Knowledge

User talk:SummerPhDv2.0

Source 📝

3307:
fact."Western European Imperialism" had nothing to do with Salafism, nor did Salafism develop in the 19th century. Salafism has existed throughout the entire history of Islam. All Islamic Caliphates have been governed by Salafists. A Caliphate is, by nature, an Islamic Empire that wages Jihad against ALL non-Muslims, as commanded by Muhammad in the Koran. Thus, Salafism dates back to Muhammad. Nor was there any discernible departure from Salafism in the 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th or 18th centuries. The article as it stands now suggest that Western Civilization did something to cause Salafism in the 19th century. This is an outright lie, which can be proven by the reality of the relationship between Western Civilization, Islam and the rest of the world during this period. Islam was actively invading, conquering, forcibly converting, occupying and enslaving millions of Europeans during the period from the 13th through the 19th century, until the Ottoman Empire was defeated in WW1. All the while, the Islamic invaders' governments and leaders were as Salafist as one can be. They conquered all of Greece, all of Israel, all of Constantinople and the Pontus, all of Ionia, all of Spain, all of Portugal, and much of Italy, Eastern Europe, Asia, North Africa, and India. Salafism was as much or more influenced by the Empires of Egypt, Persia, Parthia, Babylon, Germany (its ally in WW1 and WW2),India, Russia, Africa, China and Mongolia as it was by Western Civilization, so why are those empires not listed as the reason for the emergence of Salafism, at least on par with Western Civilization? Perhaps you are unaware, but there is a reason why Islamic Caliphates have tended to lay the blame for their problems on certain regions. It is because those regions are the Jihadist Salafists' primary targets for terror attacks and invasion, because they consider those regions to be the greatest barriers to their efforts to conquer all of mankind and the entire world, as the Koran commands them to. They are the perpetrators of the crime, not the victims as they like to claim. Is it Knowledge's position that al-Baghdadi and Bin Laden were heroes and martyrs who died in a just and righteous fight against western imperialists? It certainly sounds that way when I read your articles, which makes me wonder if someone like al-Baghdadi wrote the article, then preserved it in the editorial process and the arbitration committee, in spite of the many efforts prior to my own to remedy the lies, the bias, the deception, the Jihadist propaganda and the injustice spoken in your article. That's certainly what that article sounds like when it is phrased the way it currently is. This needs to stop. The article is not neutral. The article does not contain all sides of the mainstream opinions. The article presents a lie as if it was a fact. The article appears to lay the blame on the Greeks, Spaniards, Italians, Portuguese, Macedonians, and Jews for the Islamic invasion and occupation of their countries for centuries, supposedly because they were western imperialists themselves, and therefore Salafism emerged because of what they did, deservedly so, and that's why all those European nations and peoples lost their land and their liberty for centuries, right Knowledge? Then in WW1, those lousy Western Imperialists dared to prevent the German-Islamist/Salafist powers from conquering all of the rest of Europe, and that's why Salafism came into being, right Knowledge? This is outrageous. Correct the article or I will inform those who need to know that Knowledge is promoting Jihadist propaganda and thus encouraging attacks on Western targets. This ends here.
3394:, and I think you know it. How exactly is removing a demonstrably false, biased, non-neutral, non-consensus statement that is at best an opinion, at worst an outright lie designed to promote global terrorism, disruptive? My removal of that statement was entirely appropriate, and I and many others will continue to demand that you remove the statement until you do so. THERE IS NO CONSENSUS ON THAT STATEMENT, BY EDITORS OR BY SCHOLARS, therefore Knowledge policies require that you remove it, and/or include the converse opinion, which is, by the way, the opinion of the majority of humanity and scholars. Remove the comment immediately, or prove that the comment has the consensus of the community and scholars, which is impossible, because there is no such consensus, and if anything, the consensus is just the opposite of what the article says. This fact is evident from both the talk page and all of the articles about Islam, Islamic imperialism, Islamic Salafist behavior that persisted long before the 19th century, and Islamic invasions and aggression toward not only Europe, but every civilization they came in contact with. That is not an opinion. That is factual, well-established history, which can be found in hundreds of Knowledge articles' sources. Your refusal to read my comment, complaint, justification and request for arbitration is unprofessional and contrary to your duties to the Knowledge community commensurate with your office. 6372:(not sure on how to format responses so apologies) - first - really appreciate the detailed response since I couldn't find information on how to address a situation like this (tried really hard to find info!) re: conflict of interest I'm just a friend the individual reached out to - no commercial or business relationship of any kind - since there isn't a "customer service" number to contact Knowledge what other option would a living person have but to reach out to people they know?; re: the other paths to updating thanks for the guidance - I'll share with the person in question and see how they want to proceed; for a living person included in Knowledge this is an example of how difficult it can be to ensure Knowledge is accurate - and I get the tension here and need for being cautious. 7529:
know who the vandals are and who is correting the vandalism.“ I’m already an extended auto confirmed user, and if you actually took the time to look at my history excluding run time edits, you’ll see that I have been responsible for bigger film page edits than you may have assumed, from fully-detailed plot and grammar edits to production and section organization. I feel as though my edits for the film Parasite (2019) reflects this adequately. So let me ask you, what recourse would I possibly have in randomly changing numbers? What on earth are you thinking my intent is? Some ulterior motive? Even editors with more contributions than me don’t always utilize the edit summaries unless we have too. You are just blowing this topic way out of proportion.
707:
super-human. When and where this phrase is deployed is subjective, an opinion of a writer. By such standards, every *fictional* character listed on the page enters the discussion as an example of a "Magical Negro" once mentioned in some publication of note as a "Magical Negro". In my addition to the page, I have given another example from the Washington Beacon editorial page to a discussion as to whether the character is a "Magical Negro". This should suffice, as it's a much more reputable source than many of the others listed as references and clearly references a debate as to Wayne being a "Magical Negro". Nevertheless, the way you are curating this page makes it clear that your AND my opinions don't matter -- only yours does.
7521:
haven’t noticed. You’re trying to advocate citation requirements that are better used for more important matters. Additionally, an explanation for my change of a number is just asinine. “I changed a number to a different number. End of story.” Sounds pretty anticlimactic. The biggest offender here is that you go straight to me for not sourcing a runtime change when you don’t even consider the past editors who incorrectly edited the runtime, likely UNSOURCED as well, so you putting your attention on me is not only unjustified, but also hypocritical. You seem as if your goal is to go after editors like who you’re referring to, yet in this case you completely ignore past editors thereby failing to adhere to your goal and standards.
5450:
Eyed Peas and David Guetta were all hitting the top of the charts with EDM-heavy tracks. Whilst Europe has been partying for decades, the US – a sleeping giant in the EDM world – suddenly woke up. Collaborations with EDM Producers and the biggest names in pop became commonplace. Calvin Harris alone has worked with Rhianna, Ellie Goulding and Florence. Dance music took over the charts Stateside and Pop EDM was born, becoming the mainstream sound listened to on the school run and office commute. Pop EDM’s success is largely a result of fusing the genius of hit song writing with hook-laden electronic soundtracks. And doesn’t call them pop, dance-pop or EDM and only what the music trend was.
2601:
aware of when posting data I have serious problem with this date; the correct date should be at least 2 weeks later. It would never take 23 days between release and chart for Springsteen I have all the Billboard records, I will compare the two data points for his other singles, and some other artists I am scanning my 48 Bruce Springsteen books for information on this; Unfortunately, much easier to get recording info than release info David Tilson benchwarrant17@yahoo.com Please contact me with any clues or additional points of view PS I changed date to May 1984 for now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tillywilly17 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
9710:- for some reason, it doesn't say it's a superhero show anymore. I don't know about the other sources, though; they seemed pretty legit to me but I could be wrong. Plus, a couple of editors are complaining on the talk page about what they think doesn't belong on the list. I know- I can't believe these arguements are happening again. They're either not reading the section about the clarifications of what does and what does not belong on the list, or read it and didn't care and insist that their personal opinions are material. But thankfully, no bulk removals! I didn't know if you'd be interested in looking at these updates. Anyway, stay safe and God bless!!! 3114:
responsibility. If I were irresponsible, I would be avoiding the subject, not talking about it. For starters, I have four years of work and 75,000 edits that say I am responsible. My willingness to engage in discussion, debate, to understand and improve are signs of responsibility. I don't see how editors can accuse someone of personal attacks and incivility without being specific. I disagree that it is enough to show someone a link to the documentation. I have discussed with editors over the years that the documentation can be confusing and contradictory. I don't understand how excluding or forbidding sincere, honest talk from Talk pages benefits anyone.
3643:
publication by a small house, it engendered little response in the U.S., initially, but that as it picked up in Europe, someone stateside had something to say. But this is research on the body of writing, pre-internet, and so it will take a while to flesh out. Meanwhile, I think I will put the critical response section back in, if empty—I only left the librarian statement in, to keep the section in, and not empty—so that there is a place to put in critical response information as it is found (and to encourage people to look for it). Cheers. An old Prof, still in saddle.
7752: 1913:"Box Office" it shows you exactly how much money the film made domestic and international for it's worldwide total of $ 171.1 million dollars. Somebody recently has simply been changing the first number of the box office total to three and not sourcing this information. Which is violating the page and information, I am simply re-editing it to the actual total box office where at the bottom of the article it is sourced already under box office mojo, I suggest you look at the sources that I have put and see for yourself, Thanks. 6051:. She's the only one to make the statement about Belgium as a production country. This cultivar has been developed in the Netherlands, and at the time Florence Ignorant wrote about it, they were only grown in the Netherlands (by 2020, there is also life stock in the USA and in Australia). Where did she get the idea to mention Belgium as a production location? That's all the factual information she gave about 'Pineberry' and it's all erroneous. It's ridiculous to refer to such a piece of **** in a Knowledge article. 3634:
without providing any source. At the same time, the one academic that had a look at this subject in 2015 found that there was no real research justification for the hyperbole (i.e., content along the lines that it was a life-changing novel for an entire generation). As well, people characterise the work as being a missive that is anti-psychiatry, when the evidence for the time is that, historically, this was not a period with such attitudes, but in fact just the opposite (and at least one of
683:" quotes someone as saying, "I hated this movie. Hated, hated, hated, hated, hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it." That someone is not a random Knowledge editor or some random person with a blog. (If you would like to read random people's comments, there are sites for that.) It's 64: 5741: 7533:
defend an incorrect runtime, then so be it, a source will be added, but only because that runtime is being monitored, and not because I’m able to or because you just want me to. But keep in mind, just because of my edits that I mentioned doesn’t mean you are schooling me on any of the editing lingo. You seemed way out of line with how you approached me; hell, bot messages for invitations or concern alerts are simpler and more straight-to-the-point than you.
5890: 9017:
user's history that match times when the other user name was editing (if one name edited for an hour then stopped and a few minutes later the other editor started editing, for example). Maybe the new user name was registered right after the first name was blocked or warned. Maybe when one editor was challenged (on a talk page or by having an edit reversed) the other showed up to defend them (arguing for them on the talk page or restoring their edit). -
7562:
up. Another was a compromised account, with a roommate occasionally adding in some random changes. Maybe if I dug through your history and spent a lot of time examining your history I would... No. If you used edit summaries I wouldn't have to. Heck, to the best of my knowledge you are using a blog as a source that uses run times from the aircraft versions of films, "rounded" by dropping the seconds and avoiding times ending in 3 because it's "bad luck".
7108:, I don't know how to edit constructively with this editor. I've left messages on his talk page about edits, I've left messages on talk pages in which he reverts edits with no explanation, and he hasn't responded to any of them. I don't think it's at the point where they should be blocked (at this point), but it's nearly impossible to communicate with them. So I don't know how to foster a positive editing relationship with them. Do you have any advice? 9414: 8474: 6752: 7039:
closely paraphrasing it, even if the source is cited, still constitutes a copyvio. Do NOT even write the summaries less then 100 words, even if it is in your own words, it could be an edited version of the copyvio summary, and are most likely to be scrutinized for a possible copyvio. You may also explain spoilers too, as WP:SPOILER applies, even if you don't want spoilers, Knowledge always would contain spoilers in their articles.
21: 6882: 7574:. Could I spend a few hours figuring out "what (you are) all about" before asking you to use edit summaries? Sure. Or, I could explain the problem and ask you to use edit summaries. I chose the latter. You want the simple version? Pretend I just said: "I don't know what you are doing. Please use edit summaries." For newbies, we have a consensus warning that says essentially that. We have it because EDIT SUMMARIES ARE HELPFUL. 7235:(accurate, but not descriptive -- they were also a Black group, a vegan group, etc. but the reason the group existed is religious/philosophical). The current wording implies -- unfairly, IMO -- that the fire department simply let the fire burn (I'm betting the sources put that decision on either the PPD or other higher-ups). I think you are editing based on the text you found in the article, rather than what the sources say. 1005: 6600: 937: 8935:
response was inappropriate and a violation of Knowledge policy, you decided to engage in further personal attacks by issuing an inappropriate formal "warning" concerning "vandalism", which you alse appear not to understand, since talking is what talk pages are FOR, and threatened to involve my ISP. You are abusing your position within Knowledge, and using your platform to violate multiple Knowledge policies.
5213: 4258: 2285: 1425: 3788:. When material is not sourced, we have no way of knowing if it is true and significant. Maybe you got it from a documentary on the making of the film that discusses the choice of action cameras as an important aspect of the "feel of the film". Maybe you saw the film, had recently used an action camera yourself and just guessed that they were used for the film. Maybe you made it up and 9519:
the date in Knowledge; or if Knowledge only has the month and year of release, she tries to add the day. I'm glad she's not the only one, but I'm sorry that it has become a problem. Dates are the one thing she really excels at, and for all I know, the changes she made are correct. She has promised me that she won't try to edit anymore, but I will share your KIDSTVDATES page with her.
3076:
otherwise is not living in this universe" as a personal attack? I'm still trying to learn what constitutes a personal attack and incivility on Knowledge, with the intent to correct past mistakes. This is not a request for linked acronyms. I would like you to explain the situation in your words in plain, clear language. Thank you very much for answering my questions.
1857:"In season 3 episode 3 of Hulu's The Handmaid's Tale, titled "Useful", Commander Lawrence says "Binders full of women" in reference to (actual, physical) binders in his hands which are full of profiles of women he can choose from to fill a vacant position in his household. In this show women are objects owned by men. This line occurs at 23:25 into the episode." 2899:. The information must be published in independent reliable sources. Jackie Robinson's achievement was (and repeatedly still is) reported in such sources. For the most part, they are cited in the subjects' individual articles. Who says Robinson was the first? If you check his article, you will find numerous sources backing up the claim. Those sources are 8686:"Passing" is short for "passing away", meant to imply the dead person is not gone but instead has "moved on" to wherever the local religious belief says the dead go. "Died" is unambiguous: The body stopped functioning and was disposed of according to local customs. It's the difference between saying today is "the Sabbath" rather than saying "Saturday". 8585:. There is nothing -- other than your interpretation to indicate it is more significant that anything else she has ever said. We cannot select individual statements to include in articles based on our opinions. Imagine the article on your favorite and least favorite politician if editors could select material based on what they found to be important. 7761:) (Why should Jason Buchanan from allmovie.com be the decider of the tone of the movie rather than M. Night Shyamalan himself? Is this because Jason's white? M. Night worked for two years on the movie whereas Jason Buchanan decided it in under 2hrs. When will this white privilege end? Also a movie cannot be compared to McDonalds meal. ) 7558:"I changed a number to a different number" is not what I am requesting and would not be helpful. Yes, you changed a number. WHY did you change it? Did you pull the number out of the air? Do you have a source? Was the previous number bad rounding? Do you simply want every film to be a minute longer to silence the voices in your head? 7933:. I am not sure where the "auto3" came from, but it is define in "Ship of Fools" by World Party. There is also a 3rd time the source was used but was not listed with a ref name for one of the songs from the 50's. Can you possibly merge these 3 into one ref name? I am not sure how to do that as I have recently returned to Knowledge. 6655:. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 1345:
things); 2.) he was very visible (and audible!) in the media and at conventions, where fans would very likely have heard him speak; and 3.) the article's subject concerns a character from a Science Fiction TV show that is very knowing and ironic in its awareness of genre tropes, and also very big on pop-culture references.
6153:
NYT is reliable, no matter what subject they're writing on. That's bullshit. I don't know if there's any subject that you're an expert on, but if there is one, then you will have the experience that newspapers, no matter which one, NEVER succeed in publishing an article on that subject that has got everything right.
2612:
for wider grooves (larger amplitude) and greater separation between grooves, the latter of which results in less cross-talk. Consequently, they are less susceptible to wear and scratches. The 12-inch single is still considered a standard format for dance music, though its popularity has declined in recent years.
1107:. As you have been warned about this in the past, please realize that the next time it happens, you will receive a final warning. If you continue after that, you will be blocked from editing. (ETA: Actually, given FlightTime's comment above, you might be moving toward a block a bit faster than I thought.) - 7153:. The text you disagree with ('retirement home') is present in the version that you had restored to, so I don't think your edit is achieving the purpose you intended. If you disagree with that term, I think it would have been better to amend that individual term, rather than reverting the whole edit? Best, 5568:
editing wikis. This is a real surprise because my messages were reverted quickly and never responded to. The email address was only live on Knowledge for a few minutes before being buried in the page history. These bots or people definitely found my email from the IP's contribution page, which is bizarre.
9670:
in recent years), which contradicts the consensus you and others reached on defining which songs would be present on the list. I would be grateful if you could collaborate and return the article to its pristine state that you and others had achieved in the past. Also, I would be grateful if you could
7512:
1. “... you didn't provide a reliable source.” Of course I didn’t, it’s the runtime to a film. Time spent looking for the source is the real “time wasted,” NOT the correction. What’s the point of getting in disputes over purists who use the unreliable BBFC for runtime information? One quick search on
2521:
How are you going to delete the information I added, which is accurate (if you’re from Los Angeles you know), and leave up the false information that they beef with crips as if Crips were one gang and they all beef with the 18 Streets. Don’t correct me on a subject you have no knowledge of. Thank you
9823:
personally, im big on accuracy and grammar, and i think i would probably want somebody to point these things out if they found them in something i wrote. even though i refuse to capitalize or use apostrophes in "casual" settings, if im editing something "important" like a wikipedia article, i follow
9657:
article in the past. The article has since gone into disrepair and I and others have been trying to bring it back to the status you had achieved, however, there is one particular editor who has continually reverted any edits made and who is currently serving out a block due to this type of behaviour
9264:
craftsmen that has been overlooked for some reason. I hope I have found enough sources/reasons to prove his notability and why he deserves a Knowledge page. (I watched the Adam Savage videos and came to Knowledge to look him up and was astounded he didn't have a page, given all his accomplishments).
9016:
Don't be afraid of SPI. File the case. Explain what makes you think they're the same person. Give links showing similar edits/comments/edit summaries or whatever. Check the edit histories of both for conflicting edits (two accounts for one person editing at the same time is unlikely) and gaps in one
8553:
Hello Summer - you reverted my edit to KA's page that she appeared to have resurrected her support for Trump. The reference I gave and quoted exactly was her own tweet of support - is that not a reliable source? It was seven or eight tweets into a thread started by James Woods. As I am not a Twit
7520:
3. “You never leave an edit summary, add a source or otherwise explain your change. This is a problem.” How and why? Because I’m correctly fixing an incorrect runtime listing that wasn’t even sourced in the first place? Sourcing a runtime is not a mandatory feature in film page billings, in case you
7516:
2. “ Looking through your edit history, you seem to have a bit of a history with increasing the run time of various movies by 1 minute.” All you did was pluck minor edits in fixing incorrect runtimes as early as last October. Some of the films, such as Capone (2020), were corrected because they were
7342:
issue: Somewhere in the sources, blame/responsability is no doubt spelled out. PFD grunts refusing to move into an active shooting zone vs. PFD commanders at the scene vs. PFD leadership safe behind lines vs. PPD commanders/leadership vs. city leadership. I don't recall what the commission found and
7174:
I have undone your revert. I don't know where you see "retirement home" in the version I am restoring; I don't see it and searching the page does not find it. None of the sources refer to the house as a "retirement home". The group in the house has a long history of refusing to follow housing codes,
5785:
There might not be one. If a company is notable (and this one is), there are in-depth reliable sources about the company. Aspects of the company that are relevant to the story of the company will be in those sources. If sources about the company don't discuss the meme, it's simply not significant to
5563:
Hi. More than two years ago I made a ridiculously bad attempt to troll you on a throwaway IP address. First, I would like to apologize for that. I think I was mad about some page reversion that I no longer care about, and my 2018 self thought trolling with an outdated "Zimbabwe scam" would be a good
5449:
2) Have you ever read the source for pop, dance-pop and EDM? I take it you haven’t as you would’ve seen this: Mainstream EDM is a marriage made in heaven with mainstream pop. Calvin Harris reflects back to a moment in pop history in 2011 when a combination of major artists including Lady Gaga, Black
4082:
make follow up here but dont say i wrote; write me first so we can agree on this and there are many other articles needing correction; wikipedoia is garbage as proven wikipediasucks.co but at least lets have something right! also on rm and rocky 6 page u can do new thead saying that the super fight
3633:
I absolutely agree with you—most of these sections are simply unsourced editor WP:OR relating personal experience. On the oither hand, I do believe we need a "Critical response" section, because articles, everywhere—Knowledge and in the popular media—say things like "it was critically well received"
3455:
Hi! One of my friends insists that mac and cheese is classified as a soup and I, a scholar, could not disagree more. So, of course, I felt the need to edit the wikipedia article to include the fact that mac and cheese is NOT and will NEVER BE a soup, to prove my point. Am I wrong in saying this?
2604:
Additional Information The 12" single was released May 9, 1984 and was the biggest selling 12" single in the U.S.A. that year. Not sure if this is the same release date. Back in these days, we did not yet have CD singles, full-size CDs were coming or just started (have to look it up) so we still had
2553:
You might be THE recognized expert on all things related to the 18th Street Gang. You might be an outright vandal, adding false and disparaging claims. You might know some things and be mistaken about some other things. I might be the foremost scholar on street gangs or know nothing whatsoever about
2072:
I understand you won't be responding to this for several days, as you are currently blocked for disruptive editing. I also note that you currently seem to be pursuing some kind of campaign against U.S. editors on your talk page. You will, of course, receive notes from around the world regarding your
9389:
The majority incl government, think tanks and law enforcement use the language specific domain expert SLPC and ADL descriptions. Any source that cannot be corroborated and/or conflicts with the ADL and/or SLPC on the topic of right wing hate groups is not credible and unreliable. We don't cite Math
9263:
dedicated a seven-part filmed series to his work. Many of the online references to him refer to him as 'legendary', 'the great', etc (obviously these haven't been put into the article as the sources are not newspapers, magazines etc) so he is clearly held in high esteem. He seems to be one of those
8691:
The new voice actress was not used in episodes chosen ("selected") for her to voice the role in. She voiced the role in those episodes of the season that hadn't been recorded before the other actress died. Imagine there are 10 apples on a table. You take 6 of them. You selected those 6. The other 4
7617:
2) Research every edit. Waste time. Reinvent the wheel. You could be doing other things, had the original editor bothered to explain themselves. But spend your day duplicating effort. If you find a different answer, is the original editor a vandal or did you just find a different answer? Research a
7561:
Yes, I see you have a bit of history. I've run across other editors with extensive histories of productive edits and occasional bursts of vandalism. Confronted, one basically "explained" that gee, since they made so many good edits, what was the problem with 10% or so vandalism -- we should lighten
7532:
I shouldn’t have to explain myself with the edit history that I have. If you had actually taken the time to find more worthy examples of what I’ve done than you’d think twice to treat me like a potential editor-vandal/bottom-of-the-barrel type. Of course, if someone else out there is so stuck-up to
7528:
5. “If you are randomly changing the numbers, you simply need to stop. Knowledge does have a few vandals who randomly change game scores, heights, dates, run times, etc., often by small amounts to avoid detection. Otherwise good editors correcting these figures need to use edit summaries so editors
7391:
I'm aware that is generally frowned on and I generally do not. However, I did not immediately recognize your user name and your talk page has very few topics and no archive. Unless everyone starts carefully investigating who is and who is not a "regular" before notifying them of reverts, my mistake
7123:
I have no magic here. I have them on my watchlist and expect that consistent escalating warnings will eventually lead to them either turning a corner or earning a block. After a block, further blocks typically get longer. Editors who refuse to communicate usually find the blocks getting longer much
7038:
Episode summaries must be expressed in your own words and have to go by 100 to 200 words in length, per MOS:TVPLOT. Do NOT submit content you find from another web site as it is WP:COPYVIO, which Knowledge cannot accept and will be removed or reverted. Superficially modifying copyrighted content or
6152:
Look, it's evident that you're not a botanist, nor did you make a significant study of this subject. That means that you're not capable to judge the reliability of Miss Fabricant's article. I showed you it's full of errors, yet you want it to be mentioned just because of some stupid notion that the
5919:
There is no assumption of bad faith. There is a pickup truck in the film. That it is a Dodge Ram is borderline trivial to begin with -- the model of the truck is completely irrelevant to the plot. That you believe it is a 1994-2002, second generation BR/BE model is unsourced: the information is not
5571:
I was wondering: is there a way that those edits I made could somehow be hidden to prevent people from getting my email address and associating it with spam? On a related note, do you have any idea how bots/people are even finding those old edits? Again, they were only on the page history for a few
5366:
I'm new - I don't understand why you keep reverting my change - Im not say she isn't black, I just rearrange the text. For the reason I cited with the change - "while she may have partial ancestry from any of the black racial groups of Africa by way of her father, its misleading to lead with she is
4536:
Almost all of the articles in the categories of Internet Meme and Music Meme have no mention of the article subject being a meme. By your standards, the category should be removed from them even if it applies. I don't think it is significant even to add a whole new header regarding the fact that it
3642:
had to say about the origins of the ideas, and then the way in which Cockcroft handled them? And this question can be asked twice—what did they think at the time of its original publication, and what are critics and profs now saying, with the perspective of the decades since? My hunch is that, as a
2600:
Release date We had a release date of May 26, 1984, this was actually the date this song entered the Billboard charts (at no 36); it was in top 10 two weeks later the other release date we had was May 3, 1984, and several internet sites copied our information, which is something we should always be
2559:
Knowledge does not know who either one of us is and how to weigh what you think the article should say vs. what anyone else thinks it should say. Instead, we cite sources. Long story short: the article should say what independent reliable sources say. If you make changes to an article and you don't
2214:
An editor's race, religion, ancestry, orientation, identity, age, eye color, political affiliation, favorite flavor of ice cream, need for corrective lenses and a million other things has nothing to do with it. Labeling another user a "racist" because of where they were born has me wondering if you
1912:
page. I forgot to source the film at first but I have since done that. On the official page on Box Office Mojo you can see that the actual numbers the movie has made, somebody has been falsely changing it for some reason. also you can just look on the actual "Contact" film page at the bottom under
1853:
Hi, I got a message from you alerting me to the removal of an edit I put in the "Binders full of women" page. The message suggested the edit I created did not contribute constructively. I am wondering what about the post should be improved to contribute constructively? For your convenience, here is
1365:
Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not for general discussion of the article's topic ("thoughts that occur to (users) concerning the article's subject"). Your observations cannot be included in the article; they are off topic. It is common to simply delete discussion
656:
Have you ever seen The Leftovers? Do you honestly think the character Wayne does not qualify on the list you keep editing? Every reference in this section sites someone's opinion as to whether the trope is being used, so how can you dismiss a reference where there's an active debate as to the use
547:
Perhaps "libel" was too harsh a word. I believe you have misrepresented by edit history *by omission*, and therefore did consider your statements false and defamatory. But w/e I'm over it. The section header "no we're not" was in response to the patronizing tail of your comment "Are we clear?".
526:
requires that factual claims about you be 1) clearly false 2) damaging to your reputation and 3) clearly identifiable as being about you as an individual. My statements were 1) accurate 2) reflect the reputation you have built for yourself here and 3) are not reasonably connected to you as a living
418:
Your new version, had it been made first, would have raised less concern: I would have chopped the bit about Streisand (including the grammatical error) and left the rest. By itself, the statement on her appearance sticks out like a sore thumb. It's about the critic not liking the way she looks and
9518:
Interesting page. I just discovered that my adult autistic daughter has been editing Knowledge articles. She makes lists from IMDb of animated series and movies with their release dates and memorizes them. When she sees a discrepancy of release dates between IMDb and Knowledge, she tries to change
9254:
He's been an odd one to make a page about, as he seems to have flown under the radar publicity-wise, despite working on many high-profile films. From what I can gather he has only recently started giving in-depth interviews. He has been described as 'widely acknowledged as the best armourer in the
8996:
and Irish Loughmoe castle. I don't know enough of the ins and outs of SPI to match them, but it seemed that 0m9Ep and 17u9e were a good match. What I saw wasn't enough to trigger complaints directly, but the editor is blatantly an old hand (see their user page, they advertise it) and seemed rather
8934:
This is to serve notice that you are officially being warned for violating Knowledge policies on civility and personal attacks. You appear to not understand what a personal attack is, and have interpreted legitimate and reasonable criticism as "personal attacks." Then, when you were told that your
8766:
I am not saying anything positive or negative about your editing by posting the template. I post them when I see newer editors at "hotbed" articles, templating both those actively involved in disputes and those merely editing on one or more of the pages. (Sometimes an editor in a heated discussion
7621:
3) Revert the edit. Discuss the problem with the editor. Explain that a brief edit summary like "Pre _______" would solve the problem. If they start providing explanations, check a few. Are they using a reasonably reliable source? How do they round 1:33:58? Do they get 1:34 as they should or 1:35,
7613:
1) Ignore it and move on. This is apparently the option you are advocating. In all cases, what will remain is the most recent change. Vandalism will continue unabated. People who do not understand rounding will continue to degrade info. People using bad sources or bad judgement will continue to do
6919:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
6462:
accepted not only belongs but I am convinced would surely belong if this article WERE good or featured. At this point the barn door is open and the horse got away but if you want to go searching for the horse go right ahead. I believe I am on the right side now even in a good or featured article.—
6338:
the subject actually mentions the divorce. We cannot, however, do much in the way of interpreting a primary source. So, the subject saying they are a "single (parent)" would not work (my very-old-school cousin considers herself a "single parent" as she sees the children as her job and her husbands
6331:
The easiest way to add information is to use a reliable source that states exactly what you are trying to add -- if such a source exists. So, you'd be looking for a [[WP:IRS|reliable published source directly stating that the subject is divorced. An interview (a type of primary source) would work,
5445:
You reverted an edit that explicitly calls them a hip hop, pop, R&B and dance-pop group and said it had been discussed on the talk page; there is little to none evidence on the group’s talk page saying as to it, also when you reverted it back to your preferred version, you haven’t even checked
5069:
The various accounts and IPs have been blocked (though more will certainly surface). Several of the regular targets have been protected several times over the past couple of months, with the editor adding targets while waiting for the protection to end. At some point, someone will either get lucky
2611:
Although 7 inches remained the standard size for vinyl singles, 12-inch singles were introduced for use by DJs in discos in the 1970s. The longer playing time of these singles allowed the inclusion of extended dance mixes of tracks. In addition, the larger surface area of the 12-inch discs allowed
1948:
Film review summaries are a recurring problem. The review aggregators (Rotten Tomatoes, Metacrtic, etc.) assign summaries ("generally positive", "mixed or average", etc.) by way of an algorithm. As a result, we can't cite that piece as a reliable source (which requires editorial oversight). All we
1631:
Hello, Abracadabra4201, welcome to Knowledge and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Knowledge, such as Writersupreme (talk ¡ contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not
1385:
I have to disagree as it would not seem impossible to integrate this observation into the article, for example if this shared pronounciation with what I would assume to be a relevant researcher would provide further insights into this fictional character and or their voice actor. I understand that
1344:
You don't revert items on a Talk page! That's for users to discuss thoughts that occur to them concerning the article's subject. I posted my observations regarding Isaac Asimov's pronunciation of "robot" in good faith, because 1.) he was a Science Fiction author who wrote about robots (among other
6461:
I'm afraid to even tell you what happened since you'll likely revert it. But I made a mistake saying certain details don't belong in good or featured articles. That's what YOU believed. I just said it because maybe it would be harder to get these details accepted. What the community seems to have
4639:
I don't understand your revert. Unsourced? I was careful in my edit summary to make sure everyone knew it was sourced, "adding some material from the section on political discourse to the lead, there are sources in the article for all of this". If you look at the section you'll see the sources. I
3556:
book's article. I take your word for the fact that the Pop culture section should be redacted. But perhaps return the one entry that did have a citation? And perhaps the couple that also appear in the box at article end, or are otherwise wikilinked? Leave it to you. A stub of a section, even with
3075:
You left an edit summary on my Talk page that reads "General note: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Talk:Smooth jazz". Would you quote the sections from my posts that you consider to be personal attacks? Second, would you regard the comment "It's a notable topic. Anyone who thinks
706:
You're using standards of objectivity for an inherently subjective narrative device. There's no such thing as a "Magical Negro" -- it's a pejorative. Screenwriters aren't writing the stories of the grand "Magical Negro"; instead, they're criticized for unwittingly characterizing black people as
460:
That a mainstream publication let "a aardvark" go is rather surprising. That a review of a film would wander afield into discussing the actress's appearance rather than the film is not surprising. That we would somehow pick this tidbit of nonsense as a summary of the whole review is inexplicable.
7234:
Oh, there are a few more problems. The police did not bomb the house "in order to serve an eviction notice" (yes, that's the reason the cops were there, but there was a lot more between them showing up and the bomb being dropped). I don't think the "militant group" is a fair summary of the group
4194:
In articles such as this one, we have very brief episode summaries of perhaps 2 or 3 sentences. Minor elements, such as the brief appearance of a backpack in the background simply does not merit coverage. Your edit seems to imply that the appearance of the backpack is what half of the episode is
3113:
I don't know know what to make of these comments or how they can be considered acceptable responses on Knowledge. I didn't ask for "exploration". I asked two simple, direct questions that require little time to answer. Nowhere have I "abandoned agency" if you are suggesting I am trying to avoid
795:
There has been a disruptive editor by the name of Nostalgicperson03218 who continuously tries to put his own opinion in the X-Men Origins: Wolverine page by saying it got mixed reviews while the sources show it was negatively received. He won’t stop until he is blocked and I was wondering if you
194:
Not the best edit summary... "Blubbering" is uncontrollable talking. An editor who adds unnecessary info about a favorite star's nude scene in a film likely just burned off a bit of their excitation by "telling the world". Someone over the course of most of a day adding similar info over several
9616:
You were a member of Aerosmith and no one acknowledges it? I understand your suffering. I've won five Pulitzers, named a living saint and for 3 years in the late 1980s I single handedly ran UNICEF. Unfortunately, until independent reliable sources recognize our immeasurable contributions to the
9369:
has now been submitted for review. I want to be sure that you do not disagree with acceptance of the draft. It appears to me that there were two problems with the article that you cut back down to a redirect. First, it appears to have been a copy-paste from the draft that would have lost the
7765:
Why should Jason Buchanan from allmovie.com be the decider of the tone of the movie rather than M. Night Shyamalan himself? Is this because Jason's white? M. Night worked for two years on the movie whereas Jason Buchanan decided it in under 2hrs. When will this white privilege end? Also a movie
5567:
Anyway: for whatever reason, 2018 me also thought it would be a good idea to use my actual email address in my trolling messages. I don't know how, but bots and/or people have somehow located my email from the three edits I made on that IP and my inbox is now flooded with weird spam relating to
4210:
I've seen other episode lists of other TV shows like Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi have trivia things like that on their summaries, so I thought it would be worth noting here. True, the Stimpy backpack behind the character's back isn't important to the plot as it is just a background thing, but I thought
3526:
Why "...2016..."? As the article says, "The film premiered at Fantastic Fest on September 26, 2016...". Per MOS, "Release dates should therefore be restricted to the film's earliest release, whether it was at a film festival, a world premiere, or a public release, and the release date(s) in the
614:
Ideally and in good faith, their account history would be used as a last resort only and only if yours would be analysed as well. And in yours, statements such as that one does not have a fundamental right to contribute and engage through edits, that you do not care, not to mention the tasteful
9096:
Hello. Thanks for contacting. I do believe this is an error, since I did cited billboard's official site showing each artist's history on the charts, showing that in fact, the respective songs were their only Top 40 Hits. In my view, everything seemed right. Could you please point out what was
6437:
In both cases, the disputes seemed to be off track, turning away from competing ideas (what sources say and how Knowledge should handle that information) to competing people (who did what to whom and what that says about them). In both cases I attempted to redirect the conversations to article
6287:
A friend asked for my help updating their Knowledge change to reflect their current marriage status (from married to divorced). I searched Knowledge and Google for how to source a change like this and couldn't find any information. I did provide a source in the change comment and the person in
5993:
The New York Times is a newspaper, not a scientific journal, or a horticultural magazine. It may be considered very authoritative in political matters, but it obviously is not in biology. Florence Fabricant very convincingly showed why we should not refer to NYT when writing about botanical or
4691:. I'm a bit disappointed that you think that a former Arbitrator and current Checkuser and Oversighter might be unaware of policy. Are you really going to edit war if I just revert you in line with ]? I've always thought that you were a good editor and all of this comes as a bit of a surprise. 1693:
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Knowledge again, as you did at Alcohol and health, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as
3180:
and I will, notwithstanding, carefully reconsider even those portions before restoring them, and consider entering further collegial dialogue with you about any remaining unrestored segments that you address promptly on a segment-by-segment basis. Yeah, if you'd like, in good faith, to defend
5279:
Hey, thanks for showing up on my page and arrogantly telling me what to do. I added something with the intention of noting a link between the credits on Ozark and those of The Wild Wild West in a section on the opening credits where they were already being discussed, but I guess you are some
4091:
In any case, I will not edit on behalf of anyone else. If you are not a banned/blocked editor and the edits are legitimate, it's certainly easier to do it yourself than try to explain it to me and have me do it. I will, however, take a look and watch for signs of socking, undeclared multiple
3306:
Explain to me and the rest of the world how exactly Salafism "developed... as a response to Western European imperialism" is a true statement from a reputable source. This is not spoken as an opinion, nor is there a counter-balancing opinion, so this is clearly being spoken as a statement of
1860:
Based on the link you sent with your message, I have looked at my contribution for following conventions, being on-topic, citing sources, clarity, efficiency, and organized under the correct sub-heading in the artcle. I would understand your objection to this contribution better with further
872:
The editor in question was given multiple chances and warnings. They did not listen or respond in any way. They were blocked from editing for 24 hours, still did not respond and returned with more of the same behavior. They have now been blocked indefinitely and will not be unblocked without
756:
On the talk page, I suggested 3 other references that demonstrate the character represented an example of a MN. Since you removed my changes the last time, would the following references allow me to re-add the character to the list: (1) This is an interview with the executive producer of The
8554:
there may be a better means, which I am unaware of, of linking directly to her tweet. If you agree that this is a reliable source I would be grateful if you could revert your revert; and if there is a better way to cite the specific tweet (as opposed to the thread) please go ahead. Cheers!
7524:
4. “How you could be looking at a source and not know what it says is a mystery.“ - Not only do you come off as rude, but you act so condescending towards me for a harmless mistake I made with that edit you mentioned that I’m baffled that someone like you is a high-profile editor, when I’ve
211:
Hi. I was browsing 'magical negro' after reading about the movie 'music' and looked at the Talk page. Anyway- I live in Scotland and here 'blubbering' means crying as in "he's a blubbering wreck". Whereas 'blabbering' is similar to blethering ie someone who is talking too much. Kind regards
6832:
I just found you from minutes ago (between 8:30pm/20:30pm to 8:45pm/20:45pm), that you undoing my edit of the clearly unrecognized/unrecognised (the very soon likely short-lived, if more protesters are staying that area they consider 'controlled' (or separated from) the US police system)
1126:
A conditional threat to block can be considered a threat more generally speaking. Perhaps a gentle explanation is in order, that the user will only be blocked in their disruptive conduct continues, rather than the ham-fisted approached you have elected to take? This is clearly a language
6399:. While I welcome your comments in that discussion and hope you will continue to contribute to it, I also noticed that you have never edited that page before, and so it seems like you came across that discussion by following me to that page after we had our dispute. That would seem like 5613:
Another problem is that there are numerous sites built on information from Knowledge. Some of them merely copy selected articles to build their own content: Knowledge article's showing up as blog posts, local history sites, wikis dedicated to narrower topics, etc. Also, there are sites
1827:
Further, since reliability is based on context, some sites are of limited utility. While we wouldn't cite, for example, an entrepreneur's personal blog for claims their product is going to save the world, we might use it for basic, non-controversial info about them or their company. -
7717:
Oh come on, Karen. I could have dealt with the issue politely. The reason I called your Karen bahevior out was that it was worth it. Absolutely obnoxious. 90% of your edits are reverts of others' contributions. The rest 10% are bitting away newcomers. 1 Karen = one project destroyed.
6827: 4087:
I have no idea who wrote this, why they are using a secondary account and why they are contacting me via email asking me to make changes for them. It would seem likely that they are trying to hide something from someone. Given the number of socks around here, that's my first guess.
8903:
Hi, thanks for the message you've left on my talk page. I should indeed have added an edit summary on my modification to the martian (film) page. I've edited the martian page again but this time added an edit summary. Can you check and see if it is adequate? Thanks. Wikieditor1377
2114:
I'm waiting on an account, did the request thing but it says 4 month backlog, and I'm not dealing wit hcomplaints about lack on in-line citations, because it's not my fault that the captcha does not have an accessible option. It's Knowledge's fault fo rbeing so anti 3rd party.
7685:
LMAO. Whatever Karen. Fat, useless, unemployed piece of trash with a garbage diploma. Want to police everything to suit your little emotions. Subhumans. Do whatever you want. My time is better spent on work than arguing with a piece of garbage like you. Always seeking problems.
438:
That's how Simon writes, like it or dislike it. His picking on the appearance of actors or actresses (Besides Streisand, try Wallace Shawn, Liza Minelli, Melanie Griffith to name a few) is well known. Your mentions of fact checking, reliable sources and proofreading are way off
7837:
does not belong? I don't think there's a difference in triviality between the first paragraph (Star Trek) versus the second paragraph (Hannibal). They both contain "trivial" information relating to popular culture, and in fact both contain information coming from the source
6227:
One of the main problems in building Knowledge is that so many editors get involved in topics they don't know anything about, yet feel free to "correct" knowledgeable contributors, based on ridiculous assumptions. You provided a very convincing example of that problem here.
333:
This confused you: "What do you mean 'unsourced'? Power groove = groove metal." Apparently, this was intended to jump start me into searching the article for a source calling it "Power groove" and then find evidence that "power groove" and "groove metal" are the same thing.
1949:
can do is quote it with inline attribution. This leads to some editors adding their own interpretations ("mixed to positive", "mostly negative", "well received", etc.). As there is no reliable source to individually back up the statement, it is "synthesis" (as described at
259:
Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to their associated articles, not for general discussion of the articles' topics. Improvements to articles can be made through reference to independent reliable sources. Your blog entry is not a reliable source. Please see
7629:
If it helps, imagine I had simply changed one of your numbers back to what it was before or changed it to a different number -- with no edit summary. How would you determine what had happened? Why should *I* have explained my edit if you don't need to explain yours? -
7625:
Yes, this is a "hill you can die on". You can stake your ground, refuse to admit there might be a problem, demand the project change to accept your preferences and see what happens. You are likely to have better results if you simply provide even the briefest of edit
7057:
If the article currently uses something other than broadcast order, find something in MOS to back using broadcast order and change it citing MOS. Failing that, suggest the change on the article's talk page, wait a week and (assuming no one argues against it) make the
8611:
The last paragraph about future changes to the mall is incorrect, so I removed that section. It refers to future changes but when you go to the source it actually is referring to a different project adjacent to Greenspoint Mall. That's why I removed that last part.
5811:
page (weeks ago)? There are other participants there who have not gotten such a notice. I know the notice itself says "It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date"......but the fact I got it and others haven't.....makes me think there
3518:
If you disagree with describing it as a 2016 film, please open a discussion of the issue on the article's talk page. In addition to changing the text of the article (as you did), the article would need to be moved. The article is not at "Split (2017 Movie)". It's at
2806:
I put me on the list because I was the first women of color mechanic for TWA, there were 3 others after me. If I did it incorrectly please let me know so I can go back on the list. I’m researching to find out if I was first for all major airlines, but I was for TWA
7322:
issue: While accurate, "militant" does not define the group. Random militants would find nothing in common with the group. Black anarcho-primativists might. It's the difference between call the Seventh Day Adventists a "vegetarian group" and a "vegetarian Christian
6288:
question could submit a statement. I respect the need for Knowledge to be accurate - but note that in this case there is a living person behind the page and the page is not accurate. Hoping you can help me provide the sourcing needed to fix this inaccuracy. Thanks!
329:
Raptorlino changed genres in an article without providing a source or explanation. I reverted with an edit summary that their edit was "Unsourced/undiscussed genre change". The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material.
1155:
Bah. It's no mere threat. It's a "death threat". Those who blank every warning they get and simply restore what they want often benefit from a ham-fisted approach, paying attention to something a lot simpler than the consensus warnings they ignore as "threats". -
7536:
Seriously, next time you have a problem with someone’s edits, better find out what they’re all about in terms of contributions before judging them, plain and simple. But hey, if we’re doing this over a runtime adjustment, then I have nothing more to say to you.
7796:
Why independent sources? Because Knowledge is based on what independent reliable sources say about a subject. Otherwise, Knowledge would say that every car is the best car ever, every politician is the savior of the universe and every religion is the One True
6431:
An editor who, for example, makes unsourced changes in one article often has similar edits in other articles. Checking other articles for the same or similar problem is not only common, it is recommended, so long as the intent/result is neither disruption nor
4134:, most commonly known as the "George Reeves Person" or "GRP"). He hides behind proxies, and probably has made upwards of a thousand sockpuppets since Knowledge originally banned him in 2006. I routinely remove his stuff (unreliable original research, mainly). 2093:
It is true I trust UK admins way way way more tha nU.S. admins, but that is due t omy pro UK bias, give nthat after my family flead Eritrea during the start of the conflict with Ethiopia, it was the UK that game us a home in Southend-On-Sea then later London.
3577:
Imagine the topic were Richard Nixon. There are countless films, TV shows, novels, exposes, songs, album titles, operas, cartoons, etc. that mention or discuss Nixon. However, none of them are meaningful subjects when discussing Nixon. Yes, an article about
9170:
Apart from DTTR, you don't need to hand out DS notices to anyone who's placed them in a given topic area in the past twelve months. I think I've placed a couple dozen AP2 notices in the past twelve months, mostly to people who turned out to be sockpuppets.
4229:
No, I am not aware of anywhere on Knowledge that should include that level of detail on a cartoon episode. There are, of course, other projects -- wikis dedicated to specific shows and other topics. I don't know if there is one that applies here or not. -
3720:
There are numerous banned editors editing anonymously -- often in disputes with other banned editors editing anonymously. Given the frequency with which they show up here asking me to edit on their behalf, I have a longstanding of not getting involved. -
769:): "Holy Wayne oft-disrobed, muscular, dark body takes the pain...of his predominately white, male clientele. The visual imagery is iconic and hearkens back to past representations of Black men acting as magical negros largely in service of white men." 7569:
is to build a better encyclopedia. However, in a world full of incompetence, vandalism, mental illness, ill intent, carelessness, alcohol/drugs, compromised accounts, etc. I do not know. How can I find out? Extensive research? In theory. Or, perhaps
5223:
regarding NIH definition. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is
5769:
What would be a good source considering the only real sources for internet culture are the items and culture itself? I get that youtube isn't a credible source, but do you know any places where I could find a good source regarding the meme itself?
4876:
Absolutely. As you have been edit warring and socking with dozens of accounts and IP addresses, it is very unlikely you will be unblocked right now. You might, however, be given the [[WP:SO|standard offer, offering you a way to become a productive
7614:
so. Your favorite blog uses times rounded to the nearest 5 minutes? Fine. You watched it on TV, it was edited and your time includes commercials? Fine. You are an outright vandal, churning through a series of articles to slowly degrade them? Fine.
3668:
I have recently oppened a talk section on BeyoncĂŠ and Jay-Z's collaborative album "Everything is Love" to clarify if the project should be labeled as a joint album or a debut album by "The Carters". Can you help me to clarify this matter, please?
3235:
As your changes seem to cover a lot of ground, I encourage you to "partialize": break your changes down into pieces, pick one piece to start with and -- as directly and succinctly as possible -- explain what you feel should be changed and why. -
4225:
Yes, there are other articles. Some of them are great. Some of them are horrible. That another article has trivia, typos, copyright violations, strange formatting or anything else does not mean that those things are good and should be in other
2502:'s page. I added the category victims of domestic abuse. I didn't think I had to add a citation since it was already mentioned in the article that Eric Clapton was violent towards her. I have since added a citation and I re-added the category. 622:
Let me be more succinct: The editor in question's history is one of dancing near and over the line on discretionary sanctions on issues related to gender, then (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) disappearing. I'm not playing that game. -
5422:. Also OR: "...may have partial ancestry from any of the black racial groups of Africa..." In any case, to make any change to this section, you will need to discuss the issue on the article's talk page and establish a consensus to do so. - 1632:
allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 17:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1596:
is a silent film, a black and white film, a Russian film, a classic film, an influential film, an early film, a well-known film, etc. Some of these are mentioned in the film's article, some are not. They are, nevertheless, true. Are they
9370:
history. Second, the editor who created the article (by the improper copy) seems to have been a sockpuppet. Either of those was reason to undo it. Is that correct? Do you know of any reason why the draft should not be accepted now?
9384: 4708:
Anywho, checking a bit closer, I now see you were summarizing in the lead. Of course that's appropriate. I was thrown by the statements that you had sources elsewhere in the article and thought you were adding new material. Carry on. -
6855:
And plus, what you mean its 'disputed' when the Autonomous Zone' has covered, both from the mainstreamed or alternative press (either biased or not) or even some of the protesters also referring it as a 'occupational protest' as well?
5971:
BTW, no need to type your used name after using the automated signature. Whether you are hitting the signature button at the top if the edit box or using ~~~~, both add your name, links to your user and talk pages and a timestamp. -
3337:
As you seem to feel very strongly about the article content (as you have with previous articles you have been involved with), you may wish to take a break from editing and return when you feel to can discuss the issues briefly and
9787:""$ 5 million" means the real figure was somewhere between $ 5,499,999 and $ 4,500,000, a difference of almost $ 1 million. "$ 5.0 million" indicates the real figure is $ 5,049,999 and $ 4,050,00, a difference of about $ 100,000." 927: 8750:
You templated me on my talk page about "post-1932 politics of the United States" but I have no idea what this would pertain to. I haven't edited any articles on this topic and have only been doing recent changes patrols today.
3769:
were used to film some segments." However, you might have meant that a character uses action cameras or something else. Assuming English isn't your primary language, you might be more successful editing Knowledge in one of the
9866:
Hi - I came across your username on a talk page archive and thought 'haven't seen them around for a while'. Turns out I haven't seen you around for two years! I hope you're well, and enjoying whatever you're doing now. Best
6976:
It's a strange drop-in in the final paragraph: "In May, Fiorentino, who was married to writer director John Byrum ('Razor's Edge') and divorced him in 1993..." I suppose it's easy to miss because it seems so out-of-place. -
6651: 4559:
Yes, if "almost all" do not have sourced content discussing its use in a meme, it should be removed from almost all of them. If, based on the sources, there is virtually nothing to say about its use in a meme, the fact is
2420: 3584:
would naturally discuss Nixon -- it's hard to say anything meaningful about the opera without discussing Nixon. The reverse is not true: the overwhelming majority of sources about Richard Nixon do not discuss that opera,
7622:
1:33 or 1:30 or something else? If they continue to refuse to provide even brief explanations, remind them that communication is required for any cooperative enterprise to continue. Ask them again. Escalate as required.
6009:: they are both species, not breeds. But her chief editor told her not to use scientific names, because the general public is not familiar with them. What she should have done is find the vernacular names and use them. 8524:
As I said on their talk page, I wasn't sure why Mkayj14 sent me an email saying "SummerPhDv2.0 has to become an administrator on the English Knowledge." and that I'd have to look into what other user name(s) they had
3275: 2969: 7577:
The onus is on your to show that you are adding verifiable information. It is not on my to figure out who you are, guess whether you are using reliable sources, figure out if you understand...etc. That simply is not
3010:. He/she says the shows are self-evidently non-superhero shows. It appears this editor's removal is due to personal opinions; plus, the editor is ignoring the sources and has left a big mess. The editor's name is 2103:
As I explain on the talk page of an admin I trust, Amakuru, I may be uninformed to some degree as I've never so much as set a toe on the U.S. soil, and I'venever met a friendly American in my 28 years on this earth.
9906: 9194:
Understood and please forgive the notice. With the exception of a few admins whose blocks of a few trolls stick in my head -- and lacking a reasonable way to check who has notified others -- I don't have much of an
3710: 6325:
Please be aware that Knowledge user names are to be used by individuals on a one-to-one basis:each user name is to be used by one and only one person. Shared accounts or accounts on behalf of organizations are not
9395: 8674: 7417:
page is a bit confusing, because the credits of Season 5 say "Canada-South Africa co-production", but you won't allow the latter country in unless there's like a network or figures from the country to prove that.
6665: 5402:, reverted you, referring you to "discussion" (the talk page, where discussion cites the sources saying she is half African American and trying to figure out weightings for Korean/Japanese, based on the sources. 2767:
a mycologist, my point in the discussion above the RfC is that there is no academic verification of Stamets as a degree-defined mycologist, an academic title and discipline that would require a PhD. There is no
9399: 7208:
with you, so will give you the opportunity to undo your edit and amend 'retirement' to 'residential'. Per my previous note to you above, I do not think it is helpful for you to undo a whole edit because of one
9038:
An FYI on these two editors- yes, with both making strikingly similar edits in regards to unsourced/trivial reruns of shows, definitely seems to be the same person. Also seem to be a possible block evasion of
8873:
I'd say there would need to be a lot more involved. DSs are meant to put a quick stop to disruption in articles that are prone to it. I've only seen DS applied where there is editing based on a clear POV. -
3648: 341:
change, I reverted it as "Unsourced/undiscussed genre change". The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. There was no need for additional care on my part. -
1498:"skewed, making it a potential anomaly" - At this point, it was obvious that (in addition to the whole thing being made up) you do no know the meanings of the words "skewed", "potential" and/or "anomaly". 231:
So, basically you say, until criticism was published off-site it can not be referenced in Knowledge. But, if it was published off-site, then it can be referenced in Knowledge. Ok, I made an off-site copy:
4662:
is for readers to be be able to easily check that the information comes from a reliable source. The only way to find your note would be to dig through the article's history to find the edit and your note.
2979:
Hello, anonymous-editor-who-is-almost-certainly-a-banned-editor. I see you are here to continue your crusade against another banned editor. That crusade -- and failure to heed warnings -- is what got you
376:
is one of them. Since what I put in liked to Simon's WP article (which if you read you may have learned that one of What's up Doc's characters was a parody of Simon), your summary is simply unbelievable.
8670: 7886:
That he is a substantial part of a documentary, that's worth mentioning, though it's certainly not "in popular culture" material (unless the documentary is far more popular than the average documentary).
6719:
Previously, we had a claim that John Malkovich as Dr. Adrian Mallory was based on Dr. Strangelove. That was enough for me to watch the show. (Malkovich riffing on Dr. Strangelove? What could be better!)
6636: 6066:
Anonymous: I get that you disagree. That said, your invective against an author (who will likely never see it) isn't helpful. Saying she is wrong and telling us what you believe is right isn't much help
5668:
Hi again. Thanks for the response. It means a ton to me that you responded and took this seriously. If you could remove the link on your userpage to one of the now-hidden revisions it would be great as
3775:
2) It seems to be a random bit of trivia, placed randomly in the article. Assuming you were saying how parts of the film were shot, where you placed it has no relation to anything else being discussed.
679:
Whether you or I think a character is a "magical Negro" or not is immaterial. Knowledge is based on independent reliable sources. Yes, many articles have opinions in them. For example, our article on "
1458:"However, this result is controversial, as it does not abide by any standard tootsie-pop-licking methodology. Thus, some researchers believe that this result is skewed, making it a potential anomaly." 9441:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5446:
any facts: 1) Billboard’s review for them being hip hop reverts to a 404 error/dead page, whereas the Wall Street Journal’s article is still active and explicitly calls the group a hip-hop ]] group.
1098:, you will be warned again. If you keep at it, you will eventually be blocked from editing. If you then say you had no idea that would happen, the warnings you were given (but ignored) say otherwise. 9827:
i also figured it wasnt my place to attempt editing anything to try to correct it for you, mainly because it doesnt belong to me, but also because im just not 100% sure what you were trying to say.
9198:
The goal is to head off those on one side who are notified coming to me claiming to be "targeted" by a notice. "Hey, yeah, I notified you, but the editor you were arguing with was also notified." -
1386:
contributors are responsible for a certain amount of caution but the policy that you quote is a tricky one and one could claim that it is void as it is not seldomly used in overly repressive ways.
7509:
Hello, I am leaving you a response to the message you left me on my talk page regarding film runtimes. I have several problems with how you presented yourself on my talk page regarding my edits:
4665:
Saying there are sources elsewhere in the article does not indicate which sources. Additionally, there is the possibility that those sources elsewhere will be removed at some point in the future.
3975:
I am not an admin. I did not -- cannot -- block anyone. I requested their first block. When I saw them editing with a new IP, I reverted all of their edits and asked for them to be blocked again.
2985:
No, I will not do anything for you. You'll need to log on under your original account and ask to be unblocked. (I am going to take one look at the article and decide to undo your edits or not. -
9845:
p.s. i cant figure out why this message keeps getting appended to your existing talk topic, if you can tell me what im doing wrong, or what is making it happen, id really appreciate it. thanks.
6487:
I'd need more info to have any idea what you are talking about. I don't see that you've editing that article any time recently and don't specifically recall what interaction we many have had. -
6178:. That's total nonsense. It's part of the explanation she made up herself for the name 'Pineberry', so that in her mind everything fits. The name "pine strawberry" however, was given in 1766 by 3133:
The purpose of an article's talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article. Article talk pages should not be used as platforms for your personal views. -
2318:
I guess the lesson here is threefold: 1) Don't make personal attacks. 2) When called on making personal attacks, don't restore them. 3) When called on it a second time, don't restore them again.
8285:
Not very reliable, Futon Critic always uses the same production codes if two episodes air on the same day??? I promise you that's not how the show was actually produced, check the end credits.
6547:
I don't know what your "feelings" are about and I don't feel like digging through history to figure out what you are talking about. You are on the record as vaguely annoying, at this point. -
5831:
on your talk page. Today I notified all three of the most recent contributors (including you). The three contributors prior have also been notified (or have notified others of the situtation).
5988: 5305:
was not written by me. It is a consensus note used throughout the project to notify editors of common situations. If you feel the text is "arrogant", you may wish to discuss the issue at the
3332:
I am addressing your disruptive editing. Whether you are right, wrong or somewhere in between is immaterial at this point. If you continue to edit war, you will be blocked from editing again.
46:
1) You will frequently be wrong. Discuss the issue on the talk page. When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. Read the policy/guideline someone says you violated. They might be right.
9833:
if i misunderstood something, or if the way it sits right now says exactly what you wanted it to say from the start, i dont think it is, but if it is, then i apologize and feel a bit silly.
7766:
cannot be compared to McDonalds meal. Even Ignatiy Vishnevetsky who is a better reputed critic than Jason Buchanan has written a beautifully detailed article on AV Club regarding the tone. (
6865: 7513:
YouTube or iTunes gives you the exact runtime and what is left on the Knowledge page is the approximate. It’s that simple, and it’s not a hill worth dying on to cite a YouTube search page.
390:
4 It is in the reception section of the article. Reception sections are for among other things, what was written about the film in question. John Simon is a published film critic just like
9706:, but I just noticed that for the past couple of years, there have been updates. One of the editors challenged some sources in the Fake Sources section. I already fixed the citation for 7787: 9538:
Haven't seen you around lately. I know life can suddenly get hectic but it seemed unlike you to just drop off editing completely and without warning. Hope things are going well for you.
815:
I will admit I use to be the same way, but I looked at his previous edits, and he is known for putting his personal input on many movies. I use to be this way, but I changed. He hasn’t.
4974:
You are continuing to edit in defiance of a standing block. Your edit will be reverted. Stop editing, log on to your original account and follow the directions to request an unblock. -
3301: 179:
Hi, thanks for your removal of what you call "blubbering" from the various X-Men films. Just as a matter of interest, what do you mean by the term "blubbering" in this context? Thanks!
7555:
What every editor reviewing one of your edits encounters is someone changed an article. Why they changed it is not obvious. There is no edit summary, source or explanation of any kind.
5870:. If you really want to bring this to a head, I'll work on further researching the article and fleshing it out, but I haven't really been very active on writing in Knowledge lately. - 5678:
And thank you Sro23 for hiding the revisions. Don't know how much good it will do (I guess only time will tell), but I'm so grateful that you went through the trouble to do it for me.
2100:
I feel the same about Georgia, Texas and a few othe rright-wing states. I know it's not all people from the states I named but it's enough that these laws and views are strong there.
9457: 6870: 2434: 2107:
So I do not hate all of th eU.S. editors and admins, but I just have a minor oversion to those from overly right republican areas. I say overly right to not include all republicans.
957: 7980:
Clearly you are doing this because you are a social justice warrior scumbag. You removed the fact that Tom Wolf was Charlie Robertson's campaign chairman. You are a partisan hack.
2133:
Your prejudice has no weight here. Where someone lives is not an acceptable reason for you to not treat them with the same respect and civility we expect you to treat all editors.
9427: 9148: 2584: 4491:. I think it would be helpful to keep the categories "Internet Memes" and "Music Memes" because that's exactly what the song is - you can see it all over the place on Sept. 21 4004:
Thanks for your explanation. Perhaps you could also update the page for String Band as it doesn't currently mention anything about the possibility of having woodwinds. Cheers.
1738:. It cannot be used as a source in any Knowledge article and should not be linked from any article. If you continue to link to the site, I'll take additional steps as necessary. 1432:
I don't challenge your decision to delete my contribution to the tootsie pop article, but I do challenge your belief that it was poor writing. How exactly was it poor writing?
5618:
Knowledge: people analyzing content and who adds it, forums where they complain about various editors, etc. If your info is on any of those sites, we can't control that either.
3482:
You were wrong to add it to Knowledge. Independent reliable sources do not discuss whether or not mac & cheese is a soup, so Knowledge has nothing to say on the subject. -
6916: 6889: 6875: 7343:
haven't looked it up recently. Simply saying the fire department "let (it) burn out of control" may not accurately reflect which agency did what and is certainly inexact. -
5683: 3271: 2965: 1321:
Although the playful and affectionate stereotyping of Jewish caricatures may also be applicable here, I would point out that in his pronunciation he echoes that favoured by
762: 6590: 9902: 8373:
and making me think I could get another edit war warning. As a result, I am now going to take a break from editing Knowledge until further notice. Thanks a lot Cryptical.
7687: 7491: 7472: 7453: 6767: 6745: 5577: 4483:
The reason I removed your edits is because September by Earth Wind and Fire is in fact considered a meme. I hate to source Know Your Meme but here's a whole article on it
3706: 3295: 2995: 7695: 6060: 4517:
At present, the article says absolutely nothing about a meme. To someone reading the article (or brought there by one of the categories), it makes absolutely no sense. -
3731: 3279: 9391: 8678: 8369:
See Cryptical, you took the page WAY TOO FAR. Even if incorrect, The Futon Critic is still the most relatable source for TV programs. Cryptical, what your just doing is
6661: 5382:
I do not "keep reverting (your) change". I reverted it once. You bumped African American to the end and removed a raft of AA categories without explanation of any kind.[
5193:
Hi, I hope this is the right way to notify you that I have requested dispute resolution for the Reiki article, specifically regarding using the NIH definition for Reiki.
4026:"A string band is an old-time music or jazz ensemble made up mainly or solely of string instrument." If it is "mainly" string instruments, there is something else there. 7027:, even if it is edited or completely original, it is still copyvio. As a result, they need to be replaced with summaries that are about 100 to 200 words in length, per 5863:. It's certainly notable enough, though the article is outdated & under-referenced. (Sadly, so is the article in ro-wiki, or I'd just pull in material from there.) 3403: 3316: 3093:
I am not interested in exploring this with you. Knowledge's civility guidelines -- which have been linked for you several times and explained -- are sufficiently clear.
9892: 9839:
i also realize that this is probably like the least important thing ever, and i probably didnt even need to message you. but i did anyway, most likely out of boredom.
6961:
article, I'm afraid I don't see a single word about John Byrum, let alone a 1993 divorce. Can you point me to where it says that, because I'm not seeing it. Thanks! --
4833:
You, the person, are already indefinitely blocked. You are not eligible to edit articles or discuss content in any way. Any editor may revert any or all of your edits
3679: 1824:
Yes. That said, as there are billions of such sites and each addition adds a tiny fraction of a second to page loads, we usually don't bother; eventually that adds up.
987:
Hi SummerPHDv2.0, My apologies, must have click on the wrong line when revert which it was intended for other editor. very sorry and I have removed the message above.
8166:
In the future, please add a section title so that I know what you are talking about. Without it, it looked like you were asking about Top Gun 2, to topic before this.
3652: 3445: 2890:
becoming the first African-American to play Major League Baseball in the modern (post-nadir) era was seen by many as a turning point. This brings up the second point.
9813:
a difference of: $ 999,000 or almost $ 1 million (about the same difference as the example that makes up the first sentence of the last paragraph, just $ 999 less)
6709: 6349:
The final option can be a bit of a hassle, which is why I saved it for last. The subject of the article, or their personal representative follow the instructions at
4330:
I was going to say, “Bragging about your PhD is not a good look”, but, after getting a gander of your talk page, I can see that probably the least of your problems.
4015: 3562: 7846:
is an unreliable source, I would be fine with removing that source, but I don't think the entire paragraph should be deleted. Thanks in advance for your response.
7063:
If you find that the summaries are copyright violations, remove them citing the source of the text. If you can rewrite them, great. If not, at least remove them. -
6804:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
6576:
stuff. My abilities to research are limited geographically so I can't do much to improve them, but they all need good scholarly additions. If you ever get bored...
6092:
It's not a matter of what I believe. I showed you the errors she made in the "facts" she mentioned. It was you who wanted to believe the NYT is a reliable source.
5679: 5361: 3644: 1847: 7499: 4882:
In the meantime, stop editing. Every edit you make is just another violation of your block and, as you should have realized by now, isn't going to last anyway. -
4762:
Can we call End of the World classic rock, remove folk from Losing My Religion, classify Billie Jean as pop, and find a specific genre for Don't Stop Believing?
2657: 8840: 8767:
will see the template and think they are being targeted. I template anyone I see editing the article anew just to avoid that.) I probably hit you for an edit to
8230:
Just so the case is clear, the page was doing just fine before Baldi came in. We have many sources saying it's a 52-episode show, not a 26 52-segments show, and
7956: 5573: 4250: 4174: 4057: 4050: 3070: 1526: 1439: 6684: 9644: 6743: 5802: 2375:
argument. "This is a list of music considered the worst by professional music critics. By 'professional music critic' we mean any paid music critic who admits
1802: 1776: 1707: 1645: 908: 860: 837: 213: 8451:
I have no idea who you are or why you'd think I would care, but an indefinite block for block evasion seems to be a strange way to announce your candidacy. -
6947: 9951: 9697: 8960: 8911: 5454: 3660: 3001: 2844:
of pages, not the top. Depending on your settings, there should be a tab at the top of the page titled "New section which allows you to do this more easily.)
2199:
So even if the person is a racist Alabaman rightwing trump supporter who thinks Eritrea is a bleep hole, they still get to tell me what to do on Knowledge?
9946: 9483: 9217:
I understand the problem - it's something we run into at AN3, where we get dedicated edit-warriors demanding that the other guy(s) get the same treatment.
9089: 8028: 6838: 6047:, she would probably call it the Peruvian squill, and blab about its Peruvian origins. That's the kind of ignorance we have to deal with here. She writes: 5154: 4990: 3474: 3460: 2529: 1920: 243: 7449:
Even though it's a different IP address that's long, we aren't the same. I just think the "jumping beans" should be linked because it's not a common term
6344:
Failing that, the subject can update their (verified) social media accounts (Facebook and such) or the bio section of their personal/professional website.
9692: 7541: 6777:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 5383: 3683: 3503:
The movie Split was released theatrically in 2017, not 2016. Usually movies are described with their theatrical release date, not the year it premiered.
401:
means and have made approximately 150,000 edits here? I should expect this from you since you are the same nut who idiotically accused me of sockpuppetry
6620: 5153:
I didn't add the information on the 2Pac Better Dayz site. Someone else did and they spelled a couple of things wrong so I was only fixing the wording.
4188: 2973: 2568:
for more information. Ask for help here, on your talk page or on the article's talk page if you don't understand something or aren't sure what to do. -
9910: 9520: 7896:
The wiki is not reliable. Someone added something to a wiki. Based on that, we know... nothing, other than the fact that someone added it to a wiki. I
7256:, I must admit I am confused - you are reverting to a version of the article which still has the majority of the issues in it that you are describing. 6373: 6295: 5376: 3504: 1103:
Incidentally, calling me "a huge hipocritical person" and claiming (incorrectly) that I am threatening you could easily be seen as a personal attack.
323: 8180:
your edit, saying "As sourced in the 'Release' section". If you look in the release section, you will see a source for the date you think is wrong. -
7969: 6041:. In stead of using an existing vernacular name, she "interpreted" the scientific names, an unforgivable error. If this lady ever gets to write about 5923:
An assumption of bad faith would involve me saying something about your reasons for adding the claim. I said nothing whatsoever about your motives. -
3557:
only one entry, but with a citation, might set the momentum in a good direction. Cheers. And sorry to hear about your unexpected break with the past.
1283:
I've engaged regarding the "Anti-feminist" remark. Given that this is an ongoing discussion, it would be appreciated if you could continue you input.
1117: 9719: 9711: 9118:
I reverted, asking you to see the article's talk page for the article's inclusion criteria. Those criteria call for two independent reliable sources
9109: 8613: 8127: 7942: 6822: 5821: 3087: 3054: 3023: 3015: 1814: 8651:
Is there a difference between passing away and dying? And also, when I said "abeilt in select episodes." I was talking about how episodes featuring
7742: 7727: 6448: 5982: 5638: 5320:
for general discussion of article's topics. Article talk pages are intended to be used to discuss sourced improvements to their associated articles.
4984: 4847: 4801: 4320: 2849: 2097:
The U.s. states I have problems with happen to include Dermies's state Alabama, due to its anti feminist and anti abortion and right-wing politics.
1513: 941: 929: 8600: 8332: 8294: 8272: 8251: 7691: 7495: 7476: 7457: 5505: 5368: 4464: 4433: 4403: 4376: 4358: 3920: 3889: 3875: 3826: 3808: 3429: 3378: 2772:
for him as a mycologist. He is a hobbyist focused on mushrooms the way a gardener (with no botany degree) is focused on flowers. I interpreted the
2723: 1838: 1070: 1029: 892: 9043:. Both accounts (Packman + Kingkobra) both use the word 'evan' instead of 'even', so at this point its pretty obvious... Already reported both at 8973: 8461: 8382: 7822: 7461: 7091: 7073: 6268: 6237: 6135: 6101: 6083: 5482: 5169: 3254: 3168:
is unacceptable. We need discuss no further for now, if you do a block self-revert, and shape up -- at least as concerns my edits. Alternatively,
2455: 2301: 1895: 8147: 8070: 7853: 7712: 7138: 6737: 5497: 5295: 5281: 5182: 5046:
Perhaps I'm missing something. I'd just like to put an end to the constant back and forth which is why I'm suggesting temporary page protection.
5003: 4121: 4043: 3628: 3492: 3343:
Rather than a long wall of text, try breaking the issue down into smaller pieces and start with one of those pieces using the following formats:
3213:
Your unexplained edits were, as nearly as I could tell, not an improvement. The rambling hidden comments were clearly not encyclopedic additions.
2833: 2814: 2578: 2410: 2346: 2225: 2192: 2152: 2083: 1407: 1348:
I don't know what higher purpose you thought you were serving when you deleted my Talk item, but please resist the urge to indulge in it future.
633: 7640: 7238:
I'd suggest partializing. Unless you are truly writing the lead from scratch, you might do better breaking it down into one change at a time. -
2717: 746: 722: 697: 513:, which you now feel is "libelous" is an accurate summary of your edits under this user name (I did not bother to look up your sockpuppetry and 205: 9611: 9132: 8016: 6557: 6534: 6497: 5959: 5903:
I was merely correcting a link on the plot summary. Next time, think before falsely accusing someone of making an "unsourced and trivial" edit!
5077:
and hasn't figured out all of their efforts have been wasted. So long as Knowledge allows anonymous editing, there is little else we can do. -
4745: 4719: 4700: 4682: 4240: 4220: 4205: 3541: 3029:
There is no "permission". (Incidentally, I'm not an admin, not that that is particularly relevant.) I'll take a quick look and see what's what.
2883: 1769:
Did I just personally offend you? Anyways, I took down all that I had added, including new ones after that. Hopefully, there aren't any left.
9750:"Rounding is a bit more difficult, but more accurate: $ 148.95 is, after all, much closer to $ 150 than $ 149. $ 140 is getting further away." 9234: 9208: 9083: 8637: 7480: 7402: 6412: 5796: 5729: 5407:"In her book Fabulousity she stated that she was 1/2 black and half mixed-Asian..." says the talk page. I personally see the reliable source, 3714: 3638:
exposes states this). So, I think the question is begged—what have informed people about that period in history, and about this genre/area of
3062: 3044: 2271: 2208: 2176: 2127: 2053: 2037: 1638:
I do not know, nor have heard of before, of any user named "Writersupreme". Hence I cannot possibly conduct any joint activity with him / her.
1260: 1245: 1217: 1194: 1166: 1150: 599:
I really don't need you to suggest AN/I. Frankly, with your history, I'd just ask an uninvolved admin to apply the discretionary sanctions. -
9350: 8884: 8852: 8822: 8799: 8781: 7920: 7651:
Sorry, if you have a Karen problem, please see a therapist. Stop posting "warnings" on my page and stop reverting my response to User:Zezen.
5933: 5844: 5687: 5432: 5110: 5087: 5064: 5041: 5026: 4938: 4923: 4621: 4589: 4546: 4527: 4164: 4141: 3976: 1617: 1473:"any standard tootsie-pop-licking methodology" - There is no pre-existing methodology. The sources make clear how they devised their methods. 1463:"this result" - There is more than one result being discussed. As you have no follow up to any of them, your claims do not apply to just one. 1380: 475: 447: 429: 8190: 8173:, saying "The date was incorrect." While this tells us you thought the date was wrong, we're left guessing as to why. I still have no idead. 7914: 7775: 7353: 7271: 7248: 7229: 7191: 6987: 6258:
Forgive me for repeating myself: This discussion is about article content. You will need to discuss the issue on the article's talk page. -
5659: 5355: 4579:
define the subject as having". Check the sources in the article. Do they commonly and consistently discuss the song being used in a meme? -
3143: 3125: 3108: 2947: 2395: 2331: 1944: 1677: 920: 849: 609: 594: 580: 557: 542: 9090: 9027: 8702: 8542: 8410: 8396: 7926: 7051: 6724: 6572:
Hi! Can't recall seeing you around the gang articles before, but thanks for watching. 99% of the edits on the gang articles are gangbanger
6170:
I did not even mention the most stupid error Florence Fabricant made, but which shows she has no idea what she's writing about. She states
5233: 5194: 7369: 6828:
Your removal edit from the list of active separatist movements in North America, with the recent new 'Autonomous Zone' declared at Seattle
5330:
If you feel my use of a consensus warning notice was out of line and needs further attention, feel free to review some of your options at
3988: 3765:
1) The grammar is bad enough that I cannot be certain enough what you were trying to say to be able to correct it. Presumably, you meant "
3760:
Your addition, "Some action cams are been used in this film.", has several problems, any one of which would be reason enough to remove it.
3246: 2741: 2425:
It's been six years and counting since the 2013 Ender's Game film is released. I was expecting a TV series, but we've got is none. Why? --
763:
https://www.tvbuzer.com/news/the-leftovers-season-1-finale-recap-the-guilty-remnant-s-memorial-day-plot-has-devastating-consequences-50379
9404: 9138: 8590:
If this tweet marks a meaningful event in her life, independent sources will discuss it. At that point we might have something to add. -
7929:, it seems Top40Weekly has 2 ref names, "Prism" and "auto3". The first comes from the fact the first artist I added using the source was 7385: 6646: 6585: 5552: 3743: 3592: 2852:
added your achievement to the article, "First African American Woman Mechanic for Major Commercial Airline: Trans World Airlines (TWA)."
2006: 1085:
the same as other warnings given to thousands of editors ever day. If you add unsourced material to articles, you will receive a warning.
998: 303: 9302: 9160: 6669: 5713: 5289: 2014:
I'd like to post the link in the edit summary to the Crush version of the song as it is anotable cover, but do not know how to do this.
1586: 6481: 5271: 5008:
SPI could take a while. Is it not worth taking it to the last blocking admin or requesting page protection until they are re-indeffed?
3352:
The source cited, "FUBAR Monthly" is not a reliable source. It is merely a blog. We should remove that source and claims sourced to it.
2615:
May 3 might end up being correct, too bad person who entered that did not cite source! Tillywilly17 (talk) 17:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
2362: 2245: 510: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 7865: 5384:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kimora_Lee_Simmons&type=revision&diff=946420506&oldid=945450390&diffmode=source
5266: 5128: 352: 6924:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 6849: 5939: 5529: 4300: 2826: 1788: 1623: 1544: 761:. (2) Here is a recap of season 1 where they specifically indicate that Wayne has become a "Magical Negro" by the end of the season: 9627:(for which a RS was later found and added to his article); it might be condign to ask whether messages like this are a little mean. 9060: 8923: 7595:
2) It was wrong. Someone checked it against a reliable source and corrected it with the wrong information (typo, bad rounding, etc.)
5572:
minutes, yet now my email inbox is flooded because of them. Thanks. And sorry once more for my uncreative trolling way back then. --
4649: 4510: 766: 374: 373:
is WP notable. He wrote theater and film criticism for over 40 years and has published at least 3 books on the former. Reverse Angle
8643: 7828: 6390: 6363: 5695: 3970: 2675: 1761: 9702:
Hey, how's it going? It's been awhile. I hope you're doing well. Hey, I don't know if you've been reading the talk page of the
9329: 8569: 7995: 7872:
I'm not completely sold on the section needing to exist. Most "In popular culture" sections eventually devolve into pointless and
6773:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
5581: 5396: 1872: 274: 9593: 7883:
As the subject of a reliable source all its own, I can certainly see mention of the Star Trek character in the article somewhere.
7179: 6993: 3702: 3204: 2799: 2231: 1538: 1451: 9340:
If you have questions related to article content (like this), you will need to discuss the issues on the article's talk page. -
8739: 5162: 2042:
Also I was about to request an account named Nahom Tesfay, my name, but due to backlog I'd have to wait several months. thanks.
805: 9724: 9564: 7592:
1) The information there was wrong. Someone checked it against a reliable source and corrected it with the correct information.
7485: 6905: 6871: 6454: 5779: 5462: 4963: 4868: 4822: 4777: 3098:
Further, I am not particularly moved by your attempt to abandon individual agency. You are responsible for your own actions. -
2793: 2293: 1534: 1447: 532:
Finally, the section header here seems to indicate that this account is being used by more than one person. Is that correct? -
9307: 8215:
Please take over for me because I don't want to have another warning about edit wars. Please give them edit war warnings too.
8177: 8170: 8060:
supporting the material. If you do not have a reliable source for the material, you should not have added it to begin with. -
8036: 6699: 4967: 4826: 4781: 3468: 2878:
not) include every person from New York City. It is limited to notable people; those who have their own article on Knowledge.
585:
Well, I consider your comments about me misleading. Call that whatever you like. If you want to bring me to ANI, go ahead.
9896: 8205: 7876:
lists of the subject being mentioned in TV shows/movies/comic books/operas/etc. (note the complete lack of such a section in
7679: 6616: 6350: 5588: 5316:
on the Ozark (TV series) talk page was, IMO, entirely focused on your opinion of something related to the show. Knowledge is
4478: 4296: 3395: 3362:
The reliable source cited says "FU is BAR" but another source, "HHGTTG" says "FU is not BAR". We should include that as well.
3308: 3153: 2142:
and should not be included in the article. If you disagree, you will need to discuss the issue on the article's talk page. -
1810: 1784: 1715: 1653: 1359: 1337: 1086: 953: 916: 845: 8353:
C) The discussion here about article content in an article I'm not editing is wasted. Take it to the article's talk page. -
7549: 7175:
file paperwork, etc. There is zero chance that they registered their housing (with no one over age 50) as a retirement home.
1393:
As there are zero reliable sources discussing this in relation to the show, any addition based on this observation would be
9918: 9888: 9479: 9033: 8989: 8945: 8919: 8440: 8051:
as it is a standardized warning used throughout the project on a regular basis and the text represents community consensus.
7660: 6229: 6093: 6052: 5246: 5241: 5202: 4892: 4488: 4102: 3675: 3512: 2930: 2541: 2426: 1864: 790: 9639: 9570: 8563: 8444: 8350:
B) Lots of edits to the article and very little discussion on the article's talk page. It should be the other way around.
3952: 3409:
The "duties...commensurate with (my) office"? Please tell me what the duties of my office are...I'd be interested to hear.
9703: 9684: 9553:
I'm wondering how you are, too, Summer. You're editing just stopped and I hope you are okay and are just busy with life.
9547: 8953: 7754: 7117: 6897: 6713: 6705: 6567: 4634: 4011: 3697:
in September, but along with the others are European-located IPs for those years. It looks to me like they have multiple
3558: 3007: 2697: 2537: 2200: 2168: 2119: 2045: 2029: 1928: 280: 251: 8621: 8261: 8096: 7949: 6702: 1089: 9508: 7168: 5758: 5608:
No matter what, bots that have already collected your address so far will still have it. Nothing you can do about that.
5313: 2653: 2297: 1488:"some researchers" - Who are these supposed researchers? Had you not made them up, identifying them would be important. 784: 776: 714: 672: 664: 221: 132: 129: 126: 123: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 7767: 7439: 6970: 6957:
Hi, Summer. You're a longtime colleague and I didn't want to revert anything without speaking with you first. In that
6395:
Hi, we recently had a dispute, and then I noticed you commented in a talk page discussion I was involved in regarding
5920:
clearly stated in the film or obvious to all viewers without specialized knowledge. It is unsourced and, IMO, trivial.
4019: 2382:
You disagree. You went personal. You were called on it. You were blocked. You decided to keep going. That didn't help.
2371:
and thinks that cooking the criteria with the specific aim of excluding it is a legitimate approach. It's not. It's a
9782:
hopefully, you understand the difference between the two, and the fact that neither of those statements is correct.
8042:
You added unsourced material. I reverted your edit and gave you a warning consistent with your edit and your history.
7987: 7975: 6528: 6475: 6381: 6303: 5338: 2867: 2488: 465:
coverage of the Camp David Accords by quoting a piece about the size of Carter's forehead. It's off-topic minutia. -
105: 87: 84: 81: 49:
2) The more certain you are that #1 doesn't apply to you, the better off the project will eventually be without you.
9533: 9528: 8518: 8224: 8159: 5828: 5172:. In doing so, the addition of the information became yours. Please do not add unsourced information to articles. - 4286: 3566: 1963: 981: 412: 188: 9601: 9281: 9276: 9144: 8898: 8363: 6642: 6506:
That's the idea. If you find anything wrong, then I guess you revert and discuss. I have no idea when it was added.
6282: 5302: 5188: 4807:
I don't want to be blocked so I'm taking it to the talk page as I want to establish consensus on the genres first
3754: 2484: 1685: 1250:
Awfully prejudicial against breakfast to assume there's something wring with the most important meal of the day. -
1008:
I'l stop adding the info again but KNOW THIS, Please stop accusing me and giving me a death threat all because of "
102: 99: 96: 93: 90: 9836:
if it isnt too much trouble, could you possibly reply and let me know what corrections you end up making, if any?
9607: 9379: 9188: 7948:
Ref names like "auto#" and "#:" are usually from semi-automated tools for handling ref, like reFill, which I used
4339: 4083:
film with ali was inspiration to rocky 6! encyclopediasupreme.org/Rocky/AliVsRocky2.pdf ali vs rocky 2 comin soon!
2511: 830:
So you're suggesting Wiki should give him no chance? If you can change, so can he. Less drastic measures needed.
824: 499: 9475: 8323:. Nickelodeon episode lists are always like this on The Futon Critic. Knowledge shouldn't be a relatable source. 7812:
If you would like to discuss the content of the article, please discuss the issues on the article's talk page. -
6994: 5764: 5104: 5058: 5020: 4917: 4506: 2800: 2635:
I am sorry about changing the secondary date on Born In the USA, I got nervous thinking people woukd read May 26
1306: 993: 522:
Accusing me of libel is a good way to earn yourself a permanent ban from editing. Additionally, please note that
226: 8113:
that source. It is not my job to find sources for your edits. Either you have a source, add the information and
7900:
go to a wiki and add that the character is a composite based on Bella Abzug and Richard Chamberlain. Please see
7770:) Here are also two articles by Chris Evangelista(Slashfilms) and Jeff Spry(Syfy) to further support my claims.( 1667:
would resolve the issue. Given the resolution of your next issue, however, I don't think I'll need to bother. -
490:
The next time you want to write some libelous claptrap about another editor, do it on your own damn talk page.
9366: 8760: 8719: 8155: 7861: 6723:
I yanked the "Mooch" claim because there was no cite for the claim anywhere near the claim and it included the
6455: 5913: 4072: 3934: 2822: 1846: 1311: 402: 8572:
said, "However by 2020 she appeared to have resumed her support for Trump." That is your interpretation and a
7303:
my revert: "bombed...following a standoff...initiated by the Philadelphia police to serve an eviction notice."
5878: 5517: 3006:
Hi! Long time no read! Anyway, there's a problem. Once again, another editor has made a big removal in the
2953: 2548:
I'm going to revert changes you make to Knowledge which do not conform to Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
1943:
you added in saying the film was "well received by critics", as I hoped my edit summary would have made clear.
1366:
clearly about the article subject itself instead of its treatment in the article. All of this is discussed at
195:
films with an imagined story arc with the nudity becoming a defining character trait is likely beyond that. -
9861: 9667: 9574: 8708: 6695:
The source already used in the cast section does support the irrelevant claim that the character is based on
6206:
in many languages (just check the interwiki links). It is the hybrid, the garden strawberry, not the species
6001:. That's total nonsense. She most probably found the correct information: 'Pineberry' is a hybrid cross from 5148: 2729: 757:
Leftovers addressing the commentary that the show used characters like Wayne as a “magical black man” trope:
363: 27: 9830:
hopefully this message finds you happy and healthy, and you understand that i am only trying to be helpful.
7893:
mention in the article about the Star Trek character is just that: a bare mention. It strikes me as trivial.
5807:
Why exactly has this been issued to me at this time? Because of my participation on the talk section of the
4108: 3943:. I have undid them all but I hope you could extend the ban to longer period. This user is very annoying. - 2319: 2312: 2236:
I've been doing more than 30 edits,but i still don't know how to edit correctly,can you help me?,thanks ;-)
9450: 9298: 9290: 7938: 6834: 5558: 5070:
and discover a blockable range with limited collateral damage or will file an abuse request with their ISP.
4959: 4864: 4818: 4773: 3414:
In the meantime, your edits were disruptive. If you continue to edit war, you will be blocked from editing.
3172:
mentally segregate my edit into segments corresponding to those that are made manifest by the diff display,
1530: 1443: 1025: 506: 9010: 7517:
newly-released and their pages were still up to date on new edits, like with Rotten Tomatoes percentages.
6604: 6592: 4640:
never add unsourced material and I'd hate for people to think I do, would you please self-revert? Thanks.
9932: 9742: 9680: 9462: 8092: 8022: 7776:
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/rewatch-m-night-shyamalans-the-happening-is-a-better-b-movie-10-years-later
6896:
heavy handed POV, was redirect but was edited to be standalone - unanimous consensus at RfD for DELETE -
6202:, because its taste resembled the taste of pineapples, at least in his opinion. "Ananas" is the word for 5894: 5438: 4367:
You started it, lady. And if I'm going to launch a "personal attack" on you, I'll have to take a number.
3450: 3399: 1806: 1780: 1711: 1700:
Please describe any offensive action taken by me in this regard. We should discuss it like two gentlemen.
1649: 1417: 1397:. There is nothing to change/add to an article based on an editor's observation/thoughts on the topic. - 1092: 1037: 912: 841: 162: 9856: 9390:
Weekly on the Theory of Relativity page over Einstein. This is intellectual destitution at it's finest.
6898:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_21#1985_Cops_from_Hell_Bombing
3270:. I'd initially reverted but that blindly rollbacker restored it back. Would you like to figure it out? 9741:
i was clicking around the site and i got myself lost, somehow i ended up reading your user page about:
9492: 8949: 8915: 8436: 7723: 7646: 7504: 6926: 6921: 6861: 6581: 6408: 5955: 5280:
Knowledge god who will tell other people what to contribute on a TALK page. Gosh, we are SO lucky! ````
4928:
Yes, there is a note at ARV and I've added this account to the extensive sock case already underway. -
4061: 3939:
You blocked this user on 9th Dec, but on 10th Dec it was released. He started overlinking again, refer
3520: 3498: 1882: 1663:
Given the number of unlikely coincidences that would need to have occurred, I am quite certain a quick
8581:
The rest of your edit is quoting a tweet she (or, presumably, a representative of hers made). It is a
8467: 7471:
Also, some people's IP addresses just change automatically after a few weeks or sometimes every day --
7004:. We go by the broadcast order for episodes, not mixed. Examples for lists in broadcast order include 5536: 4131: 3285:
Given the number of banned users looking for registered users to edit on their behalf, no, I won't. -
3222:
If you would like to work on addressing the problems with your additions, we are now up to the "D" in
2911:
no) and independent of the subject (not written by Robinson, his friends and family, his manager, etc.
758: 9375: 8559: 8492: 7952:. They do a decent job of harmonizing differing ref styles, finding and compressing repeat refs, etc. 7144: 6845: 6073:
As this is now a question of article content, please take the question to the article's talk page. -
5735: 4429: 4372: 4335: 4265:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
3885: 3822: 3750: 3312: 2533: 1924: 247: 217: 9499:
You tagged this almost ten years ago as NN, but it's widely sold in the Northeastern United States.
8839:
Would reverting someone blanking content count as action that could be sanctioned? To be honest the
8087:
because I've heard that the released date has been pushed to July 2, 2021. You should look it up. --
7444: 6892:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done for the following reason:
6779: 6403:, and I hope you will refrain from following me to any additional pages in the future. Thank you. – 5533: 4282: 3266:
2601:644:4301:xxx added "mixed reviews" or something in "Critical reception" section which violates
366:. "Not a reliable source (fact checking would include proofreading) not a summary statement re film 41: 9881: 9654: 9577:. You were slightly before my time, so I missed you by a few months, but I appreciate your work on 9362: 8606: 8482:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
8406: 8378: 8328: 8290: 8268: 8247: 8220: 7873: 7783: 7426: 7408: 7087: 7047: 6952: 6233: 6179: 6097: 6056: 5623:
Additionally, various sites archive various portions of the Internet. We don't control them either.
5458: 5331: 4757: 4564: 4049: 3572:
It's not a matter of citations. Most references to a subject in popular culture are simply trivial.
2649: 2608:
The first commercially released CD Single was Angeline by John Martyn released on 1 February 1986.
2516: 2430: 2017:
I am limited due to the fact I am using JAWS, a screen-reader and can't in-line cite it right now.
1868: 1009: 780: 718: 668: 6808:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3614:? Because it has a meaningful part in the story of Ford, as he discussed in an interview with the 2466:
Hi. Forgive me if I'm informing you of things you already know but, we now have clear guidance at
9688: 9294: 8484: 8032: 7991: 7934: 7525:
interacted with film page editors who are civil, open, patient, and understanding. Shame on you.
7114: 6377: 6299: 5412: 5158: 3587: 3464: 3347:
The article says "FU is BAR" but we don't have a source stating that. We should remove the claim.
2917: 2663: 2204: 2172: 2123: 2049: 2033: 1044: 1021: 1017: 767:
https://www.amazon.com/Cultural-Politics-Colorblind-Routledge-Transformations-ebook/dp/B00YY64066
286: 6121:. This is a discussion of article content. Please take it to the article's talk page and/or the 5628:
Nothing on the Internet ever really goes away. I don't really see much success forthcoming... -
485: 9876: 9805:
is in fact what you meant, i would just like to point out that: ($ 5,049,000 - $ 4,050,000) is
9653:. I am writing to you, and to others, as I noticed you were one leading editors working on the 8420: 8133: 8102: 8088: 7959:. Now we're down from an eye-popping 431 refs to an ever-so-slightly more manageable 430. :) - 7702:
2601:647:4580:e4b0:ccfc:4cfd:d36c:3d5e has been blocked for blocke evasion/personal attacks. -
7545: 7099: 6690: 5273: 5264: 3694: 3357:
The article says "FU is BAR" but the source cited says "FU is not BAR". We should correct that.
3130:
Do not make personal attacks anywhere on Knowledge. Comment on content, not on the contributor.
2691: 2471: 2258: 810: 184: 9040: 8985: 8347:
A) You have plenty of editors involved already. I don't think adding me to the mix will help.
6210:, occurring in the western parts of both the America's, that bears the name "pine strawberry". 4658:
What you say in an edit summary quickly disappears into the edit history. Knowledge's goal of
4484: 2474:. Gotta love those handy shortcuts; they make potential arguments so much easier to handle :D 9928: 9578: 9524: 9438: 9242: 9105: 8929: 8548: 7719: 7656: 7571: 7000:
This page continues to get vandalized a lot, but also, I think the episode list is violating
6857: 6577: 6573: 6522: 6469: 6404: 5999:"A cross between a Chilean berry (also known as a pine strawberry) and a breed from Virginia" 5951: 4955: 4860: 4814: 4788: 4769: 4742: 4733: 4697: 4646: 4502: 4216: 4184: 3528: 3508: 2461: 651: 387:
3 Fact checking? And by the way that's a word for word quote. I own a copy of Reverse Angle.
357: 311: 291: 7306:
issue: Between the attempt to serve the notice and the bombing, there was an armed standoff.
4076: 4073:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Rocky_Marciano&diff=905573901&oldid=905572814
2445:
What the lack of a TV series has to do with your "once-in-a-lifetime" claim is beyond me. -
2073:
edits and are expected to communicate with other users without regard to your prejudices. -
615:
expression that one should not be a you know what, it may very well hint at things as well.
9715: 9449:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 9371: 9226: 9180: 9056: 8941: 8907: 8666: 8617: 8555: 8428: 8151: 8143: 7983: 7857: 7849: 7598:
3) It was right. Someone used a reliable source and wrongly "corrected" it with wrong info.
7380: 7009: 6805: 6396: 6291: 5775: 5709: 4951: 4856: 4810: 4765: 4617: 4494: 4425: 4368: 4331: 4290: 4007: 3881: 3818: 3746: 3255: 3226:; you boldly made changes, I reverted them, now we discuss them on the article's talk page. 3058: 3019: 2954: 2818: 2810: 2641: 2592: 2525: 2480: 2467: 2241: 1916: 1798: 1772: 1703: 1641: 1522: 1435: 1317:
One of his running traits is his pronunciation of the word "robot", pronouncing it "RO-bət"
1303: 1242: 1191: 1147: 1060: 904: 833: 772: 710: 660: 239: 9385:
The majority of the RS do not label the Proud Boys fascists, white supremacists or racists
9259:, and his work is held in the UK royal collection of armour, as well as in other museums. 8047:
If you have a problem with the wording of the warning, you may wish to bring it up at the
2903:(published by a source with an established reputation for fact-checking and accuracy: the 8: 9513: 9325: 9004: 8848: 8795: 8756: 8432: 8402: 8374: 8324: 8286: 8264: 8243: 8216: 7779: 7422: 7083: 7043: 6817: 6774: 6190: 6184: 5909: 5898: 5817: 5600: 5439: 5372: 5099: 5053: 5015: 4912: 4611: 4542: 4138: 3996: 3606: 3419:
If you wish to discuss the content of the article, please use the article's talk page. -
2507: 2493: 2139: 2064: 1578: 1551: 1478:"tootsie-pop-licking" - Tootsie Pop is a proper noun. Capitalize proper nouns in English. 1355: 1333: 863:, I had no idea you would be commenting on a topic from a month ago about a random issue. 444: 409: 370: 9816:
i figured i should probably let you know what i found, it seems like you may or may not
6649:
to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at
4489:
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/21/17887990/earth-wind-fire-september-21-meme-demi-adejuyigbe
4454:
If you have a specific complaint, please explain. Otherwise, I think we're done here. -
4293:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2020:
For reasons I explain on my talkpage I can't create an account now, though I'd like to.
1605: 9852: 9731: 9659: 9650: 9493: 9272: 9165: 7771: 7604:
5) It was wrong. Someone corrected it with an unreliable source and got it wrong again.
7466: 7435: 7265: 7253: 7223: 7196: 7162: 7110: 6966: 6612: 6423: 6400: 5850: 5834:
This is not about you or your contributions. It is merely a notice of the situation. -
5754: 5645: 5317: 5285: 5263:, you two have also been involved. It seems like a pretty suspicious article overlap. 4902: 3794: 3792:. There's no way to tell without fully researching what action cameras have to do with 3688: 3121: 3083: 2886:
no. Without discussing the merits of your claim specifically, this limits the article.
2367:
Yes, I commented in the discussion. Yes, I see there is a faction that wants to remove
2358: 2308: 949: 590: 553: 495: 174: 9666:
and others are Christmas Carols (you will get a better understanding by observing the
7425:
website that explicitly says that Season 5 is a "South African-Canada" co-production.
7333:
your version: "(PFD) let the subsequent fire burn out of control following a standoff"
4837:. Your only option is to log on to your original account and asked to be unblocked. - 4655:
Yes, your edit summary said there were sources elsewhere in the article. Two problems:
3527:
country or countries that produced the film, excluding sneak previews or screenings."
3368:
If, instead, you continue as you have been, you will be blocked from editing again. -
3175:
restore (or at least clearly identify) the hills you don't consider worth defending),
2631:
the date Wickipedia had - If you look way back, you will see that was originally there
1982: 1694:
potentially being penalized by search engines. SummerPhDv2.0 17:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1203:, so I turned up the volume. If they can't understand what they are hearing, that's a 9868: 9588: 9504: 9421: 9365:
to the film was expanded into an article. You then reverted it back to a redirect.
9156: 9070: 8514: 8316: 8262:
http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/littlest-pet-shop-a-world-of-our-own/listings/
8076: 8056:
If you have a reliable source for the material, feel free to restore it along with a
8003: 7205: 7150: 7032: 7024: 7001: 6675:
You know, I think this would be a very good idea. I think you should stand for RFA.--
6070:
Knowledge doesn't decide who is right or wrong, we decide which sources are reliable.
5260: 4316: 4307:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3547: 3011: 2760: 2748: 2704: 2686: 2645: 2251: 1903: 1748: 1278: 962: 680: 180: 7199:, apologies, you are correct that the original text was actually 'residential home'. 5225: 3865:
It may be true, but trivial. Knowledge is not a random collection of information. -
9924: 9469: 9434: 9101: 9066: 8745: 8392: 8312: 8196: 7768:
https://film.avclub.com/was-the-happening-supposed-to-be-taken-seriously-1798243486
7652: 7618:
few more. Dig in. Maybe there is a problem. Heavy research is the only way to know.
7125: 6940: 6763: 6516: 6463: 6043: 5883: 5875: 5124: 4737: 4728: 4692: 4641: 4274: 4212: 4180: 3966: 3948: 3789: 3604:
A rare instance where a reference in popular culture is meaningful is the skits on
3200: 2752: 2372: 820: 801: 8716:
Here is a link that proves that The Croods: A New Age has been pushed up a month.
5411:, states "...whose father is African-American and mother is Japanese-American,..." 4211:
SOMEWHERE it should be noted. Do you know where we can add trivia stuff like this?
4179:
Why did you revert my edit there! I thought it would be important to mention here!
2916:
Next, it is generally a bad idea to write about yourself in Knowledge. Please see
2780:
as not verifying his credentials, but rather referring to him as a mycologist, as
2751:. I requested your review of this RfC issue due to your fair-minded discussion at 2470:(summarised from multiple policies and guidelines) to reference when dealing with 9672: 9543: 9220: 9174: 9052: 8652: 8320: 7897: 7610:
There are, of course, plenty more. The reviewing editor (me) has several choices:
7375: 7105: 6316:
If you are in contact with the subject of an article you are editing, please see
5771: 5705: 5655: 5525: 5469: 5399: 5237: 5198: 5116: 4834: 4270: 3698: 3267: 3259: 2961: 2887: 2879: 2664: 2476: 2237: 1987: 1284: 1223: 1172: 1128: 1051: 988: 968: 514: 8812:
Slight correction: I did not template SurgeonRT. They were already templated. -
6920:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
5599:
have those edits removed from accessible history through a process explained at
4079: 3852:
I do not have a source for your claim. It is your responsibility to provide one.
3839:
I do not know what you were trying to say. You will need to improve the grammar.
233: 9635: 9446: 9321: 8844: 8791: 8752: 8726: 8582: 8134: 8110: 8057: 8048: 7005: 6931: 6812: 6680: 6317: 6122: 6118: 5905: 5866:
I'm focused mainly on Commons these days, so if you are pursuing this further,
5813: 5506: 5324: 5306: 5094: 5048: 5010: 4907: 4688: 4669: 4607: 4538: 4498: 4266: 4135: 3737: 3580: 3165: 3155: 2934: 2789: 2737: 2503: 2277: 1664: 1571: 1351: 1329: 1200: 440: 405: 9317: 9313: 5944:
Hi, I posted on the talk page and would like your input. Thank you very much!
5587:
On Knowledge, all old edits are accessible through page history. For example,
4537:
is a meme - would the addition of a category not suffice? I don't understand.
3940: 2703:
Looks like I overreacted to a new editor adding links to a blog and using the
145: 141: 9940: 9848: 9676: 9442: 9356: 9268: 9248: 9048: 9044: 8979: 8627:
Thanks for the clarification. I've restored you edit, with an explanation. -
8573: 8529: 7901: 7877: 7801: 7666: 7431: 7258: 7216: 7155: 6962: 6841:
page, when the other pages of any separatist movements has including current
6759: 6625: 6608: 5750: 5542:
The East German judge scored me low on the parallel ports and token rings. -
5342: 5074: 4345: 4325: 3958: 3766: 3596: 3223: 3117: 3079: 2900: 2671: 2354: 2304: 2063:, as a link to Apple Music would demonstrate, but the guideline in question, 1950: 1940: 1735: 1367: 1204: 1104: 1095: 1013: 945: 586: 567: 549: 491: 261: 63: 8720:
https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/1148874-the-croods-a-new-age-moves-up
6758:
Hello, SummerPhDv2.0. It has been over six months since you last edited the
5859: 5851: 4791:
is about to be blocked as a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked editor. -
3034:
BTW, you seem to have been doing a lot of work on the at article. Thanks! -
1326: 9663: 9582: 9500: 9152: 8998: 8660: 8656: 8510: 8502: 8370: 8106: 7930: 5808: 5697: 5595:
in 2001. Bots can (and obviously do) dig through Knowledge constantly. You
5520:
Thank you for this wonderful expression. You caused me a big smile. Love --
5419: 5392: 5298:: Please note, I have moved your comment from my user page to my talk page. 4312: 4308: 3910:
I raised three issues. You may have addressed one. That leaves two more. -
3553: 2684:(as a full-time writer, not guest) and currently works for Film Companion. 2421:
Ender's Game, no more adaptations and being once-in-a-lifetime adaptations?
2161:
to realize it is how I was raised, Southern U.S. is ebad, England is good.
1561: 1394: 1387: 1222:
Awfully prejudicial against bacon to assume I was talking about breakfast.
1171:
But I've never been a fan of ham; Much prefer bacon, preferably with eggs.
616: 398: 381: 9901:
Nonsense. Summer may have left or probably retired since the end of 2020.
5252: 2593:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Dancing_in_the_Dark_(Bruce_Springsteen_song)
2138:
A link to Apple Music will not make the cover noteworthy. The cover fails
2059:
The cover in question does not seem to be notable. I do not doubt that it
1468:"is controversial" - There is no evidence of any kind of controversy here. 9707: 9620: 9282: 9260: 8659:
were not being aired in production order and that she had taken over for
8388: 8209: 7276:
I identified several issues. Here's what they were and the two versions:
6935: 6422:, but it probably was from your editing. That by itself is certainly not 5871: 5592: 5341:, along with the associated edit summary, constitutes a personal attack. 5256: 5220: 5120: 4659: 4278: 4030: 3962: 3944: 3785: 3781: 3611: 3196: 2896: 2863: 2769: 2565: 2499: 816: 797: 684: 391: 9453:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
6194:, so in fact to about every strawberry that is sold today. He called it 4077:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Rocky_Marciano&action=history
1049:
Death threats ? You better have a link to this, please post it here. -
337:
Rather than searching the article and researching the genres to support
309:
I've even gone so far as to furhter bolster the genre with new sources.
147: 9539: 9431:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
8993: 8768: 7581:
Give this is Knowledge, anyone can edit and a lot of people who should
7028: 7013: 5651: 5521: 5511: 2756: 1600:
Incidentally, the article, siting the BFI source, says it is "the best
765:. (3) This is an academic text that discusses Holy Wayne in Chapter 2 ( 563: 9785:
also, the final two sentences of the last paragraph on the page read:
9251:, and wonder if it can have the notability and sources tags removed? 6911:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
4736:
15:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Oops, you did it earlier, thanks again.
4111:
claims you are a banned editor. What's the story, Privacyshattered? -
1909: 9629: 9624: 9413: 8938:
I am more than happy to take this up with someone higher than you.
6676: 6203: 5947: 5889: 5740: 4726:
Any chance you could self-revert so it doesn't look like an edit war?
4424:...or do you not read the acres of complaints on your own talk page? 4060:
and sent me an email. As they have not edited, I have left a note on
2785: 2733: 2680: 2182:
I don't care where your prejudice came from. It has no place here. -
9887:
I think this person may be ... deceased. Proof of life is needed.
7607:
6) It was right. Someone used an unreliable source and made it wrong
7035:
applies. When removing the summaries please use this note for them:
1795:
A query. If the website's illegit, can't it be simply blacklisted?
942:
Talk:Battlefield Earth (film)#Regarding a certain detail in the plot
930:
Talk:Battlefield Earth (film)#Regarding a certain detail in the plot
509:
you disputed the accuracy of my brief mention of your edit history.
380:
2 The source I cite is his book. Written by him. How does that fail
9658:
on another article and who insists popular Christmas songs such as
9555: 9073:
have both been indefinitely blocked for unsourced contributions. -
4130:
Greetings -- this is an editor banned from all Wikimedia projects (
4071:
hi, cant do it alone; restore rocky's rec to 9-4 and here is proof
3639: 2781: 2605:
7" 45rpm singles, right? I will check, all this off top of my head
2111:
About the Apple music thing, I guess it'll take some gifuring out.
759:
https://screencrush.com/the-leftovers-season-2-finale-tom-perrotta/
143: 9316:
And there is even an other video as well from somebody else, too:
7042:
If you agreed with me on this, then thank you for your listening.
5219:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
3327:
So far, I have said absolutely nothing about he article's content.
20: 8201:
Two users are having an edit fight with me and I can't stand it.
8083: 7414: 5323:
If you have further concerns regarding talk pages, please review
3670: 1747:
As your purpose here is to promote your website, you are clearly
9466:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 9149:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour)
9147:, you previously proposed for deletion, is up for discussion at 8479:
Hello, SummerPhDv2.0. Please check your email; you've got mail!
7833:
Can you give more of an explanation on why the 2nd paragraph of
7427:
https://www.toonboom.com/community/success-stories/clockwork-zoo
6908:, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. 3610:
where Chevy Chase imitated Gerald Ford. Why is that included at
9456:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
7017: 4487:. Here is a Vox article on aswell regarding how the meme arose 4080:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Rocky_Marciano#Amateur_Record_9-4
3189:
argument(s), I probably won't need to be hard-nosed about that.
2554:
gangs. Or both of us could be somewhere between those extremes.
1936:
Yes, the source you added does resolve that problem. Thank you.
527:
individual (i.e. John Smith of 123 Main St., Peoria, Illinois).
9425:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
8234:
isn't a Nickelodeon show, therefore that is irrelevant to the
7565:
What do I think your intent is? I have no idea. I assume your
7319:
my revert: "the black militant anarcho-primitivist group MOVE"
7300:
your version: "bombing...in order to serve an eviction notice"
7295:
police bombed the house "in order to serve an eviction notice"
5115:
There's lots of evidence of less-than-innocence involved, but
4989:
REMEndofTheWorld has been indefinitely blocked as a sock, per
4389:
I did not attack you. Whether or not others have attacked me,
4029:
If you would like to research and add a fuller description to
2164:
Unlearning things I've been tought as a kid is far from easy.
1503:
That was actually kinda fun. Thanks. Now don't do it again. -
148: 6049:"they are grown in Belgium and imported from the Netherlands" 5229: 3941:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/125.238.204.17
2925:
If you still feel your entry belongs in the article, I would
2254:
is a good place to start. Everything else is just commentary.
1483:"tootsie-pop-licking" - There is no reason to hyphenate here. 523: 9791:
now, in that last sentence, im prettysure you meant to say:
7149:
Hi there. I've undone your reversion of my lead copyedit on
5212: 285:
The information you have called "unsourced" that I added to
9247:
Hi there. I've been working on the article I started about
7490:
Some stuff is out of order and there are some duplicates --
4853:
I should login to PianoManFolkRock and ask to be unblocked?
4485:
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/september-by-earth-wind-fire
3302:
Justify the Edit You Are Protecting on the Salafist Article
9679:
a look over too. I would like to see the articles achieve
6930:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 5487:
Iluvdancemusic has been indefinitely blocked as a sock. -
1199:
I don't care what you prefer for breakfast. The editor is
568:
Personal attacks are not acceptable anywhere on Knowledge.
9748:
i noticed a sentence in the fourth paragraph that reads:
9255:
world' in an article about him in the UK weekly magazine
7178:
I simply do not see where you got "retirement home" from.
5897:
when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
5208:== Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion == 4571:
characteristics of a topic -- "one that reliable sources
2292:
Weren't you one of those people who was in favor keeping
1105:
Personal attacks are not acceptable anywhere on Knowledge
1081:, not a "death threat". The wording of those warnings is 9769:"$ 148.95 is much closer to $ 150 than it is to $ 149??" 9115:
You provided links showing the artists' chart histories.
8663:
several episodes before the season completed production.
7601:
4) It was right. The person "correcting" it is a vandal.
7016:. RBUK though is not like that and also needs to follow 5395:
explanation involving your definitions and observations.
5367:
African American, given her phenotype and birth mother."
4905:? We need to put an end to these disruptive edits ASAP! 3191:
This could "... be the beginning of a great friendship."
2960:
Can you keep an eye of the page? Make sure who violates
2585:
misunderstanding re Dancing In the Dark and BITUSA pages
2023:
Anyway, do you know how I can get a link to that cover?
9437:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
8841:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions
8208:, I was making the episode list look similar to modern 8027:
Please do not threaten editors with unwarranted blocks
6778: 5386:
I explained that I was reverting "Unexplained changes".
5232:. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 5073:
At the moment, it's a game a whack-a-mole, likely with
5031:
Please read the note right before your last comment. -
4269:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 736:
Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. -
8238:
page. You have not responded to any talk pages on the
6639:
would like to nominate you to become an administrator.
3053:
My pleasure! And thanks to you as well! God bless!!!
2862:
In general, most "List of..." articles are limited to
2564:
can revert your change or remove the information. See
1370:
which explains Knowledge's guidelines on the issue. -
9760:
then i thought about context and what you might have
8725:
To make that change to the article, you will need to
8006:. Please read the final warning on your talk page. - 7778:) Please look into it. Cheers. Have a nice day. :) -- 6652:
Draft: Knowledge:Requests for adminship/SummerPhDv2.0
6418:
I don't remember how I ended up at the talk page for
4672:
those sources with the information you are adding. -
3817:
So, add it yourself. Because what I say it's real. --
3014:. May I have permission to restore it? God bless!!! 2759:, among others where you and I have participated. At 1910:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Contact_(1997_American_film)
7772:
https://www.slashfilm.com/the-happening-anniversary/
6839:
List of active separatist movements in North America
6515:
Anyway, I wanted to go on record with my feelings.—
5989:..."hard to believe the New York Times was wrong"... 5948:
https://en.wikipedia.org/People_for_the_American_Way
4991:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/PianoManFolkRock
882:
Collaboration and communication are not optional. -
236:
So, now it can be linked in the main article, right?
57: 9756:"how is $ 148.95 much closer to $ 150 than $ 149??" 8528:Mkayj14 has been indefinitely blocked as a sock of 5309:
to perhaps reword the note to sound more welcoming.
2935:
have an article about you before you could be added
2929:encourage you to follow the guidelines outlined at 1734:The website you have been adding links to is not a 971:: You seem to have placed this warning in error. - 9778:"$ 148.95 is much closer to $ 150 than $ 149 is??" 3880:A source ???? Watch the film. And you see that. -- 2090:I have an oversion to some U.S. editors, not all. 1493:"skewed" - This is vague enough to be meaningless. 9047:, but I'm sensing this may need to be brought to 8963:has been blocked from trolling and disruption. - 7807:When will white privilege end? You are off-topic. 6025:(and it's certainly not exclusively from Chili); 3742:... do you revert uselessly my contribution here 9938: 8387:Can you respond to the talk page already please 5994:horticultural subjects. Let me give some proof. 5362:Kimora Lee Simmons: Difference between revisions 3671:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Everything_Is_Love 1908:Hello, this is regarding the edit I made on the 1604:." Is LGBTQ a film genre? Dartmouth says it is. 901:Ah, well. Thanks for taking the time to reply. 9606:This is a bit delayed, but I see that you left 8771:, reverting SurgeonRT whom I also templated. - 8425:I will become an administrator, SummerPhDv2.0 4948:I actually sourced the genre for Billie Jean! 4251:Disambiguation link notification for January 18 4175:My edit on the Oh Yeah! Cartoons episodes list. 3435:174.126.168.126 has been blocked for BATTLE. - 3071:Attacks and incivility at smooth jazz Talk page 2840:(FYI: Please add new talk page comments to the 2589:this is the talk page from Dancing in the Dark 1555:it reads "Battleship Potemkin is a 1925 Soviet 9645:Assistance on List of Christmas carols article 7665:Sherwilliam has been blocked from editing for 5803:Discretionary sanctions notice on my talk page 2933:. As the article now stands, we would need to 2747:Thanks for your time to review and comment at 1939:The note I added to your talk page is for the 566:" is, again, incorrect and a personal attack. 9698:Update on List of superhero television series 8992:, suggesting that account might be a sock of 7128:carries a lot more weight than it used to. - 6811:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge! 6647:contact 2601:8B:C300:4A70:5C23:24AB:A241:C247 5704:May I recommend long-term (semi-)protection? 5255:are quite similar to the genre-warrior sock? 4154:Sure enough. Thanks for the clarification. - 3002:Another Bulk Removal At The Superhero TV List 234:https://the-arioch.livejournal.com/90752.html 156:This page has archives. Sections older than 9952:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 9683:status in advance of the holiday. Thank you 9617:world, Knowledge has nothing to say about us 9091:List of one-hit wonders in the United States 8260:No Cryptical, look at the production codes: 7927:List of one-hit wonders in the United States 7328:the fire department simply let the fire burn 5345:are not acceptable anywhere on Knowledge. - 5170:restored unsourced information I had removed 3597:his head living in a jar in the 23rd century 2624:this date is not correct either May 9, 1984 9947:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 9318:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNLuWORfle0 9314:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bXVNeLx_18 8988:for OR. You might want to be aware of this 8212:cartoons but they disagree and don't care. 8140:No, that was the correct date, wasn't it? 6645:to see what this process entails, and then 6339:job as being limited to his employment...). 6318:Disclosing a potential conflict of interest 2857:There are several problems with this entry. 1881:The talk page discussion I mentioned is at 1325:, as shown in the following Youtube video: 570:Please consider this your final warning. - 394:who is quoted in countless film articles. 7800:Is it because of race? That is a baseless 6603:You are invited to join the discussion at 2931:Knowledge:Conflict_of_interest#COI_editing 2782:he does himself on his commercial webpage. 1569:". It does not mention LGBT as a genre. -- 940:You are invited to join the discussion at 9923:What happened -- just got bored I guess? 6850:Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities 2678:winner, the fact that he was written for 1327:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AWJJnQybZlk 1127:misunderstanding... admins these days... 31:. SummerPhDv2.0 has not edited Knowledge 9809:a difference of about $ 100,000.. it is 9312:Hey, check out this video by CrudeNood: 9097:exactly the mistake made there? Thanks. 5650:I've deleted the revisions per request. 4393:are responsible for your own actions. - 2724:Describing the qualifications of Stamets 2676:National Film Award for Best Film Critic 2621:that was day it entered Billboard chart 859:Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier, 443:, is the complaint department really on 408:, is the complaint department really on 8574:contentious claim about a living person 7316:your version: "the militant group MOVE" 3272:2402:1980:824B:3413:3AC8:A644:A85F:29B2 2966:2402:1980:8240:C6B4:3E0D:2886:BFB4:D3E9 166:when more than 10 sections are present. 9939: 9903:2001:D08:2900:177E:BCBE:9913:DF8C:9D2E 8843:page isn't the easiest thing to read. 7688:2601:647:4580:E4B0:CCFC:4CFD:D36C:3D5E 7589:edit, there are several possibilities: 7492:2601:647:8480:D300:B1A5:CF9A:81C8:65F6 7473:2601:647:8480:D300:B1A5:CF9A:81C8:65F6 7454:2601:647:8480:D300:B1A5:CF9A:81C8:65F6 7392:is something you can expect to see. - 7023:I also believe that the summaries are 4109:Talk:Rocky_Marciano#Amateur_Record_9-4 3961:has blocked the account for 3 month - 3707:2402:1980:24E:A9D3:95E7:CFEE:9803:4291 2379:is the greatest recording in history." 9392:2601:46:C801:B1F0:2D92:A947:910C:C354 9361:In September 2020, the redirect from 9151:. Your opinion would be appreciated. 8671:2601:246:d00:6b00:1114:c471:547b:363b 8206:Littlest Pet Shop: A World of Our Own 7921:Multiple Ref Names on a single source 7204:I am not keen to engage in a game of 7104:Hey, can I ask you a question? About 6704:because it is dumb and pointless. -- 6662:2601:8B:C300:4A70:5C23:24AB:A241:C247 6637:2601:8B:C300:4A70:5C23:24AB:A241:C247 6351:Knowledge:Contact us/Article subjects 4056:Today someone registered an account, 2294:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 9422:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 8483: 8401:I will when I'm done with my break. 7290:issue: It was not a retirement home. 6629: 6605:Talk:A Bug's Life#Plot summary issue 6593:Talk:A Bug's Life#Plot summary issue 5468:As a sockpuppet of a banned editor, 5418:Phenotype is not an argument, it is 5228:".The discussion is about the topic 4705:I'm a former Arbitrator? News to me. 15: 9704:List of superhero television series 9405:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 9139:Article for discussion notification 9122:saying it is a "one-hit wonder". - 8311:Actually Cryptical, your violating 8109:for the new date, you will need to 6922:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 5512:_:))-2020-03-31T13:48:00.000Z": --> 5507:_:))-2020-03-31T13:48:00.000Z": --> 5075:someone who just doesn't understand 4901:Has this been reported to an admin 3693:Hi Summer. 203.63.75.145 posted in 3661:Question about "Everything is Love" 3008:List of superhero television series 2619:The May 26 date is definitely wrong 2007:how do you get an apple music link? 1091:and restore the unsourced material, 1018:Knowledge's policy on verifiability 999:June 2019 - Stop giving me a threat 362:Your reversion and edit summary at 13: 8472: 6880: 6750: 6701:but I'm glad you removed the claim 5739: 5453:So please read before you revert. 5391:Then you returned with a verbose, 5211: 4064:pointing them to this discussion. 3645:2601:246:C700:9B0:8940:B5F:88C:155 2895:Everything in Knowledge should be 2298:list of music considered the worst 52:3) Everything else is commentary. 14: 9963: 8681:) 17:51, September 12, 2020 (UTC) 8117:or do not add the information. - 7370:I've been here for fifteen years. 6176:"also known as a pine strawberry" 5940:People for the American Way edits 5092:Aah! Thanks for the explanation. 3322:I did not read your wall of text. 3164:Your indiscriminate reversion on 2868:List of people from New York City 1749:not here to build an encyclopedia 1624:Reply regarding multiple accounts 1545:List of films considered the best 160:may be automatically archived by 28:This user may have left Knowledge 9412: 9145:Canadian Tour (Motley Crue Tour) 8644:Passing VS Dying/Select VS Occur 7835:Paul Stamets: In Popular Culture 7829:Paul Stamets: In Popular Culture 6643:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 6598: 6391:Following editors to other pages 5888: 5325:Knowledge's talk page guidelines 5303:comment I left on your talk page 4256: 2728:Could you review and comment on 2385:What are you hoping for here? - 2283: 1423: 1003: 935: 62: 19: 9619:"). This is funny and all, but 9460:and submit your choices on the 9335:Those are not reliable sources. 7284:your version: "retirement home" 6995:Rainbow Butterfly Unicorn Kitty 5966:Thanks, I've already responded. 4871:) 10:25, February 4, 2020 (UTC) 4567:, categories are for essential 3780:3) It is unsourced. One of the 2801:List of African-American firsts 2784:Thanks again for the effort. -- 2674:under the condition of being a 2629:the correct date is May 3, 1984 2498:Hi, you undid an edit I did on 2353:Well, you got anything to say? 2232:how i can become a good editor? 419:says nothing about the film. - 9824:the rules much more closely. 9367:Draft:Moana (Disney character) 8924:22:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 8885:23:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 8853:23:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 8823:23:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 8800:23:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 8782:23:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 8761:22:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 8740:19:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 8703:22:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 8638:18:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 8622:09:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 8004:not here for the right reasons 7486:Can you fix the episodes page? 6456:The Goldbergs (2013 TV series) 5786:the subject of the company. - 5251:Am I the only one that thinks 3185:of them with exactly the same 1975: 1: 9857:14:04, 28 November 2022 (UTC) 9575:Knowledge:Missing Wikipedians 9509:21:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 9484:02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 9439:Knowledge arbitration process 9400:18:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC) 9380:00:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 8601:18:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC) 8564:18:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC) 7374:You don't template regulars. 7287:my revert: "residential home" 5719:You don't need my !vote... - 5356:23:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC) 5290:20:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC) 5267:04:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5242:22:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 5203:22:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 5183:20:19, 12 February 2020 (UTC) 5163:14:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC) 4687:Sorry but you are wrong. See 4479:Regarding Earth Wind and Fire 3989:04:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC) 3971:03:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC) 3953:03:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC) 3732:20:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 3715:16:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 3684:17:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC) 3653:04:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC) 3629:04:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 3567:01:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 3552:Thanks for your follow up at 3446:04:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 2948:01:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2827:22:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC) 2794:22:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 2742:15:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 2718:11:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 2698:11:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC) 42:Knowledge in three easy steps 9882:19:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC) 9738:greetings and salutations, 9693:16:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 9548:20:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 9529:05:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC) 9351:00:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC) 9330:23:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC) 9303:19:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC) 9291:File:KajagoogooHangonNow.jpg 9277:16:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC) 9235:02:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 9209:02:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 9189:01:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 9161:22:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC) 9133:20:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC) 9110:07:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC) 9084:20:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC) 9061:04:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC) 9034:Packman2445 and Kingkobra775 8488:at any time by removing the 7753:Undid revision 968229496 by 6906:criteria for speedy deletion 6890:1985 Cops from Hell Bombing. 6876:1985 Cops from Hell Bombing. 6835:Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone 6123:reliable sources noticeboard 5247:Jshpinar genre-warrior socks 5129:20:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 5111:16:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 5088:16:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 5065:15:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 5042:15:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 5027:15:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 5004:15:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4985:15:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4968:15:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4939:15:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4924:15:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4893:15:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4848:15:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4827:15:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4802:15:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4782:15:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4746:15:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4720:12:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4701:05:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4683:16:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4650:06:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4622:04:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4590:02:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4547:01:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4528:00:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4511:00:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 4465:21:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 4434:21:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 4404:19:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 4377:18:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 4359:17:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 4340:16:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 4321:10:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 4241:01:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 4221:00:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 4206:23:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 4189:20:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 4165:03:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 4142:02:46, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 4122:01:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 4103:01:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 3978:I expect they'll be back. - 3921:16:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3890:14:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3876:13:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3827:13:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3809:12:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3790:added the material as a joke 3755:08:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3542:03:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC) 3513:02:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC) 3493:03:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC) 3469:02:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC) 3430:00:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 3404:22:25, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 3379:17:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 3317:04:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 3296:17:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 3280:11:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 3247:00:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC) 3205:22:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 3144:15:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 3126:12:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 3109:03:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 3088:02:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 1931:) 11:53, July 10, 2019 (UTC) 791:I need help blocking someone 507:Talk:Men Going Their Own Way 7: 9933:22:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC) 9681:Knowledge:Featured articles 9308:Butterbean's Café cancelled 9028:17:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC) 9011:04:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC) 8974:17:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC) 8954:04:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC) 8543:02:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 8519:20:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC) 7413:What you said to me on the 6568:Street/prison gang articles 6384:) 00:04, May 19, 2020 (UTC) 6306:) 00:04, May 19, 2020 (UTC) 5509:"browser gymnastics" =: --> 4835:without further explanation 4635:MS-13 - my text was sourced 4044:12:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 4020:12:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 3384:That is a false statement, 3063:02:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC) 3045:01:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC) 3024:23:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 2996:03:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 2974:15:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 2658:02:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 2579:02:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2542:01:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC) 2512:05:53, 11 August 2019 (UTC) 2400:And now we're done here. - 2067:demands substantially more. 1718:) 14:33, July 2, 2019 (UTC) 1656:) 14:33, July 2, 2019 (UTC) 364:What's Up, Doc? (1972 film) 289:is sourced in the article. 281:Your requested explanation. 254:) 04:46, May 24, 2019 (UTC) 10: 9968: 9897:07:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC) 9720:14:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC) 9476:MediaWiki message delivery 8462:19:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC) 8445:17:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC) 8411:02:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8397:02:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8383:02:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8364:02:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8333:02:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8295:01:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8273:01:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8252:01:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 8225:01:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 7955:I made the change for you 7732:Obsessive sock blocked. - 7572:communication on your part 6746:Draft:Levittown race riots 6125:for further discussion. - 5857:I've removed your PROD on 5822:23:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC) 5797:21:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 5780:19:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 5759:15:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 5730:02:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 5714:02:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 5688:22:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC) 5553:15:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 5531:13:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 5498:17:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 5483:17:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 5463:17:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 5433:15:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 5377:14:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 4254: 4062:User talk:Privacyshattered 3695:Talk:See You Again#Writers 3618:, cited in the article. - 3521:Split (2016 American film) 2763:where you said Stamets is 2597:I described problem first 2489:14:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC) 2411:15:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 2396:03:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 2363:02:12, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 2281: 2215:aren't simply trolling. - 1883:Talk:Binders_full_of_women 1565:it reads "Carol is a 2015 1421: 461:It's like summarizing the 9754:and i thought to myself: 9594:23:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC) 9565:20:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 8984:I notice you just warned 8191:19:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 8160:18:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 8128:16:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 8097:15:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 8071:02:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 8037:01:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC) 8017:15:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 7996:14:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 7976:You are revising history. 7970:01:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC) 7943:23:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 7915:20:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 7866:18:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 7823:03:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 7788:03:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 7743:04:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 7728:04:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 7713:00:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 7696:23:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 7680:22:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 7661:19:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 7641:16:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 7550:07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 7500:02:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 7481:00:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 7462:00:35, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 7440:21:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 7421:Here's a source from the 7126:Communication is required 7092:21:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 7074:21:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 7052:20:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 6988:19:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 6971:19:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 6948:13:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 6888:A tag has been placed on 6866:00:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 5660:01:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 5639:01:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 5582:00:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 5117:nothing to discuss openly 2732:, please? Many thanks. -- 2456:21:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 2440:I have no way of knowing. 2435:19:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 2347:03:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 2332:23:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 2313:21:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 2272:17:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 2246:03:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 2226:17:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 2209:03:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC) 2193:22:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 2177:20:19, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 2153:17:17, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 2128:08:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC) 2084:21:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC) 2054:21:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC) 2038:21:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC) 1964:16:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC) 1861:clarification. Thank you 1618:16:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1587:09:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1549:If you go on the page of 1539:16:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC) 1514:16:15, 28 June 2019 (UTC) 1452:15:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC) 1408:04:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC) 1307:18:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 1261:02:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 1246:02:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 1218:20:01, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 1195:18:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 1167:18:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 1151:18:23, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 1118:16:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC) 1071:16:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC) 1030:15:58, 19 June 2019 (UTC) 994:02:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 982:18:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 958:05:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 634:04:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC) 222:21:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 9911:07:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC) 9655:List of Christmas Carols 9640:07:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 9614:'s talk page in April (" 9602:Unnecessary warning note 9474:to your user talk page. 9363:Moana (Disney character) 9041:2603:6000:970b:643d::/64 8899:Edit: The Martian (film) 7403:19:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 7386:19:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 7354:23:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 7272:19:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 7249:19:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 7230:16:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 7192:15:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 7169:10:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 7139:00:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 7118:22:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 6823:04:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 6738:23:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC) 6714:21:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC) 6685:23:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC) 6670:02:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC) 6621:08:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC) 6586:04:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC) 6558:17:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 6535:17:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 6498:16:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 6482:16:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 6449:23:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 6413:23:11, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 6364:05:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 6283:Updating marriage status 6269:03:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC) 6238:23:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 6180:Antoine Nicolas Duchesne 6136:00:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 6102:00:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 6084:00:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 6061:23:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC) 5983:18:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 5960:18:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 5934:07:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 5914:05:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 5189:Reiki dispute resolution 4668:The solution here is to 4565:Knowledge:Categorization 4033:, feel free to do so. - 1953:) and cannot be used. - 1896:03:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1873:02:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1839:20:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC) 1815:19:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC) 1789:14:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1762:19:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 1686:Reply regarding Spamming 1678:18:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 1559:", while on the page of 1381:14:42, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 1360:12:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 1338:01:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 1088:If you blank the warning 921:19:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC) 893:04:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC) 850:14:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 825:16:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC) 806:15:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC) 785:17:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC) 747:04:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 723:04:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 698:03:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 673:02:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 610:04:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 595:04:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 581:03:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 558:03:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 543:17:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC) 500:14:40, 2 June 2019 (UTC) 476:16:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC) 448:12:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC) 430:12:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC) 413:10:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC) 353:02:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC) 324:05:42, 25 May 2019 (UTC) 304:05:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC) 275:11:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 206:18:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC) 189:12:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC) 7031:, and also spoilers as 5879:20:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 5845:00:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC) 5765:HHgregg meme subheader= 3588:Madman Across the Water 2918:Knowledge:Autobiography 1725:I am not a "gentleman". 1012:content, as you did on 287:Vulgar Display of Power 227:Three Laws are slavery. 9534:Hope you're doing well 9293:to something smaller? 8477: 6927:deleting administrator 6913:contest the nomination 6902: 6885: 6755: 6182:to the hybrid between 5997:Miss Ignorant writes: 5744: 5337:Please also note that 5274:Talk:Ozark (TV series) 5216: 4085: 3935:IP User 125.238.204.17 2866:entries. For example, 2336:Make that fourfold. - 1848:Binders full of women) 1312:Reverted Talkpage Item 1201:having trouble hearing 163:Lowercase sigmabot III 9623:really did tour with 9435:Arbitration Committee 9419:Hello! Voting in the 8709:The Croods: A New Age 8692:were not selected. - 8476: 6894: 6884: 6760:Articles for Creation 6754: 5743: 5215: 5149:2Pac Better Dayz Page 4069: 4058:User:Privacyshattered 2707:label "prominent". - 33:since 3 November 2020 8997:obnoxious. Regards, 8105:: No. If you have a 7010:Lego City Adventures 6768:Levittown race riots 6744:Your draft article, 6397:The Hunt (2020 film) 6311:A few wrinkles here. 6119:is a reliable source 5559:Question and apology 4309:opt-out instructions 2670:I believe he passes 397:You don't know what 9820:be into accuracy. 9289:Can you shrink the 8344:Looks to me like: 8023:Not so civil revert 7423:Toon Boom Animation 6959:Beaver County Times 6780:edit the submission 6766:page you started, " 6172:Fragaria chiloensis 6027:Fragaria virginiana 6011:Fragaria chiloensis 6007:Fragaria virginiana 6003:Fragaria chiloensis 5899:Twister (1996 film) 5893:Please remember to 5440:The Black Eyed Peas 4287:fix with Dab solver 3607:Saturday Night Live 3451:Macaroni and Cheese 3256:Don't Call Me Angel 2955:Don't Call Me Angel 2560:cite your sources, 1594:Battleship Potemkin 1552:Battleship Potemkin 1418:Tootsie Pop Article 1390:26 June 2019 (UTC) 796:could help me out. 619:26 June 2019 (UTC) 9660:The Christmas Song 9651:User:SummerPhDv2.0 9494:Tuscan Dairy Farms 9451:arbitration policy 9295:Copyrightpower1337 8648:by 24.12.189.138 8485:remove this notice 8478: 8240:A World of Our Own 8232:A World of Our Own 8204:It is on the page 7935:Copyrightpower1337 7647:Your Karen problem 7505:Talk Page Response 6944: 6886: 6756: 6039:scarlet strawberry 6023:coastal strawberry 6019:Chilean strawberry 5745: 5217: 4299:• Join us at the 4289:). Such links are 4075:here r references 3784:of the project is 3499:Split (2017 Movie) 2870:obvious does not ( 2472:this kind of stuff 2302:Well about that... 1854:the post I added: 1079:consensus warnings 1045:AnimeDisneylover95 1022:AnimeDisneylover95 9569:Note that I have 9490: 9489: 9231: 9185: 8956: 8944:comment added by 8910:comment added by 8682: 8669:comment added by 8447: 8431:comment added by 8162: 8146:comment added by 8103:Stephenfisher2001 8089:Stephenfisher2001 7998: 7986:comment added by 7868: 7852:comment added by 7279:"retirement home" 7151:1985 MOVE bombing 7145:1985 MOVE bombing 7113: 6942: 6917:visiting the page 6659: 6658: 6307: 6294:comment added by 6035:common strawberry 5962:Ihaveadreamagain 5895:assume good faith 5868:please do ping me 5736:A kitten for you! 5696:Suggestion as to 5680:DontMessageMezze2 5649: 5332:WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE 5261:User:EvergreenFir 4970: 4954:comment added by 4872: 4859:comment added by 4829: 4813:comment added by 4784: 4768:comment added by 4624: 4513: 4497:comment added by 4304: 4291:usually incorrect 4092:accounts, etc. - 4067:The email reads: 4022: 4010:comment added by 3012:User:Kchishol1970 2829: 2813:comment added by 2761:Talk:Paul Stamets 2749:Talk:Paul Stamets 2660: 2644:comment added by 2544: 2528:comment added by 1932: 1919:comment added by 1817: 1801:comment added by 1791: 1775:comment added by 1719: 1706:comment added by 1665:sockpuppetry case 1657: 1644:comment added by 1541: 1525:comment added by 1454: 1438:comment added by 1205:different problem 1068: 1041: 1038:talk page watcher 923: 907:comment added by 852: 836:comment added by 787: 775:comment added by 725: 713:comment added by 675: 663:comment added by 317: 297: 255: 242:comment added by 170: 169: 39: 38: 9959: 9874: 9871: 9735: 9591: 9585: 9563: 9473: 9416: 9409: 9408: 9349: 9346: 9343: 9232: 9229: 9225: 9223: 9207: 9204: 9201: 9186: 9183: 9179: 9177: 9131: 9128: 9125: 9082: 9079: 9076: 9026: 9023: 9020: 9007: 8972: 8969: 8966: 8939: 8926: 8883: 8880: 8877: 8821: 8818: 8815: 8790:Gotcha. Thanks. 8780: 8777: 8774: 8738: 8735: 8732: 8701: 8698: 8695: 8664: 8636: 8633: 8630: 8607:Greenspoint Mall 8599: 8596: 8593: 8541: 8538: 8535: 8509: 8507: 8501: 8497: 8491: 8487: 8475: 8460: 8457: 8454: 8426: 8362: 8359: 8356: 8189: 8186: 8183: 8171:changed the date 8141: 8126: 8123: 8120: 8069: 8066: 8063: 8015: 8012: 8009: 7981: 7968: 7965: 7962: 7913: 7910: 7907: 7847: 7821: 7818: 7815: 7741: 7738: 7735: 7720:Jesus Christ 2nd 7711: 7708: 7705: 7678: 7675: 7672: 7667:personal attacks 7639: 7636: 7633: 7409:Caillou Season 5 7401: 7398: 7395: 7352: 7349: 7346: 7311:"militant group" 7270: 7268: 7263: 7247: 7244: 7241: 7228: 7226: 7221: 7190: 7187: 7184: 7167: 7165: 7160: 7137: 7134: 7131: 7109: 7072: 7069: 7066: 6986: 6983: 6980: 6953:Linda Fiorentino 6945: 6938: 6929: 6883: 6858:Chad The Goatman 6820: 6815: 6800: 6799: 6794: 6793: 6788: 6787: 6782: 6753: 6736: 6733: 6730: 6630: 6602: 6601: 6578:John from Idegon 6556: 6553: 6550: 6531: 6525: 6519: 6496: 6493: 6490: 6478: 6472: 6466: 6447: 6444: 6441: 6405:wallyfromdilbert 6362: 6359: 6356: 6289: 6267: 6264: 6261: 6134: 6131: 6128: 6082: 6079: 6076: 6044:Scilla peruviana 6015:beach strawberry 5981: 5978: 5975: 5952:Ihaveadreamagain 5932: 5929: 5926: 5892: 5843: 5840: 5837: 5795: 5792: 5789: 5728: 5725: 5722: 5643: 5637: 5634: 5631: 5574:DontMessageMezze 5551: 5548: 5545: 5538: 5535: 5519: 5513: 5508: 5496: 5493: 5490: 5481: 5478: 5475: 5431: 5428: 5425: 5398:Another editor, 5354: 5351: 5348: 5314:comment you made 5181: 5178: 5175: 5107: 5102: 5097: 5086: 5083: 5080: 5061: 5056: 5051: 5040: 5037: 5034: 5023: 5018: 5013: 5002: 4999: 4996: 4983: 4980: 4977: 4956:REMEndofTheWorld 4949: 4937: 4934: 4931: 4920: 4915: 4910: 4891: 4888: 4885: 4861:REMEndofTheWorld 4854: 4846: 4843: 4840: 4815:REMEndofTheWorld 4808: 4800: 4797: 4794: 4789:REMEndofTheWorld 4770:REMEndofTheWorld 4763: 4758:Regarding Genres 4740: 4731: 4718: 4715: 4712: 4695: 4681: 4678: 4675: 4644: 4615: 4588: 4585: 4582: 4526: 4523: 4520: 4492: 4463: 4460: 4457: 4402: 4399: 4396: 4357: 4354: 4351: 4294: 4283:check to confirm 4275:Native Americans 4260: 4259: 4239: 4236: 4233: 4204: 4201: 4198: 4163: 4160: 4157: 4120: 4117: 4114: 4101: 4098: 4095: 4051:Privacyshattered 4042: 4039: 4036: 4005: 3987: 3984: 3981: 3919: 3916: 3913: 3874: 3871: 3868: 3807: 3804: 3801: 3730: 3727: 3724: 3703:Talk:Rebel Heart 3627: 3624: 3621: 3540: 3537: 3534: 3491: 3488: 3485: 3444: 3441: 3438: 3428: 3425: 3422: 3393: 3390: 3387: 3377: 3374: 3371: 3294: 3291: 3288: 3245: 3242: 3239: 3142: 3139: 3136: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3043: 3040: 3037: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2946: 2943: 2940: 2920:for more detail. 2808: 2753:Talk:Coconut oil 2716: 2713: 2710: 2696: 2694: 2639: 2577: 2574: 2571: 2523: 2517:18th Street Gang 2487: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2409: 2406: 2403: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2373:No true Scotsman 2345: 2342: 2339: 2330: 2327: 2324: 2287: 2286: 2270: 2267: 2264: 2224: 2221: 2218: 2191: 2188: 2185: 2151: 2148: 2145: 2082: 2079: 2076: 1999: 1998: 1996: 1995: 1979: 1962: 1959: 1956: 1914: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1837: 1834: 1831: 1796: 1770: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1701: 1676: 1673: 1670: 1639: 1616: 1613: 1610: 1585: 1583: 1576: 1527:Dimitri Gasgenov 1520: 1519:You're welcome 1512: 1509: 1506: 1440:Dimitri Gasgenov 1433: 1427: 1426: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1300: 1298: 1296: 1294: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1239: 1237: 1235: 1233: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1188: 1186: 1184: 1182: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1144: 1142: 1140: 1138: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1069: 1065: 1058: 1056: 1048: 1035: 1016:. This violates 1007: 1006: 980: 977: 974: 939: 938: 902: 891: 888: 885: 831: 770: 745: 742: 739: 708: 696: 693: 690: 658: 632: 629: 626: 608: 605: 602: 579: 576: 573: 541: 538: 535: 474: 471: 468: 428: 425: 422: 351: 348: 345: 320: 315: 314: 300: 295: 294: 273: 270: 267: 237: 204: 201: 198: 165: 149: 66: 58: 23: 16: 9967: 9966: 9962: 9961: 9960: 9958: 9957: 9956: 9937: 9936: 9921: 9879: 9872: 9869: 9864: 9729: 9727: 9700: 9673:Christmas carol 9647: 9604: 9589: 9583: 9554: 9536: 9516: 9497: 9467: 9407: 9387: 9372:Robert McClenon 9359: 9347: 9344: 9341: 9310: 9287: 9245: 9227: 9221: 9219: 9205: 9202: 9199: 9181: 9175: 9173: 9168: 9141: 9129: 9126: 9123: 9094: 9080: 9077: 9074: 9036: 9024: 9021: 9018: 9005: 8982: 8970: 8967: 8964: 8932: 8905: 8901: 8881: 8878: 8875: 8819: 8816: 8813: 8778: 8775: 8772: 8748: 8736: 8733: 8730: 8727:cite the source 8711: 8699: 8696: 8693: 8653:Kaitlyn Robrock 8646: 8634: 8631: 8628: 8609: 8597: 8594: 8591: 8556:Cross Reference 8551: 8539: 8536: 8533: 8521: 8505: 8499: 8495: 8493:You've got mail 8489: 8481: 8473: 8470: 8468:You've got mail 8458: 8455: 8452: 8423: 8360: 8357: 8354: 8199: 8187: 8184: 8181: 8138: 8124: 8121: 8118: 8115:cite the source 8107:reliable source 8079: 8067: 8064: 8061: 8025: 8013: 8010: 8007: 8002:You are likely 7978: 7966: 7963: 7960: 7923: 7911: 7908: 7905: 7842:. If you think 7831: 7819: 7816: 7813: 7802:personal attack 7790:Stillwater1103 7763: 7739: 7736: 7733: 7709: 7706: 7703: 7676: 7673: 7670: 7649: 7637: 7634: 7631: 7507: 7488: 7469: 7447: 7432:Luigitehplumber 7411: 7399: 7396: 7393: 7372: 7350: 7347: 7344: 7266: 7259: 7257: 7245: 7242: 7239: 7224: 7217: 7215: 7188: 7185: 7182: 7163: 7156: 7154: 7147: 7135: 7132: 7129: 7102: 7070: 7067: 7064: 6998: 6984: 6981: 6978: 6955: 6941: 6936: 6925: 6881: 6879: 6872:Speedy deletion 6846:autonomous zone 6830: 6818: 6813: 6797: 6796: 6791: 6790: 6785: 6784: 6783:and remove the 6751: 6749: 6734: 6731: 6728: 6693: 6628: 6599: 6596: 6570: 6554: 6551: 6548: 6529: 6523: 6517: 6494: 6491: 6488: 6476: 6470: 6464: 6459: 6445: 6442: 6439: 6393: 6360: 6357: 6354: 6285: 6265: 6262: 6259: 6132: 6129: 6126: 6080: 6077: 6074: 6031:wild strawberry 5991: 5979: 5976: 5973: 5942: 5930: 5927: 5924: 5886: 5855: 5841: 5838: 5835: 5805: 5793: 5790: 5787: 5767: 5738: 5726: 5723: 5720: 5702: 5635: 5632: 5629: 5561: 5549: 5546: 5543: 5515: 5494: 5491: 5488: 5479: 5476: 5473: 5443: 5429: 5426: 5423: 5364: 5352: 5349: 5346: 5277: 5249: 5191: 5179: 5176: 5173: 5151: 5105: 5100: 5095: 5084: 5081: 5078: 5059: 5054: 5049: 5038: 5035: 5032: 5021: 5016: 5011: 5000: 4997: 4994: 4981: 4978: 4975: 4935: 4932: 4929: 4918: 4913: 4908: 4889: 4886: 4883: 4844: 4841: 4838: 4798: 4795: 4792: 4760: 4738: 4729: 4716: 4713: 4710: 4693: 4679: 4676: 4673: 4642: 4637: 4586: 4583: 4580: 4524: 4521: 4518: 4481: 4461: 4458: 4455: 4426:DetroitWheels74 4400: 4397: 4394: 4369:DetroitWheels74 4355: 4352: 4349: 4332:DetroitWheels74 4328: 4301:DPL WikiProject 4271:Catholic League 4263: 4262: 4257: 4253: 4237: 4234: 4231: 4202: 4199: 4196: 4177: 4161: 4158: 4155: 4118: 4115: 4112: 4099: 4096: 4093: 4054: 4040: 4037: 4034: 3999: 3985: 3982: 3979: 3937: 3917: 3914: 3911: 3882:ComputerHotline 3872: 3869: 3866: 3819:ComputerHotline 3805: 3802: 3799: 3747:ComputerHotline 3740: 3728: 3725: 3722: 3701:socks. Same as 3691: 3663: 3625: 3622: 3619: 3550: 3538: 3535: 3532: 3501: 3489: 3486: 3483: 3453: 3442: 3439: 3436: 3426: 3423: 3420: 3396:174.126.168.126 3391: 3388: 3385: 3375: 3372: 3369: 3309:174.126.168.126 3304: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3264: 3243: 3240: 3237: 3162:Dear Colleague, 3160: 3140: 3137: 3134: 3105: 3102: 3099: 3073: 3041: 3038: 3035: 3004: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2958: 2944: 2941: 2938: 2888:Jackie Robinson 2880:Harry Belafonte 2804: 2726: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2692: 2685: 2668: 2665:Baradwaj Rangan 2587: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2519: 2496: 2475: 2464: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2423: 2407: 2404: 2401: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2328: 2325: 2322: 2290: 2289: 2284: 2280: 2268: 2265: 2262: 2234: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2162: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2080: 2077: 2074: 2009: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1993: 1991: 1988:Box Office Mojo 1981: 1980: 1976: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1906: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1851: 1835: 1832: 1829: 1803:Abracadabra4201 1777:Abracadabra4201 1758: 1755: 1752: 1736:reliable source 1708:Abracadabra4201 1688: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1646:Abracadabra4201 1626: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1579: 1572: 1570: 1547: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1430: 1429: 1424: 1420: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1314: 1292: 1290: 1288: 1286: 1281: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1231: 1229: 1227: 1225: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1180: 1178: 1176: 1174: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1130: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1061: 1052: 1050: 1042: 1004: 1001: 978: 975: 972: 965: 936: 933: 909:Abracadabra4201 889: 886: 883: 861:Abracadabra4201 838:Abracadabra4201 813: 793: 743: 740: 737: 694: 691: 688: 657:of the trope? 654: 630: 627: 624: 606: 603: 600: 577: 574: 571: 539: 536: 533: 488: 472: 469: 466: 426: 423: 420: 360: 349: 346: 343: 318: 312: 298: 292: 283: 271: 268: 265: 229: 214:Andrew ranfurly 202: 199: 196: 177: 161: 150: 144: 71: 44: 12: 11: 5: 9965: 9955: 9954: 9949: 9920: 9917: 9916: 9915: 9914: 9913: 9889:76.143.148.157 9877: 9863: 9860: 9776:did you mean: 9767:did you mean: 9726: 9723: 9699: 9696: 9646: 9643: 9603: 9600: 9599: 9598: 9597: 9596: 9579:WP:KIDSTVDATES 9535: 9532: 9515: 9512: 9496: 9491: 9488: 9487: 9458:the candidates 9428:eligible users 9417: 9406: 9403: 9386: 9383: 9358: 9355: 9354: 9353: 9337: 9336: 9309: 9306: 9286: 9280: 9244: 9241: 9240: 9239: 9238: 9237: 9212: 9211: 9196: 9167: 9164: 9140: 9137: 9136: 9135: 9116: 9093: 9088: 9087: 9086: 9035: 9032: 9031: 9030: 8981: 8978: 8977: 8976: 8961:47.150.190.198 8946:47.150.190.198 8931: 8928: 8912:Wikieditor1377 8900: 8897: 8896: 8895: 8894: 8893: 8892: 8891: 8890: 8889: 8888: 8887: 8862: 8861: 8860: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8856: 8855: 8830: 8829: 8828: 8827: 8826: 8825: 8805: 8804: 8803: 8802: 8785: 8784: 8747: 8744: 8743: 8742: 8710: 8707: 8706: 8705: 8688: 8687: 8645: 8642: 8641: 8640: 8608: 8605: 8604: 8603: 8587: 8586: 8583:primary source 8578: 8577: 8550: 8547: 8546: 8545: 8526: 8480: 8471: 8469: 8466: 8465: 8464: 8433:Abbygail Miles 8422: 8421:Administrators 8419: 8418: 8417: 8416: 8415: 8414: 8413: 8403:BaldiBasicsFan 8375:BaldiBasicsFan 8342: 8341: 8340: 8339: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8335: 8325:BaldiBasicsFan 8302: 8301: 8300: 8299: 8298: 8297: 8287:CrypticalFiery 8278: 8277: 8276: 8275: 8265:BaldiBasicsFan 8255: 8254: 8244:CrypticalFiery 8242:page, either. 8217:BaldiBasicsFan 8198: 8195: 8194: 8193: 8174: 8167: 8137: 8135:Tropic Thunder 8132: 8131: 8130: 8078: 8075: 8074: 8073: 8053: 8052: 8049:community pump 8044: 8043: 8024: 8021: 8020: 8019: 7977: 7974: 7973: 7972: 7953: 7922: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7894: 7887: 7884: 7881: 7874:indiscriminate 7830: 7827: 7826: 7825: 7810: 7809: 7808: 7805: 7798: 7780:Stillwater1103 7762: 7751: 7750: 7749: 7748: 7747: 7746: 7745: 7699: 7698: 7648: 7645: 7644: 7643: 7627: 7623: 7619: 7615: 7611: 7608: 7605: 7602: 7599: 7596: 7593: 7590: 7579: 7575: 7563: 7559: 7556: 7506: 7503: 7487: 7484: 7468: 7465: 7446: 7445:That's not me! 7443: 7410: 7407: 7406: 7405: 7371: 7368: 7367: 7366: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7357: 7356: 7340: 7334: 7330: 7329: 7325: 7324: 7320: 7317: 7313: 7312: 7308: 7307: 7304: 7301: 7297: 7296: 7292: 7291: 7288: 7285: 7281: 7280: 7236: 7212: 7210: 7202: 7200: 7176: 7146: 7143: 7142: 7141: 7101: 7100:Seeking advice 7098: 7097: 7096: 7095: 7094: 7084:BaldiBasicsFan 7077: 7076: 7060: 7059: 7044:BaldiBasicsFan 7006:The Loud House 6997: 6992: 6991: 6990: 6954: 6951: 6878: 6874:nomination of 6869: 6829: 6826: 6762:submission or 6748: 6742: 6741: 6740: 6721: 6692: 6691:Space Force TV 6689: 6688: 6687: 6657: 6656: 6633: 6627: 6624: 6595: 6591:Discussion at 6589: 6569: 6566: 6565: 6564: 6563: 6562: 6561: 6560: 6540: 6539: 6538: 6537: 6510: 6509: 6508: 6507: 6501: 6500: 6458: 6453: 6452: 6451: 6434: 6433: 6428: 6427: 6392: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6367: 6366: 6346: 6345: 6341: 6340: 6328: 6327: 6322: 6321: 6313: 6312: 6284: 6281: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6247: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6230:77.164.133.132 6218: 6217: 6216: 6215: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6154: 6143: 6142: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6094:77.164.133.132 6087: 6086: 6071: 6068: 6053:77.164.133.132 5990: 5987: 5986: 5985: 5968: 5967: 5941: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5921: 5885: 5882: 5854: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5832: 5804: 5801: 5800: 5799: 5766: 5763: 5761: 5737: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5701: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5691: 5690: 5673: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5663: 5662: 5641: 5625: 5624: 5620: 5619: 5610: 5609: 5605: 5604: 5560: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5514: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5455:Iluvdancemusic 5442: 5437: 5436: 5435: 5415: 5414: 5404: 5403: 5388: 5387: 5363: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5335: 5328: 5321: 5310: 5299: 5276: 5270: 5248: 5245: 5210: 5209: 5190: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5150: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5071: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4896: 4895: 4879: 4878: 4851: 4850: 4805: 4804: 4759: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4706: 4666: 4663: 4656: 4636: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4620:comment added 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4561: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4531: 4530: 4480: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4362: 4361: 4327: 4324: 4267:Mummers Parade 4255: 4252: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4227: 4176: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4125: 4124: 4053: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4027: 3998: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3936: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3812: 3811: 3777: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3767:Action cameras 3762: 3761: 3739: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3690: 3687: 3676:186.248.94.205 3662: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3616:New York Times 3601: 3600: 3581:Nixon in China 3574: 3573: 3549: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3529:WP:FILMRELEASE 3524: 3500: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3479: 3478: 3459:-Kelly Candle 3452: 3449: 3433: 3432: 3416: 3415: 3411: 3410: 3382: 3381: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3349: 3340: 3339: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3303: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3263: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3207: 3194: 3192: 3190: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3173: 3166:Silent Running 3163: 3159: 3156:Silent Running 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3131: 3115: 3095: 3094: 3077: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3048: 3047: 3031: 3030: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2982: 2981: 2957: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2922: 2921: 2913: 2912: 2909:Breitbart News 2905:New York Times 2892: 2891: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2846: 2845: 2837: 2836: 2803: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2667: 2662: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2556: 2555: 2550: 2549: 2518: 2515: 2495: 2492: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2442: 2441: 2427:183.171.64.225 2422: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2383: 2380: 2377:Sgt. Pepper... 2369:Sgt. Pepper... 2351: 2350: 2349: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2255: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2198: 2196: 2195: 2167: 2160: 2156: 2155: 2135: 2134: 2110: 2089: 2087: 2086: 2069: 2068: 2008: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1946: 1937: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1865:24.181.229.252 1850: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1825: 1819: 1818: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1625: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1598: 1546: 1543: 1517: 1516: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1313: 1310: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1121: 1120: 1100: 1099: 1094:as you did at 1074: 1073: 1000: 997: 985: 984: 964: 961: 932: 928:Discussion at 926: 925: 924: 898: 897: 896: 895: 877: 876: 875: 874: 867: 866: 865: 864: 854: 853: 812: 811:He won’t stop. 809: 792: 789: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 729: 728: 727: 726: 701: 700: 687:'s opinion. - 653: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 529: 528: 519: 518: 487: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 463:New York Times 453: 452: 451: 450: 433: 432: 359: 356: 327: 326: 282: 279: 278: 277: 228: 225: 209: 208: 176: 173: 168: 167: 155: 152: 151: 146: 142: 140: 137: 136: 77: 76: 73: 72: 67: 61: 55: 43: 40: 37: 36: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 9964: 9953: 9950: 9948: 9945: 9944: 9942: 9935: 9934: 9930: 9926: 9912: 9908: 9904: 9900: 9899: 9898: 9894: 9890: 9886: 9885: 9884: 9883: 9880: 9875: 9859: 9858: 9854: 9850: 9846: 9843: 9842:take it easy 9840: 9837: 9834: 9831: 9828: 9825: 9821: 9819: 9814: 9812: 9808: 9804: 9803:"$ 4,050,000" 9799: 9798: 9797:"$ 4,050,00," 9794: 9793:"$ 4,050,000" 9789: 9788: 9783: 9780: 9779: 9774: 9771: 9770: 9765: 9763: 9758: 9757: 9752: 9751: 9746: 9744: 9739: 9736: 9733: 9732:SummerPhDv2.0 9722: 9721: 9717: 9713: 9709: 9705: 9695: 9694: 9690: 9686: 9685:37.18.134.184 9682: 9678: 9674: 9669: 9665: 9661: 9656: 9652: 9642: 9641: 9638: 9637: 9632: 9631: 9626: 9622: 9618: 9613: 9609: 9595: 9592: 9586: 9580: 9576: 9572: 9568: 9567: 9566: 9562: 9560: 9559: 9552: 9551: 9550: 9549: 9545: 9541: 9531: 9530: 9526: 9522: 9511: 9510: 9506: 9502: 9495: 9486: 9485: 9481: 9477: 9471: 9465: 9464: 9459: 9454: 9452: 9448: 9444: 9440: 9436: 9430: 9429: 9424: 9423: 9418: 9415: 9411: 9410: 9402: 9401: 9397: 9393: 9382: 9381: 9377: 9373: 9368: 9364: 9352: 9339: 9338: 9334: 9333: 9332: 9331: 9327: 9323: 9319: 9315: 9305: 9304: 9300: 9296: 9292: 9284: 9279: 9278: 9274: 9270: 9265: 9262: 9258: 9252: 9250: 9249:Terry English 9243:Terry English 9236: 9233: 9230: 9224: 9216: 9215: 9214: 9213: 9210: 9197: 9193: 9192: 9191: 9190: 9187: 9184: 9178: 9163: 9162: 9158: 9154: 9150: 9146: 9134: 9121: 9117: 9114: 9113: 9112: 9111: 9107: 9103: 9098: 9092: 9085: 9072: 9068: 9065: 9064: 9063: 9062: 9058: 9054: 9050: 9046: 9042: 9029: 9015: 9014: 9013: 9012: 9008: 9002: 9001: 8995: 8991: 8987: 8975: 8962: 8959: 8958: 8957: 8955: 8951: 8947: 8943: 8936: 8930:October, 2020 8927: 8925: 8921: 8917: 8913: 8909: 8886: 8872: 8871: 8870: 8869: 8868: 8867: 8866: 8865: 8864: 8863: 8854: 8850: 8846: 8842: 8838: 8837: 8836: 8835: 8834: 8833: 8832: 8831: 8824: 8811: 8810: 8809: 8808: 8807: 8806: 8801: 8797: 8793: 8789: 8788: 8787: 8786: 8783: 8770: 8765: 8764: 8763: 8762: 8758: 8754: 8741: 8728: 8724: 8723: 8722: 8721: 8717: 8714: 8704: 8690: 8689: 8685: 8684: 8683: 8680: 8676: 8672: 8668: 8662: 8658: 8654: 8649: 8639: 8626: 8625: 8624: 8623: 8619: 8615: 8602: 8589: 8588: 8584: 8580: 8579: 8575: 8571: 8568: 8567: 8566: 8565: 8561: 8557: 8549:Kirstie Alley 8544: 8531: 8527: 8523: 8522: 8520: 8516: 8512: 8504: 8494: 8486: 8463: 8450: 8449: 8448: 8446: 8442: 8438: 8434: 8430: 8412: 8408: 8404: 8400: 8399: 8398: 8394: 8390: 8386: 8385: 8384: 8380: 8376: 8372: 8368: 8367: 8366: 8365: 8351: 8348: 8345: 8334: 8330: 8326: 8322: 8318: 8314: 8310: 8309: 8308: 8307: 8306: 8305: 8304: 8303: 8296: 8292: 8288: 8284: 8283: 8282: 8281: 8280: 8279: 8274: 8270: 8266: 8263: 8259: 8258: 8257: 8256: 8253: 8249: 8245: 8241: 8237: 8233: 8229: 8228: 8227: 8226: 8222: 8218: 8213: 8211: 8207: 8202: 8192: 8179: 8175: 8172: 8168: 8165: 8164: 8163: 8161: 8157: 8153: 8149: 8145: 8136: 8129: 8116: 8112: 8108: 8104: 8101: 8100: 8099: 8098: 8094: 8090: 8086: 8085: 8081:Uh, I edited 8072: 8059: 8055: 8054: 8050: 8046: 8045: 8041: 8040: 8039: 8038: 8034: 8030: 8029:LordAgincourt 8018: 8005: 8001: 8000: 7999: 7997: 7993: 7989: 7985: 7971: 7958: 7954: 7951: 7947: 7946: 7945: 7944: 7940: 7936: 7932: 7928: 7916: 7903: 7899: 7895: 7892: 7888: 7885: 7882: 7879: 7878:Richard Nixon 7875: 7871: 7870: 7869: 7867: 7863: 7859: 7855: 7851: 7845: 7844:hannibal.wiki 7841: 7836: 7824: 7811: 7806: 7803: 7799: 7795: 7794: 7793: 7792: 7791: 7789: 7785: 7781: 7777: 7773: 7769: 7760: 7756: 7755:SummerPhDv2.0 7744: 7731: 7730: 7729: 7725: 7721: 7716: 7715: 7714: 7701: 7700: 7697: 7693: 7689: 7684: 7683: 7682: 7681: 7668: 7663: 7662: 7658: 7654: 7642: 7628: 7624: 7620: 7616: 7612: 7609: 7606: 7603: 7600: 7597: 7594: 7591: 7588: 7584: 7580: 7576: 7573: 7568: 7564: 7560: 7557: 7554: 7553: 7552: 7551: 7547: 7543: 7538: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7522: 7518: 7514: 7510: 7502: 7501: 7497: 7493: 7483: 7482: 7478: 7474: 7464: 7463: 7459: 7455: 7450: 7442: 7441: 7437: 7433: 7429: 7428: 7424: 7419: 7416: 7404: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7384: 7383: 7379: 7378: 7355: 7341: 7339: 7335: 7332: 7331: 7327: 7326: 7321: 7318: 7315: 7314: 7310: 7309: 7305: 7302: 7299: 7298: 7294: 7293: 7289: 7286: 7283: 7282: 7278: 7277: 7275: 7274: 7273: 7269: 7264: 7262: 7255: 7254:SummerPhDv2.0 7252: 7251: 7250: 7237: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7227: 7222: 7220: 7213: 7211: 7207: 7203: 7201: 7198: 7197:SummerPhDv2.0 7195: 7194: 7193: 7180: 7177: 7173: 7172: 7171: 7170: 7166: 7161: 7159: 7152: 7140: 7127: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7119: 7116: 7112: 7107: 7093: 7089: 7085: 7081: 7080: 7079: 7078: 7075: 7062: 7061: 7056: 7055: 7054: 7053: 7049: 7045: 7040: 7036: 7034: 7030: 7026: 7021: 7019: 7015: 7011: 7007: 7003: 6996: 6989: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6968: 6964: 6960: 6950: 6949: 6946: 6939: 6933: 6928: 6923: 6918: 6914: 6909: 6907: 6901: 6899: 6893: 6891: 6877: 6873: 6868: 6867: 6863: 6859: 6853: 6851: 6847: 6844: 6840: 6836: 6825: 6824: 6821: 6816: 6809: 6807: 6802: 6781: 6776: 6771: 6769: 6765: 6761: 6747: 6739: 6726: 6722: 6718: 6717: 6716: 6715: 6711: 6707: 6706:109.76.135.73 6703: 6700: 6698: 6686: 6682: 6678: 6674: 6673: 6672: 6671: 6667: 6663: 6654: 6653: 6648: 6644: 6641:Please visit 6640: 6638: 6634: 6632: 6631: 6623: 6622: 6618: 6617:contributions 6614: 6610: 6609:Lord Sjones23 6606: 6594: 6588: 6587: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6559: 6546: 6545: 6544: 6543: 6542: 6541: 6536: 6532: 6530:contributions 6526: 6520: 6514: 6513: 6512: 6511: 6505: 6504: 6503: 6502: 6499: 6486: 6485: 6484: 6483: 6479: 6477:contributions 6473: 6467: 6457: 6450: 6436: 6435: 6430: 6429: 6425: 6421: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6398: 6383: 6379: 6375: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6368: 6365: 6352: 6348: 6347: 6343: 6342: 6337: 6336: 6330: 6329: 6324: 6323: 6319: 6315: 6314: 6310: 6309: 6308: 6305: 6301: 6297: 6293: 6270: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6248: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6223: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6209: 6208:F. chiloensis 6205: 6201: 6197: 6193: 6192: 6191:F. virginiana 6187: 6186: 6185:F. chiloensis 6181: 6177: 6173: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6146: 6145: 6144: 6137: 6124: 6120: 6117: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6103: 6099: 6095: 6091: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6085: 6072: 6069: 6065: 6064: 6063: 6062: 6058: 6054: 6050: 6046: 6045: 6040: 6036: 6032: 6028: 6024: 6020: 6016: 6012: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5995: 5984: 5970: 5969: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5961: 5957: 5953: 5949: 5945: 5935: 5922: 5918: 5917: 5916: 5915: 5911: 5907: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5891: 5881: 5880: 5877: 5873: 5869: 5864: 5862: 5861: 5853: 5846: 5833: 5830: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5819: 5815: 5810: 5798: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5777: 5773: 5762: 5760: 5756: 5752: 5748: 5742: 5731: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5715: 5711: 5707: 5699: 5689: 5685: 5681: 5677: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5664: 5661: 5657: 5653: 5647: 5646:edit conflict 5642: 5640: 5627: 5626: 5622: 5621: 5617: 5612: 5611: 5607: 5606: 5602: 5598: 5594: 5590: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5579: 5575: 5569: 5565: 5564:retaliation. 5554: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5532: 5527: 5523: 5499: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5471: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5460: 5456: 5451: 5447: 5441: 5434: 5421: 5417: 5416: 5413: 5410: 5406: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5394: 5390: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5374: 5370: 5357: 5344: 5340: 5336: 5333: 5329: 5326: 5322: 5319: 5315: 5311: 5308: 5304: 5300: 5297: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5287: 5283: 5275: 5269: 5268: 5265: 5262: 5258: 5254: 5244: 5243: 5239: 5235: 5231: 5227: 5222: 5214: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5200: 5196: 5184: 5171: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5155:WilliamTFrank 5130: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5109: 5108: 5103: 5098: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5063: 5062: 5057: 5052: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5025: 5024: 5019: 5014: 5007: 5006: 5005: 4992: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4940: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4922: 4921: 4916: 4911: 4904: 4903:SummerPhDv2.0 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4894: 4881: 4880: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4870: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4849: 4836: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4803: 4790: 4787: 4786: 4785: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4771: 4767: 4747: 4744: 4741: 4735: 4732: 4727: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4707: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4699: 4696: 4690: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4671: 4667: 4664: 4661: 4660:verifiability 4657: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4648: 4645: 4623: 4619: 4613: 4609: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4591: 4578: 4574: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4529: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4512: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4490: 4486: 4466: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4435: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4405: 4392: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4378: 4374: 4370: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4360: 4347: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4323: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4305: 4302: 4298: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4242: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4166: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4143: 4140: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4123: 4110: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4089: 4084: 4081: 4078: 4074: 4068: 4065: 4063: 4059: 4052: 4045: 4032: 4028: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4012:1.136.111.174 4009: 4002: 3990: 3977: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3959:User:Graham87 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3922: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3810: 3797: 3796: 3791: 3787: 3786:verifiability 3783: 3779: 3778: 3774: 3773: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3733: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3686: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3672: 3666: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3637: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3589: 3583: 3582: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3559:50.252.127.89 3555: 3543: 3530: 3525: 3522: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3494: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3475:Kellymccandle 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3461:Kellymccandle 3457: 3448: 3447: 3431: 3418: 3417: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3380: 3367: 3363: 3360: 3358: 3355: 3353: 3350: 3348: 3345: 3344: 3342: 3341: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3330: 3326: 3325: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3297: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3261: 3257: 3248: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3225: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3188: 3184: 3174: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3167: 3157: 3145: 3132: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 2997: 2984: 2983: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2956: 2949: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2851: 2848: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2802: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2774:Seattle Times 2771: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2719: 2706: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2689: 2683: 2682: 2677: 2673: 2666: 2661: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2630: 2625: 2622: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2609: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2590: 2580: 2567: 2563: 2558: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530:Anonymous1028 2527: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2491: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2473: 2469: 2468:WP:SONGTRIVIA 2462:WP:SONGTRIVIA 2457: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2412: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2320: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2273: 2260: 2256: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2227: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2201:38.111.120.74 2194: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169:38.111.120.74 2165: 2159: 2154: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2120:38.111.120.74 2116: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2101: 2098: 2095: 2091: 2085: 2071: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2046:38.111.120.74 2043: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2030:38.111.120.74 2027: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2015: 2012: 1990: 1989: 1984: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1965: 1952: 1947: 1945: 1942: 1938: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1921:Jayman6273737 1918: 1911: 1897: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1849: 1840: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1763: 1750: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1690:Your querry: 1679: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1628:Your querry: 1619: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1582: 1577: 1575: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1515: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1409: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1369: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1301: 1262: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1096:Splash (film) 1093: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1066: 1064: 1057: 1055: 1046: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014:Splash (film) 1011: 996: 995: 992: 991: 983: 970: 967: 966: 960: 959: 955: 954:contributions 951: 947: 946:Lord Sjones23 943: 931: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 900: 899: 894: 881: 880: 879: 878: 871: 870: 869: 868: 862: 858: 857: 856: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 829: 828: 827: 826: 822: 818: 808: 807: 803: 799: 788: 786: 782: 778: 774: 768: 764: 760: 748: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 724: 720: 716: 712: 705: 704: 703: 702: 699: 686: 682: 678: 677: 676: 674: 670: 666: 662: 652:The Leftovers 635: 621: 620: 618: 613: 612: 611: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583: 582: 569: 565: 561: 560: 559: 555: 551: 546: 545: 544: 531: 530: 525: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 503: 502: 501: 497: 493: 477: 464: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 449: 446: 442: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 417: 416: 415: 414: 411: 407: 403: 400: 395: 393: 388: 385: 383: 378: 375: 372: 367: 365: 358:Are you nuts? 355: 354: 340: 335: 331: 325: 322: 321: 308: 307: 306: 305: 302: 301: 288: 276: 263: 258: 257: 256: 253: 249: 245: 244:85.90.116.114 241: 235: 224: 223: 219: 215: 207: 193: 192: 191: 190: 186: 182: 172: 164: 159: 154: 153: 139: 138: 135: 134: 131: 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 95: 92: 89: 86: 83: 79: 78: 75: 74: 70: 65: 60: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 9922: 9865: 9847: 9844: 9841: 9838: 9835: 9832: 9829: 9826: 9822: 9817: 9815: 9810: 9806: 9802: 9800: 9796: 9795:instead of: 9792: 9790: 9786: 9784: 9781: 9777: 9775: 9772: 9768: 9766: 9761: 9759: 9755: 9753: 9749: 9747: 9740: 9737: 9728: 9725:i got lost.. 9701: 9664:Silver Bells 9648: 9634: 9628: 9615: 9612:User:Mradice 9605: 9557: 9556: 9537: 9517: 9498: 9461: 9455: 9432: 9426: 9420: 9388: 9360: 9311: 9288: 9285:single cover 9266: 9257:Country Life 9256: 9253: 9246: 9218: 9172: 9169: 9143:An article, 9142: 9119: 9099: 9095: 9071:Kingkobra775 9037: 8999: 8983: 8940:— Preceding 8937: 8933: 8906:— Preceding 8902: 8749: 8718: 8715: 8712: 8665:— Preceding 8661:Russi Taylor 8657:Minnie Mouse 8650: 8647: 8610: 8552: 8427:— Preceding 8424: 8352: 8349: 8346: 8343: 8239: 8235: 8231: 8214: 8203: 8200: 8142:— Preceding 8139: 8114: 8082: 8080: 8026: 7982:— Preceding 7979: 7924: 7890: 7848:— Preceding 7843: 7839: 7834: 7832: 7764: 7758: 7664: 7650: 7586: 7582: 7566: 7542:Theironminer 7539: 7535: 7531: 7527: 7523: 7519: 7515: 7511: 7508: 7489: 7470: 7451: 7448: 7430: 7420: 7412: 7381: 7376: 7373: 7337: 7260: 7218: 7157: 7148: 7103: 7041: 7037: 7022: 6999: 6958: 6956: 6912: 6910: 6903: 6895: 6887: 6854: 6842: 6831: 6810: 6803: 6792:{{db-draft}} 6772: 6757: 6696: 6694: 6660: 6650: 6635: 6597: 6571: 6460: 6419: 6394: 6334: 6333: 6290:— Preceding 6286: 6207: 6199: 6195: 6189: 6183: 6175: 6171: 6115: 6048: 6042: 6038: 6034: 6030: 6029:is known as 6026: 6022: 6018: 6014: 6013:is known as 6010: 6006: 6002: 5998: 5996: 5992: 5946: 5943: 5902: 5887: 5867: 5865: 5858: 5856: 5809:Jared Taylor 5806: 5768: 5749: 5746: 5703: 5698:Home Alone 3 5615: 5601:WP:OVERSIGHT 5596: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5516: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5408: 5365: 5343:Such attacks 5339:comment here 5307:village pump 5278: 5272:GTGeek88 re 5250: 5218: 5192: 5152: 5093: 5047: 5009: 4950:— Preceding 4947: 4906: 4855:— Preceding 4852: 4809:— Preceding 4806: 4764:— Preceding 4761: 4725: 4724:OK, thanks. 4638: 4577:consistently 4576: 4572: 4568: 4493:— Preceding 4482: 4421: 4390: 4329: 4306: 4264: 4178: 4090: 4086: 4070: 4066: 4055: 4006:— Preceding 4003: 4000: 3938: 3793: 3741: 3692: 3674: 3667: 3664: 3636:The Guardian 3635: 3615: 3605: 3586: 3579: 3554:The Dice Man 3551: 3502: 3458: 3454: 3434: 3383: 3361: 3356: 3351: 3346: 3305: 3265: 3193:Collegially, 3186: 3182: 3179: 3161: 3074: 3005: 2959: 2926: 2908: 2904: 2884:my aunt Edna 2875: 2871: 2841: 2809:— Preceding 2805: 2777: 2773: 2764: 2727: 2688:Kailash29792 2687: 2679: 2669: 2646:Tillywilly17 2640:— Preceding 2637: 2634: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2618: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2596: 2591: 2588: 2561: 2524:— Preceding 2520: 2497: 2465: 2424: 2376: 2368: 2291: 2259:adopt-a-user 2235: 2197: 2166: 2163: 2157: 2140:WP:COVERSONG 2117: 2113: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2065:WP:COVERSONG 2060: 2044: 2041: 2028: 2025: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2013: 2010: 1992:. Retrieved 1986: 1977: 1969: 1915:— Preceding 1907: 1863: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1797:— Preceding 1771:— Preceding 1768: 1702:— Preceding 1699: 1696: 1692: 1689: 1640:— Preceding 1637: 1634: 1630: 1627: 1601: 1593: 1580: 1573: 1566: 1560: 1556: 1550: 1548: 1521:— Preceding 1518: 1434:— Preceding 1431: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1323:Isaac Asimov 1322: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1285: 1282: 1224: 1173: 1129: 1082: 1078: 1063:open channel 1062: 1053: 1002: 989: 986: 934: 903:— Preceding 832:— Preceding 814: 794: 777:23.240.96.37 771:— Preceding 755: 715:23.240.96.37 709:— Preceding 665:23.240.96.37 659:— Preceding 655: 489: 486:No we're not 462: 396: 389: 386: 379: 368: 361: 338: 336: 332: 328: 310: 290: 284: 238:— Preceding 230: 210: 181:Captainllama 178: 171: 157: 80: 68: 54: 51: 48: 45: 32: 26: 9925:Herostratus 9708:Jonny Quest 9621:Mark Radice 9610:comment on 9521:Sparkmadley 9514:KIDSTVDATES 9463:voting page 9283:Hang on Now 9261:Adam Savage 9102:BayronKaien 9067:Packman2445 8210:Nickelodeon 7988:72.94.14.15 7653:Sherwilliam 7336:my revert: 6837:' from the 6574:NOTFACEBOOK 6518:Vchimpanzee 6465:Vchimpanzee 6438:content. - 6424:WP:HOUNDING 6401:WP:HOUNDING 6374:DublinRanch 6326:acceptable. 6296:DublinRanch 6114:Again, the 5829:my response 5827:Please see 5593:White House 5591:an edit to 5472:applies. - 5318:not a forum 5257:User:DMacks 5253:these edits 5221:noticeboard 4739:Doug Weller 4730:Doug Weller 4694:Doug Weller 4643:Doug Weller 4616:—Preceding 4606:Yes... lol 4279:Vanity Fair 4213:UpWithJimmy 4181:UpWithJimmy 4031:String band 4001:Hi there, 3997:String Band 3795:The Martian 3612:Gerald Ford 3505:Alexis.rans 3338:succinctly. 2500:Pattie Boyd 2494:August 2019 1557:silent film 1077:I gave you 873:responding. 685:Roger Ebert 392:Roger Ebert 133:/Archive 18 130:/Archive 17 127:/Archive 16 124:/Archive 15 121:/Archive 14 118:/Archive 13 115:/Archive 12 112:/Archive 11 109:/Archive 10 9941:Categories 9919:TF you go? 9712:Sparkles32 9590:say hello! 9447:topic bans 9222:Acroterion 9176:Acroterion 9166:DS notices 9053:Magitroopa 8990:discussion 8769:Proud Boys 8614:Mlgtrumpet 8317:WP:CRYSTAL 7626:summaries. 7467:IP address 7106:LancedSoul 7033:WP:SPOILER 7029:MOS:TVPLOT 7025:WP:COPYVIO 7002:WP:CRISTAL 6904:Under the 6814:Jalen Folf 6798:{{db-g13}} 6786:{{db-afc}} 6725:@fuckjerry 5860:Șapte Seri 5852:Șapte Seri 5772:Plutonical 5706:DawgDeputy 5537:_:))": --> 5534:_:))": --> 5530:_:))": --> 5518:_:))": --> 5400:Praxidicae 5226:Needs Work 4311:. Thanks, 4295:(Read the 3699:Xboxmanwar 3689:Xboxmanwar 3055:Sparkles32 3016:Sparkles32 2897:verifiable 2765:verifiably 2757:Talk:Reiki 2705:WP:PEACOCK 2477:Fred Gandt 2252:WP:PILLARS 2238:Kairipines 1994:2009-01-27 1970:References 1567:drama film 1293:Promethean 1232:Promethean 1181:Promethean 1137:Promethean 1054:FlightTime 990:CASSIOPEIA 969:CASSIOPEIA 564:Defamation 441:...William 406:...William 371:John Simon 175:Blubbering 106:/Archive 9 88:/Archive 3 85:/Archive 2 82:/Archive 1 9878:(blether) 9764:meant.. 9668:talk page 9625:Aerosmith 9571:added you 9443:site bans 8845:Helper202 8792:Helper202 8753:Helper202 8570:Your edit 8508:template. 8313:WP:WINARS 8077:Top Gun 2 7797:religion. 7578:possible. 7206:ping pong 7111:BOVINEBOY 7082:Ok then. 7014:It's Pony 6852:a pass? 6848:(s) like 6806:this link 6775:mainspace 6727:guess. - 6697:the mooch 6432:distress. 6204:pineapple 5906:Areaseven 5814:Rja13ww33 5369:ADOS MMXX 4608:Digiulio8 4539:Digiulio8 4499:Digiulio8 4226:articles. 4195:about. - 4136:Antandrus 3548:Thank you 3158:reversion 2850:Your edit 2681:The Hindu 2504:Twixister 2257:Consider 2158:You have 1983:"Contact" 1941:synthesis 1904:July 2019 1602:LGBT film 1597:"genres"? 1352:Nuttyskin 1330:Nuttyskin 1279:RE: MGTOW 1010:unsourced 963:June 2019 511:This edit 445:the roof? 410:the roof? 103:/Archive8 100:/Archive7 97:/Archive6 94:/Archive5 91:/Archive4 9849:Snarevox 9811:actually 9762:actually 9743:rounding 9269:Stronach 9267:Cheers, 9120:directly 8942:unsigned 8920:contribs 8908:unsigned 8746:Template 8713:Hello, 8679:contribs 8667:unsigned 8530:Pcgmrich 8441:contribs 8429:unsigned 8321:WP:OTHER 8197:Help Me! 8178:reverted 8156:contribs 8148:Clrichey 8144:unsigned 8058:citation 7984:unsigned 7891:Hannibal 7862:contribs 7854:Chharvey 7850:unsigned 7261:Darren-M 7219:Darren-M 7158:Darren-M 7124:faster. 6963:Tenebrae 6843:de facto 6420:The Hunt 6382:contribs 6304:contribs 6292:unsigned 6200:ananassa 6196:Fragaria 5884:May 2020 5751:BulgeUwU 5470:WP:EVADE 5296:GTGeek88 5282:GTGeek88 4964:contribs 4952:unsigned 4869:contribs 4857:unsigned 4823:contribs 4811:unsigned 4778:contribs 4766:unsigned 4573:commonly 4569:defining 4560:trivial. 4507:contribs 4495:unsigned 4261:Resolved 4132:This one 4008:unsigned 3640:aleatory 3268:WP:SYNTH 3260:WP:SYNTH 3187:specific 3118:Vmavanti 3080:Vmavanti 2962:WP:SYNTH 2927:strongly 2901:reliable 2834:Localber 2823:contribs 2815:Localber 2811:unsigned 2778:NY Times 2730:this RfC 2654:contribs 2642:unsigned 2538:contribs 2526:unsigned 2485:contribs 2355:Rjrya395 2305:Rjrya395 2288:Resolved 2118:thanks. 2026:thanks. 1929:contribs 1917:unsigned 1811:contribs 1799:unsigned 1785:contribs 1773:unsigned 1716:contribs 1704:unsigned 1654:contribs 1642:unsigned 1535:contribs 1523:unsigned 1448:contribs 1436:unsigned 1428:Resolved 917:contribs 905:unsigned 846:contribs 834:unsigned 773:unsigned 711:unsigned 661:unsigned 587:Galestar 550:Galestar 515:WP:EVADE 492:Galestar 252:contribs 240:unsigned 69:Archives 9584:wizzito 9573:to the 9501:Bearian 9470:NoACEMM 9195:option. 9153:Aspects 9006:discuss 9000:Tarl N. 8511:Mkayj14 8084:Top Gun 7415:Caillou 7323:group". 7058:change. 6801:code. 6720:Hardly. 6067:either. 4877:editor. 4689:WP:Lead 4618:undated 4420:So are 4313:DPL bot 3782:pillars 3665:Hello, 2980:banned. 2864:notable 2296:on the 1875:10cows 1697:Reply: 1635:Reply: 1388:lmaxmai 1083:exactly 617:lmaxmai 517:edits). 158:60 days 9873:Summit 9818:really 9649:Hello 9228:(talk) 9182:(talk) 9051:soon. 9049:WP:ANI 9045:WP:AIV 8389:JDB555 7902:WP:SPS 7840:cbc.ca 7567:intent 7382:Shadow 7214:Best, 7018:MOS:TV 6937:Ed6767 6819:(talk) 5872:Jmabel 5589:here's 5409:People 5121:DMacks 4346:WP:NPA 4139:(talk) 3738:Why... 3262:part 2 3224:WP:BRD 3197:JerzyA 2876:should 2842:bottom 2693:(talk) 2672:WP:SPS 2562:anyone 2278:Hey... 2061:exists 2011:Hello 1951:WP:SYN 1368:WP:TPG 1304:(talk) 1243:(talk) 1192:(talk) 1148:(talk) 817:Zvig47 798:Zvig47 319:editor 299:editor 262:WP:IRS 9870:Girth 9677:Carol 9671:give 9540:Sro23 9357:Moana 8994:17u9e 8986:0m9Ep 8980:0m9Ep 8525:used. 8371:WP:DE 7931:Prism 7898:could 7585:edit 7209:word. 6943:talk! 6795:, or 6764:Draft 6626:Admin 6037:, or 6021:, or 5669:well. 5652:Sro23 5616:about 5522:Steue 5420:WP:OR 5393:WP:OR 5234:Pamxz 5230:Reiki 5195:Pamxz 4326:Ahem. 3595:" or 3154:Your 2907:yes, 2882:yes, 2874:not, 2872:could 2638:the 1592:Yes, 1581:waxie 1562:Carol 1395:WP:OR 681:North 524:libel 439:base. 399:WP:RS 382:WP:RS 316:music 313:danny 296:music 293:danny 9929:talk 9907:talk 9893:talk 9853:talk 9745:.. 9716:talk 9689:talk 9675:and 9608:this 9544:talk 9525:talk 9505:talk 9480:talk 9433:The 9396:talk 9376:talk 9326:talk 9299:talk 9273:talk 9157:talk 9106:talk 9069:and 9057:talk 8950:talk 8916:talk 8849:talk 8796:talk 8757:talk 8729:. - 8675:talk 8618:talk 8560:talk 8532:. - 8515:talk 8437:talk 8407:talk 8393:talk 8379:talk 8329:talk 8319:and 8291:talk 8269:talk 8248:talk 8236:AWOO 8221:talk 8169:You 8152:talk 8111:cite 8093:talk 8033:talk 7992:talk 7957:here 7950:here 7939:talk 7904:. - 7889:The 7858:talk 7784:talk 7774:) ,( 7759:talk 7724:talk 7692:talk 7669:. - 7657:talk 7546:talk 7496:talk 7477:talk 7458:talk 7436:talk 7377:Half 7338:same 7267:talk 7225:talk 7164:talk 7115:2008 7088:talk 7048:talk 7012:and 6967:talk 6932:here 6862:talk 6770:". 6710:talk 6681:talk 6677:Jorm 6666:talk 6613:talk 6582:talk 6524:talk 6471:talk 6409:talk 6378:talk 6353:. - 6300:talk 6234:talk 6188:and 6098:talk 6057:talk 6005:and 5956:talk 5910:talk 5876:Talk 5818:talk 5776:talk 5755:talk 5747:yay 5710:talk 5684:talk 5656:talk 5578:talk 5526:talk 5459:talk 5373:talk 5312:The 5301:The 5286:talk 5238:talk 5199:talk 5168:You 5159:talk 5125:talk 4993:. - 4960:talk 4865:talk 4819:talk 4774:talk 4743:talk 4734:talk 4698:talk 4670:cite 4647:talk 4612:talk 4575:and 4563:Per 4543:talk 4503:talk 4430:talk 4373:talk 4348:. - 4336:talk 4317:talk 4277:and 4217:talk 4185:talk 4016:talk 3967:talk 3949:talk 3886:talk 3823:talk 3798:. - 3751:talk 3745:? -- 3711:talk 3680:talk 3649:talk 3593:Ohio 3563:talk 3509:talk 3465:talk 3400:talk 3313:talk 3276:talk 3201:talk 3183:some 3122:talk 3084:talk 3059:talk 3020:talk 2970:talk 2937:. - 2819:talk 2790:talk 2786:Zefr 2776:and 2770:WP:V 2755:and 2738:talk 2734:Zefr 2650:talk 2566:WP:V 2534:talk 2508:talk 2481:talk 2431:talk 2359:talk 2309:talk 2261:. - 2242:talk 2205:talk 2173:talk 2124:talk 2050:talk 2034:talk 1925:talk 1885:. - 1869:talk 1807:talk 1781:talk 1751:. - 1712:talk 1650:talk 1574:Maze 1531:talk 1444:talk 1356:talk 1334:talk 1207:. - 1026:talk 1020:."-- 950:talk 913:talk 842:talk 821:talk 802:talk 781:talk 719:talk 669:talk 591:talk 554:talk 496:talk 339:your 264:. - 248:talk 218:talk 185:talk 9862:Hey 9807:not 9801:if 9773:or 9662:, 9348:PhD 9345:mer 9342:Sum 9322:DSZ 9206:PhD 9203:mer 9200:Sum 9130:PhD 9127:mer 9124:Sum 9081:PhD 9078:mer 9075:Sum 9025:PhD 9022:mer 9019:Sum 8971:PhD 8968:mer 8965:Sum 8882:PhD 8879:mer 8876:Sum 8820:PhD 8817:mer 8814:Sum 8779:PhD 8776:mer 8773:Sum 8737:PhD 8734:mer 8731:Sum 8700:PhD 8697:mer 8694:Sum 8655:'s 8635:PhD 8632:mer 8629:Sum 8598:PhD 8595:mer 8592:Sum 8540:PhD 8537:mer 8534:Sum 8503:ygm 8498:or 8459:PhD 8456:mer 8453:Sum 8361:PhD 8358:mer 8355:Sum 8188:PhD 8185:mer 8182:Sum 8125:PhD 8122:mer 8119:Sum 8068:PhD 8065:mer 8062:Sum 8014:PhD 8011:mer 8008:Sum 7967:PhD 7964:mer 7961:Sum 7925:On 7912:PhD 7909:mer 7906:Sum 7820:PhD 7817:mer 7814:Sum 7740:PhD 7737:mer 7734:Sum 7710:PhD 7707:mer 7704:Sum 7677:PhD 7674:mer 7671:Sum 7638:PhD 7635:mer 7632:Sum 7583:not 7400:PhD 7397:mer 7394:Sum 7351:PhD 7348:mer 7345:Sum 7246:PhD 7243:mer 7240:Sum 7189:PhD 7186:mer 7183:Sum 7136:PhD 7133:mer 7130:Sum 7071:PhD 7068:mer 7065:Sum 6985:PhD 6982:mer 6979:Sum 6934:. 6915:by 6735:PhD 6732:mer 6729:Sum 6607:. 6555:PhD 6552:mer 6549:Sum 6533:• 6495:PhD 6492:mer 6489:Sum 6480:• 6446:PhD 6443:mer 6440:Sum 6361:PhD 6358:mer 6355:Sum 6266:PhD 6263:mer 6260:Sum 6174:is 6133:PhD 6130:mer 6127:Sum 6116:NYT 6081:PhD 6078:mer 6075:Sum 5980:PhD 5977:mer 5974:Sum 5931:PhD 5928:mer 5925:Sum 5842:PhD 5839:mer 5836:Sum 5812:is. 5794:PhD 5791:mer 5788:Sum 5727:PhD 5724:mer 5721:Sum 5700:... 5636:PhD 5633:mer 5630:Sum 5597:can 5550:PhD 5547:mer 5544:Sum 5510::)) 5495:PhD 5492:mer 5489:Sum 5480:PhD 5477:mer 5474:Sum 5430:PhD 5427:mer 5424:Sum 5353:PhD 5350:mer 5347:Sum 5180:PhD 5177:mer 5174:Sum 5106:vee 5101:van 5096:Rob 5085:PhD 5082:mer 5079:Sum 5060:vee 5055:van 5050:Rob 5039:PhD 5036:mer 5033:Sum 5022:vee 5017:van 5012:Rob 5001:PhD 4998:mer 4995:Sum 4982:PhD 4979:mer 4976:Sum 4936:PhD 4933:mer 4930:Sum 4919:vee 4914:van 4909:Rob 4890:PhD 4887:mer 4884:Sum 4845:PhD 4842:mer 4839:Sum 4799:PhD 4796:mer 4793:Sum 4717:PhD 4714:mer 4711:Sum 4680:PhD 4677:mer 4674:Sum 4614:) 4587:PhD 4584:mer 4581:Sum 4525:PhD 4522:mer 4519:Sum 4462:PhD 4459:mer 4456:Sum 4422:you 4401:PhD 4398:mer 4395:Sum 4391:you 4356:PhD 4353:mer 4350:Sum 4297:FAQ 4238:PhD 4235:mer 4232:Sum 4203:PhD 4200:mer 4197:Sum 4162:PhD 4159:mer 4156:Sum 4119:PhD 4116:mer 4113:Sum 4100:PhD 4097:mer 4094:Sum 4041:PhD 4038:mer 4035:Sum 3986:PhD 3983:mer 3980:Sum 3963:Jay 3945:Jay 3918:PhD 3915:mer 3912:Sum 3873:PhD 3870:mer 3867:Sum 3806:PhD 3803:mer 3800:Sum 3729:PhD 3726:mer 3723:Sum 3626:PhD 3623:mer 3620:Sum 3591:, " 3539:PhD 3536:mer 3533:Sum 3490:PhD 3487:mer 3484:Sum 3443:PhD 3440:mer 3437:Sum 3427:PhD 3424:mer 3421:Sum 3392:PhD 3389:mer 3386:Sum 3376:PhD 3373:mer 3370:Sum 3293:PhD 3290:mer 3287:Sum 3244:PhD 3241:mer 3238:Sum 3141:PhD 3138:mer 3135:Sum 3106:PhD 3103:mer 3100:Sum 3042:PhD 3039:mer 3036:Sum 2993:PhD 2990:mer 2987:Sum 2945:PhD 2942:mer 2939:Sum 2715:PhD 2712:mer 2709:Sum 2576:PhD 2573:mer 2570:Sum 2453:PhD 2450:mer 2447:Sum 2408:PhD 2405:mer 2402:Sum 2393:PhD 2390:mer 2387:Sum 2344:PhD 2341:mer 2338:Sum 2329:PhD 2326:mer 2323:Sum 2269:PhD 2266:mer 2263:Sum 2223:PhD 2220:mer 2217:Sum 2190:PhD 2187:mer 2184:Sum 2150:PhD 2147:mer 2144:Sum 2081:PhD 2078:mer 2075:Sum 1961:PhD 1958:mer 1955:Sum 1893:PhD 1890:mer 1887:Sum 1836:PhD 1833:mer 1830:Sum 1759:PhD 1756:mer 1753:Sum 1675:PhD 1672:mer 1669:Sum 1615:PhD 1612:mer 1609:Sum 1511:PhD 1508:mer 1505:Sum 1405:PhD 1402:mer 1399:Sum 1378:PhD 1375:mer 1372:Sum 1258:PhD 1255:mer 1252:Sum 1215:PhD 1212:mer 1209:Sum 1164:PhD 1161:mer 1158:Sum 1115:PhD 1112:mer 1109:Sum 979:PhD 976:mer 973:Sum 944:. 890:PhD 887:mer 884:Sum 744:PhD 741:mer 738:Sum 695:PhD 692:mer 689:Sum 631:PhD 628:mer 625:Sum 607:PhD 604:mer 601:Sum 578:PhD 575:mer 572:Sum 540:PhD 537:mer 534:Sum 505:At 473:PhD 470:mer 467:Sum 427:PhD 424:mer 421:Sum 350:PhD 347:mer 344:Sum 272:PhD 269:mer 266:Sum 203:PhD 200:mer 197:Sum 9943:: 9931:) 9909:) 9895:) 9855:) 9718:) 9691:) 9630:jp 9587:| 9581:. 9561:iz 9546:) 9527:) 9507:) 9482:) 9472:}} 9468:{{ 9445:, 9398:) 9378:) 9328:) 9320:-- 9301:) 9275:) 9159:) 9108:) 9100:-- 9059:) 9009:) 8952:) 8922:) 8918:• 8851:) 8798:) 8759:) 8677:• 8620:) 8562:) 8517:) 8506:}} 8500:{{ 8496:}} 8490:{{ 8443:) 8439:• 8409:) 8395:) 8381:) 8331:) 8315:, 8293:) 8271:) 8250:) 8223:) 8176:I 8158:) 8154:• 8095:) 8035:) 7994:) 7941:) 7864:) 7860:• 7786:) 7726:) 7694:) 7659:) 7587:do 7548:) 7540:- 7498:) 7479:) 7460:) 7452:-- 7438:) 7181:- 7090:) 7050:) 7020:. 7008:, 6969:) 6864:) 6789:, 6712:) 6683:) 6668:) 6619:) 6615:- 6584:) 6527:• 6521:• 6474:• 6468:• 6411:) 6380:• 6335:if 6302:• 6236:) 6198:× 6100:) 6059:) 6033:, 6017:, 5958:) 5950:-- 5912:) 5901:. 5874:| 5820:) 5778:) 5757:) 5712:) 5686:) 5658:) 5580:) 5528:) 5461:) 5375:) 5288:) 5259:, 5240:) 5201:) 5161:) 5127:) 5119:. 4966:) 4962:• 4867:• 4825:) 4821:• 4780:) 4776:• 4545:) 4509:) 4505:• 4432:) 4375:) 4338:) 4319:) 4303:.) 4285:| 4273:, 4219:) 4187:) 4018:) 3969:) 3951:) 3888:) 3825:) 3753:) 3713:) 3705:. 3682:) 3651:) 3565:) 3531:- 3511:) 3467:) 3402:) 3315:) 3278:) 3258:- 3203:) 3195:-- 3124:) 3086:) 3061:) 3022:) 2972:) 2964:. 2825:) 2821:• 2792:) 2740:) 2656:) 2652:• 2540:) 2536:• 2510:) 2483:· 2479:· 2433:) 2361:) 2321:- 2311:) 2300:? 2244:) 2207:) 2175:) 2126:) 2052:) 2036:) 1985:. 1927:• 1871:) 1813:) 1809:• 1787:) 1783:• 1714:• 1652:• 1607:- 1537:) 1533:• 1450:) 1446:• 1358:) 1336:) 1299:» 1238:» 1187:» 1143:» 1028:) 956:) 952:- 919:) 915:• 848:) 844:• 823:) 804:) 783:) 721:) 671:) 593:) 556:) 498:) 384:? 369:1 250:• 220:) 187:) 9927:( 9905:( 9891:( 9851:( 9734:: 9730:@ 9714:( 9687:( 9636:g 9633:× 9558:L 9542:( 9523:( 9503:( 9478:( 9394:( 9374:( 9324:( 9297:( 9271:( 9155:( 9104:( 9055:( 9003:( 8948:( 8914:( 8847:( 8794:( 8755:( 8673:( 8616:( 8576:. 8558:( 8513:( 8435:( 8405:( 8391:( 8377:( 8327:( 8289:( 8267:( 8246:( 8219:( 8150:( 8091:( 8031:( 7990:( 7937:( 7880:. 7856:( 7804:. 7782:( 7757:( 7722:( 7690:( 7655:( 7544:( 7494:( 7475:( 7456:( 7434:( 7086:( 7046:( 6965:( 6900:. 6860:( 6833:' 6708:( 6679:( 6664:( 6611:( 6580:( 6426:. 6407:( 6376:( 6320:. 6298:( 6232:( 6096:( 6055:( 5954:( 5908:( 5816:( 5774:( 5753:( 5708:( 5682:( 5654:( 5648:) 5644:( 5603:. 5576:( 5524:( 5457:( 5371:( 5334:. 5327:. 5284:( 5236:( 5224:" 5197:( 5157:( 5123:( 4958:( 4863:( 4817:( 4772:( 4610:( 4541:( 4501:( 4428:( 4371:( 4334:( 4315:( 4281:( 4215:( 4183:( 4014:( 3965:( 3947:( 3884:( 3821:( 3770:. 3749:( 3709:( 3678:( 3647:( 3599:. 3561:( 3523:. 3507:( 3477:, 3463:( 3398:( 3311:( 3274:( 3199:( 3120:( 3116:– 3082:( 3078:– 3057:( 3018:( 2968:( 2817:( 2788:( 2736:( 2648:( 2532:( 2506:( 2429:( 2357:( 2307:( 2240:( 2203:( 2171:( 2122:( 2048:( 2032:( 1997:. 1923:( 1867:( 1805:( 1779:( 1710:( 1648:( 1529:( 1442:( 1354:( 1332:( 1297:l 1295:| 1291:| 1289:l 1287:« 1236:l 1234:| 1230:| 1228:l 1226:« 1185:l 1183:| 1179:| 1177:l 1175:« 1141:l 1139:| 1135:| 1133:l 1131:« 1067:) 1059:( 1047:: 1043:@ 1040:) 1036:( 1024:( 948:( 911:( 840:( 819:( 800:( 779:( 717:( 667:( 589:( 562:" 552:( 494:( 404:. 246:( 216:( 183:(

Index


This user may have left Knowledge

/Archive 1
/Archive 2
/Archive 3
/Archive4
/Archive5
/Archive6
/Archive7
/Archive8
/Archive 9
/Archive 10
/Archive 11
/Archive 12
/Archive 13
/Archive 14
/Archive 15
/Archive 16
/Archive 17
/Archive 18
Lowercase sigmabot III
Captainllama
talk
12:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
18:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Andrew ranfurly
talk
21:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
https://the-arioch.livejournal.com/90752.html

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