User talk:Ldm1954/Archive 2

828:

don't need them. Leave out fellowship support, especially of the kind that can be considered bragging, like a Fulbright. I would use the announcement instead as a reference for what you are doing with it. You are a Fellow of the American Physical Society. That is a big deal. You are an APS Fellow because you made an impact on your field: but what is that impact? For example, back in 2015 I read abstracts of papers and I have been reading whatever I can find now, but I can't say why the Marks dodecahedron matters - though I've found a book source that I can't see enough of that might do it.

3202:

it meets any speedy deletion criterion. 2b. The topic appears unimportant, is possibly not worth the effort of fixing, and no great loss if deleted due to expiring in draftspace. 2c. The topic is not a new topic likely to be of interest to multiple people (such as current affairs topics). 2d. The page is a recent creation by an inexperienced editor. Older articles should not be draftified. As a rule of thumb, articles older than 90 days should not be draftified without prior consensus at AfD or another suitable venue

989: 1348: 1229: 31: 2491: 606: 190: 380: 656: 2781:). I corrected the issues and removed the template. You put the template back without checking for corrections or modifying the template.. It also could have been discussed on the talk page as Knowledge suggests. This is not what you did. In addition I was not the original editor, there were inaccurate links and questionable writing. I replaced this with correct references and edits. It said if you repair then remove the template which I did. 1774:

one of 8 criteria. One of those criteria is "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society." In fact, the draft on Alexander Greer states "From 2020-2022, Professor Greer served as President of the American Society for Photobiology." Given this point that I made here, could the decision be reconsidered? Thank you kindly and I hope you have a nice week.

559: 3110:. Here is the relevant section for an article that does not meet the required standard: 2a. The page is obviously unready for mainspace, for example: 2a-i. is not a reasonable WP:STUB (e.g. has very little verifiable information, or is interchangeable with a short dictionary entry, but the definition is not good) - every day at NPP I see pages on notable topics with minor issues. I fix them. That's how a collaborative project works. 2710: 1105: 3326:. I would appreciate any thoughts you might have about the validity or applicability of this policy. In the meantime, I will clean up the references you suggest. This is my first biographical article I have created (all others have been about science topics), and I hope to create more about other biophysicists in the future, so your constructive criticism is very helpful, and your time is appreciated. 803:

editors are opposed to having articles about any academic who hasn't made the newspapers or other media in some way. They want one criteria of notablilty that covers all living people. On the science and academic side, we want to cover the people who do the work of the science that is included in Knowledge, and not have to wait for the obituaries written by the professional societies. Over the years

263: 1715: 125: 2420: 423:. Obviously, I cannot send you copies of contracts of all his previous and current appointments, which are not for public distribution, but that documentation was provided to Imperial College when he was appointed to his current post. I should also mention that some of his achievements and prizes, especially those before early 2000s, have no online references to provide. 1716:

https://www.isna.ir/news/97111106141/%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B3%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%BE%DA%98%D9%88%D9%87%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AC%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%87-%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%DA%A9%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1

1502:, unfortunately you have gone in the wrong direction. The reviews you added do not prove notability, it is one of the "features" of Knowledge that a notable book does not make the author notable. (Odd, but that is the established consensus.) Also, all the reviews and similar you have added can be considered as "bragging", what is called 1805:. I cannot find too much specific information, but it looks like the biannual meetings have something like 100 talks/posters. This is dwarfed by ACS and APS which have thousands of attendees. Hence I am not going to reverse my decision. You can always resubmit and see if someone else disagrees with me, but I would not advise that. 330:. I understand your criticisms about the points that I have to improve. However, I would like to point out that Prof. Dario Polli was elected fellow of OPTICA and SPIE, two of the most important societies in optics and photonics worldwide. They promote "fellow" a few people per year on a selective basis, just like IEEE cited in 819:(as of Dec 2018) - neurologist. I don't like the timeline style I used then, and would write the professional development section differently now. The subject himself has edited it later and I may go in and remove stuff. I haven't included what to leave out in that guide, but I am going to talk about that now. 2063:. I have solved the issue on adding unnecessary citations. Thanks for bringing that to my attention, I have tried to correct that and now I think it's up to the required standards. I have tried to add more selected publications that are highly cited to try and sort out the notability issue so as to satisfy 3201:

2a. The page is obviously unready for mainspace, for example: 2a-i. is not a reasonable WP:STUB (e.g. has very little verifiable information, or is interchangeable with a short dictionary entry, but the definition is not good); 2a-ii. or it would have very little chance of survival at AfD; 2a-iii. or

3033:

Thank you, These guides are very helpful. I will go through them and make edits to the page. Once complete, a second opinion would be great. I didn't intend to edit so prolifically, the page was suboptimal, Wiki Medicine says edit boldly, so I did. I have added sources for his positions, my concern

2530:

I am very concerned about this page. He has an astonishingly high h-factor for someone who finished their PhD in 2019 and a huge publication rate (~400 total in Google Scholar), 29 in 2024 up to Feb 19. If there were awards from major organisations that recognize him then I would acknowledge him as a

1649:

Hello, thank you for pushing me to prove notability and improve the article. I have added dissertation/thesis information (unfortunately they are not available online, but I was able to cite their location at Pitt), brief explanations of hydrogen exchange and its impact on society, have expanded upon

1482:

Hello, I appreciate your review and comments on my draft. I think I’ve included enough details to meet notability standards but eager to discuss it further if needed. His books were peer-reviewed in journals when published, and I think it’s important that his writing was among the earliest in the new

831:

Please stop making edit requests at the article talk page. I will be happy to work with you here on your talk page and address your concerns about the article. You can explain to me why the work matters, and we can find sources that say it. Introductions to papers often do a good review of field, but

802:

A little background about encyclopedia articles and Knowledge in particular. Academics and researchers don't generate the kind of media coverage that politicians, entertainers, and sports figures do. This poses problems here at Knowledge, which has an enormous amount of popular culture coverage. Many

3267:

Do you believe this policy does not apply because any of these above criteria are not met? If so, which one and why? I would like to note that I believe criterion 5 is satisfied because of the references to articles from independent sources like a professional society, grant-providing organizations,

810:

We have articles about academics and researchers who have made a significant impact on their field. An encyclopedia article isn't a resume. (We always have a link to a resume if one is available so that information is just a click away.) The focus is on what the person's contributions have been, the

483:

There have to be citations on the page to all of those you mention, and more. This is a fundamental requirement for all articles in Knowledge. If statements made in an article are not validated by sources then they should be removed. The rules are particularly strict for academics. There is no point

3296:

reinstated it, and I reinstated it a second time. You should try not to use someone's personal website as it is the least reliable source; anything can be added without oversight. An official university website is one step up, but many consider it tainted as well. (Often universities have a curated

2866:

That is your assumption and not truth, Good intent would be respectfully adding concerns to the talk page, where they could be addressed with collegiality and respect. What you have done lands as bullying and lands as offensive. I have checked other pages you have interacted with and I see the same

2805:

I fixed all references before you put this up again. No one should have to deal with sock puppets and then this lack of concern or respect. As editors, it is appropriate to be respectful and not make spurious assumptions. On checking your own page, there are problems and dead links. I am an expert

1920:

Hello, I would have appreciated, if you at least gave me a response. I am a mathematician but working mostly for the German Knowledge, I am not that familiar with the English Knowledge policies. However I disagree with what you said about the notability of Benjamin Schlein. It's not even true what

349:

The big problem is that you have mixed in a lot of not notable material with the two things that might qualify (OPTICA & SPIE) so they are diluted. Both are a little marginal on notability, for instance 129/year for SPIE is OK but ~220/year for OPTICA is marginal. I have gone through and marked

2638:

I went through your page hoping to find an example of good practice. I found at least 10 areas where I can ask the same questions you asked, “relevance” et cetera. In addition, it is inappropriate to use one’s personal CV as an “independent” source. In addition, there are non working links on your

2115:

Thanks for the input, I think the best course of action if I understand you well would be to translate the Turkish sources, because from my previous experiences sources like those would be used to demonstrate notability. However I agree with everything else you said. I too don't think it satisfies

2091:

under criteria one. He does not have a strong publication record (as yet), and his awards are very junior. (I don't count the top 2% as being very meaningful.) The bar in the English Knowledge is high because it has people from all countries. If you want a second opinion you can ask others such as

1952:

confirming the notability. I am sorry that I have to say that, but I think I can judge much more than you who is a notable mathematician. You come from a different field and I respect your contribution to science. But it's hard to judge articles on mathematics or mathematician for people, that are

1773:

I am not sure if I replied in the correct spot before. If you're seeing this a second time, my apologies for the redundancy: Hello! I hope you're doing well. I would like to dispute part of what you wrote: "no major awards or society fellowships." My understanding is that an academic needs to meet

827:

For the purposes of an article, leave out all the average professor stuff, which means most of the resume stuff. Leave out scholarships. Leave out grants - most professors have them. I leave out early career awards unless unusual. They show promise. Our articles are about the promise fulfulled and

3371:

That makes sense. I have attempted to improve the page a bit by relying more on the university/departmental pages which are controlled by Boston University and relying more on ORCID and Google Scholar. Additionally, I have converted some lists into prose. Please let me know what you think. Again,

1600:

for academics. It's tricky to find documentation of additional awards online, but I believe that Criteria 1a, 1b, 1d, 4a (I cited syllabuses) should all combine to clear the hurdle. I will say it's been wild searching for citations, etc., as you come across extremely similar "ships in the night,"

1168:

Thanks for your suggestions about reorganization to comply with Knowledge's layout guidelines, and potentially containing more than one topic. Can you be more specific about which topics should be separated? If possible, can you also be specific about what layout guidelines haven't been followed?

3157:

I did not create the page, as should be obvious. You absolutely did not explain in detail how the page did not meet the required standard. In fact, you specifically raised formatting as the issue and requested section headings and an infobox. Those are not issues to justify a move to draftspace.

2134:

I moved it back to a draft, and made one minor section title change. I don't feel that I should approve or reject it, I think it should be done by someone else. Please use the dark blue "Submit for review" at the bottom of the large green-grey section. It will then go in a queue and someone will

1440:

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at

1321:

3232:

article. I saw that you reinstated the BLP label that I removed. I removed the BLP label because I believed that although some sources are published by the subject's institutions or from ORCID, much of the information is corroborated by external sources and because of the guidelines outlined in

746:

when you have questions about what is going on at the article. The current discussion about sources does not make sense, but those of us with experience with this can pursue it. Go and make yourself a nice cup of tea, which I am doing for myself now, and not look at the article for a few days.

1892:

My interpretation of the DPG grant was that it was just a research grant, rather than a true award. Since he has other major ones I removed it; focusing more on his significant achievements and not diluting them. I might have been incorrect about it's importance, in which case just add it

2067:

under criteria 1 (I think, forgive me if I am wrong on it). Also I have included some secondary sources on the other topics at least to satisfy the general notability guidelines. I hope I have solved most of the issues. I would really like to hear your input on it. Best regards,

2014:

First, you left me no other option, I tried to have a discussion with you but you ignored me. Second, what makes them notable. I would say firstly what they achieved in mathematics, not anything else. Let's take Kerov. Well in probability theory there is a bound called the

3449:

that such sources can be used. You seem to be wanting a different set of standards than what Knowledge actually uses. If you would like to see self-published sources barred, you can of course start an effort to have a policy changed, but this is not the way to do that. --

570:

for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can

1975:, notability is not something debated on my talk page. The article only cites one of his papers, and has no content as proof; it is the job of the editor who writes an article to prove beyond reasonable doubt. Please note that starter grants are not considered notable. 1483:

field. One thing I can’t figure out in editing is changing a name title to include a middle initial, as he appears to throughout his published works, etc. Hoping to add pages for others (co-authors, etc.!) once I get the hang of it all. Thanks again, and be well.

815:), motivated by what to say to students who have pasted their professor's web page in as an article. That is, what to do instead of a copyright violation. We have very few biographies that successfully explain the professor's academic work. An example I cite is: 2096:

or go to the tea room for help. Maybe there are interviews of him in newspapers or other articles about him. (It might be those are already there, but in Turkish -- you would need to provide a translation of the title for context.) Those secondary sources mean

152:

the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

3245:

Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they are established experts in the field, so long as:

2153:

Hello. Thanks a lot for your input. I was afraid of adding a lot of publications and only chose a selected few. I thought it would plague the article with only publications not making it exactly encyclopedic. Thank you, I will do as you have directed me.

780:, as the current editors are refusing to listen to me and introducing yet more incorrect statements. They know my life better than I do. I will wait for a week or so, and if the page still contains significant misinformation I will consider putting in a 1842:

It is better, but still short on details. For instance, more articles about his achievements, a source for his PhD thesis etc. in principle all statements must have a source as backup. If not, they should be deleted. Some reviewers may be very strict.

741:

What is on Knowledge is an encyclopedia article about you from an independent point of view, which is different from having an information page about yourself. I suggest leaving it to other editors to manage, and contacting science editors by way of

3064:

I read the guides and made multiple changes. In addition, I worked on following your prompts. I included the address page where it was cited rather than the general site re James Lind. I will ask for a 2nd opinion here as I edited substantially.

3342:

The reasoning is the same as why Blogs are not used -- they have not been checked for accuracy. It is similar with newspapers; some are considered reputable as they check information, others dont. You need to try and stick with curated (checked)

2372:

Please do not move an article that is being discussed at AFD. It's disruptive and interrupts the discussion. If an article is Kept, it can be moved but if it is moved during the discussion period, your move will simply be reverted. Thank. you.

2311:

3321:

I greatly appreciate your specific feedback. I think I understand how the article might be improved, but I still do not fully understand why information from a personal website or university page is unacceptable given the policy specified in

3444:

Sorry, but this is a standard you are making up. It is not "common sense" that we never use self-published sources in regards to statements about themselves. While we have limits on what can be used from such sources, it is common practice

456:

These documents are not confidential, but he would not wish them to appear anywhere on the web. They are provided for the confidence of the Knowledge Editors, and after the page is set – I ask that these would be archived or deleted.

414:

Professor Kornyshev has the prestigious position of a Chair of Chemical Physics (Full Professor) of Imperial College London, which is one of the World top 10 Universities, subject to many international ratings, e.g. QS rating).

3079:

It looks much better to me, but there was a very harsh comment made by a very experienced medical editor who should make comments. I do not know enough about the technical details to judge those; I ping'd him on the talk page.

2828: 3414:. Given your understanding of other WP policies and guidelines, and given your presumed relationship with academia, the hesitancy to understand the aforementioned commonsense gives an impression in which you might appear 357:

See if you can find unrelated (local newspapers etc) articles to boost him. Material from his university is useful, but can be considered as biased. If you find enough ping me and I will give further feedback. Good luck.

1929:(the Wigner matrices). I am not an expert on his work in mathematical physics, since I am coming from probability theory. But I would not have written an article about him, if he did not have an impact on mathematics.-- 3129:, The article exactly matched the criteria "the article does not meet the required standard" as I explained in detail. Please compare your stub to other articles on notable astronomers, I have suggested a few for you. 2168:

Don't add more of his publications, in fact only include 5-10 at most. Hus weakness is that he does not have that many well cited publications -- reviewers will notice that. The can see from his Google Scholar page.

1673:

phrases (bragging, or spin without providing information) that others may (probably will) object to. I may edit one or two out to give you an idea, but I don't know enough about him to be confident about doing more.

2138:

It has pluses, as he does have some mention in secondary sources. What it does not have as yet is a massive publication record. I think there is a 50% chance it will be accepted, but I should not decide. Good luck!

1554:(academics), I’m struggling a bit to fairly say that he wrote books before anyone else did, and now this is a college major and its own communication discipline… without “peacocking.” I will try more. Thanks again 824:

The criteria above are sometimes summed up as an "Average Professor Test": When judged against the average impact of a researcher in a given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more

102:

It looks fine now. I am in the process of accepting it. You should clean up slightly your references, they go after a "." or "," (not before) and they do not have space between them -- please check other pages.

