User talk:Morwen/archive5

489:

abolition. The 1972 Act simply says "For the administration of local government England and Wales shall be divided into ... and these areas shall be known as counties". It goes on to define those counties in terms of existing 'administrative counties', so they were obviously aware of the proper term at the time. To me this means either a) they intended to replace both the administrative counties and traditional counties with 'counties' (though if so why not say so by abolishing the traditional counties?) or more likely b) they regarded the traditional counties as exactly that, counties as determined by tradition, not law, and having no legal status. This is consistent with the 1974 statement. However, what they intended is (to a lesser extent) also irrelevant. What they failed to do is specifically deal with the traditional counties, so the position is ambiguous.

3130:, slightly more accurate in its portrayal of Morayshire (and a few other more sizable detached parts that sprung to mind), so if you want to use it to amend any of the relevant images, please do. It was altered using photoshop, which may have added unnecessary 'baggage', so you might prefer to alter your own master image seperately. I've flagged new 'pieces' with small, easily-erasable letters, which should be self-explanatory. 2385:(emphasis mine) That is, of course, incompatible with the GFDL. This does not apply to photos on their site which do not have the "Photo courtesy of GeekPhilosopher.com" text. Please delete any images which are in violation. Alternatively, you can try to contact them about the GFDL, but seeing their big "Photos cannot be posted for redistribution" notice on the frontpage I don't think they would be cooperative. 3120:

of inverness-shire locally in morayshire was specifically incorporated into the "highland" region in 1975 is also odd; one wonders why administrative morayshire was dissected back into its consituent historic pieces before reincorporation into the oversized two-tier 'regions' that followed. Just goes to show the enduring significance of the traditional counties, I'm inclined to remark...

3029:, but is this discussed anywhere else? I'm confused and hoping you can let me know if my memory is bad, or if we did decide to refer to the current counties as "counties", not "administrative counties"? The change has been made to individual county pages, and to the MediaWiki table that lists England's counties. Thanks, 3248:

Siberian federal district, and so on), but I couldn't help but noticed that the list of districts on the pages is actually a {{msg:Russian_federal_districts}} shortcut message, and not the actual table with the list. Do you know who should be contacted in regards to what that message generates? Any

3063:

Is it really helpful or informative to have the boxes showing MPs who 'resigned' through appointment as Steward or Bailiff of the Chiltern Hundreds or Steward of the Manor of Northstead? This is an appointment which carries no duties and no salary. The only interesting thing about it would be to give

2932:

Dear Mor; Hi1 You and a few other people these days have accidentally blocked me cause I use a IP thats shared by the infamous Michael. Because of this I can only do half of my wikipedia work basically. Its been like this for about 4 days. I know it was accidental but can you please unblock me? My IP

1966:

I was confused by the description of Middlesbrough and Stockton as counties in their current state. I understand that they are unitary authorities but I didn't think this made them counties per se - does anyone actually refer to the "county of Middlesbrough" for example? It would sound very odd to my

1920:

Regarding Manchester, I didn't think a map showing Manchester within Greater Manchester was terribly helpful, as anyone trying to look up that information could see it on the Greater Manchester page, but now you've put in a map showing M within England I have no problem with it, as it is more use to

3211:

Thank you for fighting the good fight on the county issue, which I'm afraid I know too little about to be of any use. I know it must be tiring, but I am glad to see you remaining here and adding your considerable knowledge and good sense to the collective that is Knowledge. If there is anything an

2401:

Re: images with explicit restrictions on third parties, Jimbo has said several times that such pictures should not be allowed - check the lengthy fair use threads on the mailing lists. I would like to ask you not to upload such images, unless you declare them fair use, in which case we basically say

1704:

Surely Coventry and Wolverhampton are synonymous with the borough/city. Whereas Walsall and Dudley districts are made up of several seperate towns which each have there own identities but have been lumped together for local government administration. Somebody from Stourbridge is hardly likely to say

613:

Changing the subject, the map and fact box thingy you put in on the Birmingham page, doesn't fit in at all with the text and looks a bit of a mess with the text squeezed up alongside it. Do you thik it might be a good idea to have a link to the map rather than putting it on the main article space to

453:

I suspect I may be overreacting. I am perfectly happy to talk of Middlesex and Westmorland etc in the present tense, but as areas, not as counties. I am aware of the legal argument that the 'ancient and geographic counties' were not amended or abolished in 1888, but I regard that as an interesting

3119:

I note that it seems to use the "counties" of "moray" and "banff" to mean the administrative counties that were abolished in 1975 ( I can't see the logic there, unless it's refering to the same "counties" that still exist for registration purposes). The fact that the previously incorporated portion

2316:

The Genitive and the Possessive are not the same per se, true; articles are written generally, not from the point of view of English. In English, the possessive case is a type of the genitive (thus, a possessive genitive), and today indeed the only type in use. A genitive in English (only remaining

2188:

TTBOMK there is no York Town Council or similar, and no body but the City has any legal or administrative existence, or any defined borders. The new City of York was created not as an agglomeration of different places (which might warrant a collective entry), but because the single physical TOWN of

104:

Great work on the maps, but the Indonesian province ones would be better if the non-Indonesian land was shown in outline, rather than being represented as equivalent to the sea. Looking around at some other pages maybe it's a wikipedia policy to show only the political entity, but if so it's a bad

2377:

I'm afraid we can't use the original photos by GeekPhilosopher.com. Their copyright page states: "These photos are labeled 'Photo courtesy of GeekPhilosopher.com - your premier source for free stock photos.' We took these photos and we own the copyright. You are free to do whatever you want with

2131:

Whouahhhh. We did duplicate work, I just finished with a new map of Germany with better border lines as well, and now I see you uploaded the same one hour ago. But at least mine has the boundaries of the neighboring countries as well, and the new coloring scheme. I guess I will upload my empty and

1844:

As I have already said these things should be decided on a case by case basis, and common sense should be our guide. I have already said I dont think trying to apply a single set of rigid rules to everything is very sensible. I do wish the government wouldn't make things so complicated. Perhaps we

630:

I've tinkered with it and made it a bit narrower. Actually I'm probably going to Birmingham next week, and I was thinking of taking some photos, do you have any ideas of things to photograph? I was thinking of getting a shot of the skyline as a main picture, and possibly a few of the canals do you

512:

I suspected something like that might be the case. Thanks for the research. One other interesting thing I discovered is that the 'traditional counties of Great Britain' are actually a chimera. Although each county individually has been used at some point in the past, there has never been a time

459:

However, the technical legal argument seems to me to be irrelevant to the ABC's motivations, if not their claims. I see the real reason as rejection of Parliament's authority to define counties. If the 1888, 1965 or 1974 acts had purported to abolish the historic counties, I doubt they would lie

191:

after an anon had created it. I know you didn't write it, but I wanted another opinion to make sure I'm not overreacting. Pearl Took gets mentioned exactly once in LOTR, and never in any other book. I know Knowledge is not paper and all that, but it seems to me that we should call a halt somewhere

3244:

I am not sure if you would be able to help me with this; if not, would you please forward this on to someone who can? Anyway, I was trying to figure out how Russian federal districts were named. In my opinion, whoever came up with the English versions of the names, should be shot in the head ...

1926:

Regarding Oxford, someone had put loads of pictures in and made a cluttered mess, and I intended to try and sort it out, I never intended to remove your map permanently if you look I put it back in again in a different place so it would fit better, however I dont know how to deal with all the new

1768:

I think we should decide these things on a case by case basis, for instance it makes sense to split the Dudley article, but it would be rather silly to split the Birmingham article. I dont think we should try to apply a single rule to everything as it will inevitably create anomolies. You have to

2317:

in interrogative and personal pronouns, I believe) always denotes possession, and possessive pronouns are always pronouns in the genitive case. Hence the original article was right: my is the genitive case of me, and is thus a genitive pronoun – and consequently a possessive pronoun. I think. :)

488:

To me the intent is irrelevant and what is important is the actual legal situation. Having looked it up, it is not as obvious as the ABC claims. The parts of the 1888 that deals with counties and preserves the traditional counties are completely repealed and superseded, though there is no formal

2795:

Hi - just wondering which part of Lewis was in Ross-shire. I thought that the whole region was in Inverness-shire, with Harris lying in the other county, and that's why I reverted the previous edit (with an explanation) -- on closer inspection, that should be the other way round, it all lay in

1725:

Good point, but I dont think the two things are quite comparable. Birmingham is a city and is generally recognised as a single place, not a borough of seperate towns lumped together for local government convenience. It has been absorbing places which were once seperate towns for many years. For

1123:

Morwen, keep on with the great work you're doing on the maps. I can imagine how much work you put into them, I'm an illustrator too. I would have been very hurt by the nonsense phrase "very ugly" from G-man. G-man, have some thought for the person you're writing to and phrase your remarks more

3088:

of "moray" seems to accuractely depict the "rump" area of traditional morayshire, without the detached section of inverness-shire that was incorporated into the post 1889-administrative county, and also without the detached sections (which were administratively incorporated into administrative

2192:

Regardless of the legal change of status, the reality was that the (pre-existing) City Council expanded its jurisdiction to a larger area, and simultaneously took over some extra functions within its new boundaries. Surely it is more natural to say that "York has grown" than that there is some

1803:

