User talk:Vacant0/Archive 1

8779: 3734:, I don't understand what's the issue with you undoing every change I make? First, it was reasonable, I did not cite the sources well, then I put them in and you give a subjective judgement on how they are not reliable, yet I don't understand by which criteria do you say that one country's public service broadcaster is reliable whereas another's is? Seems a bit like you are trying to push a certain narrative, whilst you are not open to being objective, which after all is the goal of this website, especially when it comes to English Knowledge, and not specific national ones. Issues between the two countries need to be addressed on the page as they always have been, just because you personally don't like it, that is simply not a reasoning that's valid enough. 8659:

on November 6, 1991). In the print and internet version, etrend.sk informs about economic and political policy in Slovakia, finances, activities of business entities, analyzes and comments on international events affecting business. And about Denník N: Denník N is a Slovak daily, originally only an internet medium, which was created after the departure of some members of the SME daily editorial board in 2014. The editorial office deals with investigative, more analytical and extensive texts, and at the same time produces brief and fast news. The medium is financed mainly from payments from subscribers. The Denník N has also been in printed form since January 2015 and since 2017 it has also been publishing the monthly N magazine .

569:(it's a good way to avoid repetition among two related articles, in my opinion better than the copy-paste method, which may lead to the part in one page being updated in one page, while remaining outdated in another) from the separate page you have suggested. To help it further match with reality, I think that party's ideology and its "right-wingness" should be disputed as well in the main page, as I said in its talk page (similar to what various others said in the past, however they were all left unconcluded. As the party continues to govern, I think it would be more and more obvious that it does not really have an ideology. However that's an another but related topic.) Pozz, 499:"allegations". Is it poorly sourced? No. Is it irrelevant? No. All is directly linked with the party, and is significant to note, these are major affairs that describe how it is in reality, because otherwise it sounds like an usual political party in some western country, which it is not. Original research? No. All data is given from the sources. Attacking tone? That's absurd. Please give a reason for why did you revert the edit, otherwise you might be suspiciously affiliated with them in some way or another. I hope not. That's immoral. I really doubt however, that deleting 12000 bytes from a page is in good faith. Please prove me otherwise. 3743:. Your edit to the lede didn't have any sourcing behind it, and the rest was badly sourced. RTCG and other Montenegrin websites and tabloids tend to be biased in some ways, and for that reason, we can't use those sources here in this article. This also goes for Serbian tabloids, such as Kurir, Blic and online blogs/tabloids that can be biased in these kinds of situations. Your edits can get added back when the article gets re-written, only if the information is proven to be reliably sourced. If you indeed have sources for that text, you can leave the sources here and I will then add it back when the article gets re-written. Thanks, 1873: 1520: 5870: 5268: 4589: 5592: 2602: 1765: 2436:'s infobox, it lists authoritarianism as one of two "power ideology" axes. You also seem to be making two different arguments here. One is that authoritarianism is not an ideology, and the other is that the PRI can no longer be classified as authoritarian. I would say that the second argument has more standing, but I would still say that it's an authoritarian party. I can not see how you can say that authoritarianism is not an ideology, but technocracy is. Can you please elaborate on the distinction between the two? Thank you 957: 8663:

things, admitted to the idea of Nazi checks for 1,488 euros, of which Kotleba is oficially convicted. Vice-Chairman Mazurek, oficially convicted of defamation of race. Among other things, he is known from a video where he throws paving stones at Muslim women. Vice-Chairman Ďurica, singer of the neo-Nazi group White Resistance, who was also recognized by the COURT literally as a neo-Nazi. Miroslav Suja, Vice-Chairman. It is publicly known that worked for the head of the Slovak mafia Mikuláš Černák.

