682:"The Americans had other assets as well. Over 150 tanks–over 100 of which were M4 Sherman tanks–had been committed to the invasion. The M4 Sherman tank was superior to the Japanese Type 97 tank. It was primarily used to support infantry and was considered one of the most effective weapons for destroying enemy emplacements. Flame throwers were extensively used. Smith had seen the need for motorized flamethrowers and had requested that the Army's Chemical Warfare Service (CWS) in Hawaii install them in M3 Stuart tanks. Seabees with the CWS had 24 tanks, nicknamed "Satans", converted to flamethrowing in time for the invasion. They were very effective for destroying pillboxes, cave defenses, buildings, canefields, and brush."
960:). One of the major problems in most writing about the island warfare in the Pacific is that almost all the Japanese witnesses died. Testimony from Japanese survivors interrogated by the military is included in the article. I did include English-language works from Japanese-speaking scholars studying the Pacific War. These include Tanaka, Irokawa, Kawamura, and Hiroyuki. The former three have author links with their sources. They mainly focus on how the battle impacted Japanese decision making at the grand strategic level.
910:. It is not a perfect source, as that article points out. Unlike the United States Marines and the United States Army, the United States Navy never published an official history. Morison's is the closest it comes. The Navy stated that Morison's history was not its official history. His advantage however, is that the navy gave him access to its records, gave him an office office in the Navy Department under the Director of Naval Records and History while writing the book, and a staff of assistance. See the
420:"Organized resistance ended when at least 3,000 Japanese soldiers died in the final gyokusai attack" - eesh I had to look up what gyokusai was. I'm not sure what I expected, but I think a brief description here, either wave or swarming. I also noticed that gyokusai redirects to Banzai charge. Any reason for this particular wording here? I'm not familiar with the subject matter, just the first thing I've noticed.
675:
think I see the logic having it where it is now: the
American firepower allowed for this turning point. Right now parts of the section feels like it disrupts the narrative, considering what came before it. All of that said, the tanks with flamethrowers sounds fucking badass, which is partly why I think that needs to be highlighted better in the article than where it is. This section is what caught my eye:
484:"Nimitz assigned Admiral Raymond Spruance, " - I had to scroll up to remember who Nimitz was. Maybe remind the reader his significance, since it's the start of a section (Opposing forces). Kinda similarly when you say "the amphibious landings of Forager". I had to look up what Forager was again. Not a huge deal, but to a non-military expert, it might be helpful to have a few more reminders.
968:
reliable. Much of his testimony was initially shared under the name of an officer who had actually died in the fighting, and his story changed over time (cf., Hoffman's version written in the 1950s and Toland's summary based his interviews with
Hirakushi in World War II), and some statements are contradicted by interrogations of other survivors. Problems with the details can be found in
698:"But his army's cohesion was disintegrating. Some of the remaining forces moved north, others holed up in whatever caves they could find and put up sporadic, disorganized resistance." - I noticed a few times earlier where a sentence started with "But", which felt clunky. And then the second part felt like it was missing a word, or a semicolon. Maybe "while others holed up"?
1062:(1968; New York: Pantheon, 1978). I had access to this book when writing the article. It gives an overview of a Japanese perspective, but Saipan is not discussed. The closest he comes is a passing mention of the Battle of the Philippine sea as part of the Japanese military being ground down by overwhelming American production.
712:"On 4 July, the 27th Infantry Division and 4th Marine Division headed northwest. The 27th division reached the east coast at Flores Point, south of Tanapag" - wait is the 27th the same for both sentences here? How did it go northwest and end up east? Going around the tip of the island, I'm guessing? If so, maybe clarify that?
437:
Is it worth mentioning the brief history of Saipan being taken by Japan/Germany/US as part of the background? The US was kind of taking the island back, and it never gave it up after the war. Or furthermore, there isn't even much of a background to the
Pacific campaign, just starting the narrative in
252:
for promotion to A class on the general text quality. On source formatting, I would suggest adding archive URLs for the
National Park Service source in the Online sources section, and also for Trefalt 2018, the only two sources we don't have archive URLs for. I will be doing a source review tomorrow.
929:
Just to add here, Morison continues to be widely used by professional historians so is clearly a reliable source. He shouldn't be used in isolation as the books can be dated at times (and sometimes can be slightly eccentric), but that's not the case here. I've referenced
Morrison in several FAs that
674:
Why does the "American firepower" section appear under "25-30 June: Central Saipan, breakthrough"? I noticed that the
Sherman tanks were already mentioned previously, just not in as much detail. I wonder if the "American firepower" should appear under "Opposing forces" under the American section? I
452:
I notice that two times you use "nmi", without ever using the term "nautical mile". I was only familiar with the abbreviation because tropical cyclone articles (which I usually focus on) often have their units listed in nautical miles/knots, which we always convert since the average reader probably
967:
Ironically, one of the major sources for the
Japanese military perspective on the island-as cited in the English-language sources- was Takashi Hirakushi. Almost all contemporary histories still cite him as a source, but as a footnote in the article suggests, his first-person testimony may not be
1164:
Sorry for the late response, I missed this until now. When working on the article, I looked for relevant articles in journals without a military focus when researching the article in the academic search engines of had access to, including Google
Scholar. They were few. I used Trefalt (2018) in
660:"Intelligence had estimated that there were no more than 300 Japanese soldiers in the area" - do we know what intelligence? It might be better saying "Advanced reconnaissance" or "Spies" or however they estimated that, than starting with "Intelligence", which is odd to me as a civilian.
423:" and left Japan vulnerable to strategic bombing" - you mention this in the third lead paragraph, but it's also in the first. I'm not sure if the material in the first paragraph should be moved to the third, since that all kind of lumps together the aftermath of the battle.
1028:, the Japanese multivolume official history of the war has been translated, and it doesn't include the sections on Saipan Most personal memoirs by Japanese people who were at Saipan have not been translated either. Hughes mentions two untranslated memoirs about Saipan.
470:"The largest towns on the island–the administrative center of Garapan with its population of 10,000, Charan Kanoa, and Tanapag–were on the western coast of the island, which was where the best landing beaches for an invasion were. " clunky wording here
533:"This made the defenses brittle." - is "brittle" the best word here? I'm not familiar with military terms here, and I'm not sure if "weak" is better, but maybe there's a better word out there than a word that makes me think of brittle candy.
526:. Tinian was the next island invaded a month after Saipan. (It's about three miles from Saipan.) I kept the format of that article because it passed both the A-class review and is a featured article using the DD Month Year format.
137:, which effectively destroyed the Japanese navy's airpower. The island's capture pierced the Japanese defense perimeter and provided the American forces with an island base that put the Japanese home islands in range of the
302:#153: For this text, "Less than a half hour after the start of the amphibious invasion", p. 63 would be the correct one, not p. 64. For the other use of this ref number, p. 64 is correct. You will have to separate the two.
271:
I added the archive link for the
National Park Service. I couldn't archive the convenience link for Trefalt as it is behind academia.edu's server, but the doi is available for readers, who have access to the journal.
1213:
The article appears to have been considerably expanded and copy edited since the ACR. It is clearly of FA standard - I can't find much to comment on, though I've made a few minor tweaks to tidy up the article.
515:"6 June 1944" - this stood out to me that your date format is European. Saipan is a US territory now, and most of the US uses Month and Day, not Day then Month. Is there a reason you chose this date format?
972:
in the article. The sources in the footnote provide more information. I've provided convenience links to the sources wherever possible so
English-speaking readers can verify the information themselves.
445:
Changed section name to "History and Geography". The US occupied Guam before the war, but not Saipan. The Saipan became a Japanese possession, part of the mandates, immediately after World War I.
922:
here.) In using Morison as a source, I did not use his analyses or assumptions of motivations. I used what he had access to, (e.g., ship number, troops, information about plans, and the like.)
811:
All in all an interesting read about a battle I knew nothing about! Well done all around. Most of my notes should be pretty easy to fix/address (I hope). Lemme know if you have any questions. ♫
999:
Also,with respect to Japanese sources: Trefalt is an English-speaking source, but her article gives a critical treatment of civilians in Saipan in her analysis of civilian survivor's diaries.
413:
911:
1024:
Interestingly, Hughes on pg 102 (with a footnote with specific references) also points out that the Japanese sources remain thin, though they would be useful. Very little of the
71:
846:
Absolutely, thanks so much for the quick responses! Happy to support now. Good work on this. I don't usually read military articles, but I found this fairly easy to follow. ♫
689:
Moved the section on the tanks to "Opposing Forces". Kept the sections on artillery and portable flame-throwers in this section, as this is when they were actively deployed.
552:"On 11 June, over 200 F6F Hellcats from the Fast Carrier Task Force launched a surprise attack on Japanese airfields in Saipan and Tinian..." - we don't have an exact number?
1104:
that could be used. I'll also stress that I am less adept at analyzing military sources than academic ones, so if there is some subtle bias I won't necessarily spot it.
798:"Hirohito only accepted Saipan's eventual fall on 25 June when his advisors told him all was lost" - in 1944 or 1945? The last year mentioned was 1945, so I have to ask
907:
1139:
1113:
1095:
320:
For #124, The Harmsen citation and its associated convenience link were corrected to p. 62, which discusses the first night's assault; #153 was corrected to p. 63.
822:
580:
1157:
430:
removed repeat of strategic bombing in lead, taking out mention of strategic bombing from the fourth paragraph, but left it in the first since it is important.
939:
1194:
987:
857:
841:
607:
453:
doesn't know what they are. Considering you mostly use imperial with metric units in parenthesis, I don't think you need the nmi, unless you think otherwise.
299:#124: ok but only Shaw, Nalty and Turbladh 1989 has the required supporting text, I could not find any in Harmsen 2021. Perhaps you should remove the latter.
726:"and inflicting 80% casualties" - the rest of the article used exact number of casualties, not percentages, so I suggest using an exact number if you can.
351:
329:
315:
281:
235:
401:
1244:
895:
217:
1071:
1041:
1008:
1228:
169:
67:
As of 1 October 2024, 01:35 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. An FAC coordinator will be responsible for closing the nomination.
914:
for a review of Morison. Morison's strength is clearly one of the reference sources for later histories of the Pacific War, including Ian Toll's
118:
262:
386:
499:
Over 60,000 troops were assigned to the assault: Approximately 22,000 were in each Marine division and 16,500 in the 27th Infantry Division.
1236:
1186:
1063:
1033:
1000:
979:
833:
599:
393:
321:
273:
227:
161:
110:
339:
770:" It was the Americans' most costly battle in the Pacific up to that time." - seems to have been deadly, not costly, unless I'm mistaken
1101:
930:
passed with no concerns being raised over the source. The series remains the most detailed account of the US Navy in World War II.
919:
952:
when possible, though I will provide foreign language sources with a quote and translation when they make a critical point (see
646:"He proposed to indefinitely postpone the 18 June invasion of Guam." - I'm guessing that happened? There's nothing else of this
51:
407:
17:
1209:
I also reviewed this in its A-class review. I'd like to offer the following comments in regards to meeting the FA criteria:
598:(Zulu time) Saipan's military time zone falls within K time (or Kilo time), GMT+10. But none of the sources clarify this.
47:
878:
a high-quality reliable source? In terms of reliability, it seems like we are working with good sources ... but even with
92:
1177:
discusses American casualties in terms of policy decisions in the war. The Tanaka (2023) chapter in the edited volume
248:
I was one of the reviewers at A class and found this article to be a comprehensive review of the battle. I can happily
130:
632:
I see "pillbox" is linked in the pic farther down in the article than when it's mentioned for the first time in prose.
39:
734:"who survived the last banzai charge" - see my earlier comment about gyokusai or banzai, as long as it's consistent.
1204:
1181:
described where Saipan fit into Japanese defense strategy at the governmental level. Though Astroth (2019),
153:
87:
1219:
As a very minor suggestion, I'd suggest replacing "took out" with something more formal, liked "destroyed"
134:
1130:, I am moderately up to speed with the Pacific Campaign, so I will reread the article with this in mind.
125:
This article is about the Battle of Saipan in June 1944. Because it was underway at the same time as the
1185:
is a book, not a journal, its is an in-depth about civilian casualties in a larger historical context.
556:
438:
1944. I see you mention more history under "geography", but that kind of feels like "background" to me.
1183:
Mass Suicides on Saipan and Tinian, 1944: An Examination of the Civilian Deaths in Historical Context.
141:
bombers. The fall of the island led to the collapse of the Japanese cabinet with the resignation of
865:
569:
That's fair, but anytime I deal with anything time specific, it's helpful to clarify with a note. ♫
208:
File:Garapan_Fire,_Saipan,_3_July_1944.jpg: the licensing here is contradictory - is this PD or CC?
1109:
891:
852:
817:
575:
146:
59:
1135:
1091:
491:
added that Nimitz was commander of the Pacific Fleet. Replaced "Forager" with "Mariana Islands"
882:
the fact that English and US-affiliated sources are almost the entire source body raises some
243:
729:
Added "about 900 casualties". I left 80% as a clause to illustrate the magnitude of the loss.
43:
1169:
analyses Japanese civilian's experience using Japanese diaries and memoirs, Plung (2021) in
870:
Source formatting seems consistent. Are "free Press" and "Metro books" really lowercase? Is
566:
which states that event times should be given in the time zone in which the event occurred.
363:
906:
Morison as a source: "New Guinea and the Marianas, March 1944–August 1944." is part of the
871:
347:
311:
258:
213:
55:
614:
Is there a reason "8000 men" doesn't have a comma for 8,000? Also, is this exact or about?
338:
then. Also I'd really appreciate it if you could check out a PR I opened recently, linked
8:
1173:
discusses Saipan in the context of evacuation policies in Japan, Giangreco (2003) in the
1017:
I've replaced the Hughes from history today with the peer-reviewed article by him in the
953:
26:
1153:
1127:
1105:
1083:
887:
847:
829:
812:
595:
591:
570:
381:
705:
Reworded sentences. Removed initial "But". Removed some of the other lead "But's" too.
201:
Alt text added to 27th infantry moving inland, troops moving through Garapan in flames
1145:
1131:
1087:
594:, I assume that for the American sources, time would be based on the WWII version of
126:
1224:
949:
935:
879:
523:
142:
34:
27:
1055:
1240:
1190:
1067:
1037:
1004:
983:
883:
837:
603:
397:
343:
325:
307:
277:
254:
231:
209:
165:
114:
1025:
522:
I wanted to keep the format consistent with this article's companion article,
1149:
376:
157:
625:, which states that commas are optional for four digit numbers.(Added comma)
555:"which began around 08:40" - timezone? Is this local time? Washington time?
563:
1220:
1179:
The Modern Japanese Nation and Empire c. 1868 to the Twenty-First Century
957:
931:
463:
nmi removed, rainfall has cm conversions, seven miles now has kilometers.
368:
I reviewed this at A-class and looks good to me. But to prove I read it:
969:
760:
622:
1216:
The lead is excellent, and a model of how they should be structured.
996:
oops, forgot about the Hughes. Removed it and replaced with Atroth.
948:
Japanese sources: My contributions tend to aim to a close adherence
667:
Replaced "Intelligence" with "Smith". This follow's Lacey's wording.
456:" 81 and 91 inches" - convert to metric please. Ditto "seven miles"
129:
in France, it is less well known. It was the first invasion of the
832:. I've responded. Do these address the issues you pointed out?
1100:
Good but I wonder if there are other sources (non-military ones)
903:
Capitalization: "Free Press" and "Metro Books" have been fixed.
875:
653:
Added footnote that the Invasion of Guam took place on 21 July.
886:
concerns. Are there really no Japanese sources on the battle?
874:
a reliable source? Some of what it says raises questions. Is
226:
Updated licensing to PD; it is part of the Marine archives.
138:
908:
History of United States Naval Operations in World War II
719:
That should have read "west coast at Flores Point". Fixed
97:
763:
states that commas are optional for four digit numbers.)
1060:
The Pacific War: World War II and the Japanese, 1931–45
187:
Updated three maps of campaign progress to upright =1.2
72:
Featured article candidates/Battle of Saipan/archive1
501:- I'm not sure the use of the colon after assault:
639:Linked first occurrence of pillbox in main text.
296:#3, #8, #21, #68, #81, #172, #267, #287: all ok.
1148:, did you get a chance to do this yet? Cheers,
1058:'s work, which was translated into English,
412:I figured I should review it since I have
791:replaced with "shells during the battle".
477:reworded, breaking it into two sentences.
293:All sources are from reliable publishers.
1235:done! Thank you for the review Nick-D!
14:
1021:. It's more in-depth and fully cited.
1171:the Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
918:and Hornfischer. (see Hornfischer's
621:Added "around" before 8000. Followed
156:and the images have been reviewed by
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
290:then. Here goes the source review:
23:
392:Thank you, Hawkeye7! I fixed it.
286:The source formatting review is a
131:Mariana and Palau Islands campaign
24:
1256:
752:"Eventually 1700" - why no comma?
372:"Nagumo" is misspelt as "Nagamo"
194:Some images are missing alt text
912:Naval Command and Heritage site
1245:21:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1229:10:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1195:18:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
1167:The Journal of Pacific History
1158:21:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1140:11:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1114:10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1096:18:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
940:10:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
13:
1:
828:Thank you for your comments,
133:. The invasion triggered the
876:http://www.historytoday.com/
135:Battle of the Philippine Sea
7:
1086:, how is this looking now?
1072:23:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1042:23:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1019:Journal of Military History
1009:16:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
988:15:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
896:08:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
858:19:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
842:18:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
823:01:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
608:19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
581:17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
540:"brittle" changed to "weak"
402:14:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
387:08:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
180:Suggest scaling up the maps
10:
1261:
557:Coordinated Universal Time
408:Support from Hurricanehink
352:16:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
330:15:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
316:07:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
282:21:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
263:17:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
236:16:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
218:05:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
170:18:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
152:The article has passed an
119:18:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
66:
1175:Pacific Historical Review
334:The source review is a
147:prime minister of Japan
1054:Hughes also mentions
268:Thank you Matarisvan,
872:Samuel Eliot Morison
784:What is "ordnance "?
954:Frederick the Great
916:Pacific War Trilogy
777:Changed to "deadly"
596:Military time zone
1205:Support by Nick-D
920:review of Morison
855:
820:
578:
127:Normandy landings
121:
105:
104:
1252:
851:
816:
574:
562:Here I followed
524:Battle of Tinian
384:
379:
108:
77:
76:
64:
63:
35:Battle of Saipan
28:Battle of Saipan
1260:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1207:
868:
414:an FAC open too
410:
382:
377:
366:
246:
68:
37:
33:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1258:
1248:
1247:
1232:
1231:
1217:
1214:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1022:
1012:
1011:
997:
991:
990:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
962:
961:
945:
944:
943:
942:
924:
923:
904:
867:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
809:
808:
807:
806:
800:
799:
795:
794:
793:
792:
786:
785:
781:
780:
779:
778:
772:
771:
767:
766:
765:
764:
759:Added comma. (
754:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
736:
735:
732:
731:
730:
723:
722:
721:
720:
714:
713:
709:
708:
707:
706:
700:
699:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
684:
683:
677:
676:
671:
670:
669:
668:
662:
661:
657:
656:
655:
654:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
634:
633:
629:
628:
627:
626:
616:
615:
611:
610:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
553:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
541:
535:
534:
530:
529:
528:
527:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
503:
502:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
478:
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
458:
457:
454:
449:
448:
447:
446:
440:
439:
434:
433:
432:
431:
425:
424:
421:
409:
406:
405:
404:
374:
373:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
305:
304:
303:
300:
297:
294:
269:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
221:
220:
205:
204:
203:
202:
196:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
182:
181:
154:A-class review
123:
122:
109:Nominator(s):
103:
102:
101:
100:
98:External links
95:
90:
82:
81:
75:
74:
30:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1257:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1103:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1056:SaburĹŤ Ienaga
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
995:
994:
993:
992:
989:
985:
981:
978:
971:
966:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
941:
937:
933:
928:
927:
926:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
888:Jo-Jo Eumerus
885:
881:
877:
873:
866:Source review
859:
854:
849:
848:Hurricanehink
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:Hurricanehink
827:
826:
825:
824:
819:
814:
813:Hurricanehink
804:
803:
802:
801:
797:
796:
790:
789:
788:
787:
783:
782:
776:
775:
774:
773:
769:
768:
762:
758:
757:
756:
755:
751:
750:
744:
740:
739:
738:
737:
733:
728:
727:
725:
724:
718:
717:
716:
715:
711:
710:
704:
703:
702:
701:
697:
696:
688:
687:
686:
685:
681:
680:
679:
678:
673:
672:
666:
665:
664:
663:
659:
658:
652:
651:
650:
649:
645:
644:
638:
637:
636:
635:
631:
630:
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
613:
612:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:Hurricanehink
590:
589:
582:
577:
572:
571:Hurricanehink
568:
567:
565:
561:
560:
558:
554:
551:
550:
546:
545:
539:
538:
537:
536:
532:
531:
525:
521:
520:
519:
518:
514:
513:
508:Colon deleted
507:
506:
505:
504:
500:
497:
496:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
482:
476:
475:
474:
473:
469:
468:
462:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
450:
444:
443:
442:
441:
436:
435:
429:
428:
427:
426:
422:
419:
418:
417:
415:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
380:
371:
370:
369:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
306:
301:
298:
295:
292:
291:
289:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
270:
267:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
251:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
192:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
120:
116:
112:
107:
106:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
83:
79:
78:
73:
70:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
36:
29:
19:
1208:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1132:Gog the Mild
1088:Gog the Mild
1059:
1026:Senshi SĹŤsho
1018:
915:
869:
810:
742:
564:MOS:TIMEZONE
498:
411:
375:
367:
335:
287:
249:
247:
175:Image review
174:
173:
151:
124:
93:Citation bot
32:
958:Joan of Arc
741:Changed to
143:Hideki TĹŤjĹŤ
970:footnote h
805:added 1944
761:MOS:DIGITS
623:MOS:DIGITS
344:Matarisvan
308:Matarisvan
255:Matarisvan
244:Matarisvan
210:Nikkimaria
950:WP:NONENG
880:WP:NONENG
383:(discuss)
364:Hawkeye 7
342:. Cheers
1150:Ian Rose
884:WP:UNDUE
743:gyokusai
378:Hawkeye7
158:Hawkeye7
88:Analysis
1126:Thanks
253:Cheers
250:support
80:Toolbox
48:history
1221:Nick-D
932:Nick-D
547:Battle
145:, the
1237:Wtfiv
1187:Wtfiv
1128:Jo-Jo
1084:Jo-Jo
1064:Wtfiv
1034:Wtfiv
1001:Wtfiv
980:Wtfiv
834:Wtfiv
600:Wtfiv
394:Wtfiv
322:Wtfiv
274:Wtfiv
228:Wtfiv
162:Wtfiv
111:Wtfiv
56:watch
52:links
16:<
1241:talk
1225:talk
1191:talk
1154:talk
1136:talk
1110:talk
1102:here
1092:talk
1068:talk
1038:talk
1005:talk
984:talk
936:talk
892:talk
853:talk
838:talk
818:talk
604:talk
576:talk
398:talk
348:talk
340:here
336:pass
326:talk
312:talk
288:pass
278:talk
259:talk
232:talk
214:talk
166:talk
139:B-29
115:talk
60:logs
44:talk
40:edit
1146:Gog
1144:Hi
1082:Hi
956:or
856:)
821:)
579:)
1243:)
1227:)
1193:)
1156:)
1138:)
1112:)
1094:)
1070:)
1040:)
1007:)
986:)
938:)
894:)
840:)
606:)
559:?
416:.
400:)
350:)
328:)
314:)
280:)
261:)
234:)
216:)
168:)
160:.
149:.
117:)
58:|
54:|
50:|
46:|
42:|
1239:(
1223:(
1189:(
1152:(
1134:(
1108:(
1090:(
1066:(
1036:(
1003:(
982:(
934:(
890:(
850:(
836:(
815:(
745:.
602:(
573:(
396:(
346:(
324:(
310:(
276:(
257:(
230:(
212:(
164:(
113:(
62:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.