Right, I regard that as deeply unsatisfactory. City status is just a ceremonial symbolic thing, and the process for obtaining it a bizarre monarchic relic... All it entitles a borough to is the right to have itself a "City Council" and a Lord Mayor. It doesn't by itself alter identities or

1687:

Well as a rule of thumb an article should be about whatever is the most common use of that term. So Dudley should be about the town of D as that is what is most commonly associated with the word. Whereas the term Wolverhampton and Coventry are always used in referance to the cities, that seems

2740:

on numerous wikipedias, replacing "Germanic" with "Semitic" and removing Yiddish from articles dealing with Germanic languages. I don't know if he is some sort of anti-Yiddish Jewish nationalist, but his edits are obviously simple vandalism, and the page you protected should be reverted to an

1761:

I was under the impression that it had been agreed that when a town and local government district shared the same name the articles should be split. So I was rather surprised that you objected to my splitting of the Dudley page, I thought I was doing what had been agreed. I dont quite see why

578:

Coventry and Warwickshire effectively form part of a single area and are often spoken of as such, and most of the Warwickshire towns surrounding Coventry are effectively dormitary towns for Coventry and thus form a sort of "Greater Coventry" metropolitan area. Although no such an area exists

3380:

may sound rather odd to the average reader, as far as I can see Stocksbridge is the only place which is seperate from the main conurbation. In this particular case I would be tempted to merge the article but point out that the city boundaries encompass neighboring places like is done at

498:

To my mind, calling them 'traditional counties' or 'historic counties' rather than 'counties' deals with the problem in a very Knowledge-like fashion. 'Counties' without anything else is clearly defined by the 1972 Act as meaning the post-1974 metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties.

746:

I would like to apologize for my childish deceptions. I did not mean to hurt you or any other Wikipedian. I would like to wipe the slate clean. This is a sincere apology, and a promise that I will not decieve you again. Once again, I am truly sorry. Thank you for your support.

1962:

Hi. I can see that in the months I was away from Knowledge many changes have been taking place wrt the nomenclature for bits of the UK. I have not been following this debate in detail so please forgive me if I am reopening horrendous areas of argument that you thought were dead!

2409:

Yeah, it sucks - copyright is fundamentally stupid. But in the end I hope that we will have truly free images of most people, places and things. We already do have a few photos of celebrities taken by Wikipedians, for example, and keeping fair use at a minimum encourages that.

666:

Ok -- hope I didn't seem like I was "correcting" you at all. Just trying to figure out a way of aiming all this stuff at the same place (honestly, I hope the anon cuts it out...my day is not brighter for having to view these detestable words) Thanks for responding so quickly,

1542:

I'm not sure what the primary use is in English, but I have certainly seen it used as the name of the lost territories. There should be an article dealing with the issue, and it should not redirect to the DDR article which have nothing with this historical term to do.

439:

Therefore it is probably in your own interest to use the phrasing less objectionable to them. No doubt there will always be the traditional county fanatics, but most will be satisfied by a mention of the traditional county in the first paragraph in the present tense.

1152:

article the box takes up more space than the text, and should perhaps be added to a seperate article about the district rather than the town. I am merely trying to make articles look nice, I wasn't trying to hurt anyone, I realise a lot of work has been put into

2292:

you had the colspan=2 in. I'm happy to go back and reinstate the colspans. However it did seem to me that you were consistently not closing the first cell & row of the table with /td /tr... and so this is just a reality check ... am I missing something?

2529:

Hi Morwen, regarding the naming issue on the Counties/Prefectures of Albania, is it confirmed by some solid source that counties is indeed preferred. There are many links with prefectures, and I'd like to be sure before I go around and change them. Thanks,

525:

I'm ok with the term 'traditional county' using sparingly. However, this does not extend to accepting 'Somerset is a traditional county, ceremonial county and administrative county in south-west England' at the start of the article. ] 07:07, Feb 13, 2004

1852:

Brighton and Hove, Lancaster etc seem to be the exceptions rather than the rule, of course Brighton and Hove isnt a "place" but Coventry say clearly is. I say it would be sensible to apply different criteria depending on the circumstances. Any thoughts?

1075:

I can see your point about Humberside, but I don't like the "Humber" solution much. I guess the point of the line was to list the 1974 counties which formed the basis for drawing up the region. My best solution, I think will be to put in a link to

2606:) to the german Knowledge. If there will be a change in the images, let me know. In the next days I will interwiki all the images and would be very glad if you could upload the India images in case of changes in the future. Usally the name is Indi 1812:

I'm not sure I agree with you about that, an ordinary local government district is merely an area used for the efficient delivery of local services and are not designed to be thought of as a "place" - have you ever heard anyone say "I come from

725:

I strongly advise you to not mischaracterise content disputes as vandalism. Personally I do not really care about the article, but I do care about people wrongly calling other people vandals. I think you owe Wik an apology for the namecalling.

2015:(c) if it IS unusual, is it worth explaining it on the relevant pages or in a page linked to them, so people like me do NOT come swanning in changing things because they can't believe there could be such a thing as a "county of Middlesbrough"!? 1386:

I go and see if the council is called a district or a borough council. Of course, this doesn't help for the ones just called council. I suppose there is a list somewhere. I will make (district) redirect to (borough) for every one eventually.

2465: 1061:

However, people also tick that box when uploading fair use images, noncopyrighted images, etc, where they copyright holder definitely hasn't uploaded under GFDL. Maybe the upload text to state that (or slashing and burning and replacing)

1613:

I don't see why city status for a borough makes any difference. If Coventry should be about the borough, then so should Walsall and Dudley. This is why I have carefully avoided splitting articles about metropolitan boroughs so far.

3332:

Maps are easy - they will both show Stockton up to, or down to, the Tees. Estimating the areas & populations may take a little longer - the latest report of the Boundary Committee for England on ward boundaries should help.

1996:

a county at some deep legal level? I'm thinking of all the other weird (to me) ones that have popped up in the 90s which seem often to be the names of towns, Darlington or whatever - are they all actually legal counties too? -

2222:

Have been offered to "...show this picture on Knowledge for one calendar year...". Could you tell me whether this is worth the effort, and how to enforce that it's not used by any third party, and not used past the time limit.

602:

Actually I've heard there are plans to merge the Coventry and Warwickshire police forces, as apparently Warwickshire police force is one of the smallest in the country and is not viable, I dont know if you've heard anything

1088:

I have to say those new box thingies youve been putting in are very ugly, especially on short articles, isn't there some way that say they could be collapsed as defualt but openable, rather like you can collapse TOC's.

2036:

covers it reasonably well. All the unitary authorities apart from the metropolitan boroughs and the districts of Berkshire are counties in their own right. I'm not sure we need to mention this everywhere, though.

2266:, etc.) Are you basing the bitmapped images from a vector graphic file? What line thikness are you using? Is there a color standard ? i.e. red for counties, blue for province, gray and green for countries, etc.// 3093:

morayshire has not been entirely forgotten by the beaurocrats! In other words, the lieutenacy area created in 1996 seems to have been based on an area which has not been used for administration since 1889...

1030:? You protected that article some time ago due to Levzur's continual deletions of content. Tannin has had to protect it again and there is an RfC ongoing at the moment - your views would be very welcome. -- 3326:

Hi. I was wondering if you know how you are planning to map County Durham and North Yorkshire, where they split the borough of Stockton-on-Tees between them ceremonially? Morwen 16:34, May 3, 2004 (UTC)

1860:

Have you given up on this disgussion or something?. Actually having thought about it regarding Dudley. If Dudley (borough) were to become a city, then it might be better to use the arrangement used with

468:

in 1844. It certainly didn't become part of the 'admninistrative county' of Northumberland in 1844 since no such beast was created until 1888. We could perhaps invent a new type of county, but that

2851: 1792:

If Dudley were made a city then the seperate articles about Stourbridge etc could still exist as long as they said they were part of the city of D, in the same way the Sutton Coldfield article does.

2634:

Thanks, for your fast answer, and thank you that you will send me a comment in case of an update. As I recognised yesterday, the swedish language version also uses some (or all?) of your maps. Bye,

1145:

I wasn't refering to the maps their OK, I was refering to the region boxes. I apologise if I've caused offence, I was tired and in a bad mood that day and perhaps could have been a bit more polite.

2564: 400:

I understand your position, and now accept that the administrative counties should be primary. However, for your own sake, you will find that most traditionalists will amend the following:

2647:. Perhaps you could create such an indian prototype map too and link it in your user page? Then the people could change borders for their own using your map in the future. Would be great! 1879:

I dont know where you've got that idea from, why would I want to remove your maps?. I dont know what you mean by "making it up as you go along" you havn't answered any of my above points.

3165: 2181:

WRT your response to my changing the description of from town to city, I've thought about it and also looked at previous discussion of this issue on your talk page. My question is: what

175:

Fantastic work on the maps, and on creating stubs for all those districts and traditional Scottish counties. Given your map-drawing talents, is there any chance of some maps showing the

1605:

Er yes I do actually, I dont get it surely common sense dictates that coventry should be about the city of coventry, surely that is what people will expect when they look up 'Coventry'

2861:

What I am incapable of doing is updating the maps. Are you up for the task of finding out what the borders of Daikondi province and adding the borders to each of the province maps and

2196:

Legally, administratively and practically, I would suggest that the town and the city are one, or else the town cannot exist! I am (always) very much open to counterarguments, though!

