User talk:Ultramarine

1922:

remain "responsible for crimes against humanity", that comprends, in it's definition, the crime of massacre and persecution, as well as grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. Dont forget we are talking about people who performed mass murdering and torturing. I think a general "participation in human rights violations" it is absolutely inappropriate. So a mediation could be "Between 1946 and 2001, the SOA trained more than 61,000 Latin American soldiers and policemen. Some of them became sadly famous for being responsible of crimes against humanity, such as generals Leopoldo Galtieri or Manuel Noriega, as well as some Augusto Pinochet's officers. The terrorist Luis Posada Carriles was educated in the school in 1962, even if he never graduated.", of course with source and maybe putting the picture of posada in fort benning.

3050:. Someone provided me with a code to add to a section of my preferences, it created a "cite" box at the end of the normal edit box, I can try to find the name if you need. I normally write articles in notepad, however lately due to a discussion on the policy proposal page, I have decided to allow the edit count to flow. I have been informed that it can be seen as important to some. If you have questions, you can ask me directly. This way it prevents this odd situation where people are whispering in plain sight. -- 175: 8327: 8116: 7898: 7692: 7489: 7113: 6718: 6522: 6235: 5776: 5390: 5179: 4912: 4602: 4362: 4172: 3859: 3574: 3231: 2405: 1405: 965: 658: 345: 10741: 10630: 10545: 10460: 10329: 10244: 10147: 10041: 9911: 9808: 9705: 9608: 9508: 9405: 9308: 9201: 9107: 9029: 3178:

legal principle double jeopardy: editors can not be tried multiple times for the same alleged offense (same sock puppetry charges). At least until there are new FACTS. From what I read there is nothing new. I've done nothing new. So why can't I be just left alone to prove myself? Don't you have better things to do, like write articles? This is not worth the trouble. I might as well go back to just using my dyanmic IP address. At least I had some peace then.

17460: 17400: 249: 21: 1887:

source. It seems from the article as u want it to look like, that CIA's aim was creating peace and prosperity in the continent...by training some of the most bloody terrorists. C'mon! On the other side, my add was from italian wiki, where it is not considered NPOV, why should it be here? has en wiki maybe different rules? Pls, if u want to be democratic, respected and avoid edit wars, discuss before deleting contributions.

13283: 4550: 8535: 17527:

financial markets and I have noticed that there isn’t a lot of "useful" information available on Knowledge (to my surprise). In addition to that, the information available through sites such as Investopedia or Investing is tightly controlled by the business owners and hence easily manipulated. Simply, traders like me could not trust such sources in planning the investment and trading strategy...

12411: 5659:

dramatic (EVERY member of the Japanese armed forces was out to fight to the death? ANY U.S. negotiation flexibility instigated by encountering mainland resistance would have been interpreted as a sign of "brittleness" by the Japanese army? Surely, some were more realistic, and on both counts?). I was alarmed to discover a rather-too-perfect meeting of minds between you and Mr. Frank.

87:. I've been working to clean the page up a bit, basically rewording and consolidating to improve flow. I'm also going to be sourcing material, since most of the current material is unsourced and I'm thinking that all future contributions should be sourced as such. It looks like we may be coming at it from two different angles, which is good, but I'd encourage you to consult the 2996:(though a simple indef block is the more likely outcome and certainly wouldn't be unwarranted). In the last ArbCom case though, SevenofDiamonds denied being a sock of NuclearUmpf until the very end. Regardless, I would not make any direct accusations until more evidence has been compiled as Merzbow says.-- 2662:

This page, especially the section describing the impacts on culture needs a lot of work. I am willing to put in the requisite changes, if you would help me with the process. In other words, would you back me up in deleting the portions regarding a "global culture", more unification, etc.? The only

1921:

were graduated, according to SOA watch, I even put the source. I think it is important to write it in the introduction, as example of famous graduated. I think it's euphemistic to use the words "participation in human rights violations" for people accused of crimes against humanity. I think it should

921:

is frequented by experts on SYN and OR, and if there's any one thing we really need expertise on, that's precisely it. But that is not to say "go behind the talk page's back" here. Just inform the talk page whenever you post something on the noticeboard, and you can be sure, anyone who wants to get

17526:

Wikinvesting is a non-profit, game-changing movement which aims to round up all those individuals who believe that unbiased financial market information and knowledge should be extensively available to everyone. And this is also how I got to you :) Namely, I was searching for information I needed on

17490:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

3015:

If it really is him and he is willing to admit it, I wouldn't argue against just a topic ban against the articles that perennially get him into trouble. I will point him to this section and highly suggest that, if so, he email an admin asking for terms instead of forcing us to do the entire song and

1313:

I'm poking you since you're quite good at writing up stuff that conforms to the bureacracy. I think perhaps an RFCU is indicated for those two IP addresses that keep reverting, plus the "new" single purpose account User:Rafaelsfingers. I suspect that these IPs, along with Rafaelsfingers and everyone

3192:

Ultra, do a history on your talk page. SGR was helpful enough to expose his IP, which appears to be from a dial-up provider in the San Jose area (popsite.net, owned by starnetusa.net). So we've got G33 from his home Comcast cable connection (plus IPs), Raphael from his cell phone, and Supergreenred

3144:

Ultra, I've added my evidence. I focused on edit timelines and linguistic tell-tales. Per your statement, it looks like you're going to focus on drawing the big picture - discussing account creation times, shared articles/POV, RFCU results, etc. (If you can, throw in a comparison to how Gio managed

2765:

You've suggested that several other accounts are merely sockpuppets of Giovanni. You still need to inform those accounts that they are being accused of being socks on the ArbCom page so that they have a chance to defend themselves if they so choose. Really they should probably all be parties to the

2128:

Travb copied a ten days old statement by another editor to the end of the talk page and then added his personal comment. Misleading and none of this regarding article content. My agreement was regarding such tactics. But again, if such tactics are used, then the issue should be presented fairly. If

3030:

Well, he denied being Seven on his talk-page. I looked at how they create articles, they do it in a very similar way - articles are born fully-formed, and scrupulously formatted, with multiple references to the same source always numbered like "Times1", "Times2", etc., among other similarities. Is

2977:

I actually was thinking this same thing a few days ago, but like Merzbow was not really sure. What struck me as most similar is that the accounts both create a lot of new articles on very similar topics, and seem to adopt similar formats for creating the article, citing the references, etc. One of

2106:

that you voice agreement to limiting comments on the article discussion page to be about the article - you also include comebacks about a non-article related issue, that as you indicate, is 10 days old. Your disagreement with Travb should have been moved to your account talk pages if you wished to

1968:

