173:
1136:
1069:
1008:
841:
110:
130:
689:
90:
120:
36:
140:
100:
1300:. If it weren't for my caption, the ordinary reader would not even know that it has been tagged for deletion because there's no sign for them. If they click on the image, they are still not told. You have to click again and again through a maze of links to arrive at the deletion discussion which has few comments because it is so hard to find. It's the bureaucratic obfuscation satirised in
150:
929:"We pledge that we will never attack or mock any group whose members include those who do not have a choice about their membership in the group. Groups covered by this pledge include, but are not limited to, those based on race, nationality, sex, gender, age, disability, social or economic status, veteran status, body type, or religion."
1513:. And then there is getting access to those that exist, & finding those that exist. Surmounting these issues is often much more difficult than those who don't write articles think. (FWIW, if anyone is interested in creating more articles on women of the Early Roman Empire, the definitive work is Marie-Therese Raepsaet-Charlier,
1261:
Numerous images of the subject have been deleted or nominated for deletion and the discussion for the image to the right is still open. The article too has been nominated and deleted so many times that it has been difficult to make an exact count. The issue here is of making such women (in)visible
1565:
is a policy. Rather, our insistence on things like verifiability present a limit to the imaginations of a certain chattering class that thinks any outlet is only acceptable if it observes their preferred orthodoxies. I posit that we should recognize these RIGHTGREATWRONGS editors for what they are
294:. This means their lives and works are effectively hidden from people without access. As editors, if we have access to databases, we are able to make that "invisible" information "visible". Recent examples of women brought to light from resources hiding in databases include civil rights activist
216:
says "We need to actively look for women's stories, and put them back into the historical narrative, there are so many women that should be household names but just aren't." Sometimes, as in the case of an entire group of women programmers, their contributions are just disguised enough to become
1349:
In other words, you uploaded an image locally to try to avoid a deletion discussion on the copyright status of the work, and you're annoyed that your attempt to circumvent that discussion didn't completely work. You wan't to complain that no one knows about the deletion nomination, when we
1174:
I am personally a bit surprised to see the extent to which anyone connected with this Phelps article seems very eager to assume bad faith. I would recommend that before you accuse others of vexatious attempts to make women disappear, you should maybe check to see if hypothetically, their
942:
has written in his edit comment "No, but non-binary vs. analog is a joke, and there are no special groups immune to good-natured humor." So we disagree. I'll just ask a couple of admins here to take a look if the photo is re-inserted again and decide on the best way to keep it out.
804:
995:, misleadingly implying that Phelps herself was nominated for deletion (if that were possible), or that her article is up for deletion (which it's not – it's a garden-variety dispute over the image's licensing). So I posted the following image parodying misleading captions:
1241:, I like you, but this is just bullshit. I don't know about last year's PRODs or speedies or whatever, but at this point no one's trying to "delete" Clarice Phelps, or even her article, or questioning her notability. There's a question about the licensing of the
237:, history curricula standards discuss women at a rate of "approximately 1 woman for every 3 men" and focus largely on white people's roles in history. History classes also tend to reflect women's activism, but ignore the other hats they wore through time. In the
281:
throughout history. But we can make those whom history has left behind more visible. If you find resources in print, research suggests that helping that information get online can make it much more likely to be discovered. Knowledge itself is a huge source of
143:
1215:
explicitly states bad faith must have been involved. While I myself wrote articles about women and persons of color, I have warned against these sorts of initiatives asserting that history hasn't represented enough of the right groups.
113:
1566:
and encourage them to write for periodicals and publishing houses where their screeds could become source material instead of allowing them to circumvent policy altogether out of fear of their reprisals and persecutions.
1535:
That, of course, is the problem in a nutshell. Verifiability and 'only reflecting what reliable sources are saying' are vital principles here, but when reliable sources largely ignore someone, that gives us a problem.