708:

May I ask why you are aiding known vandal Wik in distorting the page? As the talk page illustrates Swinemünde is a far more common name. Take a look at the page history, Wik has added

1360:

Morwen, where did you get the maps for the Scottish regions and unitary authorities from? Would it be possible to get some for the 8 electoral regions for the Scottish Parliament?

105:

one! Why hide useful information? Leaving out the costal context might be OK for land locked or completely borderless countries, but in a case like Indonesia it's just confusing.

448:

A compromise I had been trying to using is "traditionally with the borders of". However, this got reverted to "is within the traditional county of" as it apparently 'misleading'.

1765:

I agree the York thing is a bit of an anomaly, but it seems that this local government stuff is such a complete mess that whatever we do we create a certain number of anomalies.

3349: 1745:

I don't like city status determining whether we split or not. If, say, Dudley were to be granted city status in 2005, would you then agree to merging the articles? What about

1622:

Surely there are two entities known as 'Dudley' the town of D and the borough which consists of several towns, therefore it is logical that they should have seperate articles.

2906:

I'm just transferring the articles about the provinces in Afghanistan to the German Knowledge. I appreciate your maps very much. Please allow me one request and one remark:

1648: 1324:

Oh, ok. I am so sorry for my mistake. I usually take care to write "his/her" or "he/she" when I refer to somebody I don't know, but I had the wrong impression you were a boy.

2559:

Thanks very much for your feedback last night on the question of how to deal with country subdivisions. I noticed that there was a bit of a gap between the country format at

1225: 587:

That seems fine to me. We could do with an overall article on these types of things - the Nottingham metropolitan area is quite huge, for example. I think I will start one.

238:

Thanks for your great work on the maps, but some of them seem to be missing -- perhaps due to WikiMedia software problems? -- will you upload and fix them again? Sorry. --

3247:

Far Eastern federal district (and leave information not relevant to the federal district but relevant to the Russian Far East on the Russian Far East page), Siberia -: -->

1916:

Well firstly, I have no objection to your maps, you have obviously put a lot of work into them. I only want to see them put in the right place where they are applicable.

1804:

geography. In absence of a good way of determining that doesn't rely on untested assumptions about what 'everyone thinks' i think we should just leave them unsplit.

249:- all images uploaded in four days in January are inaccessible. There are hundreds to reupload and I'm not going to do it until I am told they are permanently lost. 1737:

IMO if a place has city status it should be treated as a single place, whereas ordinary local government boroughs which have no identity should be treated as just that

834:

Here's the link I used to find out about Nolan, it's got pretty much every holder of a peerage in the UK and Ireland through history. May take a while to load though!

2716:... shouldn't that be in a different geographic projection? The map of the whole of Russia doesn't make sense in an equidistant projection, but smaller ones should. -- 372:, and is not in an appropriate tone for an encyclopedia. I think you will find 'drunken idiots' infest most places in the country, Milton Keynes is nothing special. 2459: 2258:

Very nice maps, I think too! Do you have any tip to give me, I'm thinking about doing the same map of Sweden counties (or whatever they are translated into english,

1906: 1396: 2581:

As someone who raised objections as to bias in an earlier version of the article, do you agree that the NPOV dispute tag can now be removed from the reworked page?

3366:

article, what criteria are you using to decide when to split city articles. To be honest I'm not to keen on city articles being split unless it's really neccesary

2163: 1435: 610:

No such a thing as the "Coventry Metropolitan area" officially exists, although it effectively does in real life so should it be described as such do you think?.

3037:

Please don't go away for long! You are well respected and trusted here, by me I know, and by many others also. Please let me know if I can help with anything.

2563:

and the handful of national subdivisions that have so far been defined. I've had a go at drafting a new WikiProject for country subdivisions - it's currently at

2006:(b) if it is NOT unusual, is it documented somewhere in the wiki so that people like me floundering in ignorance about the general siutation may be educated, and 1705:"I come from Dudley" (the borough) he would say "I come from Stourbridge". Whereas someone from Wolverhampton (the city) would say "I come from Wolverhampton", 1734:

were historically seperate towns from Birmingham until 1889, and for many years the redidents of Edgebaston and Aston resented being made part of Birmingham.

2402:"We ignore your restrictions, anyone can use this image under the US copyright code for educational purposes". There's no need to immediately delete all such 2303:

Apparently so: /td Optional in HTML. Required in XHTML. I guess they can all be changed automatically should wikipedia ever decide to point to a new DTD... --

780: 364:

Newbie: Why do you keep reverting the edit's to Milton Keynes? I have lived in MK all my life, and believe what I have to say is authoritative. Please help!

3169: 3025:'s recent edits to many county pages restore the "administrative county" language. Didn't we decide to do away with it? I've left him a note pointing to 1872:

There's no point having this discussion - you are making it up as you go along, and I have a suspicion this is motivated by an attempt to remove my maps.

1382:

Good work on the seperating districts and towns. Just wondering, when naming the articles, how do you decide which are districts and which are boroughs?

1336:

Hello. Might I ask why you have noted the screenshots of Pokemon games as GFDL? I presume you don't own the copyright to the games or the characters?.

317:

I don't know if there's an English version but you can see the names on the right hand side and they seem to be fairly accurate to me (and up to date). --

1949: 1625:

Common sense dictates that Coventry and Birmingham should be about the cities, that is certainly what most people mean when they look up those articles.

716: 3108:. I wonder if you would consider its definition of 'county' to be ambiguous. Also note that it calls both the lieutancy area and the county 'Moray'. 2696:

Thanks again Morwen for the counties of Albania. I've been kinda busy so I haven't gotten around to doing much. You're doing a hell of a job though!!!

2052:

OK and thanks. I will not worry about the general situation! I might try and clarify it where I see it as unclear but there again I might not... :)

3064:

the precise date of the appointment which is in the House of Commons Information Paper. I also have a list of the appointments from 1944 to 1958.

3058: 3081:

it's own article. It will prove far more flexible in the long run. I thought about doing so myself, but didn't want to start another "move war".

3050:

I've created articles for most of the provinces of Bulgaria. It still needs some work, but do you know where the "maps available" are? Thanks,

1077: 1946: 1204: 713: 3004:

I think it's fairly self-evident that there are other people besides Michael deserving of being blocked, but thought I'd reiterate anyway. -

2981: 2568: 2518: 2267: 1047: 1031: 913: 901: 3312:. Importantly, if I am in the wrong (which I do not believe I am), then there needs to be a notice to this effect, and possible removal of 2968: 2685: 1932:

Regarding other stuff I'm saying each case should be treated differently depending on the circumstances, I havn't changed my mind as such.

856: 188: 2393:

if we can't use them, neither can de, which i got the image from. I note that we have absolutely thousands of images that aren't GFDL.

2910:

the German transcription is slightly different from the English. So the numerical order doesn't not correspond to the alphabetical order.

1293: 795: 579:

officially. Do you think I should add it? after all it is common on articles about cities to add the population of the surrounding areas

176: 2662:

Also I have a few rights to photos of airline planes from their owners but since my computer has little memory I cant post them. I have

2614:

Pradesh.png instead of IndiaAndhraPradesh.png in the german Knowledge. In a few case the english and german orthographie differs (Rajast

2151:

Just wondering, what should be done when the district/borough consists of the town of the same name and nothing much else, such as with

896:

I've added a lengthy gazetteer of places, areas, localities and transportation links (all pointing to other Knowledge articles) to

2069:

What tool(s) do you use to produce them and where do you get the data from? I think I may start doing some of Spain, for example.

1975:

Ah. Thank you. Oh dear - it's more complicated than I thought. Isn't it always? I've corrected the error I introduced in Stockton.

1392: 3352: 1967:

ears but I acknowledge it is not impossible. Could you please educate me about the logic behind this language? Thanks very much

1789:, prior to 1925 what is now Stoke was comprised of about five different towns which were merged together to form a single city. 1696:

Ah, so how did you figure out which are 'most commonly associated' or are you basing it upon what _you yourself associate with?

1211: 2189:

York (ie. the urban area) had outgrown its previous borders, and it was considered desirable to keep it under unified control.

989:

Just a heads-up that user:62.188.4.102 has been editing a lot of the Welsh counties to resurrect the old entities again. :( --

964: 313:

I'll help you out. I also found a nice graphic presentation of each county at the Unemployment Office web site, for example at

1475:

Of the three options, I would prefer 1, although 2 is also ok. I think 3 doesn't have the article a new user would expect at

3225: 3026: 1817:". Whereas if it is given city status it is designed to be thought of as a single place. That's certainly my opinion anyway. 1498:

to make it say its not a city, but the borough it is part of, is? The other question is where do we draw the line. Should

1221: 811:

Hi Morwen, I noticed you've added {{msg:South_Asia}} in the India page. Where do I get a complete list of the {{}} options ?

1769:

agree the present Dudley/Walsall articles are far from satisfactory - trying to cover two seperate entities on one article.

3337: 1411:

I'm gonna do that once I've finished my entire lot. By the way, what do you think I ought to be doing with districts like

2713: 2644: 1300:, which now I tried to turn into a basic article. If it wasn't created first as a stub by you, I wouldn't ever bother to 939: 819: 113:

I had been considering that. More worrying to me is how hard it is to see some of the provinces. I added zoom maps for

2774:

Of course I'm uploading mine - I haven't got yours to upload. If yours are better replace mine - it's a wiki after all.

2406:

images, but after we've tagged them all we will probably get rid of most of them and declare a small minority fair use.

984: 2033: 852: 755:

page is for Lewes district and not the town of Lewes. I presume that a similar issue occurs o a number of other pages.

2449:

Thanks for cleaning up after my careless! I'd just said to myself, "Wait a minit, something doesn't feel right..." --

1679:

be? An article about the town or the borough/city? And what should it have been before Wolverhampton became a city?

1274: 1027: 943: 875:

You are welcome - in future you can use the 'move this page' feature, which is on the left hand side of the screen.

659:

I have no particulra opinion. I could remember the first but not the second. Probably the latter would be better.

381:

Morwen, in considering the above comment, you may want to look at the kind of knowledge this anon has shared over at

3293:

I notice that some Malaysian states have maps, others don't. Just a reminder in case you forgot to complete this. --

2589:

Thanks. You're right, the page needs more depth - like almost every page in Knowledge - so feel free to contribute!

1367:

Hi - i'm back - on colossus. Using mozilla 1.1 which doesn't have chatzilla. Will sort out an IRC client in a bit.

997:

I'm going to let someone else fight that battle. This IP seems to be making OKish edits to other articles though.

3320: 3309: 2733: 2560: 425: 369: 2666:

do some for me but I was wondering if you could help too, cause I dont want to throw all the work on Arp's lap!

1053:

We seem to be using GFDL as the default for images that they have taken, as that's the box that they've ticked.

2781:

No I haven't quit IRC - but you saw that IRC was causing mozilla to crash. I will go and find a better client.

3389: 3370: 2763:

Sorry to bore you but I've noticed we might have another traditional counties saga: Look at the edits of User

2707: 2554: 2524: 2476:

An IP claims to be the user who posted it and also to be the original copyright holder. I think that's ok.

1945:

Thanks for restoring the text, I can only guess for some reason my browser did not send the full text across.

1785:

It seems rather unlikely that it would, but I surpose logically I would, there has after all been a precedent

3085: 1921:

the average reader. I probably should have disgussed it with you first instead of removing it so I apologise.

1148:

I was merely wondering if their was a better way too arrange them, to make them smaller. For instance on the

900:. What do you think? Is this something that could usefully be done for the other London boroughs as well? -- 2497: 1534:

One example doesn't prove anything. Of course the term is used in the other meaning as well by some people.

867:

mix-up. Thanks for your help. Can you explain to me what the best way to handle that type of situation is ?

696:

make some of the articles make more sense to those of us who have no conception of where some things are. --

692:

Sorry to fill your talk page with spam, but thought I'd drop a line thanking you for all the maps. =] They

2862: 2575: 1893: 1647:

should have been about the town until the borough achieved city status, when it should have been moved to

3302: 2796:

Ross-shire with Harris in Inverness-shire. I've never seen Lewis used as a name for the entire island.

2603: 2360: 1444: 1043: 80: 3212:

uninformed American admin can do to give you any assistance on the county issue, please do let me know.

2828: 2487:

That's not the process documented for getting authorization. (I wrote "Passion of the Christ"... ;) -

2087: 273:

Argh, I just noticed that we didn't pinpoint all the problems with Croatian county maps. For instance,

3106: 2822: 2659:

Dear Morwen: Hi! You accidentally blocked me when blocking the Michael IPs can you please unblock me?

1900: 277:

the Zadar county no longer includes that much of Lika, but includes southern part of the island of Pag

3282: 1361: 57: 53: 49: 41: 37: 33: 29: 2921: 2899: 2886: 2804: 2643:

A last disturb :-) In the german Knowledge you can find the "prototype image" for brasilian states:

3343: 2855: 1568: 766:

yes, I have been seeking them and splitting the pages. In some cases its not obvious what to do -

3105:

Don't you mean 1975, not 1889 there? But yes, the lieutancies of Scotland are rather bizarre.See

2858:

I added the new province, but I indented it, so that the numbers would still align with the map.

2574: 2438:

Thanks for your prompt fixing of vandalism to the Bush page! They've really been at it today...

1374: 958: 3265: 3168:

about mistake in ascribing a couple of exclaves. The rest are much improved, however; very good!

1652: 963:

Greetings Morwen. Poor form indeed, but the Beatles did not put an apostrophe in the name of the

1927:

image markup etc so the Oxford page is still a mess, I'm hoping someone else will sort that out.

1905:

I forget where, but there was another one where someone had replaced the map with a link saying

1717:? Would they say they are from Birmingham? I understand many of them would fiercly deny it. 151:

Much better! Thanks. I don't think there's any need to include the rest of New Guinea, it was

2977: 1463: 1415:

where the council is called X city council, but covers towns other than X. I see three options

651:? I had leaned to the latter, but am of course open to having my opinion changed. :) Thanks, 555: 513:

where the 86 were actually used for Lord-Lieutenancy all at the same time, and no others were.

246: 125:

the problem would only be worse. I will reconsider, possibly redrawing it with thinner lines.

2372: 1957: 1762:

metropolitan boroughs should be treated differently to normal boroughs, unless their cities.

1194: 1124:

gently. The maps are perfectly good looking and to hide them from initial view would be silly.

2736:

conserning the issue. The person who vandalized the page have attacked articles dealing with

192:

around here. I'd like to put this on VfD and strongly argue that it goes. What do you think?

3239: 3228:

which is a superset of the various county displays at presnet, but wouldn't want to stage a

3224:

Do you know if there is an infobox standard for English counties? I've put up a proposal at

477:

Apologies for my ramble. I may have had a point when I started; if so I have forgotten it.

3271: 3245:

maybe twice. I'd love to rename them in a more uniform manner (e.g., Central Russia -: -->

3009: 2918: 2133: 1448: 1428: 1412: 1400: 648: 283:

the area around Nasice is now part of the Osijek-Baranja county rather than Pozega-Slavonia

8: 3257:

Thanks a bunch! I didn't know these messages were editable. Learned something today! --

2430:

Grey and cloudy. Will take some tomorrow as I am going to a computer shop at Edgware Rd.

2354: 2167: 1495: 1296:(so now you have 4) because I like your many geographical stubs and maps. Especially for 1199:

There is a small problem with the maps you uploaded for North and South Yemen; they show

909: 87: 83: 76: 72: 68: 65: 1688:

perfectly logical to me. I wasn't aware that there was a separate town of Wolverhampton

933: 288: 2962: 2945: 2729: 2678: 2281: 2137: 2101:

OK, but does the CIA include the borders of England Counties? or do you do it by hand?

1591: 1488: 1421: 844: 61: 3145:

Thankyou. I shall go and update the smaller maps in due course (probably tomorrow).

1021: 218: 3357: 3334: 3233: 3213: 3038: 3030: 2893: 2832: 2816: 2782: 2775: 2756: 2749: 2648: 2635: 2627: 2431: 1826: 1777:

You haven't answered my question, would you merge Dudley if it achieved city status?

1479:, and Canterbury, Canterbury is very awkward (we have been trying to avoid this, eg. 1368: 1054: 759: 668: 652: 388: 224: 212: 193: 1886:

Well, because you keep changing your mind about whether city status is magic, etc..

837: 3051: 2882: 2810: 2797: 2737: 2663: 2590: 2582: 2383: 2304: 2297: 2246:

Very nice work you are doing on the subdivisions of countries and their maps. I am

1714: 1564: 1480: 1404: 1179: 1127: 1081: 990: 500: 441: 180: 156: 94: 17: 2988:

You are blocking people that aren't Michael. Why don't you be a bit more careful?

2976:

Thought you might be interested to know that there's a discussion going on at the

2146: 1940: 1643:

Coventry is a bad example. What about Wolverhampton? By your current argument,

3305: 3124: 3005: 2914: 2866: 2764: 2453: 2207: 1753:? I propose that for metropolitan boroughs we just generally don't split ever. 1557: 1515: 1226:

Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(places)#Transliteration_of_Russian_place_names

262: 3045: 1462:

I think Borough of Guildford is a good format. It would also fit well with the

1070: 1037: 779: 261:

Wow, awesome work on the Afghan maps! Seeing them has filled me with great joy!

2701: 2547: 2535: 2414: 2386: 2338: 2285: 1786: 1348: 951: 864: 681: 469: 465: 357: 2723: 1889:

I don't know why you are removing my maps. However, its pretty clear you are

1502:

be about the town of Bradford and another article be about the city/borough?

687: 170: 2366: 2224: 2200: 2102: 2070: 2053: 2023: 1968: 1676: 1656: 1644: 1579: 1297: 1217: 840: 697: 2913:

I found another map in the internet, that shows some changes in the area of

2280:

Trampling through wikiland as only a newbie can, I came across your maps on

2275: 2193:

abstract entity called "York" within another one called the "City of York"?

268: 99: 2717: 2488: 2469: 2162:

I've left a semi-coherent question for you about districts and boroughs at

1746: 1519: 1280: 1046:

other related Knowledge articles. See if you can think of any more. ;-) --

968: 884: 868: 756: 570:

area, Coventry is the tenth largest city in England, and is a twin city to

567: 385: 318: 292: 209: 3128: 3072: 2927: 2691: 2421:

I have tagged tens of times more images than you, so ner-ner-ner-ner-ner.