3300:

Use ORCID, Google Scholar, Research Gate etc. Don't use ones such as 11-13 which has no useful information, 10 is obsolete, 9&24 are the same, 6&7 are the same (and have little info), 19 is irrelevant.

3276:

policy for this page? I responded to a comment by User4edits on my own talk page about this if you would like to involve them in this discussion. Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.

350:

with places which have dubious notability and could perhaps be deleted, and some with . For instance, I suggest a link to his PhD thesis. The wording on his achievements is also poorly stated, what is called

1549:

I think I understand, it’s just a little head-spinning to seek secondary sources but also not use them. Is it enough to just write “his book was reviewed in X journal” and leave it at that? Carefully reading

2405: 3173: 435:

2. A set of copies documenting his awards, received long ago and for which we could not find corresponding web pages (web links to all other awards were included in the earlier submitted text). These are:

3034:

is that these pages on universities are dynamic. Is it permitted to use links generated from the internet archive or wayback machine? I will work on each of these points you have raised and revert back.

2244:

I don't understand what you are getting at in the last two sentences. For example, the list of archaeologists includes a number of archaeologists with a "born 19??" designation for living archaeologists.

798:

Got your email. Happily I had just made myself another cup of tea. It is a very good idea to walk away for a while. This matters too you, which is why we discourage editors from working on articles about

1030:

before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.

2272:

From a brief look the page has already been substantially improved. When it is ready you should resubmit for review, I will leave it to someone else. Please be aware that there are many people who are

1568:

Yes, just saying reviewed works. Perhaps you can say "he was an early formulator of...". Also something like "his book was used in the first majors on the topic" (if you have a source to prove that).

685:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 600: 2731:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can

2844:

It is linked, if you do a search, you will see at least 5 pages that have cited this research and I have linked to many existing pages in the edits which also cite some of this Scientist's work.

1650:

his two most notable and prestigious awards, and have added citations for being elected to the Natl Academy of Science and the American Society of A&S. I do believe this hits on many of the

1184:

Again, thanks for your suggestions. Can you be more specific about which topics should be separated and if possible, can you also be specific about what layout guidelines haven't been followed?

3241:

policy is, in my perception, strictly satisfied. My understanding is that self-published sources are ok if the subject is itself and a few other reasonable criteria are met. The policy states:

184: 142: 2582:

As I said, he needs a major awards from the international scientific community that recognizes him. Neither the local Turkish ranking nor the Stanford list are international peer recognition.

2269:. You have to find other independent sources which indicate that it is, for instance someone citing him as the first person to use it in a review or similar, and describing how imortant it is. 2558:" is also a question in my mind. In Elsevier page, there is a downloadable huge Excel database which shows literally top 2% scientist. Mohammed Sultan Al-Buriahi's name is also in this list. 812: 854:

Re: "I have enough grey hair that I know what is notable versus fake in academia". You probably know all this, but I will reiterate some opinions based on my interactions with Knowledge:

3192:"The article exactly matched the criteria "the article does not meet the required standard" as I explained in detail." - are you aware of the criteria? Here is the full, entire criteria: 2470: 1130: 939: 701: 2980:

You can be considered to have a COI with respect to the statement about "Expert Needed", since you have edited so much of it. It would have been better to ask for a second opinion.

670: 3011:

with needing more sources, on the page as well as via talk and a message to the main author. On March 5th Melcous (who has 115,403 edits and is a rollbacker) deleted all of the

2116:

criteria one, I just took a look at your Google Scholar page and got a glimpse of what you mean. But honestly thank you, I guess I will try and act accordingly. Best regards,

1442: 1323: 811:

awards related to those contributions, and, if possible, the professional development that resulted in the contributions. I've written a guide to writing such an article (see

1596:

No problem with toughness, I want to get it right. (Though we must all remember there is a wikipedia page for "tastes like chicken.") I submitted again, trying to follow the

1945: 3106:- moving an article to draftspace because it doesn't have an infobox is an abuse of the draftify procedure. The criteria for moving an article to draftspace is set out at 2754: 2523: 1718: 1711: 2508: 1870:

I noticed, you removed the award "DPG Research Grant Canada" with the comment "Minor copy editing". Was this a mistake, or was the citation not sufficient for the entry?

505:

i have marked some of what needs sources. In addition, reduce the Bibliography, remove claims that seem like bragging, remove grants and minor details/awards/positions.

1021:; Knowledge needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference. 2450: 1921:

you said, that he only wrote "1" notable paper (see Google Scholar of him). Schlein did some influential stuff like for instance in probability theory he showed (with

334:. I do not want to be polemical, I just want to ask which aspects I have to take into consideration in order to improve writing Knowledge pages! Thank you very much. 2725: 2703: 2060: 491:, that is anything that even slightly looks like bragging. I have seen editors be much, much nastier. There are some who would just delete 90% of the current draft. 2806:

in medicine. I earned my doctorate from Oxford. and I am a BMJ research editor. I have checked your history and you have made a habit of leaving negative feedback.

643: 373: 2853: 227: 87:

Thank you very much for your comments. I have added a COI statement on the talk page and fixed the mess with multiple duplicates in the Google Scholar page. --

1408:

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.

1289:

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.

179: 2795:

There were three fake sources to statements in this article; it would be good to have an expert read this over to check that these were just minor mistakes..

1158: 2561:

As of the message I'm sending to you now, he has "10331" citations. What do you suggest me to do in order to make the editors and you accept this article?

2539:

link in the article, he has been selected to "Best Rising Stars of Science in Turkey 2023 Ranking" list in 7th place. They gathered that information from "

2286:

N.B., the list was to give you examples of other pages that you could look at. Just because some of them also have "born 19??" does not make that correct.

1142: 1535:

If these are true awards (here is a medal), then they matter. However, if they are just a grant to do research then they don't as all faculty get grants.

2732: 1878: 1185: 1170: 327: 2993: 2899: 575:

within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

3216: 1790: 1775: 1362:

in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as

1243:

in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as

728: 1877:, but I have trouble understanding the Knowledge system how to link a translated article correctly. Can you maybe point me to the correct menu? ^^' 1827:

Hi There, i appreciate you for reviewing this. i have added more information according to your comments. thx! please let me know if it is fine now.

400: 1034: 3286: 2666:

and the statement about my two week trip to China. If you think there are errors I suggest that you add a request to change on the talk page as I

2977:

section of the infobox (which should be scientist, not person) is way too long. Someone (not me) will almost certainly cut this as inappropriate.

2328: 2276:

harsher than I am about judging notability and requiring sources. In a page I worked on I was once challenged to prove the birth date of someone.

2093: 1517: 536: 520: 469: 118: 2701: 1430: 1311: 1084: 1405:

not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.

1286:

not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.

595: 1689: 1655: 1606: 1555: 1499: 1484: 861:

Another problem is the concept of "useful". Example: many academicians proclaim the utility of MOFs, but just try to find an industrial app.

232: 1418:, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the 1299:, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the 286: 2531:

rising star. Neither the "Rising Star" nor top 2% judge him in the context of his peers. Without this acknowledgement I think we must wait.

2357: 2237:). Also, isn't his pioneering use of LiDAR in Mesoamerica, a major archaeological region, worth his having a Wik page? Also, his work on 1733: 1730: 1727: 572: 1178: 977: 135: 2609: 2576: 1719:

https://vpr.um.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=949:2019-01-27-06-29-03&catid=8&Itemid=283&lang=fa

1398: 1279: 427:

I am, however, able to send you the copies of the following documents, which professor Kornyshev allowed me to copy and submit to you:

384: 2749: 2513: 1385: 1266: 1163: 1014:

is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.

893: 756: 2967:

Relevance of statement "Dr. Djulbegovic, a practicing oncologist..." is unclear. As it stands this is unsourced, so comes across as

1750:

Junior awards are not notable. Also, should not try and convince me, you have to make the page notable by itself while not bragging

1663: 1644: 1521: 875:

Edits from profs and similar are usually fine, it is their students who are often tone-deaf about what Knowledge is supposed to be.

