User talk:Tarl N./Archive 4

1297:

across the Intercoastal. The Intercoastal is part of the Army Corps Of Engineers. The ACOE does not recognise the barrier island as Deerfield Beach Island. In the event of an emergency, Deerfield Beach is a separate beach from Boca Raton Beach and Hillsboro Beach. Deerfield Beach is also a city. Boca Raton is also a city. Hillsboro Beach os a city that is at the south end of the barrier island. It is not part of Deerfield Beach. This entire entry is false information. One look at a map will tell you the correct identification of the area. Yes, the city of Deerfield Beach put up a sign. This does not mean the accuracy of the geographical description of "Deerfield Beach Island' is correct. Now, I will ask you to put the truthFUL post up under Deerfield Beach Island. This is a gross misuse of information should not cause any more discourse. Thank you.

3068:, which you ran afoul of, where more than three reverts is a red flag and requires a block - but you can get in trouble without reaching that level. Certainly Foobtalleditor3 is begging for trouble with his latest edit comment, don't do anything like that. As for the talk pages, just be careful to be calm - avoid getting outraged, and if you feel angry while writing, step away from the keyboard for a while and see if you can complete the comment later without getting angry. If you can't, it's probably better not to make the comment, but instead seek help from any of the numerous dispute-resolution mechanisms available. Unfortunately, none of them are going to work on the Brady article, so some admin is likely to come in with a big hammer. You don't want to be in the way of that :-). 2431:

outside New England are willing to categorize him as GOAT," doesn't really add up. First, accusing the user of semi-vandalism here is really poor form. I see no vandalism there. Furthermore, I see legitimate scholarly reasoning to have the article state that many journalists consider Tom Brady to be the greatest and not just "among the greatest," that being, that it's an overwhelming fact and the prevailing narrative in sports media. Without "greatest" instead of "among the greatest" readers can not as accurately understand who Tom Brady is and how sports culture perceives him relative to other great quarterbacks. Thus, the article's academic legitimacy is limited with "among."

2086:

speculative. Unless something with a VERY low percentage of happening happens to Tom Brady in between now and the start of the game, he will be the starting quarterback in that game. Allow me to quote the first rule of the guideline here: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." Without doubt, the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Please be reasonable here and let's not turn this into a revert war. Please get back to me on this at your earliest convenience.

3775: 602: 31: 2372: 130: 628: 1235: 2314: 581:

to change the positions players play - I assume that gets them some advantage in a fantasy football draft or something. One other thing I've seen is attempts to influence team number selection by pre-emption - if everyone documents he will have xx, the hope is that the team will just accede and give the player that number. As long as we stay out of those games, I'm not terribly worried.

1149:, we see all the various estimates that were made. The origin is listed at a depth of 29km - there is an "OFFICIAL" line, which is generally accepted as definitive. The figure of 24 km depth comes from a page down under "Moment Tensor", on the third US line, which is something else. If you click on the "US" in that line, that leads you to the detailed page for that data, 2746:

about), but that distinction doesn't seem to have been all that significant. The intra-white ethnic slurs were simply anti-minority - e.g., those who were anti-Italian might also be anti-Irish (who were certainly not dark-skinned). Sometimes the prejudice was anti-catholic, and a general theme of anti-semitism was present - more often it was simply "not us".

1909:. Given that the previous sentence says it varies by 1.6% across the surface, which is far greater than the difference between 1/6th and 0.166, it isn't necessary to specify that it's an approximation. The actual relation between the nominal lunar and terrestrial gravity is actually 0.165816... and it's not necessary to specify that either. 1683:

over-exaggeration. They are thought to combat vandalism, not good faith edits. In the article about Moon's gravity there stands "16.6 % (1/6)". This is wrong, 1/6 is more than 16.6 %. You can write something like "about 1/6" if you wanna. Why don't we "need 'anything and anybody'", what's wrong with it?

3486:

Don't worry about it. Just improve your own editing, that's what you can do. At this point, stepping away for a day would do more to calm things down than anything else, let BMorrow151 worry about his own problems. Tomorrow, go over the talk page comments and see if there's anything new that needs to

3365:

A major life-lesson there. When you find yourself in a running argument (here or elsewhere), the best thing you can do is step back for a day, and then write a short comment the next day that makes your position clear. There's no hurry on Knowledge, and taking a day to distill your comments will gain

2745:

Ah. In the U.S.? It's not a subject for polite conversation these days, just discussing it can get you ostracized or brought before a board of review now. Generally, any European was considered white. For some people there was a sub-category of Nordic or Aryan (depending on which era you were talking

2324:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about

580:

Yup. The main thing is that we see battles from people across the globe to assign numbers (different numbers!) to players before they have numbers. I don't understand what the motivation is, there must be some game where they gain advantage by setting the player numbers. A secondary game is they like

477:

However, as informal as the website may seem (IDK if 'blog' is really appropriate but, don't get me wrong, I see your point) the citations on the website are very much valid. Beckerath and Lepsius are authoritative figures in the hieroglyphic cartouche field (as weirdly specific of a sub...subject of

3546:

Bmorrow is being a jerk. It happens. That will cost him during some future conflict. For example, EdJohnston cut you a break in a recent trip to ANI, largely because Ed looked at your history and decided you weren't being malicious. If BMorrow does something that brings him up to a similar forum, he

3234:

I'm sorry about that. I'll try to keep things more organized if I can. But that's my point--there's a lot of evidence against Brady as there is for him, so we should not be giving him undue credit. Am I the only one who feels this is being done by a massive hype train? Knowledge can't fall victim to

3015:

I don't know if EdJohnston is going to directly intervene on the article, but I do know the admins have talked about the problem presented by the polarization seen in Brady's editors. I suppose someone could report Footballeditor3 to ANI, which would probably result in a block because of his refusal

3011:

Well, life is unfair. But in more detail, probably because Footballeditor3 hadn't reached his current levels of "I'm gonna keep at it" until after Bagumba decided to leave the article. That sometimes happens - Admins burn out too, and this particular case was one where Bagumba stepped back and asked

2867:

But it was true the pats vs the colts, that the pats won the game. That they only allowed 7 points. That the balls were deflated. That Brady was given a four game suspension, that Belichick denied any involvement. Crazy. U can maybe say “the info didn’t fit their” maybe I shouldn’t have put it their

2539:

Maybe we should just let Kvaalin cry himself out on talk page without too much response (even though it's supposed to be for discussing the article, not for inventing and reviewing WP:OR). If he actually tries to put anything uncited on the main page (or cited, but crap) it will get reverted either

748:

We're actually in agreement regarding making sure numbers are official before adding them to roster templates. I'm mentioning unofficial sources (players' Twitter accounts, for instance) in the talk page just to mention that those number claims are out there, while also making sure they aren't added

679:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

3302:

Very few editors are focussed on one article - I just looked, I have somewhat over 1700 pages on my watchlist. And I'm relatively tame, I know some editors whose watchlists go well into five figures. That means, like most editors, that if I spend more than a minute or two on Brady, I'm not doing my

2430:

I'm looking at your comment on the reversion you made to the Tom Brady article. I'm not sure why you chose to revert the user's edits. Your reasoning, "The reality is that this is vandalism-bait while he's still playing. It's subjective ("many"), we'd need a specific reference stating just how many

1724:

Yeah, I made no jokes in my response and I meant everything that I said. I'm just looking out for you both; I don't want things to turn heated and nasty like I see happen with other users on Knowledge. Just keep civil, and understand that messages and notifications are going to be left on your user

1085:

Depths of earthquakes are always reported as depths beneath the theoretical sphere of sea level. This periodically results in disconcerting numbers (such as in the current Kilauea eruption), where negative depths are reported (they aren't above the ground, they are above sea level). If you find the

722:

A copy? You do realize that it's a template on Knowledge, right? I'm merely notifying you as well, since you violated the three-revert rule. You continue to engage in hypocritical behavior. Furthermore, you want to know what's "meaningless"? The fact that you left that ridiculous message on my

200:

Tarl, I'm pretty sure you meant a lower case "e" in the space elevator talk page link you made on Dir70's talk page. The talk page with upper case "E" leads to something confusing. Normally, changing what someone else says on a talk page is very very bad manners. But I did it anyway for expedience

2751:

In general, a century ago, the big issue was "non-black" - one drop of sub-saharan African blood made someone "colored". Even octoroons who were visually indistinguishable from pure Europeans were considered non-white. Amerindian and oriental heritage was less of an issue, noting that major league

2548:

something new. He's got some issues that we can't manage by telling him "No" on the talk page. That just results in more of the same endlessly repeated drama. We're getting dirty fighting a pig who likes it. Maybe we should let it run around in its sty all it wants instead of trying to hold it

2519:

C'est la vie. I don't know what Kvaalen's background is, but I have repeatedly butted heads against him on this type of issue. I'm reminded of the comment about four types of officer: intersection of {energetic, lazy} axis with {competent, incompetent} axis. The first couple of times I pointed out

1840:

Neither the surface gravity on earth nor the surface gravity on the moon are precise values; they both vary by considerably more than the difference between 0.166 and 1/6th. If you read the sentence before the one you modified, it says exactly that, and provides a map showing the variations on the

1347:

Also, there are only two S-IVBs at KSC, 514 and 209 (I've seen both in person). 514 is part the display Saturn V, while 209 is on the Saturn IB at the visitors center. The Saturn V page contradicts itself with that (it says both 514 and 500F are on display at KSC, which simply isn't true). It also

1296:

Tarl edits were made to the page Deerfield Beach Island because it does not exist. There is no such geographical location recognised by any city, county, state, or country. Deerfield Beach is located in that area with Boca Raton and Hillsboro Beach. Lighthouse point is not part of that area, it is

1030:

Tarl_N., thanks (I'm new at this), but there is a problem with the way the epicenter of the earthquake is described as being "at an underwater depth of approximately 29 km..." because it implies the earthquake was 29 km "underwater," when, technically, it was 24.4 km beneath the seafloor. And this

882:

My sincere apologies, again. I made a bad assumption. I've seen other people (e.g., SummerPhDv2.0) get screwed by losing their credentials, I was under the assumption there was less that could be done about it than you are suggesting. I remember your RFA (where, ironically, your username became an

866:

I apologize for being a bit curt, but that whole "NinjaRobotPirate isn't a checkuser, and he even if he were, he isn't even allowed to offer to help you" came out of nowhere. I'm trying to help someone here, and I don't really like having to argue about whether I'm allowed to even make the offer.

3373:

I'll note that I've been considerably more verbose than usual in this discussion here - that's because it's a conversation directed at a single individual, rather than to a group. If this were a wide-ranging discussion on an article talk page, you'd see more than a day between edits, and each one

2461:

You misunderstood the "vandalism bait". People who dislike Brady, seeing that comment, are likely to do things like change "greatest QB" to "greatest cheater" (this is an empirical statement, having observed the process in action). While he's actively playing (and associated with "Darth Hoodie"),

1697:

If you read the top of this talk page, it states that when I respond to a comment on my talk page, I will leave a talkback on yours. As for Oshwah joking, he's an administrator, and he doesn't joke about threats on Wiki. It's something that is taken very seriously on Knowledge. As for the general

3668:

I was being polite. It was an unnecessary edit and actually incorrect. As is, the sentence specifies what is nearest to what. Your change (from "nearest to sun" to "nearest after sun") removed the explicit declaration and made it implicit (presumably to "us") and added an unnecessary complexity.

564:

I get where you're coming from, although far flimsier sources have passed without problem here. I think this is as good of a source as we're going to get until it's made official in May, generally when minicamp starts. Not worth starting an edit war over this, but I'm fairly certain I'll just be

216:

Indeed, that page shouldn't even exist. I've nominated it for deletion. Thanks for fixing it. For the record, the proper way to deal with something like that is to add a comment below indicating what the correct link should have been. Alternatively, if you feel it absolutely needs to be fixed in

3328:

Yeah, true. My view is that if Montana vs Brady is still debateable, and there are many people supporting both sides, then Brady doesn't deserve to have the GOAT label on his article because all this time, that honor could have gone to Montana's article. And if Brady doesn't deserve to have the

2085:

Brady won the AFC Championship Game, which means he will make his ninth appearance in the Super Bowl. I looked at the Crystal Ball guideline you linked, and I don't see how that applies. Are you saying that noting that violates that guideline until the game actually starts? I mean, this is not

815:

The problem is that I have no idea what you are referring to. "There's a video" doesn't help me, you need to be somewhat more specific. I don't watch every video ever created by every football player on every team. We need citations, which we can refer to. Does the video say "these numbers are

699:

A direct copy of the warning I left on your talk page is meaningless. It's to notify you about a policy, and since I notified you about it, there's no point it telling me about it. The only requirement for the warning is that before I reported you to the edit warring noticeboard, I had to have

1640:'s revert of your recent edits, nor do I see anything wrong with the edit summaries he left when he did so. Please do not engage in the hostile use of words by telling him that he "better stop watching you" - this kind of word use and tone begins to set the discussion toward the path of being 518:

If you have access to Beckerath and Lepsius, and you are willing to cite from them directly (chapter and verse, or page and section), you can do so. But you cannot cite from a evanescent single-author web page. A year down the road, after that user has taken down his web page, a future editor

2498:

in my list of comments. But, I "redacted" it from my draft because I figured it was blindingly obvious to them and they surely would know it already. I didn't want to upset the new peace. But also, I thought it would be better in my/our back pocket(!). And, Klavn is a sensitive boy. He

1682:

And why are you writing something onto my talk page although I wrote you please don't write anything there? And Oshwah is obviously joking (I'm just telling not to watch me please) and didn't see Tarl's previous edits on my talk page and in the comments. The use of Twinkle and Huggle is an

1517:

You're telling me the point differential has to be cited? All I had to do was look at the standings to find that out! You mean I have to put THAT as a citation? GRRR! This is frustrating. Can't people look at it for themselves? It's not rocket science! But whatever, I'll take a look at it.

142:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2492:"5) It would be hard to justify a complex integration done by an editor as not being WP:OR, as the ease of making mistakes has been demonstrated. Even if an integration/refactoring was indeed done right, the verification of it, by discussion among editors, is exactly what's done 2933:

I would suggest adding a comment on your own talk page (perhaps below my comment), expressing contrition and your intent to avoid edit warring again. If you put it on your talk page, add a {{ping|Bagumba}}, so he notices your apology. Alternatively, you could put your apology on

1225: 2692:

Can't speak to Italians. I grew up in Mexico and have spent some time reading writings from the Conquista and New Spain eras (i.e., pre-Hidalgo), so wanted to mention that I didn't see the fixation on skin color we ended up with in the 'states. The "Casta" system with

1480:

What do you mean, I needed sources? I get the somewhat flowery writing, but most of the info I put on there didn't need to be cited. There's something called observation and comparison. In fact, I calculated the 2007 New York Giants' strength of victory all by myself.

1977:

make the conversion to other units. So it would be something like "500 km (310 mi)". But in any case, astronomical objects are generally measured in km, there is no need to convert to miles. That discussion is the one which should take place on the article talk page.

2434:

You might have had a point if the user wrote, "Tom Brady is the greatest QB of all time." That is semi-vandalism. More than anything, please do not throw around the term "vandalism" lightly. That is not an ethical way to edit Knowledge articles and debate changes.

1657:

Indeed, I did mistake the edit to Extreterrestrial skies, I thought you were adding "the asteroid". That one is correct. The rest of your edits, though, were wrong. We don't need "anything and anybody" in an encyclopedia. As for watching, that's what patrollers do.

3626:

Oh yeah, true. Remember how everyone seems to think that getting the last word means they're right? And ah, the days of recess. Those were the DAYS, weren't they?! Right?! RIGHT? XD Man, you got me all nostalgic. We all wish we were elementary schoolers, don't we?

3293:

What I want is a sentence that is precise and verifiable to a citation. Tomorrow, I'll probably add a comment about "consider" being incorrect, because it is present tense, whereas what we do is document the past (maybe they considered, we don't know if they still

1272:

For what it's worth, I'm on a semester-long wikibreak. I only rarely edit, probably not getting to check my watchlist more than a couple of times a week. Among other things, I'm dealing with what I'll need to do to start a PhD, so my time available has decreased.

425:

for being uncited — when in fact most of them were very clearly cited. I've undone the edits that removed cited information, if something never had a citation (which, admittedly, none of the infoboxes you reverted did) then I kept them reverted as they really

2503:

defend himself against the slightest of perceived slights, as he does with his walls-o-text. I figured not mentioning that particular elephant in the room (integrations being OR) for now could help keep everyone in the present more-cooperative spirit.

482:

accurate and widely cited and supported by other sources (most notably, though not really good to use as a citation, I've seen pictures on Commons of multiple cartouches and they all match as far as I've seen) 17:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC) (unsigned)

3750:

Tarl, EK made another wall of the same old OR. I wonder if it should be completely ignored and maybe he'll stop trying to goad us into enabling his sad and lonely psychological needs. I'll take my cues from you (I'll ignore it if you do).

3547:

probably won't get as much slack. The best thing you can do is develop a thick skin - there are obnoxious people all over WP. In the particular sequence on Brady, I would have answered that comment in one line something to the effect of "See

2752:

baseball players had dark-skinned players who were described as Mexican, long before they had players who were specifically black. But it all varied depending on the location and specific era, and I'm certainly not an expert on it. Regards,

934:, really is a long sequence of unhelpful edits. Hopefully the block at least gets their attention, it feels like they may well be entirely well-intentioned but seriously not helping. Let me know if you notice this individual reappearing. ~ 224:. The theory underlying that form of changing talk page comments is that someone may have already read (and in this case possibly bookmarked) the text, and needs to know what changed out from under him without looking at the edit history. 842:. He was referring to the nameplate above the players' lockers, which shows their numbers. The video also shows Allen receiving his #17 jersey and Edmunds picking #49. (And the roster page on the team site now lists all numbers anyway.) 3063:

No, just edit normally. But before reverting anything, think it over, and make sure you aren't engaging in an edit war. A 1st revert, explained calmly, isn't an issue. A 2nd revert starts to be an issue. There is a policy

1428:

Hi Tarl, I received it as a gift and read the original version in the original language (the thesis). I did not see any COI just be cause I read it before the english version. MOreover what is wrong with the reference?

1950:. The value given was 500 km. You must work with that value, not come up with a new value which produces 500 in the convert template. And you need to check the grammar, which you got wrong. You have been reverted, per 3256:

Yup. The issue we should be discussing is not whether there is evidence Montana is greater than Brady (or not), but how we deal with the sentence in the lead. You need to learn how to do more with less. Some rules of

1550:

Look, pal, I'm just following what I see on the page, okay? If you read the articles, they have the same stuff throughout. All I'm doing is staying consistent. Look at the playoff section of the 2007 season article.

3187:

Recentism is the underlying issue, it's the reason so much passion attaches and we see edit wars to support one view or another. My two issues are the specifics of the statement made (make sure we don't engage in

2259:. Second off, you don't get to make article importance evaluations. Whether something is top importance or mid importance is a decision voted on elsewhere, not simply set by someone who wants a higher evaluation. 1239: 1227: 2120:

I suspect we differ on what "almost certain to take place" means. A lunar eclipse in May 2021 is almost certain to take place. My waking up tomorrow is likely, but falls short of the standard "almost certain".

2101:

This is speculative. He might break a leg. He might accidentally utter a racial or sexual slur and be banned. He has not made his 9th appearance. He has an invite, whether he actually attends is still unknown.

3555:

Don't personalize it." I'd have left it at that, and just kept in mind that other editors remember such interactions. At this point, the discussion is over, the rest just comes across as recess-time taunting.

378:

The New England Patriots really were the fifth defending Super Bowl champion to lose in the next season's Super Bowl. They joined the 1978 Cowboys, the 1983 Redskins, the 1997 Packers, and the 2014 Seahawks.

1779:

And while I'm at it, allow me to convey my apology to 212.186.15.191 - I let myself get irritated, and my crankiness clearly showed on that talk page. I was less polite than I should have been. My regrets,

1436: 3855:

My suggestion would be to ask at that website if they have a picture they are willing to allow being used by Knowledge, which generally means they allow free use of the image. You might also try reading

519:

maintaining that article has to have access to the sources cited, and we have to have confidence that the source isn't just a single author claiming stuff (which means an editorial process). Please read

2935: 2520:

where he had made mistakes, but after a while with endless walls of text, I gave up on that. At this point, I'm down to simply checking that what he says matches a RS, and if it doesn't, I complain.

154:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2809:

Want you to know all my sources and info was true. He did deflate balls. He knew about it. All what I said there was fact. Just want you to know muchacho, maybe your sources aren’t reliable Chico

2462:

there are a huge number of people who fall into the category of disliking him. As a pragmatic measure, we shouldn't be adding things that invite what they think of as "appropriate retaliation".

2832:. The debate on the deflategate article has been ongoing since inception, and Knowledge has standards on how this is handled. Just blasting random chunks of your opinion into biographies (see 1262: 2911:

Okay, but as one last thing, can you tell them I'm sorry for any mistakes I may have made and if I rubbed them the wrong way? I'm sorry if I acted a little heated all that time. Thanks.

2848:. The absence of that, is by itself, sufficient reason to immediately remove the change. In this particular case, the blatantly partisan viewpoint and poor formatting made it mandatory. 1344:, and he knows far more about historical spaceflight than I ever will. The original source in the article is the only one I've ever seen that says that S-IVB-500F in on display at KSC. 3432:

and move on. Leaving it alone for a day is probably best, that leaves his comment as the most visible for a longer time, letting more people notice it (which reflects on him, not you).

170: 1340:

The sources that I linked to are reliable. One source (James (Lockheed)) got the information he provided from people at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. The other, Ed Kyle, runs

791:

Go look at the video of Allen and Edmunds 1st day as Bills on BuffaloBills.com and you'll clearly see the NUmbers I edited on those players lockers. I wouldn't change them blindly

534:, which I'm sure you're well aware of). It's next to impossible to have a conversation when I don't know whether the person talking is the same person I was talking with yesterday. 3016:

to participate on the talk page and willingness to declare that he intends to keep on warring. I don't recommend you try it, though, you're on thin ice and could get measured for

2697:(cleanliness of blood) was inherently racist in that your ancestors mattered (and were believed to dominate your behaviour), but this originated in anti-Jewish sentiment from the 1954:, you must discuss this on the article talk page before proceeding. I feel the conversion to miles is unnecessary, and that discussion should take place on the article talk page. 2572:), so we will eventually have to revert. At that point, the discussion will probably continue on ANI. I know some of the admins have gotten tired of him, we'll see what happens. 3329:

label, then we shouldn't be putting it on there. The original statement is both necessary and sufficient. To the contrary, the GOAT label is sufficient, but it's not necessary.

1150: 487: 1973:

Let me be more precise in the complaint about using 310 miles in the conversion template. If a source says 500 km, the article should specify the value the source gives, and

2648:

I can definitely see what you mean about the birthdates. I just was trying to be more accurate, but for kids of stars you don’t need all of that. Thanks for letting me know.

1621:

the term. And please, don't write anything onto my talk page, let's talk here if you wanna, but better you stop watching me. Some of your comments are nonsense or evil. --

1444: 3136:

is going to come under the microscope themselves when the entire incident is examined. It's not unusual to see incidents resolved as "both reporter and target blocked".

2308: 1469: 3716:

Thank you for your message. I am now creating Article about nomad Barista Coffee and it will be complete within minute for introduction. Thank you for your advice!

3370:

syndrome, and by participating in one, one loses credibility. Hence my comment about dialing it back. You're new, you'll need to get used to the way things are done.

1034:

Saying 29 km underwater is misleading, and anyway, the deepest depth of the ocean (the Marianas Trench) is only 11 km. CloudioOU (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

2357: 3012:

for other Admins to handle your case. He could have blocked you directly, but given the situation he did the professional thing and let someone else look at it.

2338: 2988: 188: 1702:. When one of your edits is reverted, for whatever reason, the next step is to discuss it on the article's talk page, not simply re-revert. Please also read 2701:(recovery of Spain from the Moors) rather than skin color. Spaniards of the time were more likely to self-identify as Christian than as a racial category. 2662: 2407: 1758:, which is disruptive and not allowed on Knowledge. Please avoid repeatedly reverting articles in a back-and-forth manner with other editors; you need to 3271:

Rule of thumb is that persuasiveness is roughly related to the inverse of text length. The more you write, the less effective you are to a wide audience.

2938:. Explain something like given time to reflect, you understand the problem. Keep it to a couple of lines, any longer than that won't be read. Good luck! 2732: 2679: 910: 547: 499: 103: 3461:

I have a bad feeling I'm triggering him. I haven't been a paragon of virtue throughout this whole thing, you know. Am I doing anything wrong aside from

3443:

When one person is being derisive, and the other keeps to business and ignores the insults, it makes a telling difference in perception. Which matters.

816:

assigned to these players", or does it show a player picking up a jersey, or does it show a player saying to nobody in particular "I'd like number nn"?

839: 3428:. It's perfectly obvious to the old timers reading the comments. Best thing to do with that kind of comment is to either ignore it or briefly mention 3336: 2964: 2649: 2611: 1448: 987: 883:

item of discussion), and thought your adminship was more recent than it was, so becoming a checkuser already was unlikely. A bad mistake on my part.

397:

on the form that comment takes. In particular, the list of five other teams has nothing to do with this Superbowl. Please discuss this issue there.

1440: 1298: 3192:

from biased sources such as google searches), and the pragmatic issue that even implying GOAT status in Knowledge's voice will attract vandalism.

980:

I don't edit Knowledge often, so I am unfamiliar with the procedure. I updated my website to reflect that the resonance probably does not exist.

896: 2994: 2786: 1415: 638:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 3702: 3682: 2072: 1922: 1900: 1854: 1835: 1719: 3628: 3596: 3581: 3541: 3525: 3481: 3466: 3415: 3400: 3357: 3342: 3251: 3236: 3182: 3167: 3127: 3112: 3058: 3043: 3006: 2958: 2928: 2912: 2533: 2442: 2272: 1692: 1652: 1566: 1552: 1519: 1482: 1217: 464: 761: 365: 351: 239: 3814:. I would assume these are free content, but Knowledge's copyright rules are complex and I'm inexperienced. What's the best way to proceed? 2900: 2861: 2765: 2714: 851: 780: 3265:

If you write stuff in the middle of a discussion (responding to a sub-paragraph way above the current end), it's likely nobody will read it.

2642: 1019: 594: 3846: 2585: 1891:

Yes, but to write "16.6 % (1/6)" is a lie because 16.6 % isn't 1/6. So better to write "...(about 1/6)". Nothing would be wrong with that.

1326: 1103: 876: 615: 410: 3687:

It was not incorrect. It claimed the Sun to not be a star, which it is. It's better to be slightly more complex than outright incorrect.

2720:

But in the United States and Europe are Spaniards considered by others as white? In Belgium (I am originally from there) I would say yes.

829: 732: 713: 3760: 3636: 3614: 3589: 3575: 3500: 3474: 3456: 3408: 3387: 3350: 3316: 3244: 3205: 3175: 3149: 3120: 3103: 3081: 3051: 2980: 2951: 2475: 2300: 2278: 2245: 2202: 2177: 2134: 2115: 2003:

Hi, yeah, I can change my username. And nop, my account is not for spam. I have no relation with any of the sources I add on wikipedia.

1991: 1596: 1574: 1560: 1545: 1527: 1509: 1199: 1170: 1129: 3877: 3860:(Knowledge:Image use policy), which describes the constraints on images we can use. Once you are sure you have rights to an image, then 2238: 1793: 1745: 1671: 1644:. Please remain positive and open-minded in your comments and discussions, and work things out peacefully with other users. Thank you - 3090:. What's going on in the Brady article right now is classic battleground behavior. Admins tend to use heavy hammers when this happens. 1774: 1025: 969: 122: 2277:

I note that this isn't the first time I've warned you on editing importance templates on Super Bowl LIII. The last time you did this:

1192: 1617:

You undid several of my edits and gave a wrong description. You have to look precisely, e.g. Quaoar is no asteroid and this is why I

740: 530:

As for you, with your multiple changing IP addresses, all of them in Brooklyn, please create an account and use it (and only it, see

2965:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Mk8mlby_reported_by_User:Bagumba_(Result:_Warned)

2321: 495: 1306: 115: 1392: 3741: 2028:

Sorry I'm still learning how to use wikipedia, I thought I could delete it after having requested a change in username. Cheers.

807: 574: 3562:. That was a really sad situation, where an editor evidently felt unable to let someone else have the last word. It cost him. 2050: 2022: 439: 3662: 1388: 1359: 647: 3023:

I'm going to give it a couple of days, and if nobody suggests anything better, I'll try my compromise and see what happens.

1630: 1146: 950: 332: 3694: 3654: 2877: 2818: 2046: 2018: 1892: 1827: 1684: 1622: 254: 210: 184: 3823: 3290:

What Bagumba wants is to have a sentence in the lead which reflects wide opinion, whether that opinion is deserved or not.

2887:

make edits to a biography without having a reliable source citation for what you are adding. Do not try to add that back.

2657: 2619: 2513: 2454: 2419: 2386: 1068: 3789: 3166:

means don't let recent hype impact what Knowledge says, right? The whole Tom Brady issue essentially comes down to this.

2505: 2415: 2349: 2230: 1751: 1184: 431: 387: 2568:

Yup. My experience is that he will take silence as assent (which is the general characteristic of anyone who resorts to

922: 246: 202: 111: 3533: 3036: 2920: 2600: 2562: 1841:

moon. It already has established in that sentence that the value is an approximation. So the change is inappropriate.

3735: 2224: 1967: 1490: 859: 672: 491: 3435:

Tomorrow, I might add a comment suggesting to him to tone it down, and mention those policies. The key comment from

745:

Just making sure there's no ambiguity regarding unofficial numbers for sources, as I'm mentioning in the talk page.

693: 2667:

And the rest of southern Europe? With the immigration of Italians the American people did not consider them white.

995: 2219: 2151: 2095: 1286: 3731: 2798: 1257: 1178: 1090:

careful to not cite an obsolete source - the edit I reverted showed a NASA reference which was clearly obsolete.

1049: 269: 180: 3487:

be said. Try to avoid repeating anything you've said before. Note, not saying anything is perfectly acceptable.

999: 2794: 1291: 1240:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League#Suspended players (for apparently the third or fourth time)

1228:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League#Suspended players (for apparently the third or fourth time)

803: 639: 3653:

No, the edit was not a test. I had provided an explanation, I've no idea how it could be perceived as a test.

3601:

You probably are triggering in the sense that he needs to have the last word. Let him, it makes him look bad.

2450: 1355: 1213: 902: 786: 3864:

will tell you how to go about uploading it - or you can ping me again, I've done that part before. Regards,

3399:

Is it just me, or is Bmorrow151 being a huge jerk? I want him to calm down, but I don't seem to be helping.

1113:

M 9.1 - near the east coast of Honshu, Japan 2011-03-11 05:46:24 UTC 38.297°N 142.373°E 29.0 km depth

1086:

description incorrect, fix the description, not the numbers. In this case, the numbers are correct. And be

655: 430:

uncited. Be more attentive in the future, make sure what you remove for being uncited is actually uncited.

163: 2344:

Tarl N., Thanks for the notice about this matter on DRN. I did pipe in. I also notice that Kvaalen did

650:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

3580:

I'm asking because I want to be sure I'm not triggering anyone or horsing around in ways I shouldn't be.

3111:

essentially says don't complain about other people's mistakes if you've done just as bad as them, right?

659: 559: 175: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1198:

If it wasn't you, then someone else using the same IP address as you, within minutes of your edits did:

3797: 3698: 3287:

You've made your position clear, and nobody really disputes it - Brady vs. Montana is still debateable.

2042: 2014: 872: 38: 2963:

Actually, I just noticed that as I was typing in the above, your case got closed with a warning. Read

3520:

Am I the only one who's being relentlessly attacked by someone, or am I just throwing an ill-advised

2496:. Thus, it literally bears real hallmarks of real research! We need to be very careful about that." 2425: 2411: 1384: 860: 667: 608: 601: 1313:

Responded on the user's talk page where the conversation started. Take it to the article talk page.

3658: 1896: 1831: 1688: 1626: 1532:

Mk8mlyb, please read the yellow box on the top of this page. Again, I'll answer on your talk page.

2509: 2362: 2353: 2234: 1823: 1332: 1188: 435: 416: 3836:

Indeed, Knowledge's copyright rules are complex, and the fact that something is downloadable is

2985:

One thing I don't understand. Why me? I'm just one of the guys involved in this thing. Why does

1109:

Further, the reference you cite above specifies a depth of 29 km. Very top of the page, it says:

3765: 3087: 2804: 2605: 2334: 1997: 991: 916: 651: 635: 373: 361: 328: 259: 250: 206: 107: 3284:

when putting references on a talk page, so you get a block with them near where they are made.

3235:

those. But to be fair, from your perspective, do I look to be backing Montana a bit too much?

1348:

says further down that 514 is part of the Saturn V on display, and quotes a source from NASA.

928: 3727: 3648: 3333:

what I'm trying to say, but I can't stop running my mouth because I'm too busy fighting with

2906: 2873: 2814: 2728: 2675: 2281: 1423: 1045: 868: 847: 757: 195: 151: 2936:

WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Mk8mlby_reported_by_User:Bagumba_(Result:_)

3719: 3690: 3462: 3367: 3274:

Note, references are an exception, because they are out of the main line of text. Do add a

2790: 2782: 2653: 2615: 2569: 2438: 2403: 2034: 2006: 1612: 1475: 1380: 1371: 1037: 983: 570: 162:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1360:

https://www.drewexmachina.com/2016/09/23/the-saturn-500f-the-moon-rocket-that-couldnt-fly/

8: 3871: 3785: 3756: 3676: 3608: 3569: 3521: 3494: 3450: 3381: 3310: 3199: 3163: 3143: 3108: 3097: 3075: 3030: 3017: 2974: 2945: 2894: 2855: 2759: 2708: 2636: 2596: 2579: 2558: 2527: 2481: 2469: 2446: 2394: 2382: 2294: 2266: 2196: 2171: 2128: 2109: 2066: 2038: 2010: 1985: 1961: 1916: 1848: 1787: 1713: 1665: 1590: 1539: 1503: 1463: 1409: 1320: 1302: 1280: 1251: 1164: 1123: 1097: 1013: 963: 890: 823: 774: 707: 643: 588: 541: 458: 404: 394: 383: 345: 314: 291: 233: 221: 1729:

responds to you here. He's doing this to be courteous to you; the notifications are for

217:

place, use strikeout to cover the incorrect text and the insert the correct text. E.g.,

3857: 3811: 3711: 1069:

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20110311054624120_30#shakemap

799: 728: 689: 622: 3268:

If you write more than 2-3 lines, most readers will probably only skim what you write.

2142:

Indeed we do differ on that. Perhaps we should start a discussion on the talk page...

3861: 3632: 3585: 3529: 3470: 3404: 3346: 3240: 3171: 3116: 3047: 2916: 2776:

Hey, I made a couple comments on the spygate page. Would you please check them out?

2330: 2215: 2147: 2091: 2080: 1570: 1556: 1523: 1486: 1267: 1209: 357: 324: 138: 47: 17: 1737:

and give others the benefit of the doubt in cases where the intent isn't clear. :-)

752:

I'm sorry if I've caused any confusion. Thanks for helping keep the roster correct.

3819: 3278: 3132:

Essentially correct. More accurate would be to say anyone reporting an incident on

2869: 2810: 2740: 2724: 2687: 2671: 843: 753: 147: 3524:? Have you been on the other end of someone's barrage of insults and accusations? 2777: 1031:

info, BTW, does come from the U.S. Geological Survey (which I should have cited):

684:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 421:

You reverted a number of edits to pages for certain Roman Emperors made by the IP

3774: 3429: 3421: 3189: 2771: 2252: 1906: 723:

page, thinking you have the power to block me. You're really full of yourself.

566: 646:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3802:

Hi Tarl, and thanks for your recent assistance! I would like to add a photo to

3781: 3752: 3723: 2829: 2825: 2592: 2554: 2378: 2326: 1244: 1140: 1080: 1041: 676: 531: 379: 159: 3840:

sufficient to mean that wikipedia has rights to use the image. The key point:

3548: 3436: 3425: 3133: 3065: 2833: 2626: 2371: 2284: 2256: 1951: 1947: 1763: 1734: 1703: 1699: 1641: 1580: 795: 724: 685: 155: 3865: 3743: 3670: 3621: 3602: 3563: 3488: 3444: 3394: 3375: 3323: 3304: 3229: 3193: 3158: 3137: 3091: 3069: 3024: 2968: 2939: 2888: 2849: 2845: 2753: 2702: 2630: 2573: 2521: 2463: 2288: 2260: 2211: 2190: 2184: 2165: 2159: 2143: 2122: 2103: 2087: 2060: 1979: 1955: 1910: 1842: 1781: 1759: 1755: 1726: 1707: 1659: 1637: 1584: 1533: 1497: 1457: 1403: 1314: 1274: 1205: 1158: 1117: 1091: 1007: 975: 957: 884: 817: 768: 701: 582: 535: 524: 520: 452: 448: 398: 339: 308: 283: 225: 3845:: You can prove that the copyright holder has released the image under an 1356:

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=6263.msg104353#msg104353

3831: 3815: 3803: 2625:

Didn't notice it. I just noticed your additions, and wanted to point out

1767: 1738: 1645: 447:

Uncited includes meaningless citations; citations only count if they are

634:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

166:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3559: 1733:, not Tarl N.'s. Don't be so quick to interpret messages as hostility; 935: 478:

a field as it may sound), and I double-checked the citations, and they

2723:

And the rest of southern Europe? (Portuguese, Italians, Greeks, etc.)

2399:

Totally agree on your revert of the AAA battery name (Micro <-: -->

3807: 129: 2993:

and the others get away with everything else? That's just not fair.

1341: 3363:

I can't stop running my mouth because I'm too busy fighting with...

627: 2320:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

99:

sorry about the confusion - you are of course correct. thank you.

675:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 201:

and because it was minor. I'm hoping that was okay with you.

169:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1822:

Alright, I forgive you both. But please correct the phrase in

1456:

Answered on the IP's talk page, where the discussion started.

3810:, and has two downloadable photos there on a webpage labeled 2883:

That discussion is on the deflategate page. Regardless, you

2610:

Is there a reason you left the birthdate of his oldest son?

2313: 1583:, I'll assume some problem in understanding the yellow box. 1496:

Answered on user's talk page, where the discussion started.

618:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1565:

Hey! I put some sources on both articles. Is that enough?

1725:

talk page. Otherwise, you won't be notified at all when

1372:

https://www.johnweeks.com/spacecraft/saturn_v_ksc_3.html

1155:

The data below are NOT the most preferred data available

2329:. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 2229:

Listen to me That Should be top performance you Idiot.

666:

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being

150:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3042:

Do I just lay low and limit myself to the talk pages?

2549:

still. Should we only worry if it jumps the fence? (

2544:

the talk page up with evidence of all the work he did

1698:

issue of reverting your edits, please read the policy

3366:

you credibility. Knowledge editors really resent the

2400:

Micro Mignon). I just had a wrong reference. Cheers.

658:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 264:

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated

2309:

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

393:Absolutely. But there is an ongoing discussion on 1363: 3225:(response to "Issues with current wording" post) 2540:right away or in due course -- and he will have 642:to work toward making a version that represents 3374:would only be a couple of lines long. Regards, 2280:, and you promptly claimed you hadn't done it: 1367: 682:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 2836:) is unacceptable. Something you should note, 2164:Sounds like the right idea. I'll do that now. 451:. That website is essentially someone's blog. 2663:And nowadays Spaniards are considered white? 1579:Again, responding on user's talk page. With 523:on what is acceptable - anything outside of 3806:, a living orchestra conductor. She has a 3553:Comment on content, not on the contributor. 3441:Comment on content, not on the contributor. 3558:An example of what can happen when things 2348:notify me when he posted it. Hmmmm... 1238:You are invited to join the discussion at 607:Hello, Tarl N.. You have new messages at 2377:Thank you for your time and assistance! 2322:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 1183:I Did Not do that Super Bowl LIII Page 14: 1437:2804:14d:1a87:1102:d980:5ddb:8aba:cd64 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1760:discuss disputes and issues properly 139:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 25: 3420:He's being a newbie, and violating 23: 2868:but it was all reliable muchacho. 2312: 2244:Evidently this is in reference to 1026:2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami 956:Will do. Thanks for blocking him. 626: 600: 123:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 24: 3889: 3086:I should mention another policy, 1826:because 1/6 is more than 16.6 %. 1754:on your user talk page regarding 1342:http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/ 741:Clarification on Patriots numbers 700:notified you. Both are done now. 3773: 2370: 1364:https://en.wikipedia.org/SA-500F 1233: 749:to the template until official. 128: 29: 2283:. You're pushing the limits of 1946:I also reverted your change to 1402:Responded on user's talk page. 671:—especially if you violate the 173:and submit your choices on the 2059:Comments on user's talk page. 1449:06:45, 27 December 2018‎ (UTC) 1368:https://en.wikipedia.org/S-IVB 1062: 1006:Answered on user's talk page. 907:Thanks for your AIV report of 136:Hello, Tarl N.. Voting in the 116:19:39, 5 September 2017‎ (UTC) 13: 1: 3465:that I need to keep in mind? 2799:21:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC) 2766:18:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC) 2733:10:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC) 2715:07:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC) 2680:07:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC) 2658:17:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 2643:16:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 2620:07:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 2601:05:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 2586:05:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 2563:05:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 2534:22:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 2514:22:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 2476:06:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC) 2455:06:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC) 1470:18:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC) 1416:03:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC) 1393:22:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC) 1327:03:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC) 1307:03:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC) 565:doing this again in a month. 411:23:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC) 388:23:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC) 275:You are encouraged to change 255:02:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 240:16:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 211:06:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 152:Knowledge arbitration process 2420:12:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 2387:05:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 2358:10:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 2339:06:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 2301:19:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC) 2273:18:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC) 2239:15:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC) 2220:02:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 2203:00:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 2178:00:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 2152:00:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 2135:06:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC) 2116:06:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC) 2096:06:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC) 2073:06:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 2051:06:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 2023:04:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 1992:15:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1968:15:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1923:15:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1901:15:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1855:15:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1836:15:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1794:08:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1775:08:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1746:08:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1720:08:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1693:08:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1672:07:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1653:07:51, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1631:07:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 1597:05:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1575:05:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1561:05:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1546:04:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1528:04:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1510:04:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1491:04:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 366:02:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC) 352:20:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC) 333:10:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC) 189:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 7: 1287:21:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC) 1263:21:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC) 1218:20:53, 7 August 2018‎ (UTC) 609:KENGRIFFEY24FAN's talk page 10: 3894: 3761:17:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC) 3736:04:05, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 3703:13:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 3683:19:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC) 3663:14:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC) 3637:03:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC) 3615:03:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC) 3590:03:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC) 3576:03:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC) 3534:02:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC) 3501:02:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3475:02:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3457:02:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3409:02:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3388:01:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3351:01:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3317:00:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3245:00:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 3206:22:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 3176:22:41, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 3150:23:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 3121:23:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 3104:06:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 3082:06:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 3052:06:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 3037:06:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 2995:05:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 2981:00:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 2952:00:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 2921:00:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 2901:02:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 2878:02:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 2862:02:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 2819:02:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1193:00:49, 8 August 2018 (UTC) 733:20:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 714:20:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 694:20:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC) 595:17:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 575:14:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 500:17:29, 6 April 2018‎ (UTC) 181:MediaWiki message delivery 2189:Started. Please discuss. 1636:I see nothing wrong with 1171:06:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 1130:05:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 1104:05:51, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 861:User talk:BatteryIncluded 548:20:42, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 465:21:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 440:18:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 3303:job elsewhere. Regards, 2840:addition to a biography 1020:03:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC) 1000:02:16, 6 July 2018 (UTC) 970:20:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 951:16:32, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 808:21:03, 1 May 2018‎ (UTC) 268:tags, which are causing 3878:19:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 3847:acceptable free license 3824:15:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 3790:17:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC) 2225:Super Bowl LIII Article 1824:Gravitation of the Moon 1179:Super Bowl LIII Article 897:02:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 877:02:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 852:23:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC) 830:00:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 781:00:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 762:00:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 527:is effectively uncited. 2670:Thank you very much. 2317: 1292:Deerfield Beach Island 631: 605: 2316: 903:Thanks for the report 840:the video in question 787:Buffalo Bills Numbers 630: 604: 148:Arbitration Committee 42:of past discussions. 2967:. Take it to heart! 1766:instead. Thanks :-) 1145:Digging further, at 767:We're cool. Thanks, 668:blocked from editing 2551:previously IP...104 2210:Thanks. Will do... 560:Re: Jordan Matthews 395:Talk:Super Bowl LII 222:Talk:Space elevator 219:Talk:Space Elevator 95:Alpha Centauri edit 3798:Image use question 2695:limpieza de sangre 2486:Hi Tarl. Yeah, I 2318: 656:dispute resolution 632: 616:remove this notice 606: 488:2600:387:5:80d::b0 270:Obsolete HTML tags 164:arbitration policy 3808:publicity website 3795: 3794: 3738: 3722:comment added by 3705: 3693:comment added by 3439:to keep in mind: 2801: 2785:comment added by 2457: 2441:comment added by 2426:Tom Brady changes 2422: 2406:comment added by 2392: 2391: 2053: 2037:comment added by 2025: 2009:comment added by 1735:assume good faith 1452: 1396: 1221: 1053: 1040:comment added by 1002: 986:comment added by 811: 673:three-revert rule 503: 119: 92: 91: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Tarl N. 3885: 3874: 3835: 3777: 3770: 3769: 3742:Another wall-of- 3717: 3688: 3679: 3625: 3611: 3600: 3572: 3560:don't go so well 3551:, specifically, 3545: 3497: 3485: 3453: 3419: 3398: 3384: 3361: 3340: 3327: 3313: 3283: 3277: 3255: 3233: 3202: 3186: 3162: 3146: 3131: 3100: 3078: 3062: 3033: 3010: 2992: 2977: 2962: 2948: 2932: 2897: 2858: 2780: 2762: 2744: 2711: 2691: 2639: 2582: 2530: 2472: 2436: 2401: 2374: 2367: 2366: 2297: 2269: 2251:First off, read 2199: 2188: 2174: 2163: 2131: 2112: 2069: 2032: 2004: 1988: 1964: 1919: 1851: 1790: 1771: 1742: 1716: 1668: 1649: 1593: 1542: 1506: 1466: 1451: 1433: 1412: 1395: 1377: 1323: 1283: 1260: 1254: 1247: 1237: 1236: 1220: 1202: 1167: 1144: 1126: 1100: 1084: 1071: 1066: 1035: 1016: 981: 966: 948: 933: 932: 913: 893: 869:NinjaRobotPirate 826: 810: 792: 777: 710: 619: 591: 544: 502: 484: 461: 407: 348: 317: 306: 294: 288: 281: 267: 236: 230: 132: 118: 100: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3893: 3892: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3872: 3843:Freely licensed 3829: 3800: 3768: 3748: 3714: 3677: 3651: 3619: 3609: 3594: 3570: 3539: 3495: 3479: 3451: 3413: 3392: 3382: 3355: 3334: 3321: 3311: 3297: 3281: 3275: 3249: 3227: 3200: 3180: 3156: 3144: 3125: 3098: 3088:WP:BATTLEGROUND 3076: 3056: 3031: 3004: 2989:Footballeditor3 2986: 2975: 2956: 2946: 2926: 2909: 2895: 2856: 2846:reliable source 2807: 2774: 2760: 2738: 2709: 2685: 2665: 2637: 2608: 2580: 2528: 2484: 2470: 2428: 2397: 2365: 2363:A beer for you! 2311: 2295: 2267: 2227: 2197: 2182: 2172: 2157: 2129: 2110: 2083: 2067: 2000: 1986: 1962: 1917: 1907:MOS:UNCERTAINTY 1849: 1788: 1769: 1740: 1714: 1666: 1647: 1615: 1591: 1540: 1504: 1478: 1464: 1434: 1426: 1410: 1381:IanThePineapple 1378: 1335: 1333:SA-500F sources 1321: 1294: 1281: 1270: 1258: 1252: 1245: 1234: 1231: 1203: 1181: 1165: 1138: 1124: 1114: 1098: 1078: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1067: 1063: 1028: 1014: 978: 964: 936: 914: 909: 908: 905: 891: 864: 824: 793: 789: 775: 743: 708: 660:page protection 625: 620: 613: 589: 562: 542: 485: 459: 419: 417:Mistaken undos. 405: 376: 346: 315: 304: 292: 284: 279: 265: 262: 234: 226: 198: 193: 192: 133: 125: 101: 97: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3891: 3881: 3880: 3852: 3851: 3799: 3796: 3793: 3792: 3780:For your work 3778: 3767: 3766:A pie for you! 3764: 3747: 3740: 3713: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3695:188.222.60.185 3655:188.222.60.185 3650: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3556: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3433: 3371: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3288: 3285: 3272: 3269: 3266: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2908: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2865: 2864: 2844:be cited by a 2806: 2805:Bill Belichick 2803: 2773: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2748: 2747: 2718: 2717: 2664: 2661: 2646: 2645: 2607: 2606:Tom Brady Kids 2604: 2589: 2588: 2537: 2536: 2497: 2491: 2483: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2427: 2424: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2375: 2364: 2361: 2343: 2327:Space elevator 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2249: 2226: 2223: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2039:Exoplanetswiki 2030: 2029: 2026: 2011:Exoplanetswiki 1999: 1998:Exoplanetswiki 1996: 1995: 1994: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1893:212.186.15.191 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1828:212.186.15.191 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1762:and come to a 1685:212.186.15.191 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1623:212.186.15.191 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1432:(unsigned) -- 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1354:References 1. 1334: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1293: 1290: 1269: 1266: 1230: 1226:Discussion at 1224: 1223: 1222: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1153:, which notes 1133: 1132: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1073: 1072: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 977: 974: 973: 972: 904: 901: 900: 899: 863: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 833: 832: 788: 785: 784: 783: 742: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 717: 716: 624: 621: 612: 599: 598: 597: 561: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 528: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 470: 469: 468: 467: 418: 415: 414: 413: 375: 374:Super Bowl LII 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 321: 320: 298: 297: 261: 260:Your signature 258: 245:Good points. 243: 242: 197: 194: 171:the candidates 134: 127: 126: 124: 121: 96: 93: 90: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3890: 3879: 3875: 3869: 3868: 3863: 3859: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3848: 3844: 3839: 3833: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3763: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3745: 3739: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3674: 3673: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3649:Re:March 2019 3638: 3634: 3630: 3623: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3606: 3605: 3598: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3567: 3566: 3561: 3557: 3554: 3550: 3543: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3502: 3498: 3492: 3491: 3483: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3463:WP:WALLOFTEXT 3460: 3459: 3458: 3454: 3448: 3447: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3417: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3396: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3379: 3378: 3372: 3369: 3368:WP:WALLOFTEXT 3364: 3359: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3338: 3332: 3325: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3308: 3307: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3280: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3253: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3231: 3226: 3223: 3207: 3203: 3197: 3196: 3191: 3184: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3160: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3147: 3141: 3140: 3135: 3129: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3101: 3095: 3094: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3079: 3073: 3072: 3067: 3060: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3028: 3027: 3021: 3019: 3013: 3008: 2996: 2990: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2972: 2971: 2966: 2960: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2949: 2943: 2942: 2937: 2930: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2907:Re: Tom Brady 2902: 2898: 2892: 2891: 2886: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2863: 2859: 2853: 2852: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2802: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2779: 2767: 2763: 2757: 2756: 2750: 2749: 2742: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2721: 2716: 2712: 2706: 2705: 2700: 2696: 2689: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2668: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2644: 2640: 2634: 2633: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2603: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2587: 2583: 2577: 2576: 2571: 2570:WP:WALLOFTEXT 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2547: 2543: 2535: 2531: 2525: 2524: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506:40.117.60.104 2502: 2495: 2489: 2477: 2473: 2467: 2466: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2432: 2423: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408:185.40.44.207 2405: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350:40.117.60.104 2347: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2323: 2315: 2302: 2298: 2292: 2291: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2264: 2263: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231:68.103.78.155 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2204: 2200: 2194: 2193: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2169: 2168: 2161: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2136: 2132: 2126: 2125: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2107: 2106: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2074: 2070: 2064: 2063: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2027: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2002: 2001: 1993: 1989: 1983: 1982: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1959: 1958: 1953: 1949: 1948:Impact crater 1924: 1920: 1914: 1913: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1856: 1852: 1846: 1845: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1795: 1791: 1785: 1784: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1772: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1752:left a notice 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1711: 1710: 1705: 1701: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1673: 1669: 1663: 1662: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1598: 1594: 1588: 1587: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1537: 1536: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1501: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1471: 1467: 1461: 1460: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1424:mafia sources 1417: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1352: 1351:Thanks, -Ian 1349: 1345: 1343: 1338: 1328: 1324: 1318: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1278: 1277: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1241: 1229: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185:68.103.78.155 1172: 1168: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1142: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1095: 1094: 1089: 1082: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1032: 1021: 1017: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 971: 967: 961: 960: 955: 954: 953: 952: 949: 947: 943: 939: 930: 927: 924: 921: 918: 912: 898: 894: 888: 887: 881: 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 862: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 831: 827: 821: 820: 814: 813: 812: 809: 805: 801: 797: 782: 778: 772: 771: 766: 765: 764: 763: 759: 755: 750: 746: 734: 730: 726: 721: 720: 719: 718: 715: 711: 705: 704: 698: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 678: 674: 670: 669: 663: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 629: 617: 610: 603: 596: 592: 586: 585: 579: 578: 577: 576: 572: 568: 549: 545: 539: 538: 533: 529: 526: 522: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 501: 497: 493: 489: 481: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 466: 462: 456: 455: 450: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 437: 433: 432:24.38.192.180 429: 424: 423:107.77.223.20 412: 408: 402: 401: 396: 392: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 349: 343: 342: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 318: 312: 311: 303: 302: 301: 295: 289: 287: 278: 277: 276: 273: 272:lint errors. 271: 266:<font: --> 257: 256: 252: 248: 241: 237: 231: 229: 223: 220: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 196:Fixed link... 191: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177: 172: 167: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 141: 140: 131: 120: 117: 113: 109: 105: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3866: 3842: 3841: 3837: 3801: 3749: 3718:— Preceding 3715: 3689:— Preceding 3671: 3652: 3603: 3564: 3552: 3522:WP:BOOMERANG 3519: 3489: 3445: 3440: 3376: 3362: 3330: 3305: 3224: 3194: 3164:WP:RECENTISM 3138: 3109:WP:BOOMERANG 3092: 3070: 3025: 3022: 3018:WP:BOOMERANG 3014: 3003: 2969: 2940: 2910: 2889: 2884: 2866: 2850: 2841: 2837: 2824:Please read 2808: 2781:— Preceding 2775: 2754: 2722: 2719: 2703: 2698: 2694: 2669: 2666: 2647: 2631: 2609: 2590: 2574: 2550: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2522: 2500: 2493: 2490:going to say 2487: 2485: 2464: 2437:— Preceding 2433: 2429: 2402:— Preceding 2398: 2345: 2342: 2331:Eric Kvaalen 2319: 2289: 2261: 2228: 2209: 2191: 2166: 2141: 2123: 2104: 2084: 2061: 2033:— Preceding 2031: 2005:— Preceding 1980: 1974: 1956: 1945: 1911: 1843: 1782: 1768: 1756:edit warring 1739: 1731:your benefit 1730: 1708: 1660: 1646: 1618: 1616: 1613:Your reverts 1585: 1534: 1514: 1498: 1479: 1476:Giants edits 1458: 1431: 1427: 1404: 1375: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1339: 1336: 1315: 1295: 1275: 1271: 1250: 1243: 1232: 1182: 1159: 1154: 1118: 1092: 1087: 1077: 1064: 1056: 1036:— Preceding 1033: 1029: 1008: 982:— Preceding 979: 958: 945: 941: 937: 925: 919: 911:147.0.136.19 906: 885: 865: 818: 790: 769: 751: 747: 744: 702: 681: 665: 664: 633: 583: 563: 536: 479: 453: 427: 422: 420: 399: 377: 358:Anomalocaris 340: 325:Anomalocaris 322: 309: 299: 285: 274: 263: 247:66.31.54.242 244: 227: 218: 203:66.31.54.242 199: 174: 168: 145: 137: 135: 104:97.121.17.94 98: 75: 43: 37: 3858:WP:IMAGEPOL 3804:Sarah Hicks 2870:Mambagoat24 2811:Mambagoat24 2778:videotaping 2741:JamesOredan 2725:JamesOredan 2699:reconquista 2688:JamesOredan 2672:JamesOredan 2501:must always 2494:in research 2482:integration 2395:AAA Battery 1376:(unsigned) 1157:. Regards, 844:DNOMN8R3.14 754:DNOMN8R3.14 652:noticeboard 176:voting page 36:This is an 3862:WP:UPIMAGE 3712:Hi Tarl N. 3337:Bmorrow151 2650:Bmorrow151 2612:Bmorrow151 2325:the topic 1750:I've also 1309:IM7707MSL 1057:References 988:Tony873004 623:April 2018 160:topic bans 3782:Polly7423 3753:RFinlay72 3724:Minealpha 2593:RFinlay72 2555:RFinlay72 2379:FrostCzar 2081:Tom Brady 1764:consensus 1337:Hi Tarl, 1299:IM7707MSL 1268:Wikibreak 1147:Technical 1141:CloudioOU 1081:CloudioOU 1042:CloudioOU 644:consensus 640:talk page 380:Dancs1985 356:Thanks! — 156:site bans 87:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3812:presskit 3746:from EK? 3732:contribs 3720:unsigned 3691:unsigned 3430:WP:CIVIL 3422:WP:CIVIL 3190:WP:SYNTH 2795:contribs 2787:DubsOnly 2783:unsigned 2546:deriving 2451:contribs 2439:unsigned 2416:contribs 2404:unsigned 2253:WP:CIVIL 2047:contribs 2035:unsigned 2019:contribs 2007:unsigned 1770:~Oshwah~ 1741:~Oshwah~ 1648:~Oshwah~ 1515:Really?! 1445:contribs 1389:contribs 1214:contribs 1050:contribs 1038:unsigned 996:contribs 984:unsigned 923:contribs 838:I found 804:contribs 796:Mavbmf22 725:Dsaun100 686:Dsaun100 680:warring— 654:or seek 636:edit war 614:You can 496:contribs 112:contribs 3873:discuss 3867:Tarl N. 3678:discuss 3672:Tarl N. 3629:Mk8mlyb 3622:Tarl N. 3610:discuss 3604:Tarl N. 3597:Mk8mlyb 3582:Mk8mlyb 3571:discuss 3565:Tarl N. 3542:Mk8mlyb 3526:Mk8mlyb 3496:discuss 3490:Tarl N. 3482:Mk8mlyb 3467:Mk8mlyb 3452:discuss 3446:Tarl N. 3416:Mk8mlyb 3401:Mk8mlyb 3395:Tarl N. 3383:discuss 3377:Tarl N. 3358:Mk8mlyb 3343:Mk8mlyb 3324:Tarl N. 3312:discuss 3306:Tarl N. 3279:reftalk 3252:Mk8mlyb 3237:Mk8mlyb 3230:Tarl N. 3201:discuss 3195:Tarl N. 3183:Mk8mlyb 3168:Mk8mlyb 3159:Tarl N. 3145:discuss 3139:Tarl N. 3128:Mk8mlyb 3113:Mk8mlyb 3099:discuss 3093:Tarl N. 3077:discuss 3071:Tarl N. 3059:Mk8mlyb 3044:Mk8mlyb 3032:discuss 3026:Tarl N. 3007:Mk8mlyb 2976:discuss 2970:Tarl N. 2959:Mk8mlyb 2947:discuss 2941:Tarl N. 2929:Mk8mlyb 2913:Mk8mlyb 2896:discuss 2890:Tarl N. 2857:discuss 2851:Tarl N. 2830:WP:CITE 2826:WP:NPOV 2772:Spygate 2761:discuss 2755:Tarl N. 2710:discuss 2704:Tarl N. 2638:discuss 2632:Tarl N. 2591:Yeah. 2581:discuss 2575:Tarl N. 2529:discuss 2523:Tarl N. 2471:discuss 2465:Tarl N. 2443:Ben00rs 2296:discuss 2290:Tarl N. 2268:discuss 2262:Tarl N. 2212:Aoa8212 2198:discuss 2192:Tarl N. 2185:Aoa8212 2173:discuss 2167:Tarl N. 2160:Aoa8212 2144:Aoa8212 2130:discuss 2124:Tarl N. 2111:discuss 2105:Tarl N. 2088:Aoa8212 2068:discuss 2062:Tarl N. 1987:discuss 1981:Tarl N. 1963:discuss 1957:Tarl N. 1918:discuss 1912:Tarl N. 1850:discuss 1844:Tarl N. 1789:discuss 1783:Tarl N. 1727:Tarl N. 1715:discuss 1709:Tarl N. 1667:discuss 1661:Tarl N. 1642:uncivil 1638:Tarl N. 1619:removed 1592:discuss 1586:Tarl N. 1567:Mk8mlyb 1553:Mk8mlyb 1541:discuss 1535:Tarl N. 1520:Mk8mlyb 1505:discuss 1499:Tarl N. 1483:Mk8mlyb 1465:discuss 1459:Tarl N. 1411:discuss 1405:Tarl N. 1322:discuss 1316:Tarl N. 1282:discuss 1276:Tarl N. 1206:Tarl N. 1166:discuss 1160:Tarl N. 1125:discuss 1119:Tarl N. 1099:discuss 1093:Tarl N. 1015:discuss 1009:Tarl N. 965:discuss 959:Tarl N. 892:discuss 886:Tarl N. 825:discuss 819:Tarl N. 776:discuss 770:Tarl N. 709:discuss 703:Tarl N. 677:reverts 590:discuss 584:Tarl N. 543:discuss 537:Tarl N. 532:WP:SOCK 460:discuss 454:Tarl N. 406:discuss 400:Tarl N. 347:discuss 341:Tarl N. 316:discuss 310:Tarl N. 293:discuss 286:Tarl N. 235:discuss 228:Tarl N. 39:archive 3832:Ran0t0 3816:Ran0t0 3549:WP:NPA 3437:WP:NPA 3426:WP:NPA 3331:That's 3257:thumb: 3134:WP:ANI 3066:WP:3RR 2885:cannot 2834:WP:BLP 2627:WP:DOB 2542:filled 2287:here. 2285:WP:AGF 2257:WP:NPA 1952:WP:BRD 1704:WP:3RR 1700:WP:BRD 1581:WP:AGF 1246:Eagles 567:Elijah 338:Done. 3744:WP:OR 2248:edit. 929:WHOIS 525:WP:RS 521:WP:RS 449:WP:RS 305:] (]) 280:] (]) 16:< 3820:talk 3786:talk 3757:talk 3728:talk 3699:talk 3659:talk 3633:talk 3586:talk 3530:talk 3471:talk 3424:and 3405:talk 3347:talk 3294:do). 3241:talk 3172:talk 3117:talk 3048:talk 2917:talk 2874:talk 2842:must 2828:and 2815:talk 2791:talk 2729:talk 2676:talk 2654:talk 2616:talk 2597:talk 2559:talk 2510:talk 2447:talk 2412:talk 2383:talk 2354:talk 2335:talk 2255:and 2246:this 2235:talk 2216:talk 2148:talk 2092:talk 2043:talk 2015:talk 1975:only 1905:See 1897:talk 1832:talk 1689:talk 1627:talk 1571:talk 1557:talk 1524:talk 1487:talk 1441:talk 1385:talk 1303:talk 1253:24/7 1210:talk 1189:talk 1151:here 1088:very 1046:talk 992:talk 976:Eris 917:talk 873:talk 848:talk 800:talk 758:talk 729:talk 690:talk 571:talk 492:talk 436:talk 428:were 384:talk 362:talk 329:talk 251:talk 207:talk 185:talk 146:The 108:talk 3838:not 2838:any 2488:was 2346:not 1370:5. 1366:4. 1362:3. 1358:2. 1259:(C) 1242:. 662:. 648:BRD 480:are 300:to 3876:) 3822:) 3788:) 3759:) 3734:) 3730:• 3701:) 3681:) 3661:) 3635:) 3613:) 3588:) 3574:) 3532:) 3499:) 3473:) 3455:) 3407:) 3386:) 3349:) 3341:. 3315:) 3282:}} 3276:{{ 3243:) 3204:) 3174:) 3148:) 3119:) 3102:) 3080:) 3050:) 3035:) 3020:. 2979:) 2950:) 2919:) 2899:) 2876:) 2860:) 2817:) 2797:) 2793:• 2764:) 2731:) 2713:) 2678:) 2656:) 2641:) 2629:. 2618:) 2599:) 2584:) 2561:) 2532:) 2512:) 2474:) 2453:) 2449:• 2418:) 2414:• 2385:) 2356:) 2337:) 2299:) 2271:) 2237:) 2218:) 2201:) 2176:) 2150:) 2133:) 2114:) 2094:) 2071:) 2049:) 2045:• 2021:) 2017:• 1990:) 1966:) 1921:) 1899:) 1853:) 1834:) 1792:) 1718:) 1706:. 1691:) 1670:) 1629:) 1595:) 1573:) 1559:) 1544:) 1526:) 1508:) 1489:) 1468:) 1447:) 1443:• 1414:) 1391:) 1387:• 1325:) 1305:) 1285:) 1216:) 1212:• 1201:. 1191:) 1169:) 1128:) 1102:) 1052:) 1048:• 1018:) 998:) 994:• 968:) 895:) 875:) 850:) 828:) 806:) 802:• 779:) 760:) 731:) 712:) 692:) 593:) 573:) 546:) 498:) 494:• 463:) 438:) 409:) 386:) 364:) 350:) 331:) 307:: 282:: 253:) 238:) 209:) 187:) 179:. 158:, 114:) 110:• 102:-- 3870:( 3850:. 3834:: 3830:@ 3818:( 3784:( 3755:( 3726:( 3697:( 3675:( 3657:( 3631:( 3624:: 3620:@ 3607:( 3599:: 3595:@ 3584:( 3568:( 3544:: 3540:@ 3528:( 3493:( 3484:: 3480:@ 3469:( 3449:( 3418:: 3414:@ 3403:( 3397:: 3393:@ 3380:( 3360:: 3356:@ 3345:( 3339:: 3335:@ 3326:: 3322:@ 3309:( 3254:: 3250:@ 3239:( 3232:: 3228:@ 3198:( 3185:: 3181:@ 3170:( 3161:: 3157:@ 3142:( 3130:: 3126:@ 3115:( 3096:( 3074:( 3061:: 3057:@ 3046:( 3029:( 3009:: 3005:@ 2991:: 2987:@ 2973:( 2961:: 2957:@ 2944:( 2931:: 2927:@ 2915:( 2893:( 2872:( 2854:( 2813:( 2789:( 2758:( 2743:: 2739:@ 2727:( 2707:( 2690:: 2686:@ 2674:( 2652:( 2635:( 2614:( 2595:( 2578:( 2557:( 2553:) 2526:( 2508:( 2468:( 2445:( 2410:( 2381:( 2352:( 2333:( 2293:( 2265:( 2233:( 2214:( 2195:( 2187:: 2183:@ 2170:( 2162:: 2158:@ 2146:( 2127:( 2108:( 2090:( 2065:( 2041:( 2013:( 1984:( 1960:( 1915:( 1895:( 1847:( 1830:( 1786:( 1712:( 1687:( 1664:( 1625:( 1589:( 1569:( 1555:( 1538:( 1522:( 1502:( 1485:( 1462:( 1439:( 1435:— 1408:( 1383:( 1379:— 1319:( 1301:( 1279:( 1208:( 1204:— 1187:( 1163:( 1143:: 1139:@ 1122:( 1096:( 1083:: 1079:@ 1044:( 1012:( 990:( 962:( 946:a 944:c 942:z 940:a 938:m 931:) 926:· 920:· 915:( 889:( 871:( 846:( 822:( 798:( 794:— 773:( 756:( 727:( 706:( 688:( 611:. 587:( 569:( 540:( 490:( 486:— 457:( 434:( 403:( 382:( 360:( 344:( 327:( 323:— 319:) 313:( 296:) 290:( 249:( 232:( 205:( 183:( 106:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index