7198: 7144:Chelsea, London 7140: 7101:Have you tried 7081: 7010: 6886:|article name}} 6881: 6869: 6863: 6846: 6797: 6761: 6700: 6698:La Strada, etc. 6638: 6636:georgemelly.com 6611: 6576: 6513: 6486: 6371: 6369:Literary London 6305: 6278: 6251: 6176: 6143: 6029: 6024: 6006: 5980: 5944: 5922: 5917:Westbourne Park 5905: 5893: 5866: 5844: 5827: 5815: 5810:St James's Park 5798: 5776: 5764: 5752: 5740: 5723: 5706: 5684: 5672: 5650: 5633: 5621: 5609: 5592: 5580: 5568: 5546: 5524: 5497: 5475: 5463: 5446: 5434: 5412: 5395: 5363: 5350: 5341:Waterloo Bridge 5336:Vauxhall Bridge 5302: 5257: 5234: 5230:St James's Park 5196: 5177:Wellington Arch 5162:Twinings Museum 5117:Queen's Gallery 5097:Madame Tussauds 4973: 4964: 4794: 4789: 4611: 4577: 4509:geographically. 4475: 4323: 4296: 4265: 4234: 4173: 4118: 4085: 4051: 3970:informal policy 3784: 3533: 3472: 3458:Empire (cinema) 3396: 3303: 3206: 3150: 3148:Royalty theatre 3104: 3033:Gielgud Theatre 2990:Olympic Theatre 2985: 2920: 2859: 2761:Fortune Theatre 2757: 2718:history). HTH. 2716:Fortune Theatre 2692: 2610: 2607: 2584: 2537: 2472:Almeida Theatre 2468: 2430: 2374: 2295:Fortune Theatre 2291:Fortune Theatre 2183: 2114: 2095:, presented in 2073: 2067: 2059: 2051: 2028:... and all we 1953: 1889: 1830: 1768: 1701:Adelphi Theatre 1697: 1695:Adelphi Theatre 1687:User:Kbthompson 1679:Opera Burlesque 1611: 1567: 1366: 1342: 1338: 1320: 1249: 1131:Jack the Ripper 1122:Jack the Ripper 1118: 1087:Kennington Road 1083: 1081:Kennington Road 1021:Manual of Style 961: 861: 817: 714: 624: 593: 579:on the parish! 555: 510: 479: 427: 383: 322: 258: 197:mostly harmless 166: 148: 130:Manual of Style 89: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7623: 7611: 7610: 7609: 7608: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7604: 7603: 7602: 7601: 7600: 7503: 7500: 7497: 7496: 7495: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7430: 7429: 7419: 7412:East Canonbury 7389: 7386: 7375: 7374: 7366: 7316: 7313: 7310: 7309: 7308: 7307: 7276: 7273: 7256: 7255: 7231: 7230: 7220: 7197: 7194: 7191: 7190: 7189: 7188: 7176: 7175: 7165: 7164: 7159: 7158: 7139: 7136: 7113: 7112: 7080: 7077: 7061: 7060: 7051: 7044: 7033: 7009: 7006: 6991: 6989: 6988: 6987: 6986: 6985: 6984: 6969: 6968: 6967: 6966: 6950: 6949: 6845: 6842: 6839: 6838: 6837: 6836: 6835: 6834: 6796: 6793: 6790: 6789: 6779: 6760: 6757: 6754: 6753: 6733: 6732: 6699: 6696: 6670: 6669: 6637: 6634: 6631: 6630: 6610: 6607: 6605: 6600: 6599: 6575: 6572: 6569: 6568: 6555: 6554: 6553: 6527: 6512: 6509: 6506: 6505: 6485: 6482: 6479: 6478: 6454: 6453: 6452: 6451: 6439: 6438: 6437: 6436: 6411: 6410: 6401: 6393: 6370: 6367: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6361: 6342: 6341: 6340: 6304: 6301: 6298: 6297: 6277: 6274: 6271: 6270: 6250: 6247: 6244: 6243: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6220: 6175: 6172: 6169: 6168: 6142: 6139: 6136: 6135: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6088: 6087: 6074: 6065: 6061: 6048: 6047: 6026: 6025: 6023: 6022: 6011: 6008: 6007: 6005: 6004: 5999: 5994: 5988: 5986: 5982: 5981: 5979: 5978: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5966: 5958: 5952: 5950: 5946: 5945: 5943: 5942: 5920: 5903: 5900:Warwick Avenue 5891: 5864: 5842: 5825: 5822:St John's Wood 5813: 5796: 5774: 5762: 5750: 5738: 5721: 5704: 5682: 5670: 5648: 5631: 5619: 5607: 5590: 5587:Lancaster Gate 5578: 5566: 5544: 5522: 5495: 5473: 5461: 5444: 5432: 5410: 5393: 5360: 5358: 5352: 5351: 5349: 5348: 5343: 5338: 5333: 5331:Lambeth Bridge 5328: 5323: 5318: 5316:Chelsea Bridge 5312: 5310: 5304: 5303: 5301: 5300: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5288: 5283: 5273: 5267: 5265: 5259: 5258: 5256: 5255: 5250: 5244: 5242: 5240:Constituencies 5236: 5235: 5233: 5232: 5227: 5222: 5217: 5212: 5206: 5204: 5198: 5197: 5195: 5194: 5189: 5184: 5179: 5174: 5169: 5164: 5159: 5154: 5149: 5144: 5142:Somerset House 5139: 5134: 5129: 5124: 5119: 5114: 5109: 5104: 5102:Mall Galleries 5099: 5094: 5089: 5084: 5079: 5074: 5069: 5064: 5059: 5054: 5049: 5047:Fleming Museum 5044: 5042:Faraday Museum 5039: 5034: 5029: 5027:Clarence House 5024: 5019: 5014: 5009: 5004: 4999: 4994: 4989: 4983: 4981: 4975: 4974: 4967: 4965: 4963: 4962: 4957: 4952: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4934: 4932:St John's Wood 4929: 4924: 4919: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4897: 4892: 4887: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4869: 4864: 4859: 4854: 4846: 4841: 4836: 4831: 4826: 4821: 4804: 4802: 4796: 4795: 4788: 4787: 4780: 4773: 4765: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4742: 