User talk:Smokefoot/TalkArch2015

476:. Unfortunately, thus far, our experience working with you has been very disappointing. I'm referring to the many very insulting comments you have made in response to my student's initial postings on the talk pages of the articles they are beginning to work on. For example: 'When you say "different chemicals that are polymerized" you sound chemically illiterate. It will be difficult for someone with such a weak grasp of our language to contribute useful content?' This was your response to someone's comment on an article TALK page. This is insulting on so many levels, I can't even begin to list them. Also, on many article talk pages, you left a statement like this "Please talk to your teacher about how grown-ups do bibliographic searches in the sciences." I feel condescended to and nervous about contributing further to wikipedia from reading this comment, and I can only imagine what a young adult would feel when faced with this type of 'input'. A key component of this type of assignment, as you likely know, is training in how to find good sources. We've been doing that. The bibliographies listed on the article talk pages are the initial sets of references, and many may not even be included/ used in the article improvements that end up on the main article page. In response to the 'grown up' comment from you one student spent time investigating the list of references YOU added in response to their bibliography and found that, in contrast to the list of sources they listed, your list included sources that were unavailable and that had in fact already been eliminated from the list of sources they will use for the WP entry. This example brings up another very important point: the amount of my time and my student's time that has been used toward reacting to and responding to your input. This is time that could have been much more productively used by all of us to do what we want to do, which in this case is to improve Knowledge entries. If you feel that my student's contributions to the main article pages are not up to par, we welcome your constructive input. If you feel compelled to add demeaning and insulting comments to their entries, please first contact me with your complaint and I will work on constructively addressing any and all issues with my students. Also, we are currently following the plan for developing Knowledge entries developed by the Wiki Education Foundation, which includes listing potential references and a contribution plan on the article talk page. If you have issues with this format for student contributions, please discuss it with them. 2828:

vanity and foolishness. I said nothing about the production of hydrogen molecules but you hung your criticism on that and continue to address that issue. I don't care if someone is an "experienced editor" of this or that subject, they first must know the basic principles of the subject before they edit or revert someone else's edits. Knowledge is chock to the hilt with very bad writing and I intend to correct what I see. At a minimum, stay out stay out of the way while others straiten out the convoluted writing that exists here on WP in a plenitude. A horse designed by committee is called a camel, and most of the articles on WP read the way camels look. Finally, your labeling my edit as "baby talk" is pathetically silly and beyond the pale.

572:

al., which motivated then editor Proctor to wage a belligerent campaign on any Knowledge article that praised the achievements of these Nobelists. Hints of his efforts remain in the organic semiconductor article, Proctor's point being that everything the Nobelists were recognized for was done well before them. It is disappointing to me that readers who do not know a lot about the field will the impression that McGinness's contribution was important or that doped melanin is representative of the well defined materials that captured the imagination of the world when Kitagawa et al announced polyacetylene.

163:. This assigment focuses on teaching them to write about chemistry and learn how to copy-edit, not learn Knowledge techniques (although they are free to do so, and many do). To this end, in the past few years, I have set up the articles, precluding their need to even register (I realize that Wiki-central command views student involvement as a recruiting mechanism but I have not seen that trend after going through hundreds of students). The skeleton articles that I establish, illustrate referencing, chem box, linking. You can see this approach with the history of 1920:. You can also look to the diffs, where you know your way around. I have further comments to make regarding your assessment of me, but these can wait. Ponder, while you go (if you go, there, to the recent lead paragraph deletion at the singlet oxygen article) that the Welsh and the Belgians, peaceable folk that they are generally perceived to be, were, at particular moments of they history, particularly nasty pieces of work to those attacking. Thanks if you can take a look. Otherwise I will come back in a day or two. Cheers. 938:, a technology that alarms a small but fierce group of opponents. You will see that the disruptive edits tend to come from those unregistered or with blank user pages. You must have noticed that pattern elsewhere. But hey, this thing is not that big a deal to me and since you seem to have a lot of experience, I will definitely think twice before suggesting to another editor that they say something about themselves or their intentions on their user pages. Thanks for taking the time to advise me. -- 2003:

that you seem to be functioning as a grader. Your situation hopefully will resolve itself because the project would really benefit from additional expertise. It appears that the standards and style in Knowledge do not match your standards and vision for what this venue should or could be. My association with this project is intended as a hobby for relaxation, so hopefully your comments will not undo that pleasant state of mind.

481:

think that comments like "different chemicals that are polymerized" is distinctly unpromising for would-be editors at Knowledge. For an in class essay, that level of awkwardness about "chemicals" is fine, so I wanted to loudly warn them that the standards are higher if they intend to contribute at Knowledge. I also reminded them repeatedly not to go after these compounds as if they are evil, which has been a pattern previously.

443:, the main thing is thanks for the response. The greatest problem Wiki chem has with homework projects is that the students get in over their heads and the instructor is missing in action. The result is that the student insert newsy or narrow Google-able citations in order to meet some quota. I am sympathetic that it is difficult to select areas in Knowledge where broad, not narrow information is missing. If you look at 419:

essays into the midst of existing pages. We focus on developing tight paragraphs of information to add to stubs or start class articles. Let me know if and feel free to jump in, of course, if you notice one of mine not following the chemistry rules. I'm fully connected with the Education Foundation (trouble keeping up with the name), used their new page wizard (nice!), and have a couple of them helping out with class.

1998:...a brief response to your evaluation, and it is as pointed, and while not as critical of you personally, it may yet not be best posted here. (It is critical of this institution, pointed with regard to its trajectory, and critical of latitude allowed particular editors.) I am open to suggestions, but am willing to place it here, if there is no better option. Le Prof 71.201.62.200 (talk) 16:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC) 3136: 2227: 2152: 1634: 1272: 3278: 2940:

requirement to capitalize dangerous chemicals so as to allow them to be noticeable in text. My view is that chemical safety regulation universally trumps all rules that grammar regulators might lay down, as about 99% of the grammar people have never had a chemistry class. Not all chemical elements or compounds need to be capitalized all the time, but the dangerous ones need it absolutely!

3079:: "The simplest resin of this class is formed from reacting two moles of epichlorohydrin with one mole of bisphenol A to form the bisphenol A diglycidyl ether..." the section I removed: "The simplest resin of this class is formed from reacting two moles of epichlorohydrin with one mole of bisphenol A to form the bisphenol A diglycidyl ether..." -- 643:

that Foam Supplies holds the patent on using methyl formate as a polyurethane foam blowing agent (trade name Ecomate)...and also add that PU foam is used for more than just insulation. I guess this could be considered "commercial", but it is factual and I think relevant (just as BASF is mentioned right above as a producer of methyl formate).

2409:. Spoken colloquially, for professional chemists, the "Rubber Handbook" is the bible for data, and Ullmann's Encyclopedia is kind of the Encyclopedia Britannica of details. The Chem project is closely monitored by about 10 chem professionals, who rely on outside perspectives like yours to keep things ship-shape, so thanks for the note. -- 1845:(note change to paragraph opening, which paralleled the triplet article, and the removal of the entire introductory paragraph). That latter paragraph was intended as temporary, so that others could move material into the main body, as the Edit summaries and Talk section indicates. (But, it was not intended for part-and-parcel elimination.) 447:, students added low quality content on poorly conceived topics. All of those students contributions were wiped clean from Knowledge, I recall. I have taught many courses using Knowledge as a component, and it is a fair bit of work, expecially topic selection and guiding sourcing. Good luck because I know this is hard work, -- 2009:

vs an improver. Few high flying scholars, retired or otherwise, find Wiki-chem satisfying, if that is any consolation to you. I have seen them come and go. My association with this project is a hobby for relaxation and general "do-gooderness". Well, I am rambling... In any case, thank you for the courtesy of checking. --

2033:-Ferrocenes). Maybe I'm wrong, but I hope you can also help me with respect to the technical applications of this class of polymers. Although I have found a lot of examples for potential applications, I must admit that I'm not sure if those are indeed already technical applications or just ideas. Any hint is welcome. -- 487:

they are not reaching out, but simply blurting out statements of what they will do, whereas editors here expect cooperation, consensus, and conversation over plans. I and others were expecting responses from the students like "Got it, we are just learning how to use Web of Science" or "We are cognizant of

3258:

or similar field that could suppress the jmol or take an alternative SMILES string to use for it. There are a bunch of compounds, especially some classes of organometallics and multicomponent clusters, that the SMILES is reasonably correct but translating it to 3D gives wildly incorrect structure. In

2449:

Hi Smokefoot, I’m writing to you because are studying medicine in the University of Barcelona and we have recently edited nervonic acid page due to a biochemistry project. We would like to know why you changed some of the things we have posted. If you told us what is wrong we could try to improve the

2008:

Hi there Le Prof, you are welcome to put your comments here if you think that doing so will be constructive. I am not any arbitrator (or is it arbiter) and dont want to be. I usually avoid conflict around here, but I felt pressed to be frank with you, i.e. that you seem to be functioning as a grader

1969:

Note, I posted a to do list for the lede, and please do not take offense. If I could, I would just edit, but it would only start a firestorm. It is better if I make some notes, and sit out. (And that is what I did.) If the editor in question agrees to stop following and hounding, I will gladly return

1852:

talk page, which I know from Dirac's page you are interested in, (ii) I came today to edit the lede in question, in particular to remove citations, which I have since transferred to the Structure section (so they do not have to be repeated in the lede). Still, the Structure section is weak, and needs

912:

It's not that I'm agitated, it is that remarks like that one are unhelpful, get in the way of what should be a simple administrative decision, and are contrary to our policies. It may be your opinion that you need to ask such things, but I think you will find that pretty much nobody who works at PERM

841:

Oh, I didn't intend my comment in a negative way. My speculation was that you had thought about the process so deeply to convince yourself to insert the temporal aspect when none was mentioned. I wouldnt have thought so deeply but would have taken the process description at face value. Oh well, its

2939:

As far as I know, all elements must always be capitalized since c.1550. The common names for compounds don't have this requirement. The label names (on sold products) for elements and compounds, by ISO practice -- must be capitalized. Probably for safety reasons, I would expect that there would be a

2827:

You have the same problem too many people in this world have, you fail to hear what people are saying to you or you fail to read what they have written. Rather, what you do is hear what you want to hear and read what you want to read and that typically is what flatters you most. That is a display of

2002:

Hi there, you are welcome to put your comments here if you think that doing so will be constructive. Like I said, I usually avoid conflict around here, but you pressed me to be frank about my views of your editing style to the extent that I pay much attention to them, which I don't except to notice

1563:

You are welcome to discuss the matter there and even transfer this conversation or link it. When we encounter a newish editor determined to cite in the manner you are - the situation almost always involves complication that precludes objectivity. Just don't engage in ref-spamming - the pattern of

1173:

If you are talking about the stick diagrams, unfortunately you have to buy ChemDraw. Pricey but super versatile. Esp the PC version. It is given to me from the place where I work. There are similar drawing programs that are free that are slightly inferior. In the Manual of Style for Wiki-Chemicals,

933:

unhelpful. I was not trying to cosy up to the newish editor, but tell them what I thought. So, I am sorry that you and your colleagues are cross with me. If my well intentioned remark offended you or the editor, I extend my apologies. In the chemistry sphere of Knowledge, which I mainly inhabit,

881:

Frankly I think PERM doesn't really need extraneous comments at all, but it certainly doesn't need comments like that. Please don't make comments like that again, they do not help admins make decisions and only get in the way of what is supposed to be a fairly straightforward administrative process.

873:

is rather shocking from such an experienced user. I'm not sure where you got the idea that having anything at all on your userpage was even remotely a requirement for low-level user permisssions, but I can assure this is not the case and as far as I am aware never has been. And of course asking "who

571:

2) To most researchers and technologists, "organic semiconductor" means a well defined synthetic material. The revolution in organic semiconductor area was the preparation of well defined materials that enabled structure- property correlations. These innovations led to a Nobel Prize to Kitagawa et

486:

Obviously, these are my views, which you may not share and, to some extent, find very offensive. I saw no other way to get their attention. And even with my semi-shrill comments, we almost never see expected responses from these students who supposedly are reaching out on the talk pages. Obviously

418:

Hi Smokefoot- thanks for dropping by my course page and giving advice on chemical pages. We haven't chosen our topics yet, although I imagine some chemical pages may be in for some work by my class. I read the thread you recommended, and don't believe my students have been guilty of dropping entire

94:

Re. "(Undid revision 641569121 by Ankababel (talk) not encyclopedic content - there are lots of interesting debates)" -- this is just style, I removed the "interesting debate" phrase previously. Why don't you just rewrite? Anyway I've done it now. Mea culpa for using unfortunate phraseology. Or are

2919:

Be careful, this kind of area is filled with bullshit. All sorts of nonscientists are after some sort of elixir, and are surprised that various salts are "underresearched". There is no (zero) natural role for V in mammals. Vanadium is common in petroleum because the porphyrins which result from

2404:

Interesting perspectives about how different kinds of sources hedge their reputations. But in Knowledge, priority is given to conventionally books and reviews. Knowledge studiously avoids commercial vendors. And on-line mirror sites. In fact, Knowledge does not even view Knowledge as a reliable

1879:

When I first stated editing, I enjoyed for a few days noticing the lack of rigor and derived a certain amount of smug pleasure from the sense that I knew huge amounts about certain articles that were semi-awful. But then I figured out that the regular editors here are essentially totally dedicated

1819:

I am not asking you to get involved in the personal issue. But his latest revert of my work came as I was trying to develop the ledes of both the triplet and singlet oxygen articles in parallel, before leaving it off to someone such as yourself to continue with. (I am an OChem and early preclinical

716:

YOu are welcome to re-edit. The reason it is a blowing agent is its volatility, and I was trying to unify that property into multiple uses. I was also trying very deliberately to avoid the term "Ecomate" which seems parochial (probably some US brand) and ephemeral (brand names come and go). The

621:

Hi and many thanks for the note. I am pretty distracted now to think about this but will do so probably on the weekend. Knowledge is dealing with a lot of unsupervised students being forced to add content for Knowledge, and I can be a little too hasty in my edits of their contributions, which are

519:

goes away. I learned about the switch from the Smithsonian chips collection. Are you suggesting the Smithsonian institution is not reliable? Although it could be, the article by McGinness, Proctor and Peter Corry "Amorphous semiconductor switching in melanins." Science 183.4127 (1974): 853-855. has

670:

Well the main thing is thank you for your time and consideration. It is usually very irritating to have one's work mangled or modified. Go ahead and revert my edit. I assumed that you were pushing a commercial item, and we are very leery of that kind of activity. A large fraction of edits from

471:

Hi Again, Smokefoot. We've chosen many different chemistry pages to work through this semester, and I see that you've visited most of them. Its great for the students to know that they are connecting with a very large community of Wikipedians. Several Wikipedians have worked with my courses over

444: 237:

students from discussing tox or safety or environmental aspects, despite the fact that I am a tree-hugger myself. Googling on chemical topics mainly turns up tox - safety - environmental content, often crufty, but I want them to write about hard core chemistry. Students are always ready to fill

209:

chemistry is healthy, so we write about all sorts of topics. I also meet with them to identify their professional interests, the point being that articles might enhance their employment aspirations and hence their devotion to their topic. Some of their diverse interests have been in beer brewing

2048:

Hello. There are no applications for any polyferrocene that I know about, and I have looked. The original polymers were based on vinylferrocene and the more recent generation of the ring-opened materials derived from ansa ferrocenes. Neither are in the market place to my knowledge (despite the

1891:

Rather than complaining/tagging about poor references - fix the damn problems, one at a time. And for goodness sakes, stop lecturing us. We are doing good stuff. We do not aim for perfection. In fact, for some warped reason, I kind of like imperfect articles because that vulnerability reminds

897:

Well I definitely got that you are agitated. For those contributing technical content, it is very helpful to know something about the editor, at least for me, but apparently not for you. We all tend to read too much into little notes we leave around here, so dont let my opinions weigh on you.

642:

Smokefoot, first off, I am new to Knowledge, so I apologize in advance for any errors in etiquette. I saw your edit to mine on methyl formate and wanted to discuss, rather than go back and forth in dueling edits. I did not add the reference to Foam Supplies and Ecomate, but just wanted to clarify

563:

1) Proctor was a major fraudster and bully on Knowledge, who turns out to be an embittered quack who sells hair-growth cures. He promoted this device insufferably (there must have been 6 copies of this image across Knowledge). The article on McGiness exists only because of his student Proctor's

480:

Thanks for the input. In my experience many or most courses contribute bad content to Knowledge-chemistry: where students focus on word count, who seem to have little instruction on searching (Googleable, US-centric), and whose work gets little intervention by the instructor. Furthermore, I do

377:

is also possible. 1,2,2-trichloroethane is the same as the 1,1,2- and so the lowest numbering is used. Similarly, 2,2,2- is the same as 1,1,1- and again the lowest numbering is used. The hydrogens are understood to be placed on the carbon skeleton as needed wherever there are no substitutions.

1868:

Well you're not going to like what I have to say. I dont care for your style of editing. It seems pretentious, heavy handed, overly academicy, and your edit notes and tags seem snotty. Too many tags about imperfections. That having been said, its kind of a free-for-all here and it takes all

1783:

In my experience, this sort of label is put on so female workers who are pregnant do not continue work in environments where exposure to liquid or vapor would result in their experiencing a high DMA concentration in circulating blood, which might harm the developing child. Cheers mate. Le Prof

1020:

Hi Smokefoot! I'm helping some researchers run a study on Knowledge and I'd like to ask you to be a collaborator on the project (not a research subject/participant). We need someone with experience reviewing new chemistry articles to help us control for some confounds in the study. Given your

737:

You reverted my edit, which is fine. I am usually willing to defer to you in things like this. However, I believe that the explanation clearly shows the intent to separate the absorbtion of salt and then the lowering of pH. Only the latter would be the case if hydrochloric acid were the intended

178:

Students work in teams. I have about 30 students and supervising 30 articles is too much work to do well (in the past courses we have uploaded many more). Employers of my students want them to demonstrate an ability to work as teams. I am highly focused enhancing student employability. Only a

132:

I know that you've been using students to contribute to WP for several years, and I was wondering about doing the same. We're just setting up a new course here at Bristol on the theme of Chemistry in the Digital age, and WP seems like a good topic, especially as that's now the default source for

2776:

I don't need to provide a reason for edit an article, such remarks are a "courtesy." When you know for a fact that an edit is wrong then revert edits otherwise you need to show the wisdom of leaving them alone. I suppose you called one of your friends in to start an edit war. That is just plain

700:

Just saw your new edit, and I think you left out some words? What about something like the following? Because of its high vapor pressure, it is used for quick-drying finishes. Methyl formate is also used as a blowing agent for a wide range of polyurethane foam applications under the trade name

2654:

Knowledge can be a little-messy but "pure chaos" might be overstating it. In the past 50 years, there is no difference between inorganic and organic nomenclature. Organometallic chemistry put an end to that! The chemboxes are carefully and regularly monitored so if you see problems, please,

1872:

I dont think that you are being stalked. In fact I am grateful for Boghog's diligence because he is a better editor than you are. Do you really think that he wants to follow some academic twit around trying to keep the tone and style somewhat Knowledge-like? I doubt it. So, if you are having

2385:

One note, though - I would guess that, though reference books hinge their reputations on the accuracy of their information, commercial catalogs are likely under legal obligations to ensure the validity of the numbers they present. I'm no chemist, though, so that's pure speculation on my part.

