Knowledge talk:WikiProject Pharmacology/Archive 1

3410:. While there is some information that appears reasonably accurate on both sites, probably a bit moreso on erowid, they do seem to be more closely affiliated to the illegal drug community than the academic community. Lycaeum, for example, has a link that says "trip reports", with users posting their own personal experiences about taking various drugs. I don't think this is exactly the kind of thing that wikipedia wants to be associated with,... Rather than going on a massive deletion spree, I'd rather post here and inquire what other editors think about these sites and their relation to wikipedia? 3032:

other weekend (some of them you will find quite familiar) and i will continue to do it, plus i'm constantly adding new entries as well, so nothing is final and there is plenty of room for improvement - for an example a "Search" can be done only for the different identifiers (PubChem, CAS, etc), for a string in the name and synonyms, and for the chemical composition which are all in the "General" tab of the "Search" form - the form opens up after moving the mouse over the "Actions" in the navigation row, and the clicking on "Search" in the pull down menu that pops out.

3115:). A careful literature search at that point showed that this was a non-existent entity that was being promulgated heavily on blogs and forums. (Hmm, depression also causes sexual dysfunction. How on earth are you going to distinguish between the two?) I'm very reluctant to get personally involved, but I feel it is high time that we start applying very strict criteria to the articles on psychopharmacological drugs. Isn't it rather odd that these claims are by and large only made on psychopharmaca? (Yes, I know about Roaccutane and interferon.) 2229:

including, say, information on an experimental drug into the article on the disease it is intended to treat or help manage, if I observe and recall correctly the members of our medicine projects seem to use Phase III trials as this cutoff. We do, however, have articles on drugs which are not yet at this stage of development, such as some drugs mentioned in the NCI's Cancer Dictionary. In my humble opinion, if there is enough information from reliable, scholarly sources to build a comprehensive, accurate article, not violating our guideline of

93:

benefit of a wider scope and an article scale system in place, whereas WP Pharm gets the benefit of more members and more structure for work. All members of WikiProject Drugs are now members of WikiProject Pharmacology. While all the pages are now under the new name of WikiProject Pharmacology, not all the text may be. Please make corrections as you see pages that need to be updated. I know the categorization and templates need to be updated; I will handle that myself. If you have any questions, I would like to hear them.

1764:

metabolism of BDP to see if it gets converted to beclomethasone once it is inside the cells but couldn't get any, all they talk is about the effects) but these two are very different compounds - BDP has 2 additional propyl groups, which make it not only heavier bit also more lipophilic as they prevent the formation of 2 H-bonds that beclomethasone does. Now all we need to figure out if the information on the Beclomethasone's page describes Beclomethasone pharmacological properties or it actually describes BDP ones. --

31: 6323:

educate students by having them contribute to wikipedia, but at the same time, it should be realized that this is a public project, and students need to interact with the community (this should actually be part of their education). I've seen many class projects actually get published in professional, peer reviewed journals before, and the journals don't have any special rules for these class projects -- they're treated like any other paper.

1254:. Sure, that's what it's most commonly known as, but really, what the article is about is the thiopental anion. There could be potassium thiopental, or thiopentic acid (if that's what it's called, I don't know). The point is, the cation is unimportant. It's the anion that has all of the pharmacological properties, and that should be what the article is about. I'm sure there are other cases of this out there. Not to mention 6098:. Virtually no one calls them by the former name; pharmacologically, they are referred to by the latter. Though a major characteristic of pretty much all of them is a quaternary cationic nitrogen atom. This is because they are mimicking the structure of acetylcholine, so as to competitively bind in its binding pocket. But overall, quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants and neuromuscular blocking drugs are the same thing. 2739:. I beleive it has a high importance to this project, because of its extreme importance in the research and treatment of cancer. I am new to wikipedia, so any help writing and formatting the article up to wikipedias standards would be very helpful. Also, at the moment, there is still a lot to be said about mitotic inhibitors. It would be great if someone could assess the article for quality and importance. 971:. Perhaps the distinction isn't there (the dictionary defines drug=medicine) but to my mind the drug is the active ingredient and the medicine is the tangible thing you take (syrup, tablet, etc). One can take a licensed medicine such as a tablet and crush it into a syrup suspension to form an unlicensed medicine. The drug remains the same. BTW: the article also currently appears to give advice ("should"). 2333:

marketed drugs (in some areas such as CNS, the success rate is ~10%). A majority of drug candidates will fall out of development before they get any significant media attention. And, of course, most drugs are not first in class. As to the issue of generics - we typically have articles based on the active drug substance which will include the branded drug and also later generic/bioequivalents. --

2214:, or have the potential to be a "blockbuster", or are "first-in-class", or have gotten attention in the popular news media, etc. But beyond that, I would say that Knowledge's general guidelines for notability (such as non-trivial media attention, published clinical data in reliable sources, etc.) can give direction as to whether an experimental drug should be mentioned in Knowledge or not. -- 584:, copied verbatim from papers in PubMed (not just quotes) and other sources. Pulled the shutters down on the article until it can be properly reviewed and cleared. Looks like it might need to be scratch-written. I'll expose the DrugBox and a few other bits for the moment as this is proven to be ours. Can we try to rebulid this article, preferably without all the cruft and POV this time?? :) - 4976: 2284:. Now CHHIP as an oncology trial seems notable, in as much as most cancer patients are in some form of trial as the field of oncology constantly develops. Also CHHIP is "out there" in the real world being applied to large number of patients; but I would agree that that article needs properly sourcing and citing. What though of the other articles in this list ? 817:, which is legal in the U.S., but kind of perversely it doesn't seem like the FDA regulates that at all, as long as the drug is approved for something, whereas each new product, even if it has the same active ingredient as a previous approved medication, has to go through the whole process of proving safety and efficacy. 5301:-containing preparation produced on the Indian subcontinent. I turned the page into a redirect, because we have no articles on individual brand names barring some very specific exclusions. The user undid my move, stating that Kamagra is a major brand that deserves its own page like Pepsi vs Coke and so on. 7190:

Thank you. Yes, I was just perusing some pharmaceutical pages for inspiration and noticed that drugs seem to be entered by their pharmacological name with reference to any trade names in the respective article. That's a good plan, I'll get on it. It'll be better for my learning if I fugure it out for

4613:

True but it depends what is termed by interaction - for the most part they are either unforseen or watched-out-for issues that have to be addressed - hence my idea about putting it there. Drugs used synergistically are unusual/significant to the point that they probably are better with an individual

6929:

OK, I've finished going over the list above, in no small way thanks to Paul and StephP. Of the 197 articles in the category, 129 (roughly 65.5%) could be sourced. Since I meant to verify the existence of the compound and nothing else, I took an INN or USAN listing to be sufficient; some articles, of

5819:

Thanks! What I really need is that Chinese study, that French paper, maybe that one Dutch article that says that the typical epileptic primidone user is an elderly person who started on it before it became wondrously unpopular, some of the articles I only cited because the titles were so tantalizing

2874:

If the specific articles discussed the marketing history of the product, I would be more likely to agree with you. But right now they just appear as old advertisements with little to no context in the article as a whole. So I would vote to remove them unless there was some specific reason why that

2025:

Well, they obviously should not be present if there isn't enough information to fill them out :) Ideally an article should be pretty comprehensive and follow a certain "template", but the "guideline" is unofficial and there should probably be some leeway in this particular article, as theobromine is

1357:

Yes, it would most likely change the body's ion content. But in the cases I have mentioned, the cation is not important; i.e. it does not have pharmacological significance. However, in the one case you mention, this rule of thumb doesn't hold: lithium itself has pharmacological effects. See articles

6322:

article; it seems to fit best as a sub-article, linked to via the 'history' section. Although I don't think we should hesitate to assist with the article's development, or apply a "hands off" approach until the article is graded. It's great that there are more academic projects out there willing to

2359:

drug candidates would be a bit much—since the drug discovery/development process is lengthy and few will ever make it to the market, many articles of little interest (specialist or otherwise) would be left. The question is, how little interest is enough interest? Some drug candidates will of course

2209:

I don't think there is an easy answer to that question, but here are a few of my thoughts. I would certainly say that all marketed drugs are notable because medical need is a prerequisite for drug approval (theoretically, at least) and Knowledge should be a good source of neutral information about

1779:

which is a single article about various salts, but none of the salts per se are notable (ie being a diproponate, valerate or sodium phosphate is not the issue - whereas being a salt of Betamethasone is). The difference in these two cases is that Betamethasone is used as a number of different salts,

1774:

Beclometasone itself is never used clinically in UK, but it is an accepted generic name that refers to Beclometasone dipropionate which is used as a cream, nasal spray and inhaler (hence the description of Beclometasone being the INN). "Beclometasone" is thus not notable in itself (ie does not need

1763:

There are peoeple that keep wiping out Beclomethasone's page and putting a "redirect" to Beclometasone dipropionate simply because INN has decided to name the latter the same way as the former. I don't know the reasons behind that call (i tried to get some "free text" articles from PubMet about the

6368:

I agree with Dr Cash's words, although I must say that in this case the editors responded swiftly to my messages. I would strongly encourage both editors to remain involved with their article, and hopefully join us in a more permanent fashion. In this WikiProject we can always use a few academics!

6352:

That's fine. Although to reiterate my point, which seems to have been missed, one of the key elements of class projects using wikipedia should be for students to gain experience in developing articles and content with the greater community, not as a "dumping ground" for material generated in class

4272:

Unless anyone's super keen, I'll hold off on the psych ones as I'm a bit tied up at the moment with some other editing so I've nominated paracetamol which would be a straightforward fix, and aspirin, which is in pretty good nick and may be a good one to get the ball rolling and improve morale etc.

3479:

I'm very happy discussing the reliability of Erowid, but so far I have only seen it as a repository of subjective experiences, which is almost by definition unencyclopedic. I think that neither Erowid nor the 2,000 KiB piece are particularly helpful if a reader wants to understand the effects of a

2967:

is certainly acceptable; IMHO it perfectly accompanies the statement "Diazepam was the top-selling pharmaceutical in the United States from 1969 to 1982, with peak sales in 1978 of 2.3 billion pills." Unfortunately, the resolution is very high and, right now, the image is following the drugbox; if

1516:

I haven't yet joined any Wikiprojects, and as a novice I'd feel uncomfortable about trying to assess and assign significance to articles I've edited. But I think these articles should be of considerable interest to this group - the one having a much longer history than I'd imagined, and the other

6433:

Has anyone actually heard of this monoclonal antibody? I cannot find any reliable info this (google or pubmed), and i am wandering if in fact it is a hoax (as with many other suspicious mAbs listed in the template). I was going to nominate it for deletion, but the last thing i want to do is get a

2198:

I hope this is the right place to bring this up. At what stage of development does a compound become notable? Should a drug only merit mention in wikipedia once it is commercially available? Or should it be once it is used on humans (in clinical trials)? Or may be once used on animals? Or even

1559:

has reached B-class, a peer review is a good idea. But before I put it up for that I want to get rid of the "unsourced" tag I put on it, and unfortunately that requires fixing the unsourced claims first. Plus it would be nice to fix the Eurocentrism a bit (i.e. put in something about the Arabic

807:

I'm not super-knowledgeable about this (please correct me on any of these things), but it looks like in the U.S. it's probably illegal to prescribe, dispense, manufacture, or import FDA-unapproved drugs. The only times it's definitely OK are in clinical trials and under some special programs for

3031:

for a while. I thought that it could help us a bit when making searches for articles about organic compounds, as Knowledge does not have it or at least i'm not aware if there is one. It is in a very basic form right now and contains only 229 entries but i've been adding new features almost every

2228:

I don't think this has ever been officially discussed before. I agree with Ed that there is no easy answer, and that all marketed drugs are notable as there is a potential that readers will turn to Knowledge for information on them, but for experimental drugs there is no "cutoff". With regard to

630:

This is an ongoing problem -- more so with the less attended drug articles. I saw one article deleted that did not take any text from the source that was referenced on the speedy tag. Fluoxetine is a major article and should not be deleted every time someone posts some copyrighted material. I

92:

As you should hopefully know, there has been discussion of this merger for quite some time now. In any case, welcome to the New WikiProject Pharmacology, which is a merged WikiProject Drugs and WikiProject Pharmacology. The purpose of this merge was to enhance each WikiProject; WP Drugs gets the

4958:

further at this point. As I understand it, I/we could (a) seek A-class status for the article with WP:PHARM and/or WP:CHEMS, (b) put it up for peer review, or (c) shoot directly for FA (although the article likely needs further contributions to meet the comprehensiveness criterion). I suppose

4378:

I'm merging the article worklist with a new assessment page, since it doesn't seem to be being used anymore, and a much better way of keeping track of the articles is through the categories instead. These two comments were on that page, so I'm copying them here, since they seem to be relatively

2332:

Actually, I think these criteria exclude most drug candidates. Every new drug candidate will be patented (very few exceptions) - so I don't think this should affect whether it's notable enough or not for Knowledge. However, a majority of drug candidates that enter clinical trials never become

560:

article and marked it for NPOV and cites. There's a comment on the talk page. I'm in agreement here; the article looks POV-laden and is missing many critical cites/refs. I've done a small tidy-up on it but could someone more knowledgeable possibly look it over and add some refs or clean out the

4424:

I found an error on the Paclitaxel page and made notes in the Discussion under Production. I followed the link at the top to check out the Pharmacology group and joined, but it looks like nobody's home. I'm new to all this so maybe I'm missing something. Anyway, I don't know the ettiquette for

1577:

Well first, I better introduce myself, I'm Ryan - a final year undergraduate studying pharmacology. I'd like to help with this project, I have an interest in cardiovascular and anti-arrhythmic pharmacology, would anyone like to give me a prod and point me in the direction of articles that need

1957:

Hmm. I wouldn't object to such a categorization, particularly for medications not available as generics, but I do foresee the potential for some issues. How notable should a manufacturer be to warrant its own category? Should we include only "blockbuster drugs" or everything a certain company

663:

but, yes. That's a fair point. However, copyrighted text may be a problem in the article's edit history. Best move the bad article, build up a new, quarintined one from the old, then deleted the moved one. Problem with copyvio is that the text may leave Knowledge legally vulnerable, hence the

649:

I've reinstated the non-copyvio content. Couldn't we have moved the article content, copyvio and all, out of mainspace (i.e. to the WP:PHARM workspace) so it could be collaboratively rewritten? I'm not knocking the value of the proverbial clean slate, but that's gonna be a lot of hard work :)

6698:

I agree with JFW in that articles that have potential should be left and will get expanded. However, I have a (small) interest in mAbs and I cannot recall ever coming across the ones i listed above, neither in recent literature nor at any conferences. Despite showing recent activity in other

5374:

I also agree about Kamagra; I think that in almost all circumstances, brand names of a drug should redirect to the INN. However, I think the naming conventions merit further discussion. Fvasconcellos has pointed out that some ranges of drug products have their own articles (should they?);

2182:

It looks sensible to me and I've voted for it. BTW The talk page of the poppers article is dominated by arguments about an alleged AIDS link. The presence of people who understand scientific articles would be beneficial in helping raise the level of evidence used. A merge might achieve that

7153:

Welcome to Knowledge, and you did come to the right place. I am not a pharmacologist (although we have some on board :) but you seem to be off to a good start. I would like to suggest two minor things: providing more references for the "Technical details" section; and moving the article to

6930:

course, had more available sources (i.e. that could be used to expand the article), and 68 had none—no hits on PubMed, no CAS number, not in INN lists or any Google-indexed USAN decisions. This is obviously a quick and dirty method, but I believe it is enough. I propose a two-step process:

2633:

Apixaban is a factor Xa inhbitor that is structurally similar to rivaroxaban (it has the phenyl-morpholinone portion in common). It is in clinical trials (not sure at what stage, but rivaroxaban is further ahead). I can give you a list of literature/patent references if you would like.

3093:

is another case of a poorly organised page on a psychopharmacological substance written almost entirely by anons and loaded from beginning to end with doubtful criticism. That includes case reports on possible side effects (generally very poor sources on actual drug safety) and so on.

6206:

It does look like excellent work. Maybe a separate page is warranted, with partial merging of some content? I have a feeling some of the more, well, pharmacological aspects (SAR, etc.) are a bit beyond the interest of the average guy who wants to know "why do I have to take Lipitor".

3454:

I hate to play devil's advocate, but doesn't allowing such links discourage the addition of such anecdotal content into the articles themselves? I'd rather see a link to Erowid than a 2,000 kB-long piece on someone's experiences with such and such obscure home-brewed tryptamines :P

2584:

Many of the psychiatric articles are laid out in completely different orders and discuss different topics. It is difficult to compare the medications because you can't go to one page, notice a side effect and then go to the next and look at the same section to see how it differs.

1665:

Calcium channel blockers would be an extremely good theme for me to work on (Just handed in my undergraduate thesis on the comparison of NCX knockout mice with NCX wild types with respect to arrhythmias!), I'll check out everything you've noted tomorrow. Lets hope I can put my

4745:, and an additional week will help it out tremendously. I am still opposed to any further extensions towards three weeks or one month, as I don't think that would necessarily help the article in question and I don't want this new collaboration to become too stale too quickly. 4326:

I have improved a lot this article in the last month and I´m thinking of nominating it for good article. I have asked for a scientific peer review; but I would appreciate any comments on how to improve it both in contents and style. The discussion page for the peer review is:

1075:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are 261:

Hello again! Just letting you all know that I cleaned up this WikiProject's documentation. For example, there is now a style guide which merges three naming guidelines. Additionally, I created a workspace, which allows for collaborations on things that are not articles.

6228:

But I thought that as an encyclopedia we ought to be covering some of the knowledge available on the non-relevant but yes-encyclopedic subjects... Most patients will have little interest in the fact that their antiarrhythmic was developed as an antianginal in Belgium.

2085:

I haven't been there for a while and today i kinda stumbled upon it and it struck me how poor the page looked considering the ammount of members and the ammount of articles this project takes care off, so I decided to upgrade the design by applying the one created by

502:. The first paragraph is pack full of jargon. Lead sections usually are not supposed to have jargon, or at least fancy terms are supposed to be explained. Could someone translate that paragraph into a little bit simpler language please? Thanks for your consideration.- 4512:

is dangerously close to losing it's GA status, having been nominated early in the GA program's history (12/8/2005), it lacks referencing, and has become a bit disorganized. So if anyone has a moment in the next couple of days, swing on by and see what you can do.

6578:

If you really cannot find anything, I suggest sending an email to the original creator (he has not responded to his talkpage messages), and simultaneously sending the whole whack to AFD. Let us know when this happens, so we can comment. You may want to inform

5403:, purportedly because the former is a mixture of salts and the latter is of historical/cultural significance. I guess most of this is still fairly straightforward and might not need a lot of discussion, but it at least needs to be more evenly implemented. -- 2321:

that haven't made it to phase III and that haven't attracted media attention. Is that a sensible criterion? Will it cover many drug candidates? Is there a problem with simply allowing all drug candidates - are there going to be so many as to be unuseful?

2312:

These criteria are very inclusive and most drug candidates satisfy at least one (e.g. few drugs reach trials without patent protection). Perhaps it is useful to ask the inverse question: when is a drug not notable? Reversing the above conditions suggests

5930:

providing accurate, reliable information; people may be coming to Knowledge and looking for this. In the future, it may pan out or lead to nothing, but I don't think a brief mention, clearly qualifying that this is an animal study, would be inappropriate.

3751:

unification thread. Automated fill in by Diberri's tool would be lost. I'm personally moderately against this idea (but I understand why suggested), but what do others think (again reply on the template talk)? Clearly only one set of changes appropriate.

454:

whenever I can (i.e. not very often ;)—most of it can be cleared by judicious redirecting. I think this should have a prominent place in the Project main page, and maybe we could add a note to the top of the list saying WP:PHARM can handle such requests?

4599:

I disagree. They're actually two different topics altogether. While most people probably think of drug interactions as a bad thing, interactions between two drugs can also be favorable, such as when two drugs are combined to increase the overall effect.

1343:

is obviously good old salt. I accept the wider point that the anion has the pharmacological properties ascribed to the chemical as a whole but the cation is surely important. As an even stronger example, you could equally have Lithium pentothal, and

7296:

I came across this article whilst looking at selenium compounds. (I contribute to chemicals project). I believe that this compound is better described stoichiometrically as selenium disulfide. What is sold commercially is probably a mixture of cyclo-

5824:

article concerning the aftermath of AstraZeneca's decision to get out of the business of manufacturing and selling that particular drug. I'm also working at reading the full texts of all the articles I can get in my city. Can anyone figure out how to

1434:

talk page listed as part of WikiProject Pharmacology anyway? I don't see any real reason for quahogs to be pharmaceuticals. If this is a mistake, somebody should correct this. If you want me to do it, you can contact me on my talk page. Thanks.

2199:

earlier sitting in a test-tube in a laboratory? Or perhaps even earlier, in a patent or in the literature? Is it dependant on development stage at all? I was just wondering how notability applies and if this topic been discussed before. Cheers.

4425:

editing pages, I figured I'd post something here that I think this entry needs correction, and if the original author or anyone else doesn't object in a few weeks I'll remove the Zhao reference and incorporate my comments and references. -DL --

2884:

Well, I do feel (as I mentioned above) that they are appropriate for and can enrich the History sections of articles. Granted, as U.S. ads one may argue that they also add geographical bias, etc. No-one has raised this point, but I don't think

3000:. The themes and images used in the ad typify the views of schizophrenia and its treatment at the time (this ad is from the 1980s). You could contrast that with ads for e.g. Zyprexa, etc. I'll add the appropriate information for fair use. 6628:)?), should be considered for AfD as hoaxes/non-notables by an editor who left the project in April. However whilst I agree for one single delete nomination, articles must individually be assessed for inclusion in this process, as an example 5926:. As for the varenicline study, I'm not keen on including something so preliminary ("The data suggest that the α4β2 nAChRs may play a role "), but it seems to have gotten a lot of press coverage, and we should ultimately cater to the reader 1913:. (The categorisation of these seems a lot better now, for which I'm sure this project deserves the credit.) Someone knowledgeable might want to look in, and check that they don't overlap unreasonably, might be useful as sub-topics, etc. 637:

I don't think any admin would delete the CNN article. There was a lot of text that was not copyrighted on this page. Remember that ideas cannot be copyrighted, in pharmacological jargon, there are only so many ways to say the same thing.

6570:

Some of these drugs may be so experimental that they haven't even got their name into Google. The content is also suspicious; some claim that monoclonal antibodies "are used to treat osteoporosis". That is incorrect. You might want to try

6005:

Content's over my head, but I think it needs spell-checking, typo catching, un-overwikilinking. I've spent some time working on those issues, but it could use another look. Also, maybe someone can spiff-up the images (points at Fvas). :)

2233:

and not misleading potential readers, then it could be covered, even if at earlier stages of development. I'd say it is a matter of common sense and should be looked at on a case-by-case basis; no notability guideline is applicable in

6966:

I support an AfD for the 68 (they might even be speedy-able). For the others, I think we keep the bar relatively low for keeping the article, but keep the bar relatively high for including the articles in the navigational templates.

2015:. Could you let me know whether I'm being too idealistic, but I'm assuming that if you as a group feel that these headings should be covered in all drug articles, then an article shouldn't be promoted to good until they're covered. -- 2589:

Many of these articles have been filled by anonymous contributors, sometimes with a rather anti-psychopharmacological agenda. I should think that a restructuring of these articles should be accompanied by a pruning of biased waffle.

4465: 3264:). Of course, GA & FA require nominations, but I don't have to worry about that since 99.9% of these articles are falling under the first three quality classes, and not the developed ones,... I guess we got a lot of work to do. 2104:

Excellent! I've made some tweaks, to make the links point to the right places etc. and also added a shamelessly self-promotional picture, since I don't think we have any featured pictures :( Anyone have any extra ideas? BTW, we are

3038:

P.S. It DOES NOT work in Dumxplorer. Once i used to take my time to make the javascript code run on Dumxplorer too but i just got tired of it and now i stubbornly refuse to do it. Opera (I recommend it) and Firefox run it fine. --

4707:

by Dr. Peter Kramer, a psychiatrist. But the paper was only published in 2000, and it doesn't appear to be a scientific source as much as a social science or religious source. I would think that this would be of more interest to

3255:

I've recently begun going through the list of unassessed articles, assessing each one for class (quality) and importance. For quality, I am rating each one using the standard wikipedia grading scale (stub < start < B <

830:

Anyway, that's what I know/could find... I feel like this is a legal issue that will differ by country so it's odd that that article says things like "should". (Also, grammatically shouldn't it be "off-licence drug"?) Other

3189:

Which countries? Who are these pharmacists? Is this reduction in adverse effects anecdotal? Has it been published? Sorry to be abrupt, but that's OR until proven otherwise, and thus—fortunately of unfortunately—inadmissible.

4579:-related, so keeping an Interactions section after Pharmacokinetics might provide more context. I see the aspirin article has no dedicated ADME/PK section, though, so moving it up next to Adverse effects isn't a bad idea. 1943:(Tamiflu). On the one hand, when I look at the Viagra article I don't see a category like "Category:Pfizer pharmacuticals"; however, in other commercial products such as cars it is common to have such categories (such as 4554:- given that WP is mainly for laypeople so the former section is more relevatn to adverse effects. This also makes the sections more heirarchical. Anyone have a strong opinion on this either way before I do it? cheers, 1029:

I've added {{unreferenced}} and {{expert-verify}} tags to the article in case someone comes across it (unlikely, I know) and takes its content as gospel. Should have thought of this when I wikified it. BTW, I don't like

512:

I just hacked it around a bit. Can you take a look at it now and see what you think? The article is a bit sparse on data still and needs fleshing out (some of the other progestins are only one-liners plus a drugbox!!) -

3918:

I'm sorry there was anything to catch at all. This is just plain sad, and disrespectful of those who contribute productively with their expertise to make Knowledge a place where people can go for reliable information.

4520:, though I think it needs to be fixed a bit earlier than the COTW program will start, and I'm not sure if it's the best drug to launch the program with? But if you disagree with this, you could always vote for it at 5106: 946:, which I found quite interesting; the latter even defines a distinction between "unlicensed" and "off-label". Also, I can't help but think people may be coming to the article at its present location looking for 5891:. The problem is: it is an animal study. I dispute that we need to include animal studies unless of absolutely earth-shattering relevance, and I was wondering if we could have a somewhat clearer policy on this. 148:

Thank you! Luckily, the merger was easy since nothing overlapped. Anyways, I'll get the bot to tag some articles for WikiProject Pharmacology, and we can all take a field day and assess the hell out of them! :)

7133:

I'm really rather new here, so apologies if I'm out of place. I created a new article today and I need the assistance of a pharmacologist. I'm a medical radiation physicist by trade, and I'm very familiar with

5304:

Can we get a degree of consensus on the wisdom of making forks for brands, and under what circumstances this may or may not be a good idea. Kamagra scores 2,000,000 Google hits, almost exclusively advertising.

1471: 3356:

Drugs assessed at low-importance is pretty much everything else. Not very well known, primarily research compounds that are not on the market but might be used in the laboratory for studies, etc,... (e.g.

6941:

Discuss the notability of the remaining (verifiable) articles. Verifiable does not equal notable, and many of these compounds are still in phase I/II trials or have had nothing on them published in years.

5395:, etc., which (I think?) are mostly combined for ease of administration, and where there's not much more to say than is already in the separate drug articles). There are also still separate articles for 2975:

I wouldn't object to the removal of the other images, or to their deletion—it doesn't look like these articles will be expanded anytime soon, and I've no time at the moment to do it myself :( Any takers?

3627:

Raul has never put an article up at FAR that I can remember; the person who is most likely to review medical articles is right here, and I'm glad to work on them first, using FAR only as a last resort.

1080: 221:

Would anyone object if I were to take my bot and have it sleuth throughout the categories related to drugs and pharmacology and have it automatically tag article talk pages with the WikiProject banner?

2381:?" I usually think, if it's only still known by its codename, it's probably too early to have an article on it. That may be quite naïve on my part, and hasn't stopped me from creating articles such as 1392: 5075:

each have four votes each. It would be nice if someone could cast their vote here and help break the tie. If they're still tied tomorrow, I'll go with the article that was nominated first, which is

1910: 5119: 3741: 3304:

Articles assessed as high-importance generally include major drugs, like a prototype drug for a class, the first drug discovered in a class, or a drug that has received major media coverage (e.g.

3846:

New article. I've never, ever heard of this (not surprising), but it appears to be an elaborate hoax. No hit on the CAS or PubChem entries, ATCs do not exist. The second cited source is actually

1852:

The project tag continues to appear on the talk pages of strangely unrelated articles (often involving mollusks). Please keep an eye out for any inappropriately tagged articles. Cheers everyone.

2613:

I couldn't find many primary sources on this novel oral anticoagulant being developed by Bristol-Myers-Squibb. Does anyone have access on its synthetic history (e.g. is it chemically related to

904:

Yeah, sorry, I forgot to say in my comment but I assumed (partially from the spelling of license) it was a non-U.S. legal issue. The lack of Google hits makes the whole thing dubious though. --

7408: 4703:

From the perspective of the science(s) of pharmacology, chemistry, or drug design, I've never heard the term before. It sounds to me to be rather concocted. A google search for the term yields

2026:

probably more notable for its presence in chocolate than any pharmaceutical use. I won't get too much into this, though, as I reviewed the article for GA the first time around :) Best of luck,

1403: 6482:

Perhaps PROD it? I also couldn't find anything on PubMed, and a quick Google search didn't find "tiratumumab" in any INN lists or USAN decisions (most of which I've found to be indexed). Has

5088: 1439: 6353:

that they don't want to see edited by others. Professors should realize this when making assignments instead of treating wikipedia like a cheap and easy way to publish material and content.

5387:

article? Does a combination product have to be notable enough in itself to merit an article (e.g. multi-ingredient cold medications)? Or must it have some kind of synergistic effect, e.g.

437: 6575:. It is possible that these pages were generated after a very long "list of oncology-related terms" was uploaded to Knowledge, many of which were of distant notability or very experimental. 4501: 3183:

In countries that do not restrict distribution of isotretinoin, pharmacists recommend 5mg to 10mg per day, since at lower dosages many of the adverse effects are diminished or non-existent.

5723:

I have nominated the article for featured article after working on it. If anybody thinks the article is good enough please vote for it. Any comments for improvement will also be welcomed.

1378: 5101: 2347:

As Ed said, WP articles are (or should be) on the active substance, so generics and all relevant formulations should be covered by the one article. We do break this rule sometimes (e.g.

1560:

period from 400 to 1500 AD). The early Chinese prohibition (1729) should be explored better as well, though it's a complex subject and maybe a peer review would provide better insight.

5094: 1191: 440:). Some of the terms in the general medical section would fall under this project too. Looks like several members already work on it, but it could be mentioned on the project page. -- 7305:

compounds with maybe a little elemental sulfur and selenium too, depending on the method of production. If noone has any objections I will make some appropriate changes to the article.

1478: 1517:

being the basis of what might just turn out to be the aspirin of 2020. These articles aren't anywhere near finished, mind you, but I think some second opinions would help them out.

660: 5820:

and I was young and stupid, and to make the essential tremor section at least as large as those sections devoted to things for which it is hardly ever used. I also need to get that

4890: 4328: 1395:(amounting to roughly 250 articles) which could then be categorized by people knowledgeable in the subject, thus reducing the risk of improper categorization. Please let us know on 1324:

Etidronate vs. etidronic acid is a borderline case. The salt form is likely the form that is administered orally to strengthen bones, whereas only the acid has chelate properties.

801: 6633: 1531:, not project assessment—you may want to have a look over there for an overview of the process, as WP:PHARM doesn't provide project-only peer review (unlike some projects such as 1391:

to identify pharmacology stub articles which do not currently have a category (besides the stub category of course). If the project is interested, we could create something like

1159: 1095: 2743: 537: 4335: 1718: 1694: 1656: 4768: 4139:

A good first step maybe is starting up a standing list of chunky/substansive articles with a good foundation for making a crack at FAC sometime. I (and others) have souped up

3480:

particular compound. Scientific studies with specific endpoints/reproducible markers are much more helpful than "whoa man, good stuff this! better than ganja for sure, mate!"

871: 540:. There are some interesting papers on PubMed, but most are restricted access. If anyone has any ideas on how to expand or improve the article, they'd be greatly appreciated! 2949: 2856: 2832: 1144:

has been declared "historical" due to lack of activity. Please can we push towards consensus and make it a formal guideline. If we think it is close, we can advertise on the

1135: 3710: 7080: 6082: 4919: 4823: 4245: 3983: 3889: 3622: 1424: 1227: 1022: 4077: 4049: 3640: 3597: 2933:

If they're used to illustrate a discussion of the history of the drug, then that would probably be OK. As it now stands, I am disputing whether or not the images used in

1238:

There are many drugs (and other compounds) that are in conjugate base form, and the naming for the articles of these drugs is pretty shoddy in some places. (for example,

1113: 954: 417: 398: 6736: 6102: 6048: 6010: 5996: 5636: 5616: 4802: 3829: 2070: 2050: 2041: 1746: 1564: 1550: 1464: 389: 7200: 7185: 6684: 6362: 4963: 3079: 891: 7420: 6916: 6902: 6829: 6277:

I have no problem at all with university projects, as long as they adhere to policy and cite their sources. If we need to do a bit of mopping up after them - so what?

5967: 2730: 1149: 754: 459: 316: 7391: 7357: 6976: 6511: 6312: 6271: 6222: 5946: 5352: 5220: 5193: 4657: 4633: 4604: 4594: 4402: 4360: 4308: 4288: 3820: 3800: 3519: 3510: 3490: 3470: 3449: 3428: 3004: 2991: 2958: 2912: 2869: 2400: 2253: 1993: 1886: 1328: 1319: 1101:

The references are an absolute mess, but I'm more concerned by the neutrality tag and reason why it was brought to FAR. Is there a POV dispute or not? (and I do mean

1047: 1038: 842: 250: 202: 191: 7234: 6145: 4453: 4383: 3205: 3140: 2764: 2187: 2124: 1370: 1352: 451: 362: 182: 163: 143: 7119: 7056: 6785: 5846: 5708: 5565: 5083: 4716: 4101: 4031: 4007: 3934: 3913: 2569: 2541: 2517: 2481: 2163:

I've proposed a merge, in line with standard practice on combining chemistry, pharmacology, history, and sociology into single articles. Outside input is welcome.

683: 674: 654: 6656: 6647: 6033:. Someone should get in touch with these new contributors—if they're really on a class project or something, we could be losing a valuable outreach opportunity ;) 6028: 5838:

Apropos of nothing, does anyone know where I can find all of that Russian, Italian, etc. stuff listed at the bottom of my user page? I'm thinking of improving the

5688: 5369: 4866: 4318: 3725: 2147: 2139:

is being addressed for the new recombinant proteins, and especially those which have differing names from the endogenenous peptides. Obviously co-ordination with

1975: 1638: 978: 778: 625: 610: 6232:

In any case, the gents from Iceland have requested that we defer the merge until their professor approves their work. A+, I'd say. I wish more students did this.

5407: 5265: 5233: 4174: 3962: 2135:

In the discussion page for tissue plasminogen activator, a suggestion was made in the discussion page to rename tPA as alteplase. I'm wondering if this sort of

1837: 1816: 1792: 1499: 921: 343: 236: 5025: 4264: 2879: 2709: 2678: 2643: 1866: 1634: 519: 7525: 7024: 6805: 5727: 4860: 4110: 2288: 6593: 6477: 5333:. In my very humble opinion, the only notable aspect of Kamagra is this gel formulation ("Kamagra jelly" gets major Google hits). That can be mentioned in the 5147:

were documented. Now there is some data on muscular dystrophies. An initial Knowledge version was a poorly written copyvio, and was deleted after a short AFD:

4429: 3721: 1917: 1059: 908: 616: 5901: 3868: 2342: 2223: 1641:

will also invariably lead you to some individual drug articles needing some TLC. Again, welcome, good luck and good work—the project could use more activity!

1521: 7284: 5859: 2326: 2203: 1164: 964: 644: 5008: 4239: 822:

Drugs imported from other countries are definitely not legal until they've been approved by the FDA, as evidenced by their warnings about online pharmacies.

732: 276: 7493: 6169: 5050: 2416: 2176: 2140: 2091: 1031: 984: 341: 200: 180: 141: 6635:), and some hits on Google, but none of these establish it as in clinical use, production, having been subject of a journal paper or widely reported (aka 5981:, of how much emphasis to give neuromuscular blockers. The structure–activity discussion is also far better developed than at our other current articles. 4842: 2600: 4192: 3043: 1396: 1349: 960: 788: 780: 6421: 4737:

for one more week, to give it a little bit more time to fix up the article and get it closer to featured status. Also, given the participation level in

2019: 825:

And compounding something that isn't available as an approved formulation is OK (as long as the active ingredient is used in approved medications, etc.)

488: 7147: 6332: 5575: 4722: 4528: 3385: 3157:

which isn't supported by research. The user is claiming that low dose treatment is just as effective as FDA-approved treatment without citing sources.

2184: 2047: 2016: 718: 6172: 5810: 4483: 2791: 1951: 773: 7192: 7139: 6338: 5874: 4569: 1768: 1630: 968: 933: 79: 71: 66: 6346: 2861:

Well, the advertisements provide some historical context. I've been arguing that the inclusion of pharma ads is akin to e.g. including the ads for

1130: 6837: 6746:, I've just found several of these to actually be redundant: names under consideration by the USAN Council to possibly become USANs. For instance, 6700: 6615: 6483: 5601: 4697: 3048: 2452: 1959: 444: 368: 7314: 6379: 6287: 6242: 6200: 6164:

mishap I'm recovering from, and my attempt to map the effects of changing neurotransmitter levels. Does my interpretation appear correct? Which

2098: 6793: 6528: 5280: 4790:

to be used in transdermal patches to deliver a time-controlled release of drugs to patients. This information could be added to articles such as

3756: 3674: 3495:

Excuse me while I mop the floor and wipe the coffee off my nose. Now I remember why I never go near our...more psychoactively-themed articles...

3220: 7341: 7090:

AfD was closed early & all deleted...This sort of thing really irks me. Any good reason why I shouldn't block both accounts of this user? —

4106:

I'd also be happy to participate, even if it's just in copyediting. Collaborating so that an article improves quickly is really exciting. XD --

3784: 3669: 1856: 1602: 7163: 6960: 6907:

Yes, I agree with that. And the accounts are no longer used for vandalism now that it is all done. So formally Blake3522 is a good wikipedian.

6851: 6796:. I believe that if the name is not in PubMed it is not notable enough to be in WP. Generous deletion is indicated for all those absurdomumabs. 6536: 6532: 4426: 4417: 2012: 1775:

separate article) but should (as in its clinical use) redirect to BDP. The selection of a single article about a clinical entity is similar to

1384: 6713:) has failed to respond to validation requests. if there is no opposition I will get round to nominate (at least some of these) for deletion. 769:

page about the validity of a recent review of clinical trials of antioxidant supplements. Expert advice would be much appreciated. Thank you.

590: 506: 331: 7399: 7208: 7099: 6540: 6427: 5666: 4949: 3544: 3245: 1304:). However, in some compounds (I can't think of any off the top of my head), the anion/cation is not the INN. What should we do about those? 1213: 296: 7457: 6873: 6811: 3125: 1168: 544: 7138:

as an imaging technique but I fear my sketchy knowledge of pharmacology may be letting the article down. Does anyone have any suggestions?

7009: 6751: 6747: 6544: 6520: 5952: 4944: 4900:

claims that, if approved, tapentadol would be the first oral opioid to become available in over 25 years. That sounds like a nice hook, if

4773: 3414: 3398:

In several drug articles, I am seeing inline citations and external links to two sites, which I am uncertain whether they meet wikipedia's

3167: 1282: 372: 107: 6995: 6124: 7062: 6722: 6564: 6552: 6548: 6524: 6443: 3715: 1894: 7000:

Of the remaining 61 articles, I suggest speedily deleting those that have no references. The legitimate ones usually have at least one.

5419: 2725: 2694: 2659: 2627: 2094:. If some of you can take a look at it and see if there is anything else that needs to be done (i bet there is) to get it completed. -- 567: 7507: 5621:

Thank you. Nice to know my, erm, "vandar" is still somewhat accurate, sad to know hoaxes are still a problem with scientific articles.

5361:

article, would be quite inappropriate to have its own article, as per existing practice on INN generic vs brand drug for articles (see

5315: 5038: 1064: 327:

Would any of the participants be interested in Collaboration of the month system, in which we try to bring an article to FA quality? --

5161: 3539: 3381:

Hope this helps! Anyone that wants to help out, feel free to join in! If you have any ideas for improving this criteria, let me know.

3330:

Drugs which are commonly prescribed and/or used but not the major drug in its class, are assessed at mid-importance. Examples include

3375:

Haven't really used this yet. Mainly for anything categorized to the wikiproject but doesn't fit elsewhere (lists, categories, etc).

3064:

which some editors feel constitutes OR and is incorrect. Would be good to get some pharmacologists and or medicos in on it. cheers,

2377:

Before writing an article on a drug, although I've started few, the first question that comes to my mind is "has it been assigned an

1626: 7498: 6810:

A lot of them probably do need deletion. In anticipation of a mass AfD, I've followed your suggestion and am using the category to

5716: 4366: 3177:

sources (whether intentionally or otherwise), and additions such as the following are IMHO unacceptable with or without a citation:

2193: 863: 4575:

Hmm... why not? That's a more prescribing information-like order. My one concern is that most relevant drug-drug interactions are

794:

From the article: "An off-licenced drug does not have a licence for human use for any indication or age group (in that country)."

302:

Thank you for notifying us! I created a section on the WikiProject main page for listing articles up for evaluation of some kind.

6729: 5413: 5055: 2269: 1006: 835: 47: 17: 7266: 7221:

structure wrong, and we had it right. Antony Williams is seriously interested in helping us, I believe. I will raise this at

6883:. It seems the second account was created after the first account's last edit, and they were not used simultaneously. I may be 5869: 5653:

accounts so that you can improve articles to standard quality and then upload them to Veropedia so that they can be preserved?

5148: 3737: 2130: 1072: 216: 131: 7191:

myself. Reference wise, I'm sure I can dig up some proper citations, I'll set that as my second task. Thanks for your advice!

5973:

The article seems pretty good, and very well-outlined (class project perhaps?); although there will certainly be overlap with

2011:

for GA status. I've put it on hold for now. One of the reasons is that it seems to be missing rather a lot of the headings on

1220: 619:- stuff like the drugbox / references / links / cats, and the initial header were all verified (by me, at least) to be okay - 4829: 4341:

Myself and other editors are going over the article. It could certainly use some copy editing, and edits for compliance with

3944: 5111:

The question is, should the pharmacology guidelines for INNs apply to organic synthesis articles?. Please see discussion at

3101:. This equally hair-raising article sprung to life a few months after I'd had a very long argument on the same subject with 2429:

Has anyone ever heard of this? I haven't, my usual sources turn up nothing, and the drugbox has apparently been copied from

6091: 5953: 4968: 4642:

effects. However, coverage of beneficial interactions, as well as beneficial secondary effects, is probably limited on WP.

6652:

PS That user has not set their account for wikipedia email link - I've left therefore one final notice at their talk page.

6337:

Our professor has copied the article so there is no need for the hands off approach anymore. You can edit it as you wish.

2046:

Thanks. I did pick this article to review because I immediately thought "chocolate". So I shan't argue with that point. --

963:

article is getting the object and the usage confused in parts (and may also have got the off/un confused too). I'd prefer

7488: 7386: 7336: 7279: 7180: 7075: 7051: 6955: 6897: 6824: 6780: 6679: 6506: 6416: 6307: 6266: 6217: 6140: 6077: 6043: 5991: 5941: 5805: 5703: 5672:

I've already uploaded some pharma articles. It's pretty easy. Anyone who needs access, just email me and I can add you -

5631: 5596: 5560: 5347: 5260: 5215: 5188: 4914: 4818: 4652: 4589: 4478: 4448: 4355: 4303: 4072: 4026: 3978: 3929: 3884: 3863: 3815: 3779: 3705: 3617: 3581:

in the dark ages (may 10, 2004), has large sections of the article that are unreferenced, and probably does not meet the

3505: 3465: 3200: 2986: 2907: 2851: 2827: 2759: 2512: 2447: 2395: 2248: 2119: 2065: 2036: 1988: 1881: 1713: 1651: 1545: 1527:

Both tagged as interesting to the project and assessed. If I may be bold, I think what you're going for here is actually

1505: 1494: 1459: 1419: 1314: 1018: 723: 3603:

Yep, paracetamol has been heading towards FAR level for quite some time. Perhaps we should focus on it specifically, as

2809:, although that image is unacceptably large) as opposed to just "being" in an article with very little content (such as 2433:. Based on the creator's contributions, I'm thinking of sending it to AfD as a hoax. Perhaps it was a typo (thinking of 1812:

with beclometasone and betamethasone respectively, not another salt of beclometasone and betamethasone respectively. --

6611: 6318:

I don't see a reason to merge it. It's quite detailed, and I can't see that it would make sense to put it all into the

3338:, which is assessed high, but with over 2,000 known DOX analogs, we're not putting all of them at high-importance ;-), 3022: 2579: 2152: 1145: 702: 6157: 4808:

That is very interesting. Those articles are, respectively, listy and stubby—I can't even think of where to add it :P

4248:. It should be functional now, and ready to go. If everything goes well, and all approve, I would hope that the first 7400: 7159: 6465: 3828: 3692: 3569:

has a couple of 'citation needed' tags, and could probably use a little bit of minor adjustments. It was promoted to

3163:

I would like another voice in this discussion as I'm confident that this anonymous user is adding original research.

2378: 1206: 1176: 1076: 1068: 6519:

Interesting. I ran a quick check and was unable to find reliable info on most of the alleged mAbs in that template.

6130:

Yes, we would :) Go for it—seems like a great idea, and long overdue. If you need a hand with cleanup, let us know!

7239: 6572: 6120:, if anyone wants to help that would be way cool. If not, no big deal. Just thought you guys would want to know :) 5884: 5717: 5520: 4709: 4320: 4151:

would be one where there are more published criticisms so would be easier to get material not published by pharma.

3748: 3733: 3683:

members :) I've proposed the creation of a new template to be used in articles on combination medications (such as

3057: 849:

There's gotta be another name for that. "Off-licenced drug" only gets 56 ghits; less than ten when you -Knowledge.

256: 243: 5907:

Hmm. I think we should look at things on a case-by-case basis; for instance, when I started a minor "overhaul" of

5649:

If you're as dedicated as I'm guessing you are based on your dedication to stuff, how would you guys like to have

5337:

article, as can any underground significance I'm not aware of (as long as it can be reliably sourced, of course).

7373: 6847: 6766: 6710: 6625: 6493: 5842:

page once this is done. Everything is out of order and so many once not uncommon uses are not discussed at all.--

5752: 5112: 5033: 1071:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 834:

Finally, this is actually a question of pharmacy/pharmacy law, not pharmacology, and you might find more help at

4468:

regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

3131:

Thank goodness we can change these pages, am I right? I will see if I can do anything to fix up these articles.

7462: 6403: 6389: 5788: 5487: 5446: 5290: 4638:

Yep. I see Dr. Cash's point, though—it's the same as naming a section "Side effects" when all it describes are

4629: 4565: 4284: 4235: 4170: 3112: 3075: 1922: 1752: 1609: 1209:

soon. Any comments or suggestions, either here or on the article Talk page, would be much appreciated. Thanks,

747: 7407:

Hi there, NAD is up as a candidate for featured article. Reviews, comments and suggestions are welcome on the

6252:. So, it was really a university project? We've been getting a wonderful little boom of those :) The expanded 5795:

for quite some time (I've been watching from afar with interest :) Perhaps this is our next FA in the making?

2080: 187:

Looking good! I thought of creating a boilerplate message to notify participants of the merger. Any thoughts?

7167: 7125: 6861: 5132:

is a novel small-molecular agent that makes ribosomes less sensitive to stop codons. It attracted a paper in

4667: 4533: 3158: 1999: 1958:

manufactures/markets? What about drugs developed by one company, then marketed by another? My personal take:

6759: 3278:

This is the highest importance. Articles rated as top-importance are generally major classes of drugs (e.g.

2805:

much to the articles; historical ads could be very appropriate to illustrate, say, a History section (as in

2143:

would be a good idea to get a template which is amenable to both projects, unless this has already happened

7347:

Shame clindamycin has a bad press in some respects. I find it extremely useful in recalcitrant cellulitis.

6095: 6064: 5974: 5855:

of those uses were once not uncommon; I think I only found two or three links concerning it and epilepsy.--

5774: 5662: 5527: 5473: 5456: 3098: 760: 465: 5171:

making it lay-friendly. As an aside, I can't even find a structure for this; I presume there's one in the

7217:. I should mention that he has previously blogged about a case where one of the major databases had the 6384: 5959:

A new article popped up in the last few days. Perhaps you folks might want to take a look? --Cheers from

5504: 5500: 4987: 3874:

Never mind—users experimenting with creation of hoaxes. Warned, reverted, deleted, blocked as necessary.

3661:

wikiproject, but I think it fits the category. It looks very good. A little more work, and it might make

2749:

Hi there, and welcome. I've assessed the article—very nice work, by the way—and done some minor cleanup.

1785: 1757: 2210:

all forms of medical treatment. I think drugs in clinical trials are notable if they represent a novel

1335:

Wouldn't changing the cation have consequences for the ion content of the body generally? For example,

791:

a synonym for another class of drug within Pharmacology? If so, should a redirect or merge be in order?

7260: 6177: 4488: 4293:

Excellent work, everyone :) I'll be a bit busy over the next few days, but will see how much I can do!

3313: 3250: 2996:

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see the urgency to delete these images. For example, take the ads for

2055:

No problem. Just be careful not to encourage too much informality or undue weight :) (mmm...chocolate)

1932: 1903: 431: 117:- looks great! :) I've taken the liberty to update the project userbox information and to move it from 38: 5362: 913:

I don't know about the technical aspects of this issue, but I've wikified the article (as part of the

728:

Somebody changed Bupropion article category from pharmaceuticals to chemicals. Can it be changed back?

6151: 5732: 4459: 4779: 2875:

ad was significant and if it was, then it should state so in the caption and in the article's text.

2775:

What's WikiProject Pharmacology's position on including advertisements in articles about drugs (see

2669:. As far as I know, it's a complete list from Chem Abstr. of references that mention "apixaban". -- 1727:

Hey, Ryan - welcome to the project. Nice to have you on-board. (your reputation precedes you :) ) -

7289: 7166:

recommend that articles on medications/diagnostic agents be named after the INN whenever possible.

6924: 2136: 1936: 1847: 1700: 941: 572: 5759:. This is a more general medical topic that should be of particular interest to the Pharm project. 5533:; phenobarbital, despite no longer being first-line, is still the most widely used anticonvulsant; 7484: 7453: 7382: 7332: 7275: 7176: 7071: 7047: 6951: 6893: 6820: 6776: 6675: 6502: 6412: 6358: 6328: 6303: 6262: 6213: 6136: 6073: 6039: 5987: 5937: 5801: 5699: 5627: 5592: 5556: 5511: 5436: 5384: 5343: 5256: 5211: 5184: 4910: 4814: 4791: 4648: 4585: 4474: 4444: 4351: 4299: 4068: 4022: 3974: 3925: 3880: 3859: 3811: 3775: 3701: 3613: 3501: 3461: 3420:

I don't know much about the second site, but some context about the first source is available at

3196: 2982: 2903: 2847: 2823: 2813:). I am also slightly bothered by the images' high resolution, and by the presence of two ads in 2755: 2508: 2443: 2391: 2244: 2115: 2061: 2032: 1984: 1877: 1709: 1671: 1647: 1613: 1579: 1541: 1490: 1455: 1415: 1310: 1119: 1014: 766: 615:

Not so fast!! There's lots of good stuff in there that's verifiably okay. It was all here --: -->

436:

I think yet another thing this project should do is work on the pharmacology requested articles (

3766: 2684:

Cheers. Will work on it... Don't have it deleted. Do you mind if I move it to my own userspace?

6887:

a little too far, but I won't block established accounts absent evidence of bad-faith efforts.

6113: 5658: 5570: 5540: 5466: 5046: 4764:

to be the next collaboration of the week. Any input on breaking this tie would be appreciated.

4045: 3636: 3241: 3227: 3136: 2770: 2666: 2422: 1944: 1612:

and subcategories for individual drug articles. As a single suggestion off the top of my head,

1187: 1091: 599: 493: 477: 406: 378: 351: 305: 265: 225: 196:

Good idea. That'll get folks moving on updating/evaluating stubs and stuff. Plenty to do! :) -

152: 96: 4856:

tag which may be used on any article's talk page, also deleted some mostly unsigned blogging.

3294:). Interestingly enough, there are no actual individual drug articles assessed at this level. 3267:

For the importance assessment, I'm trying to fit everything into the following general scale:

959:

Thanks for those links. The first is particularly helpful and shows that there is a noun. The

471: 7256: 7095: 5612: 5392: 4882:. Since this is within five days, this gives us a unique opportunity to shoot for a possible 4741:, I don't want to overburden too many people too early on. I think progress is being made on 4668: 2946: 2788: 322: 6182:

Just a note to point out that some chaps from Iceland have been doing some sterling work on

5229:

The Nature paper gives the systematic name: (3-oxa-diazol-3-yl]-benzoic acid; C15H9FN2O3. --

818: 371:

with a smooth process (that is, it's smoother than WP:ACID's). By the way, feel free to use

7416: 7310: 7196: 7143: 6342: 5878: 5426: 3688: 3146: 3084: 2550:

today :) Redirected. It looks like the chemists agree & nothing links directly to it -

1345: 714:

pet food recall, the article could use some work by knowledgable contributors. Thanks! --

289: 7478:

for December 21 (tomorrow). Let's keep an eye out for vandalism and inaccurate additions.

5923: 826: 8: 7367: 7319: 7005: 6912: 6869: 6841: 6801: 6704: 6619: 6487: 6426: 6107: 5746: 5072: 4925: 4897: 4851: 4082:

Might be an idea to start that up again. I'd put in a bit of work on it where I can :) -

3761: 3646: 3362: 2302: 2211: 2172: 2168: 1962:'s been around for a long time, and I never objected to its presence in articles such as 1233: 403:

Let's focus on the articles that are top/high importance yet are not even good articles.

281: 121: 5493:; ACE inhibitors are the first line of drug treatment of hypertension, and captopril is 4879: 4704: 1927:

What is the policy on allowing drug products to be categorised by company? A new user,

137:

which is also more WikiProject compliant. I already de-redirected everyone's userpage -

7519: 7479: 7449: 7377: 7352: 7327: 7270: 7230: 7171: 7114: 7066: 7042: 6990: 6985:

upport listing all unverifiable mumabs in one AFD. Not for speedy as far as I can see.

6972: 6946: 6888: 6815: 6771: 6670: 6588: 6497: 6472: 6407: 6397: 6374: 6354: 6324: 6298: 6282: 6257: 6237: 6208: 6195: 6183: 6161: 6131: 6099: 6068: 6034: 5982: 5932: 5896: 5796: 5782: 5694: 5622: 5587: 5551: 5480: 5338: 5310: 5284: 5251: 5206: 5179: 5156: 5080: 5019: 5002: 4939: 4905: 4887: 4809: 4799: 4765: 4713: 4643: 4623: 4601: 4580: 4559: 4525: 4469: 4439: 4380: 4346: 4294: 4278: 4261: 4229: 4164: 4063: 4017: 3969: 3959: 3920: 3875: 3854: 3806: 3795: 3770: 3696: 3666: 3608: 3594: 3534: 3516: 3496: 3485: 3456: 3444: 3411: 3382: 3191: 3120: 3106: 3069: 3028: 2977: 2898: 2842: 2818: 2750: 2720: 2705: 2689: 2674: 2654: 2639: 2622: 2595: 2503: 2438: 2386: 2338: 2239: 2219: 2144: 2110: 2087: 2056: 2027: 1979: 1872: 1704: 1642: 1536: 1485: 1450: 1410: 1400: 1336: 1305: 1224: 1210: 1127: 1110: 1044: 1010: 951: 751: 680: 651: 581: 549: 541: 456: 395: 188: 4756:, whether Aspirin is finished or not. Currently, there is a tie with 4 votes each for 3439:. They are personal experience by people who experiment with psychoactive substances. 1784:(rather than any specific salt), whereas "Beclometasone" only ever clinically implies 6880: 6855: 6580: 6458: 6018: 5912: 5756: 5654: 5644: 5243: 5199: 5137: 5042: 4901: 4041: 3847: 3629: 3279: 3234: 3211: 3132: 3061: 3050: 2736: 2230: 1532: 1510: 1251: 1180: 1084: 798: 665: 604: 482: 411: 383: 356: 310: 270: 230: 157: 114: 101: 2798: 2260:

Thank you Pgr94 for raising this thread, the articles previously queried to me were

7290: 7155: 7091: 7020: 6718: 6560: 6439: 6058: 6007: 5964: 5768: 5693:

Hmm. Sounds interesting—I would like to know more about the criteria, process etc.

5608: 5064: 5057: 4960: 4931: 4727: 4694: 4521: 4517: 4249: 4098: 4016:. I'm always shocked at how much work most articles under our "jurisdiction" need. 4004: 3910: 3729: 3291: 2969: 2606: 2566: 2538: 2478: 1743: 1561: 1518: 1436: 1289: 1196: 1172: 1141: 917:) in the hope that it will help someone decide whether to keep, redirect or merge. 914: 884:. Sounds a bit like "Fair-use image" which doesn't really exist either (as a noun) 533: 5167:

A bit out of my league, I'm afraid, especially explaining the mechanism of action

4934:

on the reliability of lay sources in attributing adverse reactions to medication.

2490:(cross-posted there, forgot to notify here—sorry!), I'm tempted to redirect it to 1167:

is a proposed guideline discussed and developed over recent months. Please visit

944: 7445: 7437: 7425: 7412: 7306: 7222: 6653: 6644: 6294: 5978: 5960: 5366: 5275: 5239: 5144: 4857: 4783: 4761: 4738: 4576: 4505: 4062:), so there you have it. Maybe this time around we could shake it up a little :) 4013: 3946: 3838: 3753: 3680: 3658: 3582: 3035:

I hope you find it usefull. Any "how to be improved" feedback would be welcomed.

2942: 2784: 2499: 2487: 2414: 2285: 1834: 1789: 1616:

could use some expansion, references (as an admin I presume you're familiar with

1340: 1246:). It makes no sense to talk about anything except the anion, in the case of the 1157: 1120: 976: 889: 770: 743: 525: 293: 173: 87: 7038: 2459: 2458:

Yep. I parsed it as Diamorphine & had to read it twice. Looks like it meets

1788:, hence the choice as to which is the article and which should be teh redirect. 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7363: 7001: 6908: 6865: 6797: 6792:] is a better list of useless mabs. Otherwise you miss some crap, for example, 5919: 5887:) is very keen to include an reference to an article on alcohol dependence and 5742: 5738: 5404: 5124: 4787: 4198: 4140: 4107: 3684: 3390: 3287: 2890: 2547: 2423: 2360:

be notable precisely for their failure to ever reach marketing status, such as

2318: 2298:

phase III or later, including marketed drugs (and presumably ex-marketed drugs)

2164: 2157: 1809: 1753: 1572: 1301: 1293: 1275: 1271: 905: 839: 729: 499: 441: 328: 247: 169: 6768: 3958:

was just promoted to FA status today! Congrats to all those editors involved!

7475: 7348: 7248: 7226: 7110: 6986: 6968: 6938:. If they are all deleted, there will be some cleanup to do (templates, etc.) 6884: 6603: 6584: 6468: 6453:

possible, the article should be deleted. I presume it was a mistake, because

6393: 6370: 6278: 6233: 6191: 5892: 5778: 5724: 5306: 5152: 4935: 4883: 4868: 4835: 4795: 4619: 4555: 4497: 4395: 4342: 4332: 4274: 4225: 4160: 3791: 3590: 3530: 3481: 3440: 3425: 3116: 3102: 3065: 3001: 2955: 2876: 2866: 2838: 2716: 2701: 2685: 2670: 2650: 2635: 2618: 2591: 2355:) and should probably look into such "forks" eventually. I do think allowing 2334: 2215: 1948: 1863: 1853: 1830: 1781: 1776: 1367: 1359: 1325: 1288:

If I get what you're trying to say, that's what I try to do when editing—cf.

1279: 1263: 1243: 1035: 1000: 918: 881: 858: 814: 514: 503: 375:

anytime; it's like an experimentation/development zone for this WikiProject.

338: 197: 177: 138: 7448:

project (originally only part of WP:CHEMICALS), and assessed it at B-class.

6742:. Tomorrow I'll scan PubMed and Google for sources. After scanning a PDF of 4834:

I don't hang around pharma pages, so I was alarmed to find this going on at

823: 809: 7433: 6636: 6464:). It should be deleted like other articles, and its mention in the drugbox 6461: 6253: 6249: 6121: 6024: 5915: 5829:

flesh out the mechanism of action section? It's rather emaciated right now.

5202: 5140: 4749: 4675: 3949: 3850: 3662: 3654: 3586: 3578: 3570: 3553:, I noticed that two of them are a bit in need of attention. Specifically, 3550: 3436: 3399: 3391: 3331: 3283: 3261: 3257: 3164: 3154: 3147: 3040: 2997: 2938: 2889:

ads could ever be construed as an endorsement of the product? If they meet

2814: 2810: 2780: 2740: 2314: 2261: 2095: 1813: 1765: 1528: 1247: 596:

I deleted it as a copyright violation. Let's start the article over again.

394:

Nice idea. Now we have a week to start thinking of articles to nominate...

3528:

Emails Derek a new keyboard with coffee-resistant heavy-duty plastic cover

2294:

Ok, so here are some of key criteria for drug notability mentioned above:

1833:

which in thw lead-in current says "It is available as a number of salts:"

7320: 7244: 7106: 7016: 6935: 6762: 6755: 6714: 6695: 6640: 6556: 6450: 6435: 6054: 5888: 5856: 5843: 5839: 5764: 5673: 5380: 5107:

Naming conventions for articles on the total synthesis of pharmaceuticals

5076: 5068: 4757: 4679: 4253: 4208: 4152: 4083: 3989: 3895: 3647: 3574: 3562: 3558: 3335: 2968:

the History section were moved to the bottom of the article (contrary to

2614: 2551: 2523: 2463: 2361: 2265: 2008: 2001: 1967: 1940: 1728: 1617: 1239: 947: 704: 669: 640: 620: 585: 562: 282: 7214: 4959:

people here can help most readily with the first option :) Any advice?

3769:

just made DYK. Would anyone care to have a look, maybe expand a little?

3153:

I am concerned that one anonymous user is repeatedly adding material to

172:

which is also a little more WikiProject compliant. We still get to keep

7503: 7252: 7015:

I would also support AfD nomination of the 68 non-verifiable articles.

6629: 6454: 6168:

appear to have been preferentially overstimulated or understimulated?

6117: 6021:

has also popped up :) It's very comprehensive, but needs some wikifying

5400: 5388: 5358: 5334: 5298: 4875: 4839: 4412: 4372: 4218: 4148: 3343: 3317: 3305: 3090: 2410: 2323: 2273: 2200: 1971: 1625:

If you're interested in assessing articles, you could also hang around

1363: 1297: 1153: 972: 885: 715: 711: 573: 557: 550: 5321:

Kamagra is a brand of sildenafil. It is not a range of products, like

3744:(ignore the "-combo" in its name - it would replace code at Drugbox). 7471: 7463: 7170:

is quite straightforward, but we can help you with that if you wish.

7033:

Very well; I'll list them. None of the CSD fit here, although a case

6666: 5792: 5472:. I would like them to use more representative images than the usual 5230: 5116: 5098: 4983: 4543: 4203: 4144: 3955: 3339: 3216: 2862: 2649:

Would love some literature. Please dump it on my talkpage... Cheers.

2277: 1963: 1928: 1914: 1475: 1431: 1388: 1259: 7436:

back in 2005, but a re-review indicates that it no longer meets the

5550:

If anyone has any ideas or complaints, they're more than welcome :)

1804:

Dave, beclometasone dipropionate and betamethasone dipropionate are

6165: 5908: 5396: 4389: 4368: 4155:

is a former FA which is a bit rusty and I am sure, heck why not do

3604: 3566: 3554: 3309: 3089:

I was today again confronted with a horrible case of drug-bashing.

2964: 2934: 2806: 2776: 2607: 2352: 1446: 1202: 853: 5432:

are to be created (and will be shortly after I have posted this):

7426: 7135: 7126: 5376: 5330: 5322: 5294: 5247: 5151:. Anyone interested in writing up this fascinating new compound? 4748:

So a new article for collaboration of the week will be chosen on

4742: 4734: 4723: 4539: 4509: 4508:. I'm reviewing all of the chemistry articles. As it stands now, 4504:, we are reviewing all current GAs to see if they still meet the 4490: 4329:

Knowledge:Scientific peer review/Therapies for multiple sclerosis

4213: 4156: 2382: 2365: 2153: 1978:, by the way.) I'd appreciate others' thoughts on this matter :) 526: 498:

Could the kind editors of this WikiProject please take a look at

5578:. No Google hits, no PubChem hits, drugbox is a copy-paste from 2498:. One could then argue for CSD R3, but I am of the opinion that 6606:, then if no one above can locate citation to verify, then all 6319: 6187: 5579: 5129: 3421: 3358: 2491: 2430: 6864:). How about closing both accounts? Admins among us - respond. 6496:) (monoclonal stub creator extraordinaire) commented on this? 5089:

Yet Another Proposal for additional pharmacological stub types

4224:..of course I'm biased as psychiatry is my field.....cheers, 4012:

Maybe we should start an official collaboration, sort of like

1862:

Could someone update the information in the progress section?

1387:

is trying to find WikiProjects interested in using the bot of

1034:", that could refer to any field (bootleg CDs, for instance). 631:

mean, if I were to copy some text from cnn.com's home page to

7218: 5977:, perhaps this is the solution to the problem we ran into on 5326: 4955: 4786:

licensing its patented microneedle technology used in common

4524:,... Who knows, maybe it'll eventually get FA status,... ;-) 2348: 2281: 1805: 1556: 1506: 1267: 4438:—oh well :) I guess we do need to shake things up a little. 4054:

Hmm. I just found out that, apparently, MCOTW is now MCOTM (

2715:

Done. Would you like me to kill off the resultant redirect?

1379:

An invitation to categorize uncategorized pharmacology stubs

5143:) when its beneficial effects on nonsense-mutation related 4838:. Is there a specialised template notice for this problem? 4753: 4257: 995:

for which there is no human use indication) and unlicensed

738:

Do you mean the project banner on the Talk page? Bupropion

7105:

I see grounds for blocking: refusal to participate in the

6555:

etc... I cant help wandering if this is a practical joke.

5741:

has just been nominated for GA, after significant work by

5650: 5357:

Agree - Kamagra just a brand and whilst may so mention in

5063:

There is currently a tie in the total number of votes for

3407: 2972:, but MEDMOS is not set in stone) it would be a great fit. 2385:(still in Phase I) but I like "quick and dirty" criteria. 1829:

Thank you - I stand corrected - but I had taken this from

4040:

have a collaboration page, but it was terribly inactive.

3403: 2886: 1266:

are not at all properly explained. Glutamate is the free

1255: 633: 452:

Knowledge:Requested articles/list of missing pharmacology

7326:

Is up for GA status. Comments and improvements welcome!

6934:

List these 68 articles at AfD (a single AfD) as failing

4616:(though I haven't checked this out on other articles...) 4546:

so the headings all matched up and pondered whether the

1339:

is used in lethal injections to stop the heart, whereas

1250:(and in the case of any other drugs). I take issue with 999:. It's just an idea, and is it just me or am I sounding 3738:

Template_talk:Drugbox#Single solution for consideration

2735:

I recently started and partially developed the article

1635:

Category:Pharmacology articles needing expert attention

1201:

Hi there fellow WP:PHARM members. I've been working on

710:

With the recent identification of this compound in the

7109:

process or to respond to queries... How very strange.

6297:

just what we're supposed to do? No complaints here :)

5918:

in the article; it got a bit of press and was used by

4678:

or at best, an obscure neologism. Thoughts, anyone? -

6770:. Maybe generous redirecting can sort out this mess. 3585:

as it stands today. This should be fixed ASAP before

2954:

I agree with Remember the dot, plus I like his name.

1608:

Hey there, and welcome! Well, you could always check

1165:

Knowledge:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)

1136:

Knowledge:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)

168:

Kewl! Bring 'em on :) I've also created the shortcut

6186:. I'd personally prefer to merge this into the main 5607:

Deleted. And I've blocked the serial hoaxer, too. —

4712:

than us, so you might want to run it by that group.

2141:

Knowledge:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology

1409:

I think this would be a great idea. Any objections?

746:. I've assessed it for this project as well, so now 5375:combination products also present problems (should 2305:

or patented (can't be patented without being novel)

1292:, to which I just added a Drugbox, and my moves of 742:a chemical, so I think it falls under the scope of 6639:) as currently being used for research - so fails 6632:created by same editor, yet the name is valid(see 3740:, please add any comments there. Test template at 2731:Could use some help with mitotic inhibitor article 6665:appear to be notable as well as verifiable, e.g. 2665:Since it's a bit long I put it on a user subpage 1631:Category:Unknown-importance pharmacology articles 532:I've just created a stub on this investigational 6090:I'm thinking that the best solution is to merge 3790:Could you add PMID/DOI codes to the references? 1871:Done by a bot every two days. Hey, nice work :) 5476:. Any syggestions? I thought of the following: 3221:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Bupropion 536:being tested by AstraZeneca, previously on the 292:. Comments, edits and suggestions are welcome. 6158:Talk:Neurotransmitter#Neurotransmitter effects 5546:, that's a tougher one. I welcome suggestions. 2801:. I can't say they're really necessary or add 2013:Knowledge:WikiProject Pharmacology/Style guide 1060:Cannabis rescheduling in the United States FAR 940:), which gets far more Google hits, including 3853:. Could use a hand or a cluestick, please :) 3549:After briefly reviewing this project's three 1947:). Should we allow such categories, or not? 1205:for a while now, and intend to put it up for 1126:New navigational template. Feedback welcome! 176:- I've added both to the project main page - 3286:), or a major concept of pharmacology (e.g. 1472:Category:Uncategorised pharmacology articles 765:Hi there. A discussion is proceeding on the 5178:WP:PHARM needs more activity. <sigh: --> 3749:Template talk:Drugbox#Drugbox & Chembox 3734:Template_talk:Drugbox#Time for new drugbox? 2109:behind on collaborations, request pages... 1173:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles) 580:Hi there. I found a lot of copyvio, as did 7508:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Aquaretics 6467:removed once deletion has been completed. 5039:Knowledge:Peer review/Theobromine/archive1 2893:I personally see no reason to remove them 2409:Patented is irrelevant to notability IMO. 1899:I've proposed a number of new subtypes of 1171:to indicate whether you support or oppose 1065:Cannabis rescheduling in the United States 808:cancer (and other rare diseases, I think). 6190:page, but perhaps there are other views? 3653:This article has just been promoted as a 1627:Category:Unassessed pharmacology articles 1393:Category:Uncategorized pharmacology stubs 6604:Knowledge is not directory or a listings 6248:Fair point, though that's the beauty of 4954:I'm a bit uncertain how best to develop 3720:Just a pointer to a proposal to merge {{ 987:"? We could then distinguish unlicensed 664:'terminate with extreme prejudice' that 6758:are all proposed USANs for a single mAb 5205:may be helpful as well. Any takers? :) 3742:User:Davidruben/Templates/Drugbox-combo 3675:Proposal: new drugbox for combinations? 3657:. It wasn't previously tagged with the 3223:. The Pharm project might want to add 836:Knowledge:WikiProject Clinical medicine 538:list of requested Pharmacology articles 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Pharmacology 14: 6881:several legitimate uses of sockpuppets 6765:seems to have been eventually adopted. 6457:has been mentioned in the literature ( 5149:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/PTC124 4550:section was better as a subsection of 4246:Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7209:Blog discussion on error in a drugbox 6023:, and should probably be merged with 4950:Opium now a Good Article - what next? 3607:is still reasonably well-maintained? 3545:Articles in serious need of attention 2617:) and recent trials being conducted? 556:Hi all. An anon editor went over the 6092:Quaternary ammonium muscle relaxants 5954:Quaternary_ammonium_muscle_relaxants 4774:Interesting new drug delivery method 3515:JFW, you owe me a new keyboard! ;-) 25: 6112:I'm going to be working on merging 5583: 4867:Potential Pharmacology article for 4674:The above article really smacks of 2486:Per your reasoning and comments at 1895:pharmacology-stub subtypes proposed 1484:Thanks. We'll start working on it. 748:all your bupropion are belong to us 23: 6612:Category:Monoclonal antibody stubs 5851:Perhaps it was unwise to say that 3988:Yayy!!! :) Well done, everyone - 2797:Well, IMHO this meets Knowledge's 1474:, I'll begin populating it soon. 24: 7539: 7401:Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 7160:International Nonproprietary Name 5521:Image:Phenobarbital3d updated.png 4886:listing for it on the main page. 2700:Feel free to copy or move it. -- 2301:blockbuster/first-in-class/novel 470:The discussion has been moved to 7499:Article for deletion: Aquaretics 6573:Special:Whatlinkshere/Anetumumab 5718:Therapies for multiple sclerosis 5503:or an opioid structure (such as 5250:. I just hope nobody sues me :) 4974: 4710:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology 4321:Therapies for multiple sclerosis 2194:When does a drug become notable? 1939:, which includes compounds like 1699:All right then. Care to work on 880:I'd support a merge/redirect to 244:Category:Psychoactive drug stubs 29: 7041:in some of these. AfD is best. 6669:. This needs a thorough check. 5922:as part of their rationale for 5414:Image search for new stub types 5113:Talk:Paclitaxel total synthesis 3435:Neither Erowid nor Lycaeum are 679:Nicely put, and point taken :) 6614:(?any of these not created by 6390:Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics 5870:Varenicline and animal studies 5418:As a result of the discussion 5383:or should there be a separate 5051:23:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 5009:20:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 4964:04:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 4945:19:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4920:21:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4891:19:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 4861:12:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 4843:08:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 4824:15:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 4803:04:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4769:01:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 4244:I've created a new page for a 2131:Dealing with recombinant drugs 1610:Category:Antiarrhythmic agents 1399:if you're interested. Cheers, 217:Automatic addition of articles 13: 1: 7526:16:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 7494:02:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 7458:17:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 7432:This article was promoted to 7392:16:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 7285:15:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 7269:). Help expanding welcome :) 7235:02:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 7201:15:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 7186:14:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 7148:14:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 7120:05:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 7100:05:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 7081:17:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 7057:16:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 7025:14:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 7010:11:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 6996:07:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 6977:02:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 6961:22:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 6917:13:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 6903:14:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 6874:02:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 6830:15:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 6806:02:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 6786:02:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 6723:00:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 6685:15:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 6657:15:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 6648:15:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 6594:14:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 6565:14:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 6512:11:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 6478:22:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 6444:17:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 6422:16:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 6380:20:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 6369:Your professor can join too! 6363:19:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 6347:15:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 6333:06:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 6313:15:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 6288:14:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 6272:14:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 6243:14:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 6223:13:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 6201:14:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 6173:12:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 6146:22:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 6125:18:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 6103:04:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 6083:01:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 6049:22:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 6011:14:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 5997:14:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 5968:13:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 5947:14:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 5911:, I chose to keep mention of 5757:the Clinical Medicine project 5474:Image:FlattenedRoundPills.jpg 4830:People seeking medical advice 4717:05:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 4698:05:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 4658:02:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 4634:02:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 4605:01:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 4595:00:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 4570:00:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 4529:06:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 4484:01:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 4454:00:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 4384:19:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 4361:01:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 4336:08:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 4309:18:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 4289:10:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 4265:05:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 3747:Also, only fair to pointout, 1970:. (As for the Viagra article— 1109:to the article's neutrality) 813:Obviously this is related to 779:Is there another name for an 602:, your friendly neighborhood 480:, your friendly neighborhood 409:, your friendly neighborhood 381:, your friendly neighborhood 354:, your friendly neighborhood 344:23:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 332:23:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 317:11:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 308:, your friendly neighborhood 297:05:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 277:12:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 268:, your friendly neighborhood 237:03:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 228:, your friendly neighborhood 203:04:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 192:02:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 183:00:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 164:00:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 155:, your friendly neighborhood 144:00:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 132:User WikiProject Pharmacology 108:17:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 99:, your friendly neighborhood 7421:02:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 7358:22:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 7342:22:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 7315:11:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 6096:neuromuscular blocking drugs 5975:Neuromuscular-blocking drugs 5902:17:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 5860:17:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5847:17:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5811:02:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 5728:14:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 5709:14:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 5689:07:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 5667:00:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 5637:00:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 5617:00:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 5602:19:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 5566:23:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 5505:Image:Morphin - Morphine.svg 5501:Image:Paracetamol-3D-vdW.png 5408:23:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 5370:23:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 5363:WP:MEDMOS#Naming_conventions 5353:23:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 5316:22:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 5266:14:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 5234:08:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 5221:20:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 5194:20:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 5162:16:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 5120:07:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 5097:, and share your thoughts. 5026:01:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 4969:Proposed deletion: Superdrol 4780:interesting article on ZDNet 4516:I've also nominated this at 4193:Impromptu list of candidates 4159:why we're at it....cheers, 3099:Post SSRI Sexual Dysfunction 7: 5102:04:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 5084:18:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 4436:It looks like nobody's home 4240:22:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4175:22:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4111:16:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4102:16:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4078:16:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4050:15:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4032:00:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 4008:00:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 3984:23:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 3963:23:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 3935:15:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 3914:15:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 3890:15:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 3869:13:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 3821:16:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3801:03:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3785:02:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3757:18:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 3670:16:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3641:05:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 3623:11:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3598:06:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3589:notices and puts it up for 3540:10:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 3520:16:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 3511:14:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 3491:05:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 3471:00:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 3450:06:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3429:04:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3415:03:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3386:02:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 3269: 3246:16:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 3206:17:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 3168:10:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1786:Beclomethasone dipropionate 724:Categorization of Bupropion 348:I can create one. Hold on. 10: 7544: 6256:page even made it to DYK. 5240:that makes it a lot easier 4972: 4848:Thanks, I've inserted the 4430:18:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 3141:13:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 3126:11:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 3023:Organic compounds database 3005:22:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2992:22:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2959:17:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2950:17:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2913:14:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2880:14:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2870:11:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2580:Consistancy for Comparison 1974:, cough, cough—we do have 1695:23:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1657:23:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1620:;) and a more formal tone. 1603:23:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1551:17:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1522:16:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1465:02:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1449:, who added the template. 1440:02:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1430:Speaking of which, why is 1425:00:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1404:00:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1320:01:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 1283:01:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 1228:00:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1192:20:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1131:17:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1114:23:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1096:21:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 1079:. Reviewers' concerns are 843:17:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 802:11:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 774:15:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 755:14:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 733:12:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 719:23:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 684:23:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 675:18:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 655:16:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 645:16:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 626:02:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 611:02:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 591:00:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 568:17:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 545:21:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 520:01:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 507:00:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 7255:(created this morning by 6434:genuine article deleted. 5065:Collaboration of the Week 4733:I have decided to extend 4726:extended for one week at 4403:17:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 3830:Isopapa-dimethoxy-aniline 3711:21:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 3565:article is still ok ;-). 3173:Seems like it. They also 3080:11:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3056:There is a discussion on 3044:10:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 2857:21:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 2833:15:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 2817:where one would suffice. 2799:non-free content criteria 2792:04:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 2765:15:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 2744:18:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2726:14:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2710:14:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2695:15:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2679:12:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2660:23:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2644:19:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2570:02:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 2542:02:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 2518:01:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 2482:20:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 2453:15:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 2417:14:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 2401:13:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 2343:12:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 2327:12:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 2289:18:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2254:15:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2224:13:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2204:12:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 2188:21:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 2177:19:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 2148:16:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 1780:so the article chosen is 1397:the taskforce's talk page 1214:20:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1160:15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 1067:has been nominated for a 1048:22:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1039:22:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 1023:20:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 979:19:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 955:18:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 922:18:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 909:23:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 892:22:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 872:20:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 489:11:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 460:14:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 445:09:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 418:15:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 399:14:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 390:03:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 363:02:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 251:09:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 7476:Today's featured article 7444:it. I did add it to the 7240:Potential DYK candidates 5293:) has created a page on 4878:was recently created on 4542:along the same lines as 2628:13:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2601:13:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2231:not being a crystal ball 2125:13:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2099:02:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2071:13:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2051:08:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2042:01:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2020:01:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 1994:17:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 1952:05:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 1937:Category:Gilead Sciences 1918:23:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1887:02:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1867:20:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1857:19:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1838:22:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1817:21:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1793:11:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1769:16:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 1703:as well? Happy editing, 1701:Sodium-calcium exchanger 1637:. A quick browse of the 1385:categorization taskforce 1371:23:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 1329:23:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 257:Cleaned up documentation 5791:), has been working on 5385:hydrocodone/paracetamol 5034:Theobromine peer review 4792:route of administration 3049:Request for Comment at 3027:I have been working on 2522:Yep. I say do it, so - 1747:00:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1719:00:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC) 1614:calcium channel blocker 1565:16:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 1500:15:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1479:04:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1353:20:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 1348:is used for depression. 1270:; glutamic acid is the 1140:The proposed guideline 1069:featured article review 7247:(created yesterday by 6160:" I describe a recent 6114:Sulfonamide (medicine) 6029:Camptothecin analogues 5056:Tie-breaker needed at 4705:this interesting paper 3695:. Input is welcome :) 3573:in september of 2006. 3186: 3058:Talk:Psychoactive_drug 1976:Category:Pfizer brands 1945:Category:Ford vehicles 1923:Categories by company? 932:I'd propose a move to 815:off-label prescription 797:Thanks for your help. 6850:) is a sockpuppet of 5488:antihypertensive-stub 5447:antihypertensive-stub 5393:amlodipine/benazepril 4669:Cosmetic pharmacology 4534:Streamlining articles 3724:}} with a proposed {{ 3402:guidelines. They are 3180: 1009:comment was added by 450:Good idea. I work on 246:be bot-tagged too? -- 42:of past discussions. 7164:our style guidelines 7065:. Thanks, everyone. 6732:from the content of 6694:As a self confessed 3767:Hartmann F. Stähelin 3689:ampicillin/sulbactam 3060:- a Venn diagram on 1639:navigation templates 1346:Lithium pharmacology 761:Expert advice wanted 617:Talk:Fluoxetine/Temp 466:Heroin name question 7510:(21 December 2007) 6885:assuming good faith 6728:I've set up a list 6385:Another new article 5528:anticonvulsant-stub 5481:Image:Captopril.svg 5457:anticonvulsant-stub 5422:, four subtypes of 5073:Receptor antagonist 4990:on 2 October 2007) 4252:can be selected by 3363:5-Methoxytryptamine 3097:Which brings me to 2500:redirects are cheap 2303:mechanism of action 2212:mechanism of action 2081:Project's main page 965:Unlicensed medicine 6184:statin development 6178:Statin development 6162:psychopharmacology 6017:In the same vein, 5777:), with help from 5663:write this article 4930:Please comment at 4898:This press release 4880:September 18, 2007 3728:}} into current {{ 3679:Attention, fellow 3251:Article assessment 3233:to its mainpage. 2308:popular news media 2088:User:ClockworkSoul 1555:Thanks! Now that 1337:potassium chloride 1296:articles (such as 1032:Unlicensed product 985:unlicensed product 915:wikification drive 582:User:Fvasconcellos 432:Requested articles 369:collaboration page 7523: 7516:--User:Ceyockey ( 7492: 7440:, so I've had to 7390: 7355: 7340: 7283: 7215:this blog comment 7184: 7158:, as that is the 7117: 7079: 7055: 6993: 6959: 6901: 6828: 6812:check for sources 6784: 6744:Hospital Pharmacy 6683: 6591: 6510: 6475: 6420: 6377: 6311: 6285: 6270: 6240: 6221: 6198: 6152:Neurotransmitters 6144: 6081: 6047: 6019:New Camptothecins 5995: 5945: 5899: 5809: 5733:Articles to watch 5707: 5635: 5600: 5586:situation again. 5564: 5351: 5313: 5264: 5219: 5192: 5159: 5023: 5016:--User:Ceyockey ( 5006: 4999:--User:Ceyockey ( 4942: 4918: 4822: 4656: 4593: 4538:I was organising 4482: 4460:MEDMOS discussion 4452: 4359: 4307: 4076: 4030: 3982: 3933: 3888: 3867: 3819: 3798: 3783: 3736:proposal and the 3709: 3691:). Discussion is 3621: 3551:featured articles 3537: 3509: 3488: 3469: 3447: 3379: 3378: 3280:Anti-inflammatory 3204: 3123: 3062:Psychoactive_drug 3051:Psychoactive drug 2990: 2963:Well, the one on 2945:are acceptable. — 2911: 2855: 2831: 2763: 2737:mitotic inhibitor 2723: 2692: 2657: 2625: 2598: 2516: 2451: 2399: 2252: 2123: 2069: 2040: 2007:Hi I'm reviewing 1992: 1904:pharmacology-stub 1885: 1717: 1655: 1549: 1511:Apolipoprotein A1 1498: 1463: 1423: 1318: 1274:, and MSG is the 1252:Sodium thiopental 1148:. Discuss on the 1026: 961:Off-licenced drug 789:Off-licenced drug 781:Off-licenced drug 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 7535: 7517: 7482: 7470:Just a reminder— 7380: 7353: 7330: 7291:Selenium sulfide 7273: 7257:Animated Cascade 7174: 7162:of DaTSCAN, and 7156:Ioflupane (123I) 7115: 7069: 7045: 6991: 6949: 6891: 6879:Well, there are 6818: 6774: 6741: 6737:Humanmonoclonals 6735: 6699:wikipedia areas 6673: 6589: 6500: 6473: 6410: 6375: 6301: 6283: 6260: 6238: 6211: 6196: 6134: 6071: 6037: 5985: 5935: 5924:banning orlistat 5897: 5799: 5697: 5686: 5683: 5681: 5625: 5590: 5576:Droneamphetamine 5554: 5545: 5539: 5532: 5526: 5516: 5510: 5492: 5486: 5471: 5465: 5461: 5455: 5451: 5445: 5441: 5435: 5431: 5425: 5341: 5311: 5254: 5209: 5182: 5157: 5017: 5000: 4978: 4977: 4940: 4932:Talk:Varenicline 4908: 4902:crystal ball-ish 4812: 4692: 4689: 4687: 4646: 4583: 4472: 4442: 4401: 4398: 4349: 4319:Peer review for 4297: 4096: 4093: 4091: 4066: 4020: 4002: 3999: 3997: 3972: 3950:Featured Article 3923: 3908: 3905: 3903: 3894:Good catch :) - 3878: 3857: 3837:Cross-posted to 3809: 3796: 3773: 3699: 3633: 3611: 3535: 3499: 3486: 3459: 3445: 3292:Pharmacogenomics 3270: 3238: 3232: 3226: 3194: 3121: 2980: 2947:Remember the dot 2901: 2845: 2837:The images need 2821: 2789:Remember the dot 2753: 2721: 2690: 2655: 2623: 2596: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2536: 2533: 2531: 2506: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2441: 2389: 2242: 2113: 2059: 2030: 1982: 1908: 1902: 1875: 1848:Wikiproject tags 1741: 1738: 1736: 1707: 1691: 1689: 1687: 1685: 1683: 1670:to good use :-) 1645: 1633:and, of course, 1599: 1597: 1595: 1593: 1591: 1539: 1488: 1453: 1413: 1308: 1290:butylscopolamine 1184: 1088: 1073:featured quality 1004: 870: 866: 861: 856: 852: 767:Talk:Antioxidant 672: 623: 609: 588: 565: 534:kinase inhibitor 517: 487: 416: 388: 361: 315: 275: 235: 162: 136: 130: 126: 120: 106: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 7543: 7542: 7538: 7537: 7536: 7534: 7533: 7532: 7501: 7468: 7430: 7409:nomination page 7405: 7362:Just passed by 7324: 7304: 7300: 7294: 7242: 7211: 7131: 6927: 6739: 6733: 6449:If there is no 6431: 6406:) on the 14th. 6387: 6180: 6154: 6110: 5979:Muscle relaxant 5957: 5872: 5735: 5721: 5679: 5677: 5674: 5647: 5582:. Looks like a 5573: 5543: 5537: 5530: 5524: 5514: 5508: 5490: 5484: 5469: 5463: 5459: 5453: 5449: 5443: 5439: 5433: 5429: 5423: 5420:mentioned above 5416: 5278: 5145:cystic fibrosis 5127: 5109: 5091: 5061: 5036: 4981: 4980: 4975: 4971: 4952: 4928: 4874:The article on 4872: 4832: 4788:inkjet printers 4784:Hewlett Packard 4776: 4762:Muscle relaxant 4731: 4685: 4683: 4680: 4672: 4552:adverse effects 4536: 4494: 4462: 4396: 4393: 4376: 4324: 4195: 4089: 4087: 4084: 3995: 3993: 3990: 3953: 3901: 3899: 3896: 3833: 3805:But of course. 3764: 3718: 3716:Drugbox upgrade 3677: 3651: 3631: 3547: 3400:reliable source 3396: 3253: 3236: 3230: 3224: 3214: 3151: 3087: 3054: 3025: 2943:Trifluoperazine 2785:Trifluoperazine 2773: 2733: 2611: 2582: 2557: 2555: 2552: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2469: 2467: 2464: 2427: 2238:circumstances. 2196: 2161: 2133: 2083: 2005: 1925: 1906: 1900: 1897: 1850: 1761: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1681: 1679: 1677: 1675: 1673: 1589: 1587: 1585: 1583: 1581: 1575: 1514: 1381: 1341:sodium chloride 1236: 1199: 1182: 1138: 1124: 1121:Template:PAH rx 1086: 1062: 1005:—The preceding 969:Unlicensed drug 934:unlicensed drug 868: 864: 859: 854: 850: 785: 763: 726: 708: 703:Help needed on 670: 621: 597: 586: 578: 563: 554: 530: 515: 496: 475: 468: 434: 404: 376: 349: 325: 303: 286: 263: 259: 223: 219: 150: 134: 128: 124: 118: 94: 90: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7541: 7531: 7530: 7529: 7528: 7500: 7497: 7467: 7461: 7429: 7424: 7404: 7398: 7397: 7396: 7395: 7394: 7323: 7318: 7302: 7298: 7293: 7288: 7241: 7238: 7210: 7207: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7203: 7130: 7124: 7123: 7122: 7088: 7087: 7086: 7085: 7084: 7083: 7028: 7027: 6980: 6979: 6943: 6942: 6939: 6926: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6920: 6919: 6835: 6834: 6833: 6832: 6788: 6692: 6691: 6690: 6689: 6688: 6687: 6650: 6597: 6596: 6576: 6517: 6516: 6515: 6514: 6430: 6425: 6386: 6383: 6366: 6365: 6316: 6315: 6275: 6274: 6226: 6225: 6179: 6176: 6153: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6109: 6106: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6053:Now merged by 6027:, or moved to 6015: 6014: 6013: 6000: 5999: 5956: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5920:Public Citizen 5871: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5814: 5813: 5761: 5760: 5739:Hepatotoxicity 5734: 5731: 5720: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5646: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5584:diramamorphine 5572: 5571:One more hoax? 5569: 5548: 5547: 5534: 5518: 5512:analgesic-stub 5498: 5497:ACE inhibitor; 5437:analgesic-stub 5415: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5372: 5355: 5277: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5268: 5224: 5223: 5196: 5176: 5126: 5123: 5108: 5105: 5090: 5087: 5079:in this case. 5060: 5054: 5035: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5011: 4973: 4970: 4967: 4951: 4948: 4927: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4871: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4831: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4775: 4772: 4730: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4671: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4608: 4607: 4597: 4535: 4532: 4502:sweeps process 4498:WikiProject GA 4493: 4487: 4464:Discussion is 4461: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4422: 4421: 4408: 4406: 4405: 4375: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4323: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4222: 4221: 4216: 4211: 4206: 4201: 4199:chlorpromazine 4194: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4141:chlorpromazine 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 3986: 3952: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3844: 3843: 3832: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3763: 3760: 3717: 3714: 3685:co-trimoxazole 3676: 3673: 3650: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3625: 3577:, promoted to 3546: 3543: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3513: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3432: 3431: 3395: 3389: 3377: 3376: 3373: 3367: 3366: 3354: 3348: 3347: 3328: 3322: 3321: 3302: 3296: 3295: 3288:Clinical trial 3276: 3252: 3249: 3213: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3185: 3184: 3179: 3178: 3150: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3086: 3083: 3053: 3047: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2973: 2952: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2841:, by the way. 2835: 2772: 2771:Advertisements 2769: 2768: 2767: 2732: 2729: 2713: 2712: 2682: 2681: 2647: 2646: 2610: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2581: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2544: 2426: 2424:Diramamorphine 2421: 2420: 2419: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2319:bioequivalents 2310: 2309: 2306: 2299: 2292: 2291: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2160: 2158:Alkyl nitrites 2151: 2132: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2004: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1960:Category:Lilly 1935:) has created 1924: 1921: 1896: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1810:propionic acid 1798: 1796: 1795: 1760: 1754:Beclomethasone 1751: 1750: 1749: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1660: 1659: 1622: 1621: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1513: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1468: 1467: 1428: 1427: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1302:etidronic acid 1294:bisphosphonate 1276:conjugate base 1272:conjugate acid 1235: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1198: 1195: 1137: 1134: 1123: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1043:Nice point :) 981: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 897: 896: 895: 894: 875: 874: 846: 845: 832: 828: 820: 811: 784: 777: 762: 759: 758: 757: 725: 722: 707: 701: 699: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 577: 571: 553: 548: 529: 524: 523: 522: 500:Levonorgestrel 495: 494:Levonorgestrel 492: 467: 464: 463: 462: 433: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 367:There, a nice 337:Definitely! - 324: 321: 320: 319: 285: 280: 258: 255: 254: 253: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 89: 86: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7540: 7527: 7522: 7521: 7515: 7514: 7513: 7512: 7511: 7509: 7505: 7496: 7495: 7490: 7486: 7481: 7480:Fvasconcellos 7477: 7473: 7465: 7460: 7459: 7455: 7451: 7447: 7443: 7439: 7435: 7428: 7423: 7422: 7418: 7414: 7411:. Thank you. 7410: 7402: 7393: 7388: 7384: 7379: 7378:Fvasconcellos 7375: 7372: 7369: 7365: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7356: 7350: 7346: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7338: 7334: 7329: 7328:Fvasconcellos 7322: 7317: 7316: 7312: 7308: 7292: 7287: 7286: 7281: 7277: 7272: 7271:Fvasconcellos 7268: 7265: 7262: 7258: 7254: 7250: 7246: 7237: 7236: 7232: 7228: 7224: 7220: 7216: 7202: 7198: 7194: 7189: 7188: 7187: 7182: 7178: 7173: 7172:Fvasconcellos 7169: 7165: 7161: 7157: 7152: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7145: 7141: 7137: 7129:: New article 7128: 7121: 7118: 7112: 7108: 7104: 7103: 7102: 7101: 7098: 7097: 7093: 7082: 7077: 7073: 7068: 7067:Fvasconcellos 7064: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7053: 7049: 7044: 7043:Fvasconcellos 7040: 7036: 7032: 7031: 7030: 7029: 7026: 7022: 7018: 7014: 7013: 7012: 7011: 7007: 7003: 6998: 6997: 6994: 6988: 6984: 6978: 6974: 6970: 6965: 6964: 6963: 6962: 6957: 6953: 6948: 6947:Fvasconcellos 6940: 6937: 6933: 6932: 6931: 6918: 6914: 6910: 6906: 6905: 6904: 6899: 6895: 6890: 6889:Fvasconcellos 6886: 6882: 6878: 6877: 6876: 6875: 6871: 6867: 6863: 6860: 6857: 6853: 6849: 6846: 6843: 6839: 6831: 6826: 6822: 6817: 6816:Fvasconcellos 6813: 6809: 6808: 6807: 6803: 6799: 6795: 6794:Tucusituzumab 6791: 6790:I think that 6789: 6787: 6782: 6778: 6773: 6772:Fvasconcellos 6769: 6767: 6764: 6760: 6757: 6753: 6749: 6745: 6738: 6731: 6727: 6726: 6725: 6724: 6720: 6716: 6712: 6709: 6706: 6702: 6697: 6686: 6681: 6677: 6672: 6671:Fvasconcellos 6668: 6664: 6661:Some of them 6660: 6659: 6658: 6655: 6651: 6649: 6646: 6642: 6638: 6634: 6631: 6627: 6624: 6621: 6617: 6613: 6609: 6605: 6601: 6600: 6599: 6598: 6595: 6592: 6586: 6582: 6577: 6574: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6566: 6562: 6558: 6554: 6550: 6546: 6542: 6538: 6534: 6530: 6529:Cetforlimumab 6526: 6522: 6513: 6508: 6504: 6499: 6498:Fvasconcellos 6495: 6492: 6489: 6485: 6481: 6480: 6479: 6476: 6470: 6466: 6463: 6460: 6456: 6452: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6441: 6437: 6429: 6424: 6423: 6418: 6414: 6409: 6408:Fvasconcellos 6405: 6402: 6399: 6395: 6392:, created by 6391: 6382: 6381: 6378: 6372: 6364: 6360: 6356: 6351: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6344: 6340: 6335: 6334: 6330: 6326: 6321: 6314: 6309: 6305: 6300: 6299:Fvasconcellos 6296: 6292: 6291: 6290: 6289: 6286: 6280: 6273: 6268: 6264: 6259: 6258:Fvasconcellos 6255: 6251: 6250:summary style 6247: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6241: 6235: 6230: 6224: 6219: 6215: 6210: 6209:Fvasconcellos 6205: 6204: 6203: 6202: 6199: 6193: 6189: 6185: 6175: 6174: 6171: 6170:66.218.55.142 6167: 6163: 6159: 6147: 6142: 6138: 6133: 6132:Fvasconcellos 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6105: 6104: 6101: 6097: 6093: 6084: 6079: 6075: 6070: 6069:Fvasconcellos 6066: 6063: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6045: 6041: 6036: 6035:Fvasconcellos 6032: 6030: 6026: 6020: 6016: 6012: 6009: 6004: 6003: 6002: 6001: 5998: 5993: 5989: 5984: 5983:Fvasconcellos 5980: 5976: 5972: 5971: 5970: 5969: 5966: 5962: 5955: 5948: 5943: 5939: 5934: 5933:Fvasconcellos 5929: 5925: 5921: 5917: 5914: 5910: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5900: 5894: 5890: 5886: 5883: 5880: 5876: 5861: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5845: 5841: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5828: 5823: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5812: 5807: 5803: 5798: 5797:Fvasconcellos 5794: 5790: 5787: 5784: 5780: 5776: 5773: 5770: 5766: 5763: 5762: 5758: 5754: 5751: 5748: 5744: 5740: 5737: 5736: 5730: 5729: 5726: 5719: 5710: 5705: 5701: 5696: 5695:Fvasconcellos 5692: 5691: 5690: 5687: 5685: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5656: 5652: 5638: 5633: 5629: 5624: 5623:Fvasconcellos 5620: 5619: 5618: 5615: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5598: 5594: 5589: 5588:Fvasconcellos 5585: 5581: 5577: 5568: 5567: 5562: 5558: 5553: 5552:Fvasconcellos 5542: 5541:sedative-stub 5535: 5529: 5522: 5519: 5513: 5506: 5502: 5499: 5496: 5489: 5482: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5475: 5468: 5467:sedative-stub 5458: 5448: 5438: 5428: 5421: 5409: 5406: 5402: 5398: 5394: 5390: 5386: 5382: 5378: 5373: 5371: 5368: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5354: 5349: 5345: 5340: 5339:Fvasconcellos 5336: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5320: 5319: 5318: 5317: 5314: 5308: 5302: 5300: 5297:, which is a 5296: 5292: 5289: 5286: 5282: 5267: 5262: 5258: 5253: 5252:Fvasconcellos 5249: 5245: 5241: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5232: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5222: 5217: 5213: 5208: 5207:Fvasconcellos 5204: 5201: 5197: 5195: 5190: 5186: 5181: 5180:Fvasconcellos 5177: 5174: 5170: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5160: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5142: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5122: 5121: 5118: 5114: 5104: 5103: 5100: 5096: 5086: 5085: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5070: 5066: 5059: 5053: 5052: 5048: 5044: 5040: 5027: 5022: 5021: 5015: 5012: 5010: 5005: 5004: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4966: 4965: 4962: 4957: 4947: 4946: 4943: 4937: 4933: 4921: 4916: 4912: 4907: 4906:Fvasconcellos 4903: 4899: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4889: 4885: 4884:Did You Know? 4881: 4877: 4870: 4869:Did You Know? 4862: 4859: 4855: 4853: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4841: 4837: 4836:Talk:Tramadol 4825: 4820: 4816: 4811: 4810:Fvasconcellos 4807: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4801: 4797: 4796:drug delivery 4793: 4789: 4785: 4781: 4771: 4770: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4746: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4729: 4725: 4718: 4715: 4711: 4706: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4696: 4693: 4691: 4677: 4670: 4659: 4654: 4650: 4645: 4644:Fvasconcellos 4641: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4631: 4628: 4625: 4621: 4617: 4614:section each 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4606: 4603: 4598: 4596: 4591: 4587: 4582: 4581:Fvasconcellos 4578: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4567: 4564: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4531: 4530: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4514: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4492: 4486: 4485: 4480: 4476: 4471: 4470:Fvasconcellos 4467: 4455: 4450: 4446: 4441: 4440:Fvasconcellos 4437: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4431: 4428: 4420: 4419: 4414: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4404: 4400: 4399: 4391: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4382: 4374: 4370: 4362: 4357: 4353: 4348: 4347:Fvasconcellos 4344: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4334: 4330: 4322: 4310: 4305: 4301: 4296: 4295:Fvasconcellos 4292: 4291: 4290: 4286: 4283: 4280: 4276: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4242: 4241: 4237: 4234: 4231: 4227: 4220: 4217: 4215: 4212: 4210: 4207: 4205: 4202: 4200: 4197: 4196: 4176: 4172: 4169: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4112: 4109: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4097: 4095: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4074: 4070: 4065: 4064:Fvasconcellos 4061: 4057: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4028: 4024: 4019: 4018:Fvasconcellos 4015: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4006: 4003: 4001: 3987: 3985: 3980: 3976: 3971: 3970:Fvasconcellos 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3961: 3957: 3951: 3948: 3936: 3931: 3927: 3922: 3921:Fvasconcellos 3917: 3916: 3915: 3912: 3909: 3907: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3886: 3882: 3877: 3876:Fvasconcellos 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3865: 3861: 3856: 3855:Fvasconcellos 3852: 3849: 3842: 3840: 3835: 3834: 3831: 3822: 3817: 3813: 3808: 3807:Fvasconcellos 3804: 3803: 3802: 3799: 3793: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3781: 3777: 3772: 3771:Fvasconcellos 3768: 3759: 3758: 3755: 3750: 3745: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3726:Drugbox-combo 3723: 3713: 3712: 3707: 3703: 3698: 3697:Fvasconcellos 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3672: 3671: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3649: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3626: 3624: 3619: 3615: 3610: 3609:Fvasconcellos 3606: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3542: 3541: 3538: 3532: 3529: 3521: 3518: 3514: 3512: 3507: 3503: 3498: 3497:Fvasconcellos 3494: 3493: 3492: 3489: 3483: 3478: 3477: 3472: 3467: 3463: 3458: 3457:Fvasconcellos 3453: 3452: 3451: 3448: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3393: 3388: 3387: 3384: 3374: 3372: 3369: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3355: 3353: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3327: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3301: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3263: 3259: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3229: 3228:MCOTWannounce 3222: 3218: 3207: 3202: 3198: 3193: 3192:Fvasconcellos 3188: 3187: 3182: 3181: 3176: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3166: 3161: 3160: 3156: 3149: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3124: 3118: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3095: 3092: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3074: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3052: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3036: 3033: 3030: 3006: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2988: 2984: 2979: 2978:Fvasconcellos 2974: 2971: 2966: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2914: 2909: 2905: 2900: 2899:Fvasconcellos 2896: 2892: 2888: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2878: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2853: 2849: 2844: 2843:Fvasconcellos 2840: 2836: 2834: 2829: 2825: 2820: 2819:Fvasconcellos 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2766: 2761: 2757: 2752: 2751:Fvasconcellos 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2718: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2693: 2687: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2652: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2620: 2616: 2609: 2602: 2599: 2593: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2571: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2549: 2545: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2535: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2514: 2510: 2505: 2504:Fvasconcellos 2501: 2497: 2494:as a typo of 2493: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2449: 2445: 2440: 2439:Fvasconcellos 2436: 2432: 2425: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2408: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2387:Fvasconcellos 2384: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2367: 2363: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2325: 2320: 2316: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2241: 2240:Fvasconcellos 2237: 2232: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2189: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2159: 2155: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2145:Markjohndaley 2142: 2138: 2126: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2111:Fvasconcellos 2108: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2072: 2067: 2063: 2058: 2057:Fvasconcellos 2054: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2034: 2029: 2028:Fvasconcellos 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2003: 1995: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1980:Fvasconcellos 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1920: 1919: 1916: 1912: 1905: 1888: 1883: 1879: 1874: 1873:Fvasconcellos 1870: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1839: 1836: 1832: 1831:Betamethasone 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1818: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1794: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1782:Betamethasone 1778: 1777:Betamethasone 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1759: 1755: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1740: 1726: 1720: 1715: 1711: 1706: 1705:Fvasconcellos 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1669: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1653: 1649: 1644: 1643:Fvasconcellos 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1566: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1537:Fvasconcellos 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1512: 1508: 1501: 1496: 1492: 1487: 1486:Fvasconcellos 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1470:I've created 1466: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1451:Fvasconcellos 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1433: 1426: 1421: 1417: 1412: 1411:Fvasconcellos 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1401:Pascal.Tesson 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1372: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360:hydrochloride 1356: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1306:Fvasconcellos 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264:glutamic acid 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244:sodium amytal 1241: 1229: 1226: 1225:Fvasconcellos 1222: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1211:Fvasconcellos 1208: 1204: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1169:the talk page 1166: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1128:Fvasconcellos 1122: 1115: 1112: 1111:Fvasconcellos 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1049: 1046: 1045:Fvasconcellos 1042: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1011:Fvasconcellos 1008: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 980: 977: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 957: 956: 953: 952:Fvasconcellos 949: 945: 942: 939: 935: 931: 923: 920: 916: 912: 911: 910: 907: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 893: 890: 887: 883: 882:Off-label use 879: 878: 877: 876: 873: 867: 862: 857: 848: 847: 844: 841: 837: 833: 829: 827: 824: 821: 819: 816: 812: 810: 806: 805: 804: 803: 800: 795: 792: 790: 782: 776: 775: 772: 768: 756: 753: 752:Fvasconcellos 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 734: 731: 721: 720: 717: 713: 706: 700: 685: 682: 681:Fvasconcellos 678: 677: 676: 673: 667: 662: 658: 657: 656: 653: 652:Fvasconcellos 648: 647: 646: 643: 642: 636: 635: 629: 628: 627: 624: 618: 614: 613: 612: 607: 606: 601: 595: 594: 593: 592: 589: 583: 575: 570: 569: 566: 561:POV/cruft? - 559: 552: 547: 546: 543: 542:Fvasconcellos 539: 535: 528: 521: 518: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 501: 491: 490: 485: 484: 479: 473: 461: 458: 457:Fvasconcellos 453: 449: 448: 447: 446: 443: 439: 419: 414: 413: 408: 402: 401: 400: 397: 396:Fvasconcellos 393: 392: 391: 386: 385: 380: 374: 373:the workspace 370: 366: 365: 364: 359: 358: 353: 347: 346: 345: 342: 340: 336: 335: 334: 333: 330: 323:Collaboration 318: 313: 312: 307: 301: 300: 299: 298: 295: 291: 284: 279: 278: 273: 272: 267: 252: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 233: 232: 227: 204: 201: 199: 195: 194: 193: 190: 189:Fvasconcellos 186: 185: 184: 181: 179: 175: 171: 167: 166: 165: 160: 159: 154: 147: 146: 145: 142: 140: 133: 123: 116: 112: 111: 110: 109: 104: 103: 98: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 7518: 7502: 7469: 7466:on Main Page 7441: 7431: 7406: 7370: 7325: 7295: 7263: 7243: 7212: 7168:Moving pages 7132: 7107:verification 7094: 7089: 7037:be made for 7034: 6999: 6982: 6981: 6944: 6928: 6858: 6844: 6836: 6743: 6707: 6693: 6662: 6622: 6608:198 articles 6607: 6537:Cetlalimumab 6533:Cetinlimumab 6518: 6490: 6451:verification 6432: 6400: 6388: 6367: 6336: 6317: 6276: 6254:Camptothecin 6231: 6227: 6181: 6155: 6111: 6089: 6061: 6025:Camptothecin 6022: 5958: 5927: 5881: 5873: 5852: 5826: 5821: 5785: 5771: 5749: 5722: 5675: 5655:MessedRocker 5648: 5611: 5574: 5549: 5494: 5417: 5379:redirect to 5303: 5287: 5279: 5244:CID 11219835 5172: 5168: 5133: 5128: 5110: 5092: 5062: 5043:MessedRocker 5037: 5018: 5013: 5001: 4991: 4982: 4953: 4929: 4873: 4849: 4833: 4777: 4750:September 19 4747: 4732: 4681: 4673: 4639: 4626: 4615: 4562: 4551: 4548:interactions 4547: 4537: 4515: 4495: 4463: 4435: 4423: 4416: 4407: 4394: 4377: 4325: 4281: 4243: 4232: 4223: 4167: 4085: 4059: 4055: 4042:MessedRocker 4037: 3991: 3968:Woo-hoo! :) 3954: 3897: 3845: 3836: 3765: 3746: 3719: 3678: 3655:Good article 3652: 3548: 3527: 3526: 3397: 3380: 3370: 3351: 3334:(similar to 3332:Daunorubicin 3325: 3299: 3284:beta blocker 3273: 3266: 3260:< A < 3254: 3215: 3174: 3162: 3155:Isotretinoin 3152: 3148:Isotretinoin 3133:MessedRocker 3109: 3096: 3088: 3085:Hair-raising 3072: 3055: 3037: 3034: 3026: 2998:fluphenazine 2939:Fluphenazine 2894: 2815:fluphenazine 2811:fluphenazine 2802: 2781:Fluphenazine 2774: 2734: 2714: 2683: 2648: 2612: 2583: 2553: 2525: 2495: 2465: 2434: 2428: 2356: 2311: 2293: 2262:Pralatrexate 2235: 2197: 2162: 2134: 2106: 2090:and used in 2084: 2006: 1926: 1898: 1851: 1797: 1762: 1730: 1672: 1667: 1580: 1578:attention!? 1576: 1515: 1469: 1429: 1382: 1350:87.80.209.34 1248:barbiturates 1237: 1200: 1163: 1146:Village pump 1139: 1125: 1106: 1102: 1063: 997:preparations 996: 992: 988: 967:rather than 937: 799:Guroadrunner 796: 793: 786: 764: 739: 727: 709: 698: 666:MessedRocker 661:google cache 639: 632: 605:MessedRocker 603: 579: 555: 531: 497: 483:MessedRocker 481: 469: 435: 412:MessedRocker 410: 384:MessedRocker 382: 357:MessedRocker 355: 326: 311:MessedRocker 309: 287: 271:MessedRocker 269: 260: 231:MessedRocker 229: 220: 158:MessedRocker 156: 115:MessedRocker 102:MessedRocker 100: 91: 60: 43: 37: 7438:GA criteria 7413:Tim Vickers 7321:Clindamycin 7245:Eltrombopag 7213:Please see 7061:AfD is now 6763:zalutumumab 6756:zalutumumab 6696:eventualist 6654:David Ruben 6645:David Ruben 6541:Cetolimumab 6428:Tiratumumab 6293:Heh. Isn't 6108:Sulfa merge 6008:Rifleman 82 5965:Rifleman 82 5889:varenicline 5840:galantamine 5427:pharma-stub 5381:hydrocodone 5367:David Ruben 5093:Please see 5077:Paracetamol 5069:Paracetamol 4961:Mike Serfas 4926:Varenicline 4896:Excellent. 4858:David Ruben 4778:There's an 4758:Paracetamol 4506:GA criteria 4496:As part of 4489:GA Sweeps: 4254:September 5 4209:paracetamol 4153:paracetamol 3762:New article 3754:David Ruben 3722:Drugbox-mab 3648:Resveratrol 3583:FA criteria 3575:Paracetamol 3563:Antioxidant 3559:Paracetamol 3408:lycaeum.org 3336:Doxorubicin 2615:rivaroxaban 2496:diamorphine 2435:diamorphine 2362:torcetrapib 2286:David Ruben 2266:Ocrelizumab 2185:Peter cohen 2048:Peter cohen 2017:Peter cohen 2009:theobromine 2002:Theobromine 1968:atomoxetine 1941:Oseltamivir 1835:David Ruben 1790:David Ruben 1562:Mike Serfas 1529:peer review 1519:Mike Serfas 1437:Fifth Rider 1432:hard clam's 1383:Hello. The 1240:amobarbital 1234:Anion issue 1175:becoming a 983:How about " 948:Off-licence 705:Aminopterin 472:Talk:Heroin 283:Antioxidant 113:Good work, 36:This is an 7520:talk to me 7504:Aquaretics 7307:Axiosaurus 7253:lacosamide 7193:Jonnylaney 7140:Jonnylaney 6945:Thoughts? 6925:Assessment 6752:duntumumab 6748:anetumumab 6630:Ibalizumab 6581:WP:CLINMED 6545:Duntumumab 6521:Anetumumab 6455:iratumumab 6339:Wozniakinn 6295:mopping up 6118:Sulfa drug 5875:Linkinlogs 5401:Benzedrine 5389:Zestoretic 5359:sildenafil 5335:sildenafil 5299:sildenafil 5020:talk to me 5003:talk to me 4876:Tapentadol 4852:talkheader 4577:metabolism 4413:Paclitaxel 4373:Paclitaxel 4219:fluoxetine 4149:fluoxetine 3404:erowid.org 3344:Tetracaine 3306:Penicillin 3091:Duloxetine 2887:historical 2865:article. 2839:rationales 2274:Apolizumab 2137:degeneracy 2000:Reviewing 1972:sildenafil 1533:WP:MILHIST 1364:zwitterion 1298:etidronate 1219:Up for GA 993:c:ompounds 938:unlicenced 771:TimVickers 712:Menu Foods 668:showed. - 574:Fluoxetine 558:Fluoxetine 551:Fluoxetine 294:TimVickers 288:Up for FA 122:User Drugs 7472:bupropion 7464:Bupropion 7364:Jimfbleak 7039:WP:CSD#A1 7002:Paul gene 6909:Paul gene 6866:Paul gene 6838:Blake3522 6798:Paul gene 6701:Blake3522 6667:efungumab 6616:Blake3522 6583:as well. 6553:Futumumab 6549:Extumumab 6525:Betumumab 6484:Blake3522 6166:receptors 5793:Primidone 5743:Countincr 5651:Veropedia 5645:Veropedia 5405:Galaxiaad 5058:WP:RxCOTW 4984:Superdrol 4728:WP:RxCOTW 4618:cheers, 4544:bupropion 4522:WP:RxCOTW 4518:WP:RxCOTW 4367:Notes on 4273:cheers, 4250:WP:RxCOTW 4204:clozapine 4145:clozapine 4108:Galaxiaad 3956:Bupropion 3587:The Big R 3340:Kanamycin 3217:Bupropion 3212:Bupropion 2970:WP:MEDMOS 2863:Coca-Cola 2460:WP:CSD#G1 2278:Beraprost 2165:Night Gyr 2107:seriously 1964:tadalafil 1929:User:G716 1668:expertise 1260:glutamate 1207:GA status 1177:guideline 1150:talk page 1142:WP:MEDMOS 1107:objection 1105:, not an 906:Galaxiaad 840:Galaxiaad 831:comments? 730:Paul gene 442:Galaxiaad 329:Parker007 248:Galaxiaad 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 7474:will be 7450:Dr. Cash 7446:WP:PHARM 7374:contribs 7267:contribs 7227:Walkerma 7223:WP:CHEMS 6969:Arcadian 6862:contribs 6848:contribs 6711:contribs 6626:contribs 6494:contribs 6462:17335294 6404:contribs 6394:Lilypink 6355:Dr. Cash 6325:Dr. Cash 6100:Dr. Cash 6065:contribs 5961:WP:CHEMS 5916:16377080 5909:Orlistat 5885:contribs 5789:contribs 5779:Fuzzform 5775:contribs 5753:contribs 5725:Garrondo 5397:Adderall 5291:contribs 5281:J.Picton 5203:17389552 5141:17450125 5081:Dr. Cash 4979:Resolved 4888:Dr. Cash 4800:Dr. Cash 4766:Dr. Cash 4739:WP:PHARM 4714:Dr. Cash 4630:contribs 4620:Casliber 4602:Dr. Cash 4566:contribs 4556:Casliber 4526:Dr. Cash 4397:Jreferee 4390:Aspergum 4381:Dr. Cash 4379:recent. 4369:Aspergum 4333:Garrondo 4285:contribs 4275:Casliber 4262:Dr. Cash 4236:contribs 4226:Casliber 4171:contribs 4161:Casliber 4147:, while 4014:WP:MCOTW 3960:Dr. Cash 3947:WP:PHARM 3851:17569741 3839:WP:CHEMS 3732:}}. See 3681:WP:PHARM 3667:Dr. Cash 3659:WP:PHARM 3605:caffeine 3595:Dr. Cash 3567:Caffeine 3555:Caffeine 3517:Dr. Cash 3426:Arcadian 3412:Dr. Cash 3383:Dr. Cash 3310:Caffeine 3113:contribs 3103:Shibidee 3076:contribs 3066:Casliber 3002:Andrew73 2965:diazepam 2956:Remember 2935:Diazepam 2877:Remember 2867:Andrew73 2807:diazepam 2777:Diazepam 2706:Edgar181 2675:Edgar181 2640:Edgar181 2608:Apixaban 2546:Feeling 2488:WP:CHEMS 2353:fentanyl 2339:Edgar181 2315:generics 2220:Edgar181 1949:Walkerma 1933:contribs 1864:Fuzzform 1854:Fuzzform 1447:User:RCP 1445:I'd ask 1368:Fuzzform 1326:Fuzzform 1280:Fuzzform 1203:orlistat 1197:Orlistat 1036:Smalljim 1019:contribs 1007:unsigned 919:Smalljim 744:WP:CHEMS 659:It's in 504:Andrew c 174:WP:DRUGS 7427:Menthol 7136:DaTSCAN 7127:DaTSCAN 6852:BlakeCS 6122:Lizz612 5536:As for 5377:Vicodin 5331:Nurofen 5323:Tylenol 5295:Kamagra 5276:Kamagra 5248:PubChem 5014:updated 4992:Deleted 4988:WP:PROD 4743:Aspirin 4735:Aspirin 4724:Aspirin 4640:adverse 4540:aspirin 4510:Ethanol 4491:Ethanol 4466:ongoing 4427:DLuber1 4418:DLuber1 4214:aspirin 4157:aspirin 3730:Drugbox 3632:Georgia 3237:Georgia 3175:removed 3165:Rhobite 2891:WP:NFCC 2885:such... 2741:Dancanm 2383:AZD2171 2366:TGN1412 2154:Poppers 1183:Georgia 1103:dispute 1087:Georgia 991:(i.e., 527:AZD2171 242:Should 170:WP:WPPH 88:Welcome 39:archive 7442:delist 7251:) and 7225:also. 7096:tizzle 7017:StephP 6761:, and 6715:StephP 6602:Given 6557:StephP 6436:StephP 6320:statin 6188:statin 6055:PFHLai 5857:Rmky87 5844:Rmky87 5822:Lancet 5765:Rmky87 5613:tizzle 5580:heroin 5507:) for 5242:—it's 5238:Well, 5198:P.S.: 5175:paper? 5173:Nature 5134:Nature 5130:PTC124 5125:PTC124 4782:about 4343:WP:MOS 3591:WP:FAR 3422:Erowid 3359:PA 824 3318:Viagra 3219:is at 2941:, and 2492:heroin 2431:heroin 1573:Hello! 671:Alison 641:Selket 622:Alison 600:Signed 587:Alison 564:Alison 516:Alison 478:Signed 407:Signed 379:Signed 352:Signed 339:Alison 306:Signed 266:Signed 226:Signed 198:Alison 178:Alison 153:Signed 139:Alison 97:Signed 7434:WP:GA 7219:taxol 7092:Scien 7035:could 6637:WP:RS 6094:with 5928:while 5755:) of 5609:Scien 5327:Advil 5246:from 4986:(via 4956:Opium 4676:WP:OR 4060:month 3630:Sandy 3561:(the 3437:WP:RS 3392:WP:RS 3235:Sandy 3041:Boris 2411:Colin 2349:Actiq 2324:Pgr94 2282:CytRx 2270:CHHIP 2201:Pgr94 2096:Boris 1814:Boris 1808:S of 1806:ESTER 1766:Boris 1557:Opium 1507:Opium 1268:anion 1181:Sandy 1154:Colin 1085:Sandy 1001:ORish 989:drugs 973:Colin 886:Colin 716:Dfred 576:alert 16:< 7454:talk 7417:talk 7368:talk 7354:T@lk 7311:talk 7261:talk 7231:talk 7197:talk 7144:talk 7116:T@lk 7021:talk 7006:talk 6992:T@lk 6973:talk 6936:WP:V 6913:talk 6870:talk 6856:talk 6842:talk 6802:talk 6754:and 6730:here 6719:talk 6705:talk 6641:WP:N 6620:talk 6590:T@lk 6561:talk 6488:talk 6474:T@lk 6459:PMID 6440:talk 6398:talk 6376:T@lk 6359:talk 6343:talk 6329:talk 6284:T@lk 6239:T@lk 6197:T@lk 6156:In " 6116:and 6059:talk 5913:PMID 5898:T@lk 5879:talk 5783:talk 5769:talk 5747:talk 5659:talk 5523:for 5483:for 5462:and 5399:and 5312:T@lk 5285:talk 5231:Itub 5200:PMID 5158:T@lk 5138:PMID 5117:Itub 5115:. -- 5099:Alai 5095:here 5071:and 5047:talk 4941:T@lk 4840:Tony 4754:2007 4624:talk 4560:talk 4371:and 4279:talk 4258:2007 4230:talk 4165:talk 4143:and 4058:for 4046:talk 3945:New 3848:PMID 3797:T@lk 3693:here 3687:and 3637:Talk 3557:and 3536:T@lk 3487:T@lk 3446:T@lk 3424:. -- 3406:and 3371:none 3300:high 3242:Talk 3159:diff 3137:talk 3122:T@lk 3107:talk 3070:talk 2803:that 2787:)? — 2722:T@lk 2691:T@lk 2667:here 2656:T@lk 2624:T@lk 2597:T@lk 2548:BOLD 2364:and 2351:and 2169:talk 2156:and 1915:Alai 1911:here 1756:and 1629:and 1618:WP:V 1509:and 1476:Alai 1389:Alai 1362:and 1262:and 1242:vs. 1188:Talk 1092:Talk 1081:here 1077:here 1015:talk 950:... 943:and 936:(or 838:. -- 438:here 290:here 7506:at 7403:FAC 7376:). 7349:JFW 7249:JFW 7111:JFW 6987:JFW 6610:in 6585:JFW 6469:JFW 6371:JFW 6279:JFW 6234:JFW 6192:JFW 6067:). 5893:JFW 5853:all 5827:pad 5661:) ( 5495:the 5365:). 5329:or 5307:JFW 5169:and 5153:JFW 4936:JFW 4904::) 4794:or 4760:or 4500:'s 4038:did 4036:We 3792:JFW 3531:JFW 3482:JFW 3441:JFW 3365:). 3352:low 3326:mid 3320:). 3314:LSD 3274:top 3117:JFW 2895:all 2717:JFW 2686:JFW 2651:JFW 2619:JFW 2592:JFW 2502::) 2437:?) 2379:INN 2357:all 2236:all 2092:MCB 1966:or 1758:BDP 1535:). 1256:MSG 1221:now 1179:. 787:Is 750::) 634:CNN 127:to 7524:) 7456:) 7419:) 7351:| 7313:) 7297:Se 7233:) 7199:) 7146:) 7113:| 7063:up 7023:) 7008:) 6989:| 6975:) 6967:-- 6915:) 6872:) 6814:. 6804:) 6750:, 6740:}} 6734:{{ 6721:) 6663:do 6643:. 6587:| 6563:) 6551:, 6547:, 6543:, 6539:, 6535:, 6531:, 6527:, 6523:, 6471:| 6442:) 6373:| 6361:) 6345:) 6331:) 6281:| 6236:| 6194:| 6006:-- 5963:; 5895:| 5680:is 5665:) 5544:}} 5538:{{ 5531:}} 5525:{{ 5515:}} 5509:{{ 5491:}} 5485:{{ 5470:}} 5464:{{ 5460:}} 5454:{{ 5452:, 5450:}} 5444:{{ 5442:, 5440:}} 5434:{{ 5430:}} 5424:{{ 5391:, 5325:, 5309:| 5155:| 5067:. 5049:) 5041:. 5024:) 5007:) 4938:| 4854:}} 4850:{{ 4798:. 4752:, 4686:is 4632:) 4568:) 4415:- 4392:- 4345:. 4331:-- 4287:) 4260:. 4256:, 4238:) 4173:) 4090:is 4048:) 3996:is 3902:is 3794:| 3665:. 3663:FA 3639:) 3593:. 3579:FA 3571:FA 3533:| 3484:| 3443:| 3361:, 3346:. 3342:, 3316:, 3312:, 3308:, 3290:, 3282:, 3262:FA 3258:GA 3244:) 3231:}} 3225:{{ 3139:) 3119:| 3078:) 3029:it 2937:, 2897:. 2783:, 2779:, 2719:| 2708:) 2702:Ed 2688:| 2677:) 2671:Ed 2653:| 2642:) 2636:Ed 2634:-- 2621:| 2594:| 2558:is 2530:is 2470:is 2462:- 2341:) 2335:Ed 2280:, 2276:, 2272:, 2268:, 2264:, 2222:) 2216:Ed 2183:-- 2175:) 2173:Oy 1909:, 1907:}} 1901:{{ 1735:is 1690:te 1688:ai 1686:hw 1684:et 1682:tl 1680:os 1676:an 1674:Ry 1598:te 1596:ai 1594:hw 1592:et 1590:tl 1588:os 1584:an 1582:Ry 1366:. 1300:→ 1278:. 1258:, 1223:. 1190:) 1152:. 1094:) 1083:. 1021:) 1017:• 1003:? 740:is 638:-- 474:. 135:}} 129:{{ 125:}} 119:{{ 76:→ 7491:) 7489:c 7487:· 7485:t 7483:( 7452:( 7415:( 7389:) 7387:c 7385:· 7383:t 7381:( 7371:· 7366:( 7339:) 7337:c 7335:· 7333:t 7331:( 7309:( 7303:y 7301:S 7299:x 7282:) 7280:c 7278:· 7276:t 7274:( 7264:· 7259:( 7229:( 7195:( 7183:) 7181:c 7179:· 7177:t 7175:( 7142:( 7078:) 7076:c 7074:· 7072:t 7070:( 7054:) 7052:c 7050:· 7048:t 7046:( 7019:( 7004:( 6983:S 6971:( 6958:) 6956:c 6954:· 6952:t 6950:( 6911:( 6900:) 6898:c 6896:· 6894:t 6892:( 6868:( 6859:· 6854:( 6845:· 6840:( 6827:) 6825:c 6823:· 6821:t 6819:( 6800:( 6783:) 6781:c 6779:· 6777:t 6775:( 6717:( 6708:· 6703:( 6682:) 6680:c 6678:· 6676:t 6674:( 6623:· 6618:( 6559:( 6509:) 6507:c 6505:· 6503:t 6501:( 6491:· 6486:( 6438:( 6419:) 6417:c 6415:· 6413:t 6411:( 6401:· 6396:( 6357:( 6341:( 6327:( 6310:) 6308:c 6306:· 6304:t 6302:( 6269:) 6267:c 6265:· 6263:t 6261:( 6220:) 6218:c 6216:· 6214:t 6212:( 6143:) 6141:c 6139:· 6137:t 6135:( 6080:) 6078:c 6076:· 6074:t 6072:( 6062:· 6057:( 6046:) 6044:c 6042:· 6040:t 6038:( 6031:? 5994:) 5992:c 5990:· 5988:t 5986:( 5944:) 5942:c 5940:· 5938:t 5936:( 5882:· 5877:( 5808:) 5806:c 5804:· 5802:t 5800:( 5786:· 5781:( 5772:· 5767:( 5750:· 5745:( 5706:) 5704:c 5702:· 5700:t 5698:( 5684:n 5682:o 5678:l 5676:A 5657:( 5634:) 5632:c 5630:· 5628:t 5626:( 5599:) 5597:c 5595:· 5593:t 5591:( 5563:) 5561:c 5559:· 5557:t 5555:( 5517:; 5350:) 5348:c 5346:· 5344:t 5342:( 5288:· 5283:( 5263:) 5261:c 5259:· 5257:t 5255:( 5218:) 5216:c 5214:· 5212:t 5210:( 5191:) 5189:c 5187:· 5185:t 5183:( 5136:( 5045:( 4917:) 4915:c 4913:· 4911:t 4909:( 4821:) 4819:c 4817:· 4815:t 4813:( 4695:☺ 4690:n 4688:o 4684:l 4682:A 4655:) 4653:c 4651:· 4649:t 4647:( 4627:· 4622:( 4592:) 4590:c 4588:· 4586:t 4584:( 4563:· 4558:( 4481:) 4479:c 4477:· 4475:t 4473:( 4451:) 4449:c 4447:· 4445:t 4443:( 4358:) 4356:c 4354:· 4352:t 4350:( 4306:) 4304:c 4302:· 4300:t 4298:( 4282:· 4277:( 4233:· 4228:( 4168:· 4163:( 4099:☺ 4094:n 4092:o 4088:l 4086:A 4075:) 4073:c 4071:· 4069:t 4067:( 4056:M 4044:( 4029:) 4027:c 4025:· 4023:t 4021:( 4005:☺ 4000:n 3998:o 3994:l 3992:A 3981:) 3979:c 3977:· 3975:t 3973:( 3932:) 3930:c 3928:· 3926:t 3924:( 3911:☺ 3906:n 3904:o 3900:l 3898:A 3887:) 3885:c 3883:· 3881:t 3879:( 3866:) 3864:c 3862:· 3860:t 3858:( 3841:. 3818:) 3816:c 3814:· 3812:t 3810:( 3782:) 3780:c 3778:· 3776:t 3774:( 3708:) 3706:c 3704:· 3702:t 3700:( 3635:( 3620:) 3618:c 3616:· 3614:t 3612:( 3508:) 3506:c 3504:· 3502:t 3500:( 3468:) 3466:c 3464:· 3462:t 3460:( 3394:? 3240:( 3203:) 3201:c 3199:· 3197:t 3195:( 3135:( 3110:· 3105:( 3073:· 3068:( 2989:) 2987:c 2985:· 2983:t 2981:( 2910:) 2908:c 2906:· 2904:t 2902:( 2854:) 2852:c 2850:· 2848:t 2846:( 2830:) 2828:c 2826:· 2824:t 2822:( 2762:) 2760:c 2758:· 2756:t 2754:( 2704:( 2673:( 2638:( 2567:☺ 2562:n 2560:o 2556:l 2554:A 2539:☺ 2534:n 2532:o 2528:l 2526:A 2515:) 2513:c 2511:· 2509:t 2507:( 2479:☺ 2474:n 2472:o 2468:l 2466:A 2450:) 2448:c 2446:· 2444:t 2442:( 2413:° 2398:) 2396:c 2394:· 2392:t 2390:( 2368:. 2337:( 2317:/ 2251:) 2249:c 2247:· 2245:t 2243:( 2218:( 2171:/ 2167:( 2122:) 2120:c 2118:· 2116:t 2114:( 2068:) 2066:c 2064:· 2062:t 2060:( 2039:) 2037:c 2035:· 2033:t 2031:( 1991:) 1989:c 1987:· 1985:t 1983:( 1931:( 1884:) 1882:c 1880:· 1878:t 1876:( 1744:☺ 1739:n 1737:o 1733:l 1731:A 1716:) 1714:c 1712:· 1710:t 1708:( 1678:P 1654:) 1652:c 1650:· 1648:t 1646:( 1586:P 1548:) 1546:c 1544:· 1542:t 1540:( 1497:) 1495:c 1493:· 1491:t 1489:( 1462:) 1460:c 1458:· 1456:t 1454:( 1435:- 1422:) 1420:c 1418:· 1416:t 1414:( 1317:) 1315:c 1313:· 1311:t 1309:( 1186:( 1156:° 1090:( 1030:" 1025:. 1013:( 975:° 888:° 869:♠ 865:C 860:M 855:P 851:♠ 783:? 608:. 598:— 486:. 476:— 415:. 405:— 387:. 377:— 360:. 350:— 314:. 304:— 274:. 264:— 234:. 224:— 161:. 151:— 105:. 95:— 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Pharmacology/Archive 1 - Knowledge

Index