3392:

here as he reinstated the BLP first, so pro-forma should have a chance to comment. (Plus I am busy today so can check in detail.)

2433:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3350: 3211: 3119: 1966: 1067: 157: 266:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3185: 3015:

section. I would not be surprised if the Edited Books are questioned (wrong format) and the whole article put up for deletion (

2819: 2362: 1193: 648: 96: 2384: 2019:-Kerov bound. He was one of the most important Russian probabilist in the time period 1970-2000? He was working at the famous 343: 3482: 2363: 2302: 1513: 1414:

Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using

1295:

Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using

804: 367: 112: 2323: 1079: 3459: 3048:

People frequently use wayback in references. Their problem is the opposite -- they can (will) get obsolete. No free lunch.

2301: 2234: 2044: 2009: 1984: 1852: 1154: 1075: 841: 793: 771: 724: 175: 3401: 3383: 3366: 3337: 3316: 3167: 3138: 2658:

write or edit that page, since that would be a clear COI. It has several errors introduced by other editors, for instance

1909: 1836: 1456: 1215: 1141:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

1997:, what proves notability? That article just states his existence, there is nothing demonstrating his impact on the world. 1762: 1366:, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the 1337: 1247:, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the 736: 477: 3439: 2591: 2218: 2178: 2163: 2148: 2125: 2110: 1814: 1783: 315: 301: 553: 2295: 528: 514: 500: 3525: 3152: 3089: 3074: 3057: 3043: 3028: 2778: 2693: 2679: 2625: 2265:

For the others, neither you nor I can call his use of LiDAR or other work as significant. If we did that it would be

2077: 2000:

N.B., while both may be notable, no proof. Knowledge statements without proof should always be deleted, as you know.

1938: 1794: 1744: 1591: 1471: 1372:. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you 1253:. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you 1697: 1683: 1628: 1614: 1577: 1563: 1544: 3097: 2020: 1651: 1597: 1551: 161: 2202: 1122:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

3103: 2482: 2461: 2407: 2399: 1492: 1150: 1071: 816: 720: 171: 3004: 2648: 1886: 832:

I don't have access to jstor. Don't discount university press releases - though they have to be used carefully.

2024: 1342: 388: 487:

N.B., the various editors have been gentle with you, all pointing out that you need to add sources and remove

79: 2446: 1797:

is an important career move, but I would not consider it on a part with major academic societies such as the

905: 567: 245: 3297:

page for faculty which I consider secondary as there could be legal consequences to misleading information.)

2477:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2253: 321: 2478: 2457: 2035:. All very famous people. I am sorry, just first study the people or leave it to mathematician to decide.-- 1223: 694: 405: 2603: 2553: 2923:. I have marked a few of the issues with the article on the page already. To be specific and a few more: 958: 858:

A big problem is that academicians are usually blind as to what counts vs what elevates their prominence.

706: 448:

C.Confirmation of election to Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters (Diploma of a Foreign Member)

71: 59: 1734:

https://press.um.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=991:f-811&Itemid=714&lang=fa

1731:

https://press.um.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=964:f-781&Itemid=714&lang=fa

1728:

https://press.um.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=915:f-729&Itemid=714&lang=fa

2198: 2031:, do you think any unimportant person becomes there chief-editor? Look at the others main-editors like 1441:

administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the

1377: 1322:

administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the

1258: 38: 888: 170:

There is a backlog of over 1300 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help!

2770: 2610:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?type=printable&id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384

1896:

Sorry, I don't know how or even if you should link to the German page. Perhaps ask a question at the

1802: 1798: 1768: 1381: 1262: 1203: 1093: 563: 339: 92: 3514:

this discussion does not belong on my talk page, particularly the recent somewhat personal comments.

2639:

page. Never the less, I will fix/improve what I can because the quality of the work I do matters.

1994: 1954: 1820: 1363: 1244: 2735:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 1582:

It looks like you ran into a different reviewer who I know is harsher than I am. It can be tough!

1436:

Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

1317:

Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

626:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

210:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

3353:

which is an official page whose content is controlled/curated by Northwestern University, versus

2876: 2445:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 2040: 1962: 1934: 1832: 1411:

If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.

1292:

If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.

837: 752: 538: 234: 197: 3478: 3379: 3333: 3282: 3207: 3181: 3163: 3115: 2054: 1882: 1477: 1426: 1307: 1189: 1174: 973: 3351:

https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/research-faculty/directory/profiles/marks-laurence.html

2764: 2233:

I know this is his own university, but CSU in a publicity piece calls Fisher "world-renowned"(

3411: 3172:

How can you say you explained in detail how the article did not match the required standard?

2186: 1821: 1740: 1705: 869: 682: 1949: 3455: 3446: 3435: 2832: 2633: 2572: 2536: 2442: 2159: 2121: 2073: 1779: 1367: 1248: 899: 693:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 591: 549: 542: 335: 282: 249: 238: 88: 8: 3521: 3423: 3397: 3362: 3323: 3312: 3307:

mess, and needs a proper rewrite. I will refrain from tagging this so you can repair it.

3269: 3238: 3234: 3221: 3148: 3134: 3085: 3053: 3024: 3008: 2989: 2675: 2587: 2504: 2395: 2291: 2214: 2174: 2144: 2106: 2028: 2005: 1980: 1915: 1905: 1848: 1810: 1758: 1679: 1624: 1587: 1573: 1540: 1467: 1211: 1199: 1047: 884: 879:

In any case, Knowledge would be very fortunate to have your expertise. Happy editing. --

865: 789: 767: 510: 496: 363: 331: 311: 297: 108: 2984:

By putting in markers and tags I am giving you indications on what needs to be changed.

2235:

https://source.colostate.edu/world-renowned-csu-archaeologist-next-up-in-lecture-series/

3107: 2935: 2916: 2249: 2036: 1990: 1972: 1958: 1930: 1828: 1602: 1359: 1240: 833: 748: 743: 524: 473: 3354: 2964:

The sentence "This work demonstrates the logical connection between ..." is unsourced.

2954:

The statement "where he trained a cadre of researchers in evidence-based medicine" is

2616:. Does Knowledge have formal citeria for international peer recognition? Where is it? 3508: 3474: 3407: 3375: 3329: 3278: 3268:

and multiple popular science magazines. Could you please guide me in how to make the

3203: 3177: 3159: 3126: 3111: 3070: 3039: 2955: 2912: 2895: 2689: 2644: 2621: 2353: 1897: 1751: 1670: 1605:, who had an extremely similar career, just later. Thanks again for your guidance. 1503: 1451: 1039: 969: 777: 664: 488: 396: 351: 47: 17: 2879:

or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject

1669:

I am going to approve the draft. I think some more editing is needed as it has some

1509:

The only thing you have added that might be relevant is what you call "awards", i.e.

2815: 2721: 2238: 1953:

not mathematicians. Same story I had here on Knowledge already with my article for

1736: 1721: 1693: 1659: 1610: 1559: 1488: 1415: 1296: 713: 678: 639: 613: 578: 269: 223: 1384:. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the 1265:. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the 3504: 3500: 3466: 3451: 3431: 3389: 3293: 2920: 2908: 2568: 2490: 2426: 2411: 2228: 2155: 2131: 2117: 2088: 2084: 2069: 2064: 2016: 1858: 925: 587: 582: 278: 273: 257: 420: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3415: 3003:, if you think I am exaggerating then please have a look at the old version of 2613: 2194: 2032: 948: 880: 690: 635: 219: 3237:. I additionally added the subject's personal website as a source so that the 2948:

section is unsourced. If I really was being nasty I would have deleted it all.

1347: 1228: 988: 3419: 3410:

Not using self-published and self-written sources from personal web pages is

3273: 3217: 3016: 2717: 2259: 2245: 1926: 1419: 1402: 1330: 1300: 1283: 1026: 1011: 982: 781: 686: 627: 623: 211: 207: 2456:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1116:

On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

1046:

If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's

932:

that is a peer reviewed and authoritative scientific journal in the sector.