1992:(a) is this situation (ex-Cleveland counties) unusual, or is more or less 1443:

The other inconsistency is with how we treat London Boroughs. IF we have

1080:, but to be honest I'm not that happy with it, so feel free to edit away. 638: 395: 3286: 3270:

Sorry to bore you Morwen but I was wondering if you could help me out at

3258: 3250: 3146: 3131: 3109: 3095: 3022: 2996: 2847: 2477: 2422: 2394: 2318: 2251: 2117: 2091: 2078: 2038: 1910: 1873: 1838: 1805: 1778: 1754: 1718: 1697: 1680: 1660: 1615: 1599: 1572: 1503: 1452: 1434:

have Canterbury be about the city/borough of Canterbury, have it link to

1337: 1314: 1264: 1253: 1245: 1108:

Thats not always practical, there often isn't much to say about a place.

1098: 1063: 998: 976: 924: 897: 876: 822: 803: 771: 727: 660: 644: 623: 588: 478: 461: 460:

silently. This is evidenced by the rejection of claims that places like

382: 373: 332:

Well, if you do want to - you might find my working maps some help. See

303: 250: 239: 201: 160: 137: 126: 106: 3089:

inverness-shire). Explain that! I can't, but it certainly suggests that

1026:

Hi Morwen - When you have a moment, could you please leave a comment at

337: 333: 3386: 3367: 3274: 3200: 3192: 3078: 2768: 2450: 2350: 2156: 1933: 1880: 1866: 1854: 1846: 1818: 1793: 1770: 1738: 1727: 1706: 1689: 1668: 1636: 1629: 1606: 1595: 1587: 1476: 1325: 1305: 1286: 1229: 1154: 1109: 1090: 632: 615: 604: 596: 580: 122: 2755:

Look - you may have better ones than me - and I may have missed some.

2542:

Sigh, OK, thanks, I'll go change them...wish they'd asked us first :)

2505:

Is there any chance of having some of your wonderful outline maps for

2468:

resolved? Was there proof of copyright permission provided? Thanks -

2217: 2173: 1659:. I find this absurd, and hope it is misrepresenting your position. 543:

article something about the population of the surrounding area. like:

536:

Anyway changing the subject, I wanted you're opinion about something.

155:

that I had issues with first, and just having those few milimeters of

3363: 3084:

Secondly I've just noticed the following: Interestingly, the current

3065: 2767:

to the Wolverhampton and West Midlads articles which I have reverted

2697: 2543: 2531: 2510: 2213:

Yeah - zonked this morning - just finishing my coffee then going in.

1834: 1830: 1635:

Sorry but I'm really going to have to move the Coventry article back

1544: 1535: 1527: 1523: 1224:. I've posted a proposal there and created a place for discussion at 947: 787: 678: 622:

The box stays. If you want to help improve the design, feel free.

432: 414: 404: 353: 2602:

Hello Morwen. I "stole" all your very good looking India maps (i.e.

1355: 1228:. as a place to discuss all this. I hope you will join us there. -- 314: 223:

Thanks for fixing the dodgy markup of the table. You beat me to it!

3294: 3196: 3188: 2989: 2439: 2236:

Do you happen to have the same problem, or even a solution to it :)

1814: 1583: 1499: 1427:

have Canterbury about the city/town of Canterbury, have it link to

1149: 1015: 812: 735: 540: 410: 299: 2878: 352:

Thanks for the maps on the districts of Albania Morwen. Good job!

256: 233: 2873:

There is maybe a quite reliable source for the borders on de the

2742: 1484: 1200: 946:. I'd appreciate it if you could upload a fixed version. thanks, 767: 571: 559: 208:

Did you get to the bottom of the East Sussex, West Sussex thing?

3206: 2413:

And yes, I'm lecturing again. But I don't charge admission ;-).

2241: 1833:. The city boundaries are huge compared to the town, and cover 891: 703: 3232:

by implementing this if there is another standard somewhere. --

2892:

Still a bit rough. What did you rebrand them as? wealthmaster?

2514: 2506: 1865:, ie Dudley is a town within a UA called the "City of Dudley". 1301: 118: 3362:

I'm not entirely sure I agree with your decision to split the

3016: 2466:

Imperial College Electrical and Electronic Engineering Society

2460:

Imperial College Electrical and Electronic Engineering Society

2344: 1420:

have Canterbury about the town of Canterbury, have it link to

2920:). I can't see, which source is the more appropriate one. -- 2789: 2152: 1731: 1487:). As for 2, strictly speaking, the city is the borough, so 752: 566:

census) around 800,000 people live in the wider Coventry and

152: 3219: 2444: 2329:

I think you're right. I've always thought the opposite of a

1244:

Why did you revert 66.32.141.50's edits? They seem correct.

533:

Just as we thought we'd put the counties thing to bed......

347: 280:

the Sibenik-Knin county includes the Knin area (obviously :)

3382: 2288:, and, err, straightened up the HTML. Err. Before noticing 1896:

rm map this is already shown on the Greater Manchester page

1862: 1750: 1590:? I guess we should make the article about the city be at 1011: 1007: 563: 551: 114: 3182: 2980:

concerning "Blank Map tracings from copyrighted maps". --

2517:

respectively? I'd need three maps, one of each region. --

2311: 2185:"York" if it is not the same thing as the "City of York"? 1829:

is a single place? I see. Well, what do you think about

1563:

Hello. We have two standards already for borough names.

3191:

the district of Basildon includes the towns of Basildon,

2954: 2937: 2874: 2670: 1203:

as an independent country, which it wasn't until 1993. -

2732:

on a vandalized version. You may want to have a look at

2654: 2164:

Knowledge talk:List of English districts to disambiguate

1491:

shouldn't link to the town, even if that seems obvious.

829: 2626:

hmir instead of Jammu and Kashmir. Would be very glay,

1628:

Is there a seperate town of 'Coventry' I don think so.

1571:. I don't think there is any need to create a third. 2567:. I'd be grateful for any thoughts you might have. -- 2324: 1239: 287:

I believe that we need to synchronize maps fully with

2155:. Should it be left as it is or split do you think?. 2086:

By the way, I shouldn't do any more for the moment -

3059:

Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds/Manor of Northstead

2788: 2597: 1550: 1222:

Knowledge:Village_pump#Transliterations_from_Russian

741: 677:

Thanks for zapping the vandalism on my userpage. --

1313:Thank you. Please note though that I am a girl. 117:and another one. If i extended it to cover north 2831:that Afghanistan has established a 33rd province, 2809:Hi Morwen, maybe you can weigh in on this matter: 2509:proper and its northern and southern provinces of 2077:The gimp, and what data? I just trace CIA maps ;) 2064: 975:Terrible. ;) Actually, they did, just not eough ;) 712:info to the page and is merely pushing an agenda. 3246:Central federal district, Russian Far East -: --> 2969:Discussion at Village Pump which may interest you 1578:Also, I take it you don't object to my splitting 539:I was thinking about writing on the intro to the 1042:I've added what looks like a zillion links from 454:historical footnote, not a basis of geography... 302:. I'll redo everything from scratch soon. :( 2838:I have changed all province articles that read 1304:it and find info about this Ukranian region :) 1014:seem to be mixed up in your Pakistani maps. -- 938:Hi Morwen, looks like there was a typo in the 3378:Sheffield is a place in the City of Sheffield 2881:. Daikondi was the most northern district of 2022:Sorry if this is a terrible bore for you! :) 1252:Because it made the next sentence nonsense. 1212:Сою́з Сове́тских Социалисти́ческих Респу́блик 3348:Sorry - redirected while you were deleting. 3301:Morwen, can you please clarify copyright re 1391:Also, don't forget to change the links from 1845:should try to get other people's opinions. 1518:. It's a completely different article than 1028:Talk:Zviad Gamsakhurdia#Request for Comment 3308:has a problem with it. See discussion at 2741:unvandalized version as soon as possible. 187:Hi Morwen. I'm writing because you edited 3281:I like your cool-looking inset maps like 1176:Understood, I was a bit bad-tempered too. 291:. Sorry I didn't notice this sooner :/ -- 2852:Template:Footer Provinces of Afghanistan 1522:, and the term has a different meaning. 2349:wouldn't it be an improvement to move 2090:is going to set a new format for them. 1393:List of English districts by population 420:whereas they will (probably) not amend 14: 3249:help would be appreciated! Thanks. -- 1347:I don't, in fact. Thanks. I fixed it. 200:See talk page. I agree it is silly. 3226:Knowledge:WikiProject UK Subdivisions 3199:. So shouldent the article be split? 3027:Knowledge:Naming conventions (places) 2565:User talk:ChrisO/Country subdivisions 1675:Simple enough question - what should 965:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 338:http://cryosphere.net/~morwen/cro.xcf 334:http://cryosphere.net/~morwen/cro.png 3077:Firstly, congratulations for giving 2995:I haven't blocked anyone for days. 1526:18:16, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) --- Thanks. 940:Image:AlbaniaNumberedPrefectures.png 431:... was formerly the county town of 3316:images granted under this licence. 3166:Image_talk:ScotlandTradNumbered.png 2951:Dear Mor; Hi, thanks for the help. 2645:de:Bild:Brasilien_Bundesstaaten.png 1980:Thanks for giving me the reference. 1447:, maybe it would be better to have 820:Knowledge:MediaWiki custom messages 23: 3310:Knowledge:Copyright problems#May 2 2708:Detailed maps of Russian districts 2555:Templates for country subdivisions 2525:Counties or Prefectures of Albania 2034:Administrative counties of England 863:I had no idea how to clean up the 853:Talk:American_University_of_Beirut 24: 3400: 3123:With regard to the discussion at 2498:Serbia / Kosovo / Vojvodina maps? 2116:Those I traced from other maps. 1403:and from the appropriate county. 1097:Make the articles longer, then. 944:Talk:List of Albanian prefectures 315:http://www.hzz.hr/hzz.asp?ID=4065 289:that image I previously mentioned 1713:I see. What about someone from 734:Thanks from the known vandal. -- 562:. With a population of 300,848 ( 2879:http://www.fao.org/afghanistan/ 2734:Knowledge:Vandalism in progress 2728:You've unfortunately protected 1909:, which was even more bizarre. 1586:too? Shall we do the same for 426:traditional counties of England 370:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 2823:Afghanistan has a new province 2618:an instead of Rajastan, Jammu 1667:Now you've completely lost me 1379:Yes, definitely addictive :-) 802:Oops. I always make that one. 647:is better than redirecting to 470:multiplies entities needlessly 413:was formerly in the county of 13: 1: 3376:I see your point, but saying 2900:Maps Provinces of Afghanistan 2863:Image:AfghanistanNumbered.png 2805:Sulu, Suuruu, and Mister Kato 2714:Media:RussiaVolgaNumbered.png 1044:London Borough of Southwarkto 985:"Traditional" counties again! 3303:Image:John Maynard Smith.jpg 2604:image:IndiaAndhraPradesh.png 2576:History of British socialism 1749:, should we merge that with 1649:Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton 1375:Districts of England (again) 1275:Re: "move this page" feature 959:No apostrophe in Sgt Peppers 838:Leigh Rayment's Peerage Page 7: 2946:Antonio Reeejected!! Martin 2712:I happened to stumble upon 2361:Free state (disambiguation) 2250:them for the Dutch wiki ;p 1445:London Borough of Southwark 631:have any other suggestions. 10: 3405: 3283:Image:EnglandBlackpool.png 3253:17:10, Apr 23, 2004 (UTC) 2704:04:36, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC) 2538:16:06, Mar 21, 2004 (UTC) 2417:23:01, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC) 2389:21:28, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC) 2373:GeekPhilosopher.com photos 2088:Knowledge:WikiProject_Maps 1958:Middlesbrough and Stockton 1216:I've replied to a post by 1195:Maps for South/North Yemen 1057:13:53, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC) 1018:23:27, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC) 971:21:03, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) 954:14:30, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) 738:19:50, Feb 14, 2004 (UTC) 700:12:36, Feb 14, 2004 (UTC) 663:20:21, Feb 13, 2004 (UTC) 407:was a county of England... 3297:07:11, May 2, 2004 (UTC) 3289:23:31, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3277:12:17, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3261:17:21, Apr 23, 2004 (UTC) 3240:Russian federal districts 3236:14:50, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3216:18:54, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3203:20:53, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3149:20:50, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC) 3112:18:11, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC) 3098:18:02, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3068:16:48, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3054:19:43, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2800:12:13, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2785:17:36, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2778:17:26, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2771:17:21, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2759:17:15, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2752:13:26, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2745:00:05, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2720:21:18, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2688:20:09, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2679:Antonio Zip Values Martin 2585:22:05, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2571:14:51, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2550:16:13, Mar 21, 2004 (UTC) 2521:02:31, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2480:23:01, Mar 19, 2004 (UTC) 2472:23:00, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2456:20:26, 2004 Mar 19 (UTC) 2434:14:41, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2425:23:02, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC) 2397:21:29, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC) 2380:except redistribute them. 2369:18:27, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2341:18:24, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2321:17:49, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2254:08:18, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1913:19:50, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 1876:19:38, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 1602:20:02, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1575:19:39, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1371:19:35, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC) 1340:17:39, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC) 1317:12:37, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC) 1283:22:37, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1256:15:45, Feb 28, 2004 (UTC) 1248:15:43, 2004 Feb 28 (UTC) 1232:03:24, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1207:13:28, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1101:23:05, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC) 1093:23:04, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1084:17:32, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1066:14:07, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC) 1050:13:13, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1034:11:11, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1001:13:08, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC) 993:13:00, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC) 979:21:05, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) 927:16:19, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC) 904:13:44, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) 887:09:00, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) 879:08:56, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC) 871:08:53, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) 859:13:24, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC) 847:21:37, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC) 825:07:17, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC) 815:07:06, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC) 806:07:17, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC) 798:00:38, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC 786:Just a quick note, it is 774:16:45, Feb 15, 2004 (UTC) 762:16:44, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC) 730:19:50, Feb 14, 2004 (UTC) 721:19:46, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC) 684:10:35, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC) 655:20:20, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC) 635:13:46, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC) 626:07:58, Feb 11, 2004 (UTC) 618:00:15, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC) 607:19:03, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC) 599:18:50, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC) 591:18:42, Feb 10, 2004 (UTC) 583:18:39, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC) 481:17:49, Feb 10, 2004 (UTC) 444:16:47, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC) 360:16:04, Feb 7, 2004 (UTC) 253:17:55, Feb 6, 2004 (UTC) 3350:Troll Silent, Troll Deep 3172:18:30, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3134:20:46, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3041:04:51, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC) 3033:22:30, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2999:21:58, Apr 5, 2004 (UTC) 2984:10:37, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2896:15:40, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2869:05:42, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2856:Provinces of Afghanistan 2819:02:07, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2593:22:15, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2491:23:10, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2307:10:52, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2270:20:00, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2227:11:45, 2004 Mar 9 (UTC) 2203:04:02, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2170:02:57, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2159:21:20, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2120:11:32, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 2094:11:26, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 2081:11:25, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 2073:11:13, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2041:10:43, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 1971:10:17, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1954:14:39, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1883:19:43, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1869:19:10, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1857:20:30, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1849:19:58, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1821:19:43, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1808:19:23, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC) 1796:19:17, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1781:19:10, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC) 1773:19:06, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1757:21:23, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1741:21:20, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1721:21:00, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1709:20:55, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1700:20:46, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1692:20:34, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1683:20:29, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1671:20:26, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1663:20:23, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1639:20:21, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1632:20:11, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1618:20:06, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) 1609:20:04, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1569:London Borough of Camden 1547:18:37, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1538:18:30, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1530:18:17, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1506:22:56, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC) 1455:22:40, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC) 1407:22:35, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1328:13:43, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1308:12:36, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1267:16:07, 2004 Feb 28 (UTC) 1182:09:24, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1157:23:36, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1130:09:40, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC) 1112:23:09, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC) 916:15:53, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC) 671:20:30, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC) 503:01:46, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC) 376:22:32, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC) 306:15:26, Feb 7, 2004 (UTC) 295:15:24, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC) 265:23:47, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC) 242:17:54, 2004 Feb 6 (UTC) 227:14:54, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC) 215:10:20, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC) 204:22:31, Feb 5, 2004 (UTC) 196:22:29, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC) 183:15:25, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC) 140:21:56, Feb 4, 2004 (UTC) 129:12:04, Feb 4, 2004 (UTC) 109:11:22, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC) 3390:13:53, 6 May 2004 (UTC) 3371:10:44, 6 May 2004 (UTC) 3353:22:46, 4 May 2004 (UTC) 3338:06:45, 4 May 2004 (UTC) 3012:21:45, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) 2140:23:29, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2105:11:29, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2056:10:53, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 2026:10:40, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1936:20:06, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1907:click here to see a map 1653:Wolverhampton (borough) 1514:Please stop messing up 1397:List of places by Jedis 1351:01:18, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC) 967:album. See the cover. 934:Typo in one of the maps 391:22:25, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC) 321:15:28, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC) 3164:Hello; please note at 2978:Knowledge:Village_pump 1556:Disgussion moved from 1494:So do we want to edit 1464:County of Peterborough 1436:Canterbury, Canterbury 1431:about the borough/city 1424:about the city/borough 1022:Zviad Gamsakhurdia RfC 247:Knowledge:Village_pump 219:Aircraft table screwup 177:British national parks 136:How does it look now? 2963:Antonio Morbid Martin 2933:is :205.188.116.211. 2561:WikiProject Countries 2132:full-scale map as on 643:Morwen, do you think 614:improve the layout?. 424:... is one of the 39 3272:Talk:Gloucestershire 2684:I replied on my page 2147:Districts / Boroughs 2134:Knowledge:Blank maps 1941:Old English language 1449:Borough of Guildford 1429:Canterbury (borough) 1413:Canterbury (borough) 1401:Districts of England 1362:Big Jim Fae Scotland 649:List of ethnic slurs 159:showing is enough. 3046:Bulgarian provinces 2359:and the content of 2355:Free State (German) 1292:Hi. I gave you one 1071:MediaWiki:Yorkshire 1038:Southwark link orgy 910:City of Westminster 781:MediaWiki:Carribean 751:--- The map on the 2748:I'm okay - tired. 2730:Germanic languages 2724:Germanic languages 2282:Alnwick_(district) 1592:City of Birmingham 1489:City of Canterbury 1422:City of Canterbury 688:Another maps kudos 368:Because it is not 171:National Park maps 2960:Sincerely yours, 2943:Sincerely yours, 2833:Daikondi province 2827:It was announced 2676:Sincerely yours, 2649:de:Benutzer:Stern 2636:de:Benutzer:Stern 2628:de:Benutzer:Stern 2276:Maps - HTML query 1827:Brighton and Hove 1598:about the town. 1364:, March 1st 2004 269:Croatian counties 100:Indonesian Maps 2 3396: 3127:, I've uploaded 3086:Lieutenancy area 3073:Morayshire/moray 2990:Lirath Q. Pynnor 2928:Blocked (again!) 2883:Oruzgan province 2846:. I have Edited 2811:Talk:Hikaru_Sulu 2738:Yiddish language 2692:Thank you again! 1715:Sutton Coldfield 1565:Halton (borough) 1481:Bromley, Bromley 1180:Adrian Pingstone 1128:Adrian Pingstone 923:Looks splendid. 794:is a typo. =P -- 639:Redirected slurs 396:English counties 95:User_talk:Morwen 18:User talk:Morwen 3404: 3403: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3360: 3346: 3323: 3321:Ceremonial maps 3306:User:Maveric149 3268: 3266:Gloucestershire 3242: 3222: 3209: 3185: 3125:Talk:Morayshire 3075: 3061: 3048: 3019: 2971: 2930: 2915:Parwan province 2902: 2825: 2820: 2807: 2793: 2765:User:MattRevell 2726: 2710: 2694: 2657: 2600: 2579: 2557: 2527: 2500: 2462: 2447: 2375: 2347: 2327: 2314: 2300: 2278: 2244: 2220: 2176: 2149: 2067: 1960: 1943: 1558:User Talk:G-Man 1553: 1516:Eastern Germany 1438:about the town. 1377: 1358: 1289: 1277: 1242: 1230:BCorr ? Брайен 1214: 1197: 1073: 1040: 1024: 987: 961: 936: 894: 832: 784: 770:, for example. 744: 706: 690: 641: 464:became part of 398: 350: 271: 259: 236: 221: 173: 102: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3402: 3375: 3359: 3356: 3345: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3322: 3319: 3318: 3299: 3291: 3279: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3241: 3238: 3221: 3218: 3208: 3205: 3184: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3121: 3114: 3113: 3101: 3074: 3071: 3070: 3060: 3057: 3056: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3018: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3001: 3000: 2986: 2970: 2967: 2936:Thank you and 2929: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2911: 2905: 2901: 2898: 2890: 2889: 2824: 2821: 2814: 2806: 2803: 2802: 2792: 2787: 2761: 2725: 2722: 2709: 2706: 2693: 2690: 2656: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2640: 2639: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2578: 2573: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2526: 2523: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2482: 2481: 2461: 2458: 2446: 2443: 2436: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2399: 2398: 2374: 2371: 2364: 2358: 2346: 2343: 2326: 2323: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2295: 2286:Northumberland 2277: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2219: 2218:Picture Import 2216: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2175: 2174:(City of) York 2172: 2148: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2096: 2095: 2083: 2082: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2028: 2027: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1959: 1956: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1929: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1842: 1841: 1810: 1809: 1799: 1787:Stoke-on-Trent 1783: 1782: 1759: 1758: 1723: 1722: 1702: 1701: 1685: 1684: 1665: 1664: 1620: 1619: 1552: 1549: 1540: 1532: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1457: 1456: 1440: 1439: 1432: 1425: 1417: 1416: 1389: 1388: 1376: 1373: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1319: 1318: 1310: 1309: 1288: 1285: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1258: 1257: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1235: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1177: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1146: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1125: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1103: 1102: 1086: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1039: 1036: 1023: 1020: 1004: 1003: 1002: 986: 983: 982: 981: 980: 960: 957: 956: 935: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 918: 917: 908:Oops, I meant 893: 890: 889: 881: 880: 865:Lawrence Oates 861: 855:page. Thanks. 851:Plz check the 849: 831: 828: 827: 826: 809: 808: 807: 783: 778: 777: 776: 775: 750: 743: 740: 732: 731: 705: 702: 689: 686: 675: 674: 673: 672: 640: 637: 628: 627: 593: 592: 576: 575: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 519: 517: 516: 515: 514: 507: 506: 505: 504: 493: 492: 491: 490: 483: 482: 474: 473: 466:Northumberland 456: 455: 450: 449: 437: 436: 429: 418: 417: 408: 397: 394: 393: 392: 378: 377: 362: 349: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 325: 324: 323: 322: 308: 307: 285: 284: 281: 278: 270: 267: 258: 255: 235: 232: 220: 217: 206: 205: 186: 172: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 144: 143: 142: 141: 131: 130: 101: 98: 27:Archived talk: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3401: 3392: 3391: 3388: 3384: 3379: 3373: 3372: 3369: 3365: 3355: 3354: 3351: 3339: 3336: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3317: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3304: 3298: 3296: 3290: 3288: 3284: 3278: 3276: 3273: 3260: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3252: 3237: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3217: 3215: 3204: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3171: 3170:80.225.35.154 3167: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3133: 3129: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3080: 3069: 3067: 3055: 3053: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2985: 2983: 2979: 2974: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2958: 2956: 2952: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2941: 2939: 2934: 2923: 2919: 2916: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2897: 2895: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2868: 2864: 2859: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2836: 2834: 2830: 2818: 2813: 2812: 2801: 2799: 2791: 2786: 2784: 2779: 2777: 2772: 2770: 2766: 2760: 2758: 2753: 2751: 2746: 2744: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2721: 2719: 2715: 2705: 2703: 2699: 2689: 2687: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2674: 2672: 2667: 2665: 2660: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2584: 2577: 2572: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2537: 2533: 2522: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2503: 2490: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2471: 2467: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2442: 2441: 2435: 2433: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2416: 2411: 2407: 2405: 2396: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2378:these photos 2370: 2368: 2362: 2356: 2352: 2342: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2322: 2320: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2299: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2253: 2249: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231:you too... ;) 2228: 2226: 2214: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2202: 2199:Best wishes, 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2184: 2179: 2171: 2169: 2165: 2160: 2158: 2154: 2139: 2135: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2072: 2055: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2040: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1970: 1964: 1955: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1925: 1924: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1901: 1899: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1882: 1877: 1875: 1870: 1868: 1864: 1858: 1856: 1850: 1848: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1820: 1816: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1795: 1790: 1788: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1772: 1766: 1763: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1740: 1735: 1733: 1729: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1708: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1691: 1682: 1678: 1677:Wolverhampton 1674: 1673: 1672: 1670: 1662: 1658: 1657:Wolverhampton 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645:Wolverhampton 1642: 1641: 1640: 1638: 1633: 1631: 1626: 1623: 1617: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1603: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580:Wolverhampton 1576: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1548: 1546: 1539: 1537: 1531: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1372: 1370: 1365: 1363: 1356:Scottish Maps 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1341: 1339: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1284: 1282: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1247: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1208: 1206: 1202: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1156: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1129: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1092: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1078:1974 counties 1065: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1056: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1019: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 992: 978: 974: 973: 972: 970: 966: 955: 953: 949: 945: 941: 926: 922: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 907: 906: 905: 903: 899: 888: 886: 878: 874: 873: 872: 870: 866: 860: 858: 854: 848: 846: 842: 839: 835: 824: 821: 818: 817: 816: 814: 805: 801: 800: 799: 797: 793: 789: 782: 773: 769: 765: 764: 763: 761: 758: 754: 748: 739: 737: 729: 724: 723: 722: 720: 719: 715: 711: 701: 699: 695: 685: 683: 680: 670: 665: 664: 662: 658: 657: 656: 654: 650: 646: 636: 634: 625: 621: 620: 619: 617: 611: 608: 606: 600: 598: 590: 586: 585: 584: 582: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556:West Midlands 553: 549: 546: 545: 544: 542: 537: 534: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 511: 510: 509: 508: 502: 497: 496: 495: 494: 487: 486: 485: 484: 480: 476: 475: 471: 467: 463: 458: 457: 452: 451: 447: 446: 445: 443: 434: 430: 427: 423: 422: 421: 416: 412: 409: 406: 403: 402: 401: 390: 387: 383: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 366: 365: 361: 359: 355: 339: 335: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 298: 297: 296: 294: 290: 282: 279: 276: 275: 274: 266: 264: 254: 252: 248: 243: 241: 231: 228: 226: 216: 214: 211: 203: 199: 198: 197: 195: 190: 184: 182: 178: 162: 158: 154: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 145: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 111: 110: 108: 97: 96: 93: 92:Current talk: 89: 85: 82: 78: 74: 70: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 28: 19: 3377: 3374: 3361: 3347: 3335:Keith Edkins 3325: 3324: 3313: 3300: 3292: 3280: 3269: 3243: 3234:Keith Edkins 3229: 3223: 3214:Jwrosenzweig 3210: 3186: 3100: 3090: 3083: 3076: 3062: 3049: 3039:Jwrosenzweig 3031:Jwrosenzweig 3020: 2987: 2975: 2972: 2961: 2959: 2953: 2950: 2944: 2942: 2935: 2931: 2903: 2894:Secretlondon 2891: 2860: 2844:thirty-three 2843: 2839: 2837: 2826: 2817:Paul Richter 2808: 2794: 2783:Secretlondon 2780: 2776:Secretlondon 2773: 2762: 2757:Secretlondon 2754: 2750:Secretlondon 2747: 2727: 2711: 2695: 2683: 2677: 2675: 2668: 2661: 2658: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2601: 2580: 2558: 2528: 2504: 2501: 2463: 2448: 2437: 2432:Secretlondon 2429: 2412: 2408: 2403: 2400: 2379: 2376: 2348: 2334: 2330: 2328: 2315: 2289: 2279: 2263: 2259: 2247: 2245: 2230: 2229: 2221: 2212: 2198: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2161: 2150: 2068: 1993: 1965: 1961: 1950: 1944: 1915: 1904: 1895: 1888: 1885: 1878: 1871: 1859: 1851: 1843: 1811: 1798: 1791: 1784: 1767: 1764: 1760: 1747:City of York 1736: 1724: 1703: 1686: 1666: 1634: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1604: 1577: 1562: 1555: 1554: 1541: 1533: 1520:East Germany 1513: 1390: 1381: 1378: 1369:Secretlondon 1366: 1359: 1342: 1335: 1334: 1298:L'viv region 1287:L'viv region 1278: 1243: 1234: 1215: 1198: 1087: 1074: 1055:Secretlondon 1052: 1041: 1025: 1005: 988: 962: 937: 895: 882: 862: 850: 836: 833: 810: 791: 785: 749: 745: 733: 717: 709: 707: 693: 691: 676: 669:Jwrosenzweig 653:Jwrosenzweig 642: 629: 612: 609: 601: 594: 577: 568:Warwickshire 547: 538: 535: 532: 518: 438: 419: 399: 363: 351: 286: 272: 260: 257:afghan maps! 244: 237: 234:Maps missing 229: 225:David Newton 222: 207: 194:DJ Clayworth 185: 174: 103: 91: 45: 26: 25: 3052:Warofdreams 3023:User:80.255 2973:Hi Morwen, 2957:bless you! 2940:bless you! 2848:Afghanistan 2798:Warofdreams 2673:bless you! 2669:Thanks and 2591:Warofdreams 2583:Warofdreams 2502:Hi Morwen, 2305:Tagishsimon 2298:Tagishsimon 2242:Great maps! 2178:Hi Morwen, 1985:I wondered: 1405:Warofdreams 1082:Warofdreams 898:Westminster 892:Westminster 704:Swinoujscie 645:Hate speech 595:OK done it 501:Andrew Yong 462:Islandshire 442:Andrew Yong 181:Warofdreams 3193:Billericay 3187:Regarding 3079:Morayshire 3017:A question 3006:Hephaestos 2904:Hi Morwen, 2867:Kingturtle 2840:thirty-two 2415:—Eloquence 2387:—Eloquence 2351:Free State 2345:Free state 1994:everything 1728:Edgebaston 1596:Birmingham 1594:and leave 1588:Birmingham 1496:Canterbury 1483:is now at 1477:Canterbury 1153:them. :::: 883:Thank you 263:Kingturtle 189:Pearl Took 123:New Guinea 3364:Sheffield 3358:Sheffield 3220:Infoboxes 3207:Thank you 2877:website: 2511:Vojvodina 2445:Redirects 2339:Decumanus 2168:Oliver P. 1835:Morecambe 1831:Lancaster 1349:Fibonacci 1263:Rightho. 942:map. See 792:Carribean 788:Caribbean 433:Berkshire 415:Berkshire 405:Middlesex 348:Thank you 121:and east 3344:Redirect 3197:Wickford 3189:Basildon 3183:Basildon 3021:Morwen, 2842:to read 2404:existing 2367:Ruhrjung 2312:Re: Case 2260:province 2248:stealing 2225:Palapala 2201:Cambyses 2136:anyway. 2103:Pfortuny 2071:Pfortuny 2054:Nevilley 2024:Nevilley 1969:Nevilley 1815:Sandwell 1726:example 1584:Coventry 1500:Bradford 1279:thanks! 1218:Mikkalai 1150:Basildon 841:fabiform 698:Delirium 548:Coventry 541:Coventry 411:Abingdon 300:Bollocks 2718:Shallot 2655:Blocked 2489:Texture 2470:Texture 1485:Bromley 1466:format. 1281:Kwertii 1205:Sandman 1201:Eritrea 969:Moriori 885:No Guru 869:No Guru 830:Peerage 768:Chester 757:Mintguy 572:Dresden 560:England 554:in the 386:Pakaran 319:Shallot 293:Shallot 210:Mintguy 3287:Menchi 3259:Ezhiki 3251:Ezhiki 3147:Morwen 3132:80.255 3110:Morwen 3096:80.255 2997:Morwen 2982:ChrisO 2829:Friday 2622:nd Kas 2610:Andhra 2569:ChrisO 2519:ChrisO 2515:Kosovo 2507:Serbia 2478:Morwen 2423:Morwen 2395:Morwen 2331:phobia 2325:phobia 2319:Sinuhe 2268:Rogper 2252:Waerth 2118:Morwen 2092:Morwen 2079:Morwen 2039:Morwen 1911:Morwen 1874:Morwen 1839:Morwen 1837:etc! 1806:Morwen 1779:Morwen 1755:Morwen 1719:Morwen 1698:Morwen 1681:Morwen 1661:Morwen 1651:, and 1616:Morwen 1600:Morwen 1573:Morwen 1504:Morwen 1453:Morwen 1338:Morwen 1315:Morwen 1302:google 1265:Maroux 1254:Morwen 1246:Maroux 1240:Reagan 1099:Morwen 1064:Morwen 1048:ChrisO 1032:ChrisO 999:Morwen 977:Morwen 925:Morwen 914:ChrisO 902:ChrisO 877:Morwen 823:Morwen 804:Morwen 772:Morwen 728:Morwen 694:really 679:No-One 661:Morwen 624:Morwen 589:Morwen 479:Morwen 374:Morwen 304:Morwen 251:Morwen 240:Kaihsu 202:Morwen 161:Pm67nz 138:Morwen 127:Morwen 119:Borneo 107:Pm67nz 3387:G-Man 3368:G-Man 3275:G-Man 3201:G-Man 2917:(see 2885:. -- 2854:. On 2790:Lewis 2769:G-Man 2686:Debug 2598:India 2451:Jerzy 2363:to ]? 2337:. -- 2335:mania 2333:is a 2166:. -- 2157:G-Man 2153:Corby 1934:G-Man 1881:G-Man 1867:G-Man 1855:G-Man 1847:G-Man 1819:G-Man 1794:G-Man 1771:G-Man 1739:G-Man 1732:Aston 1707:G-Man 1690:G-Man 1669:G-Man 1637:G-Man 1630:G-Man 1607:G-Man 1551:Names 1326:Optim 1306:Optim 1155:G-Man 1110:G-Man 1091:G-Man 991:Arwel 912:. -- 857:May05 753:Lewes 742:sorry 682:Jones 633:G-Man 616:G-Man 605:G-Man 597:G-Man 581:G-Man 550:is a 526:(UTC) 230:yeah 153:Papua 16:< 3383:York 3285:. -- 3230:coup 3195:and 3091:real 3066:Dbiv 2922:Ralf 2887:Ralf 2850:and 2815:- - 2702:Talk 2698:Dori 2548:Talk 2544:Dori 2536:Talk 2532:Dori 2513:and 2284:and 2264:land 2138:andy 2065:Maps 1863:york 1751:York 1730:and 1582:and 1545:Nico 1536:Nico 1528:Nico 1524:Nico 1294:wiki 1012:FATA 1010:and 1008:NWFP 1006:The 952:Talk 948:Dori 845:talk 796:Maio 790:... 564:2001 552:city 358:Talk 354:Dori 336:and 245:See 115:Bali 3314:all 3295:Wik 2955:God 2938:God 2875:FAO 2835:. 2671:God 2664:Arp 2608:en_ 2464:Is 2454:(t) 2440:Rei 2353:to 2290:why 2208:bed 1997:and 1825:So 1655:to 1567:or 1387:;) 1220:at 1016:Wik 813:Jay 760:(T) 736:Wik 558:of 435:... 428:... 384:. 213:(T) 157:PNG 3385:. 3333:-- 2865:? 2743:Zw 2700:| 2630:. 2546:| 2534:| 2382:" 2365:-- 2296:-- 2262:, 2223:-- 2183:is 1947:Jo 1451:? 1399:, 1395:, 950:| 843:| 714:Jo 710:no 356:| 179:? 90:. 88:16 86:. 84:15 81:14 79:, 77:13 75:, 73:12 71:, 69:11 66:10 64:, 60:, 56:, 52:, 48:, 44:, 40:, 36:, 32:, 3010:§ 3008:| 2638:. 2624:c 2620:u 2616:h 2612:_ 2357:, 1951:r 718:r 574:. 472:. 389:. 62:9 58:8 54:7 50:6 46:5 42:4 38:3 34:2 30:1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index