4741: 4731: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4610: 4607: 4597: 4596: 4576: 4571: 4568: 4567: 4555: 4524: 4474: 4471: 4468: 4467: 4446: 4445: 4425: 4424: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4399: 4398: 4389: 4353: 4352: 4343: 4322: 4319: 4316: 4315: 4295: 4292: 4289: 4288: 4264: 4261: 4258: 4257: 4233: 4230: 4213: 4212: 4183: 4172: 4169: 4166: 4165: 4153: 4152: 4136: 4135: 4130: 4128: 4117: 4114: 4111: 4110: 4084: 4081: 4078: 4077: 4050: 4045: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4003: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3986: 3985: 3975: 3974: 3965: 3964: 3959: 3958: 3953: 3952: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3901: 3897: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3870: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3845: 3844: 3831: 3830: 3826: 3813: 3809: 3783: 3780: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3763:Tarquin Binary 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3712: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3700:Tarquin Binary 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3676:Tarquin Binary 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3640: 3639: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3613:Tarquin Binary 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592:interrupted... 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3576: 3575: 3562: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3549:Tarquin Binary 3542: 3541: 3532: 3529: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3471: 3470:Lost in London 3468: 3454: 3453: 3425: 3424: 3414: 3395: 3390: 3387: 3386: 3364: 3363: 3354: 3323: 3322: 3302: 3299: 3296: 3295: 3284: 3283: 3272:Regent's Canal 3268: 3236: 3235: 3229:Bromley-by-Bow 3205: 3202: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3171: 3170: 3149: 3146: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3103: 3100: 3097: 3096: 3076: 3075: 3055:Yada-yada-yada 3023: 3022: 3014:<blush: --> 3008: 2984: 2981: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2934: 2919: 2916: 2899: 2898: 2869: 2858: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2802:, I think. -- 2788:Wimpole Street 2756: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2704: 2703: 2691: 2690:DYK discussion 2688: 2685: 2684: 2666: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2652: 2646: 2645: 2635: 2634: 2629: 2621: 2619: 2618: 2583: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2493: 2492: 2467: 2464: 2450: 2449: 2429: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2407: 2406: 2396: 2389: 2373: 2372:The Mosley Mob 2370: 2367: 2366: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2326:Strand, London 2319: 2318: 2308: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2261: 2257: 2255:1865 PoW-: --> 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2214: 2182: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2113: 2110: 2107: 2106: 2050: 2047: 2044: 2043: 2034: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1997:Surrey Theatre 1993: 1992: 1983: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1930: 1929: 1912:former theatre 1888: 1885: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1867: 1866: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1809: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1722: 1721: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1689: 1682: 1644: 1643: 1634: 1619:Strand, London 1610: 1607: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1589:redevelopment. 1586: 1566: 1563: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1478: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1385: 1384: 1365: 1362: 1319: 1316: 1302: 1301: 1280:London Burkers 1248: 1245: 1235: 1234: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1160: 1159: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1082: 1079: 1069: 1068: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1047: 1039: 1038: 960: 957: 931: 930: 907: 906: 896: 895: 892: 889: 886: 881: 878: 860: 859:Burlesque edit 857: 854: 853: 843: 816: 813: 810: 809: 808: 807: 795: 794: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 751:Norton Folgate 710:Main article: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 677: 676: 675: 674: 664: 660: 649: 648: 623: 620: 616: 614: 613: 592: 589: 576: 575: 554: 551: 518:United Kingdom 509: 503: 500: 499: 478: 475: 473: 471: 470: 457: 426: 423: 403:Deborah Warner 382: 377: 374: 373: 364: 363: 362: 321: 318: 315: 314: 301: 300: 299: 286: 285: 276: 257: 254: 252: 240: 239: 238: 237: 224: 223: 214: 210: 209: 206: 203: 200: 193: 185: 184: 165: 162: 160: 153:TheParanoidOne 141:sign your name 133: 132: 127: 122: 117: 112: 107: 88: 85: 80: 79: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7622: 7613: 7599: 7596: 7592: 7588: 7587: 7586: 7583: 7579: 7575: 7574: 7573: 7570: 7566: 7562: 7558: 7557: 7556: 7553: 7549: 7548: 7547: 7544: 7540: 7537:- I give up! 7536: 7532: 7531: 7530: 7527: 7523: 7522: 7521: 7520: 7517: 7513: 7509: 7499: 7491: 7488: 7484: 7480: 7476: 7472: 7468: 7464: 7461: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7452: 7447: 7446: 7445: 7442: 7438: 7434: 7433: 7432: 7431: 7428: 7425: 7420: 7417: 7413: 7409: 7408: 7407: 7406: 7403: 7399: 7395: 7385: 7383: 7382: 7379: 7372: 7367: 7364: 7360: 7356: 7352: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7342: 7338: 7334: 7330: 7321: 7312: 7306: 7303: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7294: 7289: 7288: 7287: 7286: 7283: 7272: 7270: 7269: 7266: 7261: 7254: 7251: 7247: 7242: 7241: 7240: 7239: 7236: 7229: 7226: 7221: 7217: 7216: 7215: 7214: 7211: 7207: 7203: 7193: 7187: 7184: 7180: 7179: 7178: 7177: 7174: 7171: 7167: 7166: 7161: 7160: 7155: 7154: 7153: 7152: 7149: 7145: 7135: 7133: 7132: 7129: 7125: 7122:, husband of 7121: 7117: 7111: 7108: 7104: 7100: 7099: 7098: 7097: 7094: 7090: 7086: 7076: 7074: 7073: 7070: 7066: 7059: 7056: 7052: 7048: 7045: 7042: 7038: 7034: 7031: 7026: 7025: 7024: 7023: 7020: 7015: 7008:Unity Theatre 7005: 7000: 6996: 6992: 6983: 6980: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6971: 6970: 6965: 6962: 6958: 6954: 6953: 6952: 6951: 6948: 6945: 6940: 6939: 6938: 6937: 6934: 6931:. Thank you. 6930: 6926: 6924: 6918: 6914: 6910: 6906: 6902: 6897: 6895: 6891: 6885: 6879: 6875: 6868: 6860: 6857: 6853: 6852: 6841: 6833: 6830: 6826: 6825: 6824: 6821: 6817: 6816: 6815: 6812: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6802: 6792: 6788: 6785: 6780: 6777: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6770: 6767: 6759:Unity Theatre 6756: 6752: 6749: 6744: 6743: 6742: 6741: 6738: 6731: 6728: 6724: 6720: 6716: 6715: 6714: 6713: 6710: 6705: 6695: 6693: 6692: 6689: 6685: 6682: 6679: 6675: 6668: 6665: 6661: 6657: 6656:official site 6653: 6652: 6651: 6650: 6647: 6643: 6633: 6629: 6626: 6622: 6621: 6620: 6619: 6616: 6606: 6603: 6598: 6595: 6591: 6590: 6589: 6588: 6585: 6581: 6580:George Formby 6571: 6567: 6564: 6560: 6556: 6552: 6549: 6545: 6541: 6537: 6536: 6535: 6532: 6528: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6518: 6508: 6504: 6501: 6497: 6496: 6495: 6494: 6491: 6481: 6477: 6474: 6470: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6460: 6450: 6447: 6443: 6442: 6441: 6440: 6435: 6432: 6428: 6424: 6420: 6415: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6409: 6406: 6402: 6399: 6394: 6391: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6384: 6381: 6376: 6366: 6360: 6357: 6353: 6352: 6351: 6348: 6343: 6339: 6336: 6331: 6330: 6329: 6326: 6322: 6317: 6316: 6315: 6314: 6311: 6300: 6296: 6293: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6283: 6273: 6269: 6266: 6262: 6261: 6260: 6259: 6256: 6246: 6242: 6239: 6234: 6228: 6225: 6221: 6219: 6216: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6206: 6201: 6200: 6199: 6196: 6191: 6190: 6189: 6188: 6185: 6181: 6171: 6167: 6164: 6159: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6149: 6138: 6134: 6131: 6126: 6120: 6117: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6103: 6100: 6096: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6089: 6086: 6083: 6079: 6075: 6073: 6070: 6066: 6062: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6053: 6046: 6043: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6036: 6033: 6021: 6013: 6012: 6009: 6003: 6000: 5998: 5995: 5993: 5990: 5989: 5987: 5983: 5977: 5974: 5970: 5967: 5965: 5962: 5961: 5959: 5957: 5954: 5953: 5951: 5947: 5940: 5936: 5931: 5926: 5921: 5918: 5914: 5909: 5904: 5901: 5897: 5892: 5889: 5885: 5880: 5875: 5870: 5865: 5862: 5858: 5853: 5848: 5843: 5840: 5836: 5831: 5826: 5823: 5819: 5814: 5811: 5807: 5802: 5797: 5794: 5790: 5785: 5780: 5775: 5772: 5771:Regent's Park 5768: 5763: 5760: 5756: 5751: 5748: 5744: 5739: 5736: 5732: 5727: 5722: 5719: 5715: 5710: 5705: 5702: 5698: 5693: 5688: 5683: 5680: 5676: 5671: 5668: 5667:Oxford Circus 5664: 5659: 5654: 5649: 5646: 5642: 5637: 5632: 5629: 5625: 5620: 5617: 5613: 5608: 5605: 5601: 5596: 5591: 5588: 5584: 5579: 5576: 5572: 5567: 5564: 5560: 5555: 5550: 5545: 5542: 5538: 5533: 5528: 5523: 5520: 5516: 5511: 5506: 5501: 5496: 5493: 5489: 5484: 5479: 5474: 5471: 5467: 5462: 5459: 5458:Charing Cross 5455: 5450: 5445: 5442: 5441:Charing Cross 5438: 5433: 5430: 5426: 5421: 5416: 5411: 5408: 5404: 5399: 5394: 5391: 5387: 5382: 5377: 5372: 5367: 5362: 5361: 5359: 5357: 5353: 5347: 5344: 5342: 5339: 5337: 5334: 5332: 5329: 5327: 5324: 5322: 5319: 5317: 5314: 5313: 5311: 5309: 5305: 5299: 5296: 5292: 5289: 5287: 5284: 5282: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5274: 5272: 5269: 5268: 5266: 5264: 5260: 5254: 5251: 5249: 5246: 5245: 5243: 5241: 5237: 5231: 5228: 5226: 5225:Regent's Park 5223: 5221: 5218: 5216: 5213: 5211: 5208: 5207: 5205: 5203: 5199: 5193: 5190: 5188: 5185: 5183: 5180: 5178: 5175: 5173: 5170: 5168: 5165: 5163: 5160: 5158: 5155: 5153: 5150: 5148: 5147:Spencer House 5145: 5143: 5140: 5138: 5135: 5133: 5130: 5128: 5125: 5123: 5120: 5118: 5115: 5113: 5110: 5108: 5105: 5103: 5100: 5098: 5095: 5093: 5090: 5088: 5085: 5083: 5080: 5078: 5075: 5073: 5070: 5068: 5065: 5063: 5060: 5058: 5055: 5053: 5052:Guards Museum 5050: 5048: 5045: 5043: 5040: 5038: 5035: 5033: 5030: 5028: 5025: 5023: 5020: 5018: 5015: 5013: 5010: 5008: 5005: 5003: 5000: 4998: 4995: 4993: 4990: 4988: 4985: 4984: 4982: 4980: 4976: 4971: 4961: 4958: 4956: 4953: 4951: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4935: 4933: 4930: 4928: 4925: 4923: 4920: 4918: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4898: 4896: 4893: 4891: 4888: 4886: 4883: 4879: 4878:Little Venice 4875: 4874: 4873: 4870: 4868: 4865: 4863: 4862:Knightsbridge 4860: 4858: 4855: 4850: 4847: 4845: 4842: 4840: 4839:Covent Garden 4837: 4835: 4832: 4830: 4827: 4825: 4822: 4818: 4813: 4809: 4806: 4805: 4803: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4786: 4781: 4779: 4774: 4772: 4767: 4766: 4763: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4740: 4737: 4732: 4722: 4719: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4697: 4694: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4676: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4660: 4654: 4651: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4635: 4632: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4606: 4605: 4602: 4595: 4592: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4582: 4575: 4570: 4566: 4563: 4560: 4556: 4554: 4550: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4541: 4537: 4532: 4526: 4522: 4521: 4518: 4515: 4511: 4510: 4505: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4484: 4483: 4479: 4470: 4466: 4463: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4452: 4444: 4441: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4431: 4423: 4420: 4415: 4411: 4408: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4397: 4394: 4390: 4387: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4376: 4371: 4367: 4363: 4362: 4359: 4351: 4348: 4344: 4342: 4339: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4329: 4318: 4314: 4311: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4301: 4291: 4287: 4284: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4274: 4270: 4260: 4256: 4253: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4243: 4239: 4229: 4227: 4226: 4223: 4220: 4210: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4198: 4197: 4196:Did you know? 4192: 4188: 4184: 4181: 4177: 4176: 4168: 4164: 4161: 4157: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4147: 4143: 4138: 4137: 4134: 4131: 4126: 4121: 4113: 4109: 4106: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4095: 4091: 4080: 4076: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4063: 4059: 4058: 4057:Me and My Gal 4049: 4044: 4038: 4035: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3984: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3971: 3967: 3966: 3961: 3960: 3955: 3954: 3950: 3945: 3944: 3935: 3932: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3879: 3876: 3871: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3832: 3827: 3823: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3801: 3796: 3792: 3790: 3779: 3767: 3764: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3741: 3738: 3733: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3717: 3713: 3704: 3701: 3697: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3680: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3659: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3638: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3617: 3614: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3574: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3553: 3550: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3528: 3520: 3517: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3502: 3499: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3489: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3478: 3467: 3466: 3463: 3459: 3452: 3449: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3423: 3420: 3415: 3412: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3401: 3394: 3389: 3385: 3382: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3369: 3362: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3337: 3332: 3331:Savoy Theatre 3328: 3321: 3318: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3308: 3301:Savoy Theatre 3298: 3294: 3291: 3286: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3274:runs through 3273: 3269: 3266: 3265:neighbourhood 3262: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3233: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3216: 3211: 3201: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3176: 3169: 3166: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3155: 3145: 3139: 3136: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3099: 3095: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3082: 3074: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3021: 3018: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3004:middle-olding 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2995: 2991: 2983:Globe Theatre 2980: 2978: 2977: 2974: 2969: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2948: 2944: 2939: 2935: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2926: 2915: 2913: 2912: 2909: 2906: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2884: 2883: 2882:Did you know? 2878: 2874: 2870: 2867: 2863: 2862: 2854: 2846: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2762: 2752: 2748: 2745: 2741: 2740: 2733: 2730: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2699: 2694: 2693: 2687: 2683: 2680: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2670: 2660: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2644: 2641: 2637: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2628: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2532: 2528: 2525: 2521: 2520: 2515: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2499: 2491: 2488: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2477: 2473: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2455: 2448: 2445: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2428:Re: Southwark 2425: 2419: 2416: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2380: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2334: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2309: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2253: 2252:Scala Theatre 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2241: 2237: 2234: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2215: 2212: 2211:Scala Theatre 2208: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2188: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2148: 2143: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2135:copyright tag 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2109: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2076: 2070: 2062: 2057: 2046: 2042: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2021: 2018: 2013: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1957:W. S. Gilbert 1948: 1942: 1939: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1928: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1914:. Still, now 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1884: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1849:. Thank you. 1848: 1844: 1840: 1835: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1796:Sam Blacketer 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1763: 1757: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1728: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1702: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1675:Opera Comique 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1653:W. S. Gilbert 1650: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1620: 1616: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1595:All the best. 1594: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1562: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1548: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1531: 1520: 1517: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1470: 1467: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1450: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1416: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1364:The Britannia 1361: 1360: 1357: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1335: 1331: 1329: 1325: 1315: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1262: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1233: 1230: 1226: 1225:Gothic horror 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1216: 1204: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1180: 1172: 1169: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1067: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1024: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1003: 998: 996: 992: 988: 983: 981: 977: 973: 969: 964: 956: 955: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 929: 926: 922: 921: 920: 919: 916: 912: 905: 902: 898: 897: 893: 890: 887: 885: 882: 879: 876: 875: 874: 873: 870: 866: 856: 852: 849: 844: 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 831: 826: 822: 812: 806: 803: 799: 798: 797: 796: 793: 790: 786: 782: 781: 780: 779: 776: 771: 759: 756: 752: 748: 743: 739: 738:Occam's Razor 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 723: 718: 713: 708: 705: 695: 692: 691:Sam Blacketer 687: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 673: 670: 665: 661: 658: 653: 652: 651: 650: 647: 644: 639: 638: 637: 636: 633: 632:Sam Blacketer 629: 619: 617: 612: 609: 604: 603: 602: 601: 598: 588: 586: 585: 582: 574: 571: 566: 565: 564: 563: 560: 550: 548: 547: 544: 540: 536: 531: 530: 527: 523: 522:Great Britain 519: 515: 508: 502: 498: 495: 491: 490: 489: 488: 485: 474: 469: 466: 462: 458: 456: 453: 450: 449: 442: 441: 440: 439: 436: 432: 422: 420: 418: 415: 414:GuillaumeTell 411: 406: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389:article that 388: 381: 376: 372: 369: 365: 361: 358: 357: 352: 351: 350: 347: 343: 342: 341: 340: 337: 336: 331: 327: 317: 313: 310: 306: 302: 298: 295: 290: 289: 288: 287: 284: 281: 277: 273: 272: 271: 270: 267: 263: 253: 250: 249: 246: 236: 233: 228: 227: 226: 225: 222: 219: 215: 212: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 182: 181: 180: 179: 176: 172: 171:Bethnal Green 161: 158: 157: 154: 146: 142: 138: 131: 128: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106: 103: 102: 101: 99: 94: 93: 84: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 7612: 7577: 7505: 7498: 7483:Poughkeepsie 7478: 7474: 7471:timed ticket 7470: 7415: 7411: 7391: 7384: 7376: 7370: 7354: 7322: 7318: 7311: 7278: 7271: 7259: 7257: 7232: 7199: 7192: 7141: 7134: 7124:Ella Shields 7114: 7082: 7075: 7062: 7047:Left theatre 7046: 7029: 7011: 7004: 6999:Vesta Tilley 6990: 6956: 6920: 6904: 6898: 6861: 6849: 6847: 6840: 6798: 6791: 6762: 6755: 6734: 6701: 6694: 6671: 6655: 6641: 6639: 6632: 6612: 6604: 6601: 6577: 6570: 6558: 6514: 6507: 6490:Simply south 6487: 6480: 6455: 6397: 6389: 6372: 6365: 6335:Simply south 6320: 6310:Simply south 6306: 6299: 6279: 6272: 6252: 6245: 6224:Simply south 6205:Simply south 6184:Simply south 6177: 6170: 6144: 6141:Vandal block 6137: 6116:Simply south 6052:Simply south 6049: 6032:Simply south 6030: 5992:Blue plaques 5985:Other topics 5492:Edgware Road 5470:Edgware Road 5390:Baker Street 5152:Tate Britain 5062:Horse Guards 5037:Crime Museum 4987:Apsley House 4922:Queen's Park 4867:Lisson Grove 4834:Clare Market 4718:Simply south 4693:Simply south 4650:Simply south 4622:Simply south 4598: 4578: 4569: 4557: 4552: 4548: 4527: 4523: 4513: 4512: 4507: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4490: 4486: 4485: 4480: 4477: 4476: 4469: 4447: 4440:David Lauder 4426: 4407:David Lauder 4385: 4375:David Lauder 4369: 4365: 4364: 4354: 4326:regards, -- 4324: 4321:Wendy Hiller 4317: 4300:Simply south 4297: 4290: 4266: 4259: 4235: 4232:Edit dispute 4228: 4216: 4201: 4200: 4194: 4167: 4139: 4132: 4112: 4086: 4079: 4055: 4052: 4043: 3969: 3948: 3892: 3839: 3835: 3821: 3816: 3797: 3793: 3785: 3778: 3731: 3711: 3650: 3646: 3629: 3625: 3534: 3527: 3473: 3455: 3443:Samuel Foote 3426: 3410: 3397: 3388: 3365: 3324: 3304: 3297: 3264: 3240: 3207: 3200: 3172: 3151: 3144: 3105: 3098: 3077: 3065: 3061: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3045:Have a look 3024: 3011: 3003: 2986: 2979: 2965: 2956:David Lauder 2938:Arthur Lloyd 2925:David Lauder 2921: 2914: 2902: 2887: 2886: 2880: 2853: 2758: 2751: 2686: 2665: 2620: 2605: 2585: 2578: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2538: 2535:Green Street 2531: 2494: 2469: 2451: 2431: 2424: 2392: 2375: 2368: 2356: 2352: 2339: 2298: 2294: 2274: 2251: 2238:Thanks! -- 2232: 2230: 2210: 2184: 2175: 2156: 2151: 2144: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2115: 2108: 2096: 2092: 2055: 2052: 2045: 2029: 1994: 1954: 1947: 1919: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1890: 1883: 1851:65.12.162.36 1831: 1824: 1812: 1805: 1769: 1762: 1737: 1723: 1698: 1691: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1645: 1612: 1598: 1581: 1568: 1552: 1549: 1538: 1533: 1529: 1527: 1477: 1426: 1421: 1412: 1386: 1377: 1367: 1336: 1332: 1321: 1303: 1291: 1287: 1266:Hackney Wick 1263: 1250: 1236: 1211: 1181: 1177: 1149: 1145: 1119: 1112: 1100: 1084: 1070: 1025: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1006: 999: 984: 965: 962: 932: 910: 908: 884: 862: 855: 818: 811: 772: 768: 719: 715: 706: 702: 685: 625: 618: 615: 594: 587: 577: 556: 549: 539:Commonwealth 532: 511: 501: 480: 472: 447: 428: 421: 407: 384: 375: 355: 334: 323: 316: 304: 259: 251: 241: 196: 189: 167: 164:The East End 159: 134: 95: 91: 90: 83: 60: 43: 37: 7479:appointment 7394:Talk:Ilford 7327:—Preceding 7260:independent 6719:Lionel Bart 6688:Obiskobilob 6646:Obiskobilob 6644:website? 6609:Marie Lloyd 6559:Little Shop 6548:Peripatetic 6517:Peripatetic 6419:London smog 6255:Tagishsimon 5939:Westminster 5628:Marble Arch 5429:Bond Street 4979:Attractions 4960:Westminster 4473:Manor House 4386:performance 3732:accumulator 3257:Three Mills 3108:Three Mills 3102:Three Mills 2669:Peripatetic 2539:Looking at 2049:BAFTA award 1887:Music Halls 1806:sub-regions 1788:East London 1780:East London 1772:East London 1766:East London 1738:performance 1282:, see also 995:Bow, London 968:Bow, London 963:Kbtompson, 747:Duns Scotus 391:Hoxton Hall 36:This is an 7582:Kbthompson 7552:Kbthompson 7526:Kbthompson 7487:Kbthompson 7451:Kbthompson 7424:Kbthompson 7378:Kbthompson 7293:Kbthompson 7265:Kbthompson 7235:Kbthompson 7225:Kbthompson 7183:Kbthompson 7163:criticism. 7148:Kbthompson 7128:Kbthompson 7107:Kbthompson 7069:Kbthompson 7055:Kbthompson 6961:Kbthompson 6829:Kbthompson 6811:Kbthompson 6795:Marylebone 6784:Kbthompson 6748:Kbthompson 6727:Kbthompson 6664:Kbthompson 6625:Kbthompson 6594:Kbthompson 6563:Kbthompson 6531:Kbthompson 6500:Kbthompson 6473:Kbthompson 6459:Kbthompson 6423:London fog 6405:Kbthompson 6398:big events 6356:Kbthompson 6347:Kbthompson 6325:Kbthompson 6292:Kbthompson 6276:5000 Today 6265:Kbthompson 6238:Kbthompson 6215:Kbthompson 6195:Kbthompson 6163:Kbthompson 6130:Kbthompson 6099:Kbthompson 6082:Kbthompson 6069:Kbthompson 6042:Kbthompson 5976:Public art 5718:Paddington 5701:Paddington 5679:Paddington 5645:Marylebone 5616:Maida Vale 5563:Green Park 5519:Embankment 5210:Green Park 5192:London Zoo 5132:Royal Mews 4941:including 4927:St James's 4904:including 4900:Paddington 4885:Marylebone 4876:including 4872:Maida Vale 4815:(see also 4736:Kbthompson 4672:Kbthompson 4666:There's a 4631:Kbthompson 4591:Kbthompson 4562:Kbthompson 4517:Kbthompson 4462:Kbthompson 4419:Kbthompson 4393:Kbthompson 4347:Kbthompson 4338:Kbthompson 4310:Kbthompson 4283:Kbthompson 4252:Kbthompson 4160:Kbthompson 4105:Kbthompson 4083:A Question 4072:Kbthompson 3980:Kbthompson 3909:Kbthompson 3850:Kbthompson 3822:we aspired 3737:Kbthompson 3655:Kbthompson 3634:Kbthompson 3570:Kbthompson 3498:Kbthompson 3488:Kbthompson 3462:Kbthompson 3419:Kbthompson 3381:Kbthompson 3358:Kbthompson 3317:Kbthompson 3290:Kbthompson 3241:modern Bow 3191:Kbthompson 3165:Kbthompson 3126:Kbthompson 3091:Kbthompson 3070:Kbthompson 3017:Kbthompson 2947:Kbthompson 2943:PeoplePlay 2918:Watchlists 2842:Kbthompson 2800:Marylebone 2784:Bloomsbury 2744:Kbthompson 2720:Kbthompson 2679:Kbthompson 2656:Kbthompson 2588:Kbthompson 2571:Kbthompson 2524:Kbthompson 2487:Kbthompson 2476:Viva-Verdi 2458:Kbthompson 2434:Kbthompson 2401:Kbthompson 2361:Kbthompson 2342:Kbthompson 2313:Kbthompson 2303:Kbthompson 2265:Kbthompson 2221:Kbthompson 2202:Kbthompson 2168:Kbthompson 2101:Kbthompson 2089:bafta list 2038:Kbthompson 1987:Kbthompson 1924:Kbthompson 1861:Kbthompson 1817:Kbthompson 1753:Kbthompson 1743:Kbthompson 1716:Kbthompson 1649:WP:G&S 1638:Kbthompson 1601:Kbthompson 1557:Kbthompson 1543:Kbthompson 1534:music hall 1431:Kbthompson 1403:Kbthompson 1356:Kbthompson 1310:Kbthompson 1296:Kbthompson 1270:Kbthompson 1239:Kbthompson 1215:Kbthompson 1185:Kbthompson 1154:Kbthompson 1105:Kbthompson 1073:Kbthompson 951:Kbthompson 915:Kbthompson 848:Kbthompson 789:Kbthompson 775:Kbthompson 722:Kbthompson 669:Kbthompson 608:Kbthompson 581:Kbthompson 570:Kbthompson 543:Kbthompson 494:Kbthompson 465:Kbthompson 461:Hetty King 452:Kbthompson 431:Music hall 387:Music hall 368:Kbthompson 356:Alphachimp 346:Kbthompson 335:Alphachimp 309:Kbthompson 280:Kbthompson 262:Music hall 245:Kbthompson 218:Kbthompson 149:{{helpme}} 137:Wikipedian 115:Help pages 7502:Postcodes 7416:political 7275:Greenwich 6901:this link 6856:copyright 6323:case ... 6321:cAPS LOCK 6174:K & C 6158:Pop Music 5793:Royal Oak 5759:Queensway 5407:Bayswater 5276:Elections 5215:Hyde Park 4943:Chinatown 4849:Hyde Park 4844:Fitzrovia 4829:Belgravia 4824:Bayswater 4800:Districts 4540:IsarSteve 4094:SFTVLGUY2 4062:SFTVLGUY2 3893:discussed 3719:The Tower 3647:treatment 3566:Islington 3353:Alwaleed. 2792:Fitzrovia 2393:nightsoil 2122:copyright 2012:Melodrama 1951:Burlesque 1839:vandalism 1667:WP:London 1582:low level 1530:melodrama 1425:entitled 1150:ownership 1146:anonymous 1017:generally 869:Signaleer 865:burlesque 559:Lozleader 139:! Please 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 7341:contribs 7329:unsigned 7250:Ssilvers 7210:Ssilvers 7170:CmdrObot 7168:Cheers, 7019:Skekayuk 6979:Madmedea 6944:Madmedea 6933:Madmedea 6923:48 hours 6766:Ssilvers 6737:Ssilvers 6709:Ssilvers 6674:Tomandlu 6642:official 6584:Futurano 6303:hOUNSLOW 6020:Category 5888:Victoria 4950:Victoria 4910:Tyburnia 4895:Millbank 4601:Ssilvers 4581:Ssilvers 4497:Haringey 4451:Ssilvers 4430:Ssilvers 4358:Ssilvers 4328:Ssilvers 4250:Archive 4242:Ssilvers 4146:Ssilvers 4090:Ssilvers 3905:East End 3448:Ssilvers 3429:Ssilvers 3400:Ssilvers 3368:Ssilvers 3336:Ssilvers 3327:Iolanthe 3307:Ssilvers 3276:Mile End 3253:Mile End 3249:Old Ford 3175:Ssilvers 3154:Ssilvers 3081:Ssilvers 3037:Ssilvers 2994:Ssilvers 2973:Ssilvers 2873:21 March 2830:contribs 2822:Jlittlet 2818:unsigned 2814:Thanks! 2776:St Giles 2766:Jlittlet 2640:Ssilvers 2498:Ssilvers 2281:Ssilvers 2260:1886 PoW 2240:Ssilvers 2192:Ssilvers 2128:and the 2093:for 2006 2001:Ssilvers 1973:Ssilvers 1965:Travesty 1961:Travesty 1843:reverted 1727:Ssilvers 1706:Ssilvers 1657:Ssilvers 1349:contribs 1144:suspect 1063:Jhamez84 1028:Jhamez84 937:, isn't 712:flobalot 526:Jeff3000 505:link to 190:harmless 120:Tutorial 92:Welcome! 7460:Colin4C 7093:Colin4C 6919:) then 6660:WP:SPAM 6615:Colin4C 6446:Colin4C 6431:Colin4C 6380:Colin4C 6282:Colin4C 6002:Schools 5747:Pimlico 5308:Bridges 4917:Pimlico 4890:Mayfair 4857:Kilburn 4812:Aldwych 4808:Adelphi 4489:Hackney 4187:2 April 3516:Colin4C 3477:Colin4C 3243:is the 3066:italics 2782:, with 2729:Circeus 2698:Circeus 2557:I'd go 2511:Colin4C 2509:me....) 2444:Henrygb 2415:Colin4C 2379:Colin4C 2330:Colin4C 2138:to the 2126:license 2017:Colin4C 1938:Colin4C 1908:theatre 1894:Colin4C 1874:Colin4C 1847:sandbox 1671:project 1624:Colin4C 1572:Colin4C 1553:theatre 1532:to the 1516:Colin4C 1466:Colin4C 1446:Colin4C 1415:Colin4C 1389:Colin4C 1371:Colin4C 1340:SatyrTN 1328:WP:LGBT 1257:Colin4C 1229:Colin4C 1200:Colin4C 1168:Colin4C 1135:Colin4C 1091:Colin4C 1037:points: 1002:WP:LEAD 939:Deneuve 925:Colin4C 911:serious 901:Colin4C 830:Colin4C 821:Dracula 802:Colin4C 755:Colin4C 643:Colin4C 597:Colin4C 514:British 507:British 484:Colin4C 435:Colin4C 326:Aldgate 294:Colin4C 266:Colin4C 232:Colin4C 175:Colin4C 98:welcome 87:Welcome 39:archive 7388:Ilford 7363:WP:NOR 7359:WP:VER 6957:modern 6892:. See 6574:Thanks 6484:Review 6258:(talk) 5997:People 5839:Temple 4817:Strand 4514:Cheers 4499:-: --> 4491:-: --> 4222:(Talk) 4012:about. 3007:thing! 2908:(Talk) 2807:(Talk) 2611:abjotu 2293:-: --> 2254:-: --> 2130:source 2061:MarÃa 2030:wanted 1565:Things 933:Maybe 663:later. 6915:(per 6064:over. 4478:Hi ya 4219:ALoan 3992:area. 3135:Gordo 3116:Gordo 3057:, in 2905:ALoan 2804:ALoan 2608:tariq 2074:cosas 2068:habla 1304:Done 1103:.... 980:WP:GA 446:Note 16:< 7595:Talk 7593:â¢ 7591:MRSC 7569:Talk 7567:â¢ 7565:MRSC 7543:Talk 7541:â¢ 7539:MRSC 7516:Talk 7514:â¢ 7512:MRSC 7441:Talk 7439:â¢ 7437:MRSC 7402:Talk 7400:â¢ 7398:MRSC 7337:talk 7333:Hjuk 7050:pub! 6874:GFDL 6704:here 6546:. -- 5291:2018 5286:2014 5281:2010 4937:Soho 4908:and 4810:and 4495:and 4273:Talk 4271:â¢ 4269:MRSC 4191:2007 3270:The 3110:and 3031:and 2966:The 2877:2007 2828:â¢ 2826:talk 2796:Soho 2794:and 2549:Talk 2547:â¢ 2545:MRSC 2388:70s. 2357:live 2097:2007 1967:and 1910:and 1813:real 1677:and 1613:The 1585:now. 1345:talk 989:and 985:Per 537:and 410:here 7533:re 7349:In 7118:by 7089:Bow 6249:BAC 5969:A–Z 5964:1–9 4185:On 4171:DYK 3817:all 2871:On 2857:DYK 2056:won 1922:). 1790:to 1290:or 959:Bow 520:or 7365:). 7343:) 7339:• 7067:. 6903:. 6882:{{ 6870:}} 6864:{{ 6471:. 6421:, 4620:. 4217:-- 4211:. 4193:, 4189:, 3255:, 3251:, 3245:E3 3047:at 2903:-- 2897:. 2879:, 2875:, 2832:) 2569:. 2297:+ 2157:gr 2152:An 2142:. 2071:~ 2063:: 1794:. 1429:. 1347:| 1308:. 1046:). 686:or 419:) 199:); 7335:( 7032:! 7001:. 4819:) 4784:e 4777:t 4770:v 3413:. 3062:6 2836:. 2824:( 2077:) 2065:( 1681:. 1351:) 1343:( 192:; 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index