All right with cold war. I will look for the specific events and movements in South America, even if i think it is gonna make the article a bit less flowing. About posada, the source is from National Lawyers Guild (used also in other wiki articles). Maybe you dont like the source but it still is a

1881:

article started in the mid 1940s, so i think it's absolutely pretestuous to say "not sure it was cold war", cause it was. about the reasons why the school was created, u deleted, again with no discussion at all, everything, by saying it was unsourced. I think u can understand by yourself that u'll

1872:

but you, instead of taking the discussion, deleted all my adds, that were not personal points of view but translated from other wikis (in this case the italian one). I will, if u prefer, put more sources (you deletede posada's name by saying "according to relyable sourse without quoting, anyway, i

17530:

So, what we want to create is a base where active or aspiring traders, content writers, investors, and generally financial enthusiasts will share their knowledge and experience, discuss investment opportunities, analyze news etc., all for the purpose of wikinvesting becoming the biggest financial

3177:

I got your message. I wonder, is it even possible for an editor to edit in peace here, anymore? Everytime I take a break, I come back to see more time wasting *&%%$ # innane wiki-drama. Sheesh. This is a big waste of time. Knowledge is seriously getting off-track. Maybe we need to borrow that

1886:

tool for avoiding wht you dont like to be written. The reasons of creation of school are explained by common sense, if u just see wht was happening in latin america in that period. I see the whole article mainly refers to the official website of the school, that cannot be considered but a partial

1240:

I think that you can remove the separate Biotechnology section. I have made a slight word change that should allow the paragraph to be part of the Eugenics section. It is the "new eugenics". Barring that, I believe the biotechnology that Stock discusses will have to be moved from the Contemporary

1159:

What would you say to a proposal to merge Criticisms of communism with Communism? Criticisms has no sources or references and is extremely short-- I don't think it merits it's own article unless it's greatly expanded. I'm poking you about this since you seem to edit in the area of political stuff

5677:

edit, where, in the mere 3 minutes between 8:21 and 8:24 on March 13, you somehow forgot that the text you'd just supplied was copy-pasted without attribution from an article you'd also cited. You obviously knew what statements you were trying to support, so it's hard to believe that you didn't

2995:

helped MONGO with the SoD case and might be of some help on this issue, though Proab does not really edit here much anymore) I'd personally like to see the user admit it, be topic banned from articles like the "Allegations" article, and allowed to continue creating new articles as they have been

2982:

write a lot of articles, they were just violating a previous ban under a different account. Even if I Write Stuff is SoD, they seem to be making some positive contributions, though there seems to be some possibly vexatious litigation as well which could be a straightforward reason to indef block

1972:

All right with violation of human rights, u r right cause they still had no trial in Aja (or never will have, for Galtieri that is dead). But "participation" i think has to be replaced with "responsible for" since Galtieri was condamned twice, by militar and civil court, Noriega (apart from the

3045:

I guess I must eventually chime in, I pick the names depending on what the majority of sources are, for instance most articles from websites are thanks to the Associated Press, so they lack author names, and are tagged if I am dealing with multiples, as Times1, Times2, etc. If for instance the

1928:

About the history of fort, I will make further investigations and add several informations missing, that are present in the italian one. Of course, i will look for sources. But please, next time use the discussion page a little more. Of course I am waiting for hearing something from you before

5658:

and search for same. The way you left it, the wording seemed to be original with you. I've corrected the quoting. You seem to be a big fan of careful inline citation. So am I. But I'm also a big fan of accurate attribution. I checked what you cited, since it seemed a little sweeping and

2845:

as would normally be the case. I'm not sure WMC how you are so certain that all of the accounts in question are all sockpuppets of Giovanni (as opposed to one or more than one of the accounts simply being one of 100,000 or so people (at a minimum) in the Bay Area who would somewhat agree with

2082:

It was Travb/Inclusionst who copied a more than 10 days old statement to the end of talk and then added his comment. Obviously not particularly relevant and the talk page should be about the article content, but if insisting on bringing this up, then the issue should be described

17531:

knowledge “open source” base. I am not sure if you are familiar with the recent case of GameStop where gaming enthusiasts gather around the GameStop via reddit forum and prevented the hedge funds from sinking it down. They were basically our inspiration to starting this project.

2840:

No, we don't "all know that they are." If we did Jehochman would have kept the block on Giovanni in place, but he had doubts, as apparently did a couple of other admins who talked to Jehochman (not including me, I wasn't even an admin at the time). A full case should be made at

937:

After rewrites, that case is no longer obvious enough that I'm willing to make the call. Meanwhile, you obviously are not willing to drop it. So why are you so reluctant to bring the noticeboard into the case? If they make a call, I'll back it up. Promise! —

2846:

Giovanni's position on the article) but if you have specific evidence you might want to post it somewhere instead of wasting time arguing against the posting of courtesy "hey you're over at ArbCom" notes on user talk pages (actually I wonder if anyone has argued

17278:

as a political culture. It is an effort to coordinate the work of Wikipedians who are knowledgeable about oligarchy in an effort to improve the general quality and range of Knowledge articles on these topics. I invite your participation and correspondence. Be

10845:

He did not respond to my comments on R.J. Rummel, probably because he is acquainted with him. I think Rummel did a lot of interesting work whilst at uni, but he seems to have become a raging right-wing nutcase since retiring and becoming a full-time blogger.

2855:

to be socks by some process, yes, we do inform them that they are accused of being socks. So again to Ultramarine, please post notes on these users talk pages as the ArbCom rules require given that you have clearly filed a complaint against the accounts in

2983:

based on the past ArbCom decision (I'm really not paying enough attention to the "Allegations" article to know what is going on with that or how I Write Stuff is behaving). It's worth looking into a bit further, and probably would need to be brought to

2961:

are not present, although I've only looked at edit summaries and not text itself. And RFCU info for Seven is likely stale. In other words, I'm certainly not ready to make an accusation yet, but I think this should be looked at by others as well. -

154:

Hello, Im new to wikipedia and was wondering about your graph. Do the figures you used for the graph include corn production in the US? As a percentage of this is for ethanol ? I did follow your references but could not find the base data u used

17426:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2850:

that before—it's a rather remarkable position to take given the relative triviality of the issue and the fact that the opposite position does absolutely no harm and actually conforms to Knowledge policy). Until such time as the users are

893:

That way, you'll be less likely to exhaust and alienate other editors and more likely to establish a pattern of getting rid of those unsightly violations than you'd be by spreading the effort over several instances simultaneously.

1314:

else who has been reverting to the IP version with claims of consensus (including possibly Giovanni33) are the same person. Given the language it might also be SPTS, of course-- that's for RFCU to decide, if they accept the case.

17522:

My name is Tijana and I am a team leader of Wikinvesting.com project. Along with five of my colleagues and friends who are investment and trading enthusiasts, I have started the Wikinvesting which is based on MediaWiki platform.

2178:

Ultramarine, the 3RR board is not for discussing violations of arb-comm matters. If you think Giovanni has broken his restrictions you need to post on the arb-comm enforcement page. I am telling Giovanni the same about yourself.

3066:

The points made by Merzbow are striking. Right now I do not think I have the time to help look into the details due to others tasks like the Giovanni33 RfA. But I agree with the general suggestions made by both Bigtimepeace and

901:

SYN violations may feel satisfying, but it really is counter-productive, if you want to actually change the article. I'll be your ally if you try to get rid of OR, but if you try to include more, you'll find me an obstacle. —

105: 1969:

source, so if we copy whole texts from the FAQ of SOA website (with a probable copyviol, i'd say) I dont see why we couldn't quote National Lawyers Guild. There is even the archive pic, that i will put as a further evidence.

3805: 10019:

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described

2634:

I'm sorry that my comment got in above yours on that page, Ultramarine. That was just some kind of editing error on my part. At least this time I think I got the right number of equals signs in the section header.

12495: 17430:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

17355:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 17534:

I would love to share more information about this project with you and also discuss future potential opportunities, hence if you are interested, please let me know so we can continue this on our slack channel.

131:

Sooner or later you'll manage to get that page cleaned up. Unfortunately this is unlikely to happen while the current residents revert everything you do-- but still, getting the difs in there is worth doing.

2299:

I do not support starting the war. Now there are only bad options. It will take many years before Iraq is stable if staying. On the other hand leaving could create anything from a genocide to a new Somalia.

5695:

edit, just before the previous mentioned one, shows you appropriating AFA wording. Do you actually NOT know that you're supposed to make it clear where the quote from the cited source starts and ends?

17233: 2958: 1849:

Anyway, the reason why I'm here was to say hi, Ultramarine. I have returned after an extended absence and I wanted to let you know that I can help with any democracy-related articles and such. --

1946:

I forgot...u made a little mess with the sources...now looks that there are 4 sources about the new curriculum in SOA... I can fix it when performing the edit, as soon as we reach an agreement.--

317:

Ha...no surprise...StonePutToSky did the move near the end of February and Dancewiththedevil took the quotes out....there was no consensus for making the title as POV as the text I can't imagine.

10834:

Hi. I remember speaking to you about three years ago as regards democratic peace theory. I thought you might like my discussion with Mark Humphrys (the Dublin Uni geneaologist) on the topic.

1830:

fills that role quite nicely. Having a category or article named after any ideology with the word "repression" after it is a violation of NPOV, since repression means, by definition, something

106: 10014: 8729: 7082: 2619:. You seem to be aware of his editing and I feel you may be able to support his side, and we want it to be as fair of a case as possible. If you have a comment, please feel free to add it. 17227: 13309: 263:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 13297:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 4890:

Hi, I don't know if you have any plans for that draft version, but I hope its alright if I remove the image that is of the 1921 famine in Saratov, not the 1933 one in Ukraine. Regards.--

8577: 5114:

The accuser has a pattern of writing anti-Western, pro Communist material that is difficult to source so nobody can tell if it is reasonable or not. Please deal with the accusations.

13308:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

11159: 6965: 6016: 121: 2032:

I think that with this second source there are no more doubts and that your edit on Posada's article can as well be deleted. I will add the source in both articles if u dont mind. --

10967: 5692:

As they say, when you see a cockroach scuttle across your kitchen floor, you never think "There goes the one cockroach in the kitchen". You think, "This place is infested!". This

5253: 3145:

his previous farm of sockpuppets as well). Also, I didn't mention the bits of linguistic evidence already in your statement; hopefully you can find even more that my eyes missed. -

414: 270:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

17389: 17241: 15813: 14772: 14158: 10565: 5749: 5642: 1804: 1030: 9946: 4972: 17049: 14748: 9828: 17423: 9737: 6222: 3402: 1909:

Posada "was trained in sabotage and explosives at the CIA's School of the Americas for an invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs." according to sourced wiki article about him.

2002:

is the source not enough? I'd avoid anyway "but not to SOA Watch", cause they dont deny he was educated there, just dont report he was graduated, since he actually wasnt.--

12489: 11567: 11551: 5151:

The above named Arbitration case has closed. Giovanni33 is banned for a duration of one year by the Arbitration Committee. You may view the case at the above linked page.

4977: 3545: 2061: 201:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

17177: 17065: 16972: 16863: 16762: 16658: 16565: 16472: 16379: 16286: 16201: 16116: 16023: 15930: 15837: 15736: 15635: 15544: 15450: 15357: 15256: 15163: 15075: 14982: 14881: 14788: 14687: 14594: 14509: 14413: 14336: 14267: 14190: 14081: 13985: 13884: 13807: 13714: 13637: 13552: 13467: 13382: 13221: 13132: 13047: 12967: 12874: 12765: 12664: 12595: 12362: 12301: 12232: 12139: 12054: 11937: 11844: 11735: 11626: 11482: 11361: 11276: 11201: 11096: 11003: 10904: 10779: 10688: 10583: 10492: 10400: 10282: 10191: 10094: 10033: 9964: 9858: 9761: 9652: 9555: 9455: 9358: 9255: 9154: 9064: 8958: 8875: 8769: 8643: 8411: 8205: 7987: 7776: 7566: 7390: 7277: 7206: 6989: 6904: 6799: 6416: 6319: 6129: 6047: 5950: 5865: 5549: 5471: 5284: 5248: 5013: 4792: 4695: 4451: 4256: 4066: 3960: 3931: 3706: 3431: 3341: 3312: 3300: 2513: 1600: 1494: 1061: 754: 552: 455: 2051:

About the edit in Posada's article, it's the same as on SOA. Ok with source but there's no need to add that SOA hasnt it in archives, for the same reasons stated above.

17449: 17185: 17169: 17081: 17057: 16980: 16964: 16879: 16855: 16778: 16754: 16674: 16650: 16581: 16557: 16480: 16464: 16395: 16371: 16302: 16278: 16217: 16193: 16124: 16108: 16031: 16015: 15946: 15922: 15845: 15829: 15744: 15728: 15643: 15627: 15555: 15533: 15458: 15442: 15365: 15349: 15264: 15248: 15179: 15152: 15083: 15067: 14990: 14974: 14889: 14873: 14796: 14780: 14695: 14679: 14602: 14586: 14517: 14501: 14493: 14421: 14405: 14344: 14328: 14275: 14259: 14198: 14182: 14089: 14073: 13993: 13977: 13945: 13892: 13876: 13815: 13799: 13775: 13722: 13706: 13645: 13629: 13560: 13544: 13475: 13459: 13390: 13374: 13229: 13213: 13140: 13124: 13055: 13039: 12975: 12959: 12882: 12858: 12834: 12773: 12757: 12672: 12656: 12370: 12147: 12062: 11945: 11852: 11743: 11634: 11559: 11490: 11474: 11442: 11367: 11282: 11207: 11195: 11102: 11090: 11066: 11009: 10997: 10910: 10898: 10785: 10694: 10589: 10498: 10406: 10394: 10288: 10276: 10203: 10106: 10082: 9976: 9870: 9846: 9755: 9664: 9646: 9567: 9549: 9467: 9443: 9364: 9352: 9267: 9160: 9070: 8970: 8946: 8887: 8863: 8781: 8758: 8665: 8621: 8416: 8404: 8217: 8200: 7999: 7788: 7769: 7578: 7395: 7383: 7284: 7272: 7211: 7001: 6916: 6811: 6692: 6611: 6428: 6331: 6141: 6059: 5962: 5943: 5877: 5860: 5561: 5483: 5296: 5025: 4804: 4707: 4565: 4463: 4268: 4078: 3972: 3718: 3675: 3443: 3353: 3305: 2525: 2506: 1869: 1612: 1569: 1506: 1073: 1054: 766: 747: 564: 540: 467: 443: 2639:

I assume the order of the comments doesn't matter all that much so I'm not changing it, but if it matters to you feel free to either move it, or ask me to move it.

17307:

Hey man, are you still using wikipedia. Things have gone to crap on operation northwoods, and they have really inaccurate info. I tried changing, but was shut down

17193: 17161: 17089: 16988: 16887: 16786: 16682: 16589: 16488: 16403: 16310: 16225: 16132: 16039: 15954: 15853: 15752: 15651: 15566: 15466: 15373: 15272: 15187: 15171: 15091: 14998: 14966: 14897: 14865: 14804: 14703: 14610: 14525: 14142: 14001: 13730: 13237: 13063: 12890: 12781: 12733: 12680: 12293: 12224: 12155: 12131: 12070: 12046: 11953: 11929: 11860: 11836: 11751: 11727: 11618: 11498: 11466: 11426: 11373: 11355: 11288: 11270: 11213: 11189: 11108: 11084: 11015: 10991: 10916: 10892: 10791: 10773: 10700: 10682: 10504: 10412: 10388: 10370: 10197: 10185: 10100: 10088: 9970: 9864: 9852: 9767: 9658: 9561: 9461: 9449: 9261: 9249: 9058: 8964: 8952: 8881: 8869: 8775: 8763: 8654: 8632: 8212: 7994: 7958: 7781: 7573: 6994: 6911: 6887: 6804: 6606: 6421: 6324: 6134: 6052: 6023: 5955: 5872: 5655: 5556: 5476: 5289: 5020: 4984: 4797: 4700: 4458: 4261: 4073: 4026: 3967: 3711: 3639: 3438: 3348: 2518: 1605: 1501: 1066: 759: 718: 557: 462: 16948: 16387: 11998: 9328: 7342: 7260: 7182: 6977: 6865: 3552: 1877:

article. He was not graduated but still trained. So it was enough to change "graduated" in "trained" instead of pretestuosly delete it all. Cold war, according to

7470: 861: 17487: 17073: 16871: 16770: 16573: 15898: 15821: 15341: 14655: 14134: 13969: 13621: 13520: 12866: 12826: 12551: 12200: 12115: 12014: 11905: 11804: 11719: 11695: 11687: 11610: 11575: 11434: 11418: 11153: 10874: 10650: 10364: 10358: 10349: 9931: 9725: 9221: 9127: 8839: 8565: 7359: 7334: 7174: 6860: 6779: 6109: 5451: 5240: 5144: 4761: 4756: 4671: 4663: 4422: 4232: 4021: 3924: 3663: 3646: 3292: 2477: 1808: 1556: 406: 332: 17153: 17134: 17033: 16932: 16831: 16727: 16634: 16541: 16448: 16355: 16270: 16177: 16084: 15999: 15906: 15797: 15696: 15611: 15511: 15418: 15317: 15232: 15136: 15043: 14950: 14849: 14756: 14663: 14570: 14477: 14397: 14320: 14243: 14166: 14057: 13953: 13860: 13783: 13690: 13605: 13528: 13435: 13358: 13193: 13185: 13108: 13020: 12935: 12842: 12741: 12640: 12579: 12559: 12346: 12277: 12208: 12123: 12030: 11913: 11820: 11796: 11703: 11594: 11458: 11339: 11258: 11171: 11072: 11060: 10979: 10880: 10761: 10670: 10571: 10480: 10376: 10264: 10173: 10070: 9952: 9834: 9743: 9731: 9628: 9537: 9431: 9334: 9233: 9227: 9142: 9040: 8928: 8845: 8740: 8734: 8588: 8387: 8181: 7970: 7963: 7752: 7549: 7366: 7187: 6982: 6892: 6787: 6594: 6392: 6300: 6035: 5848: 5836: 5537: 5265: 4996: 4780: 4683: 4434: 4049: 4033: 3943: 3687: 3651: 3414: 3324: 3124: 3120: 2954: 2489: 2108: 2064: 1581: 1477: 1374: 1042: 1025: 730: 521: 426: 17254: 3031:

there a tool which people use to facilitate the creation of articles that generates them in this way? Because that's the only benign explanation I can see. -

17619: 14466: 13937: 10961: 7354: 7347: 6880: 5926: 5668: 4768: 3846: 3658: 3108: 2470: 2060:

If you agree that the content of the page should be limited to discussing the actual article, I urge you to strike the non-content related part of this post

1465: 17494:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

6216: 3159:

Your section is great as well. Good catch with the anon IP accidentally responding as G33 - oops. The AnnH quote describes exactly what is going on here. -

856:

by keeping in mind the lay audience for whom you are writing. Copying text directly from court dockets does not achieve this goal because it is written in

17614: 15426: 14942: 10973: 10660: 9528: 9425: 9136: 6409: 6404: 6380: 6011: 4544: 3919: 1274:

I will stop, if you will stop. In fact I have stopped now and will no longer revert. But same to you, yes?64.118.111.137 (talk) 20:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

878: 5766: 1765: 1216: 17541: 17145: 17041: 16940: 16839: 16743: 16735: 16642: 16549: 16456: 16363: 16185: 16100: 16092: 16007: 15914: 15805: 15712: 15704: 15619: 15522: 15434: 15333: 15325: 15240: 15144: 15051: 14958: 14857: 14764: 14671: 14578: 14485: 14389: 14251: 14174: 14150: 14065: 14046: 13961: 13868: 13791: 13698: 13613: 13536: 13443: 13366: 13201: 13116: 13031: 12943: 12850: 12749: 12725: 12648: 12587: 12354: 12285: 12216: 12038: 11921: 11828: 11711: 11602: 11583: 11345: 11264: 11177: 11165: 11078: 10985: 10886: 10767: 10676: 10577: 10486: 10382: 10270: 10179: 10076: 10061: 9958: 9937: 9840: 9749: 9634: 9543: 9340: 9243: 9148: 9046: 8934: 8851: 8746: 8599: 8392: 8188: 7975: 7757: 7554: 7378: 7265: 7194: 6872: 6397: 6307: 5272: 5138: 5001: 4439: 4244: 4054: 3948: 3694: 3670: 3634: 3548: 3419: 3329: 3218: 2950: 2494: 1868:

Ultramarine, I think it is very unpleasant from you to sistematically remove all the adds you dont like. I put a section in the talk page of the article

1816: 1588: 1482: 735: 528: 431: 17566: 17509: 17444: 17315: 16666: 16533: 16294: 16209: 15938: 15720: 13451: 12951: 11812: 11679: 11543: 11450: 11183: 9640: 9437: 9346: 9052: 8940: 8857: 8752: 8610: 8399: 8193: 7982: 7764: 7561: 7371: 7199: 6899: 6792: 6599: 6582: 6503: 6312: 6122: 6040: 5938: 5853: 5544: 5464: 5377: 5277: 5008: 4785: 4688: 4589: 4446: 4249: 4061: 3955: 3699: 3426: 3336: 2684:

Come back and clean up the references to all of the text you dropped in the article. I give you two days, or I delete it. Please see discussion page.

2501: 1593: 1489: 1049: 742: 533: 438: 13271: 2724:

Thanks for the reminder. Any particular reasonyou cannot show the same courtesy to me that I gave to you and wait until the matter has been discussed?

17570: 17275: 17246:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

16956: 16847: 15059: 12022: 12006: 11333: 10950: 10863: 10167: 8446: 8247: 8029: 7818: 7608: 7425: 7031: 6641: 6587: 6458: 6385: 6295: 6171: 6117: 6028: 5931: 5841: 5693: 5675: 5591: 5532: 5459: 5326: 5260: 5055: 4989: 4834: 4773: 4676: 4493: 4427: 4298: 4237: 4108: 4041: 4038: 3936: 3748: 3682: 3473: 3407: 3317: 2957:, N4G is from the same city as prior (assumed) Seven socks TenOfSpades and ElevenOfHearts. However, many of the tell-tales like what MONGO presented 2870: 2795: 2555: 2482: 1642: 1576: 1564: 1470: 1103: 1037: 796: 723: 594: 516: 419: 17384: 7076: 13097: 13009: 12266: 12189: 12104: 11894: 11785: 11668: 6970: 6509: 5161: 545: 450: 2029:

Good news! I found a second and much more reliable source about education of posada in SOA, from Washington University National security archive.

1687: 12924: 12815: 12714: 12629: 12540: 11987: 11532: 11407: 11322: 11247: 11142: 8176: 2835: 2813: 2707: 639: 92: 1395: 947: 911: 17565:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

12335: 11049: 11044: 10945: 8711: 8524: 5123: 4153: 2725: 2392: 2138: 2092: 1812: 1180: 952: 645: 318: 13169: 13092: 12330: 12261: 12184: 11982: 11889: 11780: 2313:

Quite - which is why Obama's position was right. Also looks much more respectable around the world as Iraq war was an international mistake.

2241:

I find foreign policy particularly interesting.I will wait and see more concretely what they suggest and what they do. Here is a good webpage

1906:. I do not know what more I should bring as evidence. I propose the mediation: "in the early years/in the beginning of Cold War" if u prefer. 17554: 15306: 15221: 13926: 13849: 13764: 13594: 13509: 13424: 13342: 13004: 12919: 12810: 12709: 12624: 12567: 12099: 11663: 11527: 11402: 11317: 11242: 5145: 4584: 3518: 3116: 3109: 3076: 1337: 1230: 12399: 11137: 5636: 4879: 3138: 2886: 1792: 1753: 15402: 15301: 15125: 15032: 14931: 14737: 14644: 14559: 14030: 13921: 13844: 13679: 13674: 13589: 13504: 13347: 13174: 8549: 8314: 8103: 7885: 7679: 7476: 3561: 2672: 2465: 1707: 1193: 15216: 15120: 15027: 14833: 14732: 14639: 13759: 13419: 13266: 10451: 6686: 2648: 17549: 14926: 14838: 14554: 14455: 14450: 14378: 14373: 14309: 14304: 14232: 14227: 14123: 12423: 8815: 8705: 8308: 7879: 4899: 3210: 3059: 271: 149: 14118: 8491: 8292: 8074: 7863: 7673: 3025: 3010: 2600: 1211: 1148: 841: 14035: 10738: 10627: 10542: 9005: 8518: 6706: 5723: 5705: 5687: 5166: 4349: 4159: 3532: 3090: 2011: 1955: 918: 887: 164: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 17578: 9599: 9499: 9299: 9192: 8903: 3793: 2366: 2352: 2336: 2322: 2308: 2294: 2280: 2266: 2252: 2236: 2222: 2116: 2072: 17514: 17476: 17412: 16068: 15983: 15882: 10457: 9505: 9402: 9396: 9198: 9104: 9098: 8909: 8821: 5737: 5106: 5100: 3187: 2991:

since there was a previous ArbCom case. If this is the same user as the SoD account (and more evidence is definitely needed, I think

1843: 931: 890:

for comments (with a note on the talk page), drive it through the process, and wait until it is removed before you take up the next?

17222: 17118: 16916: 16815: 16711: 15781: 10823: 10732: 10621: 8997: 5371: 4538: 4343: 2271:

Yes. Obama as a black president would certainly have a large symbolic impact regardless of anything else. A woman as president also.

17017: 16618: 16517: 16432: 16339: 16254: 10536: 10326: 10144: 10038: 9305: 3168: 3040: 1179:

Thanks for your thoughtful edits on the Church Committee. I think your latest edits make for a better article than deletion alone.