1000:

for me? It was recently created in one go by a single-topic editor but for all that the scope seems broad and the content legit (although better referencing is required). I'm usually wary of essay dumps like this one, they're often full of holes but this isn't a topic I'm familiar with. I was

1883:

One nice thing about Knowledge is that the redemption of any user is only a few edits away. Your pointing out that singlet O2 is magnetic was a real coup! Converting that article's lede into something ponderous (IMHO) was unhelpful in my view. The idea is to slightly improve articles

1712:

1) "and may damage fertility or the unborn child. It is harmful in contact with skin or if inhaled, and causes serious eye irritations." Are the GHS hazard statements already mentioned in the table (H312, H332, H360) and additionally in reference 8 (European Chemicals Agency, Opinion on

1125:

Your contributions at least for text in the chemistry sector are deficient and misleading, so please stop until you talk to your teacher, parents, or someone around here for advice. About the image, they look awful and did not emphasize tetrahedral nature of methane derivatives.

2798:

In any case, chemists and biochemists are generally careful to distinguish hydrogen and protons. Anyway, its simple, as far as most of us are concerned, there is NO H2 in anything above algae. Nada. Humans have some in our gut, but that comes from microorganisms down there, not

568:. If McGinness contribution were notable, he would have been recognized professionally with awards and such (academicians are very good at decorating each other). None of the extensive Nobel literature (reviews by the three prize winners) even mentions McGinness contribution. 2382:. I do have some reference books I could check, but I figured it'd be best to keep the source as transparent and publicly available as possible, at least so long as the discussion permits it. That said, if you think that we should cite the books, I'll gladly do that as well. 845:

About Rongalite, I encourage you to get that article renamed. It may be one of those terms like Kleenex that has just become generic. Ullmann's Encylopedia uses the term a lot. I would not draw any particular conclusions about the lack of negativism in its description.

1311: 646:

One thing that I do feel is misleading in your edit is to say that methyl formate "has also been considered" as a blowing agent...since it has been in commercial use as a foam blowing agent since 2002. Here is reference showing it has been EPA SNAP approved since 2003:

1913:

notwithstanding, I would ask your WP chemistry opinions at these two Sections (Talk sections), say what you will. If you can offer an opinion, I would be glad to hear it. (Your objectivity and perspective have been welcome in the past.) Please see these two sections,

1721: 2943:

A lot of grammar regulators don't even have enough since to come in out the rain -- for example most grammar guides never cover 'man' (as in 'Manhole') as being borrowed from Saxon -- and that 'mann' is actually gender neutral in nearly all Germanic languages.

1488:, not professional writers. Its a pretty big difference that hopefully you will learn as you advance in your career. But you seem to be itching to promote Sutherland and Nature Chem paper. Oh well, lots of other people do the same as you and it is no crime. -- 2071:

applications or not (and at least I would not use ferrocenes as antiknock additives; the precious metals on the TWC would most likely not like it). I will see if I can find something about the redox sensors. Again, thanks for your support and the quick answer.

1806:

I have a longstanding stalker, someone who reverts me almost in real time when I am making chem edits. It is purely personal, insofar as other chem editors routinely see and read the same text, and leave it. It dates back to me editing this editor's "owned"

202:. For some appealing topics we just cannot find good general sources, so we dont pursue those. We are increasingly turning toward improving existing articles because we are running out of topics and so many existing articles could use help in select themes. 2792:

I needed to call in a someone experienced. I dont know Boghog from a Adam, he is just an experienced bio-editor who might straighten things out. He could be counted on to remove anything dumb I might write too. So please don't accuse Boghog of being my

2358:, Smokefoot: I'm happy with the article now. Its original incarnation was just a copy of a supplier's catalog page. But it is definitely a notable reagent in organic chemistry, worthy of an encyclopedia article. Thank you, both, for improving it. -- 2278: 1323: 74:

Re. "Undid revision 641402623 by Ankababel (talk) conflict of interest, cite a review by someone else" -- this is an odd remark to make. In most or many cases only one review is cited. A review is a review -- it covers many viewpoints and should be

3161: 3094:

Hi again. That makes sense, and explains why I was confused. I see you also fixed the epoxy page where I found the content. Thanks for clearing that up! Just out of curiosity, how did you find out about it? Is there some bot that alerted you to

2177: 1659: 1716:

2) "because of its toxic for reproduction properties." is mentioned in reference 10 (Agreement of the Member State Committee on the Identification of N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMAC) as a Substance of Very High Concern – Adopted on 24 November 2011)

605:

I agree that the paragraph you removed was too arcane for the article. However, I do think that the greater point (that there are various strategies to improve photostability) is important for the article, and that the citation should be kept.

2454:

Thanks for the note. I was trying to figure out what is going on with this page and concluded that you must be selling nutritional supplements! A really big issue in Knowledge is the quality of the references. This policy is discussed here

2266: 1340: 1424:

disciple? In my first graduate year, I had to do calcls and expts on the reactivity of the outer sulfur atom of thiosulfonate anion… enough to make me appreciate d-orbital contributions, but also to be quite sure I was going to be an

701:

Ecomate, patented by Foam Supplies, Inc., as a replacement for CFCs, HCFCs and HFCs due to its zero ozone depletion potential, zero global warming potential and zero volatile organic compounds. . It is also used as an insecticide.

1211:

I wanted to send you a direct message about a new chemistry layout tool I'm working on, but you're not signed up for private messaging. I'm wondering if you could send ME a message with an email address I can use to get in touch.

495:

Finally, you can however also see that rather than simply complaining, I on several occasions suggested some good reviews for the students to build on. Those reviews are the foundations of their content. In any case, good luck,

1376:

I did not do anything to create the lede that I thanked you for correcting. I simply came to the article for information, and found a wikilink that was not justified. See Vsmith's talk page if you are interested. Cheers. Le Prof

275:

Hi ! Thanks for your editing. I did reinsert the lab prep bit but maybe we should discuss this (I made a note on the talk) as I'm new to Knowledge and not so au fait with you do articles. I'd be very grateful for any help !

1069:

A tidal wave of mediocre content coming from these classes. But we cannot blame the contributing students, their labor is forced upon them in the form of homework assignments. Oh well, life goes on and its only Knowledge.

190:

Students must get their draft article approved by me as a Word document before they can upload to Knowledge. It is refining this Word document where they actually learn the most and where I do most of my work - about 2-3

3053:)? It seemed like it was good information and that it wolud be relevant to the page I added it to. I was unaware copying from one page to annother was bad, but if it is would you give me a bit more info on the subject? 2596:

I guess if one wanted to play games, then every article could be expanded ten-fold with all kinds of weird and wondrous ideas and possibilities. Knowledge is mainly focused on serving people operating in the real world.

2317:

After fixing this up a bit, I looked in the history and saw it's been often-created and often-redirected...most recently by you. I have no strong opinion or vested interest in it, if you think it's better as a redirect.

1815:

article, and has since repeatedly followed me, real time when he is on, or same day, to many, many articles that I sit when I log in. I have repeatedly had to drop editing at articles, because of his following me about.

174:

We try to write shorter articles and this is probably our greatest weakness compared to typical multi-page student essays where they learn a lot about a big area. The emphasis however is on editing as much as creating

372:

The appellation "dicarbon trihyrdogen trichloride" does not specify where the chlorine atoms are located in the molecule. The 1,1,1- prefix specifies the three chlorines are located on the #1 carbon atom. The isomer

878:, not who they are and what they choose to put on their userpage. In fact, in the hundreds and hundreds of permisssion requests I have personally reviewed I don't recall a single case where a userpage was relevant. 2674: 1307: 153:

I would be glad to help. First of all, we contribute through a course that is mainly a lab (synthetic inorganic/organometallics for advanced undergrads). This Knowledge article is worth about 10%. Here are some

2725:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 755:

You seem to have thought about it, although it is possible that these old-timers or low-tech chemists are cheaply making HCl, but it doesnt really matter. Now about Rogalite ... You have my attention. Cheers,

2333:

No, I dont have a particular strong view either. I was following/helping what I thought Edgar was up to. And it looked like the creator was a turkey, not that I am supposed to say that. Thanks for the note.

1051: 1835:

articles to see what I was doing, before he followed me to there and removed the developing parallel structure between the articles (by removing and changing the lede of the singlet article). Here are links:

2104:

Next time, please use "talk" to fellow users, rather than intervening with changes -- please? And please wait more than a few minutes, in case a fellow user is still making changes to the entry -- please?--

3071:

Hi and thanks for the note. There is no problem copying things within Knowledge, but I found a report on-line that was very similar and it is likely that the section we are discussing was taken from there.

2804:

In terms of not leaving an edit summary, you are correct - there no obligation to leave one, its merely a courtesy. But courtesy is not only nice, it facilitates process by communicating with colleagues.

472:

the past several years, and our contributions to Knowledge have been improved, and the student's experience enhanced. I invite you to spend some time looking at the contributions made through my courses

194:

I de-emphasize graphics. Probably nonideal, but students are not very good at ChemDraw and I am picky. We could do more at pdb and csd images, but again this aspect of the course emphasizes writing not

1966:

TY for your hard work there today, and for setting an example for how discussion can lead to community, rather than to an individual's desired outcome. The article is clearly better for your attendance.

1246:

Edgar181 is already on my list. If you have contact info, I'm happy to ask the others, or you can point them my way. I have direct messaging so it should be easy for any of you to start the conversation.

814:

thought about it before I changed something. I assure you that's how I normally proceed. On the other hand, you seem to have failed to do either before reverting my edit. Perhaps the shoe fits better on

109:

Dear Smokefoot: Thanks for the comments. So far, the students are quite enthusiastic if a bit nervous. I am also new to this media, so I appreciate your comments and look forward to suggestions in the

1174:

some of these options are described. If that does not work, let me know. Looks like you have a good program for drawing the 3-d structures (the ones that I complained about), what do you use? --

1720:

3) The only information not referenced is the addition of H319 in GHS hazard statements (Causes serious eye irritation). However here the current Labelling according Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (

2981:...and be sure your basis is stronger than IUPAC's 2004 recommendation not to capitalize chemical names. That's the basis cited for Knowledge's current practice to not do so either, as noted in 1938:

OK, I just rewrote the disputed thing. I cant figure out what the arguing is all about and dont want to do super careful comparison of versions. I came to the article completely neutrally. --

2770:

From the wikipedia article on Photosystem II : "The hydrogen ions (protons) generated by the oxidation of water help to create a proton gradient that is used by ATP synthase to generate ATP."

515:

Why do you think the device created by Dr. Peter Proctor and Dr. McGiness was not significant? If there is an organic semiconductor device that was developed before theirs show its picture and

2639:) ... this is pure chaos! Take a look to all articles and the boxes too ... Please consider also the inorganic nomenclature, first the cation and then the anion! Regards, a german chemist, -- 1769:

Sounds like a reasonable request - why would unborn children be exposed to DMA? I am sure taht all sorts of things are dangerous to unborn children but I dont see the connection to DMA. --

1366: 913:

would agree with you and would instead find such comments an unwelcome and unhelpful obstruction. So please, don't do that again, regardless of your opinion on the merits of such questions.

2699: 2262: 732: 2101:

FYI, I was adding as I found items, which started in the U.S. (whose universities generally have more money, thus more findings, hence the greater number of U.S. citations to start with).

2759: 1454:

one of the team who authored the research paper on the cyanosulfidic model. He's reviewing their work. He also quotes an opinion from another scientist in the same field who also was

2886:

It is unusual that this compound is primarily derived from Diesel Petrol (and high grade Gasoline) refining. It's really bad for Diesel combustion, but somehow good for primates...

413: 2173: 2130:(published refereed reviews and books) and remember that one state in the US does not speak for the world! California is a wonderful place but it does not speak for the world!-- 3157: 1015: 238:

any article with all sorts of health and safety stuff - easy to get and easy to write about, but not very chemical (unless they figure out the chemical mechanism of tox, etc).

749: 2982: 1655: 1345: 491:" or "Thank you for suggesting reviews that we had not considered, but why don't you think our sources are not as good?" or "You're right, we were being too US-centric." 505: 2786: 428: 47:, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on 1040: 1873:

trouble with Boghog, then you may be the problem. I would ask him/her for advice on what to do, because it looks like he/she has a lot of experience and knowledge.

3259:

some of those cases, one could write an alternate structure descriptor that is too nonstandard to be useful for database searches but does give a correct diagram.

2587: 2569: 2533: 972: 3049:

Regarding (Undid revision 694267113 by Jazzlw (talk) appears to be plagiarism), is it plagiarism to copy relevant information from another wikipedia page (from

2920:

decayed chlorophyll (ancient plants) have a high affinity for VO as well Ni. Inorganic chemists at UBC have looked at the biomedical angle involving vanadium.--

2510:

I am not 100%, but I don't think that there is a soluble form of even semi-naked H. I also dont think that even Li has been made using the methods used to get

2754: 2500: 2077: 2038: 1753: 717:

global warming bit sounds like a sale pitch to me, even if it is true. These are probably niche apps, the big kahuma being formic acid. My guess at least. --

3008: 1970:

to this article. But it has not happened yet, and so this. like steroids, natural products, and some others, are on the "do not touch" list. Cheers. Le Prof

1568:

editors do this. Like I said, do yourself a favor and talk to your advisor about the difference between a real review and News and Views etc. There is also

1021:

background in reviewing drafts, it seems like you've got the kind of experience we're looking for. Would you be willing to discuss the details with me? See

964:

Hi, I appreciate your edits but can you please hold off for 1 week? This is a graded assignment and just need you to wait until the quarter is over. Thanks.

3387:

kind of thing nearly kept me from ever becoming an editor. It would be nice if you could explain when you revert someone's first edit. Just saying. Cheers --

277: 2809:

The trick here is not to let oneself get cornered or angry, because then we screw up and say things we regret. Been there, done that. In any case, peace. —

671:

newcomers is solely to support some cause of theirs, Happy editing and, since we now know each other, feel free to ask other questions. Happy editing. --

2777:

childish and weak. Do I need to call in someone else on this nonsense. I would but I consider myself too old and wise to resort to such childish nonsense.

2648: 1198: 1167: 1979: 1022: 1346:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RRArchive285&type=revision&diff=668236364&oldid=668223844

615: 2436: 2418: 2067:

Hi Smokefoot, thank you for the answer. The ring-opened polymers look promising, but from the papers I found it was simply not clear if there were any

2053:

in pharma. Possibly some antiknock formulations use simple ferrocenes. A few companies have apparently invested in ferrocene-based redox sensors. --

934:

editors with blank user pages as well as those unregistered are often problematic. If you want to get a sense of this pattern, look at the editing at

702: 687: 656: 3332:

Not sure, but seems like a good guess. I just rewrote the Hinsberg contribution. If you prefer what was there before, feel free to revert my work.--

1961: 1947: 1933: 1904: 1853:

expert attention. (iii) I am signing this from URL to prevent the editor from stalking me here as well. I can be found at User:Leprof_7272. Le Prof

1793: 1401: 1183: 1135: 631: 367: 352: 3488: 3450: 3012: 2668: 2606: 2591: 2573: 2555: 2537: 1749: 1609: 1595: 1581: 1558: 1544: 1519: 1497: 1097: 1079: 303: 1415: 726: 680: 391: 3411: 3035: 2620: 2523: 2081: 2062: 2029:

Hi Smokefoot, I would like to thank you for creating some drawings that I've used in the German Knowledge for an article about polyferrocenes (and

1778: 1088:

Haha you didn't take the hint and nominate it. :-) I hate doing that stuff. There needs to be a bot that will AfD things at the press of a button.

947: 922: 907: 332: 1257: 1241: 855: 836: 765: 405: 2976: 2947: 2929: 2905: 2851: 2139: 1141: 891: 871: 2837: 2290: 585: 456: 40: 3369: 3355: 3341: 3268: 3121: 3107: 2343: 1301: 3396: 2994: 2367: 1335: 550: 3292: 1119: 785:) which redirect to it. It's got a chemical data panel, but it's listed by a trademarked name. This is not the way we handle (for instance) 2251: 590: 230:). These are employable topics in the US. Naturally, they write a lot of inorganicky articles too, which are not coupled to employment. 1437:, and so I have a modicum of knowledge on orbital interactions, and the continuum from non-metallic to artificial metallic, etc. Cheers. 777:

smells like spam to me. Checking "What links here", I note that it's only referred to as "Rongalite" in a positive context, whereas the

528: 343:

Why did you revert my edit? The words "dicarbon trihyrdogen trichloride" would actually be its chemical name using the correct systems.

1296: 1010: 338: 285: 104: 2866:

I have had : 1 Highschool, 1 Community College, 2 University Chemistry Classes ... and I do keep up with the University of Nottingham

1880:

to article improvement, managing somehow to avoid nasty comments. Most editors quickly concede to a good argument on technical stuff.

1862: 2379: 295:

Thanks for the pointers. I'm not sure if any secondary sources exist for XeF2 etching for MEMS. Maybe I should write that paper :)

3435: 3020: 1467: 1232:

Sure, but I am the world's worst Wikipedian for anything like that. V8rik, Edgar, and DMacks - folks like that would be better. --

133:

anything they want to know. Would you be able to give me a quick rundown of what you do with them / potential pitfalls / benefits?

2327: 865: 622:

usually not very good. If you think that my edit should be reverted, feel free. We can discuss later. Thanks and best wishes, --

510: 119: 3379: 2504: 1761: 315: 251: 2955: 2913: 1226: 710: 695: 664: 265: 147: 2704: 2215: 2042: 2018: 1434: 980: 3194: 984: 3326: 2480: 2463:. This situation gets more serious when the references relate to human health. In that case the standard is very high, see 2220: 1386: 64: 1695: 167:. Similarly, we have shifted increasingly to article improvement, again avoiding their need to register) as illustrated by 2964: 2750: 2656: 2398: 1063: 3088: 84: 51:

and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to

2764:

The splitting of water, frees oxygen and hydrogen. The hydrogen is used to produce ATP. The hydrogen exists as ions not H

2113: 1971: 1953: 1925: 1854: 1785: 1265: 1564:

promoting the research of a single research group by citing the same or similar pubs in several articles.. Many new or

3473: 3065: 2737:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2583: 2565: 2529: 1600:

Thanks for the note. We can agree to disagree on need for those citations, but there is lots to do. Happy editing. --

3384: 2514:. If you really want to get into the closest approach to H-, one approach would be to check out hydricity scales. -- 396:... and again, people dont use that kind of name/appellation no matter how many numbers one puts before or after it!-- 2305: 3360:

Thank you for the encouragement. Somehow I feel uneasy/guilty/arrogant running roughshod over these new editors. --

3241: 1392:

Cheers, and anytime you want to correct my geochem, or inorg chem, please, please, please, feel very free. Le Prof

2659:- many people would be very interested in helping to fix problems that you detect. Auch, bin ich anorganischer. -- 2496: 1757: 1288: 1105: 311: 3227: 2746: 2560:

Do these superacids in solid state include naked proton cation? By the way, where can melting point data for the

1036: 782: 180: 89: 3205: 2495:

based on cryptands (where both H+ and hydride ion are present) may have been reported in chemical literature?--

2310: 600: 205:

Although the course is on inorganic/organometallics, I figure that for undergrads just learning to write about

3461: 1406:

Thanks for the note. If the compound/article has sulfur in it, I usually have an interest. Best wishes, --

44: 3160:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2963:

RE chemical names being capitalized: If you have a good source for doing please alert the community here at

2690:

have a nice work ... I corrected the last articles similar to the others acetates, formates, nitrides ... --

2469:

rely on great references - such as famous textbooks and reviews in the best medical journals (Lancet, NEJM).

2176:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1658:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3112:

the language looked too slick for the usual editors - me included - so I Googled a word string. cheers, --

546: 184: 842:

always curious how these off-hand remarks can get read when one would never draw that conclusion verbally.

3002: 2881:

in spite of the possibility of it helping with respect to the global obesity and Type 2 Diabetic pandemic

2742: 2542:

Well you are basically asking for the identity of the strongest acid. That topic is within the realm of

2467:. References to .com sources are often a problem. If you are medical students, then I encourage you to 2350: 2491:

Hello, Smokefoot! I've seen your contribution to chemicals topics. I therefore ask you whether hydrogen

1827:

article, in particular, the large redaction of material. I would also have you compare the ledes of the

3426:. I encourage you highly to vote on whether Alexa should or shouldn't have a separate article. Thanks. 2311: 1801: 991: 976: 323:

looks like neat stuff. No chemist would expect XeF2 to be good for anything outside of research lab. --

270: 3441:

I just dont know enough about the particulars to offer a useful vote. Good luck with your editing. --

3423: 3417: 2861: 2486: 1876:

I should say that I avoid conflict usually, my editing activities are some sort of therapeutic thing.

1700: 1445: 686:

Thanks! It's good to know that someone is "policing" these articles from purely commercial messages.

529:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=205685824019020802&as_sdt=20005&sciodt=0,9&hl=en

382:

naming system (IUPAC claims its naming system is the official one.), 1,1,1-trichloroethane is used.

124: 3300: 2899:-- A screensaver from the output of the How It's Made work via a friend I know (so have a laugh) : 2432: 2394: 1203: 1006: 290: 281: 3479:

Let me check again. It read like it had not been done for PhCHO itself. Thanks for the note. --

2427:

Understood. I'll go ahead and check the reference books later today. Thank you for your advice! --

1993: 1975: 1957: 1929: 1858: 1789: 1421: 1194: 1163: 1115: 611: 348: 219: 179:

fraction are aiming for professional schools - and they tend to write on academic topics such as

52: 648: 3469: 3431: 3076: 2695: 2644: 2286: 2145: 2024: 1591: 1554: 1515: 1463: 1450:

Have you looked at the article I cited from Science Mag? Its author is Robert F. Service. He's

1331: 1093: 1059: 637: 26: 36: 3484: 3446: 3407: 3365: 3337: 3237: 3129: 3117: 3084: 3031: 2972: 2925: 2847: 2814: 2664: 2602: 2551: 2519: 2476: 2444: 2414: 2339: 2135: 2058: 2014: 1943: 1900: 1774: 1605: 1577: 1540: 1493: 1411: 1397: 1382: 1341:

Separating organomercury from mercury poisoning is difficult, but there is some justification

1237: 1179: 1131: 1075: 943: 903: 851: 761: 722: 706: 691: 676: 660: 627: 581: 558:

I can see where you are coming from, and I really appreciate the note. Two things on my mind

501: 452: 401: 387: 374: 363: 328: 247: 3182: 2203: 1840: 1683: 806:

For what it's worth, your phrase "You seem to have thought about it" is pretty rude. Yes, I

601:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Photobleaching&diff=422545059&oldid=422509572

3392: 3190: 3016: 2733:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2561: 2238:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2211: 1745: 1691: 1283:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

968: 918: 887: 534: 307: 299: 48: 1848:

Three closing notes -- (i) I added another citation to the paramagnetic discussion at the

445:

Education Program:Louisiana State University/CHEM 4150 Environmental Chemistry (Fall 2014)

8: 2738: 2460: 2428: 2390: 2127: 1918: 1915: 1678:

amber, copal, damar, most are not, being labeled as "recent. Rosin is a solid ] obtained

1627: 1569: 1371: 1253: 1222: 1151: 1032: 1002: 832: 745: 100: 80: 17: 3041: 2951: 2909: 2833: 2782: 2579: 2363: 2109: 2089: 1735:

H312 + H332: Harmful in contact with skin or if inhaled Causes serious eye irritation.

1433:. Also, vis-a-vis the solids angle, my grad inorg Prof was the veritable and venerable 1190: 1159: 1111: 997: 935: 778: 607: 521: 344: 261: 143: 69: 60: 3464:? It sounded to me like it "was actually done" rather than "was only talked about". 3317:

students in a class together? Any idea what their academic level or project scope is?

3465: 3427: 2714: 2705: 2691: 2640: 2301: 2282: 2231: 2094:

Smokefoot, your over-fast intervention interrupted my major updates on the chemical "

1706: 1587: 1550: 1511: 1475: 1459: 1327: 1276: 1089: 1055: 424: 215: 874:

are you" is way, way out of line. Permisssions requests are about reviewing a users

3351: 3322: 3288: 3264: 3223: 3103: 3061: 2990: 2734: 2718: 2323: 2256: 2050: 1393: 1378: 1147: 1045: 542: 383: 3388: 3208: 3186: 3140: 2983:

Knowledge:Naming conventions (chemistry)#Capitalization of elements and compounds

2464: 2295: 2207: 2156: 2073: 2034: 1812: 1687: 1638: 959: 914: 883: 516: 488: 115: 564:

efforts . McGiness was an ordinary scientist who published a nice paper. See

3480: 3442: 3403: 3361: 3333: 3233: 3181:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

3113: 3080: 3027: 2968: 2921: 2843: 2842:

Jeesh. Please consult other technical editors since you are so displeased. --

2810: 2730: 2722: 2660: 2598: 2547: 2515: 2472: 2410: 2373: 2335: 2274: 2202:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

2131: 2098:," and I lost all the international footnotes I was just about to add!!! :( 2054: 2010: 1939: 1896: 1849: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1770: 1682:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

1601: 1573: 1536: 1489: 1407: 1319: 1249: 1233: 1218: 1175: 1155: 1127: 1110:

Why did you delete the molecule photo and the information about its synthesis?

1071: 1052:

Transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation of the Tiara bio-prosthesis

1027: 939: 899: 847: 828: 757: 741: 718: 672: 623: 596: 577: 565: 497: 466: 448: 397: 359: 324: 243: 227: 223: 168: 96: 76: 2876:

The Vanadium Sulphate references were inherited from the core Vanadium text.

2273:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

1318:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

2829: 2778: 2726: 2359: 2121: 2105: 1565: 1363: 1360: 1355: 1350: 257: 139: 56: 3456: 3218:

input (is what SMILES is for right). So removing SMILES removes Jmol :-). -

3199: 2456: 2406: 1215:

Your email will of course remain private to me, no commercial blah blah...

473: 438: 420: 1892:

readers that this is a living enterprise and invites incremental upgrades.

1705:

Hello Smokefoot, I would like to ask you to undo your last editing in the

32: 3347: 3318: 3284: 3260: 3249: 3219: 3099: 3057: 2986: 2355: 2319: 2049:

hype). Possibly, the only commercial applications of ferrocenes are the

1823:

I would ask you to look at the edits this editor made to the lede at the

538: 164: 1146:

How do you make those really neat molecular structures like the ones at

2870:

account on YouTube (that has millions of viewers as it is good telly).

2165: 1820:

drug discovery prof and pharma worker, and not a PChem/IOChem expert.)

111: 524:. That article documents the work which led to the device's creation. 2543: 653:

Again, I am new to this and hope this is the right approach to take.

3149: 2492: 1808: 790: 786: 211: 3145: 2247: 2161: 1643: 1458:

one of the research team in question. This is a secondary source.

1292: 2721:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2243: 3313: 2879:

For some unknown reason this compound is vastly underresearched

2528:

How about naked proton cation in some compounds? Are there any?

3153: 2511: 2169: 1651: 1549:

Would you like to discuss this in the talk page of the article?

1531:.' But you are evading the central point, Service's article is 1480:

Not really, it is an editorial by Service, a technical writer

3402:

Thanks for the note. Will be more attentive to not biting. --

3050: 1647: 733:

Could you have a look at the last sentence in that paragraph?

379: 358:

No problem. People dont use that name. Its not a big deal.--

3077:

http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/ra/c4/c4ra11318g/c4ra11318g1.pdf

649:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-08-21/html/03-21425.htm

2684: 2680: 2676: 2625: 2621: 39:

of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see

2450:

article. We would appreciate any information. Thank you.

1586:

I'm actually not a new editor, nor am I aware of any COI.

2760:

You quite obviously don't know what you are talking about

2095: 1430: 414:

Thanks for help, Smokefoot and welcome to my new semester

2771: 2564:

be found, which seems to be missing from that article.--

1843: 1837: 3307: 738:

compound. If you concur, please revert your reversion.

256:

Thank you very much; I'll take that all into account.

3214:

Well, you did! The Jmol link is derived directly from

3011:. Do you still have the material available to fix it? 1016:

Reviewing a set of article drafts for a research study

3346:

What you wrote is definitely an improvement. Thanks!

3007:

Hi there! I see you made two refs with the same name

1672:] (a ]), ], ]. Some are classified as fossil resins 1654:

by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just

1189:

I use avogadro. has info on millions of structures.

522:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/183/4127/853.short

3156:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just 2889:I really should add it to a list I am working on: 2172:by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just 520:been cited 312 times since its publication in 1974 1713:N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMAC), 12 September 2014). 1023:m:Research:Impact of Knowledge on Academic Science 576:In any case, that is my 2 cents. Best wishes, -- 2900: 2713:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 3169:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 2185:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1667:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1895:Sorry to seem unpleasant. Happy editing. -- 2675:So please correct all the other articles too: 2190:The molecule has tetrahedral molecular geomtry 2471:Feel free to ask some additional questions.-- 41:m:Single User Login finalisation announcement 2631:Please take a look to the category acetates 2378:I just posted a talk section on the subject 2126:Sure - I'll come back later. Please follow 2967:. Otherwise such format will be changed.-- 1527:you view Service's article 'as a matter of 3174:Chlorine is used extensively in ]s and in 1050:Dude wrote this as a homework assignment: 2582:be included in the superacids category?-- 2405:source, I don't think. The rule book is 1054:. It's in wiki-limbo with tags a-plenty. 1025:for more information about the study. -- 1535:a secondary source. Nice try though. -- 1484:by Science Mag. Reviews are written by 2772:https://en.wikipedia.org/Photosystem_II 1142:Those really clean molecular structures 781:have been converted to chemical terms ( 14: 2300:No problem. I was not sure about it. ( 810:read the paragraph I was editing, and 3143:. I have automatically detected that 2159:. I have automatically detected that 1741:H360D: May damage the unborn child. 1738:H319: Causes serious eye irritation. 1641:. I have automatically detected that 1001:wondering if you had any insights. -- 2965:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Chemistry 2657:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Chemistry 1811:article. Then he followed me to the 591:undo revision on photobleaching page 929:It was my intention to be helpful, 595:Hi Smokefoot, I saw your rv on the 23: 3026:I fixed the problem. Thank you. -- 339:My edit to 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 24: 3500: 3232:Thanks for pointing that out. -- 2739:review the candidates' statements 876:contributions to the encyclopedia 793:. I suggest the page be moved to 527:Citations for the above article. 200:a lot of time figuring out topics 55:with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, — 3276: 3254:, I keep meaning to look into a 3134: 2225: 2150: 1632: 1289:Political corruption in Illinois 1270: 511:Organic Semiconductor notability 2892:The items the Canadian TV Show 795:sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate 783:sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate 181:Transition metal alkyne complex 2936:Capitalization of the elements 2745:. For the Election committee, 2715:Arbitration Committee election 2706:ArbCom elections are now open! 2216:14:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 2140:16:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC) 2114:15:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC) 1842:(note parallel language), and 797:, and redirect from Rongalite. 161:not emphasize Wiki-formatting' 13: 1: 3489:19:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC) 3474:19:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC) 3451:03:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC) 3436:03:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC) 3412:19:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC) 3397:19:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC) 3380:Please don't bite the newbies 3370:18:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 3356:14:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 3342:01:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 3327:22:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC) 3293:23:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC) 3269:22:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC) 3242:18:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 3228:19:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 3195:14:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 2995:04:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 2977:02:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 2956:21:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 2930:17:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 2914:05:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2852:13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 2838:12:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 2787:19:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2755:13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2700:19:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC) 2669:01:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2649:00:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2607:12:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2592:10:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2574:10:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2221:Reference errors on 2 October 2082:21:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 2063:20:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 2043:19:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 727:22:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 711:15:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 696:13:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 681:23:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 665:21:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 632:14:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC) 506:19:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 35:I'm involved in the upcoming 3122:22:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 3108:22:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 3089:14:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 3066:05:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 3036:13:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 3021:09:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 2556:14:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC) 2538:09:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC) 2524:04:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC) 2505:21:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC) 2481:01:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 2437:16:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 2419:16:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 2399:16:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 2368:16:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 2344:15:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC) 2328:08:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC) 2306:15:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 616:23:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 586:21:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 551:17:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 457:14:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 429:01:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 406:12:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 392:06:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 368:03:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 353:02:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 333:23:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC) 316:21:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC) 286:09:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 266:22:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 252:18:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 185:Nitrogen-15 NMR spectroscopy 148:12:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 120:13:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 7: 2896:has not shown being made. 2741:and submit your choices on 2291:00:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 2019:04:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 1980:07:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC) 1962:04:47, 20 August 2015 (UTC) 1948:11:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 1934:05:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 1905:02:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 1863:17:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 1794:17:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 1779:16:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 1762:08:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 1266:Reference errors on 14 June 105:14:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 85:14:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 65:00:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 10: 3505: 3183:these opt-out instructions 2747:MediaWiki message delivery 2204:these opt-out instructions 1696:00:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1684:these opt-out instructions 1041:19:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 1011:11:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 985:22:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 948:21:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 923:21:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 908:20:42, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 892:19:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 3424:Talk:Clyde cancer cluster 3277: 2817:) 23:17, 23 November 2015 1610:12:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 1596:04:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 1582:11:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1559:03:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1545:03:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1520:02:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1498:00:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1468:00:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1367:04:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 1336:00:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 1098:21:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC) 1080:13:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC) 1064:08:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC) 996:Could you have a look at 856:23:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 837:22:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 766:03:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 750:00:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 3211:: "how to remove Jmol?" 2279:report it to my operator 1502:I see it as a matter of 1416:01:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 1402:00:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 1387:00:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 1324:report it to my operator 1258:18:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC) 1242:03:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1227:02:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1199:22:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC) 1184:17:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC) 1168:14:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC) 1136:16:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC) 1120:16:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC) 1106:Bromochlorofluoromethane 870:I have to say this edit 3162:my operator's talk page 2178:my operator's talk page 1660:my operator's talk page 220:Pentachloronitrobenzene 95:you just anti-nanotech? 90:Pulp and paper industry 3256:|jmol_override_SMILES= 2312:Borane–tetrahydrofuran 2236:automatically detected 1924:Le Professeur morveux 1909:You personal opinions 1281:automatically detected 866:"Meaningful user page" 2719:Arbitration Committee 2655:please, please alert 1888:keep them accessible. 1732:Hazard statement(s): 1297:broken reference name 375:1,1,2-trichloroethane 3152:may have broken the 2562:fluoroantimonic acid 2168:may have broken the 1729:Signal word: Danger 1650:may have broken the 49:Special:MergeAccount 3003:Ambiguous reference 2723:arbitration process 1152:properties of water 31:Hi Smokefoot! As a 18:User talk:Smokefoot 2735:arbitration policy 2622:Category: Acetates 2580:helium hydride ion 2196:with C<sub: --> 1923: 1802:Please have a look 1709:article. Reasons: 998:Hydrogen spillover 992:Hydrogen spillover 936:water fluoridation 271:Silver(I) fluoride 3422:I made a vote on 3418:Vote: Alexa Brown 3314:Pierpaolo.cordone 2862:Vanadium Sulphate 2626:Category:Formates 2487:Hydrogen alkalide 2351:talk page stalker 2260: 1921: 1765: 1748:comment added by 1707:Dimethylacetamide 1701:Dimethylacetamide 1446:Secondary Sources 1305: 1208:Hail, Smokefoot! 988: 971:comment added by 779:negative contexts 554: 537:comment added by 378:According to the 319: 302:comment added by 216:2-Methylundecanal 125:UG contribs to WP 63: 43:). By looking at 3496: 3316: 3310: 3301:Student-project? 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3257: 3253: 3217: 3165: 3138: 3137: 2354: 2254: 2229: 2228: 2195: 2181: 2154: 2153: 2125: 2051:Josiphos ligands 1813:natural products 1764: 1742: 1677: 1663: 1636: 1635: 1479: 1358: 1353: 1299: 1274: 1273: 1204:Direct messaging 1148:hydrogen cyanide 1030: 987: 973:Michael Liao Sax 965: 553: 531: 470: 442: 318: 296: 291:Xenon Difluoride 222:), antibiotics ( 129:Hello Smokefoot 59: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3462:Sure about that 3459: 3420: 3382: 3312: 3306: 3303: 3275: 3273: 3255: 3247: 3215: 3209:Silicon dioxide 3202: 3175: 3144: 3135: 3132: 3044: 3005: 2864: 2767: 2762: 2743:the voting page 2709: 2688: 2629: 2489: 2447: 2376: 2348: 2315: 2298: 2226: 2223: 2197:3v</sub: --> 2191: 2160: 2151: 2148: 2119: 2092: 2027: 1996: 1994:I have prepared 1804: 1743: 1727: 1703: 1673: 1642: 1633: 1630: 1486:real scientists 1473: 1448: 1374: 1356: 1351: 1343: 1271: 1268: 1206: 1144: 1108: 1048: 1026: 1018: 994: 966: 962: 868: 735: 640: 593: 532: 513: 464: 436: 416: 341: 297: 293: 273: 226:), explosives ( 218:), pesticides ( 127: 92: 72: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3502: 3492: 3491: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3419: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3381: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3302: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3201: 3198: 3179: 3178: 3171: 3170: 3131: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3096: 3073: 3072: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3004: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2979: 2938: 2933: 2932: 2901:http://HIM.scr 2863: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2819: 2818: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2800: 2795: 2794: 2765: 2761: 2758: 2712: 2708: 2703: 2687: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2635:(and formates 2628: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2576: 2488: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2429:BartholomewRSP 2422: 2421: 2391:BartholomewRSP 2375: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2346: 2314: 2309: 2297: 2294: 2275:false positive 2271: 2270: 2222: 2219: 2200: 2199: 2187: 2186: 2147: 2146:September 2015 2144: 2143: 2142: 2091: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2026: 2025:Polyferrocenes 2023: 2022: 2021: 2005: 2004: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1967: 1893: 1889: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1850:singlet oxygen 1833:singlet oxygen 1829:triplet oxygen 1825:singlet oxygen 1803: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1725: 1702: 1699: 1680: 1679: 1669: 1668: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1506:, rather than 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1435:Jeremy Burdett 1373: 1370: 1342: 1339: 1320:false positive 1316: 1315: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1247: 1205: 1202: 1187: 1186: 1156:carbon dioxide 1143: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1083: 1082: 1047: 1044: 1017: 1014: 1003:Project Osprey 993: 990: 961: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 867: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 843: 823: 822: 821: 820: 801: 800: 799: 798: 769: 768: 734: 731: 730: 729: 684: 683: 639: 638:Methyl formate 636: 635: 634: 597:photobleaching 592: 589: 574: 573: 569: 566:John McGinness 560: 559: 512: 509: 493: 492: 483: 482: 462: 461: 460: 459: 415: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 394: 340: 337: 336: 335: 292: 289: 278:TatanyaGolding 272: 269: 240: 239: 231: 228:lead styphnate 224:Yersiniabactin 214:), perfumery ( 203: 196: 192: 188: 176: 172: 169:lead styphnate 156: 155: 126: 123: 91: 88: 71: 68: 28: 27:Global account 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3501: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3315: 3309: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3251: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3212: 3210: 3206: 3197: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3173: 3172: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3163: 3159: 3158:edit the page 3155: 3151: 3147: 3142: 3130:December 2015 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3098:Thanks again 3097: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3054: 3052: 3047: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2897: 2895: 2894:How It's Made 2890: 2887: 2884: 2882: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2869: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2803: 2802: 2797: 2796: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2774: 2773: 2768: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2707: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2627: 2623: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2445:Nervonic acid 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2387: 2383: 2381: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2313: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2268: 2264: 2258: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2237: 2233: 2218: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2194: 2189: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2175: 2174:edit the page 2171: 2167: 2163: 2158: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2123: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2007: 2006: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1972:71.201.62.200 1968: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1954:71.201.62.200 1952:TY. Le Prof 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1926:71.201.62.200 1919: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1887: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1855:71.201.62.200 1851: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786:71.201.62.200 1782: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1730: 1724: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1708: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1656:edit the page 1653: 1649: 1645: 1640: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529:acknowledging 1526: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504:acknowledging 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1354: 1348: 1347: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1313: 1309: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1282: 1278: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191:DudeWithAFeud 1185: 1181: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160:DudeWithAFeud 1157: 1153: 1149: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112:DudeWithAFeud 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 989: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 949: 945: 941: 937: 932: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 920: 916: 911: 910: 909: 905: 901: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 879: 877: 872: 857: 853: 849: 844: 840: 839: 838: 834: 830: 827: 826: 825: 824: 818: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 773: 772: 771: 770: 767: 763: 759: 754: 753: 752: 751: 747: 743: 739: 728: 724: 720: 715: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 698: 697: 693: 689: 682: 678: 674: 669: 668: 667: 666: 662: 658: 654: 651: 650: 644: 633: 629: 625: 620: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 608:Richard☺Decal 603: 602: 598: 588: 587: 583: 579: 570: 567: 562: 561: 557: 556: 555: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 530: 525: 523: 518: 508: 507: 503: 499: 490: 485: 484: 479: 478: 477: 475: 468: 458: 454: 450: 446: 440: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 426: 422: 407: 403: 399: 395: 393: 389: 385: 381: 376: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 350: 346: 345:DudeWithAFeud 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 288: 287: 283: 279: 268: 267: 263: 259: 254: 253: 249: 245: 236: 232: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 208: 204: 201: 197: 193: 189: 186: 182: 177: 173: 170: 166: 162: 158: 157: 152: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 134: 130: 122: 121: 117: 113: 107: 106: 102: 98: 87: 86: 82: 78: 67: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 19: 3466:WhatamIdoing 3460: 3428:Philmonte101 3421: 3383: 3304: 3231: 3213: 3203: 3180: 3176: 3133: 3074: 3055: 3048: 3045: 3006: 2946: 2942: 2935: 2934: 2904: 2898: 2893: 2891: 2888: 2885: 2880: 2878: 2875: 2873:THAT SAID, 2872: 2867: 2865: 2820: 2775: 2769: 2763: 2710: 2692:Alchemist-hp 2689: 2641:Alchemist-hp 2636: 2632: 2630: 2584:5.15.187.229 2566:5.15.187.229 2530:5.15.183.142 2490: 2468: 2461:WP:SECONDARY 2448: 2388: 2384: 2377: 2316: 2299: 2283:ReferenceBot 2272: 2267:Ask for help 2235: 2232:ReferenceBot 2224: 2201: 2192: 2149: 2128:WP:SECONDARY 2103: 2100: 2093: 2068: 2030: 2028: 1997: 1910: 1885: 1847: 1822: 1818: 1805: 1744:— Preceding 1740: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1704: 1681: 1674: 1631: 1588:Kalidasa 777 1570:WP:recentism 1551:Kalidasa 777 1532: 1528: 1524: 1512:Kalidasa 777 1507: 1503: 1485: 1481: 1476:Kalidasa 777 1460:Kalidasa 777 1455: 1451: 1449: 1426: 1375: 1349: 1344: 1328:ReferenceBot 1317: 1312:Ask for help 1280: 1277:ReferenceBot 1269: 1217: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1188: 1145: 1109: 1090:Softlavender 1056:Softlavender 1049: 1019: 995: 967:— Preceding 963: 930: 880: 875: 869: 819:(Smoke)foot. 816: 811: 807: 794: 774: 740: 736: 699: 685: 655: 652: 645: 641: 604: 594: 575: 533:— Preceding 526: 514: 494: 463: 417: 342: 298:— Preceding 294: 274: 255: 241: 234: 206: 199: 160: 138: 135: 131: 128: 108: 93: 73: 45:your account 30: 3139:Hello, I'm 2356:User:DMacks 2230:Hello, I'm 2155:Hello, I'm 1726:Pictogram: 1637:Hello, I'm 1628:August 2015 1394:Leprof 7272 1379:Leprof 7272 1372:Note, Smoke 1275:Hello, I'm 703:DrGeorge888 688:DrGeorge888 657:DrGeorge888 384:H Padleckas 165:iron boride 37:unification 3389:ἀνυπόδητος 3187:BracketBot 3185:. Thanks, 3141:BracketBot 3042:Plagerism? 3013:Palosirkka 2731:topic bans 2544:superacids 2497:5.15.29.92 2281:. Thanks, 2277:, you can 2252:cite error 2208:BracketBot 2206:. Thanks, 2166:Chloroform 2157:BracketBot 2090:Slow down! 2074:ZdBdLaLaLa 2035:ZdBdLaLaLa 1750:Football90 1688:BracketBot 1686:. Thanks, 1639:BracketBot 1422:Eric Block 1326:. Thanks, 1322:, you can 915:Beeblebrox 884:Beeblebrox 304:KrisPister 75:impartial. 70:Fullerenes 3481:Smokefoot 3443:Smokefoot 3404:Smokefoot 3362:Smokefoot 3334:Smokefoot 3234:Smokefoot 3146:your edit 3114:Smokefoot 3081:Smokefoot 3028:Smokefoot 2969:Smokefoot 2922:Smokefoot 2868:Chemistry 2844:Smokefoot 2811:Smokefoot 2727:site bans 2661:Smokefoot 2599:Smokefoot 2548:Smokefoot 2516:Smokefoot 2473:Smokefoot 2459:and here 2411:Smokefoot 2336:Smokefoot 2250:caused a 2248:your edit 2234:. I have 2162:your edit 2132:Smokefoot 2055:Smokefoot 2011:Smokefoot 1940:Smokefoot 1922:Le Crétin 1897:Smokefoot 1771:Smokefoot 1644:your edit 1602:Smokefoot 1574:Smokefoot 1537:Smokefoot 1525:Of course 1508:promoting 1490:Smokefoot 1429:chemist, 1408:Smokefoot 1295:caused a 1293:your edit 1279:. I have 1250:Riventree 1234:Smokefoot 1219:Riventree 1176:Smokefoot 1128:Smokefoot 1072:Smokefoot 1028:EpochFail 940:Smokefoot 900:Smokefoot 848:Smokefoot 829:Riventree 775:Rongalite 758:Smokefoot 742:Riventree 719:Smokefoot 673:Smokefoot 624:Smokefoot 578:Smokefoot 498:Smokefoot 467:Smokefoot 449:Smokefoot 398:Smokefoot 360:Smokefoot 325:Smokefoot 244:Smokefoot 198:We spend 97:Ankababel 77:Ankababel 3308:Avdarsan 3283:Noted. - 3216:|SMILES= 3204:re your 3150:Chlorine 3056:Thanks! 2948:Eyreland 2906:Eyreland 2830:Zedshort 2779:Zedshort 2685:Acetates 2681:Nitrides 2677:Formates 2493:alkalide 2465:WP:MEDRS 2364:Edgar181 2122:Aboudaqn 2106:Aboudaqn 1809:steroids 1758:contribs 1746:unsigned 1482:employed 1046:Homework 1037:contribs 981:contribs 969:unsigned 812:actually 808:actually 791:Rohypnol 787:Phisohex 547:contribs 535:unsigned 517:WP:UNDUE 489:WP:MEDRS 312:contribs 300:unsigned 235:prohibit 212:Humulone 195:drawing. 175:content. 154:aspects: 136:Thanks, 57:DerHexer 2296:Mahusha 2244:Styrene 2242:On the 1427:organic 1287:On the 1158:, etc. 960:Request 474:Hakeleh 439:Hakeleh 421:Hakeleh 191:drafts. 110:future! 53:ping me 33:Steward 3348:DMacks 3319:DMacks 3285:DePiep 3274:DMacks 3261:DMacks 3250:DePiep 3220:DePiep 3154:syntax 3100:Jazzlw 3058:Jazzlw 2987:DMacks 2821:(UTC) 2717:. The 2512:sodide 2374:KOH MP 2320:DMacks 2246:page, 2170:syntax 1911:de moi 1869:types. 1652:syntax 1566:WP:COI 1291:page, 599:page: 539:Mhotep 159:I do ‘ 61:(Talk) 3075:From 3051:epoxy 2793:dupe. 2637:salts 2633:salts 2546:. -- 2457:WP:RS 2407:WP:RS 1648:Resin 1572:. -- 1364:arris 380:IUPAC 258:Chris 210:(see 140:Chris 112:Dbzam 16:< 3485:talk 3470:talk 3457:Bees 3447:talk 3432:talk 3408:talk 3393:talk 3385:This 3366:talk 3352:talk 3338:talk 3323:talk 3311:and 3305:Are 3289:talk 3265:talk 3238:talk 3224:talk 3200:Jmol 3191:talk 3118:talk 3104:talk 3085:talk 3062:talk 3046:Hi, 3032:talk 3017:talk 3009:here 2991:talk 2973:talk 2952:talk 2926:talk 2910:talk 2848:talk 2834:talk 2815:talk 2783:talk 2751:talk 2696:talk 2665:talk 2645:talk 2624:and 2603:talk 2588:talk 2578:Can 2570:talk 2552:talk 2534:talk 2520:talk 2501:talk 2477:talk 2433:talk 2415:talk 2395:talk 2380:here 2340:talk 2324:talk 2302:Talk 2287:talk 2257:help 2212:talk 2136:talk 2110:talk 2078:talk 2069:real 2059:talk 2039:talk 2031:ansa 2015:talk 1976:talk 1958:talk 1944:talk 1930:talk 1917:and 1901:talk 1859:talk 1839:and 1831:and 1790:talk 1775:talk 1754:talk 1692:talk 1606:talk 1592:talk 1578:talk 1555:talk 1541:talk 1516:talk 1494:talk 1464:talk 1412:talk 1398:talk 1383:talk 1332:talk 1302:help 1254:talk 1238:talk 1223:talk 1195:talk 1180:talk 1164:talk 1132:talk 1116:talk 1094:talk 1076:talk 1060:talk 1033:talk 1007:talk 977:talk 944:talk 919:talk 904:talk 888:talk 852:talk 833:talk 817:that 762:talk 746:talk 723:talk 707:talk 692:talk 677:talk 661:talk 628:talk 612:talk 582:talk 543:talk 502:talk 453:talk 425:talk 402:talk 388:talk 364:talk 349:talk 329:talk 308:talk 282:talk 262:talk 248:talk 144:talk 116:talk 101:talk 81:talk 3207:in 3148:to 3095:it? 2883:. 2799:us. 2711:Hi, 2263:Fix 2261:. ( 2164:to 2096:XXX 1886:and 1723:): 1646:to 1533:not 1510:... 1456:not 1452:not 1431:mdr 1420:An 1308:Fix 1306:. ( 931:not 789:or 207:any 3487:) 3472:) 3449:) 3434:) 3410:) 3395:) 3368:) 3354:) 3340:) 3325:) 3291:) 3267:) 3240:) 3226:) 3193:) 3120:) 3106:) 3087:) 3064:) 3034:) 3019:) 2993:) 2985:. 2975:) 2954:) 2928:) 2912:) 2850:) 2836:) 2785:) 2753:) 2729:, 2698:) 2683:, 2679:, 2667:) 2647:) 2605:) 2597:-- 2590:) 2572:) 2554:) 2536:) 2522:) 2503:) 2479:) 2435:) 2417:) 2397:) 2389:-- 2366:) 2360:Ed 2342:) 2334:-- 2326:) 2304:) 2289:) 2265:| 2214:) 2198:]. 2193:]] 2138:) 2112:) 2080:) 2072:-- 2061:) 2041:) 2017:) 1978:) 1960:) 1946:) 1932:) 1903:) 1861:) 1792:) 1777:) 1760:) 1756:• 1694:) 1608:) 1594:) 1580:) 1557:) 1543:) 1518:) 1496:) 1466:) 1414:) 1400:) 1385:) 1334:) 1310:| 1256:) 1240:) 1225:) 1197:) 1182:) 1166:) 1154:, 1150:, 1134:) 1126:-- 1118:) 1096:) 1078:) 1070:-- 1062:) 1039:) 1035:• 1009:) 983:) 979:• 946:) 921:) 906:) 898:-- 890:) 854:) 846:-- 835:) 764:) 756:-- 748:) 725:) 709:) 694:) 679:) 663:) 630:) 614:) 584:) 549:) 545:• 504:) 496:-- 455:) 427:) 404:) 390:) 366:) 351:) 331:) 314:) 310:• 284:) 276:-- 264:) 250:) 242:-- 233:I 183:, 146:) 118:) 103:) 83:) 3483:( 3468:( 3445:( 3430:( 3406:( 3391:( 3364:( 3350:( 3336:( 3321:( 3287:( 3263:( 3252:: 3248:@ 3236:( 3222:( 3189:( 3177:. 3164:. 3116:( 3102:( 3083:( 3060:( 3030:( 3015:( 2989:( 2971:( 2950:( 2924:( 2908:( 2846:( 2832:( 2813:( 2781:( 2766:2 2749:( 2694:( 2663:( 2643:( 2601:( 2586:( 2568:( 2550:( 2532:( 2518:( 2499:( 2475:( 2431:( 2413:( 2393:( 2362:( 2353:) 2349:( 2338:( 2322:( 2285:( 2269:) 2259:) 2255:( 2210:( 2180:. 2134:( 2124:: 2120:@ 2108:( 2076:( 2057:( 2037:( 2013:( 1974:( 1956:( 1942:( 1928:( 1899:( 1857:( 1788:( 1773:( 1752:( 1690:( 1675:( 1662:. 1604:( 1590:( 1576:( 1553:( 1539:( 1514:( 1492:( 1478:: 1474:@ 1462:( 1410:( 1396:( 1381:( 1361:H 1357:B 1352:S 1330:( 1314:) 1304:) 1300:( 1252:( 1236:( 1221:( 1193:( 1178:( 1162:( 1130:( 1114:( 1092:( 1074:( 1058:( 1031:( 1005:( 975:( 942:( 917:( 902:( 886:( 850:( 831:( 760:( 744:( 721:( 705:( 690:( 675:( 659:( 626:( 610:( 580:( 541:( 500:( 469:: 465:@ 451:( 441:: 437:@ 423:( 400:( 386:( 362:( 347:( 327:( 306:( 280:( 260:( 246:( 187:. 171:. 142:( 114:( 99:( 79:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index