7452: 6617: 6379: 5530: 5210: 5157: 4425: 4157: 4010: 3188: 2206: 2072: 1987: 1707: 31: 7151: 831: 723: 4473: 8969: 8921: 8873: 8721: 8405: 8352: 8216: 8148: 8100: 8052: 7916: 7868: 7820: 7772: 7636: 7399: 7351: 7093: 6902: 6854: 6806: 6326: 6278: 6230: 6182: 6134: 3451: 2695: 1114: 1062: 8687: 4840: 5371: 3083: 863: 5055: 7272: 372: 4108: 8566: 8463: 6713: 4213: 3245: 7059: 760: 652: 3640: 2406:". I agree with this completely, however, this should be added somewhere on the page and not in the infobox, since this article mentions PRI's past. All of these pages that you've stated above have Authoritarianism in the Infobox and they have to be fixed. My edit wasn't misguided at all, "Authoritarianism" should not be included in the infobox since it isn't an ideology. Thanks 2757: 2712:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1131:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1079:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 565:

article be named to be neutral? I thought it was better to put it all in the main page to create a more accurate impression for the reader, who might otherwise dismiss it as unimportant. I think it would be the best to include a summary of the affairs and nature of the party in the main page, possibly as an

5503:

I do not plan on creating it but we should obviously wait, the parliamentary elections might be held next year so if they ended up announcing when it's going to be held by the end of this year then we can create the page for the current list of MPs. Also, thanks for your work over the years, creating

3556:, the right-wing aspect is less so. The modern left-right divide is harder to discern in around 1850s U.S. political identities, and while a lot of what the Know Nothings advocated does align with the modern right and far right, so does what the Democrats, Whigs, and Republicans of the day advocated. 2253:

On the PRI page, you claimed that authoritarianism was not an ideology, and you removed the edit. However, I would argue that authoritarianism is considered an ideology by Knowledge. For one, on the PRI page, technocracy is listed as an ideology, when technocracy and authoritarianism are both ways of

8658:

Dear Vacant. First of all: Dennik N and Trend are NOT tabloid media. From the Slovak Knowledge about Trend: TREND is a Slovak weekly on economics and business, intended mainly for readers operating in the economic sphere and business. It has been published since 1991 (the first issue was published

6442:

after message that you let on Deepfriedokra's talk page), can you ensure that these IPs are blocked and the pages in question protected? They are a banned user and all their edits should be reverted. I tried to alert on the return of this banned user, but the admins don't care and ignore my requests

3822:

I also don't see the need to calculate the number of recoveries, though the people who also updated the chart during the early months of the pandemic have been doing that almost every time. I'm not sure which date should be first affected by the removal because the other people who updated the chart

2146:

Some user decided to upload a higher quality version of the same image so I decided to just cut the sides off. I totally prefer the older image though since there's more space at the top and it isn't cut off. It would be better if you can revert it to the older version since the uploader got blocked

4933:

Could you please edit back Mas Madrid to Center left to left wing? that article isn't reliable enough to cite Mas Madrid as far-left and Mas Pais which is the political party they go by in Spain is cited as Center-left to left wing i don't understand the reasoning behind citing them as far left for

3763:

Hi. Sorry for opening another discussion here about removal of sourced content. On your talk page, this is the third discussion of that kind in less than 24 hours, but my problem has nothing to do with your recent editing activity. I have been looking for people who are familiar with Serbia because

3578:

Hello. It was a mistake of mine to add that since I know that the left-right political spectrum today isn't the same in the 1850s/1860s United States. It does align with the modern right-wing and far-right but I know that it's wrong to call them like that even though they were a 19th-century party,

353:

Hi, thanks for uploading diagram of seats distribution in the Parliament of Montenegro after the 2020 election. If you would add a lighter shade of orange presenting DCG-led list MPs, to make it easier to distinguish from the DPS list, also it would be better to add #fd00ff for presenting SD on the

8666:

Those articles talk about these members. It is clear from this that they are neo-Nazis. I know that own research is not allowed, but at this point we simply do not have better resources about their ideology. Because even those sources are sometimes inspired by Knowledge. I think it is obvious that

7510: 3869:

another edit of that IP, but it cannot stop editing the chart. I'm using the same website that you linked here, but I cannot recall if the way it looks now is different from how it looked in July last year. I don't want to stop updating the chart because of one IP, but if disruption persists, what

2863:

Hi Vacant0, I know I recommended that you make a bold edit, but I feel like it could have been clearer if your edit summary had mentioned that you had tried to start a discussion but that people were responding to something else instead. That way, I think the user who reverted you might have been

4972:

Mas Madrid is the madrid regional version of Mas Pais which is already cited as center left with reliable source in the mas pais page, if we have hundreds of pages with PP and PSOE regional wings and their ideologies being the exact same i don't understand why can't it be the same for Mas Madrid

3772:

several of those numbers from the template. I felt the need to undo those changes because there has been no discussion about that problem until now, but it insists that those numbers should be removed. I know that you have not edited that template before, but since you could be familiar with how

2512:

So bizzare. How do you know which one to use for nationality then? I had Yugoslavian and you changed it to Yugoslav. I always thought Tito was trying to creat a Yugoslav ethnic identity. Sort like how a bunch of Slavic tribes united to form Poland. Yugoslavia even copied Poland’s anthem hehe. So

564:

I agree completely that it's controversial (I wanted to write that in the first response but forgot hehe), my only concern was that while undoing the content you didn't move it anywhere. But then I realized I can get the historical source code of the page, so that's not a problem. How should the

548:

I reverted the edit because I think that something controversial like that should be discussed on the talk page first, my recommendation is to create a separate page for this and I want an opinion from you and others that regularly edit the page. If you agree that the "controversies/allegations"

517:

I recommend creating a separate page about the controversies/allegations of crime and corruption about SNS and after finishing the page link it to the main SNS article with some text that will explain controversies/allegations in detail. I'm guessing that the page will be really long and I don't

8662:

2nd. Sources spoke of top members of the movement. All members are the former most popular politicians of the ĽSNS. ĽSNS is considered by everyone to be neo-nazi on the wiki as clearly neo-nazi. The leader Uhrík, the former ĽSNS vice-leader and righthand man of Marian Kotelba, who, among other

584:

I recommend naming the article "SNS-related allegations of crime and corruption" and I also agree that the main page should include a summary of the affairs. I'm gonna help you with it whenever I'm free. The political position of SNS is disputed and that goes the same for the ideologies in the

4322:

because no one answered and I don't know what is the next best course of action. Should we wait for someone to comment and resolve the problem? Is it possible to start another RfC? I fear that if no one comments or solves the issue the entire discussion will be archived and removed while the

604:. Please try to contribute on it, or at least participate in the talk page, as, you know, some people may try to take it down. Go through the article and possibly find something that is not in neutral point of view, it might be attempted to delete the entire article even for a minor mistake. 498:

Why did you revert the adding of allegations of crime and corruption in the page? I think that, we both know that it's true. However Knowledge dictates that all data on it must retrieven from trustable sources. Is it biased, lacks a neutral point of view? No. The section is clearly labelled

5473:

There isn't, no. I was holding off on creating a new "List of Current Members" page until I'd finished writing articles on the individual members. I'm conscious of the irony that the assembly might be dissolved before then. Obviously, I won't object if someone else creates the page first.

2945:

I agree on that too and afaik there aren't any modern Balkan politicians that were promoted to GA. I was just curious because Bandić's article was requested for GA multiple times, but I don't think it will become a GA unless someone gives a lot of attention to it. Thanks for your response

4379:? Don't know. What do you think should be next step? I would start another RfC, but I'm not sure how and I don't know if new RfC will be tied to conversation about this issue that is ongoing on talk page of article in question? Or do we have to repeat all arguments in new RfC? 810: 549:

section should be moved to another page then great, but if you don't then give me a reason why it should stay on the main page. At least, in my opinion, something controversial like this should be discussed first, and then after discussing the topic the work should begin.

8196:] Both sources do not say that Miroslav Škoro sings anti-Serbian songs. Both you and Слободар should be reported to the admin in order to invent and add what is not written in the source. This needs to be deleted by someone right away, I can't because it's semi-protected- 702: 3340:

Vacant0, I can use your help with this article. For starters, I'm wondering if the picture in the sr.wiki can be moved to Commons, and I see that you have some Commons experience; I'd appreciate it if you could assist. And then the article itself needs some work...