16161: 15680: 15595: 15495: 10235: 10138: 15988: 15887: 15786: 10320: 10241: 10008: 9908: 9902: 9805: 9799: 9702: 9696: 9605: 7099: 7095: 7091: 2766:

case. We can't operate under the assumption that they are Gio's socks and thus we don't need to inform them of what's going on.--

2628: 209:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 17334: 17210: 17123: 17106: 17022: 17005: 16904: 16820: 16803: 16716: 16699: 16623: 16606: 16505: 16420: 16327: 16242: 16149: 16056: 15971: 15870: 15769: 15685: 15668: 15583: 15483: 15390: 15289: 15204: 15108: 15015: 14914: 14821: 14720: 14627: 14542: 14438: 14361: 14292: 14215: 14106: 14018: 13909: 13832: 13747: 13662: 13577: 13492: 13407: 13254: 13157: 13080: 12992: 12907: 12798: 12697: 12612: 12510: 12387: 12318: 12249: 12172: 12087: 11970: 11877: 11768: 11651: 11515: 11390: 11305: 11230: 11125: 11032: 10933: 10808: 10717: 10606: 10521: 10429: 10305: 10220: 10123: 9993: 9887: 9784: 9681: 9584: 9484: 9381: 9284: 9177: 9013: 8673: 8476: 8277: 8059: 7848: 7638: 7455: 7061: 6671: 6488: 6201: 5621: 5356: 5085: 4894: 4864: 4523: 4328: 4138: 3778: 3503: 3154: 2654: 2585: 1672: 1133: 826: 624: 1302: 294: 16921: 16522: 16437: 16344: 16259: 16166: 12477: 8442: 8438: 8243: 8239: 8025: 8021: 7814: 7810: 7604: 7600: 7421: 7417: 7027: 7023: 6637: 6633: 6454: 6450: 6167: 6163: 5587: 5583: 5322: 5318: 5051: 5047: 4830: 4826: 4489: 4485: 4294: 4290: 4104: 4100: 3744: 3740: 3469: 3465: 2946: 2551: 2547: 1638: 1634: 1099: 1095: 880: 792: 788: 590: 586: 321: 305: 243: 17327: 2714: 1221:

We both know we've done nothing against policy, so let him threaten all he wants. Not like much will come of it, after all.

17380: 16073: 15600: 15500: 15407: 1281: 1269: 3123:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 873: 15386: 15285: 15200: 15104: 15011: 14910: 14817: 14716: 14623: 14538: 14434: 14357: 14288: 14211: 14102: 14014: 13905: 13828: 13743: 13658: 13573: 13488: 13403: 13250: 13153: 13076: 12988: 12903: 12794: 12693: 12608: 12383: 12314: 12245: 12168: 12083: 11966: 11873: 11764: 11647: 11511: 11386: 11301: 11226: 11121: 11028: 10929: 10858: 10804: 10713: 10602: 10517: 10425: 10301: 10216: 10119: 9989: 9883: 9780: 9677: 9580: 9480: 9377: 9280: 9173: 9017: 8450: 8251: 8033: 7822: 7612: 7429: 7035: 6645: 6462: 6175: 5595: 5330: 5059: 4838: 4497: 4302: 4112: 3752: 3477: 2932: 2918: 2780: 2559: 2055: 1646: 1107: 800: 598: 327: 312: 144: 1715: 17367:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

8370: 8159: 7941: 7735: 7532: 7316: 7243: 7156: 6948: 6843: 6761: 6565: 6363: 6278: 6091: 5994: 5909: 5819: 5515: 5433: 5222: 4955: 4739: 4645: 4405: 4215: 4004: 3902: 3818: 3617: 3525: 3385: 3274: 3006: 2866: 2776: 2606: 2448: 2168: 1990: 1938: 1827: 1538: 1448: 1008: 847: 701: 499: 388: 5651: 17323: 2755: 1834:

done to a person or group of people. It is not the job of wikipedia to judge whether any given action was unjust. --

15145:

Knowledge leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade

12535: 1777: 1360:

Well, that's the last we'll hopefully see of those two. Perhaps we can actually get something done around here now.

17569:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 4885: 1188: 299: 12471: 2804:

Please. None of them are currently blocked, as I would expect them to be, if they were confirmed to be socks. —

17376: 13272: 10829: 2971: 2701: 1738: 1693: 1336:

I shouldn't waste your time and mine with wind-ups but I couldn't resist it. I won't carry on any more I promise

1323: 1260:

One of us should just report that IP for 3RR violation. It's obviously not there to actually do anything useful.

1255: 226: 202: 77: 72: 67: 62: 57: 52: 47: 15318:

FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee

2188: 13861:

Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits

12440: 3535: 2831: 2791: 2751: 1858: 1250: 17591: 17472: 12430:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure

17407: 17391: 17302: 12467: 5710:

And I've since found yet more. Also some mention of your verbatim copying from sources at the Talk page for

3822: 2257:

Do you see the way the US is seen in the rest of the world as important? (The international image of the US)

1820: 1382:

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of

126: 27: 2693: 1369: 238: 17237: 17201: 17097: 16996: 16895: 16794: 16690: 16597: 16496: 16411: 16318: 16233: 16140: 16047: 15962: 15861: 15760: 15659: 15574: 15474: 15381: 15280: 15241:

Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Knowledge, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed

15195: 15099: 15006: 14905: 14812: 14711: 14618: 14533: 14429: 14352: 14283: 14206: 14097: 14009: 13900: 13823: 13738: 13653: 13568: 13483: 13398: 13245: 13148: 13071: 12983: 12898: 12789: 12688: 12603: 12378: 12309: 12240: 12163: 12078: 11961: 11868: 11759: 11642: 11506: 11381: 11296: 11221: 11116: 11023: 10924: 10799: 10708: 10597: 10512: 10420: 10296: 10211: 10114: 9984: 9878: 9775: 9672: 9575: 9475: 9372: 9275: 9168: 9022: 8919: 8831: 8721: 8534: 8433: 8234: 8016: 7805: 7595: 7412: 7018: 6628: 6445: 6158: 5578: 5313: 5134: 5119: 5042: 4821: 4480: 4285: 4095: 3735: 3556: 3460: 2953:, his primary interest seems to be creating articles about Latin American drug gangs, just like Seven. Per 2542: 2207: 2048:

Sorry I was wrong, that's another Posada, a officer in Guatemala. Keeep anyway the source, it's a good one.

2041: 1629: 1090: 783: 581: 17600: 17297: 4571: 3841: 1293:

You have not stopped. You have done 8 reverts. Self-revert to the version before you started edit warring.

135:

Watch out for Stone put to sky. He's trying to put words in your mouth so he can run to WP:ANI with them.

17495: 17372: 10021: 2668: 2198:

Hi Ultramarine - just wondering who you're supporting for next Pres in 2008? Are you a McCain supporter?

