User talk:Morwen/13

4428:

since you were making a bunch of changes yourself - and SUGGESTED <- the key word here, not DEMANDED, not THREATENED, that you guys should work together on it since what you and he were doing was similar and that in my opinion the articles should stay uniform with each other. Strange - sounds like I was "helping out" a bit anyway. My point is that when they don't look uniform thats when they look like shit - which is how they all were before I started expanding upon them. Yes I agree my entires are wordy - and I even mentioned a few times to people who complained or suggested they be shorter that by all means - if you can reword them to be shorter go right ahead. But of course, no one took the initiative (so obviously I'm not the only lazy bastard around here) and they remain as I originally made them and have been so for over a year now. And I'm not saying that because they are a year old they should stay like that - I'm merely stating no ones done anything until now. Yes they could be improved, I always though "Quick Overview" was cheesy myself - at the time I didn't, but I never got around to fixing it yet. My argument with RadioKirk was about "Trivia" not being allowed by consensus since however colorful you reword it - it's still trivia.

5359:

the easiest. Start over. Tone of voice is notoriously lacking in electronic media. People misinterpret one another very easily. If you assure Morwen nicely that you meant no threat, I'm sure that as a reasonable person she'll graciously accept that. Then there's the underlying "sources" issue. This is also not so hard IMHO. WP is filled with unverified facts waiting to be verified. I'm sure that you'd be happy to agree to unverified facts being tagged. I'm equally sure there are helpful editors out there who'll help find sources while you're overseas. Furthermore, any unverified fact that can be demonstrably disproved with a source or using solid logic can be discussed on a talk page and removed until such a time that you return from overseas. I don't think you'd disapprove of this approach. Now it could be that I'm being an interfering Limey idiot who's not really understood the issues, but it could also be that this can be solved easily. I hope it's the latter. I'm going to post a copy of this to Morwen's talk page. If you two can sort this out, that'd be just dandy. Cheers, --

4984:

not too. People think I'm hording all the ST pages and don't agree to change. Not true - My only wish is that whatever is decided upon for one ST episode article is that it becomes standard for all the ST episode articles. If you delete "Overview" I don't have a problem with it as long as the rest get the same treatment and they look uniform. I don't have any problems with people making drastic changes or rewriting what I've written. I just think it's lame when they're all different, one has overviews, one doesn't, one has a Plot line, another has Summary, one has Trivia, another has Notes - know what I mean? It's a daunting task to keep them the same I know - but when I have time here I'll try and change the rest to conform with the consensus.

4197:

I agree that Wigan town and Wigan Borough are not one and the same and legally a distinction does exist, however those from areas such as Ince, Orrell, Pemberton, Platt Bridge etc do not see themselves are seperate to those from aras very close to the town centre such as Swinley. A common expression in these areas is going 'into/to town' (a reference to Wigan town centre). It is generally assumed for example that when one uses the expression 'going shopping' they are going to Wigan town centre. Additionally those born and/or live in theses areas refer to themselves as

3627:

2006, Greater Manchester is not a concept with which I see anyone easily identifying. I love Manchester - I breathe Manchester. The frequently touted idea that exponents of the (ancient) counties are in some way affected or snobbish is lazy, condesceding and absurd. No Mancunian I have ever met has any vague civic identification with anything outside the city itself. And, likewise the residents of the other absorbed towns of Lancashire and Cheshire, which have wonderfully varied histories like to be left , basically , to be themselves - to have their own identity.

4215:

all about 1-3 miles from the town centre) certainly do see themselves as Wiganers. People in places such as Leigh and those areas next to Salford will not see themselves being from Wigan given the geographical separation. Places such as Leigh clearly have a distinct identity. I have lived in Wigan all my life (and while I know that this does not automatically entitle my opinion to be taken as fact), I believe the above point (again limited to the areas immediately surrounding the town centre.), to be accurate given my experience. User; Man2

4040:"Oh please - that's utterly absurd - what on earth made you think that? Please look at Talk:Galaxy class starship, where I get accused of 'blasphemy' for suggesting that non-canon starships should be allowed there. Please look at timeline of Star Trek, where I have added details of the early Spaceflight Chronology and suchforth. Please look at Other Starfleet ship classes#Federation class, which I just added yesterday. Is this the action of a canon fascist? I expect an apology. 464:

category system for natives of is a bit broken (mixture of People from and Natives of, for starters), but people are generally only born in one place, so logically you'd only expect one category path to them from "people by birthplace". If we really wanted to have a parallel hierachy of traditional counties then we could do that - but I would question the encyclopedic value of that other than as yet another (ab)use of Knowledge to promote a particular geographic cause.

4973:) some are different though since a few on the episode lists have been changed over time. I thought by adding an overview sentence it would sum up the "gist" of the episode, not really giving away the spoiler, but just stating what the episode was about - in case no one wanted to read the lengthy diatribe I wrote for the plot. I don't know how you want to handle this - leave them in or out - I'd like them to stay if possible. I think they're useful. 3448:

Below are several references to Orrell being described as a suburb. As a novice editor I am unsure as to the requirement for citations (i.e. do citations need to be from governmental sources or are any acceptable?.) With this in mind can i refer you to: 1.www.hotelhound.co.uk/uk/greater_manchester/orrell 2.www.british-publishing.com/Pages/wiganBG/AroundBorough.html (please scroll down to 'Orrell') 3.www.wiganwarriors.com/MidContent.asp?cid=28 4.

883:

sort of navigation tool and the metropolitan counties happen not not to share a name with a historic county , the metropolitan counties have no similar reference to the historic counties. This problem is difficult to resolve while using the model of not disambiguating ceremonial counties from the historic ones. I think majority of these county issues could be solved by having two sets of pages and a disambiguation page.

5307: 1735:. If you would wish to discuss this further, I could provide you with my dissertation on social equality. I'm quite comfortable in disscussing this. Furthermore, the unsigned editor is actually my much younger brother who is a novice Wikipedian who has lived with me during what has recently been a difficult period. The contributions made are all fair and helpful which is more than I can say for Wancsalot. 3641:

that hold this view are much less of a minority than you suggest - but counter-intuitiveley it seems we just can't be bothered with it. Maybe there's a relationship. Maybe the counties dweebs are generally a bit flakey. Who knows? The counties thing is probably one of the more idiosyncratic of my views. I'm surprised at the lengths people have gone to to refute my screwball assertions. Very strange.

3819: 173:

looked at a few other towns and cities and many have wrong figures and this seems to an area where there should be a standard. Is putting things right something a bot could do working on the info box? It would still require a tidy up of any figures in the articles but having a single source of data and a method of updating it might make the exercise required around 2011/2012 much easier.--

4188:

distinction is made between the town and the borough, in fact the only mention of the borough comes in local council literature. It is generally accepted that areas within the borough are 'in' Wigan. Unfortanetly I can provide no reference for this point as I am unaware of any study conducted regarding the matter. I hope this point was helpful to you.

5377:

your life. Last time I checked, the U.K. and the U.S. were allies and you should be thanking Husnock for every day of service he gives you defending both our nations from terrorists. Life isn't all about Star Trek, little girl, its time to grow up. Watch who you pick your fights with and remember who your friends are. -LCOL Dan Rappaport, CENTCOM

868:

administrative divisions in the Yorkshire infobox? Furthermore, "Yorkshire" does not exist as a ceremonial county or as any other type of administrative division, therefore the Yorkshire infobox clearly relates to the historic county as it contains information on more than one ceremonial county. Logically, shouldn't the Lancashire box do the same? §

403:

merseyside. In the absence of the common sense solution ie. basing our geography and categorisation on fixed traditional boundaries rather than the constantly changing admin ones, using both categories was the best compromise that could be arrived at. I think historical accuracy should take precedence over internal consistency here.

1665:, where the celebration of the diversity of ethnicity, as a reputed and emotive social-contruct, is tollerated and accepted. With the context I've provided, and given that sexuality, like ethnicity, is ultimately a leading factor upon one's experience of living, I do indeed stand by it's inclusion on the grounds forsaid. 2706:

get around to expanding other elements out - the map there was one of my first go's and I could create a far better one now. On the specific issue at hand it may be worth renaming the "Name" section to something broader and detailing the varying form that the Name has represented - Broad tribal area -: -->

4273:תועבה can be translated in a few ways, I was using only one from the JPS version. Indeed, I actually prefer one translation given by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan who said that the word means "mistaken act" תוע-בהbut regardless of how it translated into other languages, the Hebrew Bible clearly condemns this act. 5376:

I am a Colonel attached to the United States Army Cental Command. I've been following your little spat with Husnock and can honestly say it makes me sick. Husnock should not have gotten so worked up, but you should not be going around saying members of the United States armed forces are threatening

4196:

Hi yes your right those from Leigh (and certain other areas of the Borough) do differentiate between Wigan town and borough. Leigh is a town in its own right and Leigh locals would use the term 'driving to Wigan'. However those from areas closer to the town centre do not generally make a distinction.

4187:

Hi I was just reading the discussion regarding article merge in the Metropolitan Borough of Wigan article. I noticed your point questioning if people in Wigan make the distinction between town and borough. Im not sure if the decision regarding the article has been made, but I can confirm that no

3626:

I can't understand why Greater Manchester is given such prominence in every article. It hasn't served any administrative function for twenty years and only did so for twelve years. The abolition of the Metropolitan County Councils was a cynical act - but it is a separate issue. The point is - now, in

3619:

The (ancient) counties do exist. If they didn't then we wouldn't be having this exchange. They don't have to exist by virtue of an Act of Parliament but simply because they are used by the people who live in them every day. As was demonstrated this week by the Timperley/Altrincham debacle, the people

3548:

I think it's best, when refering to a "county" to explicitly name the type of county (within the limits of half-elegant prose). I think this will avoid confusion and reduce the likelihood of future tit-for-tat edit wars caused by new users (not me) objecting to the unqualified use of the word county,

3447:

Thank you for your contributions to the Wigan article and you raise an excellent point regarding the issue of suburbs. Despite the council's official description of the areas as 'towns' the do in fact act as suburbs of Wigan. Additionally they are seen as such by those who live in the area (as i do).

172:

Hi Morwen, you are right it was a clumsy edit. However the figure I used does have traceability, though I didn't provide the trail. Your figure also has merit but you don't cite your reference either (except on my talk page and I still can't find that data on the government statistics web site). I've

5107:...not to mention impacts and/or items taken from the real world legal system. I also say a speedy close. The person who nominated this should have talked about it first instad of doing this to get Coolcat in a whirl. This could have been hashed out on the article talk page instead of at an AfD. - 4983:

I wasn't concerned that the overviews gave away plot - I was careful that they didn't when I wrote most of them - it would be like what you'd read on the back of a video tape box or DVD case. Sometimes someone came by and changed them around so they started to give away plot - I tried to reword them

3640:

Oh, P.S. if at any time in the future someone turns up espousing the merits of using the traditional counties and they are accused of being me. Remember, it won't be me ok. It really really won't. Please remember I'm not the only one who has this weird counties thing goin' on. I actually think those

3108:

We have here the knub of the problem. A few people hold very strong opinions on counties. I could compare them to various kook groups, but I suspect that would inflame matters. I had, until 2003, no opinions on counties whatsoever, until such time as I saw people editing Knowledge to push their

2501:

actually do exist, therefore aggregating 2001 CP data for them is perfectly legitimate. The Scottish equivalent is Lieutenancy areas, not counties, which were abolished in 1975. Should we start compiling bogus tables for other defunct subdivisions of Scotland too? - there are lots of them. How about

818:

With regard to the template:Yorkshire , this was already included in many articles on towns which aren't actually linked from the box. I can't see how my additions are inconsistent with these other articles. Bearing this in mind, why should the template:Lancashire only be included in articles id the

5481:

Morwen, WNMHGB looks great - thanks for the clean up and verification of sources. I hope it makes featured article, but I'm not sure if it will since it doesn't seem "lengthy" enough by the featured article standards. I've seen some small articles make the cut in the past, so we'll have to see what

4214:

Hi im not sure who posted the above point, so didnt know who to reply too. (sorry if it wasnt you). As I tried to make clear in the above point, the places CLOSE to the town centre DO NOT make a distinction between town and borough. The places I mentioned above (Ince, Orrell, Pem, Platt Bridge etc,

4054:

Christ!... RELAX and allow me explain... I simply misunderstood where you were coming from. I didn't read up on everything you've participated in nor do I keep track of all your edits. I just see what you say or change on the pages that I have on my watchlist and respond accordingly. The way I read

3577:

Unfortunately for us we can't second-guess the intent of Parliament. Even if we read Hansard to see what was said in a debate we cannot possibly know the motives of MPs as they go through the lobbies. We can only go off the wording of the Acts, and as has been shown in recent years, the drafting of

3481:

Hi thanks for the post regarding my above references. I think the suggestion to add a paragraph detailing the urban geography of the area is an excellent idea. The wording allows for Orrell, Ince, Pemberton etc to be identifed in their unofficial status as incorporated areas of the town and rightly

3049:

settlement articles as possible to try and stem this kind of contribution, so I'm very much dismayed by this user's edits after the work I put in! However, I have took your advise on board, and will take a step back from this user (whilst I grit my teeth!). Thanks for the contact. Do keep me in the

2883:

Ah. I hadn't thought about the border problem caused by adding only part of Scotland. And I never for a moment thought it was nationalist: I mean, most of the (Traditional) Welsh and Scottish counties are much smaller than the English ones, so it'd get impossible to see if it was a full map anyway.

2873:

Hi! I don't want to look down on your work - it's very good, and must have been at the least a difficult setup to make all the county maps. However, it looks very strange to me to see England with Wales and Scotland cur off. Would it be possible to "sketch in" as it were, the outline of the rest of

2705:

TBH The whole article could do with a sort out! That is not to say that the content is bad, it is actually quite good, it is just the folks who have done work on it are interested in pre-roman-roman-mediaeval timeframes - thus that is all it actually really details. At some point I will hopefully

2349:

I say that it is part of your WP:POINT campaign to confuse readers into believing that the counties abolished in 1975 somehow still exist (which of course they do... in your fertile imagination), with the prominent mention in the intro of the 2001 census!?! It is indeed original research if you are

990:

In hindsight compromise appears to have been foolish. There needs to be a policy of zero-tolerance agreed at the highest level possible and then enforced. This should be on the following basis: 1) Knowledge used as a soapbox/for advocacy, 2) general disruption and 3) total lack of academic sources.

886:

As this re-structure isn't likely we can avoid inconsistency between the treatment of Lancashire and Yorkshire by creating a small "article series" sidebox for Lancashire (and other historic counties the area of which covers parts of ceremonial counties with differing names). These would be similar

882:

Another major inconsistency is that the articles on the ceremonial counties which happen to share their name with a historic county have both a ceremonial county infobox Template:England_counties and a traditional county infobox Template:England_historic_counties , whereas, because the infobox is a

843:

Some people might take exception to the use of the word "infect" to describe their edits. I am not pushing a point of view or writing about any "traditionalist" movement. I added information to the Lancashire template to make it comprehensive. You have changed the header of the title thereby trying

5358:

Hello Husnock. First off, I wish you success, luck and vitory in your professional life. I do think that there's an easy solution to this shebang, but I'm not an admin, so won't post on their noticeboard. There are two rproblems here, it seems to me. The main problem is the "death threat". This is

5226:

Hi Morwen - This is excellent stuff you're adding - do we need citations or is this all your own? (Forgive me for asking - I've just seen so much on wiki that is "borrowed" without citation that when I encounter good stuff I wonder.) Thanks for adding it - you've capsulized the series very well.

4045:

All I want is that stuff, from canon and non-canon stuff should be properly sourced. Most of it isn't at the moment. Particularly bad is where we claim information has been sourced from an episode, but it actually comes from Okuda. That's great to have that information, but it should be sourced to

3978:

I can see you're one of those die-hard "if it wasn't mentioned on screen then it doesn't belong here" kind of editor. I am to a point as well but I think certain things can have acceptions. Besides, if you think a few mentions of non-canon references in Trek articles are bad, then you should check

3630:

Well, I think I have made quite a lot of worthwhile contributions in between being exasperated and I hope some of these will stand for a while. There is a well organised clique of editors whose obsession with the defence of the status quo which they created has become an article of faith. I don't

3512:

Thanks. Yes, but for example, the Reading order says that the "boundary between the County of Berks and the County of Oxford shall be altered so that the Borough shall be wholly situate in the County of Berks and the County Borough of Reading shall for the purposes of the Act of 1888 ... be within

799:

Hello. thanks for your comments. The guidelines don't specifically say whether or not the ceremonial county should be stated first in any given article. In each article I have tried to include information on both the county and the post 1974 metropolitan county and the post 1997 ceremonial county.

444:

I'm not sure whether a method of dual categorisation would work, at either the article or category level - i.e. have my example article in both History of GM and History of Lancs. and People of GM and People of Lancs., or whether it would be better to have the article in People of GM, and let that

413:

I accept we are using ceremonial counties and the reasons for this. However most of the people in those cats were born in the ceremonial county of Lancashire (as the term is now understood). Interesting point about US states though, where they have no problem with towns and cities crossing state

163:

After come consideration from your comments and seeing the news article with 'Project Orion' as the title, I think I have come up with a compromise that will work for the time being. To direct people who have seen that or come here looking for that term, I have added an unofficial name section to

120:

Yes I am the person you thought but if you review the changes I made it was simply to decategorise myself as a Euro politician stub and I made no change to the body of the text. Being a regional politician in Jersey hardly merits being categorised as a Euro politician however feel free to undo the

4783:

I removed the copyvio notice on Starfleet Security as there is no evidence of the article being a copyvio of the one at Memory Alpha. The page looks completely different and I can find no sentences that are exactly the same, so elaboration on the talk page of what specifically is copyvio would be

4427:

Did I say anywhere that I didn't want people to edit my contributions? I told RadioKirk I simply disagreed with he was doing and that I wasn't going to help out which is my right. I don't get paid for my time on Knowledge so I'm not obligated to do anything. I came here to tell you about his idea

4205:

You are wrong. Wigan is a town and a place in it's own right. There are road signs telling you when and where you enter it's boundaries. Wigan has it's own council, which takes it's place amongst representative councils from all the other towns which make up the 'Borough'. People from other towns

1236:

No that was their high point and one-and-only. The only districts they got were (I think) Newport, Monmouth, Vale of Glam and Cardiff so it would be hard for them to take a whole county, with independents being so strong in most of Wales. I don't believe they ever won any of the pre 1974 counties

863:

I'm aware I have now reverted the article 3 times in one day. Which of the boxes are acting as promotional tools? This can be solved without removing them. As for the uglification of articles, aesthetic judgements are subjective and I don't think you should use it as a reason for deleteing useful

402:

My understanding is that we use the geography ie. ceremonial county of the time to describe historical events such as births and that people should be categorised accordingly. Clearly, anyone born before 1974 (the vast majority of people in these cats) cannot be a native of greater manchester or

4928:

but the circular edits are carrying on with fairly unpleasant arguments. A slight threat has been left on my talk page by one of the contributors. I'm not sure if this constitutes a personal attack but the whole range of articles are an absolute mess. Could you I ask you how best to proceed?

1633:

Many thanks for your reply regarding this. Having thought about your position, and read through my replies (I was actually under the impression that you did not want it included on grounds of homosexual-intollerance) I should've made it a little clearer that I am (as a member also of a number of

3592:

Thankyou for your thorough analyses and more generally for your considered, polite dialogue. OK, rationality's going out of the window here...this isn't in any way directed particularly at you but I can't waste more time on this counties nonsense. So a measured emotional response. I will end up

2128:

I'd still argue that saying the franchise serves northeast england is not correct as, like I say, places like Scunthorpe etc aren't in NE England, hence just saying North of England should be used. Maybe what is needed is a better explaination that not all of the company's services are actually

1838:

Some users had started to dogmatically, zealously and systematically revert all of my edits relating to counties etc. without any debate. I think this was on the basis that they had previously disagreed with one particular point, decided I must be taking an alternative philosophical position to

1819:

Thanks. I can't see any reason other than to avoid scrutiny - it certainly doesn't seem to fit any of the reasons his little boxes link to. I am also concerned that he confessed using some sockpuppets immediately after my checkuser request, but only ones we had identified, and not the several

1222:

Yes. The Conservatives gained cotrol of South Glamorgan at the 1977 elections, which was a bad year for Labour, who lost overall control of Gwent. The Tories also took Cleveland, Nottinghamshire and Staffordshire from Labour, the Isle of Wight from Independents and a bunch of councils from NOC.

463:

Really what we need is sufficiently advanced category mathematics and that will sort everything out. The edits in question here aren't talking about article texts or indeed categories directly on articles: I'm perfectly happy for articles to say "was born in 1931 in Rochdale, Lancashire". The

2189:

Please stop the CountyWatch allegations. It is very tiresome. In point of fact the 2001 census data are available in many different forms: Council areas, Parliamentary constituencies, CPs, &c. There are no direct stats for "ceremonial counties" in England either - The stats as presented on

1660:

I trust that it did not come across as a slur upon his character nor the group (which of course it is absolutely NOT!) - on the contrary, I believe his bold and courageous choice to be openly gay should be celebrated and tollerated, and it's inclusion is merely descriptive... like that in such

4457:

disambiguation page and I ran across your pages under "what links here". I see that you have redlinks and dab links in your list for the Ellingtons, you might like to check the dab page because I think I found most of the Ellingtons on Knowledge. I even found references to a North & South

4231:

that took place 16-17 November 2006. I would have liked to respond to the comments there at the time, but the page has already been archived, even though the question of editing the article is not over. So I am copying the following response to you, that I had wanted to put in. Best wishes,

2772:

What's REALLY funny is that it ISN'T a joke. Most people at Gaither are well aware of the swimming pool. This has gotten to the point where I don't care. Taking it off that page is robbing this encyclopedia of legitimate information. But if you're comfortable with that, be my guest. What an

4396:

in coming up with some sort of mutual format for them. I don't agree with the changes since he seeks to get rid of "Trivia" headers and replace them with more informative headers since the word "Trivia" seems to be forbidden here for some reason. He's eliminating "Quick Overveiws" as well.

3109:

POV in a manner totally inconsistent with Knowledge's encyclopedic utility. I have since done a lot of reading and established that a lot of what was said in 2003 was straightforward nonsense, if not lies. We are still mopping up the mess. I still have no strong view on what counties

867:

Before joining any quest: Are you saying the Lancashire template should only exist on articles describing the administrative districts shown as links within it? Which articles should include the Yorkshire template? Why do you think it is reasonable to include links to articles on defunct

232:

I think you probably have enough to keep you busy: from my experience of using archives the time is always used up alarmingly quickly, and I end up with pages and pages to digest. All those reports by the Local Government Commissions in the 1960s would make a few weeks reading, I'm sure.

4839:

for things in the past, generally real-life behind the stage info that it is a reliable source for. Drawing your own conclusions from things the a source says, then citing it, is still original research, regardless of whether the s source is the Encyclopedia or the episodes themselves.

3466:

I do concede that Standish is difficult to prove and therefore should be identified as a seperate village (not town). Skelmersdale should be identified as a seperate area as it is a town in West Lancashire clearly outside the Metropolitan Borough of Wigan and outside Greater Manchester.

252:

shows them as one parish. So I suspect that they are operating jointly for now but when this area gets built over in the next 5 years or so (much of it is already! compare the 1999 aerial survey with 2005), each element will be big enough to stand on its own and tehy will separate.

4286:

At that point, after someone threatened to block me, instead of practicing what they preached and engaging me in a serious dialogue on the issues and not as a distraction about what I was doing, I took the entire matter to Mediation Cabal where it has remained this past week. See

3139:

It seems that this communication of mine to yourself was traced rapidly and I apologise that this issue has been brought to yourself in such as way - my motivations were simply to keep contact and seek advise from one of our most diplomatic, well read and experienced wikipedians.

3909:

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

5171:

I am not going to leave right away. I would have left had there not been the star trek afds. I dislike leaving unfinished business. It saddens to see people get happy with my departure since all my wiki-existence I worked to better wikipedia regardless of the overwhelming odds.

3541:

If this is the case, it's clear that two sets of counties have been in existence since the paasage of the 1888 Act. (A secondary implication of the second reading is that this particular order actually alters the boundary of the ancient county aswell as the "other" county"

1684:

Just thought you might like to know that any page labeled as a WikiProject could be eligible for deletion if the project page has no listed members of the project. The one above has no listed members. You might want to add a members section and add your name to it. Thanks.

2987:. This user was the Puppetmaster of the multiple sockpuppets we found a month or so ago, whom we used check user on. However, this user it seems is now contributing again though not in good faith. It seems they are an emerging Naming conventions/historic county offender. 4206:

within the 'Borough' DO NOT regard themselves as being Wiganers. That is a myth. The Wigan Borough includes places as far east as Salford. The locals there are very bitter about being taken into Wigan Borough, as most have never been, nor are likely to ever go, to Wigan.

2179:, not one single mention, on the official results website: www.scrol.gov.uk). It is pure original research: he has clearly taken the parish level data and done his own sums to invent stats for his beloved, but alas deceased, counties. AFD? Admin warning for Owain? -- 2691:- this is all getting a bit much. The topic in hand is completely obscured by a lengthy, disruptive and increasingly abuse diatribe. I think something needs to be done to refocus this page to encyclopedia content and improvement. At the moment it reads like usenet. 4897:

I am citing the encyclopedia for the rank insignias. They are there, are they not? Have I mis-cited any? (I am seriously requesting you to verify, I do have my copy). As for the "text" there is room for work of course, but an AFD wasn't even necessary for that...

4292: 5514: 3989:

Probably more to do with Lucas Film more tightly weaving together the SW tapestry. Plenty of inconsistencies, but when the folks at the top at least lend credence to the novels and comics and whatnot, it brings it closer into the fold. Not so much with Trek.

2884:

Mind, it does have the minor detriment of making it less clear which counties border Wales (the border with Scotland is less ambiguous). I don't see any way to fix that, though, short of fading out the lines for scotland in the north, which could be ugly.

436:

in History of Greater Manchester is slightly jarring, as is the fact he is not present in any Native of Lancashire category, or even a subcategory thereof. I still find the loss of historical accuracy more concerning than the anachronism though, even if

4627:

Hi, I noticed you asked for information about the Council Ward for 'Higher End' (which is regarded as being part of Billinge). It comes under the 'Orrell' Ward, which is part of the Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council. See Government National Statistics.

4256:

If an article deals with same-sex marriage, then as long as the comment/s on a talk page (yet!) deals with that topic it is connected to it, even though it may be phrased in a way that may not always please everyone... because according to the Bible it

3979:

out all the Star Wars articles - 70% of the SW stuff on here is from outside the movies - all the games, toys, books, RPG's. But for some reason no one seems to have a problem with it. I guess it might be because SW had way more marketing or something.

2790:

matter if you are interested. It is basically about the term rugby super league being used as a disambiguation for all rugby competitions by that or a similar name. Currently it is used as a page for the American RU competition, the rugby super league.

567:

Anyway, I just wondered what the outcome of your discussion with BHA was as I can't find it in your talk archives. At present, there is no link to a source showing these people are humanists. So maybe a link in the references section to the BHA website

3113:

to be. If they go ahead and get the Mersey re-established as a border: fine, they can be my guest, I'm not going to shed a tear; I'm not going to go on a campaign on Knowledge denying this : rather I will be happy to participate in the latest update.

4288: 1959:

I'm going to have to think about this one. If I say the district is called Rutland County Council (which it is) someone is bound to change it (reasonably enough). what do the signs say when you drive into the place? Welcome to Rutland County Council?

3604:

article which unconditionally says it is in Cheshire - this is how I think of the place. Godley is in Cheshire. The fact that this article strikes a false note with you rather suggests that in the majority of articles I am applying the principle of

5057:

You talking about my spelling edit of Cerberus? Actually, I think the misspelling was originally my error. It was spelled Cerebrus for quite a while back in the history and my browser spell checker indicated it was wrong which is how I noticed it.

4261:

a shame on South Africa and any other place that makes same-sex marriage "legal" since the Bible condemns that kind of behavior. What if a law was passed "allowing" theft, or murder, or adultery? Would that make them "legal" too? This is not about

3198:

Hi Morwen, sorry to hit you with another request but doing good work always earns more :-) Could you take a look at the boundaries of the above constituency and help out. Its rather a contentious one so if you could take a look at the comments on

448:

As for the extent of England question - I have nothing against a Natives of Mercia category etc. for the cases temporally appropriate, even if it could end up being amusingly juxtaposed in dual categorisation next to Natives of Milton Keynes...

1834:

Hello, This is the reason... Keeping Heated Issues in one area: editors use different accounts in talk pages to avoid conflicts about a particular area of interest turning into conflicts based upon user identity and personal attacks elsewhere.

4485:: State where you got it, citations should state the original source (i.e. the LA Times) and the intermediate source (i.e. "as retrieved from LexisNexis on October 16, 2006"). Articles which relate to Rachel Marsden, may, when they violate 2119:

and make it into a seperate franchise and then to add services from the Northwest regional franchise which didn't actually cross the hills along with others. As the Wiki accepted form seems to be to use the Government Office definitions of

5340:, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on 4438:

Most of the stuff under "trivia" in those articles wasn't written by me. Those editors put them under various headers like "Trivia", "Notes", "Behind the scenes", "Misc", "Bloopers" etc... so I just used Trivia to keep it all consistent.

1982:

The name of the county was changed from North West Somerset to North Somerset with effect from 28th June 2005 by a resolution passed by North Somerset District Council under section 74 of the Local Government Act 1972 (c.70) on 28th June

1934:

What is with changing pop figures (always to inflate an area's population). This week I've found it at Chester, Glasgow (to make it bigger than Manchester) and Cardiff (where somebody keeps inventing a Greater Cardiff Metropolitan Area)?

822:

With regard to your last comment. I don't know whether Manchester, Liverpool and Barrow have been included on any maps of Lancashire since 1974. I suspect they have. Not sure what you mean about editing reality. Was just providing useful

832:

The Lancashire template was also already included on many articles on town and villages before I added it to more. These articles were not linked from the template. Should you be removing the Lancashire template from these articles too?

5433:

The only other things I'd say to tweak on the page is drop the succession boxes (they are redundant to the infobox succession thingy now) and the repeat date as it is a lot more harder to verify. Other then that it looks pretty good :)

4636:

Can't find out what happened to this force: they appear to have amlgamated with Cheshire, but not in 1967. I have come across a 1968 date from a site selling police badges, but other dates on the same page seem queationable. Any ideas?

1012:

Agreed, these people clearly have an agenda, and are determined to push it no matter what, they are not interested in compromise. I would suggest that interested wikipedians should co-operate to enforce the policy and take no nonsense.

3213:

No probs. Don't blame you wanting to stay out of it. Not sure the ward details on their own would do me any good as I'm not at all familiar with London Local Govt but pass me the info and I'll see what I can make of it. Thanks anyway.

4269:

At no point did I re-insert my comment 3 times into the talk pae within 24 hours, and to say that it violates the 3RR is false. I did it over a few days, so there could not have been any application of the 3RR in this case under any

1558:. I'm becoming increasingly exhausted and displeased with this kind of behaviour from a minority of users, and would certainly welcome any efforts which would move towards resolving this with more effect than the Naming conventions. 2958:

Thanks Morwen, much appreciated and a nice job. Was surprised to see that Formby remained after the 1974 reorganisation. Always thought it was removed. That will teach me for writing things based on what I'd last read 20 years ago.

2673:

17:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC) here. Are you still doing maps? If so, could you get in touch with me as there are significant revisions I would like to make you aware of for the map in the above article. Please please please! Cheers,

4493:

rather than the liberal interpretation they have applied. For violation of his previously imposed article ban, as well as edit warring, block evasion, and sockpuppety, Arthur Ellis is banned from editing Knowledge for one month.

2947:

Hi Morwen, love the job you did on the Newton constituency boundaries. Is there any chance you could do the same for the Ormskirk constituency sometime as I've just got a rather general description in there at the moment. Thanks

1769:

Really, though, there's no need to stoop to name-calling and other breaches of civility. The best way of showing someone for what they are is to be scrupulously polite at them. I realise this is difficult, but its the only way.

2633:

Info not ment to be promotional. Alot of the stuff i'm using is taken straight from the WYMAS article, know some people who wrk with them & hav gathered that it was more a take-over than a merger so was working from there.

1643:

You rightly point out that it is a rather interesting political union, given the right-wing affliations of the pressure group which is coupled with Russell's position as a notable pioneer and advocate of gay-specific astrology

2650:. I've not included any mention that it was more of a take-ove in the article as it's unsourced, however assuming that it was true in the whymas article it would seem logical it is still being used by the expanded service . 950:

I would say there is now a systematic disruption to Knowledge. A particular point of view is given undue weight. Furthermore, that point of view has no basis in fact. More significantly, for the purposes of an encyclopedia,

3952:

I didn't know you were an admin. I did not recognize the name. There are over 1000 admins and I can't remember them all. I had no intentions of "patronising" you. However, I did think you were a less experianced user.

3027:

I am monitoring the situation. From a brief glance, I don't think Bailrigg's edits are as unproductive as they had been originally (although his silence regarding earlier actions is regrettable), so give him a breather?

2930:

Been having doubts about that move ever since I did it tbh Morwen :) When I DO get around to writing the geography article I will do as recomended as it just looked wrong and out of place when I did the full title. Cheers

3526:

It could mean that all of the boundary changes mentioned in the sentence are limited to the Act of 1888, the implication being that the counties are still in existence for purposes other than this order and the 1888 Act

2915:

Hmmm. I would have thought one way of finding out about wards in the past would be to unearth a local paper for the area and time period with the election results. I should be able to do something about Wigan's arms...

4228: 346:

I noticed there are several maps you uploaded in 2004 that have since been replaced in the respective articles and are now orphaned. I just wanted to let you know that - if you don't mind - I'll put these up at ifd.

4266:, this is about understanding why the majority of religious leaders and people are opposed to such things, and that can, must and will be part of articles like this. What can I do, I didn't write the Bible! Honest! 1601:

I believe it's inclusion adds to the article; it elaborates on the nature and significant lifestyle and interests of the head of this group. It is also included on his main article, and is inline with that of say

853:

I note your removals of the Tempalte Yorkshire are mainly confined to those towns and villages which lie outside the current administrative divisions. Is this really about whether the infobox links to an article?

431:

Hi, I was just about to leave a note on pretty much the same lines as the above (I've seen your response on Lancsalot's talk page too). It appreciate it is quite a difficult situation. The anachronism of having

3452:(which also describes Ince as a suburb.) The article also mentions 'southern suburbs' which include Pemberton 5.www.statistics.gov.uk/pbc/review_areas/Greater_Manchester_Boroughs/downloads/TR_Manchester_Day9.doc 776:) regarding the "agreed/proposed" movement/title change of the article. It seems that most of the camp who take an interest in this field of work (from both sides) have agreed that the article should be moved to 744:, not the name change order, which could only be done by a special meeting of the council with a two thirds majority. Orders were made for electoral arrangements in the other unitaries at the same time. Silly me. 5006:

here. Not sure if one exists yet - I think someone once tried it but for some reason it never happened. A portal could help get a community of trek fans together to discuss things like page standards and stuff.

1455:

Yeah - it's not. The question then is: is there a puppetmaster or not? I gather if there is they are being careful about it, but the pattern of edits doesn't really match anyone else's MO. Nine sockpuppets!

3881: 3001:

I've left some stern words (again) at their talk page, as I do not believe they are editting in good faith. I wanted to contact a few of the editing community for support and advise, as I often lose my cool!

4879:

for things it does not actually say. You would do well to acknowledge and address the point actually raised, rather than misreading what is being said and addressing that, people might think you are using

819:

template links to them when the Yorkshire template is included in articles which it does not link to? In the absence of clarity, for now, I will only replace the template in the articles that it links to.

2190:

Knowledge are "sums" of unitary authority areas and non-metropolitan counties. I don't see what the problem here is, other than your attempt to eradicate all mentions of counties from Scottish articles.

4003:

Well when some information comes from sources written by people who worked on the show and endorsed by Paramount I consider them semi-canon at least and should be allowed in articles. Like Mike Okuda's

2069:

Good grief. Even the scouts have their own county system. At least they are not pushing for articles about towns to start: Wimbledon is a town in London, and within the bounds of the scouting county of

4016:. Even if specific info contradicts what is seen in the show, I can fill en entire website with how many instances the show has contradicted itself. If one thing Trek has a problem with is continuity. 2721:

I would probably tend to more tightly define the historical period. The wording isn't really an ancient thing, 1700-1900 is a fairly tight band of time, "previously" or "historically" may fit better.

1149:

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what considerations he has given to reinstituting the 13 geographical counties as the standard geographical framework for Wales; and if he will make a statement.

4681:

He was tagged "suspected" and as such I assumed it was simply his ascertion. If its confirmed then goes without saying - I didnt have that info and assumed no one else did, or, hed be blocked already

3931:

If you know what it is, then why don't you use it? I need summaries to help me decide whether or not you vandalized the page. Vandals rarely leave any summary (except possibly the section header).

3203:

regarding St George's Hanover Square, first as I don't really want to drop you into the middle of someone elses fight. If you want to stay clear and not get involved, then I fully understand. Thanks

1805:

I have repeated your request for Bailrigg to justify his need for sockpuppets. As it is he is still editing with both accounts which makes scrutiny of his edits very difficult, and is forbidden in

815:

I have altered the template to include the metropolitan borough of Stockport (partly Lancashire) and made clear the metropolitan borough of Manchester is only partly in Lancashire as you suggest.

193:

a while back on this article. He is doing cut-and-paste moves again, and vows to continue. Would appreciate your input (and a double-check that I restored everything back properly). Thanks. --

5071: 4820:

Hi, this is a sanity check thing. Either the majority is wrong or I am right... I asked the same question to several people... Would it be OR research to cite Star Trek Encyclopedia as source? --

929: 4144:", don't even consider unblocking until you've at least talked to Brad. Or, you could just save time and not ask Brad for the user to be unblocked, because clearly it ain't going to happen. -- 5353: 156:

dab page to things that actually have project in it. I don't think too many people are going to be confused because I havn't found any news / NASA articles that list the name 'Project Orion'

2299: 1902: 934: 4554: 3316:

I dont doubt for a second that its not true I just dont think it belongs on that page, as apart from using the same model its unrelated. Maybe if you could get a verifiable cite a mention

4276:

The list of "abominations" in the Bible is long, and homosexuality is most definitely one of the abominations, so we can't argue it away with other comparisons that are not to the point.

3493:

Hi just changed the article a moment ago. I used the paragraph from your post if that was ok?. I just added the area of Abram as I believe it forms part of the Wigan Urban Area also. --

2470:. They are a type of county in the same way as postal counties are a type of county. The adjective just refines what we're referring to — by your logic a "red car" wouldn't be a car! 2052:

A broad style question, then, is how to entitle articles which comprise a historicyl series about a country. Perhaps there's a style guide in existence, which I may have overlooked.

1662: 905: 3673:'preciate you leaping in with your copy of the Encyclopedia and providing a useful secondary source to fill in blanks and add some backbone to many of these Trek-related articles. -- 631:? Seems a bit silly having a council operate under a name for one day. Maybe there was some legal reason: the council had to be out of the shadows before a name change could happen? 4663:

a trade dispute is going on in Stockport, with the head of the Stockport Trades Council meeting the Chief Constable of Cheshire. Not that journalists are always right, of course...

3620:

react with incredulity when attempts are made to deny a fact they take for granted every day. Remember, these are people that actually live in the places described by the articles.

4854: 5072: 4056: 486: 4069:

and I really have nothing to apologize for. And I never said you were a fascist — but if thats what you want me to believe then you're doing a damn good job of making me wonder.

5517:(not to mention various websites) about the episode. Apparently Data's quote was the original working title for the episode, before it was changed to the title we know it by. -- 3136:

With regards to the contact you've received above, given the histories and comparison, I very much maintain my suspicisions. I've left reasons for this as Bailriggs talk page.

2550:

Still trying to track down a citation for the 1996 change to postcode defined circulation. However, here is one for removal of all county data from the PAF in 2000: Royal Mail,

524:

any chance you can make the exploded box to the left a little bit more and make the box smaller? its just that it kind of hard to see nottingham on the main image of england.--

3191: 3042:

Thanks for the swift reply! I've left what I feel is another firm but fair comment at their talk page again - hopefully this can explain things cooly and clearly to this user.

4458:

Ellington in the article on Maidenhead- facinating name for a town, by the way. Anyways, I figured you might like the spot of help so I dropped this note. Have a great day! --

1820:

others that that were turned up by checkuser. I was still clinging to the vague hope that this could be solved without blocks but alas it is looking increasingly unlikely.

5400:

You will be happy to know that I have departed this site, never to return. BTW, I asked around and that was a legitimate message from a real Lieutenant Colonel who works in

498: 864:

information. I think that articles will organically grow into a more pleasing form, the older they are and the more edits are made, without actually have to delete items.

4557:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. — 1532:. Are these permissable? - from the rather focussed and comparible contribution histories, I suspect that this is a sock puppet of one of our mutual Lancastrian friends. 4467: 305: 3367:

The encylopeadia seems to be a good source of info so I would say yes, from Mr. Melton's message I think he believes it is good as well, so just stick it in a ref tag:

2568:

Bugg*r. I was doing a major edit and saw you were making changes so I thought I would insert only some sections to avoid an edit conflict. They should all be back now.

1306:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 4550: 2619:? I started editing but it is very much back to front and a little too England focussed. I'm not sure how much info it needs and it could do with another set of eyes. 1102: 1098: 2600:

I'll keep an eye out for it. Unfortunately, I don't have much time to spend on Knowledge right now, so my contributions count has dwindled rather a lot recently! --

249: 5444: 4608: 4584: 3833: 3775: 3378: 3326: 3286: 3249: 1083: 968:

I agree, this is getting totally out of hand, the 'pedia seems to be getting hijacked by a group of traditional counties fanatics. Anyone any idea about what to do?

164:

the dab with 'Project Orion' in it. If the name doesn't catch on (hopefully it won't carch on) then when it is no longer used much I think we can safely remove it.

4767:

and extracted a quote. I prefer internal links to external links, in regular article text. External links are for sources; we are not a blog but an encyclopedia. --

4110: 2902: 377: 5091: 1550:(you may wish to take a look) about some recent and subtle edits to ancient Lancashire related articles, including a rather useless addition at the bottom of the 104:

I'm in the middle of a big project listing all the Jersey politicians and a breif spiel, only doing so in my lunch hour so may take a while, thanks for the tips.

3200: 4804:

is a cousin of mine. Hope the colonies haven't given you a headache about the copyvo thing. We're just getting you back for burning the White House in 1812. -

1484: 182: 5363: 4544: 3192: 2362:. Counties no longer being used for local government does not mean they do not exist. That is a very simplistic and naĩve view of the world if I may say so. 1299: 918: 381: 363: 348: 4201:. The issue of borough/town identity is not a significant debate in the area as the (majority) of the borough areas are not perceived as seperate entities. 5441: 5177: 5148: 5087: 4903: 4866: 4825: 4605: 4581: 3829: 3771: 3374: 3322: 3282: 3245: 2420: 2285: 2231: 362:

Sure, I'll check them all seperately. Just wanted to let you know before so I don't have to post thousands of image deletion warnings on your talk page. --

2350:

using the article to try to (mis-)represent that "counties" (sic) have anything whatsoever to do with the 2001 Census, or indeed anything, after 1975. --

1040: 790:

page (which clearly seems to already exist) needs to be deleted/cleared before we can make a move. Any chance of some aid in this? Hope so. Many thanks.

157: 3207: 914:, if you're interested. There are afew things that came to pass much later: Hereford & Worcester, Bournemouth in Dorset, proto-Merseyside (SWLNWC!) 4707: 4682: 4489:, be reduced to a stub by any user or deleted, together with their talk pages, by any administrator. Bearcat and Bucketsofg are expected to conform to 4171: 3612:

If we leave the tautology of the various Acts aside and ignore abstract thoughts of the layering of different systems of counties, if we eliminate the

3133:

Metropolitan=Ceremonial. Agreed. Though i think this goes against the conventions, albiet subtly (met counties are to be treated as counties)!........

2731: 1445:

Don't think it's Lancsalot personally, hope I'm right. The sockpuppeteering needs knocking on the head asap though - keep up the good detective work!

1428: 1374: 4246:

Hi folks I just noticed your comments here and I wanted to respond in my own "defense" to set the record "straight" (good pun, no? ;-}) So here goes:

1303: 4501: 4468: 3991: 3674: 3482:

as significant residential areas serving the town centre without the issue of directly labeling them as "suburbs". Great suggestion, thanks again. --

3359: 1134: 1094: 1084: 683:

Could the explanatory note simply be in error? I asked a friend of mine who works for Gwynedd Council and he remembers the name change happening on

5296: 3634:

I feel I am being driven away by intolerance and dogmatism and having observed this dispute for only a few months I know that I'm not the only one.

3168:

However, as my title suggests, I am not surprised, and I am sure, neither are you. I've apologised to Bailrigg in full. Disgraceful in the extreme.

4295:, where you can read the series of events and when they took place. Please feel free to add your comments there as well, I'd love to hear from you. 2759: 2692: 2620: 2583: 2569: 2541: 2075: 1906: 1547: 1340: 1328: 1293: 1271: 1253: 1190: 1126: 1122: 1112: 1075: 992: 956: 941: 4969:

I put the overview lines in the episode articles that I've personally worked on. They were taken directly from the episode lists (i.e. pages like

4298:

Finally, when the dust settles I will go back to work on the article and provide many more quotes and references, so that the article can reflect

5174: 5145: 5104: 5084: 4970: 4900: 4863: 4822: 3846: 3788: 3532:

boundary between the County of Berks and the County of Oxford shall be altered so that the Borough shall be wholly situate in the County of Berks

3391: 3339: 3299: 3262: 283: 270: 3414:

If there's any British town stubs, I'd be willing to update them with some info on what the place-names mean. Let me know, and I'll help out! --

5290: 4939:

I don't disagree with your suggestion, but could we ban only non registered users? The whole set of articles need sorting out desperately...

3946: 2748: 887:

to the Yorkshire template but could perhaps be very much smaller and would clearly show they relate to the historic county to avoid confusion.§

389: 371: 183: 4564: 786:, I've tried to move the page there, but have faced technical difficulties which only an admin can address. I'm under the impression that the 318: 204: 4703: 4616: 3403: 3351: 3311: 2940: 2758:

For some time there was a campaign against wikilinking lone years. Do you know if this has ended? I am crap at keeping up with these things.

1929: 1677: 1475:

Hi, as an experienced user who is highly specialised in the whole county-status field, I wanted to liase with you about the contributions of

1689: 1159: 4919: 4371: 2994:

and the multiple breaches of the naming conventions, I feel that this user is not prepared to edit towards the establised consenus/policy.

2315: 1252:

I apologise, I knocked out your edits with my copyedit. It was my intention to reinsert your changes but you seem to have beaten me to it.

1211: 3504:

Hi sorry about getting rid of the stuff on the Wigan discussion page, wasnt aware of the rule about leaving it on. Will do in the future.

3362: 2991: 2737: 3434: 2952: 1313: 560:

After a quick guess as to what BHA stands for, I thought this seemed slightly inappropriate, especially given the wording. However, from

4989:

Plus I didn't know you wrote "Tasha is killed off in the episode". I deleted it because it didn't seem to fit well with the other text.

1939: 1845:

If I am not blocked any future edits relating to counties, or coming close to the counties subject will be made under Bailrigg account.

5506: 4310:-dominated government, parliament, and courts. There are always at least two sides to every story, right? That is the essence of NPOV. 3218: 2963: 2736:

I think all of the LAs (education) in England should have Knowledge articles. I wikilinked to one that does not have an article yet at

4933: 4020: 3994: 2977:

Great edits and approach to the Wigan troubles - I hadn't noticed this until it was too late! Though it seems this has been diffused.

1431: 1406: 1377: 5138: 5046: 5011: 4993: 4667: 4432: 4411: 4355: 4129: 4084: 2309: 2000: 1989: 1973: 1964: 1343: 1241: 1165:

Yep. I am particularly amused by the dryness of the answer above it. "I have recieved three representations, all from the same guy"

959: 445:

category be a subcat of People of Lancs. (which, although not true for some articles, is correct for the majority given their dates).

422: 237: 5032:

as per the Star Trek WikiProject naming convention? Someone redirected it a while back - that user has been banned for some reason.

3677: 3128: 2514:, etc, etc? We could pretend that these entities still exist... and fool Knowledge's readers into thinking that they actually do. -- 1760: 1634:"minority groups") actually an advocate of equality, and celebrator of diversity with particular regards to ethnicity and sexuality. 1360: 1061: 1043: 260: 5152: 4956: 4943: 3968: 3925: 3668: 3623:

So, there is my simplest solution. The counties exist and they should be acknowledged becaue they are used by a great many people.

3455:

Reference for Ince include: 1.www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=41387 (refer to opening paragraph of main body of text.)

3233: 3224: 3068: 2852: 2798: 2654: 2604: 2373: 2354: 1872: 1669: 1624: 1575: 226: 209: 5111: 2092: 2055:

I tend to rely on others for style tips, and if someone points out an error I'm always happy to fix it. Just show me where! :-) --

1923: 1266:

You are indeed correct. My edit summary could/should have continued "where one is more notable than the other", which would spare

1173: 748: 699: 670: 649: 528: 509: 5181: 5165: 4907: 4892: 4870: 4848: 4699: 4490: 4486: 3707: 3572:"for the purpose of the Act" bit is positioned in the middle of a clause such that it cannot be referring to the entire paragraph 3449: 3122: 3036: 2782: 2725: 2481: 2441: 2333: 2270: 2254: 2245: 2218: 2201: 2152: 2035: 1828: 1795: 1778: 1756:, in addition to his well known disruption. Many thanks for your help and time, I trust that clears my position on a few things. 1496: 1464: 1022: 995: 977: 804: 794: 760: 4481:

normally to be avoided, articles should not link to copies of press reports archived on any site in violation of copyright. Per

4080:

And... It's cute you quoting me on your talk page. Feel free to add my name next to it if you wish so I'm not just a "someone".

3574:

then the order is refering to two distinct sets of counties. Those for the purpose of the Act and those for all other purposes.

1561:

If you could reply with your advise about such things, and how best to tackle this, I would be most appreciative. Kind regards,

4715: 4342: 4065:. But if you're not - cool, it was my mistake for misreading you. If you are then my original statement stands. In either case 1565: 501:. I appreciate noone is suggesting this, but you know, that's what "let's not even be slightly anachronistic" would lead to. 4174: 4099: 3165:

I knew it was fishy! I even wrote as a reminder to myself to keep an eye on the account before the main bulk of inflamation!

2863: 2678: 2107:

article. As I put in me edit summary really the name of Transpennine has always been a bit of an error and has been since the

5193: 4835:

It is impossible to answer such a generalised question as it depends what exactly the claim being made is. I have cited the

4528: 4283:

written in "religious" terms, but that addition to the article was deleted because an editor there said it was "all made up".

3688: 3160: 2941: 2558: 2141: 2071: 1678: 1470: 635: 4829: 4598:

I'll add the footnotes in :-) (He still hasn't replied to my email asing for a freely licensed photo of him self, hehe :)!)

2021: 1571:--I see Mrsterviec has also become aware of this as outlined in his message above! Apologies for the duplicatation of info! 588: 564:, it seems "Distinguished Supporter" is a particular class of humanist. Perhaps there should be an article explaining this? 5200: 4641: 4334: 4320: 4314: 4222: 3963: 3941: 3920: 3682: 2995: 2303: 533: 110: 5491:

Thanks for the compliments. Will be busy for the next couple days, but will review the page as requested. Best to you.

5042:

Thanks - BTW I joined the Star Trek WikiProject. I forgot about that, should have joined earlier but never got around it.

4443: 4421: 4401: 4250: 4236: 2695: 1288: 5447: 5036: 4611: 4587: 4512:

Great, shame they're not there (and citable), anymore. I'll keep plugging away at it, and cross check against the list.

4328: 3863: 3839: 3781: 3721: 3700: 3696: 3384: 3332: 3292: 3255: 3155: 1842:

Also, in my defence, I have not used any of the accounts to duplicate votes or to back up opinions voiced in discussion.

1284:

I'm not really sure but am changing links to wgat i have affected. I have moved the cambornes to their county locations.

519: 407: 243: 4482: 3418: 2623: 1140: 336: 4813: 4771: 2777: 2662: 2424: 2319: 2098: 1741: 1711: 1594:. I suppose if there are objections to the inclusion of this, I would ask why is the inclusion of his occupation as an 593: 160: 5128: 3061: 2059: 1373:

this is getting increasingly absurd. i suggest we take these three and two others to checkuser. (morwen, logged out)

662:, then it was not the council who changed the name at alll (as we have in the articles) as they weren't elected until 5216: 5025: 4790: 4157: 4090: 3229:

You don't have to delete the entire page if you think some of it is a copyright vio - It should be reworded instead.

2012: 4977: 3983: 3054: 3021: 3009: 1745: 1718: 1331: 1197: 872: 858: 848: 837: 827: 5059: 4631: 4539: 4516: 4152: 4119: 3663: 3172: 2935: 2853: 2845: 2594: 1490: 1449: 900: 891: 356: 296:

I felt that the cerem Bucks stuff is less important, but if you find the brackets offensive I'll take them off. --

138: 127: 5133: 5066: 3631:

think most of them can see the wood for the trees. I think its time to step back and look at what really matters.

2905: 2820: 2434:

Sorry that all this is taking place on your Talk page Morwen: I really did just want your advice - and I still do!

1078: 5470: 5280: 4387: 3853: 3795: 3606: 3398: 3346: 3306: 3269: 2891: 2878: 2809: 2683: 1129: 766: 300: 3858: 3045:

I've tried hard over the last week or so to introduce the infobox, section titles and county context to as many

2920: 2544: 2518: 2292: 2183: 1953: 1858: 1598:

deemed as permissable over the censorship of his sexuality? - which is a debate I would not even want to touch!

944: 5019: 4758: 3800: 2762: 2498: 2078: 1839:

theirs and that I must be 'opposed'. A lot of the edits I made were in the hope that a consensus would emerge.

1725: 1707: 397: 323: 291: 4592: 3274: 3186: 2538:

County: The county does not form part of any address and changes to it are therefore not covered by this code.

1849: 1813: 5452: 5420: 5187: 5119: 4307: 4229:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive147#User:IZAK criticizing same-sex marriage on talk page

4135: 4061: 3692: 3536:

and the County Borough of Reading shall for the purposes of the Act of 1888 ... be within the County of Berks

2825: 2715: 2610: 2026: 1891: 215: 5394: 5062:" has is spelled Cerberus, (one "e") and I double checked the draft of the script at twiztv.com to be sure. 4808: 4689: 4462: 4073: 3560: 3096: 3087: 1740:

The message I made to Wancsalot is an admittedly angry list of references I made to stop such edits such as

1645: 5325:

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge's

4711: 3869: 3738: 2587: 2572: 1749: 1279: 1274: 787: 777: 598:

I went to look these up, and interestingly enough (in a relative way) the orders for changing the names of

561: 5495: 5482:

happens. Anyway, it's a good starting template at least for cleaning up the rest of the episode articles.

4382: 3582: 3074: 1909: 1526: 177: 5486: 5476: 5029: 4478: 4293:

Knowledge talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-17 Religious opposition to same-sex marriage in South Africa

3409: 2211: 1610: 1230: 810: 728:

of the Local Government Act 1972. This order was made on the 19th December 1994 by the Secretary of State

276: 99: 80: 5521: 4417:

I'm so saddened that my contributions don't live up to your standards. I guess I'll go hang myself now.

1514: 5124:

I'll give you a Wiki cookie if you put my barnstars in to the neat kind of box you have on your page. -

4814: 4776: 3644:

I Love The City of Manchester in the rain. It's very agreeable - the Lancastrian spirit incarnate. xxx

2969: 2663: 2173:, not the "counties" (sic) which were abolished in 1975 (in fact the words "county" or "counties" does 2104: 1985:

There are numerous references to the "County of North West Somerset" prior to that. Which is confusing.

1256: 877: 5103:. The potential there is enourmous. General Order 7 Death Penalty, Judge Aaron Satie, 7th Gaurutee, 1427:

this is really quite blatant - someone was evidently creating 'sleeper' accounts on September 18th.

1395: 726:

The name of the County has been changed from Cardiganshire to Ceredigion in accordance with section 74

4964: 4303: 3973: 3587: 2638: 2577: 2428: 1809:. If there is no satisfactory justification, I would support having the socks blocked. Best wishes, 1753: 1337: 1318: 1267: 955:

have come to light which support that view. This is unnaceptable to the core values of this project?

547: 143: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 5258: 5249: 5240: 5231: 4289:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-17 Religious opposition to same-sex marriage in South Africa

2298:

I'll give him credit for one thing, when this guy makes a point he does not do it by half measures:

1324: 5236:

Whoa! maybe I should have read your talk page before writing the above ... I apologize for asking!

5205: 4506: 4104: 4059:

I thought you were against adding homeworlds of aliens mentioned in the behind the scenes book for

3959: 3937: 3916: 3899: 2803: 2507: 2108: 1520: 1353: 1203:

I just noticed that you have an article up at FAC, and was hoping you would take time to finish up

911: 385: 367: 352: 4731: 2556:

Royal Mail removed the Former Postal County field from the PAF Raw Data products in December 2000.

1868:. As you may guess, I didn't think this was a suitable justification for the multiple accounts. 1699:

When the results from checkuser come back I expect a full apology for these baseless accusations.

1399: 5368: 5052: 4167: 3755: 2925: 2688: 2039: 1502: 1226:

Labour took back South Glamorgan at the next elections in 1981 and kept control until abolition.

1069: 618: 615: 2133:

Pennine but that that is the name that has been given/it uses and then add a link to the actual

328:

Hi, thanks for pointing out the duplication of pages, please can you look at the talk pages for

4522: 4035: 3880: 1508: 1193:. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. 1179: 1117: 329: 311: 4407:

Yeah, "Poor and Unprofessional", just what I was thinking. Thanks for insulting me yet again.

3450:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/vote2001/results_constituencies/constituencies/630.stm

3099:

Worth remembering that more than one person holds the opposite view to yours on the counties.

1721:. Note the comments about Grant which leave no doubt as to his real opinions on the subject. 1097:. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 5341: 4535: 3887: 2910: 2774: 2767: 2523: 2395: 2234:. Adding together figures to present them in a more useful fashion is not original research. 2146: 1944: 923: 115: 4279:

I subsequently expanded the implications of what I had written on the talk page, but it was

3903: 2160: 5408: 5245:

Oh good grief - now I've looked at your user contributions. I think I'll go shoot myself.

4676: 4361: 4349: 2753: 2700: 2064: 1694: 433: 315: 297: 280: 267: 257: 219: 5510: 2812:. Erlewine has e-mailed me, and I would like more editors to add their opinion. Thanks! -- 1995: 8: 5466: 5287: 5277: 4795: 3954: 3932: 3911: 2901:

Please do not delete my talk from my talk page, even if you put them back later. Thanks.

2868: 1878: 341: 107: 87: 83: 72: 68: 65: 4857:

the claim is that Star Trek Encyclopedia is a "self-publication" and hence not meeting "

4622: 3460: 2017:

The report is discussed in The Times of March 22, 1923 (page 9): it has a handy map too.

5273: 4777: 4448: 3507: 3046: 3015: 2817: 2590:

and related articles recently! Nice to see some sanity being restored to them...... --

2125: 2121: 1883:

I do apologies for the barrage of messages of late. I thought you may be interested in

1865: 1714:. A study of contributions from this IP clearly prove that they are one and the same. 1686: 525: 61: 5416: 5263: 5197: 4561: 4367: 4028: 3891: 3873: 3810: 3177: 3148: 3083:

is very comparable to another user. I'm inclined to have a check user run. Thoughts?

2888: 2875: 2112: 1854:

With regard to the other accounts. I don't think these have been used for some time.

1731:

Perhaps my true feelings on equality can be demonstrated through my contributions to

1310: 1285: 1208: 1194: 1152:

None. I am not aware that there is such a thing as a standard geographical framework.

167: 135: 124: 3815:

Please accept my apologies if anything I said last night caused offence towards you

414:

lines. Can you imagine them replacing their existing geography with something like

5337: 5213: 5206: 5162: 5100: 5003: 4889: 4845: 4574:

Hi. Where/what is your source for the Crusade eps. so I can add it to the article?

4531: 4096: 3760: 3743: 3726: 3712: 3704: 3656: 3601: 3597:

than this counties thing might seem to the uninformed to suggest. And I'm not one.

3565: 3431: 3415: 3183: 3119: 3033: 2745: 2563: 2089: 1949:

Er fine, I'll change it, i'm just trying to get around the "titular county" thing.

1920: 1825: 1775: 1461: 1261: 1170: 696: 646: 584: 506: 200: 190: 94: 17: 5329:. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the 5492: 5330: 5326: 5314: 4569: 4166:

and I would appreciate it if you took some time to read it. The relevant page is

3238: 3215: 3204: 3182:

Sorry about my mixup on that page, mistook the main article for the talk page. --

2960: 2949: 2932: 2896: 2795: 2675: 2670: 2511: 2476: 2368: 2328: 2265: 2240: 2196: 2156: 2116: 1896: 1581: 1019: 974: 5082:

article. Mind closing the afd as a merge so that I can remove the afd notice? --

4474:

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

4182: 2288:- is part of the same WP:POINT campaign. Joint AFD as pure original research? -- 2259:

Your grasp of the English language is very tenuous. Where have I admitted that?

2164: 1979: 1586:

Apologies, the edit summary was rather poorly worded! Russell is indeed gay and

5500: 5483: 5462: 5428: 5268:

Hi Morwen! I was just wondering if these two articles could/should be merged?

5221: 5063: 5043: 5033: 5008: 4990: 4974: 4785: 4744:. They are the full production numbers as per the Desilu/Paramount TV studios; 4664: 4655:

an air crash occurs near the headquarters of "Stockport Borough Police" but on

4638: 4513: 4440: 4429: 4418: 4408: 4398: 4393: 4379: 4352: 4339: 4263: 4126: 4116: 4081: 4070: 4017: 3980: 3748: 3731: 3613: 3230: 2917: 2839: 2741: 2515: 2438: 2351: 2306: 2289: 2251: 2215: 2180: 2138: 2018: 1997: 1986: 1970: 1961: 1950: 1936: 1806: 1722: 1238: 1237:

either. Glamorgan county council was fairly solidly Labour from the early 30s.

1227: 1217: 1204: 1186: 1180: 1156: 1039:

They have been up to it for about 24 months now. Do not say I didn't warn you--

952: 915: 844:

to narrow the definition of what should be included. Who is POV pushing here??§

745: 667: 632: 419: 404: 234: 223: 5212:

Please have a look: this may interest you! (the last entry which I posted!) --

2788: 2616: 2540:

I could probably dig out something more specific if you need it, let me know.

5518: 5389: 5383: 4953: 4940: 4930: 4801: 4764: 4498: 4459: 3766: 3660: 3652: 3648: 3579: 3578:

constitutional reform on the back of an envelope can have unexpected results.

3557: 3430:

aren't always "ash-tree village" but "Aslakr's village" for one of them... --

3169: 3152: 3093: 3084: 3065: 3051: 3018: 3006: 2984: 2813: 2651: 2635: 2601: 2591: 2169: 2049:. Apparently the country was renamed half a dozen times in the 20th century. 1888: 1869: 1855: 1846: 1810: 1792: 1757: 1703: 1666: 1649: 1621: 1607: 1603: 1572: 1562: 1446: 1403: 1357: 1109: 1074:

It seems to stop the rest of the article displaying. I can't seem to fix it.

1058: 801: 791: 773: 550:) has added a sentence to various articles to say that people are humanists: 543: 450: 333: 153: 4162:

I have posted a response to the comments you made regarding the deletion of

3895: 5412: 5360: 5318: 5125: 5108: 4858: 4805: 4768: 4752: 4558: 4114: 2808:

Hi. Due to your prior involvement with the article, I'd like your input at

2722: 2712: 2056: 1884: 1732: 1617: 1307: 1247: 897: 888: 869: 855: 845: 834: 824: 438: 174: 5254:

hahahaha - ok, I'll put off the shooting. Never was one for guns anyway.

4875:

I do not see any such claim there. I see a claim that you are citing the

2151:

This article is totally misleading, and is designed to be, in my opinion:

2046: 5158: 4885: 4841: 3594: 3243:

Can you cite it used the model? If so make a note of it on its own page?

3115: 3080: 3029: 2628: 2085: 1916: 1821: 1771: 1591: 1457: 1394:

Agreed. I believe, from the comparable edit content and dates, that both

1166: 692: 642: 607: 574: 502: 477:

What I especially don't want to see is a situation where someone born on

195: 4227:

Hi Morwen: I just noticed that you and a few admins had a discussion at

3476: 4656: 3530:

The second way to read it is to believe the first part of the sentence

2471: 2363: 2323: 2260: 2235: 2191: 1616:

Additionally, it seems our observations have been noticed:- please see

1595: 1014: 969: 599: 5192:

The main article got moved by you. However, the talk page is still at

4800:"The English, the English, the English are best!" Believe it or not, 1903:

Category:Districts of England created by the Local Government Act 1894

840:

hich places are not in Lancashire on the new version of the template?

5317:, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring 5255: 5246: 5237: 5228: 5079: 4454: 4392:

Since your changing the Trek episode articles I suggest talking with

4375: 4311: 4247: 4233: 4145: 3494: 3483: 3471: 2860: 2833: 2466:

Er, sorry to break it to you, but registration counties are counties

2360: 4140:

For the love of God, in the future, when someone's block reason is "

3442: 3320:

be brought into context within a section on the creation and model.

2394:

Now that I have ceased guffawing: those ain't "counties": those are

2103:

See we've had a bit of disagreement about the intro wording for the

1189:

is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found

5457:

I've made some edits for brevity and flow; feel free to review. :)

5306: 5269: 5024:

Since an admin will probably have to do it, think you can redirect

4881: 4163: 4142:

Blocking for death threats, personal attacks per WP:AN/I discussion

2740:- I've also started linking to LA's from municipal articles - E.G. 2134: 2028: 1994:

The change apparently caught the Department of Health by surprise!

1551: 555:...is a Distinguished Supporter of the British Humanist Association 539: 478: 5404:. Maybe some should pay attention to part of what he had to say. 3765:

When you remove the trivia by your "standards" they would violate

2998:

following multiple warnings on their talk page demonstrates this.

2582:

Hi, just wanted to say "Well done!" for all the hard work you and

2250:

So, you have now admitted, twice, that it is original research. --

1702:

If you want an example of real sockpuppetry, look no further than

1663:

List of first black Major League Baseball players by team and date

3824: 3143:

Finally, I object to the wording Bailrigg has been pushing, i.e.

2503: 1555: 1101:. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 896:

Perhaps theese sideboxes could be placed in the history sections§

684: 624: 603: 490: 332:

then let me know what you think the best way forward is. Thanks.

5073:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Starfleet Judge Advocate General

4724: 1590:

so, and the edit along with the reference is in accordance with

1139:

Thought you might be interested in this (if you havent seen it)

4952:

Don't worry - I'm a bit tired tonight. Thanks for your help.

4737: 4648: 3145:... and/but/though is in the historic county of Xshire, England 415: 4527:

Hi, just wondered if you'd seen the interesting discussion at

3545:

Not sure my explanation is as clear as I believe my logic is.

3534:

is refering to a different set of counties to the second part

3499: 3470:

Please let me know if the references are acceptable. Thanks --

2738:

Local_Education_Authority#List_of_Local_Authorities_in_England

2534:

When will we change an address in response to customer demand?

5401: 4925: 3427: 2647: 769:

article is very much at peace at the moment- which is great.

641:

That's very odd. I'll check the wording of section Thingy.

149: 148:

I think that since we already have a detailed dab page about

5354:

Crossposting that which I just posted on Husnock's talk page

4497:

For the Arbitration Committee, Arbitration Committee Clerk,

2137:

later on in thes ervices list further down in the intro?? --

1093:

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened:

380:

today, and will post more over the next couple of days... --

5509:", I found Data's quote ("Where none have gone before") at 4660: 4652: 3616:

and seek the simplest and most elegant and best solution..

1223:

Labour only held Durham, Mid Glamorgan and West Glamorgan.

688: 663: 659: 628: 611: 494: 482: 279:

should be deleted, but not for the reason that you cite. --

4745: 4741: 4529:

Talk:Cork (city)#Is the city in the county? Facts, please.

3488: 3103:

I don't think it was you who was being fingered this time.

1103:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden/Workshop

1099:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden/Evidence

906:

Local Government Boundary Commisssion recommendations 1948

4302:

parties views in South Africa, and not just those of the

3358:

Go ahead and cite the encyclopedia's real-world stuff. --

3151:, and again goes against the conventions, albeit subtly. 2830:

Hi Morwen, no problem and thanks for the note. Greetings

1478: 742:

County of Cardiganshire Electoral Arrangements Order 1994

2155:. It is part of User:Owain's/County Watch's neverending 1125:- check this out, its being transcluded into infoboxes. 256:

Any suggestions about how to show it in the interim? --

3201:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies

2990:

As well as the sockpuppetry, there have been issues of

1207:; several comments have been left at the FAR. Thanks, 189:

Hi, I noticed you were involved with a discussion with

1791:

Apologies - a freak typing error! What a coincidence!

765:

Hi, please don't fret at the title, it seems that the

5297:

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

4549:

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

3461:

http://www.estateangels.co.uk/estate_agents/pemberton

2980:

I'm contacting you however regarding another issue.

2874:

the Isle, possibly at highly reduced opacity? Sorry!

1298:

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

218:, by adding bits of horley and Charlwood parishes to 4191: 4095:

Hey, Morwen. Do you mind if I wikify the LEA names?

3695:) are administered by counties. Others (such as the 3193:

Westminster St George's (UK Parliament constituency)

2421:

List of civil parishes in Scotland by county in 1975

2318:

original research? It's exactly the same data as in

2286:

List of civil parishes in Scotland by county in 1975

2232:

List of ceremonial counties of England by population

266:

I see you've already done it. Thanks for fixing. --

4046:

Okuda. Morwen - Talk 07:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)"

940:Is this something that should really be happening? 3426:Thanks for the talkpage message. I found out some 2359:Counties abolished in 1975 eh? Then explain this: 5157:Leaving again? But you only left this morning! 4469:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden 1651:, will undoubtedly (and sadly so) raise eyebrows. 1095:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden 1085:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden 214:Just FYI, these two parishes were created by the 5381:With friends like that, who needs enemies? .... 5143:I will satisfy the desire of people like you. -- 4748:, for reasons unknown, presents them partially. 4971:List of Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes 3876:" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: 3691:) are administered by cities. Others (such as 3463:(please select 'Information about Pemberton') 3370:"xyz", Page: xyz. Publisher: xyz.</ref: --> 1057:You also have my full support in such things. 658:Come to think of it, if the order was made in 184:List of the monarchs of the Kingdom of England 4545:Image:Lambethnorth300.jpg listed for deletion 4483:Knowledge:Citing sources#Intermediate sources 740:The order referred to in the footnote is the 623:I wonder why the changes weren't made before 3902:of users who are watching that article. See 2316:List of civil parishes in Scotland by county 4924:I noticed you have been involved before at 4784:helpful so it can be addressed. Thank you. 4647:Circumstantial evidence from The Times: On 4067:it WAS NOT AN ATTACK in ANY WAY against you 2398:. The adjective is fundamental to the term. 2214:, by you and/or your County Watch chums? -- 5304: 5099:I actually changed that to a page move to 2732:Articles for local (education) authorities 1710:where he "agrees" with an unsigned editor 4736:I got them from cached copies of the MIA 4333:should go? I don't know if it belongs at 3886:The text written here will appear on the 2810:Talk:Michael Erlewine#Request for comment 2322:just presented in a different way! Geez! 3769:- See why it is such a silly guideline? 2887:Ach, weel! Thanks for the quick reply. 1901:I'm thinking of creating and populating 1294:Image:Holborn300.jpg listed for deletion 1108:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 716:OK, I've figured it out: the note reads: 441:is as much a Merseysider as I'm Mercian. 4555:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 4491:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 4487:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 2709:County comprising of 2 districts -: --> 2223:a) I don't have any "CountyWatch chums" 2153:List of Scottish counties by population 2111:decided to take a dedicated service of 2036:Talk:Cambodia under Pol Pot (1975-1979) 1304:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 314:, please? (or tell me how to do it). -- 14: 3280:Remember.. you cant cite memoy alpha. 2859:Ho, I have answered you on the above. 2707:part of pre-unification kingdom -: --> 1537:Category:Places_in_historic_Lancashire 930:Category:Ceremonial County of Cheshire 5194:Talk:Nottingham East Midlands Airport 3906:for full information on this feature. 3689:New York City Department of Education 3687:Some U.S. school boards (such as the 2942:Ormskirk (UK Parliament constituency) 1930:Annonymous IPs and imaginary censuses 1719:message which he left on my talk page 1679:Knowledge:WikiProject UK subdivisions 772:I've been advised to contact you (by 306:Another joint parish of two parishes? 4920:Wigan, Richard Ashcroft and so on... 4335:Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 3816: 3703:) only have to answer to the state. 3647:PPS My other idiosyncracies include 2710:area comprising of 2 counties -: --> 2300:Template:Scottish county populations 2045:There is a list of country names at 935:Category:Historic County of Cheshire 910:I've set out the 1948 proposals at: 5513:, and it can also be seen in older 5336:You have been left this message by 5078:I have boldy merged the article to 4453:Hi there, I was just expanding the 4329:User:Lozleader/Scottish white paper 3722:Encounter at Farpoint (TNG episode) 3701:Houston Independent School District 3697:Los Angeles Unified School District 3521:for the purposes of the Act of 1888 1648:, which is a major field in itself 1554:article, and the categorisation of 23: 4696:PS: Thanks for the heads up to :) 3717:I'll show you what they violate.. 2502:a few tables on the population of 2425:List of civil parishes in Scotland 2320:List of civil parishes in Scotland 2210:So, you admit that the article is 1746:this denial of reasonable requests 24: 5532: 5139:Dont worry I am leaving wikipedia 5026:The Menagerie (Star Trek episode) 3060:I've lost some tooth enamel from 2646:That part was a direct copy from 5305: 3879: 3872:there is a small field labeled " 3817: 3669:Many thanks for your trusty book 3225:Star Trek planet classifications 2983:I'm increasingly concerned with 2854:Template talk:Lord Lieutenancies 2042:), but here is an afterthought. 210:Horley and Salfords & Sidlow 5311: 4763:I opened a PDF file related to 3870:editing an article on Knowledge 3607:Knowledge:Writing for the enemy 2783:Proposal for rugby super league 1135:"Traditional Counties" of Wales 767:Traditional counties of England 761:Traditional counties of England 376:I've posted the first bunch at 310:Could you verify the status of 5002:Maybe we can make a Star Trek 4479:Knowledge:External links#Links 4325:I wonder where this material: 4057:Talk:List of Star Trek planets 2499:Ceremonial counties of England 2230:original research, then so is 2034:Hi, Morwen. I answered you at 1726:21:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1690:19:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1670:20:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1625:19:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1611:19:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1576:16:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1566:16:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1450:19:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1432:18:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1407:17:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1378:17:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1361:16:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1344:13:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1332:12:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1314:21:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1289:21:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1275:16:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1257:12:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1242:21:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1231:20:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1198:01:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1174:22:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1160:20:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1130:07:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1113:02:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 1079:12:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1062:23:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1044:19:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 1023:19:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 996:19:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 978:18:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 960:16:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 945:16:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 919:23:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 901:18:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 892:18:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 873:17:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 859:16:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 849:16:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 838:16:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 828:16:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 805:23:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 795:00:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 749:10:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 700:10:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 671:09:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 650:08:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 636:08:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 589:12:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 529:20:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 510:20:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 487:Category:Natives of Cumberland 423:19:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 408:14:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 5522:04:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 5496:03:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 5487:01:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 5477:18:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 5453:17:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 5395:15:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 5364:12:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 5291:10:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 5286:OK! I see what you mean Tnx. 5281:10:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 4617:16:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC) 4593:16:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC) 4565:04:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC) 4540:00:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 4517:23:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 4502:16:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 4463:07:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 4444:22:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4433:19:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4422:19:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4412:19:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4402:19:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4383:16:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC) 4356:12:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC) 4343:22:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 4315:09:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 4308:South African Communist Party 4251:09:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 4237:09:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 4175:03:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 4153:17:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 4130:17:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 4120:17:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 4100:03:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 4085:09:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 4074:08:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 4062:Star Trek: The Motion Picture 4021:05:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 3995:02:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 3984:00:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 3969:21:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 3947:20:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 3926:20:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 3859:10:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 3801:22:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 3708:22:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3693:Baldwin County Public Schools 3678:16:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3664:00:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3583:21:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 3561:20:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 3079:I can't help but notice that 1541:Category:Places_in_Lancashire 1471:Places in Historic Lancashire 390:09:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 372:13:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 357:12:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 337:18:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 319:19:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 301:14:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 275:I can see why you think that 216:Charlwood and Horley Act 1974 139:07:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 128:06:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 111:10:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 5507:Where No One Has Gone Before 5259:21:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 5250:20:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 5241:20:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 5232:20:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 5217:16:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 5201:11:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 5182:00:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 5166:00:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 5153:23:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 5129:05:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 5112:01:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 5092:01:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 5067:22:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 5047:21:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 5037:21:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 5012:20:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 4994:20:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 4978:19:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 4957:22:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4944:22:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4934:21:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4908:22:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4893:21:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4871:21:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4849:21:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4830:21:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4809:21:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4791:20:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4772:15:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4755:6:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 4732:Star Trek production numbers 4716:15:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 4690:15:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 4668:12:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 4642:12:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 4321:Scottish White Paper of 1963 4223:Admin talk same-sex marriage 3739:Mirror, Mirror (TOS episode) 3683:About American school boards 3614:multiple entities needlessly 3435:10:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3419:10:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3404:13:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3363:13:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3352:08:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3312:08:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3275:08:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3234:05:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 3219:16:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 3208:14:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 3187:13:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 3173:23:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 3156:23:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 3123:22:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 3097:22:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 3088:22:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 3069:23:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 3055:23:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 3037:23:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 3022:23:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 3010:23:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2964:23:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2953:22:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2936:17:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2921:13:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2906:23:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 2892:16:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 2879:15:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 2864:15:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 2846:23:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 2821:04:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 2799:12:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2778:09:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 2763:17:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 2749:22:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2726:22:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2716:22:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 2696:16:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 2679:17:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2655:15:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2639:15:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 2624:22:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2605:22:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2595:22:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2588:Historic counties of England 2573:13:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 2545:22:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 2519:18:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2482:11:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2442:10:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2374:10:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2355:10:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2334:10:23, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2310:10:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2293:10:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2271:10:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2255:10:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2246:10:23, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2219:10:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2202:10:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2184:09:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 2142:22:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 2093:13:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 2079:13:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 788:Historic counties of England 778:Historic counties of England 562:British Humanist Association 534:British Humanist Association 248:I'm sure you are right, but 7: 5030:The Menagerie (TOS episode) 3864:Please use the edit summary 3516:This can be read two ways: 3459:Reference for Pemberton: 1. 2744:links to its schools, etc. 2060:14:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2022:12:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2001:22:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 1990:22:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 1974:22:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 1965:22:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 1954:22:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 1940:10:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 1924:08:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 1910:08:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 1892:17:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1873:19:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 1859:19:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1850:19:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1829:18:51, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1814:18:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1796:15:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1779:15:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1761:14:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1465:15:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 1212:22:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 520:Image:EnglandNottingham.png 499:Category;Natives of Cumbria 284:17:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 277:Broughton and Milton Keynes 271:17:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 261:16:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 244:Broughton and Milton Keynes 238:13:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 227:12:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 205:02:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 178:16:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 161:02:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 152:, that we should limit the 10: 5537: 4815:The Star Trek Encyclopedia 4199:Wiganers and/or from Wigan 3593:sounding even more like a 3014:Replied to stern words at 2787:Leave your opinion on this 2664:States in Medieval Britain 2105:First TransPennine Express 2099:First TransPennine Express 594:Welsh unitary name changes 4551:Image:Lambethnorth300.jpg 4158:Deletion review: Gamestah 4091:Local Education Authority 4010:Guide to the Enterprise-D 3375:Deus Sum (Matthew Fenton) 3323:Deus Sum (Matthew Fenton) 3283:Deus Sum (Matthew Fenton) 3246:Deus Sum (Matthew Fenton) 3050:loop if need be. Thanks, 2165:presented its findings in 2072:Greater London South West 2013:Greater London Commission 1864:I replied to Bailrigg on 1546:I've also conversed with 1356:user may also be linked. 1268:Wellington Rural District 4632:Stockport Borough Police 3570:Well, if as you say the 2615:Could you look at this: 2532:, (2004) notes p.18-19: 2530:Address Management Guide 2508:Grand Duchy of Lithuania 1978:According to note 21 at 912:User:Lozleader/lgbc_1948 730:for the Home Department 121:changes if you so wish. 5342:PocKleanBot's talk page 4623:Higher End Council Ward 4388:Star Trek article edits 3369:<ref name="xyz": --> 3129:Metropolitan=Ceremonial 2708:part of Scotland -: --> 2689:Template talk:Yorkshire 2684:Template talk:Yorkshire 2040:Talk:Communist Cambodia 5020:The Menagerie redirect 4759:Those bloody PDF files 4111:User:Generic Character 4006:Star Trek Encyclopedia 3519:If we take the phrase 3513:the County of Berks." 3064:already! Grrrrrrr.... 2419:I have now redirected 2163:was conducted in, and 398:People from categories 330:Fire Service in the UK 324:Fire Service in the UK 312:Tyringham and Filgrave 5505:Hi, for the article " 5188:East Midlands Airport 5120:Barnstar Organization 4702:comment was added by 4553:, has been listed at 4136:Reasonable unblocking 4055:your response on the 4014:Star Trek Star Charts 3892:page revision history 3657:lovely noble baroness 2826:Members of Parliament 2617:County#United_Kingdom 2611:County#United_Kingdom 2497:Please note that the 2396:Registration counties 2347:I did not say it was: 1905:. What do you think? 1706:himself. Here is an 1402:may also be related. 1302:, has been listed at 4350:Counties of Scotland 4109:Does this look like 3555:county of Lancashire 3551:county of Merseyside 3147:I believe this is a 2996:This misleading edit 2212:WP:Original research 1915:Sounds good to me. 1754:this personal attack 1750:this ridiculous edit 1539:is a subcategory of 1300:Image:Holborn300.jpg 1280:Cambourne + Camborne 489:and someone born on 434:James Prescott Joule 220:Reigate and Banstead 4929:Thanks in advance. 4183:Wigan Article Merge 3904:m:Help:Edit summary 3600:With regard to the 3410:British place-names 3005:Hope you can help. 2284:This new article - 1969:Re your edit: fine 1535:It also seems that 811:Lancashire Template 100:Thanks for the tips 5274:Township (England) 5060:Too Short a Season 4778:Starfleet Security 4242:Response from IZAK 4034:Copypasta from my 3823:.. I guess its my 3092:Not me this time. 3047:Greater Manchester 3016:User_talk:Jhamez84 2970:The Master returns 2429:WP:Content forking 2126:North East England 2122:North West England 1717:Finally here is a 878:Lancashire sidebox 5474: 5451: 5425: 5411:comment added by 5393: 5350: 5349: 5345: 5327:quality standards 5180: 5151: 5090: 4965:ST Overview lines 4906: 4869: 4828: 4742:Internet Archives 4719: 4615: 4591: 4368:User:84.9.192.124 4050: 4038: 3974:Trek Canon Issues 3967: 3945: 3924: 3857: 3799: 3588:Life is too short 3402: 3350: 3310: 3273: 3161:I'm not surprised 3149:Dangling modifier 2903:Generic Character 2578:Historic counties 2480: 2372: 2332: 2269: 2244: 2200: 2113:Regional Railways 1646:as indicated here 1319:Persona non grata 1142:(at the bottom). 953:no acedemic texts 250:this map on MKWEB 203: 144:Project Orion DAB 5528: 5460: 5450: 5435: 5424: 5405: 5387: 5335: 5309: 5302: 5301: 5207:Talk:Street name 5173: 5144: 5101:Law in Star Trek 5083: 4899: 4862: 4821: 4788: 4697: 4687: 4686: 4614: 4599: 4590: 4575: 4507:Police circulars 4150: 4105:User:Copiedimage 4048: 4033: 3957: 3935: 3914: 3883: 3849: 3828: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3791: 3770: 3602:Godley, Hyde, UK 3394: 3373: 3371: 3342: 3321: 3302: 3281: 3265: 3244: 2849: 2842: 2836: 2804:Michael Erlewine 2775:Rhythmnation2004 2711:current status. 2506:in 2001, or the 2474: 2366: 2326: 2263: 2238: 2194: 2176:not exist at all 1531: 1530: 1497:deleted contribs 1481: 1017: 972: 580: 577: 572:be appropriate. 199: 191:User:TharkunColl 95:User_talk:Morwen 18:User talk:Morwen 5536: 5535: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5527: 5526: 5525: 5515:Usenet postings 5503: 5448:52278 Alpha 771 5442:Fenton, Matthew 5436: 5431: 5406: 5371: 5369:Bizarre comment 5356: 5351: 5315:Anthony Giddens 5299: 5266: 5224: 5210: 5190: 5141: 5122: 5076: 5055: 5053:ST planets edit 5022: 4967: 4922: 4818: 4798: 4786: 4781: 4761: 4734: 4727: 4698:—The preceding 4684: 4683: 4679: 4634: 4625: 4612:52278 Alpha 771 4606:Fenton, Matthew 4600: 4588:52278 Alpha 771 4582:Fenton, Matthew 4576: 4572: 4547: 4525: 4509: 4472: 4451: 4390: 4364: 4323: 4225: 4194: 4185: 4160: 4146: 4138: 4107: 4093: 4031: 3976: 3866: 3845: 3818: 3813: 3787: 3715: 3685: 3671: 3590: 3568: 3510: 3502: 3491: 3479: 3445: 3412: 3390: 3368: 3338: 3298: 3261: 3241: 3227: 3196: 3180: 3163: 3131: 3077: 2972: 2945: 2928: 2926:West Lancashire 2913: 2899: 2871: 2857: 2844: 2840: 2834: 2831: 2828: 2806: 2785: 2773:administrator! 2770: 2756: 2734: 2703: 2686: 2667: 2631: 2613: 2580: 2566: 2526: 2512:Crimean Khanate 2149: 2117:Northern Spirit 2101: 2067: 2047:Cambodia#Naming 2032: 2015: 1947: 1932: 1899: 1881: 1742:this incivility 1697: 1682: 1584: 1482: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1321: 1316: 1296: 1282: 1264: 1250: 1220: 1184: 1137: 1120: 1088: 1072: 1070:Youngs citation 1015: 970: 926: 908: 880: 813: 763: 731: 691:as described. 596: 578: 575: 536: 522: 400: 344: 326: 316:Concrete Cowboy 308: 298:Concrete Cowboy 294: 281:Concrete Cowboy 268:Concrete Cowboy 258:Concrete Cowboy 246: 212: 187: 170: 146: 118: 102: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5534: 5502: 5499: 5475: 5430: 5427: 5398: 5397: 5370: 5367: 5355: 5352: 5348: 5347: 5334: 5323: 5310: 5300: 5298: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5288:Richard Harvey 5278:Richard Harvey 5265: 5262: 5223: 5220: 5209: 5204: 5189: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5140: 5137: 5121: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5075: 5070: 5054: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5021: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5014: 4997: 4996: 4986: 4985: 4966: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4947: 4946: 4921: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4910: 4817: 4812: 4797: 4794: 4780: 4775: 4765:blood diamonds 4760: 4757: 4733: 4730: 4726: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4678: 4675: 4673: 4671: 4670: 4633: 4630: 4624: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4571: 4568: 4546: 4543: 4524: 4523:Irish counties 4521: 4520: 4519: 4508: 4505: 4471: 4466: 4450: 4447: 4436: 4435: 4415: 4414: 4389: 4386: 4363: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4322: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4296: 4284: 4277: 4274: 4271: 4267: 4224: 4221: 4219: 4217: 4216: 4210: 4208: 4207: 4193: 4190: 4184: 4181: 4179: 4159: 4156: 4137: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4106: 4103: 4092: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4077: 4076: 4030: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 3998: 3997: 3975: 3972: 3950: 3949: 3888:Recent changes 3865: 3862: 3830:Matthew Fenton 3812: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3772:Matthew Fenton 3753: 3752: 3751: 3746: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3729: 3714: 3711: 3684: 3681: 3670: 3667: 3589: 3586: 3567: 3564: 3549:whether it be 3509: 3506: 3501: 3498: 3490: 3487: 3478: 3475: 3458: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3411: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3365: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3240: 3237: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3195: 3190: 3179: 3176: 3162: 3159: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3105: 3104: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3040: 3039: 2971: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2944: 2939: 2927: 2924: 2912: 2909: 2898: 2895: 2870: 2867: 2856: 2851: 2838: 2827: 2824: 2805: 2802: 2784: 2781: 2769: 2766: 2755: 2752: 2742:City of London 2733: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2702: 2699: 2685: 2682: 2669:Hello Morwen, 2666: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2630: 2627: 2612: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2586:have put into 2579: 2576: 2565: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2525: 2522: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2224: 2205: 2204: 2159:campaign. The 2148: 2145: 2100: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2066: 2063: 2031: 2025: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1946: 1943: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1898: 1895: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1832: 1831: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1764: 1763: 1737: 1736: 1696: 1693: 1681: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1628: 1627: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1548:User:Mrsteviec 1472: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1347: 1346: 1320: 1317: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1281: 1278: 1263: 1260: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1205:Parliament Act 1187:Parliament Act 1183: 1181:Parliament Act 1178: 1177: 1176: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1136: 1133: 1123:Template:Lancs 1119: 1118:Template:Lancs 1116: 1087: 1082: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 983: 982: 981: 980: 963: 962: 938: 937: 932: 925: 922: 907: 904: 879: 876: 812: 809: 762: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 729: 727: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 676: 675: 674: 673: 653: 652: 614:See Note 2 at: 595: 592: 558: 557: 535: 532: 521: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 456: 455: 454: 453: 446: 442: 426: 425: 399: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 343: 340: 325: 322: 307: 304: 293: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 245: 242: 241: 240: 211: 208: 186: 181: 169: 166: 145: 142: 117: 114: 108:RichardColgate 101: 98: 27:Archived talk: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5533: 5524: 5523: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5498: 5497: 5494: 5489: 5488: 5485: 5479: 5478: 5472: 5468: 5464: 5458: 5455: 5454: 5449: 5446: 5443: 5439: 5426: 5422: 5418: 5414: 5410: 5403: 5396: 5391: 5386: 5385: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5374: 5373:Dear Morwen: 5366: 5365: 5362: 5346: 5343: 5339: 5333:'s talk page. 5332: 5328: 5322: 5320: 5316: 5308: 5303: 5292: 5289: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5279: 5275: 5271: 5261: 5260: 5257: 5252: 5251: 5248: 5243: 5242: 5239: 5234: 5233: 5230: 5219: 5218: 5215: 5208: 5203: 5202: 5199: 5195: 5183: 5179: 5176: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5164: 5160: 5155: 5154: 5150: 5147: 5136: 5135: 5131: 5130: 5127: 5113: 5110: 5106: 5105:Samuel Cogley 5102: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5094: 5093: 5089: 5086: 5081: 5074: 5069: 5068: 5065: 5061: 5048: 5045: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5013: 5010: 5005: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4995: 4992: 4988: 4987: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4976: 4972: 4958: 4955: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4945: 4942: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4932: 4927: 4909: 4905: 4902: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4891: 4887: 4884:arguments. 4883: 4878: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4868: 4865: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4847: 4843: 4838: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4827: 4824: 4816: 4811: 4810: 4807: 4803: 4802:Lord Deramore 4793: 4792: 4789: 4779: 4774: 4773: 4770: 4766: 4756: 4754: 4749: 4747: 4743: 4740:website from 4739: 4738:Original Trek 4729: 4720: 4717: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4688: 4674: 4669: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4640: 4629: 4618: 4613: 4610: 4607: 4603: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4589: 4586: 4583: 4579: 4567: 4566: 4563: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4542: 4541: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4530: 4518: 4515: 4511: 4510: 4504: 4503: 4500: 4495: 4492: 4488: 4484: 4480: 4475: 4470: 4465: 4464: 4461: 4456: 4446: 4445: 4442: 4434: 4431: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4420: 4413: 4410: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4400: 4395: 4385: 4384: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4357: 4354: 4351: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4341: 4337: 4336: 4331: 4330: 4326: 4316: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4294: 4290: 4285: 4282: 4278: 4275: 4272: 4270:circumstance. 4268: 4265: 4260: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4249: 4244: 4243: 4239: 4238: 4235: 4230: 4220: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4200: 4189: 4180: 4177: 4176: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4155: 4154: 4151: 4149: 4143: 4131: 4128: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4118: 4115: 4112: 4102: 4101: 4098: 4086: 4083: 4079: 4078: 4075: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4063: 4058: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4049:End copypasta 4047: 4042: 4041: 4037: 4022: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3996: 3993: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3982: 3971: 3970: 3965: 3961: 3956: 3948: 3943: 3939: 3934: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3922: 3918: 3913: 3907: 3905: 3901: 3898:, and in the 3897: 3893: 3890:page, in the 3889: 3884: 3882: 3877: 3875: 3871: 3861: 3860: 3855: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3841: 3838: 3835: 3831: 3826: 3802: 3797: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3783: 3780: 3777: 3773: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3754: 3750: 3747: 3745: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3737: 3733: 3730: 3728: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3710: 3709: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3680: 3679: 3676: 3666: 3665: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3645: 3642: 3638: 3635: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3621: 3617: 3615: 3610: 3608: 3603: 3598: 3596: 3585: 3584: 3581: 3575: 3573: 3563: 3562: 3559: 3556: 3552: 3546: 3543: 3539: 3537: 3533: 3528: 3524: 3522: 3517: 3514: 3505: 3497: 3496: 3486: 3485: 3477:Wigan Suburbs 3474: 3473: 3468: 3464: 3462: 3456: 3453: 3451: 3443:Wigan Suburbs 3436: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3417: 3405: 3400: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3386: 3383: 3380: 3376: 3366: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3348: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3334: 3331: 3328: 3324: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3308: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3294: 3291: 3288: 3284: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3271: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3251: 3247: 3236: 3235: 3232: 3220: 3217: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3206: 3202: 3194: 3189: 3188: 3185: 3175: 3174: 3171: 3166: 3158: 3157: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3141: 3137: 3134: 3124: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3098: 3095: 3090: 3089: 3086: 3082: 3070: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3053: 3048: 3043: 3038: 3035: 3031: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3020: 3017: 3012: 3011: 3008: 3003: 2999: 2997: 2993: 2988: 2986: 2985:User:Bailrigg 2981: 2978: 2975: 2965: 2962: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2951: 2943: 2938: 2937: 2934: 2923: 2922: 2919: 2911:Billinge etc. 2908: 2907: 2904: 2894: 2893: 2890: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2877: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2855: 2850: 2847: 2843: 2837: 2823: 2822: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2792: 2789: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2768:Swimming pool 2765: 2764: 2761: 2751: 2750: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2698: 2697: 2694: 2690: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2672: 2665: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2626: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2606: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2575: 2574: 2571: 2559: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2524:Postal county 2521: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2500: 2483: 2478: 2473: 2469: 2468:by definition 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2443: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2397: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2375: 2370: 2365: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2353: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2335: 2330: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2272: 2267: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2172: 2171: 2170:council areas 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2147:Advice please 2144: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2123: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2077: 2073: 2062: 2061: 2058: 2053: 2050: 2048: 2043: 2041: 2037: 2030: 2027:What to call 2024: 2023: 2020: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1963: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1952: 1945:What you said 1942: 1941: 1938: 1925: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1904: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1857: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1808: 1797: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1780: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704:User:Jhamez84 1700: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1687:Badbilltucker 1680: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1650: 1647: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1604:Graham Norton 1599: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1544: 1542: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1503:nuke contribs 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1480: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1323:I wonder who 1315: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1243: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1224: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1182: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1077: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 997: 994: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 979: 976: 973: 967: 966: 965: 964: 961: 958: 954: 949: 948: 947: 946: 943: 936: 933: 931: 928: 927: 924:Multiple cats 921: 920: 917: 913: 903: 902: 899: 894: 893: 890: 884: 875: 874: 871: 865: 861: 860: 857: 851: 850: 847: 841: 839: 836: 830: 829: 826: 823:information.§ 820: 816: 808: 806: 803: 797: 796: 793: 789: 785: 781: 779: 775: 774:User:Aquilina 770: 768: 750: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 701: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 672: 669: 665: 661: 657: 656: 655: 654: 651: 648: 644: 640: 639: 638: 637: 634: 630: 626: 621: 619: 616: 613: 609: 606:were made on 605: 601: 591: 590: 586: 582: 581: 571: 565: 563: 556: 553: 552: 551: 549: 545: 541: 538:I've noticed 531: 530: 527: 526:GregLoutsenko 511: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 452: 447: 443: 440: 435: 430: 429: 428: 427: 424: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 409: 406: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 374: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 359: 358: 354: 350: 339: 338: 335: 331: 321: 320: 317: 313: 303: 302: 299: 285: 282: 278: 274: 273: 272: 269: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 254: 251: 239: 236: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 217: 207: 206: 202: 198: 197: 192: 185: 180: 179: 176: 165: 162: 159: 155: 154:Project_Orion 151: 141: 140: 137: 133: 130: 129: 126: 122: 116:Autobiography 113: 112: 109: 105: 97: 96: 93: 92:Current talk: 89: 85: 82: 78: 74: 70: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 28: 19: 5511:Memory Alpha 5504: 5490: 5480: 5456: 5437: 5432: 5407:— Preceding 5399: 5382: 5375: 5372: 5357: 5324: 5313:The article 5312: 5267: 5253: 5244: 5235: 5225: 5211: 5198:Simply south 5191: 5156: 5142: 5134:replied here 5132: 5123: 5077: 5056: 5023: 4968: 4923: 4877:Encyclopedia 4876: 4837:Encyclopedia 4836: 4819: 4799: 4782: 4762: 4750: 4746:StarTrek.com 4735: 4728: 4695: 4680: 4677:Of course... 4672: 4635: 4626: 4601: 4577: 4573: 4548: 4534: 4526: 4496: 4476: 4473: 4452: 4437: 4416: 4391: 4370:banned user 4365: 4362:Banned user? 4348:I put it in 4338: 4332: 4327: 4324: 4299: 4280: 4258: 4245: 4241: 4240: 4226: 4218: 4209: 4198: 4195: 4186: 4178: 4161: 4147: 4141: 4139: 4108: 4094: 4066: 4060: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4032: 4013: 4009: 4005: 3977: 3951: 3908: 3885: 3878: 3874:Edit summary 3867: 3850: 3842: 3836: 3814: 3792: 3784: 3778: 3716: 3686: 3672: 3646: 3643: 3639: 3636: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3622: 3618: 3611: 3599: 3591: 3576: 3571: 3569: 3554: 3550: 3547: 3544: 3540: 3535: 3531: 3529: 3525: 3520: 3518: 3515: 3511: 3503: 3492: 3480: 3469: 3465: 3457: 3454: 3446: 3413: 3395: 3387: 3381: 3343: 3335: 3329: 3317: 3303: 3295: 3289: 3266: 3258: 3252: 3242: 3228: 3197: 3181: 3167: 3164: 3144: 3142: 3138: 3135: 3132: 3110: 3091: 3078: 3044: 3041: 3013: 3004: 3000: 2992:vote rigging 2989: 2982: 2979: 2976: 2974:Hi Morwen, 2973: 2946: 2929: 2914: 2900: 2889:Adam Cuerden 2886: 2882: 2876:Adam Cuerden 2872: 2858: 2829: 2807: 2793: 2786: 2771: 2757: 2754:Linked years 2735: 2704: 2701:Re: Galloway 2687: 2668: 2632: 2614: 2581: 2567: 2555: 2551: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528:Royal Mail, 2527: 2496: 2467: 2433: 2432: 2346: 2283: 2227: 2175: 2174: 2168: 2150: 2130: 2102: 2068: 2065:Scout county 2054: 2051: 2044: 2038:(moved from 2033: 2016: 1981: 1948: 1933: 1900: 1882: 1866:my talk page 1853: 1844: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1804: 1733:Oldham Riots 1716: 1701: 1698: 1695:Sockpuppetry 1683: 1661:articles as 1618:User:Fogscan 1600: 1587: 1585: 1560: 1545: 1540: 1536: 1534: 1523: 1517: 1511: 1505: 1499: 1493: 1487: 1474: 1444: 1322: 1286:Simply south 1283: 1265: 1251: 1225: 1221: 1185: 1155: 1144: 1138: 1121: 1107: 1092: 1089: 1073: 1041:84.9.210.110 939: 909: 895: 885: 881: 866: 862: 852: 842: 831: 821: 817: 814: 798: 783: 782: 771: 764: 741: 622: 597: 573: 569: 566: 559: 554: 537: 523: 497:would be in 439:John Rylands 401: 345: 327: 309: 295: 255: 247: 213: 194: 188: 171: 158:OfficialUser 147: 136:DariusJersey 134: 132:No problem. 131: 125:DariusJersey 123: 119: 106: 103: 91: 76: 26: 25: 5338:PocKleanBot 5214:SunStar Net 4853:To be more 4796:The English 4725:Award Time! 4532:Warofdreams 4172:cheese-cube 4097:WhisperToMe 3705:WhisperToMe 3595:reactionary 3432:SunStar Net 3416:SunStar Net 3184:SandyDancer 3081:User:Selnec 2869:County maps 2746:WhisperToMe 2161:2001 census 2084:Scounties! 1879:Distruption 1708:edit of his 1429:82.35.9.122 1375:82.35.9.122 1338:And another 608:December 19 342:Orphan maps 5493:Sir Rhosis 5445:Lexic Dark 4657:October 16 4609:Lexic Dark 4585:Lexic Dark 4449:Ellingtons 4372:User:Irate 4366:Hello. Is 4012:, and the 3992:EEMeltonIV 3900:watchlists 3675:EEMeltonIV 3508:Re Wording 3500:Talk Pages 3472:User: Man2 3360:EEMeltonIV 3216:Galloglass 3205:Galloglass 3075:Comparable 2961:Galloglass 2950:Galloglass 2933:Galloglass 2796:Ehinger222 2676:Fergananim 2671:Fergananim 2554:, (2003), 2552:PAF Digest 1620:. Thanks, 1596:astrologer 1521:block user 1515:filter log 1479:Arrievaulx 1327:could be? 600:Ceredigion 5484:Cyberia23 5459:RadioKirk 5264:Townships 5080:Starfleet 5064:Cyberia23 5044:Cyberia23 5034:Cyberia23 5009:Cyberia23 4991:Cyberia23 4975:Cyberia23 4787:Cowman109 4665:Lozleader 4639:Lozleader 4514:Lozleader 4455:Ellington 4441:Cyberia23 4430:Cyberia23 4419:Cyberia23 4409:Cyberia23 4399:Cyberia23 4394:RadioKirk 4353:Lozleader 4340:Lozleader 4148:Cyde Weys 4127:Lozleader 4117:Lozleader 4082:Cyberia23 4071:Cyberia23 4029:RE: canon 4018:Cyberia23 3981:Cyberia23 3896:diff page 3894:, on the 3811:Apologies 3761:WP:AVTRIV 3756:Amok Time 3744:WP:AVTRIV 3727:WP:AVTRIV 3637:Have Fun 3495:User:Man2 3484:User:Man2 3231:Cyberia23 3178:NeoNazism 2918:Lozleader 2760:Mrsteviec 2693:Mrsteviec 2621:Mrsteviec 2584:Mrsteviec 2570:Mrsteviec 2542:Mrsteviec 2516:Mais oui! 2439:Mais oui! 2352:Mais oui! 2307:Mais oui! 2290:Mais oui! 2252:Mais oui! 2226:b) If it 2216:Mais oui! 2181:Mais oui! 2139:Achmelvic 2076:Mrsteviec 2019:Lozleader 1998:Lozleader 1987:Lozleader 1971:Lozleader 1962:Lozleader 1951:Lozleader 1937:Lozleader 1907:Mrsteviec 1723:Lancsalot 1527:block log 1400:this user 1396:this user 1341:Mrsteviec 1329:Mrsteviec 1272:Mrsteviec 1254:Mrsteviec 1239:Lozleader 1228:Lozleader 1157:Lozleader 1127:Mrsteviec 1076:Mrsteviec 993:Mrsteviec 957:Mrsteviec 942:Mrsteviec 916:Lozleader 746:Lozleader 668:Lozleader 633:Lozleader 420:Lancsalot 405:Lancsalot 235:Lozleader 224:Lozleader 168:Harrogate 5519:Arteitle 5421:contribs 5409:unsigned 5270:Township 5028:back to 4954:Regan123 4941:Regan123 4931:Regan123 4882:strawmen 4855:specific 4769:Uncle Ed 4712:contribs 4700:unsigned 4499:FloNight 4460:Elipongo 4164:Gamestah 4113:to you? 4036:talkpage 3964:contribs 3942:contribs 3921:contribs 3840:contribs 3782:contribs 3713:Episodes 3699:and the 3661:Bailrigg 3655:and the 3580:Bailrigg 3566:So tired 3558:Bailrigg 3489:Re above 3385:contribs 3333:contribs 3293:contribs 3256:contribs 3170:Jhamez84 3153:Jhamez84 3094:Bailrigg 3085:Jhamez84 3066:Jhamez84 3052:Jhamez84 3019:Bailrigg 3007:Jhamez84 2814:Dhartung 2652:Nate1481 2636:Nate1481 2602:RFBailey 2592:RFBailey 2564:Historic 2157:WP:POINT 2135:Pennines 2057:Uncle Ed 2029:Cambodia 1889:Jhamez84 1870:Aquilina 1856:Bailrigg 1847:Bailrigg 1811:Aquilina 1793:Jhamez84 1758:Jhamez84 1712:contribs 1667:Jhamez84 1622:Jhamez84 1608:Jhamez84 1573:Jhamez84 1563:Jhamez84 1552:Rochdale 1491:contribs 1447:Aquilina 1404:Jhamez84 1358:Jhamez84 1352:I think 1262:dab page 1145:I like: 1110:FloNight 1059:Jhamez84 802:Bailrigg 792:Jhamez84 548:contribs 479:March 31 451:Aquilina 382:Fritz S. 364:Fritz S. 349:Fritz S. 334:Escaper7 292:brackets 5413:Husnock 5361:Dweller 5331:article 5319:cleanup 5126:Husnock 5109:Husnock 4806:Husnock 4753:AarHan3 4570:Crusade 4559:Nv8200p 4264:WP:SOAP 3825:Romulan 3749:WP:SPAM 3732:WP:SPAM 3239:Miranda 2897:My Talk 2723:SFC9394 2713:SFC9394 2510:or the 2504:Prussia 2314:How is 1897:New cat 1807:WP:SOCK 1582:Russell 1556:Mossley 1308:Nv8200p 1090:Hello, 898:Wenslet 889:Wenslet 870:Wenslet 856:Wenslet 846:Wenslet 835:Wenslet 825:Wenslet 784:However 685:April 2 625:April 2 604:Gwynedd 491:April 1 175:Rjstott 5501:WNOHGB 5438:thanks 5429:WNMHGB 5222:ST:TNG 5159:Morwen 5004:portal 4886:Morwen 4842:Morwen 4704:Glen S 4649:June 5 4602:thanks 4578:thanks 3827:side. 3767:WP:WAF 3428:Ashbys 3116:Morwen 3030:Morwen 2427:, per 2086:Morwen 2074:. :) 1917:Morwen 1822:Morwen 1772:Morwen 1588:openly 1458:Morwen 1218:S Glam 1167:Morwen 693:Morwen 643:Morwen 503:Morwen 485:is in 201:(Talk) 196:JW1805 5402:Dubai 5390:Help! 4926:Wigan 4861:". -- 4859:WP:RS 4685:Glen 4192:Above 4125:Cool 3868:When 3854:email 3847:count 3796:email 3789:count 3399:email 3392:count 3347:email 3340:count 3318:could 3307:email 3300:count 3270:email 3263:count 3111:ought 2648:WYMAS 2472:Owain 2364:Owain 2324:Owain 2261:Owain 2236:Owain 2192:Owain 2131:Trans 1983:2005. 1398:, and 1209:Sandy 1195:Sandy 1016:G-Man 971:G-Man 617:and 579:Rawle 570:would 150:orion 16:< 5417:talk 5272:and 5256:Tvoz 5247:Tvoz 5238:Tvoz 5229:Tvoz 5163:Talk 4890:Talk 4846:Talk 4708:talk 4661:1967 4653:1967 4562:talk 4536:talk 4477:Per 4380:Talk 4376:MRSC 4312:IZAK 4291:and 4248:IZAK 4234:IZAK 4170:. -- 4168:here 4008:and 3960:Talk 3955:Will 3938:Talk 3933:Will 3917:Talk 3912:Will 3834:talk 3776:talk 3659:. x 3653:Bill 3651:and 3649:Jarv 3379:talk 3372:;). 3327:talk 3287:talk 3250:talk 3120:Talk 3062:this 3034:Talk 2861:Phoe 2841:talk 2835:Phoe 2818:Talk 2536:... 2477:talk 2369:talk 2329:talk 2305:. -- 2302:and 2266:talk 2241:talk 2197:talk 2124:and 2090:Talk 1921:Talk 1885:this 1826:Talk 1776:Talk 1752:and 1592:WP:V 1509:logs 1485:talk 1462:Talk 1354:this 1325:this 1311:talk 1248:FORL 1191:here 1171:Talk 697:Talk 689:1996 664:1995 660:1994 647:Talk 629:1996 612:1994 602:and 585:Talk 544:talk 507:Talk 495:1974 483:1974 416:this 386:Talk 368:Talk 353:Talk 5384:Guy 5178:out 5175:Cat 5149:out 5146:Cat 5088:out 5085:Cat 4904:out 4901:Cat 4867:out 4864:Cat 4826:out 4823:Cat 4304:ANC 4300:all 4281:not 3553:or 2848:~~ 2832:~~ 2629:YAS 2437:)-- 2431:. ( 2423:to 2109:SRA 1543:. 540:BHA 418:? 378:ifd 5423:) 5419:• 5276:. 5196:. 5172:-- 5161:- 4898:-- 4888:- 4844:- 4751:-- 4714:) 4710:• 4659:, 4651:, 4378:• 4374:? 4259:is 3990:-- 3962:- 3940:- 3919:- 3609:. 3538:. 3523:: 3118:- 3032:- 2816:| 2794:-- 2228:is 2167:, 2088:- 1919:- 1887:. 1824:- 1774:- 1748:, 1744:, 1606:. 1460:- 1270:. 1169:- 1105:. 833:W§ 807:§ 780:. 695:- 687:, 645:- 627:, 620:. 610:, 587:) 546:• 505:- 493:, 481:, 388:) 370:) 355:) 347:-- 222:. 90:. 88:16 86:. 84:15 81:14 79:, 77:13 75:, 73:12 71:, 69:11 66:10 64:, 60:, 56:, 52:, 48:, 44:, 40:, 36:, 32:, 5473:) 5471:c 5469:| 5467:t 5465:| 5463:u 5461:( 5440:/ 5415:( 5392:) 5388:( 5344:. 5321:. 5058:" 4718:. 4706:( 4604:/ 4580:/ 4306:- 3966:) 3958:( 3944:) 3936:( 3923:) 3915:( 3856:) 3851:· 3843:· 3837:· 3832:( 3798:) 3793:· 3785:· 3779:· 3774:( 3401:) 3396:· 3388:· 3382:· 3377:( 3349:) 3344:· 3336:· 3330:· 3325:( 3309:) 3304:· 3296:· 3290:· 3285:( 3272:) 3267:· 3259:· 3253:· 3248:( 2479:) 2475:( 2371:) 2367:( 2331:) 2327:( 2268:) 2264:( 2243:) 2239:( 2199:) 2195:( 2115:/ 1529:) 1524:· 1518:· 1512:· 1506:· 1500:· 1494:· 1488:· 1483:( 1046:. 1020:* 975:* 854:§ 666:. 583:( 576:J 542:( 384:( 366:( 351:( 62:9 58:8 54:7 50:6 46:5 42:4 38:3 34:2 30:1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index