Knowledge

Style (book)

Source 📝

107:. It sets out to answer the questions, "Why is so much writing wordy, confused, graceless, dull?" and "What are the qualities that endow language, spoken or written, with persuasiveness or power?" It offers "a few principles" and "a number of examples of the effective use of language, especially in prose", and adds "a few warnings". The book is written as a series of eleven essays (with much quotation and anecdote, and without bullet-points or note-form), which themselves illustrate the virtues commended. The work is unified by what Lucas calls "one vital thread, on which the random principles of good writing may be strung, and grasped as a whole". That "vital thread" is "courtesy to readers". It is upon this emphasis on good manners, urbanity, good humour, grace, control, that the book's aspiration to usefulness rests. Discussion tends to circle back to 18th-century masters like Voltaire, Montesquieu, Gibbon, the later Johnson, or their successors like 132:
best side of their characters, and at their best moments." He goes on to outline the elements of a lucid, varied, pointed prose style; to warn of perils (the book is an anthology of weeds as well as flowers); and to explore different methods of planning, composition and revision. Passages quoted for analysis are in a range of styles, taken from letters, essays, criticism, biography, history, novels and plays. There is a chapter on the rhythms of prose and on aural effects. Of figures of speech, Lucas deals with simile and metaphor; of rhetorical tropes, he discusses irony, and syntactical devices such as inversion and antithesis. For points of correct English usage he refers readers to Fowler's
329:, "exemplifying brilliantly all that it seeks to instill – enjoyment of reading and mastery of writing." It was Lucas's most successful book. He had long had a reputation as a stylist, "one whose pen possesses the sparkle and fascination which made the essay, in the hands of writers such as Bacon and Montaigne, a thing of beauty and interest". Some reviewers expressed the view that "The book's most obvious merit lies in its quotations" ( 379:(2011) considered the book "filled with fine things ... F. L. Lucas wrote the best book on prose composition, for the not-so-simple reason that, in the modern era, he was the smartest, most cultivated man to turn his energies to the task". The 2011 article "brought attention to this neglected classic and helped set in train its reissue". 368:
disliked the work and dismissed its author as "middlebrow": "There have been wonderful styles which illustrate the virtues of clarity, brevity, simplicity and vitality. Other styles, no less wonderful, have exhibited obscurity, amplitude, complexity and decadence. Good writers have been urbane, gay
349:
praised Lucas's close analysis of faulty style: "The passage in which he dissects a great hunk of Swinburne's prose, reduces it by more than half, recognizes that it could be made shorter still, and ends by suggesting that it need not have been written at all, is in itself worth the whole price of
308:, who added their own sub-title, 'The Art of Writing Well'. "Though one cannot teach people to write well," Lucas had observed, "one can sometimes teach them to write rather better." Harriman House brought out a fourth edition in 2020, correcting minor errors in the third and adding a Foreword by 131:
Lucas begins with a definition of style in prose, and a discussion of its importance. He questions the extent to which style can be taught, given that it is a reflection of personality ("The problems of style are really problems of personality" ), but concludes that "Writers should write from the
