522:
Basildon in 1974? Harrow should probably also stay split since it seems that many of the other places (like
Stanmore) would still be thought of as being distinct and every other London borough is split. Havant might already be an exception since as noted the old district was "Havant and Waterloo" and anyway Hayling Island is clearly distinct. Fareham clearly contains some distinct areas so its marginal. Woking (which I previously missed from the list of post 2005 splits) perhaps should be merged, its an interesting one in that Byfleet may be classified as being distinct in that its not part of the BUASD and was from 1989 to 2010 a parish. The discussion for splitting is at
481:, as you can see Chesterfield fails the 1st 3 (as long as you go by BUA and not BUASD) while Corby passes every test. Its also interesting to note that of the 3 that have pre 1974 boundaries all of them are in Hampshire (unless you take into account Basildon which apparently got part of Thurrock Urban District and is now partly parished) but as noted Havant is maybe already an exception due to the former district being "Havant and Waterloo". Interestingly Exeter just like Chesterfield could (but I probably wouldn't recommend) arguably be split for the same reason (aside from being unparished and pre 1974) Topsham is part of Exeter BUA but not BUASD.
622:
2043:
792:
2265:
1008:
903:
208:. My "but that's the actual name! that's how council uses it, and it's the legal name! you just don't apparently know what things are called" argument never really worked. Oh god now I'm getting flashbacks to the chap who imagined an entire county borough that never existed and refused to accept my documentation that it didn't on the basis that I was too young. Anyway, not as contentious as counties (although that seems to have settled down now, at least).
2409:
1826:
1762:
1404:
1928:
1670:
1107:
707:
204:
localities never really saw the big picture. Corby was one of those one that was right on the edge where I think I reckoned it should be split but it was clear that would be unable to achieve a consensus. I do remember blank incomprehension from people particularly for calling the split articles 'City of X' vs 'X' for the ones that had city status. Perhaps that was a mistake and I should have just gone with
456:
would actually vote against that list - I'm surprised to find out I made it!, but I do remember being turned against it pretty quickly when I realised it was a choice between synthesis and the BUASDs; and I /really/ didn't like the BUASDs being ranked in a sort of national list, because they didn't seem to be designed for that, and the ONS wasn't presenting them like that. Yeah I just mean that like
2210:
1886:
1600:
1558:
1327:
826:
672:
239:). I think the tests for having single articles there are too lax, namely I think that if the district does have recent boundaries like Cheltenham but the ONS BUA/BUASD is similar shouldn't be split as well as cases like Ipswich where the BUA/BUASD is larger than the district aren't split. The only ones that have pre 1974 boundaries that are split are
1027:
This person does not appear to be notable per the criteria of WP:JOURNALIST. The majority of the works she contributed to don't even have
Knowledge articles. The only thing that maybe warrants notability is being the "senior narrative designer" on Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines 2, but she is no
222:
I very much doubt that Corby would ever have been controversial if split, the only controversy seems to have been with splits of districts with city status mainly due to the confusion with the title. In addition as noted Corby district is due to be abolished in April next year and the unparished area
1434:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
406:
With
Newcastle upon Tyne I'd actually consider keeping as is for partly the same reasons as Manchester etc you gave above in that many will consider it to be the whole Tyneside BUA but what do you mean by unwieldiness of the name? Are you talking about the fact that the district is called "Newcastle
521:
that have pre 1974 boundaries would you suggest merging? As far as they go
Basildon probably should be kept split since Billericay is clearly a separate town (and the former district was called "Billericay" previously) as well as the fact that it seems part of Thurrock Urban District became part of
455:
The BUAs are interesting but ultimately as i understand it, a strip development on a main road between two otherwise independent settlements would be enough to merge the BUAs for statistical purposes but doesn't really necessarily affect how people think about on the ground? Hilariously, I think I
272:
I mean, I may well have misjudged that. I never really liked 'X District' as a solution because nobody ever really uses it as a name independently - certainly not with the capital letter. It's only ever found as part of the phrase 'X District
Council', and in that case it's the 'District Council'
398:
saying about distinct settlements in a district is interesting here, with Corby (apart from Weldon) the villages in the parished part are unquestionably standalone settlements while with
Chesterfield the other town isn't unquestionably stand alone, which do you give more weigh to? IMO the former.
203:
Hi thanks, that's interesting trip through memory lane! As I recall back then I was seen as quite a bit of a splitter - I was trying to mostly apply some sort of general principles country-wide, to do with the size of settlements not part of the main BUA in the district. Most editors from various
1263:
When someone edits a
Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
2433:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1850:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1786:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
2296:. By naming this Pakistan Muslim League, we are creating confusion because the article is about a group of political parties. In that sense, there is no need for the existance of this article. we can merge it into related articles, or we can merge it to
1271:. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on
1468:
527:
1854:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
1790:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
247:, I think Havant is somewhat an exception anyway since the district contains distinct places (such as Hayling Island) and the older district was actually called "Havant and Waterloo" anyway. Fareham could maybe be merged. Note that I have created
2436:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has
1368:
1211:
this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of
December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the
301:
Birmingham, Manchester, Middlesbrough, Coventry - keep merged - just cans of worms if you do these. Manchester in particular get used as a name for a much larger urban area than the 'locality'. We also do already have
1590:
2381:
Hi, thanks for your message. When I created the page, twenty-one years ago, I did so as a disambiguation. Perhaps your concerns about its content could be resolved merely by restoring the page to disambiguation?
1196:
1294:
251:
but not all are included due to some nakesake districts being partly parished but having only 1 article. Out of the "Partly parished" section on my list which ones would you recommend/consider splitting?
1872:
1471:
about problems with scope and links etc with splitting
Reading etc. If the boundaries didn't change in 1974 then yes I'd have the district since the older district was formed of which for Reading it is
415:
City
Council" similar to Hull City Council/Kingston upon Hull? I'm not sure how this would be problematic other than the fact that the council has a shorter name than what we'd give the district namely
1509:
816:
400:
2101:
There's usually a meetup on the second Sunday of every month. There's lately a risk that Penderel's Oak will close and so we may have to move on to another venue so don't leave it another 20 years!
1957:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1699:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1134:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
734:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
395:
228:
1272:
2179:
1612:
463:
Ultimately I'm not really editing on the ground in this area, though and both what the principles should be and the application of them are are judgement calls and I'm happy to sit those out.
1317:
1831:
1816:
2196:
662:
1846:
1548:
2167:
1973:
1715:
1604:
1150:
750:
1814:
386:
I'd agree with you're opinions but I'd make 2 small changes, I'd flip Chesterfield round since although Staveley is a town and parish and was former an urban district it is part of
1905:
1942:
1684:
1120:
891:
720:
1570:
1508:
all the older districts have article (as well as the settlements) with 1 exception Harrow because the boundaries didn't change in which case it redirects to the current one, see
834:
1477:
1339:
680:
1213:
2229:
1302:
1229:
2020:
1624:
1653:
852:
551:
353:
so i think ultimately i don't disagree with any of your assessments there although maybe I wouldn't bother to do the marginal ones if there was any local pushback.
1279:
692:
2150:
2429:
2008:
1767:
1752:
223:
parished so the borough would be a former entity anyway. The only proposal to merge a district without city status that I'm aware of is Barrow-in-Furness (see
2460:
1915:
991:
798:
791:
1867:
1438:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
403:(an article you created) this appears to be being debated, (I can notify you since its standard to notify the author without being classified as canvasing).
2397:
2248:
1782:
1351:
1283:
2138:
1750:
2300:
because this article, talks about parties under same/similar name, actually came from Pakistan Muslim League and we already have an article about it (
286:
I'm not really sure my opinion matters very much just because I happened to do this work originally. BUT having said that, of you partly parished list
1177:
776:
2448:
611:
2032:
1364:
872:
For neutrality purpose opinion request is being made to users who significantly edited different sides of Pakistani political spectrum articles.
2191:
1393:
857:
676:
380:
227:) failed in 2008/9. In 2012 most of the districts were moved from "X (district)" and X (borough)" to "X District" and "Borough of X" in 2012 see
1585:
1385:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
2459:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2253:
2178:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2149:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2019:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
205:
2284:
This article is confusing because it is about a group of political parties under same or similar name. Its infobox says it was established by
1533:
Hi. I don't have any particularly strong need to express any feelings in this area that I was involved in editing over fifteen years ago now.
1512:. I'd be neutral on if we split the likes of Reading but yes if split it should deal with the district all time rather than just post 1974.
2443:
1431:
2000:
1742:
589:
569:
545:
273:
of 'X', not the 'Council' of 'X District'. But also 15 years later maybe I've matured enough to just let go of it. Or at least pretend to.
1809:
1097:
697:
2162:
1374:
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
644:, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the
1464:
1453:
1187:
655:
2418:
2375:
1835:
1771:
1420:
996:
1092:
886:
953:
508:
472:
439:
362:
267:
217:
2472:
2360:
2313:
2297:
1920:
1662:
1072:
974:
323:
Cheltenham, Gloucester, Oxford, Slough, Southend, Worcester - the boundaries are fairly tight with the urban area, keep merged.
2087:
Hi, Andrew. Unfortunately I'm busy tomorrow afternoon. :( Maybe I'll try and come to a 20th anniversary one in the summer?
518:
478:
444:
I'm sure "X District" usage do occur in databases, wikis and procedurally generated content but like, take the principle of
1996:
1738:
1649:
1469:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK geography/Archive/WikiProject UK subdivisions#Splits where borough is smaller than urban area
1173:
866:
772:
528:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK geography/Archive/WikiProject UK subdivisions#Splits where borough is smaller than urban area
421:
2304:). This article has only three sources. And the page gives us an idea that it is an single political party. It looks like
1505:
1225:
1028:
longer part of that project nor is the studio she was attached to, so I'm not sure how influential she is on the project.
910:
896:
2220:
2202:
1896:
1878:
1657:
1608:
1592:
1566:
1550:
1335:
1319:
818:
664:
2081:
1356:
2175:
2169:
95:
1247:
2463:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
2182:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
2153:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
2061:
2023:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
645:
303:
197:
2364:
2128:
2110:
2096:
1992:
1734:
1629:
1527:
1169:
1076:
978:
768:
326:
Newcastle upon Tyne, I think the unwieldiness of the name for a split article makes me want that to keep merged.
2391:
1542:
1305:. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
1252:
2309:
2301:
2293:
2037:
2028:
1966:
1708:
1637:
1630:
1501:
1143:
743:
329:
Peterborough - definitely agree with splitting this. Over half the land area is outside of the settlement.
2352:
2339:
2276:
2254:
1978:
1863:
1720:
1439:
1155:
1064:
1019:
997:
966:
914:
892:
805:
755:
457:
417:
70:
2356:
1874:
1645:
1458:
1068:
970:
1615:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1573:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1342:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
837:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
683:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
94:
I have produced a list of districts that don't have separate articles to their namesake settlement at
2422:
2116:
2106:
2077:
2054:
1839:
1775:
1481:
1424:
1208:
688:
248:
224:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
19:
2119:, but I have a vague recollection of having been to one at the Penderel's some yeah in the interim.
1891:
2289:
1493:
1416:
1219:
2242:
2024:
1803:
1620:
1521:
1241:
1200:
583:
563:
539:
502:
433:
391:
387:
261:
191:
179:
89:
639:
613:
2414:
2399:
2272:
2258:
2158:
2050:
1859:
1497:
1088:
514:
394:. The question can be asked if we define a settlement by the BUA or BUASD? The 2nd question at
307:
1504:
for example where there is an article about the settlement, older district and modern one. At
2016:
2010:
1954:
1696:
1301:
on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can
1131:
731:
490:
379:
use "X District" (though that is a Wiki) and "Borough of X" is (or as least was) used by the
2215:
2053:
is happening tomorrow, Sunday 14 January. You may be interested as you were present at the
1282:. If you want to make sure you donât miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can
550:
Middlesbrough has now been split again and there is yet another discussion on merging it at
2102:
2073:
1965:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1707:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1142:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
849:
843:
830:
742:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
684:
631:
236:
1309:
809:
8:
2368:
1449:
1080:
986:
982:
869:
to examine discussed edits, if you find topic interested requesting your opinion, there.
523:
143:
130:
maybe should be split. Of the changes since you're splits in 2004 the changes seem to be
119:
77:
73:
66:
62:
58:
55:
1463:
With districts that didn't have boundary changes in 1974 (or only had trivial ones, see
368:
2440:
2372:
2235:
2224:
2198:
1900:
1796:
1641:
1616:
1613:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 20#Sir Robert McAlpine, 6th Baronet
1514:
1510:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about districts#Reconstituted districts
1485:
1234:
576:
556:
532:
495:
426:
311:
254:
184:
175:
51:
376:
2335:
2154:
2146:
2140:
1936:
1678:
1114:
1084:
1051:
1047:
949:
923:
714:
652:
2322:
1476:(it became a county borough in 1888) and links to the older district would point to
1034:
936:
1985:
1950:
1727:
1692:
1347:
1162:
1127:
882:
762:
727:
621:
232:
396:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about districts#Naming conventions
314:; there's a point where splitting just adds confusion rather than clears things up
229:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about districts#Naming conventions
2468:
2456:
2450:
2187:
2069:
1562:
1331:
1189:
838:
2321:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
1906:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30 § King of the United Kingdom
1033:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
935:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
2042:
1962:
1704:
1489:
1473:
1444:
1378:
Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
1139:
739:
526:
and Guildford was used as a precedent for the split again as you have noted at
445:
372:
2115:
Noted, thanks! I wonder when the last one I went to was. Certainly I was at
1958:
1700:
1204:
1135:
927:
735:
167:
1287:
2305:
2065:
1910:
1411:
1395:
1015:
1001:
785:
649:
401:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of localities in England by population
151:
127:
103:
2345:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
2288:
in 1962. But Khan didnât establish Pakistan Muslim League. He established
1057:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
959:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
835:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 6#Diocese of Southwark
552:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK geography#Article for both Borough and town?
2383:
2120:
2088:
1577:
1534:
1343:
878:
464:
354:
209:
159:
2230:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 12 § Bolsover (borough)
1969:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1711:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1146:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
746:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2464:
2183:
1946:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1688:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1571:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Queen's Speech
1230:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK geography/Archive 1#Insane parish project
1124:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
724:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
135:
131:
111:
1340:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Ulster Unionism
2285:
1927:
1669:
1106:
706:
681:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 12#Kigns of leon
484:
147:
107:
2227:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
1903:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
1847:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of languages by writing system
1260:
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
123:
1267:
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin
244:
163:
1982:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1724:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1159:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
759:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1972:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1940:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1714:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1682:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
1603:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
1561:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
1330:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
1149:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
749:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
489:
what do you make of those? you produced the tables in 2009 for
240:
139:
2209:
1885:
1599:
1557:
1326:
1203:
from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with
1118:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
825:
718:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
671:
171:
115:
460:
is a long name. Mind you it would be far from our longest.
155:
99:
2413:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
2363:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1953:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1830:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1766:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1695:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1409:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1130:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1075:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
977:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
730:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2430:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pakistan Muslim League
2328:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1419:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1199:
Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove
1040:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
942:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
317:
Chesterfield - probably split, on account of Staveley.
829:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
675:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
2417:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
2223:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
1899:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
1834:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1783:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kirklees, Calderdale
1770:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1636:
Hello! Long ago in 2005 you created a redirect from
367:"X District" is used as an alternative label by the
1363:The administrator policy has been updated with new
636:was updated with an item that involved the article
422:Talk:City of Newcastle#Requested move 13 July 2020
2294:another political party existed from 1947 to 1958
867:Talk:Cynthia D. Ritchie#Slander of Benazir Bhutto
1381:Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
1644:. Now I changed it to the disambiguation page
231:(so an article for Corby district would be at
1591:"Sir Robert McAlpine, 6th Baronet" listed at
320:Corby, Redditch - i think are marginal splits
1432:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Cara Ellison
530:(and other places) its a false equivalence.
1465:User:Crouch, Swale/Reconstituted districts
797:Hello, Morwen. You have new messages at
2292:. Pakistan Muslim League is the name of
2041:
1278:If you have not seen it before, you can
519:User:Crouch, Swale/District split#Others
517:, on the flip side how many of those at
479:User:Crouch, Swale/District split#Tables
450:as used in actual English prose about it
2334:notice, but please explain why in your
1046:notice, but please explain why in your
948:notice, but please explain why in your
858:Requesting edit examination and opinion
2314:List of Muslim League breakaway groups
2308:and it would be best to merge it into
2298:List of Muslim League breakaway groups
1357:New administrator activity requirement
574:And Chesterfield has also been split.
158:(split in 2002) have been merged and
1937:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
1679:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
1115:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
922:Non-notable statistical area. Fails
715:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
2419:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
1921:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
1836:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
1832:List of languages by writing system
1817:List of languages by writing system
1772:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
1663:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
1506:Template:London Government Act 1963
1421:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
1269:will still be able to access the IP
1226:User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes
1098:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
911:Farnborough/Aldershot Built-up Area
897:Farnborough/Aldershot Built-up Area
698:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
13:
2323:deleted for any of several reasons
2279:because of the following concern:
2263:
1484:, both of which would redirect to
1430:The discussion will take place at
1253:How we will see unregistered users
1035:deleted for any of several reasons
1022:because of the following concern:
1006:
937:deleted for any of several reasons
917:because of the following concern:
901:
790:
14:
2483:
2427:The article will be discussed at
2176:Armenian Revolutionary Federation
2170:Armenian Revolutionary Federation
1844:The article will be discussed at
1780:The article will be discussed at
1299:We would appreciate your feedback
1188:Administrators will no longer be
817:"Diocese of Southwark" listed at
477:OK, I've produced some tables at
383:for boroughs with unitary status.
182:were once split but were merged.
96:User:Crouch, Swale/District split
2407:
2208:
1926:
1884:
1824:
1760:
1668:
1611:. This discussion will occur at
1605:Sir Robert McAlpine, 6th Baronet
1598:
1569:. This discussion will occur at
1556:
1492:would link as ]. Take a look at
1402:
1338:. This discussion will occur at
1325:
1105:
824:
705:
670:
620:
448:as it should be the common name
390:even though its not part of the
335:Warrington - yeah probably split
304:Greater Manchester Built-Up Area
2233:until a consensus is reached.
1976:and submit your choices on the
1909:until a consensus is reached.
1718:and submit your choices on the
1648:. Are you OK with this change?
1467:) you pointed out years ago at
1288:the weekly technical newsletter
1216:. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
1153:and submit your choices on the
833:. The discussion will occur at
753:and submit your choices on the
679:. The discussion will occur at
411:" while its council is merely "
2449:Good article reassessment for
2168:Good article reassessment for
2139:Good article reassessment for
2009:Good article reassessment for
1586:14:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
2001:00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1955:Knowledge arbitration process
1743:00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
1697:Knowledge arbitration process
1248:22:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
1178:00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
1132:Knowledge arbitration process
777:01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
732:Knowledge arbitration process
693:16:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
656:02:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
570:19:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
546:22:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
509:22:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
473:09:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
440:18:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
363:13:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
332:Sheffield - definitely split.
268:12:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
218:12:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
198:11:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
118:should probably be split and
2163:01:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
2129:15:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
2111:15:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
2097:14:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
2082:14:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
2033:20:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
1658:12:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1638:Northern Ireland nationalism
1631:Northern Ireland nationalism
1625:19:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
1502:Metropolitan Borough of Bury
1478:Municipal Borough of Reading
1352:19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1318:"Ulster Unionism" listed at
1314:18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1303:let us know on the talk page
1224:I have started a project at
887:12:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
806:02:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
225:Talk:Barrow-in-Furness#Merge
7:
2473:15:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
2444:08:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
2367:allows discussion to reach
2348:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
2331:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1549:"Queen's Speech" listed at
1390:22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
1214:Administrator's Noticeboard
1079:allows discussion to reach
1060:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1043:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
981:allows discussion to reach
962:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
945:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
853:11:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
524:Talk:Woking#Borough v. town
458:City of Newcastle upon Tyne
420:, this was also debated at
418:City of Newcastle upon Tyne
10:
2488:
2392:03:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2376:02:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2359:exist. In particular, the
2060:! Note that it is now at
2038:London meetup bicententary
1993:MediaWiki message delivery
1892:King of the United Kingdom
1875:King of the United Kingdom
1735:MediaWiki message delivery
1646:Northern Irish nationalism
1543:10:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
1297:this identity could work.
1232:and we now have 417 left.
1170:MediaWiki message delivery
1093:03:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
1071:exist. In particular, the
992:08:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
973:exist. In particular, the
799:c:User talk:Magog the Ogre
769:MediaWiki message delivery
663:"Kigns of leon" listed at
2353:proposed deletion process
2310:Muslim League (1947â1958)
2302:Muslim League (1947â1958)
2249:21:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
1916:23:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
1528:20:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
1482:County Borough of Reading
1417:significantly contributed
1228:. You previously started
1065:proposed deletion process
967:proposed deletion process
249:Category:Unparished areas
2421:or whether it should be
2387:
2290:Convention Muslim League
2221:redirects for discussion
2203:Redirects for discussion
2192:19:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
2124:
2092:
1990:to your user talk page.
1897:redirects for discussion
1879:Redirects for discussion
1868:16:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
1838:or whether it should be
1774:or whether it should be
1732:to your user talk page.
1593:Redirects for discussion
1551:Redirects for discussion
1538:
1494:Bury, Greater Manchester
1454:01:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
1320:Redirects for discussion
1167:to your user talk page.
819:Redirects for discussion
767:to your user talk page.
665:Redirects for discussion
468:
358:
213:
2340:the article's talk page
1810:17:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
1607:and has thus listed it
1565:and has thus listed it
1459:Reconstituted districts
1367:following a successful
1334:and has thus listed it
1052:the article's talk page
954:the article's talk page
590:21:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
2415:Pakistan Muslim League
2400:Pakistan Muslim League
2319:
2273:Pakistan Muslim League
2268:
2259:Pakistan Muslim League
2046:
1498:County Borough of Bury
1440:the configuration page
1031:
1011:
933:
906:
795:
515:Draft:Borough of Corby
308:Manchester City Centre
2365:articles for deletion
2281:
2277:proposed for deletion
2267:
2045:
2025:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2017:Royal Tunbridge Wells
2011:Royal Tunbridge Wells
1951:Arbitration Committee
1934:Hello! Voting in the
1693:Arbitration Committee
1676:Hello! Voting in the
1365:activity requirements
1128:Arbitration Committee
1112:Hello! Voting in the
1077:articles for deletion
1024:
1020:proposed for deletion
1010:
979:articles for deletion
919:
915:proposed for deletion
905:
794:
728:Arbitration Committee
712:Hello! Voting in the
628:On 12 November 2020,
1768:Kirklees, Calderdale
1753:Kirklees, Calderdale
1415:, to which you have
831:Diocese of Southwark
640:Amadou Toumani Touré
614:Amadou Toumani Touré
612:ITN recognition for
237:Borough of Kettering
2225:redirect guidelines
2219:has been listed at
2051:200th London Meetup
1901:redirect guidelines
1895:has been listed at
1423:or if it should be
1369:Request for Comment
1205:Edit Filter Manager
875:Thanks and regards
120:Newcastle upon Tyne
2357:deletion processes
2269:
2216:Bolsover (borough)
2199:Bolsover (borough)
2047:
1967:arbitration policy
1709:arbitration policy
1642:Ulster nationalism
1486:Borough of Reading
1295:two suggested ways
1144:arbitration policy
1069:deletion processes
1012:
989:
971:deletion processes
907:
810:remove this notice
796:
744:arbitration policy
312:Greater Manchester
2461:reassessment page
2255:Proposed deletion
2180:reassessment page
2151:reassessment page
2147:Marc Ravalomanana
2141:Marc Ravalomanana
2021:reassessment page
2003:
1860:Nederlandse Leeuw
1745:
1280:read more on Meta
1185:
1184:
1180:
998:Proposed deletion
987:
893:Proposed deletion
783:
782:
373:Vision of Britain
338:York - split yeah
146:have been split,
2479:
2411:
2410:
2350:
2349:
2333:
2332:
2266:
2245:
2238:
2218:
2212:
1991:
1989:
1930:
1913:
1894:
1888:
1828:
1827:
1806:
1799:
1764:
1763:
1733:
1731:
1672:
1602:
1584:
1582:
1580:
1560:
1524:
1517:
1406:
1405:
1329:
1244:
1237:
1220:Parishes project
1168:
1166:
1109:
1102:
1101:
1062:
1061:
1045:
1044:
1009:
985:for deletion. --
964:
963:
947:
946:
904:
865:Please do visit
828:
813:
766:
709:
702:
701:
674:
624:
586:
579:
566:
559:
542:
535:
505:
498:
488:
436:
429:
388:Chesterfield BUA
264:
257:
233:Borough of Corby
194:
187:
85:User_talk:Morwen
2487:
2486:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2457:Flag of Ecuador
2454:
2451:Flag of Ecuador
2438:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2361:speedy deletion
2347:
2346:
2330:
2329:
2264:
2262:
2243:
2236:
2214:
2206:
2173:
2144:
2070:Great Turnstile
2040:
2014:
2006:
2005:
1983:
1931:
1923:
1911:
1890:
1882:
1857:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1804:
1797:
1793:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1748:
1747:
1725:
1673:
1665:
1634:
1596:
1578:
1575:
1574:
1554:
1522:
1515:
1461:
1442:. Delivered by
1407:
1403:
1400:
1388:
1387:
1359:
1332:Ulster Unionism
1323:
1255:
1242:
1235:
1222:
1197:recently closed
1193:
1160:
1100:
1073:speedy deletion
1059:
1058:
1042:
1041:
1007:
1005:
975:speedy deletion
961:
960:
944:
943:
902:
900:
860:
822:
814:
803:
788:
760:
700:
685:UnitedStatesian
668:
660:
659:
646:candidates page
625:
617:
584:
577:
564:
557:
540:
533:
503:
496:
482:
434:
427:
262:
255:
192:
185:
92:
90:District splits
12:
11:
5:
2485:
2453:
2447:
2406:
2405:
2403:
2398:Nomination of
2396:
2395:
2394:
2371:for deletion.
2351:will stop the
2261:
2252:
2205:
2195:
2172:
2166:
2143:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2062:Penderel's Oak
2055:very first one
2039:
2036:
2013:
2007:
1974:the candidates
1943:eligible users
1932:
1925:
1924:
1922:
1919:
1881:
1871:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1815:Nomination of
1813:
1759:
1758:
1756:
1751:Nomination of
1749:
1716:the candidates
1685:eligible users
1674:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1650:145.15.244.207
1633:
1628:
1609:for discussion
1595:
1589:
1567:for discussion
1563:Queen's Speech
1553:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1490:county borough
1460:
1457:
1401:
1399:
1394:Nomination of
1392:
1383:
1382:
1379:
1361:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1336:for discussion
1322:
1316:
1254:
1251:
1221:
1218:
1192:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1151:the candidates
1121:eligible users
1110:
1099:
1096:
1083:for deletion.
1063:will stop the
1004:
995:
988:Pontificalibus
965:will stop the
899:
890:
859:
856:
821:
815:
804:Message added
802:
789:
787:
784:
781:
780:
751:the candidates
721:eligible users
710:
699:
696:
667:
661:
626:
619:
618:
616:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
491:WP:UKDISTRICTS
461:
453:
404:
384:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
91:
88:
17:Archived talk:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2484:
2475:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2452:
2446:
2445:
2442:
2441:Mehedi Abedin
2435:
2432:
2431:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2401:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2374:
2373:Mehedi Abedin
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2343:
2341:
2337:
2326:
2324:
2318:
2317:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2280:
2278:
2274:
2260:
2256:
2251:
2250:
2246:
2240:
2239:
2237:Crouch, Swale
2232:
2231:
2226:
2222:
2217:
2213:The redirect
2211:
2204:
2200:
2194:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2171:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2142:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2056:
2052:
2044:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2012:
2004:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1987:
1981:
1980:
1975:
1970:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1947:
1945:
1944:
1939:
1938:
1929:
1918:
1917:
1914:
1908:
1907:
1902:
1898:
1893:
1889:The redirect
1887:
1880:
1876:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1856:
1852:
1849:
1848:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1818:
1812:
1811:
1807:
1801:
1800:
1798:Crouch, Swale
1792:
1788:
1785:
1784:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1754:
1746:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1729:
1723:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1689:
1687:
1686:
1681:
1680:
1671:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1632:
1627:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1617:Shhhnotsoloud
1614:
1610:
1606:
1601:
1594:
1588:
1587:
1583:(she|they|xe)
1581:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1552:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1519:
1518:
1516:Crouch, Swale
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1470:
1466:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1435:the article.
1433:
1428:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1397:
1391:
1386:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1366:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1321:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1308:Thank you. /
1306:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1291:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1239:
1238:
1236:Crouch, Swale
1231:
1227:
1217:
1215:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:Autopatrolled
1198:
1191:
1190:autopatrolled
1181:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1164:
1158:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1038:
1036:
1030:
1029:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1003:
999:
994:
993:
990:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
957:
955:
951:
940:
938:
932:
931:
929:
925:
918:
916:
912:
898:
894:
889:
888:
884:
880:
876:
873:
870:
868:
863:
855:
854:
851:
847:
846:
842:
841:
836:
832:
827:
820:
811:
807:
800:
793:
779:
778:
774:
770:
764:
758:
757:
752:
747:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
723:
722:
717:
716:
711:
708:
704:
703:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
677:Kigns of leon
673:
666:
658:
657:
654:
651:
647:
643:
642:
641:
635:
634:
633:
623:
615:
591:
587:
581:
580:
578:Crouch, Swale
573:
572:
571:
567:
561:
560:
558:Crouch, Swale
553:
549:
548:
547:
543:
537:
536:
534:Crouch, Swale
529:
525:
520:
516:
513:I've created
512:
511:
510:
506:
500:
499:
497:Crouch, Swale
492:
486:
480:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
454:
451:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
431:
430:
428:Crouch, Swale
423:
419:
414:
410:
405:
402:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
271:
270:
269:
265:
259:
258:
256:Crouch, Swale
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
189:
188:
186:Crouch, Swale
181:
177:
173:
169:
168:Middlesbrough
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
87:
86:
83:
82:Current talk:
79:
75:
72:
68:
64:
60:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
21:
18:
2455:
2439:
2428:
2426:
2402:for deletion
2355:, but other
2344:
2336:edit summary
2327:
2320:
2283:
2282:
2271:The article
2270:
2234:
2228:
2207:
2201:" listed at
2174:
2155:Onegreatjoke
2145:
2066:High Holborn
2057:
2048:
2015:
1977:
1971:
1948:
1941:
1935:
1933:
1904:
1883:
1877:" listed at
1858:
1853:
1845:
1843:
1819:for deletion
1795:
1794:
1789:
1781:
1779:
1755:for deletion
1719:
1713:
1690:
1683:
1677:
1675:
1635:
1597:
1555:
1513:
1462:
1443:
1437:
1429:
1412:Cara Ellison
1410:
1408:
1398:for deletion
1396:Cara Ellison
1389:
1384:
1373:
1362:
1324:
1313:
1307:
1298:
1292:
1277:
1273:better tools
1268:
1266:
1262:
1259:
1256:
1233:
1223:
1207:, choose to
1194:
1154:
1148:
1125:
1119:
1113:
1085:Thunderforge
1067:, but other
1056:
1048:edit summary
1039:
1032:
1026:
1025:
1016:Cara Ellison
1014:The article
1013:
1002:Cara Ellison
969:, but other
958:
950:edit summary
941:
934:
921:
920:
909:The article
908:
877:
874:
871:
864:
861:
844:
839:
823:
812:at any time.
754:
748:
725:
719:
713:
669:
638:
637:
630:
629:
627:
575:
555:
531:
494:
449:
425:
412:
408:
253:
206:X (district)
183:
152:Peterborough
128:Chesterfield
104:Peterborough
93:
84:
81:
16:
15:
1979:voting page
1721:voting page
1310:Johan (WMF)
1209:self-assign
1156:voting page
862:Greetings,
756:voting page
632:In the news
160:Bournemouth
98:. Of those
2058:(pictured)
1963:topic bans
1705:topic bans
1140:topic bans
924:WP:GEOLAND
808:. You can
740:topic bans
235:just like
136:Hartlepool
132:Darlington
112:Warrington
2437:finished.
2369:consensus
2286:Ayub Khan
2275:has been
2049:FYI, the
1959:site bans
1701:site bans
1488:. So yes
1445:SDZeroBot
1284:subscribe
1275:to help.
1136:site bans
1081:consensus
1018:has been
983:consensus
913:has been
736:site bans
413:Newcastle
409:upon Tyne
148:Sheffield
108:Sheffield
2117:London 6
1293:We have
399:Note at
377:GeoNames
180:Tamworth
124:Redditch
2423:deleted
2068:by the
1986:NoACEMM
1912:Dylnuge
1840:deleted
1776:deleted
1728:NoACEMM
1425:deleted
1163:NoACEMM
763:NoACEMM
446:WP:NAME
245:Fareham
176:Reading
164:Ipswich
144:Preston
2384:Morwen
2338:or on
2121:Morwen
2103:Andrew
2089:Morwen
2074:Andrew
1579:Tamzin
1535:Morwen
1344:Heanor
1050:or on
952:or on
928:WP:GNG
879:Bookku
840:Joseph
465:Morwen
355:Morwen
241:Havant
210:Morwen
140:Havant
2465:Z1720
2306:WP:OR
2184:Z1720
850:talk)
392:BUASD
172:Poole
116:Corby
2469:talk
2388:talk
2244:talk
2188:talk
2159:talk
2125:talk
2107:talk
2093:talk
2078:talk
2029:talk
1997:talk
1949:The
1864:talk
1805:talk
1739:talk
1691:The
1654:talk
1621:talk
1539:talk
1523:talk
1480:and
1474:1835
1450:talk
1348:talk
1257:Hi!
1243:talk
1174:talk
1126:The
1089:talk
926:and
883:talk
845:2302
786:Talk
773:talk
726:The
689:talk
650:Step
585:talk
565:talk
541:talk
504:talk
485:MRSC
469:talk
435:talk
375:and
371:and
359:talk
263:talk
243:and
214:talk
193:talk
178:and
156:York
154:and
142:and
126:and
114:and
100:York
2312:or
2257:of
2247:)
2105:đ(
2076:đ(
2064:on
1808:)
1640:to
1576:--
1526:)
1286:to
1246:)
1000:of
895:of
653:hen
588:)
568:)
544:)
507:)
438:)
266:)
196:)
2471:)
2425:.
2390:)
2342:.
2325:.
2190:)
2161:)
2127:)
2109:)
2095:)
2080:)
2072:.
2031:)
1999:)
1988:}}
1984:{{
1961:,
1866:)
1842:.
1778:.
1741:)
1730:}}
1726:{{
1703:,
1656:)
1623:)
1541:)
1452:)
1427:.
1371:.
1350:)
1290:.
1195:A
1176:)
1165:}}
1161:{{
1138:,
1091:)
1054:.
1037:.
956:.
939:.
885:)
775:)
765:}}
761:{{
738:,
691:)
648:.
554:.
493:.
471:)
424:.
381:OS
369:OS
361:)
310:,
306:,
216:)
174:,
170:,
166:,
162:,
150:,
138:,
134:,
122:,
110:,
106:,
102:,
80:.
78:16
76:.
74:15
71:14
69:,
67:13
65:,
63:12
61:,
59:11
56:10
54:,
50:,
46:,
42:,
38:,
34:,
30:,
26:,
22:,
2467:(
2386:(
2316:.
2241:(
2197:"
2186:(
2157:(
2123:(
2091:(
2027:(
1995:(
1873:"
1862:(
1802:(
1737:(
1652:(
1619:(
1537:(
1520:(
1500:/
1496:/
1448:(
1346:(
1240:(
1172:(
1087:(
930:.
881:(
848:(
801:.
771:(
687:(
582:(
562:(
538:(
501:(
487::
483:@
467:(
452:.
432:(
357:(
260:(
212:(
190:(
52:9
48:8
44:7
40:6
36:5
32:4
28:3
24:2
20:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.