1699: 198: 88: 12517: 16840:

Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report

13333:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 13290: 8326: 8115: 7897: 7691: 7488: 7112: 6717: 6521: 6234: 5775: 5389: 5178: 4911: 4601: 4557: 4361: 4171: 3858: 3573: 3230: 2404: 2342: 2150: 1863: 1404: 964: 657: 344: 260: 42: 2733: 1346: 1169: 17480: 17416: 17206: 17102: 17001: 16900: 16799: 16695: 16602: 16501: 16416: 16323: 16238: 16186:

Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Knowledge, and more

16145: 16052: 15967: 15866: 15765: 15664: 15579: 15479: 12404: 10839: 10740: 10629: 10544: 10459: 10328: 10243: 10146: 10040: 10029: 9910: 9807: 9704: 9607: 9507: 9404: 9307: 9200: 9106: 9028: 4561: 2940: 2827: 2787: 2760: 2747: 2616: 2612: 2112: 2068: 917:

Oh sure, the article talk page is the number one place for discussions. But it's not the only one.

6704:

hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into

2156: 12448: 10443: 4564:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 3524: 1703: 1285: 1174: 100: 84: 15798:

Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes

14579:

Hoaxes in France and at university, Knowledge used in Indian court, Is Knowledge a cult?, and more

5678:

reread the quote you'd just copied when you supplied an additional inline citation to support it.

3081:

Yes, it makes sense to delay this until the G33 case starts to settle down, for all our sanity. -

17467: 17451: 5130: 5115: 3183: 3055: 2926: 2912: 2184: 1773: 1749: 1235: 285:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

117: 16675:

No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML

2663:

cultural aspect of globalization is the imposition of Western culture on the developing world.

1882:

never find official documents saying this. But asking for source for every word it's clearly an

17583: 17545: 15233:

Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports

13294: 13276: 12438:. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3814: 3002: 2902: 2862: 2772: 2664: 853: 12483: 3119:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 17319: 16364:

Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news

16178:

Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more

14765:

Knowledge controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?

13436:

A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs

5728:

You appear to be talking to yourself at the moment, since Ultra hasn't edited in months... -

2624: 2030: 1706:

page. I was interested in what other editors and administrators thought. Please have a look.

1308: 1241:

issues section, as it is more futuristic. Can we have a little cooperation on the article? --

16457:

Airplane construction with Knowledge, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric

15620:

Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Knowledge, and more

13319:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

5674:

P.S. My hope that your plagiarism was just a slip doesn't find much encouragement from this

281:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

17574: 17363:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 17311: 17218: 17114: 17013: 16912: 16811: 16707: 16614: 16513: 16428: 16335: 16250: 16157: 16064: 15979: 15878: 15777: 15676: 15591: 15491: 15398: 15297: 15212: 15116: 15023: 14922: 14829: 14728: 14664:

Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more

14635: 14550: 14446: 14369: 14300: 14223: 14114: 14026: 13917: 13840: 13755: 13670: 13585: 13500: 13415: 13338: 13298: 13262: 13165: 13088: 13000: 12915: 12806: 12705: 12620: 12395: 12326: 12257: 12180: 12095: 11978: 11885: 11776: 11659: 11523: 11398: 11313: 11238: 11133: 11040: 10941: 10025: 2936: 2677: 2644: 1874: 1759: 1277: 886:

May I suggest you pick one violation at a time, starting with the most obvious, take it to

206: 16728:

No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations

8: 17584: 17505: 17368: 14321:

New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Knowledge Bill", unsourced bios declining

10436: 9595: 9495: 9392: 9295: 9188: 8899: 8482:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 8304: 8283:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 8065:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 7875: 7854:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 7644:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 7461:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 7067:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 6677:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 6494:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 6207:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 5719: 5701: 5683: 5664: 5627:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 5362:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 5091:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 4870:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 4529:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 4334:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 4144:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 3837: 3784:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 3509:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 3193:

from dialup - all from the same area. Who the heck edits using their main account from a

2591:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 2227:

Waiting to see what the Democratic primary result is? What are the main issues for you?

2164: 2037: 2007: 1986: 1951: 1934: 1854: 1839: 1678:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 1139:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 832:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 630:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 169: 16582:

No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended

15915:

Rush Limbaugh falls for Knowledge hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Knowledge

15273:

Major MediaWiki release, password security, vulnerable MediaWiki installations, and more

17293: 15044:

Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Knowledge

14478:"Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more 12435: 8487: 8456: 8288: 8257: 8070: 8039: 7859: 7828: 7649: 7618: 7466: 7435: 7041: 6651: 6468: 6181: 5601: 5336: 5065: 4844: 4503: 4308: 4118: 3758: 3483: 3179: 3051: 2922: 2908: 2809: 2565: 2180: 1798: 1769: 1745: 1720: 1652: 1365: 1319: 1265: 1226: 1207: 1165: 1113: 943: 927: 907: 806: 604: 160: 140: 113: 96: 16093:

Spanish police pursues BLP vandals, Jimbo interviewed, advice for experts and spammers

15652:

Reusability of MediaWiki code, Google Summer of Code: Interwiki transclusion, and more

13289:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

3546:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration#Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States

1726: 17344: 17335: 16635:

Fundraisers start for Knowledge and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership

16000:

French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more

14672:

Knowledge better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more

14571:

Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Knowledge project concludes, brief news

13323:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

12531: 12431: 11073:

Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more

9089: 8988: 8806: 8696: 8509: 8092: 7665: 5733: 3809: 3206: 3164: 3150: 3086: 3047: 3046:

majority of sources are books, I use AuthorYear as a format, you can see an example:

3036: 3021: 2997: 2967: 2857: 2767: 2729: 2193: 1910: 1184: 16933:

ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive

8681:

If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

17364: 17348: 12458: 10854: 10819: 10728: 10617: 10532: 10316: 10231: 10134: 10004: 9898: 9795: 9692: 7072: 6682: 6499: 6212: 5762: 5711: 5632: 5367: 5096: 4891: 4875: 4534: 4339: 4149: 3789: 3514: 3068: 2992: 2878: 2620: 2596: 2358: 2348: 2328: 2318: 2300: 2290: 2272: 2262: 2244: 2232: 2214: 2203: 2173: 2130: 2129:

Travb had removed his copied material and comment I would not have replied further.

2084: 1784: 1730: 1683: 1391: 1351: 1294: 1144: 837: 635: 210: 12503: 12031:

Knowledge's death report premature, fundraiser, usability, new CSD, noms, and more

17214: 17110: 17009: 16908: 16807: 16703: 16610: 16509: 16424: 16331: 16246: 16153: 16060: 15975: 15874: 15773: 15672: 15587: 15487: 15394: 15293: 15208: 15112: 15019: 14918: 14825: 14724: 14631: 14546: 14442: 14365: 14296: 14219: 14110: 14022: 13913: 13869:

Study of featured article quality, Facebook's integration of Knowledge, and more!