24: 304:; this reissue Cassell mistakenly called the "second edition". After being out-of-print for four decades, the real second edition, with Lucas's translations, checked against the first edition, was reprinted in 2012 by Harriman House Publishing, of 148:"One cannot ask oneself too often, both in writing and in re-reading what one has written, 'Do I really mean that? Have I said it for effect, though I know it is exaggerated? Or from cowardice, because otherwise I should be ill thought of?' " 299:
of London in 1964, Lucas made minor changes and added – in response to some readers' protests – footnote translations (his own) of the book's foreign-language quotations. Cassell reprinted the first edition in 1974, adding a Foreword by
279:, and partly by his belief that "on the quality of a nation's language depends to some extent the quality of its life and thought; and on the quality of its life and thought the quality of its language". First published in 1955 by 416:, explored two aspects of style – brevity and metaphor – in a celebration of world proverbs as a source of wit, wisdom, and insight into human nature and national character. The piece was reprinted in Mieder and Sobieski, 339:). "There are almost as many in French as in English, and their range and aptness are remarkable." Others, however, felt that there should have been fewer examples from poetry and more from contemporary prose. 369:
and healthy: other good writers have been boorish, melancholic and diseased... Mr Lucas pays lip-service to the recalcitrant disorder of the scene" but "writes far too briefly of variety". More recently,
271:. The decision to lecture on 'Good prose, and the writing of it' (the course was later renamed 'Style') reflected a wish to improve the quality of student essays, adversely affected, Lucas felt, by the 138:. Giving, however, a few examples of regrettable change and ignorance, he stresses the importance of "preserving the purity of the English tongue". Languages evolve, but can also degenerate. 151:"A writer should view his mental offspring as relentlessly as a Spartan father. If he does not 'expose' his unsound offspring himself, others will, in a different sense." 398:
more succinctly, in a different order and with some changes in emphasis, and adds new examples and a few autobiographical anecdotes. It was reprinted in Birk and Birk,
103:(1955) is a book about the writing and appreciation of "good prose", expanded for the general reader from lectures originally given to English literature students at 275:. The decision to expand the lectures into book form for the general reader was prompted partly by his recent experience as an Intelligence report-writer in 1021: 406:(New York, 2009). The essay was reissued in 2012 as 'How to Write Powerful Prose', by Harriman House Publishing, Petersfield. 1082: 86: 1254: 387:
Lucas returned to the subject in a 4000-word essay, 'On the Fascination of Style', published in the March 1960 number of
1264: 1010: 1051:
Gold Nuggets or Fool’s Gold? Magazine and Newspaper Articles on the (Ir)relevance of Proverbs and Proverbial Phrases
1259: 1122: 654: 108: 966: 267:
was based on one of Lucas's first courses of lectures at Cambridge (1946 to 1953) after his return from
418:
Gold Nuggets or Fool's Gold? Magazine and Newspaper Articles on the (Ir)relevance of Proverbial Phrases
1075: 1036: 989: 291:
went through seven impressions in the UK between 1955 and 1964. In the second edition, published by
324: 1105: 1048: 943: 370: 340: 309: 445: 1249: 1183: 1068: 134: 104: 8: 789: 280: 69: 382: 410: 388: 330: 51: 696:
Lucas, F. L., 'On the Fascination of Style', in Birk, N. P., & Birk, G. B., eds.,
409:
His companion essay, 'The Art of Proverbs', published in the September 1965 number of
1006: 938: 375: 284: 120: 81: 73: 1113: 1157: 523: 514: 351: 346: 301: 145:"I can think of no constantly perfect stylist who has not laboured like an emmet." 1176: 116: 750:
Lucas, F. L., 'On the Fascination of Style', in Birk, N. P., & Birk, G. B.,
358:, however, found the author "sometimes laboured in his anxiety to be debonair". 1221: 1148: 359: 268: 112: 1243: 877: 335: 292: 272: 364: 1227: 1130: 1091: 868: 305: 94: 47: 37: 440: 1022:'How to Write Powerful Prose', Harriman House Publishing, Petersfield 957:(Harriman House Publishing 2012), Publisher's Acknowledgements, p.257 439:(London 1931). His mature style can be seen in his review-cum-essay, 383:'On the Fascination of Style' (1960) and 'The Art of Proverbs' (1965) 296: 23: 735: 1053:; The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont (2006), pp.41–49 435:
Lucas's own early style had been analysed in A. J. J. Ratcliff's
1060: 767:, Harriman House Publishing 2012, pp.i–iii (press quotations) 276: 851:
Rayner Heppenstall, 'Prose for General Purposes', review of
907:
Foreword by Sir Bruce Fraser to 1974 Cassell reprint of
323:
was generally well received. "A delightful book," wrote
967:
Walther, Matthew, 'The Art of Writing Well', review of
1035:
magazine, Vol. 38, No. 3, September 1965, pp.8-13;
259: 726:, 2nd edition (New York 1962, London 1964), Preface 345:approved "the entertaining relevance of anecdote". 1001:McCuen, Jo Ray, & Winkler, Anthony C., eds., 1241: 692: 690: 540:(London 1955), author's paragraph on dust-jacket 510: 508: 1049:Mieder, Wolfgang & Sobieski, Janet (eds.), 988:magazine, Vol. 27 No. 3, March 1960, pp.11-21; 847: 845: 402:(New York, 1968) and in McCuen & Winkler, 1076: 822:Sir Richard Livingstone, Foreword to Lucas's 687: 505: 842: 1083: 1069: 22: 394:. The essay reworks the core points of 1242: 1064: 200:Chapter 5: Courtesy to Readers - (3) 190:Chapter 4: Courtesy to Readers - (2) 184:Chapter 3: Courtesy to Readers - (1) 936:Epstein, Joseph, 'Heavy Sentences', 835:Cassell's advertisement for Lucas's 752:The Odyssey Reader: Ideas and Style 698:The Odyssey Reader: Ideas and Style 400:The Odyssey Reader: Ideas and Style 180:The foundation of Style - Character 13: 14: 1276: 260:Background and publishing history 811:Kingsmen of a Century, 1873–1972 740:, Harriman House Publishing 2012 140: 28:Cover of first UK and US edition 1090: 1042: 1026: 1015: 995: 979: 960: 947: 930: 913: 901: 884: 862: 829: 816: 803: 783: 778:The House of Cassell, 1848-1958 770: 757: 744: 729: 716: 703: 674: 661: 647: 634: 621: 608: 595: 449:, Vol.8, No.1, Cambridge, 1965. 429: 1123:The Woman Clothed with the Sun 955:Style: The Art of Writing Well 859:, 24 September 1955, p.371-372 765:Style: The Art of Writing Well 738:Style: The Art of Writing Well 582: 569: 556: 543: 530: 488: 475: 462: 1: 655:Cambridge University Reporter 455: 857:The New Statesman and Nation 315: 7: 1255:Books of literary criticism 824:Euripides and his Influence 700:(New York 1968), pp.486–494 295:of New York in 1962 and by 126: 10: 1281: 919:Philip Toynbee, review of 839:(London 1934), dust-jacket 837:Studies French and English 684:(London 1955), p.22, p.143 1265:Cassell (publisher) books 1214: 1195: 1168: 1141: 1098: 1037:Curtis Publishing Company 990:Curtis Publishing Company 494:John Rosselli, review of 485:(London 1955), p.16, p.45 80: 65: 57: 43: 33: 21: 441:'Long Lives the Emperor' 423: 605:(London 1955), pp.35–37 592:(London 1955), pp.41–45 1260:1955 non-fiction books 754:(New York 1968), p.490 671:(London 1955), p.24–25 579:(London 1955), Preface 446:The Historical Journal 776:Nowell-Smith, Simon, 283:of London and by the 281:Cassell & Company 70:Cassell & Company 1003:Readings for Writers 644:(London 1955), p.166 631:(London 1955), p.151 618:(London 1955), p.269 420:(Burlington, 2006). 404:Readings for Writers 248:The Harmony of Prose 135:Modern English Usage 105:Cambridge University 927:, 11 September 1955 790:Hugh Gordon Porteus 713:(London 1955), p.36 566:(London 1955), p.61 553:(London 1955), p.48 527:, 11 September 1955 500:Manchester Guardian 472:(London 1955), p.10 242:Simile and Metaphor 18: 973:New English Review 881:, 18 November 1955 809:Wilkinson, L. P., 331:Rayner Heppenstall 254:Methods of writing 174:The Value of Style 52:literary criticism 16: 1237: 1236: 939:The New Criterion 437:Prose of Our Time 376:The New Criterion 285:Macmillan Company 166: 165: 121:Desmond MacCarthy 92: 91: 87:978-0-85719-187-8 74:Macmillan Company 1272: 1158:Messene Redeemed 1085: 1078: 1071: 1062: 1061: 1055: 1046: 1040: 1030: 1024: 1019: 1013: 1005:(New York 2009) 999: 993: 983: 977: 964: 958: 951: 945: 934: 928: 917: 911: 905: 899: 898:, September 1955 888: 882: 866: 860: 849: 840: 833: 827: 820: 814: 813:(Cambridge 1980) 807: 801: 800:, September 1955 787: 781: 774: 768: 761: 755: 748: 742: 733: 727: 720: 714: 707: 701: 694: 685: 678: 672: 665: 659: 651: 645: 638: 632: 625: 619: 612: 606: 599: 593: 586: 580: 573: 567: 560: 554: 547: 541: 534: 528: 524:The Sunday Times 515:Raymond Mortimer 512: 503: 502:, September 1955 492: 486: 479: 473: 466: 450: 433: 356:The Sunday Times 352:Raymond Mortimer 347:Sir Bruce Fraser 302:Sir Bruce Fraser 141: 26: 19: 15: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1233: 1210: 1191: 1177:The Bear Dances 1164: 1137: 1107:The River Flows 1094: 1089: 1059: 1058: 1047: 1043: 1031: 1027: 1020: 1016: 1000: 996: 984: 980: 965: 961: 952: 948: 935: 931: 918: 914: 906: 902: 889: 885: 867: 863: 850: 843: 834: 830: 821: 817: 808: 804: 788: 784: 775: 771: 762: 758: 749: 745: 734: 730: 721: 717: 708: 704: 695: 688: 679: 675: 666: 662: 652: 648: 639: 635: 626: 622: 613: 609: 600: 596: 587: 583: 574: 570: 561: 557: 548: 544: 535: 531: 513: 506: 493: 489: 480: 476: 467: 463: 458: 453: 434: 430: 426: 385: 318: 262: 158:― F. L. Lucas, 152: 129: 117:Lytton Strachey 29: 12: 11: 5: 1278: 1268: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1235: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1225: 1222:E. B. C. Jones 1218: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1209: 1208: 1199: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1190: 1189: 1181: 1172: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1154: 1145: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1088: 1087: 1080: 1073: 1065: 1057: 1056: 1041: 1039:, Pennsylvania 1025: 1014: 994: 992:, Pennsylvania 978: 959: 946: 929: 912: 900: 883: 861: 841: 828: 815: 802: 782: 769: 756: 743: 728: 722:Lucas, F. L., 715: 709:Lucas, F. L., 702: 686: 680:Lucas, F. L., 673: 667:Lucas, F. L., 660: 646: 640:Lucas, F. L., 633: 627:Lucas, F. L., 620: 614:Lucas, F. L., 607: 601:Lucas, F. L., 594: 588:Lucas, F. L., 581: 575:Lucas, F. L., 568: 562:Lucas, F. L., 555: 549:Lucas, F. L., 542: 536:Lucas, F. L., 529: 504: 487: 481:Lucas, F. L., 474: 468:Lucas, F. L., 460: 459: 457: 454: 452: 451: 427: 425: 422: 384: 381: 371:Joseph Epstein 360:Philip Toynbee 317: 314: 310:Joseph Epstein 269:Bletchley Park 261: 258: 257: 256: 250: 244: 238: 228: 218: 208: 198: 188: 182: 176: 170: 164: 163: 155: 154: 128: 125: 113:Anatole France 90: 89: 84: 78: 77: 67: 63: 62: 61:September 1955 59: 55: 54: 45: 41: 40: 35: 31: 30: 27: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1277: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1245: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1213: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1194: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1144: 1140: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1086: 1081: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1063: 1054: 1052: 1045: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1023: 1018: 1012: 1011:1-4282-3128-5 1008: 1004: 998: 991: 987: 982: 976: 974: 970: 963: 956: 953:F. L. Lucas, 950: 944: 941: 940: 933: 926: 922: 916: 910: 904: 897: 893: 887: 880: 879: 878:The Spectator 874: 870: 865: 858: 854: 848: 846: 838: 832: 826:(Boston 1923) 825: 819: 812: 806: 799: 798:Time and Tide 795: 791: 786: 780:(London 1958) 779: 773: 766: 763:F. L. Lucas, 760: 753: 747: 741: 739: 732: 725: 719: 712: 706: 699: 693: 691: 683: 677: 670: 664: 658: 656: 650: 643: 637: 630: 624: 617: 611: 604: 598: 591: 585: 578: 572: 565: 559: 552: 546: 539: 533: 526: 525: 520: 516: 511: 509: 501: 497: 491: 484: 478: 471: 465: 461: 448: 447: 442: 438: 432: 428: 421: 419: 415: 413: 407: 405: 401: 397: 393: 391: 380: 378: 377: 372: 367: 366: 361: 357: 353: 348: 344: 343: 338: 337: 336:New Statesman 332: 328: 327: 326:Time and Tide 322: 313: 311: 307: 303: 298: 294: 293:Collier Books 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 273:New Criticism 270: 266: 255: 251: 249: 245: 243: 239: 237: 233: 229: 227: 223: 219: 217: 213: 209: 207: 203: 199: 197: 193: 189: 187: 183: 181: 177: 175: 171: 168: 167: 161: 157: 156: 153: 149: 146: 143: 142: 139: 137: 136: 124: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 101: 96: 88: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 68: 64: 60: 56: 53: 49: 46: 42: 39: 36: 32: 25: 20: 1250:Style guides 1203: 1202: 1184: 1175: 1156: 1149: 1129: 1121: 1114: 1106: 1050: 1044: 1032: 1028: 1017: 1002: 997: 985: 981: 972: 968: 962: 954: 949: 937: 932: 925:The Observer 924: 920: 915: 908: 903: 896:The Listener 895: 891: 886: 876: 872: 871:, review of 864: 856: 852: 836: 831: 823: 818: 810: 805: 797: 793: 792:, review of 785: 777: 772: 764: 759: 751: 746: 737: 736:F. L. Lucas 731: 723: 718: 710: 705: 697: 681: 676: 668: 663: 653: 649: 641: 636: 628: 623: 615: 610: 602: 597: 589: 584: 576: 571: 563: 558: 550: 545: 537: 532: 522: 518: 517:, review of 499: 495: 490: 482: 477: 469: 464: 444: 436: 431: 417: 411: 408: 403: 399: 395: 389: 386: 374: 365:The Observer 363: 355: 342:The Listener 341: 334: 325: 320: 319: 288: 287:, New York, 264: 263: 253: 252:Chapter 11: 247: 246:Chapter 10: 241: 235: 231: 225: 221: 215: 211: 205: 201: 195: 191: 185: 179: 173: 159: 150: 147: 144: 133: 130: 109:Sainte-Beuve 99: 98: 93: 1228:D. W. Lucas 1131:Doctor Dido 1092:F. L. Lucas 975:, July 2012 869:J. M. Cohen 657:, 1946–1953 350:the book". 306:Petersfield 240:Chapter 9: 232:Good Health 230:Chapter 8: 220:Chapter 7: 212:Good Humour 210:Chapter 6: 178:Chapter 2: 172:Chapter 1: 95:F. L. Lucas 48:Style guide 38:F. L. Lucas 1244:Categories 1185:Land's End 942:June 2011 890:Review of 456:References 222:Good Sense 206:Simplicity 76:, New York 1230:(brother) 1196:Criticism 316:Reception 297:Pan Books 226:Sincerity 72:, London 66:Publisher 58:Published 414:magazine 392:magazine 236:Vitality 202:Urbanity 127:Contents 1215:Related 1150:Ariadne 1099:Fiction 1033:Holiday 986:Holiday 796:in the 498:in the 412:Holiday 390:Holiday 333:in the 196:Variety 192:Brevity 186:Clarity 169:Preface 162:(1955) 1224:(wife) 1207:(1955) 1188:(1935) 1180:(1933) 1161:(1940) 1153:(1932) 1142:Poetry 1134:(1938) 1126:(1937) 1118:(1930) 1115:Cécile 1110:(1926) 1009:  216:Gaiety 34:Author 17:Style 1204:Style 1169:Plays 969:Style 921:Style 909:Style 892:Style 873:Style 853:Style 794:Style 724:Style 711:Style 682:Style 669:Style 642:Style 629:Style 616:Style 603:Style 590:Style 577:Style 564:Style 551:Style 538:Style 519:Style 496:Style 483:Style 470:Style 424:Notes 396:Style 321:Style 289:Style 277:Hut 3 265:Style 160:Style 100:Style 44:Genre 1007:ISBN 234:and 224:and 214:and 204:and 194:and 119:and 82:ISBN 971:in 923:in 894:in 875:in 855:in 521:in 443:in 373:in 362:of 354:in 97:'s 1246:: 844:^ 689:^ 507:^ 312:. 123:. 115:, 111:, 50:, 1084:e 1077:t 1070:v

Index


F. L. Lucas
Style guide
literary criticism
Cassell & Company
Macmillan Company
ISBN
978-0-85719-187-8
F. L. Lucas
Cambridge University
Sainte-Beuve
Anatole France
Lytton Strachey
Desmond MacCarthy
Modern English Usage
Bletchley Park
New Criticism
Hut 3
Cassell & Company
Macmillan Company
Collier Books
Pan Books
Sir Bruce Fraser
Petersfield
Joseph Epstein
Time and Tide
Rayner Heppenstall
New Statesman
The Listener
Sir Bruce Fraser

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.