258:
103:
1052:
A simple good-natured pun (apparent only after you check what's behind behind both links) on an accident of the
English language mocks nobody. But some can't see that and removed it. OK, so instead I posted a
153:
133:
990:
873:
844:
70:
333:
this month. This initiative is a great way to help women be truly more visible. This Women's
History Month, let's complete as much history as we can and let the women shine through!
248:
We know women are missing from history as it is usually written. We know that they are actively written out and we know that their work is not taught at the same rates. If they are
1389:
1202:
76:
1231:
1328:"Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."
918:
1581:
1526:
1502:
883:
is mired in noisy and unpleasant discussion, quite unlike the usual process. The extent to which such subjects attract hostile attention is quite remarkable so thanks to
980:
1341:
1287:
1271:
1256:
819:
988:– Apparently you're not even paying attention to what got posted each time. The very first post to this thread inserted a photo of Clarice Phelps carrying the caption,
778:
738:
1545:
1405:
763:
733:
1111:
1469:
123:
290:
becomes more visible when added to
Knowledge. In my own experiences, there are many women who are written about in newspapers and journals that are locked behind
758:
713:
277:
So if women are being hidden, what are we supposed to do about it? Obviously, we aren't going to have the resources to create full parity between men, women and
1293:
905:
No editwarring over joke photos. It could very easily be taken that you are making fun of non-binary people. We don't do that. Thanks for your understanding.
768:
743:
723:
718:
676:
667:
898:
926:
In the first issue after I became editor-in-chief, I wrote "The
Signpost must be more sensitive to potential offense or insult among our diverse readership..
1354:
which would have notified the talk page of the original nomination that you tried to circumvent by uploading locally, except you already did so. And you've
728:
1476:
706:
425:
1096:
mock a certain group, to wit people intolerant of criticism of themselves. So you removed that too? Really? Because... why? Because woke-scolds are a
1599:
880:
753:
700:
55:
44:
788:
773:
1117:
856:
793:
860:
783:
318:
1650:
400:
824:
636:
1517:(Louvain: Peeters, 1987). Not only am I unable to find a copy anywhere close to me, it is in French, a language I cannot read.) --
831:
21:
1626:
808:
93:
1621:
1616:
872:
is displayed as public domain by both Oak Ridge
National Laboratory and the Department of Energy, but we now have vexatious
322:
305:
Some opportunities to shine light on women and non-gender binary people this March include the following awesome projects:
350:
212:. That's not a metaphor: women become invisible over time and are even written out of history altogether. Historian, Dr.
923:
I've removed the photo once again. It has been re-inserted 3 times now, so I'd take another re-insertion as editwarring.
876:
to argue otherwise – novel arguments not previously presented for our many other good faith images from that laboratory.
1611:
310:
855:
is another prominent example. The repeated deletion of this black woman has generated adverse media coverage such as
481:
375:
1355:
586:
859:. The good news is that the public are now allowed to read about this person again, following a recent appeal at
1363:
1509:
As I often have stated, one of the problems with many topics where our coverage is inadequate comes back to
1606:
688:
187:– once considered a type of model called "refrigerator ladies" – were in fact the first programmers of the
49:
35:
17:
1394:
Can't you see that the rules magically work to hide deletion discussions involving nonwhite nonmale nons?
1480:
610:
30:
The
Incredible Invisible Woman: No more "Hidden Figures", let's work to make women visible on Knowledge!
1208:
1337:
1267:
894:
283:
1135:
1068:
1007:
1574:
1387:
1224:
1200:
840:
1450:
1358:
that attempts to comply with copyright are not harassment, but you'd rather spend more time here
1351:
1179:
1176:
1515:
Prosopographie des femmes de
Prosopographie des femmes de l'ordre sénatorial (Ier - IIe siècles)
268:
behind paywalls, but even her public domain image was stored there! Clipping out the photo from
1072:
This image has been subject to repeated vexatious, noisy, and unpleasant attempts to delete it
329:
status. If you're into photography and finding freely licensed photography, consider adding to
326:
241:, "there is just one statue of a named black woman in the entire country". It was dedicated to
205:
1098:
group whose members include those who do not have a choice about their membership in the group
1458:
1144:
1012:
295:
1366:), while disparaging people who are working to bring missing articles on women to GA status.
1632:
1487:. Vouchers can be used to purchase more books to add "invisible" information to Knowledge.
1428:
1333:
1263:
1238:
973:
911:
890:
884:
330:
163:
8:
1568:
1541:
1446:
1432:
1373:
to your heart's content, but please don't act like it's actually accomplishing anything.
1218:
963:
EiC, then I'll suggest just leaving it in and make sure that readers here are aware that
201:
450:
192:
529:
1522:
1442:
1374:
1212:
1187:
946:
815:
556:"E-visibility of environmental science researchers at the University of South Africa"
555:
278:
233:
black women in history but then focus largely on white women's contributions. In the
222:
325:
is now a full WikiProject! Women in Green works to bring articles about women up to
1495:
1140:
1016:
649:
567:
462:
299:
265:
1479:
this month, and one of the Amazon voucher prizes (£50 (c.$ 66), kindly donated by
653:
1454:
1400:
1282:
1251:
1155:
1106:
1027:
968:
906:
1552:
1537:
1462:
1457:'s article could use some work, and I could particularly use assistance at the
1362:
in entirely more edits than you've actually contributed to the article itself (
852:
269:
249:
238:
226:
213:
184:
1644:
1436:
1359:
1120:
956:
306:
234:
221:. It's even more of an issue with black women in history. Just like the late
505:
172:
1518:
1296:
in last month's
Signpost. Consider the image of Clarice Phelps shown here
1245:, and that is all. To see a conspiracy in this is asinine. Cool your jets.
242:
1562:
1490:
1370:
1183:
376:"Why were women written out of history? An interview with Bettany Hughes"
180:
1472:
has fast response times and can be used to find "invisible" information.
1395:
1277:
1246:
1150:
1101:
1022:
950:
1465:
pages, since I typically edit biographies and not film/book articles.
571:
1310:"On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."
937:
482:"What Schools Teach About Women's History Leaves a Lot to Be Desired"
218:
1147:, but from the historical record there's probably no way to know it.
1011:
As a counterpoint to the ENIAC photo, these three women operating a
466:
401:"The Women Who Contributed to Science but Were Buried in Footnotes"
287:
257:
314:
291:
1292:
The nature of what's happening in such cases was discussed in a
1485:
Most articles destubbed and improved on
British and Irish women
1301:
309:
is hosting virtual and physical edithathons around the globe.
272:
allowed her to become literally visible online to more people.
1050:
is not responsible for the inclusion of the above. Obviously.
451:"Most Invisible of All: Black Women's Voluntary Associations"
188:
1123:, I think the following makes my original point much better:
863:. But there are still attempts to make her invisible again.
560:
South
African Journal of Libraries and Information Science
1077:
1075:
1073:
351:"Meet the 'Refrigerator Ladies' Who Programmed the ENIAC"
264:
Not only was most of the information about suffragist
179:
Historian Kathryn Kleiman discovered that women like
1441:, myself, and others are working towards improving
932:
I intend to keep that pledge as best as I know how.
829:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
587:"Real-time Stream of DOIs Being Cited in Knowledge"
637:"Should Archivists Edit Knowledge, and If So How?"
635:
553:
1642:
1116:Followup: Stimulated by useful discussion here
1100:? Are you truly so lacking in self-perception?
426:"When Will Science Celebrate Everyone Equally?"
1325:"But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?"
161:
1092:Now that last caption, I will openly admit,
554:Adriaanse, Leslie; Rensleigh, Chris (2018).
1276:You're right, it's an ongoing conspiracy.
611:"DOI Referrals from wikipedia.org per day"
530:"UK's 'First' Black Woman Memorial Statue"
1319:"Ah, well, the lights had probably gone."
1182:GAs were biographies of women, and their
1134:
1067:
1006:
839:
348:
1468:I also want to generally note that the
832:
423:
373:
286:(DOI) referrals. Information stored in
14:
1643:
967:is not responsible for including it.
633:
424:Jaggard, Victoria (26 February 2020).
479:
448:
321:in March. Another excellent project,
313:in conjunction with Art+Feminism and
252:(WOC) the statistics are even worse.
54:
29:
584:
398:
1651:Knowledge Signpost archives 2020-03
27:
1143:people among those operating this
887:for her timely article about this.
687:
256:
171:
56:
34:
28:
1662:
1598:is written by editors like you –
1371:publicly express personal outrage
814:These comments are automatically
1313:"That’s the display department."
1307:"But the plans were on display…"
955:. If no admin wishes to enforce
225:, black women literally become "
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
627:
603:
578:
455:The Journal of Southern History
349:Sheppard, Alyson (2013-10-13).
1449:did a commendable job getting
825:add the page to your watchlist
547:
522:
498:
473:
442:
417:
392:
367:
342:
71:The Incredible Invisible Woman
13:
1:
654:10.1080/23257962.2017.1338561
374:Sanders, Kevin (2016-02-29).
1352:actually have a bot for that
800:
208:, it's time to consider the
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
1475:Lastly there is an ongoing
1119:, particularly comments by
881:nomination for Did You Know
229:". Historical accounts may
10:
1667:
1445:and other Hidden Figures.
585:Wass, Joe (3 March 2015).
480:White, Anna (March 2019).
449:Scott, Anne Firor (1990).
210:incredible invisible woman
1582:19:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
1546:10:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
1527:01:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
1503:19:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
1406:23:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
1390:22:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
1342:10:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
1288:04:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
1272:16:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
1257:16:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
1232:18:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
1203:17:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
1112:22:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
981:18:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
919:12:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
899:15:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
284:digital object identifier
1511:lack of reliable sources
1453:to Good Article status.
1055:comment on that removal:
1015:are an early example of
634:Cooban, George (2017).
510:East End Women's Museum
399:Yong, Ed (2019-02-11).
1481:Ser Amantio di Nicolao
1262:and it's a live one.
1161:
1080:
1033:
991:Nominated for deletion
848:
845:Nominated for deletion
822:. To follow comments,
692:
642:Archives & Records
506:"Why Women's History?"
261:
217:invisible – hidden in
176:
39:
1145:differential analyser
1138:
1071:
1013:differential analyser
1010:
843:
691:
380:English Heritage Blog
296:Margaret Just Butcher
260:
206:Women's History Month
175:
38:
1356:already been advised
1322:"So had the stairs."
1316:"With a flashlight."
1186:is about to be too.
1019:people in computing.
818:from this article's
486:Smithsonian Magazine
1211:philosophy driving
1209:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
986:re-inserted 3 times
430:National Geographic
315:Wiki Loves Folklore
202:Black History Month
1561:a problem because
1162:
1139:There may be some
1081:
1034:
849:
809:Discuss this story
779:On the bright side
739:Arbitration report
693:
680:"Community view" →
331:Visible Wiki Women
262:
193:Women in computing
177:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
1557:It does not give
1443:Katherine Johnson
1360:having an opinion
1213:subaltern studies
1051:
959:or the wishes of
833:purging the cache
764:From the archives
734:Discussion report
572:10.7553/83-2-1636
319:virtual editathon
279:non-binary people
223:Katherine Johnson
200:As we're leaving
50:View Latest Issue
1658:
1635:
1580:
1577:
1571:
1556:
1500:
1498:
1493:
1486:
1470:Resource Request
1440:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1369:You are free to
1230:
1227:
1221:
1198:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1045:
976:
954:
941:
914:
836:
834:
828:
807:
711:
703:
696:
679:
672:"Community view"
671:
658:
657:
656:– via EBSCOhost.
639:
631:
625:
624:
622:
621:
615:Chronograph Labs
607:
601:
600:
598:
597:
582:
576:
575:
551:
545:
544:
542:
541:
526:
520:
519:
517:
516:
502:
496:
495:
493:
492:
477:
471:
470:
446:
440:
439:
437:
436:
421:
415:
414:
412:
411:
396:
390:
389:
387:
386:
371:
365:
364:
362:
361:
346:
300:Cornelia Lampton
266:Alice Wiley Seay
204:and coming into
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1631:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1602:
1592:
1591:
1575:
1569:
1567:
1550:
1496:
1491:
1489:
1484:
1455:Dorothy Vaughan
1429:Coffeeandcrumbs
1426:
1382:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1239:Andrew Davidson
1225:
1219:
1217:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1160:
1032:
979:
974:
944:
935:
917:
912:
885:Megalibrarygirl
861:Deletion review
838:
830:
823:
812:
811:
805:+ Add a comment
803:
799:
798:
797:
759:Recent research
714:From the editor
704:
699:
697:
694:
683:
682:
677:
674:
669:
663:
662:
661:
632:
628:
619:
617:
609:
608:
604:
595:
593:
583:
579:
552:
548:
539:
537:
528:
527:
523:
514:
512:
504:
503:
499:
490:
488:
478:
474:
467:10.2307/2210662
447:
443:
434:
432:
422:
418:
409:
407:
397:
393:
384:
382:
372:
368:
359:
357:
347:
343:
274:
273:
254:
197:
196:
168:
167:
164:Megalibrarygirl
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1664:
1654:
1653:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1594:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1570:Chris Troutman
1530:
1529:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1473:
1447:GorillaWarfare
1433:Flyer22 Frozen
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1367:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1323:
1320:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1294:special report
1236:
1235:
1234:
1220:Chris Troutman
1168:
1166:
1164:
1148:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1114:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1020:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
971:
933:
930:
927:
924:
909:
888:
877:
865:
864:
853:Clarice Phelps
813:
810:
802:
801:
796:
791:
786:
781:
776:
771:
769:Traffic report
766:
761:
756:
751:
749:Community view
746:
744:By the numbers
741:
736:
731:
726:
724:Special report
721:
719:News and notes
716:
710:
698:
686:
685:
684:
675:
666:
665:
664:
660:
659:
648:(2): 257–272.
626:
602:
577:
546:
521:
497:
472:
441:
416:
391:
366:
340:
323:Women in Green
298:, and pianist
275:
270:Newspapers.com
263:
255:
250:women of color
239:United Kingdom
227:Hidden Figures
214:Bettany Hughes
198:
185:Frances Spence
178:
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
68:Community view
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1663:
1652:
1649:
1648:
1646:
1634:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1601:
1597:
1583:
1578:
1572:
1564:
1560:
1554:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1494:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1372:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1332:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1298:(above right)
1295:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1222:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1146:
1142:
1137:
1122:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1076:
1074:
1070:
1056:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1018:
1014:
1009:
994:
992:
987:
984:
983:
982:
977:
970:
966:
962:
958:
952:
948:
939:
934:
931:
928:
925:
922:
921:
920:
915:
908:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
896:
892:
889:
886:
882:
879:Likewise the
878:
875:
871:
867:
866:
862:
858:
854:
851:
850:
846:
842:
835:
826:
821:
817:
806:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
780:
777:
775:
772:
770:
767:
765:
762:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
747:
745:
742:
740:
737:
735:
732:
730:
727:
725:
722:
720:
717:
715:
712:
708:
702:
695:In this issue
690:
681:
673:
655:
651:
647:
643:
638:
630:
616:
612:
606:
592:
588:
581:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
550:
535:
531:
525:
511:
507:
501:
487:
483:
476:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
445:
431:
427:
420:
406:
402:
395:
381:
377:
370:
356:
352:
345:
341:
339:
338:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
303:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
271:
267:
259:
253:
251:
246:
244:
240:
236:
235:United States
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
207:
203:
194:
191:. (See also:
190:
186:
182:
174:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1596:The Signpost
1595:
1558:
1514:
1510:
1488:
1451:Mary Jackson
1401:
1396:
1297:
1283:
1278:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1151:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1054:
1048:The Signpost
1047:
1028:
1023:
989:
985:
965:The Signpost
964:
961:The Signpost
960:
947:TonyBallioni
869:
748:
729:In the media
707:all comments
701:1 March 2020
645:
641:
629:
618:. Retrieved
614:
605:
594:. Retrieved
590:
580:
563:
559:
549:
538:. Retrieved
536:. 2016-06-30
533:
524:
513:. Retrieved
509:
500:
489:. Retrieved
485:
475:
469:– via JSTOR.
458:
454:
444:
433:. Retrieved
429:
419:
408:. Retrieved
405:The Atlantic
404:
394:
383:. Retrieved
379:
369:
358:. Retrieved
355:Mental Floss
354:
344:
336:
335:
327:Good Article
311:Women in Red
307:Art+Feminism
304:
276:
247:
243:Mary Seacole
230:
209:
199:
94:PDF download
57:1 March 2020
1633:Suggestions
1477:destubathon
1364:exactly one
816:transcluded
317:is doing a
181:Jean Bartik
144:X (Twitter)
1141:non-binary
1017:non-binary
969:Smallbones
907:Smallbones
868:Her image
847:yet again.
620:2020-02-27
596:2020-02-27
540:2020-02-27
515:2020-02-27
491:2020-02-27
435:2020-02-27
410:2020-02-27
385:2020-02-27
360:2020-02-27
337:References
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2020-03-01
1627:Subscribe
1553:Neiltonks
1538:Neiltonks
1483:) is for
993:yet again
975:smalltalk
913:smalltalk
820:talk page
245:in 2016.
219:footnotes
1645:Category
1622:Newsroom
1617:Archives
1600:join in!
1437:TJMSmith
1184:next one
1121:Levivich
874:attempts
754:In focus
670:Previous
591:Crossref
534:BBC News
461:(1): 3.
292:paywalls
288:archives
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
1519:llywrch
1435:, and
870:(right)
789:Opinion
774:Gallery
231:mention
1497:(Talk)
1492:Kees08
1334:Andrew
1302:HHGTTG
1264:Andrew
1046:Note:
957:WP:3RR
891:Andrew
794:Humour
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
1612:About
1243:image
951:MER-C
784:Op-Ed
566:(2).
189:ENIAC
16:<
1607:Home
1576:talk
1563:WP:V
1542:talk
1523:talk
1463:film
1461:and
1459:book
1338:talk
1268:talk
1226:talk
1207:The
1177:last
1094:does
949:and
938:EEng
895:talk
857:this
678:Next
183:and
1402:Eng
1336:🐉(
1284:Eng
1266:🐉(
1253:Eng
1180:two
1157:Eng
1108:Eng
1029:Eng
893:🐉(
650:doi
568:doi
463:doi
162:By
79:—
1647::
1559:us
1544:)
1525:)
1431:,
1344:'
1340:)
1304::
1270:)
897:)
668:←
646:38
644:.
640:.
613:.
589:.
564:83
562:.
558:.
532:.
508:.
484:.
459:56
457:.
453:.
428:.
403:.
378:.
353:.
302:.
195:.)
1579:)
1573:(
1555::
1551:@
1540:(
1521:(
1439::
1427:@
1397:E
1383:G
1380:M
1377:G
1279:E
1248:E
1229:)
1223:(
1196:G
1193:M
1190:G
1152:E
1149:-
1103:E
1079:.
1024:E
1021:-
978:)
972:(
953::
945:@
940::
936:@
916:)
910:(
837:.
827:.
709:)
705:(
652::
623:.
599:.
574:.
570::
543:.
518:.
494:.
465::
438:.
413:.
388:.
363:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