13836: 13751: 13666: 13581: 13496: 13411: 13334: 13258: 13161: 13084: 12996: 12911: 12802: 12701: 12616: 12391: 12322: 12253: 12176: 12091: 11974: 11881: 11772: 11655: 11519: 11394: 11309: 11234: 11129: 11036: 10937: 4580: 2640: 1711: 1343: 290: 234: 225:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

17594:. You were involved previously when it was discussed and you may be interested. 17042:

Confusion about Wikileaks continues, Knowledge vs. Britannica in India, and more

16949:

British Museum hosts two days of talks between Wikimedia and the cultural sector

16848:

Interview with Johanna Niesyto and Nathaniel Tkacz from "Critical Point of View"

15705:

WikiLeaks and Knowledge; Google–WP collaboration to translate health information

13444:

Studies on collaboration and student usage, Main Page drives traffic to Time.com

17500: 17360: 17352: 17259: 15052:

Wikimania, Former Wikimedia employee looks back, Editing controversial articles

13032:

Labor squeeze revisited, journalist consultations, philosophy bungles, and more

9591: 9491: 9388: 9291: 9184: 8895: 8460: 8300: 8261: 8043: 7871: 7832: 7622: 7439: 7045: 6655: 6472: 6185: 5715: 5714:. So you do this in other articles, too. It seems to be somewhat of a habit. 5697: 5679: 5660: 5605: 5340: 5069: 4848: 4507: 4312: 4122: 3833: 3762: 3487: 2711: 2689: 2569: 2160: 2033: 2023: 2003: 1982: 1947: 1930: 1914: 1883: 1850: 1835: 1656: 1246: 1117: 869: 810: 608: 174: 13784:

Studying German flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case

12444:

article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the

1744:

Not really. I think you have already made the point - it is a tad suspicious.

107:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#User:NuclearUmpf

17608: 17439: 17433: 17356: 17289: 16941:

Amazon "shopping-enabling" Knowledge; Al Jazeera interview; be like Knowledge

16534:

November 15 launch, emphasis on banner optimization and community involvement

15512:

Pending changes poll, Public policy classes, Payment schemes debate, and more

13330: 13320: 13313: 13302: 12843:

New CTO, Britain Loves Knowledge, Telefónica partnership, Multimedia and more

12427: 12415: 12039:

Ron Livingston sues vandal, disclosure of IP address ordered, brief headlines

8483: 8284: 8066: 7855: 7645: 7462: 6971:

GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license

5157: 3827: 3799: 2984: 2842: 2805: 2741: 2656: 2242: 1361: 1331: 1315: 1261: 1222: 1203: 1199: 1161: 939: 923: 903: 282: 275: 264: 218: 186: 156: 136: 16481:

Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days

16449:

Foundation's finances, geodata milestone, interim counsel, museum conference

16008:

Wikimedia moves into India, critical conference, Vandalism detection contest

15806:

Public Policy Initiative, Houellebecq plagiarism?, Article revisions as book

15419:

Book publisher apologizes for plagiarizing photos by Wikipedians, brief news

13606:

Usability rollout, downtime, admin phishing, Wikimania scholarships and more

7550:

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones

3531:

Please do not go ignore the expressed concerns of three separate editors. ~

17562: 17556: 15523:

Zionist editing courses, newspaper denies editing candidate, net neutrality

12527: 9079: 8978: 8796: 8686: 8499: 8082: 7655: 6555: 5729: 5111: 3202: 3160: 3146: 3082: 3032: 3017: 2988: 2963: 2678: 10671:

Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more

8393:

Knowledge in the news: Knowledge's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs"

14967:

Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village

11914:

35k donated, WikiProject for Knowledge-Books, 2M rated articles, and more

10850: 10815: 10724: 10613: 10528: 10312: 10227: 10130: 10000: 9894: 9791: 9688: 7146: 7068: 6938: 6833: 6678: 6495: 6353: 6208: 5758: 5628: 5363: 5092: 4871: 4530: 4335: 4145: 3785: 3540: 3510: 2719: 2592: 2344: 2314: 2286: 2258: 2228: 2199: 1679: 1387: 1140: 833: 631: 256: 194: 17186:

Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more

16550:

WP prose praised, Public Policy update, education debate, WP documentary

16489:

Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news

3804:

Hi Ultra, you might want to take a look at the new evidence I presented

248: 17595: 17247: 15697:

Pending changes analyzed, Foundation report, Main page bias, brief news

13537:

Campaign for video, costs of crowdsourcing, iPhone app, brief headlines

10980:

Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more

8360: 8149: 7931: 7725: 7522: 7233: 6751: 4576: 2710:

as you seem to have knowledge of the situation. Feel free to comment.

1340: 1154: 324: 309: 286: 230: 15753:

Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management

15435:

Supportive communication and missing incentives on Knowledge, and more

13630:

The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature

13614:

Overdue correction, Critical Point of View conference, brief headlines

9953:

Picture of the Year, Knowledge's first logo, Board elections, and more

2490:

News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Knowledge, milestones

2107:

indulge in continued discussion about that non-article related topic.

17271: 15612:

Most linked websites on Knowledge, New York Wiki-Conference, and more

15427:

Large scale vandalism revealed to be "study" by university researcher

12124:

Mapping geotagged articles language, import sources enabled, and more

7306: 6793:

Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content

6268: 6081: 5984: 2685: 1895: 1242: 865: 17034:

Knowledge articles expert-reviewed by Encyclopedia of Life, and more

16101:

Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Knowledge, by Joseph Reagle

13521:

Knowledge-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts

13310:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lenin's Hanging Order (2 nomination)

11704:

Kiswahili contest, new advisory board members, Foundation-l and more

11586:

Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures: Cybercultures in Online Learning

10838:

I'd be interested to know what you think. I'd never thought of the

10835: 6900:

Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page

1727:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Rafaelsfingers#Additional_evidence

13282: 11922:

Reports of Knowledge's demise, prescriptions for its ills, and more

11259:

WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more

11178:

IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Knowledge at Yale, and more

10881:

Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more

10677:

Reports of Knowledge's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more

5899: 4549: 3131: 2786:

They are socks. There is no need to inform them, G33 already knows

2438: 1918: 1903: 1899: 1878: 1764:

Nothing big, but thought it would be polite to let you know I made

1565:

Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles

1528: 998: 857: 691: 489: 427:

News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones

378: 16085:

German chapter remodeled to meet Foundation requirements, and more

15060:

Vandalism edits fool media and a government, become object of bets

14757:

2010–15 plan, Smithsonian outreach, Teaching Knowledge, brief news

13109:$ 2 Million donation, cybersquatting, comScore statistics and more 11459:

Strategic planning, November conference, brief news and milestones

10371:

Volunteers lead Knowledge Academy at National Institutes of Health

8672: