User talk:Mr. Stradivarius/Archive 4

2891:

best thing to do would be to take it back to the article's talk page, and try and work things out with Poule. If that discussion becomes stalled, then you can take things back to the DRN. Also, if RSN doesn't net you any clear results, then you can bring it back to DRN and we can discuss other steps that you can take to find consensus about the sources. If/when you take things back to DRN, you should probably start a new thread. There's no particular rule about it, but making a new thread is more transparent for people looking at how DRN threads are closed, and it will also stop you from running into problems with automatic archiving. You might want to give the thread a custom title to indicate that it's the second time it's been there, and you can just include a link to the previous DRN thread, rather than writing out the entire dispute overview again. Let me know if you have any more questions. Best —

1988:

concepts introduced here that would be a huge help. Part of the goal of the project is interacting with the online community so any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. It is also my first wikipedia project, so if you have any suggestions about how to make it more accessible that would also help. Finally I have been having trouble with the notes section, for some reason every time I quote an article, it is giving it a different number instead of liking all references to the article under one number.

2179: 31: 1148: 1832: 2988:. However, we do deal with disputes that mix content and conduct issues, as often solving the content issues solves the conduct issues too. I think in this case there are a lot of things we can discuss regarding the article's content, and that is what we would focus on. Hopefully, interaction issues would be sorted out in the process. Sorry that's a bit vague, but did it answer your question? — 311:

need to change this somehow - I suggest saying something like, 'According to UNICEF, they are being denied their basic human right to education.(ref)' Or even better, use a quote: 'According to UNICEF spokesman John Smith, "these children are simply being denied their basic human right to education".(ref)'

3089:

Of course. If you are away for an extended period, then it might be best to just come back to the talk page and bring up your concerns there (with the caveats about the topic ban that I mentioned above). The article could change a lot while you are away, and indeed it seems like discussions are going

3055:

again so that we can discuss the options we have, but first I wanted to ask whether or not you intend to continue editing the article. I'm sure that you now realise this well, but during any dispute resolution process you will not be able to edit or discuss, either directly or indirectly, anything in

2890:

Hi Failedwizard. You're right that it's closed pending a consensus on the use of sources. I see that you've posted the context of the dispute to the RSN now, so that should increase the quality of the responses you get. If you manage to get a clear consensus on the sources there, then I would say the

2345:

Thank you for your hasty reply. I was aware of the notability guidelines before publishing the article, but I was hoping they could be overlooked due to the understandably difficult subject being treated. I heard of Domenicism in several masonic lodges and since I could not find any sources I thought

2026:

Also, about the other sections, I'm also not sure what articles or sources were originally used for them. If you can't find them, then it might be that it was just written without any sources in the first place. In this case, don't be afraid to re-write it completely if that would make things better.

1983:

Thank you for getting in touch. I’ve been working in this page for a class project, which is due this week. I have been working in the article a lot these past days and uploaded the changes today. I re-worded a couple of things and since I have to cite everything I’ve had to change some of the quotes

1796:

Hello Mr Stradivarius, Thanks for the heads up! I made the edit for my psych class actually. First time for everything. I will be sure to take note of the editing summary in the future :) I must ask a friend of mine if she knows band; she's the Japan fanatic :D Thanks again! (not sure if I'm posting

2418:

Hi 19maxx, and thanks for asking. "Bots" are basically just pieces of software that make automatic edits to Knowledge. Usually they do stuff that would be really tedious and time-consuming to do by hand. Bots always have "bot" at the end of their username in some form, so they're quite easy to spot.

1987:

I haven’t been able to find the articles that were used for the “4 component section” and the “initial orientation section”, so I’m not really sure how to tie them in or if I should change their current location. If you have any information, or know of any articles where I could learn more about the

2584:

for the details. To prove that Camelot is notable, it would need to be something more than just a passing mention, so things like race results won't help too much. It also needs to be more than one source, and these sources need to be independent of each other and of Camelot and his backers. Let me

754:

page but "Webberkenny" insists on using the page to air her/his beef with Lopez. In reviewing information about "Webberkenny", she/he is self described as "a fan of Jeanmarie Simpson". Furthermore, she/he has a history of vandalizing and publicizing personal battles (see the Webberkenny talk page).

310:

If you state an opinion, you can't state it directly, in "Knowledge's voice". You need to either attribute it to someone, or change it into a factual statement. For example, "They are being denied their basic human right to education" is an opinion, albeit one that many people would agree with. You

2738:

article questions have been exactly what I was looking for when I started his discussion page a month ago. It's a complete tangent to my dispute with Cindy; e.g. if someone had given this type of attentive response from day 1, it would have prevented a month of hell. I would appreciate it if you

2297:

I felt it was inappropriate to propose a deletion to the article regarding Domenicism simply because of the inability to reference. The movement is very new and not publicly debated and not yet web based, but it is a reality. Furthermore, I feel I was very factual in my writing and did not deserve

2230:

It appears that the issues on the 1971 war page have sprung up again. User top gun was previously reported on his pattern of conduct on other pages. Other users such as Dbigxray, JCAla and IP 202 have either given up or appear to have been preemptively reported for a block by top gun. I myself was

1858:

so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven

1615:

Swedish sources who often is very critical of Finnish history due tend to support the Finnish view when it opposite the Soviet/Russian view. When it comes to Baryshnikov i must say its just share politics and nothing to do with history. For example Barisnikov does not dig deep enough to verify his

1327:

No probs. If I was cheeky I would suggest going away and deleting virtually the whole RHS article!! But I won't :-) That said, the deletion was made time and time again with absolutely no comment and no attempt at discussion. WP would quickly cease to function if that was considered acceptable

662:

before I decide whether I should follow your next suggested step. I would really appreciate your input. I understand I got some important things wrong originally but I really fail to see what is wrong in my very final suggestion. I am really just seeking to conform to sticking to secondary sources

2008:

I've had a go at fixing the references for you. There are still quite a few that haven't got years or page numbers (if appropriate), so it would be really helpful if you could fill those in. Also, you have cited a few books that don't appear in the references section - if you have time, could you

2318:

Hello Luxoculi. Sorry if I offended you by proposing the page for deletion with a rationale including "probable hoax", and if it is a real movement I apologise. If it makes any difference, I labelled it like this because I could find no results for it on Google Web search, Google News, or Google

909:

I am not Kamala Lopez nor a sockpuppet nor grinding any axes on behalf of Lopez or any other related parties. And I will not relent in my desire to have an encyclopedic reference available for the public as the ERA moves towards ratification. I hope this doesn't become another Maury Ornest flash

895:

The biggest issue is not whether or not there is a criticism of Lopez. If she has been convicted of something or acted inconsistently with her mission, that should be shown based on reliable sources. On the other hand, if Lopez has made controversial statements through a respected and mainstream

1603:

I'm a Swede who was very active on continuation war and Ihantala-Tali and did a great amount of work improving the article in 2009. But I felled I was forced to leave as an active contributor as I feelt the booth section was falling apart due to politicization of history. Im pleased to see your

2237:

The easiest thing would simply be a decision to maintain wiki best practices and only list casualties and losses in the casualties and losses section. I will likely be blocked by another unsuspecting admin courtesy of topgun again, so any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.

1878:

If I understand it correctly, Steven is experiencing health problems in his real life. In connection to that, can I ask you tp summarise the discussion about the issue #1 and open a discussion #2? I am a little bit concerned with the speed of the mediation process. If others, much more complex

1281:

I'm a bit baffled by your view that it's OK to remove something if it us uncited. I had thought this was only the case in certain circumstances (eg if it is damaging). Surely it's not the case that anything uncited can be removed? There wouldn't be much of WP left if that was the case. Not

858:

Thanks for admitting your bias. I will look at Simpson's page but my interest is only in national and international activists currently forwarding causes. I do have an evolving interest in Jeanette Rankin as it pertains to the fight for passage of the ERA. Apparently Lopez is a main player in

835:

invested in that and why not challenge it? Yes, I am a huge fan of Simpson's and have been ever since I saw her play seven years ago. I'm trying to not have her page be a fan site, though, and if it comes off that way, please give me suggestions to help improve it, or even work to improve it

711:

is calling this a "personal issue" and blaming "Ms. Simpson" for trying to push it betrays an entirely personal bias on HIS (or her) part. The fact that the film is so poor despite its host of celebrities is interesting and historically notable, especially considering the historicity of its

947:

Simpson is and has been an artist on the national and international levels working in the peace movement, very notably since 9/11. You are trying to elevate Lopez (probably yourself) to Simpson's level, and the level of thousands (if not millions) of legitimate, hard working activist. Ask

859:

promoting that cause. I have asked for permission to use pictures from Heroica Films but was told that they would not be available for general use and that they owned the copyright. That was true for ANY picture connected with the film. I would suggest that you address that issue yourself.

2657:

if you want. Thanks for adding those two sources, by the way. They are a good start towards proving notability. To make it really clear that he is notable, it would be best to have a source that talks about Camelot's background in more depth. Are you aware of anything like this? Best —

2319:

Books, and it is very unusual for movements such as the one described in the article to not have a presence on the web or in any of the more traditional sources indexed by Google. In any case, for the page to stay on Knowledge, I'm afraid that the subject needs to pass Knowledge's

3056:

the article relating to the area of your topic ban. In my opinion it would be easiest for you to comply with the topic ban by not editing the article at all. However, if you are still intent on contributing it then that is your decision - just be aware that you will need to be

1506:, you talk about not liking to see editors wasting effort - it is wasted effort having to discuss page move's over and over again on every australian football talk page because some people do not like how it is. I'm happy to do the leg work, I just need to know where to start. 1893:

My health problems amount to a broken left pinkie finger, which limits my abilities to type quickly. You'd be surprised how much one who is a touch typer uses their left pinkie. I plan to open up discussion on issue 2 later today, after us mediators discuss issue 1. Best,

1750:, I am going to consider this 'case closed', for now. Of course, it could be re-opened, if necessary, at a future date - just that I am going to stop checking back for updates. I have advised Filanca that, if xe wishes to resume discussions, xe should post a new thread on 1385:

I would of course like to start by apologising for the creation of such a mock-up page. It was done in a bout of frustration that I was experiencing about the college. I would just like to say that this will not happen again, and I am not generally a Knowledge vandal.

2957:

I've now properly responded to the topic. Another thing is, is the DRN suitable to address user interaction issues? I've noticed that several other editors already took similar concerns to that topic's talk page, so I wish to focus on interaction issues first, if

2231:

blocked even though top gun commenced the edit war and has refused to comment beyond his initial remarks. He even rv'd on the basis of my being blocked at his behest rather than on substantive grounds. Please advise as the previous DR appears to have led nowhere:

2926:

Hi, I responded to the AE case, and the thing is that I wrote that talk page reply before I was blocked for 24 hours, and pasted it after it expired. Should I go and cross off the particular point to show my intents of not willing to further discuss that banned

1580:

Ah, sorry, I must have missed that. No, you don't have to nominate a spokesperson if you would rather not; it's just that I didn't see the post where you stated your position. I see you've clarified this on the mediation page, too, so thanks for that. Best —

2263:

Hi 98, sorry to hear that you are having trouble with the article again. I've reviewed the most recent disputed edits, and I still think the best thing you could do to resolve this dispute is to take it to mediation - how about leaving a request at the

925:

You are definitely Lopez or her husband. What is the Ornest reference about? In what context are you talking about pics from the film? What is the HuffPo reference about? All I did was take out an uncited reference to Lopez having been invited by

1521:

I see what you mean. It does sound like a good idea to decide specific conventions for all Australian football/soccer articles, and doing that would definitely help disputes over the names. In that case, the best thing to do would be to open an

423:

Hi there, Mr. Stradivarius. I'm currently mediating a medical-based dispute at the DRN, but my medical knowledge is limited. I was wondering if you'd be able to provide any input to make up for my lack of medical knowledge? The dispute is about

1692: 2512:. I'm aware of the difference between the UK and Great Britain (that's where I'm from, after all), and I changed it to the UK because it is the name of the state, whereas Great Britain is the name of an island. (Though I appreciate that it is 1686: 1103:

Hi Stradivarius. My sincere apologies. I had no intention of giving you a vandalism warning. I realise that I must have clicked on the wrong template - it should of course simply have been the 'Declined Speedy Deletion' notification. Sorry!

964:

or any of a host of other relevant peace activists today, and they will know and applaud Simpson's work and refute any claims you (Lopez) have of meaningful activism. Lopez (you) have a long and sordid history of alienating people including

1496:

path was to instigate some dialogue on putting some closure on the matter once and for all because it IS needed. Talk page discussions are a waste of time because the SAME discussion is had on EVERY single australilan football article. The

2457:(Richards1052), leading the page to take on an excessively promotional tone not backed by reliable sources. I think now that these self-published sources have been effectively removed, a more neutral, encyclopedic page can be created. 3115:

Hi! I'm writing because I noticed that you very recently put in an AfD for a group of books put out by a spa that only added books by a specific family run publisher (Chanda Books). I noticed that the editor also added the book

3015:

Yes, I don't think your topic ban prevents you from editing the article, only the section in question, and we would take that into account in dispute resolution. The exact solution will probably depend on the clerk/mediator. —

2136: 706:

and one of his collaborators was unhappy with the work or there had been any kind of creative OR personal struggle that affected the outcome of the film, it would be discussed on their respective Knowledge pages. The fact that

1984:

in the article for similar quotes. The concepts are still pretty much the same, although I did change the structure a bit. I’ve copy pasted a lot from my word document so I don’t know if it might be hard to track the changes.

1501:

article needs to be revised and decided upon so all codes of football have an agreed naming convention. I must say that I am a little disappointed that the discussion didn't even stay open for 24 hours. In your comment on

1380: 781:

I didn't see "webberkenney"'s post until after I submitted mine. At least she and I agree on one thing - there is a problem. A ruling by you or another administrator is likely going to be the only way to resolve this.

2944:? If so, then I think that would be a good idea, yes. I don't see your response at the AE case, though - the most important thing is to comment there so that the closing admin can see the root of the confusion. Best — 1656:

Hi Posse, and thanks for the pointers. I'll bring those sources up on the mediation page tomorrow, though I won't have time today. As for the naming of Vyborg/Viipuri, have you commented on the request for comments at

877:

but only from mainstream film critics, and there should not be too much weight on the criticism compared to the other coverage of the film. Criticism from Simpson should probably be limited to the article on the film

579: 701:

page, clearly a very close friend or family member OR Lopez herself (a non-identified SOCK PUPPET) continues to try to maintain the Lopez page as a fan site. If it were a page about a truly notable director, such as

2327:

that are independent of the subject. If this cannot be proved then I'm afraid the page will likely be deleted. Let me know if you have any questions about the process, and I'll be happy to answer them. Regards —

758:

I realize you must be inundated with petty squabbles and I would hope most issues are much larger than this but I'm clearly not going to be able to reason with her/him. Please let me know the next best steps.

515:

I created this from another article, and noticed you had it on your to-do list. I added your refs as a bibliography. The article currently consists only of a single example, plus a short comment on creoles. —

2739:

would watch the Doyle discussion page and pop in occasionally. I've copied your main passage addressing my source use there, and my response(s) to it. No pressure whatsoever. Thanks for your help so far.

1123:

page to update it a little more - I still can't bring myself to say that I can definitely tell what the subject is. Anyway, if it doesn't get updated, I think I'll take your suggestion and PROD it. Thanks —

263:

No problem. I did think that the section name should probably be shorter anyway, but I didn't fix it for whatever reason. I might have another look over it and see if there's a good way of doing it. Best —

535:. I found those sources from that search, and thought I might have a go at making them into an article, but I ended up leaving it halfway through. I'll have a look and see if there's anything I can add. — 2141: 1546:

in the RfC summary, and also notify all the editors who took part in it. Just be warned that you might need to accept a solution that you don't like, if it's the one that works for Knowledge. Best —

2031:. Don't worry about messing up other editors' work - it can always be fixed from the page history pretty easily, and if the end result is better, then it's a plus for Knowledge. So go for it. :) — 1395: 1256:

I've had a go at it, though I haven't done the infobox yet. It still needs wikifying and you should probably verify the references too, just in case anything got lost in translation. Best —

3120:, which is also non-notable and was also written by a family member of Chanda Books. I figure that it'd be better for you to add it rather than for me to do a separate AfD for this article. 557:

Because you have participated in a related RfC on this article, or have recently contributed to it, you are hereby informed that your input would be highly appreciated on the new RfC here:

2013:

section, as it is supposed to be a summary of everything else in the article, so everything that it says should be cited already. As always, let me know if you have more questions. Best —

1432:. There are only three active users, right now: Benzaband, Hi878, and I. If you have time, it would be great if you could give us your contribution (help) by reviewing the nominations at 223:

That's looking very nice indeed. It's you who I should be thanking for help! I really appreciate what you're doing, and I look forward to see how Filanca will respond to this. Regards —

2868: 814:

on the question on the article's talk page. That would get outside eyes on the dispute, which is usually the most efficient way of dealing with this kind of thing, in my experience. —

3051:

Hello again PCPP - it looks like the AE case has been closed, and that you will be allowed to continue editing the article, if you so choose. I'm willing to open up the thread at the

2804:

You're welcome! Don't worry about what kind of start we got off to - I've had a lot worse than that, let me tell you. As always, let me know if you have any more questions. Best —

2127: 1362:

be sourced, then they should be removed. You are also free to challenge material that isn't sourced and remove it yourself, and I don't think doing so would be "cheeky" at all. —

2376:, which means that any material that cannot be backed up by sources will have a hard time here indeed. You may have an easier time submitting it somewhere else - have a look at 611: 2455: 1616:

claim. Its very hard for an out stander to understand what he build his claim on. There are very many good Swedish source is the Swedish military historian Niklas Zetterling

3157:

No problem, thanks for adding them and for catching that other one! I'd almost recommend salting, except that the publisher has long since dumped their articles and ran.

1465:

Yeah, I've been caught up with dispute resolution stuff, and work at WikiProject Linguistics. I haven't forgotten MotD though, honest! I'll come over and have a look. —

1119:

I thought that was probably what happened, so no worries :) Your reading of the subject seems like a plausible one, but hopefully we can get the original author of the

487:

and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at

394: 1589: 659: 3001:

Sure, I have no problems with mixed issues. I just hope to avoid anything to do with the banned topic, and the article seemed to only make a passing mention of it.--

1847: 1527: 1093: 496: 368: 1489: 586:

article. It is the first time I have opened a case and I'm not sure if I have done it correctly; would you have a look and let me know if it is ok? Have a good day.

2167: 2284: 412: 2913: 2899: 1934: 1820: 1076: 3166: 3152: 1419: 845: 739: 543: 2368:

I'm afraid that if there are no sources then it is almost certain to be deleted. In addition to the notability guidelines, Knowledge also has the policies of

1459: 1370: 1337: 1318: 2812: 2711: 2666: 2630: 2593: 2565: 2536: 2196: 1038: 1023: 802: 776: 390: 2388: 2355: 2336: 1921: 1907: 1648: 1264: 1188: 822: 459: 450: 148: 133: 2762: 2185: 2178: 2102: 2002: 1673: 1498: 1413: 1132: 686: 645: 622: 492: 438:

Hi ItsZippy, sorry for the delay. I'm no expert in medical matters either, but that shouldn't really be necessary as long as we remind editors to stick to

2443: 2039: 2021: 989: 1888: 1798: 1554: 1473: 272: 3129: 3102: 3068: 3024: 3010: 2996: 2967: 2952: 2845:

PS the section is called "User:Pieter Kuiper again" the link does not go directly to it because of some compression above somewhere, or whatever it is.

1785: 1625:

An alternative his the Russian historian Mark Solonin who actually goes very deep in his research and tends to support the Finnish view in most cases.

1608: 231: 186: 1975: 1595: 1057: 745: 483:, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. 2256: 500: 2872: 3117: 2784: 2699: 2618: 2553: 2484: 2476:

Sorry i don't know what you are doing editing horses but uk and gb are completely different ... so get some facts right before you edit please ty

1433: 721: 2884: 1771: 1607:

First the question of the name of Viipuri. Even on Soviet war time map from 1941 the city is called Viipuri with Cyrillic alphabet, cheeking out

1299: 3141: 3137: 2347: 2346:

starting an editable article here could help in bringing out the subject. Thank you nevertheless. Do you think it will be deleted? Kind regards,

2304: 1872: 479:

project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the

1636: 755:

Finally, Simpson's opinions are already posted on her wikipage (along with a picture for which she claims to have the copyright but does not).

727:

Hi Webberkenny, sorry to hear that you're still having problems at the article. I think the best thing to do is to file another request at the

294: 1120: 3084: 3046: 1854:

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our

2748: 2291: 1970: 1565:

Re your last message to my talk page, I already posted that I would speak for myself. Is this a case of I have to nominate a spokesperson?

1285:

Anyway, the good news is I found a citation for the point so have reinserted it, as well as meeting all the other points of your response.

568: 1991:

So, well there’s a lot of stuff to do :). Unfortunately I only have until Tuesday to work in it but I look forward to working with you.

1724: 708: 525: 196: 3110: 1574: 832: 1719: 1234: 2217: 1223: 217: 2936: 175: 2192: 1306:

Amazing though it may be, that is indeed the standard. Please note that it's not really my view, but the contents of Knowledge's

257: 2076: 398: 2466: 2122: 1067:

And also for not addressing a single one of the salient points or questions addressed to your previous accusatory post. Phony!

1515: 2854: 2840: 2312: 2222: 1270: 692: 467: 94: 2796: 1926:

Yes, sorry I haven't been all that active on the case recently. I'll discuss it with Steven, and we'll get things moving. —

1806: 300:

That's looking very nice! Thank you for your great work. I have a couple of pointers for how you could make it even better:

117: 2875:- when such a response comes, is the Dispute re-opened (and possibly restored from archive) or would a new one be started? 2420: 2248: 2146:

Thank you, and a Merry Christmas and a New Year of health, happiness, peace, love, and prosperity to you and your family. –

1826: 1250: 672: 480: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 2859: 2496: 1171: 827:

Thank you, I will do that. Meanwhile, what picture does Simpson not have the copyright to? Her headshot? Or the one with

2232: 1085:

rather than arguing about it on my talk page? This isn't really the right place to continue this conversation. Thanks —

1966: 432: 3090:

on about what to do with it even now. If you do decide to come back to it, and if discussions break down again, then

2729: 2412: 1609:

http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=viipuri&more=date_all&n=10&prev=0&frow=10&page=2

1113: 985: 2828: 604: 442:. I've commented over at DRN. Again, thanks for your help on the noticeboard there; it really makes a difference. — 3060:

not to stray into the subject area you are banned from. Let me know what your thoughts are on this. All the best —

872:

As for your insistence on forcing the critique into the article, Mr. Stradivarius addressed this issue by stating:

532: 194: 2094:

was involved. I agree that the connection looks obvious, but let's wait and hear what other editors think. Best —

1747: 1679: 1543: 192: 2792: 2707: 2626: 2561: 2492: 1611:

You will find no mentioned of the Vyborg before 1950s but both Viborg and Viipuri is mentioned until late 1950s.

731:, so that it will be seen by more people. Let me know if you have any questions about filing there again. Best — 200:

I hope that seems OK to you; of course, if not, let me know. Thanks very much for your continued help with this.

2050:

Hi Mr. Stradivarius, now that the mediation has been closed it seems as though the edit-war is starting again. "

2773:

Cheers Stradivarius ill have a look at that.. and sorry that we didn't get off to the best start . i was rude.

1019: 798: 425: 2377: 1743: 1644: 1539: 1087: 2691:

That the problem he is only a young horse but i will try and find some other sources thanks you your help

1946: 1570: 1194: 488: 180: 1199:

Thank you for your input, as always. (And I think you know me well enough to realise, I'd have said that,

2921: 2162: 1714: 1454: 505: 290: 278: 1503: 2972:

We don't usually deal with pure conduct disputes. They are usually handled at a few different places -

1429: 969:, a well-respected political activist who has revealed Lopez's (your) narcissistic, phony tendencies. 836:

yourself. I doubt that you'll do that, because you clearly have a personal bias and agenda against her.

159: 47: 38: 17: 2233:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_11#Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971

1662: 1661:? If you haven't already, then you should probably let people know your preference and your rationale 896:

source like The Huffington Post, that should be shown in my opinion and I will be adding that content.

2524:

can be found that mention him, the article is in danger of being deleted. Have a look at Knowledge's

1954: 1839: 1492:(as blunt as it was) that you may have in fact missed the point... The reason I opted to go down the 564: 237: 3075:

Hi, I'm very busy at the moment and won't be available for a while, is it possible to postpone it?--

1812:

Yep, this is where messages go. Thanks for the reply! Again, if you have any questions, just ask. —

2252: 2211: 549: 154: 2513: 2454:

Thanks. A long-time problem on this page has been that Silverstein built much of the page himself

2850: 2836: 1566: 1531: 2528:

for more information. Are you aware of any sources that could go in the article? Best regards —

2909: 2880: 2462: 2118: 2082:

Hi there, and sorry to hear that you're having problems on the page again. If you suspect that

2045: 1962: 1917: 1912:

Great. Glad to learn that the health problem appeared to be much less serious than I thought.--

1901: 1884: 1860: 1802: 1777:

Sounds reasonable to me. Thanks again for dealing with this, and for keeping me in the loop. —

1479: 286: 145: 130: 114: 2869:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Augmentative_and_alternative_communication_discussion

123:

Available to chat today? 12pm local time (in about an hour) would work well for me. Email me.

3162: 3146: 3125: 3096: 3062: 3018: 2990: 2946: 2893: 2806: 2756: 2660: 2587: 2530: 2437: 2382: 2330: 2278: 2096: 2033: 2015: 1928: 1855: 1814: 1779: 1667: 1658: 1583: 1548: 1467: 1407: 1364: 1312: 1271: 1258: 1182: 1126: 1072: 1053: 981: 841: 816: 733: 717: 680: 616: 537: 521: 444: 406: 362: 266: 225: 2653:

No, just add them straight to the article. For help with referencing you can have a look at

531:

Thanks for letting me know! This all goes back to when I was looking around for sources for

2780: 2695: 2614: 2549: 2480: 2244: 1947: 1632: 1622:

Whos book "Hitler mot Stalin" From 2009 about the eastern front 1941-45 is a good source.

1333: 1295: 1007: 973: 786: 560: 476: 1879:

questions will be being discussed in the same manner, the whole process will take years.--

8: 2788: 2703: 2622: 2557: 2488: 2273: 2203: 1868: 1401:

Glad to hear it. If you do feel like doing an odd bit of vandalism again you can use the

506: 303:

First, you can't use Knowledge as a source - it doesn't pass the criteria set out in our

279: 1350:

You're right, it's usually better to talk things out on the discussion page and reach a

314:

If you want to group citations together, you can do it by using <ref name="blah": -->

2846: 2832: 2824: 2428: 2351: 2308: 2290: 2269: 1684:

We need your help. We would be grateful if you would take a few minutes to discuss the

1560: 1535: 1246: 1164: 1034: 1015: 927: 794: 772: 382: 338: 2272:- it makes keeping track of things like this much easier when you can put things on a 1542:; and because it is still quite soon after the requested move, you should link to the 2905: 2876: 2744: 2458: 2114: 2070: 1913: 1896: 1880: 1737: 1640: 1485: 1391: 1109: 668: 653: 639: 598: 484: 355:

after it as well! The full stop should go directly before the ref tag, with no space.

328: 171: 140: 125: 109: 578:

Hi Mr. Stradivarius, I have tried to open a case at the Mediation Cabal (see here:

3158: 3121: 2768: 2449: 2408: 2265: 2172: 2108: 2091: 2051: 1998: 1228: 1068: 1049: 977: 953: 837: 713: 517: 810:

Hi again. Thinking about it, maybe a good way to resolve this would be to open an

2977: 2517: 2505: 2424: 2157: 1709: 1511: 1449: 1329: 1291: 1081:

Sorry to barge in here, but could you please file another request on this at the

703: 439: 374: 251: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3080: 3042: 3006: 2963: 2932: 2654: 2028: 2010: 1864: 1764: 1402: 1216: 1138: 583: 385:

do you think is met? Or what is the third party coverage that you think meets

318: 210: 2435:

for more details. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. —

2090:

and use the case name "Ledenierhomme", as that was the previous case in which

1696:

is much better, but it is necessary to reach a consensus before approving it.

3052: 2981: 2973: 2871:

is currently closed - I'm guessing this might be while we get a response at

2818: 2509: 2471: 2432: 2087: 1791: 1751: 1523: 1493: 1355: 1351: 1242: 1156: 1147: 1082: 1030: 1011: 949: 811: 790: 768: 728: 456: 429: 386: 163: 102: 3091: 2985: 2740: 2581: 2521: 2398: 2373: 2324: 2083: 2059: 2055: 1733: 1387: 1105: 961: 957: 751: 698: 664: 660:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Spirulina_.28dietary_supplement.29

628: 614:, and made a few formatting changes. Hopefully that should do the trick. — 587: 304: 167: 1310:- it doesn't really matter what any one editor thinks about it. Regards — 1282:

wishing to make trouble, just genuinely amazed that this is the standard.

3140:. I've added them both to the AfD. If you could confirm your position on 3037:

Hi, I wish to hold off the case for a bit until my AE case is resolved.--

2754:

Hi Squish7 - I've replied on the talk page and at the DRN thread. Best —

2525: 2516:.) Anyway, there is a more pressing issue at hand - I'm not certain that 2404: 2369: 2320: 1994: 1307: 1098: 966: 828: 418: 2735: 2147: 1838:

Dear Mr. Stradivarius/Archive 4: Hello, this is to let you know that a

1699: 1507: 1439: 1358:. In all seriousness, though, if there are things in that article that 750:

Mr. Stradivarius: I loathe to write to you again about issues with the

573: 244: 2027:

In little-edited areas of the encyclopaedia such as these, it pays to

1953:

Kindly join us in the debate on the naming issues for this article at

1278:

Thanks for your balanced review of the Royal Hosptial School dispute.

663:

and eliminating primary and tertiary sources on the subject... Cheers

360:

This has been quite a long list - I hope it is useful! All the best —

324:

The article's citation style is inconsistent at the moment. Try using

3076: 3038: 3002: 2959: 2928: 1757: 1209: 551: 348: 285:

Ive completed the edits to the Education in Africa that I proposed.

203: 2009:

fill those in too? Oh, and you don't have to cite everything in the

2431:(amongst other things) on many user talk pages. Have a look at our 1831: 1238: 1381:

Creation of the page "Sagi Rama Krishnam Raju Enginnering College"

1153:

Thank you for your participation in the Dispute Resolution forum--

875:"...it is ok to have some criticism of the film in her biography, 2585:

know if you have any more questions, and I'll be glad to help. —

375: 1530:. To get a wide base of participants you should probably notify 3144:

over there, that would be great. Thanks for letting me know! —

678:

Yes, sorry for the delay. I'll go and take a look at it now. —

612:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/08 November 2011/Iraqi Turkmens

1617: 491:. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, 2113:

Thank you for the timely, informative reply, it's helping. --

1842:

case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

1746:) has not edited in over a month, and did not yet respond to 187:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Minorities in Greece

2199:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2086:

is a sockpuppet, then you should follow the instructions at

2873:

Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Academic_Conferences

2504:

Hi Royalrock! Sorry if I upset you - I was just looking at

658:

Dear Mr.Stradivarius, could you reply to my last comment @

2831:? I'd like to avoid direct contact with him, as you know. 1698:

Thanks and all the best for the upcoming Holiday season! –

2545:

sorry.... do you mean a like a mention in a news paper?

1848:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

1528:

Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (Football in Australia)

404:

Thanks for the heads-up. I've commented over at AfD. —

2580:

Yes, I mean sources like newspapers or books. See our

1499:

Knowledge:Naming conventions (Football in Australia)

307:. The other sources you have used look fine, though. 2184:Hello, Mr. Stradivarius. You have new messages at 2140:for the New Year's Day, and, if you can, check the 2128:

MotD: New Year's Eve&Day + Knowledge's birthday

1048:No, thank YOU for the phony intellectual blather. 2942:Do you mean striking your comment with <s: --> 2142:nomination for the eleventh birthday of Knowledge 1604:effort to mediate, but also feels some concerns. 1180:You're welcome! Glad I could be of assistance. — 580:Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/08 November 2011/ 2904:Thank you very much, that sounds clear and fair 2323:, which requires that it is covered in multiple 1434:Knowledge:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review 316:for the first one and <ref name="blah" /: --> 2610:hiya do i send them to you on here or? cheers 138:Hey, you got some time today to jump on Skype? 1420:It would be great if you could help us at MotD 1405:- no-one will mind if you do it there. Best — 2984:, and at the various ArbCom pages, including 2403:What is a bot, and what are they used for? -- 381:Hi, I added this to AfD. Which criterion of 1428:", but since October I have not seen you at 1003:Hmmm... thanks for the unrestrained rant. 344:to get all the references looking the same. 2582:guidelines on identifying reliable sources 1976:Communication Accommodation Theory- Gesund 1596:Ihantala-Tali and Countinuation mediation. 746:Kamala Lopez page/webberkenney shenanigans 455:Thanks for your reply - much appreciated. 2134:Please, consider to give your opinion on 1618:http://sv.wikipedia.org/Niklas_Zetterling 1203:of whether or not we happened to agree!) 317:for the second one. For more details see 2520:is notable, so unless some independent 1424:I do not know if it was my fault with " 930:to become a blogger on the HuffPo site. 191:Just to keep you informed - please see 160:Knowledge:DRN#Ra_One_-_Response_section 14: 166:, asked editors to keep at DRN. Best. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2823:Hello again! Would you please inform 2054:" now seems to have a new user name " 697:Mr. Stradivarius - the author of the 25: 2514:a little more complicated than that 1725:Minorities in Greece - case closed? 23: 3111:Put another in with the Aamoo AfD? 2177: 2058:"… what should be done about this? 1830: 24: 3181: 2298:this. I hope you can understand. 347:Finally, be careful of putting a 1484:Firstly I do tend to agree with 1146: 533:difficulty of learning languages 29: 1504:User talk:Silent Billy#Football 3053:dispute resolution noticeboard 1649:15:07, 27 November 2011‎ (UTC) 1206:Keep up the good stuff. Best, 1083:dispute resolution noticeboard 729:dispute resolution noticeboard 13: 1: 2444:10:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2413:04:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2389:17:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2378:Knowledge:Alternative outlets 2356:16:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2337:16:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2313:15:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2285:03:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2257:02:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2223:Re: 1971 again 2 months later 2218:22:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2193:22:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2168:10:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 2123:02:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 2103:15:40, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2077:15:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2040:09:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2022:08:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2003:06:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 1797:this in the write place...)-- 1720:09:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 1674:15:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC) 1590:13:13, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 1575:12:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 1555:00:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC) 1540:Knowledge talk:Article titles 1516:22:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1474:10:00, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1460:09:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1414:07:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC) 1396:16:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1371:09:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1338:09:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1319:09:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1300:09:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1265:08:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1251:06:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC) 1224:16:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC) 1189:15:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC) 1172:15:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC) 1133:13:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC) 1114:13:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC) 1094:06:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 1077:05:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 1058:05:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 1039:01:06, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 1024:03:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 990:03:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 846:20:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 823:11:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 803:06:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 777:06:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 740:02:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 722:16:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC) 693:Kamala Lopez Page Controversy 687:02:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC) 673:20:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 646:13:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 475:Since you were a part of the 468:Feedback Dashboard task force 107:We still good for in 40mins? 3167:11:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 3153:11:19, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 3136:Done, plus I found another, 3130:10:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 3103:12:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 3085:12:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 3069:14:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 3047:06:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 3025:09:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 3011:09:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 2997:09:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 2968:08:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 2953:08:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 2937:08:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 2914:11:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 2900:09:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 2885:09:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 2144:(it's just 1-2 noms below). 1971:09:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 1935:23:25, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1922:22:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1908:22:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1889:21:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1873:12:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 1827:Mediation Cabal: Case update 1821:21:55, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 1807:17:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 1786:22:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 1772:20:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 623:14:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC) 610:I've moved the page over to 605:13:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC) 569:16:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC) 544:08:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC) 526:06:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC) 501:22:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC) 489:Knowledge:Feedback Dashboard 460:20:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC) 451:06:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC) 433:15:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 413:16:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 399:15:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 369:07:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 295:01:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 273:08:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 258:08:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 232:05:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 218:05:05, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 176:21:38, 28 October 2011 (UTC) 149:06:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 134:23:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 118:22:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC) 7: 2860:Question on dispute process 2855:23:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 2841:23:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC) 2813:16:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 2797:14:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2763:16:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 2749:08:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2712:03:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2667:01:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2631:00:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2594:00:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2566:00:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2537:00:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 2497:23:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 2467:20:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 10: 3186: 2867:Just to check something - 2186:TransporterMan's talk page 305:reliable sources guideline 18:User talk:Mr. Stradivarius 2730:Your help / Doyle article 2088:Sockpuppet Investigations 1544:requested move discussion 3094:will still be around. — 2380:for some suggestions. — 2268:? Also, I recommend you 2227:Hello Mr. Stradivarius, 1687:nomination for Christmas 1302:(formerly JustResignGC) 1089:Mr. Stradivarius on tour 162:. Started to spill onto 1308:policy of verifiability 2776:Thanks for your help 2433:page on Knowledge bots 2427:which posts a copy of 2182: 1980:Hi Mr. Stradivarious, 1835: 2526:notability guidelines 2181: 1834: 1680:Christmas' Motto 2011 1659:Talk:Continuation War 1536:WikiProject Australia 1272:Royal Hospital School 472:Hi Mr. Stradivarius, 42:of past discussions. 2374:no original research 2321:notability guideline 2132:Hi Mr. Stradivarius! 1948:Memogate controversy 1532:WikiProject Football 1195:Lyudmila Pavlichenko 181:Minorities in Greece 2922:Re: My dispute case 2508:as part of routine 2270:register a username 507:Language complexity 351:before a reference 280:Education in Africa 3092:dispute resolution 2825:User:Pieter Kuiper 2734:Your help with my 2197:remove this notice 2183: 1836: 1567:The Last Angry Man 1233:Can you translate 928:Arianna Huffington 481:Feedback Dashboard 242:Arabic A. My bad. 2800: 2783:comment added by 2715: 2698:comment added by 2655:this simple guide 2634: 2617:comment added by 2569: 2552:comment added by 2500: 2483:comment added by 2247:comment added by 2166: 1770: 1718: 1652: 1635:comment added by 1458: 1222: 1177: 1176: 1027: 1010:comment added by 993: 976:comment added by 806: 789:comment added by 315:Blah</ref: --> 287:Asiamcclearygaddy 238:Thanks for fixing 216: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3177: 3149: 3148:Mr. Stradivarius 3099: 3098:Mr. Stradivarius 3065: 3064:Mr. Stradivarius 3021: 3020:Mr. Stradivarius 2993: 2992:Mr. Stradivarius 2949: 2948:Mr. Stradivarius 2896: 2895:Mr. Stradivarius 2809: 2808:Mr. Stradivarius 2799: 2777: 2759: 2758:Mr. Stradivarius 2714: 2692: 2663: 2662:Mr. Stradivarius 2633: 2611: 2590: 2589:Mr. Stradivarius 2568: 2546: 2533: 2532:Mr. Stradivarius 2522:reliable sources 2510:new pages patrol 2499: 2477: 2440: 2439:Mr. Stradivarius 2419:See for example 2385: 2384:Mr. Stradivarius 2333: 2332:Mr. Stradivarius 2325:reliable sources 2281: 2280:Mr. Stradivarius 2259: 2214: 2208: 2200: 2154: 2151: 2099: 2098:Mr. Stradivarius 2092:User:MamRostam03 2073: 2067: 2063: 2052:User:MamRostam03 2036: 2035:Mr. Stradivarius 2018: 2017:Mr. Stradivarius 1960: 1931: 1930:Mr. Stradivarius 1906: 1904: 1899: 1859:Zhang, on their 1817: 1816:Mr. Stradivarius 1782: 1781:Mr. Stradivarius 1769: 1767: 1761: 1755: 1706: 1703: 1670: 1669:Mr. Stradivarius 1651: 1629: 1586: 1585:Mr. Stradivarius 1551: 1550:Mr. Stradivarius 1470: 1469:Mr. Stradivarius 1446: 1443: 1410: 1409:Mr. Stradivarius 1367: 1366:Mr. Stradivarius 1315: 1314:Mr. Stradivarius 1261: 1260:Mr. Stradivarius 1221: 1219: 1213: 1207: 1185: 1184:Mr. Stradivarius 1170: 1167: 1150: 1143: 1142: 1129: 1128:Mr. Stradivarius 1090: 1026: 1004: 992: 970: 954:S. Brian Willson 819: 818:Mr. Stradivarius 805: 783: 736: 735:Mr. Stradivarius 683: 682:Mr. Stradivarius 642: 636: 632: 619: 618:Mr. Stradivarius 601: 595: 591: 582:) regarding the 540: 539:Mr. Stradivarius 447: 446:Mr. Stradivarius 409: 408:Mr. Stradivarius 365: 364:Mr. Stradivarius 343: 337: 333: 327: 269: 268:Mr. Stradivarius 256: 254: 249: 228: 227:Mr. Stradivarius 215: 213: 207: 201: 155:DRN needs you... 147: 143: 132: 128: 116: 112: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3185: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3147: 3113: 3097: 3063: 3019: 2991: 2947: 2924: 2894: 2862: 2821: 2807: 2778: 2771: 2757: 2732: 2693: 2661: 2612: 2588: 2547: 2531: 2478: 2474: 2452: 2438: 2425:User:EdwardsBot 2401: 2383: 2331: 2295: 2279: 2266:Mediation Cabal 2242: 2225: 2212: 2204: 2201: 2190: 2175: 2149: 2137:this nomination 2130: 2111: 2097: 2071: 2065: 2061: 2048: 2034: 2016: 1978: 1958: 1951: 1929: 1902: 1897: 1895: 1840:Mediation Cabal 1829: 1815: 1794: 1780: 1765: 1759: 1756: 1727: 1701: 1682: 1668: 1630: 1598: 1584: 1563: 1549: 1482: 1468: 1441: 1438:All the best! – 1426:da punkY thingY 1422: 1408: 1383: 1365: 1313: 1276: 1259: 1231: 1217: 1211: 1208: 1197: 1183: 1165: 1154: 1141: 1127: 1106:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1101: 1088: 1005: 971: 817: 784: 748: 734: 704:Martin Scorsese 695: 681: 656: 640: 634: 630: 617: 599: 593: 589: 576: 561:Dominus Vobisdu 555: 538: 510: 470: 445: 421: 407: 379: 363: 341: 335: 331: 325: 283: 267: 252: 245: 243: 240: 226: 211: 205: 202: 183: 157: 141: 139: 126: 124: 110: 108: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3183: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3118:Sonu ke Afsane 3112: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 2923: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2861: 2858: 2820: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2540: 2539: 2473: 2470: 2451: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2340: 2339: 2301:Kind regards, 2294: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2249:98.165.115.152 2224: 2221: 2206:TransporterMan 2191:Message added 2189: 2176: 2174: 2171: 2145: 2133: 2129: 2126: 2110: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2047: 2046:Iraqi Turkmens 2044: 2043: 2042: 2024: 1977: 1974: 1950: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1852: 1851: 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1726: 1723: 1697: 1693:second version 1681: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1614: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1481: 1480:DRN - Football 1478: 1477: 1476: 1437: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1322: 1321: 1275: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1230: 1227: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1175: 1174: 1151: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1100: 1097: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910:point for you. 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 851: 850: 849: 848: 747: 744: 743: 742: 694: 691: 690: 689: 655: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 584:Iraqi Turkmens 575: 572: 559:]. Thank you! 554: 548: 547: 546: 509: 504: 485:Steven Walling 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 420: 417: 416: 415: 391:Logical Cowboy 378: 373: 372: 371: 358: 357: 356: 345: 322: 312: 308: 282: 277: 276: 275: 239: 236: 235: 234: 182: 179: 156: 153: 152: 151: 136: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3182: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3143: 3142:Sonu ke Kisse 3139: 3138:Sonu ke Kisse 3135: 3134: 3133: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3104: 3101: 3100: 3093: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3067: 3066: 3059: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3026: 3023: 3022: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2898: 2897: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2865: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2847:SergeWoodzing 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2833:SergeWoodzing 2830: 2826: 2814: 2811: 2810: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2774: 2764: 2761: 2760: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2737: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2668: 2665: 2664: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2595: 2592: 2591: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2534: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2469: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2445: 2442: 2441: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2370:verifiability 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2326: 2322: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2293: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2228: 2220: 2219: 2215: 2209: 2207: 2198: 2194: 2187: 2180: 2170: 2169: 2164: 2160: 2159: 2153: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2074: 2068: 2064: 2057: 2053: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2030: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2012: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1959:Arun Reginald 1956: 1955:its talk page 1949: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1900: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1857: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1841: 1833: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1768: 1763: 1762: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1730: 1722: 1721: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1705: 1695: 1694: 1689: 1688: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1664: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1612: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1445: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1288:Many thanks. 1286: 1283: 1279: 1273: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1204: 1202: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1084: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 968: 963: 959: 955: 951: 950:Cindy Sheehan 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 929: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 879: 874: 873: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 847: 843: 839: 834: 831:? And how is 830: 826: 825: 824: 821: 820: 813: 809: 808: 807: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 779: 778: 774: 770: 766: 763: 760: 756: 753: 741: 738: 737: 730: 726: 725: 724: 723: 719: 715: 710: 705: 700: 688: 685: 684: 677: 676: 675: 674: 670: 666: 661: 647: 643: 637: 633: 626: 625: 624: 621: 620: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 596: 592: 585: 581: 571: 570: 566: 562: 558: 553: 545: 542: 541: 534: 530: 529: 528: 527: 523: 519: 513: 508: 503: 502: 498: 494: 493:Maryana (WMF) 490: 486: 482: 478: 473: 461: 458: 454: 453: 452: 449: 448: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 427: 414: 411: 410: 403: 402: 401: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 377: 370: 367: 366: 359: 354: 350: 346: 340: 330: 323: 320: 313: 309: 306: 302: 301: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 288: 281: 274: 271: 270: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 250: 248: 233: 230: 229: 222: 221: 220: 219: 214: 209: 208: 198: 197: 195: 193: 189: 188: 178: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 150: 146: 144: 137: 135: 131: 129: 122: 121: 120: 119: 115: 113: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3145: 3132:tokyogirl79 3114: 3095: 3061: 3058:very careful 3057: 3017: 2989: 2945: 2925: 2906:Failedwizard 2892: 2877:Failedwizard 2866: 2863: 2844: 2822: 2805: 2779:— Preceding 2775: 2772: 2755: 2733: 2694:— Preceding 2659: 2613:— Preceding 2586: 2548:— Preceding 2529: 2479:— Preceding 2475: 2459:Plot Spoiler 2453: 2436: 2429:The Signpost 2402: 2381: 2329: 2303: 2300: 2296: 2277: 2243:— Preceding 2240: 2236: 2229: 2226: 2205: 2202: 2156: 2135: 2131: 2112: 2095: 2084:User:KakaSur 2060: 2056:User:KakaSur 2049: 2032: 2014: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1952: 1927: 1914:Paul Siebert 1881:Paul Siebert 1853: 1846: 1837: 1813: 1799:Greenbbbeans 1795: 1778: 1758: 1740: 1731: 1728: 1708: 1691: 1685: 1683: 1666: 1665:. Regards — 1631:— Preceding 1627: 1624: 1621: 1613: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1582: 1564: 1547: 1538:, and maybe 1486:Silent Billy 1483: 1466: 1448: 1425: 1423: 1406: 1384: 1363: 1359: 1356:edit warring 1354:rather than 1328:behaviour. 1311: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1277: 1257: 1232: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1198: 1181: 1158: 1157: 1125: 1102: 1086: 1080: 1066: 1029: 1006:— Preceding 1002: 972:— Preceding 962:Frank Dorrel 958:Mimi Kennedy 876: 815: 785:— Preceding 780: 767: 764: 761: 757: 752:Kamala Lopez 749: 732: 699:Kamala Lopez 696: 679: 657: 629: 615: 588: 577: 556: 536: 514: 511: 474: 471: 443: 422: 405: 389:? Thanks. 380: 361: 352: 284: 265: 246: 241: 224: 204: 199: 190: 184: 158: 142:Steven Zhang 127:Steven Zhang 111:Steven Zhang 106: 75: 43: 37: 3169:tokyogirl79 3159:Tokyogirl79 3122:Tokyogirl79 2958:possible.-- 2943:</s: --> 2864:Hi there, 1628:Rgds Posse 1241:? Thanks.-- 1121:smart space 1069:Webberkenny 1050:Webberkenny 978:Webberkenny 967:Ben Affleck 838:Webberkenny 829:Judd Nelson 714:Webberkenny 383:WP:ACADEMIC 36:This is an 2736:Ryan Doyle 2292:Domenicism 2195:. You can 1863:. Thanks! 1754:. Thanks, 1748:this query 1561:Mediation? 1330:RHSAMember 1292:RHSAMember 1235:カイミロア (砲艦) 1201:regardless 627:Thank you! 477:WikiGuides 428:. Thanks. 95:Archive 10 2785:Royalrock 2700:Royalrock 2619:Royalrock 2554:Royalrock 2485:Royalrock 2421:this edit 2276:. Best — 2274:watchlist 2115:Thaavatar 1865:MedcabBot 1861:talk page 1856:talk page 1352:consensus 709:JH Scribe 654:Spirulina 552:Astrology 426:Spirulina 349:full stop 339:cite book 87:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2978:WP:RFC/U 2927:topic?-- 2793:contribs 2781:unsigned 2708:contribs 2696:unsigned 2627:contribs 2615:unsigned 2562:contribs 2550:unsigned 2506:the page 2493:contribs 2481:unsigned 2348:Luxoculi 2305:Luxoculi 2245:unsigned 2173:Talkback 2163:contribs 1967:contribs 1744:contribs 1732:Because 1715:contribs 1645:contribs 1633:unsigned 1455:contribs 1243:KAVEBEAR 1239:Kaimiloa 1229:Kaimiloa 1159:Keithbob 1031:JHScribe 1020:contribs 1012:JHScribe 1008:unsigned 986:contribs 974:unsigned 833:JHScribe 799:contribs 791:JHScribe 787:unsigned 769:JHScribe 712:subject. 457:ItsZippy 440:WP:MEDRS 430:ItsZippy 329:cite web 2741:Squish7 2518:Camelot 2241:IP 98 2029:be bold 1734:Filanca 1637:Posse72 1490:comment 1403:sandbox 1388:Vasu619 1274:dispute 665:Rdavout 550:RfC on 376:Ping Li 319:WP:REFB 168:Gerardw 39:archive 2982:WP:ANI 2974:WP:WQA 2827:about 2769:thanks 2450:Thanks 2405:19maxx 2109:Thanks 1995:Gesund 1898:Steven 1752:WP:DRN 1690:. The 1494:WP:DRN 1139:Thanks 878:itself 762:Best, 387:WP:GNG 253:(talk) 164:WP:WQA 2986:WP:AE 2819:Help! 2472:UK GB 2062:Turco 1903:Zhang 1792:Hello 1760:Chzz 1729:Hi. 1508:Ck786 1360:can't 1212:Chzz 765:John 631:Turco 590:Turco 518:kwami 206:Chzz 103:Skype 16:< 3163:talk 3126:talk 3081:talk 3077:PCPP 3043:talk 3039:PCPP 3007:talk 3003:PCPP 2964:talk 2960:PCPP 2933:talk 2929:PCPP 2910:talk 2881:talk 2851:talk 2837:talk 2829:this 2789:talk 2745:talk 2704:talk 2623:talk 2558:talk 2489:talk 2463:talk 2409:talk 2399:Bots 2372:and 2352:talk 2309:talk 2253:talk 2213:TALK 2158:talk 2119:talk 2072:Talk 2011:lede 1999:talk 1963:talk 1918:talk 1885:talk 1869:talk 1803:talk 1738:talk 1710:talk 1663:here 1641:talk 1571:talk 1512:talk 1450:talk 1430:MotD 1392:talk 1334:talk 1296:talk 1247:talk 1166:Talk 1110:talk 1073:talk 1054:talk 1035:talk 1016:talk 982:talk 880:..." 842:talk 795:talk 773:talk 718:talk 669:talk 641:Talk 600:Talk 565:talk 522:talk 512:Hi, 497:talk 395:talk 334:and 291:talk 247:Tony 185:Re. 172:talk 2423:by 2150:joe 1702:joe 1600:Hi 1526:at 1524:RfC 1488:'s 1442:joe 1237:to 1099:CSD 960:or 956:or 952:or 812:RfC 419:DRN 353:and 3165:) 3128:) 3083:) 3045:) 3009:) 2980:, 2976:, 2966:) 2935:) 2912:) 2883:) 2853:) 2839:) 2795:) 2791:• 2747:) 2710:) 2706:• 2629:) 2625:• 2564:) 2560:• 2495:) 2491:• 2465:) 2411:) 2354:) 2311:) 2255:) 2216:) 2161:• 2121:) 2075:) 2066:85 2001:) 1969:) 1965:· 1957:– 1920:) 1887:) 1871:) 1805:) 1766:► 1713:• 1647:) 1643:• 1573:) 1534:, 1514:) 1453:• 1436:. 1394:) 1336:) 1298:) 1249:) 1218:► 1169:• 1163:• 1155:— 1112:) 1104:-- 1075:) 1056:) 1037:) 1022:) 1018:• 988:) 984:• 844:) 801:) 797:• 775:) 720:) 671:) 644:) 635:85 603:) 594:85 574:Hi 567:) 524:) 499:) 397:) 342:}} 336:{{ 332:}} 326:{{ 293:) 212:► 174:) 91:→ 3161:( 3124:( 3079:( 3041:( 3005:( 2962:( 2931:( 2908:( 2879:( 2849:( 2835:( 2787:( 2743:( 2702:( 2621:( 2556:( 2487:( 2461:( 2407:( 2350:( 2307:( 2251:( 2210:( 2188:. 2165:) 2155:( 2152:f 2148:p 2117:( 2069:( 1997:( 1961:( 1916:( 1883:( 1867:( 1801:( 1741:· 1736:( 1717:) 1707:( 1704:f 1700:p 1639:( 1569:( 1510:( 1457:) 1447:( 1444:f 1440:p 1390:( 1332:( 1294:( 1245:( 1108:( 1071:( 1052:( 1033:( 1014:( 980:( 840:( 793:( 771:( 716:( 667:( 638:( 597:( 563:( 520:( 495:( 393:( 321:. 289:( 170:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index