User talk:Kittybrewster/Archive 2

4479:

talk page, (b) monitoring my contribs, (c) stalking me and (d) editing Arbuthnot articles. I think you are far less likely to be unconstructive although you have been unfair and shown lack of balance (e.g. Alexander George Arbuthnot was not a mere shopkeeper but was a British citizen and trader who was executed following a military tribunal which led to a diplomatic incident). If VK edits an article on, e.g. a Baronet, that is fine provided it is in good faith and helpful. I hope and think all three of us will learn something from this discussion. In other words, I find VK's contributions irritating and unconstructive. I have no problem discussing things constructively. Both of you have sought to test the waters by nominating articles for afd on the basis of "see how it pans out". I think you may help improve wikipedia, while VK is bored and is just filling his time. I was looking for something to offer on my part in order to get VK to sign up and the only thing you seemed to want is of no particular concern to me. What you are doing is attacking my articles in order to get something from people other than me. I think you should talk to them about that. -

188:, seems to have edited and created lots of pages concerning this family (including saying that one of them was Vice-Admiral of Scotland, and that one of them is an entrepreneur (Googling suggests the company concerned, W. M. Gulliksen, does actually exist, but doesn't suggest it's notable in any way)). The 2nd Baronet is supposed to have married Anne, daughter of the 4th Earl of Findlater, but my sources say that that nobleman had no daughter of that name, and I can't see any relative of any of the Earls marrying anyone called Gillis. My gut reaction would be that it's a couple of vanity articles concerning a non-notable American family (one of whom is presumably the editor concerned) together with a completely invented illustrious family history. 2958:). Sparkzilla calls these requirements "subjective." To me this demonstrates the stakes for Knowledge of deciding that unsubstantiated malicious allegations that no credible source argues are true can nevertheless be included on its pages. However, as most editors seem to prefer relaxing these requirements rather than enforcing policy, I am increasingly concluding that Wikpedia is not, or soon may not, be the encyclopaedia I thought it was going to be. I have extensively and patiently argued the case for the exclusion of these allegations, but am less and less inclined to continue with this attempt to explain and enforce policy. But thanks again for your support. 4431:(de-indent) Actually it was only recently when I discovered the existence of the plethora of articles you have created. How many of them have I edited? As you're well aware I've pointed out slight wording problems with them, yet I have not acted on any of those problems, hoping you would take appropriate action yourself. I have nominated what I believe to be two minor members of the family for deletion, but that is the extent of my involvement. To claim I am "attacking" your articles is assuming bad faith, and I urge you to take a more pragmatic view. As Giano has stated, it would be better to concentrate on creating 3860:

some time ago is really pathetic. I mean, is that the best you can do? Suggesting that all anons must be me is also wrong, as is suggesting that all the people you cite, because they all vote similarly on some (but not all) AfD's is also rather paper thin. One of your classic lines is assume good faith, yet on the basis of that page you quite obviously don't. I state again, that I am an independent. You have no case here which would not be thrown out of any decent arbitration. You obviously have little to do with your time.

2867:, having added 1755-1816 today, and I have been noticing that the links to and infoboxes on the LG pages for Nova Scotia are inconsistent to say the least. I would like to edit and add to you infobox, if I may. 2 - out of idle curiosity, can one purchase the title of baronetcy of Nova Scotia? Are they purely hereditary? I know very little about this type of thing. I know that the 1 square foot of Nova Scotia is still in Windsor castle (having had my picture taken on it) and am curious. 5352: 5180:

especially 2nd a subsequent and this is at the centre of the argument - now we can ignore this issue and pretend it doesn't exist or just not address it for fear of getting blocked then that is one route to go down but not the best route. Now if we can find a solution and iron out these to issues then I am happy to work towards that but I think I would rather leave wiki then be forced into a situation where this is left indefinitely unresolved.--

5826:

and Fred's page can be deleted - Harriet will soon be an "A Class" wikipedia biography as such her husbands notability is easier to prove so mention of his son on the fathers page is more easily justified and so on as the son becomes part of the history of his father. I've been writing biographies here quite a while to a very high standard (said modestly!) I do know what I'm talking about. I see no other option open to you.

1007: 388: 330: 177: 1332:) I seem to have got some English monarchs tagged, because they were also dukes or what have you. An easy way to get around this (rather than reverting those edits) would be to have the project template make the peerage WikiProject mutually exclusive to Royalty/British Royalty, i.e. if royalty is yes or british royalty is yes the peerage-work-group=yes parameter gets ignored. 4712:) did that (i.e., improving articles and/or adding well sourced "finished" articles to mainspace), and if Kittybrewster did the same with the Arbuthnots, I think we'd all be happier and have more time for improving existing articles and stubs/creating good new ones, rather than getting tied up in AfDs and worse. As Sam said above and I alluded to earlier, if 2608:" when adding links to your own website or when getting involved in articles related to you. I understand you may not have been aware of this before, but now that you know of it I think it's reasonable to expect you will abide by it by avoiding ediiting your the articles about yourself and your immediate family, and to avoid adding links to your website. - 4385:

are attacking "my articles" (meaning ones I started). But I think you have the brains to discuss things rationally rather than inevitably invariably responding provocatively. And if wiki is improved by deciding to delete Harriet Arbuthnot (whom VK tagged as nn) or by adding to the article, then God bless you - carry on. Why not? I am all in favour. -

3886:

shows quite clearly that you are incapable of rational and intelligent discussion, despite your pseudo-intellectual posturing. If I see you make one more personal attack on any editor, I shall be happy to present your catalogue of appalling behaviour totally unbefitting the gentleman you claim to be to the appropriate place for community discussion.

5950:

to yourself and you may find others agree with me. I shall not be returning to your page, as I wish to continue editing profitably and usefully elsewhere. Nor will I be editing any of your stubs - have no fear. I sencerely hope you find a solution to your predicament that is satisfactory to both yourself and the body of the encyclopedia. Goodbye

301:. There has to be a "cut off" point where military and aristocracy don't make the threshold. I am inclined to think this subject does, per commanding a large body of men (in this case a whole branch of the army), so might well be a resounding keep if it went to AfD, but I could be wrong. There are probably more dubious examples, however. 1266:

patient and sensitive when it comes to sharing their expertise. I have no patience with bullies. Having said that, I would like to have a good working relationship with fellow editors who are truly interested in improving articles and not just putting their stamp of authority on everything. Do let me know if I can help in any way.

5908:

littered with mistakes it is totally amazing many of them have survived as long as they have. I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you are a liability to Knowledge. I am voting to delete most of your pages because you have proved to me you are totally disinterested in bringing them to an acceptable standard.

4033:

them rather than nuking in the first instance. If after a while they can't be fixed, or you can't agree what the problem is, then you could call an uninvolved third party to review the thing and decide whether it should be AfDd. There are several very good people who would help with this, I'm sure.

4751:

ONIH, can I continue talking to you without VK helping? It seems that his problem with me is that he thinks I have created hundreds of stubs of non-notables. I suggest that step 1 is that he creates a page listing those pages. And that he agrees to contribute to this discussion only by way of you. If

4128:

comment in an AfD as to why they believe someone is notable, in order to assist uninvolved parties commenting in an AfD. For example, if an Irish republican was up for deletion, I would be permitted to make a comment regarding exactly why I believed the article to be worth keeping, as editors without

4032:

Gents, I think this is a good start, please don;t start a battle over it. The tit-for-tat AfDs do need to stop. Some of the articles do need to go, others do not; perhaps the best way to deal with this is to start discussing the nitty-gritty of your objections to the articles, and looking at fixing

3859:

Sorry, but thats quite pathetic. You suggest that I am anti-IRA and that it is wrong or, as you say POV. I suspect you would fall foul on that issue of tens of millions of people and certainly a great many other editors of Knowledge. Singling me out on the basis of a couple of very modest edits quite

2798:

To be honest, I'm not sure where the conflict of interest lies in you donating to the world a freely licenced image. How can that not be a good thing? The more free content we have, the better. Provided you vouch to me the photo is of the subject of the article, I will insert it into the article with

900:. You can't have it both ways. Either Vintagekits stays off your page, except where unavoidable, and vice versa. Or not. But there's not one rule for him and one for you. The copyright issue can be discussed on an article talk page, if necessary, where other interested editors can also be made aware. 279:

Lots to learn - there's never and end to it, because as soon as you've mastered something, it gets changed anyway! I might mention it is the norm not to delete or archive active threads, i.e. when users are still commenting or likely to in the immediate future. It can give the — I'm sure in this case

5949:

Get over it. You would try the patience and good faith of a saint. I am of the opinion you should be permanently banned as you are damaging the encyclopedia, all these AFDs of worthless stubs are disruptive to people whose time is better employed elsewhere. You are now attracting too much attention

5879:

it probably just does but what is the point of a few unreferenced words all of which are said with references elsewhere? I am trying to advise you here, rather than make more stubs please try and concentrate on the ones you have created already - some of those on VFD could perhaps be made notable if

5499:

on the talk page which is not the correct way to reference. As someone who researches heavily it concerns me that you are relying so heavily in all your articles on this book "Memories of the Arbuthnots" especially as it seems to be written by one of them. It is quite possible that it may not be as

5179:

My issue is not with "Arbuthnot articles" or with Kitty editing or even nominating articles of an Irish republican nature. My issue is two fold 1. Block voting on a "ilikeit" or "idontlikeit" basis rather than actually applying wiki policy and 2. Notability - I dont think that Baronets are notable -

4478:

I broadly agree. VK is the person I have identified as being IMHO disruptive and taking up my time by remarks such as "fact" against a date in 1883 or thereabouts, thereby preventing me improving articles. Therefore my objective here is to negotiate with you to persuade him to stop (a) monitoring my

4135:

What other articles are you suggesting it applies to? Rather than cast the net too wide initally, it would be best to keep the scope narrow in order to make it easier to get everyone to agree. Naturally should VK or another editor immediately start nominating similar articles that aren't part of the

4083:

no one is stalking you. You seem to be in a hole, and quite a lot of people have stopped editing in an attempt to throw you a ladder. If a compromise cannot be reached between you here, it will be reached by others, and you will find you have far less control over the outcome ar "RFArbitration" or

3974:

Naturally you would be welcome to pick a similar number of editors in return. I would suggest that this is a quick and simple solution, and prevents a large amount of time being wasted going through dispute resolution which could be spent far more constructively improving the encyclopedia. Thoughts?

3738:

is pertinent here; Kittybrewster, would you like to consider refraining from editing articles on Arbuthnots? That may seem to be an extreme step, but it is one of issues which has arisen at repeated AfDs and other discussions, and it sems to me that restraint would probably be an important factor in

2953:

Hi, thankyou for your support on the BLP noticeboard in relation to Richard Gere. I thought you may be interested to know that the main editor in favour of including false and unsubstantiated malicious allegations is now arguing on the WP:BLP talk page that the policy should be relaxed to remove the

311:

Yes, I accept he is entitled to place a nn tag and that this is prudent/ low level. It seems to me strange that there are folks who question notability of a general while contributing to articles for young men who achieved nothing other than (the dubious honour of) getting shot. I have no doubt this

6111:

Nevertheless we must surely sit back and look at his overall stupendous contribution to Knowledge instead of heading down the path which appears to be developing here. Instead of us being negative about these stubs we should rationally consider them and try to do something about them. One fellow up

4439:

I'm well aware that other editors may need some persuading to agree to this, and certainly some more than others. However I think it is best if an agreement is worked out between a small number of editors who are most involved first, and go from there. I don't think blanket bans on editing articles

4357:

That fails to address the underlying problem, that should we be unable to reach an agreement the AfD would attract the usual partisan voters, which is what my proposal is designed to avoid. My proposal actually went far further than what you're asking for here, in that neither I or any of the named

4216:

I don't deny partisan voting has gone on from both sides, but I've no intention of gathering evidence on your behalf. Rather than engaging in bitter recriminations, perhaps we can look forwards? Is the agreement acceptable to you, and do you believe you can use your influence over the other editors

3906:

I think your evidential "appalling behaviour" and "personal attacks" against me (which are, as demonstrated above), are much more serious than my honest comments. When was the last time I went near an IRA stub? Must be months ago - last year even? I'm just not interested. You can catalogue whatever

3693:

Greetings. Let me assure you that my post to Giano was meant to be lighthearted. Your family's website is unbelievably impressive, btw. My dad and 2 cousins dabble in genealogy for my family, though it isn't notable. (Well, I just found 2 very distant cousins on wikipedia. Conversely, my unassuming

2395:

Hi, saw your note on the talk page. I'm not an admin, btw! You seem to know more about correct names of baronetcy articles, and the name you want for the article doesn't seem to exist (as it's a red link) so I would have thought that you could just click on "move" and do it yourself... unless I'm

5825:

and act on it, while you still have the choice - half thes pages can be amalgamated for instance: Take Harriet's husband - improve his page considerably, then you could put a section there saying his son Fred or (whatever his name is) made miltary history by becoming a Genral aaged 103 or whatever

5193:

on the part of the closing admin and assume he/she knows to evaluate the arguments rather than count the !votes. On issue 2 I suggest you argue your case on the appropriate pages. Meanwhile I request that you ban yourself voluntarily from (a) editing Arbuthnot articles and (b) adding nn or fact or

5093:

have to make a serious effort to negotiate your own truce. That's going to require a lot of diplomacy on both sides, but I'm afraid that however difficult either of you finds it, making that big effort to find a breakthrough may now be your only way to avoid something being imposed. Are either of

4384:

I cannot say what other people will do. It may be that the solution needs to be extended. You are right to the extent that my edits to IRA articles have been correcting spelling mistakes (quite a lot) and were all some time ago. I am totally confused why VK and you (who seem to be acting with him)

3885:

I could find ample more examples of your attempts at POV pushing, if I so desired. Perhaps you can explain your contradictory stance that stubs of IRA members are to be deleted, while stubs of Arbuthnot family members are to be kept and expanded? Your constant need to fall back on personal attacks

765:

I suspect the problem is that nobody knows it's there; it doesn't seem to be linked from anywhere but your user page. If you want to attract outside interest to something, mentioning it on a relevant talk page is often a good idea. If there are at least two people who agree that there's a problem,

622:

At first I thought it might have been his baronet's badge but obviously not if he didn't inherit the title until 1939 and the photo was taken in the '20s. It looks a bit like the Belgian Croix de Guerre which he was awarded, but I'm not sure if that's only worn on the chest (?) It is a bit hard to

296:

Vintagekits isn't disrupting this. He's quite entitled to place a nn tag if he wishes, or a prod or take it to AfD, if he thinks any of these things are merited. He is proceeding very prudently with merely the lowest level to start with. This is the normal business of editing, and as long as it is

5503:

who actually own the documents which "Memories of the Arbuthnots" should have checked before publishing then I wonder what other facts it did not check. Do you see the problem here, are there any other references you could use in addition to this book? If they Arbuthnots are here to stay (I don't

4634:

source, I added some more factual information. You reverted, saying it was true but unsourced - while ignoring the fact that the only source in the whole (quite substantial) article records just his election results. Remove the unsourced material and you would end up with - well, nothing, bar a

4308:

So far as I am aware, I have no influence over anybody else. I agree that I share an approach many other people have but I have not been voting in a partisan manner and had not noticed some of the names you list as "right thinking". Other people are free to make their own arrangements with anyone

2164:

Absolutely, and thanks. I have left a note on the talk page indicating that you are in the process of confirming the permission, as well as on the page for possible violations. An admin or the permissions clearance people should take care of the rest. Thanks again for doing this the right way.

1265:

Hi and thanks for the message! Peremptory, terse, discourteous AND arrogant AND a hypocrite. I've had a long life in the world of science and have a holy respect for good logic and reasoned thinking, but I also know that the truly knowledgeable people, in all walks of life, without exception, are

5907:

Well cluttering up pages is not something anyone can accuse you of - is it? I have tried to help you with your problems - you are impossible to help. You take advice from no one. You seem to only be interested in creating pages and/or hoping someone else will do the donkey work. Your pages are

2378:

article, but it seems the debate on his sexuality is almost as highly charged as that at the waterpump on killing/murder. I think you have started a great and rightful debate, and have added my comments which I hope you find useful in your case for good precedent and policy. With Best Regards, -

853:

has tried to file the RfC anyway, and I've fixed it for them per a helpme request (as best as I can without admin tools); I also removed the 'this is a draft' line because the page was linked from RfC and people were ignoring it anyway. (Your user subpage was linked - via an external link - from

129:

I agree with Bonkers that he's an established user, but I don't see anyone with a similar editing pattern, and can't block him just on that whiff of a suspicion. If any of you has a solid guess as to his identity - it's not Vintagekits, I've already examined that possibility due to their similar

5545:

up to an acceptable level someone may one day wish to GAC or FAC her in which case these pages will be closely scrutenised. I am not trying to be difficult but it is essential that all pages, and the facts therein, pertaining to the Arbuthnot's (or any other subject for that matter) are beyond

4524:

You really are embarrassing yourself by saying that adding a fact tag to an article is being disruptive. If you add content to any article it should already be sourced and referenced, if it is not then it should and will get a fact tag put on it. Remember these are not "your" articles, they are

4435:

articles on your family members, quality over quantity. If this cannot be resolved quickly and simply it will be more difficult for you to improve the articles, as your time will be spent otherwise engaged. Going back to the quality over quantity, I could create 50 stubs on possibly notable IRA

4418:

there was not much there to explain her notability, now was there? He may have had ulterior motives (I don't know) but no-one is going to agree with you that it was an obviously unreasonable edit at the time. Unless one already knew of her there was nothing there confirming great notablility.

3817:

It suits you to be able to scrap around and name others as "partisan voters" when in fact I vote as I see fit and am not influenced by anyone. Please do not include me in any perceived cabal as I am independent. To suggest that others who simply do not agree with your activities are somehow all

5638:

Probably best, to be honest. Stumbled into this via another user, and I've already cocked one nomination up (withdrawn). Looked through a lot of the category though, and there do seem to be a lot of articles on, shall we say, the brink of notability. I'm not going to AfD any more now though

6121:

Do not lecture me on contributions to this encyclopedia. I see no stupendous contribution from Kittybrewster, and in the words of an old adversary of mine "Knowledge is not therapy" - It is a serious project - this is a bloody encyclopedia, so please treat it as such, and if you imagine this

858:

for a time.) As far as I can tell, it meets the criteria for being open even though you haven't opened it, which is a pretty unusual situation; I'm a bit confused as to do now, so I'm just posting here to let you know what the status quo is so you can make up your own mind. Hope that helps!

6112:

for an AfD was clearly a professional soldier of note. I agree the stub is not up to much but some research and re-writing may bring it up to scratch. Last but not least, Kittybrewster is unwell and doubtless this affects his overall performance etc., and I suspect this will not improve.

5074:

That's it; no third way, as far as I can see. I don't think that the community will accept a continuation of these edit wars, move wars, AfD wars, and barrages of accusation and counter-accusation accompanied by strong political POVs. The situation has been unacceptable for far too long.

3771:

Therefore I propose that the editors named below (which also includes any use of sockpuppets or IPs) refrain from nominating any articles for deletion, or participating in any Arbuthnot and Irish republican related AfD debates, apart from making comments with regard to their notability,

5845:, I have alittle more on him and his wife to add to that section later. I am working and researching the page slowly and thoroughly. creating these stubs is pointless - when you have great deal more to write then is the time to give someone a page of their own. PLease try to see this. 4590:

If he agrees to merge the non notable Baronets from each family into one article then I will consider laying off but if he continues to vigorous defend stub of articles and use wiki as his own personal genealogy website the I am going to be ruthless in putting a stop to his carry on.

4986:

I have another idea. Nobody please comment unless they are an admin and can say whether it is reasonable, constructive and fair. Namely that I be blocked for a week if I post on VKs talk page and that he be blocked for a week if he posts on mine. Then we can co9ntinue here maybe. -

5208:

There is nothing that I can think of, except stop creating stubs on Arbuthnots and Baronets - if you are going to write an article on these people try and make it quality not quantity. Finally, I agree not to edit articles about the Arbuthnots until the notability issue is sorted

5070:

action will be taken to enforce one, by bans and/or blocks. Both editors have goaded each other for months, both have received numerous warnings, and countless requests for restraint have been either ignored or evaded (by causing trouble in some way other than that specified).

1558:, with a default of 180px (which applies for most readers). However, the image subject or image properties may call for a specific image width in order to enhance the readability and/or layout of an article. Cases where specific image width are considered appropriate include: 2302:) has responded with a question. May I suggest you provide the info he asks for and communicate with him directly? He's a well known bot operator, and if you have him do the job you can be sure it will be done quickly. Cheers, and sorry I couldn't help directly this time. -- 4570:

To be honest ONiH, I am not going to stand by and let the Baronet talk nonsense about me. He has got a clue what he is talking and by calling me disruptive, a stalker and irritating is the last way that I going to stop monitoring to multitude of non notable stubs that he

3767:

Too many AfD debates (both Arbuthnot and Irish republican) have been muddied by block voting from partisan editors. While your proposal that "Irish republican" editors should not nominate any Arbuthnot articles for deletion, it lacked any reciprocal gesture in return.

3763:

Despite what you may think, to the best of my knowledge no canvassing of AfD debates regarding Arbuthnot related articles goes on. If it does happen among the Irish (I'm English born and bred, for the record) editors, I am unaware of it. Now for the matter at hand:

3421:

and the redirect associated with it, and its' addition to a number of AfD's in an attempt to segregate people using a blatantly incivil message, is totally inappropriate. The redirect has been deleted, the template as well, and your additions to the AfD's reverted.

58:- I'd block him straight-out, but I can't figure out who he might be. Do you have any idea? He seems to have some particular complaint with you, so I thought you might have a solid guess, at which point we can do a checkuser and look for a long-term solution. | 1089:

about the baronets, you always remain calm and continue. I have not got your patience and have had enough of hassels from many people; Im also starting a new 9-5 job this month so won't have the hours I have now. Anway, goodbye and keep up the excellant work.

3656:

I think you should give my comments some serious consideration. Many pages are worthy of retention others frankly are not. I am quite prepared to help you improve the more interesting ones but you must realise others are of no use to an encyclopedia at all.

258:

As your talk page is getting rather long, I thought you might benefit from an archive. See the box at the top of the page. Click the red link to open the page itself. Just cut and paste unwanted talk into it. (If you don't want the box, then just delete it.)

1715:

Heho, I think, if they were elected like the governors of the United States of America, then we should use {{s-off}}, if they were intended for their office like the governors of the British Colonies then we should use {{s-gov}}. Greetings and Happy Easter

2153:

Hi, please follow the procedures for confirming copyright permissions described above. Also, do not remove the administrative copyvio tag from your own work. This is considered vandalism, as Knowledge takes copyright issues very seriously. Thank you.

5141:

It means that we sketch out what we want from the other (e.g. that you don't edit Arbuthnot articles) and if we cannot agree something then BHG will either block us both from editing at all or she will impose a ban on you doing xyz and me doing abc. -

4350:

I'm not aware of any edits you've ever made to articles about IRA members to begin with, certainly if you have it's a small number of edits to a small number of articles, therefore not in proportion to the restriction you're suggesting in your second

3426:

do this again, or I will block you. Regardless of whatever you believe, there is no need to sink so low and make such inappropriate edits. Consider this your warning that any further disruption with similar intent will result in a block of one week.

3818:

acting in concert may suit your purpose but it won't wash. Just how many of the articles created by or substantially add to by Vintagekits and yourself have I attacked? How many have I tagged or flagged for deletion? Lets have the true facts here.

6101:

Kittybrewster has been advised countless times to improve his stubs. He chooses not to, instead he creates even more. It is very sad that the only way to have them improved is to nominate them for AFD. This is supposed to be a serious project.

979:

Yes the Earldoms will be in Burke's Peerage, Burke's Extinct Peerage, etc. But I am not aware of any source other than Rayment which seeks to collate them all. He makes mistakes but they are astonishingly rare. It is a source to trust.

6146:

Given that AfD is supporting Giano I think that's unnecessary. We deal in facts and the encyclopedia, we neither victimise or mollycoddle users. If Giano is wrong then argue against him him on AFD and show he's wrong. Otherwise please

2667:

Partly because you and Vintage were involved in an Irish discussion; but I'm sure many Irish know a lot about British titles without being particularly reverent of them. As for me, I'm an overseas hobbyist with access to a set of the

1418:

I have added a couple of reasonably notable Cunningham baronets. Let me know what you think. I may try and put some flesh on them when I have more time. Is there anything you have asked me to do anywhere which I have forgotten about?

2880:

2. At least some of them were bought from the monarch in early times; in fact there was pressur from the Crown on various people to buy one. They could never be traded. It has not been possible to buy a Baronetcy for a long time. -

2359:

issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you

2317: 4193:

Very one sided statement of partisan voting by ONIH. Actually I don't have a problem with agreeing to stay off IRA people if VK leaves my articles alone entirely and ONIH discusses rather than afd. I can't speak for anyone else. -

2513:

The COI is flagged in line of the nomination. I acknowledge it right underneath the VK vote. I am watching it and am fascinated that there are FOUR people voting to delete as their sole contribution. I will now re-read COI. -

1325: 4868:

If you refer to me here I will post here - your choice. P.S. I would not agree to the current proposal until there is an agreement over the notability of Baronets and the Barons who have never had a seat in the House of

1014:

Agree, I wasn't very happy with it although in all honesty I thought it was difficult to read also before my changes. Please feel free to make the changes you feel are necessary to make the page easier to read. Regards,

218:. The idea is to gain consensus, so individual sections do not have a "disagree" option as with AfD for example. The alternative view is stated separately. Users can then choose to endorse whichever view(s) they choose. 5058:

I'm afraid that at this point, it seems to me that you are both drinking heavily in the last-chance saloon :( I'm very disappointed to see that ONIH's timely efforts to broker a truce appear to have been rejected.

427:

You seem to have the details per your post on the French wiki wrt the colours for the crest so I don't quite follow the question. Bit surprised about the colours given as I'm used to seeing sea dogs in vert and or.

4312:

The deal I am putting forward is three sided. 1 That I don't edit articles about IRA members, 2 that VK does not edit any articles created by me (incl all Arbuthnot articles) ; 3 that ONIH discusses before afd. -

2710:

Hi Kittybrewster, Assuming the article is kept at AfD, would you consider uploading a freely licenced image please? It seems strange that we have an article on a (possibly) notable Wikipedian but without a photo!

1383:- do you already know about him? . Incidentally, I thought it strange that you labelled Phillips and Wernher as 'Sirs' before their knighthoods had been conferred. Is that normal? If I'm wrong just revert. Cheers 1539:

In articles, if you wish to have a photo beside the text, you should generally use the "thumbnail" option available in the "Image markup" (this results in 180 pixels wide display in standard preferences default

1329: 312:

article would survive an afd, but what it really needs is not an nn tag (in my opinion) but a "could use expanding" tag. I will work on that when time allows. Meanwhile I must stop feeling VK is stalking me. -

237:

No problem. Complicated business at times. I removed "disagree" as this is meant to be your statement on Astrotrain (and the relevant situation), not a !vote as such on the opening statement. I hope this is OK.

5608:

template is displayed. I have just lost an hours work. Yes, I know I should have saved elsewhere, I did not. I assumed you knew what "in use" meant! It means for a brief period someone does indeed own the page

4650:

was unsourced was it not? I stated in the edit summary that it was probably true but it was unsourced material. I would be happy for you to add the information but not when its unsources. Hardly unreasonable.--

1185:

I'm afraid I don't know enough to comment on it. It seems sourced, though, and there's nothing in it that instantly jumps out as absurd. I don't think being a former feudal baron is worth mentioning, however.

4706:"I could create 50 stubs on possibly notable IRA members right now, but I would rather concentrate on improving the existing articles, ie ones that have a chance of being classed as "good articles" or above." 5893:. It is specifically stated in WP:N as qualifying a person for an article. I think it preferable that info on a person who qualifies goes into his article rather than cluttering up someone else's article. - 2924: 3485:

I do agree that the nomination on this particular AfD doesn't represent the article in question. I'd suggest either an RfC or some formal mediation process. I'll have a word with One Night In Hackney too.

5639:(especially as it's 4am)... but at some point this category probably does need to be looked at a bit - as you'll have noticed I acknowledged that a lot of these articles are obviously notable ... but ... 3377:

Thats all very well, DGG, but why isn't anyone able to address the real problem here: the all too obvious and deliberate stalking and AfDing of articles with the surname of Arbuthnot by the same people?

5559:, obviously some of the problems I anticipated are arriving earlier than expected. This is quite normal once a page becomes fairly large with lots of blue links, it begins to attract attention. Thanks 4930:

Thank you, ONIH for doing your best. I drink to your good health. Maybe we can continue by email? Meanwhile maybe VK can make a page listing non-notables (created by me or otherwise) and his reasons. -

2104:

saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge. Happy editing!

1621:

a truly clumsy heading. I don't understand how to go about changing it. Ideally it should be Lamberton, Berwickshire, or Lamberton, Scottish Borders. Scotland is unnecessary as it is in the preamble.

5298: 1245:. I suppose representative peers had better be put in too, since there's not really any other way to categorise that category, but they will all of course be in one of the other categories already. 4347:

I don't see that as a solution at all, as this does not involve just two or three editors, and if just those are restricted others will just carry on acting as a proxy. In response to your points.

5078:

You are both talented editors, with a fine commitment to wikipedia and you have both added a lot of good material. But I am now at the point where, with great regret, I will argue for a permanent

87:

He created his User page with "I represent the UK organisation Republic which can be found at www.republic.org.uk ". Does this mean he has come to Knowledge with an object in mind? Seems like it.

2853: 5379:-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Per the discussion at 5706: 290: 4910:

Right fuck it then. You lot can carry on your dispute and end up going to arbitration and getting sanctions including bans or blocks, I'll just carry on improving the articles I want to edit.

3362:

Being undecided, I decided not to comment at the AfD, but a friendly suggestion: don't push too hard on the less notable family members. It'll make it easier to defend the more notable ones.

5761:

I'm sorry; I meant a long article on each family. For example, you know of the artilleryman, I presume, because he is related to the other line of baronets; they would form one article, like

5345: 5371:. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that has resulted in blocks being issued. It is best not to 3694:

spouse comes from a famous American family.) While I don't agree on the notability question, I would try to be evenhanded in how I gauge articles on any topic/person. Respectfully yours,

957:

which sounded like they were taken from some print or online source, but the first several I looked at had no sources listed, so I tagged thm as "unreferenced" and moved on. Then I found

2955: 1835:

I've been expecting you. "I am about to inaugurate a little war. I thought they had you assassinated in Hong Kong? THis is my second life - You Only Live Twice Mr Bond " I bid you adieu

5324: 2350: 2215:

to remove the disambig link with this edit summary: "Disambigs should go to finished articles, not lists containing a redlink to a future article." There is discussion ongoing on the

6080:

As a courtesy I inform you I have nominated these pages for deletion. If you have furthter information as to why these people are notable I suggest you add it to the pages concerned.

2464: 953:

I know you are a prolific contributor to articles about Baronets etc, so I ask you for guidance. While doing checking of random articles for referencing, I found a category of Earls:

569:

I have just come across a deletion nomination for Sir Keith Arbuthnot, Bt. You may wish to comment (here, my Talk Page, or elsewhere) on my remarks on that. I think the AfD is wrong.

5982:'s criterion: "Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislatures". -- 5496:

Then please add it to the page along with a citation to prove it linking to a book or web cite listed in the references. I see at the moment you have only put something ambiguously

5405: 5372: 3836: 910:

I agree that the comments should have been on N Stronge's page. I pasted them there, editing out the sniping. VK has never asked me not to post on his page. I guess he has now! -

2877:

1. Well done. Joining it to WikiProject_Nova_Scotia sounds a splendid idea. I am unsure what you have in mind on the infobox but the general principle of consistency seems good.

2364: 3020:, but the death dates from Rayment (16 February) vs. the article on Alexander (10 February) conflict slightly. Could you confirm that the two individuals are identical? Yours, 6073: 6068: 5160:

need to take steps back from the conlict. I would suggest that each of you tried identify both what you need from each other, and what you can do yourself to defuse things. --

4084:"RFC" than you have here at the moment. So please stop these comments such as "stalking" and try to see the actions of others as good faith attempts to solve these problems. 2923:

was not approved for A-class. General consensus was that it is a nice article, well on its way to eventually become A-class, but not just there yet. Comments can be read at

2356: 2097: 5380: 2108: 4742:

What compromise! The Baronet has created hundreds of stubs on non notables - I am not just going to ignore those until something is sorted out about the notablity issue.--

2388: 1960: 1836: 4132:

Distantly related - a member of the Arbuthnot family, obviously someone from the 18th or 19th century is distantly related, assuming they are related at all of course.

3064: 2085: 1803:. Only half the article now comes up and regardless of my efforts I cannot seem to change that. I would appreciate you assistance and for you to tell me what is wrong. 297:

done for sincere reasons, rather than overt and deliberate disruption, there is no problem, even if the person is mistaken. In the lack of evidence to the contrary, we

5360: 3046: 2400: 6084: 1586:

Bear in mind that some users need to configure their systems to display large text. Forced large thumbnails can leave little width for text, making reading difficult.

693:

for his mass spamming and bad faith PRODing. Thanks for rv his abuses but you shouldn't have had to do all that work, and not all those pages need expanding anyway.

1134: 2901:

Thank you for the Barnstar! It felt like a birthday present because my birthday was just the day before! :) Once I sort out a place, I'll put it on my userpage. --

2169: 2101: 2051: 2029: 2007: 1172: 1163: 5031: 5017: 4960: 4940: 4807: 4793: 4519: 4394: 4377: 4232: 4019: 3272: 3258: 3206: 3192: 3168: 3154: 3117: 3099: 3079: 1845: 395:

Please don't label additions to talk pages as minor edits, as some users turn off minor edits on their watchlist. Details of what constitutes a minor edit are at

6155: 3911: 3901: 3864: 3854: 1854: 1110: 646:

I wondered if you might care to update the style and content of these, or pass onto someone else who might be interested. A lot of text is from the 100 year old

4925: 4565: 4473: 4436:

members right now, but I would rather concentrate on improving the existing articles, ie ones that have a chance of being classed as "good articles" or above.

3653:

I have reverted you "wacky" reversion, because the editor in question was only joking and editing in good humour. I have expressed my views on your pages here

6141: 1100:

Thank you. I proberly won't be able to stop myself looking occasionally, I will be worried about the pages I put so much effort into being vandalised! Bye. --

5842:

he does not need a page, that is all stuff I researched for his daughters page - he is not that notable - so all that information can go where I put it here

5823: 5339: 5292: 5174: 5123: 4737: 1299:

I also know that the truly knowledgeable people, in all walks of life, without exception, are patient and sensitive when it comes to sharing their expertise.

624: 6090:

Some courtesey. How disappointing that the other two have managed to bring in another confederate into what appears to me to be a highly personal campaign.

1920:

I have downgraded a number of biographies which you rated as A-class. For an article to get an A-class rating, it should have at least the following items:

54:

Final warning issued; if he does it again, to you or anyone else, please let me know and I'll block him to make it stop. If I knew for sure he was a sock -

34:

In reference to the recent edit war(s) you have been involved in over use of "murder" over "killing" (or words to that effect), please comment on the issue

5489: 5184: 4847: 4726: 4322: 4177: 3450: 3401: 3108:

was just a printer. He asks how many rat catchers or bakers or builders there were in Edinburgh in 1582. Presumably none in the Encyclopedia Britannica. -

3029: 2977: 2389: 1204: 534: 372: 6015: 5722: 5700: 5676: 3952: 3927: 2182: 1909: 1868: 1823: 1653: 1644: 1455: 1305: 100: 6069: 6060: 5227: 5213: 5203: 5151: 5136: 4873: 4816: 4761: 4533: 4488: 3938: 3654: 3590: 3281: 3126: 2782: 2523: 2508: 2490: 2415: 2140: 2035:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org

1437: 1402: 1289: 222: 122: 109: 5806: 5788: 5774: 5756: 4423: 4270: 3725: 3290: 2681: 2662: 1387: 880: 825: 816: 760: 4595: 2890: 2383: 850: 840: 813: 788: 747: 728: 707: 5954: 5938: 5912: 5902: 5884: 5874: 5580: 5550: 5530: 5508: 5475: 4287: 4106: 4088: 3684: 3675: 2803: 2768: 2754: 2737: 2196: 1704: 1366: 1354: 914: 696:

I think he deserves to be blocked indefinitely or for a lengthy period for what he did/does/will do. Don't you agree? We both know his history of pro-

603: 316: 273: 242: 232: 6130: 6116: 6106: 6094: 6027: 3783: 3626: 3612: 1252: 1229: 305: 203: 168: 156: 139: 48: 5255:

issues involved in Kittybrewster editing them, and it's clear that underlies some of the tension at AfDs etc so far. Is that suggestion helpful? --

4863: 4854:

VK, by all means contribute to the discussion but please do so on ONIH's page or yours and let him copy and paste what HE thinks is constructive. -

4682:

JJ has only recently been on my watchlist - hence why your unsourced edit was reverted. Please feel free to reentry the information with a source.--

4203: 3471:

Nothing. The Irish republican cabal (why is that uncivil?) habitually tag articles I have created with afd or nn or fact tags. This is personal. -

2791: 1362:

My bot has now done all the categories you requested. I trust that's all, but if not you know where to make the request for further categories :) --

988: 612: 543: 525: 451: 442: 91: 2262:. If you encounter biographies that you feel deserve an A-class rating, please follow the instructions on that page and ask for an A-class review. 1891: 1068: 1059: 516: 507: 494: 485: 39: 5538:

we need an inline cite so the facts can be checked if any serious student wishes to use the information elsewhere. Again here, this edit of yours

4746: 4686: 4677: 4654: 4641: 3497: 3480: 3466: 2839: 2715: 2274: 943: 5860: 5849: 5625: 5563: 5461: 4709: 4072: 4046: 3753: 3661: 3397:

As there were previously Sir James Matthew Stronges, the article name should include his full title, can you help out with this. Best wishes, --

3368: 1104: 5747:

They are in some cases very distantly related;they just share a surname. And the article would be huge. But I am thinking how to approach it. -

5269: 5108: 4720:

can work together (one whole day so far without a walkout!), we can surely manage the same? I'm willing to assume good faith and roll with it.

3645: 3382: 2943: 1335:

Would this be acceptable, or are there articles which are genuinely in the scope of both WikiProject British Royalty and WikiProject Peerage? --

636: 3602: 3548: 2638:

For what it's worth, an accurate article on me probably could be written off the web; but I would speedy it for making no claim of notability.

2452: 2369: 2259: 1859:

I suggested that "Sir Blofeld" should be "Sir Ernst" and got this bizarre reply. Not everybody recognizes a solecism when they fall over it. -

593: 82: 2635:

until I had been involved a while. I am uneasy about our assumption that all peers are notable; and I am reluctant to expand it to baronets.

5709:

and others being nominated for afd simultaneously. They all seem to be rather more notable than second division footballers. It feels like a

3356: 2806:

PS I'm not sure if you really think it a good idea, or if you're being sarcastic :) I'll AGF and assume the former :) (double edit conflict!)

2235:

Hello. If this is Ralph George Feltham (the diplomat), all I've found for him is an MBE awarded in 1961, nothing about a knighthood. Thanks,

1430: 1374: 1040:. Do we have to manually change all the order of precedence numbers in the list or is there a more sophisticated way of doing this. Regards, 609: 540: 513: 491: 472: 289: 1955: 1554:

Specifying the size of a thumb image is not recommended: without specifying a size the width will be what the reader has specified in their

3713: 3698: 2345: 2216: 2158: 1276:

Great. I have not understood some of the reverting you have done on this article. But together we are all making progress. Do bear in mind

897: 185: 6137:...this really is getting too personal. If you're trying to push away a worthwhile user I imagine you're going the right way about it. -- 4139:

I assumed Robert Murray Arbuthnot was related, given you created the article and share the same surname. I apologise for the assumption.

2249: 2219:

talk page about the article and the way its being created. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. About to edit the other article now.

1784: 1758: 4242:

I'm very pleased to see this discussion starting. I think it's long overdue, and I hope you can all agree some sort of a ceasefire. --

3333: 647: 6021: 2703: 1423: 414: 1484: 6151:. Frankly, accusing someone of a personal vendetta is a personal attack. Let's stick with the merits (or otherwise) of the content.-- 6034:, but at this point I have to start questioning the independence of all the sources you cite. I have expressed concerns before about 3598: 3511: 2967:

The situation has improved a little since I posted the above comment, with the intervention of a couple of very experienced editors.

2912: 2864: 2694:

Sorry, I am not getting involved in this now. Articles are not necessarily consistent, however. Each must be seen on its own merits.

2244: 2013: 904: 843: 750: 468: 204: 6126:- then think again, I would imagine all this vulgar talk of one's relations is a complete embarrassment. FGS enter the real world! 5500:

non POV and candid as it could be! My second concern if that is this book is contradicting the Nothamptonshire Public Record Office

4463: 4157: 3990: 2323: 3636: 3024: 3017: 2971: 2962: 2225: 1625: 710: 3574: 3441:

I disagree. (1) It is an obvious cabal and (2) that needs to be drawn to the attention of the closing admin. It is not uncivil. -

3435: 2444:

That issue of Notes and Queries is available at Google Books. Unfortunately, it's simply a query by Ada Jane Arbuthnot (author of

1270: 1148: 42: 5605: 5457:

you are saying Woodford is in County Galway, when I have just found a legitimate link to the man again placing him in Northants.

3322: 2986: 2871: 1880: 1739:

Yes, work on all corners and ends. :-) The most succession boxes, where this is the case, surely still date from the time before

578: 344:

Thank you. Would you like to tell him? (If he doesn't know already). Dieuk seems remarkably dilligent if he is not J R Gillis. -

5996: 4354:

You earlier claimed that you weren't trying to create a walled garden, I don't consider this request in keeping with that claim.

3002: 2698: 2438: 2306: 1516: 1502: 969:? Wouldn't these titles/persons be in the more standard peerage books? I do not see where he cites to a printed source. Thanks. 673: 73:

Thanks, I'll ask C-R. If it happens again, let me know, as it looks to me like RepUK is increasing his disruption as he goes. |

4256: 3390: 1689: 1085:). I would also like to say well done for all your wonderful work on Knowledge. Despite the many hassels you get, notably from 573: 348: 5039: 2617: 2475: 195: 6055: 5991: 5654: 5536: 5400: 5319: 5264: 5169: 5103: 4996: 4251: 4167:

on the at least a couple of *IRA articles (oddly, the only one I can think of right now and which I was going to link is the

3918:

Now now both. ONIH has made a genuine attempt to be constructive and helpful here. This is not the place to post acrimony. -

3748: 3122:

Was there any mention of "Encyclopedia Britannica" when I made that comment or did you add that reference after the fact?? --

2647: 1915: 1800: 1044: 938: 215: 3822: 2907: 2126: 1532: 159: 5741: 475: 211: 5308: 1807: 1575:

When a small region of an image is considered relevant, but the image would lose its coherence when cropped to that region

1019: 5830: 5539: 5066:

Kittybrewster and Vintagekits them agree between a fairly comprehensive ceasefire which brings an end to the disruption,

1766: 1214: 1094: 920: 67: 5613: 5535:

Well now that we do know the exact date 1880, there is no need for "Memories of the Arbuthnots"'s circa is there? Here

5436: 2558: 2551:

articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,

650:. What was then obviously considered the finest writing needs considerable revision to conform to wikipedia policies... 4812:

Baronet, if you stop "tell lies" about me then I would happily stay off this talkpage. No lies = no comments from me!--

4124:

For clarity, "comment" refers to commenting in AfDs. Rather than voting, an editor concerned about an article can make

2704: 1339: 1127: 284: 263: 228:

Thank you. I thought about it and clearly (not for the first time in my life) jumped the wrong way. I have fixed it. -

5732:

What about a long article on the families concerned? The family may be notable, even if the individual members aren't.

2631:

position is not personal; I came across the discussion after editing another AfD, and had no idea that the article is

1193: 5384: 2860: 2299: 2065: 1731: 4444:

editing on any Irish republican related articles, however (and this isn't directed at you) too often the editing is

791:'s helpme in your userspace (I misread the history), but I'll leave this here because you might find it relevant. -- 5779:

No. He is incredibly distantly related to the Baronets. I know of him because I know of everyone with that name. -

3339: 1672: 1301:

Could Paul Venter provide us with a source for such an amazing statement? Certainly it has not been my experience.

973: 432: 210:

I noticed you posted in the talk page. The normal procedure is to state your view in the outside view section. See

4412: 2284:

Hi Kittybrewster, As I'm currently unable to accept bot requests due to technical issues, I moved your request to

2948: 2920: 2913: 2583: 2448:, referenced in the article), collecting information for that book, so it sheds no further light on the subject. 2255: 2133: 1977:

text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from

1881: 1512:

Please do not clutter my talk page with comments when I have specifically requested you not to do so - see below

1242: 579: 5541:

could you put an inline cite? - so that it is clear exactly which information came from where. If I can bring

4136:

agreement it would not be looked on in a positive light, and further articles could be added to the agreement.

3084:

Judging by the way constructive edits from Vintagekits are reverted, I'd say the term is more than appropriate.

2285: 700:

slants, etc. We both know he is going to continue doing this sort of thing or perpetrate other sorts of abuses.

5682: 5454: 5430:- please note the refs I have researched, which appear to confirm this. This appaears to be the ancestral home 5280: 5011: 4954: 4919: 4787: 4559: 4513: 4457: 4371: 4226: 4151: 3984: 3895: 3848: 3391: 3252: 3186: 3148: 3093: 3058: 2833: 2816: 1995: 1982: 1207:

seems only to be hereditary peers, so life peerage categories (both LPA and AJA) would appear to be necessary.

408: 5132:

Kittybrewster and Vintagekits them agree between a fairly comprehensive ceasefire" - what does this entail?--

3105: 3009: 2206: 925:

Please folks, centralise this discussion rather than splatting it over a dozen article talk pages. I suggest

891: 5114:

Thank you. I agree. We need to move apart somehow. VK, what do you want? What would you like to agree to? -

5002:

Based on what's just happened, I know where this will end up and I'm refusing to get dragged into it sorry.

4283:

can learn to co-operate with each other, then I'm sure you all can. This is at the very least a good start.

1545: 3666:

Thank you. Let the dust (afds) settle first, I think. I have that opinion about some of the IRA members. -

2998: 2230: 1966: 1682: 1618: 965:. I find it appears to be just someone's webpage. Would you consider it to be a reliable source satisfying 870: 802: 781: 539:

Will do so tonight (just getting the Wiki-email validation thing sorted as I've not switched it on before)

5822:- However, that does not solve Kittybrewsters current problems. I strongly suggest you read my edit here 3776:. That way a community consensus can be gained by uninvolved editors, and it's all fair and above board. 3325:

to 15th Earl. His brother James was the 14th! I am unsure how to do it. Regards, 14:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

2537:

Knowledge is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", but if you have a conflict of interest, you should

1992:

a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely

1411: 738: 6138: 5427: 4504:

I don't understand this. Who are you directing this at, and who are the other people being alluded to?

3808: 3507: 3398: 3330: 3038: 3031: 2976: 2342: 2146: 1320: 1169: 1145: 1119: 1037: 130:

comments on the open AfD - let me know or, if you're not comfortable doing it openly, just email me. |

962: 6051: 5987: 5396: 5315: 5304: 5260: 5165: 5099: 5004: 4947: 4912: 4780: 4552: 4506: 4450: 4364: 4247: 4219: 4168: 4144: 3977: 3888: 3841: 3744: 3537: 3245: 3240: 3179: 3141: 3086: 3051: 3042: 2826: 2061: 1463: 934: 684: 401: 29: 6006:

backbencher ever to sit in Parliament. For some of the medieval MP's, we know nothing but the name.

1933:

the article should be structured in such a way that at least a ToC appears, and no section is a stub

5660: 4266:

I think 1NIH is talking good and frank sense here, I hope something good and sensible comes of it.

3045:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 2844: 2821: 2689: 2421: 2334: 2279: 1924:

at least 1 picture; no copyright issues; fair use should be explained for use on that specific page

1667: 1027: 664: 641: 481:

Is the Viscount an armiger? You cannot just attribute Arms to him because the surname is the same.

5501: 1471:

If you are reading this please consider yourself volunteered to clean up and re-write and improve

1130:) to that? I can advise on the required mark-up, but I'm not familiar with template code editing. 808:

If you want the RfC for Vintagekits to proceed you must sign off/endorse under the section called

5934: 5898: 5870: 5784: 5752: 5718: 5672: 5576: 5526: 5485: 5471: 5447: 5383:, there seems to be no plausible case that this article is of particular relevance to members of 5365:"The occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Knowledge's common practice." 5335: 5288: 5223: 5199: 5147: 5119: 5027: 4992: 4936: 4859: 4803: 4757: 4484: 4390: 4318: 4199: 4102: 4068: 4015: 3948: 3923: 3735: 3671: 3622: 3570: 3476: 3446: 3352: 3268: 3202: 3173:

Exactly. And to possibly alleviate some of the tension round here, perhaps it would be better if

3164: 3113: 3075: 2886: 2764: 2733: 2658: 2591: 2519: 2486: 2411: 2192: 2081: 1905: 1864: 1819: 1700: 1677: 1640: 1612: 1499: 1480: 1451: 1398: 1350: 1285: 1260: 1225: 1159: 1055: 167: 17: 5568:

No problem; I will look in The Journal. Probably next week. Incidentally, Memories is online at

4778:

I did suggest that to be fair, and I don't see why Bastun is disrupting this discussion either.

4502:

What you are doing is attacking my articles in order to get something from people other than me.

2060:

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows

5695: 5649: 5556: 5022:

I fully understand. If an Admin or a genius should read this please recommend a way forward. -

4010:

Do tell me how Robert Murray Arbuthnot is related. I will give you a barnstar for that info. -

2328: 2311: 2166: 2155: 2105: 1887:

See the section on acrimony. Would you like me to see what I can find out about this? Regards,

1238: 926: 35: 4841:

Disruption by saying I'm willing to assume good faith and work within the proposal? *Le sigh*

770:, rather than leaving it in your userspace and hoping somebody notices it. Hope that helps! -- 766:

and the RfC is certified (or you think it will be certified very soon), you should post it to

114:

Vintage, I prefer that you do not leave comments on my talk page. 'Crucified on a cross' is a

6152: 4731:

After an edit conflict - well, it appears VK isn't prepared to compromise on anything... :-(

3406: 3010: 2778: 2613: 2587: 2504: 2471: 2293: 1507: 997: 654: 586: 462: 3730:

One of the issues which underlies a lot of the tension over these articles is concerns over

2426:

There is a pdf article at this address but it is pay per view so I don't know what's in it.

703:

Why don't you lodge a serious complaint as well to the Administrators or ArbCom committee??

6047: 6011: 5983: 5975: 5802: 5770: 5737: 5392: 5368: 5311: 5256: 5161: 5095: 4243: 3740: 3503: 3341: 2677: 2643: 2427: 1974: 930: 589:. It could probably do with more in the family section and some more personal information. 115: 5504:

have a problem with most of them) then you have to expand them at reliably reference them

5431: 2653:

I entirely believe you. I am fascinated that the afd has attracted so many Irish votes. -

8: 5376: 3316: 2622: 2458: 2361: 2240: 1555: 1489: 1443: 1412: 659: 632: 564: 380: 4187: 2499:

specifa/iclly warns against participating in AFD discussions when you have a conflict. -

1081:

Just a quick message to say goodbye as I am leaving my Knowledge account (reasons at my

151:

Im flattered, I truly am, I've been here a couple of weeks and you consider me to be an

6002:

Probably he is notable; but I am not convinced, as a matter of principle, that we need

5930: 5894: 5866: 5818:

Incidentally, most of the Dashwood information is in more detail and better context at

5794: 5780: 5765:, and he could fit in as a paragraph under his father or brother, depending on format. 5748: 5714: 5668: 5572: 5522: 5521:

1882. Nor do the Northamptonshire records say General Charles was stll living there. -

5481: 5467: 5443: 5331: 5284: 5219: 5195: 5143: 5115: 5045: 5023: 4988: 4932: 4855: 4799: 4753: 4480: 4386: 4314: 4284: 4195: 4098: 4064: 4011: 3944: 3919: 3803: 3667: 3618: 3566: 3472: 3442: 3429: 3348: 3264: 3198: 3160: 3109: 3071: 3016:

Someone created a stub on him. I suspect this is Charles Maitland of Pitrichie, son of

2896: 2882: 2760: 2729: 2654: 2515: 2482: 2435: 2407: 2188: 2147: 2077: 1901: 1860: 1815: 1696: 1636: 1495: 1476: 1447: 1394: 1346: 1281: 1221: 1198: 1155: 1131: 1051: 985: 911: 877: 855: 822: 757: 600: 531: 522: 439: 369: 345: 322: 313: 270: 229: 119: 97: 47: 6113: 6091: 5819: 5762: 5705:

I apologise for not being a gifted biographer. I am feeling rather under attack with

5687: 5641: 5633: 5542: 5423: 5388: 4717: 4415: 4280: 4129:

a specific knowledge of the subject may not realise exactly what makes him notable.

3935: 3908: 3861: 3819: 3793: 3607: 3379: 3287: 2935: 2759:

What a good idea! And just as I was trying to follow the spirit behind the rules. -

2266: 2137: 2123: 1970: 1947: 1888: 1851: 1804: 1710: 1650: 1622: 1434: 1420: 1393:

No I didn't; is that Friedrich? . And you are right. But baronetcy not knighthood. -

1302: 1249: 1211: 1190: 1076: 954: 725: 570: 504: 482: 192: 135: 88: 78: 63: 4217:

concerned to agree to it as well, to save everyone a whole lot of time and trouble?

4163:

For the record, I vote according to policy and notability. In the past, I've voted

2096:

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at

1978: 5413: 5381:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Baronetcies#AfD nomination of Alexander George Arbuthnot

5210: 5181: 5133: 5052: 4870: 4813: 4743: 4683: 4651: 4592: 4530: 4470: 3758: 3587: 3583: 3559: 3554: 3532: 3278: 3123: 2994: 2928: 2774: 2721: 2669: 2609: 2500: 2467: 2397: 2320: 2289: 2113: 1513: 1384: 1380: 1267: 1086: 1033: 867: 799: 778: 690: 354:

Hi Kittybrewster, I was hoping someone else would pursue it so I didn't have to :)

106: 2954:

requirement to edit BLP entries sensitively, responsibly, and conservatively (see

6123: 6007: 5922: 5798: 5766: 5733: 5079: 5044:

OK, I'm responding as an admin, as KB requested. This reply is directed to both

4660: 4647: 4627: 4623: 4619: 3542: 2903: 2673: 2639: 2010:

and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org".

2006:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at

1740: 1313: 1180: 958: 396: 339: 253: 5082:

on both of you, or at least a series of wideranging bans to keep you far apart.

4635:

statement that he ran for election to the Dáil 4 times and was successful once.

2567:

to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see

5971: 5839: 5247:

Good work :) This sounds like progress, and I have a suggestion: howsabout you

3779:

The editors who have been involved in partisan voting apart from yourself are:

3586:

was not editor or contributed to any of the AfD's that you are talking about!--

2868: 2632: 2568: 2380: 2236: 1794: 1778: 1752: 1725: 721: 628: 55: 5283:

edited today. I may be the best person to bring some of them up to scratch. -

4440:

are appropriate, knowing how badly VK is at spelling at times I would welcome

4142:

Now, is the agreement broadly acceptable to you, possibly with some tweaking?

2925:

Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/A-class review/Sir Norman Stronge, 8th Baronet

1531:

Please note there is a policy relating to image size which should be followed

1168:

Oh yes, of course, I just wasn't sure whether it had been launched or not. --

6148: 6127: 6103: 6081: 6043: 6035: 6031: 5979: 5967: 5951: 5926: 5918: 5909: 5881: 5857: 5846: 5827: 5710: 5622: 5610: 5560: 5547: 5505: 5458: 5433: 5276: 5252: 5190: 4945:

Indeed. Thanks for trying to resolve this in a measured and gentlemanly way.

4526: 4420: 4267: 4085: 4041: 4035: 3798: 3731: 3710: 3706: 3681: 3658: 3642: 2800: 2788: 2751: 2725: 2712: 2695: 2496: 2431: 2338: 2303: 2179: 2040: 1686: 1669: 1472: 1464: 1363: 1336: 1277: 1139: 1101: 1091: 1082: 998: 966: 948: 901: 767: 670: 608:

Think we need slightly more on his war service as well - nearly there though

590: 422: 302: 298: 281: 260: 239: 219: 3455:

What does a man from Montrose, Scotland have to do with the Irish "cabal" ?

5497: 4668: 3527: 3415: 2940: 2932: 2271: 2263: 1952: 1944: 1898: 1246: 1208: 1187: 981: 447:

Oh I wasn't doubting the accuracy of what you said just an unusual colour

189: 131: 74: 59: 5387:. Note that while it may be inaccurate to describe this as cross-posting, 1379:

Hi Kittybrewster, here's another baronet for you - the younger brother of

5569: 5555:

Further to the above, could you cast you eye over the final section here

4842: 4732: 4721: 4713: 4672: 4636: 4276: 4172: 3788: 3021: 2990: 2449: 2220: 2212: 2119: 1799:

Sorry to bother you yet again but I seem to have done soemthing wrong at

1661: 970: 864: 860: 796: 792: 775: 771: 448: 429: 5865:

I thought being an MP automatically crossed the notability threshold. -

5351: 2849:

Hello! Two questions, business and pleasure. 1 - I would like to pull

155:. Please don't talk about me behind my back like little school children. 5442:

How very sloppy of me. WHOOPS. You are absolutely right. Thank you. -

4664: 3998:

I probably object to the comments rather than the !vote. E.g. Dandruff.

3617:

Apologies. Your user page suggested you support Irish republicanism. -

3177:

focussed on the content of an edit rather than the editor who made it?

1065: 1041: 1016: 358: 5604:

I have just moved the page into User space. One does not edit when am

5517:

It is not contradicting them. It did not know the exact date and says

5480:

The General died 1870 and Arthur was living there when it was sold. -

898:

User_talk:Tyrenius#I_was_writing_this_the_other_night_as_I_got_blocked

503:

by Messrs., John & John Bernard Burke, 3rd edition, London, 1844.

5970:

in editing Arbuthnot articles, but I am afraid that you are wrong on

5275:

VK doesnt have an issue with me editing them. And mostly there is no

4063:

What I am trying to say here is back off please. Stop stalking me. -

3489: 3458: 3263:

And should rightly feature in this wikipedia. No mere rat catcher. -

2968: 2959: 2375: 1939:

it should be well written (but the rules are not as strict as for FA)

1772: 1746: 1719: 4550:

VK we're trying to discuss this constructively, you aren't helping.

3502:

Please would you also draw to the attention of the closing admin on

3321:

Hello Kitty. Sorry to bother you but I wondered if you could change

1526: 6030:, and on that basis I have changed my !vote to strong delete. I am 5419: 3364: 3277:

Well we'll soon see how notable he is when I stick an AfD on him.--

1203:

I see no reason why Lords of Parliament shouldn't be included. And

1154:

It can wait. It is not ready to float. Real life takes priority. -

839:

OK- when you do the section is "Requests for comment/User conduct".

744: 743:

You forgot to sign your statement on the RfC for Vintagekits. See:

5299:

An answer to the debate on using directories to assert notability?

3907:

you like. You can dish it out but you don't like any opposition.

2495:

Why are you even commenting on the AfD on your own autobiography?

2020:

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted

1685:. Which WikiProject/work group, if any, covers French nobility? -- 3695: 2122:'s father was a baronet? Sir William Waller Bruce, 10th Baronet. 1345:

No, the logic is right. They are covered by both projects. :) -

2773:

There'd be no problem with that arrangement that I'm aware of. -

1123: 467:

Any ideas where I might find the Leathers family arms to add to

6026:

Hi Kitybrewster, I was alarmed to see the problem discussed in

2561:

about articles related to your organization or its competitors,

5681:

That's the thing - it doesn't read particularly notably. And

5346:

Canvassing on the AfD nomination of Alexander George Arbuthnot

2132:

I have added the Miller baronets of Manderston, starting with

4309:

they like. Everybody is free to read any agreement made here.

1144:

Whatever became of the request for comment for Vintagekits?--

2787:

Good, thanks. I'm happy to do it, if kittybrewster wants. --

1936:

all statements should be referenced using in-line references

2750:

could add it? I have no conflict of interest, after all. --

2351:

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007

2046: 2023: 697: 280:

mistaken — impression that the user has something to hide.

5843: 5361:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Alexander George Arbuthnot

5303:

It seems that the question has already been answered: see

5251:

agree not to edit articles on Arbuthnots? There are major

3047:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Alexander George Arbuthnot

5218:

I have no plans to create further Arbuthnot articles. --

5062:

At this point, I see only two possible solutions. Either

4171:

article - but its AfD record seems to have disappeared).

3347:

Notable for having founded a successful merchant bank. -

1985:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. 4358:

editors could propose any of your articles for deletion.

3641:

I have replied to your comment on my talk page. Regards

3104:

VK's edits are not constructive. Eg His suggestion that

2533:

For future reference, here's the core of the guideline:

2428:

http://nq.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/s12-IV/83/219-g

1969:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 5156:

This war won't be stopped by action from one side: you

585:

I think it's shaped up nicely, so please do initiate a

521:

Yes, he is armigerous. I will email you the details. -

4798:

To be fair, you did. Please would VK sign up to it. -

1494:

Funny! Well it amused me anyway.Happy april fools day.

5363:. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that 4663:

revert my admittedly unsourced edit but leave all of

3582:

Block voting! we have different !votes. Additonally *

625:

Knowledge:WikiProject Orders, Decorations, and Medals

623:

make out too. Maybe you could direct the question to

5621:

OK, not to worry - I work best in use space anyway!

5546:

reproach where the references are concerned. Thanks

5426:

as it appears the Arbuthnot's home was in fact here

5355:

Your contributions history shows that you have been

5189:

I hear what you say. On issue 1 I think you need to

3159:

There is no reason to revert a constructive edit. -

2390:

Sir David Llewellyn, 4th Baronet Llewellyn of Bwllfa

2064:. For more information on Knowledge's policies, see 1205:

Category:Barons in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

706:

Pls. respond on my talk page if you care to. Yours,

3037:An article that you have been involved in editing, 2374:Hi! My apologies if we clashed this morning on the 1961:

Please follow the permission confirmation procedure

5418:Are you quite sure you have linked to the correct 5089:of you wants to avoid that, I think that you will 3943:I don't care. We are all moving forward and on. - 3603: 2258:are now preserved for those articles that pass an 1765:As a member of the British Cabinet, I would say a 1695:WikiProject France and royalty-work-group=yes - 720:He is now attacking my articles deliberately. See 38:so that we might come to a conclusion. Thank you. 5194:who tags. Is there something you want from me? - 4671:? Or can we assume you'll be off to do that now? 4630:the other day. In an article that has precisely 3608: 1979:http://www.kittybrewster.com/ancestry/barnett.htm 745:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Kittybrewster/VK_rfc 499:There is no armigerous family of Leathers in the 2466:It makes it appear you are using a sockpuppet. - 1122:. Would you be interested in helping to add the 501:General Armory of England, Scotland, and Ireland 5375:, and instead respect Knowledge's principle of 5367:, such cross-posting should adhere to specific 1533:Knowledge:Image_use_policy#Displayed_image_size 1111:hCard microformat in Template:Infobox Biography 4007:What about other articles I / we have created? 3510:the fact that the following contributors from 2406:I thought it was taken. Thank you. Done it. - 1769:has had clearly a political office. Greetings 490:I've no idea to be honest, how do I find out? 6042:good reason to take a very strict reading of 5667:nn. But the lead had room for improvement. - 3835:Evidence of your partisan voting can be seen 2582:relevant policies and guidelines, especially 1649:Very many thanks! (That was fast!). Regards, 1431:Sir Thomas Montgomery-Cuninghame, 8th Baronet 5966:Giano, I am concerned about Kittybrewster's 3197:Indeed -- Ignoring the split infinitives. - 2217:List of members of the Irish Republican Army 2076:I own the copyright and emailed wikipedia - 1572:When using detailed maps, diagrams or charts 1050:I don't know of a more sophisticated way. - 5713:and I would rather people help than afd. - 2032:with a link to where we can find that note. 810:Users certifying the basis for this dispute 5466:I will correct it at once. It is wrong. - 4411:Let's be fair here when VK made this edit 3070:Oh, for fuck's sake. I'm off on holiday.-- 2931:were not taken into account. Again sorry. 876:Removed. Not close to being useful yet. - 6038:, and this sutuation seems to me to be a 5094:you big enough to make the first move? -- 4752:this can be agreed we can plan Step 2. - 3599:Knowledge:WikiProject Irish Republicanism 3512:Knowledge:WikiProject Irish Republicanism 2865:List_of_General_Assemblies_of_Nova_Scotia 2600:As you can see, it says that you should " 2333:It's about to flare up again; apparently 2014:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 2000:then you should do one of the following: 1930:a lead section of at least two paragraphs 469:Frederick Leathers, 1st Viscount Leathers 205:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Astrotrain 4004:Where did all those spa votes come from? 3018:Alexander Arbuthnot (Baron of Exchequer) 2863:. I have been working on adding to the 648:Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition 5793:Sorrry for the slip of memory; I meant 3680:and that comment is less than helpful! 3323:John Cunningham, 14th Earl of Glencairn 3139:constructive edits have been reverted. 2286:Knowledge:Bot_requests#Succession_boxes 14: 4708:If you and VK (and to a lesser extent 4469:Oi! der nutting wrang wit me spelin!-- 2983:No sorry, I am not Michael Smith, Jr. 2463:Is there an explanation for this edit? 2370:Ted Heath and debate on killing/murder 184:It doesn't look like it. The creator, 5880:you just spent an hour or so on them 5707:William Arbuthnot (artillery officer) 1801:Robert de Brus, 1st Lord of Annandale 1595:The current image markup language is: 1375:Friedrich Eckstein/Frederick Eckstein 291:William Arbuthnot (artillery officer) 216:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Essjay 4001:How do you define distantly related? 2178:I've rewritten it to avoid copyvio. 2050:, and note that you have done so on 1743:has created {{s-gov}}. Best wishes. 1569:On images with extreme aspect ratios 438:I copied the blazon from Burke's. - 269:Thank you. Learning all the time. - 212:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Jance 105:Who do you think he could be??????-- 96:He looks like a sock-puppet to me.-- 5856:PS: Neither have you referenced it 3286:Blatant threat of mischief-making. 2481:No.I did a hasty copy and paste. - 2250:Biography A-class review department 2066:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 1988:If you believe that the article is 1973:, but we regretfully cannot accept 1767:Secretary of State for the Colonies 1522:I am happy to discuss here instead. 756:I have not yet made a statement. - 23: 6022:John Alves Arbthnot self-reference 4097:Wrong but stated in good faith. - 3135:edit, but there's no denying that 2705:Sir William Arbuthnot, 2nd Baronet 2026:or released into the public domain 1128:Knowledge:WikiProject_Microformats 530:Oops. I can't. Please email me. - 24: 6175: 5385:Knowledge:WikiProject Baronetcies 2861:wikipedia:WikiProject_Nova_Scotia 2396:missing something? Best wishes, 1617:I wonder if you could help me at 984:is an expert on this question. - 821:I don't - yet. Gathering data. - 5350: 4626::-) Case in point - my edit to 3637:Notable v Non-notable Arbuthnots 2724:is telling me not to (above) as 1837: 1546:Knowledge:Manual_of_Style#Images 1064:I have corrected the numbering. 1005: 386: 328: 175: 5696: 5691: 5688: 5650: 5645: 5642: 5330:And I tend to agree with it. - 3514:seem to be block voting, namely 2921:Sir Norman Stronge, 8th Baronet 2914:Sir Norman Stronge, 8th Baronet 2859:into the tender loving arms of 1882:Sir Thomas Burnett, 3rd Baronet 1850:Err...what was all that about? 1813:Fixed. ) should have been : --> 1243:Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876 1118:I see that you;re an editor of 963:Leigh Rayment's Peerage Pages 580:Sir Norman Stronge, 8th Baronet 5683:Charles_George_James_Arbuthnot 5455:Charles George James Arbuthnot 5305:WP:COI#Notability_and_saliency 5281:Charles George James Arbuthnot 5003: 4946: 4911: 4779: 4551: 4505: 4449: 4363: 4218: 4143: 3976: 3887: 3840: 3597:I was not aware I was part of 3392:Sir James Stronge, 9th Baronet 3244: 3178: 3140: 3085: 3050: 2936: 2825: 2822:Baron Sockpuppetry of New York 2267: 1996:GNU Free Documentation License 1948: 512:Oh well. Thanks for your help 400: 13: 1: 3106:Alexander Arbuthnot (printer) 2854:LieutenantGovernorsNovaScotia 1916:A-class Biography assessments 196:23:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 140:14:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 123:22:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 110:22:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 101:22:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 92:20:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 83:16:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 68:16:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 43:01:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 6074:Thomas Arbuthnot of Meethill 3041:, has been listed by me for 2254:Hi, A-class ratings for the 2187:Thank you v much. :) - 2118:Did you know that the actor 1683:Category:French noble titles 1619:Lamberton, Borders, Scotland 1359:Thanks for clearing that up. 689:I filed a complaint against 7: 6122:unseemly debacle will help 6046:. I'm very disappointed. -- 3490: 3459: 2919:I'm sorry to tell you that 2430:Hope it helps. Regards, -- 2098:Talk:Henry Barnett, MP/Temp 921:Article naming for Baronets 10: 6180: 5428:Woodford, Northamptonshire 5357:aggressively cross-posting 3736:WP:COI#Close_relationships 3726:COI on Arbuthnot articles? 3508:Alexander George Arbuthnot 3039:Alexander George Arbuthnot 3032:Alexander George Arbuthnot 2944:22:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 2908:18:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 2891:17:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 2872:16:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 2840:22:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2804:22:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2792:22:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2783:22:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2769:22:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2755:22:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2738:21:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2716:18:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2699:02:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2682:19:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2663:18:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2648:18:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2618:21:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2524:10:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2509:10:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2491:09:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2476:09:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2453:03:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 2446:Memories of the Arbuthnots 2439:08:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 2416:22:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 2401:22:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 2384:10:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 2365:18:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 2346:16:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 2324:15:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 2307:13:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 2275:21:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 2245:14:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 2226:22:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2197:22:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2183:21:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2170:20:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2159:17:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2141:19:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 2127:09:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2109:08:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2086:11:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 1956:08:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1544:There is also a guideline 1424:21:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1403:17:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1388:17:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1367:16:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1355:21:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1340:14:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1318:Looking at the worklists ( 1306:15:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1290:21:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1271:11:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1253:09:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1230:06:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1215:00:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1194:13:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1173:19:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1164:18:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1149:18:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1135:11:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1120:Template:Infobox Biography 1105:21:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1095:20:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1069:08:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 1060:22:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1045:16:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1038:List of extant Baronetcies 1020:07:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1003: 989:21:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 974:21:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 944:15:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 915:01:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 905:01:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 896:Please see my comments in 881:19:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 844:17:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 826:17:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 817:17:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 761:19:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 751:13:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 729:23:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 711:01:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 674:02:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 384: 326: 173: 5040:Two possible ways forward 4169:Bernadette Sands McKevitt 3739:reaching a truce here. -- 3538:User:One Night In Hackney 2627:I should assure you that 1910:20:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1892:20:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1869:20:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1855:20:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1846:16:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1824:20:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1808:13:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1785:16:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1759:10:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1732:08:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1705:21:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1690:21:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1673:00:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 1654:16:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1645:16:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1626:16:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1517:13:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1503:18:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1485:09:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1456:10:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1438:09:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1036:needs to be removed from 787:Actually, seems that was 637:21:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 613:11:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 604:10:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 594:01:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 574:13:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 544:14:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 535:14:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 526:14:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 517:13:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 508:13:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 495:13:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 486:13:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 476:12:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 452:11:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 443:10:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 433:18:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 415:01:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 373:18:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 349:09:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 317:18:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 306:01:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 285:23:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 274:13:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 264:02:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 243:23:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 233:23:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 223:23:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 160:04:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 6156:20:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6142:20:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6131:20:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6117:18:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6107:17:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6095:17:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6085:09:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 6061:13:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 6016:18:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5997:13:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5955:09:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5939:09:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5913:09:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5903:09:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5885:09:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5875:09:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5861:08:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5850:08:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5831:08:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5807:18:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5789:09:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5775:04:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5757:04:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5742:04:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5723:03:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5701:03:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5677:03:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5661:Charles George Arbuthnot 5655:03:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 5626:20:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5614:19:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5581:18:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5564:16:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5551:12:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5531:09:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5509:06:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 5359:, in order to influence 3411:Your recent creation of 2335:Pat Finucane (solicitor) 2062:Knowledge article layout 2039:a postal message to the 1897:Fascinated. Yes please. 961:which cited a web page: 665:William Aikman (painter) 56:certainly looks like one 5797:; which is an article. 5490:19:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5476:16:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5462:16:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5437:16:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5406:11:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5340:12:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5325:10:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5293:19:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5270:18:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5228:18:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5214:18:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5204:17:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5185:17:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5175:17:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5152:17:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5137:16:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5124:16:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5109:16:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5032:14:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 5018:13:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4997:13:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4961:13:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4941:13:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4926:13:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4874:13:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4864:13:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4848:12:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4817:12:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4808:11:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4794:11:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4762:11:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4747:10:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4738:10:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4727:10:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4687:11:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4678:11:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4655:10:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4642:10:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4596:10:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4566:10:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4534:10:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4520:10:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4489:10:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4474:10:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4464:10:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4424:09:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4395:09:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4378:09:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4323:09:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4288:08:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4271:06:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4257:23:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4233:22:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4204:22:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4178:22:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4158:22:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4107:09:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4089:07:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 4073:22:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4047:22:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 4020:22:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3991:22:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3953:18:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3939:18:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3928:15:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3912:15:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3902:15:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3865:15:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3855:06:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3823:06:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3754:10:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 3714:18:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3705:Gosh! HG, is your wife 3699:17:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3685:16:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3676:16:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3662:16:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3646:11:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3627:16:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3613:16:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3591:11:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3575:11:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3498:10:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3481:10:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3467:10:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3451:10:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3436:10:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3402:19:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 3383:20:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3369:00:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3357:16:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 3334:14:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 3291:20:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 3282:22:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3273:22:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3259:22:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3207:21:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3193:21:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3169:21:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3155:21:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3127:21:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3118:21:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3100:21:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3080:07:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3065:03:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3025:01:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 3003:11:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 2972:07:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 2963:02:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 2949:Richard Gere and WP:BLP 2927:. The comments made by 18:User talk:Kittybrewster 5557:Talk:Harriet Arbuthnot 3934:Sorry. He started it. 3131:I wasn't referring to 2817:Our friend in New York 2606:exercise great caution 2543:exercise great caution 2337:was murdered, but Sir 2102:Talk:Henry Barnett, MP 2052:Talk:Henry Barnett, MP 2030:Talk:Henry Barnett, MP 2008:Talk:Henry Barnett, MP 1239:Life Peerages Act 1958 927:Category_talk:Baronets 863:18:11, 12 March 2007 ( 849:As far as I can tell, 795:14:37, 12 March 2007 ( 774:14:31, 12 March 2007 ( 6139:Counter-revolutionary 6036:conflicts of interest 3809:Counter-revolutionary 3399:Counter-revolutionary 3331:Counter-revolutionary 3011:Charles Maitland (MP) 2989:comment was added by 2584:neutral point of view 2343:Counter-revolutionary 2256:WikiProject Biography 2207:Disambigs on articles 1170:Counter-revolutionary 1146:Counter-revolutionary 892:Back to the headaches 655:Allan Ramsay (artist) 5976:Member of Parliament 5917:That is a breach of 5685:definitely doesn't! 5006:One Night In Hackney 4949:One Night In Hackney 4914:One Night In Hackney 4782:One Night In Hackney 4554:One Night In Hackney 4508:One Night In Hackney 4452:One Night In Hackney 4366:One Night In Hackney 4221:One Night In Hackney 4146:One Night In Hackney 3979:One Night In Hackney 3890:One Night In Hackney 3843:One Night In Hackney 3504:John Alves Arbuthnot 3342:John Alves Arbuthnot 3247:One Night In Hackney 3181:One Night In Hackney 3143:One Night In Hackney 3088:One Night In Hackney 3053:One Night In Hackney 2828:One Night In Hackney 2799:no qualms at all. -- 2574:and you must always: 2559:deletion discussions 2288:. I've noticed that 2231:Re: Ralph G. Feltham 2041:Wikimedia Foundation 1967:welcome to Knowledge 599:I will have a go. - 403:One Night In Hackney 6032:assuming good faith 5978:, he clearly meets 5391:clearly applies. -- 4525:wikis. Please read 1983:copyright violation 1444:Cunningham Baronets 1413:Cunningham Baronets 739:RFC FOR VINTAGEKITS 660:Allan Ramsay (poet) 5795:Viscount Arbuthnot 3734:. I do think that 3565:- Thank you. ;) - 3030:AfD nomination of 2978:Michael Smith, Jr. 2316:Please comment on 2148:Henry Barnett (MP) 2100:. Leave a note at 2043:permitting re-use 1981:, and therefore a 6149:assume good faith 6070:Kenneth Arbuthnot 6059: 6014: 5995: 5937: 5901: 5873: 5820:West Wycombe Park 5805: 5787: 5773: 5763:Dashwood Baronets 5755: 5740: 5721: 5675: 5579: 5543:Harriet Arbuthnot 5529: 5488: 5474: 5450: 5424:Charles Arbuthnot 5404: 5338: 5323: 5291: 5268: 5226: 5202: 5173: 5150: 5122: 5107: 5030: 4995: 4939: 4862: 4806: 4760: 4718:Martin McGuinness 4646:Your edit to the 4487: 4416:Harriet Arbuthnot 4393: 4321: 4281:Martin McGuinness 4255: 4202: 4186:Responded to you 4105: 4071: 4045: 4018: 3951: 3926: 3774:they can not vote 3752: 3674: 3625: 3573: 3479: 3449: 3355: 3271: 3205: 3167: 3116: 3078: 3006: 2889: 2767: 2736: 2680: 2661: 2646: 2522: 2489: 2414: 2195: 2167:Butseriouslyfolks 2156:Butseriouslyfolks 2106:Butseriouslyfolks 2084: 2016:for instructions. 1971:Henry Barnett, MP 1943:Hope this helps, 1908: 1867: 1822: 1703: 1666:Per your request. 1643: 1483: 1454: 1401: 1353: 1288: 1228: 1162: 1124:hCard microformat 1058: 955:Category:Earldoms 942: 685:USER: VINTAGEKITS 363: 362:2007-03-05 08:55Z 138: 81: 66: 30:Murder vs killing 6171: 6050: 6010: 5986: 5933: 5897: 5869: 5801: 5783: 5769: 5751: 5736: 5717: 5697: 5693: 5690: 5671: 5651: 5647: 5644: 5575: 5525: 5484: 5470: 5446: 5395: 5354: 5334: 5314: 5287: 5259: 5222: 5198: 5164: 5146: 5118: 5098: 5026: 5016: 5007: 4991: 4959: 4950: 4935: 4924: 4915: 4858: 4845: 4802: 4792: 4783: 4756: 4735: 4724: 4675: 4639: 4564: 4555: 4518: 4509: 4483: 4462: 4453: 4389: 4376: 4367: 4317: 4246: 4231: 4222: 4198: 4175: 4156: 4147: 4101: 4067: 4039: 4014: 3989: 3980: 3947: 3922: 3900: 3891: 3853: 3844: 3743: 3670: 3621: 3610: 3609:Vigeur de dessus 3605: 3584:User:Leopold_III 3569: 3560:User:Leopold_III 3555:user:GiollaUidir 3533:User:Vintagekits 3496: 3494: 3475: 3465: 3463: 3445: 3432: 3420: 3414: 3351: 3267: 3257: 3248: 3201: 3191: 3182: 3163: 3153: 3144: 3112: 3098: 3089: 3074: 3063: 3054: 2984: 2938: 2929:User:Vintagekits 2906: 2885: 2858: 2852: 2845:Two quick things 2838: 2829: 2763: 2742:Well, you could 2732: 2722:User:Will Beback 2690:Murder / killing 2676: 2670:Complete Peerage 2657: 2642: 2518: 2485: 2422:Robert Arbuthnot 2410: 2280:Succession boxes 2269: 2223: 2191: 2080: 2028:leave a note at 1950: 1904: 1863: 1843: 1818: 1788: 1781: 1775: 1762: 1755: 1749: 1735: 1728: 1722: 1699: 1639: 1606: 1556:user preferences 1479: 1450: 1397: 1381:Hermann Eckstein 1349: 1323: 1284: 1224: 1220:LPA and AJA?? - 1158: 1087:User:Vintagekits 1054: 1034:Summers Baronets 1028:Summers Baronets 1009: 1008: 933: 691:User:Vintagekits 642:More on Scotland 413: 404: 390: 389: 365: 361: 332: 331: 179: 178: 153:established user 134: 77: 62: 6179: 6178: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6170: 6169: 6168: 6078: 6048:BrownHairedGirl 6024: 6008:Septentrionalis 5984:BrownHairedGirl 5799:Septentrionalis 5767:Septentrionalis 5734:Septentrionalis 5636: 5416: 5393:BrownHairedGirl 5373:game the system 5348: 5312:BrownHairedGirl 5301: 5257:BrownHairedGirl 5162:BrownHairedGirl 5096:BrownHairedGirl 5042: 5015: 5005: 4958: 4948: 4923: 4913: 4843: 4791: 4781: 4733: 4722: 4673: 4648:John Joe McGirl 4637: 4628:John Joe McGirl 4563: 4553: 4517: 4507: 4461: 4451: 4375: 4365: 4244:BrownHairedGirl 4230: 4220: 4173: 4155: 4145: 3988: 3978: 3899: 3889: 3852: 3842: 3761: 3741:BrownHairedGirl 3728: 3639: 3543:User:Padraig3uk 3487: 3456: 3430: 3418: 3412: 3409: 3395: 3345: 3319: 3256: 3246: 3243:must be in EB! 3241:this ratcatcher 3190: 3180: 3152: 3142: 3097: 3087: 3062: 3052: 3035: 3014: 2985:—The preceding 2981: 2951: 2917: 2902: 2899: 2856: 2850: 2847: 2837: 2827: 2819: 2746:the photo, and 2708: 2692: 2674:Septentrionalis 2640:Septentrionalis 2625: 2580:avoid breaching 2461: 2424: 2393: 2372: 2353: 2331: 2314: 2282: 2252: 2233: 2221: 2209: 2151: 2116: 1963: 1918: 1885: 1840:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 1797: 1783: 1779: 1773: 1770: 1757: 1753: 1747: 1744: 1741:User:Necrothesp 1730: 1726: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1680: 1678:French nobility 1664: 1615: 1613:Your assistance 1604: 1529: 1510: 1492: 1469: 1442:I have created 1429:And here also: 1416: 1377: 1319: 1316: 1263: 1261:Lionel Phillips 1201: 1183: 1142: 1113: 1079: 1030: 1012: 1011: 1006: 1002: 959:Earl of Holland 951: 931:BrownHairedGirl 923: 894: 851:User:O'Donoghue 741: 687: 644: 583: 567: 465: 425: 412: 402: 393: 392: 387: 383: 355: 340:User talk:Quarl 335: 334: 329: 325: 294: 256: 208: 182: 181: 176: 172: 169:Gillis Baronets 52: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6177: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6135: 6134: 6133: 6077: 6067: 6065: 6023: 6020: 6019: 6018: 5972:Henry Fane, MP 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5947: 5946: 5945: 5944: 5943: 5942: 5941: 5931:Kittybrewster 5895:Kittybrewster 5889:No it doesn't 5867:Kittybrewster 5853: 5852: 5840:Henry Fane, MP 5816: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5781:Kittybrewster 5749:Kittybrewster 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5715:Kittybrewster 5669:Kittybrewster 5635: 5632: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5573:Kittybrewster 5523:Kittybrewster 5512: 5511: 5482:Kittybrewster 5468:Kittybrewster 5444:Kittybrewster 5415: 5412: 5410: 5347: 5344: 5343: 5342: 5332:Kittybrewster 5300: 5297: 5296: 5295: 5285:Kittybrewster 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5220:Kittybrewster 5196:Kittybrewster 5144:Kittybrewster 5116:Kittybrewster 5041: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5024:Kittybrewster 5009: 4989:Kittybrewster 4984: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4952: 4933:Kittybrewster 4917: 4891: 4890: 4889: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4856:Kittybrewster 4830: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4800:Kittybrewster 4785: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4754:Kittybrewster 4729: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4614:And I suggest 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4557: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4522: 4511: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4481:Kittybrewster 4455: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4387:Kittybrewster 4369: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4355: 4352: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4315:Kittybrewster 4310: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4275:Gentlemen, if 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4224: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4196:Kittybrewster 4191: 4181: 4180: 4149: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4099:Kittybrewster 4092: 4091: 4076: 4075: 4065:Kittybrewster 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4012:Kittybrewster 4008: 4005: 4002: 3999: 3982: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3945:Kittybrewster 3931: 3930: 3920:Kittybrewster 3893: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3846: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3812: 3811: 3806: 3801: 3796: 3791: 3786: 3760: 3757: 3727: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3668:Kittybrewster 3638: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3619:Kittybrewster 3594: 3593: 3567:Kittybrewster 3563: 3562: 3557: 3552: 3545: 3540: 3535: 3530: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3473:Kittybrewster 3443:Kittybrewster 3408: 3405: 3394: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3372: 3371: 3349:Kittybrewster 3344: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3318: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3265:Kittybrewster 3250: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3199:Kittybrewster 3184: 3161:Kittybrewster 3146: 3129: 3110:Kittybrewster 3091: 3056: 3049:. Thank you. 3034: 3028: 3013: 3008: 2980: 2975: 2950: 2947: 2916: 2911: 2898: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2883:Kittybrewster 2878: 2846: 2843: 2831: 2818: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2761:Kittybrewster 2730:Kittybrewster 2707: 2702: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2655:Kittybrewster 2624: 2621: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2569:Knowledge:Spam 2562: 2552: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2516:Kittybrewster 2483:Kittybrewster 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2408:Kittybrewster 2392: 2387: 2371: 2368: 2362:BetacommandBot 2352: 2349: 2330: 2329:murder/killing 2327: 2313: 2312:Comment needed 2310: 2281: 2278: 2260:A-class review 2251: 2248: 2232: 2229: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2189:Kittybrewster 2173: 2172: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2115: 2112: 2095: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2078:Kittybrewster 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2033: 2018: 1962: 1959: 1941: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1925: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1902:Kittybrewster 1884: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1861:Kittybrewster 1829: 1827: 1826: 1816:Kittybrewster 1796: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1777: 1751: 1724: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1697:Kittybrewster 1679: 1676: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1637:Kittybrewster 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1542: 1541: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1509: 1506: 1500:Taste the Korn 1491: 1488: 1477:Kittybrewster 1468: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1448:Kittybrewster 1415: 1410: 1408: 1406: 1405: 1395:Kittybrewster 1376: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1360: 1347:Kittybrewster 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1293: 1292: 1282:Kittybrewster 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1233: 1232: 1222:Kittybrewster 1200: 1197: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1156:Kittybrewster 1141: 1138: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1052:Kittybrewster 1029: 1026: 1024: 1004: 1001: 996: 994: 992: 991: 950: 947: 922: 919: 918: 917: 893: 890: 888: 886: 885: 884: 883: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 740: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 722:Broun Baronets 686: 683: 681: 678: 668: 667: 662: 657: 643: 640: 621: 618: 617: 616: 615: 587:WP:Peer review 582: 577: 566: 563: 561: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 464: 461: 459: 457: 456: 455: 454: 424: 421: 419: 406: 385: 382: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 327: 324: 321: 320: 319: 293: 288: 277: 276: 255: 252: 250: 248: 247: 246: 245: 207: 202: 200: 174: 171: 166: 164: 149: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 127: 126: 125: 51: 46: 31: 28: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6176: 6157: 6154: 6150: 6145: 6144: 6143: 6140: 6136: 6132: 6129: 6125: 6120: 6119: 6118: 6115: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6105: 6100: 6099: 6098: 6097: 6096: 6093: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6083: 6075: 6071: 6066: 6063: 6062: 6057: 6053: 6049: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6005: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5993: 5989: 5985: 5981: 5977: 5973: 5969: 5956: 5953: 5948: 5940: 5936: 5932: 5928: 5924: 5920: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5911: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5888: 5887: 5886: 5883: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5872: 5868: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5859: 5855: 5854: 5851: 5848: 5844: 5841: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5829: 5824: 5821: 5808: 5804: 5800: 5796: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5786: 5782: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5759: 5758: 5754: 5750: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5724: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5711:concert party 5708: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5699: 5698: 5694: 5684: 5680: 5679: 5678: 5674: 5670: 5666: 5662: 5659: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5653: 5652: 5648: 5627: 5624: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5612: 5607: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5562: 5558: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5549: 5544: 5540: 5537: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5520: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5510: 5507: 5502: 5498: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5473: 5469: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5460: 5456: 5453:Yes but here 5452: 5451: 5449: 5445: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5435: 5432: 5429: 5425: 5422:on this page 5421: 5411: 5408: 5407: 5402: 5398: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5382: 5378: 5374: 5370: 5366: 5362: 5358: 5353: 5341: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5309: 5306: 5294: 5290: 5286: 5282: 5278: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5266: 5262: 5258: 5254: 5250: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5217: 5216: 5215: 5212: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5192: 5188: 5187: 5186: 5183: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5171: 5167: 5163: 5159: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5149: 5145: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5121: 5117: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5092: 5088: 5083: 5081: 5076: 5072: 5069: 5065: 5060: 5056: 5054: 5050: 5047: 5046:Kittybrewster 5033: 5029: 5025: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5014: 5013: 5008: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4994: 4990: 4962: 4957: 4956: 4951: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4922: 4921: 4916: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4875: 4872: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4846: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4818: 4815: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4790: 4789: 4784: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4745: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4736: 4730: 4728: 4725: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4707: 4704: 4703: 4688: 4685: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4676: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4640: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4617: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4597: 4594: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4562: 4561: 4556: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4535: 4532: 4528: 4523: 4521: 4516: 4515: 4510: 4503: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4490: 4486: 4482: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4472: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4460: 4459: 4454: 4447: 4443: 4437: 4434: 4425: 4422: 4417: 4413: 4410: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4374: 4373: 4368: 4362: 4356: 4353: 4349: 4348: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4311: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4289: 4286: 4285:Sam Blacketer 4282: 4278: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4234: 4229: 4228: 4223: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4192: 4189: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4179: 4176: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4154: 4153: 4148: 4140: 4137: 4133: 4130: 4127: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4090: 4087: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4048: 4043: 4038: 4037: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4006: 4003: 4000: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3987: 3986: 3981: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3937: 3933: 3932: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3910: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3898: 3897: 3892: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3866: 3863: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3851: 3850: 3845: 3838: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3824: 3821: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3810: 3807: 3805: 3804:Major Bonkers 3802: 3800: 3797: 3795: 3792: 3790: 3787: 3785: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3777: 3775: 3769: 3765: 3756: 3755: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3737: 3733: 3715: 3712: 3708: 3707:Maria Shriver 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3697: 3692: 3686: 3683: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3660: 3655: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3644: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3611: 3606: 3600: 3596: 3595: 3592: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3561: 3558: 3556: 3553: 3551: 3550: 3546: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3536: 3534: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3525: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3493: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3464: 3462: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3431:Daniel Bryant 3425: 3417: 3407:Recent antics 3404: 3403: 3400: 3393: 3384: 3381: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3367: 3366: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3343: 3335: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3324: 3292: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3280: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3255: 3254: 3249: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3189: 3188: 3183: 3176: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3151: 3150: 3145: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3128: 3125: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3096: 3095: 3090: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3072:Major Bonkers 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3061: 3060: 3055: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3033: 3027: 3026: 3023: 3019: 3012: 3007: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2979: 2974: 2973: 2970: 2965: 2964: 2961: 2957: 2946: 2945: 2942: 2939: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2915: 2910: 2909: 2905: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2855: 2842: 2841: 2836: 2835: 2830: 2823: 2805: 2802: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2706: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2636: 2634: 2630: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2593: 2592:autobiography 2589: 2585: 2581: 2578: 2573: 2572: 2570: 2566: 2563: 2560: 2556: 2555:participating 2553: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2454: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2391: 2386: 2385: 2382: 2377: 2367: 2366: 2363: 2358: 2348: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2339:James Stronge 2336: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2319: 2309: 2308: 2305: 2301: 2298: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2277: 2276: 2273: 2270: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2218: 2214: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2171: 2168: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2149: 2142: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2031: 2027: 2025: 2019: 2017: 2015: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1999: 1997: 1991: 1986: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1946: 1938: 1935: 1932: 1929: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1883: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1844: 1842: 1841: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1806: 1802: 1786: 1782: 1776: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1756: 1750: 1742: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1723: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1547: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1534: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1508:Lady Phillips 1505: 1504: 1501: 1497: 1496:Theresa Knott 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473:Rod Beckstrom 1466: 1465:Rod Beckstrom 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1331: 1327: 1322: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1196: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1137: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032:Hello again. 1025: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1000: 999:Duff Baronets 995: 990: 987: 986:Kittybrewster 983: 978: 977: 976: 975: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 946: 945: 940: 936: 932: 928: 916: 913: 912:Kittybrewster 909: 908: 907: 906: 903: 899: 889: 882: 879: 878:Kittybrewster 875: 874: 872: 869: 866: 862: 857: 852: 848: 847: 846: 845: 842: 827: 824: 823:Kittybrewster 820: 819: 818: 815: 811: 807: 806: 804: 801: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 783: 780: 777: 773: 769: 764: 763: 762: 759: 758:Kittybrewster 755: 754: 753: 752: 749: 746: 730: 727: 723: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 709: 704: 701: 699: 694: 692: 682: 679: 676: 675: 672: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 652: 651: 649: 639: 638: 634: 630: 626: 614: 611: 607: 606: 605: 602: 601:Kittybrewster 598: 597: 596: 595: 592: 588: 581: 576: 575: 572: 562: 545: 542: 538: 537: 536: 533: 532:Kittybrewster 529: 528: 527: 524: 523:Kittybrewster 520: 519: 518: 515: 511: 510: 509: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 493: 489: 488: 487: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 474: 470: 463:Leathers Arms 460: 453: 450: 446: 445: 444: 441: 440:Kittybrewster 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 420: 417: 416: 411: 410: 405: 398: 374: 371: 370:Kittybrewster 367: 366: 364: 360: 353: 352: 351: 350: 347: 346:Kittybrewster 343: 341: 318: 315: 314:Kittybrewster 310: 309: 308: 307: 304: 300: 292: 287: 286: 283: 275: 272: 271:Kittybrewster 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 251: 244: 241: 236: 235: 234: 231: 230:Kittybrewster 227: 226: 225: 224: 221: 217: 213: 206: 201: 198: 197: 194: 191: 187: 170: 165: 162: 161: 158: 154: 141: 137: 133: 128: 124: 121: 120:Kittybrewster 117: 113: 112: 111: 108: 104: 103: 102: 99: 98:Major Bonkers 95: 94: 93: 90: 86: 85: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 70: 69: 65: 61: 57: 50: 45: 44: 41: 37: 27: 19: 6114:David Lauder 6092:David Lauder 6079: 6064: 6039: 6025: 6003: 5965: 5890: 5817: 5731: 5686: 5664: 5640: 5637: 5603: 5518: 5417: 5409: 5364: 5356: 5349: 5302: 5248: 5246: 5157: 5129: 5090: 5086: 5084: 5077: 5073: 5067: 5063: 5061: 5057: 5048: 5043: 5010: 4985: 4953: 4918: 4786: 4705: 4631: 4615: 4558: 4512: 4501: 4456: 4445: 4442:constructive 4441: 4438: 4432: 4430: 4370: 4241: 4225: 4164: 4150: 4141: 4138: 4134: 4131: 4125: 4123: 4034: 3983: 3973: 3936:David Lauder 3909:David Lauder 3894: 3862:David Lauder 3847: 3820:David Lauder 3794:David Lauder 3778: 3773: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3729: 3640: 3564: 3549:User:Barryob 3547: 3528:User:Domer48 3491: 3460: 3428: 3423: 3410: 3396: 3380:David Lauder 3363: 3346: 3320: 3288:David Lauder 3251: 3185: 3174: 3147: 3136: 3132: 3092: 3057: 3036: 3015: 2982: 2966: 2952: 2918: 2900: 2848: 2832: 2820: 2747: 2743: 2709: 2693: 2637: 2628: 2626: 2605: 2601: 2599: 2579: 2564: 2554: 2548: 2542: 2538: 2532: 2462: 2445: 2425: 2394: 2373: 2354: 2332: 2315: 2296: 2283: 2253: 2234: 2211:I've edited 2210: 2152: 2138:David Lauder 2124:David Lauder 2117: 2094: 2059: 2044: 2036: 2021: 2011: 1993: 1989: 1987: 1964: 1942: 1919: 1889:David Lauder 1886: 1852:David Lauder 1839: 1838: 1828: 1805:David Lauder 1798: 1714: 1681: 1665: 1651:David Lauder 1632: 1623:David Lauder 1616: 1543: 1530: 1511: 1493: 1470: 1435:David Lauder 1421:David Lauder 1417: 1407: 1378: 1334: 1317: 1303:David Lauder 1298: 1264: 1202: 1184: 1143: 1132:Andy Mabbett 1117: 1114: 1080: 1031: 1023: 1013: 993: 982:User:Proteus 952: 924: 895: 887: 838: 809: 742: 726:David Lauder 705: 702: 695: 688: 680: 677: 669: 645: 619: 584: 571:David Lauder 568: 560: 505:David Lauder 500: 483:David Lauder 466: 458: 426: 418: 407: 394: 356: 337: 336: 295: 278: 257: 249: 209: 199: 183: 163: 152: 150: 89:David Lauder 53: 33: 25: 6124:his brother 5838:No, no, no 5211:Vintagekits 5182:Vintagekits 5134:Vintagekits 5053:Vintagekits 4871:Vintagekits 4814:Vintagekits 4744:Vintagekits 4714:Ian Paisley 4684:Vintagekits 4652:Vintagekits 4593:Vintagekits 4531:Vintagekits 4471:Vintagekits 4277:Ian Paisley 3588:Vintagekits 3329:...done. -- 3317:Salutations 3279:Vintagekits 3124:Vintagekits 2775:Will Beback 2623:Baronetcies 2610:Will Beback 2588:attribution 2501:Will Beback 2468:Will Beback 2459:Explanation 2398:Bencherlite 2341:was not. -- 2321:Betacommand 2290:Betacommand 2213:Tony Jordan 2136:. Regards, 2120:Nigel Bruce 1975:copyrighted 1965:Hello, and 1514:Paul venter 1490:Credit card 1385:Paul venter 1268:Paul venter 856:WP:RFC/USER 565:Baronet AfD 381:Minor edits 107:Vintagekits 6012:PMAnderson 5803:PMAnderson 5771:PMAnderson 5738:PMAnderson 5689:Eliminator 5643:Eliminator 5389:WP:CANVASS 5369:guidelines 4446:disruptive 3784:Astrotrain 2897:Resilience 2678:PMAnderson 2644:PMAnderson 2357:April 2007 2045:under the 2022:under the 1994:under the 1927:an infobox 1326:Statistics 1199:Categories 1126:(see also 841:O'Donoghue 814:O'Donoghue 789:O'Donoghue 748:O'Donoghue 708:O'Donoghue 627:. Thanks, 399:. Thanks. 323:J R Gillis 186:User:Duiek 157:RepublicUK 49:RepublicUK 6028:this edit 5891:just does 5634:Arbuthnot 5377:consensus 4661:pointedly 4659:Then why 3239:I'm sure 2869:WayeMason 2432:Bill Reid 2381:Trident13 2376:Ted Heath 1711:Governors 1540:setting). 1083:user page 1077:A Goodbye 812:. Thanks! 620:Re:Medal 132:Mr. Darcy 116:tautology 75:Mr. Darcy 60:Mr. Darcy 40:Logoistic 6056:contribs 5992:contribs 5923:WP:CIVIL 5420:Woodford 5414:Woodford 5401:contribs 5320:contribs 5265:contribs 5170:contribs 5128:"Either 5104:contribs 4869:Lords.-- 4669:Jdorneys 4624:WP:BEANS 4620:WP:POINT 4571:creates. 4252:contribs 3799:Billreid 3759:Proposal 3749:contribs 3175:everyone 3043:deletion 2999:contribs 2987:unsigned 2801:kingboyk 2789:kingboyk 2752:kingboyk 2713:kingboyk 2696:Tyrenius 2304:kingboyk 2300:contribs 2180:Tyrenius 2114:Baronets 1687:kingboyk 1670:Tyrenius 1631:Use the 1364:kingboyk 1337:kingboyk 1102:Berks105 1092:Berks105 1010:Resolved 939:contribs 902:Tyrenius 671:Tyrenius 591:Tyrenius 397:WP:MINOR 391:Resolved 368:Done. - 333:Resolved 303:Tyrenius 282:Tyrenius 261:Tyrenius 240:Tyrenius 220:Tyrenius 180:Resolved 5974:. As a 3604:Barryob 2633:WP:AUTO 2565:linking 2549:editing 2134:William 1635:tag. - 1314:Peerage 1247:Proteus 1209:Proteus 1188:Proteus 1181:Lumsden 254:Archive 190:Proteus 6052:(talk) 6044:WP:COI 5988:(talk) 5980:WP:BIO 5935:(talk) 5927:WP:NPA 5919:WP:AGF 5899:(talk) 5871:(talk) 5785:(talk) 5753:(talk) 5719:(talk) 5673:(talk) 5577:(talk) 5527:(talk) 5486:(talk) 5472:(talk) 5448:(talk) 5397:(talk) 5336:(talk) 5316:(talk) 5289:(talk) 5277:WP:COI 5261:(talk) 5253:WP:COI 5224:(talk) 5209:out.-- 5200:(talk) 5191:WP:AGF 5166:(talk) 5148:(talk) 5120:(talk) 5100:(talk) 5087:either 5028:(talk) 4993:(talk) 4937:(talk) 4860:(talk) 4844:Bastun 4804:(talk) 4758:(talk) 4734:Bastun 4723:Bastun 4710:WP:IRA 4674:Bastun 4665:Damacs 4638:Bastun 4527:WP:OWN 4485:(talk) 4391:(talk) 4351:point. 4319:(talk) 4248:(talk) 4200:(talk) 4174:Bastun 4103:(talk) 4069:(talk) 4016:(talk) 3949:(talk) 3924:(talk) 3789:Bastun 3745:(talk) 3732:WP:COI 3672:(talk) 3623:(talk) 3571:(talk) 3477:(talk) 3447:(talk) 3424:Do not 3353:(talk) 3269:(talk) 3203:(talk) 3165:(talk) 3114:(talk) 3076:(talk) 3022:Choess 2991:Friuli 2887:(talk) 2765:(talk) 2744:upload 2734:(talk) 2726:WP:COI 2659:(talk) 2590:, and 2545:when: 2520:(talk) 2497:WP:COI 2487:(talk) 2450:Choess 2412:(talk) 2237:Craigy 2222:Bastun 2193:(talk) 2082:(talk) 1998:(GFDL) 1906:(talk) 1865:(talk) 1820:(talk) 1795:Bother 1701:(talk) 1641:(talk) 1527:Policy 1481:(talk) 1452:(talk) 1399:(talk) 1351:(talk) 1286:(talk) 1278:WP:NPA 1250:(Talk) 1226:(talk) 1212:(Talk) 1191:(Talk) 1160:(talk) 1056:(talk) 971:Edison 967:WP:ATT 935:(talk) 861:ais523 793:ais523 772:ais523 768:WP:RFC 629:Craigy 610:Weggie 541:Weggie 514:Weggie 492:Weggie 473:Weggie 449:Alci12 430:Alci12 338:(from 193:(Talk) 6128:Giano 6104:Giano 6082:Giano 6004:every 5952:Giano 5910:Giano 5882:Giano 5858:Giano 5847:Giano 5828:Giano 5623:Giano 5611:Giano 5606:Inuse 5561:Giano 5548:Giano 5506:Giano 5459:Giano 5434:Giano 5279:. Eg 5080:block 4618:read 4421:Giano 4268:Giano 4086:Giano 4042:Help! 3711:Giano 3682:Giano 3659:Giano 3643:Giano 3133:every 2602:avoid 2539:avoid 1548:: 1535:: 1321:Index 1140:VKits 1066:Tryde 1042:Tryde 1017:Tryde 949:Earls 423:Crest 359:Quarl 16:< 6072:and 6040:very 5929:. - 5925:and 5571:. - 5310:. -- 5307:and 5249:both 5158:both 5130:both 5091:both 5064:both 4716:and 4667:and 4622:and 4433:good 4279:and 4188:here 4165:keep 3837:here 3506:and 3492:Nick 3461:Nick 3340:Afd 3137:some 2995:talk 2969:FNMF 2960:FNMF 2956:here 2728:. - 2436:Talk 2355:The 2318:this 2294:talk 2241:talk 2047:GFDL 2024:GFDL 2012:See 1780:talk 1774:Phoe 1754:talk 1748:Phoe 1727:talk 1721:Phoe 1633:move 1475:. - 1280:. - 1241:and 1115:Hi, 929:. -- 698:PIRA 633:talk 214:and 136:talk 118:. - 79:talk 64:talk 36:here 6153:Doc 6076:AFD 6054:• ( 5990:• ( 5968:COI 5665:not 5663:is 5399:• ( 5318:• ( 5263:• ( 5168:• ( 5102:• ( 5085:If 5051:to 5049:and 5012:303 4955:303 4920:303 4788:303 4632:one 4616:you 4560:303 4529:.-- 4514:303 4458:303 4414:to 4372:303 4250:• ( 4227:303 4152:303 4036:Guy 3985:303 3896:303 3849:303 3747:• ( 3488:-- 3457:-- 3416:Irc 3365:DGG 3253:303 3187:303 3149:303 3094:303 3059:303 2937:rab 2904:Mal 2834:303 2604:or 2571:); 2557:in 2541:or 2268:rab 2068:. 1990:not 1949:rab 1787:~~ 1771:~~ 1761:~~ 1745:~~ 1734:~~ 1718:~~ 1662:FYI 1467:etc 1330:Log 937:• ( 409:303 299:AGF 5921:, 5692:JR 5646:JR 5519:c. 5068:or 5055:. 4591:-- 4448:. 3839:. 3709:? 3696:HG 3601:-- 3419:}} 3413:{{ 3001:) 2997:• 2941:ee 2933:Er 2857:}} 2851:{{ 2824:. 2781:· 2777:· 2711:-- 2672:. 2629:my 2616:· 2612:· 2586:, 2507:· 2503:· 2474:· 2470:· 2434:| 2272:ee 2264:Er 2243:) 2165:-- 2154:-- 2037:or 1953:ee 1945:Er 1900:- 1814:- 1498:| 1446:- 1433:. 1328:· 1324:· 1090:-- 873:) 859:-- 805:) 784:) 635:) 471:? 6058:) 5994:) 5403:) 5322:) 5267:) 5172:) 5106:) 4254:) 4190:. 4126:a 4044:) 4040:( 3751:) 3005:. 2993:( 2779:† 2748:I 2614:† 2594:. 2505:† 2472:† 2297:· 2292:( 2239:( 2054:. 1605:] 941:) 871:C 868:T 865:U 803:C 800:T 797:U 782:C 779:T 776:U 724:. 631:( 357:— 342:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.