Knowledge talk:WikiProject Animal rights/Archive 2

647:

also more familiar with animal welfare legislation than them. But it is highly desireable to have someone who conducts animal testing, and who works in the regulation of animal testing, editing on the animal testing articles. I think you would have a VERY hard time finding another scientist who conducts animal testing who thinks my edits are extremely POV for a scientist. In other words, just as I assume good faith and assume your bad edits are caused by perspective and not an active anti-testing campaign you are conducting by inserting BUAV commercial literature throughout the testing pages, I expect you to assume good faith as I edit with the perspective of a scientist in the field of animal testing. As another point of reference, I have not to date performed any work, or done any consultation, with any non-scientific pro-testing agenda driven associations. In other words, I have no relation to Pro-test, or the Foundation for Biomedical Research, etc. I do belong to multiple societies that are scientifically organized, and all of them have pro-testing arms (which I similarly do not participate in). I am not a pro-testing activist. Just a scientist that is alarmed at my perceived misrepresentation of my profession on Knowledge which is caused by an enormous imbalance in the contributions of strongly anti-testing editors like you, and the contributions of people who actually conduct testing and their POV. From my POV, testing is about animal welfare, and progress on scientific agendas. Animal rights receives a dramatically UNDUE balance - it occupies less than a fraction of a percent of the activities related to testing, yet covers more than half the testing pages because it occupies the majority of the opinion of two vigilant editors on testing.--

536:

with a citation in the last week that could be looked up in five minutes on PubMed (as this one similarly can be looked up). And I looked it up, again, and provided the entire abstract for her perusal. As a second point, this talk page discussion by Slimvirgin is sort of an ambush - none of these edits occurred on the page for which this is the appropriate discussion forum. She presumably thinks that people that edit the ANIMAL RIGHTS page need to know about this sort of underhanded activity. Third, the noted contact between the aspiring ALF operative and BUAV is cited, and has not been refuted, to my knowledge, or I would not have included it. --

1189:

some elements of the animal rights movement and the conservation movement, the extermination of introduced species from island environments. I'm particularly interested in improving the criticism section (which I wrote myself, although I was logged out at the time). I myself am a proponent of island restoration and while I hope I addressed the criticisms neutrally I would value another set of eyes. Reading over it again I see that I wrote it before inline cites were pushed as aggressively as they are now, I'll address this over the next few days. Cheers.

486:

the pro-testing side (and I suspect only an extreme side of that POV) to the point where it is hard to trust what he writes. Sources who disagree with his POV are routinely removed and dismissed as idiots, even when they're reliable scientific sources. Often his edits appear almost meaningless, with typos and spelling errors, and without proper citations (though that aspect has improved recently). Sometimes he seems actively to misrepresent the sources. The result is that I have to follow him around copyediting and trying to work out what he means.

31: 693:. I'm concerned he or she is essentially cut and pasting incidents from the ALF's website, with all the POV and verifiability issue that engenders. I'm trying to de-POV, but can't keep up. The editor has been blocked previously but reincarnates with a variation on the name. I'm trying to bring this under control without blocking again, but don't seem to be getting though. If anyone can't help, I feel I have little choice but to block for evading an indef. 1562: 1484:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found 755:. It was fine before our friend got going, because it listed the acts picked up by the press and explained the consequences (arrests/sentences) for the activists as well as what they did. I'm also concerned with the upload of ever more images documenting various crimes from activist websites and Indymedia (and editors claiming to be the copyright holder) and using them to document the articles of the subject of the crime. See 830:

be able to avoid that. As for the images, I don't have a problem with their use in articles about the ALF and their actions (though even there some of them have questionable encyclopaedic value and seem more about promotion than education), I do have a problem with using them to illustrate articles on the subject of the raids. Principally because they are unreliable representation and give undue weight to a POV.

205:, as well as several articles linked from them, are in need of some unification/reorganization, cleanup, etc.. The articles are mostly decent quality, but information is spread between them in a way less than ideal (suggesting little cooperation between their respective editors). This project may be interested in putting some effort into them. Just a heads up. — 1417:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. 1637:

about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

316:

ages ago, with the ability for complex mental process, and their demonstration. I'd say deciding what rights personhood entailed, environmental ethics and the proper role of Government were more pressing. And, of course, Epistemology. I've become very interested in Hume and Popper recently. But anyway, that doesn't matter.

1999:, was started by a new editor based almost entirely on one otherwise unpublished author's Phd dissertation and a blog. Without having a background in this area, it's difficult to tell whether this should be an article. Maybe it just needs better sourcing and writing? Or not? Input from this WikiProject would be helpful. 1256:. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Knowledge 1.0 Editorial team, 2053: 1636:

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable

1292:

article? What does sentience have to do with animal rights? Marginal connection at best. Animal rights should not be the primary focus of the article. Members of this project have hijacked that article, when it should be focused on concepts like thought, perception, communication, expression. While I

829:

Thanks SV. I'm pretty sure it is the same person, but I never really supported a block in the first place. I think they are trying to be helpful, but seem unwilling to listen to advice. If the blocking admin spots them, I'm sure he will reblock, but if we can reign the editor in a little, then we may

504:

At the other end, his edits misrepresent the source by leaving out key information. For example, this edit implies that the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection cooperates with the Animal Liberation Front, although anyone familiar with these groups knows that the BUAV opposes violent action

315:

Other issues that have the importance? The only thing I've ever heard about giving animals personhood was a rather dismissive article, and I read the Economist, the New Scientist, The Times, and have recently taken up the Philosophers magazine. From what I've heard, the issue of personhood was sorted

1188:

I am flagging this article to the attention of this project to see if you are interested in reviewing it and possibly adding to it. Disclaimer, I wrote most of it (quite a while ago). I suspect there may be overlap as the field of island restoration is one of the greatest sources of friction between

646:

Yet another objection to the tone of the above criticism - that I am extreme in the context of people who conduct animal testing. People who conduct testing are my direct peers, and I am in contact with them daily. I tend to be much more familiar with the animal rights efforts than most of them, and

580:

What exactly does "two contacts away" mean? That the BUAV officer knows someone who knows someone who is a direct action activist? If so, that is really a very weak assertion. Almost everyone is "two contacts away" from thousands of people, a great number of whom they may heartily disagree with. I'm

349:

been sorted out yet, and it certainly wasn't sorted out ages ago. That should be obvious even from Google-ing around a bit. Animals aren't presently regarded as persons. Prominent philosophers and legal scholars at respected institutions (as well as a significant number of laypeople, I might add)

1652:

or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help

790:

I think this editor (if it's the same person as last time, which isn't clear as there were several account names and IP addresses) is trying to edit within the policies, judging by some of the edits I've seen. But it's clear that he's not very familiar with them. So I suggest as a first step trying

485:

If this is true, he could be an enormous help on articles about animal testing (although in a sense he's also in a conflict of interest -- he has posted in various places that this is personal for him). However, instead of being helpful, his edits are deeply problematic. He strongly represents only

276:

Larklight, everyone who talks about this issue -- mostly people who support it or are studying it, obviously -- calls it the most central, most important philosophical issue, because it's exploring the boundaries of personhood. Can you think of any other issue that philosophers are involved in that

509:

Despite their claims of leaderless resistance, Ingrid Newkirk, in her book Free the Animals, describes how Ronnie Lee introduces an aspiring ALF activist to a new activist cell in northern England. The activist initially found Lee by first contacting BUAV, making it clear that a BUAV officer is at

867:

I saw one of them being used as the main image on the new article about the rabbit farm, which is clearly not an appropriate use, unless the article's about the raid, but the raid in itself isn't notable enough. I was going to remove it, but then I saw the rest of the article, and really the page

535:

To be clear, those citations are fully defined, as in anyone who has access to a medical library can look up an article in a given year, volume, and page number of STROKE. Similarly, a polite request to fill out those citations could be easily accomplished. Slimvirgin had a similar point of issue

477:

He's been editing in this area since July 2006 with this account, and before that with anon IPs. He has said in various places that he conducts research on non-human primates, and I believe said he was in charge of such a unit. He has also said that he sits or chairs (or used to sit or chair, I

1308:

The link between sentience and animal rights is rather clear. Animals are defined (philosophically) as sentient beings; and sentience is what makes attributing rights, or more generally moral status, meaningful. That connection is not at all marginal and fully justifies the tagging. As for the

114:

According to the article, there's nothing in that bill that criminalizes anything. The article only says it sponsors research intended to help mold the minds of the citizenry--strictly along the lines of a great deal of other psychological research intended to produce well-adjusted, educated,

607:

I am quite sure you can look over the history of edits on that page and come to your own conclusions. The section of that page described the modes of resistance used by different groups. BUAV, for example, presents themselves as being opposed to violence and property destruction. Yet in the

115:

productive citizens who avoid drugs, pay taxes, vote, respect the legitimacy of existing state institutions, and would only think to resist them within the officially sponsored channels. In other words, a minor adjustment in funding and direction for a long-existing project. —

2073:

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as

791:

to have a word with him, which I'm willing to do, then thinking about admin action if that makes no difference. As for the images, all ALF images are released into the public domain, which has been confirmed by e-mail to permissions, so I don't see these as problematic.

516:

In fact, the Newkirk book that Animalresearcher cites makes it clear that the "aspiring activist" pretended to be a journalist, and that this was the only reason the BUAV helped her. So although not strictly speaking false, the way the edit is worded is very misleading.

1110:

with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Knowledge 1.0 scheme! For the

1420:

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. —

630:

Indeed, that is a very good point - for example, I'm sure I'm only two contacts away from terrorists on both sides of the Irish troubles. More specifically, to make that interpretation we would need to attribute it to a source that makes this point.

723:"we definitely did have plans to use violence against hunt people. But that got thwarted by our arrest and it never quite materialized from then. But whether or not it would have happened I don’t know, because I don’t know if we are violent people." 324:

central issue means excluding the possibility that anything else is central. The possibility that she believes that religious philosophy (for example) is also of central importance is not excluded by her statement. The old version implies that it

2056:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 1334: 1362: 319:

What does matter is that the page as it is misrepresents Kete's statement. Saying soemthing is 'this most central issue' isn't mutually exclusive with saying that soemthing else is also centrally important. Saying soemthing is

350:

are arguing that they ought to be; hence, the issue is not yet sorted out. Furthermore, it doesn't matter whether Kathleen Kete is notable. The page only cites her, it's not about her. All we are concerned with is whether

748:

is part of the problem, because of the face of it you can't really blame anyone for thinking anything and everything claimed by the ALF should be documented. However, clearly we can't do that or else we become a mirror for

500:

Apart from being almost meaningless, the source -- Stroke. 2000;31:3054 -- isn't one that all readers can easily check, the citation is incomplete, and it looks like a primary source that's dependent on his interpretation.

1645: 1623: 667: 495:

Connolly developped this methodology to minimize interanimal variability to increase statistical power to detect differences in stroke treatment groups, and to "provide important information not obtainable in rodent

608:

referenced instances they readily offered office space to the ALF, and directed people who were trying to find the ALF to Ronnie Lee. The "two contacts away" was bad writing, and it was replaced by another editor. --

2099: 1293:

wouldn't object to discussion of sentient animals (which is what I came to the article to find discussion of), that should not be the whole focus of the article. And animal rights should receive minimal coverage. --

1860: 2106: 2028: 1241:, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with 520:

I've cited only two edits here but they're representative of almost all the edits he makes to these pages. I've spoken to him many times about it to no avail, so I'm posting here in the hope others can help.

1649: 1629: 1766:

article needs a thorough going over. It mixes up two organisations, one in the UK and one in the US - alternating as to which is appears to be referring to - it needs a proper going over (and shortening).

2093: 358:

is faithfully reproducing her claims, and I think it's obvious that Kete is not a crackpot: Her undergraduate, Masters and Doctoral degrees are all from Harvard, and she teaches at Trinity College.

1507:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the 1226:. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at 1260: 1641: 1613: 137: 1962:

Currently classed as C... I think it may possibly be ready for a B. Not familiar with the project, not sure if there is a specific way preferred to suggest an article for class review.-

1351: 1203: 1099:. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. 2008: 1248:

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at

2123: 1633:

has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

1328: 1088: 1081: 294:

Your edit has no meaning in English: "it has been described as a most central philosophical issue." Do you mean to say one of the most central issues? If so, what are the others?

1107: 1278: 567: 545: 277:

has the implications of this one? I'm also not sure what you mean by distinguishing most important from most central, and also bear in mind that this is not article space.

1753: 261:

most important issue. What one person thinks isn't really important. Argueably, that sentance doesn't deserve to be in there at all, unless Kathleen Kete is very notable.

617: 127: 1322: 1065:, we at the Knowledge 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at 898: 1914: 2022: 1414: 1134: 1379: 876: 844: 824: 799: 777: 737: 640: 302: 1988: 340: 285: 217: 1722: 590: 581:

an animal rights activist, but if someone came to me wanting to interview a pig farmer, I could arrange that easily, with one that I have "just two contacts away"!

395:

article. It would be most helpful if this was rigorously cited and included direct quotes, as with the other paragraphs in this section about Singer and Francione.

153: 2098: 1982: 1265: 714: 426: 2133:

My edit to the SeaWorld article about, according to the media, a groundbreaking lawsuit by PETA using the 13th Amendment to argue against animal enslavement, was

720:"we began to play with the media a bit - because they had turned on us by that time anyways. That was around the time we became known as the maniacs of the press" 707: 1271: 648: 609: 537: 440: 1837: 409: 2038: 679: 367: 1790:

I just added this article, about this organization which released a video which shows workers throwing male chics being dropped alive into a grinding machine.

1515:

to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at

1242: 240: 108: 1804: 1443: 1198: 923:

Is the article's subject notable enough to be re-created? It has brought up some discussion about the lack of laws addressing cruelty to animals in China.

2134: 1737: 1176: 932: 1302: 1012: 656: 1670: 1062: 1051: 1003:

etc, but nothing on the broader issue. Going in the opposite direction, there are articles broader than animals that cover more 'holistic' views, e.g.

908: 179: 76: 71: 59: 1989: 1968: 1727: 1039: 1028: 1011:, though given that most animals are probably not conscious beings that would also overlap with the subject. I guess such an article could be called 270: 1879: 529: 2146: 1884: 1864: 1848: 1066: 1056: 1500: 1403: 953: 905: 1077:

represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.

145: 1691:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are 399: 1810: 1776: 815: 345:

First things first: I agree with your edit. It should be "one of the most" rather than "the most." However, the issue of personhood has

144:

for speedy deletion, because every congress, every year, has an HR 1955... it just means its the 1955th bill before congress of that year.

1945: 1593: 463: 1863:

will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the

479: 1100: 490: 250:

SlimVirgin, the source calls animal rights '... this most central philosophical issue of our time'. This is not equatable to it being

911: 457: 391:'s approach to animal rights, and specifically any statements he's made directly regarding veganism for the 'ethics' section of the 973: 189: 47: 17: 713:

I think there is an inherent problem with articles about "acts claimed by." If you consider one of the editor's other articles at

1675: 684: 555: 328:

This isn't article space, but it does use references. As such, they have to be represented accurately. And is she really notable?

1928:

I was wondering if you'd like to do an interview for publication on May 24. Let me know on my talk page (accessable by clicking

1781: 1571: 1211:

is a collection of English Knowledge articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The

451: 1408: 1015:

or something like that. It might also mention the prehuman precursors to morality seen in other animals (which relates to the

1231: 977: 965: 1644:

for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the

2034: 1212: 1112: 661: 1684: 1608: 892: 227:

Have y'all ever considered hiding the sections of the template? It's so big it looks really odd in stubby articles like

2138: 1705: 1688: 1504: 1496: 969: 222: 213: 123: 1763: 1666: 1481: 1139: 511: 489:

The following edit is very typical. ("This methodology" refers to an experimental procedure on a non-human primate):

1627:

has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A

1732:

Hi everyone. As this week's Knowledge Signpost reports, articles about "individual animals" are now candidates for

1709: 254:

most important issue, but only one of them. As such, your revert to 'the' was misguided, and I'm changing it back.

84: 1468:

subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering

1842: 1749: 1469: 744: 690: 1038:

If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons

469: 1904: 1584:

Apologies for the notice, but this is being posted to every WikiProject to avoid accusations of systemic bias.

1541: 1473: 1223: 1167: 902: 257:

Also, is it realy relivant that someone has called it thus? I'm sure you can find enviromentalists who call it

161: 97:. It has implications for Animal rights activists. I want to get it on the front page if it passes the Senate. 1954: 1516: 354:

is faithfully reproducing Kathleen Kete's claims, and whether Kete is a crackpot or not. I would guess that

1598: 1485: 1193: 1033: 2083: 2067: 2058: 1227: 1181: 1171: 958: 652: 613: 541: 445: 245: 38: 1859:

will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's

1833: 1740:

and I think input from other animal-related wikiproject participants would be helpful. Best regards,

1358: 1298: 1283: 1249: 1208: 1145: 1096: 1617:. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the 1893: 1772: 1736:

if the article does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. I have left comments

1459: 1450: 1361:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1149: 917: 434: 2045:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 1692: 1398: 1392:

Fresh eyes on this article and new editors with more mainstream viewpoints would be appreciated.

904:

but it refers to a 2006 animal abuse incident in China with a main article on Chinese Knowledge.

2142: 1701: 1313:

article itself, which you believe is too heavily centered on AR, I'll answer on its talk page.

1190: 510:

most two contacts away from direct action activists, and that these contacts are facilitative.

210: 120: 2070:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th. 1819: 2004: 1662: 1477: 1253: 1047: 996: 1896:

for the details on the requested change. This is in reference to an OTRS ticket. Thanks! ···

2128: 2118: 2075: 1374: 1346: 1294: 1024: 1004: 949: 839: 772: 756: 733: 702: 675: 636: 563: 439:

I would like some help knowing how to approach the edits made to animal rights articles by

379: 236: 1216: 8: 1886: 1768: 1745: 1552: 937: 914: 336: 266: 1363:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Students and Workers for the Liberation of UCLA Primates

760: 2066:

and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at

1910: 1393: 1337:

has been created, but I have doubts about their notability. Thoughts would be welcome.

1318: 1182: 1163: 1016: 586: 554:

If you need any help with medical citations, SlimVirgin, you can ask for assistance at

175: 944:

Does this project want to adopt this article (i.e. have its banner on the talk page)?

2090: 1996: 1963: 1783: 1713: 1696: 1527:

to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome

1434: 1385: 1257: 1126: 1084:, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects. 418:

Hi Kellen, I could try to write something, but I can't promise when, if that's okay.

206: 116: 99: 1230:. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at 901:

was previously speedy deleted because the administrators believed it to be nonsense,

2000: 1919: 1658: 1654: 1589: 1528: 1043: 1000: 928: 149: 2137:

by an editor who appears, according to the article history, to own that article.

2063: 1818:

Hi, a request for comment relating to the ideology of Veganism has been requested

1238: 2110: 2015: 1975: 1856: 1618: 1366: 1338: 1020: 945: 869: 831: 817: 792: 764: 729: 694: 671: 632: 559: 522: 419: 331:'One of the most central' may be a better wording, yes. But mine did make sense. 295: 278: 232: 167: 1019:, another needed article), although this is broadening the scope a little more. 689:

Hi all. An editor with a history of problematic advocacy is going great guns at

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1935: 1925: 1800: 1741: 1717: 1680: 1546: 1465: 363: 332: 262: 2109:

as another non-notable front in the ALF / SHAC stable. Opinions are welcome.

1897: 1874: 1829: 1812: 1733: 1575: 1536: 1314: 1153: 992: 582: 406: 396: 228: 190: 171: 1758: 1604: 1424: 1116: 1008: 558:, or get in touch with me on my user page. I will always be happy to help. 94: 1956: 1585: 1524: 1245:, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 938: 924: 202: 194: 1847:

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the

1272:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Agriculture#Need_help_with_an_unusual_article

2107:

nominated Militant Forces Against Huntingdon Life Sciences for deletion

2029:

Animal rights articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release

1449: 2046: 2037:

for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were

1796: 1386: 1310: 1289: 1275: 1080:

The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of

751: 388: 381: 359: 138:

Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007

1870: 1825: 1648:. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the 1144:

I think this should also be considered a descendant WikiProject of

392: 2082:

to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with

2033:

Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the

1687:. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 1574:

discussing if our policy on plot, WP:PLOT, should be removed from

141: 90: 2079: 983:

I don't think we have a broad article on the place of non-human

1578:. Please feel free to comment on the discussion and straw poll. 1095:

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at

1087:

A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as

988: 984: 2062:

with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's

1442:

on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at

1204:

Knowledge 0.7 articles have been selected for Animal rights

2039:

selected based on their assessed importance and quality

1335:

Students and Workers for the Liberation of UCLA Primates

1329:

Students and Workers for the Liberation of UCLA Primates

136:

i have redirected all pages taht linked to 'hr 1955' to

717:

and read reference 2, the key player in the HRS says:

2054:

Animal rights articles and revisionIDs we have chosen

763:

for example. I'm not convinced this is appropriate.

728:Even the most reliably sourced claim may be false. 1103:is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 474:and also just to have more eyes on the situation. 2014:Thanks for letting us know. I've left a comment. 1990:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Animal protection 668:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Fox hunting 2100:Militant Forces Against Huntingdon Life Sciences 1653:with a particular article, please contact me or 1640:If any members are interested, please visit the 1603:This message is being sent to WikiProjects with 1413:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new 1266:Request for comment from WikiProject Agriculture 1503:. We are also in the process of implementing a 1217:automated selection of articles for Version 0.7 89:Members of the Project may be interested in US 1657:and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! 1239:list of selected articles with cleanup tags 907:It has been covered by The Daily Telegraph 1728:New speedy deletion criterion for animals 1333:An article on an apparent new group, the 991:. There are a few specific articles like 1148:, and so it should be categorized under 868:ought to be deleted, so I just left it. 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Animal rights 2052:We would like to ask you to review the 1456:This is a notice to let you know about 1415:WikiProject coordinators' working group 1222:We would like to ask you to review the 1057:Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme 556:Knowledge:WikiProject Resource Exchange 14: 2089:For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team, 1930:Talk to Me!' in my signature). Thanks! 1607:under their scope. Since August 2007, 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1357:This article has now been listed for 1232:Knowledge:Release Version Nominations 1556: 1213:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team 913:, and various online media in China. 25: 1224:articles selected from this project 23: 24: 2157: 1764:National_Anti-Vivisection_Society 1491:If you are already subscribed to 387:We need a short-ish paragraph on 1974:I'll take a look at it, Sineed. 1560: 1288:Why has this project tagged the 910:, The Independent (South Africa) 478:forget which) his institution's 29: 1676:Paul McCartney GAR notification 745:List of acts claimed by the ALF 691:List of acts claimed by the ALF 685:List of acts claimed by the ALF 201:These two articles, especially 170:, an animal rights theorist. -- 2094:00:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC) 1820:Talk:Veganism#RfC:God_Almighty 1621:. After nearly two years, the 1549:} 08:47, 15 March, 2009 (UTC) 1279:08:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 1261:22:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 761:QinetiQ#Animal rights campaign 13: 1: 1838:23:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC) 1805:00:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 1517:Knowledge talk:Article alerts 1444:04:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 1352:19:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1323:01:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1303:23:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 877:19:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 845:18:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 825:12:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 800:11:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 778:09:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 738:08:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 708:08:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 680:15:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 657:18:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 480:Animal Care and Use Committee 427:18:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 410:16:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 241:06:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 218:21:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 180:19:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 128:21:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 2147:16:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 1880:02:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 1404:00:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 974:WT:WikiProject Animal rights 662:Fox hunting nominated for FA 641:17:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 618:13:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 591:13:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 568:16:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 546:15:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 530:21:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 400:14:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 109:04:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 7: 2124:16:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 2084:your WikiProject's feedback 1777:17:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 1409:Coordinators' working group 1380:23:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 893:Cat abuse incident in China 666:Any assistance welcomed at 341:13:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 303:16:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 286:16:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 271:16:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 10: 2162: 2068:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 2064:articles with cleanup tags 2059:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 1915:19:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC) 1853:Saturday, January 23, 2010 1795:Please watch the article. 1611:has been participating in 1594:13:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 1228:Knowledge talk:Version 0.7 976:, discussion preferred at 933:13:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 223:The Animal Rights template 154:15:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 2023:06:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC) 2009:20:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC) 1983:06:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC) 1969:14:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 1924:Belugaboy here, with the 1754:03:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 1685:good article reassessment 1683:has been nominated for a 1609:WikiProject Good Articles 1511:parameter, but forget to 1199:07:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 1177:06:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 1140:Knowledge:WikiProject Law 1097:Category:C-Class_articles 978:WT:WikiProject Philosophy 966:WT:WikiProject Philosophy 899:Kitten killer of Hangzhou 368:19:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1946:22:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 1894:Talk:Stephen R. L. Clark 1849:WP 1.0 assessment system 1723:04:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 1671:22:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 1150:Category:WikiProject Law 1135:22:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1052:20:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 1029:04:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 954:10:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 916:. A Wikinews article is 85:US House Resolution 1955 1865:WP 1.0 project homepage 1843:WP 1.0 bot announcement 1811:Request for comment on 814:I left a note for him. 166:FYI: There's an AFD on 1495:, it is now easier to 1250:this project's subpage 970:WT:WikiProject Animals 715:Hunt Retribution Squad 514: 498: 162:AFD on Paola Cavalieri 2080:Knowledge for Schools 1576:what Knowledge is not 1480:and other workflows ( 1470:Articles for deletion 1254:User:SelectionBot/0.7 997:ethics of eating meat 507: 493: 93:. Criminalization of 42:of past discussions. 2076:One Laptop per Child 1885:Requested change at 1689:good article quality 1599:GA Sweeps invitation 1501:request new features 1474:Requests for comment 1243:copyediting requests 1005:environmental ethics 757:Highgate Rabbit Farm 140:, and i have put up 1887:Stephen R. L. Clark 1034:Wikiproject Prisons 2035:Knowledge 1.0 team 1943:Milk the chicken!! 1646:running total page 1183:Island restoration 1113:1.0 Editorial Team 1017:origin of morality 959:Animals and ethics 742:I think the name, 246:Magnitude of Issue 2021: 1997:Animal protection 1981: 1913: 1878: 1784:Mercy_for_Animals 1721: 1592: 1582: 1581: 1532: 1446: 1440: 1284:Sentience Article 1175: 1132: 1013:animals in ethics 875: 823: 798: 528: 425: 301: 284: 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2153: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2020: 2018: 1980: 1978: 1966: 1944: 1938: 1911:Talk to Nihonjoe 1907: 1903: 1900: 1868: 1836: 1699: 1588: 1564: 1563: 1557: 1523:Message sent by 1522: 1510: 1437: 1432: 1429: 1422: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1309:contents of the 1196: 1191:Sabine's Sunbird 1161: 1129: 1124: 1121: 1001:animal cognition 874: 872: 842: 838: 834: 822: 820: 797: 795: 775: 771: 767: 705: 701: 697: 649:Animalresearcher 610:Animalresearcher 538:Animalresearcher 527: 525: 473: 441:Animalresearcher 435:Animalresearcher 424: 422: 352:Cabinet Magazine 300: 298: 283: 281: 105: 102: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2131: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2103: 2041:, then article 2031: 2016: 1993: 1976: 1964: 1960: 1942: 1936: 1922: 1905: 1898: 1890: 1845: 1823: 1816: 1787: 1761: 1734:speedy deletion 1730: 1678: 1601: 1561: 1555: 1544: 1508: 1466:fully-automated 1454: 1435: 1425: 1411: 1390: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1331: 1295:IronMaidenRocks 1286: 1268: 1206: 1194: 1186: 1146:WikiProject Law 1142: 1127: 1117: 1108:leave a message 1059: 1036: 961: 942: 895: 870: 840: 836: 832: 818: 793: 773: 769: 765: 703: 699: 695: 687: 664: 523: 443: 437: 420: 385: 296: 279: 248: 225: 216: 199: 168:Paola Cavalieri 164: 126: 103: 100: 87: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2159: 2130: 2127: 2102: 2097: 2030: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1992: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1959: 1953: 1951: 1949: 1948: 1921: 1918: 1889: 1883: 1844: 1841: 1815: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1780: 1769:London prophet 1760: 1757: 1729: 1726: 1681:Paul McCartney 1677: 1674: 1642:GA sweeps page 1600: 1597: 1580: 1579: 1565: 1554: 1551: 1540: 1493:Article Alerts 1460:Article alerts 1453: 1451:Article alerts 1448: 1423:Delievered by 1410: 1407: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1365:. Thank you. 1330: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1285: 1282: 1267: 1264: 1205: 1202: 1185: 1180: 1152:. Thoughts? − 1141: 1138: 1093: 1092: 1089:described here 1085: 1078: 1063:may have heard 1058: 1055: 1035: 1032: 960: 957: 941: 936: 894: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 783: 782: 781: 780: 726: 725: 724: 721: 686: 683: 663: 660: 644: 643: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 573: 572: 571: 570: 549: 548: 436: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 413: 412: 384: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 329: 326: 317: 308: 307: 306: 305: 289: 288: 247: 244: 224: 221: 209: 198: 188: 187: 186: 163: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 131: 130: 119: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2158: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2126: 2125: 2122: 2114: 2108: 2101: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2087: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2071: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2024: 2019: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1995:The article, 1991: 1984: 1979: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1958: 1952: 1947: 1941: 1939: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1901: 1895: 1888: 1882: 1881: 1876: 1872: 1866: 1862: 1861:summary table 1858: 1854: 1850: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1821: 1814: 1813:Talk:Veganism 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1782:New article: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1765: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1725: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1673: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1638: 1634: 1632: 1631: 1626: 1625: 1624:running total 1620: 1616: 1615: 1610: 1606: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1559: 1558: 1550: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1520: 1518: 1514: 1506: 1505:"news system" 1502: 1498: 1494: 1489: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1452: 1447: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1430: 1428: 1418: 1416: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1388: 1381: 1378: 1370: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1342: 1336: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315:David Olivier 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1246: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1209:Knowledge 0.7 1201: 1200: 1197: 1192: 1184: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1151: 1147: 1137: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1122: 1120: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1102: 1098: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1064: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 993:animal rights 990: 986: 981: 980: 979: 975: 971: 967: 956: 955: 951: 947: 940: 935: 934: 930: 926: 921: 919: 915: 912: 909: 906: 903: 900: 878: 873: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 846: 843: 835: 828: 827: 826: 821: 816: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 801: 796: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 779: 776: 768: 762: 758: 754: 753: 747: 746: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 727: 722: 719: 718: 716: 712: 711: 710: 709: 706: 698: 692: 682: 681: 677: 673: 669: 659: 658: 654: 650: 642: 638: 634: 629: 628: 619: 615: 611: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 592: 588: 584: 583:David Olivier 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 547: 543: 539: 534: 533: 532: 531: 526: 518: 513: 512: 506: 502: 497: 492: 491: 487: 483: 481: 475: 471: 468: 465: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 442: 428: 423: 417: 416: 415: 414: 411: 408: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 394: 390: 383: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 348: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 323: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 304: 299: 293: 292: 291: 290: 287: 282: 275: 274: 273: 272: 268: 264: 260: 255: 253: 243: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229:GANDALF trial 220: 219: 215: 212: 208: 204: 196: 192: 191:Eco-terrorism 185:Result: keep. 184: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 169: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 125: 122: 118: 113: 112: 111: 110: 107: 106: 96: 92: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2139:67.52.144.60 2132: 2129:PETA lawsuit 2104: 2091:SelectionBot 2088: 2072: 2057: 2051: 2042: 2032: 1994: 1961: 1950: 1940: 1929: 1923: 1891: 1852: 1846: 1817: 1762: 1731: 1697:TonyTheTiger 1679: 1639: 1635: 1630:new worklist 1628: 1622: 1612: 1602: 1583: 1570:There is an 1568:WP:NOT#PLOT: 1567: 1534: 1521: 1512: 1509:display=none 1492: 1490: 1458: 1457: 1455: 1431: 1426: 1419: 1412: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1332: 1287: 1274:. Thanks.-- 1269: 1258:SelectionBot 1247: 1236: 1221: 1215:has made an 1207: 1187: 1156: 1154: 1143: 1123: 1118: 1105: 1094: 1074: 1060: 1037: 1009:deep ecology 982: 963: 962: 943: 922: 897:The article 896: 750: 743: 688: 665: 645: 519: 515: 508: 505:by the ALF: 503: 499: 494: 488: 484: 476: 466: 460: 454: 448: 438: 386: 355: 351: 346: 321: 258: 256: 251: 249: 226: 200: 165: 98: 95:thoughtcrime 88: 65: 43: 37: 2049:algorithm. 2001:First Light 1957:Paul Watson 1892:Please see 1659:Nehrams2020 1655:OhanaUnited 1619:GA criteria 1553:WP:NOT#PLOT 1525:User:Addbot 1513:give a link 1497:report bugs 1478:Peer review 1270:Please see 1075:new C-Class 1044:Cdogsimmons 939:Animal love 633:Tim Vickers 560:Tim Vickers 203:Green Scare 195:Green Scare 36:This is an 2017:SlimVirgin 1977:SlimVirgin 1955:Review of 1857:WP 1.0 bot 1714:WP:CHICAGO 1547:WP Physics 1535:Thanks. — 1021:Richard001 964:Posted to 946:Richard001 871:SlimVirgin 819:SlimVirgin 794:SlimVirgin 730:MikeHobday 672:MikeHobday 670:. Thanks. 524:SlimVirgin 421:SlimVirgin 297:SlimVirgin 280:SlimVirgin 233:Murderbike 2047:WikiTrust 1937:Belugaboy 1926:Signpost! 1867:. — Carl 1742:Clayoquot 1614:GA sweeps 1482:full list 1387:Zoophilia 1311:sentience 1290:Sentience 1067:WP:ASSESS 752:Bite Back 470:block log 405:Anybody? 389:Tom Regan 382:Tom Regan 333:Larklight 263:Larklight 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2135:reverted 2112:Rockpock 2043:versions 1920:Signpost 1750:contribs 1650:worklist 1542:κοντριβς 1537:Headbomb 1368:Rockpock 1359:deletion 1340:Rockpock 1168:contribs 1082:a rubric 833:Rockpock 766:Rockpock 696:Rockpock 496:models." 452:contribs 393:veganism 172:Lquilter 1965:Sinneed 1718:WP:LOTM 1667:contrib 1436:Disable 1427:§hepBot 1128:Disable 1119:§hepBot 1106:Please 1101:The bot 1061:As you 985:animals 356:Cabinet 142:HR 1955 91:HR 1955 39:archive 1855:, the 1586:Hiding 1400:Parkin 1395:Sticky 1172:e-mail 989:ethics 925:Shawnc 407:Kellen 397:Kellen 197:, etc. 146:Decora 104:t Noir 101:Vert e 2105:I've 1851:. On 1276:Doug. 1155:Twas 458:count 207:Jemmy 117:Jemmy 16:< 2143:talk 2078:and 2005:talk 1875:talk 1801:talk 1797:Ikip 1773:talk 1759:NAVS 1746:talk 1738:here 1693:here 1663:talk 1529:here 1499:and 1486:here 1464:, a 1319:talk 1299:talk 1195:talk 1164:talk 1073:The 1048:talk 1042:. -- 1040:here 1025:talk 1007:and 972:and 950:talk 929:talk 918:here 759:and 734:talk 676:talk 653:talk 637:talk 614:talk 587:talk 564:talk 542:talk 446:talk 364:talk 360:Djk3 337:talk 267:talk 237:talk 176:talk 150:talk 2086:! 1899:日本穣 1871:CBM 1710:bio 1695:.-- 1605:GAs 1572:RfC 1252:of 1234:. 1157:Now 987:in 920:. 464:api 380:On 347:not 325:is. 322:the 259:the 252:the 2145:) 2007:) 1909:· 1906:投稿 1902:· 1873:· 1824:~ 1822:. 1803:) 1775:) 1752:) 1748:| 1720:) 1669:) 1665:• 1545:– 1519:. 1488:. 1476:, 1472:, 1321:) 1301:) 1237:A 1219:. 1170:• 1166:• 1162:( 1115:, 1069:. 1050:) 1027:) 999:, 995:, 968:, 952:) 931:) 736:) 678:) 655:) 639:) 616:) 589:) 566:) 544:) 482:. 366:) 339:) 269:) 239:) 231:. 193:, 178:) 152:) 2141:( 2120:t 2116:e 2003:( 1877:) 1869:( 1834:G 1832:. 1830:T 1828:. 1826:R 1799:( 1771:( 1744:( 1716:/ 1712:/ 1708:/ 1706:c 1704:/ 1702:t 1700:( 1661:( 1590:T 1539:{ 1531:. 1439:) 1433:( 1376:t 1372:e 1348:t 1344:e 1317:( 1297:( 1174:) 1131:) 1125:( 1091:. 1046:( 1023:( 948:( 927:( 841:t 837:e 774:t 770:e 732:( 704:t 700:e 674:( 651:( 635:( 612:( 585:( 562:( 540:( 472:) 467:· 461:· 455:· 449:· 444:( 362:( 335:( 265:( 235:( 214:c 211:t 174:( 148:( 124:c 121:t 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Animal rights/Archive 2 - Knowledge

Index