3517: 3393: 3358: 3308: 3256:

It does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;

3229: 3144: 3130: 3081: 3066: 3049: 3035: 3020: 3000: 2985: 2968: 2928: 2904: 2891: 2685: 2671: 2640: 2617: 2583: 2500: 2391: 2349: 2345: 2287: 2266: 2210: 2170: 2140: 2102: 2001: 1976: 1901: 1864: 1844: 1806: 1754: 1675: 1620: 1583: 1569: 1536: 1463: 1446: 1207: 785: 763: 506: 492: 461:

Would that help in making page live? How shall I send you these documents?

392: 359: 307: 293: 253: 104: 1922: 1710:

Hello, About the draft:Ehsan Roohi, and about his notability, he won the

2460:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1391: 1272: 697:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

914: 674:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

622:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

206:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

2716:

Hello, Ldm1954. It has been over six months since you last edited the

2598:

Top 2% Scientists Worldwide 2023 by Stanford University" published on

2548:

Top 2% Scientists Worldwide 2023 by Stanford University" published on

3250:

The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;

2890:

That is a false assumption, and you need to remove this, thank you,

2824: 2334: 2190: 1019:

it requires a good understanding of Knowledge policies and guidelines

655: 2023:. And let's talk about Schlein. He is a chief-editor of the journal 1714:

Award, which is given yearly once to one researcher below 40 years:

1119:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

601:

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

417:

All the details of his career have been approved by Imperial College

185:

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

2740: 2599: 2549: 2489:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2375: 2314: 1033:

If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the

955:(that seems to be a copy and paste from my previous draft article) 849: 444:

B. Christian-Friedrich Schoenbein “Contribution to Science” Medal

306:

Everything is answered. The full book references are appropriate.

2429:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 902:, previously I added other secondary authoritative sources like: 2608:" is peer reviewed and the methodology is cited in PLoS Biology 2333:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

968:

Is this enought to demonstrate the notability of the software?

710:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2338: 1529: 1104: 807:(WP:NPROF) developed, but it gets debated several times a year. 700:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

668:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

2938:(2005)" No source, and the library page does not mention this. 1873:

I would also like to link the German translation of the entry

1863:

Hello! Thank you for reviewing and correcting the article for

167:

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

2738:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.

2087:, the page has been improved, but I doubt that it will pass 2419: 484:

in sending them to me or anyone else, that will do nothing.

124: 2755:

Benjamin Djulbegovic page and unjustified use of template

2189:, draftification as part of NPP should only be done once. 3143:

N.B., the incorrect infobox was the least of the issues.

2927:

You have multiple unsupported statements or ones without

2467:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

1874: 1525: 1380:, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the 1261:, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the 617:

on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment

201:

on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment

3471:

Thank you for your message and input in this discussion.

3259:

There is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and

391:

incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

326:

Dear Ldm1954, I'm writing about the decline of the page

2337:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2059:

Hello, Thanks for helping out on the article I created

1017:

Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but

681:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2209:

N.B., translation of the Turkish titles helped a lot.

1443:

list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies

1324:

list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies

2543:.". I really don't understand why you rejected this. 374:

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

292:

Thanks. I will be glad to help with anything needed.

2779:

Learn how and when to remove these template messages

1512:"His research has been supported by awards from the 1198:Sorry, not my job. I suggest you get help from the 3355:

http://www.numis.northwestern.edu/Research/Faculty/

3262:

The article is not based primarily on such sources.

2185:Please don't draftify articles multiple times. Per 2961:His administrative positions at USF are unsourced. 2907:, please look carefully at the notability guide, 3426:messages I have left on your talk page. Thanks, 1957:. It's just frustration for us mathematicians.-- 1722:https://eng2.um.ac.ir/images/78/golkhatmi.dr.jpg 1354:Hi Ldm1954. Your account has been added to the " 1235:Hi Ldm1954. Your account has been added to the " 906:https://www.rcsb.org/molecular-graphics-software 3253:It does not involve claims about third parties; 3228:Hi Ldm1954. Thank you for your feedback on the 440:A. Appointment as a member of IUPAC commission 3388:It looks OK from a quick check. I am pinging @ 3346:With university pages content matters as well. 2951:His positions from 2017 to 2023 are unsourced. 2449:over time. You may like to take a look at the 1005:Hello Ldm1954, we need experienced volunteers. 926:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa009 919:CCSB Center for Computation Structural Biology 244:Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've 2612:The lead author also has a page on Knowledge 2262:For certain the CSU statement cannot be used. 421:https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/a.kornyshev 2329:Disambiguation link notification for March 5 1433:) to help ensure you don't forget any steps. 1314:) to help ensure you don't forget any steps. 949:https://handwiki.org/Software:Protein_Imager 119:November Articles for creation backlog drive 2934:"His work on uncertainly was recognized by 1085:New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive 431:A set of copies of his PhD and DSc diplomas 2915:and the guide about neutral point of view 2791:needs attention from an expert in Medicine 936:I also have other secondary sources like: 898:Hi, regarding the rejection of my article 872:(we disclose knowledge, we dont instruct). 385:Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 2931:which, rigorously, should all be removed: 1925:) universality for an important class of 519:Thank you very much. I'll work on that. 2453:to see how you can improve the article. 924:Moreover there is the reference article 2684:Good point, I can work on this next. 452:D. Diploma of the 1991 Humboldt Prize. 158:Category:AfC pending submissions by age 14: 2852:contains content that is written like 2541:Microsoft Academic Graph on 21-12-2022 2514:Draft about Mohammed Sultan Al-Buriahi 1522:Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library 1425:Please review some of our flowcharts ( 1306:Please review some of our flowcharts ( 1164:Draft: General Collective Intelligence 894:Protein Imager draft article rejection 776:I am going to walk away from the page 634:Message delivered to you with love by 218:Message delivered to you with love by 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3372:your feedback is greatly appreciated. 1875:https://de.wikipedia.org/Hans_Geissel 1645:Draft:S. Walter Englander (scientist) 1416:Earwig's copyright violation detector 1297:Earwig's copyright violation detector 805:Knowledge talk:Notability (academics) 3198:Does not meet the required standard 2526:article. I understand your message: 1793:I agree that being President of the 1518:John F. Kennedy Presidential Library 1514:National Endowment of the Humanities 1053:Cheers, and hope to see you around. 915:https://ccsb.scripps.edu/illustrate/ 665:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 566:for comments about the article, and 25: 2241:is significant in and of itself. 1688:Thanks, I'd really appreciate it. 1652:notability guidelines for academics 1358:" user group. Please check back at 1239:" user group. Please check back at 1099:January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive 1037:. You can apply for the user-right 649:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 383:There is currently a discussion at 23: 2708: 2418: 1346: 1227: 1103: 987: 604: 188: 123: 24: 3539: 3428:Please feel free to ping/mention 3174:I have seen your talkpage comment 2760:This article has multiple issues. 2498:Thanks again, and happy editing! 2437:The article has been assessed as 2364:Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship 2303:Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship 1795:American Society for Photobiology 136:WikiProject Articles for creation 2021:Steklov Institute of Mathematics 1394:. In addition, please remember: 1275:. In addition, please remember: 1202:, and also read the style guide 737:Having an article about yourself 654: 557: 378: 261: 29: 3292:I think you misunderstood why @ 3104:Andrea Ferrara (astrophysicist) 2768:or discuss these issues on the 2535:It can be seen in the provided 704:and submit your choices on the 612:Your feedback is requested at 196:Your feedback is requested at 3176:after the move to draftspace. 2279:In many respects Knowledge is 2027:. This is the main journal of 2025:Journal of Functional Analysis 1125:Each review will earn 1 point. 940:https://archivio.uninsubria.it 13: 1: 3098:Moving articles to draftspace 2592:23:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) 2577:11:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC) 2481:without posting a request to 2296:22:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 2254:21:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) 2219:10:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 2203:15:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC) 2179:11:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 2164:11:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 2149:10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 2126:14:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 2111:13:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 2078:06:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 2045:23:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 2010:23:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 1985:23:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 1967:22:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 1939:21:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 1338:04:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) 1159:02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC) 1080:01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 978:15:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 842:04:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC) 794:21:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC) 772:21:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 757:21:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 729:00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 683:Knowledge arbitration process 644:21:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 596:19:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC) 568:Talk:Electron diffraction/GA2 529:16:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 515:15:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 501:14:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 478:13:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 401:16:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 228:08:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC) 148:The goal of this drive is to 2281:Guilty until proven innocent 2101:more than a list of papers. 1910:21:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 1887:16:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 1853:23:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1837:22:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 1815:21:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) 1784:19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) 1763:01:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 1745:01:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC) 1698:12:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC) 1684:09:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC) 1664:18:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC) 1629:00:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC) 1615:00:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC) 1592:20:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 1578:18:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 1564:17:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 1545:16:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 1506:. Added them goes backwards. 1493:16:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC) 1472:18:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) 1457:08:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC) 1420:general notability guideline 1301:general notability guideline 1216:03:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC) 1194:02:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC) 1179:09:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC) 889:19:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC) 638::) | Is this wrong? Contact 619:. Thank you for helping out! 368:13:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 344:10:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 316:19:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 302:15:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC) 287:10:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC) 222::) | Is this wrong? Contact 203:. Thank you for helping out! 180:13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC) 162:other categories and sorting 113:16:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC) 97:09:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC) 7: 3272:policy consistent with the 2793:. The specific problem is: 2564:Waiting for your response. 2441:, which is recorded on its 1946:Draft_talk:Benjamin_Schlein 1387:new page reviewer talk page 1268:new page reviewer talk page 1128:Interested in taking part? 864:My favorite guidelines are 10: 3544: 3526:20:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 3483:16:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 3460:15:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 3440:05:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC) 3402:22:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3384:22:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3367:22:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3338:22:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3317:21:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3287:21:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3224:, and academic biographies 3212:00:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3186:00:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3168:00:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3153:00:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3139:00:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3120:00:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC) 3090:06:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 3075:06:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 3058:13:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 3044:12:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 3029:06:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 3007:. Back on 24 Feb I tagged 2994:06:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2941:Your reference is broken. 2911:, the guide about peacock 2900:03:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2750:21:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC) 2694:12:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2680:04:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2649:04:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2626:03:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC) 2524:Mohammed Sultan Al-Buriahi 1726:References for his books: 1712:Academy of Science of Iran 1151:MediaWiki message delivery 1072:MediaWiki message delivery 721:MediaWiki message delivery 172:MediaWiki message delivery 3499:I will make one comment: 3418:the system. Also see the 2509:00:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 2400:01:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 2385:01:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 2358:18:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC) 2324:01:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 1803:American Physical Society 1799:American Chemical Society 1343:New page reviewer granted 1224:New page reviewer granted 1204:Knowledge:Manual of Style 1140: 1102: 868:(avoid primary refs) and 564:Talk:Electron diffraction 406:Alexei A. Kornyshev draft 256:-status according to the 3349:As an example, consider 2492:leaving us some feedback 2479:create articles yourself 2458:create articles yourself 1995:Sergei Vasilyevich Kerov 1955:Sergei Vasilyevich Kerov 1944:Also see the comment in 959:https://mindthegraph.com 718:to your user talk page. 624:Feedback Request Service 208:Feedback Request Service 80:Edward Karavakis's draft 3303:In fact this page is a 2818:, as no other articles 2704:Draft:Maisie Myra Marks 963:Mind The Graph Platform 822:A quote from WP:NPROF: 322:Andrea Rabolini's draft 3265: 2733:request its undeletion 2713: 2670:edit the page myself. 2423: 1769:Draft: Alexander Greer 1399:Be nice to new editors 1351: 1280:Be nice to new editors 1232: 1108: 992: 942:(italian source) from 910:RCSB Protein Data Bank 609: 193: 128: 3357:which is unrefereed. 3243: 2718:Articles for Creation 2712: 2483:Articles for creation 2462:Articles for creation 2422: 2408:Articles for creation 1822:Draft:Etsko Kruisinga 1598:notability guidelines 1376:read the tutorial at 1350: 1257:read the tutorial at 1231: 1107: 991: 930:Oxford Bioinformatics 679:Arbitration Committee 662:Hello! Voting in the 608: 577:Message delivered by 387:regarding a possible 268:Message delivered by 192: 127: 42:of past discussions. 2702:Your draft article, 2522:You've rejected our 2346:Opt-out instructions 1360:the permissions page 1241:the permissions page 900:Draft:Protein Imager 550:Electron diffraction 543:Electron diffraction 389:conflict of interest 250:Electron diffraction 239:Electron diffraction 3447:supported by policy 3009:Hans-Christian Hege 2724:page you started, " 2604:Stanford University 2554:Stanford University 2406:Your submission at 2055:Draft: Yasin Sohret 2029:functional analysis 1478:draft:Gary Woodward 1200:Knowledge:Help desk 1035:granting conditions 944:Insubria University 552:you nominated as a 465:With best regards, 2936:James Lind Library 2919:and about sources 2827:to this page from 2714: 2424: 2061:Draft:Yasin Şöhret 1950:user:Jähmefyysikko 1706:Draft: Ehsan Roohi 1603:Richard M. Perloff 1356:New page reviewers 1352: 1237:New page reviewers 1233: 1109: 993: 695:arbitration policy 628:removing your name 610: 252:you nominated for 212:removing your name 194: 129: 3509:User:Magenta.lily 3429: 2969:original research 2888: 2887: 2864: 2863: 2842: 2841: 2835:for suggestions. 2803: 2802: 2783: 2726:Maisie Myra Marks 2634:Restored Template 2567:Have a good day. 2414:has been accepted 2267:original research 1752:Knowledge:PEACOCK 1654:. Thanks again. 1455: 1148: 1147: 778:Laurence D. Marks 762:Good suggestion. 731: 631: 585: 489:Knowledge:Peacock 328:Draft:Dario Polli 276: 215: 199:Talk:Andrew Wiles 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Ldm1954 3535: 3470: 3427: 2870: 2869: 2854:an advertisement 2847: 2846: 2829:related articles 2809: 2808: 2786: 2785: 2775: 2748: 2711: 2494: 2486: 2473: 2383: 2369:Hello, Ldm1954, 2322: 2308:Hello, Ldm1954, 2239:La Ciudad Blanca 1993:: similarly for 1916:Why no response? 1449: 1378:New Pages Review 1357: 1259:New Pages Review 1238: 1100: 1089: 1088: 1068:NPP Coordination 1048:discussion board 719: 717: 658: 621: 607: 576: 561: 560: 382: 381: 267: 265: 264: 205: 191: 131:Hello Ldm1954: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3543: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3505:User:User4edits 3501:User:NatGertler 3464: 3226: 3100: 3005:Christian Hegge 2837:(February 2024) 2825:introduce links 2798:(February 2024) 2757: 2739: 2709: 2707: 2654:Please note, I 2636: 2516: 2511: 2476: 2469: 2465: 2427:Robin Vallacher 2416: 2412:Robin Vallacher 2374: 2367: 2331: 2313: 2306: 2231: 2057: 1927:random matrices 1918: 1861: 1825: 1771: 1708: 1647: 1480: 1390:or ask via the 1382:deletion policy 1355: 1345: 1329: 1271:or ask via the 1263:deletion policy 1236: 1226: 1166: 1098: 1094:New Page Patrol 1087: 1064: 1012:New Page Patrol 985: 896: 852: 817:David A. Hafler 739: 734: 733: 711: 659: 651: 640:my bot operator 605: 603: 581:, on behalf of 558: 546: 408: 379: 376: 336:Andrea Rabolini 324: 272:, on behalf of 262: 246:begun reviewing 242: 224:my bot operator 189: 187: 182: 121: 89:EdwardKaravakis 82: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3541: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3472: 3373: 3347: 3344: 3327: 3301: 3298: 3264: 3263: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3251: 3225: 3215: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3155: 3099: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3031: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2971: 2965: 2962: 2959: 2952: 2949: 2942: 2939: 2932: 2886: 2885: 2862: 2861: 2840: 2839: 2833:Find link tool 2801: 2800: 2756: 2753: 2720:submission or 2706: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2635: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2614:John Ioannidis 2521: 2515: 2512: 2464:if you prefer. 2455: 2451:grading scheme 2434: 2431: 2417: 2415: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2366: 2361: 2330: 2327: 2305: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2284: 2277: 2270: 2263: 2230: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2187:WP:DRAFTOBJECT 2183: 2182: 2181: 2136: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2033:Cedric Villani 1998: 1987: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1894: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1824: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1533: 1510: 1507: 1479: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1438: 1437: 1434: 1423: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1369:New Pages Feed 1344: 1341: 1327: 1319: 1318: 1315: 1304: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1250:New Pages Feed 1225: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1165: 1162: 1146: 1145: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1101: 1086: 1083: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1044: 1031: 1022: 1015: 1008: 1007: 986: 984: 981: 967: 935: 923: 895: 892: 877: 876: 873: 870:WP:NOTTEXTBOOK 862: 859: 851: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 829: 820: 808: 800: 774: 738: 735: 702:the candidates 671:eligible users 660: 653: 652: 650: 647: 620: 602: 599: 545: 541:nomination of 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 503: 485: 464: 460: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 433: 432: 426: 413: 410:Dear Ldm1954, 407: 404: 375: 372: 371: 370: 355: 323: 320: 319: 318: 304: 241: 237:nomination of 231: 204: 186: 183: 168: 147: 122: 120: 117: 116: 115: 84:Dear Ldm1954, 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3540: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3473: 3468: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3448: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3345: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3325: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3275: 3271: 3261: 3258: 3255: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3240: 3236: 3231: 3223: 3219: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3199: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3156: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3032: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3013:Research work 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2979: 2976: 2972: 2970: 2966: 2963: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2950: 2947: 2943: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2930: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2884: 2880: 2878: 2877:autobiography 2873:This article 2872: 2871: 2868: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2850:This article 2849: 2848: 2845: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2812:This article 2811: 2810: 2807: 2799: 2796: 2792: 2789:This article 2788: 2787: 2784: 2782: 2780: 2773: 2772: 2767: 2766: 2761: 2752: 2751: 2747: 2745: 2744: 2736: 2734: 2729: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2705: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2664:nano surfaces 2661: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2605: 2601: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2565: 2562: 2559: 2557: 2555: 2551: 2544: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2527: 2525: 2519: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2499: 2496: 2493: 2487: 2484: 2480: 2474: 2472: 2463: 2459: 2454: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2430: 2428: 2421: 2413: 2409: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2380: 2379: 2370: 2365: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2342: 2340: 2336: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2319: 2318: 2309: 2304: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2268: 2264: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2240: 2236: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2095: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2066: 2062: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2037:Tensorproduct 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1996: 1992: 1991:Tensorproduct 1988: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973:Tensorproduct 1970: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959:Tensorproduct 1956: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1931:Tensorproduct 1928: 1924: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1871: 1868: 1866: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1829:Deondernemers 1823: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1453: 1448: 1444: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1365: 1361: 1349: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1325: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1246: 1242: 1230: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1144: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1127: 1124: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1106: 1097: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 990: 980: 979: 975: 971: 965: 964: 960: 956: 954: 950: 946: 945: 941: 937: 933: 931: 927: 921: 920: 916: 912: 911: 907: 903: 901: 891: 890: 886: 882: 874: 871: 867: 863: 860: 857: 856: 855: 843: 839: 835: 834:StarryGrandma 830: 826: 825:accomplished? 821: 818: 814: 809: 806: 801: 797: 796: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 749:StarryGrandma 745: 732: 730: 726: 722: 715: 709: 708: 703: 698: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 675: 673: 672: 667: 666: 657: 646: 645: 642:. | Sent at 641: 637: 632: 629: 625: 618: 616: 598: 597: 593: 589: 584: 580: 574: 569: 565: 555: 551: 544: 540: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 512: 508: 504: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481: 480: 479: 475: 471: 466: 462: 458: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 430: 429: 428: 424: 422: 418: 411: 403: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 369: 365: 361: 356: 353: 348: 347: 346: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 317: 313: 309: 305: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 275: 271: 259: 255: 251: 247: 240: 236: 230: 229: 226:. | Sent at 225: 221: 216: 213: 209: 202: 200: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 163: 159: 156:You may find 154: 151: 146: 144: 143:Backlog Drive 139:is holding a 138: 137: 132: 126: 114: 110: 106: 101: 100: 99: 98: 94: 90: 85: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3513: 3512: 3475:Magenta.lily 3408:Magenta.lily 3376:Magenta.lily 3330:Magenta.lily 3324:WP:ABOUTSELF 3304: 3279:Magenta.lily 3270:WP:ABOUTSELF 3266: 3244: 3239:WP:ABOUTSELF 3235:WP:ABOUTSELF 3230:Pankaj Mehta 3227: 3222:WP:ABOUTSELF 3204:AusLondonder 3200: 3197: 3178:AusLondonder 3160:AusLondonder 3127:AusLondonder 3112:AusLondonder 3101: 3012: 2983: 2974: 2945: 2903: 2889: 2883:(March 2024) 2882: 2874: 2865: 2859:(March 2024) 2858: 2851: 2843: 2836: 2813: 2804: 2797: 2794: 2790: 2776: 2769: 2763: 2762:Please help 2759: 2758: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2730: 2715: 2667: 2663: 2660:nanotwinning 2659: 2655: 2637: 2597: 2566: 2563: 2560: 2547: 2545: 2540: 2537:Research.com 2534: 2529: 2528: 2520: 2517: 2497: 2488: 2468: 2466: 2438: 2436: 2432: 2425: 2377: 2376: 2371: 2368: 2343: 2332: 2316: 2315: 2310: 2307: 2280: 2273: 2243: 2232: 2229:C. T. Fisher 2098: 2058: 1919: 1879:Dediggefedde 1872: 1869: 1865:Hans Geissel 1862: 1859:Hans Geissel 1826: 1772: 1725: 1709: 1648: 1481: 1439: 1386: 1373: 1368: 1353: 1332: 1331: 1320: 1267: 1254: 1249: 1234: 1186:CognitiveMMA 1171:CognitiveMMA 1167: 1149: 1131:Sign up here 1129: 1092: 1065: 1038: 1027:the tutorial 1025: 1024:Kindly read 1018: 1004: 970:Molpgraphfan 966: 962: 957: 952: 947: 943: 938: 934: 929: 922: 918: 913: 909: 904: 897: 878: 866:WP:SECONDARY 853: 823: 740: 705: 699: 676: 669: 663: 661: 633: 614: 611: 554:good article 548:The article 547: 468:Ehud Haimov 467: 463: 459: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 425: 416: 412: 409: 377: 332:WP:NACADEMIC 325: 248:the article 243: 217: 198: 195: 166: 155: 149: 140: 134: 133: 130: 86: 83: 65: 43: 37: 3452:Nat Gertler 3412:COMMONSENSE 3108:WP:DRAFTIFY 2917:WP:BLPSTYLE 2439:Start-Class 1923:Terence Tao 1737:Parisan1342 1401:. They are 1392:NPP Discord 1282:. They are 1273:NPP Discord 799:themselves. 707:voting page 579:ChristieBot 573:nominate it 556:has passed 270:ChristieBot 141:month long 36:This is an 3467:NatGertler 3432:User4edits 3390:User4edits 3294:User4edits 3102:Regarding 2999:N.B. for @ 2956:WP:PUFFERY 2944:The whole 2913:WP:PUFFERY 2867:patterns. 2831:; try the 2820:link to it 2765:improve it 2569:Ugurbaskin 2274:much, much 2156:Serrwinner 2135:review it. 2132:Serrwinner 2118:Serrwinner 2085:Serrwinner 2070:Serrwinner 1791:OliverT715 1776:OliverT715 1552:notability 983:Invitation 691:topic bans 615:Talk:Tuple 588:FuzzyMagma 583:FuzzyMagma 352:WP:Peacock 279:FuzzyMagma 274:FuzzyMagma 3424:ownership 2975:Known for 2946:Education 2823:. Please 2771:talk page 2471:help desk 2443:talk page 2335:MKS units 1364:patrolled 1245:patrolled 953:Hand Wiki 881:Smokefoot 687:site bans 636:Yapperbot 220:Yapperbot 164:helpful. 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2921:WP:BLPRS 2909:WP:NPROF 2600:Elsevier 2550:Elsevier 2260:Kdammers 2246:Kdammers 2199:contribs 2094:AquaDTRS 2089:WP:NPROF 2065:WP:NPROF 1948:by user 1333:Rosguill 1328:signed, 1066:Sent by 521:Ehudhaim 470:Ehudhaim 258:criteria 3518:Ldm1954 3394:Ldm1954 3359:Ldm1954 3309:Ldm1954 3145:Ldm1954 3131:Ldm1954 3082:Ldm1954 3067:AmyEBHC 3050:Ldm1954 3036:AmyEBHC 3021:Ldm1954 3001:AmyEBHC 2986:Ldm1954 2905:AmyEBHC 2892:AmyEBHC 2686:AmyEBHC 2672:Ldm1954 2656:did not 2641:AmyEBHC 2618:AmyEBHC 2584:Ldm1954 2518:Hello, 2501:Ldm1954 2447:develop 2392:Ldm1954 2350:DPL bot 2288:Ldm1954 2283:(IMHO). 2211:Ldm1954 2171:Ldm1954 2141:Ldm1954 2103:Ldm1954 2017:Vershik 2002:Ldm1954 1977:Ldm1954 1902:Ldm1954 1898:tearoom 1845:Ldm1954 1807:Ldm1954 1801:or the 1755:Ldm1954 1676:Ldm1954 1671:peacock 1621:Ldm1954 1584:Ldm1954 1570:Ldm1954 1537:Ldm1954 1504:PEACOCK 1464:Ldm1954 1462:Thanks 1403:usually 1284:usually 1208:Ldm1954 786:Ldm1954 764:Ldm1954 714:NoACEMM 507:Ldm1954 493:Ldm1954 393:Rublamb 360:Ldm1954 308:Ldm1954 294:Ldm1954 105:Ldm1954 39:archive 3416:gaming 3343:pages. 3274:WP:SPS 3218:WP:SPS 3017:WP:AfD 2875:is an 2816:orphan 2814:is an 2668:wont't 2546:This " 2339:Newton 1690:Heyccj 1656:Heyccj 1607:RJK509 1556:RJK509 1530:C-SPAN 1528:, and 1520:, the 1516:, the 1500:RJK509 1485:RJK509 1070:using 782:WP:AfD 744:WT:PHY 562:; see 150:reduce 2929:WP:RS 2722:Draft 2596:The " 2348:.) -- 1893:back. 1601:like 1445:. – 1143:here. 961:from 951:from 928:from 917:from 908:from 850:Re... 537:Your 233:Your 16:< 3522:talk 3507:and 3479:talk 3456:talk 3422:and 3398:talk 3380:talk 3363:talk 3334:talk 3313:talk 3283:talk 3208:talk 3182:talk 3164:talk 3149:talk 3135:talk 3116:talk 3086:talk 3071:talk 3054:talk 3040:talk 3025:talk 2990:talk 2973:The 2896:talk 2728:". 2690:talk 2676:talk 2645:talk 2622:talk 2588:talk 2573:talk 2505:talk 2396:talk 2390:OK. 2354:talk 2292:talk 2250:talk 2215:talk 2195:talk 2191:Elli 2175:talk 2160:talk 2145:talk 2122:talk 2107:talk 2099:much 2074:talk 2041:talk 2006:talk 1981:talk 1963:talk 1935:talk 1906:talk 1883:talk 1849:talk 1833:talk 1811:talk 1789:To @ 1780:talk 1759:talk 1741:talk 1694:talk 1680:talk 1660:talk 1625:talk 1611:talk 1588:talk 1574:talk 1560:talk 1541:talk 1489:talk 1468:talk 1452:talk 1374:must 1255:must 1212:talk 1190:talk 1175:talk 1155:talk 1076:talk 1040:HERE 974:talk 885:talk 838:talk 813:here 790:talk 768:talk 753:talk 725:talk 677:The 592:talk 525:talk 511:talk 497:talk 474:talk 397:talk 364:talk 340:talk 312:talk 298:talk 283:talk 176:talk 109:talk 93:talk 3430:-- 3420:COI 3305:big 3019:). 2602:by 2552:by 2341:. 1619:🙏 1526:CBS 1447:Joe 1326:. 586:-- 277:-- 160:or 3524:) 3511:, 3503:, 3481:) 3458:) 3438:) 3400:) 3382:) 3365:) 3336:) 3315:) 3285:) 3220:, 3210:) 3184:) 3166:) 3151:) 3137:) 3118:) 3088:) 3073:) 3056:) 3042:) 3027:) 2992:) 2898:) 2881:. 2857:. 2774:. 2746:iz 2692:) 2678:) 2662:, 2647:) 2624:) 2590:) 2575:) 2507:) 2495:. 2410:: 2398:) 2381:iz 2356:) 2320:iz 2294:) 2252:) 2217:) 2201:) 2197:| 2177:) 2162:) 2147:) 2124:) 2109:) 2076:) 2043:) 2008:) 1983:) 1965:) 1937:) 1908:) 1900:? 1885:) 1867:! 1851:) 1835:) 1813:) 1782:) 1761:) 1743:) 1696:) 1682:) 1662:) 1627:) 1613:) 1590:) 1576:) 1562:) 1543:) 1532:." 1524:, 1491:) 1470:) 1429:, 1310:, 1214:) 1206:. 1192:) 1177:) 1157:) 1078:) 976:) 887:) 840:) 792:) 784:. 770:) 755:) 727:) 716:}} 712:{{ 689:, 594:) 539:GA 527:) 513:) 499:) 476:) 419:: 399:) 366:) 342:) 314:) 300:) 285:) 260:. 254:GA 235:GA 178:) 111:) 95:) 3520:( 3477:( 3469:: 3465:@ 3454:( 3436:T 3434:( 3406:@ 3396:( 3378:( 3361:( 3332:( 3311:( 3281:( 3206:( 3180:( 3162:( 3147:( 3133:( 3125:@ 3114:( 3084:( 3069:( 3052:( 3038:( 3023:( 2988:( 2958:. 2894:( 2777:( 2743:L 2688:( 2674:( 2643:( 2620:( 2606:. 2586:( 2571:( 2556:. 2503:( 2485:. 2475:. 2394:( 2378:L 2352:( 2344:( 2317:L 2290:( 2248:( 2213:( 2193:( 2173:( 2158:( 2143:( 2130:@ 2120:( 2105:( 2092:@ 2083:@ 2072:( 2039:( 2004:( 1989:@ 1979:( 1971:@ 1961:( 1933:( 1904:( 1881:( 1847:( 1831:( 1809:( 1778:( 1757:( 1739:( 1692:( 1678:( 1658:( 1623:( 1609:( 1586:( 1572:( 1558:( 1539:( 1498:@ 1487:( 1466:( 1454:) 1450:( 1431:2 1427:1 1422:. 1312:2 1308:1 1303:. 1210:( 1188:( 1173:( 1153:( 1134:. 1096:| 1074:( 1050:. 1043:. 972:( 883:( 836:( 788:( 766:( 751:( 723:( 630:. 590:( 523:( 509:( 495:( 472:( 395:( 362:( 354:. 338:( 310:( 296:( 281:( 214:. 174:( 145:! 107:( 91:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index