6480:

Let me chime in that I think there's a serious problem at hand here. It seems quite probable that this is the same person who got blocked for a week on 16 May 2021 for disruptive editing, but then talked their way back almost immediately by feigning repentance:

637: 745: 354:

graph, for the same reason. With those changes the presented parties and coalitions would be easier to distinguish on the graph/diagram. Also see much lower resolution graph i created; File:2020 Montenegrin parliamentary election (seats).png -Thank you,

5810:

The Independents’ Movement that was represented in the House by Anna Theologou announced that according to the political parties law, it had to register the movement as a political party with the same emblem but the name was changed to Generation

2458:

Authoritarianism nor Technocracy aren't ideologies, they are a form of government. If you have some reliable sources claiming that PRI promotes authoritarian policies then I would with no doubt add it to the article. I'll fix the article now.

3738:

Hello. There are a lot of issues with this article, and the article has to be re-written. The contemporary relations and By theme sections aren't well-written at all, and they are mostly sourced by tabloids and sources that do not meet the

2161:

I don't consider the image to be any higher in resolution. If it is, it's only marginally higher. I hadn't noticed that the user had been blocked. Feel free to revert the user and restore the previous image when you have the time.

7393: 7087: 2922:

There is still a lot of work needed on the article and it's a bit too soon since his death. I don't think there is any politician with a GA article in the Balkans area, that would be hard to achieve on Bandić's one.

2403:

Brutal crackdowns on civil protests, such as Mexico’s 1968 Tlatelolco massacre, which saw security forces open fire on student demonstrators, earned the PRI a reputation for authoritarianism. Its popularity began to

8046: 7910: 3721: 8867: 6320: 6272: 8094: 7766: 6176: 3704:, which per Knowledge rules isn't allowed. In the case of this article, books are mostly preferred as a source, and the source must include that the person was a Serbophile in some way or another. Thanks, 8715: 7630: 6800: 7345: 5690: 2401:

article as an example, so no Knowledge doesn't consider it as an ideology, even though it's stated in the "List of political ideologies" article, which is wrong. The source that you added states that "

6848: 3618:

Yeah I've noticed that. It would be good though if you can add a comment there in the article to let people know that consensus was achieved already so that in the future these changes won't happen.

890:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7814: 4376:. Don't know why no one responded, maybe because lead coordinator of that project is involved in this particular dispute and is supporting claims that are not backed by sources that he misquotes 740: 848: 7441: 1342: 4953:

The project of Mas Pais was born in Madrid which is already cited as center-left i don't know what more you want? Also that article isn't reliable enough to cite Mas Madrid as far left

7436: 3891: 2704: 906: 7130: 8142: 6128: 3828: 2424:

Hello. In your first statement, you say that authoritarianism is a form of government and not an ideology. This begs the question. Why can a form of government not be an ideology?

3943: 3866: 3769: 2689: 876: 8550: 4341:

Hello, the most recent RfC was opposed by most of the editors, however, consensus wasn't established and we didn't really get anything from it. You can contact any of the listed

3824: 3036:

Thanks for telling me about WP:BRD, I'm not going to do this in the future. I'll start a discussion tomorrow and I'll explain my previous edits, you're free to join if you want.

8089: 7953: 3752: 2483:

Hi Vacant0. Isn’t Yugoslav ethnicity and Yugoslavian nationality? Like Serbian or Serb, Croatian or Croat, Slovenian or Sloven? Just wanted to understand the difference. Cheers

3851:

I recommend you to revert those edits by the IP editor so that it can be discussed there on the talk page, I will join the discussion and I will ask other editors to come too.

8910: 6363: 6315: 5068:

traditionally began at age five and was added to each year. The V-shaped marks on the chest, with certain others, indicate that the woman is marriageable. Photo taken in 1912.

3999: 8763: 8447: 8258: 7958: 7678: 7494: 7135: 6944: 6697: 6040: 5952: 5854: 5576: 5355: 5252: 5039: 4824: 4703: 4573: 4312:

Because you are experienced editor I wanted to ask you something regarding processes that handle dispute resolutions. For several months now there's ongoing discussion about

4197: 4115:

that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Knowledge – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as

3435: 3229: 3067: 2741: 2586: 1360:

We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

8137: 7809: 6219: 8758: 7673: 6843: 1857: 1749: 1608: 1504: 1248: 1160: 941: 106: 7388: 6891: 8963: 8915: 8399: 8346: 8210: 7862: 7324: 7307: 6569:

I've added this one, as well as one other likely IP address, to the three listed by Martopa in the investigation opened on 22 June. I'm also asking that the article on

6497: 7857: 8706: 7249: 7082: 5466: 3894:. A discussion has to be started on the article's talk page if the IP editor continues to revert edits. Prior to March 20, the chart seems to look the same as of now. 3765: 2441: 2387: 1738: 790: 682: 7487: 6896: 6224: 5831:

It seems like it they did, I haven't checked that. The page can be moved to either "Generation Change" or "Anex", it depends what is more sourced so that it can fit

4324: 2886:

Hey, yeah I think I made a mistake there in the edit summary by not mentioning that. I'll let the discussion go until more editors agree on Autospark's preference.

7032: 6285: 348: 8629: 2527:

You could use either Yugoslavian or Yugoslav, it doesn't matter. I prefer using Yugoslav just because of how it sounds. Just to give you a couple of examples, on

8185: 6171: 8843: 8526: 8322: 8022: 7742: 7572: 7225: 7008: 6776: 6104: 6016: 5928: 5656: 5435: 5331: 5122: 4904: 4767: 4652: 4280: 3515: 3309: 3153: 2832: 2665: 383:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to 4045: 2736: 1952: 1833: 1672: 1584: 1312: 1224: 1071: 1032: 932: 608: 570: 534: 503: 314: 2382:, Authoritarianism is listed prominently. From this, I think it is clear that your undo of my edit was misguided, and I hope I have swayed you on this issue. 2437: 2383: 1123: 585:

infobox but let's leave it like this for now. I'm gonna try to add more information about the party since there is only a little amount of text on the page.

8827: 8613: 8510: 8306: 8006: 7726: 7556: 7209: 6992: 6760: 6088: 6000: 5912: 5640: 5419: 5315: 5106: 4888: 4751: 4636: 4542:

if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~

4264: 3499: 3293: 3137: 2816: 2649: 1936: 1817: 1656: 1568: 1296: 1208: 1016: 782: 9006: 8958: 8442: 8394: 8253: 7905: 7596: 2498:

Yugoslav and Yugoslavian have the same meaning. A Yugoslav Serb is the same as a Yugoslavian Serb, same goes for a Yugoslav Croat and a Yugoslavian Croat.

2027: 1056: 359: 6939: 6573:

be semi-protected, especially since it's a biography of a living person and seems to be one of the current focuses of attention by this banned editor. -

6267: 4342: 1108: 124: 8823: 8609: 8506: 8302: 8002: 7722: 7552: 7205: 6988: 6756: 6084: 5996: 5908: 5636: 5415: 5311: 5102: 4884: 4747: 4632: 4260: 3495: 3356:

Hello, the picture can be moved to commons and be sure to add the {{PD-old-100}} template. I'm glad to help and if you want, I can re-work the article.

3289: 3133: 2812: 2645: 1932: 1813: 1652: 1564: 1292: 1204: 1012: 674: 7339: 4686: 2185: 2171: 2156: 343: 5755:

Hi, sorry for my question, I don't understand how Αλλαγή Γενιάς could be traslated as "Independents Movement" (and not as "Generational Change")... --

5232:, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 4377: 4320: 4317: 2009:, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 7625: 7287:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

6427: 4374: 2056: 176: 8205: 3946:

yesterday. It works for the meantime, but I do not know why he chose July 16 as the date from which active cases were changed to hospitalisations.

3579:

not a 21st-century one. I appreciate you commenting, I'm gonna try not to make these mistakes in the future, don't want to embarrass myself again.

1742: 1103: 1155: 766: 751: 6676: 5775: 631: 601: 594: 558: 527: 6691: 5740: 5726: 4095: 2468: 2445: 2415: 7313: 6656: 5021: 4980: 4345:

about this, and I recommend waiting between a week or two to start another RfC, but prior to that, I recommend contacting a coordinator first.

3059: 3045: 2327: 658: 643: 8190: 5818: 5756: 5245: 3890:

If the disruption continues, and by that I mean if the IP editor continues to remove information without prior consensus, you can warn them.

2241: 616: 578: 542: 511: 463:

if you like as I have started preparing a page titled "Cabinet of Zdravko Krivokapić" which I will publish once the new gov is formed. Cheers

4190: 487: 8365: 8359: 8059: 7827: 6434:

and others these last days. Since you have more relationships with administrators than me (eg: quick interventions and page protections on

5686: 5199: 2107: 417:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

6639:, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 6596: 6582: 5513: 5192: 3808:

do. I don't think that it's necessary to state the number because the government hasn't reported it, so you can remove it if you want to.

3768:

since March 21. It is claiming that the government of Serbia is not reporting the number of recoveries, and it has tried at least once to

1729:, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 6475: 5569: 5008: 4460: 4402: 4388: 4368: 4354: 4146: 4084:

You must not revert more than three times in a period of 24 hours, and if you violate this rule you can get blocked for at least 24 hours

3222: 2909: 2895: 2574: 2560: 2522: 2507: 2359: 2195: 2020: 1696: 853: 472: 7474:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 6401:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 5844: 5826: 5795: 5552:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 5179:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 4447:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 4179:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 4032:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 3421: 3407: 3393: 3379: 3365: 3210:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 2955: 2228:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 2094:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 281: 7469: 7443: 6414: 5801: 4069: 3655: 3627: 3606: 3588: 7279:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

5764: 4957:

You've added center-left without providing any reliable sources besides it. It has to be sourced, otherwise, it cannot be included. --

3975: 3961: 3937: 3923: 3903: 3885: 3860: 3846: 3817: 8778: 7643: 7406: 7100: 5519: 5146: 4802:

I disagree with your assessment that my edit was "un-constructive" and believe that clear vandalism should -- in fact -- be reverted

4535: 3398:

Thanks. The sourcing remains a problem--I don't think there's anything more that I can find (in English) to verify even basic facts.

2061: 518:

think that every single information should be on the main SNS page especially when it's really long. I'm gonna try to help if I can.

247: 156: 142: 5704: 3565: 2391: 225:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 8412: 6861: 4414: 4335: 4112: 3713: 3177: 2275: 1976: 8856: 8642: 8539: 8335: 8035: 7755: 7585: 7238: 7021: 6789: 6117: 6029: 5941: 5814: 5783: 5669: 5448: 5344: 5135: 4917: 4780: 4665: 4293: 3528: 3322: 3166: 2845: 2724: 2678: 1965: 1846: 1685: 1597: 1325: 1237: 1143: 1091: 1045: 773:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

665:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

6606: 6368: 5805: 5014:

A random blog saying they are far-left and not explaining why they are far-left is not exactly a very reliable source either..

3023: 2492: 7062:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5748: 2428:, which is listed in the infobox on ideology, is a form of government. Not only is authoritarianism listed as a section in the 2263: 426: 7284: 2540: 2133: 3539: 2279: 454: 181: 152: 2123: 8851: 8702: 8637: 8534: 8330: 8030: 7750: 7580: 7233: 7016: 6784: 6672: 6652: 6112: 6024: 5936: 5664: 5490: 5443: 5339: 5130: 4912: 4775: 4660: 4568: 4534:

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see

4288: 3523: 3317: 3161: 2840: 2673: 2307: 1960: 1841: 1734: 1680: 1592: 1320: 1232: 1040: 928: 493: 4082:

Hello, pages can be protected only in cases of high-level vandalism, edit warring, disruptive editing, sockpuppeting etc.

7779: 6503: 4809:

I've restored the previous stable version. I accidentally reverted your edit instead of another one. Hope its fixed now,

4698: 4485: 3788: 2347: 2295: 449: 309: 93: 8710: 2932: 2873: 2565:

No worries I’m fine with tour preferred edit. I was just wondering if there were specific scenarios for either. Thanks.

8793: 8765: 8698: 8579: 8552: 8476: 8449: 8272: 8260: 8197: 8155: 7972: 7960: 7692: 7680: 7522: 7496: 7266: 7175: 7137: 6958: 6946: 6726: 6699: 6054: 6042: 5966: 5954: 5878: 5856: 5606: 5578: 5385: 5357: 5281: 5254: 5072: 5041: 4854: 4826: 4717: 4705: 4602: 4575: 4304: 4230: 4199: 4027: 4001: 3667: 3465: 3437: 3259: 3231: 3103: 3069: 2782: 2743: 2615: 2588: 1902: 1859: 1783: 1751: 1622: 1610: 1534: 1506: 1262: 1250: 1174: 1162: 982: 943: 92:

Hi, Vacant0. Welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our

6460: 2708:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1127:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1075:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 8107: 7515: 7358: 4538:(even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my 4141: 3412:

Hello, there are sources and books in Serbian. I'm going to read them first and then I will add them to the article.

3350: 2283: 1895: 138: 3773:

COVID-19 figures are reported in your country, I want to know if there is any truth to the claim of the IP. Thanks.

2990:

iscuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to

2397:

By official definition "Authoritarianism is a form of government" and it isn't an ideology, this can be seen in the

229:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

7475: 6640: 6402: 5553: 5233: 5180: 5033: 4992: 4966: 4947: 4682: 4448: 4180: 4033: 3211: 2229: 2095: 2010: 1730: 8880: 8847: 8679: 8633: 8530: 8326: 8026: 7746: 7576: 7320: 7303: 7276: 7229: 7078: 7012: 6780: 6108: 6020: 5932: 5779: 5660: 5439: 5335: 5126: 4908: 4771: 4656: 4313: 4284: 4052: 3519: 3313: 3157: 2836: 2669: 2478: 2367: 2287: 2259: 2167: 2129: 1956: 1837: 1676: 1588: 1316: 1228: 1036: 924: 822: 801: 747: 714: 693: 639: 130: 119: 3370:

Well, if you can move that picture, that would be a great start--I have no experience with that at all--thanks!

1336: 266: 5749: 2339: 2713: 1483: 1132: 1080: 6541: 5029: 4988: 3928:

I'm not an expert but my opinion is that the removal should begin when it was first written (March 13, 2020)

786: 678: 2984:

everted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to

817:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

709:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

6558: 6509: 5680: 5565: 4818: 4373:

Hey, just wanted to let you know I tried contacting editors at Wikiproject Military history but no results

2995: 2429: 2379: 2375: 2303: 2299: 2248: 899: 818: 797: 710: 689: 422: 388: 241: 6448: 193:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 6534: 3758: 2311: 1891: 911: 320: 79: 71: 66: 2119:

Hi, Vacant0. I was wondering why is Mihailovic's head partially cut off in this new image you uploaded.

8976: 7316: 7299: 7294: 7262: 7255: 7074: 7069: 7045: 7038: 6189: 3957: 3919: 3881: 3842: 3784: 2351: 2343: 2323: 2291: 2163: 2141: 2125: 384: 287: 38: 6426:

This banned user, who mainly edits on topics related to far-right, pursue their disruptive edits with

8728: 8223: 5459: 4060:

some ip is vandalizing the article, can be solicited block for only account users to edit? Thank you

2961: 2335: 2331: 2267: 2254:

running a government. Also, in other wikipedia pages, authoritarianism is listed as an ideology. See

1724: 1698: 1497: 612: 574: 538: 507: 432: 129:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

6515: 8691: 7715: 7541: 7182: 7157: 6668: 6648: 5736: 5700: 4467: 4065: 3002:, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why 2917: 2772: 2355: 2315: 2271: 395:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 8989: