1146:
company before that the only reason I used their resource is that I thought it was a published article that has good value. I used searchenginejournal because it has the similar resource I needed. (I didn't realize it has backlins to Moz?) By now I couldn't turn in my homework in time as I didn't improve the contents a lot. I am new to wikipedia editing team and I accept recommendations from other editors with respect. I am now editing the conflicts section and I want to add a new section called "link building tactics" to briefly mention some common strategies of link building.
1718:) but by early November it was clear that they were all failing. WMF sent the (weakly based) cease and desist letter in mid-November 2013... by the next summer the change in the ToU came out and I always assumed it was to give the Cease and Desist Letter a stronger basis. I had no clue how the BdB affair played in. Can you tell me the story as you see it, with BdB in it? Or is that story already toward somewhere you could point me to? The things I am ignorant of never cease to amaze me. Thanks!
363:. While such comments may seem to be directed at an organization, we have to remember that sometimes individuals of these organizations could take it as a bit of a personal attack towards themselves. I think it might be best to focus on the content and not make comments towards the contributors. Hopefully we can all be mindful of what we say so that we can have a nice, civil discussion. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to working with you and everyone else in improving the article.
802:
999:, there was no call to state that the Distinguished Award is the lowest awards as if makes it any less notable than the Grand Prize. While it is indeed not the Grand Prize, your statement becomes an expression of opinion as opposed to just stating the fact that he received this awards. Could you please revise your edit so it doesn't detract from the fact that Carmine was awarded a Distinguished Musician Award at one of the most competitive classical music competitions in the world. Thank you
1563:
182:
1595:
1654:
599:
1386:
the introduction and then indicate that Porte de
Vincennes is covered in Ile de France sub section. At present there is no connection between the two and, rather shamefully, these killings are not referenced. This has nothing to do with what the other editor termed "political ideology". Facts are facts and here the causation is obscured. Thank you. Feel free to email you will find my details on the bottom of the formerly linked article
266:
1447:, perhaps you can comment. Or give links to prior discussions if you know of any. So far I can recognize some people who appear to be defending Landmark (or at least, are protective of their reputation) and others who are more keen on including criticism. It would help to find regular WP editors who just came across the issue. There was an arb case but it seems to be light on specific findings. Thanks for any help,
1870:
1782:. It seems that the article is commenting that Amazon is "in talks" and that the reporter couldn't even confirm that. Most likely, they're confused with Series C funding lead by Amazon India. Happy to self-revert if there's a better source. Still not sure about the notability there; last time I reviewed it (they spam/SEO often and frequently), I didn't feel the need to AFD. Will read up later and weigh in.
1614:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1736:. When Banc de Binary offered $ 10,000 on eLance to anyone who could make their problems on Knowledge go away, that pushed the COI issue over the top. BdB was and is in big trouble with the US SEC and CFTC and a Federal court, and BdB was desperately trying to keep that info out of Knowledge. See also the AN/I discussions.
1714:, where you attributed the change in the ToU to the Banc de Binary affair. I have been living in a story (apparently wrong?) that the change came after the community tried and failed 3 and a half times to ban paid editing following the WIki-PR affair. The last half-hearted attempt was closed in December 2013 (see
1489:
Nagle, I am user kekatie with the IP address listed in my signature below. You have harassed me for adding factual, well referenced content about women in technology in the past and now and I am asking you to cease and desist. I am a female entrepreneur who is interested in happenings around women in
455:
I did see it and for the time being the most important point to note is that the article states "alleged violations". Until it has been proven in a court of law, the actions of the company shouldn't be deemed "illegal". Over time, the court matters will be finalized and more conclusive statements can
1385:
Sir thank you for your response. However my contention is that the Porte de
Vincennes killings are not visible. It is incorrect to write that Ile de France is the parent: it is clearly the child to Charlie Hebdo Shooting. A proper course of action would mention the anti Semitic killings in 1 line in
498:
I must confess that I do not want to believe that some concern has set itself up to perpetuate in
Knowledge talkpages the rumor that BDB has committed criminal acts, recognizing not only Knowledge's influence in public opinion, but also the influence of Knowledge talkpage rumors upon Wikipedians who
479:
True. We can also cite BdB's reply in court, if you can find it. The current issue in that case is that the court has ordered Oren
Laurent to come to Washington DC for a deposition. His lawyers are fighting that. But he's a US citizen, and, as the court points, out, if you're a US citizen, you have
1815:
Thanks. I'll need to spend more time on it. This firm devotes quite a bit of energy and resources to SEO/PR, which I suppose is natural for a developing entity going through the funding cruicible. My initial impression is that much of the coverage is adapted from press releases and gobbled up by
1145:
Hello I am Hnancy and I am currently editing the link building page. Someone mentioned that I made an ad for a SEO book which is totally unacceptable to me. I am currently an informatics student at UW and it is really my project to improve the contents of a wikipedia page. I never heard of the Moz
1084:
You took out all the products and this is the second time someone removed a bunch of stuff. When I started there was a product list and I just tried to add some of the new products. In addition I did a lot of reading before putting up just a few products as highlights but from what I read you've
1014:
The organization does not call the
Distinguished Musician category an "award". Nor was there a "special mention". So it's a "category of recognition", rather than an "award". The IBLA Grand Prize is a big deal; the winner gets to play at Carnegie Hall. This is three levels down from that.
156:
You need to google the titles of all the CBR articles preferably inside the CBR site; they have moved the content around, e.g. the first article cited is now at www.cbronline.com/news/icann_ponders_registrar_crackdown. Then you need to file a quest with the list of new/working URLs at
1092:
Additionally, I don't understand why the need to try to clarify that they are not a cell phone carrier as there are many different types of mobile devices and anyone who confuse internet services with carriers probably needs to read more than the first line of the webpage.
1415:. There's some disagreement there about the relationship between the articles, and which incidents are connected. Articles about current events are written as the events happen, and sometimes a look back can improve the structure. Look for reliable sources (see
1816:
the very lightweight "reporters" that cover this segment, but there's likely a notable firm here if we could just find something more than just the normal funding hype. I'll admit that their frequent spamming has made me very hesitant to devote time to this.
1525:
Nagle- you may be right. That page regarding the Hammet cult (weregretnothing.com) looked legitimate to me. If it's a hoax, then get rid of the whole article. I thought it was a true story/item. I don't want to be party to something fictitious. Thanks...
1680:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
625:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
90:) 06:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Hey, the current people editing the article might be socks of the original people that created the first version of the article last year. It might be worthwhile to open up an SPI, but I'll leave it up to you.
494:
Regards, Nagle, and Mike V. Based on your discussion above, I wonder if you could discuss the validity of Nagle's statement in a new
Incidents thread, "The CFTC told them in 2013 they were operating illegally in the US", as it appears to be
1484:
1910:
You might want to look back a few edits to save yourself some time. I did a heavy ce based on source review, and it was reverted wholesale including the grammar fixes. Sourcing aside, most of it should be transferable for grammar fixes.
862:
Again, I do understand that I'm asking a lot from volunteer editors, and if you feel that you simply don't have time, that's totally fine—I'll continue to reach out to others and see if they might have some time to help. Thanks,
58:
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
840:
to incorporate one of the sources you provided. I would still like to take a little time reviewing the other three, so if there is specific information from those sources you would like included in my draft please let me know.
1088:
NQ Mobile is a holding company and has nearly a dozen subsidiaries all revolving around mobile. The tiny little bit you've written while removing the info on some of their actual products is discouraging to say the least.
456:
be made. Remember, Knowledge is first and foremost an encyclopedia, not a news source or the "court of public opinion". There's no deadline and there is no need to rush to any conclusions before due process has been done.
1755:
hm! Thanks! I think the extensive discussion they reference was our (failed) efforts to ban paid editing that stemmed from WIki-PR, no? I totally hear you on the BdB element tho - $ 10K wow! that is over the top.
1182:
on the article's Talk page. I know you had some trepidation about a COI editor writing a new draft, so I wanted to be sure you have a chance to take a look and share feedback if you like. Thanks, and happy new year!
629:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -
499:
then shape public opinion. But the more evidence I am shown that there exists a coordinated effort to spread false rumors of our lawlessness on
Knowledge talkpages, the more I tend to view the hypothesis credible.
1684:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
739:
Hi. DPL bot will send this message whenever you don't use appropriate hatnote syntax. And since it is a bot, it does not understand your reply. Oh, and just a heads up: Someone shared your reply on
Facebook.
248:
Hello, thanks for suggesting rollback on the Banc de Binary page, it's been whitewashed by
CorporateM, a paid for editor. Is there anything that can be done about these kinds of users and their huge text
1316:
65535 then (for 65536): FFFF ~data1~ 01 00 ~data2~~ , which could continue forever until a non-FFFF is reached or until 0000 is reached, but im just theorizing, i don't know how it _ACTUALLY_ works :o )
1499:
534:
has convinced me that Nagle's statement is borderline rather than clearly a violation. However, the issue of coordinated effort to spread rumors is not a matter for the article talkpage. Suffice.
1299:
1606:
857:
You are free to enter into a dialogue with the community on talk pages, and to suggest edits or even complete new articles or versions of articles by posting them in your user space.
1587:
665:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
1047:
most of it, then found your name on the talk page. If and when you find the time, it would be great to have a second pair of eyes on it, just to make sure I didn't overdo it. --
2014:), the user who admitted to COI, logged out, as their edits are the same (erasing any mention of Shane's debut album while restoring content that doesn't need to be restored).
1277:
1245:
250:
1541:
It's been sent to AfD, and two more editors have checked it out and concluded it's a hoax. The phrase "mockumentary" has been used. It's on track for deletion. Thanks.
411:
I don't think I could agree that there was a consensus formed on ANI that such comments were appropriate. Regardless, a discussion at ANI does not supersede one of the
1737:
674:
1638:
1443:
involving
Landmark Worldwide to ANI. I have no idea if you might be involved, but I'm assuming you know something, at least. Since we now have a related complaint at
1052:
646:
1366:
1326:
922:
660:
309:
962:
877:
777:
42:
917:
190:
2001:
575:
973:
719:
1976:
1946:
Just a reminder that if you have any questions about my Knowledge work, you may contact me for a chit-chat just about any time on my Talk page. Sincerely,
1280:
a couple of days ago. I see DocumentError has been blocked. Happy to work with you, or whoever might be willing, to arrive at a consensus version. Thanks.
1179:
976:. if you think i am out to lunch, i would get that. I posted asking for feedback and am just pinging you as you seem to participate in that page. thanks
849:
679:
77:
52:
170:
1580:
1285:
1267:
1234:
574:
Hello, can you have someone delete the page please, immediately. I will redo the page once I have fixed her IMDB credits and have more sources to cite.
1711:
1700:
1550:
1900:
340:
Okteriel was just blocked as a sockpuppet, so I wouldn't worry about his nonsense. I reverted his edit of your talk page comment as soon as I saw it.
1394:
996:
725:
Left that link in, because the human name, "Daniel Epstein", without a middle initial, is the same for both the article and the disambiguation page.
641:
1514:
1071:
759:
1490:
technology, thus I add factual well referenced content that has solid sources on the subject. Again, please stop singling me out and harassing me.
349:
186:
1024:
318:
140:
122:
1478:
1348:
1339:
The maximum possible length for an IP datagram is 65535 bytes, because the size field in the IP header, for both IPv4 and IPv6, is only 16 bits.
1214:
1289:
1062:
Sigh. There's some standard misinformation that floats around amongst hemp-related sites, and it creeps into Knowledge now and then. I'll look.
543:
526:
508:
1281:
1263:
1230:
335:
101:
1935:
1727:
1271:
1257:
1123:
734:
1765:
1750:
1199:
1159:
588:
489:
474:
450:
433:
406:
258:
1861:
1851:
1829:
1810:
1440:
848:
and COIN that updating a full article in this fashion is frowned upon by Knowledge. I understand that it is a large undertaking, but in an
108:
1535:
622:
2021:
1715:
1666:
1643:
1456:
1354:
1315:
65535? (cause it would be easy to support in theory, eg, if a packet is exactly 65535 then FFFF ~data~ 0000 , or if a packet is : -->
1311:
942:
897:
699:
611:
166:
26:
1920:
1955:
1661:
1645:
1008:
823:
1734:
1626:
583:
359:
Hey, I know that things have been getting a bit heated with the Banc de Binary situation. I just wanted to reach out to you about
1705:
872:
286:
1056:
1677:
1739:
1576:
985:
845:
1779:
1373:
1333:
1192:
1104:
938:
935:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
893:
890:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
695:
692:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
381:
1569:
1562:
1142:
2011:
1428:
1370:
1330:
162:
1238:
238:
1988:
1838:
is a "maybe" here. They're a funded, operating startup on the way up. One could argue "come back when you grow up", per
1491:
1048:
230:
1801:
You're probably right. Let's wait out the AfD, and if it stays around, try to figure out what the press coverage says.
212:
1795:
1171:
787:
1610:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1412:
1926:
Thanks. For now, I'd suggest waiting out the AfD and watching for new promotional edits. It's not an urgent problem.
1402:
360:
298:
254:
321:
1834:
Right. There's a pattern of COI editing, but the business seems marginally notable. Marginally. Notability under
72:
37:
837:
415:
of this project. All I'm asking is that we all refrain from any name calling and focus on building an article.
1615:
927:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
882:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
684:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
652:
161:. Otherwise sooner or later a busy body will come and remove all those references entirely. Hope this helps.
158:
1905:
1110:
Knowledge is not a vehicle for promotion. The article looked too much like advertising and was referred to
1044:
1040:
656:
62:
1888:
792:
397:. The consensus was that it's not an unreasonable statement given their record with regulatory agencies.
223:
1951:
1531:
1434:
324:
272:
148:
1670:
1175:
615:
292:
226:
326:. Banc de Binary agreed to stay out of the US, and the SEC and CFTC didn't take the matter further.
2005:
1695:
773:
685:
579:
1982:
1520:
1495:
1300:
1226:
990:
967:
883:
831:
755:
670:
234:
68:
1994:
1960:
345:
243:
315:
1947:
1527:
1485:
Nagle - please stop harassing a woman interested in subjects relating to women in technology.
1378:
1129:
1077:
1004:
115:
94:
1452:
1398:
1390:
1362:
1322:
1188:
1039:
and found that it contained a lot of un- and badly sourced advocacy, some of it added very
323:. Banc de Binary admitting their press release claiming CFTC clearance was "inaccurate":
8:
1896:
1686:
1305:
868:
569:
539:
514:
504:
439:
278:
1941:
1773:
1220:
1165:
1030:
751:
666:
305:
175:
47:
1229:. If you could take a look at some point that would be much appreciated. Many thanks.
1931:
1916:
1883:
1847:
1839:
1806:
1746:
1546:
1510:
1474:
1424:
1344:
1253:
1210:
1155:
1119:
1100:
1067:
1020:
958:
949:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
913:
904:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
819:
730:
715:
706:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
636:
522:
485:
446:
402:
341:
331:
136:
87:
314:
That Banc de Binary violated US law is clearly established. SEC litigation release:
224:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Mt._Gox&diff=605170736&oldid=605161573
1761:
1723:
1556:
1444:
1138:
1000:
981:
466:
425:
373:
112:
91:
1634:
1466:, and it looked too messy to handle there, and had a history. So I dumped it on
1448:
1358:
1318:
1184:
282:
207:
17:
1246:
Knowledge:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#.22New_draft.22_problem_at_Dany_Bahar
1970:
1966:
1892:
1877:
1863:
1835:
1822:
1788:
1467:
1463:
1202:
1111:
928:
864:
767:
689:
535:
500:
801:
1379:
1078:
784:
412:
394:
301:
1912:
1611:
1416:
1096:
954:
950:
932:
909:
905:
815:
711:
707:
631:
217:
513:
We're well beyond rumor. BdB is in Federal court. Anyway, this belongs at
1757:
1719:
1134:
977:
531:
458:
417:
365:
150:
189:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
1927:
1843:
1802:
1742:
1630:
1542:
1506:
1470:
1420:
1340:
1249:
1206:
1151:
1115:
1063:
1036:
1016:
726:
606:
590:
518:
481:
442:
398:
327:
195:
132:
83:
1842:. Or keep the article and trim the hype. Let's see how the AfD goes.
1817:
1783:
887:
1887:
with another article. If you are interested, please participate in
844:
I also want to respond more specifically to your comment from both
1505:
Not clear what the problem is. Please be more specific. Thanks.
1869:
441:
Any questions left about this not being an illegal operation?
1583:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
995:
Hie, While i appreciate the edits you made on this article
131:
I sent the article to AfD earlier today, but you know that.
1314:
Can Nagle's Algorithm handle packets of total length : -->
277:, to articles or any other Knowledge page, as you did at
1588:
Orphaned non-free image File:Israeloncampuscoalition.jpg
480:
to come when the courts call. That will be interesting.
1659:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
931:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
886:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
688:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
604:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1625:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
972:
if you have a moment, i'd appreciate your thoughts on
393:
That particular issue has already been hashed out on
1665:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
610:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1876:An article that you have been involved in editing—
852:Jimbo Wales says the following about COI editors:
836:Hi again John. If you have not seen, I updated my
647:File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg listed for deletion
275:biographical content, especially if controversial
923:Disambiguation link notification for October 17
187:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1621:Note that any non-free images not used in any
878:Disambiguation link notification for August 17
281:. Content of this nature could be regarded as
1303:"Nagle's Algorith", can it handle length: -->
107:I ended up erring on the side of caution and
1868:
680:Disambiguation link notification for July 18
623:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Yank Barry
1716:Wikipedia_talk:Conflict_of_interest_limit
1568:Hello, Nagle. You have new messages at
222:Why did you revert my legitimate edits?
1678:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/TUD:OS
14:
1969:, could you please watch any edits on
438:Read this new CFTC litigation release.
227:Talk:Mt._Gox#legitimate_edits_reverted
61:If you have any questions, please see
1778:Howdy, John. I removed your material
1733:See this Wall Street Journal article.
1306:65535?-2015-02-08T00:58:00.000Z": -->
1301:65535?-2015-02-08T00:58:00.000Z": -->
651:A file that you uploaded or altered,
1667:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
612:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
185:There is currently a discussion at
23:
1593:
1561:
1035:I just came across the article on
24:
2032:
1676:The article will be discussed at
1357:oh ok, i didn't know, thank you!
808:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
621:The article will be discussed at
34:The media files you uploaded as:
27:Files missing description details
1652:
1607:File:Israeloncampuscoalition.jpg
800:
597:
264:
180:
1706:Banc de binary and Terms of Use
1413:Talk:2015 Île-de-France attacks
163:Someone not using his real name
38:File:Stopbadwareyellowalert.png
776:, which allowed me to write a
320:. Wall Street Journal article.
13:
1:
1710:Hi John. I was intrigued by
1616:our policy for non-free media
1479:06:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
1457:22:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
1429:00:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
1225:Hi John – I've posted on the
1150:Answering on your talk page.
1072:00:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
1057:23:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
1025:21:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
1009:21:20, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
653:File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg
159:MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
141:06:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
123:04:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
102:04:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
78:04:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
1627:criteria for speedy deletion
1368:03:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
1349:06:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
1328:00:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
1290:15:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
1272:09:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1258:02:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
1239:14:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
1205:to get a consensus on this.
1160:05:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
1143:05:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
1124:23:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
1105:22:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
986:21:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
963:11:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
657:Knowledge:Files for deletion
271:stop adding unreferenced or
7:
2022:00:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
1956:16:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
1936:20:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
1921:19:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
1215:19:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
1193:16:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
1085:missed the mark entirely.
918:09:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
873:21:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
317:. CFTC litigation release:
10:
2037:
1901:20:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
1577:19:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
1551:22:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
1536:20:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
1248:to get more eyes on this.
850:interview for the Signpost
239:18:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
213:16:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
1852:17:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
1830:15:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
1811:05:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
1796:23:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
1766:00:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
1751:20:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
1728:14:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
1594:
1570:Malik Shabazz's talk page
1515:08:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
1500:00:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
1462:The problem showed up on
824:21:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
814:You've been in the news.
799:
788:17:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
760:18:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
735:17:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
720:08:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
642:02:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
584:22:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
544:22:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
527:22:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
509:21:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
490:20:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
475:19:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
451:18:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
434:17:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
407:06:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
382:05:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
350:20:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
336:18:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
310:08:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
171:19:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
82:== Remember the 13th ==--
1701:19:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
1669:or whether it should be
1639:17:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
686:Daniel Epstein (pianist)
675:07:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
614:or whether it should be
259:11:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
1419:), not your own blog.
884:Stamping (metalworking)
285:and is in violation of
1873:
1862:Merger discussion for
1599:
1566:
1170:Hello! I've created a
295:from editing Knowledge
251:HistorianofRecenttimes
1889:the merger discussion
1872:
1604:Thanks for uploading
1597:
1565:
838:Heritage Action draft
655:, has been listed at
67:Message delivered by
1906:Cornerstone copyedit
1227:Dany Bahar talk page
951:opt-out instructions
906:opt-out instructions
846:Talk:Heritage Action
708:opt-out instructions
43:File:Pontiac1961.jpg
1174:of the article for
793:A barnstar for you!
515:Talk:Banc de Binary
289:. If you continue,
279:Talk:Banc De Binary
1874:
1600:
1581:remove this notice
1567:
1441:referred a dispute
1435:Landmark now at AE
1411:Try commenting on
941:• Join us at the
896:• Join us at the
698:• Join us at the
193:. Thank you. --
53:File:Woodruff1.png
48:File:Buick1961.jpg
1973:? I suspect that
1965:As I reported on
1612:claim of fair use
1407:
1393:comment added by
1178:, per an earlier
1114:for that reason.
946:
901:
829:
828:
703:
659:. Please see the
273:poorly referenced
109:opened one myself
69:Theo's Little Bot
2028:
2019:
2017:Ten Pound Hammer
1999:
1998:
1979:
1948:BeenAroundAWhile
1827:
1820:
1793:
1786:
1698:
1691:
1656:
1655:
1602:
1596:
1584:
1528:Veryproicelandic
1406:
1387:
1375:
1372:
1356:
1335:
1332:
1313:
1307:
1302:
974:Pmy COIN posting
936:
891:
804:
797:
796:
693:
639:
634:
601:
600:
473:
471:
463:
432:
430:
422:
380:
378:
370:
287:Knowledge policy
268:
267:
210:
204:
201:
198:
184:
183:
119:
98:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2015:
1980:
1975:
1974:
1963:
1944:
1908:
1867:
1823:
1818:
1789:
1784:
1776:
1708:
1696:
1692:
1689:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1629:. Thank you. --
1591:
1590:
1585:
1574:
1559:
1523:
1521:The Hammet Cult
1487:
1437:
1388:
1383:
1309:
1223:
1168:
1132:
1082:
1033:
997:Carmine Miranda
993:
991:Carmine Miranda
970:
968:my COIN posting
943:DPL WikiProject
925:
898:DPL WikiProject
880:
834:
832:Heritage Action
795:
770:
700:DPL WikiProject
682:
649:
637:
632:
602:
598:
595:
572:
467:
459:
457:
426:
418:
416:
413:core principles
374:
366:
364:
265:
246:
220:
208:
202:
199:
196:
181:
178:
154:
117:
96:
80:
63:Help:Image page
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:User talk:Nagle
12:
11:
5:
2034:
2002:Ellesmacksongs
1971:Shane McAnally
1962:
1961:Shane McAnally
1959:
1943:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1907:
1904:
1878:Startup studio
1866:
1864:Startup studio
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1775:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1707:
1704:
1688:
1651:
1649:
1644:Nomination of
1642:
1589:
1586:
1575:Message added
1573:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1522:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1382:
1377:
1352:
1351:
1308:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
992:
989:
969:
966:
929:Lisson Gallery
924:
921:
879:
876:
860:
859:
833:
830:
827:
826:
811:
810:
805:
794:
791:
772:Thank you for
769:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
749:
743:
742:
741:
740:
690:Daniel Epstein
681:
678:
648:
645:
596:
594:
589:Nomination of
587:
576:Infideastudios
571:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
496:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
245:
244:Banc de Binary
242:
219:
216:
177:
174:
153:
147:
146:
145:
144:
143:
126:
125:
56:
55:
50:
45:
40:
32:Dear uploader:
30:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2033:
2024:
2023:
2018:
2013:
2010:
2007:
2003:
1996:
1993:
1990:
1987:
1984:
1978:
1977:173.164.27.57
1972:
1968:
1958:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1891:. Thank you.
1890:
1886:
1885:
1882:proposed for
1879:
1871:
1865:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1821:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1787:
1781:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1703:
1702:
1699:
1694:
1693:
1682:
1679:
1674:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1647:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1619:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1601:
1582:
1578:
1571:
1564:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1492:184.77.53.102
1480:
1476:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1445:WP:AE#Astynax
1442:
1439:Recently you
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1381:
1380:Charlie Hebdo
1376:
1369:
1364:
1360:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1329:
1324:
1320:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1262:Thanks John.
1261:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1198:Answering at
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1130:Link building
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1080:
1079:NQ Mobile Inc
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1049:78.35.252.107
1046:
1042:
1038:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
988:
987:
983:
979:
975:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
947:
944:
940:
934:
930:
920:
919:
915:
911:
907:
902:
899:
895:
889:
885:
875:
874:
870:
866:
858:
855:
854:
853:
851:
847:
842:
839:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
809:
806:
803:
798:
790:
789:
786:
782:
780:
775:
761:
757:
753:
752:Codename Lisa
750:
748:Best regards,
747:
746:
745:
744:
738:
737:
736:
732:
728:
724:
723:
722:
721:
717:
713:
709:
704:
701:
697:
691:
687:
677:
676:
672:
668:
667:Codename Lisa
664:
663:
658:
654:
644:
643:
640:
635:
627:
624:
619:
617:
613:
609:
608:
592:
586:
585:
581:
577:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
529:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
497:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
478:
477:
476:
472:
470:
464:
462:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
435:
431:
429:
423:
421:
414:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
379:
377:
371:
369:
362:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
300:
296:
294:
288:
284:
280:
276:
274:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
241:
240:
236:
232:
231:24.97.201.230
228:
225:
215:
214:
211:
206:
205:
192:
188:
173:
172:
168:
164:
160:
152:
142:
138:
134:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
121:
120:
114:
110:
106:
105:
104:
103:
100:
99:
93:
89:
85:
79:
76:
74:
70:
65:. Thank you.
64:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
35:
33:
19:
2016:
2008:
1991:
1985:
1964:
1945:
1909:
1881:
1875:
1824:
1790:
1777:
1712:this comment
1709:
1687:
1683:
1675:
1660:
1658:
1648:for deletion
1622:
1620:
1605:
1603:
1592:
1524:
1488:
1438:
1389:— Preceding
1384:
1374:65535?": -->
1371:65535?": -->
1367:65535?": -->
1355:65535?": -->
1353:
1334:65535?": -->
1331:65535?": -->
1327:65535?": -->
1312:65535?": -->
1310:
1276:I posted at
1244:Referred to
1224:
1169:
1133:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1034:
994:
971:
948:
933:Richard Long
926:
903:
881:
861:
856:
843:
835:
807:
778:
771:
705:
683:
661:
650:
628:
620:
605:
603:
593:for deletion
573:
468:
460:
427:
419:
375:
367:
361:this comment
358:
342:Coretheapple
290:
270:
247:
221:
194:
179:
155:
116:
95:
81:
66:
57:
31:
1395:Adam Blitz
1185:Mary Gaulke
1001:Lilianarice
783:on it! :-)
570:Nikita Kahn
532:User:TParis
291:you may be
151:RegisterFly
113:Tokyogirl79
92:Tokyogirl79
1942:Invitation
1928:John Nagle
1880:—has been
1844:John Nagle
1840:WP:CRYSTAL
1803:John Nagle
1774:BankBazaar
1743:John Nagle
1579:. You can
1543:John Nagle
1507:John Nagle
1471:John Nagle
1449:EdJohnston
1421:John Nagle
1359:Divinity76
1341:John Nagle
1319:Divinity76
1250:John Nagle
1221:Dany Bahar
1207:John Nagle
1180:discussion
1176:Jerry Yang
1166:Jerry Yang
1152:John Nagle
1116:John Nagle
1064:John Nagle
1045:weeded out
1037:Jack Herer
1031:Jack Herer
1017:John Nagle
953:. Thanks,
908:. Thanks,
727:John Nagle
710:. Thanks,
662:discussion
607:Yank Barry
591:Yank Barry
519:John Nagle
482:John Nagle
443:John Nagle
399:John Nagle
328:John Nagle
283:defamatory
191:Yank Barry
176:ANI notice
133:John Nagle
84:John Nagle
1893:Dodi 8238
1172:new draft
937:Read the
892:Read the
888:Embossing
865:Morzabeth
774:this post
694:Read the
536:BDBIsrael
501:BDBIsrael
495:relevant.
299:Evidence.
2012:contribs
1989:contribs
1690:nonsense
1623:articles
1557:Talkback
1403:contribs
1391:unsigned
1041:recently
779:Signpost
302:Okteriel
249:editing?
149:CBR at
1967:WP:COIN
1913:MSJapan
1884:merging
1836:WP:CORP
1671:deleted
1468:WP:AN/I
1464:WP:COIN
1282:HOgilvy
1264:HOgilvy
1231:HOgilvy
1203:WP:COIN
1112:WP:COIN
1097:Rgeurts
955:DPL bot
910:DPL bot
816:Bearian
781:article
712:DPL bot
633:Cwobeel
616:deleted
293:blocked
269:Please
118:(｡◕‿◕｡)
97:(｡◕‿◕｡)
73:opt-out
1825:(talk)
1791:(talk)
1758:Jytdog
1720:Jytdog
1697:ferret
1662:TUD:OS
1646:TUD:OS
1304:65535?
1135:Hnancy
978:Jytdog
768:Thanks
638:(talk)
461:Mike V
420:Mike V
395:WP:ANI
368:Mike V
1995:WHOIS
1631:B-bot
1417:WP:RS
16:<
2006:talk
1983:talk
1952:talk
1932:talk
1917:talk
1897:talk
1848:talk
1819:Kuru
1807:talk
1785:Kuru
1780:here
1762:talk
1747:talk
1724:talk
1635:talk
1547:talk
1532:talk
1511:talk
1496:talk
1475:talk
1453:talk
1425:talk
1399:talk
1363:talk
1345:talk
1323:talk
1286:talk
1278:COIN
1268:talk
1254:talk
1235:talk
1211:talk
1189:talk
1156:talk
1139:talk
1120:talk
1101:talk
1068:talk
1053:talk
1043:. I
1021:talk
1005:talk
982:talk
959:talk
914:talk
869:talk
820:talk
756:talk
731:talk
716:talk
671:talk
580:talk
540:talk
523:talk
505:talk
486:talk
469:Talk
447:talk
428:Talk
403:talk
376:Talk
346:talk
332:talk
306:talk
255:talk
235:talk
218:Why?
167:talk
137:talk
88:talk
2020:•
2000:is
1618:).
1201:on
939:FAQ
894:FAQ
696:FAQ
297:.
1954:)
1934:)
1919:)
1899:)
1850:)
1809:)
1764:)
1749:)
1741:.
1726:)
1673:.
1637:)
1549:)
1534:)
1513:)
1498:)
1477:)
1455:)
1427:)
1405:)
1401:•
1365:)
1347:)
1325:)
1288:)
1270:)
1256:)
1237:)
1213:)
1191:)
1158:)
1141:)
1122:)
1103:)
1070:)
1055:)
1023:)
1007:)
984:)
961:)
916:)
871:)
822:)
785:Ed
758:)
733:)
718:)
673:)
618:.
582:)
542:)
525:)
517:.
507:)
488:)
465:•
449:)
424:•
405:)
372:•
348:)
334:)
308:)
257:)
237:)
229:--
200:am
197:At
169:)
139:)
111:.
2009:·
2004:(
1997:)
1992:·
1986:·
1981:(
1950:(
1930:(
1915:(
1895:(
1846:(
1805:(
1760:(
1745:(
1722:(
1633:(
1598:⚠
1572:.
1545:(
1530:(
1509:(
1494:(
1473:(
1451:(
1423:(
1397:(
1361:(
1343:(
1321:(
1284:(
1266:(
1252:(
1233:(
1209:(
1187:(
1154:(
1137:(
1118:(
1099:(
1066:(
1051:(
1019:(
1003:(
980:(
957:(
945:.
912:(
900:.
867:(
818:(
754:(
729:(
714:(
702:.
669:(
578:(
538:(
521:(
503:(
484:(
445:(
401:(
344:(
330:(
304:(
253:(
233:(
209:頭
203:a
165:(
135:(
86:(
75:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
